Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:09]
Can you
[0:13]
» find
[0:18]
switch to zone?
[0:22]
» There is a phone call number.
[0:58]
All right.
[1:27]
Senator
[1:44]
we still trying to let M in Um,
[1:52]
did you make it on?
[1:55]
>> Good morning everyone. Matt's here.
[1:57]
Hopefully you can hear me.
[2:01]
» We would like to go ahead and get
[2:04]
started. Thanks everyone for being
[2:06]
patient with technical difficulties.
[2:08]
Karina
[2:10]
and Barbary
[2:13]
Clark.
[2:22]
I see
[2:25]
you here.
[2:29]
Park Bullen's here. Sorry.
[2:32]
Emily Gray here. Greg Shelton.
[2:35]
Jared Henderson.
[2:41]
Is that Jared? Okay. Lorie Stringham,
[2:45]
>> I'm here.
[2:47]
>> Brunard here. Lindsay Long
[2:52]
>> here.
[2:53]
>> Marcy Houseman.
[2:57]
>> Matt Bolton
[2:59]
>> here. Good morning.
[3:01]
>> Nick Griffin.
[3:02]
>> Yes.
[3:03]
>> Nicole Handy here. Terry George here.
[3:07]
Tessa Stitzer,
[3:10]
Zack Jacob.
[3:13]
Thank you.
[3:15]
>> Did you get Clark here?
[3:18]
>> Yes, you did. Thank you. Um, all right.
[3:21]
Uh, we would now like to open the
[3:23]
meeting for public comment. Any members
[3:25]
of the public wishing to comment before
[3:28]
this board, now is the time.
[3:33]
All right. See, there is no public like
[3:35]
post public comment. Um, we'd like to
[3:38]
have as many people here these items on
[3:41]
the agenda. So, we're going to move the
[3:42]
agenda out of order. Um, so we're going
[3:45]
to address items 3.7 and 3.8 now. Um,
[3:49]
for those of you who are following along
[3:51]
in your packet, we're going to be going
[3:52]
to page uh 40. Um, and just to uh start
[3:58]
this off, Rachel is going to kind of go
[4:01]
into this more detail. Um this is the um
[4:07]
the update of the withdrawal agreement
[4:09]
with Caraman and the draft of the
[4:10]
interlocal agreement with Carame. Uh I
[4:12]
know a lot of us had a chance to talk to
[4:14]
Evan about this. Um just as an
[4:17]
introduction um this agreement was made
[4:22]
um through a lot of work. I I I
[4:24]
obviously wasn't there but I met him on
[4:26]
their side as well. Um, I know Evan and
[4:29]
Helen uh and Rachel have put in
[4:32]
countless hours. We also created a
[4:34]
working group to make sure that we were
[4:37]
uh looking uh after all interests of the
[4:39]
district and all geographical areas in
[4:42]
the district. I sat on that working
[4:44]
group uh for Holiday, Anna Barbieri from
[4:47]
Taylorville, Greg Shelton from White
[4:49]
City, Nick Griffith from immigration.
[4:54]
Oh, and Lori Springham uh for Salt Lake
[4:56]
County. Um so all of us sat on that
[5:00]
working group and met frequently
[5:02]
uh throughout the summer to uh
[5:07]
to come up with this agreement. Um it
[5:11]
has not to say it's been a labor of
[5:13]
love, but it's been a labor.
[5:16]
So we're gonna have
[5:18]
um Rachel go over that uh now. Great.
[5:23]
Um, so yeah, and just to begin, I wanted
[5:25]
to also just give a little bit of an
[5:27]
introduction um, and address some
[5:31]
uh, thoughts and concerns that I've kind
[5:33]
of been hearing from folks.
[5:36]
Like, uh, Emily just said, this this
[5:38]
agreement has been a product of
[5:40]
extensive and sometimes difficult
[5:42]
negotiations.
[5:43]
I'd say what it really came down to at
[5:45]
the end of the day was a a debate not so
[5:48]
much about whether or whether Herming
[5:51]
could or should leave because I think
[5:53]
that we we kind of you know
[5:57]
understood that that that was what was
[5:59]
going to happen. But um it was the the
[6:01]
disagreement really turned on what
[6:05]
assets that um could take with them. And
[6:07]
I think that's where we spend most of
[6:09]
our time and and discussions. Uh so this
[6:13]
agreement reflects a practical
[6:15]
resolution to Herman's withdrawal. Um
[6:19]
and not necessarily a concession that
[6:22]
Herman owns a proportional share of
[6:25]
district assets or was legally entitled
[6:28]
to you know everything that it might
[6:30]
have requested.
[6:32]
Uh our district's position throughout
[6:34]
this process has been that
[6:35]
municipalities do not hold a
[6:37]
proportional ownership interest in
[6:40]
district assets. Um and and we did
[6:43]
preserve that position expressly in the
[6:45]
there's a clause there that that states
[6:48]
that. So the transfers that we
[6:50]
negotiated to Aramis agreement um are
[6:54]
not in in recognition of an ownership or
[6:56]
equity interest um per se. Uh and the
[7:01]
agreement also has Haramman releasing
[7:02]
any further asset related claims. So we
[7:04]
can just kind of put this to bed and
[7:07]
move on which is one of the biggest uh
[7:09]
benefits of this agreement.
[7:11]
Um so while we felt strongly about that
[7:13]
legal position uh you know we had to
[7:16]
evaluate all of this uh in consideration
[7:18]
of the environment that this withdrawal
[7:20]
was occurring. Herman was able to obtain
[7:24]
uh new legislation creating a whole new
[7:26]
withdrawal process. Um there was
[7:29]
significant uh potential for continued
[7:32]
legislative pressure. Um
[7:35]
any any even thoughts of of litigating
[7:39]
the issue to try to figure out where the right line is would have involved
[7:43]
additional substantial expense and delay
[7:46]
and uncertainty
[7:48]
um and disruption to our ability to
[7:50]
perform the services we need to be
[7:52]
focusing on without any sort of
[7:54]
guarantee that we'd get a better result.
[7:58]
So, um, all that is to say that, uh,
[8:01]
this negotiated, um, agreement is is
[8:05]
what our small group at least considered
[8:07]
to be a a a resolution that we could we
[8:11]
could uh, live with. And that was best
[8:15]
protective of the district given um, all
[8:18]
the, like I said, the legal pressures we
[8:20]
just discussed.
[8:22]
um protecting our remaining communities.
[8:25]
Uh we need to be focusing on on our
[8:27]
remaining communities and providing good
[8:29]
service there and not be fighting legal
[8:31]
battles on the side. Um
[8:36]
so this agreement gives Herman a defined
[8:38]
um and limited package but also gives us
[8:41]
and everyone else involved uh finality.
[8:44]
uh Herman doesn't receive uh cash or
[8:47]
fund balance in his reserves, real
[8:48]
property or a set percentage of assets.
[8:52]
Um as I'll get into it in as I go
[8:55]
through the agreement, but um there is a
[8:57]
transfer of of the containers and the
[9:00]
carts and the um some trucks and that
[9:04]
transfer is capped and subject to
[9:06]
certain you know operational protections
[9:09]
on our end uh to protect our remaining
[9:11]
fleet and our needs. Um,
[9:16]
and finally, I want to make a note that
[9:18]
we see this agreement as only expressly
[9:21]
being specific to Heramman's withdrawal
[9:24]
and not establishing precedent or any
[9:26]
other. Every future any any withdrawal
[9:30]
ever is going to be analyzed on a
[9:31]
case-by case basis under the own facts
[9:34]
and circumstances and the applicable law
[9:37]
at the time. And uh more to that point
[9:40]
of the law, uh we see ourselves as
[9:43]
perhaps trying to get back into that
[9:44]
legislation and um clearing up
[9:48]
clarifying some of the ambiguities that we saw and and had to deal with. Um
[9:54]
so in the future, you know, any any
[9:58]
request for this store is is going to be
[10:00]
revised on a case by case basis.
[10:04]
So, with that said, that's sort of
[10:07]
big things out in front. Uh, I'm going
[10:08]
to walk through the agreement and point
[10:10]
out kind of the major points so that you
[10:12]
know how this is going to go. Um,
[10:16]
actually one more o overarching point
[10:18]
before we move on. Um, we as a small
[10:20]
group got to this point where we felt
[10:23]
like we're good with the language just
[10:25]
as of like the end of last week. So, we
[10:28]
had enough time to get it here on the
[10:30]
agenda. And I know that Evan has had
[10:31]
oneonone and Emily's had some one-on-one
[10:33]
conversations with many of you. Um, we
[10:36]
wanted you guys to have the opportunity
[10:37]
to vote on it today if everyone feels
[10:39]
that they're ready, but it is a bit of a
[10:41]
short turnaround. So, if anyone feels
[10:44]
like you haven't had enough time to sit
[10:47]
with this, think about it, have your
[10:48]
questions answered, of course, we'll
[10:50]
spend time doing that today as well. Uh,
[10:52]
we can table the vote. Um, but just to
[10:55]
note that if if we do that, we would be
[10:57]
setting up a special meeting sometime in
[11:00]
the next couple weeks to come back to
[11:02]
this question. Um, rather than we can't
[11:05]
wait all the way till the next uh month
[11:06]
is basically what I'm getting at. Um,
[11:10]
assuming that we're proceeding with
[11:12]
this, which is the expectation that that
[11:14]
we have operationally, Evan's team needs
[11:16]
to be able to start actually working on
[11:19]
this and we need to have enough time to
[11:20]
implement the transition. So, we don't
[11:22]
want to we don't want to wait too long.
[11:24]
And our understanding is that this will
[11:25]
be on Heramman's agenda. Is it next
[11:28]
week?
[11:29]
>> September 9th.
[11:30]
How many weeks that is.
[11:33]
>> Okay. So, that said, um I'm just going
[11:37]
to scroll down. Let's see. So, section
[11:42]
two at the bottom there.
[11:47]
Oh, okay. Yeah. So, um, sorry, back up
[11:50]
to the recital. In recital A, it just it
[11:53]
states what kind of organization we are.
[11:55]
Uh, we provide these services on a fee
[11:58]
for service basis, operate through an
[12:00]
enterprise fund supported by customer
[12:02]
service fees. We do not impose any
[12:04]
property tax and it lists the
[12:06]
communities that we serve. That's been
[12:08]
an important point for us because again
[12:10]
we feel like the communities it's the
[12:12]
residents who've paid and they have
[12:14]
gotten the service that they paid for
[12:16]
the fee for service concept rather than
[12:19]
uh any sort of the cities aren't buying
[12:21]
in to this organization. Okay, I could
[12:24]
go into all that. I'm not going to have
[12:26]
a whole legal discussion on how that
[12:28]
works. Anyway, so back down to section
[12:30]
two, the agreement and effective uh the
[12:32]
withdrawal effective dates. So basically
[12:35]
this agreement is just saying we're you
[12:37]
know we mutually agreeing to the fact
[12:39]
that Germany is withdrawing and the way
[12:41]
the law works is it becomes legally
[12:43]
effective upon the lieutenant governor
[12:45]
issuing a certificate of withdrawal. So
[12:48]
we'll sign this agreement signs this
[12:50]
agreement as soon as it's signed by both
[12:52]
parties. Herman has to send a notice to
[12:56]
uh the lieutenant governor's office with
[12:58]
a final local entity plant which is the
[13:01]
map basically that they're saying this
[13:03]
is the area that's being withdrawn from
[13:05]
the district and then the lieutenant
[13:07]
governor's office uh issues a
[13:08]
certification and in my experience that
[13:11]
happens usually pretty quickly. They're
[13:13]
usually on top of that it usually only
[13:15]
takes a couple weeks. Um and so that the
[13:18]
way the statute is written like that's
[13:19]
the effective date. We don't really get
[13:21]
to pick a different effective date. So
[13:23]
our anticipation is that that process
[13:25]
will happen pretty quickly. Um but
[13:28]
therefore uh going down to section 4, we
[13:31]
have uh negotiated a continued service
[13:35]
uh transition
[13:37]
um until uh the end of October 31st as
[13:41]
the actual transition date. So
[13:44]
regardless of when the lieutenant
[13:45]
governor certifies it as being official,
[13:48]
we are negotiating that we will continue
[13:50]
service until uh up through October 31st
[13:54]
and so that there will be a formal
[13:56]
transition. The reason we chose that
[13:58]
date is it it makes sense on our side to
[14:02]
have uh the services end at the end of a
[14:05]
month for our billing purposes and that
[14:07]
will produce a really clean transition
[14:09]
for for us.
[14:13]
Um let's see.
[14:16]
We the asurances section says that we
[14:18]
will continue to provide uh service
[14:19]
without uh degradation of service prior
[14:22]
to that transition date. So we did
[14:25]
pointed out a few practical issues
[14:27]
there. If if a new home comes online in
[14:29]
that weird little window and transition
[14:31]
date, we'll still give them a new can
[14:33]
and all that. We'll do repairs and
[14:35]
maintenance. However, we are probably
[14:38]
not going to be uh accepting requests
[14:41]
for new subscription based services
[14:42]
during that window because that really
[14:44]
doesn't make sense for anyone. So,
[14:46]
that's the only quote unquote
[14:47]
degradation of service that might occur.
[14:50]
Um final billings and collections. Um,
[14:53]
you know, we reserve the right obviously
[14:54]
to to send out final bills and collect
[14:57]
and in pay in in cases of non-payment,
[14:59]
we are still authorized to use any of
[15:01]
our regular collection methods,
[15:02]
including placing a lean for past due
[15:05]
services against the property. This is
[15:06]
how we do our um annual certifications
[15:08]
on the property tax rules for those that
[15:10]
do not um pay in a timely manner. This
[15:14]
is just saying that we will continue to
[15:15]
be able to do that
[15:18]
um if anyone doesn't pay during this
[15:19]
window. Section six is the negotiated
[15:23]
asset transfer. Um again we've agreed
[15:27]
that this is not recognition of any sort
[15:30]
of portion of ownership or equity
[15:31]
interest. The statute does talk in terms
[15:34]
of being able to transfer assets in in
[15:37]
the case of withdrawal on the basis of
[15:39]
like necessity of the parties. And so
[15:42]
this is more in line with that than
[15:43]
considering it as being a you just get a
[15:46]
percentage because you were a member. Um
[15:49]
so what we through much negotiation um
[15:53]
settled on was uh a transfer of sideload
[15:57]
collection trucks having an aggregate
[15:59]
appraised retail value reasonably
[16:01]
approximating $825,000.
[16:05]
Uh this section contains uh methods of
[16:08]
how select an appraiser. Um we will
[16:11]
mutually select and and split the cost
[16:13]
of the appraiser to come in and appraise
[16:15]
the trucks. Um section C has
[16:18]
identification of eligible trucks and
[16:20]
this is a process that we agreed to
[16:23]
wherein Evans team will identify a pool
[16:27]
of trucks that are allowed to be
[16:30]
considered as part of the um the
[16:33]
transfer. Um it has a tiered formula so
[16:40]
that they get a mix of trucks in that
[16:42]
pool of different ages. And so we're,
[16:46]
you know, we were not allowed to just
[16:48]
give them all the lowest and the worst
[16:50]
trucks in the pile, but at the same
[16:53]
time, they can't just take all the best
[16:54]
and the newest either. So, it's got to
[16:57]
span. And so, once we have that pool put
[17:00]
together, um the
[17:03]
uh
[17:06]
what is the word? the appraisal occurs
[17:08]
and the appraiser will assign a retail
[17:11]
value to all of those trucks after
[17:13]
consideration of taking out some of the
[17:15]
um equipment that we have inside the
[17:17]
trucks that remain on our property.
[17:20]
And then uh once we have values on all
[17:23]
of the trucks within the pool, uh the
[17:26]
city of Paramin has the ability to go
[17:29]
through and basically pick and choose
[17:31]
which trucks they want. um that uh gets
[17:35]
as close as possible to that uh that uh
[17:39]
target transfer value that I identified
[17:42]
and recognizing that it would be a near
[17:45]
miracle and possibility to be able to
[17:47]
come up with an exact dollar amount that
[17:49]
matches that.
