[0:34] Chères citoyennes et chers

[0:35] citoyens, Bienvenue à cette

[0:37] séance régulière du conseil

[0:38] municipal du 16 août 2022.

[0:47] Avant de débuter la séance du

[0:49] conseil municipal, permettez-moi

[0:51] de rendre hommage au directeur

[0:54] général de la Ville, M. Weemaes,

[0:57] qui nous quitte à la fin du mois

[0:58] d'août pour relever de nouveaux

[1:00] défis à titre de directeur

[1:02] général de l'Association des

[1:06] municipalités de banlieue de

[1:09] l'Île de Montréal. M. Weemaes

[1:10] cumule 48 ans d'expérience dans

[1:12] le domaine municipal, dont près

[1:14] de 45 ans à titre de directeur

[1:18] général, dans dix municipalités

[1:22] québécoises. Après avoir

[1:26] commencé sa carrière à Gagnon,

[1:29] Chapais et Chibougamau dans le

[1:30] nord de la province, son talent

[1:32] a été rapidement perçu et

[1:36] l'impact de sa gestion de plus

[1:37] en plus reconnu à Beloeil,

[1:39] Saint-Lambert, Granby,

[1:41] Repentigny, Gatineau et

[1:42] Pointe-Claire.

[1:47] Il a oeuvré et collaboré auprès

[1:49] de 16 maires, plus de 170 élus

[1:51] et 12000 employés.

[1:57] M. Weemaes, si on fait un calcul

[2:00] rapide, vous avez participé à

[2:02] plus de 1 000 séances publiques

[2:03] dans votre carrière.

[2:11] Vous êtes un gestionnaire

[2:13] d'exception. Vous savez

[2:15] reconnaître le mérite de chacune

[2:17] et chacun, l'innovation et

[2:20] l'excellence de vos équipes. Je

[2:22] tiens à souligner votre travail

[2:24] et votre engagement au sein de

[2:25] la Ville de Pointe-Claire. Vous

[2:27] êtes un gestionnaire

[2:32] d'expérience compétent, intègre

[2:33] et professionnel. Grâce à vous,

[2:35] de nombreux projets ont été

[2:36] réalisés à la Ville de

[2:38] Pointe-Claire, au bénéfice de

[2:39] toute notre communauté.

[2:43] D'ailleurs, en 2017, vous avez

[2:45] reçu à ce titre le prix

[2:48] Distinction de l'Association des

[2:50] directeurs généraux des

[2:53] municipalités du Québec en tant

[2:54] que directeur général de l'année

[2:58] parmi toutes les

[3:06] villes de la province. C'est

[3:07] tout un honneur. Le conseil

[3:08] municipal se joint à moi pour

[3:09] vous souhaiter bon succès dans

[3:11] vos nouvelles fonctions à titre

[3:13] de directeur général de

[3:14] l'Association des municipalités

[3:15] de banlieue de l'île de

[3:17] Montréal. Nous avons eu de la

[3:18] chance de vous compter parmi

[3:20] nous ces huit dernières années.

[3:23] Vous êtes une sommité dans le

[3:26] domaine municipal et vous

[3:29] laissez derrière vous de grands

[3:30] souliers à chausser! Bravo pour

[3:31] votre parcours remarquable au

[3:33] service des citoyennes et

[3:35] citoyens. M. Weemaes, nous vous

[3:39] souhaitons une bonne dernière

[3:41] séance régulière du conseil

[3:43] municipal de Pointe-Claire!

[3:49] (applaudissements)

[6:30] J'aimerais également souligner

[6:31] le travail du Service de la

[6:32] culture, des sports, des loisirs

[6:33] et du développement

[6:36] communautaire pour les

[6:37] merveilleuses Journées de

[6:38] Pointe-Claire et l'équipe des

[6:40] communications pour leur soutien

[6:41] dans la promotion des activités.

[6:45] Je pense que les événements se

[6:49] sont très bien déroulés - la

[6:50] Foire de Valois était super et

[6:52] très fréquentée, le Festival de

[6:56] cuisine internationale était

[6:58] incroyable, la conférence et

[7:00] l'activité de bricolage à la

[7:02] bibliothèque étaient appréciées

[7:03] et la journée sur l'eau à la

[7:04] baie de Valois a également été

[7:08] populaire pour les résidents de

[7:15] Pointe-Claire. Cependant, je

[7:17] suis un peu déçu par la

[7:18] fréquentation du Centre sportif

[7:22] Olive-Urquhart pour les portes

[7:24] ouvertes lorsque je suis passé

[7:25] dimanche en début d'après-midi.

[7:26] Ce sont d'excellentes

[7:28] installations et j'espère

[7:29] qu'avec le retour à l'école, le

[7:32] centre sera plus fréquenté.

[7:36] C'était une excellente première

[7:37] fois! Félicitations à tous!

[8:29] -

[8:30] Test de locution

[8:42] madame Thibault, on peut

[8:43] commencer?

[8:52] Avec le changement suivant, avec

[8:54] l'addition

[8:55] (---)

[8:56] .

[9:10] Avis de motion,

[9:11] (inaudible)

[9:12] (---)

[9:13] . Avec la révision du plan

[9:17] d'urbanisme, 60,0 un.

[9:36] 02.01. Proclamer la semaine du

[9:37] 19 au 25 septembre 2022 comme

[9:38] étant la Semaine de la sécurité

[9:40] ferroviaire.

[9:45] - En adoptant Saad résolutions,

[9:47] le conseil municipal appuie

[9:48] l'opération

[9:49] (inaudible)

[9:50] (---)

[9:51] . Le programme de

[9:53] sensibilisation aux intrusions

[9:54] sur le chemin de fer, pas.

[10:13] - Ces requêtes, 0 un, adopté le

[10:17] procès-verbal de la séance

[10:19] ordinaire du 5 juillet 2022.

[10:50] - Période de questions. Pour la

[10:52] période de questions, nous avons

[10:55] 90 minutes pour la période de

[10:56] questions comme cela a été fait

[10:58] dans le passé. Nous commenceront

[11:01] la question des résidents de

[11:04] Pointe-Claire. Et nous

[11:07] aborderons les questions des

[11:09] promoteurs et lorsque je serai

[11:11] prêt à le faire

[11:12] (---)

[11:13] .

[16:48] >> No, sir. I'm not smearing or

[16:51] implying, I'm asking for

[16:52] clarification. I'm asking if

[16:54] this man into this man and the

[16:56] rest of Council going to backup

[16:58] what he said?

[16:59] >> I've given you clarity.

[17:01] >> So nobody else is going to

[17:04] back up the words that they've

[17:06] said?

[17:07] >> I've given you enough

[17:08] clarity.

[17:09] >> I think we should call an

[17:11] investigation.

[17:12] [laughs]

[17:13] please. Yes, sir?

[17:18] >> Mr. Stork would like to

[17:20] respond.

[17:21] >> I would like to hear your

[17:22] question. You are not organizing

[17:24] these chambers and have no say.

[17:25] What can I do for you? Do you

[17:27] have a question? I've given you

[17:29] permission to ask the question.

[17:30] >> Thank you. So I will start,

[17:34] I've got a few little questions,

[17:36] but my preamble. It's very

[17:38] disturbing to read these things

[17:40] online and I'm going to add the

[17:42] Pointe-Claire journal, for most

[17:43] of us in my generation, it's

[17:45] probably younger generations,

[17:46] see it as almost a propaganda

[17:50] rag. My seven neighbours. I only

[17:53] have seven neighbours on my

[17:54] street. My seven neighbours give

[17:56] me their Pointe-Claire journals

[17:58] unopened and unread to put into

[18:00] my recycling bag to go to my

[18:02] parents so they can bring them.

[18:04] It's our fire starter. That is

[18:05] what most people use the

[18:08] Pointe-Claire journal for.

[18:10] Insinuating that the

[18:11] Pointe-Claire journal is the

[18:12] most red paper and

[18:14] Pointe-Claire.

[18:15] >> It is.

[18:16] >> I would love to see your

[18:17] statistics on that and see. Most

[18:20] delivered? Yes, it goes into all

[18:22] our mailboxes and we really wish

[18:23] it didn't. We wish it stayed

[18:26] where it came from and did not

[18:28] use the new trees or recycled

[18:31] paper to make it. I don't read

[18:34] it. None of my neighbours read

[18:35] it. We don't think it's anything

[18:37] worth reading. To say the

[18:39] Mayor's message goes on the

[18:41] Pointe-Claire website, the

[18:44] Pointe-Claire newsletter, that

[18:45] can be emailed to all residents

[18:46] who sign up for it. That is

[18:47] where it should be, not in some

[18:52] propaganda rag that is extremely

[18:55] one-sided and not balanced. I

[18:58] would like to say, I'm very

[19:02] happy to see all these people

[19:03] here. It's a pretty good crowd.

[19:04] >> They are all waiting for a

[19:06] question. Other than an

[19:09] editorial, we would like to hear

[19:11] a question. Please get your

[19:17] question.

[19:18] >> I will cite some of the

[19:19] people that spoke at the July

[19:21] meeting that I was unfortunately

[19:22] unable to attend because I

[19:24] contracted COVID. So the average

[19:27] speaker with six minutes, that

[19:29] was the average, some had three,

[19:31] some had ten. I think you owe me

[19:34] a little bit of time. I just

[19:37] want to, I will be short. My

[19:40] questions are brief, so just

[19:41] give me a little more leeway

[19:42] here. I'm just saying I know

[19:46] everyone is here to -- hear

[19:51] appeals of demolition and

[19:53] development, bylaw changes that

[19:55] are proposed in the minutes.

[19:56] It's just mind-boggling that

[19:58] these same people live in a

[20:01] building that my in laws had to

[20:02] put up with the construction,

[20:04] because it was around the corner

[20:06] from their house. So again, we

[20:09] are in this situation of the

[20:10] city and not in my backyard, but

[20:12] then in my backyard I would love

[20:13] to have development in my

[20:16] backyard like the City of

[20:17] Toronto just passed a bylaw to

[20:19] allow carriage houses and

[20:20] secondary houses in their

[20:21] backyard. That's a really good

[20:24] way of getting densification on

[20:28] our large private lots. I could

[20:31] build another place behind my

[20:32] place and rented out at a low

[20:34] rate and get densification,

[20:35] low-cost housing, and

[20:36] everything. So my questions

[20:41] asked --. In the June meeting,

[20:46] the evaluation criteria to be

[20:47] used within the framework of the

[20:49] call for tenders for

[20:51] professional services and the

[20:52] participatory process of the

[20:53] provisions of planning and

[20:55] program and planning bylaws was

[20:57] approved. I'm gathering this was

[20:59] for the tender for the ICB, or

[21:03] the planning process, the public

[21:06] addressing process. When is the

[21:09] tender going to be awarded? When

[21:10] will we find out more about this

[21:13] public process that you have

[21:14] been promising us for eight

[21:15] months now.

[21:17] >> It's actually less than that

[21:19] because we did not get there

[21:20] until a few months ago. So it's

[21:21] not eight months.

[21:22] >> You have been promising it

[21:23] for eight months.

[21:24] >> We have not decided who and

[21:25] where the RGI applied before we

[21:27] could even go to tender. So you

[21:28] are incorrect in your statement,

[21:31] but I will actually ask Mr.

[21:34] Weemaes if he has a timeline. Do

[21:36] you have any timeline on the

[21:39] consultation?

[21:40] >> It takes six months for

[21:42] professional services. It will

[21:43] come up in the coming weeks or

[21:45] coming months, but I don't have.

[21:47] >> Thank you, Mr. Fujita.

[21:49] >> My second question. This

[21:55] spring, sorry timelines I've

[21:56] been very busy, if there was a

[21:58] call of the four applications

[21:59] from residents for the

[22:00] environmental and sustainable

[22:03] development advisory committee.

[22:04] What happened with that? Where

[22:05] has it gone? I applied and never

[22:07] heard anything from anybody

[22:09] about that application, not even

[22:11] a thank you or anything. But it

[22:13] would be really nice to know

[22:14] about these things. And you talk

[22:19] about the City communication?

[22:20] There is one of them.

[22:21] >> Go ahead, Kelly.

[22:22] >> I'm sorry if you did not hear

[22:24] back. There was a delay in the

[22:25] process, what I thought everyone

[22:27] did hear back and the interviews

[22:29] would be within the next four

[22:30] weeks. We had to reschedule them

[22:31] for various reasons. The

[22:33] interviews will be coming within

[22:35] the last week of August, first

[22:36] week of September, but

[22:38] Councillor Tremblay and I will

[22:40] follow up to make sure anyone

[22:41] who did apply, and is not going

[22:43] to be interviewed, will receive

[22:46] the feedback either way.

[22:49] >> Thank you. Appreciate that.

[23:00] >> How you doing? Could they all

[23:04] attendance of this meeting and

[23:07] Council. Subject of the question

[23:10] I will be asking today.

[23:12] >> Sorry, sir. What is your name

[23:14] please?

[23:15] >> My name is Raymond -- I live

[23:17] on 15 Compton Crescent in

[23:18] Pointe-Claire. The subject of

[23:23] this appearance is water

[23:25] fluoridation. There is an

[23:27] ongoing petition that so far has

[23:29] 30 -- 3170 residents of

[23:36] Pointe-Claire having signed a

[23:37] petition. In terms of the

[23:39] numbers, just put on my timer so

[23:42] I make it under ten minutes.

[23:46] >> Ten is generous, but okay.

[23:49] >> As for the numbers I

[23:54] surveyed, I have been keeping

[23:55] stats and accurate stats of the

[24:00] last 660 households who had the

[24:02] choice of saying yes to the

[24:03] petition. In terms of yes,

[24:07] ending the policy of water

[24:09] fluoridation by Montréal

[24:10] Pointe-Claire. And of those 660

[24:12] households, I spoken to you

[24:14] before and you told me in order

[24:16] to have the resolution passed I

[24:18] would have to show that the

[24:20] majority of residents are

[24:24] against the policy. So of the

[24:29] last 660 households, 50 to minus

[24:38] 19, I can't do that real quick,

[24:40] it's 30 something households,

[24:43] each section taking about three

[24:44] hours or ten hours to do. After

[24:47] 660 households, 495 said yeah,

[24:51] meaning 75% of households

[24:53] signed. This is the last 660.

[25:05] Île where is the topical

[25:13] application Île, raise over 10%

[25:15] of Pointe-Claire's voting

[25:17] population signed a petition,

[25:20] over 75% of respondents the last

[25:24] consecutive neighbourhoods,

[25:25] consecutive household, have said

[25:27] yes. On November 21st, 2020, my

[25:36] city councillor, Mister Cowan,

[25:37] came out with me for three and a

[25:39] half hours at noticed the same

[25:40] stats. 80% of household people

[25:42] who answered their doors said

[25:45] yes and a petition. I could keep

[25:47] going for the next two years and

[25:48] it will say the exact same

[25:50] thing. Whether it's 3170, or

[25:56] 70,000. -- 7000. Whereas topical

[26:05] application of medical grade

[26:07] fluoride provides the majority

[26:09] of protected benefit against

[26:10] cavities, where is the purpose

[26:11] of the public water supply is to

[26:13] supply water to the entire

[26:14] community which is composed of

[26:16] people with varying health

[26:18] conditions and various stages of

[26:19] life and in various economic

[26:21] status, and not to forcibly

[26:22] medicate the population. Whereas

[26:25] Pointe-Claire's residents never

[26:26] gave their consent to be masked

[26:28] medicated. Systemic application

[26:30] removes medical consent and

[26:31] freedom of choice, when fluoride

[26:34] is -- supplied the drinking

[26:36] water. There's no control with

[26:38] the amount of fluoride that is

[26:39] consumed, which can lead to

[26:41] excessive consumption. Where is

[26:43] less than 1% of the water used

[26:44] for drinking, while 99% of water

[26:51] is intended for other uses,

[26:53] industry along care, plushy,

[26:54] toilet centre. Making the policy

[26:56] of wasted taxpayer money, much

[26:59] of that fluoridated water can

[27:00] escape into the environment

[27:01] where it has considerable

[27:05] effects and wears the substance

[27:10] -- so this is the spec sheet

[27:15] from the City of Montréal, is

[27:16] against the policy themselves.

