[2:57] hi chad how are you good how are you um

[3:12] that's what i have to do don't worry

[3:14] i'll send it to you

[3:15] i like you sort of drawing oh thank you

[3:17] thank you now um tomorrow what time

[3:19] should we be here how about 8 45 good

[3:21] bye

[11:24] good

[11:31] [Music]

[12:24] for monday march 21st

[12:27] and the first committee is government

[12:29] operations mr charlotte okay so i'd like

[12:32] to call the government

[12:33] operations committee to order um we have

[12:36] four items on the agenda

[12:38] um

[12:39] a discussion around uh cannabis

[12:41] licensing zoning procurement policy uh

[12:45] ceremony resolution for zion lutheran

[12:48] church

[12:48] and a discussion around personnel um so

[12:54] first around kind of candidates licensed

[12:56] zoning i wanted to bring this back up to

[12:58] the council we

[13:00] spoke a little bit about this um

[13:02] and there was some conversation around

[13:04] this before i uh i actually joined the

[13:06] council but um as we're moving um in

[13:10] this direction i want to kind of

[13:12] open up the conversation to make sure

[13:14] that we are

[13:16] keeping in mind that we are trying to do

[13:18] this and within the spirit of the law

[13:21] that seems to uh

[13:23] clearly point out trying to you know

[13:25] write some wrongs and some historical

[13:28] lines around prohibition in

[13:30] marginalized communities and how they

[13:31] were disproportionately impacted

[13:33] by these laws and i wanted to just kind

[13:35] of have that conversation with the

[13:37] council and make sure i was uh getting

[13:39] your thoughts on on how we can do so

[13:48] and i would also if you don't mind i'd

[13:49] like mr um colin uh to speak to his

[13:52] drawing part of it yeah

[13:54] yeah mr coleman

[13:56] thank you uh good evening everyone

[13:58] um to begin um we're still waiting for

[14:01] regulations to come out from new york

[14:03] state related to

[14:04] um

[14:05] you know the parameters that the state's

[14:07] going to set up

[14:08] for lounges and dispensaries

[14:11] um i don't want to say we're in the dark

[14:13] when i think you know

[14:15] but we haven't seen even proposed

[14:17] regulations let alone finalized

[14:19] regulations

[14:21] um

[14:23] with zoning obviously you know

[14:26] there have been discussions that i've

[14:27] had with people in the development

[14:29] office

[14:31] generally i think

[14:32] we're of the mind that it's good to have

[14:34] the conversation but until

[14:36] the regulations come out so that we know

[14:38] what the state is going to require and

[14:40] whether or not

[14:43] you know we can go beyond what the state

[14:45] um may require

[14:47] um

[14:48] that's up in the air we don't know

[14:51] for example you know

[14:53] you know this i'm i'm speaking because i

[14:55] have really have no idea yeah it could

[14:57] be something related to like you know

[14:58] liquor stores where you have to have you

[15:00] know you have to be 500 feet apart for

[15:02] you know there are distance um

[15:04] requirements with liquor stores

[15:06] there's a chance that the state will do

[15:08] something very similar along those lines

[15:11] and the state may say and a city may be

[15:14] able to go beyond those restrictions we

[15:16] just don't know

[15:18] um

[15:19] you know i think obviously it's good to

[15:20] have the conversation to know to kind of

[15:23] keep it fresh but until really i think

[15:25] the state comes out with

[15:28] some type of

[15:29] you know

[15:30] regulations for us to review

[15:33] um

[15:34] it's very difficult to say what we can

[15:36] do and what we can't do

[15:40] there's not much more that i can really

[15:41] say on that i know you know as i said

[15:43] i've talked to the zoning officer about

[15:45] it we've

[15:46] you know um reviewed um you know things

[15:49] that may come up but we just as i said

[15:52] we don't know until we know

[15:56] i guess you know as we're out because

[15:58] we're gonna

[15:59] end up operating within certain

[16:01] parameters right so i just wanted to

[16:03] make sure you know i guess for the

[16:04] council outside of that piece was just

[16:06] like you know what you know as we start

[16:08] to think ahead of like you know what are

[16:10] you know some of the things that we can

[16:12] be uh you know

[16:15] making sure that we are in line with the

[16:17] spirit of this law because

[16:19] i i want to make sure that that's

[16:20] something that we're doing here that

[16:21] we're really honored you know um

[16:24] correcting you know some of the

[16:25] historical inequities that uh

[16:26] prohibition has

[16:28] uh impacted certain communities mr mayor

[16:32] can i correct i thought the

[16:35] state was going to put out first draft

[16:39] regulations so there would be a comment

[16:42] period so we would be able to

[16:44] get a general

[16:46] feel for

[16:47] the criteria that they were going to put

[16:49] into effect

[16:51] and

[16:53] kind of react

[16:55] from that you know should we endorse it

[16:57] 100 should we

[16:59] say no

[17:00] we don't want some of this and

[17:03] zoning is still largely

[17:06] the program of the local legislative

[17:08] body that you're going to have

[17:10] uh

[17:11] the final decision on that

[17:14] with the exception you know the state

[17:16] has taken some things

[17:18] such as group homes

[17:20] and

[17:21] gave them the designation as a

[17:24] thing this is a single family

[17:26] are one so that you can't

[17:29] and it's appropriate where you can't

[17:30] discriminate against them

[17:32] but

[17:33] at the same time where you have some of

[17:35] those

[17:36] homes that come in

[17:38] they create issues that

[17:40] are ancillary to their activity they're

[17:43] parking

[17:44] their traffic the things that uh

[17:47] people understand the goal of the

[17:49] organization as a whole but there's

[17:51] sometimes there are impacts that the

[17:53] state

[17:54] legislature or illinois may not have

[17:57] considered

[17:58] how do we look at these and be able to

[18:00] articulate a position that's going to be

[18:02] appropriate for schenectady and probably

[18:04] other communities across the state

[18:07] [Music]

