[0:50] Yeah.

[1:15] Where's that coming from?

[1:17] When I turned it off, I could hear it. I

[1:19] thought it was me.

[1:22] Awesome.

[1:37] Thank you.

[1:52] Almost.

[2:31] Good evening. We'll get uh tonight's

[2:34] meeting of the Scranton City Planning

[2:35] Commission called to order.

[2:40] Don, would you go ahead and do roll

[2:41] call, please?

[2:45] Mr. Fehey

[2:46] >> here.

[2:47] >> Mr. Flanigan

[2:48] >> here.

[2:49] >> Miss Davis

[2:50] >> here.

[2:51] >> Mr.

[2:52] >> here.

[2:53] >> Mr. Chair

[2:54] >> here.

[2:58] » All right. Uh, first item under old

[3:01] business is review of the preliminary

[3:03] final land development plan for the Copa

[3:05] Cabana Glamping Complex, Morgan Highway.

[3:09] Any updates on that project, Don or

[3:12] Casey? Uh, no. We got a uh review back

[3:16] from the soil conservation service and I

[3:19] think they had some comments, but that

[3:21] was the only item I've seen on that

[3:24] since uh the last few months.

[3:26] >> Okay.

[3:28] >> Where are we at? Um, as far as

[3:30] extensions that uh

[3:33] >> uh they gave us an extension. I'll have

[3:34] to go back and look at the day.

[3:36] >> Okay. Where we're at. I think I think

[3:38] it's good through September.

[3:40] >> Okay. Um,

[3:43] I mean, obvious I don't remember when we

[3:46] first looked at at the project, but you

[3:49] let us know if we get to a point where,

[3:51] you know, we might need to just

[3:54] seek, you know, have them resubmited at

[3:56] some point. I mean, if the project's

[3:58] moving along or we're still getting some

[4:00] things coming in, that's one thing. But

[4:02] if we're not here much either,

[4:05] >> yeah, I I'll reach out to them to talk

[4:07] to them.

[4:08] >> Okay.

[4:12] All righty. Any questions from anybody

[4:14] on that project?

[4:19] All right. Then we'll move on to review

[4:21] of the preliminary final land

[4:22] development plan for the construction of

[4:24] a warehouse facility on a parcel located

[4:27] on a 56.86

[4:29] acre parcel between Boulevard A and

[4:31] Elephant A south of Interstate 81. The

[4:35] proposed improvements for construction

[4:36] are two warehouse facilities totaling

[4:39] 495,000 square ft, car and truck parking

[4:42] facilities, and associated storm water

[4:44] conveyance and infiltration facilities.

[4:50] Anything on that?

[4:53] I have been in contact with the

[4:56] engineer. Um we we issued a draft letter

[4:58] to to them um because we had had several

[5:00] preliminary meetings with the uh with

[5:03] their concept plans and just they were

[5:05] bouncing different ideas off us but they

[5:06] did submit officially and we did accept

[5:09] the plans. I don't remember what month.

[5:11] Um, we created a draft letter and we

[5:13] discussed it with them because there was

[5:14] a traffic item that we wanted them to

[5:16] address and they subsequently addressed

[5:18] that by showing they can make the truck

[5:21] turns at Boulevard and Main Street in

[5:24] Dixon City. Um, they've also reached out

[5:26] about several other comments that we

[5:28] made, but we haven't gone officially on

[5:29] the record. So, I need to do that

[5:31] immediately um because I'm anticipating

[5:33] they're going to respond to that draft

[5:34] letter. Uh and and it's still valid

[5:37] minus the traffic comment that we made

[5:39] that they um responded to. Okay. So,

[5:43] they're they're active and I think we

[5:44] should I'll encourage them to come in

[5:46] next month. Um assuming they've

[5:48] responded to the review letter that we

[5:50] send, which I'll do this week.

[5:53] Okay, great. No, I think that sounds

[5:56] like a plan.

[5:58] Uh, Don, did you have any comments on

[6:00] that project?

[6:01] >> No.

[6:02] >> Okay.

[6:04] >> Working through them.

[6:05] >> All right, sounds good. Anything from

[6:07] planning commission members?

[6:10] >> Yeah, I think if they're ready and and

[6:12] available next month, um, we can have

[6:14] them in, invite them in and

[6:17] take a look at the project.

