[1:11] Recording in progress.

[1:12] Good evening everyone.

[1:14] I would like to congratulate

[1:15] you at the meeting

[1:16] city electoral council

[1:18] Pano August 27, 2026

[1:19] at 6:00 p.m. Announcing

[1:20] meeting. Nominal

[1:22] the voice of the council members.

[1:23] Weber Gini

[1:24] Alexander

[1:25] Mike Gardner.

[1:28] Please, everyone.

[1:29] can you stand up for

[1:30] taking an oath

[1:31] loyalty.

[1:40] Swear on

[1:40] allegiance to the flag

[1:41] United States

[1:43] America and

[1:43] the republic that he

[1:44] represents, one

[1:45] nations under God,

[1:46] indivisible, with

[1:47] freedom and

[1:48] justice for

[1:49] everyone. Good.

[2:03] Approval of the order

[2:05] daytime. Any

[2:06] changes to the order

[2:07] daytime?

[2:11] Station

[2:11] snow removal regarding

[2:13] the snow is still here, as is

[2:14] after the motorway

[2:20] .

[2:20] Yes.

[2:21] Something else

[2:23] will remain,

[2:24] I would also say if

[2:25] only someone else doesn't

[2:27] wants to leave it at

[2:28] point 12, discussion

[2:29] future

[2:29] map update

[2:30] land use. I

[2:31] asked to include this

[2:33] to the agenda, I

[2:34] spent some

[2:35] research, and I feel

[2:36] satisfied, so we just want

[2:38] to inform people,

[2:39] when will it end

[2:40] submission deadline

[2:41] I don't see any comments in

[2:43] this need,

[2:45] okay, any others

[2:47] changes. Something else? I will consider the offer.

[2:51] on approval

[2:52] agenda with

[2:53] changes.

[2:54] I will make a suggestion.

[2:55] on approval

[2:56] agenda with

[2:57] changes.

[2:59] Any discussion?

[3:00] Is anyone "in favor"?

[3:02] 1.

[3:05] Public

[3:06] discussion. Not

[3:09] Could you come over?

[3:10] table and just

[3:11] to say your name,

[3:12] Please? Speaking

[3:14] about today

[3:15] evening, um, about

[3:16] tax accounts,

[3:17] My name is El. Of

[3:21] your tax

[3:23] accounts, I heard

[3:24] a lot of talking and

[3:25] various things, um, from

[3:26] public, um,

[3:27] some on the second

[3:28] place, some on

[3:29] the first. So I just

[3:32] I'll make it short.

[3:33] quick comment.

[3:34] So, regarding your

[3:35] taxes if you

[3:36] taxpayer and in

[3:37] Do you have any questions about

[3:38] account, please

[3:38] call for

[3:39] the number specified in

[3:40] upper part

[3:41] account. I will do everything.

[3:42] it is possible that

[3:43] answer yours

[3:44] question. If I don't

[3:45] I can answer

[3:46] him, and this

[3:47] regarding the assessment, I

[3:48] I'll hire someone else,

[3:49] who can you

[3:50] help. Ahem,

[3:51] information sheet,

[3:52] which was included in

[3:54] your, um,

[3:54] tax account,

[3:56] everyone had to get

[3:57] its. I hope I

[3:59] didn't miss anyone.

[4:00] It was a letter.

[4:01] politeness. That's all.

[4:03] Just a letter

[4:04] politeness with

[4:05] information about

[4:06] changes that mail

[4:07] submitted over a year ago

[4:08] . This is simply for the purpose of

[4:11] so that you know that you don't

[4:12] it's worth just throwing

[4:13] your tax

[4:14] postal account

[4:16] the box outside or

[4:17] anywhere, or in

[4:18] your personal

[4:19] mailbox 10

[4:20] November, thinking,

[4:21] that he will be

[4:22] delivered quickly.

[4:24] This will not happen. They even take them away

[4:27] near the post office

[4:28] mailboxes at the post office.

[4:29] They send them.

[4:31] Sometimes it takes two-

[4:31] three days to get them

[4:32] put the post office

[4:33] stamp. You will

[4:34] overdue. Such

[4:36] It has already happened. I

[4:37] I'm trying to do

[4:38] so that this does not happen

[4:39] it happened that people

[4:40] were not punished,

[4:41] thinking that they

[4:42] paid on time

[4:43] taxes. So this

[4:44] part

[4:45] information sheet

[4:46] is simply a courtesy.

[4:49] I also spoke with

[4:50] two separate

[4:51] postmasters,

[4:52] everyone in Bennington,

[4:54] to check if it is

[4:55] Indeed. I found

[4:56] it's on the internet, and that's it

[4:57] That's what happens.

[4:59] They take him away,

[5:00] picked up, in a day

[5:01] -two when he gets there

[5:02] gets it, it

[5:02] are passed through

[5:03] car. It is not on it.

[5:04] postal address is given

[5:05] stamp on the day when

[5:06] you throw it away. If

[5:07] you need

[5:08] postmark,

[5:09] take it to

[5:10] mail. Ask

[5:11] postmaster

[5:13] put on it

[5:14] date November 10 or 9

[5:15] . They will deliver

[5:17] stamp. His will be

[5:18] sent. I will receive an envelope from

[5:20] with two stamps. Ahem,

[5:23] and I will take the one that is

[5:24] mail that you

[5:25] ask. I will take it.

[5:27] fastest postal service

[5:28] stamp so that you don't

[5:30] had delays. Ahem,

[5:33] the letter also states

[5:34] my hours

[5:35] receipts, in which I

[5:36] actually here. We have

[5:39] mailbox

[5:40] outside, and we can't

[5:41] to come at these hours

[5:42] . Hmm, whatever will be

[5:43] dropped into this box

[5:45] at 17:00 November 10

[5:46] after 5:00 p.m., I

[5:47] I'll check it at 5:00 PM.

[5:48] Anything that will be omitted

[5:50] after 5:00 PM, there will be

[5:51] overdue. Everything that

[5:52] paid online, will be

[5:53] overdue after 5:00 PM

[5:55] , because electronic

[5:56] letters have a mark

[5:57] time. Um, and one more thing:

[5:59] tax rate, and

[6:00] if you don't understand,

[6:02] how to install

[6:03] tax rate,

[6:04] come and

[6:05] ask us, don't

[6:06] guess. Not

[6:08] accuse

[6:09] treasurer. Not

[6:10] blame the election

[6:11] commission. Rate

[6:13] tax establishes

[6:14] the election commission, which

[6:16] receives documentation

[6:17] from the treasurer. These

[6:20] the numbers are taken from

[6:21] your march on

[6:22] voting. They are

[6:23] your budget

[6:24] in numbers, the amount that

[6:26] need to increase

[6:27] due to taxes.

[6:29] The same applies to

[6:30] school budget, and

[6:31] the state establishes these

[6:32] rates. So know that

[6:33] we don't choose any

[6:35] what rate, what

[6:35] we want. We also

[6:36] taxpayers.

[6:38] Therefore, when you

[6:38] come to ask about yours

[6:40] tax bill,

[6:41] be kind to

[6:42] everyone with whom

[6:42] talk, because sometimes

[6:43] I'm not here, but others are.

[6:44] trying

[6:45] to answer your

[6:46] question. Hmm, and this

[6:47] all I can say

[6:49] . Thank you very much for that.

[6:50] allowed me.

[6:52] Thank you, Helen. Thank you for

[6:55] clarification regarding

[6:56] some questions that

[6:57] were small

[6:58] the problem is the last

[7:00] several years.

[7:06] Yes. And it is marked.

[7:08] This is clearly marked,

[7:09] where is it located

[7:09] submission box

[7:10] messages here, in

[7:11] city

[7:11] administration.

[7:12] Yes. And when you

[7:14] come, it means

[7:16] what you write, and this

[7:17] also marked. Yes.

[7:22] Do we have any others?

[7:23] public comments?

[7:29] But two weeks ago I

[7:31] said, during

[7:32] What did you just say?

[7:33] your name? Your name.

[7:34] Judy Stone.

[7:35] Thank you.

[7:36] Valley Drive, which is on

[7:37] west bank

[7:38] rivers.

[7:43] Two weeks ago, I

[7:44] to everyone present here,

[7:45] they said it would be on

[7:47] place for mine

[7:49] oil company

[7:50] or other petroleum products

[7:51] companies so that they

[7:52] could go there.

[7:54] Nothing has been said yet.

[7:55] and done. I still am

[7:56] I meet people.

[7:57] in the middle of the bridge, and there

[7:58] one line is written.

[8:02] Hmm, I feel a little gross,

[8:03] because I wonder if I would be

[8:05] member of the board, and

[8:06] did I need it?

[8:07] my dear, you know,

[8:09] um, leveled or

[8:10] broken for some

[8:11] special event, or,

[8:13] you know, trenches,

[8:14] dug up on

[8:15] Montgomery Road. I understand that, but that's how it is.

[8:20] . And I understand him.

[8:21] Custom-made cars.

[8:24] My question is: why?

[8:25] they can go for

[8:26] barrels, bring them,

[8:27] instead of

[8:28] wait for someone,

[8:30] Do you know who will deliver them?

[8:33] And I am very disappointed.

[8:34] because my oil

[8:35] the company, KCA, expects that

[8:37] I will say "yes", someone

[8:38] here will call them and

[8:39] will say: "We, you can

[8:41] "to come and deliver"

[8:42] because I really am

[8:44] less than a quarter of a tank. And I

[8:46] not very much

[8:47] satisfied because now

[8:48] , since the city was founded

[8:49] closed, price increased

[8:51] for 80 cents. So I

[8:52] I'm crying instead of 400

[8:54] quarters, now I'm crying 505

[8:55] , and I don't think that's

[8:57] fair to me

[8:58] or from someone

[8:59] another.

[9:00] You know what I mean?

[9:01] I say? If someone from

[9:02] could you go there

[9:03] to apply, would it be

[9:04] otherwise? That's what I need.

[9:05] interesting. You guys,

[9:07] Are you delaying this?

[9:08] April. This is disgusting, and I don't know. I am sure

[9:12] that other people in my

[9:13] the area feel that

[9:14] exactly. They don't know,

[9:16] What are they doing? They say, "We don't know,

[9:18] how are we going

[9:19] get oil...

[9:20] some of us, western

[9:21] oil, they transport it

[9:22] oil. ACN, Kevin Green,

[9:24] isn't that right?

[9:26] Maybe Mike Green

[9:27] the only one who, for

[9:28] in the words of his wife,

[9:29] follows the rules

[9:31] or requirements, but more

[9:32] no one

[9:32] complies. I saw

[9:34] like a dump truck of the past

[9:35] I was passing by at night.

[9:37] him. I think I am

[9:38] I miss. I am not

[9:40] I understand, probably.

[9:41] I was passing by today.

[9:44] OK,

[9:46] no one reads the signs.

[9:48] This must be a sign.

[9:49] stops with three

[9:50] directions, right? And that,

[9:51] what I heard two weeks ago

[9:52] so, one by one

[9:53] every corner,

[9:54] this was not the case

[9:55] done. I think I would

[9:56] installed something, but

[9:57] no one reads this,

[9:58] because I was sitting there

[9:59] last night,

[9:59] trying

[10:00] to return to one's own

[10:01] the house I live in

[10:02] there, across the river. Wagons

[10:03] they are descending

[10:04] just keep going

[10:05] go. Not even

[10:06] are stopping. So the sign

[10:07] I don't even stop...

[10:08] I mean, if there

[10:10] someone was sitting, you know,

[10:11] clinging to people,

[10:12] they would earn

[10:12] a lot of money. I

[10:14] just, you know, me

[10:15] I just don't know. I am not

[10:17] I know, have we had any more?

[10:18] barrels, couldn't we

[10:20] to get them. They are not

[10:21] put this

[10:22] week. I mean,

[10:23] it was two weeks

[10:24] ago. So, I have this

[10:25] the feeling that it was

[10:27] said only for that

[10:28] to calm us down,

[10:29] and it seemed to me that

[10:30] I was deceived because

[10:31] Joel sat nearby and

[10:33] said: "We will do it

[10:34] in two weeks", and he

[10:35] said this, and it seems

[10:36] , everyone heard it,

[10:38] and now this is not the place."

[10:39] So, here we are.

[10:41] Well, I think we...I

[10:42] I don't want you.

[10:43] interrupt and

[10:44] stop...you know, I'm with

[10:45] I agree with this. But,

[10:47] You know, something is needed.

[10:48] do. People just

[10:49] they constantly say that

[10:50] this will be done by

[10:51] two weeks, and this

[10:52] no. Now it will be

[10:54] two more weeks, maybe

[10:55] or another month. I have

[10:56] meaning that it gives...

[10:58] Are you going?

[10:58] call Mike

[11:00] Green tomorrow and

[11:00] to say that he

[11:01] fill Judy's tank in

[11:02] Tuesday,

[11:03] because last week you

[11:04] told Tara that she

[11:05] can't do this

[11:06] until everything is

[11:07] ready. I remember that.

[11:09] See?

[11:10] Oh, this

[11:11] yeah...I don't know. I have

[11:12] I mean, I don't know what

[11:14] you guys want

[11:15] make. Do you want

[11:16] deliver me oil,

[11:18] You know, I'll take it.

[11:19] five-gallon buckets,

[11:20] I'll bring her in my...

[11:21] Hey, I don't care.

[11:23] I agree, J. So what

[11:25] I will say that this is what two

[11:27] Friday ago, after

[11:28] the meeting at which we

[11:29] were here and we said

[11:31] two weeks, yes,

[11:34] we ordered barricades,

[11:35] barrels, whatever. We

[11:38] ordered them that

[11:39] Friday morning. Then

[11:41] Where did they come from?

[11:42] It's me, Joel...I don't know,

[11:44] Judy...I have...

[11:46] mind, isn't that what was taken?

[11:51] I feel like I would

[11:52] I thought that was so

[11:53] how can you do it

[11:55] this is the end,

[11:56] instead of

[11:57] to wait for someone

[11:58] dragging your feet and

[11:59] will bring them to you...

[12:00] Well, I...and I don't...you know,

[12:01] this question is for Joel

[12:03] ...I think you know,

[12:04] Where do they come from?

[12:06] I don't...I don't know that we don't

[12:07] we control, so to speak

[12:08] say, road

[12:09] brigade, if it is

[12:10] applies to any

[12:11] which of our

[12:12] departments, whether

[12:13] road wastewater

[12:14] or overloaded

[12:15] station. So I don't know.

[12:18] where are they from

[12:19] are taken. I know that,

[12:24] Sorry, I had

[12:25] a few conversations with

[12:26] Joel during

[12:27] the last one...obviously

[12:28] , we didn't talk about

[12:29] these are the first three or four

[12:30] days after order,

[12:32] but we had this

[12:33] conversation several times,

[12:34] this week a few

[12:35] times.

[12:39] So my question is: are they

[12:41] here?

[12:41] No. When they

[12:42] will they come?

[12:44] A week and they told me this in

[12:46] Friday before.

[12:47] They said that

[12:47] a week and a half, or

[12:49] now?

[12:50] No. No.

[12:51] A week and a half from

[12:51] the moment of the initial

[12:53] order. Yes.

[13:12] You borrow

[13:13] someone, for example,

[13:14] through someone through

[13:15] state. This is what I want. Noting this.

[13:19] What is it?

[13:20] Are you buying this?

[13:21] Yes. Yes.

[13:24] So the thing is, Judy,

[13:25] which is a little more than

[13:27] , um, and I'm going

[13:28] explain this because

[13:29] I understand your

[13:30] disappointment. Also

[13:32] I think there is...I think,

[13:34] You are absolutely right. THERE ARE

[13:35] more people who

[13:36] disappointed than

[13:37] only you.

[13:38] Yes. I mean, is it

[13:40] Can he come?

[13:42] So I don't know. I am not

[13:46] I know about Mike and KCM.

[13:49] The other day she said,

[13:50] who invited someone from

[13:52] city, so that he

[13:53] called and

[13:54] said everything was fine.

[13:55] IN

[13:55] I was personal.

[13:56] conversation. I was on

[13:58] construction

[13:58] the site. Mike

[14:00] repaired stoves, hmm,

[14:02] on the same

[14:02] construction

[14:03] the site. So,

[14:05] Sorry, I don't know.

[14:06] exactly what day is it was, Judy, but it

[14:09] was after our

[14:10] meeting here.

[14:11] Good. I saw him.

[14:12] wife two days ago.

[14:13] Yes. So, uh, I don't

[14:15] I think it was Los Angeles.

[14:16] and this is probably

[14:17] , was at the beginning

[14:18] last week,

[14:19] actually, when I

[14:20] talked to Mike.

[14:22] But, therefore, partly

[14:24] the reason why

[14:25] borrow barrels or,

[14:26] hmm, you know, buy

[14:29] them in place, I don't...

[14:30] you know, this is how I already

[14:32] said we don't

[14:32] we control it on

[14:33] microlevels. Lend

[14:37] barrels in this case

[14:38] It would be foolish,

[14:39] because we

[14:40] will have to

[14:40] modify...

