Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[15:19]
Okay.
[15:23]
So, call the planning commission to
[15:25]
order. It's uh 7:15.
[15:30]
Uh present are all commission members.
[15:34]
Sever Johnson, Wayne Franson, John
[15:37]
Stout, and Lori Thomas.
[15:40]
Um
[15:42]
we will Sever would you offer invocation
[15:44]
for us? Lori, would you lead us in the
[15:47]
pledge?
[15:54]
Oh kindly, gracious eternal heavenly
[15:56]
father, we're grateful for this
[15:59]
opportunity to meet together as a
[16:00]
planning commission this evening. Bless
[16:03]
us in our deliberations that we may have
[16:06]
thy to guide us to that which will be
[16:09]
best for our community. We are grateful
[16:13]
for all the blessings that thou has
[16:14]
bestow upon us. Keep us safe in this
[16:18]
area and we pray for these things in the
[16:20]
name of thy son Jesus Christ. Amen.
[16:23]
Thank you.
[16:29]
» I aliance to the flag of the United
[16:33]
States of America and to the republic
[16:37]
for which it stands. One nation under
[16:40]
God, indivisible
[16:43]
with liberty and justice for all.
[16:50]
Thank you both.
[16:53]
Um,
[16:54]
open the time for any public comment.
[16:58]
Uh,
[17:01]
any hands raised? None here?
[17:04]
None there. Thanks, Brian.
[17:08]
Very good. We will close public comment
[17:10]
then and go to our business partner
[17:15]
hearing.
[17:17]
>> Thank you.
[17:19]
Yep.
[17:20]
Um we're
[17:23]
one item for public hearing tonight is
[17:26]
for conditional use application
[17:29]
uh from uh three bridges and I think
[17:33]
there's a copy of it here. I believe I
[17:36]
mentioned it to you in a previous uh a
[17:39]
previous meeting just in in passing.
[17:42]
What this is is um they want to have a a
[17:48]
uh gravel operation
[17:51]
uh down here with their
[17:55]
We're just We're a little late in
[17:57]
starting, Jody.
[17:58]
>> Okay, Brian, you didn't know.
[18:00]
>> Oh, okay.
[18:01]
>> Thanks.
[18:02]
>> Okay. Um they want to uh start moving
[18:07]
this pile down here by the mailboxes
[18:11]
and do a gravel sorting and um
[18:20]
that they will use then for their roads.
[18:23]
Um
[18:25]
we felt that they needed needed to have
[18:27]
a conditional use permit uh to do that.
[18:30]
They're they're fine with it. They
[18:32]
haven't started yet, obviously. So,
[18:36]
that's what that's about. And we've
[18:39]
published a a notice about the public
[18:41]
hearing for anybody who wanted to make
[18:44]
comments about it. We don't we didn't
[18:46]
receive any outside of the meeting. Uh
[18:50]
their plans are to move the gravel in in
[18:54]
the process move the gravel to further
[18:57]
to the east. So eventually the this big
[19:02]
pile of gravel down there will be moved
[19:04]
as part of this operation.
[19:06]
>> Are they screening it? Is that what
[19:08]
they're doing?
[19:08]
>> They are. Yeah.
[19:10]
>> They've agreed to put uh uh water trucks
[19:13]
down there also to lessen the dust that
[19:18]
be coming from that. Um so we've we've
[19:25]
looked at it city. We don't we don't
[19:27]
have any objections to them.
[19:30]
>> And this seems to say that part of it is
[19:33]
onsite rock crushing.
[19:36]
And so I guess they're going to crush
[19:39]
the bigger ones and then separate the
[19:41]
dirt from the from the ground.
[19:45]
>> Yeah.
[19:49]
» So one of the biggest things is we
[19:52]
required them to have a sweat plan. So
[19:55]
that will keep the area clean and u
[19:59]
keep keep inspections regular
[20:02]
inspections of it and make sure that
[20:05]
they're in compliance with their SWIP
[20:07]
plan.
[20:09]
Um their SWIP plan was like
[20:13]
40 pages.
[20:15]
>> They had to
[20:19]
where they have that stored. Is that in Woodland Hills or is it
[20:24]
>> It is. We own that piece of property
[20:27]
there is in our city limits.
