Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:00]
[Music]
[0:18]
you good
[0:22]
[Music]
[0:48]
[Music]
[1:38]
[Music]
[1:49]
[Music]
[2:37]
this
[2:40]
[Music]
[4:03]
[Music]
[4:12]
[Music]
[4:30]
he
[4:32]
[Music]
[4:47]
[Applause]
[4:47]
[Music]
[4:53]
[Music]
[5:04]
[Music]
[5:24]
[Music]
[6:19]
he
[6:22]
[Music]
[7:12]
you think that's a
[7:18]
[Music]
[8:08]
[Music]
[8:18]
[Music]
[8:28]
we're uh convening health and Recreation
[8:30]
committee because um we started a
[8:33]
discussion about um pool fees and rules
[8:36]
um I had given out um fees and and rules
[8:40]
from several
[8:41]
different uh
[8:43]
city city I I I sent I gave you guys Aly
[8:47]
Troy Colony gildin Muna and Glenville uh
[8:52]
to look over um at our last meeting but
[8:55]
it was just so much information that we
[8:57]
decided that we were just going to have
[8:58]
to take it home and read a lot of it and
[9:01]
then get back together um
[9:06]
I what you have in front of you is a
[9:08]
draft what I did was I took the
[9:10]
information that Mr lefon gave us which
[9:14]
was on the existing signage at Central
[9:17]
Park uh regarding the rules uh that are
[9:20]
posted there there's only a few of them
[9:22]
posted I sent you guys those those
[9:25]
photos um so I those are in here but I
[9:29]
also then looked at the other all those
[9:33]
other paper those papers and just pulled
[9:36]
things that I thought were important um
[9:38]
but obviously this was just my first
[9:41]
stab um so that we'd have something to
[9:44]
discuss um so obviously I don't and and
[9:47]
the other thing I want to state is that
[9:50]
again um we made it clear that whatever
[9:52]
we talk about would not be going into
[9:54]
effect until the summer of 2025 cor
[9:57]
especially since this pool is was uh
[9:59]
about to close down for the summer in a
[10:02]
couple of weeks at least um the other
[10:05]
thing we talked about was that
[10:07]
everything should be uniform across all
[10:09]
of our city pools um so so that's that's
[10:13]
all I have that I'm giving to you um so
[10:16]
you can see that these are the hours
[10:18]
this is so the hours that I'm giving you
[10:20]
are for Central Park um the capacity is
[10:23]
for Central Park
[10:26]
um my thought is that we would not
[10:29]
charge city of connect residents any fee
[10:32]
to get into the
[10:36]
pool do you need do you need no I I I
[10:39]
thought I made copies for everybody of
[10:41]
just things that I oh that you had that
[10:43]
I have but I we can make copies if you
[10:46]
want well no no I can as we're talking I
[10:49]
can okay so do you think are we any
[10:53]
agreement that um residents would be
[10:55]
free I'm in agreement residents should
[10:58]
be free at this
[10:59]
okay Joe I know you're not on this
[11:01]
committee but just in terms of your
[11:03]
input yeah I think I would support the
[11:06]
residence for f okay and then at least
[11:10]
you know until the next time we look
[11:11]
over it okay um yeah cuz we I mean we
[11:15]
have we're obviously way ahead of the
[11:17]
curve I mean the only thing that I would
[11:18]
say is that we do want to make sure that
[11:21]
we have a discussion before the budget
[11:23]
gets passed because if we have to come
[11:25]
up with new signage which we will um
[11:28]
then that needs to get incorporated into
[11:30]
the city budget request but I don't I
[11:32]
don't think it's a huge lift I mean it's
[11:34]
only you know it's not that many pools
[11:36]
it's not you know those signs I don't
[11:38]
think are that we' only need like you
[11:40]
know a few signs it's not like did the
[11:42]
other um proposals you receed did they
[11:46]
charge
[11:47]
residents some
[11:50]
some family charges Colony no um palisa
[11:56]
no but guests I don't know if we had
[12:00]
um Glenville had uh where was Glenville
[12:04]
pool Mohawk River Park and pool is that
[12:07]
that is Glenville right not yeah I
[12:09]
wasn't you know they had a pool out
[12:11]
there so they they have a fob that they
[12:15]
that you can go and get a fog right so
[12:18]
they charge a resent if you show up with
[12:19]
no fog they charge $2 I'm going I can
[12:22]
give you this to look at um well colony
[12:27]
is resident restricted and I I think so
[12:29]
is um miss yuno that it's only residence
[12:33]
and tent there is a charge uh family
[12:36]
pass of
[12:39]
$125 so there are there are yeah and
[12:42]
then they down at it also say for
[12:44]
residents are $5 for adults and $3 go
[12:48]
down a little bit further on that Maxine
[12:50]
Maxine that's because those were my
[12:52]
suggest prices next to as
[12:55]
well
[12:57]
here's yeah so so here's a here's a few
[13:00]
of
[13:02]
those
[13:04]
hi um yeah so this was just me abely
[13:09]
open putting things out there so as far
[13:11]
as the hours I would like to see them
[13:13]
12: to 6 not only Saturday and Sunday
[13:16]
but forever not forever um just said
[13:20]
12:30 right I wonder why that is that
[13:22]
it's 12:30 one day and 12:00 the other
[13:25]
days Saturdays and Sundays um I don't
[13:28]
know since the poison the Girls Club you
[13:29]
know take care of the lifeguarding I
[13:32]
just thought it would be nice to
[13:34]
be Universal throughout um I guess 6:30
[13:39]
I mean either or but as long as they're
[13:41]
Monday through you know the same
[13:45]
hours I think for I mean I can at least
[13:47]
speak to Central Park on Sundays I think
[13:50]
one of the reasons that it closes
[13:51]
earlier is because music aen starts at
[13:53]
7:00 so they were concerned about
[13:55]
parking issues for music a um to have
[13:59]
the earlier time but we could always go
[14:00]
12:00 to 6:00 I I don't know I just kind
[14:02]
of likeed at 6:30 is you know you got
[14:05]
parents coming home from work um you
[14:08]
know maybe you want the pool close they
[14:10]
get the kids up on their way home they
[14:11]
want to go home and have dinner I I I
[14:13]
don't know I just thought it should be
[14:14]
Universal yeah know that makes that
[14:16]
makes sense it makes signage easier it
[14:17]
makes rules easier when you have things
[14:20]
the same so what about um you had
[14:23]
mentioned before are is this something
[14:25]
that we're responsible to do or I'm
[14:28]
hearing out jury's out um the city
[14:31]
council it sounds like according to um
[14:34]
president pfield the city council would
[14:35]
be able to set
[14:38]
fees um but not necessarily the rules
[14:41]
but what I explained to her was that I
[14:43]
thought that she called me the other day
[14:45]
um that we could at least make
[14:48]
recommendations about new rules right
[14:50]
because I fees and she said we couldn't
[14:54]
set fees I I thought that's what she
[14:55]
said at our our meeting we we normally
[14:58]
set fees we do everything okay so the
[15:01]
fees we can do but the U pool
[15:04]
rules she said we couldn't do um but I
[15:08]
said I'm still having the meeting
[15:09]
because I think we we should have a
[15:11]
voice and we should have input into
[15:12]
recommendations that we could at least
[15:14]
pass pass on to who well right now we
[15:18]
don't have a Parks director so right now
[15:20]
um the parks director did report to Mr
[15:23]
leond um so I would hope that if we have
[15:26]
a new parks director uh coming on board
[15:29]
that um it would be still under Mr Leon
[15:32]
so or just to Mr lefon what we think is
[15:35]
appropriate yeah that's what I think we
[15:37]
could make the recommendations
[15:40]
to the mayor and the
[15:44]
mayor good I just want to clarify that
[15:46]
that's a good point let me just write
[15:48]
that
[15:49]
down I just think Universal times either
[15:53]
you know 12
[15:54]
to I I will say that I've been remiss in
[15:57]
that I have not looked at what is stated
[16:00]
or is in place for on Front Street or um
[16:04]
quack and Bush so Quack and
[16:06]
Bush so I would have to do that but
[16:08]
again I think we're way way ahead of the
[16:11]
curve here I mean in terms of you know
[16:13]
it's just it's just the idea of making
[16:15]
sure that there's money in the budget
[16:16]
for
[16:17]
signage is the only
[16:20]
uh do we so uh do we
[16:23]
know the process of they keep track of
[16:26]
who comes and who's the city resident
[16:28]
who's not so if we had to look at it we
[16:30]
would know they they do um check
[16:33]
identification at the entrance but again
[16:36]
that's a whole another Topic in terms of
[16:38]
you know did we want
[16:40]
to we we actually touched on this as a
[16:42]
council at one of our previous meetings
[16:44]
recently where we talked about um some
[16:46]
sort of ID and one of the suggestions
[16:49]
that I think the mayor made was that um
[16:52]
the school district does issue IDs to
[16:55]
its students so um you know we could use
[16:58]
we to talk with them think Mr Carle said
[17:00]
they were collected at the end of the
[17:02]
year the school IDs so we'd have to talk
[17:05]
with the school district and see if
[17:06]
there's a way to piggy back on some sort
[17:08]
of ID that way for the kids but I
[17:09]
actually like the idea of a recreational
[17:11]
pass of some sort um the issue would be
[17:15]
that people would well what we would do
[17:19]
I'm just brainstorming here but what we
[17:21]
would do is we'd set up tables outside
[17:23]
the pools um before the pools were going
[17:25]
to be open and we would publicize that
[17:28]
you know you want to come and get your
[17:29]
ID we could also like for example piggy
[17:32]
back with um the summer lunch program or
[17:35]
something like that where we're making
[17:36]
sure that the sheriff's fingerprinting
[17:39]
which is all over this summer the unity
[17:41]
cups things like that Summer's already
[17:44]
started but yeah so we'd have so it
[17:46]
would be an expense I'm sure it would be
[17:49]
um but again I think um the mayor
[17:51]
mentioned that that last I think it was
[17:53]
a committee meeting um that he didn't
[17:56]
see it being a huge expense to um like
[17:59]
to see like what's at your doctor's
[18:00]
office where you give them your name and
[18:02]
your picture pops up so that you know
[18:04]
who's going to lose their lanyard right
[18:07]
their P the right iPads or something
[18:09]
that right that they that they check do
[18:12]
do they
[18:14]
yeah well that's something to consider
[18:17]
but um I I just looked at Front Street
[18:20]
briefly and it's it's 12 to 600 closed
[18:22]
every day closed on
[18:24]
Sunday so well we wouldn't want to do
[18:27]
that with
[18:29]
the other two the other two um pools are
[18:32]
closed on Sunday oh they are qu and Bush
[18:34]
also yeah pardon me Quack and bushes y
[18:38]
so the only one um open on on the
[18:40]
weekends is Central Park on Sunday y
[18:43]
I've gotten an email
[18:45]
from individuals saying they didn't want
[18:48]
the you know the neighborhood pool
[18:50]
should be open you know it's hard for
[18:51]
them to get to whever that's why I know
[18:53]
they were both
[18:55]
closed I don't know why they would be
[18:58]
closed on Sunday they to
[19:02]
you Staffing maybe I don't know well
[19:05]
yeah I mean so that would be another
[19:06]
budgetary piece is that if we decided
[19:09]
that we wanted all three pools open on
[19:11]
Sundays uh as well then we would have to
[19:14]
pay for additional Staffing through the
[19:16]
boys and girls club for
[19:20]
that so do are you ready like in other
[19:24]
words in terms of that would we like to
[19:26]
see all all the I would like to see
[19:29]
neighborhood
[19:30]
126 um Monday through Sunday y all
[19:34]
neighborhood
[19:35]
pools as well as the city
[19:42]
for
[19:44]
okay all right your next um as far as
[19:48]
about lap swim Monday through Friday 8
[19:50]
to 9: of course I'd also like a senior
[19:53]
swim and as well where where seniors can
[19:55]
just go in the LA is for the lap Lanes
[19:59]
um with eventually some type of water
[20:02]
arobics but um and I'm wondering why
[20:05]
it's 8 to9 I I guess I would like to see
[20:08]
it maybe 10:30 to 12 or or 11 to 12 I
[20:12]
think we have to ask that question right
[20:15]
um mov it closer to the actual starting
[20:17]
time it might be maybe they were trying
[20:20]
to be able to have people go to work not
[20:22]
seniors but I mean regular adults I mean
[20:24]
other adults oh the right the the adult
[20:26]
lap swim yes but I I to throw a senior
[20:29]
in there like the adult lap you would
[20:31]
kind of think like when when we could go
[20:33]
to the high school it was like 6:00 a.m.