[14:44] Let me

[14:45] to paraphrase that. We believe that we

[14:50] need

[14:50] modify barrels,

[14:52] so that they were

[14:52] vandal-proof.

[14:59] That's right. That's why we

[15:02] just go to

[15:03] Bennington, Shesbury

[15:04] or someone else to

[15:06] borrow, or even

[15:07] to the state to

[15:08] borrow barrels and

[15:09] put them there. To us

[15:13] need

[15:13] modify barrels, and

[15:15] we have...Joel has

[15:16] idea how to modify

[15:17] barrels so that they become

[15:19] a permanent thing that

[15:20] will last a long time and not

[15:21] will be thrown into the river

[15:23] . That's why we do nothing.

[15:27] did not borrow.

[15:30] So they spent 20 barrels

[15:31] . How many barrels? I

[15:36] received...

[15:41] So, you know, that's why

[15:43] we didn't just borrow

[15:44] barrels to put

[15:45] them there, you know, and we are

[15:47] Judy...I'm wasting

[15:52] money,

[15:57] you know, Joel has an action

[15:59] . There is a limit from which they come, you know, in

[16:05] there is a limit from which

[16:06] they are leaving. So

[16:21] somehow, you know

[16:22] , Joel has an idea that

[16:24] he is going

[16:27] to make sure they don't

[16:29] found themselves in the river, in

[16:30] floating waterfalls.

[16:38] I mean, we

[16:39] waiting for the barrels, how

[16:40] just get them,

[16:42] but, according to Joel,

[16:43] Correct me if I am.

[16:45] I'm wrong. No, if there is one

[16:48] vehicle,

[16:49] if the truck

[16:50] Mike is the only one

[16:51] vehicle

[16:52] on the bridge,

[16:54] This bridge is not there now.

[16:55] by mail order

[16:58] . So, is it would help if I can take

[17:08] DMV announcement, i.e.

[17:10] leave it, but

[17:11] tell them this. So,

[17:15] if you, if you, before

[17:17] than to go, before

[17:18] than to go

[17:19] tonight, I know that Mike and Casey

[17:21] have my number

[17:22] mobile phone.

[17:28] I can eat them too.

[17:29] to call. Yes,

[17:31] I'll call Mike.

[17:32] I can

[17:33] call Mike

[17:34] tomorrow.

[17:34] Tuesday.

[17:35] What is it?

[17:36] Tuesday.

[17:37] I'll call Mike.

[17:39] They are here on Tuesday.

[17:40] So

[17:40] I will call Mike.

[17:42] tomorrow.

[17:42] Good. On Tuesday.

[17:45] It's better not to forget.

[17:48] You better take mine.

[17:49] phone number and

[17:50] write to me

[17:51] reminder.

[17:52] Yes, but you'd better take it.

[17:53] my phone number and

[17:54] write to me

[17:54] reminder or something

[17:55] That's it, Judy. And this

[17:56] normally. And I, and I with

[17:58] I agree with this. Good. But

[17:59] Julie, everyone is here.

[18:00] they will tell you that

[18:01] Better write to me or

[18:02] something like that. But

[18:03] I will call you.

[18:04] They probably do too.

[18:05] They know your number.

[18:06] Yes, they know.

[18:07] Yes. Tell her to

[18:08] I called you.

[18:09] IN

[18:09] Casey, can you...

[18:10] pass it on to them

[18:11] message to

[18:11] they called

[18:12] me, if you want. And this

[18:13] may be the best

[18:14] decision if they

[18:15] I will be called,

[18:16] Be honest with yourself. I will pass this on to your...I

[18:19] I don't want to do it there.

[18:21] Why? I don't want to do it.

[18:23] this is live, but I...I

[18:24] I'll wait.

[18:25] I'll pass it on to you.

[18:29] Ellen says that she

[18:30] no matter who she is...

[18:33] So, honestly,

[18:35] Judy, this is where we are now.

[18:36] . And I completely understand.

[18:38] your disappointment. I

[18:39] ...I really...

[18:40] I know.

[18:41] You spend on 80

[18:42] cents...80 cents

[18:43] more than a dollar,

[18:44] You know, for oil. my

[18:45] bicycle. Yes.

[18:52] Let Casey

[18:53] call me or

[18:54] another girl in...another

[18:55] the girl in the office too

[18:56] super cute. So, well, in

[18:58] There is one more in the office, besides

[18:59] his wife. Yes. But

[19:03] in any

[19:04] anyway, we...we...we

[19:05] ...we...we...we...we...we...

[19:06] we...we...we...we...we...we

[19:07] ...we...we...we...can

[19:08] to work on this,

[19:09] and I will work on it

[19:10] tomorrow. IN

[19:11] Are you okay?

[19:14] Thank you. It seems that

[19:19] No, you're fine. IN

[19:21] You're all right, Judy.

[19:22] It was...And it was

[19:23] long. And I have to

[19:25] mind,

[19:26] Thank you, Judy. Beautiful

[19:29] nights.

[19:40] Thank you. Are there any more?

[19:41] public comments,

[19:43] Hannah? Yes.

[19:47] Good. Discussion with

[19:49] Lisa from CAT TV.

[19:58] Thank you for inviting me.

[19:59] today

[20:00] in the evening. My name is

[20:03] Director, I am here today.

[20:08] at a meeting in the evening.

[20:16] Um, I'm very grateful for

[20:17] the opportunity to be here,

[20:18] to discuss, um, and

[20:20] uh, our role in

[20:21] highlighting these

[20:22] meetings. Unfortunately, I

[20:28] couldn't be here

[20:29] tonight, to agree to the terms

[20:31] this vacation, so

[20:33] I know that she is.

[20:34] did, but I thought it would be

[20:36] a good idea

[20:37] to talk to you,

[20:38] guys. Um, I understand,

[20:42] that the council decided not to renew the agreement. Em

[20:46] , and uh, disappointed. I don't quite understand.

[20:49] to argue with

[20:50] about this. Um, I respect the process.

[20:52] decision-making

[20:53] council, and I just

[20:54] I wanted it clearly.

[20:55] clarify. We are very

[20:57] we take it seriously

[20:59] to our relationship with

[21:00] municipal

[21:01] partners. Um, us too

[21:02] We respect the advice, with

[21:03] which we work, and

[21:04] important work that

[21:06] you are doing. Um, we

[21:08] always considered these

[21:10] partnerships as

[21:10] opportunity to work

[21:12] together, inform

[21:13] residents and

[21:14] engage communities. Ahem,

[21:16] and provide access

[21:18] to the local

[21:19] municipality. Ahem,

[21:20] so, as I said, I think it is important that

[21:23] we shared ours

[21:24] point of view and, um,

[21:26] made sure that everyone

[21:27] understand that we do, why we do it like we do it

[21:30] we do, and we had, um,

[21:32] you know, the opportunity

[21:33] to ask a question,

[21:34] when do you have any

[21:35] question. Probably,

[21:37] couldn't hear you in

[21:38] frame. I just wanted to

[21:39] make sure that everyone

[21:41] understood. Um, so

[21:43] I tried

[21:44] prepare, um,

[21:45] you know, statements on

[21:47] based on some conversations,

[21:48] which I heard from the council.

[21:50] I hope I will answer many

[21:52] questions, but if not,

[21:53] please inform

[21:55] me. Um, obviously I am

[21:56] I understand that the cost

[21:58] was a council problem,

[21:59] which is clear,

[22:00] considering your

[22:01] limited budgets. Ahem,

[22:03] so I just wanted to discuss

[22:05] tariff increase.

[22:07] We notified the city

[22:08] in one year about

[22:09] tariff increase.

[22:10] Our rates are not

[22:11] increased since 2019

[22:13] year. Hmm, this tariff

[22:14] is 50 dollars

[22:16] per hour. Um, and he

[22:17] $50 left

[22:18] per hour during

[22:19] eight years old. Uh,

[22:21] this year it's 75

[22:22] dollars per hour, which

[22:23] there are

[22:23] competitive

[22:25] for a professional price on

[22:26] live broadcasts and

[22:27] production. Uh, us

[22:31] asked to negotiate

[22:32] about this price, perhaps,

[22:33] in early July, and I

[22:35] couldn't do it

[22:36] through our

[22:37] partner

[22:37] relationships with others

[22:39] municipalities. I

[22:42] did not consider it appropriate

[22:43] to set a lower

[22:45] a bet for women,

[22:46] while others

[22:47] will pay another. Uh,

[22:49] so I think you,

[22:51] Guys, agree with

[22:52] hereby. Uh, but I

[22:54] proposed

[22:55] to yield to

[22:56] processing fees, which

[22:58] changed this year.

[23:00] Uh, so again,

[23:02] I thought it was important.

[23:03] to warn you a year in advance

[23:04] so that you can

[23:05] prepare your own

[23:06] budget and, uh,

[23:07] put any

[23:08] questions and make up

[23:09] budget accordingly.

[23:11] So, uh, CAT has been around since 1991.

[23:15] year. Within 28

[23:17] years we have been offering

[23:19] services at your own expense. So we

[23:22] covered each

[23:23] school meeting

[23:25] council and electoral council

[23:26] in the cities that we serve, for

[23:28] own expense. Uh, uh,

[23:30] In 2019, we realized

[23:32] that our model

[23:33] financing

[23:34] is changing.

[23:35] Technologies

[23:36] changed. Regulations

[23:38] did not change. People

[23:39] stopped cable

[23:41] television that we

[23:42] finances. And to us

[23:43] really need

[23:44] was to think about

[23:45] our long-term

[23:46] stability. So we

[23:48] decided to conclude

[23:49] contract with

[23:50] institutions and our

[23:51] city school

[23:52] advice to reimburse part

[23:54] actual costs,

[23:55] related to

[23:55] conducting these

[23:56] meetings. We cover over 200

[24:00] meetings so that you

[24:01] could explain this. I would like to say that

[24:06] the point is not that

[24:07] we made money on

[24:08] municipal

[24:09] meetings. The matter is

[24:10] in order to cover

[24:11] expenses, and we have

[24:12] very strong

[24:13] dedication to our

[24:14] mission and our

[24:15] communities, but we

[24:16] should also lead

[24:17] your business and

[24:18] to stay financially

[24:19] safe. So ours

[24:26] fee actually

[24:27] covers the time

[24:28] staff,

[24:29] equipment for

[24:30] subtitles,

[24:31] reusable direct

[24:32] Facebook broadcasts,

[24:33] YouTube, Comcast channel 1085,

[24:35] our website and

[24:36] mobile application, and

[24:37] also processing

[24:38] meetings after

[24:39] this and the organization

[24:41] and management

[24:41] special

[24:42] archived

[24:43] playlists. So I understand that it can

[24:50] it seems like we're just

[24:51] press the button.

[24:53] But behind this button

[24:54] There is a lot going on. THERE ARE

[24:56] people, there is equipment, there is

[24:58] technology, education,

[24:59] preparation and

[25:00] dissemination. Um, and

[25:03] more importantly, there is

[25:04] connection to

[25:05] residences of Cat. Um, I also understand that

[25:09] were certain

[25:10] concerns about

[25:11] that Kat is physically not

[25:12] present here, in

[25:13] room. Um, that's why I

[25:15] just wanted to be brief

[25:16] tell about it. Um,

[25:18] we switched to

[25:19] remote

[25:20] illumination,

[25:21] obviously, during COVID,

[25:22] when we helped

[25:23] to all urban and

[25:24] school boards

[25:25] learn to conduct

[25:26] virtual meetings.

[25:27] This was all new for

[25:29] everyone. But we had

[25:30] technology, and we

[25:31] knew how to do it.

[25:32] So this is what we

[25:33] really supported

[25:34] our goals. When

[25:37] personal coverage

[25:39] became possible again,

[25:40] um, panel, em,

[25:41] asked us

[25:42] continue

[25:43] remain

[25:43] virtual, um, and

[25:44] partly it was

[25:45] related to

[25:46] cost issues,

[25:47] so we satisfied

[25:48] this is a request, and that's it

[25:50] so we continue

[25:51] to be virtual, um

[25:52] . But what we

[25:55] virtual, not

[25:56] means that

[25:57] production is not

[25:57] is happening; we all

[25:59] we still provide

[26:00] direct production,

[26:01] monitoring,

[26:01] dissemination,

[26:02] post-production and

[26:03] archiving. Good.

[26:06] Um, so I just want to say that to me

[26:10] it seems that this

[26:11] more than just

[26:12] live broadcast. Ahem,

[26:14] CAT TV is 35 years old

[26:15] strengthening experience

[26:16] trust in communities,

[26:18] whom we serve. Um, and

[26:20] community members know,

[26:21] what they see

[26:23] at KTV, is verified,

[26:24] authentic and

[26:25] reliable. And they know where to find us.

[26:28] This is what we do. They

[26:29] know that if they

[26:31] tune in to KTV, then

[26:32] will see the meeting. We provide

[26:34] complete

[26:35] illumination,

[26:36] special archives and

[26:37] convenient access to

[26:38] government meetings.

[26:41] So we're not just

[26:42] we provide direct

[26:43] broadcast and

[26:44] press the button. We

[26:45] create a public

[26:46] recording and access to

[26:47] local history

[26:49] municipality. AND,

[26:52] honestly, these ideas

[26:53] arose from the Second

[26:54] World War II, about

[26:55] which I recently

[26:56] learned during

[26:57] research,

[26:58] after listening to the interview

[27:00] with a colleague where he

[27:01] really learned the lessons

[27:02] about the power of media and about

[27:03] how much

[27:04] what matters is who

[27:05] controls the media. And this

[27:09] was the basis for

[27:10] why in the United States was created

[27:12] public access. Ahem,

[27:15] and these are the principles on which

[27:16] KTV built. So why?

[27:20] it is important to have a third

[27:21] side in this

[27:22] process? Um, we

[27:24] independent of the city.

[27:27] Hmm, such a separation

[27:28] provides

[27:29] neutrality,

[27:29] transparency,

[27:30] accountability and

[27:31] public trust

[27:32] . We provide

[27:34] unedited

[27:35] unprejudiced

[27:35] time period for

[27:37] meeting coverage

[27:38] . Um, regardless of

[27:40] the one who enters

[27:41] composition of the electoral council

[27:42] Does he work for the city, um?

[27:44] , we take on

[27:45] responsibility. Um,

[27:47] we inform you about this,

[27:48] we spread this,

[27:49] we support this and

[27:51] we do before that

[27:51] available. If something

[27:55] will go wrong if the file

[27:56] accidentally deleted

[27:58] or somehow

[27:59] torn out, there is a technical

[28:00] problem or its

[28:01] not on Facebook or YouTube,

[28:07] you are responsible for this

[28:07] responsibility.

[28:10] The city is not responsible for this.

[28:11] answers. Um, so this one

[28:16] independence between

[28:17] these two things

[28:18] really can

[28:19] to protect the council, therefore

[28:20] what the council can indicate

[28:21] to the outside

[28:22] organization that takes

[28:23] on myself

[28:24] responsibility for

[28:25] these things, and this is one of

[28:26] the things we did

[28:27] for 35 years. I

[28:31] called it insurance

[28:33] a policy for this

[28:34] letter. Um, so that you

[28:37] knew that the councils and

[28:38] technology

[28:39] are changing, we

[28:39] remained

[28:40] unchanged throughout

[28:41] all these years. Um, I think that's one more thing.

[28:46] the question that arose,

[28:47] this is what we already have

[28:48] reported, uh,

[28:49] why do we need it

[28:51] cable television

[28:52] , and I think that's the case

[28:53] not necessarily in that,

[28:55] what a meeting

[28:56] is being recorded. It's about wider distribution

[28:59] this meeting and

[29:00] ensuring greater

[29:02] accessibility

[29:03] information for people.

[29:05] So, I'm doing

[29:07] casting for 30 years

[29:09] , 30 of those 35 years. And I know that in my time I

[29:13] learned that the chosen ones

[29:14] board of directors

[29:15] are changing. And CAT

[29:17] it has always been like this

[29:19] concept. That which

[29:21] The council is thinking today,

[29:22] may not be what it is

[29:24] the council thinks

[29:24] next year or

[29:25] in 10 years. And I

[29:28] accumulated enough

[29:29] years to know what, uh

[29:31] -uh, it could be

[29:32] truth. We play games

[29:36] for over 30 years. I don't know the exact year,

[29:40] when we started in

[29:41] Pennsylvania. But with

[29:44] of all the things that

[29:45] are changing, I think,

[29:46] what is that which is not

[29:47] changes, that's what

[29:48] people want to know what

[29:50] happening in their

[29:51] local service. Yet

[29:53] one concern,

[29:54] which I heard was

[29:55] because it's not enough

[29:56] people are looking at

[29:57] our platforms. And I think there is a difference.

