Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:10]
>> 2026 to 11:00AM or excuse me
[0:13]
11:00:02AM, and effect called
[0:15]
the Minnesota Senate Committee
[0:16]
and rules and Ministration to
[0:18]
order.
[0:19]
Thank you members for joining.
[0:21]
We have 3 items on our agenda
[0:24]
today dealing primarily with
[0:26]
our employees and compensation.
[0:29]
We're going to have secretary
[0:30]
batter and and must and will
[0:32]
join us.
[0:34]
And the materials that we're
[0:37]
discussing today were sent to
[0:38]
everybody last Thursday and
[0:40]
again again this morning.
[0:41]
So hopefully you all have
[0:42]
before you what it is that you
[0:44]
need.
[0:46]
We're going to begin and with
[0:47]
the committee resolution and
[0:48]
compensation and now Collin
[0:50]
Secretary battering.
[0:52]
>> Good morning. Madam Chair
[0:53]
members, you have a document
[0:56]
available to the COVID CR 0, 1,
[0:59]
9, Dash 20.
[1:01]
That's a Senate Committee
[1:02]
resolution of proposed
[1:03]
resolution that provides cut 8%
[1:06]
in a place at 10,
[1:08]
much the same form as
[1:10]
resolution approved last year.
[1:12]
I can walk you through what in
[1:14]
the document. The most
[1:16]
important component of
[1:17]
documents course annual salary
[1:19]
increases for Senate employees.
[1:22]
The document provides a 2%
[1:23]
across the board increase for
[1:25]
Senate employees and America
[1:27]
full 1.5% of salaries.
[1:34]
A word or 2 about the process
[1:37]
used to arrive. Those numbers
[1:39]
management advisory committee
[1:41]
BN meeting earlier this year
[1:43]
and that's about 4 times to
[1:46]
consider how to set those
[1:47]
amounts.
[1:49]
The pressure is on the Senate
[1:50]
budget at the outset of the
[1:52]
year.
[1:54]
Primarily health insurance
[1:56]
increases were greater than had
[1:58]
been forecasted for calendar
[2:00]
year. 26 27
[2:03]
and security costs have
[2:05]
increased significantly.
[2:07]
So
[2:08]
the management advisory
[2:09]
committee had to deal with
[2:11]
trying to write it would be a
[2:13]
competitive and also
[2:14]
sustainable number for those
[2:16]
increases
[2:19]
before you get too much further
[2:20]
of say this every time. But
[2:21]
just to be sure of the
[2:23]
management advisory committee
[2:25]
is composed of myself, the
[2:26]
director of human resources,
[2:28]
director skirt and the Chiefs
[2:31]
of staff of each caucus.
[2:32]
Generally we operate a matter
[2:34]
of the try-line consensus.
[2:36]
My proposal is for the rules
[2:37]
committee.
[2:39]
So walking you through the
[2:41]
document itself. Paragraphs
[2:43]
were beginning on line. 1.8
[2:45]
item provides the salary
[2:47]
increases that I've just
[2:48]
mentioned and provides the
[2:49]
terms for the Indian minister.
[2:53]
The document does call for the
[2:56]
preparation of America plan by
[2:58]
the director of human resources
[3:00]
to provide guidance on how the
[3:02]
merit increases are
[3:03]
administered. That document,
[3:04]
although does not need further
[3:06]
proof of what it was committed
[3:07]
is available to you in draft
[3:09]
form. The documents that have
[3:10]
been sent to you
[3:13]
walking surely quickly to the
[3:15]
document online. 1.2 1, her
[3:17]
ready for tonight's treatment
[3:18]
for employees who are at that.
[3:20]
We max, that's consistent with
[3:22]
what has been done in past
[3:23]
years. Harris fighting online.