[20:29]
>> They won't be crushing in Woodland
[20:30]
Hills, right? It'll be in Salem. Are
[20:32]
they moving them back over that way?
[20:34]
>> They are further to the east. But
[20:36]
they'll be they'll be
[20:38]
>> there's going to be picking this up and
[20:40]
then taking it to the
[20:41]
>> No, they're going to they're
[20:45]
going to have one in our area as well.
[20:47]
>> Yes.
[20:47]
>> Yeah.
[20:49]
And so that's why they're keeping a
[20:50]
water truck there. And and some of these
[20:53]
crushers have, I understand, water in
[20:56]
them as part of their operation. And I
[20:58]
don't know if that will happen with them
[21:00]
or not, but we'll keep our eye on the on
[21:03]
the dust dust control.
[21:06]
So
[21:07]
it'll probably be hard to separate with
[21:10]
the work they're going to be doing on
[21:12]
wooden hills.
[21:13]
>> Say nobody's going to get down there
[21:14]
anyway.
[21:15]
>> You know,
[21:16]
>> it looks like pure rocks. I don't know.
[21:18]
They need to separate.
[21:20]
>> Yeah.
[21:24]
>> So, any questions about that?
[21:28]
>> Now, let me uh I'll take a motion on
[21:33]
recommending these. Our conditional use
[21:35]
permits go to the city council. And so,
[21:39]
um I'll need to take a recommendation to
[21:42]
them from the planning commission. So,
[21:45]
if anyone wants to make a motion, I'll
[21:48]
make a motion to approve the conditional
[21:51]
use permit.
[21:51]
>> Okay.
[21:52]
>> For three bridges is crushing operation.
[21:55]
I'll second that.
[21:56]
>> Okay.
[22:01]
All in favor?
[22:04]
>> Any oppose?
[22:06]
Very well. We'll move that
[22:10]
to the city council. make them aware and
[22:12]
they can discuss it further.
[22:16]
Um
[22:20]
the um let's go to item six then
[22:25]
approval of March 18, 2026 planning
[22:29]
commission meeting minutes. I didn't get
[22:31]
any u comments back on it and sending
[22:35]
the minutes.
[22:36]
>> What was it?
[22:38]
Well, you said
[22:39]
>> there were still a journment,
[22:41]
>> but we did
[22:42]
>> we did have an adjournment.
[22:45]
>> Yeah.
[22:45]
>> You know, and we voted on that,
[22:47]
>> but it led on the minutes.
[22:48]
>> On the minutes. Okay. I'll I'll get back
[22:52]
in there and attach that.
[23:00]
Okay. With that one correction, then
[23:02]
I'll take a motion on the minutes for
[23:04]
March 6 18th.
[23:07]
I'll make a motion to approve the March
[23:09]
18th minutes with the correction of
[23:12]
including the adjournment.
[23:14]
>> Okay. Is there a second to that?
[23:16]
>> Second.
[23:17]
>> All right. All in favor?
[23:20]
>> I. Any opposed?
[23:23]
>> Very well. Thank you. I will
[23:26]
make that change.
[23:29]
Uh the next item is item eight and
[23:34]
um
[23:36]
there's a um
[23:42]
there's a request being made by Summit
[23:43]
Creek. Bucky is here tonight to talk to
[23:46]
us about it.
[23:48]
um to amend their
[23:52]
um
[23:54]
plat their final plat
[23:57]
and to actually add two lots
[24:02]
to it
[24:04]
and there those lots are where those
[24:06]
arrows are shown on there. Bucky, let me
[24:11]
turn time over to you and you can
[24:12]
explain
[24:14]
>> explain that. Uh, I've I've given them a
[24:16]
copy of the final plant, so I don't know
[24:19]
to show where it is. I I don't know if
[24:21]
we need to do that.
[24:22]
>> Yeah, if you've got it, that that's
[24:24]
fine. You should see two two lots.
[24:26]
There's one that's 237
[24:29]
and then there's one that's 247. Is that the arrows with supporting it?