[18:11] so we've opted in for the retail

[18:13] dispensary and the on-flight consumption

[18:16] right

[18:16] and then

[18:18] um

[18:19] then we have the other information here

[18:21] where it says that

[18:23] the governor has said that certain

[18:26] communities people certain people who

[18:27] are impacted negatively are going to be

[18:29] the first ones to get

[18:31] um

[18:32] um

[18:35] so

[18:36] i mean is that something that i mean how

[18:38] do we

[18:39] i know we can't make this decision today

[18:41] but i think we need to start having a

[18:42] conversation of how we even identify

[18:44] because people have already come forward

[18:45] who

[18:46] that doesn't that they're not in that

[18:47] category but there are people

[18:50] so people who are in that category how

[18:51] do we begin to identify or you know how

[18:54] do we do that um i know that people

[18:56] aren't going to get licenses until 2023

[18:59] but um

[19:00] it's gonna probably take a while to get

[19:01] through all of this so

[19:03] um i think that's one of the reasons why

[19:05] we're talking about it today just to

[19:07] begin to kind of put in place

[19:09] so that we're not there in 2023 trying

[19:11] to figure that out yes yeah and if it's

[19:14] i mean yeah please uh

[19:17] mr coleman pointed out

[19:20] the application process somewhat mirrors

[19:23] are similar to a liquor license

[19:25] you know we don't become aware of it

[19:28] until the process is well underway

[19:34] and i believe i read that the governor

[19:36] said there'd be the first 100 to 200 is

[19:38] that all new york state yes yes so

[19:40] that's what it is

[19:42] so i mean i guess we would just wait for

[19:44] people to fill out a license and if

[19:46] they're in our area that's how we would

[19:48] determine who was going to be able to i

[19:50] don't know and i don't think they've

[19:52] said how many

[19:54] licenses they're looking to give

[19:57] statewide

[19:59] is that 200

[20:02] most of them is it half of them is it

[20:07] still a lot of unknowns in the

[20:08] discussion

[20:11] i think they're

[20:12] unknown but

[20:13] um i thought that it was a first round

[20:15] of 100 licenses across the state and

[20:18] then the second round of 100 licenses

[20:20] across the state i thought

[20:21] but i think they're in a public comment

[20:23] period

[20:24] right now actually um

[20:27] in terms of those first hundred but

[20:29] i'm asking this question however

[20:32] even with those first and it is 100

[20:34] across the state so obviously i would

[20:36] think that they're going to be

[20:38] as the state awards the licenses they'll

[20:40] be looking at

[20:43] you know probably be skewed to different

[20:44] areas of the state as well so but we

[20:47] don't have the licenses right i mean

[20:48] it'll be a state estate thing so that's

[20:52] it's not it's not even in our control

[20:54] at that point who gets the licenses i

[20:57] think

[20:58] that's my assumption at this point

[21:00] yeah

[21:03] you know that doesn't mean that you know

[21:05] just because there are no there are

[21:07] unknowns we shouldn't think about you

[21:09] know this obviously you know the idea

[21:11] here is you know um any type of you know

[21:14] permitting process we do internally for

[21:16] the city whether that's a special use

[21:18] permit that the city council wanted to

[21:19] require for any dispensary or lounge or

[21:23] um anything related to

[21:25] you know the areas around the city in

[21:27] which

[21:28] the council may look to you know only

[21:31] allow

[21:32] dispensaries or

[21:35] lounges you know that's within your

[21:36] purview um it just can't be anything

[21:39] that's really unreasonable in terms of

[21:42] preventing somebody from actually or a

[21:44] company from actually operating within

[21:45] the city

[21:47] um but you know there may come a point

[21:49] in time where the council says you know

[21:50] we don't want to have

[21:52] you know i'm not speaking for you

[21:53] obviously this is hypothetical where you

[21:55] may say we don't want to have

[21:56] dispensaries or lounges in our one

[21:58] residential district

[22:00] obviously that's important to know um so

[22:03] we can take a look at the zoning code

[22:04] and

[22:05] um you know maybe better identify you

[22:08] know that's a gun up to you and as i

[22:10] said i've talked to the development

[22:11] staff about it you know

[22:14] again without the regulations it's

[22:16] really hard to say you know what can be

[22:17] done and what can't be done um but it's

[22:20] important i think to be mindful of

[22:22] when the regulations do come out you

[22:24] know where the council

[22:26] thinks that it would be best for lounges

[22:28] and dispensaries to be and then what we

[22:31] do internally with you know whether it's

[22:33] a special use permit or obviously you

[22:35] know somebody would probably still have

[22:37] to get site plan approval um but um

[22:40] there are things to think about um

[22:43] but with so many unknowns it's really

[22:44] hard to say how does the council move

[22:47] forward

[22:48] right yeah

[22:49] yeah just for clarity you know the

[22:51] conversation today isn't necessarily um

[22:53] you know how we you know how we move

[22:56] forward it you know for me what i really

[22:57] want to do is make sure that we are as

[23:00] because we do need to start thinking

[23:01] about it right right because we know

[23:03] that it's coming down the line so if

[23:04] we're doing that that we're doing that

[23:06] um you know in in alignment with you

[23:09] know uh

[23:11] the spirit of the law that that

[23:13] you know as it's been done so i just

[23:15] want to make sure that it's the lens

[23:16] we're looking through as we're

[23:18] um

[23:19] as we do as we're starting to think

[23:20] about it

[23:23] [Music]

[23:24] thanks uh so i definitely think it's

[23:26] important to actively remind the

[23:28] community that as these conversations

[23:30] continue to evolve as a council we're

[23:32] remaining in tune with the information

[23:34] that's coming out and then definitely um

[23:38] emphasizing what mr farley mentioned

[23:40] just understanding what the governor's

[23:42] intent is so absent or personal uh

[23:44] interpretations or opinions about the

[23:47] seating opportunity initiative it's just

[23:48] understanding that whatever is decided

[23:50] there's a little comment period as the

[23:52] mayor alluded to or that's what the

[23:54] expectation is

[23:56] but understanding that regardless of

[23:57] what comes out as a counselor and sure

[24:00] that we're promoting it to the

[24:02] betterment of the entire community so i

[24:04] think it's just

[24:05] we're aware of updates there have been

[24:07] no formalized legislation coming forward

[24:10] everyone just be patient

[24:13] that's it

[24:16] as i was looking up some things at the

[24:18] office of canada's mismanagement after

[24:20] this was on the agenda i noticed that

[24:22] there was something that they did called

[24:24] community conversations

[24:26] where they went around and talked to

[24:27] people i wasn't aware of that so um you

[24:30] can go back and it's on the website you

[24:32] can go back and hit the link and

[24:33] actually um go look at it i haven't had

[24:35] a chance to do that yet but so i it'll

[24:37] be interesting for us i think to maybe

[24:39] take a look and see

[24:40] what these community conversations were

[24:41] about

[24:42] [Music]