[20:37]
before school opened I know um so that's
[20:41]
that's you know probably the earliest
[20:43]
time you know but I'm I'm thinking the
[20:46]
you know uh I would like a
[20:48]
senior swim um maybe 1030 they don't
[20:53]
have to be in a lap they could do the
[20:54]
aerobics or something like that
[20:57]
so maybe 10 10:30 to 11:30 let's say
[21:00]
right before the before the uh I think
[21:03]
that's kind of important um lot of
[21:05]
seniors been asking for it um there used
[21:07]
to be the the the swim club at the
[21:10]
Romana that was huge and then when that
[21:13]
closed down um everybody went to the
[21:15]
high school I went there for years and
[21:17]
in the high school you know you can't go
[21:19]
there any longer I Dr Cotto said you
[21:22]
it's open again but I think so too but I
[21:25]
I haven't gotten anything it's really I
[21:27]
did it through the why at one point the
[21:30]
YMCA had taken over that's how if you
[21:32]
were a YMCA member you could go to the
[21:34]
span the high school pool and they did
[21:36]
do water robics and that thing I like it
[21:39]
was not um the environment wasn't great
[21:43]
in the locker rooms um so I sto I
[21:46]
stopped doing that um but but so that's
[21:48]
something I I think that's very
[21:50]
important since it's a city pool you may
[21:52]
as well get every age group to use it I
[21:54]
think that's a great idea um so so I
[21:58]
actually probably should look at I
[21:59]
should try to get the capacity for
[22:02]
quacken Bush and Front Street just so we
[22:04]
have everything on one and and if it
[22:06]
needs to be yeah 12:30 to 6:30 I guess
[22:09]
but like you say music Haven as well it
[22:12]
wouldn't be able to be till 6:30 on
[22:13]
Sundays in Central Park so I like the
[22:15]
idea of 126 um I don't think it matters
[22:19]
and again they're home earlier yeah I
[22:21]
think that's fine adults in the house
[22:23]
but so if we're adding um I did not put
[22:28]
you'll see like on some of those other
[22:30]
forms that I gave you out that there is
[22:32]
sometimes a discount for
[22:34]
seniors um well seniors would be free
[22:37]
yep in in Nuna seniors well yeah they'd
[22:42]
be free if they were residents
[22:45]
right okay so we could stick with the
[22:48]
reason I said adults um if you look down
[22:51]
at my fees here where I say guests of
[22:54]
city of connecting residents which was
[22:55]
one of the rules that I saw so you know
[22:59]
we I think we should limit guests um of
[23:02]
residents and I was saying no more than
[23:04]
three so then therefore a guest of a
[23:08]
resident would be $10 for an adult or $6
[23:12]
for a children these are just my great
[23:14]
and I just had a suggestion of five and
[23:16]
three I saw somebody else had that like
[23:20]
it's it's hard to to put an amount of
[23:22]
guests on there because
[23:25]
then you know there's the three of us
[23:29]
there with our three kids just say so
[23:32]
that's 12 people and then we each have
[23:35]
three guests
[23:37]
so 21
[23:39]
people you know and there's lines over
[23:43]
there so that's why I was limiting it
[23:45]
are you suggesting limiting it less than
[23:47]
three I am per day yeah and I thought
[23:51]
the cost and I'll tell you my reasoning
[23:53]
for the cost because um if I don't live
[23:58]
in SC but I come and watch my
[24:00]
grandchildren um every day and those
[24:03]
three are free but I have to pay $10 a
[24:06]
day you know that's $50 a week that I
[24:09]
have to pay to watch my grandchildren in
[24:11]
the pool so I that's why I and and I as
[24:16]
a revenue Source I mean we need to pay
[24:18]
for that's why I know chose the 10 was
[24:20]
just because the cost of of the pool and
[24:23]
trying to bring in some Revenue if we're
[24:25]
going to be free and then I thought that
[24:27]
the children could be $3 versus five
[24:30]
again you know I'm a grandmother I pick
[24:32]
up my other two grandchildren from colon
[24:35]
you know so now I'm 10 you know how
[24:39]
about a compromise of like five and
[24:41]
eight I don't know $8 for I mean again
[24:45]
we we the fees would have to come in
[24:47]
front of the council oh yeah definitely
[24:49]
we could yeah so so we have so we can
[24:52]
give a few different recommendations to
[24:53]
council we could say 10 and six we could
[24:57]
say five and three and three go seven
[25:00]
and four or seven and and and so for
[25:04]
guests they must be guests compan by
[25:07]
connected res yes that will cut down on
[25:10]
the lines I mean again we did want to
[25:13]
have some data given to us we asked for
[25:15]
some data we didn't know that right 1 2
[25:18]
3 we wanted zip codes actually we did
[25:22]
ask for that yeah um so I'll have to
[25:24]
follow up with Paul not couldn't strict
[25:26]
r
[25:29]
yeah we wanted to get data that they've
[25:31]
already collected um and the in terms of
[25:35]
um how many people they have been seeing
[25:37]
what the lines have been like but um in
[25:39]
the zip code data okay cuz they have
[25:42]
been taking that in we did ask for that
[25:45]
um you know 09 we would worry about 03
[25:50]
and 06 but we could tell by the street
[25:53]
address whether they were resents or not
[25:55]
right right they were supposed to have
[25:57]
that to
[26:00]
well we'll have to remind St upon so 10
[26:05]
and six 5 and three other numbers to
[26:07]
throw
[26:08]
[Music]
[26:09]
out something in the middle it's go yeah
[26:12]
seven and seven and four
[26:17]
yeah Joe what's your feeling on those
[26:25]
anything again these are for guests but
[26:28]
still right it as dorine said it could
[26:30]
be a grandparent bringing out of town
[26:34]
kids 7 and
[26:36]
four okay so if we do the 5 and three
[26:40]
the 10 and six and the 7 and four we'll
[26:42]
make that presentation too
[26:46]
um the rest of like three guests
[26:52]
per I think
[26:54]
that's okay it seems reasonable to me to
[26:57]
not go more than three I don't even know
[26:59]
three people to bring but I'm
[27:01]
just I'm just you know bring a bus for
[27:04]
and the whole thing is if there's a
[27:05]
parent you know bringing the neighbor
[27:08]
kids you know they're all residents
[27:09]
anyway so these would just be all
[27:12]
non-residents all right okay so I'm I'm
[27:15]
okay with three I don't know if I want
[27:17]
three Joe you okay with three yeah okay
[27:21]
so and before we get to your pool rules
[27:24]
so last um Wednesday St caterie they've
[27:28]
been walking over for years summer camp
[27:31]
mhm and so um Ella was all excited was
[27:35]
her last day of summer camp normally
[27:37]
their field trips are on Friday I'm
[27:39]
sitting at home and I'm icing and I'm
[27:41]
thinking how they can I get in the pool
[27:42]
nobody's got an IDE nobody has anything
[27:45]
so I drove over and um they had just
[27:47]
gotten there the two different groups
[27:50]
the older group of and the young group
[27:52]
was over in the playground so I talked
[27:55]
to Miss Stein horse and she said well
[27:57]
for years they' go to pool they'd walk
[27:59]
over but the uh couple of the graduates
[28:02]
were always lifeguards there so they
[28:04]
would always let them in mhm so I said
[28:09]
and there were probably maybe 40
[28:13]
students from 4 years old up to 11 the
[28:17]
oldest was 11 so I I I did text Shane
[28:20]
and he texted Julie and so Julie Julie
[28:23]
said not to worry you know just have
[28:25]
them talk to me on the way in but moving
[28:28]
forward yeah um so and now you've got I
[28:33]
I think um the older group had three
[28:36]
chaperons with them and the younger
[28:39]
group had you know whole bunch of
[28:41]
grandparents because they were
[28:44]
younger and um you know a few teachers
[28:47]
who all had
[28:49]
IDs
[28:51]
but and you know Miss steinhart said to
[28:53]
me you know 95% of these kids are
[28:56]
connected I said that I understand as
[28:59]
well so that was just a little well no I
[29:02]
think that's a really good point and I
[29:04]
hadn't thought of it and I haven't seen
[29:05]
it on any of the other pool pools from
[29:08]
the other towns have bust $30 oh yeah
[29:11]
there is that there is that but you know
[29:13]
so that's an interesting we could have
[29:15]
another category of groups like camps I
[29:18]
mean it's going to be summertime so we
[29:20]
we figure out the heading um but there
[29:23]
could be a group fee um that would
[29:26]
include up to X number of chaperon for
[29:29]
example I mean we maybe we should think
[29:32]
about that but how would we do
[29:35]
it we either have to charge a group of
[29:38]
fee right even though some of them might
[29:40]
be residents or most of them might be
[29:42]
residents right but it could also be a
[29:45]
different time of the day it could be
[29:46]
like 10:00 it could be well we just said
[29:48]
10:30 to whatever we just said for the
[29:51]
um seniors but we could
[29:53]
say well she she did mention she knows
[29:56]
that you know it's busier
[29:58]
earlier in the summer so they wanted to
[30:00]
wait till almost the last week to make
[30:01]
it easier on us and you know not and but
[30:06]
just bring the younger ones into the
[30:07]
splash pad to make it easier on us but
[30:11]
you know parents were like well I want
[30:13]
my kids to go on a pool so you know what
[30:14]
I mean so she did make it easy you know
[30:16]
want to make it easier on on how you
[30:18]
know controlling everything but it could
[30:21]
also be you know and everyone knows
[30:22]
their students at their camp and they
[30:24]
could always give a list of you know 30
[30:28]
resident students 10 non-resident
[30:31]
students that are paying $3 to enter or
[30:35]
we could have a flat fee for a group
[30:37]
because the interesting thing is and the
[30:38]
reason I like this though is think about
[30:40]
it like for example the YMCA does their
[30:43]
summer camp at Jerry barell um I'm just
[30:46]
saying it's not just the you're going to
[30:49]
have the like St cats or you know other
[30:52]
places like that just summer camps yeah
[30:54]
just summer camps in general but I mean
[30:56]
I mean obviously like The JCC they have
[30:58]
cool so their camps are all taken care
[31:00]
of but there might be other
[31:02]
organizations out there that run there
[31:04]
might be Bible camps for example
[31:05]
different at different
[31:07]
churches it might be a good Revenue
[31:09]
Source in other words and even I mean I
[31:12]
could see that it would be it could be
[31:15]
something where it was like every I
[31:16]
think about the YMCA Jerry Burell like
[31:19]
they might very well want to go every
[31:22]
week have um a time that they take the
[31:25]
kids swimming they have a splash pack um
[31:28]
you know I'm just thinking like the post
[31:30]
like events if somebody wanted to rent
[31:33]
it with a certain cost you got the and
[31:37]
then you got the oh my goodness I know
[31:40]
certain that would be like after hours
[31:42]
would have to be after hours but then
[31:44]
we'd have to get the lifeguards and that
[31:46]
kind of thing good good thinking the
[31:49]
park is huge asset to this community I'm
[31:53]
going to put that down as something to
[31:54]
think about future oriented but I mean
[31:57]
the whole group thing I haven't given it
[31:59]
any thought so I think we a group of
[32:00]
seniors rham seniors want to come yeah
[32:03]
it's a great idea we I think we'd have
[32:06]
to probably uh do some digging around
[32:08]
and some thinking rather than trying to
[32:10]
figure that out right now but I that
[32:12]
came off in in Shan you know again Julie
[32:14]
helped out and everybody walked away
[32:17]
happy so okay actually Shane would be
[32:22]
somebody we probably should have come to
[32:24]
this come to a meeting or I don't know
[32:27]
the other jul she's the program director
[32:29]
yeah she runs the the
[32:31]
pool all the pool yeah supervises the
[32:41]
lifeguards
[32:43]
okay this a good reason why we're
[32:45]
meeting so early in the year before
[32:48]
summer of
[32:49]
2025 I think that's a really looking at
[32:53]
I think that's a really good um so after
[32:55]
our rentals groups and inviting Julie to
[32:58]
another meeting is something we should
[32:59]
do at a at a future meeting so now can
[33:03]
we turn our attention to the rules for a
[33:05]
moment y yep we're it's only 5:00 so we
[33:09]
still have some time
[33:11]
here so do you want to look at these
[33:13]
before we talk about them since I just
[33:15]
gave this out to you
[33:17]
but um I I like everything and then
[33:21]
under driver's license we would also
[33:24]
include New York state non-d driver's
[33:26]
license
[33:28]
noning Li yeah because people who don't
[33:30]
drive go to motor vehicle and get a a
[33:32]
passport or green card as
[33:37]
well okay I didn't even think of that
[33:39]
that's
[33:43]
great okay I mean I think the whole fog
[33:47]
thing is too much for us right now I I
[33:49]
think so too I I think I you know I I
[33:52]
don't know anything about I don't know
[33:54]
much about uh software programs but um I
[33:59]
do
[33:59]
know a mom trying to take care of six F
[34:04]
six FS or six I or you know um just give
[34:08]
a name boom yeah and photo comes up um I
[34:13]
agree but again I don't know the cost
[34:16]
involved in that versus a so you know
[34:21]
when I think of
[34:25]
the um
[34:28]
the sheriff's department when they do
[34:31]
the
[34:32]
um when they fingerprint you or whatever
[34:34]
and they take your picture and that's
[34:36]
there it's a program that they have you
[34:38]
know I don't know but we have the
[34:39]
capability of doing something like that
[34:41]
not as far as the fingerprints but
[34:43]
working that programing yeah well I mean
[34:46]
again that's something like they did do
[34:48]
something they did something um over the
[34:51]
weekend at the pool I can't remember
[34:53]
what it was now but I mean inviting the
[34:55]
sheriff's department to come to the pool
[34:57]
oh yes they been yeah yeah is a good
[34:59]
thing good thing we're just finishing up
[35:01]
a prior meeting but you're welcome to
[35:03]
you're welcome to stay totally welcome
[35:05]
to stay
[35:07]
um okay so everything else in that first
[35:10]
statement does that sound I kind of I
[35:13]
mean we have to check with the school
[35:14]
district about the IDS again but
[35:17]
that lifeguards I was fine with
[35:20]
that yep again I still have the concern
[35:24]
which I mentioned at our last meeting
[35:28]
you'll see okay look at the next one
[35:29]
this is actually this is actually on the
[35:32]
current rules two or more adults 18
[35:34]
years or older must be present at the
[35:36]
pool when the pool is in use with at
[35:37]
least one adult on the pool deck the
[35:39]
question is are those city employees or
[35:41]
did that just mean no I thought it was
[35:45]
the child right except that I know I I
[35:50]
didn't quite I think that has to get
[35:51]
clarified right um what that is on our
[35:54]
think it can be two two or more adults
[35:57]
must be present at the pool with at
[35:59]
least one adult on the pool deck meaning
[36:01]
that one of them might be inside the
[36:02]
water with their
[36:03]
kid um I didn't quite understand that by
[36:07]
the way I put anything that was already
[36:09]
existing on the on the signs at Central
[36:11]
Park I put in here just so that we can
[36:13]
talk about it um I didn't really
[36:15]
understand that one no I didn't either
[36:17]
so okay this R was on the second sign
[36:19]
that one is on the C sign so I would
[36:22]
assume they're not employees it's a
[36:26]
format for the public but so that raises
[36:28]
a question though I I raised this last
[36:30]
time which is that we're basically