[24:35]
>> Yeah. So on our original plat
[24:39]
we plan to
[24:44]
um to include 237 in our next phase
[24:49]
which we plan to develop, you know, in
[24:51]
the next year or two. Um because we
[24:54]
thought that it was going to be easier
[24:57]
to access that lot to build a home on
[25:01]
one of the future roads that's behind
[25:03]
those lots in our master plan.
[25:06]
Now that we've cut that road in um and
[25:09]
we're looking at the grades,
[25:12]
it looks like um it looks like we can
[25:15]
access that lot and and build a a a
[25:19]
house easily from the road that we've
[25:21]
cut in.
[25:23]
And so
[25:24]
>> so that would be on Eagle Nest then the
[25:26]
continuation of Eagle Nest. Yeah. Down
[25:28]
around. Okay.
[25:29]
>> Exactly. So that would be considered the
[25:30]
frontage and
[25:33]
um uh so that's that's why we're
[25:37]
requesting an amendment for that lot.
[25:41]
the 247.
[25:44]
Um,
[25:46]
after we uh cut the road in and graded
[25:53]
that the those lots were where 221 and
[25:58]
20 and 222 are, we we realized there's a
[26:03]
lot more usable land up there than than
[26:06]
we had thought prior.
[26:08]
Um,
[26:10]
we
[26:12]
I was hoping we are doing a little bit
[26:14]
of a little bit of analysis right now
[26:17]
with our builder
[26:19]
to make sure the proper house can be
[26:22]
built in that build pad that that we're
[26:25]
showing on on 247. I thought we would
[26:28]
have that done by now. Um,
[26:31]
unfortunately, we we don't quite have it
[26:33]
done yet. So, I'm I guess I'm here
[26:37]
tonight asking for an amendment for 237
[26:41]
to come into the plat.
[26:44]
And I think we're a little uncertain
[26:47]
about 247 right now. I think we'll know
[26:50]
for sure by your meeting in May. and
[26:53]
we'd like to come back and revisit the
[26:56]
discussion on that lot in May if that
[27:00]
uh this if the um planning commission's
[27:03]
open to that.
[27:05]
>> What if you're if the engineering work
[27:08]
shows that that's going to be
[27:10]
problematic? What what are your plans
[27:15]
>> going back to what's the the
[27:16]
>> to a single lot there with one
[27:20]
>> 127 and well they just take out
[27:25]
>> 247 would that become part of 221 then
[27:29]
or part of 27
[27:31]
>> 222 it was part of 222
[27:34]
>> 222
[27:34]
>> yeah so and 222 was just a really really
[27:37]
big lot
[27:38]
>> and so we took part of that and turn and
[27:42]
turn it into two lots 222 and 247.
[27:45]
>> So if that becomes problematic in your
[27:47]
further review, you just go back to that
[27:50]
being a single lot and not not divide it
[27:53]
off. That would be your plan.
[27:55]
>> Just go back to just excluding 247 from the plat. And it's not an it's not
[28:02]
a question of engineering. It's it's
[28:05]
>> topography issues with
[28:07]
>> it's just the size of home.
[28:09]
>> It's a lot.
[28:10]
>> Yeah. Well, we know like a comfortably
[28:13]
what you're what you're showing right
[28:14]
there, like a 4,000 foot home can be
[28:17]
built, but we anticipate somebody might
[28:20]
want to build a bigger house than 4,000
[28:24]
square ft on that lot. And and so that's
[28:27]
kind of the analysis that's going on
[28:28]
right now with our builder to see, you
[28:31]
know, see if if a five or 6,000 foot
[28:35]
home or something like that can be built
[28:38]
uh on that lot. So, and we don't want it to feel too
[28:43]
squished, you know, with with a couple
[28:46]
larger homes that are 5,000 6,000 square
[28:49]
ft, you know, we want it to we want
[28:51]
everyone to feel like there's plenty of
[28:52]
elbow room up there. So, that's we're
[28:56]
just we're just double-checking
[28:57]
ourselves,
[28:58]
>> okay?
[28:59]
>> If that makes sense.
[29:00]
>> Okay. So,
[29:04]
>> um, would we really have to bring it
[29:06]
back if they decided to paint it as 221?
[29:13]
» I guess not.
[29:14]
>> It's already
[29:16]
together, right? Isn't it?
