[0:00] a bunch of stuff like the

[0:01] battery cage, pool lights, all this

[0:03] stuff.

[0:03] >> Then you can sell it and take pictures

[0:05] and show it to people so they can

[0:06] advertise. I That's a great deal, man.

[0:08] >> up. It comes to my house and I was like,

[0:10] "Well, now what? Who's coming to put

[0:11] these in?" And he's like,

[0:12] >> "Okay. We are ready to go.

[0:16] So

[0:17] Okay, we'll get the

[0:19] May 12th, 2026 2026 DRC going today at

[0:24] 10:00.

[0:26] Um that we've got first item on the

[0:28] agenda is a review of the proposed Taco

[0:32] Bell building site plan

[0:35] um that is proposed to go uh along 400

[0:38] East

[0:39] um there at the the Macy's

[0:42] uh next to the Macy's grocery store

[0:45] north of the existing Fizz building just

[0:48] in that parking lot area right off of I

[0:50] should say parking lot area the gravel

[0:53] area there just between

[0:56] uh Macy's parking lot and 400 East.

[0:58] Uh this is a again proposed site plan.

[1:02] DRC is the final review and approval

[1:04] body for the site plans. It is a

[1:06] permitted use within the commercial

[1:08] zone.

[1:09] Um so with that, we'll go around the DRC

[1:12] with any comments or questions that the

[1:14] DRC members will have. So I'm with

[1:16] Aspen.

[1:18] >> Will you go to page four, please?

[1:22] We just have some questions to clarify

[1:25] or sorry, maybe one more.

[1:27] Um for the parking requirements, our

[1:30] code states that it's one space per four

[1:32] seats. So if you could provide the

[1:34] occupancy

[1:36] so we can ensure that you meet our par-

[1:38] parking code, that would be very

[1:39] helpful. And then as far as landscaping,

[1:43] you guys have the code listed on the

[1:45] page and you call out the dumpster

[1:48] needing three landscape sides. Um but

[1:51] only two of the sides. That is a

[1:53] requirement that

[1:55] will need to be worked out. We will also

[1:58] need to see the detail for the trash

[2:01] enclosure to ensure that it matches the

[2:03] building.

[2:04] And then

[2:06] with the architectural renderings that

[2:09] will require a separate review by our

[2:11] architectural review committee.

[2:13] Um that can be set up anytime during the

[2:16] process. So, just let us know when you'd

[2:18] like to do that. And then with the sign

[2:21] permits or all the signs, they'll need a

[2:23] separate permit. You'll just do it

[2:25] through citizen serve just like how you

[2:27] applied for the site plan application.

[2:30] Um

[2:32] just as a heads-up. Will you go I don't

[2:34] remember what page it's on. Maybe 11 or

[2:36] 12.

[2:38] The signs.

[2:46] » And just so you know, these will be

[2:48] given in red line format. So, you you're

[2:50] more than welcome to take notes, but

[2:51] we'll send you a red line copy.

[2:53] >> Thank you.

[2:53] >> So, that's available.

[2:55] >> Appreciate that.

[2:55] >> Uh-huh.

[2:56] >> Yeah, I know.

[2:59] » Um yeah, just a heads-up for the

[3:01] monument sign. That pole will have to be

[3:04] concealed in like a pedestal and

[3:07] footing.

[3:08] But, I think that's everything from

[3:10] planning.

[3:14] » Randy, building?

[3:15] >> As far as the address assigned on there,

[3:16] is that from the original plat of when

[3:18] the

[3:19] >> It would be, yes. Probably, yeah.

[3:21] >> So, yeah. I think I'm good. I have

[3:23] nothing for me at this point.

[3:24] >> Okay.

[3:26] Jason, with public works?

[3:28] >> Yeah, I

[3:30] stopped by the site as part of came up

[3:32] here.

[3:32] >> Turn your mic on, Jason.

[3:34] >> Please. Sorry about that. Here we go.