[36:31]
putting a lot onto these lifeguards who
[36:34]
are
[36:34]
teenagers when you think about the fact
[36:37]
that we are going to be asking them to
[36:39]
enforce rules
[36:41]
like no smoking I'm just making that you
[36:43]
know but I'm just saying I mean again
[36:47]
that's a question for Julie from the
[36:48]
Boys and Girls Club but it is it is
[36:50]
asking a lot from teenage
[36:53]
employees um they are going to have to
[36:55]
be the people enforcing these unless we
[36:58]
have an adult that is a city
[37:02]
employee uh at the there there are two
[37:04]
policemen there every day I know police
[37:07]
officers so I guess my fear is unfounded
[37:11]
cu the left guards can basically the
[37:16]
police it's a topic that I think needs
[37:18]
some more discussion I I think I think
[37:21]
things need to be monitored as far as
[37:23]
the restrooms the changing
[37:26]
areas um
[37:28]
I think our teenage employees actually
[37:31]
do do that they have to go in I mean
[37:33]
they have to go in and make sure that
[37:34]
the toilet paper and all that kind of
[37:35]
stuff is again that's something we can
[37:38]
find from Julie what their what their
[37:41]
what their duties are responsibilities
[37:44]
okay so we're all good with number two
[37:46]
lifeguards so the authorities have
[37:49]
right number three we have questions we
[37:52]
need clarification on number three okay
[37:55]
now
[37:57]
this one seems to make sense to me
[37:59]
children under if they're not considered
[38:02]
an adult I think they have to be
[38:03]
accompanied by an adult but and then
[38:06]
it's confusing because that 16-year-old
[38:09]
who's that 18-year-old and the one above
[38:10]
it well see that's where um again I had
[38:13]
to look looking at the other pools in
[38:16]
the area in our region um that's why I
[38:20]
picked that I know great so should it
[38:23]
all be 16 or should it be
[38:26]
18 if that 18 even applies to people
[38:29]
swimming not I don't know I I got to
[38:34]
until I know more the 18 thing that that
[38:37]
I mean he's got two parents home or two
[38:39]
adults during the day to go with a
[38:41]
14-year-old not a lot of so on number
[38:44]
three what do you think that year should
[38:46]
be or should it I think we can just need
[38:48]
clarification on it I mean maybe maybe
[38:52]
that refers to the LIF guards there
[38:55]
there could be one 16-year-old but one
[38:56]
18-year-old oh that's true that's true
[38:59]
that's why I wasn't sure if they were
[39:01]
city employees okay actually I'm going
[39:03]
to pull up the photos that uh Paul sent
[39:06]
us
[39:12]
um oops that's how you spell his name um
[39:16]
Paul Paul I think or someone did have a
[39:18]
a concern um well last time we spoke
[39:22]
about it about a 16-year-old you know
[39:25]
with a parent even 14y olds right you
[39:28]
know who's going to want to hang out
[39:29]
with their Guardian parent um an adult
[39:33]
Grandma at 14 years old so did you
[39:37]
notice anything El I mean that's the
[39:38]
sign that's there now did you notice
[39:40]
anything else as far as an
[39:43]
age I did not need it let me see
[39:51]
here this is going to sound pretty funny
[39:53]
but I well that I'll get to I'll get to
[39:55]
it in a second when we get to that next
[39:57]
one but um I'm looking at the existing
[40:00]
sign the existing sign that one's on the
[40:03]
existing sign two or more adults 18
[40:05]
years or older must be present present
[40:08]
at the pool when the pool is in use with
[40:10]
at least one adult on the pool deck
[40:12]
children less than 16 years these are
[40:14]
all you know let's just check those off
[40:16]
so that one the next one the children
[40:19]
less than
[40:21]
16 well I I I think we you even talked
[40:25]
about you know you had a 16
[40:29]
should be able to
[40:31]
attend the pool on their
[40:35]
own
[40:37]
um I I forget we we kind of passed that
[40:40]
around last time as far as an age limit
[40:42]
maybe 14year
[40:46]
old I don't see I look through a lot of
[40:50]
the cool information you said I didn't
[40:52]
find
[40:54]
anything Aly said
[40:57]
children under the age of 13 must be
[41:00]
accompanied by
[41:02]
an I don't have Aly for some reason
[41:05]
didn't say Albany it just said it looks
[41:06]
like this I knew it was ALB cuz I
[41:09]
printed it off there so I I mean I think
[41:13]
we're going to redo this sign bring it
[41:14]
down to at least 13 and 14 person for
[41:18]
children less than yeah 13 and 14 I'm
[41:21]
okay with 13 or 14 which one do you like
[41:23]
better again we're just making
[41:25]
recommendations 1 okay Joe you okay with
[41:28]
that
[41:34]
sure now the next one is wicked
[41:37]
important as far as I'm concerned the
[41:38]
swim
[41:39]
diapers they need and I know they're
[41:42]
expensive I know so but we could figure
[41:45]
that out also because maybe we make sure
[41:47]
that there's some swim diapers on hand I
[41:50]
don't know I'm just saying if we had
[41:52]
to but I mean we cannot let people with
[41:57]
regular diapers into the pool I
[42:00]
mean so if they're not trained I mean
[42:02]
the the risk of having and I think there
[42:05]
are um uh racks that are you know
[42:11]
appropriate um they the
[42:14]
RS I think
[42:16]
um they this one this I thought was
[42:19]
confusing but Albany said children under
[42:22]
the age of three or not fully toilet
[42:24]
drained must be wearing a swim diaper
[42:26]
with the swimsuit or rubber pants right
[42:29]
over the top of the swim diaper then it
[42:31]
said regular diapers are not designed
[42:33]
for use in water which I definitely new
[42:37]
um I think that's very
[42:40]
important I I I don't like Colony also
[42:43]
requires the swim diapers Troy by the
[42:47]
way their pools basically were closed so
[42:48]
that's why there's so little information
[42:50]
from Troy having a lot of
[42:52]
issues getting them to reopen see
[42:57]
and this is uh
[43:00]
gildin they children in the age of five
[43:04]
they have to have life jackets by the
[43:05]
way I did not I don't think I put that
[43:07]
in there um I didn't no but I do see a
[43:10]
lot of kids with the with the swimming
[43:13]
what that Buckle in the back this this
[43:16]
has appropriate swim attire where's the
[43:18]
thing
[43:20]
about they didn't even put anything in
[43:22]
there about diapers I mean they they do
[43:24]
make a three-piece swimming diaper PES
[43:26]
for seven 96 for three pieces which are
[43:29]
I I knew my my granddaughter had them
[43:31]
they're more like just a wrap or
[43:33]
something so um maybe swimming swimming
[43:36]
diaper pants or swimming diapers yeah
[43:39]
which are a lot more
[43:41]
inexpensive than these I mean again we
[43:44]
could also see if there'd be something
[43:47]
like a skincity shares kind of thing or
[43:48]
something where somebody might do a S
[43:50]
diaper dry that we would have on hand at
[43:53]
the pool so that if there really was
[43:55]
somebody that couldn't afford the swim
[43:56]
diaper I know but I think it needs to
[43:58]
stay in there okay all right
[44:03]
um and my next one is send are no
[44:05]
smoking chewing oh yeah what about the
[44:08]
the appropriate swimwear made sense to
[44:09]
me too yes you know okay so now the no
[44:13]
diving shallow water that's on our signs
[44:15]
now and that absolutely makes sense I
[44:17]
mean obviously you don't want that for
[44:19]
you know you don't want somebody to hurt
[44:21]
themselves then this one I actually
[44:23]
changed the language because but no
[44:26]
running horse play running on the pool
[44:28]
deck or foul language is allowed okay no
[44:32]
toys flotation devices and so in other
[44:34]
words they're talking about we're
[44:35]
talking about floats there which would
[44:37]
obviously take up a lot of room masks
[44:39]
fins or and it hies the child a safety
[44:42]
feature
[44:44]
right oh this is the one that I thought
[44:46]
was funny so on our sign right
[44:50]
now you're going to laugh because I do
[44:53]
have my graduate degree but I did not
[44:54]
know what this word was I had to look it
[44:56]
up
[44:59]
expectorating you guys know what
[45:01]
expectorating is Hawkers yeah yeah
[45:04]
that's what it says on our sign at the
[45:06]
pool I didn't actually know what that
[45:08]
was so I was just questioning whether
[45:09]
somebody in fourth grade might know what
[45:11]
that was but um maybe they do so I
[45:15]
changed it to spitting good um but it's
[45:17]
no urinating discharge of fecal matter
[45:20]
spitting or nose blowing in the pool
[45:22]
that's basically on almost every other
[45:24]
pool in the region right no smoking I
[45:27]
added chewing tobacco I mean I added
[45:29]
vaping oh good
[45:31]
one that way there and that means
[45:34]
whether it's uh marijuana or tobacco
[45:37]
well I said no alcohol well I said or
[45:39]
use of illegal drugs but you do know Al
[45:42]
it's a Federate well no but right now we
[45:44]
already have no smoking at all in any of
[45:48]
our Parks it
[45:50]
doesn't it's not uh necessarily enforced
[45:55]
but um that that's already a rule in the
[45:58]
park so I feel like it's fine to say
[46:00]
this no glass containers
[46:02]
obviously the no coolers I had a little
[46:05]
bit of an issue
[46:08]
with I mean if you wanted to like come
[46:10]
and have a picnic or you know be with
[46:12]
your family for your children I think
[46:15]
the thing is that they must have to go
[46:17]
outside the pool area in other words
[46:19]
there's stuff outside the cool area
[46:21]
they'd be able to get back in but I I
[46:23]
think it's tough I I mean I guess we'd
[46:25]
have to have the cooler so inspected on
[46:27]
their way in
[46:30]
yeah so should we take out no coolers or
[46:33]
and we could add a line of all coolers
[46:35]
we have to think about that yes okay
[46:37]
well let's think about it because I I'm
[46:40]
always packing
[46:42]
lunches always did for my girls yeah no
[46:45]
I mean it it it seems natural to me and
[46:48]
I have I have a big problem with that um
[46:51]
ice cream truck being out there every
[46:52]
day every day you know how do you say
[46:56]
but you have to say know your children
[46:57]
you got three kids you got one kid I
[46:59]
mean every day that that ice cream truck
[47:01]
is parked right in front so I don't know
[47:03]
what it's permit inails it don't on city
[47:06]
streets but I don't think it's
[47:08]
appropriate you know I think they do
[47:10]
Stein Mets Park pretty pretty much also
[47:13]
I think the a lot of course you know
[47:15]
because they you know yeah um I do know
[47:19]
my daughter told me that in Cara they do
[47:21]
have affordable options for dollar menu
[47:26]
options
[47:27]
um on the truck including water that you
[47:30]
know but again if you can't bring a
[47:32]
cooler you can't you know like so there
[47:34]
water fountains your kids can drink out
[47:36]
but I want to make it you know
[47:37]
affordable for all everyone bringing
[47:40]
yeah children there okay so those are
[47:43]
issues for future right the ice cream
[47:45]
truck water I have to check there is a
[47:47]
water P there are water ponds um but
[47:50]
that's a good idea too low
[47:54]
cost we need jeie they may actually I
[47:57]
mean that could be a way that the boys
[47:59]
and girls club could leave I don't even
[48:01]
want to go there in terms of health
[48:02]
department etc etc but they might be
[48:04]
able to do some sort of treats that they
[48:06]
sell they might want to
[48:10]
sell it's hard like the um those things
[48:14]
we have at music Haven those Welches
[48:17]
food snacks and can go to the concession
[48:20]
stand and stuff yeah we don't yeah we
[48:24]
don't have a concession right things to
[48:26]
think about I saw someone even rents
[48:28]
Cabanas which is uh I have no umbrellas
[48:31]
or canopies or Cabanas allowed okay we
[48:34]
need to add that yes um I I see people
[48:38]
marking your territory and those tent
[48:40]
Cabanas are pretty big and um they're a
[48:44]
good source of
[48:46]
shade um because there's no shade
[48:49]
there um you know other than in in by
[48:52]
the changing area but we don't allow
[48:54]
them now right no but they they are
[48:57]
okay but that's a good point though if
[48:59]
you had a little kid you might want to
[49:01]
have an umbrella so that you have the
[49:03]
and over here is only astr Turf you know
[49:05]
that they can stick it in so we going
[49:07]
have to talk about that one I would say
[49:12]
right well we got to figure we got to
[49:15]
figure that
[49:16]
out um so no glass contain so the
[49:19]
coolers one we're going to question I I
[49:22]
think so no knives or firearms that
[49:23]
makes sense right no animals allow them
[49:26]
area also makes sense except service do
[49:29]
service
[49:34]
animus okay and then all trash must be
[49:37]
disposed of properly yeah I think it did
[49:39]
a great job yeah thank you for doing
[49:41]
that then these waiting times that is
[49:44]
actually on the current
[49:46]
signage so it must be from
[49:51]
um late after last sight sound of storm
[50:00]
you'd also I just want to say we have a
[50:02]
sign that says what's the method of
[50:04]
summoning on premise CPR STA and what's
[50:07]
the phone number for emergency and it
[50:09]
doesn't happen okay just has a blank
[50:12]
line so
[50:20]
tfds I'll check that and I also have to
[50:23]
get them to add
[50:25]
those right yep and he might be
[50:29]
coming
[50:31]
uh oh there's oh there's a 911 there's a
[50:34]
call 911 saving a life thing sign
[50:39]
yeah okay I don't I'm trying to figure
[50:41]
out where I saw that during we it must
[50:44]
be on the it's on the pool
[50:49]
rules yeah I mean those things make
[50:51]
sense right so if there's thunder and
[50:52]
lightning they're going to make
[50:53]
everybody leave so what they're saying
[50:55]
is there has to be a 30 minute wa have
[50:56]
to leave the fence they have to leave
[50:59]
the water I don't know if they have to
[51:00]
leave the fence for some
[51:02]
reason how do I access
[51:06]
the um the city hall uh City uh of um
[51:11]
homepage you mean how do you
[51:14]
watch Sam Samantha said that I's right
[51:17]
here oh I didn't see
[51:19]
sorry um can I get on there for some
[51:23]
reason I I saw them all walking out I
[51:26]
think that they they might have to I
[51:28]
don't know yeah
[51:31]
we where do they go okay I think we're
[51:34]
going to have to
[51:36]
stop for now what else do you guys do
[51:38]
you have anything else before we
[51:40]
stop I
[51:53]
guess anything before we oh call the so
[51:57]
so when we when we do talk about trips
[52:01]
or whatever um what's the ratio of adult
[52:04]
and I guess it's even in the pool now
[52:07]
what's
[52:08]
the
[52:11]
child I think this is this two or more
[52:14]
adults thing must be presol that's one
[52:17]
of the already children cannot have them
[52:20]
under the AG
[52:22]
of we don't have any rules about that
[52:24]
right now
[52:27]
I think that would
[52:30]
be
[52:32]
especially summer camp busing or even
[52:34]
you know can I with neighborhood kids we
[52:38]
can find that out because it's the same
[52:40]
like at my side when we have when they
[52:42]
have field trips um there's a certain
[52:44]
number of adults that have to be present
[52:46]
in field trips right so that's a good
[52:49]
ratio of adults to children for field
[52:51]
trips field trips are even just
[52:54]
normal you know I'm calling
[52:57]
under the but even on a regular Walkin
[53:01]
basis all a sudden you know I'm going to
[53:04]
I got you can only have got
[53:08]
five the
[53:13]
city responsible we should
[53:20]
probably okay all right I'm going to try
[53:23]
