[0:01] Look at him like a man.

[0:24] » More people. talking council meeting

[0:30] some

[0:39] resources.

[0:47] » Yeah.

[1:02] The other thing is I kind of hate,

[1:14] you know, right there across from the other

[1:19] area.

[1:24] Maybe we have a huge

[1:31] change. I'm still praying and hoping for a huge

[1:36] high school that

[1:58] A lot of families don't keep you.

[2:08] » Well, I was asking about the um you know, we're looking at animal

[2:16] I remember when the city uh is the second is the second animal shelter

[2:24] adoption

[2:27] in golf.

[2:41] They said, "Yeah, we did." And that's when we put the All right.

[3:04] And then instead put this out by the by the

[3:09] police station so they have support. Yeah. Makes sense. And I was like,

[3:14] "Yeah, we get a better

[3:36] place."

[3:41] She likes it.

[3:50] Sorry, we're having a little technical difficulty, so we're trying to get it

[3:55] out. >> Good.

[4:03] » Hello. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. It is um 5:37. Excuses for

[4:07] starting a little late. Uh we had some technical issues, but I think we're good

[4:10] to go. It is um 5:37 August 28, 2025. We're going to go ahead and get started

[4:16] on the planning and zoning meeting tonight. Uh would everybody please stand

[4:20] for the invocation as Commissioner Deborah M will lead us.

[4:24] Dear heaven and gracious father, we come before you just give you all the praise

[4:28] and all the glory. We thank you for this evening. We thank you Lord Jesus for all

[4:32] that are present. We ask Lord Jesus that you keep us on one accord and help guide

[4:37] us Lord Jesus in the way that we should go that's best for our city. In Jesus

[4:42] holy and precious name we pray. Amen. >> Amen.

[4:44] » Please remain standing for the pledge of allegiance and the pledge to the Texas

[4:47] flag. I

[4:49] » pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the

[4:54] republic for which it stands. One nation under God indivisible with liberty and

[5:00] justice for all. To the Texas flag. I pledge algiance to

[5:05] the Texas one state one and indivisible.

[5:11] » Please be seated.

[5:22] Okay, before we get started, we're going to do a a quick admin. I know we are we

[5:26] are just missing u vice chairman Gabriel Caba. Miss Janet,

[5:33] did you receive an email in regards to him being absent today? I believe I saw

[5:38] one earlier. >> Yes, sir. He did. He has um to um take

[5:42] his child to the doctor and so he will not be here. So that is considered

[5:46] excused. >> Okay. Have it on record that we have an

[5:49] excused absent for Gabriel Cavetta, our vice chairman for tonight, for this

[5:52] evening.

[5:55] Okay, as we get started, uh before we get started here, um if there's any

[5:59] visitors here that wants to speak to, uh the commission in regard or to us in

[6:03] regards to anything not on the agenda tonight, anything not on the agenda

[6:07] tonight, just wants to address anything to the to the board today. Nothing.

[6:12] Okay. Thank you.

[6:16] All right. We're going continue with the adoption of the minutes. Do I have a

[6:19] motion to approve uh the minutes for uh July 24th, 2025

[6:25] commissioners? Have we uh have y'all had a chance to look at those? And do I have

[6:28] a motion? >> I make a motion that we accept the

[6:30] minutes as written. >> I have a motion to approve the minutes

[6:33] for 20 for July 24, 2025. Do I have a second?

[6:36] » Second. >> I have a second. All those in favor say

[6:39] I. >> I.

[6:39] » Any opposed? Oh, motion carries.

[6:46] Ladies and gentlemen, we're getting ready to start the public hearing and

[6:49] I'm I'm surprised and uh we have we do have a house full. We do have we're

[6:53] going to start with 6.1. Just uh uh quick ad u housekeeping rules when we uh

[6:59] ask you to come up and speak. Uh please limit yourself to about 3 to 5 minutes.

[7:03] We have uh quite a bit of people that want to

[7:05] » two two uh we have quite quite a bit of people that want to speak tonight. uh

[7:10] whether it be in favor or opposing to the uh item 6.1 that we're going to

[7:15] discuss tonight. Okay. All right. We're going to uh continue on

[7:22] to 6.1. conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a a zone

[7:27] change from agriculture single family 7.5 single family 16 SF-16

[7:34] executive states retail and commercial to plan development mix use residential

[7:39] on approximately 1,5440

[7:44] acres of land plan development 25-3118

[7:52] Jenna >> chairman and commissioners. I bring to

[7:54] you tonight a planned development application.

[7:58] The name of the residential mixeduse development will be called Tteranova at

[8:04] Terrell. It is currently zone agriculture

[8:08] executive states single family and retail. The future land use is new

[8:14] traditional neighborhood with local retail and office. It's approximately

[8:20] 1,500 acres. And this developer and the owners

[8:26] um would like to um put in a development that will have approximately 36 3600

[8:34] single family homes, 1,200 multifamily residents with a 50 acre

[8:41] mixeduse known as the village square with shops, neighborhood and regional

[8:46] services along with a network of hike and bike trails and 26 interior parks

[8:52] throughout the development that will encourage outdoor enjoyment and

[8:56] community gatherings. This project is projected to span from 15 to 20 years

[9:02] encompassing 14 phases. Uh we sent 141 notices to abudding land

[9:10] owners and to date we've had six responses

[9:15] prior to yesterday and today. So, I'm going to read off some addresses that

[9:19] were not a part of your packet, but prior and in your packet are six

[9:24] responses not in favor, three responses in favor, and one undecided response.

[9:31] Also, the neighbors of the um new Glenn Haven estates, they secured petitions

[9:38] not only from that neighborhood, but surrounding areas, and those are

[9:42] attached in your packet. To date, I have one individual at 15101

[9:50] High Point Road, which is in our ETJ that is waiting to make to gain um

[9:55] additional information. Not in favor for Birdong Court,

[10:01] 155 Birdong Lane, 140 Lexington, 1670 Griffith, 22 2110 Griffith, and

[10:12] 2111 Griffith. And in favor is 147 bird song. If you will turn over to page 119,

[10:24] there is a concept plan. This will give you a little overview of

[10:30] what the um the infrastructure the the the different types of uh zoning and the

[10:38] green spaces and the uh retail commercial use.

[10:44] the developer will be invited up to make um a presentation and can um address

[10:49] some of this a little bit clearer. If you'll go to the next page,

[10:54] page 20, it gives you a plan an idea of how many uh property owners and where

[11:01] their locations that they have legal title to. The next page

[11:08] is 21. That is just a little bit to show you the open space and um the park plan.