[17:52]
Um
[17:54]
we uh we negotiated this language to say
[17:59]
that
[18:01]
um you have to they have to pick trucks
[18:03]
that come closest to that value as
[18:05]
possible. And if if they can't if it's
[18:08]
within 3% either up above or below we're
[18:13]
calling it like that's good enough and
[18:15]
there will be no um further um true up
[18:18]
so to speak. If we can't find any
[18:21]
combination that falls within that 3%
[18:24]
window down of the target value, then
[18:27]
Evan has the ability to add more trucks
[18:29]
into the pool and to try to get some
[18:31]
more options that would create um a
[18:35]
workable combination.
[18:38]
Um if despite all of our efforts, we
[18:41]
just simply cannot get a combination
[18:43]
that is within that 3% and have the
[18:45]
option of agreeing to a transfer that's
[18:48]
you know a little bit above or below
[18:50]
that. Um that would also include a
[18:52]
dollar value true up but only to the
[18:55]
extent that it was above or below that
[18:57]
3%. That 3% window would stay. But if
[18:59]
let's say it goes up 4% then um either
[19:02]
they pay us an additional that that
[19:04]
additional 1% or we give them an
[19:06]
additional 1% to get within that window.
[19:12]
Um yes we did have a limit as well um
[19:16]
due to our operational needs that uh
[19:19]
under no circumstances can they take
[19:21]
more than six trucks. That was important
[19:23]
to us because we obviously we need
[19:26]
trucks to be continuing to, you know, do
[19:29]
our service to our communities and
[19:31]
that's the number that our team settled
[19:33]
on as being portable.
[19:36]
Okay. Uh
[19:39]
let's see. We say that the transfer of
[19:42]
trucks will fully satisfy the
[19:44]
requirements of this agreement. the law.
[19:47]
Let me see. Uh the transfer of time of possession
[19:51]
just talks about you know we we're
[19:53]
transferring them as is where is without
[19:55]
any representation or warranty. Um we
[19:59]
will remove um our wolfward labels from the trucks and they will just take
[20:07]
them as is and then become responsible
[20:09]
for registration, licensing, insurance
[20:11]
on all that.
[20:13]
Um,
[20:15]
let's see.
[20:18]
Okay, all the rest of this I'm going to
[20:19]
just skip over. It's just more or less
[20:21]
factual terms. So, then we get to
[20:23]
section 8, the transfer of uh garbage
[20:27]
and recycling carts. Um, as part of our
[20:30]
negotiations, we agreed to basically
[20:32]
leave the residential carts uh where
[20:37]
they are. residents can keep their
[20:40]
garbage and recycling carts.
[20:43]
Um
[20:47]
see this is only the uh 90 to 96 gallon
[20:51]
carts issued for regular service. Um it
[20:54]
does not include any other
[20:58]
larger containers that we see.
[21:02]
Let's see. Um
[21:07]
I'm going to skip down. These are also
[21:10]
uh transferred as is. No warranty.
[21:14]
Uh the important section is removal of
[21:16]
identification. Within 180 days after
[21:19]
the transition date, the city shall
[21:22]
ensure that all of our um names are
[21:25]
covered on the cards. What our
[21:28]
understanding is is that they have a
[21:30]
plan to place a sticker on the top of
[21:33]
the every cart that um completely
[21:36]
obscures our information and states the
[21:39]
new company and contact information for
[21:41]
that company. And to the extent that our
[21:44]
carts have um logos on the sides, uh we
[21:49]
negotiated that that was still important
[21:51]
for us for those to be removed and they
[21:54]
can remove those in in either by also
[21:56]
doing stickers or even just by spray
[21:58]
painting over them. So, you know, people
[22:01]
with eyeballs can still see what was
[22:02]
said under the spray paint, but it would
[22:04]
be a clear indication that that is no
[22:06]
longer um the party that that owns this.
[22:09]
We don't want anyone contacting us for
[22:12]
issues. I I'm sure that we'll still get
[22:13]
that to some extent just because people
[22:15]
are used to us being a service provider,
[22:17]
but um we don't want it being basically
[22:20]
advertised that that this is our
[22:23]
cards and our issues or there any
[22:26]
service issues that they should prompt
[22:27]
us.
[22:29]
Um
[22:32]
okay, then number nine, retention of
[22:34]
remaining assets and liabilities. This
[22:36]
again just goes into that point of
[22:38]
everything else is that we haven't
[22:40]
mentioned is not being transferred um
[22:43]
assets, liabilities and incomes.
[22:47]
Uh 10 is a full satisfaction and release
[22:49]
of asset claims
[22:51]
meaning like I said before this is it
[22:53]
we're putting into bed. This is what
[22:55]
everyone gets.
[22:58]
Uh we're getting into more liquid stuff.
[23:00]
Number 12, the customer data transfer
[23:03]
requires within 30 days that we uh put
[23:06]
together the data package necessary that
[23:09]
they need that has the customer name,
[23:12]
service addresses, all of our basically
[23:15]
computer data on on all the residents um
[23:19]
so that they know who they're serving.
[23:21]
Um
[23:24]
let's see customer communications is the
[23:26]
responsibility of city to uh notify
[23:29]
customers of the transition and and
[23:31]
that's on them to make sure that they
[23:34]
adequately notify their customers of of
[23:36]
the of the transition and we will
[23:37]
reasonably cooperate of course but um
[23:39]
the primary uh obligation is on them to be the notifier and I am certain that
[23:44]
we will continue getting calls for a
[23:46]
long time but we'll just
[23:47]
>> transfer them to the city.
[23:50]
um
[23:52]
termination of statutory financial
[23:54]
restrictions. This is a technicality,
[23:55]
but that that law that uh the bill that
[23:58]
got passed um during this legislative
[24:00]
session had
[24:02]
a clause in there that basically
[24:04]
restricted us from incurring any new
[24:06]
debt, issuing bonds, etc., etc. after a
[24:09]
city asks to leave. Like basically, they
[24:11]
put a freeze on us from conducting any
[24:13]
business like that until we get this
[24:15]
withdrawal uh resolved. And so this is
[24:18]
just expressly stating that that that
[24:21]
ban is lifted as soon as this agreement
[24:23]
is passed.
[24:27]
Um okay, now we're getting really into
[24:29]
boiler plate that remains the
[24:30]
responsibility for accident emissions.
[24:34]
Uh number 17 is important, continuing
[24:36]
independent contracts. We do have some
[24:38]
independent service contracts in the
[24:40]
parame uh to serve private roads. Those
[24:42]
are private contract based agreements.
[24:44]
those are private roads and we have a
[24:46]
private contract with those uh areas.
[24:49]
This withdrawal does not affect those
[24:51]
private contracts that we may have and
[24:53]
so we will continue servicing those up
[24:55]
and until we you know make a different
[24:56]
arrangement but we can't cancel those
[24:59]
contracts through this process and
[25:01]
whether we decide to continue servicing
[25:03]
those areas or let those go that will be
[25:05]
a operational uh conversation of our
[25:08]
team.
[25:10]
Um I think that's basically it. We have
[25:12]
the whole section here about the
[25:14]
sections to comply with the interlocal
[25:16]
cooperation act.
[25:19]
Um everything else is legal boilerplate
[25:22]
I believe. Sure. Yep. That's it. So
[25:26]
that's the agreement we came down to and
[25:30]
what our intention is. If there's any
[25:32]
discussion now we'll take that. Then uh
[25:35]
our next agenda item is the actual
[25:37]
approval. So people if someone feels
[25:40]
prepared to make a vote we can make a
[25:41]
motion. and a second. And then at that
[25:43]
point, we'll also open it up for, you
[25:45]
know, one last call for discussion on
[25:46]
the motion.
[25:50]
» Yeah.
[25:53]
>> Um, thank you.
[25:54]
>> I may have absolutely
[25:57]
>> absolutely good. So, I just want to
[25:59]
point out a few items. So, and for a
[26:02]
benchmark for consideration, the cost of
[26:04]
a new sideload truck these days well
[26:07]
exceeds $400,000.
[26:10]
So, two brand new trucks, whether it's
[26:13]
diesel or even CNG, which are more
[26:15]
expensive, uh would exceed the $825,000
[26:21]
uh item that has been identified in this
[26:22]
agreement. Currently, we have 56 side
[26:27]
loads as part of our fleet that we tried
[26:30]
to maintain when we replace new trucks
[26:32]
and we ultimately sell those remaining
[26:35]
items off. We've done an analysis. We've
[26:39]
identified that moving forward we will
[26:42]
need a minimum of 50 trucks. Hence the
[26:45]
determination of the six trucks maximum
[26:48]
as part of this agreement.
[26:50]
Another item that I will point out is
[26:52]
that we've done um some some rather
[26:55]
robust internal financial analyses and
[26:58]
we also had a third-party financial
[27:01]
impact analysis performed uh which does
[27:04]
show a slight deficit as as it pertains
[27:07]
to the loss of revenue and the
[27:10]
realizable reduction in expenses.
[27:14]
But in both studies and both scenarios,
[27:16]
especially with all the initiatives
[27:17]
we're taking, the PGIs and cost savings,
[27:20]
it does show and demonstrate we can
[27:22]
readily absorb this reduction in service
[27:24]
and revenues that does not indicate any
[27:27]
sort of immediate nor short-term need to
[27:31]
adjust or raise our base services. So, things are looking positive from that
[27:37]
perspective. Um, as Rachel mentioned,
[27:40]
you know, this has been a product of of
[27:43]
my entire first year here with the
[27:45]
organization. My my my oney year
[27:48]
anniversary is actually August 25th. So
[27:51]
what you guys seen at that
[27:53]
marvel at this point,
[27:56]
>> myself and and the team and Rachel and uh Chair Gray and and many other of
[28:02]
our board members have spent a
[28:04]
exorbitant amount of time on this
[28:06]
agreement. And although it's not a best
[28:09]
case scenario, it does appear to satisfy
[28:13]
both parties uh collective and uh
[28:16]
interest. It looks like we have a mutual
[28:18]
understanding of this. And and from my
[28:20]
perspective, it's it's best that we just move on and continue to uh
[28:25]
evaluate, enhance, and optimize our
[28:27]
services. Uh and hopefully put this
[28:30]
behind us uh as soon as possible. That
[28:32]
way we can focus on some of the larger,
[28:34]
more important initiatives to better
[28:36]
service and continue the services we
[28:38]
provide to our remaining partner cities
[28:41]
and the customers throughout S.
[28:44]
>> Thank you. Um so now I'd like to open up
[28:48]
for discussion. It sounded like there
[28:50]
was somebody online
[28:53]
like to to
[28:54]
>> Yeah, this is Matt from Cottonwood
[28:57]
Heights. I just as someone who was not
[28:59]
part of that working group uh but who
[29:02]
has read this agreement and also
[29:05]
witnessed and watched the process at the
[29:07]
legislature and all that has taken place
[29:10]
thus far. I just want to commend our
[29:12]
team for doing the amazing work that
[29:15]
they've done and the time they've put
[29:16]
in. And I do want to also echo Evan's
[29:19]
sent sentiment that I believe it's best
[29:21]
for the districts in our best interest
[29:23]
to uh take this agreement to approve it
[29:26]
today and to move forward. Those are my
[29:29]
comments. Thanks so much.
[29:32]
>> Thank you, Matt. Um
[29:38]
volume
[29:40]
to that control.
[29:44]
Okay, we'll we'll keep going while we
[29:45]
work on that. Any other comments that
[29:48]
people would like to make? I
[29:49]
>> I feel somewhat unclear about in the
[29:53]
moving forward process
[29:56]
um if other entities want to withdraw
[29:58]
from our district. How it's that case
[30:02]
byase basis and this will be I'm just
[30:07]
worried about again. So I think I think
[30:09]
the thing to to clarify is is this
[30:12]
agreement
[30:14]
um is a negotiated settlement. It's not
[30:17]
something that um
[30:20]
>> dictated
[30:20]
>> is dictated by law. And so if another
[30:23]
entity were to move forward um this
[30:26]
wouldn't be seen as the precedent for
[30:28]
how to do that. Does that make sense?
[30:30]
>> Yes. Thank you.
[30:31]
>> And and and uh Rachel was very clear to
[30:33]
make that explicit in the in the labor.
[30:36]
>> Yeah.
[30:36]
>> Did that answer your question? Yes. Yes.
[30:38]
Thanks.
[30:39]
>> That was a concern that I had too was is
[30:42]
okay, somebody's now watching this, you
[30:45]
know, I I don't want to point fingers in
[30:47]
anybody, so I'll pick on somebody's not
[30:49]
here. Say Kurts.
[30:57]
Let's just say Karns, for example, is
[30:59]
watching this. got we should be worse
[31:01]
too watch and see how this plays out
[31:04]
>> and they you know they end up getting
[31:07]
coming out smelling kind of rosy and
[31:09]
district coming out smelling a little
[31:10]
less than rosy
[31:13]
we want to look at this and see what we
[31:14]
can get and so that's the the concern
[31:17]
that I had um I know legally we're not
[31:19]
setting a president but practically
[31:21]
we're kind of you know opening the
[31:24]
kimono a little bit and saying this is
[31:26]
kind of how this works um so that's kind
[31:30]
I I can I can speak to that but on the
[31:34]
team wants to speak to that as well.
[31:35]
That is that is definitely something
[31:37]
that was discussed a lot in at length in
[31:41]
the working group. I think we all we all
[31:42]
saw that um for this immediate situation
[31:47]
we felt like given um given the
[31:51]
political um
[31:54]
political environment that we're working
[31:55]
at, we needed to resolve this fairly
[31:58]
immediately. And our hope is because
[32:00]
there was some ambiguity between the way
[32:03]
we understand our position and and the
[32:05]
way her understo
[32:09]
uh very soon so that we can clarify
[32:12]
things so that it will not be a problem
[32:14]
>> because there's going to be a tipping
[32:15]
point.
[32:16]
>> Agreed.
[32:16]
>> If if
[32:19]
and and
[32:27]
the larger
[32:29]
areas, right? If they start with drug,
[32:32]
there's a tipping point where this isn't
[32:34]
you can't keep doing this and still have
[32:35]
a business.
[32:36]
>> Agreed. And I and I would say that I
[32:38]
don't think that would be our
[32:41]
Yeah. I don't I don't want to get there.
[32:43]
I think that's what I'm saying is is I
[32:45]
don't want to I don't want the first
[32:47]
domino that's falling here to be
[32:49]
something that's going to lead to the
[32:51]
dissolution of this. And if it does,
[32:54]
>> how do we navigate? Right. So that's I'm
[32:57]
again you're right dealing with
[32:58]
legislation given a whole new
[33:02]
the only other thing I was going to say
[33:03]
is I've been married 28 years. This is
[33:05]
my first divorce agreement and uh go get
[33:07]
visitation right from the truck.
[33:13]
Should we go visit say?
[33:19]
» I I would just add that
[33:22]
we were kind of put in this position
[33:24]
like we don't get the choice of saying
[33:27]
we don't want to set any precedent at
[33:29]
all. So, we're just not going to allow
[33:30]
this like it was happening, you know,
[33:32]
and that's that's the hard thing is like
[33:35]
to be told like you you absolutely have
[33:37]
to let cities leave. And that was a very
[33:39]
clear directive of the legislature that
[33:41]
they don't feel like cities should be
[33:44]
not allowed to leave if they don't want
[33:45]
to. So in that context like we had to do
[33:49]
it somehow and like no matter what you
[33:50]
do, yeah, you're going to look at as
[33:53]
being presidential. But um yeah, so
[33:57]
we're definitely preserving our ability
[33:59]
to argue our all of our legal points
[34:01]
next time if anybody wants to come out.
[34:03]
But the bigger thing I think to to to
[34:06]
remember and and I think it's our bigger
[34:08]
focus as Evan can speak to is a renewed
[34:11]
effort of making sure that everyone
[34:14]
remains
[34:16]
sees the value of the organization and
[34:18]
is really happy. And I think we've done
[34:20]
a lot in that regards and that's going
[34:22]
to be our strongest uh uh key here is
[34:26]
just continue to be providing really
[34:29]
good service and make it so that no one
[34:31]
would ever want to be get any better
[34:34]
elsewhere. So I think I think that's one of the main goals. But
[34:41]
>> so yeah, I I would say it's all the
[34:44]
concerns. We we see where you're coming
[34:46]
from, but we really felt like being able
[34:48]
to provide the best service and even as
[34:50]
we go through the meeting today and talk
[34:52]
about some of the future initiatives
[34:53]
that we're looking at, we see that we
[34:55]
really the direction that the district
[34:57]
wants to go. Um, and hopefully putting
[35:01]
this to bed, um, and then working on a
[35:04]
plan to clarify the law in the future
[35:07]
can, um, not only help us provide the
[35:09]
best service, but also, um, make sure
[35:12]
that we're clear, uh, on the legal
[35:14]
vision.