[27:18] It clearly says here, industrial

[27:20] use only. As a gift to the

[27:22] aquatic environment. Toxic if

[27:24] swallowed. It is nothing about

[27:26] dental decay or cavities. The

[27:29] same substance is on the market

[27:32] for ceramics and glass. Only

[27:33] four plants in the entire of

[27:36] Québec still flora date. It's

[27:39] illegal to Florida and the

[27:40] Netherlands, fanned in Israel

[27:42] 2019. Only two countries for a

[27:44] date in Europe, and

[27:46] Pointe-Claire as a policy in

[27:48] place saying they will end it

[27:51] anyways. So the majority of

[27:56] households for the last 600

[28:01] households,, if 76% of them are

[28:06] saying no, I see no reason why

[28:08] we can't pass the resolution.

[28:12] Where is the substance sodium

[28:16] silicoflouride is not

[28:17] pharmaceutical grade like a

[28:24] dental clinic, that substance

[28:25] would be even illegal for

[28:27] dentists to use in their dental

[28:28] clinic. The substance actually

[28:33] comes from Jacksonville,

[28:35] Florida. Montréal themselves are

[28:37] against the process. Montréal

[28:39] city is historically never

[28:40] fluoridated their water. Rather

[28:53] in industrial grade type, one

[28:55] that is most likely

[28:56] contaminated, so that substance

[28:58] is not approved or regulated by

[29:01] Health Canada to treat dental

[29:02] decay.

[29:05] >> Fluoride can cause harmful --

[29:08] harm to the brain and body in

[29:10] particular, during early

[29:13] development, therefore be it

[29:14] resolved to the City Council of

[29:16] the city of Pointe-Claire uphold

[29:19] the request of its residents to

[29:21] consider the important facts

[29:22] surrounding the practice of

[29:24] water fluoridation and vote

[29:25] against it. There is no way of

[29:27] dozing fluoridated tap water at

[29:29] home. No way to find out who is

[29:31] drinking it. Pregnant women,

[29:32] infants, people on dialysis,

[29:34] people with weakened these are

[29:35] all warned not to drink it. As I

[29:37] mentioned, 99% of the

[29:39] temperature goes down the drain,

[29:40] where a lot of it meets

[29:42] engagements with the --

[29:46] [inaudible]

[29:47] a lot of water, you know 15% of

[29:49] water, is wasted with leaks so

[29:52] only 0.2% of water is drank,

[29:54] more is weighted by Lee.

[44:39] I know, I felt the pain. They

[44:41] did it eventually, and that was

[44:42] not a good exercise, because

[44:45] Cartier, the contractor, went

[44:46] back wrapped. It was much longer

[44:48] than it should have been. Even

[44:49] then, it wasn't that long. They

[44:50] did it fairly well. And our

[44:53] engineers and everybody is on it

[44:55] right now. They are very much

[44:57] concerned about the timeframe.

[44:58] Everybody, Council, everyone is

[45:00] on this. They know that this is

[45:02] not something that is going to

[45:04] be allowed to go wrong or wait.

[45:06] Everyone is on it and we know

[45:09] the precariousness of what is

[45:10] going on, and we want to

[45:11] minimize all kinds of pain for

[45:12] sure.

[45:13] >> Okay. I appreciate it.

[45:15] Thanks, guys, for listening to

[45:16] me. Have a good evening.

[45:17] >> Okay.

[45:21] >> Susan Weaver, Pointe-Claire.

[45:24] First I will talk about the

[45:27] Pointe-Claire journal. From

[45:30] December 2021 until February

[45:32] 2022. Mr. Thomas, you take

[45:35] advantage of funds allotted to

[45:37] your office to take a -- out

[45:39] full page ads in the journal. As

[45:40] I have said before, it was

[45:42] unnecessary because

[45:43] Pointe-Claire reaches out to the

[45:44] citizens in print and online.

[45:47] Total cost of addeds, for the

[45:49] 7:14 -- 40 7:14. At the caucus

[45:54] meetings, the notes I played

[45:55] says --

[45:57] >> You obtained notes from a

[45:59] caucus meeting?

[46:01] >> Excuse me!

[46:02] >> Excuse me, Miss Weaver. It's

[46:04] my call on this. You obtained

[46:06] notes from a caucus meeting?

[46:08] Whose notes?

[46:10] >> Access to information. Thank

[46:12] you very much! Access to

[46:14] information!

[46:15] >> It is not your position to

[46:16] yell at me. It is not your

[46:18] position to yell -- decide how

[46:20] we will discourse right here.

[46:23] This is a chamber where there is

[46:25] decorum and we have mutually

[46:29] respectful interchange. You do

[46:32] not always adhere to those rules

[46:33] and I would encourage you to do

[46:34] so.

[46:36] >> Okay. I have two questions.

[46:38] >> Okay.

[46:39] >> I have to bring gambles and

[46:41] two questions, so will you let

[46:43] me finish and then you can speak

[46:45] afterwards? The

[46:46] >> Depending how long the

[46:47] preamble.

[46:48] >> The quiet!

[46:49] >> Miss Weaver, Miss Weaver,

[46:50] Miss Weaver.

[46:53] >> Excuse me, excuse me.

[46:54] >> You are not allowed to tell

[46:55] me to be quiet or dictate the

[46:57] rules in this chamber. That is

[46:58] not your right.

[46:59] >> What's right do I have?

[47:01] >> Do you want to be -- do you

[47:04] want your right to ask the

[47:06] question removed or behave with

[47:09] decorum?

[47:10] >> What are my rights as a

[47:12] citizen?

[47:13] >> I would like you to behave

[47:15] with decorum.

[47:16] >> Can I continue, if it's with

[47:17] quorum.

[47:18] >> Okay, I will ask afterwards,

[47:20] after the question. At the March

[47:22] 29th caucus meeting, I went to

[47:26] access the information and the

[47:27] notes I obtained says the mayor

[47:30] suggests spending $5,000 for

[47:32] publications to the journal. It

[47:38] was unanimously rejected by all

[47:39] councillors. To be noted, all

[47:41] eight councillors were present.

[47:45] I July's council meeting,

[47:47] Councillor Cowan read a

[47:48] statement that during a prior

[47:50] caucus meeting, you wanted to

[47:51] give contribute to the journal

[47:53] of $5,000. You had said yourself

[47:55] that it was morally

[47:57] reprehensible. You seem to be

[48:00] fixated on repaying the

[48:01] Pointe-Claire journal for

[48:02] heavily promoting you last year

[48:05] prior to the election. My guess

[48:06] is that you cannot pay it back

[48:08] yourself, because you would have

[48:10] to submit it at elections --

[48:12] expense. My question is, why

[48:15] attribute? If the Pointe-Claire

[48:16] journal more deserving than the

[48:17] West Island Gazette or the

[48:18] suburban?

[48:22] >> Is that the question?

[48:23] >> Yes.

[48:25] >> First of all, calls of tender

[48:30] dictate that you advertise with

[48:33] the most widely distributed

[48:34] newspaper. The most widely

[48:37] distributed newspaper at that

[48:38] timeframe was absolutely without

[48:40] a doubt the Pointe-Claire

[48:41] journal. It was the one that

[48:42] reached most households and most

[48:44] widely distributed. Can't so if

[48:47] we are to tender in and, it is

[48:49] specified, those are the rules,

[48:51] that we have to advertise in the

[48:52] most widely distributed. So the

[48:55] Pointe-Claire journal, if we go

[48:56] to calls for tender, was the

[48:57] most widely distributed

[48:59] newspaper in Pointe-Claire. It

[49:00] was the only selection for the

[49:04] advertising. The advertising,

[49:05] the mayor's message by the way,

[49:07] it's done by mayors and

[49:08] municipalities across the

[49:09] province. There's nothing wrong

[49:11] with it, and unfortunately for

[49:15] some odd reason, and it was

[49:16] going to be paid for, the normal

[49:19] -- it here to buy the no

[49:21] newspapers and what was budgeted

[49:22] for. It was nothing out of the

[49:23] norm. There was no payoff or

[49:25] anybody. It was my desire to

[49:27] communicate legitimately and

[49:29] with transparency to my citizens

[49:30] in the most widely distributed

[49:33] journal. Would you stop making

[49:35] rude faces? I'm not doing that

[49:36] to you, could you stop doing

[49:37] that? It's really not becoming.

[49:40] I would encourage you to just

[49:41] please, a little decorum. Now

[49:46] >> Can I ask a question?

[49:47] >> No, Miss Weaver I'm still

[49:49] talking. Thank you very much.

[49:53] Now, the access to information

[49:55] of caucus notes I find clearly

[49:59] suspect. And I have real doubts

[50:01] about that. And I have real

[50:04] doubts that access to

[50:06] information gave you notes from

[50:07] caucus, someone's notes from

[50:10] caucus. I don't even think that

[50:11] is legally possible. So I am

[50:13] highly suspect of your

[50:14] credibility right now.

[50:15] >> Oh really?

[50:17] >> Yes I am.

[50:18] >> Okay, well I have it all.

[50:19] >> You can show that to

[50:21] somebody, and that has to be

[50:22] verified. And I would like to

[50:23] see that. And I would like

[50:27] Madame Thibault to see that as

[50:28] well.

[50:29] >> Well I got it from

[50:30] Pointe-Claire.

[50:31] >> You're going to have to be

[50:32] forthcoming with those. Because

[50:33] we would really, really, really

[50:35] like to see them.

[50:39] >> Mayor Thomas, you can request

[50:41] for the notes from the caucus

[50:42] meeting.

[50:43] >> Okay.

[50:44] >> So you are calling me --

[50:47] >> I'm quite astonished you can

[50:49] access.

[50:50] >> You are calling me someone

[50:51] who's not telling the truth?

[50:53] >> No. I would like to see those

[50:54] notes.

[50:55] >> I think you have just accused

[50:56] me of something as a citizen.

[50:58] >> I would very much like to see

[51:00] those notes.

[51:01] >> Maybe you better read up on

[51:02] the law, the bylaws.

[51:03] >> I would love to see the note

[51:05] of those caucus meetings.

[51:06] >> I can't show them to you

[51:07] because you won't contact me.

[51:10] And you have blocked me from

[51:11] everything.

[51:12] >> This Weaver.

[51:13] >> Anyway, we only have a

[51:14] certain amount of time, I'm on

[51:15] to my second question.

[51:16] >> You aren't deciding to. If

[51:17] you are not deciding that. You

[51:22] are not deciding the rules in

[51:23] this chamber. Okay?

[51:24] >> No, I never do. I respect the

[51:26] chamber.

[51:27] >> Oh you often do. And you know

[51:28] what, Miss Weaver? If you are

[51:29] not deciding that tonight.

[51:30] >> Do I get a second question?

[51:32] >> You get a second question.

[51:33] >> Okay. And I do respect the

[51:36] chamber. The second one is

[51:39] lawsuits. In the minutes of the

[51:42] May 3rd council meeting, it is

[51:44] written, from the 2021 surplus,

[51:49] $500,000 was allotted to the

[51:51] reserve fully commit the. I've

[51:54] just heard that -- is now suing

[51:57] our city for $400,000 plus

[52:00] damages. This is one of how many

[52:04] lawsuits? The $500,000 will not

[52:06] go very far. Pointe-Claire

[52:09] citizens will eventually need to

[52:11] pay for the lawsuits, either by

[52:14] a loss of services and programs,

[52:16] or a substantial increase in

[52:17] taxes. If so, this is absolutely

[52:22] not fair to seniors like myself,

[52:25] who are on fixed incomes and

[52:27] would be forced to move out of

[52:28] their homes and away from

[52:29] Pointe-Claire. What is the total

[52:31] cost of lawsuits to date, and

[52:34] how will this affect the

[52:35] citizens of Pointe-Claire?

[52:37] >> Okay. Miss Weber, interim

[52:41] control measures are a tool,

[52:43] illegal tool, given by the

[52:45] province of Québec for

[52:48] municipalities to slow down

[52:49] development, legitimately and

[52:51] legally slow down development,

[52:53] in their areas because they are

[52:54] being developed quickly. The --

[52:58] has realized this is an issue

[52:59] across all municipalities and a

[53:01] real problem in the province of

[53:02] Québec. So they have developed

[53:05] interim control measures to

[53:07] protect cities from

[53:08] overdevelopment. They are a

[53:09] powerful legal tool, and most

[53:11] developers know that. They are a

[53:12] very powerful legal to. And when

[53:15] you enacted in RCI, it's a given

[53:17] the developers are going to sue

[53:19] in fact. It happens in all of

[53:20] them. What we have now is a

[53:26] powerful legislation that is

[53:27] given to us by the province to

[53:28] protect ourselves, and we are

[53:29] using it. We will then let the

[53:34] courts decide and that the

[53:37] outcomes resolve themselves. In

[53:42] the past these measures have

[53:43] been very effective. I'm hoping

[53:44] that will be in Pointe-Claire.

[53:46] It is a bit of a risk but not a

[53:48] huge one I'm hoping. And I'm

[53:50] hoping that seniors like

[53:52] yourself get to live in a city

[53:53] that will not be overwhelmed and

[53:56] not become too expensive and

[53:58] will allow you a quality of life

[54:00] with green space and with

[54:02] affordable housing that won't be

[54:03] the case if we do not implement

[54:05] this interim control measure. So

[54:07] thank you for your question,

[54:09] Miss Weaver.

[54:10] >> How many lawsuits to date?

[54:11] >> I just answered your

[54:13] question.

[54:14] >> You did not answer it. How

[54:15] did you answer it? I asked how

[54:18] many lawsuits to date.

[54:19] >> You've had your two

[54:20] questions. Thank, you Miss

[54:21] Weaver.

[54:22] >> You obviously do not know the

[54:23] answer. You don't know what

[54:26] you're doing.

[54:27] >> Don't hurl insults, it's not

[54:28] becoming. Yes ma'am?

[54:38] >> Mayor Thomas, councillors,

[54:39] how are you doing?

[54:40] >> Good and you?

[54:41] >> I hope everyone is doing

[54:42] well. Good, thank you. I'm in

[54:46] district seven. Just a quick

[54:49] comment. I do enjoy reading the

[54:52] Pointe-Claire paper. It is

[54:54] something I look forward to. In

[54:56] fact, I think a lot of seniors

[54:58] don't have access to computers

[55:02] or Wi-Fi or emails, or can have

[55:04] a look at the websites, so I

[55:06] think it's a good newspaper to

[55:10] keep receiving, and I keep

[55:11] reading it whenever I get it. My

[55:13] question today. What is for the

[55:20] best interest of Pointe-Claire

[55:21] residents? Could councillors not

[55:24] abide by their duty to all?

[55:27] Citizens that voted for them?

[55:30] And not the relish state

[55:31] developers -- the real estate

[55:34] developers. The reason I'm

[55:35] asking, our infrastructure is

[55:37] not adequate. Our streets are

[55:40] not adequate for extra traffic.

[55:42] From my conversations, most

[55:44] Pointe-Claire residents don't

[55:45] want extra construction.

[55:47] High-rise buildings. Condos.

[55:49] Apartments. And they specially

[55:51] don't want extra traffic around

[55:52] I were already busy streets.

[55:56] With -- wood new construction

[55:58] allow one car per unit? People

[56:00] are not coming here mainly for

[56:03] the REM or public transport. In

[56:04] fact, this is enticing people to

[56:05] come with their cars. All of

[56:09] that is against the Environment.

[56:13] I'm skipping to another subject.

[56:17] Mr. Brent Cowan of district

[56:18] eight. In the article in the

[56:22] suburban on July 27, showing a

[56:29] smile, it's the hip the humanly

[56:35] against Sotramont and Cadillac

[56:36] Fairview going ahead and

[56:37] building more units. I won't

[56:39] repeat some of the language. It

[56:48] sounds almost like incriminating

[56:49] our city. On the other hand, Mr.

[56:52] Cowan, in the newspaper the

[56:56] Pointe-Claire catalogue, it's

[57:02] quoted you want to help bring

[57:04] municipal government closer to

[57:05] the community and to encourage

[57:06] the community deeper involvement

[57:07] in their own municipal

[57:10] government. Just a reminder,

[57:15] that the shelling meeting for

[57:17] the consultation, along with

[57:20] Eric district seven, and Tara

[57:22] district for, the majority of

[57:23] the people attended there were

[57:25] against all these constant

[57:26] though -- condo construction. To

[57:29] my question to you is, if there

[57:31] would be a high-rise development

[57:35] building on your street next to

[57:36] it, how would you feel?

[57:41] >> On my street where I live,

[57:43] there have been one, two, three

[57:48] demolitions already and

[57:50] reconstructions. There is

[57:54] another three requests. One has

[57:57] been approved and another to

[57:58] requests. So there's a lot going

[57:59] on on my street as well. This is

[58:03] the nature of of life right now

[58:07] in Pointe-Claire. We mitigate

[58:09] these kinds of changes to the

[58:10] best of our ability. We can't

[58:12] stop time.

