City Council Meeting

Redmond, OR · · More Redmond, OR meetings · More Oregon meetings

Agenda

Agenda: https://redmondor.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFile(fileId=2354,plainText=false)

Full agenda packet (agenda plus every staff report and attachment): https://redmondor.api.civicclerk.com/v1/Meetings/GetMeetingFile(fileId=2358,plainText=false)

[0:16] CALL TO ORDER / ESTABLISH A QUORUM
[0:23] BLESSING - Pastor Jason Reeves, Redmond Heights Pentecostals
[0:25] PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
[1:23] CITY ANNOUNCEMENTS
[4:29] CONSENT AGENDA
[5:17] PRESENTATIONS
[5:22] 4th Quarter Financial Report
[9:26] PUBLIC HEARINGS
[9:28] Resolution # 2026-19 - A resolution of the City of Redmond, Oregon, adopting a Tiered Rate Structure for the Water Utility.
[27:51] CONTRACT REVIEW BOARD
[27:55] Award a Five-Year Agreement with uAvionix Corporation for the Flightline Airborne Position Reference Tool and Service Contract at the Redmond Municipal Airport: $242,820.
[33:50] ORDINANCES
[33:55] Second Reading - Ordinance #2026-11: An ordinance amending theRedmond City Code Section 5.305, prohibiting possession, sale and useof fireworks in Redmond.
[35:10] ACTION ITEMS
[35:16] MOTIONS AS A RESULT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
[39:35] Resolution #2026-18: A resolution declaring certain territory in northwest Redmond as being annexed to and incorporated within the City of Redmond.
[41:01] Purchase Authorization for a 3-Axle Snow Plow Dump Truck for the Public Works Department; $308,014.94
[43:08] COMMENTS FROM CITIZENS AT THE MEETING
[49:10] CITY MANAGER COMMENTS
[49:54] COUNCIL COMMENTS
[51:13] MAYOR'S COMMENTS
[52:28] ADJOURN

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

[0:07] OK thank you.
[0:15] OK thanks for your patience.
[0:18] Welcome to the city council meeting for August 25.
[0:22] I don't think pastor Jason made it.
[0:24] So we'll start with the Pledge of Allegiance
[0:26] that John will lead us in this way.
[0:30] Oh, I pledge allegiance to the flag
[0:37] of the United States of America and to the Republic
[0:40] for which it stands.
[0:42] One nation under God, indivisible,
[0:45] with liberty and justice for all.
[0:54] We're going to have a couple of things at the front.
[0:57] And first is we have a visitor here from Republic services.
[1:02] They want to come up.
[1:04] We need to establish a quorum.
[1:06] Oh, yeah.
[1:08] Get ahead of myself.
[1:08] Go ahead.
[1:11] Counselor Evelyn.
[1:13] Here mayor Fitch here.
[1:15] Counselor Nielsen here.
[1:17] Counselor Osborne here.
[1:18] Counselor Patrick.
[1:19] Here counselor.
[1:20] Wedding here.
[1:21] Counselor Zwicker.
[1:22] OK So if you guys want to come on up, that'd be great.
[1:31] Sounds good.
[1:33] Thank you.
[1:34] Commissioner yeah.
[1:36] Speak speak.
[1:38] All right.
[1:38] I can figure it out.
[1:40] Well, thank you for having me today, Mr. mayor.
[1:42] Council members.
[1:43] My name is Wes Davis.
[1:44] I'm the new general manager for Republic services
[1:47] in Central Oregon, which means I work for you guys.
[1:52] I have met with your staff.
[1:54] I've heard a lot from my team about where
[1:58] we're at in this market.
[2:00] And I am new, so it's my chance to ask for feedback
[2:06] about how we can be better.
[2:08] And what we can do to better serve our community.
[2:11] Honestly, obviously this is an essential service.
[2:14] It's something really important to the community
[2:16] so that we're healthy, safe, sanitary at all times.
[2:19] And I take that charge very seriously.
[2:23] What I'd like to do is 1, make sure you guys know who I am.
[2:27] So I've been with Republic for five years.
[2:30] I was most recently a general manager in North Idaho.
[2:32] Coeur d'Alene specifically.
[2:34] Beautiful area.
[2:35] If you've ever been up there.
[2:37] And there's not many places in the country or world,
[2:40] frankly, that I'd rather be, but this is one of them.
[2:44] I chose to come here.
[2:45] I wanted to come here.
[2:45] I hope to be here for many, many years
[2:48] and be your partner for those years.
[2:51] Before that, I was in the army for six years.
[2:53] So I've learned quite a bit.
[2:55] I've learned a lot.
[2:56] One of the things I've learned is you learn
[2:58] a lot by seeing the situation.
[3:00] So one, I want to invite all of you at all times, at any time,
[3:04] to come out and do a ride along or see our facility
[3:07] and understand where the rubber meets the road
[3:09] and what we're working on for the community
[3:11] to better serve you.
[3:13] I also want to make sure you all have a direct line to me.
[3:16] Obviously, I work with your staff right now.
[3:20] But I work for you guys.
[3:22] I also work for all the people of Redmond.
[3:24] So anybody that you hear from that needs
[3:27] help because they've been online for 40 minutes
[3:30] and aren't getting an issue resolved.
[3:31] I'd love to hear about that because that's
[3:33] my job to fix that.
[3:34] If I don't know about it, I'm probably not going
[3:35] to be able to do much about it, so I'd
[3:37] love to get that feedback.
[3:38] I love feedback, hearing what's going on, what the issues are,
[3:42] and how else I can make this better.
[3:46] I think that's pretty much all I got.
[3:47] I want to make sure you guys got to see me today.
[3:51] I'll stand for any questions or comments at this point,
[3:53] but I don't know that you guys are prepared necessarily.
[3:58] It could be a long night if we did that.
[3:59] But hey, I'm happy to be with you individually if you do
[4:02] want to take time to prepare.
[4:04] All right.