[11:16] Page 22 is just a little rendering sketch of what the village at Terrell

[11:21] will look like. Page 23 is the buffer uh the location

[11:26] map which will um encompass the 1544 acres that this development is

[11:33] proposing. Page 24 is the zoning. So if you can see right now the green is

[11:40] agriculture, the red is commercial. Then the blue is the dark blue is executive

[11:47] states with the light blue already in a planned development. Then we have um red

[11:53] is the retail and then the yellow is the proposed

[11:58] single family 7.5. The next page we're going to come back

[12:03] to because I'm going to invite Chris Snap to come up and talk about our

[12:06] thorough affair on page 25. Page 26, we've all talked about our comprehensive

[12:13] plan. We have not only the ones for our zoning, our parks, our thorough affair,

[12:18] but this will give you the definition. And I'm going to try to from now on to

[12:23] make uh give you definitions of what that future land use, this one in

[12:27] particular is the future land use of the new traditional neighborhoods. So that

[12:32] kind of gives you an oversight of what that is um involved in page. Uh the next

[12:40] page is the buffer map. So it's real hard to see, but there is a

[12:45] blue border around the 1500 and something acres. The red shows the 200

[12:51] foot buffer zone which by law were required to send notice in regards.

[12:58] The following pages is the abuing land owners that received those um notices.

[13:03] We did have a few that were returned. They were undeliverable. We tried to do

[13:08] our due diligence to find those owners with no luck because they turned around

[13:12] and came right back. And I'm going to pause for right now, um, chairman, and

[13:17] then I'll be back up to answer any questions. Thank you.

[13:20] » If if you would like for us to go ahead and do our presentation with engineering

[13:26] and the um the um developer, if that's okay.

[13:31] » Yes, ma'am. >> Okay, Chris, you want to come on up? And

[13:34] Katie, will you go back to that page 25 of the thorough affair?

[13:46] So, good evening, commissioners. I want to just bring forth some information

[13:51] concerning our city of thoroughfare map. You've you've heard this uh seen it

[13:56] before. We've talked about it numerous times. We had a revision here not too

[13:59] long ago, but basically relative to this uh development, Pteranova,

[14:06] uh the road that's going to be uh included into this is going to be the

[14:13] one that's is Lexington Drive. It's not going to be widened or anything like

[14:19] that. It's just going to be a connectivity. If you recall, our city

[14:23] thoroughfare map is just a guideline and a direction and a vision as we have a

[14:28] growth in the city and as it we extend our area out. We could continually look

[14:34] at congestion and uh traffic flow and connectivity as we go throughout. Uh I

[14:42] want to bring forth as when you look at this the first phases that we talked

[14:47] with the developer that to do is basically uh have the primary first

[14:54] phase come off Griffith Street area. There's going to be a multi-lane uh

[14:59] connectivity off that. It's going to be much larger than what's on the current

[15:03] Lexington Drive. So, that's not going to be the the main conduit into this, but

[15:10] it's going to be another connectivity to the roads. So, uh the first phase will

[15:15] be coming off of Griffith and going into there. If you'll go back,

[15:21] uh Katie to page 19 of the concept plan.

[15:30] Keep going.

[15:35] One more right there. As you can see, that gives you kind of a depiction of

[15:40] the main uh roads that will be going through the development and uh they'll

[15:47] be done in phases obviously. So, I just want to bring that forth. this

[15:52] thoroughfare map and the concern they're going through Lexington that has always

[15:57] been on our thoroughfare map for a very long time. Uh so that's nothing new to

[16:04] us from there but uh this road it's like I said it's not going to be widened or

[16:11] anything like that. So

[16:14] any questions?

[16:27] We can't hear you. >> So, you need to bring your mic and turn

[16:29] it on for us, please. >> Thank you.

[16:34] » There we go. Um, the Terteranova and the Los and the uh

[16:41] Ranch Parkway is um specifically the Los Lamos and the Terteranova. How does that

[16:46] extend from past Griffith to 205? >> So that's going to extend from Griffith

[16:52] 20 to 205. The developer is going to build that connectivity road.

[16:56] » Does the developer have ownership of that land from Griffith to 205?

[17:01] » Yes. >> Okay. And

[17:03] » there's going to be a joint effort on that between the current property owner.

[17:08] He's working out that issue with that current developer on the owner.

[17:13] » Does he have ownership of that land? No. He's worked out the development and

[17:16] agreement on that. >> Okay. So that has

[17:18] » so that is a prerequisite of this, >> right?

[17:22] Uh so that has already been done. >> Yes.

[17:26] » Okay.

[17:30] » Can you can you do me a favor? Can you clarify exactly what portion is phase

[17:35] one?

[17:38] » Let's let's let the presentation >> Great. Let's let the smart guy in the

[17:42] room do that one. >> And then before you leave, can you

[17:44] clarify one more thing for me because I heard there were folks that came in

[17:47] today with in favor oppositions, but I I didn't quite get the total counts. I

[17:52] think I heard one in favor, one undecided.

[17:55] » I'm not prepared to give you the total count. Okay.

[17:57] » Because of those additional ones that were just handed to me. So, but I will

[18:02] have that and it will be presented to city council on September the 16th.

[18:07] » Thank you. Okay. Before I invite Hugo up, I do want

[18:11] to say that staff has been working with this developer for a year. And you know,

[18:16] we're always looking for boxes to be checked that they comply with our zoning

[18:20] ordinance, our comprehensive plan, our thorough affair plan, what have you. So,

[18:25] we had a valid application after 16 revisions, I believe. And so, staff is

[18:32] here to present that we recommend. We're we're in um recom requesting a a

[18:39] recommendation to make your recommendation to city council which

[18:44] will be either on November the 16th or the 30th. Now, of course, we're going

[18:49] through a development agreement. We're going through annexation. So, this

[18:53] zoning, regardless of what your recommendation is, will still be pending

[18:58] on the final execution of those two documents. Okay. So again, uh staff

[19:05] recommends approval of zoning application PD25-3118

[19:13] pending the approval of the development agreement and annexation petition and I

[19:18] invite >> question.

[19:20] » Yes, >> today we're just strictly approving the

[19:22] zoning >> just zoning. If approved at city council

[19:26] after the second reading, this developer is prepared to then start working on

[19:31] phase one with a construction plan and then we'll come back to you and that's

[19:36] where we're going to dive into the meats and bones of what it's going to look

[19:40] like in the after condition. Okay, Hugo, you want to come on up?

[19:48] » Good evening, sir. >> Good afternoon. I'm Hugo Morales, Main

[19:52] Square Development. Um uh um we concur with staff's presentation and opinion if

[19:59] uh we're asking for your approval, recommendation for approval for city

[20:04] council. Uh we are here and my team of consultants to answer any questions you

[20:09] may have. We have a presentation that will help us answer those questions

[20:14] hopefully. So the first question I understand it was

[20:19] where's phase one? Phase one. Yes, if you can go

[20:25] uh just speed up towards the end actually just you'll we'll have a

[20:30] phasing plan

[20:34] » right there. You just passed it. So phase one is the

[20:43] » pull the mic to you a bit there, sir. >> Can you hear me? Well,

[20:47] » yes. All right. Phase one is uh along Griffith is the portion that has the new

[20:55] road extension across uh our neighbor on Griffith to 205 includes that road and

[21:02] then the area shown as phase one in the map. The road that wraps around phase

[21:07] two and goes towards the high school which is called Wagon Drive for now. So

[21:13] there phase one includes what we're calling a loop road, turnover road,

[21:18] wagon road that goes to poetry road and phase one the phase one area is a

[21:23] budding Griffith road.