[35:18]
I I want to just echo the appreciation,
[35:21]
but I know this has been countless hours
[35:24]
for board members and staff and legal
[35:27]
that just how much we appreciate, you
[35:30]
know, that we're able to make this
[35:31]
transition without having to raise
[35:33]
rates, without having to, you know,
[35:36]
shrink staff and so on. Thank you.
[35:39]
>> Thank you.
[35:40]
>> I go that. Yeah, I know has worked
[35:43]
really hard to protect the staff in in
[35:46]
all of this, which is not an
[35:47]
insignificant task. Um, and and I
[35:50]
appreciate that that he cares that much
[35:52]
about about our staff and that it's just
[35:54]
something that's been really impressive
[35:56]
through all these conversations that
[35:57]
he's brought up repeatedly that I hope I
[35:59]
hope the staff knows how much that he
[36:01]
can work on this with this very
[36:02]
difficult situation as well. So, that's
[36:04]
true. It's very admirable.
[36:07]
>> Any other comments?
[36:13]
motion. Yeah, we take a motion to adopt
[36:17]
resolution
[36:19]
448 approving the interal agreement
[36:23]
terms of withdrawal from the city.
[36:30]
» Matt Holton second.
[36:32]
>> So got a motion and a second. Um do we
[36:35]
have any final comments discussion on
[36:38]
the motion?
[36:41]
Let's do a roll call vote.
[36:47]
» Barbary
[36:49]
Clark.
[37:01]
» Yes.
[37:02]
>> Shelton.
[37:05]
» Jared Henderson.
[37:08]
Abstain
[37:14]
spring
[37:20]
is muted.
[37:28]
» Still muted.
[37:29]
>> You're muted.
[37:34]
» Let's keep going.
[37:36]
Lee Brunber. Yes.
[37:39]
>> Lindsay Lton.
[37:41]
>> Yay.
[37:44]
>> Percy Houseman.
[37:47]
>> Matt Holton.
[37:50]
» Yes.
[37:53]
>> Nick Griffith
[37:55]
>> with comment to thank the staff and
[37:58]
effort to protect the district's
[38:00]
long-term viability and its best
[38:03]
interests.
[38:07]
Nicole Henby.
[38:09]
>> Yes.
[38:10]
>> Terry George.
[38:11]
>> Yes.
[38:12]
>> Tessa Stitzer.
[38:15]
>> Zack Jacob.
[38:16]
>> Hi.
[38:21]
» Lorie Stringham.
[38:23]
>> I.
[38:27]
» All right. Um we motion passes and we
[38:31]
will go back to the agenda. I just want
[38:34]
to thank everybody. I know this has been
[38:36]
a difficult uh process and decision. Um
[38:39]
and once again
[38:42]
the work of the staff has been
[38:43]
phenomenal on this.
[38:52]
» Well, just you wait. We're got a lot to
[38:53]
talk about.
[38:55]
>> So, let's go back to um the consent
[38:59]
items. Uh, we need to approve the
[39:02]
minutes from the July meeting. Get a
[39:05]
motion for that.
[39:06]
>> I move we approve those minutes.
[39:09]
>> Second.
[39:11]
>> Motion in a second. Uh, all in favor?
[39:17]
» Second.
[39:22]
» All right. Um, moving on to the business
[39:24]
items. Uh, the general manager report.
[39:27]
Um, from Eddie.
[39:28]
>> Yes. Thank you. I'll be very brief
[39:30]
today. Uh just some some verbal updates
[39:32]
and next month kind of transition
[39:34]
between PGI updates and formal
[39:37]
presentations and an effort to get
[39:39]
through all the other meeting content.
[39:40]
Just a couple brief updates uh for the leader today. Uh we recently
[39:45]
initiated a five-star Google review
[39:49]
campaign. Uh historically we did have
[39:52]
the best ratings on Google. Um, as of
[39:54]
July 13, we had a total of 185 reviews
[40:00]
with an unfavorable score of 2.4 stars
[40:04]
out of five on Google.
[40:06]
>> So, we we we recently initiated um kind
[40:11]
of a a a goal and a kind of a um what's
[40:15]
the right word? What do we call our
[40:16]
challenge?
[40:17]
>> A challenge. Vice Google review
[40:19]
challenge. And so since that time, which
[40:21]
this only started very early August, we
[40:24]
have gained from our July benchmark 100
[40:28]
reviews. So we're now at 285 reviews and
[40:32]
our Google stars have increased from 2.4
[40:35]
to currently 3.3 out of five. Um, and
[40:39]
there's a lot of things that we've
[40:40]
discussed. There's a lot of ongoing uh
[40:42]
public relations building initiatives, a
[40:45]
lot of items to demonstrate the value of
[40:48]
our services. Those are also things I've
[40:50]
been prioritizing on and working through
[40:52]
throughout my tenure and will continue
[40:54]
to do that.
[40:55]
>> How how are you like how are you
[40:58]
encouraging people if they did something
[41:00]
to get those
[41:00]
>> Yeah. So so we have
[41:01]
>> double your reviews almost
[41:03]
>> we have a variety of recognition and
[41:05]
incentive uh rewards that we provide to
[41:08]
our team members. And so an effort to to
[41:11]
really kind of boost it because we've
[41:12]
been talking about it for a while and
[41:14]
been trying to kind of build this you
[41:16]
know review. We have QR codes at our
[41:18]
front desk and we remind people to do
[41:20]
that. Uh we created a a incentive
[41:22]
challenge for our customer solutions
[41:24]
team.
[41:26]
>> The the customer solutions team, we ran
[41:28]
this from August now through the month
[41:30]
of November. So the customer solutions
[41:32]
representative based on our existing
[41:34]
recognition programs and rewards that we
[41:36]
have. the the person who has the highest
[41:39]
number of five-star reviews uh from a
[41:42]
customer that references their name in the review uh will receive an
[41:47]
incentive reward of $500 at the end of the year. And then the person who
[41:52]
receives the second highest number of
[41:55]
fivestar reviews with their name
[41:56]
reference receives a second place
[41:59]
incentive bonus of $250
[42:02]
subject to taxes and applicable
[42:03]
deductibles. You have something to add?
[42:05]
>> Yeah, I do. Um, I think one of the
[42:07]
things that's really helped us also is
[42:09]
our new communication channel, which is
[42:10]
text messaging, because it's a lot
[42:12]
easier for our customers to go in and
[42:14]
just click that link and go do the
[42:16]
review right away versus the QR code and
[42:19]
everything else. So, I think that's
[42:20]
really helped us get some of those
[42:22]
policy reviews out.
[42:26]
So within budget within you know our our
[42:28]
approved policies for example um we do
[42:31]
have a monthly recognition uh program
[42:33]
for all of our team where uh employees
[42:36]
and and their peers recognize people for
[42:38]
something going above and beyond and
[42:40]
each month we present that as part of a team meeting. There are um voluntary
[42:46]
rewards as part of those as well to kind
[42:48]
of boost morale and make sure folks are
[42:50]
recognized in an industry that's
[42:52]
oftentimes out of sight and out of mind
[42:54]
and make sure that they're they're
[42:55]
recognized all over.
[42:57]
>> I attended a water users conference
[43:03]
and uh they said that if the only time
[43:04]
they ever hear from your from your
[43:06]
organization is when your pipe breaks
[43:09]
up. That's why yours are always low and
[43:13]
service organizations
[43:15]
think about you.
[43:19]
» Absolutely.
[43:20]
>> They almost never mess up.
[43:26]
» A few other brief updates. We continue
[43:29]
to service uh over 80 scrap containers
[43:32]
per day throughout the season. We're in
[43:34]
Mil Creek currently. uh compared to the
[43:36]
past average of of of three consecutive
[43:38]
years, we were averaging about 60
[43:40]
containers a day. So we're still well
[43:43]
over a 33% increase in this year's
[43:45]
containerbased services uh which is a
[43:48]
result of of many items later this year.
[43:50]
Probably come October, we'll have a more
[43:53]
comprehensive uh overview uh and provide
[43:56]
some data as to this year's scrap
[43:58]
program once it's all said and done and
[43:59]
have some uh some new numbers for that.
[44:03]
However, at the same time, we continue
[44:04]
to evaluate the uh perspective curbside
[44:08]
multi-waste model. Uh today, we do have
[44:11]
some information uh that Rene's put a
[44:13]
lot of uh time and effort into as kind
[44:15]
of some some conceptual preliminary
[44:17]
models on the financial piece, but also
[44:19]
on the operational capacity for such a
[44:22]
program. If you decide to move forward
[44:24]
next month, there will be a lot more
[44:26]
presented as as this the specifications
[44:28]
of the program, size of the pile, what's
[44:31]
accepted, what's not accepted, how do we
[44:33]
manage your control code compliance
[44:35]
concerns throughout the main service
[44:37]
areas. Uh but as part of this analysis
[44:40]
that Rene will largely present here
[44:42]
later today, we've been meeting with
[44:44]
other cities that do have existing
[44:46]
herbite meeting. And so very recently we
[44:50]
met with uh city of Flagstaff who I
[44:53]
worked with before and managed a
[44:55]
curbside bulky waste program. We also
[44:57]
met with the city of Scottsdale in
[44:59]
Arizona that I've collaborated and built
[45:01]
relationships with. They service I think
[45:03]
it was close to 80,000 residential
[45:06]
homes. So kind of a similar uh number of
[45:08]
households that they're servicing. Then
[45:10]
recently, just last week, we met with
[45:12]
the Sandy City Public Works Department
[45:14]
to talk about how they manage their
[45:17]
bulky waste program, uh, needs and
[45:19]
methods, frequency of service, capacity
[45:22]
from an operational perspective as well.
[45:24]
So, so more to come on that and this is
[45:26]
all helping to for us to kind of build
[45:28]
our public relations and to to meet with
[45:30]
the departments that we haven't met with
[45:32]
before, for example. Uh, and also
[45:34]
recently, uh, I met with, uh, the Utah
[45:37]
Recycling Alliance that supports and uh
[45:40]
basically coordinates a variety of these
[45:42]
charm events. You may have heard of
[45:43]
this, the community harvests.
[45:48]
Uh so trying to boost our collaboration
[45:50]
with them. There is a event coming up in Murray and they they partner with a
[45:55]
variety of of different vendors. We're
[45:57]
going to see how can we help to better
[45:59]
support those and grow our public
[46:01]
presence, provide some support from uh
[46:04]
recycling and recovery perspectives
[46:06]
during some of those community events.
[46:08]
So, more to come on that and uh next
[46:10]
month I'll have some more detailed
[46:11]
information on a couple other items and
[46:14]
that's all I have prepared for today and
[46:17]
happy to take any questions.
[46:19]
I think the charm is smart. I know we
[46:21]
don't realize that and I like was in the
[46:24]
middle of that going well that
[46:27]
does that too, right? So, I'm glad that
[46:29]
you're finding ways to collect other.
[46:36]
» All right. Um, moving on 3.2, we have
[46:39]
the safety and loss prevention.
[46:43]
>> Yes, Shane Norris will will join us at
[46:45]
the table here. He's presented a general
[46:47]
overview of our current safety program.
[46:51]
Uh, Shane manages and also oversees our
[46:54]
um claims process from automotive
[46:57]
accidents to employee injuries. and
[46:59]
helps to uh do the investigations from
[47:01]
beginning to end and make sure that
[47:03]
we're best protecting our staff and and
[47:06]
uh the organization's uh best interest.
[47:08]
And so, as you probably remember me
[47:10]
saying before, this industry,
[47:12]
particularly the collections piece of
[47:14]
the solid waste industry, is and has
[47:17]
continued to be on the top 10 most
[47:19]
deadliest occupations for a period of
[47:22]
over a decade. Currently, the solid
[47:24]
waste industry is considered the top
[47:26]
five uh most deadliest deadliest
[47:29]
industry to work in. That's largely as
[47:31]
it pertains to driving and people end up
[47:34]
getting out of their trucks and also as
[47:37]
it relates to other folks on the road as
[47:39]
well. So, so safety and and growing our
[47:42]
safety culture is something that I'm
[47:45]
constantly kind of trying to reinforce
[47:47]
at the organization. Um Shane will pres
[47:50]
provide a brief overview of his history
[47:52]
but he used to be in a fire service
[47:55]
department capacity and um I will hand
[47:57]
it over to him unless
[48:02]
» good morning. Um I apologize up front
[48:05]
presentation not being dramatic you just
[48:07]
dealt with please excuse me with that um
[48:11]
my PowerPoint presentation skills
[48:14]
they're dated so please excuse me for
[48:16]
that one as well. Um again my name is
[48:18]
Shane Norris. Um I started here with um
[48:21]
East Labor of 22 and the first one to
[48:24]
hold a fulltime position and safety as
[48:27]
the uh such waste. Um with that being
[48:30]
said coming in there were a lot of um
[48:33]
issues in that low hanging fruit to
[48:35]
reach the graph. So I've been doing a
[48:38]
lot of that and then since then we've
[48:40]
been going a lot of higher thing. I feel
[48:43]
that we as a safety program have done
[48:46]
significant improvements not just myself
[48:49]
but as a whole organization but a whole
[48:52]
and just getting complete buying. Um
[48:56]
first one if you can
[48:59]
um start with the safety culture um
[49:01]
that's a big one here that Evan really
[49:03]
stresses is making sure that we're all
[49:05]
buying into this. Um this starts with
[49:08]
recognizing safety issues, trends, using
[49:10]
those transfer data, selecting that data
[49:13]
and then acting upon it. I just looking
[49:15]
at say well we have a problem here. We
[49:18]
see the problem we want. No, we want to
[49:20]
deal with that problem. We want to get
[49:22]
it becomes a bigger problem. Um so
[49:25]
starting with that it just that just
[49:27]
starts with SOP identifying writing SOPs
[49:30]
and different things the policies that
[49:32]
help us with that having review to make
[49:34]
sure that we're doing the right thing
[49:37]
not just the right thing for the
[49:38]
organization but the right thing for the
[49:40]
individuals who are actually ones on the
[49:42]
ground doing the work. Um, as Evan
[49:44]
mentioned, it it is a d a dangerous job.
[49:47]
Even though we are doing um where we're
[49:50]
out picking up the trash bin,
[49:52]
we still have significance accidents and
[49:55]
injuries and bad things that um part of
[49:58]
the safety culture also entails is, you
[50:00]
know, practicing what you preach. It's
[50:03]
very big, but as we sit in this office,
[50:05]
most of us are in here. We're not
[50:06]
wearing safety vests or safety helmets.
[50:09]
We're not out in the field. I'm not
[50:11]
wearing steel total protective shoes
[50:12]
right now. They're comfortable office
[50:15]
shoes here. But when we go out in the
[50:17]
field, um supervisors, managers, even
[50:20]
the executive staff, um practice, they
[50:22]
put on the safety. We expect everyone
[50:24]
else to wear high visibility. We expect
[50:26]
them to they want to see us wearing it.
[50:28]
They're like, "Look, if you want us to
[50:29]
do it, you know, so when Helen's out
[50:32]
there, you know, doing something in the
[50:33]
field, she's got her vest on." That's
[50:36]
important because they see that. they
[50:38]
realize the element takes this
[50:39]
seriously. I need to take this seriously
[50:41]
because sometimes the helment we're not
[50:42]
going to get paid. So it's very
[50:44]
important that is safe to protect all of
[50:46]
us.
[50:47]
>> Um so with that it's also you know
[50:51]
making sure that we have appropriated
[50:53]
the correct funds that we need to
[50:55]
provide whether it's fair training. We
[50:56]
just had a third party come in and do
[50:59]
extensive fire extinguisher training
[51:01]
through department of transportation.
[51:03]
day after I had a fire extinguisher
[51:05]
train. So we brought out a party, had a
[51:06]
live fire. We'll see a picture of it
[51:08]
here in a minute. Um out in the back here and people had never fired
[51:13]
extinguisher got to play with
[51:14]
extinguishers, got to do multiple times.
[51:16]
So we let the office of staff come in
[51:19]
and have a fire extinguisher. So that
[51:21]
cost money because we had to pay for the
[51:23]
products, the trainers and some other
[51:24]
things. Fortunately, we were able to do
[51:27]
that.