[4:05] Thank you.
[4:05] Because I understand it could be a long night,
[4:07] and I want to do what I can to fix it.
[4:09] All right.
[4:10] Thank you, thank you.
[4:13] Next tonight on our agenda, we have a second reading
[4:15] on the fireworks ordinance.
[4:19] I don't know if anyone's here on the fireworks,
[4:22] but there won't be a public comment period.
[4:23] So I just wanted to bring that out front.
[4:27] And with that, we'll move on to the consent agenda,
[4:30] which is made up of the minutes of June 15,
[4:33] the minutes of June 23, the minutes of June 30,
[4:36] North point vista phase I infrastructure
[4:38] project change order number 5 with Taylor
[4:40] Northwest for $47,313.95.
[4:44] A purchase authorization for heavy duty
[4:46] mobile column lifts for the fleet
[4:48] services of $120,070.32, cents.
[4:52] Amendment number one to the design contract with Kittleson
[4:55] associates for the Northwest, 19th and Northwest maple traffic
[4:58] signal project TR 2412 for 26,001 99
[5:03] and the September recognitions.
[5:06] Is there a motion to approve the consent agenda.
[5:09] I move to approve the consent agenda.
[5:11] Second moved and second.
[5:12] Any further discussion.
[5:14] All those in favor, signify by saying Aye.
[5:16] Aye OK.
[5:17] Next, we have a presentation one we
[5:20] always look forward to the fourth quarter financial report.
[5:30] Good evening, Mayor and council.
[5:32] Jason Neff deputy city manager chief financial officer so,
[5:35] yeah, we are bringing the fiscal year 2526 year end report.
[5:43] So you can see the highlights there.
[5:49] On that blue box I think they can see it.
[5:52] OK thank you.
[5:54] Come on.
[5:54] Jason there you go.
[6:00] Now you can see them.
[6:02] So in that blue box is our financial highlights
[6:05] for the year.
[6:06] I should mention these are unaudited
[6:08] but numbers aren't moving much at this point.
[6:11] James Wood and his team are doing a great job
[6:13] of finalizing things.
[6:15] So operating expenses for the year.
[6:18] We spent 4% less than budget.
[6:21] That's pretty typical for Redman.
[6:23] We spend typically about 5% I think where we were a little bit
[6:26] surprised is the general fund spent about 2%
[6:31] So under our budget.
[6:34] So we were caught a little bit surprised there.
[6:40] Looking at some of the revenues, property taxes,
[6:44] we were slightly higher than budget
[6:48] franchise fees is kind of where we missed it a little bit.
[6:53] Good example.
[6:54] We were 300,000 down in franchise fees versus budget.
[6:57] Good example is in September of 2025,
[7:00] cascade natural gas dropped their rates
[7:03] by 16% We typically would assume maybe a 3% increase.
[7:08] So something we didn't anticipate.
[7:12] Also, you might remember Pacific Power
[7:15] dropped dropped their rates by almost a percent.
[7:17] So those two alone kind of missed
[7:19] the mark on franchise fees.
[7:22] Overall, we're carrying an operating deficit in the end
[7:25] of the year, $800,000, or about 2.7%
[7:30] That's for the general fund.
[7:32] We anticipated that might happen this year in our budget.
[7:36] We tighten things up quite a bit.
[7:38] We carried into the budget a 3% deficit.
[7:41] So I still am confident we will see that dissipate
[7:45] throughout the fiscal year.
[7:48] But something we'll keep an eye on.
[7:51] The water fund was break even this year.
[7:54] 3,000 positives on a $9 million budget.
[7:57] So I think our rates are right where they should be.
[7:59] The wastewater fund.
[8:01] Obviously we got the wetlands project going full steam ahead.
[8:06] The DEQ loan is going to be about $2.2 million
[8:13] eventually coming into our budget.
[8:15] Now we've got about $800,000 surplus in wastewater.
[8:19] We're going to see about 800,000 of other debt drop off
[8:22] over the next couple of years.
[8:23] And we're also anticipating about a half a million savings
[8:26] on our treatment costs.
[8:28] So we're going to get there with regards to our ability
[8:31] to afford that project.
[8:33] You look at the airport, passenger traffic was up 3,
[8:38] 3.2% the prior year.
[8:42] Overall, we had a $6.9 million operating surplus,
[8:46] you'll recall, council gave us the authorization to issue
[8:49] all the debt for the terminal.
[8:50] And in two budgets from now, we're
[8:53] going to be spending about $7 million a year
[8:56] on that debt service.
[8:57] So we are spot on where we should
[9:00] be with regards to being able to afford
[9:02] that terminal debt service.
[9:06] So those are the highlights.
[9:07] I know we got a lot to talk about tonight and other stuff.
[9:12] I can take questions from council.
[9:14] Any questions for Jason.
[9:16] I think we went over this before but basically a good report.
[9:21] So thank you.
[9:22] You're welcome.
[9:24] Let's see.
[9:25] Next, we have a public hearing and this is resolution
[9:28] 2026 19 a resolution of the city of Redmond, Oregon,
[9:32] adopting a tiered rate structure for the water utility.
[9:37] Josh with assistance from finance.
[10:01] Evening mayor and council.
[10:02] Josh, wedding operations manager for the city of Redmond.
[10:07] And tonight, before I get into the presentation,
[10:09] just to let our consultant.
[10:11] She's a remote again and her name is Deb.
[10:13] And I'll go ahead and give her the opportunity
[10:14] to introduce herself.
[10:18] Good evening.
[10:19] Mayor and council, Deb Gulati.
[10:20] Galati, Rothstein group.
[10:22] And I'll be supporting Josh on the presentation.
[10:25] Thank you.
[10:27] Yeah thank you.
[10:28] Deb so this is the same presentation
[10:31] that I gave back in July 25.
[10:33] It's a little bit more of a condensed version,
[10:36] but I always look for a little bit of a few more tidbits
[10:38] of information that I can give you guys to help
[10:41] better inform your decisions.
