Transcript
AI TRANSCRIPT
This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.
[0:00]
I got it. And just for the right third, we are starting at 10.45. Right time. Right up time.
[0:16]
Good morning, Park County. This Tuesday, September 8, 2026, 10.50. And this is a meeting for the planning and zoning commission.
[0:34]
Yeah,
[0:37]
we have everybody here except for Ms. Pam, who is that she was traveling today.
[0:41]
So I'm not able to.
[0:42]
It depends.
[0:43]
Okay.
[0:46]
Is there any public comment for items not on the agenda?
[0:50]
We
[0:55]
named it a discussion decision to set and approve the key schedule for zoning compliance
[1:00]
permits.
[1:01]
Conditional use permits, variance requests, and map amendments within the Suicide Creek District.
[1:12]
So this was one of those. This is more of a housekeeping item. We haven't received any zoning compliance permit applications. So recently, and when they asked what these governor was, I recognize that early in the process, they had asked about the scheduling, you know, I indicated to the folks who were putting that together that they typically come up with their fees and put them in the district, but they put in there that the planning and zoning commission determine the fee schedule, which is not something we typically do.
[1:38]
do so I talked about it he said because it's in the district regulations but you have to follow that
[1:42]
so we put together kind of a draft the schedule based on kind of some of our more updated
[1:49]
ease so like for floodplain permits things like that so we typically if we have control right now
[1:55]
the going rate is $300 for a zoning compliance permit and then any permits that require public hearings
[2:02]
Then we bumped that up to 600 that usually covers the legal notices and then just staff time working through those permit applications.
[2:11]
The only thing we did change in this one was with the public hearing or for a few of them to require that the applicants pay the required certified mailing for joining landowner certification.
[2:24]
depends on the landowners. How many there are? That's one of those things that we typically take out of our normal fees.
[2:32]
But what we're trying to do is create a fee schedule that covers staff time.
[2:36]
And then the public notice requirements in addition, that's good for it.
[2:41]
Notice for cooking landowners. So that's what we've got.
[2:45]
A lot of our apartment zoning districts, the fees are in the district regulations themselves.
[2:50]
and so in order to increase those we would have to go through a process of updating
[2:53]
that's regulation as much as you know it takes some time. Something we could do I know that you
[2:58]
guys have been wanting us to have fees that represent the amount of work that we do cover those costs.
[3:04]
This would be the only part one's only district that would do that the rest of them we would have
[3:08]
to go through that updating the regulation process to update those fee schedules since they're part
[3:12]
of the regulation.
[3:17]
And up on the screen I have pulled up the fee schedule that might
[3:21]
had provided, so we're not against
[3:30]
it then.
[3:32]
These are just current fees that the planning board charges.
[3:39]
Yeah, so we've gone through over the last year or year and a half updating all our
[3:43]
birthday schedules the ones that we can. The only one that we haven't done yet is the
[3:47]
subdivision regulations, and that's just because it hasn't come forward with
[3:50]
commission yet. But the ones we have, this is more reflective of what it typically
[3:56]
takes to review his only compliance permit and then for all the rest of them it requires
[4:01]
public hearings. So we have to do legal notices, gather everybody so it's just trying to
[4:06]
estimate and average out an amount of time it takes to review most applications. There'll
[4:12]
be some outliers but this is kind of our best average based on the updates that we've done
[4:17]
to other information on these individuals.
[4:33]
I can sound like this isn't unique to
[4:35]
who's creed, get the new citizen initiated, zoning district came for us today, this was
[4:42]
likely an ASCU for recommendations on the fee schedule, it would be the same, yep,
[4:48]
that you've shown.
[4:48]
That would be a recommendation, again, it's part one, so under our current process, they
[4:52]
could develop whatever fees they want, yes.
[4:55]
We would have to administer them based on that, but they're perfect if they have.
[5:00]
As we would definitely provide a recommendation with the new CSIT or the citizen issues on this process, this is something that we would be providing to applicants going forward. It's kind of procedural requirements, definitions, fees.
[5:16]
Does it make more sense to leave the B schedule out of the. So moving forward, like the subdivision regulation, that's going to be an administrative document that will not be tied directly to the subdivision regulation update. That will be something that we can update whenever we need to.
[5:31]
to do in-house and in on what we have to do with those and the costs.
[5:36]
So yeah, my goal is to pull all of our fee schedules out of the regulations and happen
[5:42]
to be administrators so we can just regulate the food.
[5:45]
Update them as needed.
[5:50]
A month ago, we had these letters going back before if they're trying to figure out the
[5:56]
So this is just cleaning up and so from now on when citizen initiative, zoning distributor,
[6:07]
we can add these.
[6:08]
This is what has come cause because we didn't have it for Sue's Creek, really.
[6:12]
We just had a ministry that's
[6:19]
how I read this while I was looking at other public comment.
[6:26]
Any public online. We don't have any public online. So at this point, I would just be
[6:30]
board member comment. Board member comments,
[6:36]
things are reasonable to me.
[6:40]
Thanks for putting
[6:41]
that together. My comments.
[6:50]
We want to make a motion to approve the peace schedules,
[6:55]
presenting compliance permits.
[7:02]
Okay. Scott made the motion. Make a motion. You move what
[7:07]
I didn't go through it at all.
[7:11]
There was conditional use of comments, variance requests,
[7:14]
and map amendments with the Suscript District
[7:16]
within the Suscript District.
[7:18]
And the reason I'm looking at it,
[7:21]
is should we take out within the Suscript District
[7:24]
and just have this as policy for the county?
[7:29]
Well, just for one.
[7:32]
Yeah, when I talk to Paul, he said because they included
[7:35]
in the regulations, and we adopt those regulations
[7:37]
with the following.
[7:39]
And so we can have, currently we can have
[7:41]
a lot of different part one zoning districts
[7:43]
that can all have different language,
[7:45]
that can have different processes,
[7:46]
different requirements.
[7:47]
We have to follow each one as a written.
[7:51]
So we'll have to come back.
[7:52]
We can't generalize this.
[7:54]
Yeah, this is not a generalization
[7:55]
that is across the board.
[7:57]
We would have to go into each one of those
[7:58]
part one zoning districts and follow whatever
[8:00]
procedural requirements they have for updating
[8:02]
the regulations and in addition to that, he said that you have to read it straight through
[8:09]
the cease-create.
[8:24]
The peace guide go for designing compliance permit conditions, use permits, various requests,
[8:31]
map amendments, within the cease-create district.
[8:35]
Is there a second second?
[8:37]
Move, second.
[8:38]
All the table say aye.
[8:39]
Aye, aye.
[8:41]
Then it's passed.
[8:44]
Thanks, Mark.
[8:44]
Thank you.
[8:46]
I would take a motion to adjourn to a move.
[8:49]
Thank you.
[8:50]
Oh, my favorite line.
[8:52]
Thank you.
[8:54]
Thank you, everyone, for your evening.
[8:56]
You asked mine today.
[8:57]
Thank you.
[8:58]
Thank you.