to well actually did you you took notes
[53:25]
or um some notes um some of your
[53:28]
questions and the things that you did
[53:30]
watch I didn't get the last part the
[53:33]
notes okay so I will try to um write up
[53:36]
some of this too and we'll just you and
[53:38]
I can communicate and we'll get it back
[53:39]
out to everybody we'll have to have
[53:42]
another meeting okay thank
[53:45]
you I mean those were some of my
[53:48]
highlighted
[53:52]
have great okay thank you
[54:02]
was I had to set my alarm on my phone
[54:06]
actually may I have a motion
[54:10]
to a second in favor I okay thank you
[54:15]
thank
[54:17]
you we are adjourned um good uh it looks
[54:22]
like
[54:24]
standing standing
[54:29]
sorry can't come to church
[54:39]
[Music]
[54:56]
oh
[55:00]
[Music]
[55:23]
[Music]
[55:35]
yes I didn't
[55:38]
[Music]
[56:03]
[Music]
[56:52]
[Music]
[57:03]
[Music]
[57:23]
[Music]
[57:55]
she
[57:57]
[Music]
[58:22]
this
[58:23]
[Music]
[59:00]
all
[59:02]
[Music]
[59:17]
[Music]
[59:57]
w
[1:00:00]
[Music]
[1:00:01]
[Applause]
[1:00:07]
[Music]
[1:00:17]
[Music]
[1:00:28]
[Music]
[1:00:35]
[Music]
[1:01:03]
in
[1:01:09]
[Music]
[1:01:35]
it's
[1:01:38]
[Music]
[1:01:59]
[Music]
[1:02:22]
[Music]
[1:02:32]
[Music]
[1:02:40]
[Music]
[1:03:16]
[Applause]
[1:03:16]
[Music]
[1:03:22]
[Music]
[1:03:29]
oh okay
[1:03:42]
great I'd like to call the orders conc
[1:03:44]
the city council committee meeting for
[1:03:46]
Monday August 19th
[1:03:48]
2024 um where before we U going to our
[1:03:51]
committees we do have two presentations
[1:03:53]
uh first of all we do have a really full
[1:03:55]
room I'd like ask everyone to please
[1:03:57]
silence your cell phon to make sure that
[1:03:59]
they're off and additionally this
[1:04:01]
meeting is for the council only so we
[1:04:03]
are we do not take
[1:04:04]
comments uh from the public um and uh no
[1:04:08]
applause no Amen Corner none of that so
[1:04:11]
first we're going to have our two
[1:04:13]
presentations and we'll start with um
[1:04:16]
Miss Patrick yes um the SKC Foundation
[1:04:19]
um has Representatives here of the on
[1:04:22]
SKC Community change Council um which
[1:04:25]
they've started
[1:04:26]
um and we have some folks from the
[1:04:28]
community change Council that are going
[1:04:29]
to be making a presentation I know is
[1:04:32]
here
[1:04:35]
um speaking
[1:04:38]
and speaking and name song speaking and
[1:04:43]
we have other members of the council
[1:04:46]
present
[1:04:48]
um speakers are if you're going to be
[1:04:50]
speaking come over here speak we need we
[1:04:53]
need folks to come up here there's a
[1:04:54]
microphone Who start
[1:04:57]
Christine and I think you know Christine
[1:05:00]
the microphone is for the people people
[1:05:02]
better that's
[1:05:04]
how sure take thank you I am Christine
[1:05:09]
Moore and I am a member of the uh
[1:05:12]
Community change Council here uh with
[1:05:15]
the skincity foundation uh and tonight
[1:05:17]
we are going to present on one skty as
[1:05:20]
well as our particular initiative which
[1:05:22]
is the housing ones concy together
[1:05:23]
initiative so who is the commity change
[1:05:26]
Council we are a team of residents and
[1:05:29]
leaders we committed to
[1:05:33]
participate in um a process which we
[1:05:37]
didn't quite know what it was to begin
[1:05:39]
with but um folks just decided to come
[1:05:42]
together through the foundation and all
[1:05:45]
of the great work that they've done um
[1:05:47]
to discuss issues in our community where
[1:05:51]
we could affect systems change so in
[1:05:55]
that process process we started off with
[1:05:56]
a three-day kickoff which was uh we
[1:05:59]
included a consultant from the community
[1:06:02]
science who came in to run that 3-day
[1:06:05]
Workshop back in March
[1:06:07]
wow so in that process we were presented
[1:06:11]
with a few different possible
[1:06:14]
projects um and narrowed it down to
[1:06:18]
quality affordable
[1:06:19]
housing I missed the last point there
[1:06:22]
was that oh sorry sorry um and okay so
[1:06:26]
there's still 18 members now actively
[1:06:28]
engaged and there's still more interest
[1:06:30]
coming that was the part that I I wanted
[1:06:32]
to miss next slide so 90 days of action
[1:06:35]
what does that look like so the
[1:06:37]
community science basically gave us an
[1:06:39]
outline to work from we identified
[1:06:42]
different areas that we needed to
[1:06:44]
address um and broke off into subgroups
[1:06:46]
and began the work in 90 days now it is
[1:06:50]
quite a task to tackle
[1:06:53]
housing in 90 days
[1:06:56]
um especially when you're not like
[1:06:58]
myself necessarily close to the problem
[1:07:01]
um with regard to some of the ways that
[1:07:03]
it was presented I would say that we're
[1:07:04]
all close to the problem because we all
[1:07:05]
want quality housing so it involves all
[1:07:08]
of us um but it wasn't an area that I
[1:07:11]
had particularly tackled but with the or
[1:07:14]
some of the people on the committee
[1:07:16]
hadn't tackled but we were committed to
[1:07:18]
90 days of action and so we started our
[1:07:21]
process so next slide oh part of that
[1:07:26]
process was branding and marketing
[1:07:27]
deciding what exactly it is we were
[1:07:29]
going to do so we created a vision in
[1:07:32]
which our uh we envisioned a future
[1:07:34]
where everyone in Connected can live in
[1:07:36]
a healthy home that helps them Thrive
[1:07:38]
and unleash their full potential so we
[1:07:40]
all agree that this is what we wanted
[1:07:42]
the outcome of this initiative to
[1:07:45]
be so some of the challenges we faced
[1:07:47]
were landlords tenants homeowners
[1:07:49]
neighborhood leaders City staff we all
[1:07:52]
have these important roles to play in
[1:07:53]
improving housing for the SK conc um but
[1:07:57]
we don't always communicate uh in in
[1:08:00]
ways that are going to get us towards um
[1:08:02]
improving housing
[1:08:04]
here um so we sort of tackled that
[1:08:09]
problem through Community
[1:08:14]
engagement in one of the Committees that
[1:08:17]
we had was research and policy so that
[1:08:19]
committee went out and did particular
[1:08:21]
work in looking at uh benchmarking
[1:08:24]
existing policies around hous
[1:08:26]
and and trying to find the gold standard
[1:08:28]
that we could learn about and then model
[1:08:30]
here in
[1:08:31]
SKC uh through the work that I did on
[1:08:33]
the engagement I leveraged my resources
[1:08:36]
from Albany and we were put in touch
[1:08:39]
with the United tenants Association
[1:08:42]
which doesn't serve skincity to the
[1:08:43]
capacity that it serves Albany but is
[1:08:46]
yet serving the capital region and did
[1:08:48]
have some data to to report back to us
[1:08:51]
but what we found is they had um this
[1:08:53]
tool called the Albany landlord report
[1:08:56]
card um and it was aligned with what we
[1:08:59]
were discussing in our initial 3 days of
[1:09:01]
action and so we decided to move forward
[1:09:03]
with exploration on how some a model
[1:09:06]
like this could be applied here in
[1:09:08]
skincity another component of our work
[1:09:10]
was mapping out our Rich resources and
[1:09:13]
skincity around housing and creating um
[1:09:17]
an ecosystem which if you happen to have
[1:09:20]
one of our handouts you'll notice the
[1:09:22]
ecosystem there or you'll see it up on
[1:09:24]
our slideshow so this is a work in
[1:09:27]
progress there are lots of organizations
[1:09:29]
that may not be um identified here in
[1:09:33]
this ecosystem so there's it's potential
[1:09:35]
to build on it but this was our starting
[1:09:38]
point part and looking at some of the
[1:09:40]
resources that we have and how they're
[1:09:42]
connected around housing here so Second
[1:09:45]
Step was
[1:09:46]
to meet with slick and I see Chris
[1:09:49]
Morris is here so we um had the
[1:09:52]
opportunity to present at their August
[1:09:54]
meeting I believe and to to hear
[1:09:57]
feedback um and to offer an opportunity
[1:10:01]
to engage in the process of developing
[1:10:04]
the
[1:10:06]
landlord um tool the landlord app we
[1:10:09]
we're calling it lease so I just want to
[1:10:12]
highlight that relationship a little bit
[1:10:14]
because it wasn't smooth sailing when we
[1:10:16]
started there are a lot of
[1:10:20]
um there's there's a lot of things that
[1:10:22]
have happened over the past few years
[1:10:23]
between landlords and tenants in terms
[1:10:26]
of relationships that needs to be
[1:10:27]
rebuilt and conversations need to be
[1:10:30]
opened um so that we're working together
[1:10:33]
to provide landlords with good tenants
[1:10:36]
that they need and our tenants with good
[1:10:38]
homes where they need to live so this um
[1:10:42]
I'm I'm proud to say that if within
[1:10:44]
those 90 days of action uh that win was
[1:10:48]
is a big one because we're continuing
[1:10:50]
the conversations as we move forward
[1:10:52]
with building the tool that will help up
[1:10:55]
lift good landlords in our
[1:10:57]
area step three feel like we skipped
[1:11:00]
over some stuff and I'm sure we did it
[1:11:02]
was a jamack 90 days
[1:11:05]
um so yeah so we we started digging into
[1:11:09]
some of the items that uh are needed to
[1:11:13]
uh prioritize what we want
[1:11:16]
to learn through the
[1:11:19]
application um we want to provide
[1:11:21]
information about rental properties and
[1:11:23]
recognize that landlords who comply with
[1:11:24]
the city codes so we need a lot of folks
[1:11:27]
in this room on board uh we did create a
[1:11:30]
community survey to make sure that this
[1:11:32]
is something that our residents actually
[1:11:33]
wanted and elely is going to present on
[1:11:36]
some of that survey data for us
[1:11:38]
shortly um and maybe just now
[1:11:44]
so thank you so much my name is Elise
[1:11:46]
Martin I work in housing over at connect
[1:11:49]
Community Action Program or scap uh so
[1:11:51]
you can see we had a really great
[1:11:53]
response to our survey uh to 220
[1:11:55]
responses the majority of them are from
[1:11:57]
renters about a third of them from
[1:12:00]
homeowners and we also had some landlord
[1:12:02]
feedback as
[1:12:04]
well um no surprise that the number one
[1:12:07]
priority for everyone who is responding
[1:12:09]
is the cost of housing when they're
[1:12:10]
looking at where they're going to be
[1:12:12]
moving um and then the quality of
[1:12:15]
housing so is it safe does it pass code
[1:12:18]
um is it in someplace that makes me feel
[1:12:20]
safe does it have the amenities I need
[1:12:22]
on a first floor uh washer dryer hook
[1:12:25]
UPS Etc um and then the responsibility
[1:12:28]
of the landlord to be responsive and
[1:12:30]
building that uh working relationship in
[1:12:32]
the beginning uh so that's what our
[1:12:34]
community is
[1:12:35]
prioritizing um and you can see that
[1:12:37]
when we checked in to um ask if they
[1:12:41]
were interested in some type of tool um
[1:12:45]
that uh similar to the one that Albany
[1:12:47]
has around 70% said yes they would be
[1:12:51]
interested and it would be helpful for
[1:12:52]
them when either uh trying to just uh
[1:12:56]
address challenges that they have in
[1:12:58]
their housing currently or when they're
[1:13:00]
looking for a new
[1:13:02]
housing um so a little bit more about
[1:13:05]
what would go into this Tool uh so on
[1:13:08]
the next slide uh there's a list of the
[1:13:10]
type of data so just a couple uh
[1:13:13]
examples here and this is in handout uh
[1:13:15]
so you can read further uh eviction
[1:13:17]
information code violation violation
[1:13:20]
information this would all get fed into
[1:13:23]
the report card uh to create a unified
[1:13:26]
uh easyto read
[1:13:29]
score um and the next steps for this
[1:13:31]
project we are looking to engage uh
[1:13:34]
stakeholders so we're here today like we
[1:13:36]
mentioned we've been talking with the
[1:13:37]
landlords we've been engaging the
[1:13:38]
community uh so making sure this is
[1:13:40]
really well well-rounded and that
[1:13:42]
everyone's voice is at the table um
[1:13:45]
looking for funding uh for the actual uh
[1:13:49]
application and then working in
[1:13:51]
Partnership to build out the tool
[1:13:55]
all right and I'm going to hand it over
[1:13:56]
to wrap up our
[1:13:59]
presentation I guess
[1:14:02]
it's we do need you I'm sorry to come
[1:14:04]
over here so that you can be on the
[1:14:10]
camera so bring over here do you want to
[1:14:14]
bring your laptop with you yeah
[1:14:19]
yeah
[1:14:24]
hello how's that yeah it's it's just for
[1:14:27]
the folks at home so um as going we
[1:14:30]
started our next guest thank you for
[1:14:32]
hosting us today um we want to uh
[1:14:36]
continue to improve and increase contact
[1:14:39]
with Community overall just building
[1:14:41]
these uh
[1:14:43]
relationships um and highlighting the
[1:14:46]
intersectionality of of oversight and
[1:14:50]
ferally distributed um funds and
[1:14:53]
programs for people that consumer is
[1:14:56]
live um I'm so proud to be part of uh an
[1:14:59]
agenda that includes the community um so
[1:15:02]
we want to highlight that we are here
[1:15:05]
with construct relationships and that
[1:15:07]
we're still we're still um managing data
[1:15:11]
and collecting
[1:15:12]
data
[1:15:16]
and so laity um played a lot of ground
[1:15:21]
workor um the first n the action engaged
[1:15:25]
um most of the people that are here
[1:15:26]
today but also uh it reflects that when
[1:15:31]
the community is included and things
[1:15:34]
that uh concern them and their quality
[1:15:36]
of life um it's important to make sure
[1:15:39]
that we have a a base a a collective
[1:15:44]
that um not just collects those that
[1:15:49]
information but we create constructive
[1:15:52]
solutions for people here um especially
[1:15:56]
we're a largely urban community and um a
[1:16:00]
lot of the people represented by members
[1:16:03]
here can tell you and agree that um it's
[1:16:07]
people that that run the economy and we
[1:16:12]
we um we're happy that sen is now
[1:16:16]
recognizing that the foundations that
[1:16:18]
are here agencies that already
[1:16:20]
established can come together and agree
[1:16:22]
that um helping consumers and residents
[1:16:26]
have a uh a place and have recourse for
[1:16:30]
their concerns as consumers is
[1:16:32]
important um so during the first 90 days
[1:16:36]
um they took action by building the
[1:16:39]
database that they're calling Le and um
[1:16:44]
also making the
[1:16:47]
uh we call
[1:16:57]
identifying our assets so um I just want
[1:17:00]
to make sure who going to the EOS system
[1:17:03]
or ecosystem that includes yes that
[1:17:06]
includes the community and um agencies
[1:17:09]
that have already um Place their efforts
[1:17:13]
toward agenda like ours and consumers
[1:17:17]
and local tenants and local community
[1:17:19]
members who um are largely consumers
[1:17:23]
here in
[1:17:25]
so we want to highlight that building
[1:17:27]
relationships that um are GE toward the
[1:17:30]
commit thank you for sharing your space
[1:17:32]
by the way so
[1:17:36]
um before you um move on to this side
[1:17:39]
just want to make sure that we
[1:17:43]
also we also are proud to include that
[1:17:47]
um in the data that we've already
[1:17:49]
collected there's
[1:17:50]
220 um 220
[1:17:55]
are completed
[1:17:57]
already we want to make sure that the
[1:18:00]
presence of the
[1:18:03]
ecosystem
[1:18:05]
intersectionality um and that a place
[1:18:08]
for community
[1:18:10]
members tenants residents longtime
[1:18:14]
contributors to the local commy have a
[1:18:16]
place that they feel safe to g a a place
[1:18:20]
that they know they will not only be