[58:14] >> High rise buildings with over

[58:15] 200 units each?

[58:18] >> The high-rise buildings are

[58:19] in my district. I voted to

[58:24] approve the high-rise on

[58:25] Belmont. I think it's within its

[58:29] rights. That building. And I

[58:32] think in the end it will be for

[58:33] the neighbourhood. I've also

[58:35] voted against the plus Frontenac

[58:37] development because it was a

[58:39] conditional use, and I thought

[58:40] that area should be reserved, as

[58:42] it is the zoning, for

[58:43] commercial. That's why I voted

[58:46] against that. 700 units that

[58:50] went there. So there is no

[58:52] blanket options to be against

[58:54] everything. Against everything

[58:56] that is new and coming. There is

[58:58] no blanket option to be against

[59:01] people who are different for

[59:02] moving in, they will, and we

[59:04] have to be welcoming to people.

[59:07] But local people around the

[59:10] Coptic Church, that want to put

[59:14] a community center there, not

[59:16] all of them because the

[59:17] referendum did not pass, but

[59:18] there was a vocal minority that

[59:22] opposed them. It's

[59:26] understandable. People are

[59:27] nervous about change. But

[59:29] changes coming, and we can't

[59:31] stop it.

[59:32] >> Thank you for that. I've got

[59:34] some statistic for you. My

[59:37] answer to development.

[1:04:10] Bonsoir tout le, monde je

[1:04:12] m'appelle Pierre L'Écuyer,

[1:04:13] résident de Pointe-Claire dans

[1:04:14] le district numéro 7 avec

[1:04:15] monsieur

[1:04:16] (---)

[1:04:17] . Comme mentionnait Monsieur le

[1:04:18] Maire, j'aimerais remercier

[1:04:21] monsieur Weemaes comme on l'a

[1:04:22] mentionné. Je sais que vous avez

[1:04:26] beaucoup de travail pour

[1:04:27] Pointe-Claire. Vous avez

[1:04:29] toujours bien répondu aux

[1:04:31] questions. Je vous souhaite

[1:04:32] bonne chance dans ce prochain

[1:04:33] chapitre de votre vie. Merci

[1:04:34] encore.

[1:09:20] Ma deuxième question, je vais la

[1:09:22] dire en français à plusieurs

[1:09:24] niveaux politiques. Les

[1:09:25] vérifications judiciaires, les

[1:09:26] conflits d'intérêts financiers

[1:09:28] qu'on appelle

[1:09:29] (intervention en anglais)

[1:09:30] sont faits sur les gens du

[1:09:32] domaine public avant de prendre

[1:09:33] le poste. On fait la même chose

[1:09:34] ici à Pointe-Claire pour

[1:09:37] certains entraîneurs sportifs au

[1:09:38] sujet du dossier criminel, par

[1:09:39] exemple. Est-ce que ce processus

[1:09:43] est une possibilité dans le

[1:09:44] futur pour le conseil municipal

[1:09:46] de Pointe-Claire? Merci.

[1:11:14] - Et pour la deuxième question.

[1:11:16] - Oui, oui.

[1:11:26] - À plusieurs niveaux

[1:11:29] politiques, des vérifications

[1:11:30] judiciaires ou des conflits

[1:11:32] d'intérêts financiers qu'on

[1:11:33] appelle vikings en anglais sont

[1:11:35] faites sur des gens dans le

[1:11:36] domaine public avant de prendre

[1:11:38] le poste. On fait la même chose

[1:11:40] ici à Pointe-Claire pour des

[1:11:42] entraîneurs sportifs, par

[1:11:43] exemple, si je veux devenir

[1:11:45] entraîneur pour un groupe de

[1:11:46] soccer, il fera une petite

[1:11:48] recherche sur moi pour voir si

[1:11:49] j'ai un dossier criminel, par

[1:11:50] exemple. Est-ce que c'est un

[1:11:52] processus qui serait possible

[1:11:53] dans le futur considéré pour le

[1:11:55] conseil municipal de

[1:11:56] Pointe-Claire?

[1:12:03] - Effectivement, une question

[1:12:05] administrative, ce sont

[1:12:06] d'ailleurs des conditions, aucun

[1:12:08] qu'on dit dans un candidat doit

[1:12:10] rencontrer pour le conseil

[1:12:12] municipal, ça relève des lois

[1:12:14] provinciales. Le conseil

[1:12:15] municipal n'a aucun pouvoir pour

[1:12:16] juger de quoi que ce soit, c'est

[1:12:17] la loi provinciale qui décide

[1:12:18] de. Ça

[1:12:19] - D'accord, je vous remercie,

[1:12:20] bonne soirée.

[1:14:47] One will never understand the

[1:14:48] damage you did someone until the

[1:14:50] same thing is done to you.

[1:14:54] Please keep in mind that at the

[1:14:58] very first house that you see on

[1:15:00] the back of May would when you

[1:15:02] are on Hymus. Keep that in mind.

[1:15:05] For the last four years, myself

[1:15:09] and my neighbours have had to

[1:15:12] endure multiple construction and

[1:15:14] development in this

[1:15:15] neighbourhood just to name a

[1:15:17] few. Hi miss --

[1:15:33] curbs on Maywood and the list

[1:15:37] goes on. The dust, the noise,

[1:15:39] the pollution, the serious

[1:15:40] influx of rodents that it has

[1:15:43] brought to us. The wildlife. The

[1:15:46] insects that destroy our crops.

[1:15:50] These are things we have to

[1:15:54] consider, not just building. You

[1:15:55] want to catch all the mice

[1:15:57] around my yard? Windows must be

[1:16:00] kept closed at all times. Air

[1:16:01] conditioning has to be on at all

[1:16:03] times. The dust is incredible.

[1:16:06] The allergies are incredible.

[1:16:07] Some people are really sick. Is

[1:16:11] the City reimbursing us for all

[1:16:13] the treatments we are getting?

[1:16:15] Absolutely not. Is anyone coming

[1:16:18] to wash windows and homes?

[1:16:20] Tables and furniture when we go

[1:16:21] outside we have to wash in order

[1:16:23] to sit down? For five years we

[1:16:26] have injured that. That is why I

[1:16:28] was upset. You have to think of

[1:16:32] what is being done. The city

[1:16:35] members, when I come to talk to

[1:16:36] them, some of the departments

[1:16:38] know me by first name for

[1:16:41] goodness sake. They are very

[1:16:42] kind. They offer whatever help

[1:16:44] they could give me. They assist

[1:16:47] us. Why can't the Council do

[1:16:51] that before construction? Why

[1:16:52] can't we be consulted? I have

[1:16:56] asked Mr. Weemaes why can't

[1:16:59] citizens be informed when a

[1:17:00] construction is going to be

[1:17:02] allowed a permit? He said,

[1:17:05] province laws, province bylaws.

[1:17:07] There is no obligation on our

[1:17:10] part. Would it not be nice?

[1:17:13] Would not be courteous? Would it

[1:17:15] not be what should be expected?

[1:17:18] That we will be imposed all of

[1:17:20] this construction and there's

[1:17:21] nothing we can say about it.

[1:17:23] It's like, shut up and put up.

[1:17:25] That's not fair. Again, I ask,

[1:17:31] can the councillors in each

[1:17:32] region, when something is being

[1:17:34] built, not approach the citizens

[1:17:36] and inform us? It's not going to

[1:17:39] take a long time. Can we change

[1:17:41] the plans? Probably not. But at

[1:17:44] least we would feel included in

[1:17:45] all of this and not just

[1:17:49] imposed. I have been a teacher

[1:17:51] for 45 years. I'm telling you,

[1:17:54] if I imposed everything on my

[1:17:56] students, you know what I get

[1:17:58] out of the? Nothing. If I

[1:18:01] include them in what I want from

[1:18:03] them, you know what I get? I get

[1:18:06] provincial champions. I get

[1:18:07] national champions. I get

[1:18:09] Olympic champions. That's what

[1:18:10] we all want. I want the council,

[1:18:13] I want to work with the mayor to

[1:18:15] work with us, and not make us

[1:18:17] feel like fools all the time.

[1:18:19] I'm tired of fighting. All I do

[1:18:21] is fight. To have tranquillity.

[1:18:25] For years I retired, all I do is

[1:18:27] spend my time writing for five

[1:18:29] pages of notes. So I can have a

[1:18:31] decent life. I have one

[1:18:39] neighbour we. We have yet wanted

[1:18:42] to give me 500 neighbours. Thank

[1:18:44] God the councillors that work

[1:18:46] for us and with us on the

[1:18:48] demolition committee were smart

[1:18:49] enough to realize that that

[1:18:51] should not happen. Would you

[1:18:54] like to be in that position?

[1:18:56] This is why. That's why I had a

[1:18:59] tone. I'm asking you again, can

[1:19:04] we all work together? Can we be

[1:19:06] informed before construction is

[1:19:09] done. Not the day we see trucks

[1:19:12] roll in, that we see bulldozers

[1:19:16] role in, before. Let's be smart

[1:19:19] about this.

[1:19:24] >> We can, the answer is, that

[1:19:27] we probably should, and we just

[1:19:30] might. It is a challenge. And

[1:19:33] you are quite right, I know

[1:19:35] where you live and it is

[1:19:39] certainly -- has certainly been

[1:19:41] under deluge for quite awhile. I

[1:19:42] feel for you. I have experienced

[1:19:45] someday loose, but not to the

[1:19:46] extent you have. It's an

[1:19:47] unfortunate part of the city for

[1:19:49] sure, but there may be other

[1:19:51] unfortunate parts of the city in

[1:19:52] the future unfortunately. And we

[1:19:54] do have to minimize the pain.

[1:19:57] And in my opinion, yes

[1:20:01] densification is a necessity,

[1:20:02] and we are pro creating and

[1:20:04] growing as a species, but we've

[1:20:06] got to find a way to do it that

[1:20:08] is not disrupting people as

[1:20:09] much. And I think we can

[1:20:10] overtime. I think it is a

[1:20:13] process. I've always thought

[1:20:14] that in Québec we were, a

[1:20:16] Montréal region, we've actually

[1:20:17] been spared a little. We have

[1:20:19] time to reflect and actually do

[1:20:21] it better. If you think about --

[1:20:25] of Toronto or Mississauga and

[1:20:26] other places, they were just

[1:20:29] completely overwhelmed whereas

[1:20:30] we can see what happened in

[1:20:32] Vancouver. We can see the

[1:20:33] monster house issue in

[1:20:34] Vancouver. We can see what has

[1:20:36] happened in other parts, heck,

[1:20:38] in Griffintown. We can see what

[1:20:39] we don't want. And I would

[1:20:42] encourage all of us, citizens

[1:20:44] and Council, to make sure we

[1:20:45] don't get what we don't want.

[1:20:46] And that we get what we do want.

[1:20:48] And we have some, hopefully in

[1:20:49] the future, we will have some

[1:20:50] say over that. That's the point

[1:20:53] of the exercise and hopefully we

[1:20:54] can pull it off. I can't promise

[1:20:56] this, but hopefully we can pull

[1:20:58] it off. Councillor Stork?

[1:21:06] >> Thanks for letting me talk,

[1:21:07] but I will refer to another

[1:21:08] point.

[1:21:09] >> That's hardly grateful. Holy

[1:21:11] smokes. Let's go, Councillor

[1:21:14] Stork.

[1:21:18] >> To speak to what you are

[1:21:20] saying, I think one thing that

[1:21:21] is really being overlooked here,

[1:21:24] I'm not trying to put Mr.

[1:21:26] Weemaes on the spot, but all

[1:21:27] residential developments to get

[1:21:28] notice. It's part of the

[1:21:31] demolition post, it's on the

[1:21:32] websites and such, but I think

[1:21:34] you are probably referring to

[1:21:35] the gas station how you were

[1:21:37] informed. For some reason, I

[1:21:39] don't know why the provincial

[1:21:40] arrangement, commercial projects

[1:21:43] do not fundamentally go under

[1:21:45] the same pathway. As residential

[1:21:50] projects.

[1:21:51] >> Okay.

[1:21:52] >> So maybe something can be

[1:21:53] done, like I did not know when

[1:21:55] that project was starting either

[1:21:56] until it started. So I think

[1:21:58] maybe there should be a broader

[1:21:59] scope to open up that element

[1:22:02] saying, for commercial projects,

[1:22:03] these are the start dates. Maybe

[1:22:05] they should be on our website.

[1:22:06] I'm not sure what can or can't

[1:22:07] be done legally in that respect,

[1:22:08] but I think something of that

[1:22:11] nature, I'm not trying to put

[1:22:12] you on the spot again, Mister

[1:22:15] Weemaes, but is there a

[1:22:16] reasoning why a lot of

[1:22:17] commercial industrial projects

[1:22:19] are not discussed in the same

[1:22:20] format? One last little thing,

[1:22:21] in reference to the dust you

[1:22:23] mentioned, that is part of the

[1:22:25] Municipal Works permit. So I

[1:22:26] would suggest an email in

[1:22:31] reference of that, to the Mayor

[1:22:32] or both of us, and ask that to

[1:22:33] be implemented as part of a --

[1:22:36] Works agreement because it can

[1:22:37] be included in terms of dust

[1:22:38] mitigation and ailments and

[1:22:40] such. That that can happen. Like

[1:22:42] when the especially thing

[1:22:43] happened at Walton, we changed

[1:22:45] the laws to address the

[1:22:46] especially stink. Now we have

[1:22:48] inspectors going prior. We do

[1:22:50] have to adopt. We cannot foresee

[1:22:52] everything, but something of

[1:22:53] that nature I agree with you,

[1:22:54] there should be testament again

[1:22:55] issues that is part of the

[1:22:57] Municipal Works agreement. Where

[1:22:58] the actual contractor, -- the

[1:23:00] developer, has to combine

[1:23:03] cleaner windows. We have to

[1:23:04] start that process. I will ask

[1:23:06] myself. Send myself an email,

[1:23:08] the mayor in email, and that

[1:23:09] should be integrated in our

[1:23:11] procedures.

[1:23:12] >> Because I have asked the

[1:23:16] developers if they would help

[1:23:17] and they say it's not their

[1:23:18] problem.

[1:23:20] >> We sort of expect that

[1:23:21] answer. I don't think they go

[1:23:23] out of their way to help us per

[1:23:24] se, but it's our responsibility

[1:23:26] to do what we need to do and

[1:23:28] that is what we mandated is part

[1:23:29] of the Municipal Works

[1:23:31] agreement, to be included. I

[1:23:33] think that's a great suggestion.

[1:23:36] To Mr. Weemaes Point, I don't

[1:23:37] know if there's an answer to

[1:23:38] that.

[1:23:40] >> The consulting process for

[1:23:42] bylaws the same for commercial

[1:23:43] and residential. The moment a

[1:23:45] city councillor wants the by law

[1:23:48] to implement rules or the way

[1:23:51] permits are allowed or something

[1:23:52] like that, the consulting

[1:23:55] process there. But once the

[1:23:56] bylaw is adopted and a packable,

[1:23:58] when someone comes in to request

[1:23:59] a permit, there is no consulting

[1:24:03] public there. The requiring has

[1:24:07] to comply with the disposition

[1:24:08] in the bylaw. He complies if he

[1:24:11] has his permit. The law is built

[1:24:13] like that. There is no process

[1:24:15] where the neighbours can be

[1:24:17] consulted and influence the

[1:24:19] process and see. That is the way

[1:24:23] the laws are set. Would it be

[1:24:25] could process? Probably, the

[1:24:27] laws are not like that at this

[1:24:28] moment. That is the problem.

[1:24:29] >> Mr. Weemaes, you're talking

[1:24:31] about provincial bylaws like you

[1:24:32] said to me in your letter.

[1:24:34] >> We are framed by provincial

[1:24:35] bylaws. We have no choice. The

[1:24:37] city is framed all around by

[1:24:39] provincial bylaws. The law says

[1:24:42] you can't do that. It's not --

[1:24:44] >> Laws can be changed.

[1:24:49] >> That's the provincial law.

[1:24:51] >> By citizens and who you vote

[1:24:55] for. The provincial level as

[1:24:56] well as municipal. It is

[1:25:00] decided, a lot of this stuff is

[1:25:01] decided at the provincial level.

[1:25:02] And it does not hurt to pay

[1:25:04] attention at that level as well

[1:25:07] regarding municipalities.

[1:25:09] Municipalities do, in many ways,

[1:25:10] have their hands tied. Not

[1:25:12] always, you are right, not

[1:25:13] always. That does not exempt us,

[1:25:16] but there are certain laws that

[1:25:18] are not unsavory, that --

[1:25:22] absolutely.

