VBD 08-03-2026

Pingree Grove, IL · · More Pingree Grove, IL meetings · More Illinois meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[1:47] Meeting called to order at 7:00 p.m.
[2:15] » Alderman Roth >> Trustee Haig
[2:17] » Here. >> Trustee Hall
[2:19] » Here. >> Trustee McCurdy
[2:21] » Here. >> Trustee Peeny
[2:22] » Here. >> Trustee Turnau
[2:24] » Here. >> Trustee Weingels
[2:25] » Here. >> President Kubiak
[2:28] » Here. >> Thank you. We have a quorum.
[2:30] » Okay. We're going to go ahead and move into public comments. Tonight we have
[2:34] two public comments. I'll call you up and if you can state your name and
[2:37] address and then make your comments. So our first comment is Jason Lewellen.
[2:41] Jason, if you can come up. I know I just said your name, but can you state your
[2:44] name and address for us again? >> You guys want to grab a pen? Jason
[2:48] Lewellen, 1400 Crest Drive. 224-558-7662
[2:54] We talked about doing something for these e-bike kids. I think I read
[2:57] something about that park you guys are doing over here.
[3:00] These e-bike kids will have nothing to do with that. I have more experience in
[3:03] biking than everybody put together in this room.
[3:07] That park has nothing to do with e-bike kids.
[3:10] It will take $100,000 to build this park.
[3:12] And like I said, I'll help raise this money, all of it.
[3:16] But it takes time. And the more we wait, the longer it
[3:19] takes. Now, I'll start with these kids have
[3:22] their own community. They have their own chat line.
[3:25] They've tried to get me to go on it with them. These kids now stop at my house.
[3:29] We have talks about safety on the bikes, not doing wheelies in front of people's
[3:32] houses, down the main streets, riding through people's lawns.
[3:35] I've had these kids at my house, my wife come home from work. As we're sitting
[3:39] out on the front lawn, I bring bikes out of my house from BMX bikes to dirt bikes
[3:42] to my motorcycles. These kids have interest.
[3:46] These kids deserve to have fun. We all wanted to have fun when growing
[3:49] up as kids. But we're waiting too long. Summer's
[3:52] almost over. Sooner or later there'll be no time to
[3:55] get it. And then these kids will go find some kind of crime cuz we have quite a
[4:00] bit going on in here between people shooting BB guns through windows,
[4:04] breaking in cars. I mean last year I was watching TV in my bedroom and someone
[4:08] was trying to open up my garage door. I had it on camera.
[4:11] And my lights were on. Kids will become criminals if we don't
[4:14] do something. I've watched these kids tone it down
[4:17] especially around my part of the neighborhood with their bikes.
[4:20] I think we need to do something. Keep that tone down and do something for
[4:23] them. I'm going to go do exactly what these
[4:26] kids are doing. Get on my bike. Have a good day.
[4:29] » Thank you. All right. Next up we have Kate Montleone. Kate, if you could come
[4:33] up and state your name and your address. >> Sure. Sure.
[4:37] Good evening. I'm Kate Montleone. Um my address is 4N385 Samuel Clemens
[4:43] and that is in St. Charles. I'm here tonight to introduce myself as a
[4:48] candidate for the Kane County board representing parts of this community,
[4:54] precinct seven and 10 specifically. Um
[4:59] and as a as a prospective member of the county board, I believe it is imperative
[5:05] to have a dialogue with the villages, the townships, and and the cities that
[5:11] comprise the county. So, I think that starting now, I want to
[5:18] be visible and accessible to yourselves as well as members of the community um
[5:26] to to address and hear their concerns. I've been a little bit surprised as I've
[5:32] canvassed around the area how little people know about the work of
[5:39] the county and the fact that they virtually no one
[5:43] knows who their elected representative is.
[5:46] So, my goal is to change that starting now. Thank you very much.
[5:53] Don't forget to vote. >> Thank you.
[5:56] » Yeah. Okay. We're going to move into the
[5:59] consent agenda. Tonight on the consent agenda, we have the approval of the
[6:03] minutes from July 6th, 2026 Village Board meeting.
[6:07] The approval of the warrant list for July 20th, 2026 in the amount of
[6:12] $411,902.17,
[6:16] the approval of the warrant list for August 3rd, 2026 in the amount of
[6:21] $814,049.29,
[6:26] and the consideration approval of pay application number one for the skate
[6:30] park improvements project in the amount of $391,429.35,
[6:37] and the uh consideration and approval of pay application number 33 for wastewater
[6:42] treatment plant improvements project in the amount of $308,922.55.
[6:49] Is there any discussion? If not, can I get a motion?
[6:55] » I move to approve the consent agenda. >> I'll second.
[7:01] » Call the roll. >> Trustee Hall.
[7:04] » Yes. >> Trustee Weingolds.
[7:06] » Yes. >> Trustee McCurdy.
[7:07] » Yes. >> Trustee Pini.
[7:09] » Yes. >> Trustee Cerno.
[7:10] » Yes. >> Trustee Hay.
[7:12] » Yes. >> Thank you. Motion carries.
[7:19] Okay. Moving on. Under items for separate action, we have item A, the
[7:23] consideration and approval of an authorization of a purchase of a stop
[7:28] stick tire deflation device in the amount of $5,789.
[7:34] Chris? >> Good evening, everyone.