[1:18:23]
recognized but that their issues as
[1:18:27]
consumers are going have the proper
[1:18:30]
oversight and the proper attention and
[1:18:32]
that we know the researchers are already
[1:18:34]
here for us to allocate a Equitable
[1:18:38]
experience for all tenants of the local
[1:18:41]
commit um
[1:18:44]
so I'm use my
[1:18:49]
SL am I okay SL yeah it just the next
[1:18:53]
steps so the next steps are uh obviously
[1:18:57]
to continue the survey the survey is
[1:19:00]
going to be careed toward making sure
[1:19:04]
we've explored every aspect of the
[1:19:06]
consumer
[1:19:08]
experience every aspect of tenants and
[1:19:12]
um local concerns for their quality of
[1:19:15]
life reability of
[1:19:18]
hous um the responsiveness of the
[1:19:21]
housing
[1:19:22]
authority and I know personally that my
[1:19:26]
um pursuit of fair housing has I've
[1:19:29]
encountered many
[1:19:31]
barriers um and I just want to voice be
[1:19:34]
the voice
[1:19:35]
concerned for people who haven't found
[1:19:38]
uh a place for an agency where is
[1:19:41]
directly here toward their consumer
[1:19:43]
concerns but mailing you know
[1:19:47]
applications doll to S
[1:19:51]
applications uh the barriers that people
[1:19:55]
um will encounter responsiveness of
[1:19:58]
landlords and
[1:20:00]
prorities this is all barriers that they
[1:20:04]
they cost the consumer so much um
[1:20:08]
they
[1:20:09]
participating and a h program program
[1:20:14]
you know that we
[1:20:15]
have you know we have requirements and
[1:20:19]
tenant um we all have to live and and
[1:20:23]
we're required to Pro
[1:20:25]
that we come to come we we add up to a
[1:20:29]
standard we that we uh we required to
[1:20:32]
prove that we can um uh uh provide a
[1:20:37]
certain standard or consistency for that
[1:20:40]
vard and so we hope that that's going to
[1:20:43]
be
[1:20:44]
anable experience for all consumers and
[1:20:47]
especially
[1:20:49]
um and um and people they haven't have
[1:20:54]
or
[1:20:56]
place
[1:20:58]
is for
[1:21:01]
time
[1:21:04]
next do we take any questions yeah let's
[1:21:06]
take
[1:21:14]
questions the housing one's going to be
[1:21:19]
together I'm wondering if there's anyone
[1:21:21]
um from slick and Al Andor um from The
[1:21:25]
Sting Municipal Housing Authority that
[1:21:27]
have been a part of the 15 or 18 people
[1:21:30]
that have been putting this together um
[1:21:33]
slick no Housing Authority no so
[1:21:36]
initially initially in the initial group
[1:21:39]
with the um for the systems change
[1:21:42]
movement before the housing issue was
[1:21:44]
decided it was open to any Resident from
[1:21:48]
this County I believe uh City connecting
[1:21:52]
to partic to choose to participate and
[1:21:54]
be part of a systems change movement so
[1:21:57]
that Core Body those 18 people are the
[1:22:00]
people who stuck with it throughout the
[1:22:01]
90 days of action whether housing was
[1:22:04]
their personal issue that they brought
[1:22:06]
in the initial survey or not it was a
[1:22:09]
Collective Agreement to move forward
[1:22:11]
since then engaging with the city
[1:22:13]
council identifying the folks in the
[1:22:16]
ecosystem who need to be have a seat at
[1:22:18]
the table to talk about housing issues
[1:22:20]
that was part of the 90 days in the
[1:22:22]
process so in that process a
[1:22:24]
presentation with the slick as well as
[1:22:27]
you know continuing our relationship
[1:22:29]
with SCA um there were particular rules
[1:22:32]
and regulations with this committee and
[1:22:34]
that if you had
[1:22:36]
um certain decision-making abilities
[1:22:38]
Through Your Role or position that you
[1:22:39]
weren't a voting member so um you know
[1:22:43]
we we got Stars if we could vote and if
[1:22:46]
you were considered in a position of
[1:22:48]
power um over the the group dynamic and
[1:22:51]
you weren't giving a a voting privilege
[1:22:55]
um you have more oh yeah just want to
[1:22:57]
say so scaff and Slick has been uh have
[1:23:00]
been acting as advisory to it um because
[1:23:03]
it is community Leed um so we're we're
[1:23:06]
at the table we're meeting together uh
[1:23:09]
but the the direct for is coming from
[1:23:10]
the community members thank you and I
[1:23:13]
will add that if you did complete the
[1:23:15]
survey or it still is open if you
[1:23:18]
haven't there is a place to indicate
[1:23:19]
whether or not you would be interested
[1:23:21]
in contributing to the housing ones
[1:23:23]
concy I know there's uh a lot of
[1:23:26]
conversations regarding the lease app
[1:23:28]
and how uh we will wait the the system
[1:23:32]
so that it's fair and Equitable and
[1:23:34]
achieves the goals that we want it to
[1:23:36]
achieve collectively it is not meant to
[1:23:38]
be uh the Albany model here applied in
[1:23:42]
connectivty this is meant to actually
[1:23:44]
build upon the Albany model and improve
[1:23:47]
it so that it's uh a resource um that
[1:23:51]
that we want to use
[1:23:55]
Mr par yeah so first of all thank you
[1:23:57]
for this important work I really
[1:23:59]
appreciate um the community engagement
[1:24:00]
aspect of this um I did hear words like
[1:24:03]
intersectionality and equity which I'm
[1:24:05]
always excited to hear um I'm just
[1:24:07]
wondering like during the survey what
[1:24:10]
type of demographic information are you
[1:24:12]
collecting um to ensure that
[1:24:16]
equable working across intersectionality
[1:24:19]
to ensure like that's like our you guys
[1:24:21]
like like your social economic uh race
[1:24:25]
type of demographic information as part
[1:24:27]
of the surver to
[1:24:28]
Ure was the specifics just Z collecting
[1:24:33]
um I didn't get the slide in there with
[1:24:35]
zip codes um we have zip codes there's
[1:24:37]
not a lot of demographic information in
[1:24:40]
there um but we did extend the survey
[1:24:44]
because we noticed that uh the zip codes
[1:24:47]
that were responding were not uh the
[1:24:49]
Target demographic that we're looking
[1:24:51]
for um so we're doing specific targeting
[1:24:53]
in Hamilton H not pleasant Etc to make
[1:24:56]
sure that we're getting a large scope as
[1:24:58]
well as making sure we're getting
[1:24:59]
homeowners tenants and
[1:25:01]
landlords so just one more thing
[1:25:04]
so I can see like you have to careful
[1:25:06]
when you're doing surveys cuz people are
[1:25:08]
don't like taking them if you're asking
[1:25:09]
a whole bunch so so I wanted to say that
[1:25:11]
too that that's not lost to me um so the
[1:25:14]
landlord report card piece is that like
[1:25:16]
so what does that mean for a landlord is
[1:25:19]
this just like more like a marketing
[1:25:21]
tool for a landlord to say hey a plus
[1:25:24]
ated by this entity or is there any more
[1:25:27]
other any other type of incentives or
[1:25:29]
things outside of that that yeah I mean
[1:25:31]
we' we've talked in brainstorming that
[1:25:33]
this could pull in resources for them
[1:25:36]
and we've talked about different Grant
[1:25:37]
fundings um and Foundation money you
[1:25:40]
know could this lead to you're eligible
[1:25:42]
for certain funding if you know you meet
[1:25:44]
a certain rate it is also um good you
[1:25:48]
know we talked a little bit about like
[1:25:50]
HUD requirements so if you're high rated
[1:25:52]
on this you're likely to be able to get
[1:25:55]
um a voucher program which is a great
[1:25:56]
setup for a landlord and get that direct
[1:25:58]
payment because you probably done all
[1:26:00]
the things you need to do to have your
[1:26:01]
apartment P inspection so it's about
[1:26:03]
keeping your apartment up so you have
[1:26:06]
for all these things so I think it it
[1:26:08]
lays a good foundation for us to use as
[1:26:10]
like a unified tool across the community
[1:26:12]
and I think have other possibilities
[1:26:14]
thank
[1:26:15]
you so in um in regards I see the
[1:26:18]
priorities um issues were the housing
[1:26:22]
costs quality of Housing and and in the
[1:26:24]
context of the ecosystem what were some
[1:26:26]
of the identified of responsiveness what
[1:26:29]
was working well what on agencies with
[1:26:32]
the needs of of residents being met
[1:26:35]
areas of breakdown that we could focus
[1:26:38]
on yeah so that's kind of our next step
[1:26:40]
right right now what we built out is the
[1:26:42]
ecosystem and we are um pulling in
[1:26:45]
people from different areas of the
[1:26:47]
community to make sure that we have
[1:26:49]
everything on the map that we need um
[1:26:51]
and we're looking at what the
[1:26:53]
connections are both formal and informal
[1:26:55]
and then building out that resource to
[1:26:57]
see what the gaps are so those are our
[1:26:58]
next
[1:26:59]
steps
[1:27:01]
okay that's it all right thank you so
[1:27:03]
much time thank you uh and to members of
[1:27:07]
the public I saw somebody raised their
[1:27:09]
hand so if you if you got the contact
[1:27:11]
information you can contact them
[1:27:12]
directly and ask any questions you
[1:27:14]
have thank
[1:27:17]
you um next Mr
[1:27:20]
wall we'll give us some information on
[1:27:22]
the do he hear in the room
[1:27:27]
he was here I thought he was as
[1:27:30]
well
[1:27:33]
okay yes is that you okay that's not Mr
[1:27:36]
wall Mr triny over
[1:27:39]
here my hands you needed to that can be
[1:27:43]
heard um yeah so I'm Brian triny um the
[1:27:48]
building inspector for the city of skty
[1:27:50]
and along with that comes a flood plane
[1:27:53]
hazard manager
[1:27:54]
so um I am appointed flood plane uh
[1:27:57]
Hazard manager so uh there's some
[1:28:01]
there's been some inquiry um from
[1:28:04]
Council about uh some of the development
[1:28:07]
that's going on in the Mohawk Harbor and
[1:28:10]
um we've we've had some uh inquiry
[1:28:13]
ourselves with
[1:28:15]
DEC and uh that brought up some
[1:28:19]
um Discovery there's been a change a
[1:28:22]
passing of the torch at the East see
[1:28:24]
there's a new uh State flood plane
[1:28:27]
manager there and he has some inquiry of
[1:28:31]
um how that has been managed and
[1:28:33]
developed in Mohawk Harbor so uh we have
[1:28:37]
been um Gathering documents and
[1:28:40]
supplying them to
[1:28:42]
DEC uh and uh you know my
[1:28:46]
predecessors uh from what I've been
[1:28:48]
coming up with and discovering have been
[1:28:51]
have managed that properly Mohawk Harbor
[1:28:54]
was um brought out of the flood plane
[1:28:57]
elevation with Phil and uh this care of
[1:29:00]
most of the properties that have been
[1:29:01]
developed before uh before I was here at
[1:29:04]
the city um and my intention moving
[1:29:07]
forward is to uh keep managing these uh
[1:29:11]
this development properly and uh making
[1:29:13]
sure the proper documentation and
[1:29:16]
surveys are uh are are prepared as this
[1:29:20]
development moves forward so uh what
[1:29:23]
what sparked this inquiry and
[1:29:25]
development uh about flood plane
[1:29:27]
development here is um the doc project
[1:29:30]
that we have at molar Harbor and U you
[1:29:33]
know that will um I I think Chris Wallen
[1:29:37]
is here to elaborate on that doc project
[1:29:40]
um but I did want to answer any
[1:29:42]
questions that I could about um the
[1:29:45]
flood plane
[1:29:46]
management so um we all received an
[1:29:48]
email which prompted some of the
[1:29:50]
questions so at this point in time I
[1:29:51]
know do you had you have any specific
[1:29:53]
questions Mr man well from from the
[1:29:55]
email it looked like that there were
[1:29:57]
some concern um on on the part of the
[1:30:00]
state and so I wanted to you know kind
[1:30:03]
of understand that a little bit better
[1:30:05]
and where we were in that process and is
[1:30:08]
that going to hold up this price any way
[1:30:11]
so um I I'll I'll lean I'll lean to
[1:30:16]
Chris on the doc project he can follow
[1:30:18]
me up uh when we talk specifically about
[1:30:20]
the doc project um that plan is 100% and
[1:30:24]
he's very familiar with the U
[1:30:25]
engineering side of that um but I'll
[1:30:28]
pass it on answer that question okay so
[1:30:30]
the docs we are designed and we were
[1:30:33]
ready to go to bid however the dec
[1:30:35]
during their review asked for a flood
[1:30:39]
survey is make sure that the
[1:30:40]
installation of the peers they are 6
[1:30:42]
18in Piers they want to make sure that
[1:30:44]
that does not impact the uh flood
[1:30:47]
elevation the final flood elevation of
[1:30:49]
the river um we do not think there's
[1:30:51]
really any way that it could given that
[1:30:54]
they are 18in cylindrical round piers in
[1:30:55]
the River Bank however they want to see
[1:30:58]
the Cs they want to see us go through
[1:31:00]
that step I have a meeting with our
[1:31:02]
consultant Wednesday morning to go
[1:31:04]
through it but uh it's similar to um
[1:31:07]
what we had to do for Mohawk Harbor or
[1:31:09]
what GL group had to do for m haror just
[1:31:11]
on a much smaller scale we are going to
[1:31:13]
get there report so if you remember when
[1:31:16]
when we took Mohawk Harbor out of the
[1:31:19]
flood plane the now you're taking area
[1:31:22]
out of the flood plane that otherwise
[1:31:23]
would would flood so they want to make
[1:31:25]
sure you're not going to impact areas
[1:31:27]
that would flood and put your flooding
[1:31:29]
elsewhere that's why that when we raise
[1:31:31]
Mohawk Harbor's uh base elevation of
[1:31:34]
ground they also had to pull the River
[1:31:36]
Bank back because they had to do a
[1:31:38]
calculation to say that if we're going
[1:31:40]
to take away this volume we have to add
[1:31:42]
the volume in a similar capacity so that
[1:31:44]
we don't increase the risk of flooding
[1:31:46]
to The Stockade or to the surrounding
[1:31:48]
areas so it's a similar study just on a
[1:31:50]
much smaller scale that they have to do
[1:31:53]
because the rest of the the everything
[1:31:55]
else is not permanent the docks are
[1:31:57]
meant to float up or float down and then
[1:32:00]
in the winter season or non Canal season
[1:32:02]
are removed from the river so the only
[1:32:05]
thing that will be left in the river
[1:32:06]
permanently are these six cylindrical
[1:32:08]
Piers uh and they're actually existing
[1:32:11]
above What's called the average high
[1:32:12]
water mark so they're not actually in
[1:32:14]
the river but in a flood situation they
[1:32:17]
are in the flood so so that would be so
[1:32:20]
we have to do this additional Ser uh
[1:32:22]
this additional study it will delay us a
[1:32:24]
little bit but it is what it what was
[1:32:28]
requested anyone
[1:32:30]
else okay well thank
[1:32:33]
you thank you
[1:32:38]
Chris next committee is Public Safety so
[1:32:40]
I'd like to call to order to the Public
[1:32:42]
Safety Committee we have one item on the
[1:32:43]
agenda tonight that is revisiting a
[1:32:45]
discussion about reducing the city speed
[1:32:47]
limit to 25 M hour and other traffic
[1:32:49]
safety measures M Patrick yes thank you
[1:32:52]
um so we've been talking about this
[1:32:53]
since August of 2022 I'm hoping that we
[1:32:56]
will get to the point where we can
[1:32:58]
actually make a decision about whether
[1:33:00]
we're going to limit uh reduce the speed
[1:33:02]
limit to 25 miles hour um so uh I think
[1:33:06]
it was two meetings ago we requested
[1:33:08]
that U Mr wall and Mr Cannon and
[1:33:12]
um uh Lieutenant uh
[1:33:16]
Brian is it rle yeah boua uh would come
[1:33:21]
and talk with us today and U make some
[1:33:24]
commendations um about the reduction in
[1:33:26]
the speed limit so take it away Mr
[1:33:32]
W I will try to be brief uh but I this
[1:33:36]
is not so much that but so much a lot of
[1:33:39]
things all at once so I'm going to kind
[1:33:40]