[24:44] so it's in english in spanish for those

[24:45] who are listening and may want to go

[24:47] back in

[24:48] i don't have the um

[24:50] the link here but it's on the cannabis

[24:52] website

[24:55] any further discussion on that

[24:58] okay

[25:00] so we'll move into our procurement

[25:02] policy

[25:04] portfolio

[25:08] thank you

[25:09] a few weeks ago we discussed

[25:12] new procurement policy for year 2022 to

[25:15] 2023

[25:17] and we held this back because mrs

[25:19] porterfield had wanted us to

[25:22] recommend that we insert the mwb

[25:25] language into the policy rather than

[25:26] having a footnote

[25:28] so

[25:29] we did that

[25:30] and this was a version that

[25:32] is with us here for us to review

[25:35] and come up with any additional

[25:37] recommendation that we may have

[25:40] [Music]

[25:43] if i may ask um

[25:45] mr gardner just give us a brief update

[25:48] if you don't mind sure sure

[25:50] mr gardner you just want to give us a

[25:52] brief update on these uh added

[25:54] changes the benefits of doing these

[26:00] all right good afternoon

[26:02] thank you um

[26:03] so so basically

[26:05] what what is the quote for you is taking

[26:08] the language that's already been

[26:09] approved in the uh mwde

[26:12] policy

[26:14] and adding into the uh practicing policy

[26:18] you know every language as opposed to

[26:19] football because it's already there but

[26:22] fellow in going

[26:23] we there's

[26:26] back and forth

[26:29] basically

[26:30] unless we have any specific questions

[26:37] i noticed a question that i think i'm

[26:39] not sure if it was from mr colton it

[26:40] says a.k.a um i was

[26:43] uncertain about that too i don't know if

[26:45] that got

[26:46] worked out

[26:47] do you want to say it or do you want me

[26:48] to i don't have any i mean that's the

[26:50] question that i raised i didn't i don't

[26:51] have an answer um so

[26:54] it um i'll just read it says um

[26:57] are the goals for

[26:59] each mbes and wpes 15 as indicated on

[27:03] the first paragraph for public works

[27:05] projects more than 100k

[27:07] or are the goals for each of those 12

[27:10] and 8

[27:11] and i did notice as i read through that

[27:13] it is in it is it says 12 and 8 in some

[27:17] different things okay so i was a little

[27:19] confused also the workforce goes deal

[27:21] specifically with the workforce so

[27:23] that's the hourly

[27:25] person working on the job site so so

[27:27] that's the eeo component

[27:29] and then the mwbe contract compliance

[27:32] piece gives us a

[27:33] okay

[27:34] okay so numbers of people on the site

[27:37] work at the workforce in the workforce

[27:39] and

[27:40] then the other part is just for like the

[27:43] contractors

[27:46] [Music]