[29:18]
>> I would just need to come back if we
[29:20]
decide we want to request the 247.
[29:26]
Yeah, because the way it was originally
[29:28]
approved,
[29:30]
it was combined those that lot there. So
[29:33]
that it would just you drop the
[29:38]
idea of trying to make a separate lot
[29:40]
out of it.
[29:40]
>> Exactly.
[29:42]
>> But we still need to tonight we need to
[29:45]
approve 230 237.
[29:49]
It was dropped off. It was it was
[29:52]
originally not put on
[29:55]
the like you said the the original
[29:58]
plaque that was reviewed by our
[30:00]
engineers.
[30:01]
>> Mhm.
[30:02]
>> It wasn't on there and then you added it
[30:06]
and we approved that final plaque with
[30:09]
the addition
[30:11]
of that lot, but then you took it
[30:15]
>> off
[30:15]
>> took it off.
[30:16]
>> Yeah,
[30:18]
I know. We do need to add We do need an
[30:20]
amend then to put that lot back on.
[30:24]
>> Yeah. So, if you're on that street
[30:25]
looking at 237, it's it's downhill
[30:29]
>> and it's the lots to the side of it. The
[30:31]
grades are fine. This one's in a little
[30:33]
bit steeper little ravine. And so, we
[30:36]
were from the plan before the the road
[30:39]
was cut in, we were really skeptical if you could build a driveway onto the
[30:45]
build pad. And but now that it's all the
[30:48]
roads cut in and all the grates are are
[30:51]
there, we feel like we can comfortably
[30:54]
be able to uh uh driveway and keep it at
[30:58]
like 8% to get down to the build pad.
[31:01]
So,
[31:03]
>> okay.
[31:05]
Any questions any of you have for Bucky on that?
[31:12]
Um,
[31:13]
there's a couple of things that I want
[31:16]
having to do with a general plan. The
[31:20]
fees haven't been paid yet for the
[31:22]
amendment. So, that needs to be need the
[31:27]
email that we were just going Yeah, they went out today. So, they should be
[31:31]
hitting the city's account today or
[31:33]
tomorrow.
[31:34]
>> All right. Very good. Um,
[31:38]
we still need to review the water shares
[31:41]
on on
[31:42]
>> the 23 set. Yeah.
[31:44]
>> On these lots to make sure that
[31:46]
>> that I've deed it enough.
[31:48]
>> Yeah. That there's enough there. So, we
[31:51]
need to uh I'm going to suggest to the
[31:54]
planning commission that we
[32:01]
the amendment gets approved with
[32:03]
conditions and that's one of them
[32:06]
>> where we're required to have needed
[32:09]
water shares on the on the final plan
[32:13]
approval. So that's that's one thing
[32:16]
that
[32:17]
or the fees sounds like they're
[32:19]
addressed. Um, another thing that
[32:24]
we need to get we need to do in concert
[32:26]
with you, Bucky, is um
[32:31]
change the a part of that
[32:36]
public road now to private road.
[32:40]
>> Yeah. the same way as we did before with
[32:43]
that other
[32:44]
>> and we have to have a public hearing to
[32:47]
do that and I think I'm talking to Jody
[32:50]
and I believe we can do that in our
[32:54]
May
[32:55]
>> meeting.
[32:57]
>> Okay. uh with I think there's enough
[32:58]
time between now and then uh to publish
[33:02]
that and any public input so that we can
[33:06]
it it's a process that that we have to go
[33:11]
through and do which we've agreed to do
[33:13]
already
[33:15]
>> and we just need to do it and working in
[33:18]
concert with you to get that done.
[33:20]
>> Yeah, I've got the paperwork. I just I
[33:23]
just met with our attorney yesterday.
[33:25]
He's he's drafting the paperwork right
[33:27]
now.
[33:27]
>> Okay.
[33:28]
>> So So it should be done anytime soon.
[33:31]
>> Okay. If you can get it to us as soon as
[33:33]
possible cuz we'll we'll probably use
[33:35]
that
[33:36]
to is as part of the public hearing in
[33:41]
information that goes out there
[33:43]
>> be specific to what
[33:45]
>> that is. And we there's some individuals
[33:49]
too that need to be notified. Uh, I
[33:52]
think they're kind of at the at the
[33:54]
bottom of the culde-sac there, but
[33:57]
they're within 300 ft of of this part
[34:00]
that will be private. And so, we need to
[34:04]
specifically inform them.