[3:36] >> I can hear you anyway.

[3:38] >> Yeah, I I stopped by the site on the way

[3:40] up and the irrigation meters that shown

[3:42] on the property, the one that you want

[3:43] to use, it looks like it's in use right

[3:45] now. I think Macy's is using that.

[3:48] I I sent some the the meter ID numbers

[3:51] to Joyce. She's going to look into that,

[3:53] but I still think we can uh

[3:55] connect on the backside of that. It's a

[3:57] 2-in meter. I

[3:59] With your landscaping, I don't think

[4:00] you'll need more than a 1-in line.

[4:04] Uh and it also showed an RP on that

[4:06] irrigation.

[4:07] You can remove that. We don't need an RP

[4:10] on our irrigation. If it was hooked to

[4:11] culinary water, yes, that would be the

[4:13] case, but our irrigation water, we don't

[4:15] require an RP.

[4:18] And as you noticed on the plans, you did

[4:20] say we work with the city for the

[4:22] culinary meter. We can Once you get to

[4:24] that point, we'll

[4:26] figure out where that needs to go. You

[4:28] got a couple of options there

[4:30] to look at that. Sewer's going to be

[4:32] straightforward. It's just right out

[4:34] front, so I don't see any issues with anything else.

[4:38] >> So Jason, what I would say on that is

[4:40] if the if that irrigation meter is in

[4:42] place, you'll probably want to do some

[4:43] exploration on where that stuff goes

[4:46] after the meter. We know where it goes

[4:47] to get to the meter, but

[4:49] >> Yeah.

[4:49] >> the Macy's development is relying on

[4:51] that, you probably ought to make sure

[4:53] that that somebody's not just going out

[4:55] there and

[4:56] digging up a 2-in line that goes

[4:58] to all of their landscaping, that'd be

[5:00] bad. The other The other thing I would

[5:02] say is when you say the the culinary,

[5:04] you're talking size or location of

[5:05] connection.

[5:06] >> Uh location of connection and placement

[5:08] of meter.

[5:09] >> Okay, the box.

[5:10] >> Yeah.

[5:11] >> Okay.

[5:11] >> Yeah.

[5:11] >> Cuz none of it will be in our

[5:12] right-of-way, right? There's not really

[5:13] a park strip or anything that's going to

[5:15] allow for that.

[5:16] >> Yeah.

[5:17] >> Okay, thank you.

[5:18] >> Uh

[5:20] Quick question for you, Jason. Uh a few

[5:22] that I have for you on on this if you're

[5:24] done with your your comments.

[5:26] >> Yeah.

[5:27] >> Um one, they're showing a 1/2-in

[5:30] a inch and a half copper for the service

[5:33] line on there.

[5:35] I mean, copper's okay, but it may be

[5:38] better for you to do a a poly line.

[5:41] >> use plastic.

[5:42] >> Yeah, I'd be Yeah, I Sorry, I didn't see

[5:44] that. Thanks for catching that. Yeah,

[5:46] Definitely go with poly.

[5:49] Yes.

[5:51] >> That's going to be easier to install for

[5:53] that whole thing.

[5:54] Um, also, this will probably be more

[5:57] related to the building permit once it

[5:59] comes in.

[6:00] But, just so you're aware of it, there

[6:03] is going to need to be a an RP

[6:05] check valve that's with the building.

[6:08] And associated with that, there will be

[6:10] required testing that will need to be

[6:11] submitted. The the contractor who builds

[6:14] the site will have to install that and

[6:16] test that RP,

[6:18] um, and provide that testing results to

[6:21] the public works department. Um, and

[6:23] then also

[6:26] Sorry, continual testing,

[6:28] uh, just throughout after the fact. Um,

[6:30] annual testing after.

[6:31] >> I can see it looks like where the grease

[6:33] trap back off the back side there, is

[6:35] that correct?