[7:39] Budgeted this year was a uh project that I started investigating last year,
[7:45] last fall. Multiple agencies have gone to these in
[7:50] the last two to three years. They're called stop sticks.
[7:54] We have a high rate of vehicles that actually travel through Pingree Grove.
[7:59] Some of them are pursued by other agencies where we don't really
[8:04] push to pursue in our town. Our officers still do feel that it is
[8:08] necessary for us to try to help stop crime and try to help neighboring
[8:13] agencies and us as well. A stop stick device, what it is is
[8:18] exactly what you think. It's these strips that go out in the road and it
[8:22] will deflate your tires. These are controlled. These are not going to blow
[8:26] out and spin out. Multiple agencies around us have been using these to
[8:31] positive satisfaction. They are very lightweight. They're
[8:36] easily to be deployed. There is training that comes along with
[8:40] this as well, which is going to be annual. And it is also recommended not
[8:45] only by the Illinois Risk Management Association,
[8:49] but also the Illinois Chiefs of Police. Um
[8:53] I reached out to uh RMA and asked about this and they said
[8:59] that it was a very good idea to start pushing this right now.
[9:03] They actually kind of want more agencies to have these first us actually pursuing
[9:09] in a vehicle as we cause a crash. The vehicles do slow down
[9:13] and they are easily able to get in the person that's involved.
[9:19] The price that I have on here for $5,798 includes nine stop sticks, which would
[9:24] outfit the patrol vehicles that we have and two training devices. They recommend
[9:30] two so we can actually do training on those.
[9:34] The life expectancy, which I just looked up a few minutes ago, is about 5 years
[9:38] if they're not used and then they would have to be probably replaced.
[9:41] Or when they are used, all you have to do is replace the little uh spikes that
[9:46] are in there at a very low cost. I bring this to you
[9:51] uh because of the fact that it is
[9:54] considered a use of force by the state of Illinois because we're actually
[9:58] stopping a vehicle. Um
[10:01] just to get consideration and see if you had any questions before I go ahead and
[10:06] do this.
[10:08] » Chief, um just a couple questions. Um one, why would you have to replace them
[10:13] after 5 years if there's no use? >> Um it was a question that was brought to
[10:17] me about 10 minutes ago and I didn't have the answer. I just looked it up
[10:20] real quick because of uh the great internet.
[10:24] They're going to be in a car. They don't get They don't get brought in like our
[10:27] AEDs and stuff like that. So, it gets actually mounted inside the trunk area
[10:32] of the car. So, you're going to have extreme heat and extreme cold and things
[10:35] like that. They get inspected with the car inspections every month, but
[10:40] I think it's no different than my bulletproof vest. Even though I don't
[10:44] use it and I know deep down inside that it will stop after 5 years,
[10:49] manufacturer recommendation is to replace after so long just to make sure
[10:53] that you have the utmost equipment.
[10:57] » Chris, we have nothing like this right now. Not on your cars.
[11:01] » No. Um the sheriff's office is they got this new thing where it's like a grapple
[11:05] that'll grab a car. Um we tried investing in something not
[11:10] that long ago uh where it was a net that would shoot out, but we couldn't get all
[11:14] the pieces for it. It was actually through uh
[11:17] uh the military, but that was something that never came to fruition. We've had a
[11:22] lot of high-speed vehicles flying down here because we have 27247.
[11:27] Um most of them are chased by other agencies.
[11:30] Our officers don't really get too involved, especially if they go outside
[11:33] of our jurisdiction, but if we can maybe slow the
[11:36] vehicle down so we can apprehend, that would be a
[11:40] a good note in our book. >> So, there have been opportunities that
[11:42] we could have used them that would have worked.
[11:45] » Yes. Um they're a small device. The brochures are on there. You throw them
[11:49] into the roadway and as the car comes by, goes over it, you yank them back out
[11:54] with a chain. That way it doesn't get the cars behind them that are coming. Um
[11:58] they've been There's videos online for this. Um I actually talked to the owner
[12:03] of the company last uh October and uh one of their neighboring
[12:09] agencies, the Village of Elburn, has them and they've used them two or three
[12:12] times since they've had them and they said it's really helped out quite a bit.
[12:15] So, I actually saw a demo of that and I thought it was pretty interesting. So, I
[12:19] wanted to try to bring that to our neighborhood.
[12:26] » Is there any other discussion? If not, can I get a motion?
[12:33] » I move to approve the purchase of nine Stop Stick tire deflation and pursuit
[12:37] prevention devices including related deployment and training accessories
[12:42] for use by the police department in the amount of $5,789.
[12:47] » I'll second.
[12:51] » Call the roll. >> Trustee Haake.
[12:53] » Yes. >> Trustee Hall.
[12:55] » Yes. >> Trustee McCurdy.
[12:57] » Yes. >> Trustee Pini.
[12:59] » Yes. >> Trustee Turnau.
[13:00] » Yes. >> Trustee Wingle.
[13:02] » Yes.
[13:04] » Trustee Turnau said yes, right? Okay, thank you. Motion carries.
[13:09] Okay, moving on. Item B is the consideration and approval of an
[13:12] authorization of a resolution accepting a special warranty deed conveying the
[13:17] fire station park in East Park from DR Horton. Andy?