[3:26]
1.2 3 alliance allows is for
[3:29]
technical adjustments to wages
[3:30]
to keep them where they need to
[3:32]
be in relation to each other
[3:36]
and care at the VA and page
[3:38]
July one
[3:40]
and provides the authority for
[3:42]
development of the mayor of
[3:43]
plan that I referred to a
[3:45]
moment ago
[3:47]
being an ally to point age
[3:50]
the authorizations provided for
[3:52]
sending plays too
[3:56]
up to 20 hours of cop or
[3:59]
vacation time
[4:01]
and what to what 1, 6, provides
[4:03]
a standard language on it for a
[4:05]
calm matches. That's
[4:08]
and play option for either 1150
[4:11]
in matching or up to 50 hours
[4:13]
of vacation account it.
[4:16]
And lastly, Paragraph B, it
[4:19]
point to 6 provides the
[4:20]
technology and communication
[4:22]
station for another fiscal year
[4:24]
in the same form that has been
[4:26]
provided in the past.
[4:28]
Happy to take any questions.
[4:31]
>> Thank you, Secretary Bowden
[4:32]
members to have questioned
[4:34]
Senator Limmer.
[4:35]
>> Yes, I do a secretary
[4:39]
butter. And
[4:41]
when we total the cost of
[4:43]
health insurance expenses
[4:48]
and then the let's say the cost
[4:50]
of
[4:52]
inflation.
[4:55]
When you combine those costs,
[4:56]
you know what that rate would
[4:58]
be compared to
[5:00]
the 2% that we're offering our
[5:02]
employees.
[5:05]
>> Secretary bothered.
[5:07]
>> The senator, I want to make
[5:08]
sure I understand the question.
[5:11]
Are you referring to
[5:13]
the expected health insurance
[5:15]
premium increase that employees
[5:16]
will be expected to pay their
[5:18]
share the premium in addition
[5:20]
to inflation?
[5:22]
>> No, I was I was kind of
[5:25]
playing off your words as you
[5:27]
were explaining health care
[5:29]
costs.
[5:30]
And I'm I'm just wondering, are
[5:33]
we
[5:34]
or we'd this year even keeping
[5:36]
up with inflation
[5:38]
for our employee benefit?
[5:42]
>> Sandra Bowden, thank you,
[5:44]
Madam Chair. And senator,
[5:47]
what I would say that is, you
[5:49]
know, at this point, I think
[5:50]
inflation has been pretty fluid
[5:51]
number. It seems to be perhaps
[5:55]
increasing, I think, the last
[5:57]
month or to pay careful
[5:59]
attention to that. Much of this
[6:01]
will depend on the slate of
[6:02]
time that you included within
[6:05]
the previous year. I think what
[6:07]
I would say senators were
[6:08]
trying to do our best
[6:10]
and recognize that. And I think
[6:13]
also that
[6:15]
most said employees are doing
[6:17]
fairly well with the additional
[6:18]
one have percent available and
[6:21]
applaud the mayor of plan.
[6:23]
So that provides yeah. In other
[6:25]
words, it would look only at
[6:26]
that 2% number when you're
[6:27]
thinking about what's
[6:28]
available, too, I would say
[6:30]
almost all us and employees and
[6:32]
hope that's helpful. It's
[6:33]
really about the best they can
[6:33]
do the other.
[6:35]
>> The other question I would
[6:37]
have to ask is, is the merit
[6:38]
increases?
[6:41]
Is it typical that every
[6:43]
employee gets a merit
[6:45]
recognition?
[6:47]
>> Thank you, Senator Lemur
[6:48]
center secretary about him.
[6:50]
>> So said number,
[6:52]
there's basically 3 levels what
[6:54]
America plan theirs, not
[6:57]
meeting expectations where
[6:58]
there's still some possible
[7:00]
amount available performance
[7:02]
has met expectations that's
[7:03]
very, really use. That would be
[7:04]
think memory serves about up to
[7:06]
one percent
[7:08]
meeting would get into a
[7:10]
believe 1.5
[7:14]
and I may have misspoken
[7:15]
anything not meeting. There's a
[7:17]
range available up to 1.5
[7:19]
meeting with a 1.5 and
[7:21]
exceeding anywhere up to 2.5.