[6:36] >> Yes, there is Yes, there's a grease trap

[6:38] installed right, um, that'll be on that

[6:41] back side there.

[6:42] Yep. So.

[6:45] Okay, anything else, Jason?

[6:47] >> No.

[6:48] >> That's all.

[6:48] >> Mike, please.

[6:50] >> Just a couple things, um

[6:53] Are we

[6:54] Is that North Orchard Lane, is that a

[6:56] city road or is that private road? I

[6:58] don't don't know what we're doing.

[7:00] >> All All these roads within here, aside

[7:02] from 400 East

[7:03] >> I assume it's private, right?

[7:05] >> Okay.

[7:06] >> Those are private.

[7:06] >> I was going to say, we would prefer a

[7:07] stop sign before you enter North Orchard

[7:10] Lane. However, we can't

[7:12] force that because it's private

[7:14] property.

[7:15] >> I think there's one shown there.

[7:16] >> Is that what that is? I couldn't tell.

[7:19] >> Yeah, there's a stop

[7:20] >> Okay, good. All right,

[7:22] perfect.

[7:23] >> There will be a

[7:25] >> Awesome.

[7:26] >> So, yeah, so there will be stop sign

[7:27] here and a no entry

[7:29] >> Okay.

[7:29] >> sign here, no entry here, and then a

[7:31] stop

[7:32] um, and then a stop sign here as it goes

[7:35] to the south.

[7:36] >> Very cool. And then, the only other

[7:37] thing I have, if you'll go to the

[7:38] landscape map

[7:41] I know we have requirements, but we've

[7:43] dealt with this in the past. Um coming

[7:46] out through the drive-up, that big tree

[7:48] that your hand was just over, both of

[7:50] those

[7:51] are, you know, obstruct view from people

[7:53] pulling out.

[7:56] And I don't love that.

[7:59] So, I don't know

[8:00] So, basically, you look at people and

[8:02] say, "I hate trees." Yes.

[8:05] But we dealt with that just barely over

[8:07] by Little Caesars and ended up tearing

[8:09] one out because we made them put it in

[8:11] and then made them tear it out. So, I

[8:12] would prefer not to have that there.

[8:14] >> Yeah, we can I say we'll add a note to

[8:16] have it just They still have to have the

[8:18] number of trees, but we can talk about

[8:20] the location of those to help

[8:21] >> They could They could pull those two and

[8:23] put them back down towards the west

[8:25] right on both of those potentially. That

[8:27] would probably be better as long as

[8:29] we're not getting

[8:30] too close to 4th East on that one that

[8:32] gets relocated. Maybe it follows the

[8:34] curve. Yeah, and it goes Yeah, along

[8:36] curve instead of

[8:38] along what they're calling Orchard Lane.

[8:40] We Also, please take those names off of

[8:42] there. Those aren't 100 North and are

[8:44] not Orchard Lane. That just confuses

[8:47] people.

[8:47] >> Yes.

[8:51] » That's all I have.

[8:52] >> Okay, sounds good.

[8:54] >> You could even label that as just

[8:55] private access or something like that or

[8:57] just access.

[8:58] That That's really what it is. It's all

[9:00] private property with access to all the

[9:01] buildings and everything around there.

[9:06] » Uh fire department didn't have We didn't

[9:08] have any issues with it.

[9:12] » Norm?

[9:13] >> Yeah, so I wanted to clarify. It looks

[9:15] like two lanes going through there. Not

[9:17] both of those are intended to be like

[9:20] drive-thru lanes right for ordering. The one lane is like a slip lane to just

[9:24] get people past if they need to jump out

[9:26] and

[9:27] go around, right? They're not

[9:28] >> It's a bypass.

[9:29] >> Okay, all right. That That was the only

[9:31] question that I had on what I had sent

[9:33] seen on the plans.

[9:37] » Okay, with that, I'll just kind of run

[9:39] through see if there's anything we

[9:40] didn't cover.

