Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:14]
[Music]
[14:00]
to order for monday april 18th
[14:03]
and our first committee is claims
[14:06]
yes i'd like thank you i'd like to open
[14:08]
the claims on
[14:10]
the claims meeting
[14:13]
and i'd like to uh we have two claims on
[14:16]
the on the docket and one of them is
[14:18]
going to
[14:19]
uh include our outside counsel so i'd
[14:21]
like to uh call for a motion to go into
[14:23]
executive session
[14:26]
is there's
[14:27]
a second you're thinking i'm
[14:32]
okay so we're gonna go into executive
[14:34]
session
[41:09]
oh
[41:24]
[Music]
[41:43]
true
[41:58]
all right um next on the agenda we have
[42:00]
a presentation by all of us it's going
[42:03]
to be on the results of the black
[42:04]
freedom project community safety survey
[42:07]
so i'd like to invite to make miles and
[42:09]
shawnee to come up
[42:11]
and uh all council members should
[42:13]
actually
[42:14]
oops
[42:15]
microphones fire microphones yes it
[42:18]
should be rubbed right yep
[42:21]
all council members should actually have
[42:22]
a copy of the survey
[42:25]
so
[42:26]
yes um and actually we have two other
[42:28]
documents to share with you all that
[42:30]
we're gonna talk about going to just
[42:32]
take the beach and then pass it around
[42:35]
oh
[42:36]
good evening
[42:38]
and uh thank you for the opportunity to
[42:39]
be able to share this information with
[42:41]
you
[42:42]
um
[42:43]
it is their community safety survey that
[42:45]
we conducted
[42:46]
we appreciate the opportunity to share
[42:48]
with all of you as we have shared with
[42:50]
others
[42:51]
um
[42:52]
as i think most people in this room know
[42:57]
young um were both born and raised here
[42:59]
in the city of schenectady and we
[43:00]
founded our organization all of us in
[43:03]
the city of schenectady
[43:05]
what you might not know is actually our
[43:07]
organizational bishop which is to
[43:09]
support and strengthen marginalized
[43:10]
communities in the fight for black
[43:12]
liberation
[43:13]
and an end to all forms of racism
[43:16]
oppression and exploitation and doing so
[43:18]
through uniting people across socially
[43:20]
created divisions
[43:22]
we understand the importance of
[43:23]
collective work therefore we have been
[43:26]
intentional
[43:27]
to develop relationships with other
[43:29]
groups and organizations locally and
[43:30]
across the state
[43:32]
as such all of us as a member of the
[43:34]
black freedom project the black media
[43:36]
project is a coalition of black
[43:38]
organizers and black focused
[43:40]
organizations across new york state
[43:43]
also known as bfp
[43:44]
last native project together with the
[43:46]
public science project research team
[43:48]
developed this community survey to
[43:51]
understand what we as black new yorkers
[43:53]
believe keeps us safe and what
[43:54]
investments institutions programs and
[43:56]
policies would positively impact our
[43:59]
communities
[44:00]
all of us knows how important a survey
[44:03]
dedicating to illuminating the
[44:04]
perspectives of black and african
[44:06]
american participants is
[44:08]
black viewpoints have historically been
[44:10]
excluded or underrepresented in most
[44:12]
research studies
[44:14]
research intentionally focused on the
[44:16]
black community makes a unique and
[44:18]
important contribution to discussions
[44:20]
and planning regarding safety and
[44:22]
allocation of resources in the city of
[44:23]
schenectady
[44:25]
this survey also is about community
[44:27]
engagement next slide
[44:30]
yeah so
[44:31]
as you see on the screen we let people
[44:33]
know where to serve will be on specific
[44:35]
dates within the community as well as
[44:36]
spend time walking in our community our
[44:38]
ground game focused primarily on the
[44:40]
hamilton hill and mount pleasant
[44:41]
neighborhoods we met because we met
[44:43]
people where they were at whether
[44:44]
walking down the street at home or at
[44:47]
local stores and shops throughout the
[44:48]
community we share digital flyers on our
[44:50]
social media platform and paper ones
[44:52]
that community events and political
[44:53]
organizations and institutions
[44:55]
listed on this slide as you see up there
[44:57]
are locations of partners we worked with
[45:00]
to reach black people within our
[45:01]
community our focus was places of known
[45:04]
community gatherings barbershops
[45:06]
libraries food pantries community
[45:08]
centers etc meeting people where they
[45:10]
were at was not just about physical
[45:12]
location but also about giving the
[45:14]
access and support needed for
[45:15]
participating in the survey some folks
[45:17]
were
[45:18]
comfortable taking surveying on tablets
[45:20]
or laptops other preferred hard copy the
[45:22]
survey was administered by ourselves and
[45:24]
some trained volunteers next slide
[45:26]
please
[45:29]
the survey results are based on 305
[45:32]
black residents in the city of
[45:33]
schenectady identified by zip code
[45:36]
while there were many different
[45:37]
demographics collected within the survey
[45:39]
this is the breakdown by age the largest
[45:41]
number of respondents as you can see on
[45:43]
the screen were between the ages of 36
[45:45]
and 45 but there was representation
[45:48]
between ages of 16 and up
[45:51]
the one other respondent
[45:54]
is an individual that even though they
[45:55]
originally identified as being at least
[45:57]
16 years old
[45:58]
indicated a number that was it was
[46:00]
outside the parameters
[46:03]
one of the handouts you all received was
[46:05]
the list of the other types of
[46:06]
demographics that were collected in the
[46:08]
survey
[46:09]
and it shows not just the questions
[46:11]
asked but the inclusiveness of the
[46:14]
options for answers as well as the
[46:16]
opportunity for individuals to choose
[46:18]
not to answer next slide please
[46:22]
the very first question which we see
[46:24]
here was to confirm that the individual
[46:25]
was at least 16 years old and that they
[46:27]
identify with black
[46:30]
being black does not mean that you do
[46:31]
not identify with any other race or
[46:33]
ethnicity and individuals included if
[46:36]
they did indeed identify with other
[46:37]
races or ethnicities
[46:39]
we'll quickly go through the next four
[46:41]
slides that are the questions the
[46:42]
participants were asked and there were
[46:44]
questions regarding investments current
[46:47]
institutions and policies
[46:49]
current institutions and practices and
[46:50]
policies next slide
[46:53]
they were first asked about the
[46:54]
allocation of money next slide
[46:58]
what safety means and looks like for
[46:59]
people in the black community next life
[47:02]
prioritization of policies they were
[47:04]
given a list of policies and they were
[47:06]
able to choose each policy was in a high
[47:08]
priority a medium priority a low
[47:10]
priority a policy they didn't want it
[47:12]
off or something they were not sure of
[47:14]
and also the opportunity to describe
[47:16]
their answers what was it they did or
[47:18]
didn't like about that policy next slide
[47:22]
as you all saw this previously this is
[47:24]
the list of those policies that were
[47:26]
included in the survey next slide
[47:30]
all right so the results of those
[47:32]
questions are nets so included are both
[47:35]
quantitative and qualitative data now
[47:37]
again this was to understand what safe
[47:39]
healthy and thriving communities mean to
[47:41]
the black community
[47:42]
three buckets if you will are investment
[47:45]
current institutions and practices and
[47:47]
policies next slide please
[47:51]
all right so here we have a city budget
[47:52]
so when asked to imagine themselves
[47:54]
being in charge of the city budget and
[47:55]
responsible for reducing a safe and
[47:57]
driving community on average schenectady
[48:00]
residents that participate in the survey
[48:02]
prioritize long-term housing for all and
[48:04]
expanding access to healthy food and
[48:06]
hunger prevention services next slide
[48:08]
please
[48:10]
the next three which are all very close
[48:11]
in allocation are quality physical and
[48:13]
mental health care for all high quality
[48:16]
public schools and living wage jobs for
[48:17]
people all education levels the constant
[48:20]
presence of police and police quit and
[48:21]
receive the lowest amount of funding
[48:24]
next slide please
[48:27]
jails prisons and detention centers now
[48:29]
when asked about jail's prison attention
[48:31]
centers the great's response was to move
[48:33]
away from imprisonment and toward
[48:34]
diversity programs such as mentoring
[48:37]
programs associative justice programs
[48:38]
and job programs
[48:40]
yeah no it should have been the next
[48:42]
time after this this is where we stayed
[48:44]
oh yeah
[48:45]
okay so yeah
[48:51]
i'm going to tell you to skip three
[48:53]
slides ahead
[48:55]
there it is that's all right yeah okay
[48:58]
so on slides 15-17 75 percent of
[49:01]
respondents will prefer a greater
[49:02]
emphasis on community-based violence
[49:04]
prevention programs that move away from
[49:06]
police presence
[49:07]
or responses as relates to preventing
[49:09]
and responding alignments
[49:15]
the next question asked about emergency
[49:16]
response in the community 66 are
[49:19]
responsible for a greater emphasis on
[49:21]
first responders through emergencies
[49:22]
that are unarmed and without threat of
[49:24]
arrest
[49:25]
next slide
[49:27]
one more
[49:28]
there we go
[49:30]
um
[49:31]
very hard to read on the screen
[49:33]
but also in your packets this is the
[49:35]
policy breakdown where they were able to
[49:37]
decide high priority medium priority low
[49:39]
priority etc etc as was mentioned
[49:43]
they were able to choose a different one
[49:44]
for each policy for each policy they
[49:46]
indicated if it were
[49:48]
which priority applied to them
[49:51]
when prioritizing policies
[49:53]
more jobs for all levels of education
[49:56]
with good benefits that pay enough to
[49:57]
support a family was a high priority for
[50:00]
85 percent of participants as was more
[50:04]
food and nutritional assistance programs
[50:06]
to address hunger
[50:08]
a high priority for 84 of participants
[50:11]
where affordable housing not shelters
[50:14]
for families and individuals who become
[50:16]
homeless and more money for public
[50:18]
schools so that they have the space
[50:20]
staff and resources they need to support
[50:22]
all their students
[50:24]
what we saw in the policies were similar
[50:27]
to the allocation of resources next
[50:30]
slide
[50:32]
we've included a sample a small sample
[50:35]
of the comments and written responses
[50:38]
for three of the policies that were
[50:40]
listed next slide
[50:43]
yeah here we have a slightest about
[50:44]
affordable housing not sheltered for
[50:46]
families and individuals who become
[50:48]
homeless now these are what folks have
[50:50]
worked on to indicate some ideas about
[50:52]
what they meant
[50:53]
as you see on the screen
[50:55]
folks like there are a lot of homeless
[50:56]
people in the city
[50:58]
having a safe environment to call home
[51:00]
is so important for our community
[51:02]
every person is entitled to clean safe
[51:04]
living situation
[51:06]
the rent is too damn high rent has
[51:08]
skyrocketed and is outrageous are part
[51:10]
of the comments from the community and
[51:12]
what they were thinking
[51:14]
next slide
[51:16]
it's important to note that none of the
[51:18]
comments were altered in any way
[51:20]
they are reported as they were written
[51:22]
they weren't changed for grammar or
[51:23]
spelling or context however it was
[51:26]
written that's what they wrote um that's
[51:28]
how we recorded it and so for this
[51:30]
particular policy it was to remove all
[51:33]
forms of policing from public schools
[51:36]
and replaced with school counselors
[51:37]
psychologists behavioral specialists and
[51:39]
trauma therapists
[51:40]
again this is a sampling of what was
[51:43]
seen within the survey
[51:45]
not enough attention is given to the
[51:46]
mental impact police presence has in
[51:48]
schools
[51:51]
in my experience police presence hasn't
[51:53]
affected school a lot
[51:55]
youth need to have someone listen to
[51:57]
them and not judge that they will
[51:59]
automatically be violent
[52:02]
there's any number of examples that are
[52:05]
in this slide that you all had
[52:07]
previously
[52:08]
and that we collected as part of this
[52:10]
survey next slide
[52:14]
so this is a larger police presence in
[52:16]
the community on public transportation
[52:18]
around the city and the schools and et
[52:19]
cetera we see other comments from our
[52:22]
community
[52:23]
um no police presence they do too much
[52:24]
harm
[52:26]
it's good and bad which is important
[52:28]
that's actually a really important point
[52:30]
right there so out of all the folks that
[52:32]
we gave the survey to there were folks
[52:34]
that landed on different sides of
[52:36]
talking about whether or not they wanted
[52:37]
the police in the community or not but
[52:39]
what we did notice a really good