[10:43] Hey, Josh, before I forget, I'm going
[10:45] to open the public hearing, so this will be part of it.
[10:48] Thank you.
[10:49] Go ahead.
[10:50] All right.
[10:53] All right.
[10:54] On the first slide here, what this shows
[10:57] is what the fixed volumetric rate is currently
[11:01] and what the volumetric rate could go to.
[11:03] Should a tiered rate be adopted in tiers 1, 2, 3, and 4.
[11:09] I would be remiss to say that I didn't point out
[11:11] the last presentation that tiers 1 and 2 were structured as such,
[11:15] so that there would be 0 impact to the household
[11:19] in the wintertime months, the non irrigation months.
[11:21] To put that in perspective for you,
[11:23] an average residential home uses about 35,600 gallons a month
[11:28] on the non irrigation months.
[11:30] And so nine tiers really or excuse me, 12 tiers.
[11:34] Really what that allows you to do is use about 12,000
[11:36] gallons or sorry 5,000 gallons.
[11:38] 9,000 gallons.
[11:39] Sorry math was wrong.
[11:40] I get a lot of numbers in my head, about 9,000 gallons with
[11:45] really no impact to the bill.
[11:49] As we can see.
[11:49] Tier 3 here.
[11:50] You can take that all the way up to about 15,700 gallons.
[11:55] Once again, minimal impact.
[11:57] And then tier four of course, is really
[11:58] the tier we're focused on.
[12:00] That's a tier where the opportunity for more
[12:02] efficient water use exists.
[12:09] What this slide really points out
[12:11] is the number of accounts in the summertime that
[12:14] jump into tier 3 and tier four.
[12:16] It's hard to say.
[12:17] From this bar graph you know exactly where that customer
[12:20] lands in tier three or tier 4.
[12:22] You could be one unit into tier 4
[12:24] and you could show up in the red bar here.
[12:28] What this also points out is what I mentioned in the earlier
[12:30] slide, the minimal impact in increase in tier 3
[12:34] and even into tier three.
[12:35] Even into tier, excuse me, tier 2 and into tier 3, taking it all
[12:40] the way up to 15,700 gallons.
[12:43] The bill impact there.
[12:44] The increase is $33.50.
[12:48] So it's not a lot.
[12:49] Tier 4 once again is the tier that we're focused on.
[12:53] Also, once again, what I was not able to point out
[12:55] in the previous presentation is, as you can see in January,
[12:58] February, March, November and December,
[13:00] you can see that there's accounts in the black
[13:04] and the red, right.
[13:05] And give you guys an idea and to get into that Black
[13:09] and then into the red.
[13:10] That's 15,000 gallons in the wintertime.
[13:13] And so while the impact to the water utility isn't super great,
[13:16] 95% of that water is indoor leaks
[13:19] that are going down the drain.
[13:21] And that's an impact on the sewer system.
[13:23] And so we're really looking to address those leaks also
[13:25] in the wintertime.
[13:28] So the wintertime you think you indicated average
[13:30] use is about 3,500 gallons.
[13:33] And that's a month.
[13:34] Yeah that is correct per household.
[13:36] And the average comes out PSU average is 2.42 times 50 times
[13:40] 31.
[13:40] What would be the average in the summertime.
[13:43] Let's see.
[13:43] An average home with indoor use and a 1,500 square foot
[13:47] yard is about $15,000 a month.
[13:55] Questions move on.
[13:57] Nope I have a question.
[13:59] Are these the numbers you're showing here on the graph.
[14:01] I'm assuming on the left side of the graph is gallons per minute.
[14:05] Is this historic usage that you extrapolated to determine
[14:09] two years, 3, and 4.
[14:11] The left hand side of the graph is.
[14:12] Number of accounts.
[14:13] Number of accounts.
[14:14] OK gotcha.
[14:15] OK gotcha.
[14:16] OK Accumulated accounts throughout the city.
[14:18] Perfect thank you.
[14:25] All right.
[14:25] This next pie chart.
[14:26] So 5% of single family residential demand,
[14:30] short term reductions.
[14:32] So conservatively we're looking for this to conserve about 5%
[14:38] In the short term that amounts to about 60
[14:42] to 75 million gallons a year.
[14:44] And then of course, as the program progresses,
[14:47] we're looking for long term reductions of 10% or better.
[14:50] So 10% on the residential demand yearly
[14:53] would be 500 million gallons, which would be pretty nice.
[14:58] It's a great opportunity to align our water use
[15:00] with our water right constraints and also
[15:03] focus on the long term capacity of the natural resource.
[15:07] We all live here.
[15:08] We know the number of droughts we've
[15:10] seen over the last five years.
[15:12] And so this just gives us a better
[15:13] opportunity to bring our water use
[15:15] into more efficient capacity.
[15:18] From my perspective, capital project deferment is a huge one.
[15:24] The more we can meet the growing needs of the needs
[15:26] of the community without constructing Wells,
[15:29] booster pump stations and reservoirs,
[15:31] that's efficiency to me.
[15:41] The 21% in tier four.
[15:43] And so what this pie chart really represents
[15:45] is the percentage of Bills throughout the year
[15:47] that occur in those tiers.
[15:50] And so to point out that the 21% in tier four
[15:53] accounts for 30% of the water is used annually.
[15:56] And if we just really do the quick math there,
[15:58] we've got 37% between tier 4 and tier 3,
[16:02] and we have 63% of the total bills
[16:04] that occur in tiers 1 and 2.
[16:09] Do we have a breakdown on residential and commercial
[16:11] for tier 4.
[16:13] This is strictly just residential.
[16:14] Just residential.
[16:15] Just residential.
[16:16] Thank you.
[16:23] And this is our bill profile.
[16:25] So what this is doing this is taking
[16:27] the average of the high bill.
[16:29] This takes all the data that we've
[16:31] compiled over the last couple of years,
[16:33] and the average of the high bill was 59 billable units.