[51:30]
And again, if I if I use an acronym or
[51:32]
any kind of terminology, please stop me
[51:34]
and let um let you help you understand
[51:36]
what I'm trying to say. Thank you, Rene.
[51:40]
Um so, basically, it starts we want to
[51:42]
start off with some training. Um just
[51:44]
what we do with our operators. Um Monday
[51:47]
morning tailgates. This is something we
[51:49]
give out every Monday obviously and it's
[51:51]
just a brief training of something. this
[51:54]
today. They got basically a friendly
[51:56]
reminder, just some things we try to
[51:57]
some small topics we want to just make
[51:59]
sure they have on the the forefront and
[52:02]
we let the leads do this. Um the leads
[52:04]
are the ones the teams that are on the
[52:06]
field. Um we let them kind of we try to
[52:09]
keep it under 10 to 15 minutes just a
[52:12]
small training just something where the
[52:13]
lease can have interaction first thing
[52:15]
in the during the week Monday morning
[52:18]
have interaction with all their um team
[52:21]
discuss things and again there are
[52:23]
various things and again this one was
[52:25]
from the reminders last week was back to
[52:27]
school um don't really think about it
[52:29]
but when school's back in session it
[52:31]
really affects us timing affects more
[52:34]
people on the road um kids running
[52:36]
around not paying attention. So that was
[52:38]
last week. So try to keep a very current
[52:41]
thing with our Monday morning tailgates.
[52:44]
Um safety standowns is something we do
[52:46]
once the month and that's going back and
[52:48]
reviewing previous months um accidents,
[52:51]
injuries, anything that important that
[52:53]
happened back then that they should be
[52:55]
made aware about. Excuse me. What that's
[52:58]
doing is that's we're not making fun of
[53:01]
people because they had an accident.
[53:02]
We're just saying, hey, well, this
[53:03]
happened. This could happen to you. we
[53:05]
don't want this to happen. And then we
[53:07]
have discussion what what could be,
[53:11]
you know, we look out for in the future
[53:13]
to make sure this doesn't happen to you
[53:14]
or or someone else. Um and then at the
[53:17]
end of the month we offer um basically
[53:19]
our bread and butter safety trainings.
[53:23]
This last month we did a obstacle
[53:25]
course. We set up some cones. We worked
[53:27]
on bagging. So all the drivers, anyone
[53:29]
who operates a commercial vehicle is
[53:31]
going through some movement obstacle
[53:33]
course. Um this week is basically just
[53:36]
doing the post check offs and what to
[53:38]
look for and specific items and
[53:39]
everything on the trust just making sure
[53:42]
we're being compliant with department
[53:43]
transportations for CDO directors.
[53:47]
So that's basically operation training
[53:49]
um for no question
[53:52]
managers and supervisors. Um, obviously
[53:55]
with the higher position, we try to have
[53:56]
a little bit more detailed um, training,
[54:00]
like with distracted driving, what to
[54:02]
look for, not necessarily them doing the
[54:04]
distracted driving, but what to look for
[54:06]
when they're out in the field observing
[54:07]
our drivers. Um, making sure they're not
[54:10]
on their cell phones, they're not
[54:11]
talking on the radios too much. They're
[54:12]
making sure the seat belts.
[54:15]
Um, accident investigation reporting. We
[54:18]
do training on this once a year. Is
[54:19]
basically just staying current with our
[54:20]
trends on how we investigate accidents.
[54:23]
for ourselves. Um, this is really big.
[54:25]
We give you like accident
[54:29]
investigation with the insurance and
[54:30]
everything. This is kind of where it
[54:32]
starts here. Reasonable suspicion. We
[54:35]
had this training uh last week. Um, this
[54:37]
is required for people who um have CDL
[54:41]
drivers working for them. Managers,
[54:42]
supervisors are required to have my
[54:44]
annual reasonable suspicion of drug and
[54:47]
alcohol. what to look for, signs and
[54:49]
symptoms, um just different things to
[54:51]
make sure we're staying on top of that.
[54:52]
It goes in line with our drug alcohol
[54:54]
testing policy.
[54:57]
Um injury response, what to do, you
[55:00]
know, what someone gets hurt on the job
[55:03]
type of things where they need to be in
[55:04]
the ER, can we just take them to our
[55:06]
work position?
[55:08]
Maybe somebody just they got hurt, but
[55:10]
they don't want to report it. It's like,
[55:12]
you know, look, I wrote my ankle. So,
[55:15]
we're like, okay, let's document that
[55:17]
with the Utah's first reported injury.
[55:19]
That just kind of starts the thing
[55:21]
because if tomorrow you can't get out of
[55:22]
bed, your ankle now the paperwork is
[55:24]
started. It's an easier flow into the
[55:26]
system. It just releases right into
[55:31]
hazard spill prevention and cleanup.
[55:33]
Unfortunately, we have some hydraulic
[55:36]
spills issues that happen. Mark our
[55:38]
truck. So, 50 gallons hydraulic fuel. So
[55:40]
you can imagine when 50 gallons of nasty
[55:43]
stuff leaks or spills, it can be a mess
[55:45]
and the pump's on. If we don't catch it
[55:47]
soon enough, it can be pretty ugly.
[55:50]
We'll have another We'll discuss that a
[55:52]
little further down, but we want to make
[55:53]
sure our supervisors know what to do
[55:55]
when they show up, how to get down the
[55:57]
proper
[55:59]
erator
[56:06]
staff, you know, we can't leave out the
[56:07]
office staff here. We got to make sure
[56:09]
that uh they're safe. They're doing
[56:10]
everything they're supposed to do. Um
[56:13]
because we are in a county facility, we
[56:16]
um kind of piggyback off the county's
[56:17]
emergency response. This manual is what
[56:20]
to do if a bomb press
[56:22]
the shooter shows up, fire alarms, gun
[56:27]
co.
[56:30]
So we work hand in hand. Uh Rusty
[56:33]
upstairs is my safety counterpart with
[56:34]
the county. She and I meet about once a
[56:36]
year just kind of talk about everything.
[56:38]
Ergonomics, that's kind of a new
[56:40]
important topic, especially for office
[56:42]
staff. Um, we've identified we were
[56:44]
having some different issues, some of
[56:46]
back, some leg issue going on. Um, and
[56:50]
then we recognize that and that's thank
[56:52]
you for approving, but we got new office
[56:54]
chairs finally. So, have one more gap
[56:58]
for someone who's larger guy fit in. So,
[57:01]
it fits me a lot. Thank you. when you're
[57:04]
sitting in a chair all day, it makes
[57:06]
sense something great. Uh first aid, we
[57:09]
want to make everybody's current on
[57:11]
first aid CPR. We do offer CPR training
[57:14]
twice a year to our staff. Make sure
[57:17]
everybody's knows what's going on. Um
[57:20]
getting an active shooter, fire,
[57:21]
earthquake drill. We've worked with the
[57:25]
Utah Shakeout. We've had them come in
[57:27]
and do some training. It's kind of fun
[57:30]
because they they bring some fun stuff.
[57:32]
Then we have some online options that
[57:34]
are given to us through Utah trust
[57:37]
reliant. It's um different topics.
[57:41]
Sometimes we'll use that um judges hazel
[57:43]
here maybe a workplace um bullying or
[57:47]
harassment or something. We can do them
[57:49]
online. We have ways to track it to see
[57:51]
where everything and who's taking and
[57:53]
who's doing well to make sure everybody
[57:55]
stay compliant.
[57:57]
So that is training. Any questions
[58:02]
for you? Trying to go fast. I know you
[58:04]
guys want to get up.
[58:07]
Um, so the Utah Local Government's Trust
[58:11]
is our basically our insurance agency
[58:13]
that we work. Um, they have 650
[58:16]
different cities, counties, districts
[58:19]
throughout the state.
[58:22]
They actually do a real good job.
[58:23]
They're a great resource for us. Um I
[58:25]
use them consistently
[58:27]
um to questions how we do things
[58:31]
about having an issue with workers comp
[58:34]
representative I reach out to them and
[58:36]
before I know what my issues were solved
[58:38]
so we're very fortunate to have them um
[58:41]
but with that they have some things that
[58:43]
they expect from us um infrastructure
[58:46]
inspections
[58:47]
they essentially making sure you know
[58:49]
once a month I walk the entire property
[58:52]
um to look for any kind of hazards any
[58:54]
kind of crack in the sidewalk, any kind
[58:56]
of issue that cause an injury or
[58:58]
something. Again, because we're a
[59:00]
county, you have to work with the county
[59:01]
to get it fixed. Um the most recent
[59:04]
probably large scale was a few years
[59:05]
ago, we had to identify
[59:08]
that need to repainting down to CGI
[59:11]
brought to the board. The board approved
[59:12]
it and so now we made a lot of trips and
[59:15]
areas and then some slips and stuff I
[59:19]
um complaint documentation. This is a
[59:21]
new one. So basically what the trust is
[59:24]
asking is that we start the
[59:26]
documentation when we have a customer
[59:27]
complaint come in it they want to know
[59:29]
that first phone call. So now we we have
[59:32]
implemented where we're documenting
[59:33]
everything through emails to where if
[59:36]
the complaint does go to some kind of
[59:38]
financial issue where we have to file a
[59:39]
claim they have a paper trail of where
[59:42]
that um came from. Um employee
[59:45]
management policy review. This is just
[59:47]
making sure that we're holding our
[59:49]
compliance, that we're reviewing our
[59:51]
SLPs and our policy manual to make sure
[59:53]
it's current, making sure we're seeking
[59:54]
legal advice periodically to make sure
[59:57]
that we're not doing anything we
[59:58]
shouldn't be doing.
[1:00:01]
From risk assessment, it says um making
[1:00:04]
sure that we have audits that come in
[1:00:07]
every now and then. So, making sure that
[1:00:08]
the number we put down, the amount for
[1:00:11]
salaries for workers comp and
[1:00:13]
everything, making sure that's
[1:00:14]
compliant.
[1:00:16]
Well, mayor and legal awareness is just
[1:00:18]
making sure we're staying up to date.
[1:00:20]
Um, they require us, I see us meeting to
[1:00:23]
I have to sit through legal training, that to sit through. I
[1:00:28]
got to stay current on liability, legal
[1:00:30]
issues and trends and everything just
[1:00:33]
make sure that I'm staying educated
[1:00:35]
everything that I need to do.
[1:00:40]
Um, driver accountability, making sure
[1:00:43]
that we hold our drivers accountable,
[1:00:45]
making sure that we're doing background
[1:00:46]
checks on them, checking all our
[1:00:49]
drivers when they come in to the company
[1:00:51]
to make sure they're safe for distracted
[1:00:54]
driving policies, SOPs, making sure
[1:00:57]
again that we're following that we're
[1:00:59]
doing everything we can to mitigate the
[1:01:00]
distracted driving and try to take
[1:01:02]
specific things away. Um, we have some
[1:01:05]
drivers who they love to talk on the
[1:01:07]
radio, but driving, so we have to kind
[1:01:10]
of get on about that. Supervisor
[1:01:13]
accountability is making sure that we
[1:01:15]
are holding our supervisor accountable,
[1:01:16]
that they're out doing their job, making
[1:01:18]
sure that everyone is playing safe and
[1:01:19]
playing by the rules, no one's speeding,
[1:01:22]
no one's talking on their phones,
[1:01:24]
wearing their seat belts. Um, high risk
[1:01:27]
driver trigger. This is something that
[1:01:29]
we we have documentation through
[1:01:31]
accidents that if we start realizing
[1:01:33]
there's a driver with a trend, it may be
[1:01:35]
something small, may hit a little
[1:01:36]
mailbox one day, they may hit a fence
[1:01:38]
one day, get a tree one day, and they'll
[1:01:40]
seem small when you look at them one by
[1:01:42]
one, but as they accumulate over a six
[1:01:44]
month or 12 month period, you realize
[1:01:46]
that you may have a driver that's just
[1:01:48]
being unsafe or not doing what they're
[1:01:49]
supposed to do. So that lets us know, we
[1:01:52]
review that once a week. We look at
[1:01:53]
specific drivers and their history and
[1:01:55]
their trends and then we take action.
[1:01:58]
That action may be retraining. It may be
[1:02:00]
bringing them in, putting them with
[1:02:01]
another driver or some senior to kind of
[1:02:04]
follow them. Sometimes supervisors get
[1:02:06]
in there. We got a young lady who's
[1:02:08]
having difficulty with backing. So we
[1:02:10]
put a supervisor in there with her drove
[1:02:12]
around and just did some training on the
[1:02:14]
job training just to make sure she's
[1:02:16]
comfortable with acting.
[1:02:21]
Um documentation and compliance with the
[1:02:24]
trust. Also, I'm not going to read all
[1:02:25]
these things. So, if you have anything
[1:02:27]
um anything up that kind of sticks out
[1:02:30]
to you, basically my job is to make sure
[1:02:32]
we're doing all of this to make sure
[1:02:34]
that we're keeping a reporting, make
[1:02:36]
sure we have updates, medical care, um a
[1:02:39]
return to work policy.
[1:02:42]
So, what this does is with us making
[1:02:44]
sure because we get basically audited
[1:02:46]
from the trust once a year. They come
[1:02:48]
in, they sit down with me, and I'm going
[1:02:49]
to provide documentation that we're
[1:02:51]
doing all this. And in doing so, we
[1:02:53]
receive a 5%
[1:02:55]
reduction in our premiums. Uh that that
[1:02:59]
sometimes can be substantial. So that's
[1:03:02]
just one way that we're saving money
[1:03:04]
using the trust. They just by doing this
[1:03:06]
documentation, making sure they come in,
[1:03:08]
they just where's this, where's this, we move over, it is once
[1:03:12]
they're satisfied, then we get our
[1:03:14]
annual driver sent.
[1:03:16]
>> Where are the VRs?
[1:03:17]
>> All the vehicle records.
[1:03:19]
>> Oh. So once a month, every driver who's
[1:03:22]
employed here with a CDL, including
[1:03:23]
myself, operation manager David, um we
[1:03:27]
get checked. So if
[1:03:30]
any of it's heading out the window this
[1:03:32]
weekend, had a little too much, we're
[1:03:33]
going to know about it real quick. Um
[1:03:36]
and where that comes into play, again
[1:03:37]
going back to the trigger hazards, if I
[1:03:40]
have a driver who's got several speeding
[1:03:42]
tickets, be able to use blanker, even if
[1:03:44]
they're in their personal vehicle, we're
[1:03:46]
going to know about it. So, you know
[1:03:47]
what's funny? He got citation for
[1:03:49]
speeding and then we call him speeding
[1:03:50]
over here and then we can address that
[1:03:53]
for you.
[1:03:56]
>> There any questions on the trust that I
[1:03:58]
could answer?
[1:04:02]
» Okay. Now, the fun stuff.
[1:04:06]
Unfortunately, we do have accidents. Um
[1:04:08]
sometimes the incidents sometimes our
[1:04:10]
fault, sometimes not our fault.
[1:04:13]
So the process um essentially once the
[1:04:16]
accident happens, the driver reaches
[1:04:19]
out, calls the manager or the
[1:04:20]
supervisor, we go out and do an
[1:04:21]
investigation. We coordinate with police
[1:04:23]
officers. If police are involved, if
[1:04:25]
911's involved, of course, they're the
[1:04:27]
first go take care of the emergency. Um
[1:04:31]
and our supervisors again do their
[1:04:32]
training. They make sure they get a
[1:04:34]
witness statements. They get a statement
[1:04:35]
from your party, our information, the
[1:04:38]
driver statement. collect whatever the
[1:04:40]
information you need. They bring it back
[1:04:43]
in here once a week to go over the
[1:04:46]
accident. We determine what it's fault
[1:04:49]
at fault or corrective action needs to
[1:04:51]
be taken there that follows through
[1:04:54]
there. We keep a point system.
[1:04:57]
Basically, you have an accident that
[1:04:59]
you're found at fault. Points accumulate
[1:05:01]
once you get to certain notice actions
[1:05:05]
and so on.
