Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[1:47]
Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m.
[2:15]
» Alderman Roth
>> Trustee Haig
[2:17]
» Here.
>> Trustee Hall
[2:19]
» Here.
>> Trustee McCurdy
[2:21]
» Here.
>> Trustee Peeny
[2:22]
» Here.
>> Trustee Turnau
[2:24]
» Here.
>> Trustee Weingels
[2:25]
» Here.
>> President Kubiak
[2:28]
» Here.
>> Thank you. We have a quorum.
[2:30]
» Okay. We're going to go ahead and move
into public comments. Tonight we have
[2:34]
two public comments. I'll call you up
and if you can state your name and
[2:37]
address and then make your comments. So
our first comment is Jason Lewellen.
[2:41]
Jason, if you can come up. I know I just
said your name, but can you state your
[2:44]
name and address for us again?
>> You guys want to grab a pen? Jason
[2:48]
Lewellen, 1400 Crest Drive. 224-558-7662
[2:54]
We talked about doing something for
these e-bike kids. I think I read
[2:57]
something about that park you guys are
doing over here.
[3:00]
These e-bike kids will have nothing to
do with that. I have more experience in
[3:03]
biking than everybody put together in
this room.
[3:07]
That park has nothing to do with e-bike
kids.
[3:10]
It will take $100,000 to build this
park.
[3:12]
And like I said, I'll help raise this
money, all of it.
[3:16]
But it takes time.
And the more we wait, the longer it
[3:19]
takes.
Now, I'll start with these kids have
[3:22]
their own community.
They have their own chat line.
[3:25]
They've tried to get me to go on it with
them. These kids now stop at my house.
[3:29]
We have talks about safety on the bikes,
not doing wheelies in front of people's
[3:32]
houses, down the main streets, riding
through people's lawns.
[3:35]
I've had these kids at my house, my wife
come home from work. As we're sitting
[3:39]
out on the front lawn, I bring bikes out
of my house from BMX bikes to dirt bikes
[3:42]
to my motorcycles.
These kids have interest.
[3:46]
These kids deserve to have fun.
We all wanted to have fun when growing
[3:49]
up as kids.
But we're waiting too long. Summer's
[3:52]
almost over.
Sooner or later there'll be no time to
[3:55]
get it. And then these kids will go find
some kind of crime cuz we have quite a
[4:00]
bit going on in here between people
shooting BB guns through windows,
[4:04]
breaking in cars. I mean last year I was
watching TV in my bedroom and someone
[4:08]
was trying to open up my garage door. I
had it on camera.
[4:11]
And my lights were on.
Kids will become criminals if we don't
[4:14]
do something.
I've watched these kids tone it down
[4:17]
especially around my part of the
neighborhood with their bikes.
[4:20]
I think we need to do something. Keep
that tone down and do something for
[4:23]
them.
I'm going to go do exactly what these
[4:26]
kids are doing. Get on my bike. Have a
good day.
[4:29]
» Thank you. All right. Next up we have
Kate Montleone. Kate, if you could come
[4:33]
up and state your name and your address.
>> Sure. Sure.
[4:37]
Good evening. I'm Kate Montleone.
Um my address is 4N385 Samuel Clemens
[4:43]
and that is in St. Charles. I'm here
tonight to introduce myself as a
[4:48]
candidate for the Kane County board
representing parts of this community,
[4:54]
precinct seven and 10 specifically.
Um
[4:59]
and as a as a prospective member of the
county board, I believe it is imperative
[5:05]
to have a dialogue with the villages,
the townships, and and the cities that
[5:11]
comprise the county.
So, I think that starting now, I want to
[5:18]
be visible and accessible to yourselves
as well as members of the community um
[5:26]
to to address and hear their concerns.
I've been a little bit surprised as I've
[5:32]
canvassed around the area
how little people know about the work of
[5:39]
the county
and the fact that they virtually no one
[5:43]
knows who their elected representative
is.
[5:46]
So, my goal is to change that starting
now. Thank you very much.
[5:53]
Don't forget to vote.
>> Thank you.
[5:56]
» Yeah.
Okay. We're going to move into the
[5:59]
consent agenda. Tonight on the consent
agenda, we have the approval of the
[6:03]
minutes from July 6th, 2026 Village
Board meeting.
[6:07]
The approval of the warrant list for
July 20th, 2026 in the amount of
[6:12]
$411,902.17,
[6:16]
the approval of the warrant list for
August 3rd, 2026 in the amount of
[6:21]
$814,049.29,
[6:26]
and the consideration approval of pay
application number one for the skate
[6:30]
park improvements project in the amount
of $391,429.35,
[6:37]
and the uh consideration and approval of
pay application number 33 for wastewater
[6:42]
treatment plant improvements project in
the amount of $308,922.55.
[6:49]
Is there any discussion?
If not, can I get a motion?
[6:55]
» I move to approve the consent agenda.
>> I'll second.
[7:01]
» Call the roll.
>> Trustee Hall.
[7:04]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Weingolds.
[7:06]
» Yes.
>> Trustee McCurdy.
[7:07]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Pini.
[7:09]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Cerno.
[7:10]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Hay.
[7:12]
» Yes.
>> Thank you. Motion carries.
[7:19]
Okay. Moving on. Under items for
separate action, we have item A, the
[7:23]
consideration and approval of an
authorization of a purchase of a stop
[7:28]
stick tire deflation device in the
amount of $5,789.
[7:34]
Chris?
>> Good evening, everyone.
[7:39]
Budgeted this year was a uh project that
I started investigating last year,
[7:45]
last fall.
Multiple agencies have gone to these in
[7:50]
the last two to three years. They're
called stop sticks.
[7:54]
We have a high rate of vehicles that
actually travel through Pingree Grove.