[16:37] So to put that in perspective, the mayor loves gallons.
[16:40] That's 44,000 gallons.
[16:43] And so if you guys will remember, I think,
[16:46] told councilor Zwicker, the average home in July utilizes
[16:49] about 15,000 gallons on a 1,500 square foot yard,
[16:52] including indoor indoor use.
[16:56] So what this shows is if this average high bill didn't change
[17:01] their water usage and they continued
[17:03] to water at 44,000 gallons a month, the bill
[17:07] impact would be $25.61.
[17:10] And I like to use July July's.
[17:12] It's when we see the highest use.
[17:15] And so your bill impact would be $25.61
[17:19] with a tiered rate adoption.
[17:30] And moving on.
[17:31] And if you guys have questions on how this looks
[17:33] on the bill, Valerie billing manager, she's in the audience
[17:36] and she might be able to answer any more targeted questions.
[17:41] But council had kind of asked, hey, what kind
[17:43] of information what kind of.
[17:47] What kind of things can we do on the bill to inform customers
[17:50] of what their previous year's water
[17:52] use would have looked like with a tier bill applied to it.
[17:57] And so what we've done here is put on there.
[17:59] This is what an average bill would look like.
[18:02] We also have the opportunity to take the individuals 12 month
[18:07] use and apply that month over month over month
[18:10] to show them what that would look if a tiered rate was
[18:14] applied to 2025 use.
[18:25] Moving on.
[18:28] So this is the implementation timeline.
[18:32] So obviously right now we're looking for an adoption today.
[18:40] And what we would like to do is implement
[18:42] in either April or October.
[18:49] First and so I think if we whichever way we implemented,
[18:58] I think the key is what I understand is educating people
[19:01] what their bill looks like now and what
[19:03] it would look like under the tiered rate ahead of time.
[19:08] That is correct.
[19:09] So we would get working on getting those out so customers
[19:12] could start looking in that viewing,
[19:14] viewing what their water use would
[19:15] look applied to a tiered rate.
[19:17] So when April came, there wouldn't be any big surprises.
[19:21] And as I understand it, we have the capability
[19:23] of doing that now pre April.
[19:27] Is that that's a question more than a statement.
[19:32] And nodding is yes OK.
[19:34] Yeah Valerie Taylor, billing and collections
[19:44] manager we would actually October with the bill
[19:47] we sent in October.
[19:48] That would be the earliest that we could start
[19:49] this communication, but that would
[19:51] give us enough time to do that.
[19:53] And then we could continue doing it from there forward.
[19:57] So just to take it one step further,
[19:58] people would see water consumption is now
[20:02] and what the rate is and what the consumption in the future
[20:04] would be with the tiered rate.
[20:07] And then I assume we can provide them
[20:09] the tools as to whether they want
[20:11] to lower that consumption with the rebate programs we have
[20:15] and other possibilities.
[20:17] Yes, correct.
[20:18] So we would do the 12 month view and then
[20:21] we do their current usage with the tier.
[20:24] And then we would also make our communication plan
[20:26] for education and outreach.
[20:28] Any other John.
[20:31] I have a non billing question.
[20:33] So we have a stated goal.
[20:35] As a city we want to reduce water usage
[20:36] by 10% This is the Tiered water system
[20:40] is not designed as a punishment for people
[20:42] who are wasting water.
[20:43] But it's designed as more of a carrot model
[20:45] to try to get that reduction down.
[20:48] Where have we seen this implemented in other cities,
[20:53] and what kind of reductions have we seen in those cities
[20:56] that have brought this forth.
[20:58] It's a great question.
[20:59] That's a great question, councilor.
[21:01] I'm actually going to pass this one off
[21:02] to Deb since she deals with so many utilities
[21:05] throughout the nation.
[21:08] Sure So I've worked with the city of Tucson, Arizona
[21:12] for years, and obviously they're in a very water
[21:15] scarce environment.
[21:17] And we saw over a 10 year period a actually even larger than 10%
[21:26] reduction in their rates or in their water consumption.
[21:32] Part of it is the structure itself sends a conservation
[21:38] oriented message pricing incentive to customers
[21:43] to understand about the scarcity of water
[21:46] and the cost of those using water during the peak season.
[21:52] The other variable is the price.
[21:55] So for the initial implementation
[21:58] we have set there's two objectives.
[22:01] One is to send that conservation incentive
[22:04] by pricing those upper tiers at a higher rate.
[22:09] But also we don't want the rate for anybody
[22:11] to decrease because that sends kind of a confusing message.
[22:15] So in the future the city can monitor what the customer's
[22:22] response is in terms of water use,
[22:25] and then continue to progressively increase
[22:28] those upper tier rates as needed to send a more pronounced price,
[22:38] provide a pricing incentive or just seeing these can be tweaked
[22:45] as you move forward during this plan
[22:49] to balance of your affordability and your conservation
[22:54] objectives.
[22:55] But studies have shown that even just the rate structure
[23:00] itself can result in about a 2% reduction
[23:04] in water use and the pricing.
[23:08] Then, depending on how high those rates are
[23:13] and how much they increase, that results
[23:16] in the additional conservation.
[23:18] And we've seen this work in Arizona
[23:20] and in other Oregon communities and across the nation.
[23:26] So one more follow up question on that.
[23:30] So do you have experience in terms of lead time.
[23:33] Because obviously the education piece of this
[23:36] is going to be huge to get this out to folks.
[23:38] Have you seen what is the sweet spot between where we're giving
[23:42] them enough time to adapt, but not
[23:44] so long that that's kind of falling off of their mind,
[23:47] and they get surprised with it when the implementation
[23:49] finally does come into play.
[23:53] Yeah, I think, a six month time period
[23:56] is sufficient and is that sweet spot,
[24:02] assuming that the billing system is able to produce
[24:06] the Bills and the other customer service material
[24:10] and that you've got the rebates and other elements
[24:14] of the program in place as someone pointed out, to support
[24:18] the customers in actually using less water in implementing
[24:22] conservation practices.