[52:41]
takeaway was that no matter who was on
[52:44]
that survey on average everyone could
[52:45]
all prioritize all these other things as
[52:47]
being important to safety uh in their
[52:50]
community um so that's really important
[52:51]
so you get to see someone here saying
[52:53]
good and bad um and you know well
[52:56]
coordinated not more so not that it's
[52:58]
about you know not having this at all
[53:01]
but that they need to be well glory and
[53:02]
they're addressing nature when they can
[53:04]
next slide
[53:07]
so what are the next steps
[53:08]
we spent weeks talking to community
[53:11]
members being really intentional about
[53:13]
where we went
[53:14]
from november through january the
[53:17]
research the information that we
[53:18]
gathered and then went to the research
[53:19]
team in new york city they compiled the
[53:22]
data and sent it back to us
[53:24]
and when we started the survey we made a
[53:26]
commitment to share the results back out
[53:28]
with the community as well as other
[53:29]
stakeholders
[53:30]
as an example we presented the results
[53:32]
to the police chief representatives from
[53:35]
each of his departments
[53:37]
as part of the continuing research that
[53:39]
we are doing we are facilitating
[53:41]
data-driven focus groups we actually
[53:43]
held our first one on april 7th
[53:46]
back at sikkim and we'll continue to go
[53:48]
back to the locations where we started
[53:50]
we'll go back to
[53:52]
city michigan go back to the seat center
[53:54]
we'll go back to the libraries in both
[53:56]
hamilton hill and mount pleasant because
[53:58]
those were the two major focuses of our
[54:00]
area
[54:04]
that's it so we'll take any questions
[54:06]
but we look forward to the opportunity
[54:07]
to be able to continue to share with you
[54:09]
the false ideas concerns from community
[54:11]
members supporting you and your mission
[54:13]
to move forward policies and resources
[54:14]
that represent the interest of the
[54:16]
residents you serve
[54:18]
it's really important and that last
[54:20]
piece that i wrote there is about a
[54:21]
community engagement how often are their
[54:24]
who we're talking to and the
[54:25]
conversation we're able to bring back to
[54:27]
you all over suppressing the needs of
[54:28]
the community it's not
[54:30]
been seen at least in my you know it's
[54:32]
my time here that there's been surveys
[54:33]
like this and the type of engagement
[54:35]
necessary to really
[54:37]
hear from the community in the ways that
[54:38]
actually have an impact
[54:40]
any questions
[54:45]
so i wanted to first thank you both of
[54:47]
you for the efforts and investments you
[54:48]
made into this survey
[54:50]
as a person that took this uh and
[54:52]
identified as a cisgender male who was a
[54:55]
black schenectadian it was a mouthful
[54:58]
in no way did i interpret oh your
[55:00]
presentation has an all-encompassing
[55:03]
gauge of all things affecting every
[55:05]
single black person within this
[55:06]
community how i internalized your words
[55:09]
was more or less as a guide to help us
[55:12]
define some areas that we could
[55:13]
potentially address and have more of a
[55:16]
pulse towards towards directing our
[55:18]
efforts
[55:19]
so with that there are a number of steps
[55:21]
that are being being taken at this
[55:23]
moment throughout the city
[55:25]
what is the frequency of this survey to
[55:26]
potentially grade the efforts that are
[55:29]
undertaken
[55:31]
i mean that's part of our future
[55:32]
planning right the the work that i
[55:35]
particularly have been doing for more
[55:37]
than 10 years is to be a constant
[55:39]
presence in this city that i was born
[55:41]
and raised in
[55:42]
to talk to community members and find
[55:44]
out what's going on
[55:46]
education and and safety are two of our
[55:49]
main priorities as an organization um
[55:52]
and so
[55:53]
it is a bit of cyclical work right um to
[55:57]
have these conversations find out what
[55:58]
the community is saying and what's in
[56:01]
their best interest based on their their
[56:03]
needs on the lived experiences and as
[56:06]
well as the data that we've seen from
[56:07]
across the nation
[56:09]
bring it back and then go have
[56:11]
continuing conversations those focus
[56:13]
groups so
[56:15]
if there are particular things that we
[56:17]
see arise we're then able to continue to
[56:20]
work with the research team and create
[56:22]
other surveys and have conversations um
[56:24]
they've been a wonderful resource and
[56:26]
they continue to support the work
[56:28]
and i'll just i'll add to the you know
[56:30]
one of the things that's an issue with
[56:32]
addressing um
[56:34]
things in the community is the
[56:35]
consistency in which we're actually
[56:36]
speaking with our community members and
[56:38]
engaging them enough and what the issues
[56:40]
are happening that we don't do it enough
[56:42]
um for more opportunities to do that but
[56:45]
actually um one of the cars that we have
[56:47]
is coming back with the information that
[56:49]
we gathered in our community um through
[56:51]
community focus groups we already had
[56:52]
one um at sycamore another one
[56:54]
electricity bar and the libraries just
[56:57]
so that like so one of the things that
[56:58]
does is allow us one to like uh
[57:02]
um give to the community the words that
[57:04]
are from that community like we're going
[57:06]
to put flowers up for people that take a
[57:07]
survey to come back out here kind of
[57:09]
these are results of that um and it's
[57:11]
important to do that right so that we're
[57:13]
engaged and that we act as a community
[57:16]
that we're not we're not in this by
[57:18]
ourselves right one of the things i tell
[57:19]
a lot of people is that when you step
[57:21]
outside of your house um you walk onto
[57:23]
that sidewalk you go to a store like
[57:24]
this belongs to you this is your city um
[57:27]
it's a collective ownership but it
[57:29]
belongs to all the same have some say so
[57:31]
how this thing goes for you and having
[57:32]
fun something we didn't mention that i
[57:34]
think is important and we should have is
[57:36]
that when we go back out to share this
[57:39]
information
[57:40]
everyone is welcome to come
[57:43]
so when we were back at sikkim it wasn't
[57:45]
just individuals that took the survey
[57:47]
there were other individuals in the room
[57:48]
there were also individuals that took
[57:50]
the survey and could speak from their
[57:51]
personal experience taking the survey
[57:53]
and then hearing those results but there
[57:55]
were other community partners as well
[57:57]
bob carroll from the skype foundation
[57:59]
was there
[58:01]
tom from sicko was there so those
[58:04]
partners being able to be part of that
[58:06]
conversation as we share the information
[58:08]
back out and then hearing their
[58:10]
responses because we have that as well
[58:12]
we have those um responses for
[58:15]
what they said at that meeting which i
[58:16]
believe is the other um
[58:18]
yeah
[58:23]
i have a question so you identified some
[58:24]
things and what immediately came to my
[58:26]
mind was about jobs and that was an
[58:28]
important thing so
[58:29]
since that was identified as such a high
[58:31]
priority what steps are you actually
[58:33]
taking to address that
[58:36]
with other groups or however however
[58:38]
you're facilitating that i mean when it
[58:40]
comes to policies right there there are
[58:43]
some very broad things listed
[58:45]
and so part of those focus groups is
[58:47]
then identifying down where do these
[58:50]
community members see a potential for
[58:53]
that to be addressed
[58:54]
because one of the wonderful things
[58:56]
about going out and talking to the
[58:57]
community is that they are filled with
[58:58]
ideas
[59:00]
they have the answers to the problems
[59:02]
it's just that no one's ever asked them
[59:04]
so as part of these focus groups it's
[59:06]
okay so if we say jobs what does that
[59:08]
mean but is
[59:09]
that focus group
[59:11]
pulling in on that particular issue we
[59:13]
were at sikkim so a lot of conversation
[59:16]
around food as well as housing
[59:19]
some of the other conversations that
[59:20]
have been had about jobs is how do we
[59:24]
create support
[59:25]
for people to move into careers as a
[59:28]
pathway
[59:30]
your favorite example is um whenever we
[59:34]
have construction here in the city how
[59:36]
are we ensuring that our own residents
[59:39]
are actually getting those jobs and that
[59:41]
money stays here in the community how
[59:43]
can we foster that what does that look
[59:45]
like in addition to that like we've had
[59:47]
a conversation with folks with cnn
[59:50]
workforce initiative um and other like
[59:53]
um
[59:54]
uh the map program already something i
[59:56]
spoke about here about and it's in the
[59:58]
map program is a multi-architectural
[1:00:00]
pre-apprenticeship program and it just
[1:00:02]
meets people in the community where
[1:00:03]
they're at as far as i understand what
[1:00:04]
the construction trades it's a stipend
[1:00:06]
six month program learning the basis of
[1:00:08]
construction and another four month
[1:00:10]
disciplinary program on whatever whether
[1:00:13]
it's uh roofing or electrical work or
[1:00:15]
whatever um that's stipend and then
[1:00:17]
there's a partnership with the union
[1:00:18]
that gets them jobs working on
[1:00:20]
initiatives in the community to help
[1:00:22]
revitalize it so those are the
[1:00:23]
conversations we're having and we'd love
[1:00:24]
to see actually have again it's
[1:00:26]
connected so we're doing our work there
[1:00:29]
to bring those type of ideas here and
[1:00:30]
just have that conversation into the
[1:00:32]
community
[1:00:34]
any other questions
[1:00:38]
well thank you very much for coming in
[1:00:39]
for sharing this information and if the
[1:00:41]
public wanted to see this is this a
[1:00:43]
public document that people can access
[1:00:45]
to so we haven't yet posted it online um
[1:00:48]
we're trying to figure out what's the best way the most accessible way to
[1:00:52]
do that dropping it in the google drive
[1:00:54]
isn't always necessarily
[1:00:56]
best fit right now
[1:00:58]
we were able to share it out
[1:01:00]
electronically i had to fix a couple
[1:01:02]
typos so
[1:01:03]
it's coming
[1:01:05]
and
[1:01:06]
if anyone is interested and want to copy
[1:01:08]
they can email us
[1:01:10]
free gmail.com
[1:01:11]
well thank you very much for coming
[1:01:13]
appreciate it
[1:01:24]
i would like to call the public safety
[1:01:25]
committee to order we have one item on
[1:01:27]
the agenda today that is the school
[1:01:29]
community engagement officer and that
[1:01:31]
will be presented by either chief
[1:01:33]
quicker or ac and or right
[1:01:59]
okay
[1:02:06]
um
[1:02:21]
all right
[1:02:23]
microphone
[1:02:24]
no no but staying as close to this one
[1:02:26]
as you can
[1:02:28]
alright over here
[1:02:30]
okay well good evening and thank you for
[1:02:32]
having me um i put together a powerpoint
[1:02:35]
presentation
[1:02:36]
i have chief whipple with me and i also
[1:02:38]
have sergeant lin here with me also
[1:02:40]
and if any members of the council has
[1:02:43]
questions
[1:02:44]
but
[1:02:45]
we're here to talk about community
[1:02:46]
engagement officer which is a
[1:02:49]
truly a partnership between the school
[1:02:51]
district
[1:02:52]
and the and the police department
[1:02:54]
now
[1:02:56]
it's important to start off with
[1:02:59]
new york state governor's executive
[1:03:01]
order 203 which was
[1:03:04]
brought to us two years ago by governor
[1:03:06]
cuomo
[1:03:08]
and the recommendations uh derived from
[1:03:11]
the collaboration that was held in
[1:03:14]
response to that executive order which
[1:03:16]
was then ratified by the city council on
[1:03:18]
may 22 march 22nd of 2021
[1:03:21]
signed by mayor mccarthy on march 31st
[1:03:24]
and submitted to the state included
[1:03:26]
two recommendations that were that really embodied community
[1:03:31]
engagement and those were the creation
[1:03:34]
of a community engagement officer
[1:03:36]
uh unit of officers that received
[1:03:39]
specialized training in the areas of
[1:03:40]
harm reduction in addition to community
[1:03:42]
health initiative training
[1:03:44]
building a model
[1:03:46]
within community policing where these
[1:03:48]
officers will work to reduce the
[1:03:49]
negative consequences of using drugs
[1:03:51]
while understanding that an individual
[1:03:53]
may not immediately stop
[1:03:55]
that model was really specifically
[1:03:58]
towards creating a unit that would go
[1:04:01]
out and focus on harm reduction within
[1:04:03]
our community but then number 18 of the
[1:04:05]
recommendations was to expand our
[1:04:08]
community policing efforts
[1:04:10]
on the staff department to allow for
[1:04:11]
community policing unit that will build
[1:04:14]
neighborhood collaborations to build
[1:04:16]
trust solve problems and reduce crime
[1:04:19]
so that was put into the recommendations
[1:04:24]
so why do we need police in schools
[1:04:26]
that's why we're here today talking
[1:04:29]
um many members of our community have