[1:05:07]
in-house claims. Um, so what this is,
[1:05:10]
let's say we sometimes we'll just damage
[1:05:13]
a mailbox, something that we don't want
[1:05:15]
to file an insurance our deductible the
[1:05:18]
insurance on anything that starts at
[1:05:20]
$10,000. So, if I can handle that at
[1:05:23]
$3,000 with an in-house payment, it
[1:05:26]
saves that much money. And then it also
[1:05:28]
saves us in the premiums of the backend
[1:05:31]
years. Just like you have an accident,
[1:05:33]
you have a little ding, you know, next
[1:05:35]
thing you know, your insurance is
[1:05:36]
probably going to go up the bottom year
[1:05:37]
because of that. We try to handle small
[1:05:40]
things, negotiate with whomever, the
[1:05:43]
other property owner, and just work it
[1:05:45]
out. Once we work out and I usually have
[1:05:48]
a little sit down, we discuss what's
[1:05:49]
going on. We discuss it. the estimates
[1:05:51]
that were provided to us and then if
[1:05:53]
approved go from there uh making sure
[1:05:56]
that we file the proper paperwork
[1:05:58]
following with the notice of claim which
[1:06:00]
required by the state of Utah anytime
[1:06:02]
anybody's receiving financial back from
[1:06:05]
a government entity or city and then
[1:06:08]
getting a property release signed.
[1:06:12]
>> So it makes sense that you would just
[1:06:14]
pay out of pocket for anything below the
[1:06:16]
deductible. Is there an amount of above
[1:06:18]
the deductible you would just pay out
[1:06:19]
with this result? Because I've done that
[1:06:21]
myself where it's like not worth dealing
[1:06:23]
with the insurance
[1:06:24]
>> that it would be case by case,
[1:06:26]
>> right?
[1:06:26]
>> Um and there are some that fall under
[1:06:28]
the $10,000, but when they start getting
[1:06:31]
into like rental cars and other things
[1:06:33]
like that, we don't have a policy or
[1:06:35]
anything that dictates how we would
[1:06:37]
handle that. So, we just kind of right
[1:06:38]
now live saying go with that. We You'd
[1:06:42]
be surprised. I don't want to get into
[1:06:44]
detail some of the craziness we deal
[1:06:46]
with. with people demanding a brand new
[1:06:48]
car, people demanding, you know, it's a scrape down the road.
[1:06:52]
>> Yeah.
[1:06:53]
>> So that again would be a case by case.
[1:06:56]
Now we have done that in the case of our
[1:06:57]
own field. We have damage. We had an
[1:07:00]
accident last year and we decided to
[1:07:02]
write that off and keep it file just
[1:07:04]
because
[1:07:11]
» Okay. And then uh last training we get
[1:07:13]
our drivers back on route discuss that
[1:07:16]
if there's any kind of issue um we get
[1:07:18]
the proper training
[1:07:20]
make sure they feel comfortable to get
[1:07:22]
them back to route. We have some drivers
[1:07:24]
who have an accident and doesn't phase
[1:07:26]
them. We have some drivers that are
[1:07:27]
literally taking two days off of work
[1:07:29]
for getting treat. So it's just we just
[1:07:32]
got a case by case basis. Thank you. Um
[1:07:36]
this is just some quick numbers. arm
[1:07:38]
functions for 24 and 25 for the year. Um
[1:07:42]
there's a lot going on with the arm. I
[1:07:45]
believe most of you have seen the arm
[1:07:46]
functions both on those. Um sometimes we
[1:07:49]
put our drivers in bad situations,
[1:07:52]
narrow streets, cars parked on both
[1:07:54]
sides of the streets, overgrown trees,
[1:07:57]
mailboxes, whatever. So yes, they're
[1:08:00]
supposed to get out and move, but
[1:08:00]
sometimes they don't have anywhere to
[1:08:01]
move it. and then trying to get the can
[1:08:03]
and reach it and the same. Um,
[1:08:05]
unfortunately backing is something that
[1:08:08]
we we charge for zero backing accidents
[1:08:10]
annually, but unfortunately we have um
[1:08:13]
but we do require drivers to back up
[1:08:16]
lines. There's a lot of backing. Some of
[1:08:18]
our drivers will literally have 40
[1:08:20]
backends a day backing into a culac off
[1:08:24]
of a busy intersection. So luckily those
[1:08:28]
heavier backing rails we do try to draw
[1:08:30]
more experienced senior drivers on
[1:08:32]
those.
[1:08:34]
>> Thank you.
[1:08:36]
>> Um just some fun little pictures here.
[1:08:38]
Um this is a hydraulic spill that
[1:08:40]
happened last year. We discussed that
[1:08:41]
earlier. The driver identified the
[1:08:44]
hydraulic league reached out the
[1:08:46]
supervisors through their training. They
[1:08:48]
came out. We started mitigating the
[1:08:50]
spill as much as possible, get more
[1:08:52]
dried down, getting the proper
[1:08:53]
resources, uh, dispatched to the area to
[1:08:56]
make sure that we had enough people on
[1:08:58]
site to deal with it. This also comes
[1:09:00]
with notifying the municipality that
[1:09:03]
we're in or the special municipal
[1:09:05]
special districts to let them know we
[1:09:07]
have this, we're in your area, we're
[1:09:09]
working on it. Um, we also reach out to
[1:09:11]
the health department to notify them.
[1:09:13]
Sometimes we get response from them,
[1:09:14]
sometimes we don't. But they're a great
[1:09:16]
resource to come out and help us take
[1:09:18]
care of the incident. And if it does
[1:09:20]
escalate beyond our resources, they can
[1:09:22]
come in with more more resources to help
[1:09:25]
us.
[1:09:29]
Um, this is just to show you what some
[1:09:30]
of our drivers deal with. Um, this is
[1:09:32]
just a typical street
[1:09:35]
neighborhood here.
[1:09:37]
You can tell how old the trees are with
[1:09:39]
the cars.
[1:09:42]
This time of year, we hit a lot of tree
[1:09:43]
branches. Obviously, our trucks are 12
[1:09:46]
and a half, 13 ft tall. As we're
[1:09:48]
cruising down, we have to go down the
[1:09:50]
road. We really have an option. So, our
[1:09:52]
drivers try to be careful, but this time
[1:09:54]
of year, things are growing. You know,
[1:09:55]
they may a month ago, it may not be
[1:09:57]
there. This month, there's a tree
[1:10:00]
sitting up the road. Right now we're
[1:10:02]
getting a lot of communication, lower
[1:10:04]
line, power line type stuff. Um, so what
[1:10:07]
happens? So we spoke at parking lot
[1:10:09]
power and if they don't come right is
[1:10:12]
they heat up like most plastic or rubber
[1:10:14]
it starts to sag and then the bow
[1:10:17]
driver's been down that road every
[1:10:19]
Tuesday all year long and all of a
[1:10:21]
sudden yesterday was 110 degrees
[1:10:24]
whatever and they go down they catch the
[1:10:25]
power alarm. Sometimes the power line
[1:10:28]
snaps or the line itself snaps. Um,
[1:10:31]
sometimes we take a few holes. So, next
[1:10:34]
video here. Um, it's kind of grainy.
[1:10:37]
It's obviously a rainy day, but if you
[1:10:39]
kind of look just up the top, Rene, if
[1:10:42]
you can kind of point out the power line
[1:10:43]
just at the top of the road. Um, right
[1:10:46]
in there. That's a power line that was
[1:10:48]
installed. This is a Tuesday route.
[1:10:51]
We've been down the road the Tuesday
[1:10:52]
before. The power line wasn't installed.
[1:10:55]
They installed it between that Tuesday
[1:10:56]
and then they decided to add it. Um, so
[1:11:00]
our driver hopefully the sound you make
[1:11:02]
sure the sound off right
[1:11:08]
you guys hearing our drivers and someone
[1:11:09]
talking themselves have like a podcast
[1:11:12]
on
[1:11:13]
>> Yeah. So anyway, you can see the power
[1:11:15]
line a lot better there. Again, this was
[1:11:17]
recently Kong. Um, and here in just a
[1:11:19]
second we're going to catch that with
[1:11:21]
the top of our truck. And if you start
[1:11:22]
looking towards the right of the camera,
[1:11:26]
you'll start seeing Transformers block.
[1:11:28]
you start seeing. So right now the power
[1:11:30]
line is on the truck.
[1:11:32]
>> The communication f I don't want to see
[1:11:33]
power line
[1:11:39]
you start seeing flashes.
[1:11:46]
Just a second. Another one pop right
[1:11:48]
there.
[1:11:49]
Um our driver realizes uh oh something
[1:11:52]
wrong. Backs up realizes the lines on
[1:11:54]
his truck. Um, unfortunately this
[1:11:57]
happens quite a bit. I've formed a good
[1:12:00]
relationship now with Rocky Mountain
[1:12:01]
Power. Reach out to them. So, in showing
[1:12:03]
you this, what we try to do is we
[1:12:05]
encourage our drivers through training
[1:12:06]
and conversation to say, "Hey, will you
[1:12:08]
identify this line's low or a tree is
[1:12:10]
low or there's some form of hazard? Let
[1:12:11]
us know." So, I've got Rocky Mountain
[1:12:13]
Power. I work flows again with other
[1:12:15]
service districts and their goals and
[1:12:17]
public works to try to mitigate this as fast as possible because this pulled
[1:12:21]
down two power lines and two power poles
[1:12:23]
that landed on someone's house. So that
[1:12:26]
could have been really ugly.
[1:12:27]
Fortunately, Rocky Mountain Power signed
[1:12:29]
off and this is not our fault that the
[1:12:30]
line was going low and we got lucky with
[1:12:33]
that one. So
[1:12:36]
the next one here, next video,
[1:12:41]
Rene, if you can kind of just jump to
[1:12:43]
about 30 seconds.
[1:12:47]
This is just some of the stuff our
[1:12:49]
drivers have to deal with. This is just
[1:12:51]
one of those again Mil Creek. um just
[1:12:54]
from the storm that just came in super
[1:12:57]
fast. Our drivers, this guy over here,
[1:13:00]
the one you see, he he slipping and
[1:13:02]
sliding and our driver is going to try
[1:13:04]
to make it down the hill. We've got
[1:13:06]
another chance.
[1:13:13]
And so he's going then you'll see the miles per hour up there go to zero,
[1:13:17]
but he's still moving.
[1:13:30]
Yeah.
[1:13:37]
» And then he's setting right out
[1:13:40]
the major intersection. He is complete
[1:13:43]
slide. His rear ends going out from
[1:13:44]
under him.
[1:13:51]
Yeah, you slide away. There's no rolling
[1:13:55]
doing everything. Can
[1:14:00]
» I just want to put this in there just to
[1:14:01]
let you know that some of the hazards
[1:14:03]
that our drivers do face. I mean, these
[1:14:05]
trucks, you would think they would do
[1:14:06]
really well in the snow, but they do
[1:14:07]
not. Um, just like a normal pickup
[1:14:10]
truck, if you don't have four drive, the
[1:14:12]
rear end is pretty light.
[1:14:14]
This just happened.
[1:14:16]
Yeah, don't mind us.
[1:14:18]
>> Oh, it'll be fine.
[1:14:19]
>> Yeah.
[1:14:28]
» So, anyway, as you can tell, he just
[1:14:29]
slides right out to the major
[1:14:30]
intersection here. Fortunately for us,
[1:14:33]
there are anyone else or no cars coming
[1:14:35]
and our driver did a great job as a
[1:14:37]
professional and he straight right out
[1:14:39]
and finished his round.
[1:14:48]
Thank you.
[1:15:04]
» Okay. Yep. I'll move that. Okay. So, um
[1:15:07]
this is just showing some insurance and
[1:15:09]
monies um that happened with automobile
[1:15:11]
claims. Um, obviously 2024 is up there
[1:15:15]
for the more senior members of the
[1:15:17]
board. You may remember the sugar house
[1:15:18]
incident. This is where that money came
[1:15:20]
from. Um, it was an expensive year. Um,
[1:15:24]
25 last year we had some damage with a
[1:15:27]
truck on public trust. You can kind of
[1:15:29]
see our trend in 26. Knock on wood. We
[1:15:32]
seem to be doing really well with our
[1:15:34]
money and everything so far. Any
[1:15:38]
question of reading those numbers? Okay.
[1:15:42]
U workers compensation. Um again we
[1:15:44]
discussed earlier about filling out the
[1:15:46]
person report of injury making sure that
[1:15:48]
we we're notified of every injury so we
[1:15:49]
can collect the date and the trends. We
[1:15:52]
do have policies for restricted duty.
[1:15:54]
That's when someone who's injured on the
[1:15:56]
job and they have to return to work but
[1:15:58]
they can't drive commercially vehicle.
[1:15:59]
So basically some kind of clerical work
[1:16:01]
or we have some smaller route audit type
[1:16:03]
of work we have them do. We do have a
[1:16:06]
return to work process depending upon
[1:16:08]
the injury and how long the employee was
[1:16:10]
out work on the retraining and the
[1:16:14]
everything. It's again it's a case by
[1:16:15]
case. If you miss two weeks of work, you
[1:16:17]
don't need as much training as someone
[1:16:18]
like I've got individual out six months.
[1:16:20]
Obviously, that individual is going to
[1:16:22]
have to have a lot of retraining once
[1:16:23]
they come back. Um, this all affects our
[1:16:26]
uh EOD. You have to experience
[1:16:29]
familiar with EOD. That's our experience
[1:16:30]
modification factor. That's what
[1:16:32]
determines our comp premiums through our
[1:16:35]
insurance. The higher the number,
[1:16:37]
obviously, the higher we're going to pay
[1:16:39]
at the end of the end of the day with
[1:16:40]
our premiums. Um, our E mod when I
[1:16:43]
started here in 22 was 2.33
[1:16:46]
with one being ideal, one being perfect.
[1:16:50]
2025, we cut it down to 0.74,
[1:16:54]
now 1.26, six showing us a savings of
[1:16:58]
over $21,000 just from handling the
[1:17:02]
workers comp claims and having fewer
[1:17:04]
claims everything they've gone through
[1:17:06]
with that. Um and then the next slide is
[1:17:10]
just some showing some of the numbers um
[1:17:13]
with injuries. Um 2026 this just to help
[1:17:21]
chair
[1:17:23]
>> the claim for 2026. This is actually
[1:17:26]
just two claims. This the one individual
[1:17:28]
I told you has been out six months with
[1:17:29]
a rotator torn rotator cuff.
[1:17:32]
>> We're pushing $90,000 just on that one
[1:17:34]
individual. So th this number the 112 is
[1:17:37]
literally just two individuals um claims
[1:17:40]
filed for the year. So it's just
[1:17:42]
expenses are getting higher as we all
[1:17:45]
things going up. Are there any questions
[1:17:47]
with this?
[1:17:49]
>> Awesome.
[1:17:51]
Well, thank you. I appreciate the
[1:17:53]
opportunity to speak before you and
[1:17:54]
there's no more questions. I will be
[1:17:57]
>> Thank you so much.
[1:18:00]
for all you do to keep
[1:18:02]
our uh everybody safe. know that.
[1:18:06]
>> All right. Um, let's move on to 3.3. Um,
[1:18:12]
there's something I'm actually really
[1:18:14]
looking forward to talking about is a
[1:18:16]
preliminary curbside bulky waste model.
[1:18:18]
And just to clarify, we're going to get
[1:18:20]
a lot more information about this next
[1:18:21]
month as well. So, if there's questions
[1:18:23]
that Evan doesn't cover, we will um
[1:18:28]
probably cover those next. So,
[1:18:29]
>> y I'm going to pretty much hand this off
[1:18:31]
to Renee who's been instrumental in
[1:18:33]
preparing this information uh and kind
[1:18:36]
of building these u preliminary
[1:18:38]
conceptual models that that we'll review
[1:18:40]
uh today. So,
[1:18:42]
>> yeah, just like uh board chair Gray had
[1:18:45]
mentioned is I'm really excited to talk
[1:18:47]
about this because as you all know our
[1:18:49]
bulky waste program is our most popular
[1:18:51]
program and I think in any city even
[1:18:54]
outside of our um our district. Uh it's
[1:18:57]
such a what we found out is that's the
[1:18:59]
most popular program that a lot of the
[1:19:02]
officials even went on.
[1:19:05]
Surprising to me. Wow. That's exciting.