[9:43] Um

[9:44] I'll do just

[9:46] uh let's see. We already talked about

[9:49] that. Just um

[9:51] quick clarifications on on these the to

[9:54] build on Aspen's, you know, comment

[9:56] there the the trash enclosure does need

[9:58] to be similar materials to the the main

[10:01] building.

[10:02] >> Okay, we showed what currently so if you

[10:04] just use

[10:07] » It could be similar to that and that

[10:08] would be looked at with the ARC. So,

[10:10] just make sure you include that detail

[10:13] with it. And

[10:14] again, this is a very prominent location

[10:17] on that and so

[10:18] >> Can we also ask on that one and maybe

[10:21] even the tree placement that we're

[10:23] talking about moving down on the curb to

[10:25] have you add in our our sight triangle

[10:27] requirements just in dashed or dotted

[10:29] lines just to kind of show and make sure

[10:31] that the first of all that dumpster and

[10:33] then the other tree is not going to be

[10:34] in the way of a

[10:36] and I'm talking about coming out on the

[10:37] 4th East not necessarily internally

[10:39] although you could do it there as well,

[10:41] but putting a sight triangle on there

[10:42] helps us to understand that we're not

[10:44] going to have the visibility issues that

[10:46] the Lieutenant Wallace that was talking

[10:48] about.

[10:48] >> Yeah, absolutely.

[10:49] >> Okay, that'd be great.

[10:53] Okay,

[10:54] um

[10:55] >> You can find those in our in our specs

[10:57] by the way in our

[10:58] >> It's in our code under title 10.

[11:00] >> Yeah, under 10-16 standards you can find

[11:02] those in there.

[11:06] » Okay,

[11:08] um

[11:09] So, storm drain on this I recognize

[11:12] you're tying into the existing storm

[11:14] drain facility that's related to the

[11:16] overall site.

[11:17] >> Yeah.

[11:17] >> We'll just need basically confirmation

[11:20] that the that the existing pond that's

[11:22] located on the east side of the the

[11:24] Macy's building that that pond is sized

[11:27] appropriately to be able to handle the additional volume that's going to be

[11:32] generated.

[11:33] Um

[11:35] in reviewing it appears that the overall

[11:37] site intended to have this pad be able

[11:41] to serve into that retention pond, but

[11:43] we'll just need the verification that pond is adequately sized to be able

[11:47] to accommodate this additional volume.

[11:49] >> Do you know where I might be able to get

[11:51] a copy of the drainage study for that

[11:52] property?

[11:53] >> Um if the develop if the overall

[11:55] developer doesn't have it, um

[11:58] we should be able to provide that to you

[11:59] as well.

[12:00] So.

[12:02] >> Thank you.

[12:06] » Um and then for Randy mentioned it

[12:10] earlier, just the grease trap. Make sure

[12:12] you're referencing

[12:14] uh

[12:15] set our we do have a grease trap

[12:18] standard within the standard

[12:19] specifications. It's S as in Sam 5

[12:24] uh to to be able to get that.

[12:27] >> Thank you.

[12:28] >> Um

[12:30] additionally, because the

[12:33] our our city standard requires for all

[12:35] storm drain curb inlets to have a snout

[12:38] on them.

[12:39] However, because this is a private

[12:41] system, that's not required, but it's

[12:44] very recommended. Uh I just it'll help

[12:47] with long-term maintenance of that

[12:49] system um for the property owner.

[12:55] » Thank you.

[12:57] >> Um I believe

[13:01] we talked about signs.

[13:06] Uh landscaping there. Um just one

[13:09] question that was had um

[13:13] there's not intended to be any outdoor

[13:16] dining associated with the site. Is that

[13:18] correct?

[13:18] >> Correct.

[13:19] >> Okay. Um we've just seen some other

[13:22] sites have afterwards have come out and

[13:24] trucked a to picnic table outside and

[13:27] put it on the gravel. Um that does

[13:29] impact parking and that kind of stuff.