[34:08]
We don't need their permission, but we
[34:09]
need to inform them of the public here
[34:12]
so they can comment if they choose to do
[34:14]
that.
[34:15]
>> Yeah. Okay.
[34:16]
>> So,
[34:17]
>> sounds great. Those were the areas I
[34:25]
have. Have Have you guys looked closely
[34:28]
at that turn around that's down that
[34:32]
you're putting in place down there?
[34:34]
>> Yeah.
[34:37]
>> Are you comfortable with that in its
[34:39]
size and being sufficient?
[34:44]
» Isn't that something Ted's got to go
[34:46]
deal with? He does the fire.
[34:48]
>> He does. We've looked we've we've looked
[34:50]
at it already when the the final plaque,
[34:54]
but and we got I got talking to with
[34:57]
Jody about it today and we're probably
[35:00]
going to use some of that to push snow
[35:03]
into
[35:04]
as we come down there. We can't push it
[35:07]
through your through your gates there.
[35:09]
And so if we do that, is that going to
[35:13]
limit
[35:15]
>> the turnaround? limit the turnaround
[35:16]
area and um
[35:20]
so
[35:20]
>> I mean I think I think we're on paper it looks like it
[35:28]
looks it looks plenty big enough. It
[35:31]
looks like we can push even snow onto
[35:34]
the shoulders past past the curbing of
[35:37]
the of the hammerhead. I think what
[35:40]
we've experienced with doing a lot of
[35:42]
snow removal up here is we'll find
[35:45]
somewhere to put the snow.
[35:47]
We always do. Everyone does.
[35:50]
>> Yeah.
[35:51]
>> So, we have those big snowblower
[35:53]
attachments on on the end of our skid
[35:55]
steers that throw the snow way over the
[35:58]
curb. And so,
[36:00]
>> Okay.
[36:01]
>> So, we're not overly worried about it,
[36:02]
but
[36:03]
>> Well, we may take another another look
[36:05]
at it and just kind of satisfy
[36:07]
ourselves, too, that we're good. Yeah,
[36:09]
>> with that. So,
[36:09]
>> yeah, we did go through it with Ted and
[36:11]
the city engineer. I mean, our engineer
[36:13]
and the city engineer and Ted all met
[36:16]
and it meets it meets city codes and
[36:19]
>> I and I noticed that that he did say
[36:21]
that it it was code compliant
[36:24]
>> the size and so forth there. So,
[36:27]
>> yeah, we want to make sure that, you
[36:30]
know,
[36:32]
I mean, our thinking is that there's
[36:33]
going to be shoulders beyond the curb,
[36:35]
which is great place to push snow to as
[36:38]
well. Yeah.
[36:39]
>> So,
[36:40]
>> okay.
[36:43]
So, those are the only So, we've got the public roads leading
[36:50]
to Summit Creek
[36:52]
um review of water shares
[36:56]
and fees paid.
[37:00]
So, if one of you want to make an
[37:03]
approval of adding at this time the lot
[37:06]
237
[37:09]
um to the final plat
[37:13]
uh conditions that those three areas get
[37:18]
addressed to comply with our city code
[37:21]
and word it however you'd like.
[37:25]
I'll make a motion to approve the
[37:28]
amended plat for Summit Creek for lot
[37:30]
237.
[37:34]
Um
[37:36]
review of water shares and make sure the
[37:39]
fees are paid.
[37:40]
>> Fees are paid and the public road
[37:42]
>> public roaded deed to the city.
[37:44]
>> The Summit Creek
[37:46]
>> to Summit Creek.
[37:47]
>> Yeah, the private road.
[37:48]
>> The private road. You said public road.
[37:50]
So yes.
[37:50]
>> Well, it is public. It has been it is
[37:52]
public. public and it is
[37:54]
>> so it needs to be deed to to Summit
[37:57]
Creek.
[37:57]
>> So it's to be deed to Summit Creek.
[37:59]
>> Yeah. For their private. Okay.