[7:59]
Some of them are pursued by other
agencies where we don't really
[8:04]
push to pursue in our town.
Our officers still do feel that it is
[8:08]
necessary for us to try to help stop
crime and try to help neighboring
[8:13]
agencies and us as well.
A stop stick device, what it is is
[8:18]
exactly what you think. It's these
strips that go out in the road and it
[8:22]
will deflate your tires. These are
controlled. These are not going to blow
[8:26]
out and spin out. Multiple agencies
around us have been using these to
[8:31]
positive satisfaction.
They are very lightweight. They're
[8:36]
easily to be deployed.
There is training that comes along with
[8:40]
this as well, which is going to be
annual. And it is also recommended not
[8:45]
only by the
Illinois Risk Management Association,
[8:49]
but also the Illinois Chiefs of Police.
Um
[8:53]
I reached out to uh
RMA and asked about this and they said
[8:59]
that it was a very good idea to start
pushing this right now.
[9:03]
They actually kind of want more agencies
to have these first us actually pursuing
[9:09]
in a vehicle as we cause a crash.
The vehicles do slow down
[9:13]
and they are easily able to get in the
person that's involved.
[9:19]
The price that I have on here for $5,798
includes nine stop sticks, which would
[9:24]
outfit the patrol vehicles that we have
and two training devices. They recommend
[9:30]
two so we can actually do training on
those.
[9:34]
The life expectancy, which I just looked
up a few minutes ago, is about 5 years
[9:38]
if they're not used and then they would
have to be probably replaced.
[9:41]
Or when they are used, all you have to
do is replace the little uh spikes that
[9:46]
are in there at a very low cost.
I bring this to you
[9:51]
uh
because of the fact that it is
[9:54]
considered a use of force by the state
of Illinois because we're actually
[9:58]
stopping a vehicle.
Um
[10:01]
just to get consideration and see if you
had any questions before I go ahead and
[10:06]
do this.
[10:08]
» Chief, um just a couple questions. Um
one, why would you have to replace them
[10:13]
after 5 years if there's no use?
>> Um it was a question that was brought to
[10:17]
me about 10 minutes ago and I didn't
have the answer. I just looked it up
[10:20]
real quick because of
uh the great internet.
[10:24]
They're going to be in a car. They don't
get They don't get brought in like our
[10:27]
AEDs and stuff like that. So, it gets
actually mounted inside the trunk area
[10:32]
of the car. So, you're going to have
extreme heat and extreme cold and things
[10:35]
like that. They get inspected with the
car inspections every month, but
[10:40]
I think it's no different than my
bulletproof vest. Even though I don't
[10:44]
use it and I know deep down inside that
it will stop after 5 years,
[10:49]
manufacturer recommendation is to
replace after so long just to make sure
[10:53]
that you have the utmost equipment.
[10:57]
» Chris, we have nothing like this right
now. Not on your cars.
[11:01]
» No. Um the sheriff's office is they got
this new thing where it's like a grapple
[11:05]
that'll grab a car.
Um we tried investing in something not
[11:10]
that long ago uh where it was a net that
would shoot out, but we couldn't get all
[11:14]
the pieces for it. It was actually
through uh
[11:17]
uh the military, but that was something
that never came to fruition. We've had a
[11:22]
lot of high-speed vehicles flying down
here because we have 27247.
[11:27]
Um most of them are chased by other
agencies.
[11:30]
Our officers don't really get too
involved, especially if they go outside
[11:33]
of our jurisdiction, but if we can maybe
slow the
[11:36]
vehicle down so we can apprehend, that
would be a
[11:40]
a good note in our book.
>> So, there have been opportunities that
[11:42]
we could have used them that would have
worked.
[11:45]
» Yes. Um they're a small device. The
brochures are on there. You throw them
[11:49]
into the roadway and as the car comes
by, goes over it, you yank them back out
[11:54]
with a chain. That way it doesn't get
the cars behind them that are coming. Um
[11:58]
they've been There's videos online for
this. Um I actually talked to the owner
[12:03]
of the company last uh
October and uh one of their neighboring
[12:09]
agencies, the Village of Elburn, has
them and they've used them two or three
[12:12]
times since they've had them and they
said it's really helped out quite a bit.
[12:15]
So, I actually saw a demo of that and I
thought it was pretty interesting. So, I
[12:19]
wanted to try to bring that to our
neighborhood.
[12:26]
» Is there any other discussion?
If not, can I get a motion?
[12:33]
» I move to approve the purchase of nine
Stop Stick tire deflation and pursuit
[12:37]
prevention devices including related
deployment and training accessories
[12:42]
for use by the police department in the
amount of $5,789.
[12:47]
» I'll second.
[12:51]
» Call the roll.
>> Trustee Haake.
[12:53]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Hall.
[12:55]
» Yes.
>> Trustee McCurdy.
[12:57]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Pini.
[12:59]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Turnau.
[13:00]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Wingle.
[13:02]
» Yes.
[13:04]
» Trustee Turnau said yes, right? Okay,
thank you. Motion carries.
[13:09]
Okay, moving on. Item B is the
consideration and approval of an
[13:12]
authorization of a resolution accepting
a special warranty deed conveying the
[13:17]
fire station park in East Park from DR
Horton. Andy?
[13:22]
» Yes, thank you. All right, so the first
amendment to the seal into annexation
[13:27]
agreement uh requires that DR Horton
convey to the village the fire station
[13:32]
park
with improvements which again include a
[13:36]
pavilion band shell structure
landscaping and a parking lot as well as
[13:43]
bathroom facility.