[1:04:31]
asked that question i want to start off
[1:04:33]
by saying that on any given day
[1:04:35]
population of scentsy high school
[1:04:37]
is approximately 2 800 students and
[1:04:40]
staff
[1:04:41]
in illinois middle school that number is
[1:04:44]
approximately 780
[1:04:46]
mount pleasant 870 steinmetz 315 central
[1:04:50]
park middle school 800 and that's just
[1:04:53]
those schools right there
[1:04:55]
so concentrated populations
[1:04:57]
of any of this size anywhere within the
[1:05:00]
city
[1:05:01]
would always be met with a threat
[1:05:03]
assessment from the police department
[1:05:05]
and we're talking about internal and
[1:05:07]
external sources of that kind of
[1:05:10]
population all coming together
[1:05:13]
now the city of santa fe school district
[1:05:15]
has had a history of police related
[1:05:17]
issues
[1:05:18]
that have been a concern to the police
[1:05:19]
department leadership
[1:05:21]
over the last few years and i brought
[1:05:23]
those issues to
[1:05:25]
former superintendent larry sprang
[1:05:27]
and most recently uh superintendent
[1:05:29]
annabal
[1:05:32]
the concerns we had were that the staff
[1:05:36]
had been discouraged from contacting the
[1:05:38]
police
[1:05:39]
this is feedback we got directly from
[1:05:41]
the staff
[1:05:42]
teachers administrators support workers
[1:05:45]
there were incidents that were not
[1:05:46]
reported to the police assaults that
[1:05:48]
occurred in the school
[1:05:50]
past assault disclosures
[1:05:53]
threats
[1:05:54]
menacing
[1:05:57]
students coming into the school with
[1:05:58]
weapons
[1:05:59]
not being reported
[1:06:01]
investigations that were of criminal
[1:06:03]
nature
[1:06:04]
i'm sorry investigations that involved
[1:06:07]
that of a crime
[1:06:08]
that were the investigations were
[1:06:10]
started and completed
[1:06:12]
prior to reporting it to the police
[1:06:16]
fights
[1:06:17]
in
[1:06:18]
or near the schools
[1:06:20]
lunchtime
[1:06:21]
sergeant linear can expand more on that
[1:06:23]
but lunchtime many fights in the schools
[1:06:26]
um and then in the neighboring community
[1:06:28]
outside of the school
[1:06:31]
and not specifically the high school but
[1:06:33]
other schools like oneida and mount
[1:06:35]
pleasant middle school
[1:06:37]
persons with mental health disorder in
[1:06:40]
the school district
[1:06:41]
um not always having local crisis unit
[1:06:44]
within the school
[1:06:45]
available to be utilized
[1:06:48]
trespassing
[1:06:50]
of suspended students excel students
[1:06:53]
parents of students coming into the
[1:06:55]
school
[1:06:56]
trespassers with no affiliation like
[1:06:58]
students from other schools
[1:07:01]
and then other and then students leaving
[1:07:03]
school grounds
[1:07:04]
um and engaging
[1:07:06]
in an activity outside the school
[1:07:08]
district that would receive that would
[1:07:10]
prompt people to call the police
[1:07:12]
it's important to note that many of
[1:07:14]
these concerns almost all of them
[1:07:17]
were noted and brought to us before our
[1:07:19]
global pandemic of 2020 and when the
[1:07:22]
pandemic hit in school shut down it kind
[1:07:25]
of
[1:07:25]
hit pause for us
[1:07:28]
so
[1:07:29]
i had a report generated and everything
[1:07:31]
that was going to go to superintendent
[1:07:32]
spring and then the pandemic had
[1:07:35]
but when the same pattern emerged in the
[1:07:37]
first two months of this school year
[1:07:39]
2021
[1:07:40]
i called for a meeting with
[1:07:42]
superintendent solaire
[1:07:44]
and he brought his leadership staff in
[1:07:46]
so we could discuss this issue
[1:07:49]
and that is when a partnership was
[1:07:51]
formed
[1:07:52]
to see
[1:07:53]
the
[1:07:56]
partnership was formed to solve what was
[1:07:58]
seen as a safety crisis that was
[1:07:59]
developing within the school district
[1:08:03]
so the concept that we came up with that
[1:08:06]
we agreed that police were needed to
[1:08:08]
help solve the safety uh crisis that was
[1:08:11]
developing
[1:08:12]
but we would need to meet and look at
[1:08:17]
what that would look like what our role
[1:08:18]
will be in the schools
[1:08:20]
so the leadership of the school district
[1:08:21]
and the leadership of the police
[1:08:22]
department we collaborated on many
[1:08:24]
meetings to discuss the needs of the
[1:08:27]
school district community
[1:08:29]
we conceptualized the community
[1:08:31]
engagement model
[1:08:33]
the one that i just explained to you
[1:08:34]
that was derived out of the executive
[1:08:37]
order 203
[1:08:40]
and what was needed within the school
[1:08:41]
district itself
[1:08:44]
that police officers would have to be
[1:08:45]
specially trained
[1:08:46]
[Music]
[1:08:48]
and that we would want to make sure that
[1:08:50]
we
[1:08:51]
not only provided them the training that
[1:08:55]
teachers and administrators in the
[1:08:56]
school district were getting but that
[1:08:58]
we're also going to reach out to
[1:09:00]
industry leaders
[1:09:01]
in the school resource officer training
[1:09:03]
field and get them the training also
[1:09:06]
so a true partnership form meeting with
[1:09:08]
mayor mccarthy and superintendent
[1:09:10]
solaire
[1:09:12]
it was agreed upon that the school
[1:09:13]
district
[1:09:15]
that officers in the school benefited
[1:09:16]
the city
[1:09:17]
and school district equally so the cost
[1:09:20]
of the program should be shared equally
[1:09:24]
one of my uh one of my requirements for
[1:09:27]
this to happen was accountability
[1:09:30]
we recognize that um
[1:09:32]
nobody wants to be placed you know
[1:09:35]
in our perfect world police aren't even
[1:09:37]
needed
[1:09:38]
um and that the presence of the police
[1:09:40]
officers may make some students
[1:09:41]
uncomfortable
[1:09:43]
and to get past that
[1:09:44]
we're going to build trust we're going
[1:09:46]
to be
[1:09:47]
really focused on building trucks
[1:09:49]
i'm sorry building
[1:09:51]
trust
[1:09:52]
officers need to be held accountable to
[1:09:54]
meet the needs of the student population
[1:09:56]
and deliver that
[1:09:58]
consistent level of service to the
[1:09:59]
population over time
[1:10:02]
to accomplish this consistent
[1:10:04]
supervision would be necessary to
[1:10:06]
accelerate that trust building that's
[1:10:08]
why i asked for a
[1:10:11]
um a sergeant to be well i i required a
[1:10:14]
sergeant be placed
[1:10:15]
in the school district
[1:10:17]
pilot program to start off
[1:10:20]
so the plan
[1:10:22]
this is a map of the city that's
[1:10:24]
connected with all the schools
[1:10:26]
and the plan that we came up with was
[1:10:29]
two officers in the high school
[1:10:32]
you just got to hit the buttons
[1:10:34]
to also in high school
[1:10:36]
and then the other school dish the
[1:10:38]
schools that we were really focused on
[1:10:39]
were the two the four middle schools
[1:10:45]
mount pleasant middle school not
[1:10:46]
pleasant valley middle school is
[1:10:48]
not named correctly that's an elementary
[1:10:51]
school so we were focused on those
[1:10:52]
middle schools
[1:10:54]
and then we didn't want to forget the
[1:10:55]
elementary schools
[1:11:00]
there's a whole bunch of them
[1:11:04]
so
[1:11:05]
taking all the schools into account
[1:11:10]
again the plan really was came down to
[1:11:12]
that we would want a sergeant to oversee
[1:11:15]
this whole program
[1:11:16]
we would put two officers in the high
[1:11:18]
school because the population was 2800
[1:11:22]
we would then place one officer that
[1:11:24]
would be
[1:11:25]
assigned to
[1:11:27]
oneida middle school and central park
[1:11:29]
middle school one officer for both
[1:11:31]
schools go back and forth and be there
[1:11:34]
to meet the needs of the community as
[1:11:36]
needed
[1:11:37]
one officer from mount pleasant middle
[1:11:39]
school and
[1:11:41]
steinbeck's career leadership academy
[1:11:44]
and washington irving that will
[1:11:45]
basically meet the needs of those three
[1:11:47]
there
[1:11:48]
and
[1:11:49]
[Music]
[1:11:50]
the sergeant would be a floater to float
[1:11:52]
between them as needed and then we would
[1:11:55]
have
[1:11:56]
one officer that would go
[1:11:58]
to float between all of the elementary
[1:12:01]
schools
[1:12:03]
and that's how we got to the number of
[1:12:04]
six
[1:12:08]
the cost of 100 000 plus benefits
[1:12:14]
that was the number that was used to
[1:12:16]
calculate the share of expense and the
[1:12:18]
easy math is
[1:12:20]
sharing 100 dollars that's 50 000
[1:12:23]
for the school 50 000 for the city
[1:12:26]
but
[1:12:27]
as the years go on and raise it in cost
[1:12:30]
increase approximate raises we built in
[1:12:33]
a two percent increase so
[1:12:35]
year two would be a hundred and two
[1:12:36]
thousand
[1:12:38]
fifty percent of each fifty one thousand
[1:12:40]
year three
[1:12:41]
two percent on top of that so year three
[1:12:43]
would be fifty two thousand twenty each
[1:12:46]
now this agreement maintains that all
[1:12:48]
over time associated with working in
[1:12:50]
schools
[1:12:51]
such as
[1:12:52]
varsity uh games
[1:12:55]
dances things like that
[1:12:57]
paid 100 by the district which is our
[1:12:59]
current arrangement so those those
[1:13:02]
numbers were simply just for staffing
[1:13:04]
during school days
[1:13:08]
so that's the cost so what's the benefit
[1:13:14]
that i see
[1:13:16]
is building the building of bonds
[1:13:17]
between students and officers and what they do they lead to they lead to
[1:13:21]
an improved sense of safety
[1:13:23]
inside the school outside the school we
[1:13:25]
want students and staff and faculty to
[1:13:28]
feel safe in
[1:13:31]
it school benefit by having improved
[1:13:33]
interaction with police officers for
[1:13:35]
students they will become familiar with
[1:13:37]
police officers you'll feel comfortable
[1:13:39]
going up to them whether it's
[1:13:41]
inside school or outside the school
[1:13:43]
they'll have a better understanding of
[1:13:45]
them by the mutual respect
[1:13:49]
i personally have experienced
[1:13:52]
cases where
[1:13:54]
back when we had school resource
[1:13:56]
officers they got to know the student
[1:13:58]
body so well it paid dividends years
[1:14:01]
into the future i'd be out on calls
[1:14:03]
where situations were tense and those
[1:14:06]
officers that were school resource
[1:14:07]
officers were able to go in there and
[1:14:09]
comp things down simply because they
[1:14:11]
knew the person
[1:14:12]
that was possibly being problematic or
[1:14:14]
they knew one of the complaints and they
[1:14:16]
were able to uh ease tension so
[1:14:19]
that familiarity to me is one of the
[1:14:22]
biggest benefits
[1:14:23]
and it's an investment that
[1:14:26]
goes into the future you know
[1:14:29]
students that are 10 years old now will
[1:14:31]
know police officers the rest of their
[1:14:32]
lives
[1:14:34]
students who trust officers will bring
[1:14:36]
problems to them that they have for
[1:14:38]
justice guidance for counseling
[1:14:41]
that's another important piece is that
[1:14:44]
we want access to the police department
[1:14:46]
to be there for for the students if they
[1:14:48]
need it they don't feel comfortable
[1:14:49]
giving it at home or being able to call
[1:14:52]
and get police officers
[1:14:56]
and and then the last benefit really is
[1:14:58]
for the school
[1:14:59]
to reduce reduce need for for police
[1:15:02]
being called to the schools
[1:15:04]
they um
[1:15:06]
they get priority service in the schools
[1:15:09]
what the benefit for the school is for
[1:15:11]
the for the city
[1:15:14]
we're going to have
[1:15:15]
problems
[1:15:16]
dealt with
[1:15:17]
before they become bigger
[1:15:19]
nip it in the mud
[1:15:21]
be able to address things before they
[1:15:23]
turn into a police call
[1:15:25]
and
[1:15:28]
basically pay it forward within the
[1:15:30]
school
[1:15:31]
system itself as far as taking care of
[1:15:33]
themselves policing themselves
[1:15:40]
we started we recognized the lead in
[1:15:43]
september
[1:15:45]
and october that's when our discussion
[1:15:47]
phase was we implemented this program in
[1:15:50]
november you'll see the calls for
[1:15:52]
service were
[1:15:54]
11217 those two months respectfully
[1:15:57]
they the pilot program starts they drop
[1:15:59]
down to 68 they go up to 89 57 61.80 so
[1:16:04]
there is a reduction in the calls for
[1:16:06]
service that originated from the school
[1:16:08]
district with the implementation of the
[1:16:10]
pilot program which was just simply two
[1:16:13]
officers
[1:16:17]
so our request before you now would be
[1:16:23]
as part of our police reform and
[1:16:25]
reinvention collaborative
[1:16:27]
texas county police department and the
[1:16:29]
city school district wish to enter into
[1:16:30]
an agreement for the police department
[1:16:32]
to provide up to six officers five
[1:16:35]
officers and one sergeant as community
[1:16:37]
engagement officers assigned to the
[1:16:39]
designated city schools
[1:16:43]
this uh this agreement would take the
[1:16:44]
effect july 1st and run through june
[1:16:47]
30th 2023
[1:16:50]
it is for a total of six officers but
[1:16:52]
our phase one would be
[1:16:54]
to add
[1:16:55]
three officers immediately