[30:01] between size

[30:01] audience and

[30:02] publicly accessible

[30:04] to information. So

[30:06] some people, of course

[30:07] , still looking at

[30:08] traditional

[30:09] cable

[30:09] television. Um, and we can't tell you

[30:13] how many people

[30:14] watching because Comcast

[30:15] never been against

[30:16] such demographic

[30:17] indicators. Um, but we know that people still

[30:21] looking at

[30:22] cable

[30:23] television, and we know that this, um,

[30:25] remains important

[30:26] access point to

[30:27] information for

[30:28] many people who

[30:30] do not have computers

[30:31] and the internet or

[30:32] decided not to

[30:33] do. Hmm, I can.

[30:38] to tell you what

[30:40] the last eight

[30:41] months, um, on YouTube we

[30:42] saw an average of 54

[30:44] viewers per month

[30:46] meeting, um, at our

[30:47] YouTube channel, and, um,

[30:49] the most interesting thing is that

[30:50] observed annually

[30:52] 238 viewers. So, um,

[30:57] we follow a lot

[30:59] this on Facebook. Unfortunately,

[31:02] they changed their, um,

[31:04] platform. So they

[31:06] no longer archived

[31:08] live broadcasts

[31:09] meetings in the last

[31:10] 30 days. So no

[31:11] opportunities

[31:12] view this

[31:13] information by

[31:14] the last, um, one

[31:15] month. But I can

[31:19] to tell you that we

[31:20] were able to view

[31:21] analytics and, um,

[31:23] about 1300, um,

[31:24] views on our

[31:25] Facebook page in those

[31:26] days when it happened

[31:28] straight panel

[31:29] meeting. I can't

[31:37] to say that each of

[31:39] I watched these people.

[31:40] panel meeting, but

[31:42] I can say that

[31:43] CAT TV Facebook page

[31:44] every Thursday and on

[31:45] this site was 1300

[31:47] eyes. On average, this is

[31:53] about 10 people per

[31:54] meeting. We saw

[31:57] up to 40 people, and most

[31:58] of them, probably, by age

[32:00] from 20 to 25 years old. So what?

[32:03] actually

[32:04] What do these numbers mean? I understand that this is not

[32:07] television

[32:08] audience. We are not

[32:09] we are talking about numbers

[32:10] networks, you know, and about

[32:12] real people who

[32:13] interact with their

[32:14] local community. AND

[32:17] I don't think that's the case.

[32:18] only in how much

[32:19] people are watching. I think it is important that

[32:22] meeting

[32:23] was highlighted so that

[32:24] the government was accessible and

[32:26] transparent, and so that

[32:27] residents could

[32:28] find information.

[32:30] So, if you were watching

[32:31] only 10 people, these 10

[32:32] people don't care

[32:33] deserve

[32:35] access to your

[32:36] information. So, I

[32:38] remembered a little

[32:39] earlier than ours

[32:40] funding has begun

[32:42] change in 2019

[32:43] . I just want it fast.

[32:45] , uh, to point out on

[32:47] this. So, cable

[32:48] companies

[32:49] use

[32:50] public rights, so that

[32:51] deliver yours

[32:52] home delivery product

[32:53] people. Um, they

[32:54] must pay

[32:55] commission in exchange for

[32:56] use of this

[32:57] public network.

[33:01] They charge a fee.

[33:02] from their subscribers

[33:03] cable

[33:04] television, and this

[33:05] the fee is reduced to

[33:06] public good

[33:07] communities. People

[33:11] refuse to

[33:12] cable

[33:12] television and

[33:13] move to

[33:14] streaming

[33:15] on the Internet. Internet

[33:17] does not have the same

[33:18] established

[33:19] regulation. None

[33:22] public good,

[33:23] although they

[33:24] use that one

[33:25] the infrastructure itself

[33:26] and the same rights

[33:27] access. So this is

[33:29] federal issue,

[33:30] which will not be resolved

[33:31] here tonight.

[33:35] But this is the main

[33:35] the problem is that, um,

[33:36] no more

[33:37] mechanism

[33:38] financing

[33:39] public good,

[33:40] who was appointed.

[33:45] So, in conclusion, um,

[33:46] once again, I respect

[33:47] Word solution, and I'm not here

[33:49] in order to

[33:50] argue with him. I

[33:51] just wanted to have

[33:53] opportunity to explain

[33:54] our point of view, um,

[33:55] what is included in our

[33:56] service, and why we consider it valuable,

[33:59] and allow you,

[34:00] Guys, put any

[34:01] What questions? Um, but

[34:03] I think that after 30

[34:05] years of coverage

[34:06] municipal

[34:07] meetings even in our

[34:08] the time of technology is still

[34:09] it matters because

[34:11] I believe that

[34:11] transparency has

[34:12] value, and access to

[34:14] government matters.

[34:16] So I am happy to

[34:18] I will answer

[34:18] question.

[34:20] Thank you.

[34:21] Please. IN

[34:22] Does anyone have a question about this? IN

[34:25] I actually exist.

[34:26] a few questions. Hmm,

[34:27] Do you know how much?

[34:28] meetings you

[34:29] highlight in

[34:30] average for

[34:31] the last few years?

[34:33] I know we had

[34:34] such information, but

[34:35] She is not in front now.

[34:37] by me.

[34:37] Yes.

[34:44] Hmm, we covered, uh,

[34:51] two, I didn't count. Hmm,

[34:58] 12, about 30, I would

[35:00] said, from 25 to 30 on

[35:03] year.

[35:06] Good. One or two more.

[35:11] Or

[35:11] contacted CAT TV,

[35:13] as far as you know,

[35:14] residents of

[35:15] concerns about

[35:16] that CAT TV is no longer

[35:18] illuminates, uh,

[35:19] minor meetings

[35:20] advice?

[35:23] Yes. Good. And I have to

[35:27] I mean, just for

[35:28] of my teaching, I

[35:29] just trying

[35:30] understand, because I agree with you. I think that public

[35:33] access is incredible

[35:34] important. I think that

[35:35] we must have this

[35:36] somehow. Hmm, and

[35:38] so I definitely

[35:39] I support this. But I

[35:41] I'm trying to find out.

[35:43] can you, because I

[35:44] tried

[35:44] think about it, and you

[35:46] better informed in

[35:47] this than me. Or

[35:49] can you please provide

[35:50] example, when someone

[35:51] can have access to

[35:52] our meeting through

[35:54] Cat TV, while he has

[35:55] may not be accessible

[35:56] to the means that we

[35:57] now we give them

[36:00] cable television

[36:04] , channel 1085? So these

[36:09] The door was closed.

[36:11] Good.

[36:15] Um, you know, another one

[36:16] part of this is

[36:17] just wider

[36:18] distribution, and that

[36:20] the fact that both

[36:21] know how to go, so

[36:22] that we've been doing this for 35 years.

[36:29] Um, so I think this is

[36:31] gets a lot

[36:32] wider, um,

[36:33] dissemination

[36:34] thanks to platforms.

[36:43] Thank you to everyone I appreciate.

[36:45] your work. There is more

[36:46] any questions? You, um,

[36:49] I actually have

[36:50] a few quick ones

[36:51] questions, Lisa. Um,

[36:56] so we want to

[37:02] make sure that I

[37:03] everything is correct

[37:04] wrote down.

[37:04] Good. IN

[37:05] There are 54 of us. It seems we have

[37:07] there was a mid-range meeting,

[37:09] which had 54

[37:10] on YouTube.

[37:11] On

[37:12] meeting.

[37:13] Right. Good.

[37:14] On our YouTube.

[37:15] On YouTube. Yes, you have.

[37:16] radio. That's what we're about.

[37:17] we are talking. And on

[37:18] town meeting

[37:20] was 230

[37:20] 238 or something like that

[37:22] ...

[37:22] Yes, I have 230+. I am not

[37:25] could remember the exact

[37:26] number, but,

[37:26] and I mean that this

[37:28] close. We don't

[37:29] need to have accurate...

[37:30] Yes, 238.

[37:31] That's what I thought.

[37:32] Good. Hmm,

[37:35] which, of course, you know,

[37:36] everyone is paying attention to this

[37:37] attention, but I thought,

[37:39] that's great. I was

[37:40] very excited,

[37:41] when I saw this.

[37:42] No, me too. And this

[37:48] helps me, as well as

[37:50] what is sitting, and already

[37:51] helps for a while

[37:52] I understand one of

[37:53] reasons why we have

[37:55] there is no such thing

[37:55] personal participation in

[37:57] city council, as

[37:58] before, when I was

[38:05] junior in the fire department

[38:06] part, fought for

[38:08] money...

[38:08] you know, there was

[38:10] crowded,

[38:11] Yes. So this is a bit for me.

[38:15] helps. Hmm, and 54

[38:21] YouTube users on

[38:22] meeting party–

[38:25] This is interesting.

[38:26] Yes. I mean that

[38:29] this is leadership again,

[38:32] Yes? And then, on

[38:34] sorry, I...I'm sorry not

[38:35] looked at the numbers

[38:36] Facebook, because, in my opinion,

[38:38] they could be

[38:39] higher. Hmm, I have

[38:41] there was only

[38:43] 1300 that were in the application

[38:45] Facebook.

[38:47] That's how much

[38:47] views were on

[38:48] our Facebook page

[38:50] on the day when

[38:50] held meetings with

[38:52] by the city council in

[38:53] live broadcast.

[38:54] Good.

[38:56] But I think that on

[38:58] recent meetings,

[39:00] which, um, I was able to

[39:01] view, there were 81

[39:02] viewing, hmm, on

[39:03] Facebook page.

[39:06] Good. Is this average?

[39:08] indicator, higher or lower,

[39:09] I understand. IN

[39:11] you have an idea, and you,

[39:13] probably not. So

[39:15] when we have 1300

[39:16] views or something

[39:17] this evening

[39:18] meetings, for example,

[39:20] tonight, yes

[39:21] ? IN

[39:24] there are a number of you

[39:25] views on Thursday

[39:26] in the evening without a husband?

[39:32] Look at them. I

[39:33] just not

[39:35] came,

[39:36] but

[39:38] I would be interested.

[39:39] to say that

[39:41] this is a site, so how

[39:42] I'm looking at this, this is

[39:44] if there were 800

[39:47] views or

[39:48] uses in the evening

[39:50] without meeting, but it would be

[39:51] 1300, and I really

[39:52] hypothetically

[39:53] I suppose.

[39:57] I understand that

[39:58] The audience is important in

[39:59] acceptance process

[40:01] solutions, but I...My

[40:02] purist view

[40:03] for this within 30

[40:04] years is that

[40:06] what if 10 people

[40:07] are watching, then it's 10

[40:08] people who had

[40:09] access, and that's important.

[40:13] Well, that's why I...I

[40:14] I hate to have

[40:15] access to the audience.

[40:18] Well, I look at it from...

[40:19] I think, therefore I want

[40:21] to be understood. I look at it from the same perspective.

[40:24] point of view, as you.

[40:25] Good. So, if so,

[40:31] then if we have

[40:32] average 54

[40:33] YouTube users,

[40:34] CAT TV YouTube users

[40:36] on the evening of the meeting, right?

[40:41] And then that Thursday

[40:42] in the evening we have

[40:43] Facebook app or something

[40:45] such, if in the evening at

[40:46] we meet

[40:47] there is a surge,

[40:48] isn't that right? Healthy

[40:54] common sense tells you that you, probably can

[40:56] take these numbers and

[40:57] to add them to a certain

[40:59] measures, right? It,

[41:00] probably not

[41:01] extremely accurate,

[41:02] but probably enough

[41:03] exactly, right?

[41:05] And you can

[41:06] look at these

[41:07] numbers for me. I would

[41:09] wanted it to be

[41:11] frankly with you, and I would

[41:12] wanted to see what it was

[41:13] for a number.

[41:16] Um, because I agree with

[41:18] Gee about this.

[41:20] Transparency, you know,

[41:21] transparency

[41:22] public access–

[41:23] This is a huge thing.

[41:24] you know. Um, I agree too,

[41:31] What is important here is not

[41:33] only channel 1085 and you know, and everything should be

[41:36] above.

[41:40] As far as I know,

[41:41] should consider all

[41:42] research that you

[41:43] conducted.

[41:44] Yes. And you know, if

[41:46] we could do it

[41:47] free of charge, we would

[41:48] did it

[41:48] free. This is ours

[41:50] mission. This is what

[41:51] important for us.

[41:52] Right. and me

[41:54] it's hard to notice.

[41:59] I understand that I

[42:00] It was difficult with this.

[42:02] I don't think we should.

[42:03] it was easy to accept

[42:04] decision. And I think that

[42:06] some of them, so I think that having a certain

[42:13] information, notes,

[42:14] which I did here, and

[42:15] Ginny and someone else,

[42:16] having certain factual

[42:18] numbers on which you can

[42:19] to base decisions on, and

[42:20] not hypothetical. Well,

[42:23] nobody says anything

[42:24] about viewing

[42:25] cat television

[42:26] on TV, right?

[42:27] well, when you go to

[42:28] Are you going to the coffee shop?

[42:29] in the grocery store

[42:30] shop. Nobody

[42:31] comes and does not say: "

[42:31] God, I saw it.

[42:32] cat television

[42:33] last night or something

[42:34] "such." You know,

[42:43] some people just

[42:44] these meetings or these

[42:46] numbers here, er, you know, the numbers that you

[42:48] provided, uh, some of the

[42:49] They knocked me down.

[42:51] Confused, to be honest.

[42:52] . So, first of all, this is 1300

[42:56] on meeting evenings

[42:57] against the infidels,

[42:59] that would be interesting, that

[43:02] justified, that's what I tried

[43:05] to say, correctly,

[43:06] so that I can do this

[43:07] to figure it out, it would be great if you could.

[43:11] give us this

[43:12] information for my

[43:13] poems, in

[43:16] Does anyone have anything else, well, I mean, you're here, and

[43:19] this is an important thing,

[43:22] of course, yes, but

[43:23] if you can provide

[43:25] we have these numbers, it was

[43:26] would be useful.

[43:26] Yes, you can just

[43:27] send them

[43:28] by email

[43:29] Tari, and she

[43:30] will distribute them to us.

[43:31] Yes.

[43:35] Thank you.

[43:35] Good. Thank you, Lisa.

[43:37] Thank you very much.

[43:42] Yes.

[43:46] Thank you.

[43:48] Good. Approval

[43:50] protocol. Meeting

[43:55] reign of August 13. IN

[44:01] Do you have a second?

[44:04] Any discussions?

[44:05] Correction. All who

[44:07] "by"? 1.

[44:09] Special meeting

[44:11] reign of August 13.

[44:12] Second. Any

[44:13] correction?

[44:14] Discussion. All who

[44:18] "by"? 1.

[44:20] Orders to be paid

[44:22] accounts on August 21 $

[44:25] 25 44543.

[44:30] Second.

[44:32] Any discussions?

[44:33] Everyone who is "in favor"?

[44:35] 1.

[44:35] Accounts payable

[44:36] debt on 28

[44:38] August $44,579.

[44:44] Second.

[44:45] Any discussion?

[44:47] Everyone who is "in favor"? I am counting

[44:50] salary 21

[44:52] August $ 13 44523.

[44:59] Second.

[44:59] Any discussion?

[45:01] Everyone who is "in favor"? I am calculating wages.

[45:05] August 28 fee $12,270.77.

[45:13] There is a second. Second. Be

[45:17] -what discussion?

[45:18] Everyone who is "in favor"...I'm fine

[45:23] . Bridge on the main road

[45:25] the streets begin

[45:25] update until you

[45:27] Go away, little one,

[45:33] behind us. You see,

[45:51] everything seems smooth,

[46:07] as if you all have

[46:09] execute Max

[46:10] million in D. Hmm, I think that's the maximum.

[46:21] a million, uh, between

[46:22] by two, er, 57,000, er, for

[46:24] something to do, and

[46:38] then yes, they were

[46:39] at the same price,

[46:40] actually common

[46:41] production volume

[46:42] here. 669, and then

[46:49] to make big

[46:51] holes for 57 231, which

[46:53] installed 124,172. They

[46:56] are going

[46:57] hold the plates,

[47:02] disappear. And they

[47:07] actually went down

[47:08] . We are none of them and

[47:11] looked at this and

[47:12] took their roots, and

[47:14] it was bigger. AND,

[47:17] um, before we

[47:22] Let's go deeper, I want to say that we

[47:25] turned to three

[47:26] different companies, one

[47:27] the company refused

[47:29] , um,

[47:30] refused to come

[47:32] , or they didn't have

[47:33] time or something like that. So

[47:35] I just want

[47:36] make sure that everyone

[47:37] know that we

[47:38] tried three different

[47:39] companies,

[47:40] which, in our opinion,

[47:41] were qualified

[47:42] , or, you know, Joel

[47:43] tried three different

[47:43] companies that, on his

[47:44] opinion, were

[47:45] qualified for

[47:46] work performance.

[47:47] French. One more thing,

[47:54] Max Million

[47:55] is this going to happen?

[47:56] make. Again.

[47:59] I will have

[48:00] problems if I will say that in September it

[48:03] what they told me

[48:04] said.