[27:51] i guess we'll have one more the only

[27:53] other thing is that i did notice that

[27:54] the

[27:55] ceiling went from 250 000 to 300 000 for

[27:58] the apprenticeship

[28:00] programs i know we had talked about that

[28:02] quite a bit

[28:03] last year i just did couldn't you

[28:04] comment on that yeah and and again that

[28:06] was the um suggestion you know was to

[28:09] come back and discuss it was talk about

[28:11] you know bringing it you know and

[28:13] phasing that in and that's all that was

[28:15] what's basically probably 250 up to 300

[28:18] 000 again

[28:20] the mindset is to create opportunities

[28:22] for

[28:23] you know the smaller firms that not

[28:25] necessarily have

[28:26] you know access to these friendships

[28:42] more local small business owners

[28:44] one of the questions i think that was

[28:45] raised at the last time that we talked

[28:47] about this a few weeks ago was to what

[28:50] extent we've had success

[28:53] um with local

[28:56] contractors being able to to do this

[28:58] based on these changes that we had made

[29:00] last time okay so so it's a long term

[29:03] process you know it's a commitment and

[29:06] um you know we've had success uh we're

[29:08] getting you know more and more firms uh

[29:11] know

[29:12] coming in line consistency in terms of

[29:14] what the state requirements are

[29:16] and so we're working that and it's a

[29:18] much more strenuous process

[29:21] in other words

[29:22] you know to get certified and all that

[29:24] there's

[29:29] and

[29:30] you know we've gotten more companies

[29:32] certified

[29:33] you know as a result of this and then

[29:35] you know more opportunities

[29:37] you know coming forward and ultimately

[29:39] you know i won't be able to say in you

[29:41] know two years from now or five years

[29:43] from the conception

[29:44] that we create more prime contractors

[29:46] that's you know in this thing that

[29:49] people you know compete and have

[29:51] capacity to perform and execute on these

[29:53] jobs

[29:54] which also means that we would have more

[29:56] opportunity for

[29:58] the workforce and our constituents so

[30:00] again we have to do two things one you

[30:02] got to bring the capacity of other

[30:04] companies to compete

[30:05] and you know being the thing which is

[30:07] all about good business but also we have

[30:09] to train and develop the workforce to

[30:11] support

[30:12] you know these companies so that's why

[30:14] you can't do one without another you

[30:16] know so you can't necessarily have a

[30:18] training program

[30:20] and you don't have companies capable of

[30:22] taking longer to do that so you have to

[30:24] bring up the workforce to support you

[30:26] know these companies that

[30:28] you know that comes along and

[30:30] there's a lot more to it than just

[30:32] the labor on the work you know and

[30:34] having the children person you know

[30:35] these companies they need

[30:36] back office support for them and they

[30:39] have trouble

[30:40] getting the paperwork in and processing

[30:42] really which is why they know their pay

[30:44] which is

[30:45] adds to the cash flow issue so so it's

[30:48] evolving process

[30:50] that they have to

[30:52] you know do and

[30:54] you know we are making that way and

[30:56] you know a lot of success and we have to

[30:59] continue but it's not easy by no means

[31:01] you know it's

[31:05] well i appreciate the work that you do

[31:08] to help folks get

[31:09] certified and

[31:11] recruit a larger workforce so thank you

[31:16] yes i would also like to thank you for

[31:18] your input in this

[31:20] this pickerman policy to get all

[31:22] information to us and also working on

[31:24] the nwp the updated mwb version for the

[31:27] next two years so once again thank you

[31:29] for all the

[31:31] good hard

[31:31] you thank you so appreciate it

[31:35] so i i raised this question so mr um

[31:38] should we

[31:39] uh we're number 10 which was going to be

[31:41] that footnote should we now if we're

[31:42] going to be moving forward just delete

[31:43] that from this document sorry listen

[31:46] i'll go back for a second i was looking

[31:47] at this

[31:49] um

[31:50] that was the question in my email but

[31:52] i left it in there and i just added for

[31:53] additional information because obviously

[31:56] you know there's additional information

[31:58] in the um equal opportunity and

[32:01] affirmative action plan okay it's a good

[32:03] reference for people to go to it's great

[32:05] that you know we've now included the

[32:06] utilization in here but kind of fills in

[32:09] some gaps for people to go to the other

[32:11] document knowing that there's another

[32:12] document

[32:13] okay we just have to put it because i

[32:14] didn't see i didn't see

[32:16] on the place where the footnote where

[32:18] the this 10 was so we have to find the

[32:20] place

[32:21] it's uh

[32:22] under number four it says for

[32:24] mwbe utilization and then footnote 10 is

[32:27] there with it all right

[32:29] okay

[32:30] thank you

[32:33] okay no i'm good

[32:35] with this okay

[32:37] okay

[32:39] pretty much

[32:59] [Music]

[33:07] it's the 150th anniversary for zion

[33:10] lutheran church it's just a resolution

[33:12] to recognizing for

[33:14] their anniversary

[33:18] second

[33:20] all those in favor

[33:24] okay

[33:25] and

[33:26] now we're going to move on to a

[33:28] discussion

[33:30] around personnel

[33:31] um so this is something if it really

[33:33] needs to be an executive session so i

[33:35] would like to have it there okay so i

[33:38] would like to uh recess no the mayor um

[33:41] wanted to add something oh okay okay

[33:44] afterwards okay so um uh

[33:46] so what we'll do is we'll go on to um

[33:49] the mayor wanted to add something here

[33:51] and then we'll

[33:52] go into that discussion so mr mayor

[33:55] talked to council member uh

[33:58] council president porterfield

[34:00] a little while ago got a request from

[34:03] the u.s conference of mares

[34:06] to

[34:07] uh

[34:11] pass it around

[34:13] there i thought

[34:14] two weeks ago that had been resolved

[34:17] but they're still

[34:19] a

[34:20] discussion in congress

[34:22] to limit or take back the money that has

[34:25] been allocated for local governments

[34:30] to fund some of the

[34:34] issues that are arising from the

[34:35] activity

[34:37] in the ukraine

[34:38] and

[34:39] some of the deficits that

[34:41] are

[34:42] funding

[34:44] necessities that are

[34:46] coming so from media

[34:49] and what i was looking for from that

[34:51] memo is to have the council consider

[34:54] passing the resolution

[34:56] saying that we

[34:57] appreciate the work that went into

[35:00] getting money for local governments

[35:03] we're going through the process now to

[35:06] spend it we've identified some projects

[35:08] in

[35:09] holland central park going through the

[35:10] review with community now and

[35:13] again looking forward to

[35:16] other things as we deal with it next

[35:18] year

[35:19] and

[35:20] i always appreciate the good work of

[35:24] people in congress sometimes it happens

[35:27] where i don't quite understand the logic

[35:29] and uh would uh ask for the council's

[35:32] consideration to go on record saying

[35:34] that

[35:35] we can thank them for the money that

[35:38] we've got and

[35:39] we need that money and

[35:42] don't want them to undertake something

[35:44] that would claw it back or modify

[35:47] what we have

[35:50] coming to us

[35:51] today

[35:55] i would absolutely 100 support that

[35:58] you know that you know we got the money

[36:00] we're anticipating spending the money so

[36:01] i think that it's definitely something

[36:03] that we should do

[36:06] so

[36:09] i agree

[36:20] [Music]

[36:24] so at this point um

[36:28] this is a traffic tool that's an outline

[36:32] again okay

[36:33] okay so i want you to recess

[36:36] okay all those in favor

[36:42] [Music]

[36:55] [Music]