of hit you with some information and
[1:33:42]
then you guys can think about the
[1:33:44]
information we can come back I do not
[1:33:46]
want you to think of this as a oneoff
[1:33:48]
I'm here every other week so you can
[1:33:50]
always ask for another update so we're
[1:33:52]
going to call this an update because
[1:33:54]
this is what we're going to do traffic
[1:33:55]
safety update I've been meeting now with
[1:33:57]
with uh Brian Canon and Brian bouga I
[1:34:00]
tried to print these for you uh but my
[1:34:02]
printer did not work with it and I can
[1:34:03]
hand it out in the future but this is
[1:34:06]
what I'm calling our Traffic Safety
[1:34:08]
update so I want to make sure we're
[1:34:10]
asking the right questions when we're
[1:34:12]
around this table the question shouldn't
[1:34:14]
be how do we reduce speed right it's how
[1:34:16]
do we increase safety so the number one
[1:34:18]
goal when you meet with the no we meet
[1:34:20]
with anybody is how do we reduce serious
[1:34:22]
injuries fatalities so speeding is a
[1:34:24]
part of that but the number one metric
[1:34:26]
that everyone uses is speed is serious
[1:34:28]
injuries fatalities then you have
[1:34:29]
speeding you have minor accidents and I
[1:34:31]
know around this table you also want to
[1:34:32]
reduce your complaints because that's
[1:34:34]
what we hear from here from the public
[1:34:36]
um we are not alone in this so I
[1:34:41]
am just part of a bigger Cog here so we
[1:34:44]
work with the dot we work with our no
[1:34:47]
which is the capital region
[1:34:48]
Transportation Council we work with
[1:34:50]
Federal highways we work with the CDTA
[1:34:52]
we work with the regional planning
[1:34:53]
commission and I'm sure I'm forgetting a
[1:34:55]
bunch of people you know we work with
[1:34:56]
the county we work with Community groups
[1:34:58]
but these are the main people um what
[1:35:00]
we're talking about is not a city issue
[1:35:03]
it is a national issue it is a state
[1:35:06]
issue it's a worldwide issue it's just
[1:35:08]
we're focused on the city so I don't do
[1:35:11]
this alone I have lots of people to
[1:35:12]
support me and this is also something
[1:35:14]
that lots of people are also working on
[1:35:16]
even in the city uh always talk about
[1:35:19]
the three E I am 1e I am engineering we
[1:35:23]
have education and we have enforcement
[1:35:26]
um education is always the hardest one
[1:35:29]
if everybody knew to cross on a
[1:35:31]
crosswalk and weight if everybody knew
[1:35:32]
to push a button if everybody drove the
[1:35:34]
speed limit you know sometimes what they
[1:35:36]
say is new laws are not the solution
[1:35:39]
just obey the laws that are there that's
[1:35:41]
tough all right and a lot of it falls on
[1:35:43]
engineering right if nobody's going to
[1:35:45]
obey the law if we don't have the staff
[1:35:47]
to enforce the law then we got to
[1:35:48]
engineer it so that people obey by the
[1:35:51]
law and that gets difficult
[1:35:54]
uh this is some data that the SPD
[1:35:56]
provided me I just wanted to show it um
[1:35:59]
this is a summary of the tickets issued
[1:36:01]
last year and where we are to date of
[1:36:03]
the tickets issue this year it's a lot
[1:36:05]
of information that's why I try to get
[1:36:06]
it in a print out for you but I will
[1:36:08]
express it but on the most part we seem
[1:36:12]
to be trending very similar um just to
[1:36:14]
let you know equipment I I had it you'll
[1:36:16]
see the kind of a um where is uh 20% and
[1:36:20]
20% so that's the numbers are actually
[1:36:22]
identical that year and equipment is um
[1:36:26]
too loud of a car muffler noise um and
[1:36:30]
then uh tinted glass things like that
[1:36:33]
that is what equipment is it's issues
[1:36:34]
with your vehicle and then right of way
[1:36:38]
is if you're driving the wrong way on a
[1:36:39]
road if you're cutting through a parking
[1:36:41]
lot if you're doing anything kind of in
[1:36:43]
the right away illegally but not within
[1:36:45]
essentially the road itself um that was
[1:36:47]
right away so those were the two that
[1:36:49]
aren't as self descriptive as as I like
[1:36:52]
but this is where we are today we use a
[1:36:54]
track system to do these things we've
[1:36:56]
also just signed up to make sure we have
[1:36:58]
it into uh the clear database which
[1:37:01]
tracks accidents in a geographic GIS
[1:37:03]
database and all this information is
[1:37:05]
being provided um to the mayor's office
[1:37:08]
for his reports and we are starting to
[1:37:10]
look at it for um future
[1:37:12]
implementation um this you know this is
[1:37:15]
one of the things I want to tell you
[1:37:16]
when I say that we're all working
[1:37:17]
together I had a meeting which I'll talk
[1:37:19]
about briefly but I had a meeting last
[1:37:21]
week at the no the capital reg
[1:37:23]
Transportation Council and this is the
[1:37:26]
information they have just for the
[1:37:27]
city's connected using the clear system
[1:37:29]
using all the data that's available they
[1:37:32]
already have areas here that are in the
[1:37:35]
city that they think are issues and they
[1:37:38]
want us to look at so I just take this
[1:37:40]
list and go one step further when I met
[1:37:42]
with them they were happy to see that I
[1:37:44]
I already know about this you don't know
[1:37:45]
we're working on this this just things
[1:37:46]
that we're doing so Crane Street Albany
[1:37:49]
Street that was on the top of their list
[1:37:50]
and they said hey do you want to do a
[1:37:51]
Lincoln study and I said we already
[1:37:53]
doing I said okay great they go what
[1:37:56]
about Eastern Avenue I go we already
[1:37:57]
replaced the signal with Eastern Avenue
[1:37:58]
they go okay now we're 0 for three right
[1:38:01]
Albany Str Brandy Wine North Elm we do
[1:38:03]
have an area there that we're looking at
[1:38:05]
that's the next phase of it but we
[1:38:07]
already did all uh Liberty that's the
[1:38:09]
same area with that um city is connected
[1:38:12]
down here the South Avenue Brandy Wine
[1:38:14]
we just did that that was an H project
[1:38:16]
so we don't have to go through the whole
[1:38:17]
list but it's just to show you that I
[1:38:18]
didn't generate this list this list was
[1:38:20]
generated by one of our third party that
[1:38:22]
is interested in all Al helping us get
[1:38:24]
highway safety money and seeing crashes
[1:38:27]
would you see potential for safety
[1:38:28]
Improvement so higher the number the
[1:38:30]
better and killed in seriously injured
[1:38:32]
down so this is a metric that they use
[1:38:34]
when they write giving us Federal money
[1:38:37]
um current tools these are all the
[1:38:40]
things that we're currently doing
[1:38:42]
enforcement we have PD we have radar
[1:38:44]
Science we just bought some more for
[1:38:46]
school zones we have variable message
[1:38:48]
radar signs there are the signs out
[1:38:50]
there that say high traffic area those
[1:38:53]
also have a radar component they can
[1:38:54]
take data we have the temporary speed
[1:38:57]
tables that we purchased and we have the
[1:38:59]
optical sensors aka the smart nodes that
[1:39:01]
we've deployed throughout the city um
[1:39:03]
all of these allow us to collect data
[1:39:06]
and to try to push everything together
[1:39:08]
uh even talking with Brian Canon he he
[1:39:10]
shared with me you know abundant amount
[1:39:12]
of data that the optical nodes uh gave
[1:39:14]
us for some of the areas that we were
[1:39:15]
looking at which broke down percentile
[1:39:18]
speeds average speeds high speeds so
[1:39:20]
that's what we're looking at those are
[1:39:22]
the tools that we currently have uh I
[1:39:24]
don't see anybody from SPD here but you
[1:39:27]
know always they always say they could
[1:39:28]
always use more enforcement so you know
[1:39:30]
more people on the street the more
[1:39:32]
enforcement that you have potential
[1:39:34]
tools all right these are kind of what
[1:39:36]
Cara would You' like to talk about so I
[1:39:38]
numbered them a little bit right so we
[1:39:40]
have the reduction of the Citywide speed
[1:39:42]
limit how do we do that City resolution
[1:39:45]
we have permanent speed tables how do we
[1:39:47]
do that I'd like to come up with a city
[1:39:49]
procedure and possibly a resolution
[1:39:51]
depending on what we need then we have
[1:39:53]
implementation of Red Lake cameras and
[1:39:55]
implementation of school zone cameras
[1:39:57]
both of these I don't have this tool I
[1:40:00]
think it's bigger but I know that we
[1:40:01]
talked about home rule last time but
[1:40:03]
it's something there so the number one
[1:40:06]
that we've been talking about for 2
[1:40:07]
years right the reduction of the speed
[1:40:09]
so like I said I had a meeting on August
[1:40:11]
15th with the capara transportation
[1:40:13]
Council and they're conducting about the
[1:40:14]
vision zero plan which was a federally
[1:40:16]
funded plan through the safy streets for
[1:40:18]
all grant program so we're part of that
[1:40:20]
plan which includes many safety metrics
[1:40:22]
which is also where that table came from
[1:40:25]
uh what they'd like to do is take a
[1:40:26]
couple select areas of the city look at
[1:40:28]
it do some reports and get some traffic
[1:40:30]
data on those areas one of the big
[1:40:32]
things that I want to share with you
[1:40:34]
that is going to help us with this is
[1:40:36]
that previously we have done a speed
[1:40:38]
study we did it on Kings Road and we did
[1:40:40]
it on Rugby Road and I sat here and I
[1:40:42]
said that using the do the New York
[1:40:45]
state do metrics it was not applicable
[1:40:48]
to reduce the speed on a road like K's
[1:40:51]
Road it didn't meet the metrics the Fed
[1:40:53]
Federal guidance is relaxed over the
[1:40:55]
state Guidance the federal guidance will
[1:40:58]
allow us to reduce speeds on roads like
[1:41:01]
kan's Road on roads like State Street on
[1:41:04]
those major roads so I'm going to show
[1:41:06]
you that what I want to do right now is
[1:41:08]
focus on the nonlocal so I'm going to
[1:41:10]
show you another this is called
[1:41:12]
functional class all right little lesson
[1:41:14]
in roadways a little bit all these
[1:41:16]
colorful roads are functional roads
[1:41:19]
they're arterials they're collectors you
[1:41:22]
know as the main road in the city if a
[1:41:24]
road on this map is not green blue or
[1:41:27]
red it's a local road if we were not the
[1:41:30]
city of skincity if we were the village
[1:41:32]
or town of
[1:41:33]
SKC we do not have the we would not have
[1:41:36]
the authority to change the speed limit
[1:41:38]
on a lot of these roads if you hear
[1:41:40]
about the town of East Green Bush
[1:41:43]
Village of Scotia any that reducing
[1:41:45]
their speed limit they do not have the
[1:41:46]
jurisdiction authority to reduce the
[1:41:48]
speed limit on County and state roads so
[1:41:50]
all they did is reduce it on local roads
[1:41:53]
if that's all you were asking as a
[1:41:55]
council was to reduce the speed liit on
[1:41:57]
local roads we could do it
[1:41:59]
today but I don't think that's a further
[1:42:02]
action you want to take cuz a local Road
[1:42:04]
and the roads are a little bit different
[1:42:05]
but I just wanted to show you the
[1:42:06]
difference I am not concerned about
[1:42:08]
local roads local roads should be 25 I
[1:42:11]
don't have a problem with that it's
[1:42:13]
these colorful roads that I just want to
[1:42:15]
make sure if we're doing this hopefully
[1:42:16]
one time everybody on the same page
[1:42:19]
reduction that I get these roads right
[1:42:22]
so then we get into oh it's gone I don't
[1:42:25]
know where it went to this is a map of
[1:42:26]
the city with these two roads and there
[1:42:28]
should be a map there but it's gone so
[1:42:30]
the two roads right now that Brian Canon
[1:42:32]
and I were looking at if you can use
[1:42:33]
your imagination are uh to be designated
[1:42:36]
as 30 this is what just based off of the
[1:42:38]
information that I have is right now
[1:42:41]
this red line you see here is State
[1:42:43]
Street that section of State Street goes
[1:42:45]
from the city line to Fair Avenue that
[1:42:47]
section of State Street is 35 mph is the
[1:42:51]
only and the longest section of the city
[1:42:52]
that 35 mph it is a commercial Corridor
[1:42:55]
and it is mostly commercial with very
[1:42:57]
little residential Brian and I talking
[1:43:00]
we did not feel that that section is
[1:43:02]
warranted to go down to 25 but we do
[1:43:05]
think that we could reduce it to 30
[1:43:07]
after Fair Avenue the character of the
[1:43:09]
street does change and we would be
[1:43:11]
looking to possibly go to a 25 or
[1:43:14]
possibly segment it more possibly like
[1:43:16]
mclen Street maybe you go 30 to mlen and
[1:43:19]
from mlen all the way to the city line
[1:43:21]
again at the Western Gateway Bridge go
[1:43:23]
close to 25 but these are the things I
[1:43:24]
wanted to talk about with the engineers
[1:43:27]
before we come to the council with
[1:43:28]
recommendation the other little squiggly
[1:43:30]
line you see up there that is Maxim Road
[1:43:33]
Extension Maxim Road Extension has no
[1:43:36]
residential it is a gateway to the city
[1:43:38]
it leads to Erie Boulevard which is
[1:43:40]
State controlled which has a 40 mph
[1:43:42]
Speedway so it would also if we were to
[1:43:45]
leave that it would also hopefully
[1:43:47]
funnel traffic away from such uh of the
[1:43:50]
residential districts and on the max in
[1:43:52]
two Boulevard in there um as you notice
[1:43:55]
I do not have Erie Boulevard on here
[1:43:58]
Erie Boulevard is an enigma to me we do
[1:44:01]
not own eie Boulevard from the
[1:44:03]
roundabout North we own eie Boulevard
[1:44:05]
from the roundabout South if this was 13
[1:44:09]
years ago before I was city engineer I
[1:44:11]
would tell you that I would not
[1:44:12]
recommend it be 25 mph I recommend it
[1:44:15]
would be 30 plus however we have seen
[1:44:18]
since I've been here and since the mayor
[1:44:20]
has been mayor and since a lot of us
[1:44:21]
have been here eie bouevard is really
[1:44:23]
transformed from commercial into
[1:44:25]
residential we have electric city we
[1:44:28]
have the apartments F Apartments uh
[1:44:31]
where the old car wash used to be now we
[1:44:32]
have wedgeway we have a lot more
[1:44:35]
residential on that area and also with
[1:44:37]
the density it's really anybody going
[1:44:40]
that fast during peak times I'm not sure
[1:44:42]
so that's an area I would like to look
[1:44:43]
at because it has transitioned from a
[1:44:46]
primarily commercial into a half
[1:44:48]
residential so I would like to look at
[1:44:50]
that area but this is what we're talking
[1:44:51]
about we're not talking about waving and
[1:44:53]
say everything's 25 I just want to look
[1:44:55]
at it and make sure that we're getting
[1:44:56]
it right and then this also goes into
[1:44:59]
what we talked about Brian and I about
[1:45:02]
signage where we have 30 mph zones will
[1:45:06]
affect where our signage is so if we
[1:45:09]
have a 30 hour street we have to make
[1:45:10]
sure that street is 30 so we still have
[1:45:12]
to change these signs cuz right now it
[1:45:13]
says 35 so all the 35s come down all the
[1:45:16]
30s come up Brian uh and I were talking
[1:45:19]
about the streets off of it we just want
[1:45:21]
to make sure uh if we put up those signs
[1:45:23]
that say 25 mph unless otherwise noted
[1:45:26]
do we need to put 25 on those streets
[1:45:29]
coming off I need to have a a
[1:45:30]
conversation about that and then Brian
[1:45:33]
uh has uh been working on with John
[1:45:35]
kucho on a number for the budget for