The amendment the first amendment to the
[13:48]
annexation agreement also requires DR
Horton to convey to the village the
[13:53]
East Park property which is property
that's located
[13:57]
up north in the Sealing 2 development
that it was determined at the time
[14:02]
that achieving access from Big Timber
Road would be very difficult from the
[14:07]
county and so that's kind of what kicked
off these negotiations to amend the
[14:11]
agreement in the first place
but that land will still be conveyed to
[14:15]
the village it's about 27 acres for our
future planning purposes and future use.
[14:22]
As I think the board is aware the plan
is to utilize the fire station park for
[14:27]
a variety of community events the first
one of which is this Saturday morning
[14:32]
it's a farmers and makers market I'll
let Laura talk a little bit about that
[14:36]
in her updates but um
but no this is the resolution to
[14:40]
formally accept the deed for both of
those properties from DR Horton.
[14:46]
» Is there any discussion?
>> Yeah is that park considered complete
[14:51]
now?
>> Yes from from DR Horton's perspective
[14:55]
yes.
>> The village is
[14:57]
» washrooms
>> What did you say?
[14:58]
» You finished the washrooms?
>> He did he did yep yep.
[15:01]
» The lighting and the fencing is us?
>> The lighting and the fencing is us yes.
[15:04]
» Horton is paying for the fencing let us
not forget that but yeah that'll be our
[15:09]
project to do.
>> We have a date or time yet?
[15:12]
» August 31st.
[15:20]
All right if there's no other questions,
can I get a motion?
[15:24]
» I move to authorize the resolution
accepting a special warranty deed
[15:28]
conveying the fire station park and East
Park from D.R. Horton.
[15:33]
» Second.
[15:37]
» Call the roll.
>> Trustee Wengles.
[15:39]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Cerna.
[15:40]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Hall.
[15:41]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Pini.
[15:43]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Haye.
[15:44]
» Yes.
>> Trustee McCurdy.
[15:45]
» Yes.
>> Thank you. Motion carries.
[15:48]
» Okay, we're going to move into reports.
Mine is first. I'm not going to say a
[15:51]
whole lot cuz I don't want to steal
anyone else's thunder tonight. But, um
[15:55]
good news, I did talk with Troutman and
Adams, which I know we've been going
[15:59]
back and forth on for what feels like my
lifetime. But, um
[16:03]
they have come to an agreement with
Albertsons and all points are agreed
[16:06]
upon. So, that being said, um Andy,
Nick, and I will be meeting with
[16:12]
Troutman and Adams to complete our
development agreement this Wednesday.
[16:16]
And I spoke with Senator Steverson this
morning. We're hoping to have permits
[16:20]
from IDOT this week.
Keep your fingers crossed on that. I
[16:24]
can't control that. Um but, all things
being said, to uh Troutman and Adams
[16:30]
will come before planning and zoning at
our next meeting on August 17th, and
[16:34]
hopefully we will see a ground break
then this fall.
[16:37]
All right, Andy, moving on to you.
>> Yes, thank you. All right, I do actually
[16:40]
do have a couple things. Uh just
continuing from what President Kubiak
[16:44]
stated about the uh uh Troutman and
Adams process. Um there's a couple
[16:49]
different pieces moving around at once.
Uh the
[16:52]
PUD development agreement, which is
really what I would say is our contract
[16:56]
with them. That is still up in the air
as a we're still negotiating it. Um that
[17:02]
is something that will ultimately go
before the village board for final
[17:05]
review and consideration. Uh at the same
time, we're working through the various
[17:10]
um zoning approvals that are separated
from that. Uh this includes a final plat
[17:14]
of subdivision, uh as well as a zoning
ordinance authorizing the different uses
[17:21]
and regulations as it pertains to the
zoning code for the subject property.
[17:27]
That is scheduled already. Public
notices have been issued for August 17th
[17:32]
before the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Uh the Planning and Zoning
[17:35]
Commission will perform its review and
we anticipate they will recommend you
[17:41]
know that they would recommend approval
to the board uh if they are ready to do
[17:45]
so at that meeting. Uh if they're not,
it is in their prerogative to continue
[17:50]
it, but um that is scheduled to occur
August 17th and so on the staff level
[17:54]
we're working
with them on those matters. I'll let
[17:58]
Nick talk about some of the other
development
[18:01]
that is ongoing. Uh we are also
continuing to work with CPKC Railroad
[18:06]
regarding our agreements for easements
for the pathways
[18:11]
or the pathway that's planned to go
across the railroad. Um we have made
[18:15]
some progress with them. They have been
working with us, but there's also some
[18:19]
very strict requirements from the
federal government for the federal
[18:22]
funding rules that will come into play
and so
[18:26]
there is a lot of back and forth between
the railroad, the Illinois Commerce
[18:30]
Commission, which is the entity at the
state level that regulates railroads,
[18:34]
as well as IDOT and our engineering team
and so we continue to work on those
[18:39]
efforts to try to keep moving that
forward. Um I will defer to Brock to
[18:44]
talk a little bit about land acquisition
in
[18:48]
regards to the roundabout project as
well. The only other thing I have right
[18:51]
now for the board is just a wanted to
give you guys a heads up that tomorrow
[18:57]
village will be issuing a press release.
This is related to a business business
[19:02]
view article. This is something that I'd
shared with the board before in my
[19:06]
weekly notes, but at the end of last
week business view, which is a uh
[19:12]
industry commercial business magazine
that's really catered towards
[19:17]
businesses and business development.
They run a series about the best managed
[19:23]
cities in different states and the
Village of Pingree Grove was featured in
[19:26]
one.
President Kubeck and I participated in
[19:30]
an interview with that
that organization a couple months ago
[19:34]
and so that's an exciting thing. We'll
be sharing that on our social media
[19:38]
platforms, but that is all I have right
now.