[48:05] Yes,

[48:06] Daniels was

[48:07] November. We

[48:10] They said that they

[48:11] maybe you will have to

[48:12] remove the heaters

[48:13] for concrete

[48:14] plaster. Um, me

[48:16] It didn't matter, Daniels.

[48:17] wanted to close the bridge, uh-

[48:19] uh, for two weeks, so

[48:20] to do this, and these

[48:21] the guys will try

[48:22] make a lane

[48:23] during the opening

[48:28] bridge. Um, or

[48:31] Can I put

[48:32] questions about

[48:32] estimates?

[48:33] Yes, in

[48:34] there are 57 of us in May, and in April we had 115.

[48:38] Are you thinking something?

[48:40] to deduct from this

[48:42] estimate 115?

[48:46] So, hmm, I think I

[48:48] would like to do with

[48:49] this, when we

[48:50] let's fix the main ones

[48:55] things, sorry. I wanted

[48:58] I wish we had already

[48:59] talked about another one

[49:00] a hole that goes through

[49:01] straight through. I

[49:04] fixed it and whatever

[49:05] what other bad places

[49:12] until a certain point,

[49:13] which we still have,

[49:14] because we calculated from

[49:16] 107 to approximately

[49:24] 200 from the grant, and then 20

[49:26] coincides so that

[49:27] make sure that this

[49:29] 9010. Oh,

[49:33] I'm not sure. I have

[49:34] look.

[49:35] Yes, we had to pay 20,000

[49:37] come up with 200 of them.

[49:40] Hmm,

[49:41] Yes.

[49:42] So maybe it's worth it

[49:44] be creative with

[49:45] proposal not

[49:46] exceed the amount

[49:47] grant.

[49:49] Yes.

[49:50] Hmm, our company is like that

[49:51] believes. Of course. I would like to move.

[50:00] go ahead with this and give them

[50:02] good, because it's not

[50:06] yes...we spent

[50:08] a lot of time, like...

[50:09] Yes, I mean like

[50:10] we must. I think I mean, I know,

[50:12] what did we talk about this

[50:13] several times. I read

[50:15] estimates. I

[50:16] reviewed them. I

[50:17] amazed by the fact (

[50:18] I shouldn't do this.

[50:19] to impress, I think that

[50:20] that's normal)

[50:21] someone from Maximan

[50:22] really arrived and

[50:22] looked at our bridge

[50:23] . Well, yes.

[50:25] I am amazed at how much

[50:26] times at different times

[50:27] scenarios people

[50:28] made a decision about

[50:29] Entrance.

[50:29] So I appreciate that this

[50:31] happened, and the fact that

[50:32] What do we have for this?

[50:32] financing. That

[50:34] the fact that we talked

[50:35] about what we

[50:35] need to start

[50:36] this as soon as possible.

[50:37] The idea that they

[50:38] can leave one

[50:39] the lane is open,

[50:40] so that we don't have to close completely

[50:43] bridge.

[50:43] We will do it.

[50:44] Probably.

[50:45] Yes.

[50:46] I just...I wouldn't...I would

[50:47] definitely supported

[50:48] persistence. I think we should

[50:50] need, as we see...I have

[50:52] meaning that people are very

[50:53] disappointed with

[50:54] many reasons and

[50:55] very worried. I am not

[50:57] I can imagine that we

[50:58] we'll be with this for a long time

[50:59] sit.

[51:00] No. They are justified...

[51:02] Yes.

[51:04] Emm worried and

[51:05] disappointed, that's for sure

[51:06] , and I know that our

[51:07] public comments...

[51:09] I don't think it was.

[51:10] ...

[51:12] I'm not with her for a while.

[51:13] I agree. I don't think so.

[51:14] that we delayed this.

[51:19] Hmm, you know, maybe

[51:21] to seem that on

[51:22] at first glance we

[51:23] went around the bushes,

[51:24] neighborhoods, flower gardens,

[51:25] house and every

[51:26] building, and all that.

[51:31] We bypassed this place.

[51:32] hundreds of times to make sure that we are trying to do

[51:36] the right things for

[51:37] city and residents from

[51:38] that side, on that side

[51:39] groups. And the conditions,

[51:46] sorry, changed,

[51:47] you know, for example, from

[51:49] 115th, when we have

[51:50] initially there was no holes, and

[51:52] then, you know, now we do here, and I have

[51:55] meaning that it is constantly

[51:57] changes, and

[52:03] this causes problems,

[52:04] trying to attract

[52:05] people there so that they

[52:06] looked at this. I think there are several.

[52:09] things. Does anyone have

[52:10] something else they're talking about

[52:11] want to talk to

[52:12] about this?

[52:13] No. I just want

[52:14] make a proposal.

[52:15] Come on, Jamie.

[52:16] No, no, no. I just

[52:17] prepared to make

[52:18] proposal. Sorry.

[52:19] No, give it.

[52:20] Well, you know what? I will consider the offer,

[52:22] and then we will open

[52:23] discussion after

[52:24] this. How are you?

[52:25] Of course. Um, I suggest that we

[52:29] continued and

[52:30] authorized our

[52:31] road crew, um,

[52:32] to accept the maximum

[52:34] , um, the rate you

[52:35] we were given so that we wouldn't

[52:36] exceed the amount

[52:37] grant, um, and so that we

[52:39] moved forward with

[52:40] due diligence

[52:41] and speed. IN

[52:46] Do you have a second?

[52:48] Good. Now, do you have

[52:49] something for me

[52:50] discussion?

[52:53] I wonder if there will be any

[52:54] theft between

[52:58] plates or,

[53:03] Probably not.

[53:08] Yes. Just don't.

[53:10] add, um, more weight. Hmm,

[53:16] At first it was an idea

[53:17] , but now you

[53:18] returned to the 90s.

[53:21] But I know that we are

[53:22] Someone was talking.

[53:24] Yes. Protection, and I don't

[53:26] I can remember what it is.

[53:27] It's over.

[53:29] Um, two questions. On-

[53:31] first, metal

[53:32] plates, they

[53:33] suitable for

[53:36] repair?

[53:37] Yes. Yes, we have.

[53:39] Will you remove them?

[53:40] back after repair,

[53:41] are they not

[53:42] will be useful because

[53:43] we will do

[53:44] repair?

[53:45] Yes, we can't, um,

[53:46] put them all back

[53:48] .

[53:48] Good. Um, there is one thing,

[53:51] especially on, um,

[53:52] east side. Yes.

[53:56] That the hole wasn't there yet

[53:57] all the way through, but he

[53:58] probably started when

[53:59] we will fix this, we will be fine

[54:01] work from this

[54:02] side. We can

[54:05] pull this one out, and, uh,

[54:07] when will we take off

[54:08] repair plates,

[54:09] we'll look into it.

[54:11] That's what I wanted.

[54:12] think. They don't

[54:14] will need

[54:15] to worry about

[54:16] to screw them.

[54:18] So,

[54:19] well, they are on four of

[54:20] them.

[54:21] They are counting on

[54:22] four of them.

[54:23] Yes.

[54:23] And how many plates?

[54:24] now?

[54:25] Five.

[54:26] Good. Um, and

[54:34] Let's look around. I

[54:36] I'll find out what mine was.

[54:37] another question.

[54:38] Julie, do you have something?

[54:39] was it?

[54:40] This is a stupid question.

[54:42] Yes. So this is me

[54:47] worries, and if I

[54:48] reviewed

[54:48] previous May

[54:50] request from Match Famil with

[54:55] assumption. Therefore,

[55:00] if we them

[55:00] we exhibit, and they say that

[55:02] assume that this is

[55:04] the area they

[55:05] are going to fix

[55:06] what will happen if

[55:07] this is much bigger

[55:12] the area they

[55:13] will have to be fixed

[55:14] ? Because two of them

[55:15] they just

[55:16] continue

[55:16] assume. And then

[55:18] my other question

[55:19] was:

[55:19] let's answer by

[55:21] in turn.

[55:21] Good. Ahem,

[55:23] that is, you assume,

[55:24] that there will be two beams here,

[55:27] I assume that these are two

[55:29] feet deep and

[55:30] four feet

[55:31] wide, and then

[55:32] it is written that

[55:33] assuming that the beam

[55:35] has dimensions

[55:36] approximately 36 by 160. I

[55:39] thought the bridge had

[55:42] 179-180 is the beam that goes

[55:46] long ways.

[55:47] Well, that's what I assume about

[55:49] length, as well as

[55:50] length of the bridge. So I didn't know because I thought that

[55:53] the bridge is a house, it's 180

[55:55] feet. So plus or minus,

[55:57] but it was mine

[55:58] question, because there are 160 here.

[56:00] So I just

[56:01] I suppose that, in my opinion, the beams are going

[56:04] only from pair to pair,

[56:06] direct

[56:07] above it, and above.

[56:08] Yes.

[56:09] Make certain

[56:10] assumption, but then

[56:12] set this limit,

[56:13] not to exceed,

[56:14] it was my idea,

[56:15] because it is an assumption

[56:17] so that

[56:17] not to exceed.

[56:18] These are the only questions,

[56:19] What did you have? You are in

[56:21] okay?

[56:21] Perfectly. Yes. Good. Or

[56:24] Yes. We said no.

[56:29] will exceed 200,000,

[56:30] if any arise

[56:32] other small

[56:33] problems with this

[56:34] way. Us too

[56:38] need them

[56:39] repair. Everything we all know. Question

[56:50] it was in the tender that

[56:51] there will be those tenders,

[56:52] which we just saw

[56:53] here, and then, and then, the tender in

[56:56] April for 10 places, which

[56:57] had to be nourished.

[57:00] No.

[57:01] Good. This is not the one

[57:04] because when we

[57:05] first time we received it,

[57:06] there were no holes there.

[57:08] Good. This is the place where

[57:11] we were just going to

[57:12] add. So now we make two big ones

[57:17] holes. In fact, the whole

[57:22] this area, uh, on

[57:23] North, uh, where is the hole,

[57:25] very rude and very

[57:26] rude. So all this

[57:31] the plot is needed

[57:32] will do.

[57:34] And this is a question from

[57:35] Muhammad. Yes.

[57:37] When they do

[57:38] repair, I know

[57:39] answer, but I want

[57:40] to hear it from you.

[57:42] When they do

[57:43] repair, they fasten

[57:44] reinforcement in concrete.

[57:48] So when they tomorrow

[57:49] they will watch it with him,

[57:50] he will be able to hear from

[57:52] you that they strengthen

[57:53] reinforcement.

[57:55] Good.

[57:57] The fittings have disappeared.

[57:58] Well, I understand that. But

[58:00] he was worried that

[58:01] we will not...us

[58:02] needs to be fixed

[58:03] this armature.

[58:06] Yes. Good. Thank you. There is more

[58:09] some

[58:09] question? There are still some

[58:11] discussion? I have

[58:12] offer. I have

[58:14] a second to

[58:14] continue with JH Max Million

[58:19] for bridge repairs on

[58:20] an amount not exceeding

[58:22] grant

[58:23] financing in

[58:24] amount of 200,000 dollars.

[58:29] Everyone who was for it, I was

[58:31] against. Good. This

[58:41] point, I guarantee,

[58:42] will be expressed

[58:43] tomorrow, just because,

[58:44] that I know that Joel

[58:45] wants to get rid of this

[58:47] just as strong as

[58:48] ...Good. Uh,

[58:52] discussion of new

[58:53] hiring on the highway.

[58:57] Good. So, yes, everyone

[59:05] Agreed, let's continue with

[59:06] this question. I have

[59:10] one question?

[59:11] Yes. Regarding this. Um, this is

[59:17] $24, regardless

[59:18] from whether they have

[59:19] they are allowed to

[59:23] training, or something

[59:25] such as CDL, CDL,

[59:27] you know, because we

[59:27] talked about what we are going to spend

[59:30] learning, and I succeed

[59:31] to everything I have on

[59:32] mind you, you know what I mean? Well,

[59:34] I hope that

[59:35] let's find someone from CDL,

[59:36] but if we find

[59:37] a good boy who

[59:39] it doesn't have it, you know, in

[59:40] we may arise

[59:46] question if

[59:50] view all

[59:51] announcement, anyone

[59:53] from 24 to 35 years old,

[59:58] and almost all of them

[59:59] have 100% insurance

[1:00:00] or close to it.

[1:00:02] They can't do it.

[1:00:03] get. They are not

[1:00:04] can get it.

[1:00:05] Let's see.

[1:00:06] face to face.

[1:00:09] And I would like to find

[1:00:11] someone more or less

[1:00:13] decent, who

[1:00:14] install

[1:00:15] truck worth

[1:00:16] $300,000.

[1:00:17] Yes.

[1:00:23] Well, there are a few things, right?

[1:00:25] wrong? In winter

[1:00:27] need someone who

[1:00:28] will be reliable.

[1:00:31] Yes, yes? To Joel

[1:00:33] could call at

[1:00:34] 4:30 or 5:00 in the morning, and

[1:00:35] they would answer

[1:00:37] the call, and they

[1:00:38] will be able to stand up,

[1:00:39] to work and

[1:00:40] to drive a car

[1:00:41] , right? Um, you need

[1:00:46] a person who can

[1:00:47] to leave for

[1:00:47] elimination of consequences

[1:00:49] storm in the middle of the night with

[1:00:50] colleague, on whom

[1:00:53] they can

[1:00:54] to rely on one's own

[1:00:55] one to be in

[1:00:56] safety and do

[1:00:57] the right things. THERE ARE

[1:00:59] a lot, there are many

[1:01:00] things when it's not

[1:01:01] just an empty pile

[1:01:02] gravel, spread out on the road, and

[1:01:06] the person aligns

[1:01:07] gravel or something like that.

[1:01:09] Right.

[1:01:11] I would add one thing. Let

[1:01:13] this reliability will not

[1:01:15] only in winter, but all year round

[1:01:16] year.

[1:01:16] Well, that's exactly what I'm talking about.

[1:01:17] I say when I talk about

[1:01:18] storm, you know, when I

[1:01:19] I'm talking about damage.

[1:01:20] from the storm, I say,

[1:01:21] you know, today

[1:01:22] The evening is approaching.

[1:01:23] thunderstorms, probably. So,

[1:01:24] you know, you need

[1:01:25] a person who can

[1:01:26] to go out with a chainsaw.

[1:01:27] This is the type

[1:01:27] damage from

[1:01:28] the storm I'm talking about

[1:01:29] I spoke, brother.

[1:01:30] Um,

[1:01:31] and I was talking about

[1:01:32] just to come

[1:01:33] to work

[1:01:35] daily.

[1:01:37] Work five days

[1:01:38] per week.

[1:01:39] Yes.

[1:01:40] Our entire team is

[1:01:42] You guys don't drive.

[1:01:43] on the ring, you guys are great,

[1:01:45] or

[1:01:45] wrong?

[1:01:46] They don't take much.

[1:01:47] vacations. They, I have

[1:01:48] I mean, they always

[1:01:49] near.

[1:01:50] Yes.

[1:01:50] Always there if you are calling. Someone

[1:01:54] the new one will be an experience.

[1:02:00] IN

[1:02:00] someone has problems with

[1:02:02] hereby? IN

[1:02:02] I have several.

[1:02:03] questions. Therefore,

[1:02:05] because I know that in

[1:02:06] you had interviews

[1:02:08] earlier. So, can they

[1:02:11] these candidates

[1:02:12] resubmit

[1:02:13] application, that is, for this,

[1:02:14] can we

[1:02:15] call them and

[1:02:16] just to say that in

[1:02:22] we have another chance, because

[1:02:23] if they can

[1:02:25] to study, you know,

[1:02:26] Yes,

[1:02:30] okay, and then

[1:02:33] my question if

[1:02:34] they receive

[1:02:35] the salary of the generals, I don't want to talk.

[1:02:40] out loud about $24.

[1:02:42] Yes.

[1:02:43] So, if they are paid

[1:02:44] such an amount, and they have

[1:02:45] no CDL, me only

[1:02:48] I'm worried that after

[1:02:49] getting their CDL

[1:02:55] automatically

[1:02:55] are promoted to the rest

[1:02:57] crew,

[1:02:59] will they have to

[1:03:00] wait for the next one

[1:03:01] budget amount? So,

[1:03:03] just because I don't

[1:03:05] I know

[1:03:06] we were going

[1:03:07] leave it for now.

[1:03:09] What am I?

[1:03:12] think about this.

[1:03:13] , Julian, you know,

[1:03:14] because it is not

[1:03:15] a discussion that I don't

[1:03:16] Who did you discuss it with?

[1:03:17] wrong? My opinion from

[1:03:19] on this subject is as follows:

[1:03:20] if you have a candidate,

[1:03:21] who comes, and we hire a person, and their

[1:03:24] hired for $24

[1:03:26] for an hour, right? Hmm, ah

[1:03:28] then I would leave it

[1:03:33] at the discretion of the road

[1:03:35] the master, so that he

[1:03:36] came in three

[1:03:37] months to a person, as

[1:03:38] when someone comes

[1:03:39] to me, and I hire

[1:03:40] his bus driver.