[38:01]
>> I'll second a motion.
[38:02]
>> Okay.
[38:04]
All in favor of that?
[38:06]
>> I. Any opposed?
[38:09]
>> Okay. Let me make a note here.
[38:23]
And just I don't know if it's helpful or
[38:25]
gives you any comfort or anything, but
[38:27]
our development agreement does require
[38:30]
us to work through the paperwork of
[38:33]
taking that portion of the road, turning
[38:36]
it private, and deeding it to the HOA.
[38:39]
>> Yeah.
[38:39]
>> So, the county won't let the plaque get
[38:42]
recorded without that being done
[38:44]
properly. So
[38:47]
>> that makes sense.
[38:48]
>> So
[38:48]
>> okay and that's it's yeah
[38:53]
>> two areas code compliance and and that
[38:56]
specifically the the development
[38:59]
agreement was amended to um address that
[39:03]
when when those issues were first
[39:07]
presented
[39:08]
>> to us. So,
[39:09]
>> yeah,
[39:11]
>> if you if you can stay in touch with us
[39:14]
or with me on the paperwork when your
[39:17]
attorney gets ready for that and and
[39:20]
that'll help us know a little bit more
[39:21]
when we need to get the publication in
[39:24]
so that
[39:25]
>> Perfect.
[39:27]
>> Yeah, I'm hoping early next week I'll
[39:29]
have the first draft of that paperwork.
[39:32]
>> Okay. So, um, are you gonna are you
[39:35]
going to check on the water rights or is
[39:38]
that something you want me to check on?
[39:39]
>> Yeah, if you check on them and see where you stand.
[39:42]
>> Yeah, I will. I've got a I've got a
[39:44]
tally. I've got a spreadsheet of a
[39:45]
tally, so
[39:46]
>> Okay.
[39:46]
>> Yeah, I can do that. So,
[39:49]
>> okay. Um,
[39:53]
» very well.
[39:54]
>> Well, thank you. I appreciate
[39:56]
>> Okay. appreciate the consideration and
[39:58]
we'll we'll get these conditions met and and
[40:04]
move on.
[40:05]
>> Very good.
[40:06]
>> Thanks for coming down, Becky.
[40:08]
>> Yeah, thank you.
[40:09]
>> Beautiful lots in there.
[40:11]
>> Oh, thanks. Yeah, it's a good spot. So,
[40:13]
it's hard to find a bad spot in Hills,
[40:15]
though.
[40:18]
>> Every time I drive down here for work,
[40:20]
I'm like, "Oh, it's so hard to It's so
[40:22]
hard to leave.
[40:24]
Got to get those kids a little older so
[40:25]
I can move in.
[40:27]
>> Yeah. Yeah.
[40:28]
>> They're all in the trenches in high
[40:30]
school and friends and you know how that
[40:34]
goes.
[40:34]
>> Yeah. Those trenches are strong.
[40:36]
>> Yeah.
[40:37]
>> So,
[40:38]
>> got a son who's still mad at me for when
[40:40]
he moved out of California back to
[40:42]
Virginia.
[40:43]
>> Oh, yeah.
[40:43]
>> Yeah. Junior in high school. And
[40:48]
>> so,
[40:49]
>> sometimes you got to go.
[40:50]
>> Yeah. Yeah.
[40:51]
>> Makes them mad, but they adapt. Yeah,
[40:54]
>> he didn't marry her. So,
[41:01]
» I'd like to think you married somebody
[41:02]
better. And I think you did. So,
[41:06]
>> anything else you need from me?
[41:07]
>> No, I think that takes care of it.
[41:09]
>> All right. Thank you. Appreciate the
[41:10]
time. Have a good night.
[41:12]
>> You bet. You, too.
[41:14]
Um
[41:19]
any I don't have any other items for me. that I I'm
[41:28]
and asked Jody to include that all the
[41:30]
time just in case there's some issues or
[41:33]
things that we need to discuss and
[41:36]
things and I don't know are there any of
[41:40]
that you
[41:41]
we're let me let me share one thing
[41:44]
Friday we're having a
[41:46]
variance hearing
[41:49]
on on two requests that have been made
[41:52]
one is from a homeowner up on um
[41:57]
what's the one just below the the
[41:59]
culde-sac below deep forest?