[1:19:07]
So this is um this is again just a high
[1:19:10]
level giving you all just a little bit a
[1:19:13]
taste of what we'll discuss more in
[1:19:14]
detail next month of how program would
[1:19:17]
work more specifically. But just wanted
[1:19:20]
to give you some comparisons of
[1:19:22]
historical data. um what we're looking
[1:19:25]
at current year, what we're projecting
[1:19:27]
based on some assumptions that we'll
[1:19:28]
review high level here. So, as you all
[1:19:31]
know, um our scrap program has
[1:19:34]
historically been able to service
[1:19:36]
between 9 and 10% of the overall
[1:19:37]
population that we service every week.
[1:19:40]
And so, um and then also our our our
[1:19:43]
folks that are on what we call our
[1:19:45]
unfulfilled weight list request has been
[1:19:47]
trending about 3,000 a year. So, those
[1:19:49]
are 3,000 additional folks that have
[1:19:51]
told us, you know, they're willing to
[1:19:52]
wait on that that cancellation wait
[1:19:54]
list. Um, and the great news is this
[1:19:57]
year, as Evan pointed out earlier, we're
[1:20:00]
already greater than 33% over what we've
[1:20:03]
done historically in prior years. So,
[1:20:05]
just a few of the changes that some
[1:20:06]
great ideas he came in with and
[1:20:08]
brainstormed as operations and and just
[1:20:10]
really made it a little more successful.
[1:20:12]
So that's tren having us trend to be
[1:20:15]
about 12% of our of our overall
[1:20:18]
population. So that's pretty significant
[1:20:20]
increase just in one year just with the
[1:20:21]
minor changes we've made. Um so as you probably may know um our current
[1:20:28]
container based automation system isn't
[1:20:30]
the most efficient um and we just really
[1:20:33]
don't think it's going to be sustainable
[1:20:34]
for over time. So that's why we've been
[1:20:36]
really digging in and saying what could
[1:20:38]
we do in the future?
[1:20:40]
Um, so the proposed curbside model and
[1:20:44]
that we're looking at providing is we
[1:20:46]
could potentially provide the service to
[1:20:49]
all of our residents up to twice a year.
[1:20:51]
Um, now this is based off of a 50%
[1:20:54]
setout rate which in talking with all of
[1:20:57]
these other cities that's basically what
[1:20:59]
they've experienced is not everyone's
[1:21:01]
going to have all the items to put out
[1:21:04]
even at that time. So in the first part
[1:21:06]
of the year, our first pass, um maybe
[1:21:08]
resident A has some stuff. In the second
[1:21:11]
part of the year, maybe resident B has
[1:21:13]
some stuff or maybe resident A has stuff
[1:21:15]
in both first and second, but resident B
[1:21:17]
has nothing. So again, this we were we
[1:21:19]
were basing on an assumption of about
[1:21:21]
50% and then when we went in was talking
[1:21:23]
with these other cities, they said
[1:21:25]
you're you're right on essentially
[1:21:26]
because that's what we've experienced.
[1:21:30]
Um, so the program would operate with
[1:21:32]
three collection crews is what we're
[1:21:34]
looking at. So each consisting of two
[1:21:36]
full-time employees and one temporary
[1:21:38]
employee. The difference between our
[1:21:39]
seasonal employees that we have now
[1:21:41]
versus a temporary for this projected uh
[1:21:43]
program is that in the future we would
[1:21:46]
be going with a temp company temp agency
[1:21:50]
you can say. So, so there's a little
[1:21:52]
more
[1:21:54]
liability on making sure we're going to
[1:21:56]
have those that staff and then also
[1:21:58]
we're not meeting them to be CDL
[1:22:00]
certified. So, this is someone that's
[1:22:02]
going to be more on the ground to going
[1:22:04]
ahead inspecting getting the piles ready
[1:22:07]
um for the two full-time folks that are
[1:22:09]
coming up behind operating those trucks.
[1:22:11]
So, that's that's been a focus that
[1:22:14]
um the proposed bulk side waste program
[1:22:16]
would operate from February through
[1:22:18]
October. that that's essentially being
[1:22:19]
able to add an additional 40 days to the
[1:22:22]
program um because of this this this way
[1:22:26]
that we're doing it versus the container
[1:22:28]
reservation system. And then during the
[1:22:30]
bulky um bulky way off season, those two
[1:22:34]
full-time employees will still have work
[1:22:36]
to do because they still have the the
[1:22:38]
leaf program that will run once uh the
[1:22:41]
bulky ways program starts through end of
[1:22:43]
December and then in January.
[1:22:47]
So they're going to have work all year
[1:22:49]
round.
[1:22:51]
I pause there. Any questions so far?
[1:22:57]
So by transitioning from this individual
[1:23:00]
container reservation program to uh to
[1:23:02]
the bulk side or the curb side program,
[1:23:05]
we are forecasted to reduce uh obviously
[1:23:07]
the uplift truck rentals and container
[1:23:09]
maintenance because those would go away.
[1:23:12]
um fuel maintenance, seasonal CDL
[1:23:14]
drivers in overtime, which I already
[1:23:16]
talked about briefly, and administrative
[1:23:17]
support right now. Um I don't I'm sure
[1:23:20]
everyone's may have some idea of the
[1:23:23]
administrative support that the current
[1:23:24]
scrap program takes. Um but it takes a
[1:23:28]
lot and so this will really help reduce
[1:23:30]
on that that cost
[1:23:33]
the time to where we can move forward
[1:23:35]
with some great wonderful new programs
[1:23:36]
for for the district. Um, can mattresses
[1:23:40]
go in this program? So, that's still
[1:23:43]
TBD. Um, so because what we've learned
[1:23:45]
from some of the partner cities that
[1:23:47]
we've talked to is um I think it was was
[1:23:50]
it Scottsdale, they allow like uh the
[1:23:52]
single and the full but anything over
[1:23:54]
that then they do not allow um because
[1:23:57]
you looking at one person versus two or
[1:23:59]
three that have to be in there. Plus it
[1:24:01]
also takes up a lot of space in that um
[1:24:04]
in in our rear loader which is the main
[1:24:07]
vehicle that we will be using. And we
[1:24:10]
also have an additional program called
[1:24:11]
the SECS program that the folks can sign
[1:24:14]
up for that we can come and even though
[1:24:16]
it's it has a fee and has a cost but you
[1:24:18]
know those are things hopefully people
[1:24:20]
aren't overturning their mattresses um
[1:24:22]
often
[1:24:25]
and each their own. I guess
[1:24:26]
>> we do see a lot of in the scrap program.
[1:24:29]
So there's a high likelihood we will
[1:24:32]
accept them if this is initiated at
[1:24:34]
least from from the but they can jam
[1:24:37]
with the trucks and get wedged if we're
[1:24:38]
standing blades create a lot of problems
[1:24:41]
with the reload truck we're able to pack
[1:24:43]
the materials and I think this year
[1:24:45]
alone we had one instance where we were
[1:24:48]
dropping the scrap containers and we're
[1:24:50]
able to load I think it was like 16 or
[1:24:52]
more individual containers into one
[1:24:55]
reload truck saving transportation
[1:24:58]
>> costing from the disposition facility.
[1:25:00]
That's a big part of what this looks
[1:25:02]
like in
[1:25:05]
our
[1:25:06]
>> GTS
[1:25:08]
temporary transportation.
[1:25:10]
>> Yeah.
[1:25:13]
>> So, so the new model will require some
[1:25:17]
initial capital to to make the program
[1:25:20]
work to we've uh come up with what those
[1:25:22]
figures look like.
[1:25:25]
So the price tag includes this initial
[1:25:27]
capital with um three articulating
[1:25:29]
grapple loaders for the bulky loading
[1:25:31]
itself into one of the rear load trucks
[1:25:34]
um per team. And we're also researching
[1:25:36]
possibly at least to own
[1:25:40]
to just see what that looks like
[1:25:42]
especially in year one as we're starting
[1:25:44]
to just roll this out and see okay how
[1:25:46]
active are our residential folks going
[1:25:48]
to be our projections and assumptions
[1:25:51]
right on or are they um way off
[1:25:55]
>> so financial highlights I know this has
[1:25:58]
been the the big piece that everyone's
[1:26:00]
want to know um so 2025 the scrap actual
[1:26:04]
program cost was was approximately 1.9.
[1:26:08]
And then the 2026 projected scrap costs,
[1:26:11]
we're looking a little bit higher
[1:26:13]
because we put a lot more effort into
[1:26:14]
this year as you saw a 33% um increase
[1:26:17]
in in prior historical services, but we
[1:26:20]
had $2.3 million there for this year.
[1:26:22]
That's what we're projecting for end of
[1:26:24]
the year. And proposed curbside program,
[1:26:27]
we're looking at an annual operating
[1:26:28]
cost of approximately 1.68.
[1:26:32]
So, what that equates to is that our new
[1:26:34]
program savings compared to 2025, you're
[1:26:37]
looking at about 316,000, which is about
[1:26:39]
15% 16% savings there. And compared to
[1:26:43]
our current year, again, this current
[1:26:45]
year is more expensive because we we put
[1:26:47]
more more effort into that, looking at
[1:26:49]
about $673,000
[1:26:52]
savings there, which is uh close to 29%.
[1:26:55]
>> So, we'd be able to recoup those capital
[1:26:57]
expenses pretty quickly.
[1:26:58]
>> Yes. Yes. Yes. Absolutely.
[1:27:01]
So here are the numbers right here that
[1:27:04]
I had just highlighted and it shows down
[1:27:06]
here what the AML savings would be. This
[1:27:08]
shows the different cost categories that
[1:27:10]
we had segmented into personnel, fleet
[1:27:13]
and equipment, administrative. I put the
[1:27:15]
little star right here on administrative
[1:27:17]
because that's where that um additional
[1:27:20]
behind the scenes administrative work.
[1:27:22]
you know, we have to look at, you know,
[1:27:24]
all the time that, you know, our
[1:27:25]
customer solutions manager spends on,
[1:27:27]
you know, getting that that calendar up
[1:27:29]
and running and the reservations and the
[1:27:31]
daily work. And then, um, Jorge, our
[1:27:33]
MIS, um, guy, how he has to scrub files
[1:27:37]
daily, Sony and David, all the time that
[1:27:39]
they're spending making sure we're
[1:27:40]
taking care of those customers on
[1:27:42]
cancellation weight list, um, our
[1:27:43]
communication effort, all of that. So, we've integrated that in our
[1:27:47]
administrative cost to say, you know
[1:27:48]
what, based on their MRP, um, this is
[1:27:52]
what we're paying for them to spend all
[1:27:54]
of this time on this program versus
[1:27:56]
running day operations. So, that's why
[1:27:59]
that's added in there.
[1:28:01]
And, uh, disposal tipping fees, overhead
[1:28:05]
unallocated, that's taken from Tom's
[1:28:07]
wonderful finance report.
[1:28:10]
I'm going to keep this up here real
[1:28:11]
quick. Um, service comparison. So
[1:28:13]
housings container service you can see
[1:28:15]
right here
[1:28:17]
2025 actual 7,457
[1:28:20]
which was about 8.6% of our overall
[1:28:22]
residents 256 projected that 10,000 a
[1:28:26]
little over 10,000. So that's that 33%
[1:28:29]
increase and that's close to 12% right
[1:28:31]
there. And again what we're proposing
[1:28:34]
we're looking about 74,227
[1:28:37]
residents a year. Again, that's based
[1:28:39]
off the 50% um sale rate. And I want to
[1:28:43]
make a note um this is our current
[1:28:45]
weekly customer count her and North Soul
[1:28:48]
Lake. So we made that adjustment. So
[1:28:50]
it's not the 865. That's why it's the
[1:28:51]
seven.
[1:28:54]
Then here's more detail on that initial
[1:28:57]
capital
[1:28:59]
truck
[1:29:02]
for the gravel.
[1:29:10]
I think I've already covered this, but
[1:29:11]
the best news is this year service
[1:29:13]
passing increased of 9 to 10% to 12%.
[1:29:18]
And then the new model is designed to to
[1:29:20]
service approximately 50% of the
[1:29:23]
wellness.
[1:29:26]
Do do you sell the current containers?
[1:29:28]
What um
[1:29:30]
you have the containers, right? You'll
[1:29:33]
hold those or sell those or what ends up
[1:29:35]
happening?
[1:29:36]
One of the things that we're hoping we
[1:29:38]
could potentially bring back is the
[1:29:40]
container rent program in the future.
[1:29:43]
So, um, as we've learned from our
[1:29:45]
customer solutions agents is that we get
[1:29:47]
a lot of callins from customers. Hey,
[1:29:50]
where's that trailer rental program?
[1:29:51]
Hey, what's, you know, can I rent
[1:29:53]
something? You know, I I know I came in
[1:29:54]
on scrap program.
[1:29:56]
And so, we're hoping to possibly use
[1:29:58]
those. So, that would be some additional
[1:29:59]
revenue that I haven't even accounted
[1:30:02]
for in this program that we would
[1:30:03]
actually get from
[1:30:06]
And we would base that off of full cost
[1:30:08]
recovery. We've been kind of underpriced
[1:30:10]
in previous years. And so as part of
[1:30:13]
this as well, we would probably want to
[1:30:14]
reinstate the what we've done in the
[1:30:16]
past years for the Canyon communities
[1:30:19]
where each residents offered kind of a
[1:30:21]
year- round reservation that they could
[1:30:23]
kind of um request at their at their
[1:30:26]
convenience, make it a more uh effective
[1:30:29]
than it was issue. We had to kind of
[1:30:30]
restrict it to only a one month basis.
[1:30:33]
So now it can be year round for them to
[1:30:36]
request
[1:30:37]
>> depending weather conditions. So it was
[1:30:39]
kind of free and say what we've done in
[1:30:40]
the past which was I think between March
[1:30:43]
and September residents could call and
[1:30:45]
basically get in service for up to like
[1:30:47]
one trailer per year longer time frame.
[1:30:51]
That's a better support the can as well.
[1:30:54]
So
[1:30:54]
>> and we'd be paying for those. Those
[1:30:57]
would be complimentary, one per resident
[1:31:01]
as they've done in the past
[1:31:03]
>> because the scrap program uh currently
[1:31:06]
does does not have that capacity for
[1:31:08]
those.
[1:31:09]
>> This is good.
[1:31:10]
>> We haven't talked about extensive
[1:31:12]
detail, but that's kind of what we want
[1:31:14]
to do. But then by reinstating the
[1:31:16]
feebased container and trailer based
[1:31:18]
services, we would be able to keep our that team busy throughout the year
[1:31:22]
bringing revenues that would would be uh
[1:31:24]
based on full cost recovery and then
[1:31:27]
when there are requests from the canyon
[1:31:29]
to provide those services as as a part
[1:31:32]
of that. So, a new curbside program, you
[1:31:34]
would not accept certain things that we
[1:31:36]
accept in our current program such as
[1:31:38]
construction and demolition debris, uh
[1:31:41]
rocks, dirt, sod, brasses, like really super heavy items. Those will not
[1:31:46]
be accepted curbside. And so, we can
[1:31:48]
offer the speedbased service on top of
[1:31:51]
or or for folks that are doing
[1:31:53]
renovations or remodels.
[1:31:58]
And we are getting a lot of requests
[1:32:00]
this year. We kind of paused the the
[1:32:02]
trailer program for the the febased
[1:32:04]
rentals and there are still quite a few
[1:32:07]
people rather following us.
[1:32:11]
>> So more to come on that which I think is
[1:32:13]
I think the numbers are incredibly
[1:32:15]
compelling. So I'm really excited
[1:32:18]
>> and there's clearly a ton of challenges.
[1:32:20]
We're going to be working through those
[1:32:21]
and there is like a capacity analysis
[1:32:23]
that Rene has next if we can kind of
[1:32:25]
just go through that briefly as well.
[1:32:28]
Um, so that was kind of the financial
[1:32:30]
use and I will say the administrative
[1:32:34]
overhead our current STR scrap program
[1:32:36]
is incredibly intensive takes us um of
[1:32:41]
our day-to-day time um for the the
[1:32:44]
website reservations, the scrubbing the
[1:32:46]
data and the routing identification
[1:32:48]
where location is. And our program
[1:32:50]
manager that runs the scrap program and
[1:32:53]
also oversees our recycling green waste
[1:32:55]
program. He's probably 60 to 80% of his
[1:32:58]
tax spra.
[1:33:05]
» No, that's okay. So, so this is a auto
[1:33:08]
just to where we can adjust it if if we
[1:33:12]
find out some of our assumptions again
[1:33:14]
are
[1:33:15]
so here we go if we wanted to say okay
[1:33:19]
because right now we're targeting about
[1:33:20]
3 minutes per home.