[19:43]
» Okay. Chief, do you have anything for
us?
[19:47]
» Just that
tomorrow night will be hosting our
[19:50]
National Night Out at the police
department.
[19:52]
It's going to be from 5:00 to 8:00.
There will be some food. There is a dunk
[19:58]
tank, which I will be going into as well
as a bunch of our other officers. All
[20:02]
proceeds will go to Special Olympics.
We're going to have a good time. I hope
[20:06]
to see everyone out there.
And if you have any questions, just ask.
[20:13]
» Thank you. All right, Pat, do you have
anything for us tonight?
[20:18]
» No, I'm just joking though.
[20:22]
Um
Crews this week are finishing up tree
[20:26]
trimming in the fourth neighborhood.
We're going to take a break for a while.
[20:30]
They are just exhausted. Um
maybe return and try and do some more in
[20:35]
the fall.
Um
[20:37]
They should get through the neighborhood
they're in, which is the Shell Tree
[20:40]
Island neighborhood this week and also
have time to get
[20:45]
the 27 Parkway trees that are being
replaced throughout the village cut down
[20:51]
as well.
So that we don't have to bring it back
[20:54]
for one day to chip.
Um
[20:58]
mosquitoes.
I met with Clark today.
[21:02]
Um
there are West Nile cases positive in
[21:06]
traps all over Kane County so far
to my knowledge not Pingree Grove.
[21:12]
Uh we will spray if
the county alerts us that they get a
[21:16]
positive case.
Um
[21:19]
our trap that we are utilizing um
last Wednesday we had uh
[21:25]
a pretty good amount of mosquitoes in
there. We sprayed on Thursday.
[21:30]
Um
Friday's count was one.
[21:33]
Monday's count was one. Most likely
Monday was the rain all weekend long.
[21:37]
The mosquitoes weren't out. They were
hiding.
[21:39]
Uh but
I asked him about these low counts like
[21:43]
this and that's environmental. Uh and so
it's hard to
[21:47]
determine what's out there
uh when we get a count like this um but
[21:52]
um
anyhow
[21:55]
um
we'll be watching for if we have a a
[21:58]
West Nile hit and the county does report
to us if they do find a West Nile
[22:02]
positive mosquito in the other trap
located
[22:06]
somewhere [clears throat] in town. Um
that they check twice a week and then
[22:11]
analyze the mosquitoes but I know
they're starting to pop up all over.
[22:16]
Um
Lastly, the waste plant at 11:30 today
[22:20]
we actually had flow going through from
the headworks out the headworks building
[22:25]
uh and starting to make its way through
the plant.
[22:27]
Uh at 2:30 they were still making some
adjustments to the filters
[22:31]
um but flow is actually going through.
Half the flow is going through the new
[22:37]
portion of the plant. We're still use
utilizing the old lift station for half
[22:41]
the flow. Tomorrow we're going to reduce
it a little further
[22:44]
and uh Wednesday hopefully shut it off
and start draining that side if we get
[22:50]
a couple of days in a row of everything
working as designed.
[22:55]
The amount of alarms at the plant
just so everybody knows is overwhelming.
[23:01]
Um
We didn't run the irrigation this this
[23:05]
weekend, but we still had alarms for
pumps faulting in the middle of night.
[23:09]
We're trying to figure that out.
Uh everybody's pointing fingers. The
[23:13]
bottom line is that at about 11:00 every
night we get a slew of alarms. I think
[23:17]
it's a ComEd issue, but the voltage
monitor isn't working yet at the plant
[23:21]
to
blame ComEd.
[23:24]
Uh so we're working through that, um but
there's been a lot of OT and call-outs
[23:29]
because of this.
Uh
[23:31]
and guys really really tired. Um
[23:37]
Tomorrow uh we get back teasers and
we'll be setting up for the National
[23:40]
Night Out. Um so the back teasers are
the monthly IEPA required samples at 14
[23:47]
locations throughout town to make sure
our water is clean and and
[23:54]
and again we pull the samples on a
Tuesday so we can get the results by
[23:57]
Thursday.
We don't normally go any later than that
[24:01]
because we don't want to have to issue a
boil order if there was an issue on a
[24:05]
weekend.
That means everybody's coming in on OT,
[24:08]
so normally you everybody does these on
a Tuesday.
[24:13]
Uh other than that, uh does anybody have
any questions for me?
[24:17]
» I have a question for you. When does the
new wastewater treatment plant
[24:21]
supervisor start?
>> I don't have an answer yet.
[24:25]
Um
I need to check tomorrow. He took his uh
[24:29]
drug test on Saturday. So tomorrow is
the day that we should have the results
[24:33]
for that and I have to talk to someone
to access the portal to see what the
[24:38]
results are. I don't have direct access
to it, which is fine with me. I just
[24:42]
need to get that done.
Um
[24:45]
Once he has that,
I spoke with him and he will give me a
[24:49]
date. He didn't want to accept a
position and have something come back
[24:53]
for some reason that we couldn't hire
him. Background check already came back
[24:57]
and it's clean, so uh
I'm guessing about 2 weeks.
[25:01]
» Okay. That'll give him how much time
with Phil?
[25:04]
» 2 weeks.
>> Okay, that's good. All right. Thanks,
[25:07]
Pat.
Okay. Uh
[25:09]
» The West Nile cases have have they been
just been popping up recently or
[25:13]
» They did They're not human cases. It's
mosquitoes infected with West Nile. Yes,
[25:18]
it's been popping up in the last couple
of weeks
[25:20]
» Okay.
>> throughout the county and throughout
[25:22]
Illinois.
>> And without there really being a way to
[25:25]
it being environmental and not being
able to actually see what's out there.