[1:25:23] >> Absolutely. If I might just

[1:25:25] ask something about the journal

[1:25:26] of Pointe-Claire. People call it

[1:25:28] a rag, call it everything. It's

[1:25:30] not a rag. It served me very

[1:25:33] well personally and my team when

[1:25:36] we fought against Brivia. David

[1:25:38] is not afraid of anyone. He's

[1:25:42] not bought by anyone. He says

[1:25:44] what we say, and he prints what

[1:25:47] we say. And if people are

[1:25:50] offended by it, so be it. For

[1:25:52] once, we have media that is not

[1:25:56] biased. At least it wasn't for

[1:26:01] me.

[1:26:03] >> There's a huge number of

[1:26:04] Pointe-Claire citizens that

[1:26:05] concur, and I would love to do a

[1:26:06] survey on that one. Because I

[1:26:08] have a sneaking suspicion, and

[1:26:12] myself included, and when I was

[1:26:14] in Pointe-Claire plaza, the

[1:26:15] wrecks of Pointe-Claire journals

[1:26:17] disappeared at a more rapid rate

[1:26:19] than any other newspaper I have

[1:26:20] seen in Pointe-Claire. So allow

[1:26:21] me to concur.

[1:26:22] >> I will conclude on saying

[1:26:24] that the land at the station is

[1:26:26] still two feet higher than

[1:26:29] ground level previously, and I

[1:26:31] was told it's because of the

[1:26:33] drainage which I can

[1:26:34] acknowledge. I'm a smart woman,

[1:26:35] I can understand all that, but

[1:26:37] it does not stop my problem.

[1:26:40] Now, the headlights will be

[1:26:41] right over my fence into my

[1:26:42] house. What can the City do to

[1:26:48] compensate me? I need a new

[1:26:49] fence. As the city ready to

[1:26:53] build me a new fence?

[1:26:55] >> That's a good question. We

[1:26:57] will certainly find out. We will

[1:26:59] endeavour and look at the

[1:27:00] situation and see if we can.

[1:27:01] >> Thank you.

[1:27:06] >> 15 minutes left, Mister

[1:27:08] Mayor.

[1:27:09] >> 15?. Okay. Are there more

[1:27:12] downstairs that want to come up?

[1:27:15] Are there any others? Are there

[1:27:16] any outside?

[1:27:24] >> Good evening. My name is

[1:27:26] Emily Schell horn, I'm here with

[1:27:27] my neighbour. We are both

[1:27:31] residents of Glenn Avenue. And

[1:27:37] in Miss Homan's District. We are

[1:27:40] here to ask the city of

[1:27:41] Pointe-Claire to please

[1:27:43] prioritize the urgent

[1:27:45] installation of a sidewalk on

[1:27:47] Belmont avenue between cool

[1:27:48] breeze and saddle brook. We are

[1:27:53] an active and diverse community,

[1:27:56] including elderly citizens and

[1:27:57] several very young children, and

[1:28:00] road safety must be urgently

[1:28:02] improved. This is the only part

[1:28:03] of Belmont, which is a 2.3

[1:28:06] kilometer street, without a

[1:28:07] sidewalk. It's an S curb

[1:28:10] stretch. It is narrow and has

[1:28:13] several blind spots and puts

[1:28:15] both pedestrians and drivers at

[1:28:17] risk. According to the Canadian

[1:28:22] council of motor transport

[1:28:24] administrators, the presence of

[1:28:26] a sidewalk reduces collate --

[1:28:28] risks of collision by 88%. We

[1:28:30] are asking that the installation

[1:28:31] of the sidewalk on this stretch

[1:28:34] be prioritized ahead of the

[1:28:36] regular scheduled repaving of

[1:28:39] Belmont. We met in June with

[1:28:42] Miss Homan and Mr. Tonga, the

[1:28:45] director of Public Security, as

[1:28:46] we were approximately 30

[1:28:48] residents of the Glenn land

[1:28:51] Belmont town house community.

[1:28:53] And we discussed various options

[1:28:58] and it was determined that

[1:28:59] temporary measures are neither

[1:29:01] sufficient nor safe, so we were

[1:29:05] informed a sidewalk has been

[1:29:06] approved by traffic. It is

[1:29:08] currently in engineering

[1:29:09] committee. But it's not foreseen

[1:29:12] for a minimum of 3 to 5 years.

[1:29:16] So we are asking for the

[1:29:18] prioritization of that. Myself

[1:29:20] on a personal level, I have two

[1:29:23] toddlers, so there's my

[1:29:24] neighbour. I use that stretch

[1:29:26] daily sometimes multiple times.

[1:29:28] It is the only exit from our

[1:29:30] street, because Glenn Lin is a

[1:29:32] cul-de-sac, so I have no choice

[1:29:35] but to use that stretch and I

[1:29:38] have multiple close -- close

[1:29:39] calls a week where a driver does

[1:29:41] not see us because I'm hugging

[1:29:43] the curve because we are already

[1:29:45] afraid. When a driver does not

[1:29:49] see us because of the blind

[1:29:50] spots, and in the winter it's

[1:29:51] even worse with the accumulation

[1:29:53] of snow. We have elderly

[1:29:54] neighbours that have told us

[1:29:55] they have been heckled at when

[1:29:56] they are walking to their

[1:29:58] mailbox uncle breeze, they have

[1:29:59] no choice but to go on that

[1:30:00] stretch, I called it by drivers

[1:30:01] to get off the road.

[1:33:48] Bonsoir.

[1:33:52] - J'espère que ça va être

[1:33:54] correct ce soir que je fasse ma

[1:33:56] présentation en anglais? Merci

[1:33:57] beaucoup.

[1:34:57] - Madame Thibault.

[1:44:14] Okay, let's go.

[1:44:17] >> Good evening. My name is --

[1:44:21] and I live in Maywood, district

[1:44:22] 7. I am here and I'm listening

[1:44:27] to everybody who's complaining,

[1:44:29] and so many negative complaints,

[1:44:31] and some positive complaints.

[1:44:35] Somewhat I wish really for

[1:44:37] everybody, just to be respectful

[1:44:40] and try to work with you as a

[1:44:43] new mayor, with a new vision,

[1:44:46] for the environment, for

[1:44:52] transparency, for the plan which

[1:44:54] you Rotrand are running on. My

[1:44:59] value really is when you see

[1:45:01] something wrong, or something

[1:45:03] dangerous, you have three

[1:45:04] options to do. Physically you

[1:45:11] can help to solve it. The second

[1:45:15] option is you can talk and try

[1:45:18] to help solve the problem. The

[1:45:20] third one, if you are not able

[1:45:21] to do those two, you pray for

[1:45:24] those people to do the right

[1:45:25] thing. So that's why I'm here

[1:45:32] for the future of young

[1:45:37] families, and the future what

[1:45:39] kids, your grandkids, and your

[1:45:42] kids what is coming. What you

[1:45:48] are doing, just try to build

[1:45:50] high-rise buildings and condo,

[1:45:53] that is not, you need green

[1:45:55] house, affordable single housing

[1:45:59] for the young family and future

[1:46:02] generation. Are you working in

[1:46:05] that, or just high rise building

[1:46:09] and condo? I want to ask all the

[1:46:14] City Councillors for that.

[1:46:16] >> Just to expedite, because we

[1:46:18] don't have time for everyone to

[1:46:19] go through, but we are in the

[1:46:22] middle of a very positive

[1:46:24] process where we are we

[1:46:27] evaluating how our urban plan

[1:46:28] going forward and we've had a

[1:46:30] couple of positive meetings and

[1:46:32] those are concerns that we are

[1:46:35] taking into consideration.

[1:46:48] >> That is what they write in

[1:46:50] the newspaper.

[1:46:51] >> What did I write, sir?

[1:46:55] >> Not you, I said you support

[1:46:58] each other for high rise

[1:47:00] building. And you are always

[1:47:02] working together.

[1:47:03] >> Councillor Stork, can we let

[1:47:04] him finish and then respond?

[1:47:06] >> Yeah, because the three of

[1:47:11] you, you and him, and Tara, you

[1:47:15] are in the chalet and the

[1:47:20] majority of people did not want

[1:47:23] any high rise building or condo.

[1:47:25] And that is what you support in

[1:47:28] the newspaper. He wants to go

[1:47:33] ahead with Fairview Cadillac, or

[1:47:36] Cadillac Fairview, and so that

[1:47:38] is what I'm trying to say. Has a

[1:47:41] new mayor, but the old

[1:47:44] Councillor, the previous Mayor,

[1:47:46] I see always was in line with

[1:47:50] the -- now you are not helping.

[1:47:55] So what do you do to help?

[1:47:57] >> With all due respect, sir.

[1:47:59] That remains to be seen. We are

[1:48:01] doing and RCI. We will see with

[1:48:02] the end result will be.

[1:48:03] Hopefully it won't. I mean, you

[1:48:05] know my vision. Hopefully it

[1:48:06] won't be high-rise buildings.

[1:48:09] It's when I ran against. I

[1:48:11] believe won't be. But we will

[1:48:13] see, we are in a process where

[1:48:16] we are, as a Council, working on

[1:48:19] the issue. So we have to see

[1:48:22] where we get before we get too

[1:48:23] angry at people. We have to see

[1:48:26] what the result will be. We

[1:48:28] cannot preclude or think the

[1:48:29] result will be something until

[1:48:30] we go through the process. So

[1:48:34] maybe, I hear what you are

[1:48:36] saying, I commiserate. I mean,

[1:48:38] I'm an opponent of intensifying

[1:48:41] with duplexes, triplexes, semi

[1:48:44] detached town houses. Not

[1:48:46] height, I agree with you, we

[1:48:48] have over done it in our city.

[1:48:50] >> It is the right thing, sir.

[1:48:51] >> I agree, but give us a chance

[1:48:53] and we may get there. Who knows?

[1:48:55] >> Okay, so what can we help for

[1:48:57] those city councillors to

[1:48:59] convince them?

[1:49:00] >> Is this in order, please??

[1:49:04] Can I have a comment from legal

[1:49:05] to corporate -- departments,

[1:49:06] please?

[1:49:09] >> Councillor Stork, you're not

[1:49:10] accused of everything.

[1:49:11] >> I'm not going to sit here.

[1:49:14] >> He's a citizen asking a

[1:49:17] question.

[1:49:18] [inaudible]

[1:49:19] >> Sir, with all due respect, we

[1:49:21] have touched fairly and evenly.

[1:49:23] >> I'm saying the true.

[1:49:25] >> Let's just leave it at that.

[1:49:26] We've done very well, let's just

[1:49:28] leave it at that. I have

[1:49:31] responded that going forward we

[1:49:32] don't know what the outcome will

[1:49:33] be, so we cannot predict it, so

[1:49:35] let's see what the result will

[1:49:37] be. Let's see where we end up.

[1:49:40] We have been in some positive

[1:49:42] meetings, and who knows what the

[1:49:43] end result will be? We cannot

[1:49:46] forecast gloom and doom. It

[1:49:47] might be good. We don't know

[1:49:48] that.

[1:49:49] >> Thank you for always writing

[1:49:50] in the newspaper, and we

[1:49:52] appreciate it.

[1:49:53] >> Thank you very much.

[1:49:54] >> I know some people they don't

[1:49:55] like it, but they don't like the

[1:49:56] truth. What we like to hear and

[1:49:58] see everybody what you are

[1:49:59] writing. And now the third

[1:50:01] option.

[1:50:02] >> I'm not writing

[1:50:04] unfortunately. I'm not allowed.

[1:50:05] Could I pass on to the next one?

[1:50:08] >> The last option for me, I

[1:50:10] have to pray for all of you,

[1:50:13] wish you well, and to do the

[1:50:14] right thing for the next

[1:50:16] generation.

[1:50:17] >> Thank. You

[1:50:18] >> Know that less you, all of

[1:50:19] you, and to work together.

[1:50:20] >> Thank. You

[1:50:21] >> Thank you.

[1:50:24] >> Thank you, Eric.

[1:50:28] >>

[1:50:29] - Bonjour, Caroline bonjour,

[1:50:31] district un. Good evening,

[1:50:33] councillors. I spoke at the last

[1:50:35] council meeting to outline the

[1:50:38] reasons why the Council should

[1:50:43] keep 275 and 325 Hymus in the

[1:50:44] ICB, unfortunately I was not

[1:50:46] successful. I'm extremely

[1:50:49] disappointed that the motion

[1:50:50] passed, not only because Hymus

[1:50:52] west is becoming our very own

[1:50:55] Griffintown, and a permanent

[1:50:56] scar on our city, and will

[1:50:58] likely become an example for

[1:50:59] other suburbs on how not to

[1:51:01] develop. But also because the

[1:51:03] majority of you campaigned and

[1:51:05] were vocal against excess

[1:51:08] development and densification.

[1:51:09] You also accused the last

[1:51:11] administration of approving

[1:51:13] developments without vision when

[1:51:14] speaking of the blast Frontenac

[1:51:16] development, a development which

[1:51:18] some of you voted against. You

[1:51:20] were elected and won your seats

[1:51:21] on that platform, and the voters

[1:51:23] are counting on you to act on

[1:51:25] your commitment and to allow

[1:51:27] your constituents to be

[1:51:30] consulted on the vision before

[1:51:31] any more developments are

[1:51:32] approved to be removed from the

[1:51:35] icy be. I am very puzzled by the

[1:51:37] reversal of the position of

[1:51:38] those councillors who ran on

[1:51:40] your platform of pausing runway

[1:51:42] development and allowing

[1:51:43] citizens to be consulted, get

[1:51:45] voted in favour of removing 275

[1:51:49] and 325 Hymus. I'm even more

[1:51:52] shocked from the motion from

[1:51:54] Councillor Cowan to melt the

[1:51:55] motion and also exclude

[1:51:56] Greenwich and the Catholic

[1:52:00] Fairview projects from the ICB.

[1:52:02] Councillor Cowan, two months

[1:52:03] before the election you ranted

[1:52:05] against increasing densification

[1:52:07] of Pointe-Claire following the

[1:52:11] approval of the class Frontenac

[1:52:12] project. I think someone already

[1:52:14] quoted you, when the council was

[1:52:16] elected, our population was just

[1:52:18] over 32,000. The Cadillac

[1:52:19] Fairview development concept

[1:52:21] alone calls for an additional

[1:52:23] 5000 department units. Where are

[1:52:25] we headed? And eventual

[1:52:27] population of 40, 50, 60,000?

[1:52:29] This city is without vision. And

[1:52:30] quote. Yet at the last meeting,

[1:52:33] you wanted to remove the

[1:52:34] Cadillac Fairview and Greenwich

[1:52:37] projects from the ICB. Two

[1:52:39] monstrous projects that would

[1:52:40] greatly increase the density and

[1:52:42] population of Pointe-Claire. At

[1:52:44] 24 storeys, the Cadillac

[1:52:45] Fairview project is the same

[1:52:46] height as the sunlight building

[1:52:48] downtown. I'm not sure if any of

[1:52:50] you have seen that building, but

[1:52:51] it's big even by Downtown

[1:52:53] standards. If that were to be

[1:52:56] built and the Fairview parking

[1:52:57] lot, it would probably be seen

[1:52:59] as far away as Hudson, and

[1:53:00] completely out of place. And a

[1:53:01] reminder for the next generation

[1:53:03] of how Pointe-Claire council

[1:53:04] dropped the ball in allowing its

[1:53:06] development to proceed. It would

[1:53:08] be a huge embarrassment for the

[1:53:11] city and I'm truly puzzled by

[1:53:14] your about-face on this campaign

[1:53:15] promise. To then have Councillor

[1:53:19] Stork, Thorstad-Cullen, and

[1:53:22] Cowan citing for his bravery? I

[1:53:24] don't think the citizens of

[1:53:25] Pointe-Claire would cite him as

[1:53:27] bravery. I would characterize it

[1:53:29] as dishonest and a betrayal.

[1:53:31] Using an excuse at the

[1:53:32] consultation process is not

[1:53:33] moving quickly enough as a

[1:53:35] justification to ban developers

[1:53:37] and exclude Pointe-Claire

[1:53:40] residents from any consultation

[1:53:41] is duplicitous behaviour. I also

[1:53:43] think it is critical when

[1:53:44] important issues such as these

[1:53:45] are voted on by Council, that

[1:53:47] all councillors vote on these

[1:53:48] important issues, and if they

[1:53:49] cannot make the meeting, have

[1:53:51] them attend by phone or vote by

[1:53:52] proxy like most boards do. This

[1:53:54] will give a voice to all

[1:53:56] Pointe-Claire -- residents.