[13:22] » Yes, thank you. All right, so the first amendment to the seal into annexation
[13:27] agreement uh requires that DR Horton convey to the village the fire station
[13:32] park with improvements which again include a
[13:36] pavilion band shell structure landscaping and a parking lot as well as
[13:43] bathroom facility. The amendment the first amendment to the
[13:48] annexation agreement also requires DR Horton to convey to the village the
[13:53] East Park property which is property that's located
[13:57] up north in the Sealing 2 development that it was determined at the time
[14:02] that achieving access from Big Timber Road would be very difficult from the
[14:07] county and so that's kind of what kicked off these negotiations to amend the
[14:11] agreement in the first place but that land will still be conveyed to
[14:15] the village it's about 27 acres for our future planning purposes and future use.
[14:22] As I think the board is aware the plan is to utilize the fire station park for
[14:27] a variety of community events the first one of which is this Saturday morning
[14:32] it's a farmers and makers market I'll let Laura talk a little bit about that
[14:36] in her updates but um but no this is the resolution to
[14:40] formally accept the deed for both of those properties from DR Horton.
[14:46] » Is there any discussion? >> Yeah is that park considered complete
[14:51] now? >> Yes from from DR Horton's perspective
[14:55] yes. >> The village is
[14:57] » washrooms >> What did you say?
[14:58] » You finished the washrooms? >> He did he did yep yep.
[15:01] » The lighting and the fencing is us? >> The lighting and the fencing is us yes.
[15:04] » Horton is paying for the fencing let us not forget that but yeah that'll be our
[15:09] project to do. >> We have a date or time yet?
[15:12] » August 31st.
[15:20] All right if there's no other questions, can I get a motion?
[15:24] » I move to authorize the resolution accepting a special warranty deed
[15:28] conveying the fire station park and East Park from D.R. Horton.
[15:33] » Second.
[15:37] » Call the roll. >> Trustee Wengles.
[15:39] » Yes. >> Trustee Cerna.
[15:40] » Yes. >> Trustee Hall.
[15:41] » Yes. >> Trustee Pini.
[15:43] » Yes. >> Trustee Haye.
[15:44] » Yes. >> Trustee McCurdy.
[15:45] » Yes. >> Thank you. Motion carries.
[15:48] » Okay, we're going to move into reports. Mine is first. I'm not going to say a
[15:51] whole lot cuz I don't want to steal anyone else's thunder tonight. But, um
[15:55] good news, I did talk with Troutman and Adams, which I know we've been going
[15:59] back and forth on for what feels like my lifetime. But, um
[16:03] they have come to an agreement with Albertsons and all points are agreed
[16:06] upon. So, that being said, um Andy, Nick, and I will be meeting with
[16:12] Troutman and Adams to complete our development agreement this Wednesday.
[16:16] And I spoke with Senator Steverson this morning. We're hoping to have permits
[16:20] from IDOT this week. Keep your fingers crossed on that. I
[16:24] can't control that. Um but, all things being said, to uh Troutman and Adams
[16:30] will come before planning and zoning at our next meeting on August 17th, and
[16:34] hopefully we will see a ground break then this fall.
[16:37] All right, Andy, moving on to you. >> Yes, thank you. All right, I do actually
[16:40] do have a couple things. Uh just continuing from what President Kubiak
[16:44] stated about the uh uh Troutman and Adams process. Um there's a couple
[16:49] different pieces moving around at once. Uh the
[16:52] PUD development agreement, which is really what I would say is our contract
[16:56] with them. That is still up in the air as a we're still negotiating it. Um that
[17:02] is something that will ultimately go before the village board for final
[17:05] review and consideration. Uh at the same time, we're working through the various
[17:10] um zoning approvals that are separated from that. Uh this includes a final plat
[17:14] of subdivision, uh as well as a zoning ordinance authorizing the different uses
[17:21] and regulations as it pertains to the zoning code for the subject property.
[17:27] That is scheduled already. Public notices have been issued for August 17th
[17:32] before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Uh the Planning and Zoning
[17:35] Commission will perform its review and we anticipate they will recommend you
[17:41] know that they would recommend approval to the board uh if they are ready to do
[17:45] so at that meeting. Uh if they're not, it is in their prerogative to continue
[17:50] it, but um that is scheduled to occur August 17th and so on the staff level
[17:54] we're working with them on those matters. I'll let
[17:58] Nick talk about some of the other development
[18:01] that is ongoing. Uh we are also continuing to work with CPKC Railroad
[18:06] regarding our agreements for easements for the pathways
[18:11] or the pathway that's planned to go across the railroad. Um we have made
[18:15] some progress with them. They have been working with us, but there's also some
[18:19] very strict requirements from the federal government for the federal
[18:22] funding rules that will come into play and so
[18:26] there is a lot of back and forth between the railroad, the Illinois Commerce
[18:30] Commission, which is the entity at the state level that regulates railroads,
[18:34] as well as IDOT and our engineering team and so we continue to work on those
[18:39] efforts to try to keep moving that forward. Um I will defer to Brock to
[18:44] talk a little bit about land acquisition in
[18:48] regards to the roundabout project as well. The only other thing I have right
[18:51] now for the board is just a wanted to give you guys a heads up that tomorrow
[18:57] village will be issuing a press release. This is related to a business business
[19:02] view article. This is something that I'd shared with the board before in my
[19:06] weekly notes, but at the end of last week business view, which is a uh
[19:12] industry commercial business magazine that's really catered towards
[19:17] businesses and business development. They run a series about the best managed
[19:23] cities in different states and the Village of Pingree Grove was featured in
[19:26] one. President Kubeck and I participated in
[19:30] an interview with that that organization a couple months ago
[19:34] and so that's an exciting thing. We'll be sharing that on our social media
[19:38] platforms, but that is all I have right now.