[6:20] All right, on to the third item under

[6:23] old business. Review of preliminary

[6:24] final land development plan for the

[6:26] development of 14 apartments with 4,000

[6:28] square ft of office space and 4,000

[6:31] square ft of retail space at 1800 North

[6:33] Washington A as part of the

[6:35] redevelopment of the former state school

[6:37] for the deaf site. Look like we have

[6:40] somebody here uh on the project. So come

[6:42] on up and introduce yourself for us

[6:45] again. And

[6:45] >> good evening. Good evening. Dave Leaka

[6:47] with Ruther and Bowen.

[6:50] Um,

[6:52] we're the engineers for the project. We

[6:54] did receive prior to last month's

[6:57] meeting comments from your engineer,

[6:59] which at this point I believe we've

[7:01] addressed. Uh, there naturally is still

[7:03] a few outstanding items that we need to

[7:06] um, well, I guess he needs to look at. I

[7:08] don't know how much you got to look at

[7:09] it, Casey, but I know a lot of the a

[7:11] good portion of them I think we've

[7:13] addressed other than I think planning

[7:15] module, which I did submit to um to Don

[7:18] and he did get back to me. Um we finally

[7:21] got a resolution from PA American as to

[7:27] what was previously utilized from a flow

[7:30] standpoint and what we're proposing. Um,

[7:35] so I did provide that uh information to

[7:38] Don. He signed off on the city side of

[7:41] it. We're just waiting for Dumbore

[7:42] Burough to sign off on their side and

[7:44] we'll actually submit it to to D

[7:47] um formally once we have sign off from

[7:50] Dumbore Burough.

[7:53] Um

[7:56] there were a number of comments. Um and

[7:59] again I I believe we went through and addressed probably 90% of them.

[8:06] There are some outstanding items. Um

[8:09] we had some comments received from

[8:12] conservation district. Um we've

[8:14] addressed those and resubmitted to them.

[8:16] So, we're kind of waiting for their

[8:18] response, [clears throat] excuse me,

[8:20] back um as to whether or not they have

[8:23] anything additional um or if they're

[8:26] ready to issue a permit. Um Lacawana

[8:30] County Regional Planning Commission. We

[8:32] submitted to them and I provided a

[8:33] letter to the city uh stating that they

[8:37] did not need to review it because

[8:40] there's really no new buildings. It's

[8:41] really just parking and storm water. So

[8:44] it it's excluded from from their review.

[8:47] So they did provide a letters stating

[8:50] that uh you guys have a copy of that. Um

[9:03] we are still waiting for a lighting

[9:06] plan. Uh I talked to the developers. We

[9:08] didn't really have um locations shown on

[9:12] our utility plan that showed lighting.

[9:14] So, I believe they're engaging

[9:16] electrical engineer just to lay out

[9:19] lights and actually provide a

[9:20] photometrics plan uh showing there's no

[9:23] overshot on to neighboring properties

[9:25] and whatnot.

[9:27] And the landscape plan is in the process

[9:29] of being developed as well.

[9:34] Um there were a few and I don't know we

[9:37] didn't waivers at the last meeting.

[9:39] Correct.

[9:41] >> I don't Yeah, I don't remember. I was

[9:42] going to ask. I have them listed here.

[9:43] >> So, yeah. So, so I did um provide a

[9:46] letter um of the waivers were

[9:49] requesting. Uh there are three waivers.

[9:52] One of them has to do with scale. One in

[9:54] equals 50. Our believe our plans are at

[9:56] 1 in equals 30, which is actually a

[9:58] larger um a larger scale, a little

[10:03] easier to read, but we're rest

[10:05] requesting a waiver on the 50 1 in

[10:09] equals 50 foot requirement.

[10:12] Um requesting a waiver on the minimum

[10:15] pipe size of 15 in. the major like

[10:18] pretty much all the pipes uh within this

[10:20] project are

[10:23] um

[10:25] going to be owned and maintained by the

[10:27] property owner. There's nothing that

[10:28] we're extending out into into a street

[10:31] somewhere that's going to be a

[10:32] requirement of the city. Um and I

[10:35] believe we're going from 12 or from 15

[10:38] to 12. We have a 12-in um outlet pipe

[10:42] that

[10:45] really didn't need to be a 15 in because

[10:48] there the flow is pretty small. Um and

[10:51] the other one was the improvement

[10:52] guarantee being that there is no

[10:54] improvements that the city needs to take

[10:56] over. Um

[10:59] we would like to request a waiver from the guarantee. Um, and typically

[11:04] that's when you're working and doing

[11:06] stuff uh within the public right away

[11:08] that's going to get dedicated to the

[11:10] city. None of there's nothing here

[11:11] that's going to be dedicated to the city

[11:13] for this project. So, uh, that would be

[11:16] the third waiver. So, I believe that

[11:17] would probably be the the first item

[11:19] that we would need to to address from your side, the waivers.