[1:17:00]
and then at the beginning of 2023
[1:17:02]
september of 23
[1:17:04]
to add those additional three officers
[1:17:08]
we had to do this to get them properly
[1:17:10]
trained i can't just take six officers
[1:17:12]
out of my staffing that i currently have
[1:17:15]
and we would request that
[1:17:17]
for the 2022 budget that i add those
[1:17:20]
three positions
[1:17:22]
that is a budget neutral
[1:17:24]
um request
[1:17:26]
because the amount of money that we
[1:17:28]
would receive
[1:17:30]
from the school district should cover
[1:17:31]
the cost of the officers going to the
[1:17:33]
police academy to replace the officers
[1:17:36]
that are in schools
[1:17:37]
and then we would be making this another
[1:17:40]
an additional request for the three in
[1:17:42]
our 23 2023 budget request
[1:17:47]
that is your comment
[1:17:51]
thank you and we will uh open it up to
[1:17:53]
any questions at this time
[1:17:56]
thank you and thank you ac
[1:17:58]
um
[1:17:59]
i think it's appropriate to hear from
[1:18:01]
our resource officer that's here uh if
[1:18:04]
unless there any objections would you
[1:18:05]
mind coming up to the front and talking
[1:18:07]
about a typical day
[1:18:11]
it's briefly summarizing i imagine it
[1:18:13]
came from that
[1:18:14]
so so the days vary based on the needs
[1:18:16]
of the district um
[1:18:19]
uh early on i mean me and officer rivera
[1:18:22]
usually sign in the kids that are in
[1:18:24]
school late and then it's responding on
[1:18:28]
a neat basis so
[1:18:29]
um
[1:18:30]
you know we have to keep in mind there's
[1:18:33]
17
[1:18:34]
uh different schools within the district
[1:18:37]
so you know they could be initial uh you
[1:18:40]
know child major disclosure at mount
[1:18:42]
pleasant middle school or
[1:18:44]
howe elementary um they range between
[1:18:48]
you know we've had threats written on
[1:18:49]
the wall specifics as it relates to
[1:18:52]
um you know
[1:18:55]
whether they say they're gonna
[1:18:57]
cause harm at uh on a circle at a
[1:19:00]
certain school at a certain time so you
[1:19:02]
know
[1:19:03]
it it varies i mean i've talked to
[1:19:06]
staff members about
[1:19:08]
the eviction process
[1:19:12]
and
[1:19:13]
again it just depends on the day
[1:19:16]
good thank you
[1:19:19]
are there any questions from my fellow
[1:19:21]
council members mr mutaver
[1:19:24]
chief you you mentioned uh this one
[1:19:25]
question i was gonna mention that money
[1:19:27]
the reimbursement receipt you're gonna
[1:19:29]
receive from the school will turn back
[1:19:30]
into hiring additional uh staffing so
[1:19:33]
that would be incremental as you are
[1:19:34]
putting stuff into the school district
[1:19:37]
you're going to use that reimbursement
[1:19:38]
to hire additional staff or you are even
[1:19:40]
going to do that one time next year
[1:19:44]
the additional
[1:19:46]
fighter
[1:19:48]
the
[1:19:51]
we would put the more senior officers in
[1:19:53]
the school and we would hire officers
[1:19:54]
train them those officers that would
[1:19:57]
then go on the street and staff our our
[1:19:59]
streets are typically the lower paid
[1:20:01]
ones until they get the seniority and
[1:20:04]
they rise up step so
[1:20:05]
the uh the model that we have built out
[1:20:07]
which is that the that they're sharing
[1:20:10]
the cost of the officer we're giving
[1:20:11]
them
[1:20:12]
you know it covers a lot a large amount of the
[1:20:15]
cost of the officer that is replacing
[1:20:17]
them with also that's why it's
[1:20:19]
considered budget neutral this this year
[1:20:21]
and
[1:20:22]
when you build it up maybe
[1:20:24]
10 years from now it's a different
[1:20:26]
conversation but for right now
[1:20:29]
it's um you know
[1:20:31]
it it does it there's not a heavy lift
[1:20:32]
from the department from uh from finance
[1:20:34]
end
[1:20:36]
so the cost that you quoted here is the
[1:20:37]
senior officer
[1:20:39]
pretty much yeah
[1:20:41]
yes
[1:20:42]
and you also mentioned that you will be
[1:20:43]
hiring senior officer into the school
[1:20:45]
district
[1:20:46]
my one of my concerns is that um
[1:20:49]
when you can be hiring senior officer in
[1:20:51]
the contract it says
[1:20:52]
recommendation of the pba the mayor and
[1:20:54]
you i would also like to see the officer
[1:20:57]
who has experience dealing with youth
[1:21:00]
you know several years over the course
[1:21:02]
of being a police department we consider
[1:21:05]
placement here
[1:21:08]
yeah the the way our system works is
[1:21:11]
that
[1:21:12]
we have a seniority system with a police
[1:21:14]
department for for the control level so
[1:21:17]
when a job opens up we bid it for for
[1:21:20]
senior and the senior bidder gets the
[1:21:22]
opportunity to interview
[1:21:24]
so
[1:21:25]
um
[1:21:26]
so through that process
[1:21:29]
we we find out who the most senior
[1:21:30]
person is and then we take a look at
[1:21:32]
them and interview them and if we don't
[1:21:34]
feel that they're the right fit then we
[1:21:36]
move on to the next one you know we have
[1:21:38]
that discussion and then we have the
[1:21:40]
additional layer of sending them before
[1:21:42]
the school board
[1:21:44]
administration the school administration
[1:21:46]
to
[1:21:47]
um for them to give approval also
[1:21:53]
so i'd like to follow up on that so um i
[1:21:55]
know that you said because i read here
[1:21:56]
that you do result in collective
[1:21:58]
bargaining which is clearly seniority
[1:22:00]
etc but um are there instances or some
[1:22:03]
things that you do that are merit based
[1:22:04]
positions
[1:22:05]
um and because i share mr muda baron's
[1:22:09]
um concern with that we want officers
[1:22:12]
who i mean it takes a certain amount of
[1:22:14]
temperament it takes a certain
[1:22:15]
temperament to work with young people
[1:22:17]
on a day-to-day basis um so is there a
[1:22:21]
possibility that there can be a
[1:22:22]
merit-based system so that officers are
[1:22:24]
chosen as opposed to
[1:22:26]
um
[1:22:27]
just doing it by seniority because
[1:22:29]
frankly looking at looking at it from
[1:22:31]
eight to four is is a pretty nice shift
[1:22:34]
and in the schools so um and maybe i
[1:22:36]
make it sound easier than it really is
[1:22:38]
but it's it's a shift that people may
[1:22:40]
bid on words as opposed to being out in
[1:22:42]
the street so
[1:22:43]
um you know i go back to is is merit
[1:22:46]
based an opportunity for pete for um
[1:22:48]
this as opposed to
[1:22:50]
just based on seniority
[1:22:53]
we have some jobs in our department that
[1:22:55]
are merit-based those were derived
[1:22:58]
through
[1:22:59]
the negotiation process with the pba
[1:23:01]
i think that before we um i'll refer to the mayor on this before
[1:23:06]
we go too deep into that conversation it
[1:23:08]
might be something more for
[1:23:10]
executive session to discuss
[1:23:12]
than do it publicly
[1:23:16]
i would agree with the chief even though
[1:23:18]
the pba has been
[1:23:21]
[Music]
[1:23:23]
a partner in this in terms of discussion
[1:23:25]
trying to get the right people there
[1:23:28]
and you know you saw from the chart you
[1:23:30]
have to understand we're putting police
[1:23:33]
in the schools
[1:23:35]
every day now
[1:23:37]
those are calls for service they aren't
[1:23:39]
just stopping there randomly it's
[1:23:42]
somebody's dialing 9-1-1 reaching out to
[1:23:44]
the police department we're sending a
[1:23:46]
car
[1:23:47]
so this allows officers to be assigned
[1:23:50]
to
[1:23:51]
the school district so they're building
[1:23:54]
a better rapport a more functional
[1:23:56]
knowledge of who the leadership is
[1:23:58]
within
[1:23:59]
each individual building and then also
[1:24:02]
rapport with the students
[1:24:05]
and i think it's a better way to respond
[1:24:07]
to those calls and you saw
[1:24:09]
it's still preliminary data but we had
[1:24:11]
two
[1:24:12]
fairly active ones when the
[1:24:14]
officers are assigned there you see that
[1:24:17]
start to drop in the earlier months on
[1:24:19]
that chart you have to remember covet is
[1:24:21]
there so that the baseline is skewed
[1:24:25]
but
[1:24:26]
i think just going forward
[1:24:29]
it's better to have these officers there
[1:24:32]
than having somebody
[1:24:34]
who would be randomly dispatched there
[1:24:36]
based on the configuration that we use
[1:24:39]
in the street
[1:24:40]
where you can't always guarantee
[1:24:42]
the officer with the training
[1:24:45]
unique to the school is going to go
[1:24:46]
there
[1:24:48]
and it's an evolutionary model
[1:24:52]
it's
[1:24:54]
one that
[1:24:55]
i think is going to pay off
[1:24:58]
good dividends it's part of the reform
[1:25:00]
package
[1:25:01]
and the dialogue has been
[1:25:04]
one that i'll call just dynamic so we're
[1:25:06]
looking at how do you do it better how
[1:25:08]
do you engage
[1:25:10]
students how do we better
[1:25:12]
serve the public as a whole
[1:25:14]
and
[1:25:16]
if we can drop those calls down to zero
[1:25:18]
would be the ideal
[1:25:20]
end game
[1:25:22]
but yes there are some components where
[1:25:24]
you get into an executive session
[1:25:26]
if the council would like to do that or
[1:25:29]
just follow up discussions
[1:25:31]
uh depending on what specific questions
[1:25:34]
there are i do have oh sorry i haven't
[1:25:36]
had further questions so currently you
[1:25:38]
have two officers in the schools yes
[1:25:40]
just two and were they chosen for
[1:25:42]
through the collective bargaining system
[1:25:44]
they were the senior bidders
[1:25:46]
so other people been but they were the
[1:25:48]
highest okay um
[1:25:51]
and also when when we did the reform and
[1:25:53]
reinvention which this came out of that
[1:25:56]
were community engagement officers were
[1:25:57]
the was the intent for them to be in
[1:25:59]
school was that the intent when we when
[1:26:01]
that piece of the legislation the plan
[1:26:04]
was passed no okay no um it was um it
[1:26:08]
was part of the process of sitting down
[1:26:10]
with the superintendent and his
[1:26:11]
leadership staff and we started talking
[1:26:13]
about our reinforcement reinvention
[1:26:15]
collaborative and the idea behind the
[1:26:17]
community engagement officer and he
[1:26:20]
really liked that idea that's why we
[1:26:22]
chose the name rather than school
[1:26:23]
resource officer
[1:26:24]
is that um you know we knew that we
[1:26:27]
wanted to engage more with the community
[1:26:29]
he knew that he wanted us there
[1:26:32]
for a variety of different reasons
[1:26:34]
and we just felt that it it it really
[1:26:38]
it wasn't exact fit but it was a fit
[1:26:40]
there
[1:26:41]
and and just to go back to the officers
[1:26:44]
um and and
[1:26:46]
them getting the job through the
[1:26:47]
seniority process
[1:26:49]
i like to tell i like to say that it's
[1:26:51]
my job it's chief whipple's job
[1:26:54]
to make sure that every officer working
[1:26:56]
for us is going to be
[1:26:58]
regardless of how they get the job
[1:27:00]
appropriate to go into the police
[1:27:01]
department go into the schools like i
[1:27:03]
don't want to just find that diamond in
[1:27:05]
the rough police officer going to
[1:27:06]
schools i want every single one of my
[1:27:08]
officers that works the street to be
[1:27:10]
acceptable to go into the schools and
[1:27:12]
that's what that's what we work for
[1:27:14]
every day
[1:27:20]
um
[1:27:21]
in terms of the training that the
[1:27:22]
officers um i believe that there's like
[1:27:24]
a more comprehensive training that the
[1:27:26]
safety team undergoes
[1:27:28]
can you talk a little bit about that
[1:27:30]
process in terms of some of the topics
[1:27:32]
and presenters that that meet with
[1:27:35]
the team
[1:27:36]
um and do the training
[1:27:38]
i mean the training that's above and
[1:27:39]
beyond
[1:27:40]
you know the police training
[1:27:42]
um
[1:27:44]
i'm not i'm not very familiar with this
[1:27:46]
sergeant might be i'll help out a little
[1:27:48]
bit with it i know that there's an
[1:27:49]
organization called nasro national
[1:27:51]
association of resource officers it's a
[1:27:54]
basic school
[1:27:55]
resource officer training we do plan on
[1:27:58]
sending our officers there to that
[1:27:59]
training
[1:28:00]
and i know that there's other training
[1:28:03]
that has been put on by the school
[1:28:05]
district and by the school safety
[1:28:06]
director jeff russo that they've already
[1:28:08]
gone to
[1:28:10]
um and they're invited to
[1:28:12]
it was the therapeutic crisis
[1:28:14]
intervention um that was you know given
[1:28:16]
by their put on that their staff at the
[1:28:20]
district um
[1:28:22]
they take
[1:28:24]
we completed that with their school
[1:28:26]
psychologists
[1:28:27]
one of the school counselors and
[1:28:29]
a master social worker
[1:28:34]
and i have another question thank you um
[1:28:37]
the other
[1:28:39]
i have a concern that this that the
[1:28:41]
officers have to float among the schools
[1:28:43]
as opposed to
[1:28:45]
officers that might be
[1:28:46]
assigned to specific schools and i guess
[1:28:49]
again um
[1:28:50]
you know have you found that challenging
[1:28:52]
that you have to be in many different
[1:28:54]