[19:43] » Okay. Chief, do you have anything for us?
[19:47] » Just that tomorrow night will be hosting our
[19:50] National Night Out at the police department.
[19:52] It's going to be from 5:00 to 8:00. There will be some food. There is a dunk
[19:58] tank, which I will be going into as well as a bunch of our other officers. All
[20:02] proceeds will go to Special Olympics. We're going to have a good time. I hope
[20:06] to see everyone out there. And if you have any questions, just ask.
[20:13] » Thank you. All right, Pat, do you have anything for us tonight?
[20:18] » No, I'm just joking though.
[20:22] Um Crews this week are finishing up tree
[20:26] trimming in the fourth neighborhood. We're going to take a break for a while.
[20:30] They are just exhausted. Um maybe return and try and do some more in
[20:35] the fall. Um
[20:37] They should get through the neighborhood they're in, which is the Shell Tree
[20:40] Island neighborhood this week and also have time to get
[20:45] the 27 Parkway trees that are being replaced throughout the village cut down
[20:51] as well. So that we don't have to bring it back
[20:54] for one day to chip. Um
[20:58] mosquitoes. I met with Clark today.
[21:02] Um there are West Nile cases positive in
[21:06] traps all over Kane County so far to my knowledge not Pingree Grove.
[21:12] Uh we will spray if the county alerts us that they get a
[21:16] positive case. Um
[21:19] our trap that we are utilizing um last Wednesday we had uh
[21:25] a pretty good amount of mosquitoes in there. We sprayed on Thursday.
[21:30] Um Friday's count was one.
[21:33] Monday's count was one. Most likely Monday was the rain all weekend long.
[21:37] The mosquitoes weren't out. They were hiding.
[21:39] Uh but I asked him about these low counts like
[21:43] this and that's environmental. Uh and so it's hard to
[21:47] determine what's out there uh when we get a count like this um but
[21:52] um anyhow
[21:55] um we'll be watching for if we have a a
[21:58] West Nile hit and the county does report to us if they do find a West Nile
[22:02] positive mosquito in the other trap located
[22:06] somewhere [clears throat] in town. Um that they check twice a week and then
[22:11] analyze the mosquitoes but I know they're starting to pop up all over.
[22:16] Um Lastly, the waste plant at 11:30 today
[22:20] we actually had flow going through from the headworks out the headworks building
[22:25] uh and starting to make its way through the plant.
[22:27] Uh at 2:30 they were still making some adjustments to the filters
[22:31] um but flow is actually going through. Half the flow is going through the new
[22:37] portion of the plant. We're still use utilizing the old lift station for half
[22:41] the flow. Tomorrow we're going to reduce it a little further
[22:44] and uh Wednesday hopefully shut it off and start draining that side if we get
[22:50] a couple of days in a row of everything working as designed.
[22:55] The amount of alarms at the plant just so everybody knows is overwhelming.
[23:01] Um We didn't run the irrigation this this
[23:05] weekend, but we still had alarms for pumps faulting in the middle of night.
[23:09] We're trying to figure that out. Uh everybody's pointing fingers. The
[23:13] bottom line is that at about 11:00 every night we get a slew of alarms. I think
[23:17] it's a ComEd issue, but the voltage monitor isn't working yet at the plant
[23:21] to blame ComEd.
[23:24] Uh so we're working through that, um but there's been a lot of OT and call-outs
[23:29] because of this. Uh
[23:31] and guys really really tired. Um
[23:37] Tomorrow uh we get back teasers and we'll be setting up for the National
[23:40] Night Out. Um so the back teasers are the monthly IEPA required samples at 14
[23:47] locations throughout town to make sure our water is clean and and
[23:54] and again we pull the samples on a Tuesday so we can get the results by
[23:57] Thursday. We don't normally go any later than that
[24:01] because we don't want to have to issue a boil order if there was an issue on a
[24:05] weekend. That means everybody's coming in on OT,
[24:08] so normally you everybody does these on a Tuesday.
[24:13] Uh other than that, uh does anybody have any questions for me?
[24:17] » I have a question for you. When does the new wastewater treatment plant
[24:21] supervisor start? >> I don't have an answer yet.
[24:25] Um I need to check tomorrow. He took his uh
[24:29] drug test on Saturday. So tomorrow is the day that we should have the results
[24:33] for that and I have to talk to someone to access the portal to see what the
[24:38] results are. I don't have direct access to it, which is fine with me. I just
[24:42] need to get that done. Um
[24:45] Once he has that, I spoke with him and he will give me a
[24:49] date. He didn't want to accept a position and have something come back
[24:53] for some reason that we couldn't hire him. Background check already came back
[24:57] and it's clean, so uh I'm guessing about 2 weeks.
[25:01] » Okay. That'll give him how much time with Phil?
[25:04] » 2 weeks. >> Okay, that's good. All right. Thanks,
[25:07] Pat. Okay. Uh
[25:09] » The West Nile cases have have they been just been popping up recently or
[25:13] » They did They're not human cases. It's mosquitoes infected with West Nile. Yes,
[25:18] it's been popping up in the last couple of weeks
[25:20] » Okay. >> throughout the county and throughout
[25:22] Illinois. >> And without there really being a way to
[25:25] it being environmental and not being able to actually see what's out there.