[11:24] Um, let me just go through here quickly

[11:28] just to see if there's anything

[11:31] that I'm missing.

[11:35] Dave, we we have a we'll have a couple

[11:37] follow-up comments on some of the

[11:39] responses, but you know, they they've

[11:40] done a really good job of of, you know,

[11:43] responding to these comments. You

[11:44] mentioned lighting and landscaping is

[11:46] outstanding. Their outside agency permit

[11:48] with the conservation district. Um, I

[11:50] think the only item that I still want to

[11:52] discuss and maybe I thought we talked

[11:54] about it last time, but maybe we

[11:55] weren't. Um, maybe we worded it wrong,

[11:57] but the internal circulation with the

[11:59] sidewalks. I think what we were trying

[12:01] to to say last time is we we wanted to

[12:04] ensure that you had a decent connection

[12:08] to the the local streets and I I think

[12:11] on the plan that doesn't happen in some

[12:13] locations.

[12:17] Uh so I just I it's something I I'd

[12:19] really like you to look at. Um

[12:21] >> we we could certainly do that. Um I I

[12:23] could even give you a call and we can

[12:25] talk about it quickly.

[12:26] >> Yeah. because we've drawn them out and

[12:27] there's lots of internal path, but I I

[12:30] think we would like to go the extra step

[12:31] and make sure they they hit the city

[12:32] streets

[12:33] >> since there's going to be, you know,

[12:35] residents here that that would want

[12:36] >> Sure. No, we can definitely do that.

[12:38] >> Okay.

[12:39] >> I I mean there I don't think that's a

[12:41] big deal in the overall

[12:42] >> I don't either. I just I just want to

[12:43] make sure we take it off. the two

[12:45] comments um and I I think we talked

[12:48] about them briefly

[12:50] last month with regards to zoning were

[12:53] the requirements from the FAA and Pendot

[12:56] for

[12:58] um Bureau of Aviation clearance. No,

[13:03] it's it's zoning one and two. We're not

[13:05] building any new buildings. So So from

[13:08] my perspective, if we're not going up

[13:11] with building heights, I'm not sure that

[13:13] there there's a need for us to get

[13:17] um any type of approval from PennDOT or

[13:21] the FAA regarding

[13:23] height

[13:24] >> because the buildings are increased.

[13:26] >> Yeah, that won't that won't be returned.

[13:28] Comment understood.

[13:33] » Um I think that that was it. I mean if

[13:37] whatever additional that you guys have

[13:40] and especially the connectivity uh we

[13:43] can definitely discuss that and come up

[13:45] with a solution on that shouldn't be an

[13:48] issue.

[13:48] >> Yeah, it's a minor item compared to the

[13:50] overall scope of work. So

[13:57] » all right. So I I yeah I mean I I'm

[14:00] assuming at this point you guys need to

[14:02] address the three waivers um because

[14:05] from our end of it if you guys approve

[14:08] those waivers we'll note them on the

[14:09] drawing so when they are approved

[14:11] everything is recorded um that states

[14:15] the waivers were granted. So

[14:18] >> okay any uh do you have any other

[14:19] comments Casey?

[14:22] Just just some follow-ups on some of the

[14:24] other comments but I don't think it's worthy of discussion at this point.

[14:27] I think they've addressed substantially

[14:29] addressed the comments and and regarding

[14:31] the waivers, their scale, minimum pipe

[14:33] size, and this uh improvements

[14:35] guarantee. We have no objection to those

[14:37] waivers.

[14:38] >> Okay. Um so we can go ahead and approve

[14:40] the the waivers tonight.

[14:42] >> Yeah, I recommend.

[14:44] >> Okay. Um I don't have uh I don't have

[14:46] those in front of me. I jotted down

[14:49] >> some notes on the the three of them, but

[14:55] thank you.

[15:05] Okay. So, we'll be looking for a motion

[15:08] first to approve a waiver requested for

[15:10] relief of plan scale from 1 in to 50

[15:13] foot to 1 in 30 foot to provide greater

[15:16] detail the proposed plans.