[21:34] I'm happy to answer any questions you may have or the public has. So we're

[21:38] here for them.

[21:42] Thank you. Thank you, sir. Okay. So, this is basically a public

[21:47] hearing. We're going to go ahead and uh I'm going to call you up in regards to

[21:51] the We're going to go ahead and open the public hearing.

[21:56] Like I said, when you come up, please state your name, your address, uh just

[22:00] keep it keep it to two minutes, ma'am. Is that correct? Keep it down to two

[22:05] minutes, please. Okay. Um I'm going to go and call your

[22:08] name. Uh Charles Mullen. Is that correct?

[22:12] there.

[22:21] » Is that correct, Mr. Charles Malden? >> Yes, sir. Yes, sir.

[22:24] » Thanks, sir.

[22:27] » I found out the the neighborhood coming in.

[22:30] » You please uh state your address, please, sir.

[22:32] » Oh, 16978 State Highway 205, Carol Terrell, Texas.

[22:37] » Thank you, sir. >> All right. New subdivisions coming in.

[22:41] They bring a lot of new livelihood to our area, new culture, new areas, new

[22:45] shopping centers. Bring a lot of new ter.

[22:49] » You can't hear. >> You need to get closer.

[22:51] » All right. How can you hear me now? >> I think the new subdivisions going in as

[22:55] far as they're bringing new stuff to Terrell, new subdivisions, new new

[22:59] shopping centers, new family centers, new parks for the kids, something to get

[23:03] outside and enjoy life. I mean, you know, new area. kind of beautify ter.

[23:08] Help it out. Not overgrow it, just help it out.

[23:13] » Thank you, sir. Appreciate your time.

[23:20] » Okay. Um, Miss Holly Meyers.

[23:27] Oh, okay. I see it. Thank you.

[23:34] I actually had down as a not a speaker, but I will speak. I'm going to be deeply

[23:39] deeply affected. >> Can you say your name and your address,

[23:42] please? >> My name is Holly Meyers. My address is

[23:44] 1670 Griffith Avenue. >> Thank you, ma'am.

[23:48] » And my concern is is because I do have a farm, there are 31, if I counted

[23:56] correctly off the map, houses that will abut straight up to my fence line.

[24:02] with my animals. And of course, the major thing is is I

[24:06] have the creek that runs through my property and I am deeply concerned about

[24:12] the drainage. When you start putting concrete down, there's going to I

[24:17] already have my creek flood on a regular basis and it's not going to do anything

[24:22] but get worse. And what's going to happen to my property

[24:26] values when this starts occurring?

[24:32] Thank you. >> Thank Thank you, ma'am.

[24:38] » Uh, Matthew, Mr. Matthew Farre, is that correct?

[24:49] » My name is Matthew Farre. I live at 1620 Griffith Avenue. I'm directly affected

[24:53] by phase one. I'm surrounded by three sides. We will have 70 houses in between

[24:59] me and my grandparents and a small uh chunk of woods and most of phase one,

[25:05] phase 2 and I think phase 10 floods and it stays wet year round. Um so I'm

[25:11] deeply concerned about the flooding that will happen. You know, if we do the math

[25:15] on 1500 acres, it comes out to 63 million and some change square foot. And

[25:21] if you add up all the concrete, we're we're roughly 43 million square ft of

[25:26] concrete. So all that natural saturation we're going to lose, that's going to end

[25:30] up on our lands. And that's what we're concerned about. Thank you.

[25:34] » Thank you, sir.

[25:41] Miss Rita Bane, is that correct?

[25:51] Thank you. Can everybody hear me? Okay, great. Um,

[25:57] first of all, recently I live in an area that will be directly affected. My name

[26:02] and address is Rita Bane. >> I'm sorry. Yeah. Can you state your your

[26:04] address, please? >> 137 Bird Song Lane.

[26:07] » Thank you, ma'am. >> You bet. Um, I live directly in line of

[26:11] this new development. We live in Glenn Haven, which is the subdivision that

[26:16] falls on Lexington. Then the next street over is Bird Song and Eldora. I believe

[26:21] they're going to connect Eldora and Bird Song at some point um to this in a small

[26:29] way. Um once we received the resoning letter uh from the city regarding

[26:34] Terteranova, um Glenn Haven residents and myself, we formed this petition. And

[26:38] if you didn't get a copy or there was uh two names redacted today in favor of

[26:43] this from this list. So I'll be happy to give you an updated copy. the um

[26:48] information that was based in the media and um site math maps that we received.

[26:53] Um, the subdivision identity

[37:09] there should be other openings to the uh proposed

[37:14] uh additions. Uh, I think that's my greatest concern be living on Lexington

[37:20] and being concerned for the children and the residents there.

[37:28] » Thank you. >> Proposing another entrance to this vast

[37:32] area. Thank you. >> Thank you, ma'am.

[37:38] [Applause] >> Gail. Is it sat?

[37:51] » I'm sorry. M. Can you pronounce your last name again?

[37:54] » Surat. >> Surat. Okay.

[37:55] » Yeah. Good afternoon. My name my name is Gail Serret, 15783 Nike Drive in

[38:00] Terrell, Texas. Okay. So, this was all brought about and possible

[38:06] with the last annexation land grab by our city.

[38:12] That land has been farm land for over a hundred years,

[38:16] but now the city has decided to take it in. And it'll happen. Your development

[38:21] will happen. Not a problem. But you do disturb

[38:26] all that we've had peace and quiet out there. I will be directly affected

[38:33] already directly affected by some of the work that's been done on the highway.

[38:37] Nike drive down at the end floods because of all the water that comes from

[38:43] there. I don't agree with it because it always

[38:47] brings higher crime. Apartments always bring higher crime. The apartment

[38:53] complexes that Terrell now has, except for the new ones,

[38:57] crime. And the owners don't keep up with them.

[39:02] You should be ashamed. You know, Forny used to laugh at us

[39:08] because we were the higher crime rate in Terrell.

[39:13] I'm a realtor. I go into Forny all the time. The crime rate is unreal over

[39:18] there. During COVID and the high sale of homes

[39:22] and land grabbers from out of state investors.

[39:28] Now they're having to sell those homes. I can walk into a home. I can walk into

[39:32] a neighborhood and drive by and see which ones

[39:36] are by investors. The lot sizes in Forny and the

[39:42] surrounding towns in these really tight communities is horrible.

