Planning Commission Meeting April 15, 2026

Woodland Hills Planning Commission · Woodland Hills, UT · · More Woodland Hills, UT meetings · More Utah meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[15:19] Okay.
[15:23] So, call the planning commission to
[15:25] order. It's uh 7:15.
[15:30] Uh present are all commission members.
[15:34] Sever Johnson, Wayne Franson, John
[15:37] Stout, and Lori Thomas.
[15:40] Um
[15:42] we will Sever would you offer invocation
[15:44] for us? Lori, would you lead us in the
[15:47] pledge?
[15:54] Oh kindly, gracious eternal heavenly
[15:56] father, we're grateful for this
[15:59] opportunity to meet together as a
[16:00] planning commission this evening. Bless
[16:03] us in our deliberations that we may have
[16:06] thy to guide us to that which will be
[16:09] best for our community. We are grateful
[16:13] for all the blessings that thou has
[16:14] bestow upon us. Keep us safe in this
[16:18] area and we pray for these things in the
[16:20] name of thy son Jesus Christ. Amen.
[16:23] Thank you.
[16:29] » I aliance to the flag of the United
[16:33] States of America and to the republic
[16:37] for which it stands. One nation under
[16:40] God, indivisible
[16:43] with liberty and justice for all.
[16:50] Thank you both.
[16:53] Um,
[16:54] open the time for any public comment.
[16:58] Uh,
[17:01] any hands raised? None here?
[17:04] None there. Thanks, Brian.
[17:08] Very good. We will close public comment
[17:10] then and go to our business partner
[17:15] hearing.
[17:17] >> Thank you.
[17:19] Yep.
[17:20] Um we're
[17:23] one item for public hearing tonight is
[17:26] for conditional use application
[17:29] uh from uh three bridges and I think
[17:33] there's a copy of it here. I believe I
[17:36] mentioned it to you in a previous uh a
[17:39] previous meeting just in in passing.
[17:42] What this is is um they want to have a a
[17:48] uh gravel operation
[17:51] uh down here with their
[17:55] We're just We're a little late in
[17:57] starting, Jody.
[17:58] >> Okay, Brian, you didn't know.
[18:00] >> Oh, okay.
[18:01] >> Thanks.
[18:02] >> Okay. Um they want to uh start moving
[18:07] this pile down here by the mailboxes
[18:11] and do a gravel sorting and um
[18:20] that they will use then for their roads.
[18:23] Um
[18:25] we felt that they needed needed to have
[18:27] a conditional use permit uh to do that.
[18:30] They're they're fine with it. They
[18:32] haven't started yet, obviously. So,
[18:36] that's what that's about. And we've
[18:39] published a a notice about the public
[18:41] hearing for anybody who wanted to make
[18:44] comments about it. We don't we didn't
[18:46] receive any outside of the meeting. Uh
[18:50] their plans are to move the gravel in in
[18:54] the process move the gravel to further
[18:57] to the east. So eventually the this big
[19:02] pile of gravel down there will be moved
[19:04] as part of this operation.
[19:06] >> Are they screening it? Is that what
[19:08] they're doing?
[19:08] >> They are. Yeah.
[19:10] >> They've agreed to put uh uh water trucks
[19:13] down there also to lessen the dust that
[19:18] be coming from that. Um so we've we've
[19:25] looked at it city. We don't we don't
[19:27] have any objections to them.
[19:30] >> And this seems to say that part of it is
[19:33] onsite rock crushing.
[19:36] And so I guess they're going to crush
[19:39] the bigger ones and then separate the
[19:41] dirt from the from the ground.
[19:45] >> Yeah.
[19:49] » So one of the biggest things is we
[19:52] required them to have a sweat plan. So
[19:55] that will keep the area clean and u
[19:59] keep keep inspections regular
[20:02] inspections of it and make sure that
[20:05] they're in compliance with their SWIP
[20:07] plan.
[20:09] Um their SWIP plan was like
[20:13] 40 pages.