[1:53:58] Councillors, you were elected on

[1:53:59] a clear mandate to stop runway

[1:54:01] development and to consult with

[1:54:02] citizens on the vision for the

[1:54:04] future of Pointe-Claire. You do

[1:54:06] not have a mandate to exclude

[1:54:07] certain pet projects from the

[1:54:10] consultation process. So I

[1:54:11] caution you to remember and

[1:54:12] honour your campaign promises.

[1:54:15] If you are looking to retain

[1:54:16] your seat in the next election.

[1:54:18] Actions speak louder than words,

[1:54:20] and the voters will remember how

[1:54:22] you represented them and whether

[1:54:23] you can be trusted to deliver on

[1:54:26] you promise. In the last

[1:54:27] election, Pointe-Claire voters

[1:54:29] turfed the mayor and two

[1:54:30] councillors, and we won't

[1:54:31] hesitate to do it again. When

[1:54:34] councillors are not acting with

[1:54:35] accordance in their promises.

[1:54:37] Things have changed in

[1:54:38] Pointe-Claire, and residents are

[1:54:39] not happy with the pace and

[1:54:40] scale of development, and are

[1:54:41] watching and noting what

[1:54:43] councillors are doing. So my ask

[1:54:45] of you today, is three. Things

[1:54:50] put 275 and 325 Hymus projects

[1:54:51] back into the ICB, which means

[1:54:53] putting it to vote at the next

[1:54:55] council meeting. We checked the

[1:54:57] demolition request for 275 and

[1:55:00] 325 Hymus. And finally, change

[1:55:02] the rules to allow Councillors

[1:55:04] to -- who are absent from the

[1:55:06] boat to attend by phone or vote

[1:55:09] by proxy so their constituents

[1:55:10] can have a second about and know

[1:55:12] where they stand. Thank you.

[1:55:15] >> Yes, Councillor Stork?

[1:55:18] >> Your point number three I

[1:55:19] fully agree with. Presents a

[1:55:22] proxies I think is important. In

[1:55:24] reference to 275, maybe some

[1:55:27] people don't know this, and it's

[1:55:30] important for all of you to

[1:55:31] know, and this is true, this is

[1:55:32] real, this is not doublespeak.

[1:55:37] Even if we put them back in the

[1:55:39] ICB, regardless of how we rezone

[1:55:43] them, that zone park, to two

[1:55:49] storeys, to a school, once the

[1:55:51] ICB is over it will still be

[1:55:54] judged on. It will still be

[1:55:57] based upon the zoning prior

[1:55:58] before the implementation of the

[1:56:00] ICB. That is clear. So my reason

[1:56:05] for supporting, protecting them

[1:56:06] out, please because regardless

[1:56:08] of the outcome of this ICB, they

[1:56:09] will be judged upon, reviewed

[1:56:12] upon, and decided upon. The

[1:56:16] zoning bylaws that were prior to

[1:56:17] the implementation of the ICB.

[1:56:20] So why would we allow people to

[1:56:22] go on for one, two, whatever the

[1:56:24] process might take, we should

[1:56:25] address them now and if we are

[1:56:27] in support of it, we are in

[1:56:28] support of it. If we are against

[1:56:29] it we are against it. But that

[1:56:31] is the fundamental reason why,

[1:56:32] and I think it's very clear that

[1:56:33] it would be unfair. Once again,

[1:56:36] even if we were to change the

[1:56:38] zoning in that area now, those

[1:56:39] two projects would still be

[1:56:43] decided upon according to the

[1:56:44] zoning bylaws before the

[1:56:47] implementation of the ICB. That

[1:56:50] is very clear to me and that is

[1:56:52] my justification.

[1:56:53] >> Okay.

[1:56:54] >> Thank you.

[1:56:55] >> Sir?

[1:56:57] >> Actually Mr. Stork, I

[1:57:01] disagree with that last

[1:57:02] statement that you said,. You

[1:57:06] have the ability you put it in a

[1:57:10] freeze and come out with a new

[1:57:11] policy on how things will be

[1:57:13] developed and how they will grow

[1:57:14] and develop. Everything comes

[1:57:18] with that. Otherwise, anybody

[1:57:20] could do anything afterwards.

[1:57:22] The projects have not been

[1:57:23] built. Okay? They have not been

[1:57:25] built, they have not been built,

[1:57:27] they can be changed, and they

[1:57:29] were all subject to the law,

[1:57:34] what's the city of Pointe-Claire

[1:57:35] wants to have done. So I'm very

[1:57:38] much and disagreement. Many

[1:57:44] other lawyers will also stand up

[1:57:45] and give another stint --

[1:57:47] statement that will contradict

[1:57:48] which you are going to say.

[1:57:50] That's with the law is all

[1:57:51] about, and I disagree with it.

[1:57:52] The point I wanted to make

[1:57:54] anyway, is I have supported many

[1:57:57] of the points that have been

[1:57:58] raised here tonight on the

[1:57:59] development, and also keeping

[1:58:01] the buildings in the freeze,

[1:58:02] they should stay in the freeze.

[1:58:06] Hymus is really starting to look

[1:58:07] like a mess. If you drive along

[1:58:09] -- I welcome you to drive along

[1:58:11] Hymus and see those two new

[1:58:13] apartment buildings that have

[1:58:14] been built, and try to enter

[1:58:16] into them. You know, it's like

[1:58:20] trying to drive into your own

[1:58:22] little laneway. But actually,

[1:58:23] it's even worse now because the

[1:58:25] laneway goes down and you can't

[1:58:26] see what's around there. So the

[1:58:28] cars going in there, you are

[1:58:29] looking, they are just terrible

[1:58:31] to see how they don't have any

[1:58:34] room to move into the spot.

[1:58:38] Unlike Cambridge where you can

[1:58:39] drive in and see when there is

[1:58:41] not another car. You can't do

[1:58:42] that for these two new latest

[1:58:45] apartment buildings. I walk

[1:58:46] along there, I see it, it's

[1:58:47] dangerous. It is dangerous. And

[1:58:49] the new buildings that are being

[1:58:52] built, that you are projecting,

[1:58:54] the densification is too much.

[1:58:56] It's just too much. You need

[1:58:58] more space between the

[1:58:59] buildings. I'm embarrassed to be

[1:59:04] living on that street now, to

[1:59:05] know what it's going to look

[1:59:06] like in the future. If you

[1:59:08] people continue along to go

[1:59:11] against what you said you were

[1:59:12] going to bring in change and the

[1:59:13] like, and we don't see it, and

[1:59:16] the optics are not good. And we

[1:59:19] will remember how people have

[1:59:20] voted for it, so I'm very much

[1:59:24] wanting to make sure the

[1:59:25] buildings are staying in the

[1:59:26] freeze and permits are not given

[1:59:27] out for them to go ahead. And

[1:59:30] one last thing as well, even the

[1:59:32] trees I saw planted on this

[1:59:35] latest one, there's probably

[1:59:37] about six inches where these

[1:59:40] trees are planted. They will

[1:59:42] grow big and get blown over

[1:59:43] because they need routes to go

[1:59:44] down, but there's no roots

[1:59:46] there. There is no routes. You

[1:59:49] have about six inches of

[1:59:51] topsoil, and the trees planted

[1:59:53] in that. How long will that tree

[1:59:56] last? Anyway, that's just a

[1:59:59] small point, but the access to

[2:00:00] these things, students. You guys

[2:00:02] have to take a better look at

[2:00:03] it. And I mentioned I understand

[2:00:07] a lot of the things that go into

[2:00:08] that. Thank you very much. Thank

[2:00:10] you for the good points beanie

[2:00:11] -- that have been raised by many

[2:00:14] of the people here in the

[2:00:15] audience tonight. They are

[2:00:17] valuable contributions. Thank

[2:00:18] you.

[2:00:32] Michel Desbiens, Monsieur le

[2:00:34] Maire, j'aurais une question

[2:00:36] pour la fin. Vous n'avez pas

[2:00:38] besoin de répondre. J'ai

[2:00:44] travaillé dans quatre villes

[2:00:46] pendant les derniers 45 ans que

[2:00:48] je demeure à Pointe-Claire.

[2:00:52] Savez-vous pourquoi je demeure à

[2:00:53] Pointe-Claire? Vous avez la

[2:00:55] meilleure ville à administrer et

[2:00:56] que moi je connais. Vous avez

[2:01:00] toute ma sympathie de voir

[2:01:02] comment vous êtes reçue

[2:01:03] (---)

[2:01:04] . Si j'étais à votre place, je

[2:01:06] serais découragé. Je ne veux pas

[2:01:08] que vous vous découragez. Il y a

[2:01:10] des leaders parmi vous. Vous

[2:01:17] devez trouver une stratégie

[2:01:18] entre vous. Vous avez une très

[2:01:21] belle ville à administrer,

[2:01:23] Mesdames et Messieurs. Ne lâchez

[2:01:24] pas! La question que j'aimerais

[2:01:29] vous poser. Je me le posé. Je

[2:01:32] vais les poser. Comment ça se

[2:01:34] fait-il qu'à Pointe-Claire on

[2:01:36] n'a pas les problèmes qu'ils ont

[2:01:38] à Montréal Nord? Quand vous

[2:01:40] répondrez la question, vous ne

[2:01:43] poserait plus de questions

[2:01:44] pourquoi vous vivez à

[2:01:45] Pointe-Claire. Je vous remercie.

[2:01:46] Bonne soirée.

[2:01:48] - Je peux répondre. On est bien

[2:01:51] différent que Montréal-Nord. On

[2:01:53] a commencé avec une vision

[2:01:56] (inaudible)

[2:01:57] (---)

[2:01:58] . On a fait un plan pour la

[2:02:01] ville qui était super bon.

[2:02:49] J'ai choisi Pointe-Claire à

[2:02:50] cause de mes enfants. Et la

[2:02:53] qualité de vie, c'est super.

[2:03:00] - Pourquoi c'est une super six

[2:03:01] villes?

[2:03:49] - À ce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui

[2:03:50] parle?

[2:04:00] - Est-ce que c'est une bonne?

[2:04:01] Réponse

[2:04:02] - J'ai un souhait: ne lâchées

[2:04:03] pas mesdames et messieurs! Il y

[2:04:06] a beaucoup de contestations. En

[2:04:09] 45 ans, c'est la première fois

[2:04:11] que je vais au conseil. Ce sont

[2:04:14] les trois derniers mois. Ce que

[2:04:15] je vois, je ne l'aime pas. Je

[2:04:18] vais vous encourager à

[2:04:21] continuer. On vous a choisi pour

[2:04:23] administrer Pointe-Claire. Vous

[2:04:25] avez une maudite belle ville

[2:04:27] administrée. J'ai travaillé dans

[2:04:28] quatre villes, je les connais.

[2:04:32] - Merci, Messieurs.

[2:04:33] - Ne lâchait pas! Essayez de

[2:04:36] vous trouver une stratégie

[2:04:37] ensemble pour travailler. Les

[2:04:39] gens, s'ils ont des raisons, ils

[2:04:41] sont habitués d'une certaine

[2:04:43] façon. Ça a changé dans les

[2:04:45] dernières années. C'est ça. Ils

[2:04:47] ne sont pas capables de

[2:04:48] s'habituer. Ils voudraient avoir

[2:04:50] peut-être de meilleures

[2:04:52] communications, une meilleure

[2:04:53] stratégie de votre part. C'est à

[2:04:54] vous à la trouver. Je vous

[2:04:56] souhaite de la trouver.

[2:04:57] - Merci, Monsieur.

[2:05:00] - Bonsoir.

[2:05:01] - C'est très gentil, merci

[2:05:02] beaucoup.

[2:05:07] Désolé.

[2:05:25] -

[2:05:26] Pour les points 10.01., 10.02..

[2:05:31] Le conseil municipal doit-là

[2:05:33] entendre l'appel important sur

[2:05:36] le comité de démolition

[2:05:38] concernant le 275 boulevard

[2:05:41] Hymus, 375, 327. Le 26 mai 2022,

[2:05:47] le Comité de démolition se

[2:05:49] réunit pour étudier la demande

[2:05:52] de démolition et de

[2:05:55] reconstruction pour ces deux

[2:05:56] adresses. Oui au 275, boulevard,

[2:06:03] le comité a autorisé la

[2:06:06] démolition et le programme de

[2:06:07] réutilisation du sol

[2:06:08] (---)

[2:06:09] . Pour le 325, 327 boulevard

[2:06:13] Hymus, le comité à autoriser la

[2:06:16] démolition et refuser le

[2:06:17] programme de réutilisation du

[2:06:19] sol dégagé. Toute personne

[2:06:24] intéressée pouvait dans les 30

[2:06:26] jours de la décision du comité

[2:06:28] faire appel de cette décision

[2:06:30] par écrit auprès du Service des

[2:06:32] affaires juridiques.

[2:06:36] Des demandes d'appel de la

[2:06:38] décision ont été reçus pour ces

[2:06:40] deux propriétés. Ces deux

[2:06:44] adresses ont été retirés du

[2:06:45] règlement du contrôle

[2:06:47] intérimaire, RCI, le gel

[2:06:49] temporaire pour la réalisation

[2:06:51] du nouveau projet pour certains

[2:06:52] secteurs de la ville.

[2:08:09] Madame Thibault?

[2:08:13] - 10.01. Appel portant sur la

[2:08:14] décision du comité de démolition

[2:08:15] concernant l'approbation de la

[2:08:16] démolition et du programme de

[2:08:17] réutilisation du sol visant

[2:08:18] l'immeuble situé au 275,

[2:08:19] boulevard Hymus.

[2:09:42] Je suis d'accord avec la

[2:09:43] décision du comité.

[2:15:57] - O.K., 10.02.

[2:18:58] - Madame Thibault, je vous

[2:18:59] attends.

[2:19:27] -, O.K. 10.03.

[2:19:30] - Adoption d'un règlement

[2:19:31] abrogeant le Règlement PC-2917

[2:19:32] modifiant diverses dispositions

[2:19:33] des règlements municipaux de la

[2:19:34] Ville de Pointe-Claire dans le

[2:19:35] cadre de l'état d'urgence

[2:19:36] sanitaire décrétée par le

[2:19:37] gouvernement du Québec. En mai

[2:19:39] de 1020, suite à la déclaration

[2:19:40] de l'état d'urgence sanitaire

[2:19:41] décrétée par le gouvernement du

[2:19:42] Québec, la Ville de

[2:19:44] Pointe-Claire à adopter le

[2:19:46] règlement 29. 17 qui visait à

[2:19:49] prolonger certains délais

[2:19:50] applicable dans la

[2:19:51] réglementation de la ville. La

[2:19:52] levée de l'état d'urgence le 1er

[2:19:53] juin dernier fait en sorte que

[2:19:54] ce règlement n'a plus d'utilité,

[2:19:56] n'est plus applicable, en

[2:19:58] conséquence, il est recommandé

[2:19:59] de l'approcher. L'abroger.

[2:20:06] - 10.04., Je pense?

[2:20:23] 10.04.? Oui

[2:20:42] 10.05. Considérer les plans

[2:20:43] d'implantation et d'intégration

[2:20:44] architecturale relatifs aux

[2:20:45] propriétés mentionnées

[2:20:46] ci-dessous: - 148, avenue de

[2:20:47] Windward Crescent; c'est la

[2:20:53] construction d'un

[2:20:54] agrandissement. - 51, avenue

[2:20:57] Summerhill construction d'une

[2:20:58] véranda; - 43, avenue King

[2:21:02] agrandissement de l'entrée

[2:21:03] charretière.; - 6701, autoroute

[2:21:07] Transcanadienne un

[2:21:08] agrandissement.; - 44, avenue

[2:21:09] Drayton. Un agrandissement.

[2:22:54] Bon, 10.06.?

[2:23:09] C'est juste des commentaires.

[2:24:04] 10.07.

[2:24:51] Les personnes présentes peuvent

[2:24:52] s'adresser au conseil concernant

[2:24:53] les sujets ci-dessous pour les

[2:24:54] items 10.07 à 10.12:

[2:25:05] - Oui?

[2:25:13] 10.07. Considérer une demande de

[2:25:14] dérogation mineure pour

[2:25:15] permettre au 12A, avenue Bowling

[2:25:18] Green une remise de jardin avec

[2:25:19] un taux d'implantation de 22,11%

[2:25:23] plutôt que le maximum permis de

[2:25:24] 20%.

[2:31:41] - Bonsoir tout le monde.

[2:46:59] - Considérez-vous avant de

[2:47:00] dérogation mineure...