[15:20] >> Do we have a motion?

[15:21] >> So moved.

[15:23] >> Have a second.

[15:25] >> Second.

[15:25] >> All right. All in favor say I.

[15:28] >> I.

[15:28] >> Any opposed?

[15:31] Motion passes. Uh second waiver. We'll

[15:34] be looking for a motion uh requesting

[15:38] uh waiver from the minimum 15in diameter

[15:40] for the proposed 12in storm pipes.

[15:44] Do we have a motion?

[15:48] » So moved.

[15:49] >> Thank you. Second.

[15:51] >> Second.

[15:52] >> All in favor?

[15:54] I

[15:55] >> I

[15:56] >> any opposed?

[15:58] All right, that waiver is approved. Um

[16:00] and the third waiver is uh from the

[16:03] improvement guarantee requirements uh in

[16:06] the SAO uh for the reasons that were

[16:08] discussed.

[16:10] Do we have a motion?

[16:13] >> So moved.

[16:14] >> Second. All in favor say I.

[16:17] >> I.

[16:19] Great. And the um Casey, the uh I know

[16:22] we had talked about the FAA approval.

[16:24] So, is that does that require a waiver

[16:26] or is that um

[16:28] >> that's a zoning? I'll take a look at

[16:31] that, but yeah, I I don't think that

[16:32] needs a waiver from the commission.

[16:35] >> It was a zoning comment.

[16:36] >> Okay.

[16:37] >> That I just don't think applies because

[16:40] we're not building up.

[16:43] >> Okay. Um great. Okay. So, you've got

[16:47] your waiverss. Um, it sounds like

[16:49] there's a little more work that still

[16:50] needs to be done and then we'll

[16:53] take a look at the project uh maybe next

[16:55] month.

[17:00] Sound like a plan,

[17:02] >> I guess.

[17:05] Is that I mean, is that all right? Were

[17:06] you looking for

[17:06] >> No, I mean naturally a conditional

[17:09] approval would be great, but if you guys

[17:11] feel as though we need to come back with

[17:13] some of those couple other items, we we

[17:15] could certainly do that. What are uh I

[17:18] mean what what's your recommendation

[17:20] Casey? Is there I mean I know you

[17:21] mentioned um you know some of the the

[17:24] sidewalks and the circulation. We

[17:26] haven't seen the the lighting plan or

[17:27] landscaping plans.

[17:33] Yeah. I mean our our our biggest items

[17:36] remaining I guess would be the some

[17:39] follow up on some existing sewer just

[17:40] showing the connectivity internally. Um

[17:44] you know there's a number of buildings

[17:45] on site and that's not necessarily

[17:48] outlined. I don't know if that's an

[17:49] issue or not. Maybe, maybe not. Uh

[17:52] lighting, landscaping,

[17:54] uh the the sidewalks,

[17:58] uh and a couple storm water comments

[18:00] just about

[18:02] some of the means and methods, we'll

[18:05] say, of of what was done. I mean,

[18:07] substantially they're they they meet the

[18:08] ordinance, but there's there's just some

[18:10] questions we have about design storms

[18:12] and things like that. So, I mean,

[18:14] they're they're in a good place. Um we

[18:17] if they have their MPDS is it like a

[18:20] technical review or is it or is it just

[18:22] >> that was we addressed comments back

[18:25] >> regarding that. So um that was

[18:28] resubmitted. I'm hoping to hear back

[18:29] from them within the next week or two.

[18:31] >> Right. And this this project just as

[18:33] just to kind of go back a bit is is

[18:36] a small part of it is in the city of

[18:38] Scranton. It's um you know joint jointly

[18:40] with Dunore Burough. I don't know how

[18:41] that's going on that end. I haven't

[18:44] >> they didn't have a meeting last month.

[18:45] So I'm going to our first meeting this

[18:48] week for for Dumbward Burough.

[18:51] >> I mean so for so for the portion that

[18:52] lies within the city of Scranton it may

[18:54] be appropriate to I mean it's at your at

[18:56] your pleasure to entertain that but

[18:58] >> and we did actually receive comments

[19:01] from Dunore Bureau's engineer and have

[19:03] addressed those as well and sent those

[19:05] back. So, I'm hoping at the Dunmore

[19:09] meeting next week that we can get

[19:11] conditional approval because we did

[19:12] address the majority of their comments

[19:15] uh other than the MPDS permit and a

[19:18] couple other minor ones. So,

[19:19] >> Mhm.