[1:03:43] Um, I know that before in

[1:03:47] we were elementary

[1:03:48] rate, and in

[1:03:49] we had a 60-day

[1:03:51] period. We have since

[1:03:52] That's it.

[1:03:55] But I, as a manager,

[1:03:56] could tell his

[1:03:57] to the boss through

[1:03:59] two weeks: "Okay,

[1:04:01] look at this,

[1:04:02] You know, I'm right.

[1:04:03] This person really

[1:04:04] good. Let's just translate it

[1:04:05] right now, so that she

[1:04:06] remained."

[1:04:07] So I think that's it.

[1:04:08] maybe

[1:04:08] indefinite period.

[1:04:09] Well, that's what I mean,

[1:04:11] I understand this.

[1:04:11] for example,

[1:04:12] trial

[1:04:13] term. But On the other hand, I don't understand. I,

[1:04:16] as I said,

[1:04:17] worked in the city 24

[1:04:19] years, but I would

[1:04:22] I thought, and I know that

[1:04:23] they would do nothing

[1:04:24] said, but it can

[1:04:25] to be slapped in the face. And I know that

[1:04:28] we must

[1:04:29] try to attract

[1:04:30] people here; you

[1:04:31] needed

[1:04:32] responsible person

[1:04:33] . I totally do.

[1:04:34] I understand. But

[1:04:35] Blake is a slap in the face.

[1:04:37] Well, I know that even though you

[1:04:39] and a slap in the face,

[1:04:40] but I just,

[1:04:41] Do you understand what I mean? I

[1:04:43] not against it. I just think, maybe.

[1:04:45] that he could

[1:04:46] verify

[1:04:47] trial

[1:04:48] term, because it can

[1:04:49] to be unreliable

[1:04:50] a person, and

[1:04:51] Yes. No,

[1:04:52] I don't want others to

[1:04:53] the boys felt it,

[1:04:55] you know,

[1:04:57] Well, that's why...

[1:04:58] Right. And exactly

[1:04:59] therefore the goal of the leader

[1:05:01] there is acceptance

[1:05:01] determination, right?

[1:05:05] I somewhat agree with that,

[1:05:06] What does she say? I have

[1:05:08] there was such a conversation with

[1:05:09] Joel before that. Um,

[1:05:11] partly this

[1:05:12] preserving our

[1:05:13] current

[1:05:13] employees and

[1:05:14] their happiness.

[1:05:15] It's not just about

[1:05:16] to find someone

[1:05:18] new. Um, so

[1:05:19] need to consider

[1:05:20] all. That's all.

[1:05:21] Absolutely true. AND

[1:05:23] saving your

[1:05:24] current

[1:05:24] employees. And this,

[1:05:26] unfortunately, on

[1:05:28] unfortunately, in my opinion,

[1:05:35] caused by others

[1:05:36] a factor that even

[1:05:38] not related to

[1:05:38] financial side.

[1:05:40] This is age. You know, this is where

[1:05:43] we are now. And I think that

[1:05:47] we are so glad

[1:05:48] directors are needed

[1:05:49] answer yours

[1:05:50] opinion terro i think

[1:05:52] what do we need

[1:05:53] view scale

[1:05:57] wages, not only

[1:06:02] the amount, but also how it

[1:06:03] balanced. Therefore,

[1:06:06] regarding your opinion,

[1:06:07] new employee

[1:06:08] comes and earns

[1:06:09] exactly the same

[1:06:10] dollars per hour,

[1:06:11] How old is that guy?

[1:06:12] who works here,

[1:06:13] Sorry, 22 years old.

[1:06:14] And I, you know, I don't know.

[1:06:16] length of service, but

[1:06:17] this is what

[1:06:18] you mean.

[1:06:19] Yes,

[1:06:20] That's right. I think that

[1:06:21] we need this

[1:06:22] review. I think

[1:06:23] what is this that we

[1:06:24] really need

[1:06:25] to consider because

[1:06:27] it's something like

[1:06:28] budget and time.

[1:06:29] Yes. I think that in

[1:06:30] future,

[1:06:31] when we...Yes. You

[1:06:32] I really need this.

[1:06:34] review.

[1:06:34] And I think we

[1:06:35] must do this

[1:06:36] now,

[1:06:37] when do you become

[1:06:38] younger.

[1:06:39] Yes.

[1:06:40] Of course.

[1:06:42] You know, and I think that

[1:06:44] this is our job-

[1:06:45] review this, and

[1:06:46] because I agree with

[1:06:47] you, Tarot, and with you,

[1:06:48] Julie, in all of this,

[1:06:49] because it is

[1:06:50] unfair, no

[1:06:51] equal scale

[1:06:52] the wages we pay

[1:06:53] we have now. And so

[1:06:55] always was. And what I

[1:06:58] I'll take a risk and say that

[1:06:59] It's always been like that, no

[1:07:00] means that it has to

[1:07:02] remain. Good. AND

[1:07:04] it shouldn't be like that

[1:07:05] remain.

[1:07:06] That's right, Jamie. Therefore

[1:07:07] ,

[1:07:08] and that's for sure

[1:07:08] starts with

[1:07:09] budgeting.

[1:07:10] That's why you need

[1:07:11] enlarge article

[1:07:12] salary and

[1:07:13] increase everything else.

[1:07:16] Yes. And I think that if

[1:07:18] we weren't, I hate it

[1:07:19] it's to say, but already

[1:07:20] at the lower limit of the scale,

[1:07:23] you know, that would be

[1:07:24] easier to do.

[1:07:30] Well, we provide the best

[1:07:31] benefits than

[1:07:32] Williamstown and

[1:07:33] Bennington.

[1:07:35] But you...I just...I don't

[1:07:37] I disagree with this. I

[1:07:39] I'm just saying,

[1:07:41] okay, this is necessary

[1:07:42] to take into account. But I agree that this

[1:07:45] pay scale

[1:07:46] need to be lifted, but

[1:07:48] we also need

[1:07:49] take into account our

[1:07:50] party of privileges.

[1:07:53] But I will look into it and

[1:07:54] I will send you some of

[1:07:55] those that I receive from 197

[1:08:00] because I can't

[1:08:02] get none.

[1:08:04] I know that. And I'm not...I

[1:08:05] I'm just saying that

[1:08:07] in this area. Yes.

[1:08:08] In this area. So,

[1:08:10] if compared to

[1:08:11] some others

[1:08:12] larger accounts,

[1:08:13] they do not provide such

[1:08:14] the very advantages for SL.

[1:08:32] So are there any more?

[1:08:33] discussion on this

[1:08:34] reason? Does it suit you?

[1:08:36] us an ad that

[1:08:37] should Joel write?

[1:08:38] Thank you.

[1:08:40] How long is it?

[1:08:41] will last approximately

[1:08:42] a couple of weeks? Is it possible?

[1:08:45] Yes, probably, as long as we will not fill

[1:08:47] vacancy,

[1:08:48] Yes?

[1:08:50] No,

[1:08:52] I know that you like it.

[1:08:53] need before winter, but

[1:08:55] I'm running out.

[1:08:59] Facebook only. Yes. As

[1:09:05] long? You must have

[1:09:07] deadline. Fortnight.

[1:09:18] Today is the 10th or so,

[1:09:20] sorry, today is the 27th

[1:09:22] me. Under consideration

[1:09:29] deadline for week 7-

[1:09:30] th or the week of the 14th, as

[1:09:32] What do you think? Week 14-

[1:09:35] th. Gives them a couple of weeks

[1:09:36] to be there. And then

[1:09:38] , and then this will give, this will give, this

[1:09:43] will give, it seems, Terry and

[1:09:44] Joel, I would guess,

[1:09:45] that there will still be a process

[1:09:47] interviews. This will give,

[1:09:50] so far, it seems we have

[1:09:51] meeting of the 10th and 24th

[1:09:58] September. You will be given 10

[1:10:00] days to pass

[1:10:02] interviews, and then

[1:10:03] you will provide

[1:10:04] recommendation and

[1:10:05] Vote on the 24th. It

[1:10:08] Does that sound reasonable?

[1:10:11] Good. I hope so.

[1:10:16] I would leave it.

[1:10:17] submission process

[1:10:18] applications open until

[1:10:20] 12:00 on the 14th. It's Monday.

[1:10:23] 12:00 noon on the 14th. Simply

[1:10:28] so that we know what it's about

[1:10:29] You are leaving. Just so that in

[1:10:31] we were finite

[1:10:32] terms. So, 12:00 noon

[1:10:34] September 14 is a process

[1:10:36] submission of applications, and

[1:10:37] then you can

[1:10:38] to plan

[1:10:39] interviews and

[1:10:40] get

[1:10:41] recommendation of the 24th.

[1:10:47] Good. Cleaning

[1:10:48] snow.

[1:10:54] Did we vote?

[1:10:56] I don't think so.

[1:11:05] I just want

[1:11:05] to make sure that we

[1:11:07] will be beaten. Yes. Therefore,

[1:11:10] because cleaning

[1:11:11] the snow was constant

[1:11:12] problem,

[1:11:13] trying

[1:11:14] to satisfy needs

[1:11:15] urban complex,

[1:11:16] Joel and I

[1:11:17] talked about it.

[1:11:19] He said that they

[1:11:20] can do it,

[1:11:21] but he doesn't know when.

[1:11:22] Um, because this

[1:11:23] municipal building

[1:11:25] , we must

[1:11:25] to make sure that we work with shovels.

[1:11:30] Um, so I think this is

[1:11:31] depends on the council.

[1:11:34] previously said,

[1:11:35] that the road must

[1:11:36] engage in. So this is

[1:11:37] means that we should

[1:11:39] to conclude a contract or

[1:11:40] What should we do?

[1:11:45] Just thinking that,

[1:11:46] maybe it will be easier

[1:11:48] find someone who

[1:11:49] we will clear the snow,

[1:11:54] than having two different ones,

[1:11:56] more fair

[1:11:57] for people so that they

[1:11:58] wanted to do it.

[1:11:59] Yes, just hire

[1:12:01] someone, just to have

[1:12:02] opportunity to hire

[1:12:03] younger children. So,

[1:12:06] if you don't post

[1:12:07] video search on this

[1:12:08] damn shovel, they won't look at her.

[1:12:10] .

[1:12:13] It says PlayStation, 7 or something.

[1:12:16] No, I don't know. But

[1:12:19] I don't know how.

[1:12:22] Shuttling Sim works, first

[1:12:24] than they will do it.

[1:12:26] So,

[1:12:27] What would your council like?

[1:12:31] To conclude

[1:12:32] contract for

[1:12:32] outsider

[1:12:33] contractor,

[1:12:34] feeling that his

[1:12:35] took upon themselves. We

[1:12:36] have done this in the past

[1:12:37] for snow removal.

[1:12:42] Do you want to do that?

[1:12:43] exactly in the same terms?

[1:12:45] Um, how about I

[1:12:46] returned, uh, something to

[1:12:48] kind of request

[1:12:49] suggestions, something, where

[1:12:50] we can put

[1:12:51] our beds, but uh, or

[1:12:53] is in your budget

[1:12:54] funds to help

[1:12:55] We're cleaning up here.

[1:12:57] ? because we don't have

[1:13:02] budget for

[1:13:03] snow removal. It

[1:13:04] the only reason why I say so. Unless we will take on

[1:13:08] maintenance services

[1:13:09] land, but this, um,

[1:13:10] just looking into it.

[1:13:13] All this is happening.

[1:13:14] at the same time, you know. Um,

[1:13:16] look.

[1:13:20] Yes, because you have

[1:13:21] contract line. Or

[1:13:24] can you, do you have,

[1:13:27] um, or

[1:13:28] can we? So we

[1:13:30] let's include this in the request

[1:13:31] proposals. This is good.

[1:13:32] remark. I

[1:13:33] postpone request

[1:13:34] proposals. Can you ask Ellen

[1:13:39] to give the council a few

[1:13:40] options, where from

[1:13:44] can or should

[1:13:46] money coming in, right?

[1:13:47] Just so we can

[1:13:48] instead of

[1:13:49] to say: "Well, they

[1:13:50] should come

[1:13:51] from here, it doesn't matter,"

[1:13:52] give us some

[1:13:52] options where we come from

[1:13:54] could take them.

[1:13:55] From the ranks or from the general, or from

[1:13:56] both? WITH

[1:13:57] both.

[1:13:57] Good.

[1:13:58] Yes, please.

[1:14:01] Good.

[1:14:03] Just so we can

[1:14:04] make the right...

[1:14:05] Good. move, and we

[1:14:06] just...we

[1:14:07] We will return.

[1:14:08] Perfectly.

[1:14:09] Um, I'll ask Joel

[1:14:10] help me with

[1:14:11] request for proposals,

[1:14:11] before I write

[1:14:12] respond. regarding this

[1:14:13] ,

[1:14:14] Yes? Perfectly.

[1:14:15] But I think we

[1:14:16] ready to publish

[1:14:17] request for proposals and not

[1:14:18] wait. We will consider

[1:14:19] budget,

[1:14:20] but I think we don't.

[1:14:21] need to wait for

[1:14:22] budget figures. We

[1:14:23] have to pay for it

[1:14:24] anyhow. Simply,

[1:14:26] Yes? So, we must

[1:14:27] post a request

[1:14:28] proposals. So I

[1:14:31] assured. I don't know,

[1:14:32] what about the rest of the council.

[1:14:34] I am comfortable if

[1:14:36] Joel and Tara will sit down and

[1:14:37] will work together on

[1:14:38] creating a request

[1:14:39] proposals, which will be

[1:14:41] sent out without advice,

[1:14:42] without need

[1:14:43] to come back to this

[1:14:44] at another meeting 10

[1:14:45] September, and then

[1:14:46] wait again, and then

[1:14:48] began

[1:14:49] a blizzard, due to which

[1:14:50] We had no one.

[1:14:53] I am sure that

[1:14:54] I will consider the offer,

[1:14:55] so that Joel and Tara

[1:14:56] prepared a request

[1:14:57] offers on

[1:14:58] snow removal in

[1:14:59] city

[1:14:59] administration and

[1:15:00] sent him from somewhere

[1:15:02] -on what dates, which

[1:15:03] they consider

[1:15:04] appropriate.

[1:15:06] We will introduce this

[1:15:07] proposal.

[1:15:08] I will support her.

[1:15:10] Is there still discussion? All,

[1:15:12] Who is "for"?

[1:15:14] Thank you.

[1:15:14] I didn't mean to offend you.

[1:15:15] excessive load

[1:15:16] , guys, but I would prefer

[1:15:18] to have it done

[1:15:19] .

[1:15:19] The fewer hands, the

[1:15:20] better. Well,

[1:15:22] put it on

[1:15:23] month. Give to people,

[1:15:24] you know, we can

[1:15:25] bring it back here 10-

[1:15:26] yeah, and we'll do that

[1:15:27] exactly the same as before, because those

[1:15:29] people themselves perform

[1:15:30] the same job. Here

[1:15:31] Yes

[1:15:32] simply. It's easier that way. Yes

[1:15:35] . Yes.

[1:15:41] Good. Update from

[1:15:43] city government. Thank you.

[1:15:44] for that.

[1:15:46] called Maxi

[1:15:47] in the morning. Nigel,

[1:15:57] we have several

[1:15:58] emails

[1:15:59] for our

[1:16:02] coordinator

[1:16:02] email from

[1:16:04] email.

[1:16:06] The review was completed.

[1:16:08] symbol E91. She

[1:16:11] visited the facilities and

[1:16:12] wrote emails

[1:16:14] letters to Vermont, 07

[1:16:15] Center Street, Montas

[1:16:16] Condo Lake, for

[1:16:17] Priscilla. Um, from

[1:16:19] David Fowle, our

[1:16:21] chairmen of the commission on

[1:16:22] planning. Commission on

[1:16:23] planning does

[1:16:24] significant progress in

[1:16:25] process improvement

[1:16:26] meetings, including

[1:16:28] previous packages

[1:16:29] documents,

[1:16:29] improved clarity

[1:16:30] order purposes

[1:16:31] day, improved

[1:16:32] protocol and

[1:16:33] improved

[1:16:34] attendance and

[1:16:35] understanding of responsibilities

[1:16:36] members, which contributed

[1:16:37] a significant achievement.

[1:16:38] There is now clarity regarding

[1:16:39] of how we will be

[1:16:41] to do one's duty

[1:16:42] duties, let's finish

[1:16:43] a new city plan, and

[1:16:44] the process is ongoing

[1:16:45] constantly. Our goal is—

[1:16:46] complete the project

[1:16:47] plan by the end of spring,

[1:16:48] which will allow

[1:16:49] engage the community,

[1:16:50] view in full

[1:16:51] and edit

[1:16:52] its by the end of 2027,

[1:16:53] which is now new

[1:16:54] term. Hmm, this is

[1:16:56] update from Nate from

[1:16:57] Protection Commissions

[1:16:59] nature. This is a bit

[1:17:00] longer. Hmm, this is for spring.