[24:24] Thank you.
[24:25] OK go ahead.
[24:31] That is the end of my presentation.
[24:33] All right, Jason, do you guys want to add anything.
[24:38] All right.
[24:40] We'll go to public comment then.
[24:42] Is there anyone here who would like
[24:44] to speak on the tiered water rate proposal.
[24:49] Seeing none, we'll close the public hearing.
[24:54] And let's see where we're at.
[24:57] We're at the motion.
[24:59] But shouldn't this be April.
[25:00] Yes So the motion we'd want to adopt it affected April 1.
[25:08] April 1.
[25:09] March 1.
[25:11] OK OK.
[25:13] So what we have.
[25:15] All right.
[25:15] So is there a motion.
[25:17] Ocean I'm already talking.
[25:18] I guess I move to adopt resolution number 2026 19
[25:22] adopting the water tiered rate effective April 1, 2027.
[25:27] Second moved in second.
[25:29] Any further discussion.
[25:31] Sure I just want to tell staff I appreciate all the work
[25:37] you guys are doing to try and figure out how to let the public
[25:41] know what they're going to be charged.
[25:43] I really appreciate that.
[25:47] However, I disagree with rising costs when especially when there
[25:54] are no projects lined up for the extra money,
[25:57] they're just going back into more conservation.
[26:02] So we aren't.
[26:05] And the reason that plays so little in my mind is.
[26:12] The city of Redmond uses three to maybe 4%
[26:16] of the water in Central Oregon.
[26:19] So 55 million gallons is a lot of water.
[26:24] But the big picture things, it's not very much.
[26:29] I just can't support rising costs for people who live here.
[26:35] Live in Redmond.
[26:37] I'm trying to think of ways we can go down rather than go up.
[26:43] So that's it.
[26:47] Any other comment.
[26:50] I'll just say that water is going to be the critical policy
[26:55] in the decades to come.
[26:59] We are in a very resource challenged situation
[27:03] in Central Oregon on water.
[27:06] One of the balances of getting additional water rights
[27:11] is establishing some rational level of conservation,
[27:15] which I think this does.
[27:18] I think if people do it the right way
[27:20] and their bill will not be increased, if it
[27:24] is, it's almost imperceptibly.
[27:28] That is $25 for the year, but this
[27:32] is the cost we pay for a long drought
[27:36] and an aquifer that's being very challenged at the time.
[27:40] So all those in favor of the resolution
[27:44] signify by saying Aye.
[27:45] Aye Opposed.
[27:48] Aye OK.
[27:51] Next, we have contract review board,
[27:54] an award of a five year agreement with Una avionics
[27:57] corporation for the flight time airborne position reference tool
[28:02] and service contract at the Redmond
[28:03] Municipal Airport for $242,820.
[28:10] Gentleman, Mayor and council.
[28:12] I just wanted to introduce Charles Hanson.
[28:16] He's been with us about a month.
[28:18] He's our new deputy director of the airport.
[28:21] And I think you've met Leif before,
[28:23] but he's going to take the lead on the presentation.
[28:26] All right.
[28:26] Welcome, Charles.
[28:32] Thank you.
[28:55] All right.
[28:56] Thank you.
[28:58] Let me get to from the beginning.
[29:04] There we go.
[29:06] All right.
[29:06] Thank you, Mayor.
[29:07] Thank you.
[29:08] Councilors Leif Andersen, in Redmond Municipal Airport.
[29:12] Contracts and properties manager.
[29:14] Tonight, we're going to ask for authorization to engage
[29:18] in a contract for five years to acquire a digital solution
[29:25] for mostly our air traffic control
[29:28] cab staff to enhance safety situational awareness in the cab
[29:34] tower.
[29:35] The full cost of the contract relates to the acquisition
[29:38] of the software, the installation, and the licensing
[29:41] of the software to not only air traffic control staff,
[29:44] but other stakeholders around the airport, which
[29:47] we'll explain in a minute.
[29:56] So first off, the acronym is apt,
[29:59] which stands for airborne position reference tool.
[30:03] This is not radar, but it's a GPS based tool that picks up
[30:11] on ads-b broadcasted aircraft, which is basically all aircraft,
[30:15] including our commercial air carriers,
[30:18] and translates that data into visual screens for air traffic
[30:23] control tower users to look at and deploy in the cab for safety
[30:29] and awareness Among the many benefits of the service
[30:36] which are listed here are.
[30:39] Verifying verifying transponder issues.
[30:41] Assisting in distressed aircraft.
[30:44] Currently in the tower, we've got folks with binoculars.
[30:48] This will add to their ability to quickly
[30:51] ascertain where aircraft are in the airport environment.
[30:54] This is the only approved vendor of this particular service
[30:58] for commercial airports in the GA community.
[31:02] So it's an FAA single source provider.
[31:08] This is an example of what the tower staff would see,
[31:13] as well as other users of this particular product.
[31:17] It will be very, very similar to what they will see if they had
[31:21] ever worked in an FAA tower with full radar
[31:24] surveillance coverage.
[31:26] So it kind of mimics the same look and effect
[31:29] of what they would have seen in previous positions
[31:32] in towers that had full radar surveillance coverage.
[31:39] As mentioned, this is the only FAA approved vendor
[31:43] for this particular service.
[31:45] The FAA and the airport staff have been wanting this
[31:48] and have worked hard on this particular opportunity
[31:51] for years.
[31:53] We also have very strong involvement and a proponent
[31:58] within the air carrier community at the airport,
[32:00] including Alaska Airlines, who have been very
[32:02] interested in instrumental in getting
[32:04] this set up for us as well.
[32:06] We did go through a sole source process
[32:08] through the city's approval process for this particular cost
[32:14] over a five year period.
[32:20] And with that, we'll take any questions.
[32:22] Thank you.
[32:23] So as I understand it, at a certain elevation,
[32:26] Seattle controls traffic.