[7:24]
Historically, you know, if
[7:25]
you're looking for said the
[7:26]
distribution of the plays,
[7:28]
I would say
[7:29]
most employees to see maybe not
[7:31]
to the full extent of the 2 and
[7:34]
a half percent. If you are
[7:36]
doing some very rough for it,
[7:37]
may take it. You know, I think
[7:40]
it's reasonable to use the 1.5%
[7:42]
for what's available to most
[7:44]
almost all.
[7:47]
>> Thank you, Senator Lugar,
[7:48]
Senator Martin.
[7:49]
>> And Secretary modern to be
[7:52]
clear that 1.5% is the pool
[7:55]
that's available. So in other
[7:56]
words, the DFL Caucus, the
[7:58]
Republican caucus are
[7:59]
non-partisan. But average you
[8:02]
has to average 1.5% of can't go
[8:04]
above that. Have some are
[8:06]
getting more equal. The number
[8:08]
of to get less
[8:11]
secretary about him.
[8:12]
>> Madam chair to rage. That is
[8:14]
in essence, correct. The pool
[8:16]
provides, you know exactly what
[8:17]
that is like a total dollar
[8:18]
amount. And then the mayor of
[8:20]
plan provides the limitations
[8:22]
on should have minimum and
[8:24]
maximum amounts within those
[8:27]
ratings. So you're correct.
[8:29]
And it's all balance out that
[8:30]
the pulsar is a limiting
[8:31]
factor.
[8:35]
>> And members there is a memo
[8:36]
and in our materials stay from
[8:39]
Darren, half from human
[8:40]
resources. If you have other
[8:42]
questions after this meeting,
[8:45]
he is a good resource for us.
[8:48]
Are there other questions
[8:50]
and the committee resolution on
[8:52]
compensation
[8:55]
seeing no questions and Senator
[8:57]
rest moves to Adapt Committee
[8:59]
resolution 19,
[9:02]
all those in favor. Please say
[9:03]
Aye, aye.
[9:07]
And those opposed say no.
[9:09]
And that motion is adopted.
[9:11]
Thank you, members. Next, we'll
[9:13]
move to that committee adoption
[9:15]
of the Senate employee Rester
[9:17]
and before I move to Secretary
[9:19]
bad and that this is in our
[9:21]
packets
[9:22]
and this is a document that is
[9:24]
sensitive in that it names
[9:26]
members and salaries.
[9:28]
So it is not distributed
[9:30]
publicly, but it is available
[9:31]
to the public. And if you'd
[9:32]
like it, please reach out to
[9:35]
our committee administrator as
[9:37]
Rachel Carlson, you can find
[9:39]
her e-mail online
[9:41]
and because we want to make
[9:42]
sure that if people want it,
[9:44]
they can get their hands on it.
[9:45]
But it is not something we
[9:46]
readily distribute everybody
[9:47]
because it contains sensitive
[9:50]
personal information about
[9:51]
salaries.
[9:53]
And I think to turn now to
[9:54]
Secretary Battered.
[9:57]
>> Thank you, Madam Chair.
[9:58]
So you have in the materials
[10:00]
provided to you. The Senate
[10:02]
roster dated 6/1/2026.
[10:07]
is picking up on some of what
[10:09]
Senator Murphy said. But the
[10:11]
chair said if this is sensitive
[10:13]
information, if you have
[10:15]
questions about, but the
[10:17]
practice for the rules
[10:18]
committee has been to away
[10:20]
referenced individual employees
[10:21]
possibly may have questions,
[10:23]
but, you know, a group or class
[10:25]
of employees and certainly also
[10:27]
happy to take questions offline
[10:28]
as well as their individual
[10:29]
concerns. We made every effort
[10:32]
to make sure that the
[10:33]
information is correct. The
[10:35]
director of human resources and
[10:36]
his team go out of their way to
[10:38]
certainly this and give the
[10:41]
Chiefs of staff the director's
[10:43]
chair for myself the
[10:44]
opportunity to review it and
[10:45]
make sure all the information
[10:46]
is accurate. It is a snapshot
[10:48]
in time that has to be
[10:50]
emphasized. So, you know,
[10:52]
for example, a number of
[10:54]
employees, well, very good.