[20:15] >> They had to
[20:19] where they have that stored. Is that in Woodland Hills or is it
[20:24] >> It is. We own that piece of property
[20:27] there is in our city limits.
[20:29] >> They won't be crushing in Woodland
[20:30] Hills, right? It'll be in Salem. Are
[20:32] they moving them back over that way?
[20:34] >> They are further to the east. But
[20:36] they'll be they'll be
[20:38] >> there's going to be picking this up and
[20:40] then taking it to the
[20:41] >> No, they're going to they're
[20:45] going to have one in our area as well.
[20:47] >> Yes.
[20:47] >> Yeah.
[20:49] And so that's why they're keeping a
[20:50] water truck there. And and some of these
[20:53] crushers have, I understand, water in
[20:56] them as part of their operation. And I
[20:58] don't know if that will happen with them
[21:00] or not, but we'll keep our eye on the on
[21:03] the dust dust control.
[21:06] So
[21:07] it'll probably be hard to separate with
[21:10] the work they're going to be doing on
[21:12] wooden hills.
[21:13] >> Say nobody's going to get down there
[21:14] anyway.
[21:15] >> You know,
[21:16] >> it looks like pure rocks. I don't know.
[21:18] They need to separate.
[21:20] >> Yeah.
[21:24] >> So, any questions about that?
[21:28] >> Now, let me uh I'll take a motion on
[21:33] recommending these. Our conditional use
[21:35] permits go to the city council. And so,
[21:39] um I'll need to take a recommendation to
[21:42] them from the planning commission. So,
[21:45] if anyone wants to make a motion, I'll
[21:48] make a motion to approve the conditional
[21:51] use permit.
[21:51] >> Okay.
[21:52] >> For three bridges is crushing operation.
[21:55] I'll second that.
[21:56] >> Okay.
[22:01] All in favor?
[22:04] >> Any oppose?
[22:06] Very well. We'll move that
[22:10] to the city council. make them aware and
[22:12] they can discuss it further.
[22:16] Um
[22:20] the um let's go to item six then
[22:25] approval of March 18, 2026 planning
[22:29] commission meeting minutes. I didn't get
[22:31] any u comments back on it and sending
[22:35] the minutes.
[22:36] >> What was it?
[22:38] Well, you said
[22:39] >> there were still a journment,
[22:41] >> but we did
[22:42] >> we did have an adjournment.
[22:45] >> Yeah.
[22:45] >> You know, and we voted on that,
[22:47] >> but it led on the minutes.
[22:48] >> On the minutes. Okay. I'll I'll get back
[22:52] in there and attach that.
[23:00] Okay. With that one correction, then
[23:02] I'll take a motion on the minutes for
[23:04] March 6 18th.
[23:07] I'll make a motion to approve the March
[23:09] 18th minutes with the correction of
[23:12] including the adjournment.
[23:14] >> Okay. Is there a second to that?
[23:16] >> Second.
[23:17] >> All right. All in favor?
[23:20] >> I. Any opposed?
[23:23] >> Very well. Thank you. I will
[23:26] make that change.
[23:29] Uh the next item is item eight and
[23:34] um
[23:36] there's a um
[23:42] there's a request being made by Summit
[23:43] Creek. Bucky is here tonight to talk to
[23:46] us about it.
[23:48] um to amend their
[23:52] um
[23:54] plat their final plat
[23:57] and to actually add two lots
[24:02] to it
[24:04] and there those lots are where those
[24:06] arrows are shown on there. Bucky, let me
[24:11] turn time over to you and you can
[24:12] explain
[24:14] >> explain that. Uh, I've I've given them a
[24:16] copy of the final plant, so I don't know
[24:19] to show where it is. I I don't know if
[24:21] we need to do that.
[24:22] >> Yeah, if you've got it, that that's
[24:24] fine. You should see two two lots.
[24:26] There's one that's 237
[24:29] and then there's one that's 247. Is that the arrows with supporting it?