[39:47] People that are buying, they want larger lots. They want to be able to feel they

[39:53] have a piece, not a small piece with a tree in the front that's going to

[39:57] eventually go up into your foundation in your driveway.

[40:04] I know. I've been on cleanup committee several years ago where I just got

[40:07] volunteers and we went out there and cleaned them up.

[40:13] We need trees more than we need sidewalks and parking lots.

[40:18] I ask you, Mr. Morales, if you continue with this,

[40:23] that you make this not cookie cutter. larger lot lots. People will buy larger

[40:30] lots and they will pay for larger lots. We want trees. We don't want a bunch of

[40:38] concrete.

[40:43] Bring back classy,

[40:47] not one that looks just like the others. for all the surrounding homes

[40:54] that are going to be devastated by your concrete and the flood. Maybe you can do

[41:00] your elevations and pour that back into all your ponds and your rivers that

[41:04] you're wanting to do. But if you're going to do a a little community down

[41:08] there, make it where people want to come.

[41:12] Make it where they want to decorate it. Make it where they want to have a

[41:15] Christmas tree that people can actually go out and do.

[41:20] » Okay. Sorry. register one in place. >> That's fine. The two res uh retail

[41:26] places that we have, good god, so boring. Nobody goes out there Christmas

[41:32] time. There's nothing to draw them out there

[41:34] except for they're closer. You have a chance to make a nice unique

[41:42] place, not like for

[41:46] we don't want for we don't want Rockwell. We want something nice and

[41:50] unique to draw people in to help with your tax rates

[41:56] for the community. Good afternoon. >> Thank you, ma'am.

[42:08] » Okay. Seems to have that's all that I have right now. Do is there anyone else

[42:11] here that didn't get a chance to as they're coming in to sign one of these

[42:15] forms or or get in to that want that wants to speak tonight?

[42:20] Uh yes, ma'am.

[42:24] » Okay. Do do we get a form for her? Ma'am, cool. Go ahead. Come on up,

[42:27] ma'am.

[42:32] » Would you state your name or your address, please? Ma'am,

[42:34] » of course. U Mary Gibbs, 15101 High Point Road. Um I don't oppose, you know,

[42:40] progress or development per se. Um, I do oppose parts of the plan due to the

[42:45] stress on the community, um, the environment and the current

[42:49] infrastructure that we have right now. Everybody deals with it every day. I

[42:54] propose uh, Terl, you guys, I guess, uh, re-examine the building density, the

[43:00] green space, and the traffic, not only in the new area, but the impact on the

[43:04] surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. I propose Terrell, y'all,

[43:10] us, all of us. I guess examine the possibility of connecting green spaces,

[43:16] looking at it more globally and holistically as far as where do we want

[43:20] Terrell to go. This is a big chunk of land, 1500 acres. We have such an

[43:25] opportunity here to really make something special as somebody else just

[43:30] said, you know, I'd really like to see Terrell uh what is the 5, 10, and 20

[43:35] year plan here? Um because we could do these little cookie cutter type

[43:40] neighborhoods, but it doesn't draw in and connect community. It doesn't make

[43:45] me want to be able to go to somebody else's neighborhood and uh play in their

[43:49] parks because I feel like I belong there. Um I know one of the people on

[43:55] Facebook at least said, you know, you can go there and enjoy their parks. Um,

[44:01] I'm sorry, but half a million dollar houses up $1.5 million houses. I don't

[44:07] see them inviting me in on my with all my kids and whatever. I I don't see that

[44:12] happening. Um, they're going to say, "Why?" One, there's not going to be

[44:16] parking for me as an outsider to go into these

[44:21] new this new community. Um, I would really like to propose that Terrell

[44:25] looks at how do we uh create a more of a universal community in Terrell when we

[44:32] do have new developments like this that they segue into what's already existing

[44:38] which right now because we've had very little zoning or coding um here in

[44:44] Terrell as far as building there is no cohesiveness between communities um and

[44:51] that's not anybody's fault. It's been going on a long time here in Terrell. Um

[44:56] I know we're a small small town. We've got uh leadership and citizens and

[45:02] everybody that's uh you're in a difficult position. Um right now I

[45:06] really feel like we have to put the health of our current and future

[45:10] citizens uh wildlife and the landscape first. Uh ter being encroached on all

[45:16] sides by vigorous development. the opportunity for for financial gain is

[45:20] and I'm sure it's intoxicating. Um but uh due to lack of land planning for

[45:26] decades, Terrell represents a mismatch of communities, zoning or lack thereof

[45:31] as well as the businesses. Um I believe there is a genuine concern the school

[45:36] system, property taxes, the roads, pollution, the increase to our cost of

[45:40] living and the burden to the utility and safety systems are real. In my opinion,

[45:46] the optimum outcome would be organically growing a safe and thriving ter

[45:50] community for young families to retirees versus focusing on executive housing.

[45:56] Um, I find that offensive really that that's the focus of this neighborhood is

[46:02] executive housing. how many can really afford a $400,000 house um or want to um

[46:11] and that's the starting point or oh you can live over here in these apartments

[46:16] it doesn't make sense to me at all um and why why are we building ridiculous

[46:23] houses like that and I'm sorry not trying to offend anybody if they live in

[46:27] houses like that but it's just a lot um >> I'm sorry m you could just start winding

[46:32] it down please >> yes sir Thank you. Um

[46:36] I I guess my main question is why must we embrace this type of growth the same

[46:41] way other communities all over Texas, all over really the United States have

[46:46] done. Why do we have to do it the same way? We've already proven that it

[46:50] doesn't really work. Um yeah, it looks great for a little while, but then you

[46:55] know people run into money problems or um things go into disrepair. Um, and

[47:01] then then where does that leave us as a community? Thank you so much.

[47:05] » Thank you, ma'am.

[47:12] » Okay. Wanted to make sure we ever anyone any anyone else that had had the

[47:16] opportunity to speak uh to the panel here tonight? We have any anybody else?

[47:21] We have any more sheets that came in? Ma'am, are we good? Okay. All right.

[47:25] With that being said, we're going to go ahead and close the public hearing.

[47:31] We're going to move over to my item 6.2. It's an ordinance of the city council of

[47:35] the city of Terrell, coffin county, Texas amending appending to zoning

[47:40] zoning ordinance of the city of Taro changing the zoning classification from

[47:43] agriculture to single family 7.5 SF 7.5 single family 16 executive stage

[47:52] retail and commercial to plan development mix residential PD on

[47:56] approximately 1544.50 50 acres of land depicted on

[48:02] exhibit B land map and described and depicted on the deed attached here to

[48:07] exhibit A and May part here for all purposes amending the official zoning

[48:11] map providing a penalty and providing repealing savings and servability

[48:16] providing for publication and effective date. This is for plan development

[48:21] 25-3118.