[37:04] 2022 capital projects which you had

[37:07] already really improved in uh the budget

[37:09] process uh

[37:11] in november of the past year uh

[37:14] and as you know uh what we're in the

[37:16] process right now is to actually go out

[37:18] and borrow the money so we're just

[37:19] getting an approval uh with this bond

[37:22] awareness to go out and borrow the money

[37:24] um as you know uh the total capital

[37:26] prices came over 12 million dollars but

[37:29] we we're looking to just borrow uh

[37:32] 6.9 million uh the other difference is

[37:34] the cost of issuance costs of 93 000 uh

[37:38] we're going to be banning this ban as a

[37:41] bonding station though uh usually for

[37:44] one year and we'll probably bond it next

[37:46] year as as long as the interest rates

[37:48] are favorable which they are right now

[37:52] um have any questions yeah

[37:54] yeah so mr ferrari mr mayor

[37:58] how many of these items are associated

[38:00] with

[38:02] no

[38:12] any questions yeah just about you said

[38:15] it was 93 000 that was a cost of

[38:17] insurance no issues

[38:20] that's right i had a question i think

[38:22] earlier today about the vehicle

[38:24] um uh i'm going to break it down uh the

[38:27] fire department they're going to have

[38:28] four command vehicles uh the last time

[38:30] they got a vehicle was four years ago

[38:32] most of their vehicles are over 15 years

[38:34] old

[38:35] and they're asked asking for four new

[38:38] ones because 15 year 15 years old is the

[38:41] newest of the last four ones so that's

[38:44] why they're getting that the police are

[38:46] getting a total of 16 of 12 uh mark cars

[38:50] for unmarked

[38:51] uh you got to remember uh

[38:53] they just received the new cards for

[38:55] 2021

[38:56] but we never got the cars in 2020 so

[38:59] they're replacing cars with huge amount

[39:02] of mileages so so we're actually we're

[39:04] looking for this actually probably won't

[39:06] get it for another nine months to a year

[39:08] so

[39:09] those police cars

[39:11] how many did we get just before i know

[39:12] that we're getting 16 now we'll get 69

[39:15] last year we got 12 all together eight

[39:16] and four

[39:18] uh the streets uh the streets uh

[39:20] department we're going to get two dump

[39:22] two dump trucks with plows the plot of

[39:24] streets and two new pickup trucks again

[39:27] those pickup trucks are uh over uh 12

[39:30] years old the ones that we're replacing

[39:33] the waste department we have four new uh

[39:35] garbage trucks

[39:36] and two pickups for the supervisors too

[39:39] and if you've seen the supervisors

[39:40] trucks you know that they need new

[39:42] trucks those guys those are also over 15

[39:45] years old

[39:46] uh the snap snap crew we're gonna snap

[39:49] and uh uh

[39:52] let me call it

[39:54] nuisance guys yeah there you go it's

[39:55] gonna be a total of three uh

[39:58] uh and that's you know one first staff

[40:00] and the two for the new nuisance guys uh

[40:02] we're

[40:03] with the mayor's uh uh uh reasoning

[40:06] anything that we use for vehicles we're

[40:07] gonna try to get all electric so trying

[40:09] to move in the electric uh

[40:11] in the electric uh realm of things

[40:14] and uh sooner you think we'll be buying

[40:16] uh electric uh pickups pretty soon as we

[40:19] hear this coming

[40:21] uh

[40:22] yeah

[40:24] how many sweepers are we gonna have

[40:25] we're gonna have one new sweeper in fact

[40:27] uh we as you remember uh i think about

[40:29] uh two months ago jay where we asked to

[40:33] order it so it's in the order now and

[40:35] that one sweeper is it still not done

[40:37] yet so we're hoping to get it before the

[40:39] end of the year hopefully get it for

[40:41] linda's sentence

[40:42] two of the streams

[40:44] one

[40:48] we're gonna have a total we're gonna

[40:49] have a total of four retirement

[40:59] any other questions

[41:02] mr would you have any other questions no

[41:04] no okay thank you thank you very much

[41:06] i'll be back

[41:10] you may have a motion on this

[41:13] second all in favor

[41:15] aye

[41:18] the next item is purchasing microphones

[41:21] for city council with sport appeal yes

[41:24] um we've been discussing this for a

[41:25] while um you know mr family brought up

[41:28] like back i think back in november just

[41:29] the whole

[41:30] um

[41:33] not good quality of uh our um our

[41:36] broadcast

[41:37] and um i know that it's going to be a

[41:39] longer process however

[41:40] uh if you notice i mean i know you all

[41:43] know this now

[41:44] we're down to one microphone period in

[41:47] the chambers and that's being shared by

[41:49] the public as well as by the council

[41:51] and

[41:52] our last meeting it just reminded me of

[41:55] a

[41:56] episode of parks and rec if you've ever

[41:58] seen it so

[42:00] i really really think that we need um

[42:03] and highly recommend that we buy at

[42:04] least two microphones so that the

[42:06] council is not sharing the microphone

[42:09] because it looks like it's going to be a

[42:10] longer process for us to um get all the

[42:14] contracts and all the other things that

[42:16] the mayor was talking about um i did

[42:19] read an email

[42:20] um where i know that there were there

[42:22] was a request for having um these

[42:24] gooseneck mics but then there was the

[42:26] whole thing about running cords which

[42:29] again is a longer process so i think at

[42:31] this point in time we need to do

[42:32] something in the short term and just

[42:34] have microphones so that the council has

[42:36] a couple microphones to use

[42:38] it's just getting more and more

[42:40] challenging

[42:42] during our meetings

[42:44] absolutely i have to agree with that

[42:46] that we need to get new microphones and

[42:49] let's work out the detail and getting

[42:51] the other stuff fixed

[42:55] yeah so um it's looked into this they

[42:58] looked into whether or not the

[43:00] goosenecks

[43:01] would be

[43:02] financially

[43:04] cost effective they are not

[43:06] um

[43:07] that was the idea

[43:08] the wiring process really isn't a big

[43:10] deal

[43:11] according to it

[43:15] but the cost is just

[43:17] well over what two wireless microphones

[43:19] would be i thought maybe since they were

[43:22] wired it might be about the same cost

[43:25] but it's not so the two wireless are

[43:28] slightly less than five hundred dollars

[43:32] any other comments

[43:34] [Music]

[43:36] you may have a motion to proceed to

[43:37] purchase a new microphone from moving

[43:41] all in favor all right

[43:44] the next item is amendments to the 2022

[43:48] 2020

[43:51] annual action plan to include a

[43:53] reallocation of 250 000 from snap and

[43:56] street paving to park improvement

[43:59] good evening and happy spring

[44:01] um this is just in relation to the

[44:03] public comment period we just had for

[44:05] the reallocation of 250 000

[44:08] um from the street painting and snack

[44:10] programs to park improvements this has

[44:12] to do with ongoing park projects that we

[44:14] have

[44:15] um and the need to kind of spend down

[44:17] the money that was on spend for prior

[44:19] years

[44:20] um so just looking for the council to

[44:22] approve this amendment and the

[44:23] reallocation of the funding

[44:26] [Music]

[44:27] that is 2021 2022

[44:31] yes okay

[44:32] oh so that that's a that's a typo on our

[44:35] agenda

[44:37] okay

[44:38] questions

[44:40] go ahead please uh so i know at least

[44:42] for me being a new council member

[44:44] whenever i hear anyone recount

[44:45] reallocating money from the street

[44:47] paving and smacking like what

[44:52] um but i didn't know if you were able to

[44:55] or

[44:56] chris i was able to come and speak to

[44:57] just a proportionality of what this

[45:00] amount of a hundred thousand dollars

[45:02] being

[45:04] is in comparison to the entire budget i

[45:06] think just to reassure people that

[45:08] this is not something that's being made

[45:10] at the expense of the entire paving sure

[45:13] uh our paving budget is is well right

[45:16] now so right now we usually get around

[45:18] 1.5 million dollars of chips money which

[45:21] is state highway consolidated roads

[45:23] money

[45:24] in addition to that the new york state

[45:25] budget has allocated an additional 1.2

[45:28] million dollars to the city for the last

[45:30] year i believe it's going to be a

[45:32] three-year program which is additional

[45:34] chips for state routes but we can use it

[45:35] for other roads um on top of that in the

[45:38] capital budget which you are just moving

[45:40] forward we also have i believe it's a

[45:41] million and a half dollars for roadways

[45:44] and there um so the paving program uh

[45:48] has the money to pave the roads one of

[45:50] the things that we cannot use this money

[45:51] for just to be clear is that this is for

[45:53] contractor work with roadways for

[45:55] long-term work it can't be used for

[45:58] potholes

[45:59] so potholes is considered maintenance

[46:02] and maintenance is not eligible for

[46:04] expenses under this money so that is

[46:07] where we have our operating budgets and

[46:09] in that kind of money but as far as i'm

[46:11] concerned we are fine for prepaying

[46:13] roads we actually have two contracts

[46:16] starting this year again and we have a

[46:18] third going out in april

[46:20] all of them essentially multi-million

[46:22] dollar programs

[46:25] and i guess

[46:27] we're doing as much work as staff also

[46:29] would allow you know like we are pushing

[46:31] the work out and getting it done so i

[46:33] don't think that we're doing any

[46:34] disservice to the citizens connecting by

[46:37] by reallocating this money i mean this

[46:38] is development block grant money this is

[46:40] money that we do try to use but now that

[46:42] we're getting increases in other areas

[46:44] i'm perfectly comfortable doing it

[46:47] thank you

[46:49] any other comments

[46:53] may have a motion

[46:55] [Music]