[25:27]
» So, we have two traps. The environmental
trap, the one that we have problems with
[25:31]
catching them, works differently than
the West Nile. It's a different species
[25:35]
of mosquito.
The West Nile trap, they don't have a
[25:39]
problem catching mosquitoes. They're not
using light. Uh
[25:43]
but
uh they're
[25:45]
the West Nile trap, the county picks the
mosquitoes up and then checks them. They
[25:49]
do something and then they can tell if
it's carrying the West Nile virus. So,
[25:53]
if they get a hit from that, they report
to us. They just haven't got a hit in
[25:57]
Pingree Grove yet.
>> [clears throat]
[25:59]
» I I guess what I'm getting at is this
something that
[26:02]
we should be proactive and not reactive?
Like just put it on like a standard
[26:07]
spray while this is spreading throughout
the county
[26:10]
and limit the mosquitoes or is this
something we wait till the West Nile is
[26:13]
there, we report a West Nile case in a
mosquito?
[26:17]
» Yeah.
>> Everybody in the town freaks out and
[26:19]
then
or I guess I'm asking everybody. I I
[26:23]
don't know. Like is this something that
we should think about like every Friday
[26:26]
night until it cools off, just spray or
whatever day, you know, and weather
[26:31]
permitting, obviously, but
[26:36]
» What are What is everyone's thought on
that?
[26:41]
» I don't understand the question.
>> The question is so it takes a West Nile
[26:45]
case to
generate an automatic spray. In one
[26:48]
instance, mosquito, right? One instance
of that.
[26:51]
So, and with our trap, it's hard to say
what we actually have out there. I guess
[26:55]
what I'm asking
>> say there's two different traps. One's
[26:58]
maintained by the county. They don't
have an issue collecting mosquitoes like
[27:01]
the female biters that are the other
trap.
[27:04]
Um but
yes, typically we wait till they
[27:08]
find a positive case and then we spray.
>> Right.
[27:11]
» If there's a positive case reported.
>> And I guess what I'm saying is with it
[27:14]
being all around the area, it sounds
like it might be a matter of when not
[27:18]
if. Is it something to keep the stuff
down while it's going around or do we
[27:22]
just wait and see what happens? Is that
what I'm getting at?
[27:26]
Cuz you know it's going to pop and like
you said, you go from a high number, we
[27:29]
spray, it goes down to one. And then it
could be rain, could be wind why we're
[27:32]
not getting any in our trap. I get they
don't have a Do they even give you a
[27:36]
count in the county's trap or they just
wait for positive case?
[27:39]
» They don't give me a count of mosquitoes
that they catch. They don't even report
[27:42]
to me unless they have a positive case.
>> Right. So, they might be getting a
[27:44]
thousand mosquitoes where we're getting
none.
[27:46]
» Yeah.
I think that there's a lot less It's a
[27:49]
Culex pipiens that is the West Nile
carrier if I'm not mistaken and there's
[27:54]
a lot less of those in the area.
Um and it's those usually pop up
[27:59]
when everybody says, "Oh, the mosquitoes
aren't bad." You know, it's not raining
[28:03]
and that's when they get you. The the
ones in the affected the female biters
[28:07]
are the ones that you can't walk out
your door without them carrying you to
[28:11]
your car.
>> Okay.
[28:12]
» Um so
but I can
[28:15]
» Are you going to be doing any granular
granular treatment before the movie?
[28:21]
» Uh no.
[28:25]
We're not doing a granular treatment. We
don't treat
[28:27]
» think the
parks going to be to try and help
[28:30]
prevent mosquitoes in the area since I
think you can walk around and watch the
[28:36]
» Um
[28:39]
we don't even spray that area of the
village because of the proximity to
[28:43]
water typically.
Uh Uh, I do have a product that we can
[28:46]
spray the the turf. It's a plant-based
product that supposedly repels them
[28:52]
uh and and the trees.
It just depends on the weather.
[28:57]
Uh um
and
[28:59]
lately the grass in the morning is so
full of dew it takes till about noon for
[29:03]
everything to dry up. Uh it only takes
about 15 minutes for it to dry, but
[29:08]
it'll take us to apply in that little
triangle probably a couple hours to
[29:12]
spray the area down
uh with a backpack sprayer. We could do
[29:16]
that. We haven't contemplated that.
Uh
[29:19]
we did not
>> done several movies over every year the
[29:23]
last probably 10 years. I'd say that
that's something that's worthwhile. I
[29:28]
don't want to be spending money on a
movie, people going for the first 20
[29:31]
minutes, getting eaten, and then
leaving. So I I think that's something
[29:35]
that
would be worthwhile to to try.
[29:51]
» Yeah. Can we spray this Thursday
evening, Pat? I don't think there's any
[29:56]
weather this week, is there?
>> I'd have to look.
[29:59]
» Uh Wednesday it looks like there could
be.
[30:01]
» Yeah, so if we sprayed Thursday, that
would cuz that's what we do for 4th of
[30:05]
July, correct? You spray that.
>> We sprayed Thursday. It it just That's
[30:08]
the way it worked. I actually we sprayed
Friday, too. We just did not spray
[30:13]
around the event till 2:00 in the
morning. We finished up. Normally the
[30:17]
route's different, but we finished up
after everybody is long gone.
[30:22]
» This would just be for the movie.
>> did not spray the event this year, the
[30:25]
grounds, because again, by the time we
got there at 5:00 a.m. Saturday morning,
[30:32]
there was already tarps everywhere.
There wasn't a bit of grass left. I
[30:35]
can't spray.
Cuz now this product is all over
[30:38]
everybody's tarps and you know, the
area's cordoned off, but the movies we
[30:42]
could probably spray it this week as
long as there's not rain and it would
[30:46]
just have to be mid-morning after the
dew is evaporated off the grass.