[48:24] Um commissioners do we have any questions? Um I do I just want to say a

[48:29] few things. Uh I do have a question for Mr. Snap if you don't mind coming up

[48:32] real please sir. Um and Mike uh we had a quite a bit of this and I know a lot of

[48:39] the uh public has already spoken to the developer and maybe a lot of answers

[48:44] have been questioned. Uh one of the thing is that I read was a congestion

[48:48] regards to our our infrastructure. In your opinion I know it's a 10 five to 15

[48:53] year or 15 to 20 year project. Can Terrell support this?

[48:58] » So, what we're So, what we're going to do and as we

[49:02] meet work with this developer as we go through each of the phases, we've talked

[49:08] about and we heard tonight about holding them accountable throughout the phases.

[49:12] And that's exactly what we're looking at doing as we progress through the phases.

[49:17] So, it's not going to say you it's a one stamp. You get free access for all these

[49:22] 1500 acres, 2,000 acres. So as the development

[49:27] occurs, it's naturally our our economics and our world changes and so our traffic

[49:32] patterns will possibly change. And as the phrases go through, then we'll look

[49:37] at doing uh traffic impact studies throughout to see if the changes uh make

[49:43] a substantial impact to our congestion of 205 and things of that nature. So,

[49:49] we'll constantly be looking at that and what evaluations

[49:53] and recommendations we need to do as far as altering paths or increasing roads or

[49:58] something of that nature. >> Okay. Well, that's great. Especially

[50:01] since we're moving in phases. So, you know, we're hoping that we keep doing

[50:05] studies as whether be every two or third phase as we continue to go along. Okay.

[50:11] Any any uh commissioners, we have any other questions or to uh the developer?

[50:15] » A couple questions.

[50:25] Good evening, sir. Hello. >> You were here a couple months ago and we

[50:30] um I asked a question about had schools been a consideration. Um you're wanting

[50:36] to add about 3,000 residences. Is that correct?

[50:39] » Correct. 3,800. >> I'm sorry.

[50:41] » 3,800 detached units. Mhm. >> And your statement at the last um

[50:46] meeting was that you didn't believe that a additional elementary school was

[50:52] necessary for that number of residences? Is that right?

[50:55] » That's correct. >> Okay. Um

[50:58] that has that changed since you've been here last?

[51:03] » No. What has changed is is

[51:08] or not uh as the development occurs, right?

[51:13] Yes sir. >> So

[51:16] so the the existing school system I understand is saturated or is near

[51:22] saturation and that's why the bond was in place and that will I think the

[51:27] information I read it uh allows for the construction of a new elementary school

[51:31] the construction of a new middle school and expanding the existing schools to

[51:36] allow for additional students. the location where the schools are relative

[51:41] to Teranova. It would be very if we have schools

[51:45] within Teranova, they would be extremely close to the existing schools. So, it

[51:48] makes no sense to have schools within Teranova, but maybe around Teranova

[51:53] would make more sense. >> Okay. Um the bond was passed prior to

[51:58] Terteranova being approved.

[52:01] » Correct. Therefore, the necessity for additional schools would have been

[52:06] outside of the scope of considering additional 3,800 residences. So, at that

[52:13] point, it would seem that there would be even more need for an additional school

[52:20] with adding those residences. Commissioner, we have been in contact

[52:26] with the TISD. They knew of this project coming in.

[52:31] they've been a part of um our meetings here in the last few months.

[52:36] Even though we do request from the um developers to consider a school site, we

[52:43] need the TISC to tell us where they want school sites. The city has decided that

[52:50] we would accommodate them for elementary schools when we have the opportunity to

[52:55] negotiate that with the developer. But the de uh TISD does have Mr. Morales and

[53:02] his team's contact

[53:06] out the other side of the development. Is there uh are there in other land

[53:11] owners that you would have to obtain

[53:16] ownership or easement rights to build the road out on the other side?

[53:21] » On the other, not on Griffith's side, but on the County Road 245 side

[53:25] » west of 205. Um east on uh towards County Road 245.

[53:35] » No, I think there's one road that goes through that, right? Can we go through

[53:40] the map to the thoroughfare map? >> 19. I see there's appears to be two

[53:44] roads. >> Are we talking about town?

[53:47] » Yeah. Can you go to our presentation PDF?

[53:50] » Los road in town north >> in turnover.

[53:53] » There you go. Uh move up 13. One more

[54:02] » right there. >> Okay.

[54:04] » So I'm just referring to the Losus and Terteranova road headed east toward or

[54:10] whatever direction that is towards north and towards 245.

[54:14] » So no those roads we we are not really required to build those roads. uh they

[54:19] are there as part of the master tharter plan but we would for those roads we

[54:24] would stop at our property limits >> and then the city would be required to

[54:30] follow >> the future developer will be whomever

[54:33] develops that land they will have to build that road. So you're saying that

[54:37] those roads are just going to stop at your development and the anticipation is

[54:42] that the other land will be developed further in the future and then they

[54:47] would just continue on. >> Yes, for the Teranova road. No, for the

[54:52] Las Parkway. Okay. Lasloas Parkway, we have to extend all the way to 245,

[54:58] » right? >> Yes.

[55:03] » That's all the questions. Great. >> Thank you. Thank you, ma'am.

[55:06] Commissioners, do we have any other questions for either? You have a

[55:10] question? >> I have a question. I have a question. I

[55:12] want to just not for the developer. Okay. Um, Miss Jan, just want to make

[55:17] sure I'm clarifying I'm understanding tonight. We are just approving for a

[55:23] change in the zoning. >> Yes, ma'am.

[55:25] » We're not approving the project any from there on we'll go step by step by step.

[55:30] So with every >> if we change it to traditional

[55:33] neighborhood and local retailing office if in the future this doesn't go through

[55:37] and somebody wants to have a farm with it can still be agriculture. We can they

[55:41] can still do what they want with their their whatever

[55:44] » they will will be in the city limits right

[55:47] » if that all goes through and they will whoever comes in if a new developer and

[55:53] they don't agree with this master plan then they have an opportunity to come

[55:57] right be back before you all and represent

[56:01] » right okay so all we're doing is zone change

[56:04] » just the zone this is just administrator getting the dirt right yes

[56:08] » commissioners keep in mind too that I know that uh some of there. They're

[56:11] actually volunteering to annex into the city, which is also good. One is because

[56:15] that way our staff will know what we're building out there instead of having

[56:19] them just do what they want to do out there,

[56:21] » right? >> Uh this way we can control more what's

[56:23] going out there. It's going to give more work for Mr. Snap and his in his office,

[56:27] but I'm pretty sure they're well up to the challenge. So, uh if you have any

[56:32] other questions, I would love to entertain a motion in regards to uh

[56:36] PD25-3118. Did you have a question, ma'am? No, I

[56:40] would I would like to remove myself from this vote.