places on any on any given given day
[1:28:58]
can you join us up here sorry it looks
[1:29:00]
like it's going to be a few questions
[1:29:01]
for you
[1:29:02]
because then you'll be on the camera the
[1:29:04]
public seats
[1:29:07]
yeah and that's what you know the pilot
[1:29:09]
program right you know with two officers
[1:29:11]
and in 17 different schools
[1:29:14]
uh you know made for some busy days you
[1:29:16]
know addressing the needs at the
[1:29:19]
different campuses
[1:29:20]
but you know that's what that's what
[1:29:22]
we've been tasked with and i think
[1:29:25]
that's
[1:29:26]
you know collectively the school
[1:29:27]
district you know saw the need for
[1:29:29]
additional um offices to handle that
[1:29:32]
workload
[1:29:34]
so
[1:29:35]
you know
[1:29:36]
that's how we're handling it now and you
[1:29:39]
know there's some emergencies that you
[1:29:40]
know if i was tied up
[1:29:42]
you know i had to supplement i swear patrol
[1:29:52]
so i had a question uh pretty simply
[1:29:54]
just how is success going to be measured
[1:29:56]
i know that we are answering this at a
[1:29:59]
point in time as you highlighted in the
[1:30:00]
presentation where there's a lot of
[1:30:02]
incidents that are happening in the
[1:30:03]
school can you just identify some of the
[1:30:06]
metrics that you're going to look at to
[1:30:07]
be able to gauge
[1:30:08]
whether this
[1:30:10]
program is improving or
[1:30:12]
not making any substantial benefits to
[1:30:14]
those
[1:30:15]
histories
[1:30:16]
sure sure so
[1:30:19]
we're going to measure this program like
[1:30:20]
we do uh you know
[1:30:23]
how we measure ourselves on a daily
[1:30:24]
basis um
[1:30:26]
you know we're going to look at calls
[1:30:27]
for service that are generated we're
[1:30:29]
going to look at the number of major
[1:30:30]
incidents that are happening where we
[1:30:32]
are needed there
[1:30:34]
and we're you know we're going to just
[1:30:37]
speak with the administration about
[1:30:39]
conducting surveys getting feedback at
[1:30:42]
the end of the school year i'm hearing
[1:30:44]
from the school community their thoughts
[1:30:46]
they're getting feedback um
[1:30:48]
but quite generally
[1:30:50]
um you know the the absence of major
[1:30:53]
issues in the school is really going to
[1:30:54]
speak volumes and that's what we're
[1:30:55]
really aiming for
[1:30:57]
we're in the business to put ourselves
[1:30:58]
out of business we get to a point where
[1:31:00]
there's no issues and and uh the
[1:31:03]
empowerment is there for the school to
[1:31:04]
police themselves through school
[1:31:06]
schools security monitors you know i'd
[1:31:09]
be happy just to leave just as fast as
[1:31:11]
we're coming in there um so we're there
[1:31:13]
for a reason
[1:31:14]
and um you know who knows if it will be
[1:31:16]
a short-term thing or a long-term thing
[1:31:18]
but you know we want to make sure that
[1:31:21]
it's a safe learning environment for
[1:31:23]
everybody
[1:31:24]
and that's that's primarily our focus
[1:31:27]
and then a follow-up uh question to that
[1:31:30]
is um based on your answer uh if the
[1:31:33]
priority is safety uh and then the
[1:31:36]
additional areas that were highlighted
[1:31:38]
in the
[1:31:39]
legislative reform to include like
[1:31:41]
educators and then also
[1:31:48]
to include educators and also making
[1:31:50]
sure that the environment is safe and
[1:31:53]
improving relationships um
[1:31:56]
i think if the onus has placed too
[1:31:58]
heavily on the safety element
[1:32:00]
my question then is how is a community
[1:32:03]
engagement officer different than a
[1:32:04]
police officer that's in a school
[1:32:08]
i was different than a police officer
[1:32:10]
if more of the illness is placed on
[1:32:12]
safety absent making sure that they're
[1:32:14]
taking the appropriate steps to build
[1:32:16]
those relationships and apply that
[1:32:18]
community health initiative training
[1:32:20]
that they we're trained to use uh if
[1:32:22]
we're not creating that also i think
[1:32:24]
that that can be very much a missed
[1:32:26]
opportunity
[1:32:29]
well
[1:32:32]
if i think i understand your question
[1:32:34]
right i'll answer it this way that you
[1:32:36]
know on a daily basis when police
[1:32:38]
officers are out in the community
[1:32:40]
working we are there empowering the community
[1:32:45]
to police themselves
[1:32:47]
um and we are simply the uh the agents
[1:32:50]
of the of the society
[1:32:53]
to to have the ability to enforce laws
[1:32:57]
if needed
[1:32:58]
and and i would see that we are working
[1:33:00]
the same way in the school district we
[1:33:02]
are simply there we have the ability to
[1:33:04]
act if needed but we don't want to act
[1:33:06]
we want to empower the school safety
[1:33:09]
officers
[1:33:10]
the staff we want to have our presence
[1:33:12]
there be of such that everybody just
[1:33:15]
does what they're supposed to do and
[1:33:16]
there's no no threat from the outside of people
[1:33:19]
coming in there thinking that they can
[1:33:21]
come in and assault a student
[1:33:23]
because their children had a
[1:33:24]
disagreement
[1:33:26]
the day before
[1:33:27]
we don't want one student to feel that
[1:33:29]
they can attack another student and get
[1:33:31]
away with it we don't want students feel
[1:33:33]
that they can bring weapons into the
[1:33:34]
schools and get away with it so we just
[1:33:36]
simply want our presence that's there to
[1:33:39]
be the deterrent
[1:33:41]
at the same time
[1:33:43]
while we're there we're taking the
[1:33:44]
opportunity to be educators to be
[1:33:46]
counselors to have to let the students
[1:33:48]
have access
[1:33:49]
to the police
[1:33:51]
to meet their needs if they have any
[1:33:55]
thank you and would you be opposed to uh
[1:33:58]
if the council should decide
[1:34:01]
i know you mentioned doing annual
[1:34:03]
feedback surveys with the staff and the
[1:34:05]
students i think it's our responsibility
[1:34:08]
as a council to make sure that we're
[1:34:09]
acting representative of the community's
[1:34:11]
interests to potentially provide us just
[1:34:14]
a report and an x amount of months
[1:34:16]
should we approve that to just gauge how
[1:34:19]
well that this program is functioning
[1:34:22]
i would not be opposed to that i i plan
[1:34:24]
on speaking the superintendent about
[1:34:25]
that anyways
[1:34:27]
thank you thank you uh it's perfect so i
[1:34:30]
think i think when you said that you
[1:34:31]
were going to um for your evaluation
[1:34:34]
process it was going to be the school
[1:34:36]
staff you didn't mention students so i'd
[1:34:38]
like to know would students be including
[1:34:39]
that and were students included in this
[1:34:42]
whole discussion
[1:34:43]
um
[1:34:44]
you know in terms of um i know that well
[1:34:46]
anyway we're students i'll let you
[1:34:47]
answer we're students included in this
[1:34:49]
discussion
[1:34:50]
in terms of um the community engagement
[1:34:52]
officers in school was there any kind of
[1:34:54]
focus group among the students
[1:34:56]
not by the police department but i
[1:34:57]
believe there was done by the school
[1:34:59]
superintendent
[1:35:01]
and um and and that was just a mistake i
[1:35:03]
would definitely want to get their input
[1:35:05]
at the end of the school year like what
[1:35:06]
are your thoughts behind it get get
[1:35:08]
ideas from them on the program
[1:35:12]
okay and i did have a question about the
[1:35:15]
um the training the nasro
[1:35:18]
but that is specifically training just
[1:35:21]
for police officers right it's not it's not
[1:35:24]
well what is it just specific like if
[1:35:26]
you're going to police in the streets or
[1:35:28]
does it include um police officers being
[1:35:31]
in schools
[1:35:33]
i believe
[1:35:34]
specifically for
[1:35:36]
school resource officers that's that
[1:35:38]
specific training all right is there a
[1:35:40]
breakdown somewhere of what actually i
[1:35:41]
know that you meant you spoke it of what
[1:35:44]
happens in that training and you don't
[1:35:45]
have to have it right here right now but
[1:35:47]
um if we have that
[1:35:48]
yeah
[1:35:50]
this
[1:35:51]
is certainly available
[1:35:54]
i believe it's available they have a
[1:35:55]
website yes
[1:36:00]
it's a model that the you know police
[1:36:01]
officer has an informal counselor like
[1:36:04]
he said a role model um and that's
[1:36:07]
what's important for me is you know i
[1:36:10]
didn't know any police officers growing
[1:36:11]
up and i think it's important that you
[1:36:14]
know
[1:36:15]
uh you see
[1:36:17]
you know officers that look like them
[1:36:19]
that
[1:36:19]
you know come from neighborhoods similar
[1:36:21]
to theirs etc
[1:36:23]
so
[1:36:24]
you know i think it's an opportunity
[1:36:27]
i know you talk about success but in
[1:36:29]
terms of recruitment you know years ago
[1:36:31]
i was tasked with recruitment and i
[1:36:33]
think it's you know
[1:36:35]
being a role model for
[1:36:37]
our youth to be the difference that they want to
[1:36:40]
see
[1:36:45]
oh i'm sorry
[1:36:46]
if i can just add something thank you
[1:36:48]
i was in some of the conversations
[1:36:50]
related to this agreement and the
[1:36:52]
question didn't come up related to
[1:36:54]
what this quarter field brought up
[1:36:56]
related to nazareth
[1:36:58]
the school district indicated that's the
[1:36:59]
gold standard for training
[1:37:01]
um there's it's obviously the national
[1:37:03]
association there's a
[1:37:05]
state version which actually doesn't
[1:37:07]
meet
[1:37:08]
according to the school district the
[1:37:10]
same criteria that the national um
[1:37:13]
training provides
[1:37:15]
and as was indicated there is
[1:37:17]
information related to it and i have it
[1:37:19]
available to me too so i can certainly
[1:37:20]
pass that well
[1:37:24]
um
[1:37:27]
yeah justin follow-up is border phila
[1:37:29]
question
[1:37:30]
community engagement officer when we
[1:37:32]
passed the police reform and reinvention
[1:37:35]
this would primarily target towards the
[1:37:38]
community and now we're hiring these
[1:37:40]
officers to compliment what is going on
[1:37:42]
with the school district
[1:37:43]
are you going to be hiring additional
[1:37:45]
officers to go out into the community
[1:37:48]
and be part of this also
[1:37:50]
and do you have a target date for that
[1:37:53]
yeah the the um
[1:37:55]
the program that we have in the
[1:37:56]
recommendations uh we have every
[1:37:59]
intention of building that out we just
[1:38:01]
haven't gotten
[1:38:03]
we're not there yet
[1:38:05]
we are putting the training we're
[1:38:07]
implementing the training that we
[1:38:09]
discussed for those officers already
[1:38:11]
that's being built up
[1:38:12]
but uh that's that's still in the works
[1:38:15]
and i will be updating our collaborative
[1:38:17]
on where we're at with that next week
[1:38:20]
um you know or coming soon
[1:38:22]
and um but
[1:38:24]
we we originally applied for a cops
[1:38:26]
grant to be able to build that program
[1:38:27]
out we're not successful we're going to
[1:38:29]
try again next year so that's the whole
[1:38:32]
as far as that program goes a lot how
[1:38:34]
does it meet those needs
[1:38:37]
would it be safe to say that the
[1:38:38]
reinforcement we're going to receive
[1:38:40]
from the school will turn that into
[1:38:41]
hiring additional staff that can be able
[1:38:44]
to be community engagement officer that can be
[1:38:47]
found within the community
[1:38:49]
as a reimbursement rather than putting
[1:38:51]
that money into
[1:38:52]
something else
[1:38:54]
talk about
[1:38:55]
whether they're remorseful
[1:38:58]
well they should just cover the six that
[1:39:00]
we're going to be
[1:39:01]
that we will be bringing on
[1:39:03]
for them
[1:39:05]
yeah but regardless we're going to hire
[1:39:07]
these officers
[1:39:08]
so those are reinforcements that we need
[1:39:10]
to just return that back into something
[1:39:13]
additional officer six more officer with
[1:39:15]
that reimbursement that we're getting
[1:39:17]
from the school
[1:39:19]
the right person from the school if the
[1:39:20]
council chooses to
[1:39:22]
put more money in the budget but that's
[1:39:24]
right now the department is lower
[1:39:27]
staffing level with what i would prefer
[1:39:29]
what the chief would prefer
[1:39:31]
so it's the
[1:39:32]
over the next
[1:39:34]
12 24 months
[1:39:36]
try and work that back up
[1:39:38]
to
[1:39:39]
what we consider an adequate staffing
[1:39:41]
level
[1:39:42]
and part of that charge is to have those
[1:39:45]
community engagement officers
[1:39:47]
not only his specific assignments but
[1:39:50]
every officer that's out on patrols the
[1:39:53]
chief talks about being able to
[1:39:55]
handle whatever the call comes up
[1:39:57]
it's the nature of the department where
[1:40:02]
some officers end up with a little area
[1:40:04]
of specialty one way or the other by the
[1:40:07]
luck of the draw some of the cases that
[1:40:09]
they end up being assigned or calls they
[1:40:11]
go to
[1:40:12]
or their natural proclivity or
[1:40:15]
educational background where they have
[1:40:17]
a little bit different
[1:40:20]
skill set that is more applicable to