[2:47:09] c'était un refus, mais

[2:47:10] c'était...

[2:47:11] (inaudible)

[2:47:14] si juste les propriétaires, que

[2:47:15] je pourrais parler de mon

[2:47:16] projet?

[2:47:21] - C'est trop tard, mais bon, je

[2:47:22] vais laisser le président de

[2:47:23] l'Assemblée...

[2:47:25] - Rapidement, peut-être?

[2:47:32] - Nous habitons. Mon nom est

[2:47:34] Valérie Tardif. On habite sur

[2:47:35] Boeing Greene, ou les

[2:47:36] restrictions, les terrains

[2:47:37] historiquement sont très grands.

[2:47:39] Sur bowling Green. Alors c'est

[2:47:43] pour ça qu'il y avait un

[2:47:44] pourcentage prévu qui est un peu

[2:47:45] moindre, sur cette rue-là, pour

[2:47:46] les... les édifices secondaires.

[2:47:50] En fait, les cabanons, alors

[2:47:56] parce qu'qu'il y a des

[2:47:57] (---)

[2:47:58] de 4000 pieds carrés, et on

[2:47:59] voulait éviter qu'il y ait des

[2:48:01] cabanons qui soient immenses,

[2:48:02] notre terrain fait partie, c'est

[2:48:03] une maison qui a été bâtie en

[2:48:05] 1964, le plus loin à peu près de

[2:48:06] l'eau. Qui a été bâtie sur une

[2:48:11] subdivision de la maison qui

[2:48:12] était à côté. Notre terrain de

[2:48:14] 7000 pieds carrés. Donc en

[2:48:18] demandant la dérogation,

[2:48:20] essentiellement, on demande qui

[2:48:24] respecte les normes de partout

[2:48:25] ailleurs à Pointe-Claire, avec

[2:48:31] des terrains qui sont similaires

[2:48:33] en fait de superficie, donc ça

[2:48:35] revient à avoir la même grandeur

[2:48:37] de cabanons que partout

[2:48:38] ailleurs, et comme je disais, la

[2:48:39] raison pour laquelle le

[2:48:41] pourcentage est plus bas sur

[2:48:43] cette rue, c'est en raison des

[2:48:44] très grands terrains qui étaient

[2:48:45] là à l'époque. Notre terrain

[2:48:49] environ 7000 pieds carrés, donc

[2:48:50] quand on parle du faible

[2:48:51] pourcentage, pour nous, ça fait

[2:48:52] quand même une petite différence

[2:48:53] de quelques pieds. On a deux

[2:48:54] enfants, des bicyclettes. Tout

[2:48:57] le tralala qu'on a. Et puis on

[2:49:01] n'a pas un immense maison aussi,

[2:49:02] sur bowling Green. Donc ce

[2:49:06] serait bien pratique pour nous,

[2:49:07] et ce n'est pas une énorme

[2:49:08] différence avec ce qu'il y a sur

[2:49:14] bowling Green, de un, dû au fait

[2:49:15] que notre terrain est beaucoup

[2:49:16] plus petit proportionnellement

[2:49:17] parlant, et dans un deuxième

[2:49:19] temps, on est dans le respect,

[2:49:21] si on, veut de l'idéologie

[2:49:24] derrière ces règles-là si on

[2:49:26] regarde les règles pour le reste

[2:49:27] des maisons à Pointe-Claire.

[2:49:29] Alors je voulais apporter ces

[2:49:30] précisions-là qui sont quand

[2:49:31] même importantes. Si j'avais un

[2:49:34] terrain de 30000 pieds carrés,

[2:49:35] ça serait un cabanon

[2:49:36] complètement énorme. Mais ce

[2:49:37] n'est pas le temps, dans notre,

[2:49:39] dans le cas de notre propriété.

[2:49:42] - Merci. Monsieur? Non, non,

[2:49:45] Monsieur, vous être contre ça?

[2:49:48] - Non, je suis le 1009. Vous

[2:49:52] venez dire que

[2:49:53] (inaudible)

[2:49:54] ?

[2:49:55] - Alors je demanderais au

[2:49:56] Conseil de reconsidérer le vote.

[2:49:58] Je ne sais pas si vous allez

[2:49:59] changer votre vote suite à mes

[2:50:00] explications. Qui clarifie, à

[2:50:02] mon avis, la situation. Alors

[2:50:05] j'ai demandé au Conseil de

[2:50:06] reconsidérer le vote, étant

[2:50:07] donné mes explications.

[2:50:09] - Qu'est-ce qu'on peut faire,

[2:50:10] Madame Thibault?

[2:50:26] - Je veux juste apporter à

[2:50:28] l'attention, mon nom est Jacques

[2:50:29] Drouin. 93, avenue Elgin, à

[2:50:31] Pointe-Claire. Mon voisinage a

[2:50:35] été avisée de tout ça. Il n'y a

[2:50:39] pas personne qui a émis un quoi

[2:50:41] que ce soit comme problème au

[2:50:44] niveau de ça. Je suis à un coin

[2:50:46] de rue. La maison, la manière

[2:50:50] dont il est bâti, il n'y a pas

[2:50:54] grand option autre que celle

[2:50:55] qu'on a. La raison, je ne ferai

[2:50:59] pas brailler personne, la raison

[2:51:01] pour laquelle on demande cette

[2:51:04] dérogation-là, mineur, c'est

[2:51:05] pour nous permettre de rester

[2:51:06] là. J'ai malheureusement eu la

[2:51:07] COVID. J'ai été 119 jours

[2:51:10] hospitalisé. Je suis maintenant

[2:51:13] un petit peu plus diminuer,

[2:51:14] physiquement. Je n'ai pas de

[2:51:16] salle de bains à l'étage. Moi,

[2:51:18] ma salle de lavage et dans la

[2:51:19] cave. Nous affaire de cannage et

[2:51:23] de... tout est dans la cave. Mon

[2:51:28] épouse est obligé de me donner

[2:51:29] un bon coup de main pour ça.

[2:51:31] Alors la raison pour laquelle on

[2:51:33] demande cette dérogation

[2:51:34] mineure-là, c'est pour nous

[2:51:36] permettre, parce qu'on aime ça,

[2:51:37] Pointe-Claire. C'est pour nous

[2:51:39] permettre de rester ici! Et de

[2:51:43] continuer à faire notre vie. Ça

[2:51:46] fait 43 ans que je demeure au 93

[2:51:47] avenue Elgin. Probablement plus

[2:51:48] que bien du monde ici. 43 ans!

[2:51:53] Alors, quand on est arrivé là,

[2:51:55] pas d'enfants, on a deux

[2:51:56] enfants. J'en ai un de 41 de 38.

[2:51:59] Alors ils ont tous vécu ça ici.

[2:52:02] C'est pour ça qu'on veut rester

[2:52:03] là. Alors, si j'avais eu des

[2:52:07] voisins qui s'y étaient opposés,

[2:52:08] je pourrais comprendre ça. Je

[2:52:10] n'ai pas de voisins qui

[2:52:11] s'opposent. J'ai même une lettre

[2:52:12] de la personne qui est le plus

[2:52:13] touché par ça. Dans le dossier.

[2:52:16] Qui, elle, dit: il n'y a pas de

[2:52:17] problème, là. Vas-y. Alors je ne

[2:52:23] comprends pas la logique de ça.

[2:52:26] Alors je vous demande de réviser

[2:52:27] votre vote. Merci.

[2:52:31] - Si je suis capable, la raison

[2:52:33] pour ça qu'il n'y a pas

[2:52:36] d'inquiétudes avec votre

[2:52:37] proposition. Mais de l'autre

[2:52:40] côté, pour les

[2:52:41] (---)

[2:52:43] parce que si nous allons

[2:52:44] promettre pour vous de faire les

[2:52:48] (inaudible)

[2:52:49] du côté nord-, il y a une chance

[2:52:50] dans toute la ligne de la rue

[2:52:51] (inaudible)

[2:52:52] . Alors ça, c'est une grosse

[2:52:55] inquiétude pour

[2:52:56] (---)

[2:52:57] . Mais après ce soir, nous

[2:52:58] serons capables de discuter...

[2:53:01] - Je veux juste vous dire que

[2:53:02] quand on retarde un mois, je ne

[2:53:05] peux pas, j'ai un constructeur.

[2:53:08] Mais je ne peux pas l'engager

[2:53:12] tant que je n'ai pas le hockey

[2:53:13] de la ville. Parce que je veux

[2:53:14] faire les choses correctement.

[2:53:15] Et là, ce que vous faites, vous

[2:53:16] êtes en train de me reculer pour

[2:53:17] le printemps. Mon état n'est pas

[2:53:22] celui normale que j'ai vécue il

[2:53:23] y a 2 ans. Je les, je l'ai eu,

[2:53:26] je la traîne. J'essaie

[2:53:28] simplement d'améliorer mon sort.

[2:53:32] Mes voisins n'ont pas protesté.

[2:53:33] Alors je ne comprends pas que

[2:53:35] vous, qui est tout près de chez

[2:53:38] nous, qui connaissent exactement

[2:53:40] le coin...

[2:53:41] - Mais, mais, mais...

[2:53:44] - Vous connaissez le coin.

[2:53:45] - Exactement, exactement.

[2:53:47] - Si vous regardez les plans, on

[2:53:48] ne nuit pas à personne. Alors je

[2:53:51] retrouve la situation un

[2:53:54] peut-être, pour vous autres,

[2:53:55] administrativement, bien

[2:53:56] correct. Mais humainement... ce

[2:53:57] n'est pas bon. Merci.

[2:53:59] - Merci.

[3:03:39] >> Okay, before proceeding, is

[3:03:41] there anybody in the room from

[3:03:45] 117 King, 140 81 word Crescent,

[3:03:48] or 309 lakeshore in the room?

[3:03:51] Now? Okay, so, upon return, we

[3:03:57] have decided to uphold our vote

[3:04:01] without change. We would

[3:04:03] encourage you to speak to your

[3:04:05] councillors to continue the

[3:04:06] process, okay? So, 10.10, I

[3:04:10] believe?

[3:04:12] - Oui. Considérer une demande de

[3:04:14] dérogation mineure pour

[3:04:15] permettre aux 117 avenue King la

[3:04:17] construction d'une galerie avec

[3:04:18] une marge de recul latéral

[3:04:19] gauche de 1,35 mètre plutôt que

[3:04:21] le minimum requis de nos 2

[3:04:22] mètres. 10.11 Consider a minor

[3:04:24] exemption request to permit at

[3:04:26] 148 De Windward Crescent Avenue

[3:04:30] an attached garage with a south

[3:04:32] side setback of 1.05m rather

[3:04:33] than the minimum required of 2m.

[3:04:46] - Dix

[3:04:47] 12. Considérer une demande

[3:04:48] d'usage conditionnel pour

[3:04:49] permettre aux 309 chemins bord

[3:04:51] du lac Lakeshore l'occupation

[3:04:53] d'une partie du bâtiment par un

[3:04:54] usage commercial de la classe

[3:04:57] >> D1, soit un restaurant. Do I

[3:05:00] have a mover?

[3:05:01] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,

[3:05:03] district three, I move to

[3:05:05] approve -- sorry, 10:12.

[3:05:10] >> Seconded, Bruno Tremblay,

[3:05:12] district six.

[3:05:13] >> All in favour? Okay.

[3:05:19] [inaudible]

[3:05:23] June 23rd to August 3rd.

[3:05:29] - Approuver la nomination

[3:05:30] officielle du roi de la lecture

[3:05:31] aménagé sur le côté sud de la

[3:05:32] bibliothèque. Madame

[3:05:36] (---)

[3:05:37] , je ne résidente de

[3:05:38] Pointe-Claire, est décédé

[3:05:39] récemment à l'âge de 22 ans.

[3:05:40] J'espère que j'ai bien prononcé

[3:05:42] son nom. Elle aimait beaucoup

[3:05:43] les bibliothèques que la Ville

[3:05:44] de Pointe-Claire. Ça leur a

[3:05:45] demandé de léguer son argent à

[3:05:46] la bibliothèque et souhaitait

[3:05:47] que ces économies puissent

[3:05:48] contribuer à un projet de

[3:05:49] bibliothèque. Un jardin de

[3:05:52] lecture a été aménagée sur le

[3:05:53] côté sud de la bibliothèque, le

[3:05:54] projet a été financé en partie

[3:05:55] grâce à un don de 20 dollars de

[3:05:57] la famille

[3:05:58] (---)

[3:05:59] fait à les amis de la

[3:06:01] bibliothèque en l'honneur de

[3:06:02] leur fille, qui sera. Et les

[3:06:03] amis de la bibliothèque ont

[3:06:04] également contribué à une somme

[3:06:05] de 10000 dollars. La famille de

[3:06:08] Sarah donnera également 1000

[3:06:09] dollars supplémentaires pour une

[3:06:10] plaque commémorative. Il s'agit

[3:06:15] d'approuver l'appellation de:

[3:06:18] (---)

[3:06:19] pour le jardin aménagé sur le

[3:06:20] côté sud de la bibliothèque.

[3:06:23] 20.03 Approve the 2022 Municipal

[3:06:24] Action Plan for the social and

[3:06:26] professional integration for

[3:06:27] persons with disability; and

[3:06:29] Authorize the 2022 objectives of

[3:06:31] the Accessibility Committee in

[3:06:32] order to submit it to the Office

[3:06:33] des personnes handicapées du

[3:06:34] Québec. Of course, with the

[3:06:41] active municipal action plan for

[3:06:43] the social integration of

[3:06:44] persons with disabilities for

[3:06:45] 2022, for the city of

[3:06:48] Pointe-Claire strategic plan, by

[3:06:49] meeting the cities obligation to

[3:06:52] the office -- to approve the

[3:06:55] plan for 2022 and authorize the

[3:06:57] objectives of the accessibility

[3:06:59] committee for submission to the

[3:07:03] Office des personnes handicapées

[3:07:04] du Québec.

[3:07:07] - Autoriser la relocalisation du

[3:07:08] lampadaire de l'ancien maire,

[3:07:10] monsieur Bill McMurtry. Alors

[3:07:11] comme vous la tradition à

[3:07:12] Pointe-Claire, la Ville installe

[3:07:15] un lampadaire particulier pour

[3:07:16] un maire ou mairesses

[3:07:17] municipalité. Ce lampadaire

[3:07:20] reste en place tant que la

[3:07:23] résidence demeure dans la

[3:07:24] famille du maire de la mairesses

[3:07:25] (---)

[3:07:26] honorifique. La propriété de

[3:07:27] l'ancien maire de Pointe-Claire

[3:07:28] est en vente, il est proposé de

[3:07:30] relocaliser cet ancien

[3:07:31] lampadaire du maire sur Stewart

[3:07:32] Roy ou une promenade d'sera

[3:07:35] aménagée pour accueillir ces

[3:07:36] lampadaires honorifiques

[3:07:37] lorsqu'ils doivent être déplacés

[3:07:38] ou ne peuvent pas être installés

[3:07:39] à la résidence de marque d'une

[3:07:40] mairesse. 20.05 Authorize the

[3:07:41] awarding of a mandate to the

[3:07:46] firm IMK S.E.C.R.L./LLP within

[3:07:47] the framework of the legal

[3:07:48] proceedings regarding

[3:07:49] agglomeration taxation. To

[3:07:53] inform a mandate to allow IMK

[3:07:55] S.E.C.R.L./LLP to ensure the

[3:07:56] benefit of the municipality of

[3:07:59] the assessment of the -- in the

[3:08:06] case of Beaconsfield against the

[3:08:07] government of Québec and the

[3:08:08] City of Montréal. Considering

[3:08:09] the application of -- I

[3:08:13] formation expenses, and

[3:08:15] authorized to operate the

[3:08:19] $6,812.88 with Pointe-Claire in

[3:08:21] the legal action.