[25:27] » So, we have two traps. The environmental trap, the one that we have problems with
[25:31] catching them, works differently than the West Nile. It's a different species
[25:35] of mosquito. The West Nile trap, they don't have a
[25:39] problem catching mosquitoes. They're not using light. Uh
[25:43] but uh they're
[25:45] the West Nile trap, the county picks the mosquitoes up and then checks them. They
[25:49] do something and then they can tell if it's carrying the West Nile virus. So,
[25:53] if they get a hit from that, they report to us. They just haven't got a hit in
[25:57] Pingree Grove yet. >> [clears throat]
[25:59] » I I guess what I'm getting at is this something that
[26:02] we should be proactive and not reactive? Like just put it on like a standard
[26:07] spray while this is spreading throughout the county
[26:10] and limit the mosquitoes or is this something we wait till the West Nile is
[26:13] there, we report a West Nile case in a mosquito?
[26:17] » Yeah. >> Everybody in the town freaks out and
[26:19] then or I guess I'm asking everybody. I I
[26:23] don't know. Like is this something that we should think about like every Friday
[26:26] night until it cools off, just spray or whatever day, you know, and weather
[26:31] permitting, obviously, but
[26:36] » What are What is everyone's thought on that?
[26:41] » I don't understand the question. >> The question is so it takes a West Nile
[26:45] case to generate an automatic spray. In one
[26:48] instance, mosquito, right? One instance of that.
[26:51] So, and with our trap, it's hard to say what we actually have out there. I guess
[26:55] what I'm asking >> say there's two different traps. One's
[26:58] maintained by the county. They don't have an issue collecting mosquitoes like
[27:01] the female biters that are the other trap.
[27:04] Um but yes, typically we wait till they
[27:08] find a positive case and then we spray. >> Right.
[27:11] » If there's a positive case reported. >> And I guess what I'm saying is with it
[27:14] being all around the area, it sounds like it might be a matter of when not
[27:18] if. Is it something to keep the stuff down while it's going around or do we
[27:22] just wait and see what happens? Is that what I'm getting at?
[27:26] Cuz you know it's going to pop and like you said, you go from a high number, we
[27:29] spray, it goes down to one. And then it could be rain, could be wind why we're
[27:32] not getting any in our trap. I get they don't have a Do they even give you a
[27:36] count in the county's trap or they just wait for positive case?
[27:39] » They don't give me a count of mosquitoes that they catch. They don't even report
[27:42] to me unless they have a positive case. >> Right. So, they might be getting a
[27:44] thousand mosquitoes where we're getting none.
[27:46] » Yeah. I think that there's a lot less It's a
[27:49] Culex pipiens that is the West Nile carrier if I'm not mistaken and there's
[27:54] a lot less of those in the area. Um and it's those usually pop up
[27:59] when everybody says, "Oh, the mosquitoes aren't bad." You know, it's not raining
[28:03] and that's when they get you. The the ones in the affected the female biters
[28:07] are the ones that you can't walk out your door without them carrying you to
[28:11] your car. >> Okay.
[28:12] » Um so but I can
[28:15] » Are you going to be doing any granular granular treatment before the movie?
[28:21] » Uh no.
[28:25] We're not doing a granular treatment. We don't treat
[28:27] » think the parks going to be to try and help
[28:30] prevent mosquitoes in the area since I think you can walk around and watch the
[28:36] » Um
[28:39] we don't even spray that area of the village because of the proximity to
[28:43] water typically. Uh Uh, I do have a product that we can
[28:46] spray the the turf. It's a plant-based product that supposedly repels them
[28:52] uh and and the trees. It just depends on the weather.
[28:57] Uh um and
[28:59] lately the grass in the morning is so full of dew it takes till about noon for
[29:03] everything to dry up. Uh it only takes about 15 minutes for it to dry, but
[29:08] it'll take us to apply in that little triangle probably a couple hours to
[29:12] spray the area down uh with a backpack sprayer. We could do
[29:16] that. We haven't contemplated that. Uh
[29:19] we did not >> done several movies over every year the
[29:23] last probably 10 years. I'd say that that's something that's worthwhile. I
[29:28] don't want to be spending money on a movie, people going for the first 20
[29:31] minutes, getting eaten, and then leaving. So I I think that's something
[29:35] that would be worthwhile to to try.
[29:51] » Yeah. Can we spray this Thursday evening, Pat? I don't think there's any
[29:56] weather this week, is there? >> I'd have to look.
[29:59] » Uh Wednesday it looks like there could be.
[30:01] » Yeah, so if we sprayed Thursday, that would cuz that's what we do for 4th of
[30:05] July, correct? You spray that. >> We sprayed Thursday. It it just That's
[30:08] the way it worked. I actually we sprayed Friday, too. We just did not spray
[30:13] around the event till 2:00 in the morning. We finished up. Normally the
[30:17] route's different, but we finished up after everybody is long gone.
[30:22] » This would just be for the movie. >> did not spray the event this year, the
[30:25] grounds, because again, by the time we got there at 5:00 a.m. Saturday morning,
[30:32] there was already tarps everywhere. There wasn't a bit of grass left. I
[30:35] can't spray. Cuz now this product is all over
[30:38] everybody's tarps and you know, the area's cordoned off, but the movies we
[30:42] could probably spray it this week as long as there's not rain and it would
[30:46] just have to be mid-morning after the dew is evaporated off the grass.