[24:35] >> Yeah. So on our original plat
[24:39] we plan to
[24:44] um to include 237 in our next phase
[24:49] which we plan to develop, you know, in
[24:51] the next year or two. Um because we
[24:54] thought that it was going to be easier
[24:57] to access that lot to build a home on
[25:01] one of the future roads that's behind
[25:03] those lots in our master plan.
[25:06] Now that we've cut that road in um and
[25:09] we're looking at the grades,
[25:12] it looks like um it looks like we can
[25:15] access that lot and and build a a a
[25:19] house easily from the road that we've
[25:21] cut in.
[25:23] And so
[25:24] >> so that would be on Eagle Nest then the
[25:26] continuation of Eagle Nest. Yeah. Down
[25:28] around. Okay.
[25:29] >> Exactly. So that would be considered the
[25:30] frontage and
[25:33] um uh so that's that's why we're
[25:37] requesting an amendment for that lot.
[25:41] the 247.
[25:44] Um,
[25:46] after we uh cut the road in and graded
[25:53] that the those lots were where 221 and
[25:58] 20 and 222 are, we we realized there's a
[26:03] lot more usable land up there than than
[26:06] we had thought prior.
[26:08] Um,
[26:10] we
[26:12] I was hoping we are doing a little bit
[26:14] of a little bit of analysis right now
[26:17] with our builder
[26:19] to make sure the proper house can be
[26:22] built in that build pad that that we're
[26:25] showing on on 247. I thought we would
[26:28] have that done by now. Um,
[26:31] unfortunately, we we don't quite have it
[26:33] done yet. So, I'm I guess I'm here
[26:37] tonight asking for an amendment for 237
[26:41] to come into the plat.
[26:44] And I think we're a little uncertain
[26:47] about 247 right now. I think we'll know
[26:50] for sure by your meeting in May. and
[26:53] we'd like to come back and revisit the
[26:56] discussion on that lot in May if that
[27:00] uh this if the um planning commission's
[27:03] open to that.
[27:05] >> What if you're if the engineering work
[27:08] shows that that's going to be
[27:10] problematic? What what are your plans
[27:15] >> going back to what's the the
[27:16] >> to a single lot there with one
[27:20] >> 127 and well they just take out
[27:25] >> 247 would that become part of 221 then
[27:29] or part of 27
[27:31] >> 222 it was part of 222
[27:34] >> 222
[27:34] >> yeah so and 222 was just a really really
[27:37] big lot
[27:38] >> and so we took part of that and turn and
[27:42] turn it into two lots 222 and 247.
[27:45] >> So if that becomes problematic in your
[27:47] further review, you just go back to that
[27:50] being a single lot and not not divide it
[27:53] off. That would be your plan.
[27:55] >> Just go back to just excluding 247 from the plat. And it's not an it's not
[28:02] a question of engineering. It's it's
[28:05] >> topography issues with
[28:07] >> it's just the size of home.
[28:09] >> It's a lot.
[28:10] >> Yeah. Well, we know like a comfortably
[28:13] what you're what you're showing right
[28:14] there, like a 4,000 foot home can be
[28:17] built, but we anticipate somebody might
[28:20] want to build a bigger house than 4,000
[28:24] square ft on that lot. And and so that's
[28:27] kind of the analysis that's going on
[28:28] right now with our builder to see, you
[28:31] know, see if if a five or 6,000 foot
[28:35] home or something like that can be built
[28:38] uh on that lot. So, and we don't want it to feel too
[28:43] squished, you know, with with a couple
[28:46] larger homes that are 5,000 6,000 square
[28:49] ft, you know, we want it to we want
[28:51] everyone to feel like there's plenty of
[28:52] elbow room up there. So, that's we're
[28:56] just we're just double-checking
[28:57] ourselves,
[28:58] >> okay?
[28:59] >> If that makes sense.
[29:00] >> Okay. So,
[29:04] >> um, would we really have to bring it
[29:06] back if they decided to paint it as 221?