[1:33:22]
What we learned is is that you know
[1:33:24]
basically for home it's it can be
[1:33:26]
anywhere between 50 and 60 seconds but
[1:33:28]
you're incorporating in the travel time
[1:33:30]
to go and you know dump the truck. So
[1:33:34]
that's why it brings it up to about 3
[1:33:36]
minutes. So essentially at 3 minutes per
[1:33:38]
crew per day or three minutes per crew
[1:33:41]
per home um we would be able to surplus
[1:33:44]
even 432.3
[1:33:46]
homes over what we already have
[1:33:47]
allocated. But if you just put that up
[1:33:51]
just a little bit
[1:33:53]
negative. So um so that's why we're
[1:33:55]
sticking right in about three minutes to
[1:33:57]
give us a little bit more.
[1:34:03]
» Yeah.
[1:34:07]
Anything else you want to highlight?
[1:34:09]
>> Uh no this is just our our operational
[1:34:11]
capacity model. We've spent a lot of
[1:34:13]
time talking to these other cities about
[1:34:15]
you know the the crews that they need.
[1:34:17]
This is all basically our analysis.
[1:34:19]
Originally, I was hoping to only have to
[1:34:21]
need two crews, but this has quickly
[1:34:23]
demonstrated that we would need three
[1:34:24]
crews to to meet the the goal of two two
[1:34:28]
annual services per household based on
[1:34:30]
that assumption of 50% setup rate. I did
[1:34:34]
forget to mention, so this year we're
[1:34:36]
renting I think 10 hook roof trucks. We
[1:34:39]
also own about I think three or there's
[1:34:41]
one that's transitioning. So, we have
[1:34:42]
four that we own. So, that would already
[1:34:45]
be in place. those those um
[1:34:48]
that capital to perform and reinstate
[1:34:51]
that experience.
[1:34:54]
So so more to come on this. This was
[1:34:56]
kind of our way to really understand can
[1:34:59]
this program work? What would the costs
[1:35:01]
look like and and can we make this
[1:35:04]
happen?
[1:35:05]
and and largely instead of having to do
[1:35:07]
a online reservation, we would be still
[1:35:10]
looking at sending out postcards and
[1:35:12]
probably identify um different service
[1:35:15]
areas and routes. So looking at how many
[1:35:18]
homes a crew could service per day, then
[1:35:22]
putting that into a week and then having
[1:35:23]
the three crews. We're touching I think
[1:35:27]
9,000 homes every week, but only 50% of
[1:35:31]
us setting them out. So 4,500 homes
[1:35:34]
service. So looking at that would would
[1:35:37]
be how we would develop our routing and
[1:35:40]
we would basically send out postcards
[1:35:41]
saying hey this is your time frame don't
[1:35:43]
set out your materials until the Sunday
[1:35:45]
prior to your week of collection. We
[1:35:48]
would maintain that type of service as
[1:35:50]
well instead of having to do the
[1:35:51]
reservations which is just incredibly
[1:35:53]
time inensive. Each area would be so
[1:35:56]
split by zones and have those those
[1:35:59]
twice annual service time frames that
[1:36:00]
would be provided. Larging a postcard
[1:36:03]
and other match.
[1:36:05]
>> Would you send the postcards twice per
[1:36:07]
year or just once per year with all the
[1:36:10]
dates on one card?
[1:36:12]
>> TD pro probably once. So a few cities
[1:36:17]
um
[1:36:18]
gave us caution to not post the
[1:36:20]
collection days on our website.
[1:36:22]
>> Oh. because there are people that see
[1:36:24]
that like contractors go and they'll
[1:36:27]
unload those streets. So, we have to be
[1:36:30]
kind of somewhat incognito as to where
[1:36:31]
those locations occur. So, a whole other
[1:36:33]
co- compliance item as well. Um, one
[1:36:36]
thing that Renee and I talked about very
[1:36:38]
recently is that in addition to what was
[1:36:40]
shown with the financials, we would
[1:36:42]
probably want to rehire and backfill a
[1:36:44]
second quality assurance inspector that
[1:36:47]
would predominantly focus on this
[1:36:49]
program and go ahead of the areas, help
[1:36:52]
to support things from a code compliance
[1:36:53]
perspective, make sure that these piles
[1:36:56]
are in compliance, reach out to
[1:36:58]
residents that have materials out there
[1:37:00]
and hopefully to alleviate some of that.
[1:37:02]
One other item we probably want to add
[1:37:04]
to this is to reinstate a full-time
[1:37:06]
sheriff's inspector to help manage his
[1:37:09]
program and support co compliance and
[1:37:11]
education issues.
[1:37:14]
>> I know that's and I don't have no
[1:37:16]
background in all that but as I kind of
[1:37:18]
chatted with some city staff around this
[1:37:20]
it was mostly the store storm water team
[1:37:22]
that was
[1:37:23]
>> like we really would like let's make
[1:37:24]
sure we're done well. So that was kind
[1:37:28]
of what I was talking about. It would be
[1:37:30]
something
[1:37:34]
» we're about to real city cities to be
[1:37:37]
>> and it might just be a communication
[1:37:39]
piece so those storm storm water teams
[1:37:41]
are aware and can be helpful right in
[1:37:44]
those and being aware of those dates.
[1:37:46]
>> Yes.
[1:37:48]
>> Yeah. Placement of the pile. There's a
[1:37:51]
lot of things to look at as part of
[1:37:52]
this. Sandy City has residents place it
[1:37:55]
three feet away from the curb,
[1:37:58]
>> which puts things in the middle of the
[1:38:00]
street, which is also problematic. I'd
[1:38:01]
like to keep it at or before the curb.
[1:38:06]
Then if you have a if you have a
[1:38:07]
sidewalk right there, you have ADA
[1:38:08]
compliance concerns. So there's a lot of
[1:38:10]
things to look at. Um, and each city,
[1:38:13]
each street is is unique with subjects.
[1:38:17]
So, so more to come on that
[1:38:20]
refining.
[1:38:25]
» Thank you very much. I think this looks
[1:38:28]
really promising.
[1:38:31]
Um, we'll range for time, but I do think
[1:38:33]
we can get through these. I don't know
[1:38:35]
what to do. Um,
[1:38:37]
>> um, yeah, I would like to try at least
[1:38:39]
introduce these topics that we could
[1:38:41]
possibly
[1:38:42]
>> Go ahead. Um,
[1:38:44]
>> are we are we okay if we go a couple
[1:38:45]
minutes over? No need to check that out
[1:38:47]
really fast. Okay.
[1:38:49]
>> So, if we're at 3.4,
[1:38:51]
um, I did provide a like two-page agenda
[1:38:55]
item summary explaining what we're
[1:38:57]
looking at, why we're looking at this.
[1:38:59]
Um, and and basically with with Herman's
[1:39:02]
now pending withdrawal, um, you know, we
[1:39:05]
need to re-evaluate and adjust our day of collection. So we are evenly
[1:39:11]
distributing our daily routes throughout
[1:39:14]
our collective remaining service area.
[1:39:16]
So so airmen currently and there's maps
[1:39:19]
section on the wall that show the the
[1:39:21]
current service and then what we're
[1:39:23]
looking at as a tenative service uh come January 1 some during withdrawal is
[1:39:31]
currently serviced four days a week and Mondays are our dream waste
[1:39:34]
collection time frames in that commute.
[1:39:37]
So we our our heaviest days are Tuesday
[1:39:39]
in Haramman uh which we dedicate seven routes and then Wednesday,
[1:39:45]
Thursday, Friday is roughly five routes
[1:39:48]
per day in Ara proper. Um so we're
[1:39:50]
looking at splitting up and evenly
[1:39:52]
distributing those those routes
[1:39:53]
throughout our main service. And so
[1:39:56]
another part of it that we're looking at
[1:39:58]
is our go back collection days. And so
[1:40:03]
we're not perfect. Um sometimes we do
[1:40:05]
inadvertently miss a street or resident
[1:40:08]
collection uh for a service. So our
[1:40:10]
current service days are not in the best
[1:40:13]
alignment from
[1:40:16]
nearby adjacent geographic proximity of
[1:40:20]
conducting u return goback if we miss
[1:40:24]
the containers uh the next day. So
[1:40:26]
currently our go back days are two and
[1:40:29]
sometimes three days after uh we learned
[1:40:32]
that we missed a street for example. So
[1:40:35]
from a customer service and a c customer
[1:40:38]
relations perspective
[1:40:40]
our team having to tell us hey sorry we
[1:40:42]
missed your container we'll be back 3
[1:40:44]
days is is not the best uh
[1:40:48]
public relations and public report from our uh inadvertent missed
[1:40:54]
collections. And so another part of what
[1:40:56]
we're proposing to reroute some of these
[1:40:59]
areas is to best facilitate the most
[1:41:03]
efficient and least expensive goback
[1:41:06]
collection schedule which would be
[1:41:08]
scheduled for the the day subsequent to
[1:41:10]
the miss collection. So the very next
[1:41:12]
day we would support some some gobacks.
[1:41:16]
So if you can just stay on that the math
[1:41:19]
really quickly.
[1:41:20]
So, so obviously Haramman southwest will
[1:41:23]
still continue to service. That's about
[1:41:25]
200ish homes. Coverton is about 300
[1:41:30]
homes and other private communities in
[1:41:32]
Heramman uh proper that will continue to
[1:41:35]
service is roughly another 300 homes. So
[1:41:38]
based on our most extensive highest
[1:41:42]
number of routes per day in Herman
[1:41:44]
currently, we're looking to change
[1:41:46]
competent service to Tuesdays to offset
[1:41:50]
and evenly distribute those daily
[1:41:52]
routing leads uh for our service area.
[1:41:54]
So currently comprehend service
[1:41:56]
Wednesday, Southwest is current
[1:41:58]
currently serviced on Friday. So
[1:42:00]
obviously we want to send and be
[1:42:01]
efficient. that we only send one truck
[1:42:03]
there or sorry one one crew there per
[1:42:06]
week instead of down to so the gobacks
[1:42:09]
there will get a little bit um complex
[1:42:12]
but those communities are uh less
[1:42:16]
complicated from infrastructure and I
[1:42:18]
presume there's less misolctions the the
[1:42:21]
big switch here is basically the flip of
[1:42:25]
Taylor'sville and then the holiday
[1:42:26]
Murray Mil Creek collection days so
[1:42:29]
currently you'll see on the Um,
[1:42:31]
Taylorville is shown as orange, which would be reflective of a Tuesday
[1:42:36]
collections. Currently, Taylor'sville is
[1:42:38]
Thursday. So, the idea is here that if
[1:42:40]
we missed any streets or hiccups in
[1:42:42]
Magna or Karns on Monday, which is red,
[1:42:45]
we would be nearby and adjacent in
[1:42:47]
Taylor'sville on Tuesday to complete
[1:42:49]
those gobacks to be more efficiently and
[1:42:52]
effective in in providing a service.
[1:42:54]
Same goes for Wednesday. So, Wednesday
[1:42:56]
we're in Sandy City in the islands and
[1:42:58]
White City, for example, Cwood Heights.
[1:43:00]
If we miss a pickup in t in
[1:43:02]
Taylor'sville from Tuesday, our
[1:43:04]
disposition facilities, the recycling
[1:43:06]
centers, the the the transportation we
[1:43:08]
use is on the way north towards
[1:43:11]
Taylor'sville, which is closer in
[1:43:13]
proximity for that that next day
[1:43:14]
service. And then the the Murray holiday
[1:43:17]
going from a from Tuesday to Thursday,
[1:43:20]
we're near Heights. So if we miss Combo
[1:43:22]
Heights streets, for example, on
[1:43:23]
Wednesday, we can go back Thursday
[1:43:25]
closer that area. And then Mil Creek, so
[1:43:27]
on so forth. So, the big thing here is
[1:43:29]
that immigration is currently serviced
[1:43:32]
Wednesdays.
[1:43:33]
I'm pushing to switch immigration to
[1:43:35]
Mondays for a couple reasons. One, if
[1:43:37]
there's snow up there, we can can push
[1:43:38]
it out later in the week. But
[1:43:40]
predominantly is to uh meet this go back demand um goal of the next day.
[1:43:48]
So if we miss elections in any area of
[1:43:51]
Mil Creek Friday, which is the dark
[1:43:53]
blue, the folks that are going up to
[1:43:55]
immigration and back down the canyon can hit those misp on the the way up or
[1:44:01]
the way down from immigration as well.
[1:44:04]
>> Um, one thing before I forget that I
[1:44:06]
wanted to point out,
[1:44:07]
>> so
[1:44:09]
one other thing, this is preliminary.
[1:44:11]
One other major thing that may have to
[1:44:12]
change as part of this is that we may be
[1:44:15]
biting off more than we can chew for
[1:44:17]
Mondays.
[1:44:19]
Paramin currently is is a green waist
[1:44:22]
drive on Mondays. We have five green
[1:44:23]
waist trucks that go there. We're losing
[1:44:25]
1,800 counts, but we also still have to
[1:44:27]
service Monday's magnet and Karns for
[1:44:30]
the green waist collection. So what I'm
[1:44:33]
thinking if you can zoom in a little bit
[1:44:34]
to the Karns and the Taylorville area.
[1:44:38]
Currently, we service a small portion of
[1:44:40]
Kurs on uh Thursday, not Tuesday. As you
[1:44:43]
can see that municipality boundary line
[1:44:45]
there. There's a high likelihood, and
[1:44:47]
Dave and I are looking at this, that
[1:44:49]
we'll need to cut off another sliver of
[1:44:51]
curves and add it to Tuesday service,
[1:44:54]
which would become orange as part of
[1:44:56]
this. And so any changes would be uh
[1:45:01]
communicated through a very robust
[1:45:03]
education outreach program, postcards,
[1:45:05]
probably even u container uh flyers for
[1:45:09]
example. Um but we're trying to evenly
[1:45:11]
distribute this this workload of of all
[1:45:13]
these areas if herin withdrawal does
[1:45:16]
take effect end of October into November
[1:45:18]
those changes will take effect November
[1:45:21]
one. or as the remaining areas we need
[1:45:24]
we want time to plan for this remaining
[1:45:26]
areas will take effect presumably
[1:45:28]
January of 2027 giving us more time for
[1:45:31]
that so southwest and copper
[1:45:34]
this would be more immediate upon
[1:45:36]
Harman's withdrawal and then uh the
[1:45:39]
other areas that we would switch we're
[1:45:40]
still fine-tuning
[1:45:42]
would be transition uh January the first
[1:45:48]
question
[1:45:50]
>> you keep and next day go back.
[1:45:54]
So if my Wednesday talk about Thursday
[1:45:57]
go back, okay, the problem I see with
[1:46:00]
that is most people are going to be
[1:46:01]
getting a home after you've closed
[1:46:05]
Wednesday for my day. How do I notify
[1:46:08]
you to get a, you know, a Thursday
[1:46:10]
goback the very next morning, right?
[1:46:13]
>> How fast can you mobilize that go back?
[1:46:17]
>> That's a great question. Um and and I'll kind of maybe um
[1:46:22]
the firmware here with our customers
[1:46:24]
agency team. They get a call, they're
[1:46:26]
the go back schedule. So this would be
[1:46:27]
mostly probably the the afternoon of
[1:46:29]
next day. If you can scroll to the next
[1:46:31]
page as we talk about this, that'd be
[1:46:33]
super helpful because I'm not really
[1:46:35]
clear how we would do next day service
[1:46:37]
and immigration, which I imagine there
[1:46:39]
aren't probably a lot of misolctions.
[1:46:41]
Um and same for the southwest corridor
[1:46:43]
as well. But
[1:46:46]
your question is very valid and logical
[1:46:48]
and something that that we you know
[1:46:50]
would strive to to meet that demand for
[1:46:53]
that next day customer service. But if
[1:46:55]
Fern can speak towards like when how do
[1:46:57]
we get calls on usually
[1:47:00]
>> we generally like we get anything after
[1:47:02]
the office is closed. That's one of the
[1:47:03]
first things um our customer service
[1:47:05]
team does in the morning. We have folks
[1:47:06]
that get here at 7 and 7:30 in the
[1:47:08]
morning. So they listen to voicemails.