[1:45:37]
what we want and the number is not as
[1:45:40]
not as large as I had thought which is
[1:45:42]
good because I think that by doing more
[1:45:44]
we're lessening our load but it's still
[1:45:46]
not nothing if you wanted to talk about
[1:45:48]
it at all I mean it's just a quick
[1:45:53]
my estimation is around 15 to 20K 15 to
[1:45:57]
$20,000 upwards of $20,000 I'm hoping as
[1:46:00]
we get into things we can keep it a
[1:46:02]
little closer to the 15 but um crunching
[1:46:05]
the numbers I believe it's right in that
[1:46:07]
range that's
[1:46:10]
good uh so that's what we're looking at
[1:46:13]
with regard to speeds um we'll go to the
[1:46:16]
end but so this is where we are with
[1:46:17]
speed right now we're hoping to have
[1:46:19]
everything done by the end of this year
[1:46:20]
even though the vision zero plan is
[1:46:22]
actually going to go to June I asked him
[1:46:23]
to roll it up so that we have it and
[1:46:25]
we're working with him to make sure that
[1:46:26]
we get all of our signage and things in
[1:46:28]
place so the next thing tool two uh this
[1:46:31]
came up I wanted to make sure this is a
[1:46:32]
kind of a discussion Point speed tables
[1:46:35]
all right I remember the council asked
[1:46:36]
2022 2023 we wanted to implement a speed
[1:46:39]
table Wayne Avenue was our location for
[1:46:42]
the speed table uh this is just a map of
[1:46:44]
work it shows you can see uh MLK School
[1:46:47]
Dwayne Avenue and I'm calling them one
[1:46:49]
and two and then we have a stop sign in
[1:46:50]
the middle stop sign's important because
[1:46:52]
it's not a straight through you do have
[1:46:53]
to stop uh this is what the speed tables
[1:46:56]
look like uh they're very nice product
[1:46:58]
little labor intensive to put down but
[1:47:00]
once they're down they're down um but
[1:47:02]
and it is very we got the high
[1:47:03]
visibility one it's a very nice product
[1:47:06]
um PD did data pre and post using the
[1:47:10]
radar cameras uh and here is a summary
[1:47:13]
of what they have so I just wanted to i'
[1:47:17]
got a bunch of notes on here the period
[1:47:18]
data was taken in uh where it was it
[1:47:21]
July so no school but in July and then
[1:47:24]
the post data was in June school is in
[1:47:27]
session the following year after the
[1:47:29]
pumps were um if you notice the traffic
[1:47:31]
was actually up I just wanted you to
[1:47:33]
notice that because the volumes were up
[1:47:35]
not huge but up and the speeding numbers
[1:47:40]
and the average speeds were actually
[1:47:41]
down so we do think in the report that
[1:47:45]
SPD put together did deem that the speed
[1:47:48]
tables were effective so you could see
[1:47:50]
that we went from uh 11 % over to only
[1:47:55]
4% that's great our westbound similarly
[1:47:59]
westbound is always a little higher the
[1:48:01]
other part of it is our Peak speeds 70
[1:48:03]
mph down to 59 79 mph down to 61 and on
[1:48:09]
top of all this data that we have we did
[1:48:11]
not receive one complaint over the 3 and
[1:48:14]
1/2 month installation um and so I I
[1:48:17]
think that it was it was a good program
[1:48:20]
I think it's something that we have to
[1:48:21]
look at so I put this together right so
[1:48:25]
speed tables can provide traffic calming
[1:48:27]
and the right application so this is
[1:48:29]
where I would push back here right is
[1:48:31]
that I don't want to legislate for my
[1:48:33]
office does the city council want to
[1:48:35]
install permanent speed tables if we do
[1:48:38]
then the city myself and Brian and SPD
[1:48:42]
we can work together to give some
[1:48:44]
locations but if we are also going to
[1:48:47]
allow the public um I have an
[1:48:51]
example of uh you might have seen this a
[1:48:53]
couple years ago if you want to pass it
[1:48:54]
around one sheet of what I really would
[1:48:57]
like to get put into place for us to
[1:48:59]
adopt which is an implementation guide
[1:49:02]
this guide is what the city of Rochester
[1:49:04]
uses uh Chief Whipple found it last year
[1:49:08]
I think it is a just a terrific guide
[1:49:10]
for something so that we can control the
[1:49:13]
requests um of it you know if the city
[1:49:16]
if Brian and I and the police are going
[1:49:17]
to put something in and it's already
[1:49:19]
going to be based off of this
[1:49:20]
information so the city will be
[1:49:22]
following this information but we just
[1:49:25]
want to make sure that similarly to the
[1:49:26]
sidewalk program and things that if
[1:49:29]
somebody wants to request something that
[1:49:31]
it's done in a more of a cohesive
[1:49:32]
organized Manner and not at this table
[1:49:35]
and not through emails and maybe uh
[1:49:37]
what's the proceed click fix um the only
[1:49:40]
thing I do want to point out with this
[1:49:42]
is uh restrictions uh this is a nice
[1:49:45]
little map I put together quickly about
[1:49:48]
where right now I would not advise so we
[1:49:51]
have what's called priority streets in
[1:49:53]
the city priority streets are usually
[1:49:54]
come into effect when you plowing comes
[1:49:56]
you want you off the street when it's
[1:49:57]
plow but priority streets are also our
[1:50:00]
priority streets if you were to know
[1:50:02]
they're here they're most of our main
[1:50:04]
roads we also have an engineering What's
[1:50:06]
called the primary Street which is
[1:50:07]
essentially an expansion of the primary
[1:50:09]
Street Network it's just not uh as
[1:50:11]
important for the plow routs and these
[1:50:14]
are the roads in the city that I would
[1:50:16]
recommend that if we're putting together
[1:50:18]
some legislation to say it that we would
[1:50:21]
these are off limits we can do maybe
[1:50:23]
other traffic calming measures but that
[1:50:26]
speed tables and speed humps we remove
[1:50:29]
that from the and I I tried to be I
[1:50:32]
tried to be judicious with it you know I
[1:50:33]
try to you know like where do you go we
[1:50:35]
can talk about it Norwood you know right
[1:50:37]
by Mount Pleasant Norwood is feeding
[1:50:39]
it's not a primary it's not a priority
[1:50:42]
that could be a main road that we look
[1:50:43]
at doing something like that about
[1:50:45]
working with the school district there
[1:50:47]
are roads secondary roads like that that
[1:50:49]
could be affected with feed buds but I
[1:50:51]
just want to make sure that we're doing
[1:50:52]
it in a way and I I can't deny that the
[1:50:55]
they did work they they did work in the
[1:50:58]
right application so I don't want to
[1:50:59]
take that off I just want to talk about
[1:51:01]
that and then the last thing that we
[1:51:04]
have tools three and four they're speed
[1:51:07]
enforcement cameras and speed
[1:51:09]
enforcement uh both for red lights and
[1:51:11]
school zones I talked to Bill Trudeau
[1:51:13]
who is the signal superintendent in the
[1:51:15]
city of Albany uh he has been there for
[1:51:17]
I believe 30 plus years uh he says that
[1:51:20]
they do have 20 and they were legisl for
[1:51:23]
20 in school zone so they have 20 and 20
[1:51:25]
um they had to pick what school zones
[1:51:27]
they're just going into this year I
[1:51:29]
believe this is going to be their first
[1:51:30]
year with them but the uh red light
[1:51:32]
cameras at the intersection have been
[1:51:34]
functioning so this is a tool that we
[1:51:36]
currently don't have but it's something
[1:51:38]
that if we feel that it's effective we
[1:51:40]
could make an effort for but I don't
[1:51:41]
have the road map to get to this um so
[1:51:45]
with that that's my quick as quick as I
[1:51:48]
can be of of speed safety in the area um
[1:51:52]
we are starting to meet more regularly I
[1:51:55]
am meeting with the no I think that
[1:51:56]
Vision zero plan is good um but I I just
[1:52:01]
want to you know like these are things
[1:52:02]
like I tried to show on that slide that
[1:52:04]
my office and with Brian coming on board
[1:52:06]
these are things we're already doing
[1:52:07]
we've already take traffic and safety
[1:52:10]
and you know we kind of lead the region
[1:52:12]
in federal aid money AIT money safety
[1:52:15]
money but it's something that it's like
[1:52:17]
drinking from a fire hose there's going
[1:52:18]
to be there's a lot of need in the city
[1:52:20]
but we are trying to do it so um in this
[1:52:23]
presentation I can update it we can try
[1:52:25]
to go forward uh a lot of the
[1:52:27]
information is going to be updated in
[1:52:28]
the mayor's uh monthly smart cities
[1:52:30]
reports going forward so that could be
[1:52:32]
made available for his office so I guess
[1:52:35]
I'll open it up to the questions at the
[1:52:37]
time as always thank you that was a nice
[1:52:39]
thorough presentation and then I think
[1:52:41]
it very much highlighted that to your
[1:52:43]
point there's already measures being
[1:52:44]
taken by the city and I thought the
[1:52:47]
other um foot stomp that I would make is
[1:52:49]
that this is not an issue uh that
[1:52:53]
disconnect the and of itself is is is
[1:52:54]
only experiencing this is a national
[1:52:56]
issue so at that time I'd like to open
[1:52:58]
up to any questions or comments as far
[1:53:00]
yeah so Echo I'm that I'm wonderful uh
[1:53:03]
very informed presentation so the
[1:53:05]
question is um so there's some things
[1:53:09]
that are in our control right there are
[1:53:10]
some things that we can do as far as the
[1:53:11]
speed tables which I think was a really
[1:53:13]
you know showed them to be quite
[1:53:15]
effective um when I'm thinking about
[1:53:17]
like some place like Kings Road in
[1:53:19]
particular which um is you know extreme
[1:53:22]
high traffic Ro so my question is we're
[1:53:26]
talking about the possibility of
[1:53:29]
reducing uh Citywide uh speed
[1:53:33]
limit I'm saying all so what type of
[1:53:36]
graduated interventions would be
[1:53:38]
appropriate for a place like King's Road
[1:53:40]
because talking to Residents is
[1:53:43]
is there was like request for a stop
[1:53:45]
sign more than overall reduction of uh
[1:53:50]
of the speed l in that are are in
[1:53:52]
particular so I'm wondering like through
[1:53:55]
the course of that traffic study that we
[1:53:57]
did um did it meet the requirements for
[1:54:00]
maybe a stop sign there instead of um
[1:54:03]
asward doing this more comprehensive
[1:54:05]
piece yeah so that's one thing stop
[1:54:08]
signs are not on my list of tools
[1:54:10]
because they're not a tool and we did
[1:54:12]
look at it um it did not meet the the
[1:54:15]
Merit for a stop sign um I have a hard
[1:54:18]
time I talked about this with Brian and
[1:54:20]
I've talked about this a little bit
[1:54:21]
internally is that um as a Judicial body
[1:54:25]
of the city of SKC you are in your own
[1:54:27]
right to put a stop sign up it is in the
[1:54:30]
city of connected however as the city
[1:54:32]
engineer with a license I cannot sign
[1:54:34]
off that it would be a compliant
[1:54:37]
mutcd stop sign however I've sent
[1:54:39]
articles out municipalities have done
[1:54:41]
this you know people have said that it's
[1:54:43]
in the greater need of the community
[1:54:45]
that we put this up and that that's what
[1:54:47]
we go we go forward with as a stop sign
[1:54:49]
um we would prefer uh Brian and I were
[1:54:51]
talking about just a little bit is that
[1:54:53]
um now with this once again another tool
[1:54:55]
is that Kings Road with the dot measures
[1:54:58]
was not able to technically be reduced
[1:55:01]
but with the federal measures we now can
[1:55:03]
reduce the speed on King's Road um we
[1:55:06]
did just put up a new signage on Kings
[1:55:08]
Road slow signage on the Kings Road last
[1:55:11]
week so we would like to see that
[1:55:13]
between the reduction of the speed limit
[1:55:14]
on that road if it's recommended which
[1:55:16]
most likely will go that route and then
[1:55:18]
the new signage what what happens there
[1:55:21]
we did put the crosswalk there we have
[1:55:23]
tried to make it you know narrower we do
[1:55:24]
have the guide rail you know we're we're
[1:55:26]
trying to put all the tools up there
[1:55:27]
that we can I believe the police have
[1:55:29]
had radar signs up there um but the stop
[1:55:33]
sign is not one of them that's why it
[1:55:34]
was specifically left out and it has
[1:55:36]
been discussed a couple of times K says
[1:55:39]
the speed tables wouldn't be appropriate
[1:55:41]
for King's Road I don't think speed
[1:55:42]
tables would be appropriate for K's Road
[1:55:47]
no what have we done or is there more we
[1:55:50]
could do on in the way of public ation
[1:55:53]
and put the message out there speed
[1:55:56]
kills and other campaign you know one of
[1:56:00]
the groups that I'm involved in that I
[1:56:01]
didn't have up there I actually meant to
[1:56:02]
is like the governor's traffic safety
[1:56:04]
board and some of the county sheriffs
[1:56:06]
and they do a lot of they uh I was on
[1:56:08]
the uh committee that started the
[1:56:10]
CNBC uh campaign and that started with h
[1:56:13]
money for Central Avenue 8 years ago and
[1:56:16]
that's been pretty successful I mean if
[1:56:17]
we need materials the state uh the state
[1:56:21]
office will give us all the materials I
[1:56:23]
know that uh SPD does um I don't want to
[1:56:26]
call it fake ticketing I don't know the
[1:56:27]
word that they call but they they go out
[1:56:29]
and they'll do like an educational
[1:56:30]
ticketing thing uh also the sheriff's
[1:56:32]
office has done that where they'll
[1:56:34]
actually if they catch you jaywalking
[1:56:36]
they'll give you like a CNBC ticket
[1:56:38]
which is kind of like a a fake ticket to
[1:56:40]
say Hey you know this is a a violation
[1:56:43]
you should cross in the crosswalk things
[1:56:45]
like that so like I said there are a lot
[1:56:46]
of Partners out there um um one of the
[1:56:49]
areas that the sheriff's office at are
[1:56:51]
are monthly meeting was is you know up
[1:56:53]
Division Street which was on the list by
[1:56:55]
the McDonald's and the bus stop you know
[1:56:58]
that is a really heavy area for
[1:56:59]
pedestrian traffic they go up there they
[1:57:01]
do targeted areas up there to try to do
[1:57:03]
enforcement and education uh events
[1:57:05]
that's one of the also the reasons that
[1:57:07]
we're looking at working with the CDTA
[1:57:09]
which is why it's up there to try to you
[1:57:11]
know move the bus stops to try to stop
[1:57:13]
all the different things there because
[1:57:15]
we have people running around buses um
[1:57:18]
but education would be great I I don't
[1:57:19]
know if you wanted to well yeah I I I
[1:57:21]
did not have a chance I was hoping to do
[1:57:23]
that before today's meeting but one of
[1:57:25]
the ideas which I thought was I was
[1:57:27]
trying to think outside the box and be a
[1:57:29]
little creative I ran it by Chris cuz I
[1:57:31]
thought maybe this is a little too wacky
[1:57:33]
Chris actually didn't think it was too
[1:57:35]
wacky so um you know I don't know if
[1:57:38]
anyone has ever taken a defensive
[1:57:40]
driving class um I took my last one
[1:57:42]
during covid when we first started at
[1:57:44]
covid um you know sitting there I
[1:57:47]
figured okay don't really have a lot
[1:57:49]
that I can do today I'm going to do this
[1:57:50]
defensive driving I definitely noticed a
[1:57:53]
change in my behavior after I took that
[1:57:55]
defensive driving class so one of the
[1:57:57]
ideas that I had was trying to see
[1:58:00]
whether I could get um a defensive
[1:58:03]
driving
[1:58:04]
course taught for free so in other words
[1:58:08]
like you can get defensive driving
[1:58:09]
through AAA you can get it in a number
[1:58:11]