[47:04] health care and national fitness

[47:06] champion

[47:09] is um mr city applied for a grant for

[47:11] the 2022 mvp healthcare campaign um this

[47:15] is going to be allocated um toward the

[47:17] purchase of an outdoor fitness port that

[47:19] will go into orbit park as part of the

[47:21] recent involvement there

[47:23] so this is just to accept the fifty

[47:26] thousand dollar grant from mvp for the

[47:28] fitness court um to be installed at what

[47:30] you want

[47:32] any comments

[47:34] we have a motion

[47:37] second all in favor uh

[47:39] the next item is authorized the

[47:41] allocation of 90 000 cdbg funds

[47:44] for the national fitness campaign

[47:46] outdoor fitness board misty so related

[47:49] to um

[47:50] related to the fitness court request

[47:52] this would be

[47:54] um

[47:55] this would be

[47:56] the authorization of the ninety thousand

[47:58] dollars to meet the local funders

[48:00] funding requirements for the um for the

[48:02] fitness court and orchard charts so

[48:05] it's basically just

[48:07] yeah it's the funding that the city will

[48:09] be contributing towards the fitness

[48:10] course

[48:12] any questions

[48:14] go ahead and support you so the 90 000

[48:16] is coming out of the 250 000 that we

[48:18] just yes

[48:21] yep okay and then the balance of that

[48:24] of the 250.