[32:30] And then this one is below that elevation.
[32:34] Yeah correct.
[32:35] This will be this is below that elevation.
[32:38] This particular tool will be able to see
[32:39] any ads-b broadcasting aircraft, but this tool
[32:43] will be basically zoomed in to the Redmond airport environment
[32:47] to pick up quicker communications with air
[32:51] traffic control in Seattle.
[32:53] The Seattle air traffic route center
[32:56] and pilots coming into the airport environment
[32:59] pick them up on the screen and then visually
[33:02] verify that they're out there for their separation
[33:05] service calls for departures, landings, et cetera.
[33:09] I'll convene the contract review board retroactively
[33:12] to your beginning leave.
[33:14] So with that, does the council have any questions
[33:18] or are we ready to move forward.
[33:23] With a motion.
[33:27] I move to approve the sole source findings and award
[33:29] the flight line airborne position reference tool contract
[33:32] to avionics in the amount of $242,820, and authorize the city
[33:39] manager to sign the contract.
[33:40] Second moved in second.
[33:42] Any further discussion.
[33:43] All those in favor, signify by saying I. I thank you very much.
[33:48] Thank you mayor.
[33:48] Thank you.
[33:49] Council so we'll reconvene the council
[33:50] from the contract review board and we'll go to ordinances.
[33:54] And this is the second reading of ordinance
[33:56] 2026 regarding fireworks.
[33:58] Is there a motion to have a second reading by Title only.
[34:03] I move to have to have a second reading of ordinance 2026 11
[34:07] by Title only.
[34:09] Second moved and seconded.
[34:10] Any further discussion.
[34:12] All those in favor, signify by saying I. Oh, Jay.
[34:22] Nay OK.
[34:24] City ordinance number 2026-11.
[34:28] An ordinance amending the Redmond city code,
[34:30] Section 5.305 prohibiting possession, sale, and use
[34:34] of fireworks in Redmond.
[34:36] Is there a motion to approve.
[34:41] I move to approve ordinance 2026 11 by roll call vote
[34:46] second a second.
[34:48] Any further discussion before we have the vote.
[34:51] If not, we'll go with a roll call.
[34:52] Vote councilor Evelyn.
[34:56] Excuse me.
[34:58] Mayor Fitch.
[34:59] Yes councilor counselor Nielsen.
[35:00] Yes Councilor.
[35:01] Osborne yes.
[35:03] Councilor Patrick.
[35:04] No counselor.
[35:05] Wedding yes.
[35:06] Councilor Zwicker.
[35:07] Yes OK.
[35:10] Next, we have an action items.
[35:12] And the first one we're going to do
[35:14] is one we discussed in executive session.
[35:17] It's resolution number 2026 21.
[35:21] Give a little background.
[35:23] Yes mayor.
[35:25] City attorney.
[35:26] So this is coming out of executive session.
[35:30] It's been before council twice now.
[35:32] The first time was for a resolution to initiate
[35:37] eminent domain process.
[35:38] And so the property concerned in this
[35:41] is the intersection of ninth and antler.
[35:44] It's part of the East side arterial.
[35:48] And there's a section of property
[35:49] that needs to be obtained.
[35:51] In order to complete this project.
[35:53] It's essential to continue the project.
[35:57] And so we've been engaging in negotiations
[36:00] with the property owner to purchase that piece of property.
[36:03] And as we are continuing those negotiations,
[36:05] we are also working through the condemnation process as well.
[36:10] So this resolution is the second resolution in this process that
[36:15] would authorize staff to file the condemnation action in city
[36:19] court while we continue to not seek
[36:22] or I think I said Circuit Court while we
[36:24] continue the negotiation process,
[36:26] because it wasn't in the packet.
[36:28] There's two sections to whereas clauses that I'll read for you
[36:31] and then briefly go over the approval as well.
[36:35] So this is resolution number 2026-20.
[36:40] It's similar to resolution 2026-10.
[36:45] That was the first resolution of these two.
[36:48] In addition, on this one we identify the property concerned
[36:52] which are tax lots 02500 and one (513) And so that's the legal
[37:05] description.
[37:06] Also included in the exhibits are the actual property
[37:10] descriptions.
[37:12] Additionally, staff has completed the appraisals
[37:15] and required notices engaged in the 40 day offer period,
[37:19] which has now expired.
[37:22] Despite these attempts, we've not
[37:24] managed to settle on a purchase price
[37:27] of the property, which is why we're moving
[37:28] forward with this resolution.
[37:31] This resolution will authorize staff to commence prosecute
[37:35] the condemnation actions.
[37:37] It also authorizes city manager and city legal counsel
[37:41] to make stipulations, amendments, agreements,
[37:44] and determine, as they determine may be in the best interests
[37:48] of the city to make final offer and negotiate a purchase price
[37:52] for this property if possible, or continue
[37:56] with the condemnation in Circuit Court.
[37:58] Any questions.
[38:01] Just one.
[38:01] OK I was just say I have a clarification question.
[38:04] So we're tonight is 2026-20.-18 correct with
[38:10] our packet for clarification.
[38:13] Thank you.
[38:14] I just want clarification on one point, which
[38:17] is that no action that we're taking tonight
[38:20] is going to prevent or interfere with any ongoing negotiations
[38:24] or ability to reach an agreement.
[38:26] That is correct.
[38:27] We will continue those negotiations
[38:29] and we actually can continue them even after filing all
[38:33] the way through the process.
[38:34] We can continue negotiations.
[38:35] Thank you.
[38:37] Is there a motion to approve resolution 2026?
[38:41] 20, a resolution authorizing the acquisition of property.
[38:45] I've got a question.
[38:46] Let me just finish this interest for the East side arterial
[38:50] projects through condemnation proceedings
[38:53] when don't we get the motion and second on the floor
[38:55] and then we'll have discussion.
[38:57] Is there a motion.
[38:58] I move to adopt resolution number 2020 6-20.
[39:05] I'll second.