[19:22] >> Okay.

[19:24] Um, I mean, it sounds to me like

[19:25] there's, you know, probably a few things

[19:27] at least the planning commission would

[19:28] want to see the the additional

[19:30] sidewalks, the landscaping plan,

[19:31] lighting plans, and and whatnot before

[19:34] we um provided conditional approval or

[19:38] final approval in that case. So, um,

[19:41] yeah, why don't we wait?

[19:43] >> We'll go and we'll provide another

[19:44] review letter. We received a

[19:45] resubmission uh recently and we'll go on

[19:47] record with that and that will likely

[19:49] clear up most of these comments. So that should be a non-issue next.

[19:53] >> Yeah. And I I'll I'll give you a call

[19:55] and we can talk about the connect or

[19:58] connectivity uh issue and we'll we'll do

[20:01] what we need to do to to address that.

[20:03] >> Okay. Thank you.

[20:04] >> Okay. Sounds good.

[20:06] >> Thank you.

[20:07] >> Yeah. Thank you. Appreciate the update.

[20:15] » All right. Under new business, uh we

[20:17] have the review of preliminary final

[20:19] land development plan for the

[20:20] development of an 1,858

[20:23] square foot building proposed as a cigar

[20:25] bar at 1545 Albbright Avenue.

[20:30] Don or Casey want to provide a little

[20:33] info about this project?

[20:36] >> Yes, this in addition to an existing

[20:38] building. They're right in there behind

[20:40] AutoZone off Greenidge Street. It's

[20:42] going to be a cigar bar and uh golf

[20:46] simulator

[20:49] facility.

[20:50] Uh it's in a flood zone, but they have

[20:54] provided us with the the flood

[20:55] information.

[20:57] Uh I think they still have a number of

[21:00] comments that they're still working

[21:02] through.

[21:05] Yeah, we issued a letter earlier this

[21:06] week. Um, obviously the the the flood

[21:09] the elevation certificate was one of one

[21:11] of the comments which they provided

[21:12] today. Um, we had a question about

[21:15] zoning because there there's not a

[21:17] permitted use in the light industrial

[21:18] zone, but I think that's resolved.

[21:21] >> Yeah. Yeah, we're we're okay on the

[21:22] zoning. So

[21:24] >> So they have some some buffering to

[21:25] provide uh based on the zoning

[21:27] ordinance, their sewage planning. Um,

[21:30] they don't really have a storm water

[21:31] plan because this is this site is almost

[21:34] entirely impervious in the existing

[21:35] condition. Um, and they're using like a

[21:38] pvious

[21:39] pavement of like pavers of some sort to

[21:42] reduce their impact. So

[21:44] >> that's what the true grid uh the true

[21:47] pavers are. Yeah, I had a question about

[21:48] that.

[21:49] >> Right. So the letter was really light. I

[21:50] mean it was a it was a good submission.

[21:52] Uh we accepted it last month. So I guess

[21:54] we can encourage them to come in next

[21:55] month as well to

[21:57] >> so they can I don't want to misrepresent

[21:59] what they're doing. Um so they can talk

[22:01] about it to us. But uh did we accept

[22:03] this one last last month?

[22:06] the person it came in like literally the

[22:09] day of or the day before the meeting. So

[22:11] I don't I don't know if we did.

[22:12] >> Yeah. I don't think we we did so we

[22:14] could formally accept it.

[22:15] >> It's complete tonight

[22:16] >> for sure. Yes. I would recommend that we

[22:18] accept it and start the review clock.

[22:20] >> Okay.

[22:23] >> All right. Um initial questions from

[22:25] anybody on this project? Anything Casey

[22:26] might be able to answer for us?

[22:32] Uh there is one uh yeah very close to this.

[22:40] » Yeah.

[22:42] >> There you go.

[22:45] I believe the owners of this property

[22:47] produce manufacture these manufacture

[22:50] their own cigars. Right.

[22:52] >> Is that there's No, I'm not sure.

[22:54] >> I think so. Yeah. Yeah.

[22:59] Um, I'm not sure. I'm not sure where

[23:02] they

[23:13] » go. I'm sorry I missed your question

[23:16] there.

[23:16] >> Do you do you know are they physically

[23:19] making cigars?

[23:21] >> No, I don't I don't believe software.