[56:43] » Okay.

[56:46] All right. Anything else? Uh once again, I'd like to u

[56:51] entertain a motion in regards to uh PD25-3118.

[57:01] » Yeah. >> Go ahead.

[57:03] » I'm sorry. >> Oh, okay.

[57:08] I'm I'm removing myself just because of what I do in my profession. I feel as

[57:13] though I may or may not be able to make a um

[57:18] an objective decision.

[57:37] What if so I have reached out have been in contact because I had

[57:43] questions. Does that preclude me from voting?

[57:48] » Okay,

[57:52] » it's no problem. I just wanted to make sure I kept it above board.

[57:57] » Okay. All right. I'm sorry. Back again. Um, we have a motion to approve

[58:02] PD25-3118. Do I have a second?

[58:07] » Second. >> I have a second. All those in favor say

[58:10] I. >> I.

[58:11] » Any oppose? >> None.

[58:13] » Can I abstain? >> What's that? I'm

[58:16] » no vote. >> No. Either yes or no.

[58:25] » You can always just say no. And then whether you abstain is still going to be

[58:28] considered as a no vote, ma'am. Or not a vote, but a nay.

[58:48] I I appreciate and applaud Mr. Morales and his um project, but I also see a lot

[58:55] of citizens in this room who have questions and I don't know that I know

[58:59] yet that they have been fully answered to our citizens liking. So, if I have no

[59:04] choice, I have to say today no. >> Okay. So, we have one no.

[59:14] » Okay. Uh once again uh we have motion to approve uh PD25-3118.

[59:20] All those in favor say I. >> I.

[59:23] » And any oppose. We have one. Thank you. Motion carries.

[59:33] Okay. Going to continue on item 6.3. conduct a public hearing to receive

[59:37] comments regarding a zone change from a town hall town hall's residential on

[59:42] approximately 18 acres of property as located in block

[59:46] one lot 23 and 23 BPT of the Howard edition in the city of Ter Texas 75160

[59:54] Kaufman County Texas identified as Kaufman County CAD property ID 18969

[1:00:01] zone change 25-3137 Seven.

[1:00:06] » Chairman and commissioners, I bring to you another zone change. This is for

[1:00:11] 198. Uh gentlemen, would we keep it down as

[1:00:16] you >> Okay,

[1:00:19] » we're going to go ahead and recess for a few minutes while we

[1:04:47] Yeah, call me and I'll be >> I sent you an email.

[1:04:50] » Very difficult. >> What was your name?

[1:04:51] » John Matson. >> Oh, yeah. Yeah, we did.

[1:04:54] » You lift it up. >> I asked for you to send me links. I

[1:04:56] don't think I >> lift it up. I know that was very

[1:04:58] » Well, I thought I sent it to you, but I'll walk you through it. Okay. All

[1:05:01] right. Thank you. Thanks for coming. I would have to ask.

[1:05:08] » Okay, let's go ahead and resume the meeting.

[1:05:10] » Chairman and commissioners, I bring to you tonight a zone change for 198 Ida

[1:05:15] Street. The existing zoning is commercial. The future land use is local

[1:05:20] retail and office and the requested zoning is townhouse residential. So,

[1:05:25] you're saying why are we here to look at this? I want to take you to page

[1:05:36] the zoning map on page 63.

[1:05:41] In this area, there are single family residents everywhere. Even though the

[1:05:47] zoning is town home 12, it really is a single family detached home. And so what

[1:05:54] this owner is wanting to do is to reszone it from the uh commercial that's

[1:06:01] reflected here in this zoning map to where he can have the same use as his

[1:06:06] surrounding neighbors to town home 12 for him to build a single family

[1:06:12] residence. Now on page 60 is a picture of there where there was a home

[1:06:21] previously on this property. that home is since gone. So, when he comes back to

[1:06:27] us for a construction plan to build a new um uh home, then we're going to have

[1:06:34] to address his driveway and all of his setbacks. So, we'll work with him in our

[1:06:39] office to do that. There were

[1:06:44] 24 letters sent to all the abuing land owners within a 200 foot buffer zone and

[1:06:50] to date no responses have been received either in favor or not in favor. Again,

[1:06:56] staff recommends approval of this zoning application zone change 25-3137

[1:07:02] for the proposed zoning. >> Thank you, ma'am.

[1:07:05] » And I'll pause for the public hearing. >> Okay, we're going to open the public

[1:07:10] hearing. Is there anyone in the audience that wants to speak in in favor of uh

[1:07:15] zone change 25-3137?

[1:07:20] Okay. Is anyone in the audience want to speak uh not in favor of uh zone change

[1:07:24] 3137?

[1:07:27] Okay. We're going to go and close the uh public hearing.

[1:07:31] Move on item to over to 6.4. An ordinance of the city council of the

[1:07:35] city of Tero, Kaufman County, Texas, amending appendix 2 zoning ordinance in

[1:07:40] the city of Tero and changing the zoning classification from commercial to town

[1:07:44] home residential and approximately.18 acres of property as located on block

[1:07:49] one lot 23A and 23B PT part of the Howard edition in the

[1:07:55] city of Terrell 75160 Kaufman County, Texas. identified as Kaufman County CAD

[1:08:02] property ID 1896-97 and more particularly described

[1:08:07] inspected within the warranty deed with vendors lean attached here to as exhibit

[1:08:12] A and made a part here for all purposes amending the official zoning map

[1:08:17] providing a penalty providing a repealing saving and servability

[1:08:22] providing for the republication of an effective date zone change 25-3137

[1:08:29] commission we have any questions for for staff. And I've been out there. There's

[1:08:32] there's an old church right next to it. I don't know if that's abandoned or not,

[1:08:36] but it's it'd be a good place. They do have a housing all on the left side of

[1:08:42] it if you're facing that building there. Uh I don't know what what future plans

[1:08:46] are for that church. So, I have any questions for staff in

[1:08:50] regards to uh zone change 25-3137?

[1:08:55] If not, I'd like to That's it. Do I have a motion in regards

[1:09:00] to zone change 253137? >> Make a motion.

[1:09:04] » Okay. I have a mo. Go ahead. >> For zone change

[1:09:09] 3137. >> Sorry about that. I have a motion to

[1:09:11] approve zone change 2025-3137. Do I have a second?

[1:09:15] » Second. >> I have a second. All those in favor say

[1:09:18] I. >> I.

[1:09:19] » Any oppose? Nope. Motion carries. Zone change 25-3137.

[1:09:27] Okay, we can have U item 6.5 is discuss and consider

[1:09:32] ordinance 3110 repeal and replace the uh city of Terra Court code of ordinance

[1:09:37] chapter 10 subdivision ordinance ordinance 25-3110.