[29:13] » I guess not.
[29:14] >> It's already
[29:16] together, right? Isn't it?
[29:18] >> I would just need to come back if we
[29:20] decide we want to request the 247.
[29:26] Yeah, because the way it was originally
[29:28] approved,
[29:30] it was combined those that lot there. So
[29:33] that it would just you drop the
[29:38] idea of trying to make a separate lot
[29:40] out of it.
[29:40] >> Exactly.
[29:42] >> But we still need to tonight we need to
[29:45] approve 230 237.
[29:49] It was dropped off. It was it was
[29:52] originally not put on
[29:55] the like you said the the original
[29:58] plaque that was reviewed by our
[30:00] engineers.
[30:01] >> Mhm.
[30:02] >> It wasn't on there and then you added it
[30:06] and we approved that final plaque with
[30:09] the addition
[30:11] of that lot, but then you took it
[30:15] >> off
[30:15] >> took it off.
[30:16] >> Yeah,
[30:18] I know. We do need to add We do need an
[30:20] amend then to put that lot back on.
[30:24] >> Yeah. So, if you're on that street
[30:25] looking at 237, it's it's downhill
[30:29] >> and it's the lots to the side of it. The
[30:31] grades are fine. This one's in a little
[30:33] bit steeper little ravine. And so, we
[30:36] were from the plan before the the road
[30:39] was cut in, we were really skeptical if you could build a driveway onto the
[30:45] build pad. And but now that it's all the
[30:48] roads cut in and all the grates are are
[30:51] there, we feel like we can comfortably
[30:54] be able to uh uh driveway and keep it at
[30:58] like 8% to get down to the build pad.
[31:01] So,
[31:03] >> okay.
[31:05] Any questions any of you have for Bucky on that?
[31:12] Um,
[31:13] there's a couple of things that I want
[31:16] having to do with a general plan. The
[31:20] fees haven't been paid yet for the
[31:22] amendment. So, that needs to be need the
[31:27] email that we were just going Yeah, they went out today. So, they should be
[31:31] hitting the city's account today or
[31:33] tomorrow.
[31:34] >> All right. Very good. Um,
[31:38] we still need to review the water shares
[31:41] on on
[31:42] >> the 23 set. Yeah.
[31:44] >> On these lots to make sure that
[31:46] >> that I've deed it enough.
[31:48] >> Yeah. That there's enough there. So, we
[31:51] need to uh I'm going to suggest to the
[31:54] planning commission that we
[32:01] the amendment gets approved with
[32:03] conditions and that's one of them
[32:06] >> where we're required to have needed
[32:09] water shares on the on the final plan
[32:13] approval. So that's that's one thing
[32:16] that
[32:17] or the fees sounds like they're
[32:19] addressed. Um, another thing that
[32:24] we need to get we need to do in concert
[32:26] with you, Bucky, is um
[32:31] change the a part of that
[32:36] public road now to private road.
[32:40] >> Yeah. the same way as we did before with
[32:43] that other
[32:44] >> and we have to have a public hearing to
[32:47] do that and I think I'm talking to Jody
[32:50] and I believe we can do that in our
[32:54] May
[32:55] >> meeting.
[32:57] >> Okay. uh with I think there's enough
[32:58] time between now and then uh to publish
[33:02] that and any public input so that we can
[33:06] it it's a process that that we have to go
[33:11] through and do which we've agreed to do
[33:13] already
[33:15] >> and we just need to do it and working in
[33:18] concert with you to get that done.
[33:20] >> Yeah, I've got the paperwork. I just I
[33:23] just met with our attorney yesterday.
[33:25] He's he's drafting the paperwork right
[33:27] now.
[33:27] >> Okay.
[33:28] >> So So it should be done anytime soon.