[48:27] the balance yes the 250 we're using what

[48:30] is the bet so 90 000 is going to go to

[48:32] this project

[48:33] so do we um do we have a

[48:36] have we decided where the other uh the

[48:38] balance of that's going to be allocated

[48:39] at this time

[48:41] yeah so some of the right now

[48:44] this is that 50 000 for the equipment

[48:49] then there's going to be installation

[48:50] costs that are associated with it which

[48:52] we're procuring through the policy um

[48:56] we're not going to put this thing

[48:57] together it's extremely intricate to put

[49:00] this together so that's anticipated

[49:02] uh to come out of there and we're

[49:04] working it has to be we have to get

[49:05] three prices for our policy because it's

[49:08] going to be over 3500 we're anticipating

[49:10] it's going to be less than 35 000 so

[49:13] depending on the ranges we're either

[49:14] going to get verbal or written quotes so

[49:16] that's going to come out of there and

[49:17] then there is also a pad that goes with

[49:20] it because these things are going to be

[49:21] mounted to a pad so that also is going

[49:24] to be in there which we're also looking

[49:26] at either doing pricing for

[49:28] our policy so both of those costs um we

[49:32] don't need your explicit authorization

[49:34] because through the purchasing policy

[49:35] will be less than a bit amount but those

[49:37] will come out of there and then the

[49:38] balance of it is remaining for parks

[49:40] particularly if we're looking at jerry

[49:41] burell yes and that will be going to the

[49:43] dairy rail park so once the project is

[49:46] moved forward we have more concrete cost

[49:48] items we can give you an update of what

[49:50] the split would be okay but those are

[49:52] our anticipated costs right now this is

[49:54] because the grant the equipment we have

[49:56] kind of set up and the rest of the cost

[49:58] we're anticipating we're not going to

[49:59] have to bid anything

[50:00] um which is going to help us because

[50:02] that's going to also save us time

[50:03] because they know that we really want to

[50:05] get this in for the late summer or i

[50:07] mean late spring early summer

[50:09] push this so we can use it um but that's

[50:12] where we are right now so the balance

[50:14] that they go over the next part is kind

[50:15] of unknown okay so

[50:17] thank you

[50:18] of course

[50:20] yes

[50:21] let's go ahead okay please

[50:27] is this the remainder of this money

[50:29] you're thinking jerry grove

[50:31] we're thinking about that for the likes

[50:33] that we were talking about a couple of

[50:34] weeks ago and we were talking about some

[50:36] hardware money uh

[50:38] possibly exactly

[50:43] funding for the park we are the design

[50:45] is in process so we have kind of an

[50:48] estimate but until we put the bid out

[50:50] we're not going to be we're not going to

[50:51] know what the total is going to be um we

[50:53] know there's a gap you know i i will say

[50:56] i mean this is like any project that

[50:57] you're going to hear from myself or

[50:58] chris has been before anyone is that we

[51:00] could always use more funds for our

[51:03] parks so

[51:04] the allocation of this money i would not

[51:06] say would preclude us from pulling that

[51:09] because we are going to have to add

[51:10] alternatives we're going to be looking

[51:11] to do more looking at you know there's

[51:13] the base and then we're going to put in

[51:15] for what we're looking at with that

[51:17] alternative design either the tennis

[51:18] courts or the basketball courts or some

[51:20] other things and yes this could be used

[51:23] towards the lighting but that may

[51:24] prevent us doing one of those other

[51:26] features so that's where you know as

[51:28] much funding as we can as we can get

[51:30] towards the project we would like to do

[51:32] so that we can put it as much into the

[51:34] park you know i always say to people

[51:36] that this is public money this is not

[51:37] going to build me fool you know you're

[51:39] not going to come to my house and see

[51:40] anything in my backyard it's all going

[51:41] to the public into there so anything

[51:43] that we can give

[51:44] you know that would be great you know so

[51:46] i would like to hope that it gets

[51:47] reviewed on its own merits yeah and that

[51:49] if it does then that's great and then to

[51:51] maybe get a little bit more

[51:53] yeah

[51:54] go ahead mr man

[51:55] and again just find out mr wallen said

[51:57] that the

[51:59] design work and jerry work morale park

[52:02] is what i'll call the park proper

[52:05] as i look at it those basketball courts

[52:07] as you go farther along hamilton street

[52:09] in

[52:10] across the street there

[52:12] it's foolish to

[52:15] fix

[52:17] this whole area up here and then leave

[52:18] this

[52:20] it's kind of a dilapidated embarrassed

[52:23] section across the street

[52:25] so as they're doing the work up

[52:28] and then look at the whole thing

[52:31] and

[52:32] there's not going to be quite enough

[52:34] money

[52:36] on the table to do

[52:38] everything right now

[52:40] but i believe as we come through and get

[52:43] some firmer numbers on what we're going

[52:44] to actually have to come up with whether

[52:47] it's arpa rearranging other things

[52:50] to make sure that we've got a project

[52:52] there that

[52:53] does everything we want and that we're

[52:56] all going to be

[52:57] proud of it and the neighbors are going

[52:59] to be appreciative of it

[53:01] and

[53:02] thank you for your consideration on the

[53:04] orchard street park uh follow-up to uh

[53:07] councilmember uh william's suggestion of

[53:09] moving the council meetings around

[53:11] maybe that we could have one at this

[53:14] place and all the council could work out

[53:18] just as a ribbon-cutting myself

[53:28] any other questions

[53:30] so the remaining is 160 000 i'm sure

[53:32] you're going to come back to the console

[53:34] for allocation for the 160 remaining the

[53:37] balance of the 160. oh would we allocate

[53:39] that yeah sure okay i mean the

[53:42] application yeah but that's what i'm

[53:44] getting here but it's going to be

[53:46] you might not notice that we're doing it

[53:48] so we'll put it up because if we you

[53:50] know like when i bring you a paying

[53:51] program i don't i don't explicitly

[53:54] detail the funding of the paving program

[53:56] there may be multiple foreign sources a

[53:58] lot of times the word we use is a

[53:59] funding quilt sometimes when i bring

[54:01] things such as psat i bring that here

[54:04] you know there is federal there's local

[54:06] there's metroplex most of the time they

[54:08] don't get into that detail but if you

[54:10] would like to sort of detail if we can

[54:12] yeah if you don't mind just let us know

[54:13] how the allocation is going with regards

[54:15] to the remaining 160 would appreciate it

[54:18] any other questions regarding this item

[54:21] may have a motion

[54:24] [Music]