[30:50] » Okay. Why don't we plan for that then this week?
[30:54] All right. Moving on then, Andy's going to take
[30:57] Nick's report. >> Yeah, just really quickly for the
[31:00] development services report, other than the Jewel and Trammell Crow
[31:04] efforts, the developer for Route 72 and Ranking
[31:08] Road, they have submitted their application to the village as well as
[31:12] their engineering submittals. So, that is being that is in the hopper
[31:17] for review from our consultants for that as well.
[31:21] As we work through that review and discuss with them further, then we will
[31:26] be looking to do similar thing as we are doing with the uh uh Jewel Trammell Crow
[31:31] process of having a development agreement or contract with the village
[31:34] and then at the same time, we'll have the necessary zoning and final plat
[31:41] of subdivision review before the planning and zoning
[31:44] commission. So, that is in the works as well.
[31:47] » Hey Andy, the what is the typical turnaround with our consultants on that?
[31:51] » So, for a full engineering review, probably about a month, I would say.
[32:00] The The biggest thing is the back and forth
[32:03] and if there's agreement or disagreement over and I mean anything from easements
[32:07] or where is this going to be located or that. Um so, I I I expect that
[32:13] especially because they're looking to do this in phases, it doesn't all have to
[32:16] be approved all at once before the board or planning and zoning commission. So,
[32:21] I think that they could start going through the planning and zoning
[32:24] commission process and um maybe a month or two
[32:29] from now.
[32:32] » What When does the tax sharing part When does that get approved in this? for the
[32:37] for Jewel? >> Yeah.
[32:38] » That'll that's part of that contract that'll come before the board.
[32:42] » Okay. Yeah.
[32:44] » Andy, the
[32:47] railroad station there, the parking they put in, I know at the beginning you were
[32:51] talking about 20 spots. I was there the other day I counted 40.
[32:57] » Yeah, it's I think it's like 30 30 six. Well,
[33:01] I remember, yeah. Yeah, so it's a lot. Yeah, yeah.
[33:05] » Yeah, good.
[33:07] » Okay. All right, moving on. Engineering?
[33:12] » Um yeah, so we submitted for the ranking damage roundabout, we submitted final
[33:16] plans last Monday. So, those are into I-dot for review. Um we're still slated
[33:21] for a November letting pending uh obviously what Andy and Amber talked
[33:24] about for the CPKC and ICC agreement. Um and then we're in various stages of land
[33:29] acquisition. So, we have um three of them secured and we're so
[33:33] we're in various stages with the other five. So,
[33:36] um that's kind of it for the roundabout. Um other than that, 72 path is still in
[33:41] it I-dot for the PDR. Um
[33:44] and then the streets project we're working through the punch list with
[33:46] Schroeder. Um as we get worked through that and
[33:49] then the skate park um we'll probably have an extension coming for uh next
[33:55] meeting. Uh they obviously with some of the weather they had earlier this year
[33:58] when they got started and some delays of equipment being shipped, um they're
[34:03] they're probably extension of time coming for the next meeting.
[34:09] » Thank you, Brock. All right, legal, do you have anything for us tonight?
[34:13] » just wanted to say thanks to Fair Graham including Brock, Andy, and Nick in
[34:16] connection with that special warranty deed from D.R. Horton from looking over
[34:20] the easements, making sure they're restricted to the perimeter of the
[34:23] property, to coaxing the special warranty deed from the sixth floor of
[34:28] the D.R. Horton headquarters in Schaumburg. It was a team effort and uh
[34:32] I thought it was well done. And then two, if there's any questions for me on
[34:36] anything else.
[34:39] » Okay. Laura. >> Oh, well, I'd just like to again
[34:43] reiterate that we have our uh first movie in the park and of course
[34:47] the location has changed from our fire station park cuz the grass is not quite
[34:51] ready. So, it's going to take place in the same
[34:54] um space as our stage was for the Independence Day celebration. So,
[34:59] that'll be right next to the Cambridge Lakes Community Center. It starts at
[35:02] 8:00 and the movie starts at dusk or it's from 8:00 to 10:00 and the movie
[35:06] starts at dusk. And then the following day, Saturday, we have our farmers
[35:10] market which will take place in the parking lot of the fire station park.
[35:14] And we have 14 vendors signed up, so we're really looking forward to that.
[35:18] And also, I'd like to let everyone know that we're rolling out the introduction
[35:21] of the business registration program to our business community with a request to
[35:26] have them register for the existing businesses register by September 18th.
[35:31] So, that'll be done by the end of this week on the first roll out. Thank you.
[35:35] » Thanks, Laura. All right. Um now we have a discussion
[35:39] on recommendation to remove flock camera identification signs. Chris, I'm going
[35:45] to let you take this one. >> All right. In the packet, I drafted a
[35:49] memo to you guys explaining the new development throughout the state
[35:55] of Illinois, especially in Chicagoland area, regarding the destruction of
[36:00] neighborhood flock cameras. Our cameras are fine at this time.
[36:05] Uh we haven't had anything, but it has been known that the signs are drawing
[36:10] attention to these and people are damaging them.