[1:17:02] and the summer of 2026.

[1:17:04] Protection Commission

[1:17:05] nature had another one

[1:17:06] busy season, which

[1:17:07] started with

[1:17:08] incredibly successful

[1:17:09] silent auction,

[1:17:10] held in church

[1:17:11] Faith this spring.

[1:17:12] Over 60 artists and

[1:17:13] artisans

[1:17:13] donated

[1:17:14] items that were

[1:17:15] sold at auction,

[1:17:16] to raise money for

[1:17:17] acquisition and

[1:17:18] installation of batus

[1:17:19] in general. We succeeded.

[1:17:20] to buy more than two

[1:17:21] dozens of batus,

[1:17:22] including a large

[1:17:23] the block that was

[1:17:24] installed on

[1:17:25] Bent trail.

[1:17:26] Installation

[1:17:27] private batus and

[1:17:28] private houses

[1:17:29] for bats

[1:17:30] started this

[1:17:31] summer and will last until

[1:17:32] autumn season.

[1:17:33] Moving on to summer,

[1:17:34] we focused on

[1:17:35] some additional

[1:17:36] projects, including

[1:17:37] coastal restoration

[1:17:38] rivers at the site of landslides

[1:17:39] on the Benb trail,

[1:17:40] completion of the map

[1:17:40] city inventory

[1:17:42] and its placement on

[1:17:43] the city website,

[1:17:43] distribution

[1:17:44] local plants on

[1:17:45] Selectboard party,

[1:17:46] coordination privately

[1:17:47] funded

[1:17:48] edible walks

[1:17:49] plants with

[1:17:50] representatives

[1:17:51] the Burra people in

[1:17:51] library, cramped

[1:17:52] cooperation with the Commission

[1:17:53] from planning over

[1:17:54] development of the section

[1:17:55] about natural resources

[1:17:56] new city plan,

[1:17:57] acquisition,

[1:17:58] construction and

[1:17:59] table setting

[1:18:00] for a picnic in the park

[1:18:01] Queen. We also

[1:18:01] performed a wonderful

[1:18:02] work together with

[1:18:03] Parks Department

[1:18:04] and rest in

[1:18:05] urban forest,

[1:18:06] including creation

[1:18:07] paper map

[1:18:07] existing trails in

[1:18:08] urban forest,

[1:18:09] completion

[1:18:10] interactive map

[1:18:11] urban forest for

[1:18:11] with Tessa's help

[1:18:12] McAn, our

[1:18:13] city forester, and

[1:18:14] Sam Page of BCRC,

[1:18:15] holding a very

[1:18:15] successful

[1:18:16] public march

[1:18:17] in the urban forest with

[1:18:18] Tessa McAn, who

[1:18:19] had an incredible

[1:18:19] a large number

[1:18:20] visitors thanks to

[1:18:21] advertising assistance

[1:18:22] from Green Mountain Club. We

[1:18:23] spoke out

[1:18:24] presentation about our

[1:18:25] Tom's Forest from ABC (

[1:18:26] Association of Commissions on

[1:18:28] nature conservation

[1:18:29] Vermont) within

[1:18:30] their series

[1:18:31] Town for story webinars. WITH

[1:18:32] looking forward to it

[1:18:33] that this fall

[1:18:34] we will gladly lead

[1:18:36] and we will participate in

[1:18:37] several additional

[1:18:38] projects, including

[1:18:39] exploring the possibility

[1:18:40] involving our

[1:18:41] urban forest to

[1:18:42] family programs

[1:18:43] forestry and

[1:18:44] forest carbon for

[1:18:45] getting additional

[1:18:46] funds for

[1:18:47] further

[1:18:47] improvement

[1:18:48] amenities,

[1:18:48] available in the city

[1:18:50] forest; work on

[1:18:50] by definition

[1:18:51] opportunities for

[1:18:52] receiving grants,

[1:18:53] which will allow us

[1:18:54] create an accessible

[1:18:55] access point for

[1:18:56] people with disabilities

[1:18:57] to the Husi River in the park

[1:18:58] Clayton; cooperation with

[1:19:00] BCRC and the commission on

[1:19:00] planning for

[1:19:01] implementation and

[1:19:02] grant management

[1:19:03] for research

[1:19:04] scope of work,

[1:19:05] given to Powell, who

[1:19:06] will be focused on

[1:19:07] improving safety

[1:19:08] and accessibility in

[1:19:09] downtown Palo; and

[1:19:10] finally finding a member

[1:19:11] communities,

[1:19:12] interested in

[1:19:12] filling vacancies

[1:19:14] in nature conservation

[1:19:15] region. After almost

[1:19:16] three years of work in

[1:19:17] we collected commissions

[1:19:18] truly dynamic

[1:19:19] team with very

[1:19:20] dynamic members,

[1:19:21] who are passionate about their

[1:19:22] work, incredible

[1:19:23] motivated and excellent

[1:19:25] promote projects

[1:19:26] between ours

[1:19:26] monthly

[1:19:27] meetings. We are very

[1:19:28] we are proud that

[1:19:29] we can continue

[1:19:30] work that will help

[1:19:31] improve life

[1:19:32] our neighbors here in

[1:19:33] It fell. Ideally.

[1:19:44] Nothing more.

[1:19:45] No others

[1:19:46] updates.

[1:19:47] Good. All business

[1:19:49] discussion and

[1:19:49] renewal.

[1:19:54] One that I can

[1:19:56] quickly decide which

[1:19:57] I'm adding it to the list because

[1:19:58] it is quite new. Hmm,

[1:20:00] as Nate mentioned,

[1:20:01] research

[1:20:02] sculptures, we

[1:20:03] received this grant

[1:20:05] agreement and BCRC. Hmm, well, we

[1:20:08] would like

[1:20:09] use BCRC

[1:20:10] as a project manager

[1:20:12] for this. Hmm, so we hope that Sam

[1:20:16] Paige, what are you all doing?

[1:20:17] appoint Sam

[1:20:18] Page Municipal

[1:20:19] project manager

[1:20:20] for research

[1:20:21] scope of work. Hmm, ah

[1:20:23] then we are going

[1:20:25] organize

[1:20:25] regular meetings with

[1:20:27] her, Nate, Tom and

[1:20:28] by me. And then, if there is

[1:20:29] a board member who

[1:20:30] would like to join

[1:20:32] to us, hmm, that would be

[1:20:33] gratefully. But to me

[1:20:35] just needed

[1:20:36] suggestion that Sam

[1:20:37] Paige was ours.

[1:20:38] project manager

[1:20:39] for a grant for

[1:20:39] volume research

[1:20:41] works. Forward.

[1:20:46] I will make a suggestion,

[1:20:48] so that we nominate Sam

[1:20:49] Page

[1:20:56] coordinator

[1:20:56] project for our

[1:20:57] volume research

[1:20:58] tunnel works

[1:21:00] center. Hmm, how is that?

[1:21:02] is it called? Grant for

[1:21:03] volume research.

[1:21:04] grant

[1:21:06] volumes. Some more

[1:21:09] discussion? All

[1:21:12] ready. It

[1:21:17] everything you had in

[1:21:19] old cases section?

[1:21:20] See the frame

[1:21:21] old cases with

[1:21:22] next meeting.

[1:21:23] Clayton Park. I do nothing about it.

[1:21:27] Clayton Park. Well, I

[1:21:31] checked the applications for

[1:21:32] grants, but found out,

[1:21:33] what do I need

[1:21:34] wait for one of

[1:21:35] them, so that first

[1:21:37] close our grant,

[1:21:38] but I still

[1:21:38] I'm checking other places.

[1:21:42] So I haven't received it yet.

[1:21:43] from this answer.

[1:21:47] So I'm still working.

[1:21:49] over this.

[1:21:49] Good.

[1:21:50] Um, mobile texting

[1:21:51] message, does he want

[1:21:53] I'd like to discuss something.

[1:21:54] about this? I

[1:21:55] sent you again

[1:21:56] instructions. There are three

[1:21:58] types of taxes that we

[1:22:00] could choose, um,

[1:22:01] for further

[1:22:02] development. Um, so there is

[1:22:05] this is a decision that

[1:22:06] need to accept, and

[1:22:08] also the decision that

[1:22:09] What will it be for?

[1:22:10] directed. Um, but I

[1:22:13] not sure if it's a good idea

[1:22:14] wants to spend some time

[1:22:16] public meetings, especially

[1:22:17] than you will vote

[1:22:18] for further development

[1:22:19] this question, or what

[1:22:21] council's consent on this

[1:22:22] reason? And I still

[1:22:25] I'm waiting for the numbers, my dear.

[1:22:27] The thing is that

[1:22:28] I don't want anything.

[1:22:29] to do until we

[1:22:30] we'll see some

[1:22:31] digits.

[1:22:32] I also think that we

[1:22:33] special needs

[1:22:34] fees for this

[1:22:35] discussion. I have on

[1:22:36] mean that this

[1:22:37] big enough

[1:22:38] question and enough

[1:22:39] It is important that we...

[1:22:41] Well, I think, and I think,

[1:22:43] that we should...I think,

[1:22:44] what should we, um,

[1:22:45] before engaging

[1:22:47] the public, I think I'm glad.

[1:22:49] must accept

[1:22:50] the decision that this is what we want to do as

[1:22:52] council. Agree.

[1:22:55] And then, if we are like

[1:22:56] glad, after

[1:22:57] we will get more

[1:22:58] information that we

[1:22:59] looking for now, after

[1:23:00] how we as a council,

[1:23:01] if we accept

[1:23:02] decision to move

[1:23:03] forward with local

[1:23:04] options tax,

[1:23:06] then we attract

[1:23:07] public. But

[1:23:08] if we don't get together

[1:23:09] move forward as

[1:23:10] council, why?

[1:23:11] waste everyone's time?

[1:23:13] Do you mean that

[1:23:15] I clearly understood that

[1:23:16] you would like to do,

[1:23:17] this is first

[1:23:18] vote if

[1:23:19] we are interested in that

[1:23:20] to make a tag. We are not talking about

[1:23:24] which option, and

[1:23:25] just about whether

[1:23:26] we are interested in

[1:23:27] future or

[1:23:28] at least investigate,

[1:23:30] and I think that Ginny

[1:23:31] is right. I think that

[1:23:32] we need

[1:23:33] special meeting

[1:23:34] only for packages

[1:23:35] options so that we can

[1:23:36] to say here, as a council,

[1:23:38] and just discuss,

[1:23:39] what do I think it is

[1:23:41] necessary.

[1:23:43] Yes. So, maybe I

[1:23:45] Haven't read about this in a long time.

[1:23:46] It's not that I don't think.

[1:23:47] that this is needed after

[1:23:49] how you decide,

[1:23:50] What do I think?

[1:23:51] Yes. I think this

[1:23:53] the council would like to do

[1:23:55] this is earlier.

[1:23:56] Therefore, I think that we

[1:23:57] need to spend

[1:23:58] meeting. We are like a council

[1:24:00] we decide yes or no.

[1:24:01] If that is the case, then we attract

[1:24:04] 100%.

[1:24:05] Good.

[1:24:06] This is my opinion.

[1:24:07] Yes, I agree.

[1:24:09] So we are waiting for

[1:24:13] numbers, and then we will decide whether

[1:24:15] shall we move

[1:24:16] further or not.

[1:24:17] And I also think that,

[1:24:18] as soon as we

[1:24:19] we'll get the numbers, I apologize. No,

[1:24:21] not immediately,

[1:24:22] as soon as we get the numbers, then

[1:24:23] we can

[1:24:24] to appoint

[1:24:24] a special meeting,

[1:24:25] so that we can

[1:24:26] discuss these numbers.

[1:24:27] Well, the only thing that bothers me

[1:24:29] anxious in anticipation

[1:24:30] numbers, and I would like them

[1:24:31] mother...Yes, more

[1:24:34] before we talk about it

[1:24:36] let's talk, but when

[1:24:37] will we get them? For

[1:24:40] Do we have any ideas?

[1:24:42] Hmm, that shouldn't be the case.

[1:24:43] long.

[1:24:46] Figures for tax from

[1:24:47] sale. These are the other two,

[1:24:50] for which we don't have

[1:24:51] data due to problems

[1:24:52] with confidentiality.

[1:24:54] Yes. Yes, we do, if that's the case.

[1:24:55] will take, say, if in

[1:24:56] we will not be given

[1:24:57] for two weeks,

[1:24:58] then maybe we will hold a special

[1:25:00] ...

[1:25:00] That's where I was. Yes,

[1:25:02] instead of

[1:25:02] wait, you know, if

[1:25:04] we are waiting for two weeks

[1:25:05] and we have no data,

[1:25:06] you know when we

[1:25:07] let's go back to

[1:25:07] next meeting

[1:25:09] board, and we have

[1:25:10] no data, I think,

[1:25:11] we should appoint

[1:25:12] date of the event

[1:25:13] meeting, in any case,

[1:25:14] special

[1:25:15] meeting, and then

[1:25:16] to make a decision. To

[1:25:17] at that time

[1:25:18] we, I hope, we should

[1:25:20] to deal with

[1:25:21] state from others

[1:25:22] issues and with tax

[1:25:24] the department is quite

[1:25:25] good.

[1:25:26] The state is quite good.

[1:25:27] it works in everything, but

[1:25:29] everything takes time. And I

[1:25:30] , you know, it's simple

[1:25:32] takes time. Um, me too

[1:25:34] I understand why this is.

[1:25:35] takes time. Simply

[1:25:37] limited staff,

[1:25:38] You know, it's not about

[1:25:39] because they are not

[1:25:40] want to supply us

[1:25:41] things, just

[1:25:42] limited staff.

[1:25:43] So, okay, let's go.

[1:25:45] Let's see again what

[1:25:46] will be until it is

[1:25:47] will sound like a plan.

[1:25:48] Sounds like a plan for

[1:25:49] me.

[1:25:49] Ideally. Let's discuss.

[1:25:55] Was it Cairo?

[1:25:56] I wasn't waiting, I was waiting,

[1:25:57] while you look

[1:25:58] your list. I know,

[1:25:59] that you have a list.

[1:26:00] Yes, I was waiting.

[1:26:02] This is the last one in the section

[1:26:03] old cases, if

[1:26:04] only we don't

[1:26:04] we take into account permissions

[1:26:05] for demolition, within the framework

[1:26:06] which, perhaps, this too.

[1:26:08] Therefore,

[1:26:10] good.

[1:26:11] For old cases.

[1:26:14] So, everyone had

[1:26:15] opportunity to get

[1:26:16] all information from

[1:26:17] Khazzi River with

[1:26:18] sediment removal

[1:26:19] hydroelectric power plant

[1:26:20] Hazzak. Good. Therefore,

[1:26:26] First I'm going

[1:26:27] tell you what

[1:26:29] I conducted research.

[1:26:30] as an administrator

[1:26:31] zoning, and what I, uh,

[1:26:32] I'm going to do as

[1:26:33] administrator

[1:26:34] zoning regarding

[1:26:35] permission. And then I want the election

[1:26:41] the council also acted with

[1:26:42] on this occasion, therefore

[1:26:44] that the electoral council is

[1:26:45] the owner of the property, therefore

[1:26:46] I think this is the solution.

[1:26:47] council. As

[1:26:51] administrator

[1:26:52] zoning, I'm going

[1:26:53] to adhere to, uh,

[1:26:54] instructions,

[1:26:55] last set

[1:26:56] instructions that I

[1:26:57] received from that

[1:26:58] the last one

[1:26:59] email,

[1:27:00] which we received on

[1:27:01] last, uh, meeting

[1:27:03] . Uh, I'm going.

[1:27:06] to issue a permit, and, um,

[1:27:07] based on the fact that

[1:27:09] he will have to

[1:27:10] apply for

[1:27:11] permission.

[1:27:13] Good. We are not

[1:27:14] we are going to give

[1:27:15] he just

[1:27:16] random resolution.

[1:27:17] He needs to submit

[1:27:18] application. So I will send

[1:27:20] him electronically

[1:27:21] letter and tell him that

[1:27:22] need to submit

[1:27:23] application for permission, and we

[1:27:24] let's help him

[1:27:25] go through this process. I

[1:27:26] researched this

[1:27:28] questions, and there are others

[1:27:29] things. Good. I am going

[1:27:32] follow

[1:27:33] Jess's recommendations,

[1:27:34] the second set, which

[1:27:35] she gave it to us. I think

[1:27:38] what is this

[1:27:39] safest

[1:27:40] way to do it that

[1:27:41] he must have all

[1:27:42] their state and

[1:27:43] federal permits,

[1:27:44] before something

[1:27:45] will fall into the river.

[1:27:48] And this is what I'm going to do.

[1:27:49] as

[1:27:50] administrator

[1:27:51] zoning. Um, do you have

[1:27:54] someone's question from

[1:27:55] on this occasion, first

[1:27:56] How do I continue? It

[1:27:58] the only thing that exists

[1:27:59] prerogative

[1:28:00] administrator. I am not

[1:28:02] I know, but I want to.