[42:02]
>> Is it Bridger?
[42:04]
>> Three. Yeah,
[42:04]
>> Bridger Circle.
[42:05]
>> Yeah.
[42:06]
>> Okay. Um
[42:08]
his name is Aaron Lloyd
[42:12]
and um
[42:18]
the council approved a variance which by
[42:23]
ordinance they can to his driveway
[42:27]
slope. It exceeded
[42:30]
um
[42:31]
>> 15%.
[42:32]
>> Yeah.
[42:34]
And so they approved that
[42:37]
in order to get that slope, he had to
[42:41]
get closer to the property line than 20
[42:44]
ft
[42:46]
and the council can't approve that.
[42:49]
So, um, he's he's written a variance
[42:54]
request
[42:55]
and, uh, there will be the our this
[42:58]
hearing officer. We've used her once or
[43:02]
twice in the past. She's an attorney.
[43:04]
She will come here Friday and hear that
[43:09]
request.
[43:11]
And also,
[43:13]
uh, he made his covert too small.
[43:19]
So that's part of the request as well.
[43:24]
So that's one request. Uh there will be
[43:27]
a second hearing
[43:29]
of uh an individual over in Summit
[43:31]
Creek. Uh his name is Gayen Briggs.
[43:37]
>> Okay.
[43:38]
>> Um he severs in their ward. He wants to
[43:42]
build a garage,
[43:46]
another garage
[43:48]
off the back corner of his house for a
[43:51]
boat and a trailer.
[43:55]
when the house was built as a spec home
[43:59]
and he and he bought it and it was
[44:03]
condition he kind Bucky told him that he
[44:05]
could put a garage in
[44:11]
with the HOA it's okay but it it's too
[44:15]
close to property lines for the size
[44:20]
that he needs to make it so he's going
[44:23]
to request a variance
[44:25]
uh in order to put this garage in off
[44:29]
the corner of his house.
[44:34]
» The issue is
[44:37]
he can fit accessory building
[44:41]
standards,
[44:44]
but it's going to be closer than 20 ft
[44:46]
to his house. So, it can't be accessory
[44:50]
building standards. it has to be the
[44:53]
house standards. So
[44:56]
that's what he's
[44:58]
got to meet. And so I don't know I don't
[45:02]
know which way it's going to go but so
[45:05]
that'll just for your information
[45:06]
that'll be on Friday
[45:10]
and we're going to do that.
[45:13]
So
[45:16]
um really no other updates.
[45:20]
Um
[45:22]
the um
[45:25]
one thing I can't I don't remember if I
[45:27]
shared with you or not the Fujas have um
[45:32]
filed
[45:33]
uh against their
[45:36]
against Adam's engineer
[45:42]
and so that's
[45:45]
going to court.
[45:48]
Um,
[45:50]
so I don't know where that will end up.
[45:52]
That's not anything to do with the city.
[45:54]
I mean, it directly we obviously had a
[45:57]
lot of interaction with her engineer
[45:59]
during the build, but um it's a separate
[46:03]
suit that they filed against uh their
[46:06]
Adam's engineer. So,
[46:09]
>> did the judge approve the extension?
[46:12]
>> Hasn't said anything about that yet.
[46:14]
>> Okay.
[46:16]
So,
[46:18]
we're still waiting.
[46:22]
Uh, take a motion to dismiss.
[46:24]
>> I'll make a motion to dismiss.
[46:27]
>> I'll second it.
[46:30]
>> Okay. All in favor?
[46:32]
>> I
[46:35]
Okay, that's
[46:38]
just
[46:40]
>> Ryan, I hope at Lake Pal.
[46:44]
No, I'm in Long Beach.
[46:52]
» Thanks for being with us tonight, Brian.
[46:54]
>> Of course. I appreciate uh I was a
[46:56]
little nervous. That's why Jody came
[46:58]
down because I texted you and you
[46:59]
weren't responding. I'm like, I don't
[47:00]
know if I should wait. So,
[47:03]
>> we were actually waiting for um
[47:07]
>> called and said,
[47:10]
>> just decided to wait for him to show up
[47:12]
and