[3:08:24] - Autoriser l'accès à mon

[3:08:25] dossier du Revenu Québec pour le

[3:08:26] compte de la ville. Les

[3:08:31] procédures administratives

[3:08:32] régulières pour autoriser

[3:08:33] l'assistance

[3:08:34] (---)

[3:08:35] à la Ville de Pointe-Claire,

[3:08:36] madame Julie Robertson, à

[3:08:38] communiquer par personne, par

[3:08:39] écrit ou par téléphoniques à

[3:08:40] (---)

[3:08:41] qui sont nécessaires pour que le

[3:08:42] dossier de la ville ce sera mon

[3:08:43] dossier pour les fichiers de

[3:08:44] Revenu Québec. 20.07 Authorize a

[3:08:45] budget amendment for water

[3:08:46] supply contributions to the City

[3:08:47] of Montreal for agglomeration

[3:08:48] services. The City of Montréal

[3:08:54] sends an annual adjustment bill

[3:08:55] to reflect the actual volume of

[3:08:57] water consumed for the previous

[3:08:59] fiscal year and this amendment

[3:09:00] is necessary to make an

[3:09:03] adjustment to the potable water

[3:09:05] rate. Autoriseras un amendement

[3:09:10] budgétaire vous couvrez le

[3:09:12] montant du contrat de services

[3:09:13] d'entretien ménager du centre

[3:09:14] sportif Olive-Urquhart. Le

[3:09:18] contrat concerné avaient été

[3:09:19] établi avec des estimations

[3:09:20] théoriques, faute d'une

[3:09:21] connaissance pratique réelle des

[3:09:22] particularités de ce bâtiment.

[3:09:24] L'amendement proposé permet de

[3:09:25] couvrir le montant réel du

[3:09:26] contrat. Les connaissances

[3:09:28] acquises réduira progressivement

[3:09:29] ce genre d'incident. 20.09

[3:09:30] Authorise the Mayor and his

[3:09:31] partner to represent the City of

[3:09:32] Pointe-Claire at the Lakeshore

[3:09:33] Ball organised by the Lakeshore

[3:09:34] General Hospital Foundation.

[3:09:37] It's for the cost of 1800

[3:09:38] dollars.

[3:09:40] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:09:42] >> I move to approve 20.0 to

[3:09:47] 20.0 night, Paul Bissonnette,

[3:09:49] district to.

[3:09:50] >> That I'm for newly?

[3:09:51] [inaudible]

[3:09:57] >> Absolutely.

[3:09:59] [inaudible]

[3:10:08] [inaudible]

[3:10:11] >> Mr. Weemaes?

[3:10:12] >> It will be accessible on the

[3:10:13] website. It's going to make

[3:10:15] modifications, if you want to

[3:10:17] suggest modifications, that will

[3:10:18] be considered for the plan for

[3:10:19] next year. We have a plan every

[3:10:20] year.

[3:10:21] [inaudible]

[3:10:28] >> You could write to us, you

[3:10:29] could write to us, and propose

[3:10:31] suggestions for modification if

[3:10:32] you have, and it will be

[3:10:35] considered by the committee in

[3:10:36] the coming year --

[3:10:38] >> She can write to me.

[3:10:39] >> We could add it to the plan

[3:10:40] next year.

[3:10:43] >> She could write to me. I'm on

[3:10:45] the committee. We will take it

[3:10:48] into consideration. We are

[3:10:49] working on the 2020 31 now.

[3:10:52] >> Okay. Do I have a mover? Of,

[3:10:57] you did it? Do we get a

[3:10:59] seconder?

[3:11:00] >> Eric Stork, district eight.

[3:11:03] >> All in favour? Okay, 20.10.

[3:11:08] (---)

[3:11:09] autoriser les conseiller Ben

[3:11:11] Cohen, Bruno Tremblay et le

[3:11:13] maire Thomas, ainsi que madame

[3:11:16] Telford à titre de substitut de

[3:11:18] remplacer, de représenter

[3:11:20] Pointe-Claire au tournoi de golf

[3:11:22] qui se tiendra aux

[3:11:24] (---)

[3:11:25] et de rembourser le coût 2200

[3:11:26] dollars plus les frais

[3:11:27] afférents. 20.11 Authorize the

[3:11:28] participation of two swimming

[3:11:30] coaches at the Canadian Swimming

[3:11:31] Coaches Association

[3:11:32] (CSCA)

[3:11:33] national conference. The annual

[3:11:38] event brings together many of

[3:11:40] Canada's swimming stakeholders

[3:11:41] and prevents presents an

[3:11:43] opportunity in the field.

[3:11:45] Pointe-Claire swimming club

[3:11:46] coaches benefit from attending

[3:11:47] these conferences to share with

[3:11:49] us the swimming professionals of

[3:11:51] Canada and to keep up with the

[3:11:54] latest developments. Our coaches

[3:11:55] will benefit from the expertise

[3:11:57] of the best practices and

[3:11:59] exchange of -- total expense

[3:12:01] will be $3,290.

[3:12:06] - Autoriser la tenue d'un encan

[3:12:08] pour la disposition des biens en

[3:12:10] collaboration avec le Centre

[3:12:11] d'acquisitions gouvernementales,

[3:12:12] anciennement le CSP cru. Il

[3:12:15] centre de discussions du

[3:12:17] gouvernement permet aux

[3:12:18] établissements les grands

[3:12:19] réseaux en santé, en services

[3:12:20] sociaux, aux municipalités et

[3:12:21] aux sociétés d'État du Québec

[3:12:22] d'accéder à

[3:12:23] (---)

[3:12:24] des actifs en surplus. Par appel

[3:12:26] d'offres et parents Chaput plus

[3:12:27] qu'organisé pour la disposition

[3:12:28] des biens qui est un service

[3:12:30] écoresponsable au gouvernement

[3:12:31] du Québec. 20.13 Ratify an

[3:12:34] expenditure of $ 3,098.21

[3:12:35] concerning electoral invoicing.

[3:12:41] For the purpose of the 2021

[3:12:43] elections, the clerk department

[3:12:45] was authorized to spend $45,000

[3:12:46] but did not take into account

[3:12:49] applicable taxes while making

[3:12:50] the request. This is to ratify

[3:12:52] the expenditure of $3,098.21 to

[3:12:55] cover the taxes to be added to

[3:12:56] the amount paid to individual

[3:12:59] four computerized technical

[3:13:00] services for 2021 action.

[3:13:04] - Finalement, 20

[3:13:07] 14, appuyer les coûts du projet

[3:13:09] pour l'échangeur des sources et

[3:13:10] la passerelle piétonnière. Lors

[3:13:12] de la séance du conseil du 5

[3:13:14] juillet dernier, la Ville a

[3:13:15] autorisé la signature d'une

[3:13:16] entente de collaboration entre

[3:13:17] le ministère des Transports du

[3:13:18] Québec, pour l'organisation des

[3:13:19] travaux de l'échangeur des

[3:13:20] sources de la passerelle

[3:13:22] piétonnière, travaux de

[3:13:24] restauration des rénovations.

[3:13:25] Assumer que les montants soumis

[3:13:27] par le MTQ

[3:13:28] (---)

[3:13:29] lors de la séance de 5 juillet,

[3:13:30] il est recommandé de confirmer

[3:13:31] officiellement au MTQ la

[3:13:33] participation financière de la

[3:13:34] Ville de Pointe-Claire pour le

[3:13:36] réfection de l'échangeur des

[3:13:37] sources de la passerelle ainsi

[3:13:38] permettre au MTQ d'octroyer le

[3:13:40] contrat selon les termes des

[3:13:41] appels d'offres sous sa

[3:13:42] responsabilité. Les travaux pour

[3:13:45] la structure routière sont de 3

[3:13:49] millions 475000. Les travaux

[3:13:50] pour la traverse pétrolière

[3:13:52] piétonnière, 5 millions 375000.

[3:13:54] Le travail qu'on totale pour la

[3:13:55] >> Do I have a mover? Ville de

[3:13:56] Pointe-Claire, 1 million

[3:13:57] (---)

[3:13:58] .

[3:13:59] >> 8 millions. I move. I am 2010

[3:14:00] to 2014, Paul Bissonnette,

[3:14:02] district to.

[3:14:03] >> Seconder?

[3:14:04] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,

[3:14:05] district three.

[3:14:06] >> All in favour?

[3:14:09] >> One comment, please. I

[3:14:10] approve. I am voting in favour

[3:14:14] of 20.0, to 20 point 13 but vote

[3:14:18] against 20.14.

[3:14:19] >> Okay.

[3:14:21] >> I approve 20.10 to 20.13 and

[3:14:24] I opposed 2014, not because I

[3:14:28] oppose an overpass, for

[3:14:30] pedestrians and cyclists, but

[3:14:32] simply because I think we need

[3:14:33] to prioritize an overpass on the

[3:14:36] 41st since we already have three

[3:14:37] ways to cross over on the 20 and

[3:14:41] the overpass is still standing

[3:14:42] and functional.

[3:14:45] >> Okay. So, all those against?

[3:14:52] We did those in favour, those

[3:14:53] against? We have six in favour,

[3:14:55] two against, am I correct? Yeah,

[3:15:01] okay. 30.01.

[3:15:03] >> 30.01 Approve an agreement to

[3:15:04] 30. 0 un. Be entered into with

[3:15:05] the borough of L'Île-Bizard -

[3:15:06] SainteGeneviève with respect to

[3:15:07] supply of services of the

[3:15:09] Pointe-Claire Communications

[3:15:10] Center. The city of

[3:15:13] Pointe-Claire agrees to make

[3:15:14] available to the Île-Bizard St.

[3:15:18] Geneviève Florida the --

[3:15:21] knowledge emergency calls and

[3:15:23] attend for the -- other than

[3:15:26] those, excludes police, fire

[3:15:28] safety, or evidence --

[3:15:31] concluding and signing into

[3:15:32] agreement for the services

[3:15:33] provided on this agreement,

[3:15:36] Île-Bizard seem to be able to

[3:15:39] pay Pointe-Claire $1,000 plus

[3:15:40] applicable taxes per year. Se

[3:15:44] prévaloir de l'option de

[3:15:45] renouvellement prévue au contrat

[3:15:46] prévu avec, au contrat intervenu

[3:15:48] avec un métier plus construction

[3:15:50] inc. pour des travaux répétitifs

[3:15:51] d'entretien et de réparation de

[3:15:53] menuiserie, pour l'année 2023,

[3:15:55] pour un montant total de

[3:15:59] 84851,55. Ceci est un appel

[3:16:00] d'offres réalisé en 2021, avec

[3:16:02] deux années ferme soit 2021 et

[3:16:03] 2022. Trois années en option,

[3:16:05] soit 23, 20 85. Ce soir, la

[3:16:08] première année optionnelle, soit

[3:16:09] 2023.

[3:16:19] >> 30.03,

[3:16:20] [inaudible]

[3:16:21] for the supply and goods and

[3:16:23] accessories for janitorial needs

[3:16:24] for the 2023 for a total amount

[3:16:29] estimated at $35,000 -- tax

[3:16:31] included. Following a call in

[3:16:38] 2019, to 2020, and three added

[3:16:42] years, to 2023, to exercise the

[3:16:45] second your optional which is

[3:16:46] 2022. Se prévaloir de l'option

[3:16:51] de renouvellement prévue au

[3:16:52] contrat intervenu avec marquage

[3:16:53] et signalisation Rive-Sud BA.5

[3:16:55] pour la fourniture de services

[3:16:57] professionnels pour le sel

[3:16:58] demande fissure sans frais âge,

[3:17:00] pour l'année 2023, pour un

[3:17:01] montant total de 10175 dollars

[3:17:04] et 29 sous, suite à un appel

[3:17:06] d'offres réalisé en 2019 est que

[3:17:07] trois années ferme, soit 2019,

[3:17:12] 2000 22020 et deux années

[3:17:13] d'option, jusqu'à 2023, ce soir,

[3:17:14] nous laissons la dernière année

[3:17:15] d'option jusqu'en 2023.

[3:17:16] >> 30.05. Exercise the option

[3:17:18] for seeing in the contract with

[3:17:19] sand about Québec Inc. for

[3:17:20] cleaning and caring services of

[3:17:22] sanitary storm sewer pipes for

[3:17:24] the year 2023 for a total amount

[3:17:29] of $101,684.46. Following a call

[3:17:32] for -- carried out in 2019 for

[3:17:34] three full years, 2019 to 2021,

[3:17:38] 2022 and 2023, this right to

[3:17:40] exercise a last optional year,

[3:17:41] 2023.

[3:17:44] - Se prévaloir de l'option de

[3:17:47] renouvellement prévue au contrat

[3:17:48] intervenu avec entreprises

[3:17:49] vaillants pour la fourniture et

[3:17:52] la livraison, sur demande, de

[3:17:53] l'occasion d'un bout heure sur

[3:17:54] Chéné à basse pression, d'une

[3:17:55] pelle mécanique et de quatre

[3:17:57] niveleuse incluant les

[3:17:58] opérateurs pour les travaux de

[3:17:59] déneigement, pour l'année 2023,

[3:18:00] pour un montant total de 240806

[3:18:01] dollars, taxes incluses. Suite à

[3:18:03] un appel d'offres réalisé en

[3:18:05] 2019 avec trois années ferme,

[3:18:07] soit 2019, 2020 et 2021. Et deux

[3:18:09] années en option, soit 2022 et

[3:18:10] 2023. Ce soir, nous exerçons la

[3:18:11] première année d'option pour

[3:18:12] 2022.

[3:18:15] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:18:18] >> I move to approve 30.01 and

[3:18:21] to exercise the options in the

[3:18:24] 30.02 through 30.06, Erin

[3:18:27] Tedford, district one.

[3:18:29] >> Secondary?

[3:18:31] >>

[3:18:32] - Je seconde, Bruno Tremblay,

[3:18:33] district six. All in favour?

[3:18:37] 30.07 just think of 30.12.

[3:18:40] >> Award of contract for a

[3:18:42] modification works to public

[3:18:43] works yard axes to o G. GIULIANI

[3:18:45] INC. for a tournament of

[3:18:49] $481,000 170.38. -- to better

[3:18:55] secure the large entries with

[3:18:57] vehicle traffic and also

[3:18:59] exceptional side conditions have

[3:19:00] been in contact, the difference

[3:19:01] between the estimated cost has

[3:19:04] also related to the lack of

[3:19:05] labour and shortage of materials

[3:19:07] by the contractors.

[3:19:12] - Octroyer un contrat pour la

[3:19:13] fourniture et la livraison

[3:19:17] (---)

[3:19:18] à Stinson pour un montant total

[3:19:20] de 85758 et 22 taxes incluses

[3:19:22] avec option de renouvellement

[3:19:23] pour les années 2023 et 2024. On

[3:19:24] va en installer sept par année,

[3:19:26] les emplacements restent encore

[3:19:27] à être déterminé.

[3:19:30] >> 30.09, award of contract for

[3:19:32] the purchase and intimidation of

[3:19:34] human resources integrated

[3:19:37] management system for a total

[3:19:38] amount of $749,000 637 tax

[3:19:41] included.

[3:19:51] Currently, we have no

[3:19:53] - En computerized system for

[3:19:54] principe non, on est en plein

[3:19:55] central HR data débat sur les

[3:19:56] procédures, la période des

[3:19:57] questions était au début.

[3:19:58] Management. It's done via

[3:19:59] several systems and many

[3:20:00] interactions must be done

[3:20:01] manually. A second attempt of

[3:20:03] the contract awarded -- under a

[3:20:05] first call has been cancelled as

[3:20:08] the supply was unable to meet

[3:20:09] its commitments and obligations.

[3:20:10] We are going to implement the

[3:20:12] integration of human resources

[3:20:14] management systems that complies

[3:20:15] with the applicable standards

[3:20:17] and practice and in so doing the

[3:20:20] effectiveness -- and resource

[3:20:22] management process. Octroyer un

[3:20:27] contrat pour des travaux de

[3:20:28] peinture de plafonds au centre

[3:20:30] aquatique, à. Findecor pour un

[3:20:35] montant total de 81483,46

[3:20:37] dollars. Suite à des travaux

[3:20:39] déjà en cours pour la nettoyage

[3:20:40] et la remise en état des lieux,

[3:20:41] il reste encore certains

[3:20:42] travaux, entre autres au

[3:20:43] plafond, à repeindre pour éviter

[3:20:44] la prolifération de la rouille

[3:20:45] sur les surfaces métalliques.

[3:20:51] >> 30.11, award of contract for

[3:20:52] the supply and delivery of the

[3:20:54] sidewalk salt spreaders for a

[3:20:55] total amount of $70,030.74 to

[3:20:59] replace obsolete units and

[3:21:00] better meet the growing needs

[3:21:01] for the icing of sidewalks.

[3:21:06] Octroyer un contrat pour les

[3:21:07] services d'entretien ménager au

[3:21:08] Centre sportif Olive-Urquhart, à

[3:21:11] avant-garde dite pour 1 an, pour

[3:21:12] un montant total de 181563,55

[3:21:15] dollars, taxes incluses, avec

[3:21:16] option de renouvellement pour

[3:21:17] deux années. C'est pour répondre

[3:21:19] aux besoins d'entretien de

[3:21:20] bâtiments réguliers.