[1:40:22]
some of these but it's that make sure
[1:40:24]
that everybody
[1:40:25]
has the level that's able to serve the
[1:40:27]
needs of the people when they get
[1:40:31]
the calls and then hopefully as the
[1:40:33]
calls go down
[1:40:36]
that you can do more of the community
[1:40:38]
engagement so that you're talking to
[1:40:40]
people
[1:40:41]
you're walking the beat you're having
[1:40:44]
more of the deterrent effect
[1:40:46]
and just a smoother engagement
[1:40:50]
with the public as a whole
[1:40:54]
yeah my concern is that we don't want to
[1:40:56]
just leave behind you know i'm not
[1:40:57]
saying you can leave it you're doing it
[1:40:58]
it's a good program that we're spreading
[1:41:00]
in school and community but i'll make
[1:41:02]
sure that we are addressing
[1:41:04]
the police reform that was intended for
[1:41:07]
to have these officers into the
[1:41:09]
community also at the same time
[1:41:12]
they will
[1:41:13]
follow the school and that's the goal
[1:41:16]
as you know it's always trying to get
[1:41:18]
the budget
[1:41:19]
i have to mention it
[1:41:23]
well i just want to clarify
[1:41:25]
i and tell me if i'm wrong but i thought
[1:41:28]
in our 2022 budget
[1:41:30]
which we had the report already
[1:41:33]
with the recommendations i thought we
[1:41:35]
actually already had included money in
[1:41:37]
this budget for
[1:41:39]
community engagement officers
[1:41:41]
and that this is a new program so this
[1:41:44]
is new money on top of what we already
[1:41:46]
put into the budget for
[1:41:49]
adding community engagement officers but
[1:41:51]
i could be wrong but that was my memory
[1:41:53]
of this it's
[1:41:54]
also the nature of hiring the police
[1:41:57]
we're
[1:41:58]
told
[1:41:59]
to pass the civil service test
[1:42:01]
be able to be hired
[1:42:03]
we have to send them to training right
[1:42:06]
so
[1:42:07]
basically an officer
[1:42:09]
that first year
[1:42:11]
[Music]
[1:42:12]
can't be used and so it's been
[1:42:15]
filling those positions that are in the
[1:42:17]
budget
[1:42:18]
and to maintain the level of staffing so
[1:42:20]
this is
[1:42:21]
[Music]
[1:42:24]
[Music]
[1:42:25]
position i think works for everybody's
[1:42:28]
benefit
[1:42:29]
even though it might not be considered
[1:42:30]
to be perfect
[1:42:36]
oh
[1:42:37]
yeah so i i just i would like um and i i
[1:42:40]
it seems like we can't discuss it openly
[1:42:42]
but i really would like to discuss
[1:42:44]
um the mayor of base as opposed to just
[1:42:47]
by seniority i think that's that's an
[1:42:49]
important you know as we know people
[1:42:51]
have different ideas about what should
[1:42:52]
and shouldn't have in schools but i
[1:42:53]
think it's extremely important that um
[1:42:56]
we're placing um officers in schools who
[1:42:59]
you know you know we want to look at
[1:43:02]
just everything and make sure that it
[1:43:03]
makes sense if this is what this is
[1:43:05]
what's going to happen um that there
[1:43:07]
should be a vetting process and
[1:43:09]
not just the standard
[1:43:12]
seniority process
[1:43:14]
so i would like to have more discussion
[1:43:15]
about that mr toro
[1:43:18]
i thought i was under the impression
[1:43:19]
that
[1:43:21]
you would interview them and then the
[1:43:22]
school board as well
[1:43:25]
would interview the candidates for the
[1:43:27]
positions in the school correct that's
[1:43:29]
correct we do interview them however you
[1:43:32]
know
[1:43:33]
that interview isn't necessarily to
[1:43:34]
select them as much as to interview them
[1:43:37]
to potentially exclude them because the job is big it's theirs and then we
[1:43:43]
interview them for the right fit if you
[1:43:45]
feel they're not the right fit then we
[1:43:46]
speak to them and said you're not the
[1:43:48]
right fit
[1:43:49]
and we and then when you who feels the
[1:43:51]
right fit
[1:43:52]
would go on to
[1:43:54]
um
[1:43:55]
be interviewed by the school board to
[1:43:56]
make sure they're right fit as well
[1:43:58]
correct okay my intention will be to
[1:44:00]
present an officer to the school board
[1:44:02]
that
[1:44:03]
i'm confident that they're going to be
[1:44:04]
fine
[1:44:06]
but that process is different than the
[1:44:07]
merit-based it's still by seniority
[1:44:10]
so that's why i really wanted to discuss
[1:44:12]
that
[1:44:15]
okay so i'm in agreement with um just
[1:44:18]
causing this conversation until we're
[1:44:20]
able to pick this back up an executive
[1:44:22]
session
[1:44:23]
uh so pending any further questions no
[1:44:25]
you'll have to move into executive
[1:44:27]
session but we have to hold this in the
[1:44:29]
data session
[1:44:32]
now we just need to recess
[1:44:35]
yeah if you're going to continue
[1:44:37]
yes
[1:44:39]
right
[1:44:42]
second
[1:44:43]
favorite
[1:44:44]
all right
[1:44:45]
unless there are any other topics for
[1:44:47]
before the committee uh can i get a
[1:44:49]
motion to adjourn normally
[1:44:51]
no we just resign
[1:44:55]
we'll pick it up
[1:44:57]
i would like to call
[1:45:01]
and this is a foreign reminder that
[1:45:03]
calling for public hearing uh cdbg cv
[1:45:06]
funding to prevent prepare for
[1:45:09]
and respond for carolina virus and this
[1:45:11]
is on april 25th
[1:45:14]
and the second item is also a reminder
[1:45:16]
for public hearing proposed annual
[1:45:18]
action plan
[1:45:20]
public hearing april 25th if there's
[1:45:23]
nothing else before finance i ask for a
[1:45:25]
motion to adjourn
[1:45:27]
second second
[1:45:29]
all in favor all right all right thank
[1:45:30]
you
[1:45:31]
i'd like to call the order city
[1:45:33]
development and planning we have 13
[1:45:34]
items on the agenda
[1:45:36]
um i don't see mr walling
[1:45:38]
[Music]
[1:45:39]
here
[1:45:41]
on his way down okay
[1:45:44]
he should be coming through the door any
[1:45:45]
minute our first item is to authorize
[1:45:47]
the issue issuance of a revocable permit
[1:45:50]
number 668 suganesh hospitality for a
[1:45:53]
sign that will overhang the cities right
[1:45:55]
away at 759 state street
[1:45:59]
i think that's detailed in the it is
[1:46:03]
what they call it the standard
[1:46:04]
application but ask the council's
[1:46:07]
favorable consideration until
[1:46:10]
mr i want to give the impression we get
[1:46:13]
by without them but we could
[1:46:15]
probably handle this one here's the sign
[1:46:19]
does everyone have an opportunity to
[1:46:20]
actually look at the information
[1:46:22]
provided in their packet
[1:46:25]
yes and so are there any questions
[1:46:29]
if not i can stand in motion i'll move
[1:46:31]
it
[1:46:32]
second all right all those in favor fine
[1:46:35]
okay um number two to authorize the
[1:46:38]
mayor or his designated agreement with
[1:46:40]
the new york state department of state
[1:46:43]
for the downtown the downtown uh city's
[1:46:45]
downtown reinvest revitalization
[1:46:47]
initiative program contract number
[1:46:49]
c1001884
[1:46:52]
are you taking this one too man
[1:46:55]
this is
[1:46:56]
[Music]
[1:46:57]
part of the uh
[1:46:59]
dri award and it's government so there's a little bit
[1:47:06]
of paperwork
[1:47:09]
and uh
[1:47:11]
looking for you to move forward on this
[1:47:15]
but this is
[1:47:16]
the master contractor thing
[1:47:19]
it's it's right here
[1:47:31]
the delay is a little longer
[1:47:40]
so we're talking about dri contract
[1:47:42]
number 84. that is correct all right so
[1:47:45]
what are the questions with contract
[1:47:47]
number 84 are there any at this moment
[1:47:50]
anyone have any questions
[1:47:53]
okay state of motion so moved
[1:47:56]
second always in favor hi all right item
[1:47:59]
number three authorize the mayor or his
[1:48:01]
destiny to intervene with the new york
[1:48:02]
state department of state for the city's
[1:48:04]
downtown utilization initiative program
[1:48:06]
contract number one zero zero one eight five so this is
[1:48:11]
i can't remember which one is which off
[1:48:12]
the top of my head i think it's 85
[1:48:14]
broadway and clinton
[1:48:16]
[Music]
[1:48:30]
decorative lights on broadway and
[1:48:32]
clinton where we don't have them to kind
[1:48:34]
of match what we're doing downtown um
[1:48:36]
it's the reason that you don't see us
[1:48:38]
paving broadway right now with the
[1:48:40]
national grid cuts because we're going
[1:48:41]
to be coming in there others dri and
[1:48:42]
doing the same thing so we're going to
[1:48:44]
do it all at once get the trenching done
[1:48:46]
get in there and put the lights in so
[1:48:49]
uh it's a good project this is step one
[1:48:52]
of
[1:48:52]
many steps
[1:48:54]
so you know this is going to be a long
[1:48:56]
process getting everything done but once
[1:48:58]
we get these contracts
[1:49:00]
passed signed authorized out to them
[1:49:02]
we'll start working on our request for
[1:49:04]
proposals to actually get designed and
[1:49:06]
then that will have to go to the state
[1:49:08]
so
[1:49:09]
do you know the cost of the project
[1:49:11]
overall for the lighting the work the budget is
[1:49:15]
eight years roughly around eight hundred
[1:49:17]
thousand dollars
[1:49:19]
oh wow okay yeah the other project the
[1:49:22]
budget for those is is you know total
[1:49:24]
projects two million but
[1:49:26]
we're a little over that butt up
[1:49:28]
we're probably gonna need to supplement
[1:49:29]
some of that but that's when we get down
[1:49:31]
the road with design and you know
[1:49:33]
because that has the j street connector
[1:49:34]
in it that has
[1:49:38]
three projects j street and then there
[1:49:40]
is city hall and
[1:49:43]
i don't know
[1:49:44]
but there's three projects lumped into
[1:49:46]
the number 884
[1:49:47]
but this is just for getting the
[1:49:49]
contracts moving
[1:49:50]
[Music]
[1:49:54]
could
[1:50:03]
these
[1:50:04]
on broadway
[1:50:06]
were cover heads that we did replace
[1:50:08]
with the leds but it's designed to
[1:50:12]
net
[1:50:13]
project was only the cobra heads
[1:50:16]
these are to standardize the light so
[1:50:18]
they're the decorative ones that you see
[1:50:20]
in front of city hall and around
[1:50:22]
the rest of downtown
[1:50:25]
just to make it more visually attractive
[1:50:28]
as we uh upgrade the streets and
[1:50:31]
overall ambiance and downtown wave
[1:50:33]
fighting
[1:50:35]
okay weight finding is always a a piece
[1:50:38]
that they put in there for uh going for
[1:50:39]
a wavelength program
[1:50:42]
are there any other questions
[1:50:46]
second
[1:50:47]
all those in favor of
[1:50:48]
thank you
[1:50:50]
ah and uh item number four our worst
[1:50:53]
vehicle contract for the cities
[1:50:55]
of schenectady greenhouse composting
[1:50:57]
toilet
[1:50:59]
so um
[1:51:01]
the city
[1:51:02]
owns the
[1:51:04]
greenhouse in central park the friends
[1:51:06]
of the greenhouse operate it and
[1:51:07]
maintain it for the most part they
[1:51:09]
really do a great job
[1:51:10]
they have an existing
[1:51:12]
bathroom facility in both the greenhouse
[1:51:15]
utility building and in the teaching
[1:51:16]
classroom neither building is ada
[1:51:20]
accessible so when they have public
[1:51:22]
events
[1:51:23]
they don't have an accessible bathroom
[1:51:24]
we did investigate the feasibility of
[1:51:27]
making the building and the bathroom ada
[1:51:29]
accessible the cost of it were
[1:51:32]
they were high they were actually hiking
[1:51:34]
you had to build a ramp and open the
[1:51:35]
doors up and then after they did some
[1:51:36]
investigating into it then it got into
[1:51:39]
that's kind of theirs not only their
[1:51:40]
teaching space but their office space so
[1:51:42]
then it was do we really want the public
[1:51:44]
to have access into our office space
[1:51:45]
because they don't have enough staff to
[1:51:47]
keep eyes on everybody
[1:51:48]
and so then they started doing a little
[1:51:50]
brainstorming and they found this
[1:51:53]
composting toilet idea which is used at
[1:51:56]
the pine bush
[1:51:57]
it is a kit system
[1:52:00]
the contractor will order the kit from
[1:52:02]
cliva small term it's a sole source the
[1:52:04]
kit will come on a truck the contractor
[1:52:06]
puts it together digs a hole and it is a
[1:52:09]
self-sustaining composting toilet no
[1:52:12]
water and no electricity
[1:52:14]
it actually is going to have a solar
[1:52:15]
panel and an led light and a fan so the
[1:52:18]
solar panel will power it to a battery
[1:52:20]
um it will have a tank underneath it for waste and it'll compost and then
[1:52:26]
every couple of years if we need to you
[1:52:28]
know we have the equipment to empty that
[1:52:30]
um the greenhouse thinks it fits more in
[1:52:33]
line with their goals and it could be a
[1:52:35]
teaching item what they're saying is you
[1:52:37]
know here we have this the whole thing
[1:52:38]
is compostable right it's about
[1:52:40]
renewable trying to keep things
[1:52:42]
sustainable so they think this will be
[1:52:43]
good and it's a building it's a it's a
[1:52:45]
fully ada building so let's know that
[1:52:48]
part yeah
[1:52:50]
so um
[1:52:51]
so it was something that you know we
[1:52:52]
have uh capital set aside to do this and
[1:52:55]
it's actually probably
[1:52:57]
a little cheaper than actually modifying