[33:31] >> Okay. If you can get it to us as soon as
[33:33] possible cuz we'll we'll probably use
[33:35] that
[33:36] to is as part of the public hearing in
[33:41] information that goes out there
[33:43] >> be specific to what
[33:45] >> that is. And we there's some individuals
[33:49] too that need to be notified. Uh, I
[33:52] think they're kind of at the at the
[33:54] bottom of the culde-sac there, but
[33:57] they're within 300 ft of of this part
[34:00] that will be private. And so, we need to
[34:04] specifically inform them.
[34:08] We don't need their permission, but we
[34:09] need to inform them of the public here
[34:12] so they can comment if they choose to do
[34:14] that.
[34:15] >> Yeah. Okay.
[34:16] >> So,
[34:17] >> sounds great. Those were the areas I
[34:25] have. Have Have you guys looked closely
[34:28] at that turn around that's down that
[34:32] you're putting in place down there?
[34:34] >> Yeah.
[34:37] >> Are you comfortable with that in its
[34:39] size and being sufficient?
[34:44] » Isn't that something Ted's got to go
[34:46] deal with? He does the fire.
[34:48] >> He does. We've looked we've we've looked
[34:50] at it already when the the final plaque,
[34:54] but and we got I got talking to with
[34:57] Jody about it today and we're probably
[35:00] going to use some of that to push snow
[35:03] into
[35:04] as we come down there. We can't push it
[35:07] through your through your gates there.
[35:09] And so if we do that, is that going to
[35:13] limit
[35:15] >> the turnaround? limit the turnaround
[35:16] area and um
[35:20] so
[35:20] >> I mean I think I think we're on paper it looks like it
[35:28] looks it looks plenty big enough. It
[35:31] looks like we can push even snow onto
[35:34] the shoulders past past the curbing of
[35:37] the of the hammerhead. I think what
[35:40] we've experienced with doing a lot of
[35:42] snow removal up here is we'll find
[35:45] somewhere to put the snow.
[35:47] We always do. Everyone does.
[35:50] >> Yeah.
[35:51] >> So, we have those big snowblower
[35:53] attachments on on the end of our skid
[35:55] steers that throw the snow way over the
[35:58] curb. And so,
[36:00] >> Okay.
[36:01] >> So, we're not overly worried about it,
[36:02] but
[36:03] >> Well, we may take another another look
[36:05] at it and just kind of satisfy
[36:07] ourselves, too, that we're good. Yeah,
[36:09] >> with that. So,
[36:09] >> yeah, we did go through it with Ted and
[36:11] the city engineer. I mean, our engineer
[36:13] and the city engineer and Ted all met
[36:16] and it meets it meets city codes and
[36:19] >> I and I noticed that that he did say
[36:21] that it it was code compliant
[36:24] >> the size and so forth there. So,
[36:27] >> yeah, we want to make sure that, you
[36:30] know,
[36:32] I mean, our thinking is that there's
[36:33] going to be shoulders beyond the curb,
[36:35] which is great place to push snow to as
[36:38] well. Yeah.
[36:39] >> So,
[36:40] >> okay.
[36:43] So, those are the only So, we've got the public roads leading
[36:50] to Summit Creek
[36:52] um review of water shares
[36:56] and fees paid.
[37:00] So, if one of you want to make an
[37:03] approval of adding at this time the lot
[37:06] 237
[37:09] um to the final plat
[37:13] uh conditions that those three areas get
[37:18] addressed to comply with our city code
[37:21] and word it however you'd like.
[37:25] I'll make a motion to approve the
[37:28] amended plat for Summit Creek for lot
[37:30] 237.
[37:34] Um
[37:36] review of water shares and make sure the
[37:39] fees are paid.
[37:40] >> Fees are paid and the public road
[37:42] >> public roaded deed to the city.
[37:44] >> The Summit Creek
[37:46] >> to Summit Creek.
[37:47] >> Yeah, the private road.
[37:48] >> The private road. You said public road.
[37:50] So yes.
[37:50] >> Well, it is public. It has been it is
[37:52] public. public and it is
[37:54] >> so it needs to be deed to to Summit
[37:57] Creek.
[37:57] >> So it's to be deed to Summit Creek.