[10:55]
08:00AM to 10:00AM separation
[10:57]
from service and then dollars
[11:00]
an ounce.
[11:02]
Well, Larry, a
[11:04]
based on promotional increases
[11:06]
as possible and play might be
[11:08]
eligible for promotion increase
[11:09]
the day after tomorrow. You
[11:11]
would see that reflected on
[11:12]
this roster. So keep that in
[11:14]
mind as you're making
[11:15]
comparisons and so forth.
[11:17]
You know, as as we look through
[11:19]
this document, as you look
[11:21]
through it,
[11:22]
the
[11:24]
the one thing I want to say
[11:25]
here and in keeping with its
[11:27]
past salary increase and he's
[11:28]
had received some feedback that
[11:31]
has been generally very
[11:33]
positive in terms of how the
[11:34]
Senate is doing the city, the
[11:36]
employment market.
[11:38]
I think we're in a position now
[11:40]
where Irene is more competitive
[11:42]
edge. That's that's certainly
[11:44]
what I've heard. I welcome any
[11:45]
and all feedback that
[11:47]
supervisors, others, any hiring
[11:49]
managers, you know, any of you
[11:53]
would have for me regarding
[11:54]
that competitiveness. We're
[11:56]
what we're trying to accomplish
[11:57]
here is, you know that so
[12:01]
careful line between keeping
[12:02]
the Senate budget using that
[12:04]
very sustainable fashion and
[12:05]
remaining competitive with with
[12:07]
the work that's been done in
[12:08]
the previous years to improve
[12:10]
Senate salary, competitive
[12:11]
bids.
[12:12]
That's what I would have to
[12:14]
tell you about the roster and
[12:15]
again, as always happy to take
[12:17]
any questions.
[12:20]
>> And really made you have a
[12:20]
question or raise your hands to
[12:22]
oh, I'm sorry. So no, I do not
[12:24]
have a question. Thank you,
[12:26]
Senator Murray.
[12:27]
>> Thank you. Madam Chair and
[12:29]
Secretary Modern appreciate
[12:32]
hearing that you feel they're
[12:34]
fairly that our wages are
[12:35]
getting more competitive out of
[12:37]
curiosity.
[12:39]
Is there anybody maybe they're
[12:40]
in part for some of the tracks?
[12:42]
How many people are losing to
[12:44]
other positions that we think
[12:46]
are leaving because of wages
[12:49]
and sort of thing or is that I
[12:51]
haven't heard a lot of people I
[12:52]
left to take a much better
[12:53]
paying job somewhere else.
[12:55]
And I know that happens.
[12:57]
But curious if there's if you
[12:59]
know, sit down, tick in the
[13:00]
number of people doing that.
[13:04]
>> And Marty Sex, a sick
[13:05]
Secretary Bowden.
[13:06]
>> Thank you. Madam Chair, out
[13:07]
of practice your apologists
[13:09]
tonight, Renee. So summer
[13:12]
anecdotally, I would say I
[13:13]
think that's true. Retention
[13:15]
has improved clay,
[13:19]
you know, certain for more
[13:21]
comprehensive look at the debt
[13:22]
or something more grounded.
[13:23]
And, you know, let's say the
[13:24]
experience the past 6 months,
[13:27]
they can check in with the
[13:29]
director of human resources and
[13:30]
just follow up more informally
[13:32]
with you. I think it's a good
[13:33]
question and maybe we need to
[13:35]
be very mindful of that.
[13:36]
Again, we want to retain the
[13:38]
advantage that has been
[13:39]
created.
[13:44]
>> Thanks, Senator Marty.
[13:45]
And I know there's been a real
[13:46]
effort on the part of the
[13:48]
Senate, too,
[13:51]
make sure that the salaries are
[13:52]
competitive.
[13:54]
So we retain a talent.
[13:57]
Are there other questions
[14:01]
and seeing no questions.
[14:02]
Senator Marty moves
[14:04]
to approve the Senate employee
[14:06]
roster dated 6/1/2026.
[14:10]
seeing no questions. All those
[14:11]
in favor. Please say Aye.