[13:31] So

[13:31] >> Yeah, Dollar Clay specifically does not

[13:34] >> Okay.

[13:37] Good to have cuz that will also help

[13:39] with your parking that we talked about.

[13:41] >> Sure, thank you.

[13:43] >> Um

[13:44] again, we've already talked about

[13:45] landscaping comments. I Oh, we didn't uh

[13:49] So, this one um maybe Aspen if you'll

[13:52] cover that.

[13:53] >> probably cover better than me.

[13:54] >> Um it just is helpful if you show the

[13:57] percentages of each material being used

[13:59] because our code requires that uh

[14:02] decorative material such as like crushed

[14:04] rock can only make up 50% of the

[14:06] landscaped area. So, you may potentially

[14:08] need to add more live plants.

[14:11] >> Okay.

[14:11] Thank you.

[14:13] >> And those don't necessarily need to be

[14:14] trees. They can be shrubs or that kind

[14:17] of thing. Okay, thank you.

[14:20] Okay,

[14:21] and I believe

[14:24] Oh, yeah.

[14:25] >> Yes. Uh Aspen mentioned this earlier

[14:27] just providing a a detail of the your

[14:29] proposed site lighting.

[14:30] >> Okay.

[14:32] Like the fixture detail?

[14:34] >> Yeah.

[14:37] Uh I already talked about the

[14:38] requirement for ERC.

[14:41] And I think that was it.

[14:43] Along there, all the comments. Anything

[14:45] else? Any other comments or questions

[14:48] that

[14:49] anyone had?

[14:53] If not, I would I would look for a

[14:55] motion.

[14:58] So

[15:00] >> John, I think there's enough hanging out

[15:01] there still with the storm drain and

[15:03] some of the other things that we've

[15:04] talked about it's probably as

[15:06] appropriate to table and have them bring

[15:07] it back when it's ready.

[15:08] >> Okay.

[15:08] >> I'll make a motion to table at this

[15:10] point in time.

[15:10] >> You got a motion to table. Is there a

[15:12] second?

[15:13] >> Second.

[15:14] >> Seconded by Randy.

[15:16] Any discussion on that motion?

[15:19] If not, all in favor, please say I.

[15:21] >> I.

[15:22] >> Any opposed?

[15:23] Okay.

[15:24] Motion passes. The application is

[15:26] tabled. We'll get a copy of these with

[15:29] There are a couple other comments we'll

[15:31] add that weren't on here. We'll get

[15:33] those added and get them sent over to

[15:34] you

[15:36] latest probably tomorrow.

[15:37] And that way you've got those to work

[15:40] um

[15:41] If you can get these turned around and

[15:43] into us within the

[15:45] So, we'll have about a week time for us

[15:47] to review it before the next DRC.

[15:50] Um our next DRC is in 2 weeks. It'd be

[15:53] the second So, the 26th approximately.

[15:56] Um so, we had those a week before then,

[15:58] we could probably get it on the next

[15:59] DRC.

[16:01] So.

[16:03] Yep.

[16:05] Okay. Uh next item on the agenda is the

[16:07] approval of the meeting minutes from

[16:09] April 14th.

[16:11] If there are any comments, I'll look for

[16:12] a motion.

[16:13] >> Y'all know I'm making a motion that we

[16:15] approve the minutes from DRC from April

[16:17] 14th, 2026.

[16:19] >> Okay. Got a motion. Is there a second?

[16:21] >> Second.

[16:21] by Alan.

[16:23] All in favor, please say I.

[16:25] >> I.

[16:26] >> Any opposed? Okay. Motion passes.

[16:30] And if there is not anything else for

[16:32] the DRC, I'll look for a motion to

[16:33] adjourn.

[16:34] >> So moved.

Santaquin City Development Review Committee Meeting - May 12, 2026

Transcript