[37:59] >> Yeah. For their private. Okay.
[38:01] >> I'll second a motion.
[38:02] >> Okay.
[38:04] All in favor of that?
[38:06] >> I. Any opposed?
[38:09] >> Okay. Let me make a note here.
[38:23] And just I don't know if it's helpful or
[38:25] gives you any comfort or anything, but
[38:27] our development agreement does require
[38:30] us to work through the paperwork of
[38:33] taking that portion of the road, turning
[38:36] it private, and deeding it to the HOA.
[38:39] >> Yeah.
[38:39] >> So, the county won't let the plaque get
[38:42] recorded without that being done
[38:44] properly. So
[38:47] >> that makes sense.
[38:48] >> So
[38:48] >> okay and that's it's yeah
[38:53] >> two areas code compliance and and that
[38:56] specifically the the development
[38:59] agreement was amended to um address that
[39:03] when when those issues were first
[39:07] presented
[39:08] >> to us. So,
[39:09] >> yeah,
[39:11] >> if you if you can stay in touch with us
[39:14] or with me on the paperwork when your
[39:17] attorney gets ready for that and and
[39:20] that'll help us know a little bit more
[39:21] when we need to get the publication in
[39:24] so that
[39:25] >> Perfect.
[39:27] >> Yeah, I'm hoping early next week I'll
[39:29] have the first draft of that paperwork.
[39:32] >> Okay. So, um, are you gonna are you
[39:35] going to check on the water rights or is
[39:38] that something you want me to check on?
[39:39] >> Yeah, if you check on them and see where you stand.
[39:42] >> Yeah, I will. I've got a I've got a
[39:44] tally. I've got a spreadsheet of a
[39:45] tally, so
[39:46] >> Okay.
[39:46] >> Yeah, I can do that. So,
[39:49] >> okay. Um,
[39:53] » very well.
[39:54] >> Well, thank you. I appreciate
[39:56] >> Okay. appreciate the consideration and
[39:58] we'll we'll get these conditions met and and
[40:04] move on.
[40:05] >> Very good.
[40:06] >> Thanks for coming down, Becky.
[40:08] >> Yeah, thank you.
[40:09] >> Beautiful lots in there.
[40:11] >> Oh, thanks. Yeah, it's a good spot. So,
[40:13] it's hard to find a bad spot in Hills,
[40:15] though.
[40:18] >> Every time I drive down here for work,
[40:20] I'm like, "Oh, it's so hard to It's so
[40:22] hard to leave.
[40:24] Got to get those kids a little older so
[40:25] I can move in.
[40:27] >> Yeah. Yeah.
[40:28] >> They're all in the trenches in high
[40:30] school and friends and you know how that
[40:34] goes.
[40:34] >> Yeah. Those trenches are strong.
[40:36] >> Yeah.
[40:37] >> So,
[40:38] >> got a son who's still mad at me for when
[40:40] he moved out of California back to
[40:42] Virginia.
[40:43] >> Oh, yeah.
[40:43] >> Yeah. Junior in high school. And
[40:48] >> so,
[40:49] >> sometimes you got to go.
[40:50] >> Yeah. Yeah.
[40:51] >> Makes them mad, but they adapt. Yeah,
[40:54] >> he didn't marry her. So,
[41:01] » I'd like to think you married somebody
[41:02] better. And I think you did. So,
[41:06] >> anything else you need from me?
[41:07] >> No, I think that takes care of it.
[41:09] >> All right. Thank you. Appreciate the
[41:10] time. Have a good night.
[41:12] >> You bet. You, too.
[41:14] Um
[41:19] any I don't have any other items for me. that I I'm
[41:28] and asked Jody to include that all the
[41:30] time just in case there's some issues or
[41:33] things that we need to discuss and
[41:36] things and I don't know are there any of
[41:40] that you
[41:41] we're let me let me share one thing
[41:44] Friday we're having a
[41:46] variance hearing
[41:49] on on two requests that have been made
[41:52] one is from a homeowner up on um
[41:57] what's the one just below the the
[41:59] culde-sac below deep forest?