[14:13]
Aye, aye.
[14:15]
And those opposed say no.
[14:17]
And that motion is adopted.
[14:19]
Thank you, members
[14:21]
and last and we'll take up this
[14:24]
ended Senate in travel
[14:25]
expenses, improved an memo and
[14:28]
now turned to Director Stengel.
[14:32]
>> Thank you, Madam Chair.
[14:33]
This is the interim travel
[14:35]
expense and pretty memo.
[14:37]
This is very similar to what
[14:39]
you've seen in past years.
[14:42]
The first section talks about
[14:43]
Purdue mileage, lodging and
[14:44]
travel expenses. The next
[14:46]
section talks about authorize
[14:47]
reimbursements
[14:49]
for certain types of business
[14:51]
related to your position and
[14:52]
its members. The communication
[14:54]
reimbursement is the same as
[14:55]
last year. Constituent service
[14:57]
mileage is the next section.
[14:58]
And then finally in in-state
[15:00]
and out-of-state travel
[15:01]
guidelines,
[15:02]
this is all the same that
[15:04]
you've seen in years past,
[15:05]
except for the day to been
[15:06]
updated. And the IRS mileage
[15:08]
rate has been updated to match
[15:09]
the current virus mileage rate
[15:11]
and 72.5 cents per mile.
[15:14]
And then there were some minor
[15:15]
formatting changes from the
[15:16]
memo from last year. But
[15:17]
otherwise, the memo and its
[15:20]
contents remain the same.
[15:23]
>> Thank you, Istanbul,
[15:26]
Senator Johnson.
[15:28]
>> Thank you. Madam Chair.
[15:30]
I just want him to make one
[15:32]
point on here, too. I know this
[15:33]
is this is not going to change
[15:35]
in this year's document, but it
[15:38]
was brought to my attention
[15:39]
just
[15:40]
a half an hour ago or so.
[15:42]
>> That, you know, underneath
[15:44]
the authorized reimbursements,
[15:46]
if that bullet headline that's
[15:48]
undermined,
[15:50]
you know, there's a number of
[15:51]
things that were authorized for
[15:53]
reimbursement on
[15:56]
back in 2022, the memo used to
[15:59]
have a line in there that had a
[16:02]
part of the reimbursement
[16:04]
authorization was majority
[16:06]
leader, assistant majority
[16:07]
leader, president of the
[16:08]
Senate, but that also minority
[16:10]
leader for appropriate duties.
[16:12]
And
[16:14]
as we are, you know, having a
[16:16]
few changes within our
[16:18]
leadership staff right now are
[16:20]
we're finding that, you know,
[16:21]
there's there's more duties
[16:23]
that I'm kind of been
[16:24]
responsible for on this stuff.
[16:25]
And so
[16:27]
is there an opportunity here to
[16:29]
to address at otherwise looks
[16:31]
like everything else kind of us
[16:32]
go through the majority leader
[16:34]
and we're not sure
[16:36]
those expenses are authorized
[16:39]
to reimbursable
[16:41]
for the minority leader duties
[16:43]
to.
[16:47]
>> The judge. Can you just you
[16:49]
draw my attention to where in
[16:50]
the memo to a chill.
[16:52]
>> So that that's yeah, I'm
[16:53]
sorry. She clarified so in the
[16:54]
current mental there's hasn't
[16:56]
been a change or a thing.
[16:57]
And this year I think this
[16:58]
happened probably back in 23 or
[17:00]
24
[17:03]
but are littered. It's about
[17:04]
time.
[17:06]
But we're just comparing notes
[17:07]
between the 2022 mammal,
[17:10]
which we can send it over to
[17:12]
you. I just received it here a
[17:14]
few minutes ago.
[17:16]
And so there's a line that was
[17:18]
taken out that just highlights
[17:20]
majority leader, Assistant
[17:22]
majority leader, president of
[17:23]
the Senate minority leader for
[17:25]
their appropriate duties with
[17:27]
then their caucus structures.