[23:23] Yeah, just store. Yeah. Uh they're going

[23:25] to have a large humidor

[23:27] and uh like I said a golf simulator

[23:31] and some other simulator I think

[23:36] >> more of a

[23:40] it's elevated in part because zone

[23:44] >> yes

[23:44] >> that's why handicap ramp

[23:47] >> Yes. Yeah. I was talking to the

[23:48] contractor today said yeah to make the

[23:50] handicap ramp work I had to do like

[23:53] >> three

[23:56] loops around

[23:59] in sense of like how many stories the

[24:01] building is

[24:03] >> it's only a one-story building but it's

[24:06] going to be I think about looking at the

[24:08] plans it's about five feet higher than

[24:10] the ground level

[24:11] >> yeah similar

[24:18] » They uh for a commercial or

[24:20] non-habitable building, they have the

[24:22] option to flood uh floodproof or

[24:26] elevate. They chose to elevate.

[24:34] So, it's still a flood zone even though

[24:37] there's the trail there

[24:40] of engineers

[24:42] along

[24:45] >> like the flood the floodgates and the

[24:47] levy despite despite that. Is that what

[24:49] you're asking?

[24:50] >> Yeah, it's still considered a flood zone

[24:51] even though there's all this work that

[24:52] was done.

[24:54] I'm sorry.

[24:57] Uh there was a the Armor Corps of

[24:59] Engineers has done a ton of work along

[25:00] the Lacuana River with the with the

[25:03] heritage trail and so that's like on

[25:05] that side of the river there's a very

[25:08] high flood wall on the trail.

[25:10] >> Yeah. Yeah, there is. But it it's still

[25:12] uh

[25:13] >> it's still a flood zone and that that

[25:15] portion of the levy hasn't been fully

[25:18] certified by FEMA yet.

[25:20] >> Oh, okay.

[25:23] All right.

[25:28] Other questions about the

[25:30] project?

[25:32] All right. If not, then uh we will

[25:34] entertain a motion to accept the plans

[25:36] for review.

[25:39] » So moved.

[25:41] >> Have a second.

[25:43] >> Thank you. Um all in favor or before

[25:46] that any further questions?

[25:50] Not all in favor say I.

[25:53] >> I. Any opposed?

[25:56] All right. Plans are accepted for

[25:57] review.

[26:00] Uh those are all the plans that we had.

[26:03] Um I don't have any I don't think I have

[26:06] anything for general commission

[26:08] business. Did you have anything, Don?

[26:12] Okay. Um anything uh from the rest of

[26:15] the planning commission?

[26:21] All right.

[26:23] Go ahead. Go ahead.

[26:30] » Um, yeah. Any uh any follow up on that,

[26:33] Don? I think the last um last we had

[26:36] talked about that. I know we arrived at

[26:42] » um Gus asked about the uh complete

[26:44] streets policy.

[26:48] » So, I think we have a we have a policy

[26:50] that we were happy with. I think um I

[26:52] think you were going to follow up to

[26:54] kind of see what the next steps in the

[26:55] process might might be.

[27:14] » Okay. Yeah, I think um yeah, if you

[27:16] could get some information about what uh

[27:18] you know what the process might look

[27:19] like. I don't know if something like

[27:20] that would go through the law department

[27:22] first and you know how that

[27:34] Right.

[27:50] » I don't know.

[27:58] intern

[28:23] also talked about public input.

[28:27] council.

[28:33] What? Okay.

[28:50] Yeah. Uh I'm happy to work with with Don

[28:53] in between uh between now and our next

[28:56] meeting we can yeah get a little more

[28:58] information about what the you know what

[29:00] kind of the the appropriate process

[29:03] would be for all of this. Um you know

[29:05] any law department reviews, community

[29:08] engagement um up to and including you

[29:11] know getting legislation to city council

[29:12] and how that all would work out.

[29:16] I think this new new territory for our

[29:18] planning commission since uh at least as

[29:20] long as I've been on the planning

[29:21] commission. Uh we we haven't proposed

[29:23] any sort of uh legislation policies

[29:27] before. So

[29:28] >> why I want

[29:33] y

[29:39] agreed. Thanks for bringing that up.

[29:42] Appreciate it.

[29:44] All right. Anything else?

[29:48] If not, we will entertain a motion to

[29:50] adjurnn.

[29:54] So,

[29:56] >> thanks. We have a second.

[29:59] >> All in favor say I.

[30:01] >> I. Thank you very much.

Scranton City Planning Commission 8-26-26

Transcript