[1:52:59]
everything to go this route and from
[1:53:00]
there from their goals so i think it'll
[1:53:02]
be a good project this is the same
[1:53:04]
contractor by the way that we recently
[1:53:06]
awarded the construction of the muni
[1:53:09]
maintenance building
[1:53:11]
and that is going on right now so
[1:53:14]
we've had he's been he's been good he's
[1:53:15]
working on the maintenance building the
[1:53:17]
goal is what he's done with that in a
[1:53:18]
month that he moves over and he does
[1:53:20]
this
[1:53:21]
so this cost of 52 000 is the
[1:53:25]
thank entire cost
[1:53:25]
great
[1:53:27]
sounds quite interesting by the way oh
[1:53:29]
and when it's all done yep come on down
[1:53:34]
all right i'm moving i'll second it i
[1:53:36]
was in favor
[1:53:38]
and we're able to do number one we did
[1:53:40]
it yeah
[1:53:47]
so the next item on our agenda is um the
[1:53:50]
hosting the quarterly meetings outside
[1:53:52]
of city hall follow-up discussion
[1:53:55]
mr williams so thank you for feeling i
[1:53:57]
apologize i wasn't able to brief this
[1:53:59]
last meeting um but i wanted to
[1:54:01]
re-engage this discussion to see how
[1:54:03]
everyone kind of felt i know there was
[1:54:04]
an article that came on the gazette
[1:54:07]
regarding this topic
[1:54:09]
i know when i initially briefed it i
[1:54:11]
mentioned uh quarterly but it's kind of
[1:54:13]
developed into wanting it to be based
[1:54:15]
around a topic after doing research into
[1:54:18]
the city code the reason why i included
[1:54:20]
chapter 28 was there's already a
[1:54:22]
stipulation that allows us to conduct
[1:54:24]
special meetings that are only based
[1:54:26]
around um
[1:54:28]
very defined topics please correct me if
[1:54:29]
i'm wrong mr coleman but with respect to
[1:54:33]
us having
[1:54:34]
conversations throughout the community
[1:54:37]
similar to this police
[1:54:39]
or the school ceo's conversation we
[1:54:42]
could have had this discussion at the
[1:54:44]
high school where there have been a
[1:54:45]
number of uh discussions already since
[1:54:47]
it's already a centralized location for
[1:54:49]
this this topic but
[1:54:52]
just wanting to gauge where everyone was
[1:54:54]
and then potentially highlight some
[1:54:56]
equipment needs
[1:54:57]
just so
[1:54:58]
if interested i can begin just looking
[1:55:01]
at what available facilities are in the
[1:55:03]
area to see what our options are to
[1:55:05]
potentially host uh
[1:55:08]
a topic discussion this year want to be
[1:55:10]
realistic don't want to open the door
[1:55:12]
for too much expectation
[1:55:13]
i do think this is something that is
[1:55:15]
easily achievable
[1:55:17]
if we can just fine-tune what we each
[1:55:19]
expect from these meetings and uh
[1:55:21]
provide enough notice in the public
[1:55:27]
it's free
[1:55:29]
um let's try to figure out how to look
[1:55:30]
too thank you for that um i actually
[1:55:34]
feel i just want to back up to the day
[1:55:36]
that we had the girls here from the high
[1:55:38]
school uh to meet with ms porterfield
[1:55:41]
and ms detour and myself
[1:55:43]
we got really positive feedback from
[1:55:45]
that and they met with staff as well
[1:55:47]
around the city hall and
[1:55:49]
a comment that the
[1:55:52]
teacher the coordinator of the program
[1:55:53]
made afterwards was that
[1:55:56]
some of the girls didn't even know that
[1:55:57]
city hall existed
[1:55:59]
um in their community they had no idea
[1:56:02]
what this what this was
[1:56:04]
um
[1:56:05]
and
[1:56:06]
uh
[1:56:08]
i thought then i thought about
[1:56:10]
the suggestion that you had made in
[1:56:12]
terms of moving the moving the meetings
[1:56:14]
around and i really maintain i really
[1:56:16]
think that it's important for
[1:56:18]
folks to come here
[1:56:20]
and and feel
[1:56:22]
like they're in the seat of democracy in
[1:56:24]
our city
[1:56:25]
at the same time i think that all of us
[1:56:27]
have been going around to a lot of
[1:56:29]
various neighborhood meetings
[1:56:31]
um a lot of different topical meetings
[1:56:33]
there's one coming up soon that is
[1:56:36]
you know the one community uh the one
[1:56:38]
schenectady initiative that the
[1:56:40]
schenectady foundation is doing um so i think that there's a lot of meetings
[1:56:45]
that we go to where we can solicit
[1:56:47]
community input and hear community needs
[1:56:50]
um on a really regular basis sikkem does
[1:56:53]
different kinds of meetings um so
[1:56:57]
now on to your suggestion that you just
[1:56:59]
made doing maybe one meeting a year on
[1:57:02]
topic
[1:57:03]
um i think if that was outside of our
[1:57:06]
regular council
[1:57:08]
committee and and council meeting if we
[1:57:11]
kept our regular council committee and
[1:57:13]
council meetings here
[1:57:15]
but did add in every so often a topical
[1:57:18]
meeting like like you're suggesting i
[1:57:20]
think that's an interesting proposition
[1:57:22]
to consider but i would want to keep our
[1:57:25]
counsel and committee meetings here
[1:57:27]
on a regular basis
[1:57:35]
so so again it's just being a conduit so
[1:57:37]
i know absolutely we all attend a number
[1:57:39]
of neighborhood association meetings
[1:57:41]
throughout the city um however that
[1:57:44]
doesn't specifically address every
[1:57:46]
resident in the in the community so
[1:57:47]
there's still a portion of of our city
[1:57:49]
where residents are being missed so i
[1:57:52]
think there's still benefits to us
[1:57:54]
hosting
[1:57:55]
uh
[1:57:56]
city city council discussions within the public forum
[1:58:02]
the reason why i included the caveat of
[1:58:04]
just having our expectation for this
[1:58:06]
year be one i don't think there's any
[1:58:08]
reason to be hard-pressed to having
[1:58:09]
quarterly meetings
[1:58:11]
right as we're coming out
[1:58:13]
potentially re-entering a pandemic
[1:58:15]
and i think placing that expectation
[1:58:17]
with the council that's still
[1:58:19]
formulating together when the number of
[1:58:21]
members are still new i think it's very
[1:58:23]
grandiose
[1:58:25]
so for me right now i think if the
[1:58:26]
intent is to potentially get to having
[1:58:29]
meetings
[1:58:30]
frequently throughout the year in the
[1:58:31]
community i think starting with calendar
[1:58:34]
year 22 just having the expectation
[1:58:37]
being with one coming back to the
[1:58:38]
drawing board seeing how that went and
[1:58:40]
then potentially reevaluating the
[1:58:42]
benefits so it was just one to not
[1:58:45]
kind of hard press tyus to
[1:58:51]
yeah
[1:58:52]
it is something that we have heard over
[1:58:54]
the last year about
[1:58:56]
campaigning talking to voters people who
[1:58:58]
are engaged that we need to engage our
[1:59:00]
community more
[1:59:02]
of what we're doing in city hall exactly
[1:59:03]
what the
[1:59:04]
young lady has been asking
[1:59:07]
about where is city hall
[1:59:09]
so we want to take a good idea you're
[1:59:11]
bringing this up here so that we take
[1:59:13]
our meetings
[1:59:14]
to the community when you say one
[1:59:16]
meeting are you referring to committee
[1:59:18]
meeting or city council
[1:59:21]
or should we do both
[1:59:23]
in the same cycle
[1:59:24]
so we can currently do a special meeting
[1:59:26]
um and
[1:59:28]
at that point it would be outlining what
[1:59:30]
is needed to have a
[1:59:32]
habit wow
[1:59:33]
what is needed to have a meeting in the
[1:59:35]
public so the expectations with making
[1:59:37]
sure that we had internet connectivity
[1:59:40]
or making sure that we had an
[1:59:42]
appropriate table size that type of
[1:59:43]
stuff to make sure it wasn't too uh
[1:59:47]
displaced when we go to a different venue um but absolutely i
[1:59:52]
would love to potentially get to having more and this is something i
[1:59:55]
support so what i need for us to work
[1:59:58]
out the logistics how are we gonna be
[2:00:00]
able to get live feed from their
[2:00:03]
internet access and accommodation if we
[2:00:05]
were to do this outside of city hall
[2:00:08]
what are what are the things that we
[2:00:10]
need to put in place
[2:00:11]
so can we work on that to see how we are
[2:00:13]
and what the council
[2:00:16]
you know you know from the council in
[2:00:18]
terms of what's doing that outside of
[2:00:19]
city hall
[2:00:21]
ms williams before having those
[2:00:23]
discussions i didn't want to prematurely
[2:00:25]
like start asking as if the council had
[2:00:27]
already decided uh i'm just one
[2:00:29]
representative so i feel very strongly
[2:00:31]
about doing this but i want to make sure
[2:00:33]
before i start asking smackley high
[2:00:35]
school hey what are the expectations for
[2:00:38]
us to be able to request the use of your
[2:00:40]
auditorium i think it's it's it's
[2:00:42]
important for me to make sure that we
[2:00:44]
are all functioning with the same
[2:00:45]
understanding and that i'm not acting
[2:00:47]
inappropriately
[2:00:48]
and you mentioned the high school i'm
[2:00:50]
just going to mention the boys and girls
[2:00:51]
club just for mentioning
[2:00:54]
so i like the idea of having a special
[2:00:56]
meeting that's and keeping our council
[2:00:58]
meetings and our community meetings here
[2:01:00]
right now since we're
[2:01:01]
um
[2:01:02]
taking baby steps so having a special
[2:01:04]
meeting um and having it on a specific
[2:01:07]
topic and actually um i received some
[2:01:09]
emails actually from a former council
[2:01:11]
member who who um mr o'brien who saw
[2:01:13]
that you know who suggested that back in
[2:01:15]
january actually that if we're going to
[2:01:17]
do this maybe we should look at a
[2:01:19]
special meeting on a particular topic so
[2:01:21]
i'm very supportive of that uh if we
[2:01:24]
can you know in the future do our
[2:01:26]
committee meetings or council meetings
[2:01:27]
outside i think that's going to take a
[2:01:29]
lot of organizing
[2:01:30]
and arranging but i'm certainly open to
[2:01:34]
doing it at least one and actually if it
[2:01:36]
works out well i'm open to doing more um
[2:01:40]
as ms patrick has said that we do have
[2:01:42]
uh we brought the young ladies here and
[2:01:43]
they've never seen um
[2:01:45]
they've never seen uh city hall before
[2:01:48]
so i think that both things can happen
[2:01:50]
that we're out in the public and we're
[2:01:52]
also when we're there inviting people to
[2:01:55]
actually come to city hall meetings
[2:01:56]
because currently when people come it's
[2:01:58]
just because they have an issue i'd love
[2:02:00]
people to come just to you know to
[2:02:02]
engage into you know um just to be there
[2:02:05]
to kind of see how we do our process so
[2:02:08]
think that going out to them would
[2:02:10]
probably get more people to to begin to
[2:02:12]
come when we want to get on this council
[2:02:15]
we certainly show up
[2:02:17]
to the public on a regular basis for
[2:02:18]
weeks on end so
[2:02:20]
i think that you know once we're now
[2:02:22]
we're all elected we you know coming
[2:02:24]
back to the community and having a
[2:02:26]
reform there
[2:02:27]
is actually um kind of a nice idea and
[2:02:30]
says to the community we don't only come
[2:02:32]
um for this time so i think it might be
[2:02:33]
a good idea
[2:02:35]
mr palamini we don't need to have a
[2:02:37]
special meeting to do this first of all
[2:02:39]
we just can have a town hall
[2:02:42]
and have people come and discuss what it
[2:02:45]
is that interests them
[2:02:47]
furthermore if we have a special meeting
[2:02:49]
we are bound i'm assuming by
[2:02:52]
the guidelines of a council meeting
[2:02:55]
where each individual only has a certain
[2:02:57]
amount of time to speak
[2:02:59]
so why not just have informal town halls
[2:03:01]
where we all show up
[2:03:03]
let people come and say what they need
[2:03:06]
to say if you want to form it around a
[2:03:08]
particular topic that's fine but to have
[2:03:11]
a special meeting
[2:03:13]
quote unquote i don't see that as
[2:03:16]
necessary we can do this already
[2:03:18]
and the other aspect is if we do these
[2:03:21]
special meetings what will be the cost
[2:03:23]
there's got to be a cost associated with
[2:03:26]
that
[2:03:27]
and that i think is needed to
[2:03:30]
have before we even go down that road
[2:03:33]
but the town halls we can do
[2:03:36]
so what mr waves said is that he wanted
[2:03:37]
to make sure there was a consensus that
[2:03:39]
we would do this before he looked into
[2:03:41]
what the cost is going to be what
[2:03:42]
equipment is needed because i think we
[2:03:44]
do have to
[2:03:45]
make sure that it's even something we
[2:03:46]
want to do otherwise
[2:03:48]
it's just um
[2:03:50]
yes mr torreira mr williams
[2:03:53]
exactly what neighborhoods aren't being
[2:03:55]
represented
[2:03:58]
by
[2:03:59]
the local
[2:04:01]
groups
[2:04:03]
you say they don't have access to
[2:04:06]
going to the neighborhood association
[2:04:08]
meetings are there specific areas that
[2:04:10]
can't get to a neighborhood meeting
[2:04:12]
[Music]
[2:04:14]
so i wasn't saying that individuals
[2:04:16]
aren't able to become members of
[2:04:18]
specific neighborhoods i'm saying the
[2:04:20]
neighborhood associations aren't
[2:04:22]