[36:13] These cameras have shown that they, especially here, that they are very
[36:17] powerful tools, especially when used the correct way, to solve crimes and be able
[36:21] to help law enforcement uh in plenty of investigations.
[36:27] Uh the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police also reaffirmed that these ALPR
[36:34] technology is also an investigative tool.
[36:39] Problem is now there are problems where people are noticing these cameras and
[36:44] they're destroying them on site. They're cutting cameras down. They're spray
[36:48] painting them. They're damaging the solar panels, disconnecting wiring.
[36:52] Uh they're striking them with other tools
[36:54] and they're dis- uh disabling the camera systems.
[36:58] These cameras are uh quite expensive and where if there's damage that's on the
[37:06] village in order to replace them. I'm trying to be proactive on this.
[37:11] Uh removal of the signs would not uh
[37:15] stop any of the functionality of the cameras.
[37:18] We're trying to make sure that we don't have any problems in the future with the
[37:22] ones that we have here. The uh
[37:28] » [sighs and gasps] >> All right, just to just so you know,
[37:32] I have attached all these other all points bulletins from these other
[37:35] agencies. We're not making this up. Flock came and said that they're aware
[37:39] of this and they will charge $500 a camera a year and then we wouldn't have
[37:44] to cover anything. I think that's ridiculous. So, I have asked in order to
[37:50] be proactive to remove the signs to avoid possible uh damage that's going to
[37:56] be coming in the near future. That's it.
[37:59] » Can you think of any other communities that have the I have not seen any other
[38:02] communities that have the 24-hour surveillance signs? Like I feel like
[38:06] we're the only ones that have >> There may be a community or two that
[38:08] have a sign at the beginning of the community saying that they're a Flock
[38:11] community, one sign. We have them in every single pole. And I know there's
[38:14] already at least one that's missing. So, um the cameras are all functional
[38:18] though. The The ones we had we had one taken
[38:21] down for the roundabout project at 20th and Ranking. We had it moved uh about
[38:25] five about 50 or 100 ft or so. Uh they did not charge us for that, but
[38:30] they will charge us if we have to remove anything else.
[38:33] I just don't think that that price that they quoted me was fair because it's not
[38:38] up it's not on us. But
[38:40] it's not that way. I don't want people to understand that we have law cameras.
[38:44] I It's not what it is.
[38:46] I drive I was just in Schaumburg yesterday.
[38:50] Uh I'm sorry, Saturday and they're
[38:53] everywhere and there's no I mean I'm I'm looking for them,
[38:56] but they're there. So and there's no signs showing that
[39:01] they have to be there. So I know it was a stipulation when we actually installed
[39:04] these. Um we put them up.
[39:07] And like I said, we haven't had a problem, but I don't want to see us
[39:11] having to be charged to replace cameras or have them damaged and brought on us
[39:17] just because uh we've been adding more success
[39:21] stories so you're aware on the village website.
[39:23] Uh now that we kind of got a grasp of how the transparency portal works and uh
[39:28] we've had plenty of opportunity to say that these are phenomenal cameras that
[39:32] are we're being are used the correct way and for the good reasons.
[39:39] » I take it we have no legal obligation to tell people about it.
[39:43] » No, we do not.
[39:49] » So these cameras, they had signs >> or no? No.
[39:52] » No. So it's
[39:56] is it safe fair to say that the signs aren't the reason they're doing it? It's
[39:59] probably they know where they're at because isn't it like public knowledge
[40:02] where these things are? There's I've seen them like it says they're here,
[40:05] here, and here. >> Mhm.
[40:06] » And then you just go around. >> There's actually a map on our village
[40:09] website that shows where they all are, too.
[40:10] » Right. That's what I'm saying. So like I don't really know that the camera is
[40:13] going to draw in if somebody's going to cut it down, it sounds like they're just
[40:16] going to cut it down. >> I'm trying not to draw attention to it
[40:19] is what I'm trying to do because these bright red signs they're saying 24-hour
[40:22] surveillance is showing where they are. >> I thought the whole point when we first
[40:26] put them up was that was supposed to be help be a deterrent.
[40:31] » Yes. That could have been uh but we're
[40:33] drawing attention to these and at that time there was no destruction of these
[40:36] cameras out there. Now that there are I'm trying to be proactive on this.
[40:40] Again, this is this is up for discussion.
[40:43] Uh if you guys want to leave them up, that's fine but if they do get damaged
[40:46] just know that the village is on the hook for any repairs. And we'll do what
[40:51] we can but as you can see these uh
[40:56] pictures what they're doing I'm just trying to make sure we don't
[41:00] have damaged equipment. These things are pretty expensive.
[41:05] » Can we discuss them? For me personally I kind of liked the attention to them
[41:11] not the damaging part but it sounds like these people are out looking to damage
[41:14] them regardless and they know where they are.
[41:17] I kind of want the criminal to see the sign. For me that means maybe they go to
[41:23] the next town or the town after. That was the reason that I asked to have
[41:28] them up to begin with. So my opinion really hasn't changed on that even
[41:31] though I appreciate where Chris is coming from. He's looking out for the
[41:34] well-being of the cameras themselves. Now if they said that they were going
[41:38] after one specifically with signs, I'd be more apt to say, "Okay, let's take
[41:41] the signs down." Now I know there's no way to really tell like is it really
[41:45] deterring criminals? Who knows? You don't know unless they commit the crime.