[30:50]
» Okay. Why don't we plan for that then
this week?
[30:54]
All right.
Moving on then, Andy's going to take
[30:57]
Nick's report.
>> Yeah, just really quickly for the
[31:00]
development services report,
other than the Jewel and Trammell Crow
[31:04]
efforts,
the developer for Route 72 and Ranking
[31:08]
Road, they have submitted their
application to the village as well as
[31:12]
their engineering submittals.
So, that is being that is in the hopper
[31:17]
for review from our consultants for that
as well.
[31:21]
As we work through that review and
discuss with them further, then we will
[31:26]
be looking to do similar thing as we are
doing with the uh uh Jewel Trammell Crow
[31:31]
process of having a development
agreement or contract with the village
[31:34]
and then at the same time, we'll have
the necessary zoning and final plat
[31:41]
of subdivision
review before the planning and zoning
[31:44]
commission. So, that is in the works as
well.
[31:47]
» Hey Andy, the what is the typical
turnaround with our consultants on that?
[31:51]
» So, for a full engineering review,
probably about a month, I would say.
[32:00]
The
The biggest thing is the back and forth
[32:03]
and if there's agreement or disagreement
over and I mean anything from easements
[32:07]
or where is this going to be located or
that. Um so, I I I expect that
[32:13]
especially because they're looking to do
this in phases, it doesn't all have to
[32:16]
be approved all at once before the board
or planning and zoning commission. So,
[32:21]
I think that they could start going
through the planning and zoning
[32:24]
commission process and um
maybe a month or two
[32:29]
from now.
[32:32]
» What When does the tax sharing part When
does that get approved in this? for the
[32:37]
for Jewel?
>> Yeah.
[32:38]
» That'll that's part of that contract
that'll come before the board.
[32:42]
» Okay. Yeah.
[32:44]
» Andy, the
[32:47]
railroad station there, the parking they
put in, I know at the beginning you were
[32:51]
talking about 20 spots. I was there the
other day I counted 40.
[32:57]
» Yeah, it's I think it's like 30 30 six.
Well,
[33:01]
I remember, yeah.
Yeah, so it's a lot. Yeah, yeah.
[33:05]
» Yeah, good.
[33:07]
» Okay.
All right, moving on. Engineering?
[33:12]
» Um yeah, so we submitted for the ranking
damage roundabout, we submitted final
[33:16]
plans last Monday. So, those are into
I-dot for review. Um we're still slated
[33:21]
for a November letting pending uh
obviously what Andy and Amber talked
[33:24]
about for the CPKC and ICC agreement. Um
and then we're in various stages of land
[33:29]
acquisition. So, we have
um three of them secured and we're so
[33:33]
we're in various stages with the other
five. So,
[33:36]
um that's kind of it for the roundabout.
Um other than that, 72 path is still in
[33:41]
it I-dot for the PDR.
Um
[33:44]
and then the streets project we're
working through the punch list with
[33:46]
Schroeder.
Um as we get worked through that and
[33:49]
then the skate park um we'll probably
have an extension coming for uh next
[33:55]
meeting. Uh they obviously with some of
the weather they had earlier this year
[33:58]
when they got started and some delays of
equipment being shipped, um they're
[34:03]
they're probably extension of time
coming for the next meeting.
[34:09]
» Thank you, Brock. All right, legal, do
you have anything for us tonight?
[34:13]
» just wanted to say thanks to Fair Graham
including Brock, Andy, and Nick in
[34:16]
connection with that special warranty
deed from D.R. Horton from looking over
[34:20]
the easements, making sure they're
restricted to the perimeter of the
[34:23]
property, to coaxing the special
warranty deed from the sixth floor of
[34:28]
the D.R. Horton headquarters in
Schaumburg. It was a team effort and uh
[34:32]
I thought it was well done. And then
two, if there's any questions for me on
[34:36]
anything else.
[34:39]
» Okay. Laura.
>> Oh, well, I'd just like to again
[34:43]
reiterate that we have our
uh first movie in the park and of course
[34:47]
the location has changed from our fire
station park cuz the grass is not quite
[34:51]
ready. So, it's going to take place in
the same
[34:54]
um space as our stage was for the
Independence Day celebration. So,
[34:59]
that'll be right next to the Cambridge
Lakes Community Center. It starts at
[35:02]
8:00 and the movie starts at dusk or
it's from 8:00 to 10:00 and the movie
[35:06]
starts at dusk. And then the following
day, Saturday, we have our farmers
[35:10]
market which will take place in the
parking lot of the fire station park.
[35:14]
And we have 14 vendors signed up, so
we're really looking forward to that.
[35:18]
And also, I'd like to let everyone know
that we're rolling out the introduction
[35:21]
of the business registration program to
our business community with a request to
[35:26]
have them register for the existing
businesses register by September 18th.
[35:31]
So, that'll be done by the end of this
week on the first roll out. Thank you.
[35:35]
» Thanks, Laura.
All right. Um now we have a discussion
[35:39]
on recommendation to remove flock camera
identification signs. Chris, I'm going
[35:45]
to let you take this one.
>> All right. In the packet, I drafted a
[35:49]
memo to you guys explaining
the new development throughout the state
[35:55]
of Illinois, especially in Chicagoland
area, regarding the destruction of
[36:00]
neighborhood flock cameras.
Our cameras are fine at this time.
[36:05]
Uh we haven't had anything, but it has
been known that the signs are drawing
[36:10]
attention to these and people are
damaging them.
[36:13]
These cameras have shown that they,
especially here, that they are very
[36:17]
powerful tools, especially when used the
correct way, to solve crimes and be able
[36:21]
to help law enforcement
uh in plenty of investigations.