[1:28:03] respond to

[1:28:04] question if they

[1:28:06] you have, because the city

[1:28:07] Poel certainly is

[1:28:08] interested

[1:28:09] aside, and you guys

[1:28:11] ,

[1:28:12] is city B,

[1:28:15] because federal

[1:28:16] cleanup grant

[1:28:17] of this area, and therefore

[1:28:29] now, as an election

[1:28:31] I'm glad...What are you listening to?

[1:28:32] Darcy today

[1:28:33] in the evening etc.? Which

[1:28:38] your feelings as advice

[1:28:39] about how the council

[1:28:41] should proceed further?

[1:28:43] Because I still

[1:28:44] I think she should

[1:28:46] to do it, even

[1:28:47] if the administrator

[1:28:48] zoning will approve

[1:28:49] permission, and then this

[1:28:50] will reach this date, and

[1:28:51] they will be

[1:28:52] to work on the basis of

[1:28:53] this permission, and whether

[1:28:54] they will approve of him,

[1:28:55] or something like that after

[1:28:57] this. It sounds like this,

[1:28:59] Do you know what position?

[1:29:00] of the electoral council regarding

[1:29:02] how we feel and what

[1:29:04] should we do? Or

[1:29:08] We must as a council

[1:29:09] to set conditions,

[1:29:10] restrictions and others

[1:29:12] things about this? I just want yours.

[1:29:16] thoughts.

[1:29:16] AT,

[1:29:17] Well, that's our decision.

[1:29:19] Yes. I mean, I thought about it for a while.

[1:29:23] time. I would like to

[1:29:24] someone was present

[1:29:25] at the meeting. We already

[1:29:26] so many times

[1:29:27] talked about it on

[1:29:28] now. I would

[1:29:29] wanted to have

[1:29:29] opportunity to bet

[1:29:30] direct questions. I think Darcy

[1:29:32] violated several

[1:29:33] important issues, on

[1:29:34] which I would like

[1:29:35] get answers. I don't think so.

[1:29:37] adversarial process.

[1:29:39] Hmm, but if this

[1:29:39] so important, and

[1:29:41] I think they are.

[1:29:42] think, then I would like

[1:29:43] to be able to attract them,

[1:29:45] to ask a question

[1:29:46] as a board member, and I think that's reasonable.

[1:29:52] –set conditions, hmm,

[1:29:53] within the framework of the law on

[1:29:55] this; but I may

[1:29:56] I wouldn't feel this.

[1:29:57] if I could bet

[1:29:58] question. And yes, I read everything, but I also think that there is

[1:30:04] difference between reading

[1:30:05] reports and conversation with

[1:30:07] someone who

[1:30:07] represents the company

[1:30:09] . IN

[1:30:09] I have one question.

[1:30:11] .

[1:30:12] How is this related? IN

[1:30:16] he has a contract

[1:30:17] rent with us for this

[1:30:18] account that

[1:30:19] concerns the upper

[1:30:20] rent level. My

[1:30:23] the concern is

[1:30:24] in that, and I believe that

[1:30:25] he is covered, that's what

[1:30:27] you know, we talked

[1:30:28] about Darcy, who

[1:30:29] talked about

[1:30:30] sewer lines.

[1:30:31] Her most

[1:30:32] concern

[1:30:33] concerned

[1:30:34] sewer lines

[1:30:35] . Hmm,

[1:30:36] utilities. THERE ARE

[1:30:37] plumbing.

[1:30:38] Utilities.

[1:30:40] Yes. I think I can.

[1:30:47] to be wrong, but,

[1:30:48] considering that he

[1:30:49] everything properly

[1:30:50] provided, it would be

[1:30:52] one of the ways

[1:30:53] go through this process.

[1:31:07] But I was curious,

[1:31:08] which is stated in

[1:31:09] the lease agreement, which

[1:31:10] he is allowed

[1:31:11] to do, because it is in

[1:31:12] rental agreement,

[1:31:13] you know, uh, and I even

[1:31:15] didn't watch it

[1:31:16] completely, but,

[1:31:17] It seems there was

[1:31:18] section...Hmm, oh,

[1:31:25] It's up to you.

[1:31:26] Yes.

[1:31:28] I just want

[1:31:29] to make sure that we adhere to our

[1:31:31] lease agreement, but

[1:31:33] we also take care of

[1:31:37] Darcy's interests. All

[1:31:50] It's said and done,

[1:31:51] how deep

[1:31:52] they can dig,

[1:31:54] just as you can't

[1:31:55] to dig veins, etc.

[1:31:59] If you follow

[1:32:01] these rules and

[1:32:02] set points,

[1:32:03] which should

[1:32:04] to encompass us

[1:32:04] correct, but not

[1:32:05] any conditions,

[1:32:08] I would still like to

[1:32:10] know how details

[1:32:11] right and how is that

[1:32:12] will happen, the point is

[1:32:13] because the devil

[1:32:14] lies in the details,

[1:32:15] Where is this all going, I

[1:32:17] simply

[1:32:23] said that this is the first time,

[1:32:24] when I see the contract

[1:32:25] rent, and I didn't know that

[1:32:27] he was not

[1:32:27] registered in the city of Alo. So I am going

[1:32:32] register this because

[1:32:34] I contacted

[1:32:34] by email,

[1:32:36] because I searched a lot and

[1:32:37] found everything else,

[1:32:38] except for the lease agreement.

[1:32:41] Therefore,

[1:32:42] rental agreement

[1:32:42] never

[1:32:43] registered in

[1:32:44] city

[1:32:44] administration.

[1:32:45] No,

[1:32:46] it was a memorandum to

[1:32:47] rental agreement.

[1:32:48] Yes. Everything else.

[1:32:50] Armen suggested

[1:32:51] him immediately. Often.

[1:32:54] I told him, you know,

[1:32:56] I asked because I have

[1:32:57] he wasn't there, and I have

[1:32:58] I mean, I searched for everything,

[1:33:00] and I got it, like everything else

[1:33:01] different, but I just

[1:33:03] appealed to us

[1:33:04] could read this,

[1:33:05] because, as I said, I know it's a 30 year old

[1:33:08] rental agreement,

[1:33:11] and he gave me everything that

[1:33:12] I

[1:33:14] provided there. So I have

[1:33:16] meaning if we

[1:33:17] let's ask him to be

[1:33:18] present at

[1:33:19] meetings on Zoom, we can either personally,

[1:33:21] because I don't know where he is

[1:33:22] alive, but

[1:33:23] I don't think so.

[1:33:24] but if you can

[1:33:25] zoom in, and,

[1:33:27] maybe you know, we can

[1:33:28] even a representative,

[1:33:31] that's good,

[1:33:34] oh, I think, oh, isn't it

[1:33:35] another hour, this

[1:33:37] okay, that's it

[1:33:38] right,

[1:33:39] yes, I want to say,

[1:33:41] yes, I think there is

[1:33:42] representative on

[1:33:43] mobile, which could

[1:33:45] would do it.

[1:33:47] So, for me

[1:33:48] generally about the project

[1:33:49] there are several red ones

[1:33:50] flags. One of

[1:33:53] they were addressed to

[1:33:56] FEMA. FEMA level regarding

[1:33:59] of what it could be

[1:34:00] sediment and how much of it

[1:34:02] now, of course,

[1:34:03] differs from

[1:34:04] what they say,

[1:34:05] going to

[1:34:06] delete, right? AND

[1:34:10] I don't remember.

[1:34:11] by heart, I have

[1:34:12] no information, but

[1:34:13] they say that

[1:34:14] are going to delete

[1:34:15] from there a foot of sediment. FEMA

[1:34:18] from 2010 or something like that

[1:34:20] there was, I don't remember

[1:34:22] dates that are significantly

[1:34:23] were different. Therefore,

[1:34:26] What are we doing? I think

[1:34:29] that this is very important

[1:34:30] for us to know that they

[1:34:32] removed - one foot or so

[1:34:33] return to 2011

[1:34:38] what was there. Um,

[1:34:41] you know, I think that's

[1:34:42] key point. If

[1:34:45] they stated that

[1:34:46] one foot

[1:34:47] enough for

[1:34:48] dam operation,

[1:34:49] then I would say one

[1:34:51] foot, or

[1:34:53] wrong? But if it were

[1:34:55] it was as if it were

[1:34:57] not so, are they

[1:34:58] will address this

[1:34:59] FEMA numbers, and I think

[1:35:00] that Darcy was right

[1:35:02] opinion about who

[1:35:03] will determine and how we

[1:35:07] let's determine where it is located? Is there

[1:35:11] external agency,

[1:35:12] except the contractor,

[1:35:14] which determines that they

[1:35:16] dug up

[1:35:17] five feet, and that's it

[1:35:18] the place where they

[1:35:19] should be, and this

[1:35:20] normally.

[1:35:21] Who determines where these 5

[1:35:22] feet?

[1:35:23] Yes.

[1:35:24] Um, so I think,

[1:35:25] what she really had

[1:35:27] a good idea. This is what was I thinking? Um, I

[1:35:30] tried a lot

[1:35:32] to think, because I think that

[1:35:33] This, you know, is important.

[1:35:34] thing, and I, and I don't want to dissuade him from

[1:35:37] this. I just want

[1:35:38] make sure that this

[1:35:40] done,

[1:35:41] and, well, I have no doubt,

[1:35:43] that it will be done

[1:35:44] properly. I just want to

[1:35:48] make sure that this

[1:35:49] made so that it

[1:35:50] did not create

[1:35:51] problems for the city,

[1:35:56] infrastructure, be

[1:35:57] then the bridge, sewage

[1:35:58] or a water pipe along

[1:36:00] roads. The only thing that bothers me

[1:36:04] I'm worried about this.

[1:36:05] to make sure that we,

[1:36:06] not fulfilling

[1:36:07] due diligence,

[1:36:08] let's not create a problem

[1:36:09] in the future with

[1:36:10] infrastructure,

[1:36:11] because

[1:36:12] infrastructure

[1:36:13] incredibly important

[1:36:14] for all of us.

[1:36:16] I also think that

[1:36:17] regarding her

[1:36:18] remarks on the fact that

[1:36:19] Is this contaminated?

[1:36:20] material and where it is

[1:36:21] will be disposed of, I just don't know.

[1:36:23] answers to this

[1:36:24] question, and I would like

[1:36:25] to know her. And I think that

[1:36:28] given that this

[1:36:29] great idea, I agree with this, for

[1:36:32] except that in

[1:36:33] within the limits of what we

[1:36:39] can we or can't we

[1:36:40] make. Are we,

[1:36:42] I think this is a state,

[1:36:43] which is located in

[1:36:44] within the state, about which

[1:36:45] I, you know, can

[1:36:46] to say that

[1:36:47] we can rely on

[1:36:49] with permission or not, but I would like to know

[1:36:51] and I agree with you. I would also like to know,

[1:36:54] because where will it go? Or

[1:36:56] will this be thrown out?

[1:36:57] Karl's farm, and will it be

[1:36:58] she properly

[1:37:00] closed,

[1:37:01] and will we have

[1:37:02] problem with food,

[1:37:03] more precisely, with

[1:37:04] feed through

[1:37:05] five years on this

[1:37:06] place, because we are dealing with this

[1:37:08] everywhere, so I think

[1:37:10] what is this right

[1:37:11] remark, right?

[1:37:13] So I think we should

[1:37:14] need to contact

[1:37:16] to Armen, to ask

[1:37:17] his representative 10

[1:37:18] September. I, as

[1:37:20] administrator

[1:37:21] zoning, I will write

[1:37:22] him electronically

[1:37:23] letter and notification,

[1:37:24] what does he need

[1:37:25] to do for the process

[1:37:27] obtaining permission, and

[1:37:28] then, um, because in

[1:37:29] it is 10 days old

[1:37:30] waiting for this. So

[1:37:33] I will start this process.

[1:37:34] after Josh

[1:37:35] will approve its permission.

[1:37:38] He has 10 days.

[1:37:40] expectation

[1:37:41] after Josh

[1:37:42] will approve this permission.

[1:37:44] Question,

[1:37:46] What is it?

[1:37:47] I think he has

[1:37:48] sorry, I don't

[1:37:50] interrupted, he has 15

[1:37:51] days, I made a mistake. Ahem,

[1:37:55] would it be better,

[1:37:56] maybe like you,

[1:37:58] Mike, there are a few

[1:37:59] questions so that we

[1:38:00] sent these

[1:38:00] question

[1:38:01] in advance, so that,

[1:38:02] when he comes, we will not

[1:38:04] they buried him

[1:38:04] questions they have

[1:38:06] will not be.

[1:38:10] You know what I mean?

[1:38:11] I say, we will put

[1:38:12] question and let's say,

[1:38:14] what are these questions that we are going to put

[1:38:16] ,

[1:38:16] this is ours

[1:38:17] anxiety and

[1:38:18] questions that we are going to put

[1:38:20] at the meeting, so that when

[1:38:21] you will come, you were

[1:38:23] ready for these questions.

[1:38:24] I think that's reasonable.

[1:38:25] . The only thing I would say is

[1:38:27] This is what I wouldn't want.

[1:38:28] for someone to say that we

[1:38:29] responded to

[1:38:29] question, so no

[1:38:30] reasons to be on

[1:38:31] meeting, because here

[1:38:32] What's the matter: answer

[1:38:33] to the question, I want,

[1:38:34] so that they are ready,

[1:38:35] isn't that right? Because I want to get

[1:38:37] information they have

[1:38:38] there must be time

[1:38:39] to prepare. I am from

[1:38:40] I agree with you.

[1:38:41] But their response to

[1:38:43] maybe later

[1:38:44] cause secondary

[1:38:45] question that would be

[1:38:46] quite reasonable.

[1:38:48] Right. Therefore,

[1:38:49] at least the initial one

[1:38:51] the question they would

[1:38:52] They put it, and I agree with

[1:38:53] secondary

[1:38:54] questions, well, they would

[1:38:55] arose, but they

[1:38:57] would be ready for

[1:38:58] initial question:

[1:38:59] "Okay, as far as

[1:39:00] deep you

[1:39:01] are going to dig, and

[1:39:02] how will this affect

[1:39:03] sewer line?

[1:39:04] » So, here I am

[1:39:06] I agree 100% with

[1:39:08] both options.

[1:39:10] Good. So, I think that

[1:39:15] way to deal with this

[1:39:17] —that is to say, hmm, here

[1:39:18] list of questions that

[1:39:19] has an election commission,

[1:39:21] but we would ask

[1:39:22] personally

[1:39:22] representative

[1:39:23] respond to

[1:39:24] secondary issues,

[1:39:25] which can

[1:39:32] to arise from

[1:39:32] the main question. Or

[1:39:35] Does this seem reasonable?

[1:39:36] But I would also like to

[1:39:37] so that you can

[1:39:38] send this

[1:39:38] by email, I

[1:39:39] assured. Right.

[1:39:40] Yes. And I also wanted

[1:39:42] I wish he...

[1:39:44] Yes. Make sure

[1:39:45] that we are not forbidden

[1:39:46] also hear

[1:39:47] answers to our

[1:39:48] main questions.

[1:39:49] Right. Oh, I do.

[1:39:50] I want. Yes. But I

[1:39:51] just want, i just

[1:39:52] I want to make sure that

[1:39:54] we won't just

[1:39:55] bomb it

[1:39:56] issues that

[1:39:57] he has a little

[1:39:57] to investigate, and on which

[1:39:58] he will not be able to

[1:39:59] respond to

[1:40:00] meeting, and he will say:

[1:40:01] "Well, I can't

[1:40:01] answer this

[1:40:02] now, but I can

[1:40:03] answer this

[1:40:04] the next day or

[1:40:05] "two."

[1:40:05] I agree with you.

[1:40:07] Right. So I think there is, I think,

[1:40:09] what is really

[1:40:09] justified

[1:40:10] arguments from both

[1:40:11] parties. I think that

[1:40:12] we need

[1:40:13] to set a date by

[1:40:14] which we have

[1:40:15] to ask a question

[1:40:16] Mike or Tara, whoever

[1:40:17] it was not, and so

[1:40:18] how can they be

[1:40:19] to forward, for example,

[1:40:20] Well,

[1:40:21] I think this group

[1:40:22] questions we are talking about

[1:40:23] now we are talking,

[1:40:24] comes from

[1:40:25] election commission,

[1:40:26] my questions from

[1:40:27] administrator

[1:40:28] zoning, I conducted

[1:40:29] enough research

[1:40:31] so that

[1:40:32] I was comfortable,

[1:40:35] but these are your questions

[1:40:36] , or not

[1:40:37] Yes?

[1:40:37] I'm glad you

[1:40:38] listed the questions

[1:40:39] if you want

[1:40:39] distribute them among

[1:40:40] the rest of the election

[1:40:41] commissions so that we can

[1:40:42] to make an addition

[1:40:43] or editing.