[41:49] So if it's deterred three or four, I for me it's leave them up.
[41:54] You know, see what happens. If you guys want to
[41:57] take them down, that's fine. It's not a big deal to me either way but that was
[42:01] the reason I wanted them up and I don't really know that that's changed for me
[42:04] personally. >> The current investigations the police
[42:07] department has had that says success stories for their use.
[42:11] Um these people are out there anyway. So,
[42:16] we're we're catching them. They're there. I don't think a sign is going to
[42:20] deter anyone or not. The car burglars that came in last week, they drove right
[42:24] past two of them. And I mean, it was a stolen motor vehicle out of Chicago, but
[42:29] that signs aren't going to deter them. What deters them is
[42:33] us being out there. And we were as soon as the cameras activated, we were out
[42:38] there and they were in and out of here within 7 minutes. We had to get to the
[42:40] other side of town, though. So, that's the reason we didn't get there in time.
[42:44] But, we already have leads on those. The signs aren't going to deter anybody.
[42:48] All they're going to do is draw attention.
[42:51] And I'm just trying to make sure that if someone does take a baseball bat to them
[42:54] or cut them down or spray paint them or anything,
[42:58] they're they're $3,000 cameras and we're on the hook for them. And that was part
[43:03] of the agreement. Now, they weren't getting damaged
[43:05] before, but now they're all over the place. Like I said, that's why I
[43:09] provided you guys the all-points from surrounding agencies.
[43:12] » Has RMA provided any guidance on what they would suggest?
[43:16] » No, they say it's up to us.
[43:22] And Flock has given a alternative. They will cover the damage for $500 a camera
[43:27] per year.
[43:34] » All right, what does everybody want to do? You want to roll the dice or you
[43:37] want to take down the signs? Let's go down the list. Drew, what do you think?
[43:43] » I'm with Luke. I think sign or not, the press on Flock is so bad right now
[43:49] » Yeah. >> that
[43:51] you could probably hide them in the ground and people will dig them up and
[43:54] break them >> [snorts]
[43:55] » at this point. >> Okay.
[43:57] » Um my only thing about it is if we're going to get charged for removing a sign
[44:03] and still have it damaged potentially and then pay?
[44:08] That I don't understand. [clears throat] Um
[44:12] I can understand where Chris is coming from with trying to not
[44:15] put a a bigger spotlight on it where it's at, but I don't know at this point
[44:20] with the record that Flock is is going with
[44:24] across the country, I don't think having a sign up or not is
[44:29] going to change if somebody wants to do it.
[44:32] » Okay. Adam, what do you think? >> Uh I think take them down because I
[44:35] believe I mean all these bulletins from all these agencies they they can't just
[44:40] be making that up. I mean they are the experts. They're the ones that are on
[44:43] this and that's their recommendation. I would tend to agree. And I like I
[44:48] said, I don't I don't see any other communities with those signs up. I just
[44:51] see all the ones in ours that are a little
[44:54] but I see both sides, you know, I understand it's could be a deterrent,
[44:57] but it really also is a you know, some guy's pissed off driving home and sees
[45:02] that and thinks, you know what? This is my time. Cuz he sees the sign.
[45:06] Um so, I'd say take them down. >> Okay. Luke, you want to keep them up?
[45:10] » Uh yeah. Um it
[45:15] So, I look at it like the red light cameras, right?
[45:19] I see the sign, I actually stop at the sign. I know they stop. Some people
[45:22] still blow through them, you know, and they're still going to commit the
[45:24] crimes. And actually to Adam's point for what he just said, actually if we're the
[45:29] only town with the signs and we're the only ones that haven't been getting
[45:31] damaged or haven't been damaged yet. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, you
[45:36] know. >> Okay. All right. Ed, where do you stand
[45:38] on this? >> I would take them down. Um I wasn't a
[45:42] fan for the sign at the beginning, so. >> Okay.
[45:45] All right. Kevin? >> Again, I see both sides. Uh
[45:49] I like our transparency portal. Uh people want to see we're not trying to
[45:53] hide every anything. Um
[45:56] I would be in favor of taking them down. >> Taking them down? Okay. Robert?
[46:02] » I'm with everybody else. I see both sides of this. I I tend to lean on the
[46:08] they're up, we're not having issues. Um I I don't think this sign being there is
[46:14] going changes anybody's mind if they're going
[46:17] to do something bad. For me, I'd say we leave them up.
[46:20] » Leave them up. Okay. All right. And I guess we leave them up.
[46:24] » Sounds good. Thank you. >> Okay. All right, thank you. All right,
[46:28] does anyone have any old or new business?
[46:32] Okay. If not, can I get a motion to move into executive session? Michael, I'm
[46:37] going to have you read it. >> Sure.
[46:40] Is there a motion to go into closed session
[46:42] pursuant to 5 ILCS 120/2C1 regarding the appointment, employment, compensation,
[46:47] discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the village?
[46:52] » So moved. Okay.
[46:57] » Call the roll. >> Trustee Hall.
[47:00] » Yes. >> Trustee Peters.
[47:01] » Yes. >> Yes.
[47:03] » Trustee Turner. >> Yes.
[47:04] » Trustee Haig. >> Yes.
[47:06] » Trustee McCartney, I'm sorry, McCreary, and Trustee Weingolds.
[47:08] » Yes. >> Thank you. Motion carried.
[47:11] Okay, we're going to be moving into