[39:06] OK discussion.
[39:07] Jay Keith.
[39:10] This isn't 100% It doesn't slow the process down.
[39:16] Correct Correct a unanimous vote is not required.
[39:20] OK OK.
[39:23] Any further discussion.
[39:25] All those in favor, signify by saying Aye.
[39:27] Aye Opposed.
[39:30] Aye OK, so next we have resolution 2026 18,
[39:40] a resolution declaring certain territory in Northwest Redmond
[39:43] as being annexed to and incorporated within the city
[39:45] of Redmond.
[39:46] Kyle all right.
[39:47] Good evening, Mayor and council.
[39:49] As the mayor just mentioned, this is a really
[39:51] relatively small annexation.
[39:54] And this is essentially needed to Annex A little piece
[39:58] of property that's owned by Hayden homes in off of Northwest
[40:03] way and Northwest Redmond.
[40:04] And you'll see there on the graphic,
[40:06] it's denoted in the yellow.
[40:08] So all together it's just over 3/4 of an acre.
[40:11] Again, once we annex that then subsequently it will
[40:15] be dedicated for right of way.
[40:17] And that's because the adjoining property owner, Pacific star
[40:22] estates, which is a master development plan,
[40:24] they're going to begin work on a multi-phase residential
[40:27] development, and they will be required
[40:30] to basically improve Northwest way along the frontage
[40:33] of their property.
[40:34] So we need that full right of way dedication
[40:37] for that to materialize.
[40:39] So any questions.
[40:42] No it looks like a pretty small annexation.
[40:46] Any questions.
[40:48] Is there a motion.
[40:50] I moved to adopt resolution 2026 18.
[40:54] I'll second.
[40:55] Moved in second.
[40:55] Any further discussion.
[40:56] All those in favor, signify by saying Aye.
[40:59] Aye OK.
[41:01] Next, we have a purchase authorization for three axle
[41:04] snowplow dump truck for the public works
[41:07] department for $308,014.94.
[41:13] Ryan good evening.
[41:16] Mayor and council.
[41:17] Ryan Kirchner, public works operations manager for the city.
[41:21] Tonight's action item request or ask
[41:24] council to approve the purchase of one 2027
[41:28] with 10 yard dump truck that will have a dump body and snow
[41:33] fighting systems attached.
[41:36] This purchase will be made via or through PAPI with.
[41:40] It is for 308,400 or $14.94.
[41:46] This purchase was competitively bid via sourcewell contract.
[41:51] This purchase specifically is for the transportation division,
[41:54] which will use it for summer hauling, street
[41:57] preservation projects and snow fighting
[41:59] during the winter months.
[42:01] It's also replacing almost 30-year-old 5 yard
[42:05] dump truck that is undersized and is
[42:08] also beyond its useful life.
[42:11] This purchase was first presented to the Budget
[42:14] Committee and is in the current fiscal year budget
[42:19] under the transportation, capital, vehicles,
[42:21] and equipment sub fund.
[42:23] And before we move to motion, I'd be
[42:25] happy to answer any questions.
[42:27] Is it 308 within the budgetary framework.
[42:30] Yes OK.
[42:33] Is there a motion.
[42:38] I moved to authorize the city manager to purchase one 2027
[42:42] with T4 83 axle dump truck chassis with snow removal
[42:46] equipment from with utilizing sourcewell
[42:49] contract number 032824.
[42:53] KTTC in the amount not to exceed $308,014.94.
[43:00] A second.
[43:01] Any further discussion.
[43:03] All those in favor, signify by saying Aye.
[43:06] Aye Thank you.
[43:09] Up next, we'll have comments from Citizens.
[43:12] Does anyone have a comment at this time.
[43:16] Yeah come on up, sir.
[43:22] If you just state your name and address, that'd be great.
[43:25] Oh, Richard frost.
[43:27] OK, but Richard, you can use the table.
[43:29] That's fine.
[43:30] Just make sure you hit the button
[43:32] to make the microphone go on.
[43:34] OK yeah.
[43:43] I'm a sort of a victim of the verra mobility place.
[43:50] I talked to you about two weeks ago
[43:53] and gave you some literature, and I didn't get any response.
[44:00] I wish I could have and that's not everything.
[44:04] So we all know that system is separate from everything,
[44:08] but it's not.
[44:10] So it came along and I don't know who got it.
[44:16] Most probably the police.
[44:17] The police officers or.
[44:22] This area we're talking about the traffic cameras
[44:25] was that we're talking about the traffic cameras.
[44:27] And that went through.
[44:29] I got myself a good six in maple.
[44:31] So yeah.
[44:31] But anyway, that did go through a fairly rigorous review
[44:35] process, but go ahead.
[44:37] Oh, I don't think that Vera mobility was a very good choice
[44:44] at all since it's going through a class action lawsuit,
[44:48] and those could go on for a couple of years.
[44:50] You just don't know what's going to happen with one of those.
[44:53] And it's just and when I came and when
[44:55] I've come into this building, I decided
[44:57] I was going to go to a judge or and so
[45:02] that made me give back my pictures that they had taken.
[45:09] And I thought, oh, OK.
[45:11] And so when I about a week before I was going
[45:14] to do the final thing here.
[45:16] Excuse me.
[45:18] I went to the police office and I said, well,
[45:22] can I get my pictures back so I can put up more of not
[45:27] a defense but just a show.
[45:29] And so they said, yeah.
[45:31] And they got a young lady in there
[45:32] to get a computer outside the police department
[45:35] or in the police department in the lobby
[45:38] there for people to use.
[45:39] And I said, I'm 75 years old and I understand
[45:42] you are to remind everybody you pointed that out when you were
[45:46] there that we couldn't get my pictures back,
[45:52] and that's a failure.
[45:55] And so when I came here for the judge,
[45:59] I said, well, I've been pondering
[46:00] over even getting a jury.
[46:02] And I said, well, that would be kicking my own self
[46:04] in I decided not to do that.