[1:09:44] » Y'all love when I come up here and give you these big long zone changes. Um,

[1:09:48] this one our council member Miss Donna Renee Anderson loves because the next

[1:09:54] two items we have revisions to the subdivision ordinance and also the

[1:09:59] zoning ordinance and these are exactly reflective of the legislative

[1:10:04] um timing and it's everything that has to be approved by September 1st. So

[1:10:10] these are just updates based on Texas state law. What I've done is provided

[1:10:14] just the pages of those ordinances with the red line um so that you can read the

[1:10:20] actual statements that are being added. It was a little bit of cleanup adding a

[1:10:25] couple of extra departments that we have added in our review and also just making

[1:10:30] sure that our subdivision ordinance actually reflects what our policies and

[1:10:35] procedures are in our office as far as reviews. So, we just had a few

[1:10:40] recommendations and our hope from this point forward is every August we'll

[1:10:45] bring these to you so that we know October one is our deadline for all new

[1:10:50] ordinances, right, Miss Katie? And applications and everything else. So,

[1:10:54] I'm here to answer any questions if you have any about the subdivision

[1:10:58] ordinance.

[1:11:02] Commissioner, we have any questions for uh staff in regards to

[1:11:07] orders change? Is it a huge update or just

[1:11:11] » It really is just to update uh Texas state law. And if you go through there,

[1:11:16] it's like anywhere you we might have mentioned public works. We also make

[1:11:20] sure that we mention the utilities department. And it's just really more

[1:11:24] reflective of the individuals and the steps that our developers take through

[1:11:29] our platting process. >> Okay. We need a vote in regards to I'm

[1:11:33] sorry. >> Um so Railen

[1:11:37] looking at these they're just are there any major changes that we need to be

[1:11:41] aware of? >> There are there is no code change. Okay.

[1:11:46] » It it's literally processes and administrative procedures. There there

[1:11:51] is nothing that will change to the developer. There are no major um

[1:11:56] systemic changes as it deals with platting. rules remain the same.

[1:12:03] » Do we need a vote in regards to uh to to ordinance 25-3118?

[1:12:08] » Yes, sir. >> I'd like to entertain a motion or is

[1:12:13] that the is we do the vote on the second one? Ma'am, the 6.6.

[1:12:17] » You'll uh recommend uh to city council this ordinance and then we'll do a

[1:12:22] second recommendation on the next item. >> Okay. I'm going to just read 6.6 6 and

[1:12:27] I'll let enter a motion in regards to because 6.5 and 6.6 are the

[1:12:32] » 6.5 is your subdivision ordinance and 6.6 is your zoning ordinance. So it's

[1:12:37] two separate ordinances. >> Oh, okay. Okay.

[1:12:39] » Yes, sir. >> So, I'd like to entertain a motion in

[1:12:41] regards to ordinance 25-3110.

[1:12:46] » I'll make a motion that we accept changes.

[1:12:48] » I have a motion to accept the changes for ordinance 25-3110.

[1:12:52] Do I have a second? >> Second.

[1:12:54] » I have a second. All those in favor say I. I

[1:12:57] » any opposed? None. Motion carries. Okay. 6.6 is an ordinance of the city

[1:13:04] council of the city of Terrell, Coffman County, Texas, repealing and replacing

[1:13:08] the city of Terrell code for the ordinances chapter 10 subdivision

[1:13:12] ordinance as set forth in the exhibit Attached here to and made a part here

[1:13:17] for all purposes providing for their severability and providing the effective

[1:13:21] date.

[1:13:26] Now, that was part of the 6.5. Am I correct?

[1:13:29] » Yes. >> Okay. I'm going to go ahead and and just

[1:13:32] move on. >> Now, we're on 6.7 discussing consider

[1:13:35] ordinance number 3138 repeal and replace the city of Tur Court of Ordinance,

[1:13:40] Appendix 2, zoning ordinance. So, usually I get to bring y'all really

[1:13:45] fun and controversial things to consider in your zoning ordinance, but again,

[1:13:50] this is just um some updates due to the legislative changes. Um and you'll

[1:13:57] notice that some of our public hearing our public hearing

[1:14:01] um notifications have not changed, but they've just kind of broadened where we

[1:14:05] can advertise. um they've gone in and put some different wording as far as the

[1:14:11] 20% rule and the biggest section was the um homebased businesses rather than what

[1:14:19] we used to call um home occupation. So, um nothing really fun,

[1:14:27] but just making sure that our ordinances reflect uh new state law and also the

[1:14:31] language of it. Commissioners, any questions for staff

[1:14:36] in regards to uh ordinance number 3138?

[1:14:42] » Okay. Uh I'm guessing 6.8 is the same. So we're going to read this and then

[1:14:46] I'll entertain a motion in an ordinance of the city council of the city of Ter

[1:14:50] Coffman County, Texas repealing and replacing appendix 2 zoning ordinance of

[1:14:54] the city of Terrell providing for the servability and providing for an

[1:14:57] effective date. Accepting ordinance. Uh, do I have a

[1:15:02] motion to accept ordinance number number 3138 as written?

[1:15:07] » I move that we accept ordinance number 3138.

[1:15:11] » Okay. I have a motion to approve. Do I have a second?

[1:15:14] » I have a second. All those in favor say I.

[1:15:17] » I. >> Any oppose?

[1:15:18] » No. Motion carries. Okay. We have no action items for today.

[1:15:24] Uh, going to go ahead and move on over to business items.

[1:15:29] Business item 8.1 and 8.2. two that um I if it's okay with the city council I

[1:15:36] mean or with I'm sorry that's the but the planning zoning committee it's

[1:15:39] basically 8.1 is accepting of the public waterline improvement phase one and then

[1:15:45] uh the 8.2 to accepting of the Independence Parkway at Crossroads. All

[1:15:49] it is just a accept as it is. Is that correct or do we have a

[1:15:53] » chairman? Um we would like to postpone the arburetum water line and delay that

[1:15:59] till September 25th planning and zoning. >> What we're going to delay we have to

[1:16:05] have a make a motion in regards to delay in that or we're just going to

[1:16:10] » Yes, you have to accept that delay. Yes, sir.

[1:16:12] » All right. Do I have a motion to delay the uh operatum phase one motion?

[1:16:17] » Motion to delay. >> Okay, I have a motion to delay it. Do I

[1:16:20] have a second? >> Second.

[1:16:21] » I have a second. All those in favor say I.

[1:16:23] » I. >> Any oppose?

[1:16:26] » Motion carries. All right.

[1:16:32] Item 8.2 Two, acceptance of the Independence Parkway at Crossroads

[1:16:35] Terrell.

[1:16:44] » Yes, Mr. Snav. >> So, commissioners, what this is is very

[1:16:48] similar to the other. It's basically our final acceptance of the improvements.