[1:40:44] Yes.

[1:40:45] And then send

[1:40:46] him a list of questions,

[1:40:47] and I think that we,

[1:40:48] of course, we can

[1:40:49] to formulate it like this,

[1:40:50] so that you know that we give you some

[1:40:53] preventive

[1:40:53] question,

[1:40:54] but there may be

[1:40:55] secondary questions

[1:40:56] . So we would like to

[1:40:58] representative here

[1:40:59] answered.

[1:41:00] Good,

[1:41:01] Julie,

[1:41:01] Can I be?

[1:41:02] child? Because our

[1:41:04] next meeting

[1:41:05] will be the 10th, and they

[1:41:06] you need to be able to

[1:41:08] complete the process

[1:41:09] obtaining permission.

[1:41:11] Don't they have any?

[1:41:12] only until October 1st,

[1:41:14] to be able to go into the water? So

[1:41:17] that's what

[1:41:19] will we make a decision?

[1:41:20] No. So here's what I'm into

[1:41:22] I am right. That's why

[1:41:24] I am going to start.

[1:41:25] process of obtaining

[1:41:26] permission, probably

[1:41:27] tomorrow or on

[1:41:28] weekend. I am going

[1:41:29] contact Armen.

[1:41:30] So, the process

[1:41:31] obtaining permission...

[1:41:33] Good. Good.

[1:41:35] We will start as soon as

[1:41:36] he will get permission

[1:41:37] from us.

[1:41:39] Good. Then

[1:41:45] he can...i'm sure

[1:41:46] , that can...

[1:41:47] administrator

[1:41:48] zoning will approve

[1:41:49] this permission is based on

[1:41:50] what I said,

[1:41:51] just because

[1:41:52] research that I

[1:41:53] spent. Good. This

[1:41:58] permission. To Joshu

[1:42:01] need this permission,

[1:42:02] that

[1:42:03] to advance from

[1:42:04] government permit, and

[1:42:05] I know for sure that you mean, and I

[1:42:08] I'm trying to help.

[1:42:09] to advance this process,

[1:42:10] and that's great,

[1:42:11] thanks to the window.

[1:42:12] No, it's true. Because

[1:42:13] it has a window. So

[1:42:15] That's a great question. I think that if we had

[1:42:19] someone was here 10

[1:42:20] September,

[1:42:23] process of obtaining

[1:42:24] permission would already be there

[1:42:25] initiate. I don't want to

[1:42:26] delay the process

[1:42:27] obtaining permission in

[1:42:28] on this issue, whether

[1:42:29] wrong? While the election

[1:42:31] the commission will not say "yes"

[1:42:32] . So, if the election

[1:42:34] the commission will say "no",

[1:42:37] the whole process

[1:42:37] obtaining permission

[1:42:38] there will be no more

[1:42:39] initiate. But I don't

[1:42:40] I want to delay

[1:42:41] process if we are going to say "

[1:42:43] Yes".

[1:42:44] Does this make sense?

[1:42:46] Yes.

[1:42:46] Good. I just want to...

[1:42:50] sometimes I'm not very sure

[1:42:52] I explain, but I don't want to.

[1:42:53] delay it longer,

[1:42:55] than necessary, but I think September 10th,

[1:42:57] if we had one here

[1:42:59] representative, and for all

[1:43:00] our questions would be

[1:43:04] enough answers

[1:43:06] ,

[1:43:07] election commission

[1:43:08] could

[1:43:08] vote for

[1:43:09] approval.

[1:43:10] Yes.

[1:43:12] Process

[1:43:12] dredging and

[1:43:13] obtaining permission

[1:43:14] will already be held. AND

[1:43:17] there could be three, four,

[1:43:21] five days, during

[1:43:22] which they will have to

[1:43:23] wait for permission.

[1:43:24] Yes. Sprat

[1:43:25] days have

[1:43:26] to end, and then

[1:43:27] they will be able to start your own

[1:43:29] project.

[1:43:29] This is a question too.

[1:43:31] Sorry.

[1:43:31] No, that's normal. No.

[1:43:33] Does this seem reasonable?

[1:43:35] Yes.

[1:43:35] Good.

[1:43:37] Something else from this

[1:43:38] reason? Sorry. I just think that this

[1:43:44] the best course of action. AND

[1:43:46] I thank everyone for this.

[1:43:51] opinion on this matter

[1:43:52] and question. I think

[1:43:53] that's pretty good.

[1:43:56] Something else from our

[1:43:57] old business, or

[1:43:58] Is everything okay? It was

[1:43:59] the only last one? IN

[1:44:01] I only have one,

[1:44:02] Julia. Of course, I

[1:44:03] It would be a great pity,

[1:44:04] if you didn't do this

[1:44:05] done.

[1:44:05] I know it's because

[1:44:06] emails that

[1:44:08] we get. We

[1:44:09] received several

[1:44:10] letters, and I have

[1:44:11] only a group of

[1:44:11] rescue squad,

[1:44:13] regionalization.

[1:44:19] Guys, a few minutes.

[1:44:20] , is there any

[1:44:21] information that

[1:44:22] can be shared to

[1:44:23] our city residents

[1:44:25] had...And since I

[1:44:26] saw several

[1:44:27] emails

[1:44:28] from the residents, and from

[1:44:29] you guys too...well

[1:44:31] , was

[1:44:34] one electronic

[1:44:35] letter,

[1:44:36] and I know that the one who

[1:44:39] I can share, well,

[1:44:40] but I just...is there

[1:44:42] a place where we can

[1:44:43] view the protocol

[1:44:44] ...Sir, or not, sir?

[1:44:46] No...

[1:44:47] Good.

[1:44:50] Nick Zack from BCRC is

[1:44:51] coordinator of this

[1:44:53] groups.

[1:44:55] The rest of us are just

[1:44:56] group members.

[1:44:57] I'm just curious,

[1:44:58] or

[1:44:59] there is no other...um,

[1:45:01] just so people don't

[1:45:02] thought we were something

[1:45:03] we hide.

[1:45:04] I definitely do this.

[1:45:05] I will do it.

[1:45:05] Yes. I am not going.

[1:45:10] to resort to

[1:45:11] logistics of offers

[1:45:12] , because, um, honestly

[1:45:13] speaking 100% honestly and

[1:45:15] 100% transparent

[1:45:16] proposals that

[1:45:17] are considered, and

[1:45:18] options that are available on

[1:45:20] table. Our group

[1:45:26] definitely not

[1:45:27] decided on one,

[1:45:28] two, three, four, which

[1:45:30] no matter what the number.

[1:45:32] Right? They

[1:45:33] narrowed the circle, and I have

[1:45:37] See you soon,

[1:45:39] On the 9th.

[1:45:40] Yes.

[1:45:40] Because I missed it,

[1:45:41] I almost missed it.

[1:45:42] meeting, because I thought that

[1:45:43] this is the ninth, and

[1:45:44] I read it wrong

[1:45:45] email. IN

[1:45:46] anyway, I

[1:45:47] finally did so,

[1:45:48] that the process will be like this,

[1:45:58] that at the council meeting

[1:45:59] Bennington

[1:46:00] will take place

[1:46:00] informational

[1:46:01] meetings, at

[1:46:02] council meeting

[1:46:03] Bennington. This will be

[1:46:15] information meeting

[1:46:17] here, with everyone

[1:46:18] options, uh,

[1:46:19] Shesbury and Woodford,

[1:46:20] because it's four

[1:46:21] participating cities, uh, in

[1:46:23] this group. Uh, so how?

[1:46:32] only we will decide,

[1:46:34] which I believe will be 9-

[1:46:35] that number will be

[1:46:36] a decision has been made,

[1:46:37] deadline for

[1:46:38] so that all this is

[1:46:43] published, was 1

[1:46:44] October. Uh, we have

[1:46:47] meeting on the 9th.

[1:46:55] Everything will be like this, uh, we

[1:46:56] must all

[1:46:57] to finish on the 9th

[1:46:58] moment, and then, uh, in

[1:47:00] we have, uh, information,

[1:47:02] I don't remember how we met her.

[1:47:03] called, but in any case she, uh,

[1:47:06] she is a representative

[1:47:07] Bennington Rescue from their

[1:47:09] council. It is she.

[1:47:15] is going to convey

[1:47:16] information to

[1:47:16] wide

[1:47:17] public,

[1:47:18] will work on this.

[1:47:20] Good.

[1:47:23] Um, so now, um, this

[1:47:28] really going on. Um, I think this one

[1:47:34] email,

[1:47:43] maybe a little

[1:47:45] demanded things that, um

[1:47:46] , will be published

[1:47:52] to the general public, when

[1:47:53] The time will come.

[1:47:55] Good.

[1:47:56] And right now it's not like that

[1:47:58] someone something

[1:47:58] hid. We have

[1:48:02] there is simply no...I can

[1:48:03] tell you everything,

[1:48:04] what is happening on

[1:48:05] meetings, but many

[1:48:06] this does not apply

[1:48:08] that which

[1:48:08] will take place and

[1:48:09] will move forward,

[1:48:11] so, um, this is ongoing,

[1:48:12] so this electronic

[1:48:13] The letter was kind of...

[1:48:15] I know better,

[1:48:17] no...no...letter to which

[1:48:18] can you answer...

[1:48:19] actually it's something on

[1:48:20] like...thank you for your

[1:48:21] email, but

[1:48:22] for now...um, you know,

[1:48:24] no information,

[1:48:25] which one can

[1:48:25] to share with a wide audience

[1:48:26] the public, and that's what

[1:48:28] I just want to say

[1:48:29] ...No, I understand, Julie.

[1:48:30] No, and I appreciate that. I

[1:48:32] said...

[1:48:33] Yes.

[1:48:34] Mmm...

[1:48:35] answered, because I am becoming

[1:48:37] braver, but...

[1:48:41] Yes. Therefore,

[1:48:44] Oh, yes. Demonstration.

[1:48:47] So, she has one. You

[1:48:49] do you want to do this

[1:48:50] demonstration? I

[1:48:51] just...Yes.

[1:48:53] So, I gave you,

[1:48:54] Guys, a copy of what?

[1:48:56] Because it is a state

[1:48:58] regulations. So, I gave it to you guys,

[1:49:00] a copy of our

[1:49:01] previous

[1:49:02] demonstration

[1:49:03] the version we had

[1:49:04] to do for

[1:49:05] mobile home in

[1:49:06] Vermont. So, this and me

[1:49:09] did not remove her name,

[1:49:10] but this is an older version

[1:49:12] , which we had,

[1:49:14] and we did as

[1:49:15] it was written,

[1:49:17] demonstration. So

[1:49:20] she was appointed,

[1:49:21] as I said, for

[1:49:23] mobile homes,

[1:49:24] because it is a state

[1:49:25] statute, and I can

[1:49:26] say it's 19 or

[1:49:28] the last nine. But I

[1:49:32] just because we

[1:49:33] finally came up with

[1:49:34] the new version that I

[1:49:35] just wanted to, like

[1:49:36] Darcy, we could all

[1:49:37] to communicate because

[1:49:39] we are not...

[1:49:40] I think that the one that

[1:49:42] Hannah sent us

[1:49:43] sprat

[1:49:44] days ago,

[1:49:45] was well composed,

[1:49:46] or the one who has it

[1:49:47] composed,

[1:49:48] I am working on it.

[1:49:49] together, and therefore we use,

[1:49:52] as I said, when

[1:49:54] someone wants to take off

[1:49:55] mobile home,

[1:49:56] this is what they get

[1:49:57] now, and it will do

[1:50:01] our previous one

[1:50:02] version with state

[1:50:03] tax.

[1:50:04] I understand.

[1:50:06] Yes. 15 dollars is

[1:50:10] registration fee,

[1:50:11] and this is a state statute

[1:50:12] which I want to get

[1:50:14] not just from

[1:50:15] residents of the city. It

[1:50:18] registration fee,

[1:50:19] which is installed

[1:50:20] by statute.

[1:50:22] I think that now

[1:50:24] they talk a lot about

[1:50:25] it. I am ready now.

[1:50:27] accept the project

[1:50:32] permission to

[1:50:32] demonstration, which

[1:50:34] sent to us by Hannah 10

[1:50:35] days ago or something

[1:50:36] like this.

[1:50:39] 14.

[1:50:40] Yes, I am ready.

[1:50:41] accept this permission

[1:50:42] right now.

[1:50:43] This form. IN

[1:50:44] I just have a question.

[1:50:45] : Do we need

[1:50:46] policy? Because I know we have

[1:50:48] policy.

[1:50:49] I don't think so.

[1:50:50] politics, Julie. I think it's selective.

[1:50:54] the ad stops

[1:50:56] obtaining permission for

[1:50:57] demolition, which has

[1:50:58] be submitted for any

[1:51:00] -any demolition in

[1:51:01] within the city limits, and this

[1:51:02] covers this permit,

[1:51:03] application or permit that

[1:51:04] covers practically

[1:51:05] everything I couldn't do

[1:51:06] come up with a scenario,

[1:51:08] which was not there. So

[1:51:12] I don't know, I don't think so.

[1:51:14] I, what is this, so to speak?

[1:51:15] , council policy. It...

[1:51:16] this was...this city...this

[1:51:18] requirement as owner

[1:51:19] land in the city or

[1:51:20] property owner.

[1:51:21] This is an extension

[1:51:22] legislation in

[1:51:23] within the state.

[1:51:25] I am ready to accept it.

[1:51:27] .

[1:51:27] Make a suggestion

[1:51:28] about acceptance

[1:51:34] demolition permit/

[1:51:35] transfer to

[1:51:35] printed

[1:51:36] in form,

[1:51:37] presented to us

[1:51:38] August 14.

[1:51:40] Yes. August 14.

[1:51:43] I will support this.

[1:51:44] proposal. Any

[1:51:46] further discussion

[1:51:47] ? Um, and this permission, um,

[1:51:49] will have a fee in

[1:51:51] amount of 15 dollars.

[1:51:55] Yes. Good.

[1:51:57] Perfectly. I have

[1:51:58] offer. I have

[1:51:59] friend. There is still

[1:52:00] discussion? All who

[1:52:02] "by"?

[1:52:02] I.

[1:52:06] Look at me.

[1:52:08] So you know what? Your

[1:52:09] the electoral council has, and

[1:52:11] The city of Pau has...has

[1:52:12] demolition permit,

[1:52:13] which is approved

[1:52:14] by the electoral council.

[1:52:17] Head.

[1:52:18] Good.

[1:52:20] Oh. Get busy

[1:52:21] in the correct order

[1:52:22] daytime.

[1:52:24] No.

[1:52:25] There are no new cases.

[1:52:27] Any public

[1:52:28] comments? I understand.

[1:52:31] . Yes. So, I begin.

[1:52:36] read

[1:52:38] this morning. My

[1:52:42] mother had to go to

[1:52:43] hospitals through

[1:52:44] heart problems, and I want to sincerely thank you.

[1:52:47] to the Rescue service for their

[1:52:49] quick response at 4:30

[1:52:50] in the morning when they took her away, for

[1:52:52] professionalism, and she

[1:52:53] I really liked it.

[1:52:55] building. And I just

[1:52:58] I want publicly

[1:52:59] tell you guys,

[1:53:01] Thank you very much.

[1:53:03] Thanks, Rob. Any

[1:53:05] other public

[1:53:06] comments? Without hands.

[1:53:10] Good. Is it needed?

[1:53:11] us executive

[1:53:12] legal committee

[1:53:13] questions?

[1:53:14] We need it. Yes.

[1:53:18] Good. I will consider.

[1:53:19] petition for

[1:53:21] executive introduction

[1:53:22] Committee on Legal Affairs

[1:53:23] questions.

[1:53:24] I suggest going to

[1:53:25] executive

[1:53:26] meeting with

[1:53:26] legal issues. IN

[1:53:30] Do I have a request?

[1:53:31] second. All in favor?

[1:58:11] Recording is in progress.

[1:58:12] Let's consider

[1:58:13] request for withdrawal

[1:58:14] from the executive

[1:58:15] Committee on Legal Affairs

[1:58:16] questions.

[1:58:16] Second.

[1:58:18] Microphone is on.

[1:58:20] Yes. Yes. IN

[1:58:22] I have a request. IN

[1:58:23] I have a second to exit the executive

[1:58:25] Committee on Legal Affairs

[1:58:25] questions. Everyone who is "in favor"?

[1:58:27] I.

[1:58:29] Sorry. Uh, me

[1:58:30] I will consider the request.

[1:58:31] about the transfer

[1:58:32] meeting.

[1:58:32] I will move on to

[1:58:33] transfer

[1:58:33] meeting.

[1:58:34] Second.

[1:58:35] They look

[1:58:36] ideally. IN

[1:58:37] I have a request. IN

[1:58:38] I have a second. All,

[1:58:39] who is "for", about

[1:58:40] transfer

[1:58:40] meeting.

[1:58:42] Thank you all. AT,

[1:58:45] record.

Pownal Select Board // 8-27-26

Transcript