[54:37] development plan

[54:39] there's 13 items on the agenda and the

[54:42] first item of secret determination for

[54:44] barrett street and south avenue yeah

[54:47] so this is relation to you know what was

[54:50] on the agenda two weeks ago there was

[54:52] some questions about the planning

[54:53] commission meeting and the minutes for

[54:55] that um i did provide those minutes um

[54:58] you know we didn't see

[55:00] as much there wasn't much opposition to

[55:02] the project it was more

[55:04] questions sort of

[55:05] you know reservations about what does

[55:07] this mean you know for the neighborhood

[55:09] and

[55:10] you know so hopefully you've had a

[55:11] chance to look through that but um

[55:14] is there any questions about that

[55:20] any questions anymore yeah

[55:23] all right then that takes up

[55:25] motion

[55:26] so

[55:28] this this first one would be for the

[55:31] same seeker yes for the secret

[55:33] nope oh second

[55:35] i'm sorry all those in favor all right

[55:38] okay uh the resulting ordinance for bear

[55:40] street in south avenue

[55:42] um yep related to the same thing this is

[55:44] just the recommendation to pass an

[55:46] ordinance um changing the zoning

[55:47] district from r2 to the c4

[55:51] any questions around that

[55:54] second all those in favor

[55:56] thank you all right thank you

[55:59] okay the next item on the agenda is to

[56:01] award three bids and contracts for this

[56:03] connected police department fire and

[56:04] raid mr wallon

[56:06] so

[56:08] as uh we may or may not be aware

[56:10] the

[56:11] seneca police department actually has a

[56:13] firing range

[56:14] fire

[56:15] has not functioned in quite some time

[56:18] um

[56:19] chief sieber did receive a grant to uh

[56:21] upgrade the facility and get it back to

[56:22] functioning we have been working with a

[56:24] consultant taking a little longer than

[56:26] we hoped but we have finally put out a

[56:29] bid for the work

[56:31] what you may see is there are actually

[56:33] four given the

[56:34] amount of money that this contract is it

[56:37] is a essentially

[56:39] a million dollar contract in a way

[56:42] we have to follow wick's law which

[56:44] separates all of the

[56:46] duties there's mechanical there's

[56:47] electrical plumbing in general

[56:50] we put it out

[56:51] we called it a

[56:53] firing range ventilation upgrade we got

[56:56] three we did not get a gc bit

[56:59] we think that was due to the fact that

[57:01] it was called spd

[57:03] ventilation because the majority of the

[57:05] work is in here's ventilation but the gc

[57:07] component we did not get any prices so

[57:09] we met with aaron and we discussed it

[57:12] and we said we were comfortable with

[57:13] these bids they were

[57:15] actually i think a little less than our

[57:16] estimate they're contractors that we've

[57:18] worked with so what we're doing is we're

[57:20] putting out the gc pro on wednesday with

[57:22] a new title called

[57:24] firing range reconstruction because we

[57:26] want to hit the ticklers on the web to

[57:29] make sure that gc see it

[57:31] so this is three of the four they are

[57:33] independent

[57:35] and then once we have the gc back and

[57:37] awarded we can begin the project

[57:39] so

[57:40] are there questions mr probably yeah so

[57:42] the group covers the entire cost of this

[57:45] no okay the grant covers a portion of

[57:47] the cost we're going to be using uh in

[57:50] our capital budget not

[57:51] in our capital budget we have a

[57:53] facilities line item for city facilities

[57:56] we'll be using the city's facilities

[57:58] line to cover that portion of them

[58:00] because the grant

[58:02] the grant was for let's say the

[58:06] pertinence is inside of it the the

[58:08] tracks the burn those things but as we

[58:11] started researching

[58:13] um

[58:13] the actual ventilation

[58:15] the engineering components of how to get

[58:18] air flow how to make sure that when you

[58:20] shoot the lead goes down range the fumes

[58:23] go out we have a hepa filtration system

[58:25] it's actually you know a lot more

[58:27] advanced than it is so we put the

[58:29] capital budget together to cover those

[58:31] costs

[58:32] so it's once again

[58:34] a couple different fund sources like we

[58:35] say but we we do have it together um and

[58:38] uh we're going to be ready to move

[58:40] forward but no the grant couldn't it

[58:42] didn't cover all of it because the cost

[58:43] just went up we also had uh you weren't

[58:45] here at the time about two years ago um

[58:47] there was lead in asbestos

[58:49] we used a good amount of money i led an

[58:51] asbestos abatement to

[58:54] evade the whole area and clean it up we

[58:56] had to clean the floors actually mop

[58:58] them like several times to get let off

[59:00] the floor so it's a it's an interesting

[59:02] process but it is going to be uh you

[59:04] know a very functioning range that they

[59:06] can use hopefully for the next you know

[59:08] 30 40 years so that's what we're hoping

[59:10] for but um this is for the three and

[59:12] then i'll be bringing you the fourth

[59:13] once we have it in a couple of weeks and

[59:16] then from there we'll move forward with

[59:18] hopefully construction get get it all

[59:20] functioning again

[59:21] any other questions mr what's it aaron

[59:23] yeah just uh talking aside with mr

[59:25] colding i think we should pass this in

[59:27] individual um contract one e

[59:30] sorry 1b 1c and 1d there are separate um

[59:34] subcontractors yeah that'd be great

[59:36] so three three approvals i would like to

[59:38] recommend that we do them individually

[59:40] okay

[59:42] are there any other questions before i

[59:44] no

[59:45] okay so first of all i'll entertain a

[59:47] motion on contract one b

[59:50] so second all those in favor all right

[59:54] uh second uh and shiny motion on

[59:56] contract 1c

[59:58] so

[59:58] second all those in favor all right

[1:00:01] and finally uh concerning motion on

[1:00:03] contract one and d

[1:00:05] so

[1:00:06] second all those in favor all right all

[1:00:08] right thank you

[1:00:09] all right and we'll just make sure

[1:00:10] that's reflected in there all right

[1:00:12] thank you um the

[1:00:15] next item on the agenda is the award

[1:00:17] vision contracts with the bail park

[1:00:19] improvement uh project phase two

[1:00:21] yes thank you so this you you might

[1:00:23] recall seeing this before

[1:00:25] um this is actually the third time we've

[1:00:27] bid this hopefully the last thing is

[1:00:29] we're talking about bail park tree

[1:00:31] removal um

[1:00:33] previously we had a discrepancy in the

[1:00:36] bid documents that meant that we had to

[1:00:38] rebid it there was some language that

[1:00:39] got left in from the previous bid

[1:00:41] we did receive three bids the bids were

[1:00:45] almost identical than before

[1:00:48] the low is still the same as the second

[1:00:50] time that we bid it the cost per tree

[1:00:53] might have actually come down a little

[1:00:54] bit but uh and then this particular

[1:00:56] bidder we're doing they just to let you

[1:00:58] in behind the curtain a little bit we're

[1:01:00] doing something to a little bit more

[1:01:01] proactive on my office where we're

[1:01:03] receiving the bids we are not

[1:01:05] immediately rushing them to this table

[1:01:07] so we receive the bids on wednesday we

[1:01:09] used to bring them right to the

[1:01:11] legislative and then monday so now what

[1:01:13] we're doing is we're taking a step back

[1:01:15] we're working with ron

[1:01:16] and we're really making sure that we

[1:01:18] have all of our utilization paperwork

[1:01:20] that ron's having a moment to vet them a

[1:01:22] little bit more thoroughly and then

[1:01:24] we're moving forward so in this case

[1:01:26] uh they've been working with ron

[1:01:28] actually for four weeks because they

[1:01:29] knew that we had to rebid it and i

[1:01:31] believe that you've been happy with the

[1:01:32] progress that you've seen you've had

[1:01:34] some good emails back and forth they now

[1:01:35] have what three subs that they're going

[1:01:38] to be using absolutely

[1:01:40] so um so that's kind of a new process

[1:01:42] you're not going to see things coming

[1:01:43] here as fast because instead of us

[1:01:46] awarding and then going through the

[1:01:48] process we're going to go through the

[1:01:50] process make sure we're on the same page

[1:01:52] then award just so that we don't get

[1:01:54] caught in any kind of a you know the

[1:01:55] carrot is the award

[1:01:57] so we want to make sure that we're doing

[1:01:58] it in that process and so it's worked in

[1:02:01] this process we're doing it a couple

[1:02:02] others

[1:02:03] so

[1:02:04] well thank you for that consideration

[1:02:05] sure is that just a question so is that

[1:02:07] a best practice that they can do moving

[1:02:09] forward for all projects or just kind of

[1:02:11] my office sure yeah

[1:02:13] that's what we've started to do and i

[1:02:15] think it's worked better that way don't

[1:02:16] you ron yeah absolutely

[1:02:23] all right the remaining items are all

[1:02:25] for property sales and we'll be um

[1:02:28] an executive session so i'd like to

[1:02:30] entertain a motion to recess

[1:02:32] so second all of the favorite

[1:02:34] we're reset

[1:02:37] so

[1:02:49] yeah

[1:02:50] yeah so i would like to get a motion

[1:02:54] second

[1:02:56] oh

[1:02:58] all in favor

[1:03:06] interest

[1:03:07] related to uh foreclosure action the

[1:03:09] other one is a claim

[1:03:11] okay so so are you saying they're both

[1:03:14] should be an executive session okay um

[1:03:17] with regard to

[1:03:18] number four that from government

[1:03:20] operations earlier yeah

[1:03:23] i don't know exactly what the discussion

[1:03:26] is around

[1:03:28] i just want to make sure that it's

[1:03:29] covered by executive session it has to

[1:03:31] fall within the scope of what's allowed

[1:03:34] under open meetings law

[1:03:36] um so i don't know the scope of you know

[1:03:38] well i i talked to mayor batman and so

[1:03:41] um so what we would be discussing we me

[1:03:43] too

[1:03:44] um

[1:03:45] it's it's around personnel

[1:03:53] i mean personnel generally is could be

[1:03:54] discussed in executive session yeah can

[1:03:57] yes it can

[1:03:59] it depends on the level of detail

[1:04:00] obviously i you know without me knowing

[1:04:03] the level of detail or you know

[1:04:07] but i'll you know obviously um

[1:04:11] i'll i'll defer to you um on the

[1:04:13] discussion um obviously things related

[1:04:15] to employees and

[1:04:19] employment history

[1:04:21] is privy to executive session

[1:04:24] um it is around employees i can say that

[1:04:26] i guess

[1:04:30] okay i'm part of that yep as one make

[1:04:32] sure yes

[1:04:34] so i think we're in

[1:04:36] yeah

[1:04:40] [Music]

[1:05:13] you

Schenectady City Council Committee Meeting, March 21, 2022

Transcript