[1:47:10]
They they review all of the emails and
[1:47:11]
also the chats. And so while we we go
[1:47:14]
ahead and post the um next goats excuse
[1:47:18]
me before we leave for everything that
[1:47:20]
we've had we generally um we get
[1:47:23]
notified by 11 a.m. we can generally get
[1:47:26]
that.
[1:47:28]
>> So that's now going to be on the
[1:47:30]
customer to make sure that they have
[1:47:32]
responded before
[1:47:34]
>> 11 a.m. the next day
[1:47:37]
assuming they have time.
[1:47:39]
>> Right. Yeah. No, I'm just just trying to
[1:47:41]
make sure that we're not being overly
[1:47:43]
ambitious and not giving people adequate
[1:47:46]
time to say, "Oh, you know, I just
[1:47:47]
realized my trash can never got picked
[1:47:49]
up." And it's now lunchtime when I have
[1:47:52]
time to call.
[1:47:54]
Um, and maybe I should get somebody on
[1:47:56]
the phone because not like I'm the kind
[1:47:57]
of person I don't leave messages and
[1:47:59]
things like that, too, because I just
[1:48:00]
assume they're lost in the either. Uh,
[1:48:03]
so that that's my only concern with
[1:48:05]
doing it like the very next day, but I
[1:48:08]
do like the plan in general. Otherwise,
[1:48:11]
>> what would happen if they did it in the
[1:48:13]
afternoon? Would they need to wait till
[1:48:15]
the next or you would you would kind of
[1:48:18]
base that off of like if that was
[1:48:20]
happening consistently or you would do
[1:48:21]
oneoffs?
[1:48:22]
>> I think I mean if it started happening
[1:48:24]
consistently and it's a larger volume
[1:48:27]
back and say okay does this make sense,
[1:48:29]
right? Um, you know, however, thankfully
[1:48:33]
like our supervisors or our managers, if
[1:48:35]
they're not on board, they can sometimes
[1:48:38]
swing swing out. I know, um, David a lot
[1:48:41]
of, you know, hey, we've got this
[1:48:42]
emergency go that needs to happen. Who's
[1:48:44]
in the area? Sometimes somebody's in the
[1:48:47]
area already. So the girls talk to um we
[1:48:50]
say the girls because they are the
[1:48:51]
ladies that are bunch
[1:48:53]
and uh so so they they um they're on the radio you know constantly
[1:48:58]
with our operations team and and
[1:49:00]
sometimes the leads are doing training
[1:49:02]
you know and so they're in that area. So
[1:49:04]
we do have this situation because if
[1:49:05]
it's not a lot of folks and if it's not
[1:49:08]
a consistent item
[1:49:11]
>> what's the like currently when do you
[1:49:14]
get the most calls for for is it usually
[1:49:17]
like the evening and the like when do
[1:49:19]
you usually get those calls too? We
[1:49:21]
actually get them a lot in the early
[1:49:22]
afternoon the on the day of service. And
[1:49:25]
it's interesting because because um our
[1:49:28]
customer solutions team is on the radio
[1:49:30]
often saying are we hit that route yet?
[1:49:33]
Because sometimes that's what happens
[1:49:36]
and um the drivers will let us know
[1:49:38]
we're not we haven't been there. And and
[1:49:40]
thankfully we're able to find some of
[1:49:41]
those goats soon like right after
[1:49:44]
because we do have other folks on
[1:49:51]
I think we we want to look at a
[1:49:53]
secondary goback schedule. So this is
[1:49:56]
the most simplistic way that we can try
[1:49:59]
to at least enhance this for the time
[1:50:00]
being. Long-term goals is to get
[1:50:04]
utilization of technology and routing
[1:50:06]
software. And typically in a collection
[1:50:09]
u operation such as ours, each city
[1:50:13]
would be broken up into multiple days of
[1:50:15]
collections throughout the work week. So
[1:50:17]
you're always like we we would
[1:50:19]
presumably have a team that services
[1:50:21]
just Taylor'sville and they have
[1:50:23]
different routes on Mondays, Tuesdays,
[1:50:24]
Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and then
[1:50:26]
we're always nearby for for performing
[1:50:29]
those go back collections as well and
[1:50:31]
after service pickups too. So trying to
[1:50:33]
take that on right now would be uh
[1:50:35]
incredibly overwhelming and a lot of
[1:50:38]
work to evaluate. uh so but in in future
[1:50:40]
years our goal will be to identify and
[1:50:42]
implement that routing software that
[1:50:44]
helps to actually build those routes and
[1:50:46]
create that even distribution throughout
[1:50:49]
those. This is the more immediate
[1:50:52]
most simplistic way that we look to to
[1:50:54]
make these these adjustments to better
[1:50:58]
service uh
[1:51:01]
spread throughout the the week but also
[1:51:02]
to to better provide customer service to
[1:51:06]
our customers at this point. So, um,
[1:51:09]
more more to come on this. This is
[1:51:10]
preliminary. We need just some fine
[1:51:12]
tuning. Want to see if there's any
[1:51:13]
feedback or overarching concerns, uh,
[1:51:17]
about this, um, as it's
[1:51:21]
>> makes a lot of sense. I'm just curious
[1:51:23]
when you do route planning and stuff
[1:51:26]
like that for this and for the program.
[1:51:34]
you take into account density of
[1:51:38]
residential areas. So in other words,
[1:51:41]
mining can go really fast from house to
[1:51:43]
house and 10 minutes down the street.
[1:51:47]
Yeah. When you're talking the difference
[1:51:48]
between 3 minutes and 3 and a/4 minutes
[1:51:50]
making the making it work or not work,
[1:51:53]
>> right?
[1:51:53]
>> You know, does that play into it
[1:51:56]
>> to to a degree? Yes.
[1:51:58]
>> Have to at some
[1:52:00]
>> Yes. Absolutely. Because in immigration,
[1:52:03]
you know, for example, we're we're
[1:52:04]
driving, you know, thousands of feet
[1:52:06]
between households,
[1:52:08]
>> right? So that density of collection
[1:52:09]
point is is certainly the 3 minutes for
[1:52:11]
the bulky is kind of a generalized
[1:52:13]
assumption
[1:52:15]
average over the entirety of service
[1:52:17]
area. But absolutely our our current
[1:52:20]
routes that each driver has like magnets
[1:52:23]
split up into probably a dozen routes
[1:52:25]
that we have trash going. It's based on
[1:52:28]
number of parcels and we track those
[1:52:30]
completion times. We have a team that is led through a lead operator help make
[1:52:36]
sure that that team is is completed and
[1:52:39]
that gives us feedback as to we can
[1:52:41]
adjust those those routes on.
[1:52:49]
» Any other questions or concerns about
[1:52:52]
that these changes?
[1:52:56]
>> All right. Um on 3.5 considerations to
[1:53:00]
suspend subscription based curbside
[1:53:02]
green waste collection service offerings
[1:53:04]
in the southwest geographic region of
[1:53:06]
Salt Lake County due to significant call
[1:53:07]
distances
[1:53:09]
participation outside of business.
[1:53:12]
>> Thank you. So I can probably be quite
[1:53:13]
brief on this. I talked with board
[1:53:15]
member Stitzer from Copperton uh and
[1:53:17]
board member string stringum from Sully
[1:53:20]
County. Um
[1:53:23]
but that doesn't forego the the need to
[1:53:25]
discuss this as well. So currently we
[1:53:27]
are servicing about 1,800 green waste
[1:53:31]
subscription services in Herman proper.
[1:53:34]
Outside of Harman and proper we have
[1:53:36]
been tracking number of subscriptions in
[1:53:39]
the southwest unincorporated area which
[1:53:41]
again is about 200 homes and then
[1:53:43]
Copperton uh roughly closer to 300
[1:53:46]
homes. of those service areas. Given how
[1:53:49]
far it is outside of our collective uh
[1:53:52]
combined service area, we currently only
[1:53:54]
have 11 Green Waste can subscribers. The
[1:53:58]
private areas that will continue to
[1:54:00]
service inherently proper is only about
[1:54:03]
roughly 10 additional Greenway
[1:54:05]
subscriptions. And so sending a separate
[1:54:08]
truck out there for
[1:54:11]
less than than 30 overall subscriptions
[1:54:14]
does seem to make a lot of sense from an
[1:54:16]
efficiency and operation standpoint.
[1:54:18]
These materials used to be accepted as
[1:54:20]
the Trans Jordan landfill, which is in a
[1:54:22]
similar vicinity, but they suspended
[1:54:25]
permanently their green waste composting
[1:54:27]
program. So we have continued even with
[1:54:30]
Trans Jordan closing to currently haul
[1:54:33]
even all the 1800 Herman Greenways
[1:54:36]
all the way north of Magna essentially
[1:54:38]
to the Salt Lake Valley composting
[1:54:40]
facility. So significant hall distance.
[1:54:43]
And so basically
[1:54:45]
what we're recommending is that we of
[1:54:47]
those 11 subscribers in Copper
[1:54:50]
Southwest, we cancel those subscriptions
[1:54:52]
after Herman's withdrawal is complete.
[1:54:54]
Uh and we no longer offer the that green
[1:54:57]
waste program specifically in Southwest
[1:55:00]
Uncorporated or or in the town of
[1:55:02]
Copperton until perhaps there's a time
[1:55:05]
period where we can get significant
[1:55:07]
interest and demand to reinstate that.
[1:55:09]
So just looking at from an efficiency,
[1:55:11]
financial cost and operational
[1:55:15]
um sensibility perspective, you know,
[1:55:18]
based on what we're seeing with those
[1:55:19]
subscriptions, uh does it make sense to
[1:55:21]
continue to provide that subscription
[1:55:23]
based optional add-on service?
[1:55:26]
>> That just makes sense to me. It sounds
[1:55:27]
like we've talked to the people whose
[1:55:29]
communities are affected so and it makes
[1:55:32]
sense to them.
[1:55:36]
» Board member Stitzer had um a couple
[1:55:38]
reservations. as we talk through this um
[1:55:40]
she may be on at this point as well. Um
[1:55:43]
because we we have kind of restricted to
[1:55:46]
subscription services um since prior to
[1:55:49]
my tenure uh in this general area but
[1:55:53]
also at the same time have not seen to
[1:55:56]
my understanding a lot of like interest
[1:55:58]
nor requests to add those services for
[1:56:01]
Copperton and South Incorporated this.
[1:56:04]
So um it's a challenging item and and
[1:56:08]
you know a lot of the other cities that
[1:56:10]
are um which is way different than what
[1:56:13]
we're members of Trans Jordan. Um to my
[1:56:16]
understanding those green waste
[1:56:18]
collection services are now being
[1:56:20]
recovered through their composting.
[1:56:22]
They're just being used in some cases as
[1:56:23]
additional refues that's being buried at
[1:56:26]
the landfill. It's not from birth to
[1:56:28]
birth. So conversely, wolfer has
[1:56:30]
continued to haul immature all the way
[1:56:32]
north to the solid valley length
[1:56:36]
based on trans Jordan that they
[1:56:37]
suspended their green rice program
[1:56:40]
several years ago.
[1:56:41]
>> So you're saying is other organizations
[1:56:43]
are picking up green rice separately but
[1:56:45]
then disposing of it in the landfill.
[1:56:48]
>> I'm not saying that. I'm just saying
[1:56:50]
mostly those programs have been
[1:56:51]
suspended.
[1:56:52]
>> Oh, correct. And then to my
[1:56:55]
understanding, the city of West Jordan
[1:56:56]
has now what's called their green can
[1:56:59]
change to a seasonal can.
[1:57:01]
>> It's just another trash can,
[1:57:02]
>> but it's basically Yeah, basically a
[1:57:04]
secondary trash can.
[1:57:04]
>> It's another trash can, but it's only
[1:57:06]
picked up until April.
[1:57:08]
>> Okay. Okay,
[1:57:09]
>> which is similar ours our green waist
[1:57:11]
program runs roughly March through mid
[1:57:14]
December,
[1:57:15]
>> but we have and continue to and will
[1:57:17]
continue to haul those materials to the
[1:57:20]
composting facility that's that's being
[1:57:21]
operated by Salt Lake County uh which is
[1:57:24]
in the extreme northwest portion of the
[1:57:26]
county of the Salt Lake Valley landfill
[1:57:29]
and adjacent to that is the
[1:57:35]
» any concerns about that change for is
[1:57:41]
» so predominantly I was just hoping for
[1:57:43]
support from this body to um to take
[1:57:47]
that approach. I don't think it's a
[1:57:49]
formal motion. So subscription based
[1:57:52]
service some cases we don't offer uh
[1:57:55]
curbside glass is not offered currently
[1:57:57]
in that area but the county as well
[1:57:58]
because of distance and density and
[1:58:02]
demand
[1:58:03]
>> other than plan but do you know where
[1:58:04]
the tipping point is to how many
[1:58:06]
subscribers
[1:58:08]
required
[1:58:10]
>> if there was significant interest I
[1:58:13]
would hope minimum we haven't done the full analysis from efficiency
[1:58:17]
standpoint I would hope a minimum 50 but
[1:58:20]
hopefully I Ideally, it would be like
[1:58:22]
100 100 plus addressing customers.
[1:58:30]
I love that. Unless anyone has any
[1:58:33]
concerns that they're not voicing, I
[1:58:34]
think we're supportive.
[1:58:39]
All right. Um,
[1:58:42]
that's direction. Yes.
[1:58:44]
>> Okay. All right. Item 3.6 with Helen.
[1:58:48]
modifications to monthly billing due to
[1:58:49]
dates to avoid billing discrepancies for
[1:58:51]
autos.
[1:58:52]
>> Right. Uh we when we went to monthly
[1:58:55]
billing we made the due date the last
[1:58:57]
day of the month that is also the day of
[1:59:00]
our real date. Um
[1:59:03]
that has caused a problem between our
[1:59:07]
software the sell software building
[1:59:11]
payment vendor for pay um that created a
[1:59:14]
problem for auto pay.
[1:59:16]
Um, and so the best way we could
[1:59:18]
determine to correct this problem is to
[1:59:21]
change the due date. So we moved it back
[1:59:22]
to the 27th of every month. reason we
[1:59:26]
chose that one last 10th of February um
[1:59:28]
you know over the coming month the month
[1:59:31]
and
[1:59:32]
>> it's I think that that will this last
[1:59:35]
bill was the first one that we did that
[1:59:36]
with and I do think this is going to
[1:59:37]
solve
[1:59:42]
» specifically has to do with with
[1:59:43]
integration constraints between our
[1:59:45]
various financial and billing systems
[1:59:48]
and form pay um in the future we think
[1:59:51]
can gradually enhance that uh we make
[1:59:55]
the customer get their bills
[1:59:57]
change. We've looked at our policy
[1:59:59]
manual. There's nothing that the sport
[2:00:01]
has adopted for a specific for for
[2:00:04]
billing um due dates. So, um we just
[2:00:08]
wanted to provide that as as
[2:00:09]
information. uh didn't seem to think
[2:00:12]
there was any sort of formal motion
[2:00:14]
needed for this, but it is something
[2:00:16]
that was very recently implemented um to
[2:00:19]
avoid these discrepancies and people
[2:00:21]
having a lot of confusion when we have
[2:00:22]
one for
[2:00:29]
all. Um are there is there any other
[2:00:31]
board of business that members of the
[2:00:33]
board need to discuss?
[2:00:39]
See on the agenda subsequent items for
[2:00:41]
board meetings. I'll just let you look
[2:00:43]
at that items at your leisure. Um I will
[2:00:46]
make a motion to Sure.
[2:00:48]
>> So move
[2:00:49]
>> second.
[2:00:50]
>> All in favor?
[2:00:54]
» I
[2:01:05]
kind of
[2:01:09]
Yeah. Um, are you hearing from people
[2:01:12]
that they want less bins at the same
[2:01:20]
room?
[2:01:22]
>> Yeah, that would be I can certainly help
[2:01:24]
to donate those.
[2:01:27]
It's largely
[2:01:27]
>> Justin.
[2:01:45]
» Yeah, the recycles are like it's the
[2:01:48]
trash ones. There's just so many
[2:01:50]
available
[2:01:59]
» or trash to recycle.
[2:02:02]
>> We can certainly discuss that.
[2:02:07]
My husband wanted me to ask about his
[2:02:10]
price of a trash
[2:02:12]
I told him don't want to do it.
[2:02:35]
» So I'd rather just have this for myself.
[2:02:38]
>> Yeah.