[42:02] >> Is it Bridger?
[42:04] >> Three. Yeah,
[42:04] >> Bridger Circle.
[42:05] >> Yeah.
[42:06] >> Okay. Um
[42:08] his name is Aaron Lloyd
[42:12] and um
[42:18] the council approved a variance which by
[42:23] ordinance they can to his driveway
[42:27] slope. It exceeded
[42:30] um
[42:31] >> 15%.
[42:32] >> Yeah.
[42:34] And so they approved that
[42:37] in order to get that slope, he had to
[42:41] get closer to the property line than 20
[42:44] ft
[42:46] and the council can't approve that.
[42:49] So, um, he's he's written a variance
[42:54] request
[42:55] and, uh, there will be the our this
[42:58] hearing officer. We've used her once or
[43:02] twice in the past. She's an attorney.
[43:04] She will come here Friday and hear that
[43:09] request.
[43:11] And also,
[43:13] uh, he made his covert too small.
[43:19] So that's part of the request as well.
[43:24] So that's one request. Uh there will be
[43:27] a second hearing
[43:29] of uh an individual over in Summit
[43:31] Creek. Uh his name is Gayen Briggs.
[43:37] >> Okay.
[43:38] >> Um he severs in their ward. He wants to
[43:42] build a garage,
[43:46] another garage
[43:48] off the back corner of his house for a
[43:51] boat and a trailer.
[43:55] when the house was built as a spec home
[43:59] and he and he bought it and it was
[44:03] condition he kind Bucky told him that he
[44:05] could put a garage in
[44:11] with the HOA it's okay but it it's too
[44:15] close to property lines for the size
[44:20] that he needs to make it so he's going
[44:23] to request a variance
[44:25] uh in order to put this garage in off
[44:29] the corner of his house.
[44:34] » The issue is
[44:37] he can fit accessory building
[44:41] standards,
[44:44] but it's going to be closer than 20 ft
[44:46] to his house. So, it can't be accessory
[44:50] building standards. it has to be the
[44:53] house standards. So
[44:56] that's what he's
[44:58] got to meet. And so I don't know I don't
[45:02] know which way it's going to go but so
[45:05] that'll just for your information
[45:06] that'll be on Friday
[45:10] and we're going to do that.
[45:13] So
[45:16] um really no other updates.
[45:20] Um
[45:22] the um
[45:25] one thing I can't I don't remember if I
[45:27] shared with you or not the Fujas have um
[45:32] filed
[45:33] uh against their
[45:36] against Adam's engineer
[45:42] and so that's
[45:45] going to court.
[45:48] Um,
[45:50] so I don't know where that will end up.
[45:52] That's not anything to do with the city.
[45:54] I mean, it directly we obviously had a
[45:57] lot of interaction with her engineer
[45:59] during the build, but um it's a separate
[46:03] suit that they filed against uh their
[46:06] Adam's engineer. So,
[46:09] >> did the judge approve the extension?
[46:12] >> Hasn't said anything about that yet.
[46:14] >> Okay.
[46:16] So,
[46:18] we're still waiting.
[46:22] Uh, take a motion to dismiss.
[46:24] >> I'll make a motion to dismiss.
[46:27] >> I'll second it.
[46:30] >> Okay. All in favor?
[46:32] >> I
[46:35] Okay, that's
[46:38] just
[46:40] >> Ryan, I hope at Lake Pal.
[46:44] No, I'm in Long Beach.
[46:52] » Thanks for being with us tonight, Brian.
[46:54] >> Of course. I appreciate uh I was a
[46:56] little nervous. That's why Jody came
[46:58] down because I texted you and you
[46:59] weren't responding. I'm like, I don't
[47:00] know if I should wait. So,
[47:03] >> we were actually waiting for um
[47:07] >> called and said,
[47:10] >> just decided to wait for him to show up
[47:12] and