[36:27]
Uh the Illinois Association of Chiefs of
Police also reaffirmed that these ALPR
[36:34]
technology
is also an investigative tool.
[36:39]
Problem is now there are problems where
people are noticing these cameras and
[36:44]
they're destroying them on site. They're
cutting cameras down. They're spray
[36:48]
painting them. They're damaging the
solar panels, disconnecting wiring.
[36:52]
Uh
they're striking them with other tools
[36:54]
and they're dis-
uh disabling the camera systems.
[36:58]
These cameras are uh quite expensive and
where if there's damage that's on the
[37:06]
village in order to replace them. I'm
trying to be proactive on this.
[37:11]
Uh removal of the signs would not
uh
[37:15]
stop any of the functionality of the
cameras.
[37:18]
We're trying to make sure that we don't
have any problems in the future with the
[37:22]
ones that we have here.
The uh
[37:28]
» [sighs and gasps]
>> All right, just to just so you know,
[37:32]
I have attached all these other all
points bulletins from these other
[37:35]
agencies. We're not making this up.
Flock came and said that they're aware
[37:39]
of this and they will charge $500 a
camera a year and then we wouldn't have
[37:44]
to cover anything. I think that's
ridiculous. So, I have asked in order to
[37:50]
be proactive to remove the signs to
avoid possible uh damage that's going to
[37:56]
be coming in the near future.
That's it.
[37:59]
» Can you think of any other communities
that have the I have not seen any other
[38:02]
communities that have the 24-hour
surveillance signs? Like I feel like
[38:06]
we're the only ones that have
>> There may be a community or two that
[38:08]
have a sign at the beginning of the
community saying that they're a Flock
[38:11]
community, one sign. We have them in
every single pole. And I know there's
[38:14]
already at least one that's missing.
So, um the cameras are all functional
[38:18]
though.
The The ones we had we had one taken
[38:21]
down for the roundabout project at 20th
and Ranking. We had it moved uh about
[38:25]
five about 50 or 100 ft or so.
Uh they did not charge us for that, but
[38:30]
they will charge us if we have to remove
anything else.
[38:33]
I just don't think that that price that
they quoted me was fair because it's not
[38:38]
up it's not on us.
But
[38:40]
it's not that way. I don't want people
to understand that we have law cameras.
[38:44]
I
It's not what it is.
[38:46]
I drive I was just in Schaumburg
yesterday.
[38:50]
Uh
I'm sorry, Saturday and they're
[38:53]
everywhere and there's no I mean I'm I'm
looking for them,
[38:56]
but they're there.
So and there's no signs showing that
[39:01]
they have to be there. So I know it was
a stipulation when we actually installed
[39:04]
these.
Um we put them up.
[39:07]
And like I said, we haven't had a
problem, but I don't want to see us
[39:11]
having to be charged to replace cameras
or have them damaged and brought on us
[39:17]
just because
uh we've been adding more success
[39:21]
stories so you're aware on the village
website.
[39:23]
Uh now that we kind of got a grasp of
how the transparency portal works and uh
[39:28]
we've had plenty of opportunity to say
that these are phenomenal cameras that
[39:32]
are we're being are used the correct way
and for the good reasons.
[39:39]
» I take it we have no legal obligation to
tell people about it.
[39:43]
» No, we do not.
[39:49]
» So these cameras, they had signs
>> or no? No.
[39:52]
» No.
So it's
[39:56]
is it safe fair to say that the signs
aren't the reason they're doing it? It's
[39:59]
probably they know where they're at
because isn't it like public knowledge
[40:02]
where these things are? There's I've
seen them like it says they're here,
[40:05]
here, and here.
>> Mhm.
[40:06]
» And then you just go around.
>> There's actually a map on our village
[40:09]
website that shows where they all are,
too.
[40:10]
» Right. That's what I'm saying. So like I
don't really know that the camera is
[40:13]
going to draw in if somebody's going to
cut it down, it sounds like they're just
[40:16]
going to cut it down.
>> I'm trying not to draw attention to it
[40:19]
is what I'm trying to do because these
bright red signs they're saying 24-hour
[40:22]
surveillance is showing where they are.
>> I thought the whole point when we first
[40:26]
put them up was that was supposed to be
help be a deterrent.
[40:31]
» Yes.
That could have been uh but we're
[40:33]
drawing attention to these and at that
time there was no destruction of these
[40:36]
cameras out there. Now that there are
I'm trying to be proactive on this.
[40:40]
Again, this is this is up for
discussion.
[40:43]
Uh if you guys want to leave them up,
that's fine but if they do get damaged
[40:46]
just know that the village is on the
hook for any repairs. And we'll do what
[40:51]
we can but
as you can see these uh
[40:56]
pictures what they're doing
I'm just trying to make sure we don't
[41:00]
have damaged equipment. These things are
pretty expensive.
[41:05]
» Can we discuss them? For me personally
I kind of liked the attention to them
[41:11]
not the damaging part but it sounds like
these people are out looking to damage
[41:14]
them regardless and they know where they
are.
[41:17]
I kind of want the criminal to see the
sign. For me that means maybe they go to
[41:23]
the next town or the town after.
That was the reason that I asked to have
[41:28]
them up to begin with. So my opinion
really hasn't changed on that even
[41:31]
though I appreciate where Chris is
coming from. He's looking out for the
[41:34]
well-being of the cameras themselves.
Now if they said that they were going
[41:38]
after one specifically with signs, I'd
be more apt to say, "Okay, let's take
[41:41]
the signs down." Now I know there's no
way to really tell like is it really
[41:45]
deterring criminals? Who knows? You
don't know unless they commit the crime.
[41:49]
So if it's deterred three or four, I for
me it's leave them up.