[3:21:23] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:21:24] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[3:21:27] >> Seconder?

[3:21:28] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[3:21:31] >> All in favour?

[3:21:35] 30. 13 Award a contract for

[3:21:36] maintenance services of the IBM

[3:21:37] storage servers, to ITI, for a

[3:21:38] total amount of $ 51,597. 20,

[3:21:39] taxes included. the sound

[3:21:45] platform is used for the city

[3:21:48] that advises the

[3:21:49] [inaudible]

[3:21:50] wreck locates the -- two data

[3:21:53] centres and allows for the data

[3:21:54] centres redundancy. Autoriser

[3:21:58] l'achat de 19 véhicules légers

[3:21:59] dans le cadre de l'entente pour

[3:22:00] le Regroupement d'achat de biens

[3:22:01] et de services proposé par le

[3:22:03] Centre d'acquisitions

[3:22:04] gouvernementales, pour un

[3:22:05] montant total de 943004 dollars

[3:22:07] virgule 25, taxes incluses. Au

[3:22:09] lieu de procéder nous-mêmes avec

[3:22:10] une série d'appels d'offres

[3:22:11] distincts au cours des années,

[3:22:13] procéder au remplacement de nos

[3:22:14] véhicules selon les besoins de

[3:22:15] nos services, nous avons

[3:22:16] regroupé tous nos besoins dans

[3:22:17] une liste unique qui a été

[3:22:18] intégré à un appel d'offres

[3:22:19] réalisé par le gouvernement du

[3:22:20] Québec. Le Centre d'acquisitions

[3:22:22] gouvernementales, et ce, au

[3:22:23] bénéfice des ministères,

[3:22:24] sociétés d'État, municipalités

[3:22:25] et composantes des réseaux

[3:22:26] scolaires est assemblée qui ont

[3:22:27] choisi de participer à une telle

[3:22:28] démarche. Les économies

[3:22:30] garanties et les livraisons

[3:22:31] obtenus sont substantielles,

[3:22:32] surtout les dates de livraison.

[3:22:33] Et ces livraisons se feront

[3:22:35] progressivement selon le

[3:22:36] calendrier indiqué à l'appel

[3:22:37] d'offres et selon nos reçus. 30.

[3:22:40] 15 Approve change orders to the

[3:22:41] contract undertaken with à L. M.

[3:22:44] L. PAYSAGISTE ET FRÈRES INC.,

[3:22:45] for the replacement of synthetic

[3:22:46] grass surfaces

[3:22:47] (fields 2 and 3)

[3:22:48] at Terra Cotta Park, for a total

[3:22:49] amount of $ 33,520. 39, taxes

[3:22:54] included. extra work was

[3:22:55] required for the modification of

[3:22:57] the soccer lines to comply with

[3:23:00] the future soccer Québec rules.

[3:23:02] Addition of nine player soccer

[3:23:05] goals, modifications of the

[3:23:07] organization planning of the

[3:23:08] contractor work to accommodate

[3:23:10] support teams and school

[3:23:12] activities that have a sport

[3:23:15] program and removal of anchors

[3:23:17] for marker flags on field two

[3:23:18] and three. Approuver des

[3:23:21] modifications au contrat

[3:23:23] intervenu avec construction CP B

[3:23:26] pour la construction d'un

[3:23:27] nouveau poste de quartier pour

[3:23:29] un moteur total de 114326,41.

[3:23:34] Pour diverses modifications

[3:23:35] apportées aux chantiers et aux

[3:23:36] travaux en cours, dans la

[3:23:38] demande et avec l'approbation de

[3:23:39] la Ville de Montréal, la Ville

[3:23:40] de Montréal est la seule

[3:23:41] responsable et payent la

[3:23:42] totalité des coûts. Le rôle de

[3:23:43] la Ville de Pointe-Claire s'est

[3:23:44] limitée à réaliser les dix

[3:23:45] travaux. 30. 17 Approve change

[3:23:49] orders to the contract

[3:23:50] undertaken with LES

[3:23:51] TERRASSEMENTS MONTRÉAL INC., for

[3:23:52] exterior repair works of the

[3:23:53] Ovide Park chalet, for a total

[3:23:54] amount of $ 16,482. 44, taxes

[3:24:01] included. concrete required,

[3:24:04] excessive asphalt on four mark

[3:24:06] around existing underground

[3:24:08] electrical conduits, and

[3:24:09] excavation work of existing

[3:24:11] underground electoral conduits

[3:24:13] under

[3:24:14] [inaudible]

[3:24:15] and the decontamination area.

[3:24:18] Installation of sticks and

[3:24:19] yellow tape to prevent citizen

[3:24:21] traffic on it. Credit obtained

[3:24:24] for a less excavation work than

[3:24:26] anticipated on the south side of

[3:24:27] the building for $4,000, and

[3:24:29] credit obtained for the

[3:24:30] installation of waterproofing

[3:24:31] membrane which required for --

[3:24:35] less surface than anticipated on

[3:24:36] the plans and, finally, a

[3:24:38] removal of an underground tank

[3:24:40] discovered during the excavation

[3:24:42] and -- $15,000. A total of

[3:24:47] 16,000 and $482.44, tax

[3:24:48] included. Approuver des

[3:24:52] modifications au contrat

[3:24:53] intervenu avec aménagement

[3:24:55] sud-ouest pour un jardin de

[3:24:56] lecture et la réfection d'un

[3:24:57] sentier ont pavé de béton

[3:24:58] préfabriqués pour un montant

[3:24:59] total de 1862,88. Dans le cadre

[3:25:04] du contrat de construction des

[3:25:05] fameux jardins en arrière de la

[3:25:07] bibliothèque, il a fallu

[3:25:08] procéder au retrait d'une source

[3:25:10] d'arbres enfuis et des travaux

[3:25:11] supplémentaires pour creuser à

[3:25:12] travers une souche de

[3:25:13] (---)

[3:25:14] enfoui pour réinstaller

[3:25:15] (---)

[3:25:16] . 30. 19 Approve a change order

[3:25:18] to the contract undertaken with

[3:25:19] RÉALISATION DYNAMIQUE INC., for

[3:25:20] the construction of a splash pad

[3:25:22] at Augusta Park, for a total

[3:25:23] credit of $ 7,801. 05, taxes

[3:25:31] included. to approve a credit of

[3:25:35] $7,000 as a consequential

[3:25:37] decrease of contract value due

[3:25:39] to the abandonment of a

[3:25:40] waterproof cabinet originally

[3:25:42] planned to protect the water

[3:25:43] feature controls a stem. As a

[3:25:45] sanitary building, it would also

[3:25:49] [inaudible]

[3:25:50] instead be installed in this

[3:25:52] building.

[3:25:53] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:25:55] >> Brent Cowan, district eight,

[3:25:58] moving item 30.13 to 30.19.

[3:26:01] >> Seconder?

[3:26:02] >> Paul Bissonnette, Paul

[3:26:03] Bissonnette, district deux.

[3:26:04] District to.

[3:26:05] >> All in favour?

[3:26:10] >> Okay.

[3:26:16] - Régulariser la dépense envers

[3:26:19] pro magique et maintenance pour

[3:26:20] des services entretien ménager

[3:26:21] pour divers bâtiments de la

[3:26:22] ville, pour un montant total de

[3:26:24] 76211,21 dollars, taxes

[3:26:25] incluses. À la table 23 contrats

[3:26:28] de services d'entretien ménager

[3:26:29] ainsi que le lancement d'appel

[3:26:31] d'offres public pour les

[3:26:32] services d'entretien ménager

[3:26:33] pour les bâtiments de la ville,

[3:26:34] nous avions effectué une demande

[3:26:36] auprès de plusieurs fournisseurs

[3:26:37] pour combler les besoins

[3:26:38] imminents. La mesure qui est

[3:26:39] maintenant au plus bas

[3:26:40] soumissionnaire

[3:26:41] (---)

[3:26:42] réaliser les dépenses engagées

[3:26:43] pour les services Aux bâtiments

[3:26:44] de la ville durant ces périodes.

[3:26:45] 30. 21 Approve the evaluation

[3:26:46] criteria to be used within the

[3:26:47] framework of a call for tenders

[3:26:48] for professional services for

[3:26:49] economic development support in

[3:26:50] the Pointe-Claire Village. try

[3:26:55] to defy and retain the

[3:26:57] professional services of a

[3:26:59] specialized firm to develop -- a

[3:27:02] margins in the village of

[3:27:03] Pointe-Claire, and operation for

[3:27:06] entering major infrastructure

[3:27:07] work to be carried out in the

[3:27:08] village of Pointe-Claire.

[3:27:12] Approuver les critères

[3:27:13] d'évaluation devant être

[3:27:14] employés dans le cadre d'un

[3:27:15] appel d'offres pour des services

[3:27:16] professionnels de photos et de

[3:27:17] vidéos pour l'année 2023 avec

[3:27:19] l'option de renouvellement pour

[3:27:20] l'année 2024. C'est pour

[3:27:22] répondre aux besoins réguliers

[3:27:23] de la ville. Et finalement 30.

[3:27:26] 23 Reject the bid received

[3:27:27] within the framework of a call

[3:27:28] for tenders for plumbing

[3:27:29] replacement at City Hall. the

[3:27:36] bids received far exceeded more

[3:27:38] than 66% our additional

[3:27:39] estimate. We will -- energy

[3:27:40] course.

[3:27:44] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:27:46] >> I move to adjust the expense

[3:27:49] at 30.2 and to approve the

[3:27:51] evaluation criteria to 30.21 and

[3:27:54] 30.22 and reject the bid at

[3:27:56] 30.23. Erin Tedford, district

[3:27:57] one.

[3:27:58] >> Seconder?

[3:28:00] >> I second, Cynthia Homan,

[3:28:01] district five.

[3:28:02] >> All in favour? Okay.

[3:28:09] - Déposer la liste des

[3:28:10] changements au personnel par

[3:28:11] décision délégués pour le mois

[3:28:13] d'août 2022 tel que préparé par

[3:28:14] monsieur Vincent Proulx,

[3:28:15] directeur des ressources

[3:28:16] humaines. C'est un dépôt.

[3:28:19] - Excuse-moi.

[3:28:20] - 50. 02 Approve the list of

[3:28:21] non-delegated staff changes as

[3:28:22] of August 16, 2022.

[3:28:31] Nomination de directeur général

[3:28:32] ou d'une directrice générale par

[3:28:33] intérim. La Loi sur les cités et

[3:28:35] villes énonce l'obligation pour

[3:28:36] une ville de nommer et d'avoir

[3:28:38] en poste un directeur général.

[3:28:40] Suite à l'annonce du départ de

[3:28:42] monsieur Robert

[3:28:44] (---)

[3:28:45] , le 26 août prochain, la ville

[3:28:46] a amorcé un processus de

[3:28:47] recrutement afin d'embaucher un

[3:28:49] nouveau directeur ou une

[3:28:50] nouvelle directrice générale.

[3:28:52] Dans l'intervalle, il y a lieu

[3:28:53] de nommer monsieur Daniel

[3:28:54] Séguin, actuellement directeur

[3:28:56] des finances et trésorier de la

[3:28:57] ville, pour agir à titre de

[3:28:59] directeur et général par intérim

[3:29:01] de la, ville et ce jusqu'à ce

[3:29:02] que le Conseil procède à la

[3:29:04] nomination d'un directeur ou

[3:29:05] d'une directrice générale. Cette

[3:29:08] nomination est effective au 26

[3:29:09] août.

[3:29:11] >> Do I have a mover?

[3:29:15] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[3:29:18] >> Seconder?

[3:29:22] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[3:29:24] >> All in favour? Okay.

[3:29:29] - Variable. Avis de motion dépôt

[3:29:35] d'un projet de règlement

[3:29:36] modifiant le Règlement de

[3:29:37] contrôle intérimaire

[3:29:38] (---)

[3:29:39] en lien avec la révision du plan

[3:29:40] et de règlements d'urbanisme. Ce

[3:29:43] projet dérèglement vise à

[3:29:46] exclure ou associé au projet

[3:29:47] connu sous le nom

[3:29:48] (---)

[3:29:49] de même que Liu associé au

[3:29:50] projet du Quartier

[3:29:51] (---)

[3:29:52] .

[3:29:53] >> Does anybody have notes?

[3:29:57] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen.

[3:30:02] - Alors, Madame Thibault, vous

[3:30:03] voudriez...?

[3:30:04] - Oui, merci. Quelques mots

[3:30:05] avant la levée de la séance. A

[3:30:08] few words before closure. Au nom

[3:30:09] des employés de la Ville de

[3:30:10] Pointe-Claire et un moment

[3:30:11] personnel, je tiens à remercier

[3:30:13] chaleureusement monsieur

[3:30:14] Robert-F. Weemaes pour l'immense

[3:30:15] travail qu'il a accompli au

[3:30:16] cours des dernières années. Il a

[3:30:19] dirigé la ville avec intégrité

[3:30:20] et dévouement, il a inspiré et

[3:30:22] motivé les employés de la ville

[3:30:23] au quotidien. Il va nous

[3:30:24] manquer. Nous souhaitons le

[3:30:27] meilleur pour l'avenir.

[3:30:28] (rires)

[3:30:32] On behalf of the employees of

[3:30:35] city of Pointe-Claire and

[3:30:36] myself, I would like to extend a

[3:30:37] warm thank you to Mr. Weemaes

[3:30:40] for tremendous work he has done

[3:30:41] over the past few years. He has

[3:30:43] led the city with integrity and

[3:30:46] dedication. He has inspired and

[3:30:48] motivated city employees on a

[3:30:50] daily basis. We will miss him

[3:30:53] and wish him all the best for

[3:30:54] the future.

[3:30:57] (applaudissements)

[3:30:59] [applause]

[3:31:04] - Monsieur le Maire, mesdames,

[3:31:06] messieurs, membres du conseil,

[3:31:07] mes amis les employés. Mesdames

[3:31:09] et messieurs mes citoyens, ce

[3:31:10] soir, c'était ma dernière

[3:31:11] assemblée publique dans une

[3:31:12] carrière où j'aurai fait

[3:31:13] au-dessus de 1000 assemblées

[3:31:14] publiques. Ça a été pour moi,

[3:31:17] travailler 8 heures à

[3:31:18] Pointe-Claire, un honneur et un

[3:31:19] plaisir. Honneur parce que

[3:31:21] c'était une équipe

[3:31:22] exceptionnelle, autant au niveau

[3:31:23] des élus que les employés de la

[3:31:24] population. Ça a été agréable de

[3:31:26] travailler avec des gens

[3:31:27] déterminés et engagés à faire de

[3:31:28] leur ville la meilleure ville

[3:31:29] possible. Et aussi un plaisir

[3:31:30] parce que j'ai trouvé les défis

[3:31:33] quotidiens, tous les défis

[3:31:34] quotidiens qu'on peut vouloir

[3:31:35] rencontrer, auxquelles on peut

[3:31:36] faire, face et surtout la

[3:31:37] collaboration nécessaire pour

[3:31:38] réaliser quoi que ce soit. Tout

[3:31:40] seul, je n'aurais rien fait. Si

[3:31:43] je réussis à le faire, c'est

[3:31:44] parce que le travail de tout le

[3:31:45] monde, c'est le travail des

[3:31:46] élus, de tous les employés

[3:31:47] surtout. Sans eux, il n'y a rien

[3:31:48] qui se fait.

[3:31:50] >> I would like to thank

[3:31:51] everybody for the support they

[3:31:54] gave me over the last eight

[3:31:55] years, and the collaboration you

[3:31:57] gave to me, I will be sure to

[3:32:00] remember me it for the city of

[3:32:02] Pointe-Claire, and for the

[3:32:03] coming years, to the Association

[3:32:06] of -- to be able to help the

[3:32:08] city and the files with the

[3:32:10] agglomeration of Montréal. We

[3:32:11] know they have -- thank you very

[3:32:14] much.

[3:32:17] - Merci, Monsieur Weemaes.

[3:32:24] >> On that wonderful note,

[3:32:25] closure? Do I have a mover?

[3:32:30] >> I move to close, Tara

[3:32:31] Stainforth, district four.

[3:32:33] >> Seconder?

[3:32:34] >> Seconded, Bruno Tremblay,

[3:32:36] district six.

[3:32:37] >> All in favour? Do we vote?

[3:32:39] All in favour? Okay, there we

[3:32:41] Merci tout le monde. Go. Thank

[3:32:42] you, folks. Merci, Monsieur

[3:32:43] Ouimet.

2022-08-16 - Conseil de la Ville de Pointe-Claire

Transcript