all-encompassing of every member and the
[2:04:24]
community so there are certain members
[2:04:26]
who just
[2:04:27]
don't attend organizations and i think
[2:04:29]
it's important for us to make certain
[2:04:31]
steps to make sure that they are able to
[2:04:34]
be
[2:04:35]
viewers or to have better access so this
[2:04:38]
is again just
[2:04:39]
increasing access for people to to see
[2:04:41]
us and then engage with us so we can
[2:04:44]
then bring them in to to city hall
[2:04:46]
because i've heard that frequently where
[2:04:48]
people don't even know where city hall
[2:04:49]
even exists
[2:04:51]
and
[2:04:53]
your goal is to increase people in
[2:04:55]
attendance
[2:04:57]
first of all at a special meeting and
[2:04:58]
then secondly to get them to come here
[2:05:02]
yes ms williams
[2:05:04]
my intent very
[2:05:05]
candidly is i
[2:05:07]
it pains me to hear our public forums
[2:05:11]
have zero comments
[2:05:12]
and that represents a legislative item i
[2:05:15]
think it is imperative that we have
[2:05:18]
continuous input and feedback from the
[2:05:20]
members of our city and if people aren't
[2:05:23]
using the current processes that are in
[2:05:25]
place us taking steps to see what more
[2:05:28]
we can do to meet them where they are
[2:05:30]
sure
[2:05:33]
mayor
[2:05:35]
in
[2:05:37]
my uh
[2:05:38]
years of experience you will
[2:05:41]
notice
[2:05:42]
you'll look back and appreciate where
[2:05:44]
things have run fairly smoothly and
[2:05:46]
people are all in agreement when you get
[2:05:48]
the meeting where
[2:05:49]
everybody comes out and all of a sudden
[2:05:52]
things have changed so much so it runs
[2:05:54]
in cycles that
[2:05:56]
it may be self-correcting that you're
[2:05:58]
looking to
[2:05:59]
meet everybody then one day everybody's
[2:06:01]
just going to show up here
[2:06:03]
i'll be sick one day
[2:06:09]
i think that
[2:06:10]
me i think a good example are the
[2:06:12]
neighborhood meetings that we did hold
[2:06:13]
at the mayor hill held that we all
[2:06:15]
attended um for the awkward process i
[2:06:17]
mean i think that's pretty much the town
[2:06:19]
hall
[2:06:20]
model
[2:06:21]
um that mr palamani is mentioning um
[2:06:25]
and i'll just throw out there also that
[2:06:26]
don't forget about the libraries as well
[2:06:28]
because they have a lot of the
[2:06:30]
technology
[2:06:31]
um and
[2:06:32]
pretty much we can
[2:06:34]
as long as we get on schedule uh use
[2:06:36]
those you know at no cost
[2:06:38]
um so it would just be the technology
[2:06:40]
piece um which
[2:06:50]
and it's nothing new i mean we've done
[2:06:52]
this in the past um unfortunately
[2:06:55]
not very well attended
[2:06:57]
but
[2:06:58]
we have had these type of events so
[2:07:02]
to have a town hall or
[2:07:04]
and get people engaged with a particular
[2:07:06]
topic or just what's on their mind
[2:07:10]
this is nothing new for us and
[2:07:13]
um
[2:07:14]
it's something that we can do without
[2:07:16]
having a special meeting
[2:07:19]
i don't i don't recall as a whole entire
[2:07:22]
council ever doing that we certainly
[2:07:24]
took the budget on the road
[2:07:27]
the budget yeah
[2:07:30]
okay i don't remember that
[2:07:32]
we did because i was the chair we set up
[2:07:34]
the meetings and every time probably
[2:07:36]
four or five different neighborhoods
[2:07:38]
and there weren't very many people that came unfortunately
[2:07:43]
okay
[2:07:44]
if you do a budget with a tax increase
[2:07:51]
but i was gonna say that's why it's
[2:07:52]
important to do these types of
[2:07:55]
deliberations as a council because
[2:07:56]
that's a very important idea where i'll
[2:07:58]
be able to i'm not in no position trying
[2:08:00]
to have us recreate the wheel i just
[2:08:02]
want to see it happen
[2:08:04]
so if we can come together and develop a
[2:08:06]
framework for how that town hall is
[2:08:08]
going to happen occur and if we hold
[2:08:10]
each other accountable to be present
[2:08:12]
because i think there is power in
[2:08:14]
numbers and as a council we should be
[2:08:16]
engaging the city i am not opposed to
[2:08:18]
just having something that is already
[2:08:20]
done in the past just making sure we
[2:08:22]
picked the right topic to improve our exposure
[2:08:27]
nice
[2:08:28]
so what are you looking for at this
[2:08:29]
point in time
[2:08:34]
i would say if the consensus is shifting
[2:08:36]
towards having a town hall um
[2:08:40]
i can formulate some themes
[2:08:42]
to have the conversation around and if
[2:08:45]
in the meantime everyone can just come
[2:08:47]
up with what their individual
[2:08:48]
expectations for town hall
[2:08:51]
it's uh
[2:08:52]
how you envision that being structured
[2:08:55]
i think
[2:08:59]
okay
[2:09:00]
do you want to bring this back up
[2:09:02]
in two weeks
[2:09:04]
so in two weeks we just kind of come
[2:09:06]
back to the table with um what we'd like
[2:09:09]
to see happen maybe talk about some
[2:09:10]
topics i'd like to see
[2:09:12]
um and you'll look at we can talk about
[2:09:14]
different locations
[2:09:16]
and of course we don't have to worry
[2:09:18]
about um concerning ourselves with
[2:09:20]
making sure that we have the technology
[2:09:22]
that we need so
[2:09:23]
all right just it's a classification so
[2:09:25]
we're still going to be continuing
[2:09:26]
discussion and having
[2:09:28]
city council
[2:09:30]
and
[2:09:45]
my understanding is we were just really
[2:09:46]
talking about town halls are you still want to continue the
[2:09:49]
discussion
[2:09:52]
outside the home city hall well
[2:09:54]
i wouldn't be in favor of that so i
[2:09:56]
don't know i think you were looking for
[2:09:57]
whether there was consensus among the
[2:09:59]
board members
[2:10:00]
around among the council members um
[2:10:03]
about whether we would be interested in
[2:10:05]
doing
[2:10:06]
city council meetings my statement was
[2:10:09]
that i i would rather hold our city
[2:10:11]
council meetings in our city council
[2:10:14]
committee meetings here
[2:10:16]
um i would be
[2:10:18]
open to having
[2:10:20]
topical
[2:10:21]
meetings in other neighborhoods and
[2:10:23]
other settings so that's just my my
[2:10:26]
vote
[2:10:28]
all right so it's clear that um so let's
[2:10:31]
just
[2:10:32]
have a just kind of like just talk this
[2:10:34]
through so are you still interested in
[2:10:36]
doing council meetings not necessarily
[2:10:38]
right now not that one this year but in
[2:10:40]
the future is that something you're
[2:10:41]
still interested in doing yes in the
[2:10:43]
future but if we're able to have one now
[2:10:45]
the the the town hall discussion to to
[2:10:48]
see how it's perceived and see how it's
[2:10:50]
formulated i think it would be more or
[2:10:52]
less like a test
[2:10:54]
[Music]
[2:11:09]
see where we are with it
[2:11:11]
mr toro
[2:11:15]
are we going around the food yeah okay
[2:11:17]
so
[2:11:18]
i i like carl's idea um you know town
[2:11:22]
hall
[2:11:23]
see how that works out and then in the
[2:11:25]
future i mean if it works out well this
[2:11:27]
time and we want to discuss it again i
[2:11:29]
think our meetings belong here in our
[2:11:32]
government building and
[2:11:34]
you know but maybe we'll get some more
[2:11:36]
folks to join us but um i think for now
[2:11:39]
if we have a town hall and all of a
[2:11:41]
sudden it seems like there's 40 people
[2:11:43]
who might want to
[2:11:45]
um
[2:11:46]
have us
[2:11:47]
do a special meeting
[2:11:52]
something we can bring back to the table
[2:11:53]
and discuss okay there mr pelham did you
[2:11:56]
have more input i just think uh our
[2:11:58]
meeting should be here
[2:12:01]
this is the center of our city
[2:12:02]
government it's important for people to
[2:12:04]
know
[2:12:05]
where this building is
[2:12:06]
what it represents it represents
[2:12:08]
everybody in this city
[2:12:10]
and it's important to try to get people
[2:12:13]
here
[2:12:14]
whether it's kids and maybe we can have
[2:12:18]
a one day a month where we do tours for
[2:12:21]
kids or school groups
[2:12:23]
if the mayor's available
[2:12:25]
he could
[2:12:26]
come and see them that would be
[2:12:28]
something worthwhile to get kids here
[2:12:31]
and younger people
[2:12:33]
but i think it's vital
[2:12:35]
for having government meetings in our
[2:12:38]
cities
[2:12:40]
where our city government centered is
[2:12:42]
important
[2:12:43]
and if we truly want to hear what people
[2:12:46]
have to say the town hall concept allows
[2:12:49]
them
[2:12:50]
to talk
[2:12:52]
and for us to be quiet and listen
[2:12:54]
and
[2:12:55]
i think that
[2:12:56]
to me is the
[2:12:58]
more appropriate way to go
[2:13:00]
well i think both are acceptable and
[2:13:03]
we'll just continue to go down this road
[2:13:04]
um i i understand what you're saying
[2:13:06]
about this being you know in peop being
[2:13:09]
the center of government
[2:13:10]
however the city is also part of the
[2:13:13]
people that we serve and so meeting them
[2:13:15]
where they are i think is of equal
[2:13:17]
importance so
[2:13:18]
we'll put it on again for two weeks and
[2:13:20]
just continue these discussions so if
[2:13:22]
you can bring back your
[2:13:24]
uh
[2:13:31]
language in the city code says that
[2:13:34]
council meetings are to take place at
[2:13:36]
city hall unless otherwise posted right
[2:13:39]
with proper notice
[2:13:42]
i would
[2:13:43]
say that it doesn't really set out
[2:13:44]
whether or not you have to do something
[2:13:46]
by resolution for that purpose
[2:13:48]
i would for the purposes of um you know
[2:13:52]
providing notice to the public my
[2:13:54]
recommendation would be that the council
[2:13:56]
passed a resolution for that purpose
[2:13:57]
[Music]
[2:13:59]
so if we're going to do a special
[2:14:01]
meeting because it does
[2:14:03]
give um
[2:14:04]
how that's done that special meaning
[2:14:06]
that's clearly covered in the code so
[2:14:09]
if we're not going to do a special
[2:14:10]
meeting however or if we're going to
[2:14:11]
call it a town hall
[2:14:14]
do we need to what would we need to do
[2:14:16]
no you wouldn't have to know because
[2:14:19]
i mean
[2:14:20]
there's nothing in the code that talks
[2:14:22]
about town hall meetings right so
[2:14:24]
anything that were to happen
[2:14:26]
um you know the
[2:14:28]
obviously the council can obviously
[2:14:30]
agree to do it um
[2:14:32]
if somebody didn't make it
[2:14:35]
um there's nothing you know in the code
[2:14:37]
that requires a council person to attend
[2:14:39]
the town hall
[2:14:41]
to be frank
[2:14:43]
as opposed to you know
[2:14:44]
certain requirements related to
[2:14:46]
attending regular meetings and
[2:14:48]
you know meeting actual meetings of the
[2:14:50]
council the other thing is if you were
[2:14:51]
to do town hall you couldn't take any
[2:14:53]
formal action obviously uh as
[2:14:56]
mr palmer
[2:14:57]
is to you know listen to what people
[2:14:59]
have to say it's one of those times when
[2:15:00]
we would just have to you know you as
[2:15:02]
council people have to sit there and
[2:15:03]
just listen to what people say because
[2:15:05]
you can't take official action
[2:15:07]
um
[2:15:08]
because it's not a regularly called
[2:15:10]
council meeting
[2:15:16]
excuse me
[2:15:18]
but they could ask us questions yes
[2:15:20]
absolutely yeah so it's not like
[2:15:22]
you would create the format yeah
[2:15:25]
okay but you couldn't obviously pass a
[2:15:28]
resolution right right no i just can't
[2:15:29]
i'll take a formal option yeah okay
[2:15:33]
all right well let's bring this back
[2:15:34]
into exciting
[2:15:36]
and we'll see definitely discussions and
[2:15:38]
it sounds like we're leaning more
[2:15:39]
towards town hall but i think at some
[2:15:41]
point special meaning outside should not
[2:15:43]
be outside the realm of possibility
[2:15:46]
any other questions or discussions on
[2:15:48]
that
[2:15:49]
no okay
[2:15:51]
we'll
[2:15:52]
be back in two weeks with that thank you
[2:15:54]
mr williams
[2:15:55]
all right the uh next item on the agenda
[2:15:57]
is a um
[2:16:00]
ceremonial resolution for jerry amy zion
[2:16:02]
church there are going to be 185 years
[2:16:04]
ago
[2:16:06]
they're the oldest black church in the
[2:16:07]
city and their event is on the 29th so
[2:16:10]
um i'd like to be able to present them
[2:16:11]
with a
[2:16:12]
ceremony resolution
[2:16:15]
so second all those in favor thank you
[2:16:19]
and the uh
[2:16:21]
the next item for public is the a
[2:16:23]
ceremony resolution for arbor day which
[2:16:25]
is the 29th of april this year we do a
[2:16:28]
resolution for them every year
[2:16:30]
we would invite folks from retreat and
[2:16:33]
whoever else is helping i know community
[2:16:35]
fathers is involved with um doing some
[2:16:37]
of the tree planting nowadays so we just
[2:16:39]
invite folks to city hall to accept that
[2:16:41]
resolution so moved okay always in favor
[2:16:44]
hi
[2:16:46]
okay um
[2:16:49]
the final four items are for executive
[2:16:51]
session to discuss property sales
[2:16:55]
so uh at this time on the same motion to
[2:16:57]
go in executive session
[2:16:59]
second all's in favor all right
[2:17:01]
okay
[2:17:02]
we're gonna go to the executive session