[41:54]
You know,
see what happens. If you guys want to
[41:57]
take them down, that's fine. It's not a
big deal to me either way but that was
[42:01]
the reason I wanted them up and I don't
really know that that's changed for me
[42:04]
personally.
>> The current investigations the police
[42:07]
department has had that says success
stories for their use.
[42:11]
Um these people are out there anyway.
So,
[42:16]
we're we're catching them. They're
there. I don't think a sign is going to
[42:20]
deter anyone or not. The car burglars
that came in last week, they drove right
[42:24]
past two of them. And I mean, it was a
stolen motor vehicle out of Chicago, but
[42:29]
that signs aren't going to deter them.
What deters them is
[42:33]
us being out there. And we were as soon
as the cameras activated, we were out
[42:38]
there and they were in and out of here
within 7 minutes. We had to get to the
[42:40]
other side of town, though. So, that's
the reason we didn't get there in time.
[42:44]
But, we already have leads on those.
The signs aren't going to deter anybody.
[42:48]
All they're going to do is draw
attention.
[42:51]
And I'm just trying to make sure that if
someone does take a baseball bat to them
[42:54]
or cut them down or spray paint them or
anything,
[42:58]
they're they're $3,000 cameras and we're
on the hook for them. And that was part
[43:03]
of the agreement.
Now, they weren't getting damaged
[43:05]
before, but now they're all over the
place. Like I said, that's why I
[43:09]
provided you guys the all-points from
surrounding agencies.
[43:12]
» Has RMA provided any guidance on what
they would suggest?
[43:16]
» No, they say it's up to us.
[43:22]
And Flock has given a alternative. They
will cover the damage for $500 a camera
[43:27]
per year.
[43:34]
» All right, what does everybody want to
do? You want to roll the dice or you
[43:37]
want to take down the signs? Let's go
down the list. Drew, what do you think?
[43:43]
» I'm with Luke. I think sign or not, the
press on Flock is so bad right now
[43:49]
» Yeah.
>> that
[43:51]
you could probably hide them in the
ground and people will dig them up and
[43:54]
break them
>> [snorts]
[43:55]
» at this point.
>> Okay.
[43:57]
» Um my only thing about it is if we're
going to get charged for removing a sign
[44:03]
and still have it damaged potentially
and then pay?
[44:08]
That I don't understand. [clears throat]
Um
[44:12]
I can understand where Chris is coming
from with trying to not
[44:15]
put a a bigger spotlight on it where
it's at, but I don't know at this point
[44:20]
with
the record that Flock is is going with
[44:24]
across the country,
I don't think having a sign up or not is
[44:29]
going to change if somebody wants to do
it.
[44:32]
» Okay. Adam, what do you think?
>> Uh I think take them down because I
[44:35]
believe I mean all these bulletins from
all these agencies they they can't just
[44:40]
be making that up. I mean they are the
experts. They're the ones that are on
[44:43]
this and that's their recommendation.
I would tend to agree. And I like I
[44:48]
said, I don't I don't see any other
communities with those signs up. I just
[44:51]
see all the ones in ours that are a
little
[44:54]
but I see both sides, you know, I
understand it's could be a deterrent,
[44:57]
but it really also is a you know, some
guy's pissed off driving home and sees
[45:02]
that and thinks, you know what? This is
my time. Cuz he sees the sign.
[45:06]
Um so, I'd say take them down.
>> Okay. Luke, you want to keep them up?
[45:10]
» Uh yeah. Um
it
[45:15]
So, I look at it like the red light
cameras, right?
[45:19]
I see the sign, I actually stop at the
sign. I know they stop. Some people
[45:22]
still blow through them, you know, and
they're still going to commit the
[45:24]
crimes. And actually to Adam's point for
what he just said, actually if we're the
[45:29]
only town with the signs and we're the
only ones that haven't been getting
[45:31]
damaged or haven't been damaged yet.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it, you
[45:36]
know.
>> Okay. All right. Ed, where do you stand
[45:38]
on this?
>> I would take them down. Um I wasn't a
[45:42]
fan for the sign at the beginning, so.
>> Okay.
[45:45]
All right. Kevin?
>> Again, I see both sides. Uh
[45:49]
I like our transparency portal. Uh
people want to see we're not trying to
[45:53]
hide every anything.
Um
[45:56]
I would be in favor of taking them down.
>> Taking them down? Okay. Robert?
[46:02]
» I'm with everybody else. I see both
sides of this. I I tend to lean on the
[46:08]
they're up, we're not having issues. Um
I I don't think this sign being there is
[46:14]
going
changes anybody's mind if they're going
[46:17]
to do something bad.
For me, I'd say we leave them up.
[46:20]
» Leave them up. Okay.
All right. And I guess we leave them up.
[46:24]
» Sounds good. Thank you.
>> Okay. All right, thank you. All right,
[46:28]
does anyone have any old or new
business?
[46:32]
Okay. If not, can I get a motion to move
into executive session? Michael, I'm
[46:37]
going to have you read it.
>> Sure.
[46:40]
Is there a motion to go into closed
session
[46:42]
pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2C1 regarding the
appointment, employment, compensation,
[46:47]
discipline, performance, or dismissal of
specific employees of the village?
[46:52]
» So moved.
Okay.
[46:57]
» Call the roll.
>> Trustee Hall.
[47:00]
» Yes.
>> Trustee Peters.
[47:01]
» Yes.
>> Yes.
[47:03]
» Trustee Turner.
>> Yes.
[47:04]
» Trustee Haig.
>> Yes.
[47:06]
» Trustee McCartney, I'm sorry, McCreary,
and Trustee Weingolds.
[47:08]
» Yes.
>> Thank you. Motion carried.
[47:11]
Okay, we're going to be moving into