[17:30]
And so just wondering if that's
[17:32]
something that we could maybe
[17:34]
I will time to reflect on a
[17:37]
going forward here
[17:39]
just that we know because we
[17:40]
just don't have clarity on on.
[17:42]
Are those duties the left come
[17:44]
down and address or those
[17:47]
covered or not?
[17:48]
>> Okay, that you're looking
[17:49]
for a pretty Senator Johnson
[17:51]
for those days.
[17:52]
>> Well, this is the author as
[17:54]
reimbursements. So it will be
[17:56]
those expenses that are
[17:57]
incurred in the duties of
[17:59]
coming down.
[18:01]
>> Thanks for raising it,
[18:02]
Senator Johnson and yes,
[18:03]
let's talk it through
[18:05]
to make sure. And I I just like
[18:06]
to see where I was back there.
[18:08]
>> I appreciate those already
[18:10]
do this. I just want to talk
[18:12]
about this today. It's OK,
[18:15]
I'm happy to take it up with
[18:16]
you,
[18:19]
Senator Front.
[18:20]
>> Thank you, Madam Chair.
[18:21]
Thank you. Senator Johnson.
[18:22]
I'm interested in hearing or as
[18:24]
well figures minority in the
[18:26]
way we provide for some very
[18:28]
important Senator Johnson
[18:31]
to know when that change was
[18:32]
made, it was president 2022,
[18:35]
do we know at what point there
[18:37]
was up
[18:38]
removal? That's the right term.
[18:40]
Thank you, Madam Chair. That
[18:41]
under Johnson.
[18:43]
>> To Johnson. Yeah. It and I
[18:45]
don't know the exact the
[18:47]
interment that was made.
[18:48]
It was either in the 23 in term
[18:51]
were the 24 inter. So I'm not
[18:54]
sure which one it was, but we
[18:56]
can get that information over.
[18:58]
>> Thank you, Senator Johnson,
[19:00]
that. Thank you, Madam Chair.
[19:01]
Looking forward to that
[19:02]
discussion.
[19:04]
>> And Madam Chair, Senator
[19:05]
Johnson, I just got a text that
[19:07]
said it was the 23
[19:10]
after the 23 year.
[19:15]
>> Thank you, Senator Johnson,
[19:16]
thank you. Senator France will
[19:18]
have that follow-up
[19:19]
conversation and I'm glad to
[19:20]
call that out.
[19:21]
On that note,
[19:25]
as we're talking about changes
[19:27]
we wear in order to maintain
[19:29]
the stability of our budget.
[19:32]
In a news that of hiring pause.
[19:36]
I'm not a freeze
[19:38]
but a pause and with the
[19:40]
intention of making sure if we
[19:42]
have positions to fill that
[19:43]
there's a process for the Mac
[19:45]
to do that. And I think it is
[19:47]
important to acknowledge day
[19:49]
since departure right at the
[19:50]
end of session and then
[19:51]
important role to be filled.
[19:53]
And so while we have often used
[19:55]
to freeze and just said no
[19:57]
hiring
[19:58]
and we're going to pause, but
[19:59]
we want to make sure there's a
[20:00]
process by which the Mac can
[20:02]
take up those questions.
[20:04]
So we have to compliment to
[20:05]
staff necessary for caucuses
[20:11]
chair.
[20:12]
>> Senator Reid should
[20:13]
appreciate the recognition and
[20:15]
accommodation for
[20:18]
for our group or 2. So
[20:20]
absolutely in conversations as
[20:22]
things kind of progress here.
[20:23]
Thank you.
[20:26]
>> Are there any questions on
[20:27]
the interim travel expenses and
[20:29]
pretty a memo
[20:32]
and seeing no questions.
[20:33]
Senator Pappas moves
[20:35]
to approve the interim travel
[20:37]
expenses and pretty letter
[20:38]
dated 6/1/2026. All those in
[20:41]
favor. Please say Aye. Aye.
[20:44]
And the House I know.
[20:47]
And that motion is adopted
[20:49]
there being no further business
[20:51]
before the Rules Committee.
[20:52]
This meeting is adjourned.
[20:53]
Thank you. Members
[20:55]
have a good summer