[1:16:53] This is the Independence Road that's going from 557 access road all the way

[1:16:59] over to Rose to Sil Seachill Road. So it meanders through the apartment

[1:17:04] complex. We have actually competed completed two other sections. So uh this

[1:17:12] project all the improvements are installed and the affidavits are

[1:17:16] received and the road meets our standards of what we ask him to put into

[1:17:21] our TCSS. So you might want to say what happened to the pre previous one 8.1.

[1:17:28] They didn't get me all the paperwork. They said they would. I owe you. I'm

[1:17:31] going to get it to you and they didn't do it. So I pulled it. That's the reason

[1:17:34] why I'm asking you to postpone it. >> So there's nothing hidden in there as

[1:17:38] far as we're there. This 8.2 the independence Parkway is installed. It's

[1:17:43] made our standards. We came the things of the drainage and things of that

[1:17:47] nature. >> Thank you, sir. Like to entertain a

[1:17:50] motion to accept Independence Parkway at Crossroads of Terrell.

[1:17:54] » I move that we accept. >> Okay.

[1:17:57] » Independence Parkway at Crossroads Terrell. I have a motion to accept uh

[1:18:01] the Independence Parkway at Crossroad Terrell. Do I have a second?

[1:18:04] » Second. >> I have a second. All those in favor say

[1:18:06] I. >> I.

[1:18:08] » Any oppose? As there are no motion carries.

[1:18:15] Item.3 is discuss and consider a construction plan for the city of

[1:18:18] Terrell pet adoption facility situated at 1.466

[1:18:23] acres of land part of the block 634 and 635 of the reser revised map of Ter and

[1:18:29] the W Foggman survey abstract number 164 in the city of Terrell Kaufman County

[1:18:35] Texas CP25-15.

[1:18:42] » Who's speaking on this one?

[1:18:46] She's like, "What?" >> I I'm didn't rec recognize Foggelman

[1:18:51] survey. Um very exciting piece here. Uh if you'll go to the next page where we

[1:18:57] can see our site plan, you might recognize where this site is. Um it is

[1:19:01] next to our new police headquarters. And so the city council has been working

[1:19:07] through budget and we have been doing programming for the possibility of a new

[1:19:12] animal control shelter. Um so this is just simply the construction pla process

[1:19:18] for that. Um, the actual construction of the project will not come to city

[1:19:23] council until September 16th, but we are following our own rules and making sure

[1:19:29] that the construction plat if if funding is approved, we would be ready to go

[1:19:34] into construction of the facility.

[1:19:40] So, y'all just get to be a part of the process. Any

[1:19:45] questions for staff in regards to the uh CP25-15?

[1:19:50] If not, I'll enter a motion to for CP25-15.

[1:20:04] » Have a motion to approve. Do I have a second?

[1:20:07] » I have a second to approve CP25-15. All those in favor say I.

[1:20:12] » I. Any opposed? None. Motion carries.

[1:20:18] 8.4. Discuss and consider a construction plat for a 174 resident residential lot

[1:20:24] and one non-residential lot in the Elpier survey abstract 373 and the East

[1:20:30] Bivby survey abstract 495 as phase 1D of the Nosber development situated on

[1:20:37] 26.758 acres of land in the city of Terrell,

[1:20:41] Kaufman County, Texas. CP25-14.

[1:20:45] Ma'am, >> chairman and commissioners, I bring to

[1:20:47] you a construction plan for Norpur phase 1D. So, this is the third phase that I

[1:20:54] have brought to you. There will be another phase coming before you next

[1:20:58] month. This is um part of the plan development agreement ordinance number

[1:21:05] 2949 that was presented and approved by PNC on June 23rd, 2022. and final

[1:21:12] approval by city council on December 28th of 22. A development agreement was

[1:21:17] also executed by the city council on December 20th of that year. Phase 1A

[1:21:23] final plat was presented to you all on September the 12th of last year. And

[1:21:29] phase 1 C construction plat was presented this year to you all January

[1:21:34] 23rd. So now this developer is selling lots out there and they're ready to

[1:21:40] start the third phase which is this 1D. If you will turn over to page

[1:21:48] Katie, I'm looking for the um

[1:21:55] let's go to page

[1:22:00] 125.

[1:22:05] So where you see here the phase 1D, this is the construction plan I'm presenting

[1:22:11] to you tonight. This one, this plaid is

[1:22:18] 174 residential lots and one non-residential lot. The developer had

[1:22:24] already previously like I just mentioned phase 1A and then the 1C. So now 1D is

[1:22:31] immediately behind the 1C just to give you acclamation. And I

[1:22:36] don't know if any of you have had a chance to drive out there, but they've

[1:22:38] really got some homes popping up. I see on Facebook, you know, realators are

[1:22:43] already selling lots, homes, and so they're they're moving and progressing

[1:22:47] very well. Staff has reviewed this construction

[1:22:52] plat uh civil drawings as well as the other item analysis that were presented.

[1:22:58] and staff recommends that um PNZ approve construction plat 25-14.

[1:23:07] And I'll pause for any questions. >> Commissioners, any questions in regards

[1:23:11] to CP25-14? >> You said one nonresidential.

[1:23:16] » Yeah, that's usually like a green space and you would have to zero in on this,

[1:23:22] but it will be a little green space. It's either a parklet. Um I believe it's

[1:23:27] up there in the top right corner right up in there. That 12 in the very

[1:23:33] top right. There you go. >> So that's probably a parklet

[1:23:40] there. But yeah, >> at this point though this vote is just

[1:23:44] administrative. >> This is just administrative. Now, we had

[1:23:47] mentioned to you that these were going to go on consent items, especially you

[1:23:51] said, and of course, you always have the opportunity to pull it if you want me to

[1:23:55] give you more detail, remind you, but I kind of forgot to put it on the consent

[1:24:01] and it was too late. Brian said I couldn't bring it over out of business

[1:24:05] into consent. So, you get to hear all the fun stuff again.

[1:24:11] you haven't had the chance, uh, it's a good idea just to drive out there and

[1:24:15] take a look, see what they're doing out there. They're doing pretty good job out

[1:24:18] there. >> So, any questions for, uh, for staff? If

[1:24:23] not, I I'll consider a motion in regards to CP25-14.

[1:24:28] » Make a motion to CP25

[1:24:35] » 14. Yes, ma'am. Okay. I have a motion to accept CP uh CP25-14.

[1:24:39] Do I have a second? >> Second.

[1:24:42] » I have a second. All those in favor say I.

[1:24:45] » I. >> Any oppose?

[1:24:47] No. Motion carries.

[1:24:51] All right, commissioners. Uh, looks like we are done for the evening. I

[1:24:54] appreciate y'all coming out tonight. Thank you. It's a long night. Y'all have

[1:24:58] a good evening and meetings adjourned.

Planning and Zoning Commission - Aug 28 2025 Full Meeting

Transcript