[46:07] But so anyway, he dismissed it, the whole thing because I
[46:11] just said, this is ridiculous.
[46:13] Because I don't think I was guilty of that behavior.
[46:16] And I don't think and I don't maybe the police can tell
[46:19] me where did my pictures go.
[46:23] They never showed up.
[46:26] So obviously I'm saying I'm not giving a very good thing
[46:31] here because it's not my thing.
[46:34] But you guys need to clean it up.
[46:37] And I would start with getting rid.
[46:39] I don't care if air mobility is not a good.
[46:42] I've got all kinds of stuff.
[46:44] Just for fun.
[46:45] I read all your information.
[46:46] What's that.
[46:47] I read all your information.
[46:48] Well, it wasn't all the information.
[46:49] There's tons of information on it.
[46:51] I said I read your information that you gave me.
[46:53] What's that.
[46:54] I read the information you gave me.
[46:56] Well, that's.
[46:56] Well, I didn't.
[46:57] I didn't think you.
[46:58] I didn't want to burden you with that.
[46:59] But you didn't.
[47:01] And I'm not trying to get on you.
[47:03] You're a nice guy.
[47:05] But I don't.
[47:05] I think it's not going to go over
[47:08] very well if we don't sweeten.
[47:10] I don't get the system going properly.
[47:13] And that's when it could have been set.
[47:16] And a good time or a bad time for when it was set.
[47:21] Was may right when their mobility
[47:23] crashed on the NASDAQ a lot.
[47:26] I don't know if you follow that, but yeah,
[47:28] that was a big crash on the.
[47:30] So to sum up, Richard, because your time ran out.
[47:33] Let me just ask.
[47:35] You're asking us to review the situation with the police
[47:37] department is what I'm getting from your testimony
[47:40] that I found it kind of confusing.
[47:43] I kind of found it confusing in the court
[47:45] building because they said when I went to get my pictures up
[47:50] here the first time, they had two people come back
[47:53] and say, well, you need to know that, you'll they
[47:58] didn't really sit that we have these pictures.
[48:02] And I go, well, yeah, I brought them back.
[48:04] Yeah but it was like this big deal.
[48:07] And I have a hunch most people just pay their fine and leave,
[48:12] and I just don't think that.
[48:15] Couldn't you get another vendor.
[48:17] I mean, you get a meeting.
[48:20] And the judge said he could.
[48:22] It's not that difficult. All right.
[48:24] Well, we'll review that with the police
[48:26] department and the city staff.
[48:28] What's that.
[48:29] We'll review.
[48:30] I think we're going we actually talked
[48:31] about having review at some point of how this is working.
[48:34] So we won't be working too good.
[48:36] All right.
[48:37] Well, I appreciate your opinion.
[48:39] We'll find out from everyone else, too.
[48:40] OK I just wanted to.
[48:44] Because I seem to be the only one.
[48:45] I seem to be the only one that did a jury.
[48:47] One almost.
[48:48] And walking in the door.
[48:50] And it's like, no, this.
[48:51] And this is going around the whole country.
[48:53] All right with different vendors.
[48:55] And this isn't as bad as a lot of them.
[48:59] All right.
[49:00] Thank you very much for your testimony.
[49:02] Thank you.
[49:03] OK anybody else with a public comment.
[49:08] Seeing none, we'll go to Keith.
[49:11] OK I have a couple of things.
[49:13] First of all, the wild ride car show occurred last weekend.
[49:17] And at least from PD, the Police Department's perspective.
[49:21] And Sergeant gortney was down there.
[49:22] It went really well.
[49:23] They had good communication with Shane, who you met,
[49:25] who did the presentation a month or so ago.
[49:28] So the new way they're running the show and the coordination
[49:31] with police and making sure people
[49:32] don't do unsafe things worked out, so I
[49:35] just wanted to pass that on.
[49:37] And the only other thing we also back in July 28,
[49:42] there was the annexation related to the Segoviano property.
[49:47] And that kind of went through without protest.
[49:50] So that's done as well.
[49:51] That's what I've got.
[49:53] All right, Jay, we'll start with you.
[49:57] Yeah I'd like to just bring up a name of a guy who passed away
[50:04] a week after the fair, and Randy Marvin is who it was,
[50:09] and he died.
[50:12] Died at his house.
[50:14] But I'd been with him just a few days earlier.
[50:17] He gave me a ride out to my car at the fair.
[50:21] He volunteered for everything.
[50:23] Our flags that we see every holiday.
[50:27] He was part of that program and just his veteran and a real.
[50:37] Real giving person always wanted to be part of the help people.
[50:44] So I just.
[50:45] I'm going to miss him a lot.
[50:47] I just wanted to bring it up.
[50:49] Thank you.
[50:50] OK Clifford.
[50:52] Yes, I guess I pass.
[50:55] Yes I just want to say that I think the world
[51:00] is a little less bright today with the loss of Dolly Parton.
[51:03] And my thoughts and prayers go out to her family.
[51:06] And I've got some albums that I'll be rolling around tonight.
[51:10] So let me say something about water.
[51:18] If we don't do this, our rates will skyrocket in the future
[51:24] because water will not.
[51:28] The more people we get with the static amount of water,
[51:32] is a supply and demand issue there,
[51:35] and prices will go up more appreciably than if we take
[51:40] the steps to do water conservation, which
[51:43] also puts us in a better state to get additional water rights.
[51:49] We have one currently pending before the water resources
[51:52] department to transfer surface water
[51:55] rights of 500 million gallons from the river to groundwater.
[52:00] But water is not increasing in our basin.
[52:03] And so this is the right step for a lot of right reasons.
[52:09] And no one likes any increase.
[52:12] But this is going to be the softest increase compared
[52:14] to if we don't do something.
[52:16] So with that, I think the council
[52:18] made a great decision on moving forward with the water
[52:21] tiered rate system.
[52:22] I think on the long term, it will be quite beneficial.
[52:26] And with that, we're adjourned.