of places I was hoping that maybe I
[1:58:14]
could get it so that either we would
[1:58:17]
think about putting a certain pot of
[1:58:19]
money together when we do our budgeting
[1:58:21]
for
[1:58:22]
2025 um where maybe we would pay for
[1:58:25]
defensive driving or if I could just get
[1:58:27]
somebody to actually donate the
[1:58:29]
defensive driving um that if we could do
[1:58:33]
that as an incentive to get people to
[1:58:35]
take the defensive driving that at least
[1:58:37]
it might be one dent in that was no pun
[1:58:40]
intended but one way of trying to get
[1:58:43]
people to think more about their driving
[1:58:45]
habits um I know that um when I first
[1:58:48]
started this back in August of 2022 the
[1:58:51]
first people called were the were you
[1:58:53]
know the chief of police because I did
[1:58:56]
you know didn't know if it was just
[1:58:57]
crazy the crazy idea also around
[1:59:00]
lowering the speed limit the chief
[1:59:02]
really felt that if we could lower the
[1:59:04]
speed limit um that maybe we'd get
[1:59:08]
people going 30 if the speed limit was
[1:59:10]
25 it also might be easier for them to
[1:59:13]
um again if people were going um let's
[1:59:16]
say 40 in a 25 mph speed zone the police
[1:59:20]
have more latitude in terms of ticketing
[1:59:23]
um which hopefully then would also be a
[1:59:25]
deterrent and might help to change some
[1:59:27]
of these behavior um because I I
[1:59:29]
definitely agree Chris mentioned this
[1:59:31]
earlier that out of those those ease
[1:59:33]
that we've heard about now several times
[1:59:35]
over the last couple of years education
[1:59:37]
and behavioral change is going to be the
[1:59:40]
toughest part of this um so um that was
[1:59:45]
that was the one idea that I had shared
[1:59:46]
with Chris the other day and I will
[1:59:48]
bring this up it is not in the
[1:59:49]
presentation but stay tuned for future
[1:59:51]
presentations cuz it's going to be a
[1:59:52]
bigger issue is that there's a new
[1:59:54]
buzzword out there called micr mobility
[1:59:57]
and micr Mobility is electronic scooters
[2:00:01]
skateboards Halls Wheels bikes it's all
[2:00:06]
of the things that go 30 mph and are not
[2:00:09]
registered vehicles and I don't want to
[2:00:12]
you know that's an entirely side
[2:00:14]
conversation but it is also part of this
[2:00:18]
because it's unregistered vehicles at
[2:00:21]
speeds on sidewalks on roads and it does
[2:00:25]
affect uh traffic and safety so as a
[2:00:29]
region we bring it up we're trying to
[2:00:30]
figure it out I know SPD has a hard time
[2:00:33]
with it because there's classifications
[2:00:35]
there's a lot of things that go into it
[2:00:37]
but that eventually will be up here and
[2:00:39]
I don't know what the pool will be but
[2:00:41]
more and more you're going to be seeing
[2:00:42]
that and that that's the term of it is
[2:00:44]
called micromobility yeah that
[2:00:46]
definitely has to be something that we
[2:00:48]
take on as well moving forward any of
[2:00:52]
questions or comments M so Mr Wallen um
[2:00:55]
so you talked about a couple things that
[2:00:57]
could happen and our our real goal that
[2:01:00]
we were trying to get to 25 mil an hour
[2:01:01]
but you also talked about these speed
[2:01:03]
tables so incrementally is there
[2:01:05]
anything that we can do to can and the
[2:01:08]
defensive driving actually I like I
[2:01:09]
don't know about the money
[2:01:10]
car but um I think that's a good idea
[2:01:13]
and I'm wondering if insur if it impact
[2:01:15]
people's Insurance in a positive way
[2:01:17]
well it would I mean if you take
[2:01:19]
defensive driving for 3 years after you
[2:01:21]
take it
[2:01:22]
you get a discount on your insurance so
[2:01:24]
that can be their incentive as
[2:01:26]
well we don't have can't give you money
[2:01:29]
it definitely will take your insurance
[2:01:31]
down so uh incrementally are there
[2:01:33]
things we can do in in what short time
[2:01:36]
frame in terms of the speed tables and
[2:01:38]
also the um lowering the speed limit I
[2:01:40]
know you didn't want to do that
[2:01:41]
individually but yeah so lowering the
[2:01:43]
speed limit I mean I would really like I
[2:01:46]
know that you could just have patience
[2:01:47]
and bear with me as I go through with
[2:01:49]
the engineers and Brian because it's
[2:01:50]
there and we will we'll get and I I can
[2:01:52]
even run some of this through them to
[2:01:53]
see if we can do it faster but in the
[2:01:56]
shorter term things that we can control
[2:01:59]
um you know take Dwayne Avenue with the
[2:02:01]
speed table so I showed you the results
[2:02:05]
I don't have any complaints we do not
[2:02:07]
have any permanent speed tables in the
[2:02:09]
area I would prefer that if we were to
[2:02:12]
put speed tables in they come with some
[2:02:14]
kind of a documented support from the
[2:02:17]
council that says that you are okay with
[2:02:19]
the implementation of these speed tables
[2:02:22]
and that's kind of what I'm looking for
[2:02:23]
is the procedures in it I do not believe
[2:02:26]
and I can look that there's anything in
[2:02:28]
the city Charter that says that the city
[2:02:30]
engineer can put speet tables in I'm
[2:02:32]
sure you could find some language that
[2:02:34]
says anything in his discretion but I
[2:02:37]
would just like to have the support like
[2:02:39]
you know if we're going to move forward
[2:02:40]
if we want to put that in permanently we
[2:02:43]
can move forward with in the spring I
[2:02:45]
know it's almost po but putting those in
[2:02:47]
permanently coming up with standards
[2:02:48]
we're going to need markers on either
[2:02:50]
side for plows right we're going to need
[2:02:52]
reflectors we're going to need to make
[2:02:54]
sure you know but to that could be a
[2:02:57]
step that the the committee can take or
[2:02:58]
the council can take as well as if we
[2:03:01]
want to entertain a form like Rochester
[2:03:04]
if we want to entertain allowing us to
[2:03:06]
move forward internally with identifying
[2:03:09]
a couple other locations and and doing
[2:03:11]
programs like this to to do that and
[2:03:13]
coming back because right now that was a
[2:03:15]
was a test it was a pilot program pilot
[2:03:19]
program's over it didn't seem effective
[2:03:21]
I just don't know how move forward any
[2:03:23]
other questions or comments Tor uh thank
[2:03:26]
you yes thank you Chris um so I know
[2:03:28]
since we purchased the first one you had
[2:03:30]
mentioned in Prior meetings that the
[2:03:32]
cost has gone up substantially with the
[2:03:35]
um with the with the cost of them how
[2:03:38]
much of the speed tables themselves okay
[2:03:40]
they're not I don't I don't I wouldn't
[2:03:42]
worry about the cost of them necessarily
[2:03:44]
I mean if we're going to buy another set
[2:03:45]
of them we have a set we just need to
[2:03:47]
find the right spot to put them in based
[2:03:49]
off of this information and I can I can
[2:03:51]
bring that to you
[2:03:52]
um but when they do work you know
[2:03:54]
because this will be
[2:03:56]
a I'm I'm I don't know how to to control
[2:03:59]
the floodgates necessarily if you were
[2:04:00]
to go to Albany and go into the Arbor
[2:04:03]
Hill Neighborhood I believe they spent a
[2:04:04]
million dollars putting in speed tables
[2:04:07]
throughout the Arbor Hill Neighborhood
[2:04:09]
so once again is that is a commitment of
[2:04:11]
City funds that currently you don't have
[2:04:13]
in front of you so if we're going to do
[2:04:15]
that you're going to say Chris we
[2:04:18]
usually Bond you a million5 dollars to
[2:04:20]
pave City roads we want to take a
[2:04:23]
percentage of that and we want you to
[2:04:24]
put it in the speed tables all right
[2:04:26]
there's no funding source out there that
[2:04:28]
I'm aware of I can see if H funding is
[2:04:30]
available but you know everything we do
[2:04:32]
has a repercussion from somewhere else
[2:04:35]
and if we do Dwayne Avenue what's to say
[2:04:37]
that a neighboring Street will not want
[2:04:40]
something similar if you're going to see
[2:04:41]
it and then that's how you know when
[2:04:43]
Arbor Hill they did multiple streets so
[2:04:46]
we have one it was a school zone it was
[2:04:48]
picked because it was cut through it's a
[2:04:49]
good Street um you know Tri Street which
[2:04:52]
is right identified next to it that
[2:04:54]
traffic cing is going to be different
[2:04:55]
that traffic cing is we're narrowing the
[2:04:57]
road significantly we're putting that
[2:04:59]
cycle track and you know we're going to
[2:05:00]
be doing landscaping so that's a
[2:05:02]
different type of
[2:05:05]
traffic um I usually like reserving my
[2:05:07]
questions to the end but because they're
[2:05:08]
related can you talk around the
[2:05:10]
turnaround time of installing them and
[2:05:12]
then any maintenance issues that you
[2:05:13]
identified on this test of installing a
[2:05:16]
speed HP I do not think they would be um
[2:05:20]
a long lead time to install it is uh
[2:05:23]
typically they're asphalt we could look
[2:05:25]
to do it in the concrete um but I
[2:05:27]
believe albes are all asphalt um if we
[2:05:30]
were to design and put out a bid we
[2:05:32]
could probably put them in this year but
[2:05:34]
I don't know if that would be something
[2:05:35]
that we would put it in just in time for
[2:05:37]
clouds
[2:05:39]
um but it is literally you would Mill
[2:05:41]
out a keyway in the location then you
[2:05:44]
would put um probably some dowels to get
[2:05:46]
it down and then you would just form it
[2:05:48]
with asphalt which is hand work but it
[2:05:50]
could be done and then then we'd have to
[2:05:52]
see if we' like to paint it and that was
[2:05:53]
something then we'd have to maintain the
[2:05:55]
paint but we definitely would want if
[2:05:56]
you were to go to um Colony they have
[2:06:00]
indicators on both sides and then they
[2:06:02]
have a sign ahead that says you know
[2:06:03]
bump ahead you know we just have to put
[2:06:05]
that package together similar to a
[2:06:07]
school zone so we have a speed table
[2:06:10]
package and it it anything can be done
[2:06:13]
it's really I mean this is pretty
[2:06:14]
standard to uh the mutcd books and
[2:06:16]
things for when you have it um so I'm
[2:06:19]
not I'm not too concerned about it it's
[2:06:20]
just when
[2:06:22]
and uh you know one I I can afford a
[2:06:25]
dozen now we're starting to get into
[2:06:27]
impacting other things in the budget
[2:06:29]
then uh just the second part of that the
[2:06:31]
maintenance issues does it permanently
[2:06:32]
alter like the Integrity of the roadway
[2:06:34]
or was that something that you didn't
[2:06:35]
identify as an issue no it it would only
[2:06:38]
alter that that location spe bump would
[2:06:41]
be and it would be it would be intergal
[2:06:42]
itself it would only be if we did
[2:06:44]
concrete it would be you know its own
[2:06:46]
its own thing which might which might be
[2:06:48]
where we go with it to make it last a
[2:06:49]
little longer any other questions m p so
[2:06:52]
it does seem first of all thank you I
[2:06:54]
know how much time you put into this and
[2:06:55]
I really appreciate it um it would
[2:06:58]
obviously have budget implications I'm
[2:07:00]
looking at Mr Ferrari because I know he
[2:07:02]
doesn't like budget implications um but
[2:07:05]
obviously um whether it was speed tables
[2:07:08]
whether it's enforcement whether it's um
[2:07:10]
you know uh the the the the lights all
[2:07:15]
the things on the lights I mean how are
[2:07:18]
we able to come up with those sort of
[2:07:20]
budget Pro jections in terms of what we
[2:07:22]
would need to if we were looking at this
[2:07:25]
comprehensively um as you just did um as
[2:07:28]
opposed to just the speed limit um are
[2:07:30]
we able to you know put that kind of
[2:07:32]
packaging together in time for how it
[2:07:35]
would impact the 2025 budget and what we
[2:07:38]
would need to discuss for the 2021
[2:07:43]
budget I would I would probably start
[2:07:45]
with talking with Bill and Albany I
[2:07:47]
believe when you set up these speed
[2:07:48]
cameras there is more of a agreement
[2:07:51]
part of it where the company that you
[2:07:53]
sign up to do it it's like a revenue
[2:07:54]
share to pay for somebody operating it
[2:07:56]
so I would have to but I believe that's
[2:07:59]
how that was set up um one of the things
[2:08:02]
I I'll share with this this was an
[2:08:03]
interesting one that we would just have
[2:08:05]
to work through the logistic is
[2:08:06]
apparently there is a law that with this
[2:08:10]
school zone speed cameras they have to
[2:08:12]
issue the tickets within 14 days or the
[2:08:15]
ticket is null and that is done by the
[2:08:18]
police department so they're trying to
[2:08:20]
figure out you know the resources to
[2:08:23]
make sure that they can turn around
[2:08:24]
those tickets in a time that's adequate
[2:08:26]
to be able to get it out so that's one
[2:08:28]
of the things that they're looking at is
[2:08:29]
that okay they're anticipating that when
[2:08:31]
they get up there for the first couple
[2:08:33]
of months the tickets are going to go
[2:08:35]
high high generation of tickets and now
[2:08:37]
they have to go through get them all out
[2:08:39]
so that's a that is a a labor question
[2:08:42]
that they have right
[2:08:44]
now and you know if you if you guide me
[2:08:47]
that way I will ask the questions and
[2:08:49]
get the information like I said this is
[2:08:51]
a Sandbox that I play in so I I know to
[2:08:55]
get it but it's just what what do we
[2:08:56]
want to do and then like you said if we
[2:08:59]
if we were to bond you know you're going
[2:09:00]
to come to the capital budget and if I
[2:09:01]
put a bond of $1.5 million which is what
[2:09:04]
a typical amount is that we would do
[2:09:06]
annually um the speed tables can come
[2:09:09]
out of that bonded money um that is an
[2:09:11]
equ to come out of that but once again
[2:09:13]
is you're you're not doing something on
[2:09:15]
a road otherwise you're you're you're
[2:09:17]
allocating the money differently which
[2:09:18]
is fine I mean it's all for the benefit
[2:09:20]
of the city but there is no nothing else
[2:09:24]
new everything's getting allocated
[2:09:26]
different any other questions or
[2:09:31]
comments so with that being said I just
[2:09:33]
wanted to clarify one point you made you
[2:09:35]
said with respect to lowering the speed
[2:09:37]
limit to 25 mph you were asking for
[2:09:39]
additional time to see out that studies
[2:09:41]
the of the year is that correct yes so
[2:09:44]
the recommendation from our city
[2:09:45]
engineer is to pause and allow him time
[2:09:47]
to continue that work how does everyone
[2:09:49]
feel about that
[2:09:52]
my hair has only gotten grayer no only
[2:09:54]
kidding but um I mean if we need to do
[2:09:56]
that we need to do that um but um yeah I
[2:10:03]
mean um but to your point Miss Patrick
[2:10:05]
uh we have a proven method that does
[2:10:07]
work so those speed tables I I know
[2:10:09]
we're trying to weigh costs as we enter
[2:10:12]
another budget season but I think with
[2:10:14]
respect to loss of life I think this is
[2:10:17]
not uh a complicated issue I think it's
[2:10:20]
more or less just how we make those
[2:10:21]
concessions with our other ask that we
[2:10:23]
have with regards to the budget in the
[2:10:24]
city and then asking our residents to
[2:10:27]
understand if we are positioning money
[2:10:29]
to affect change in this one area that
[2:10:32]
might come at an expense to others
[2:10:34]
because we cannot view everything uh so
[2:10:36]
he making sure there's a lot of
[2:10:37]
realization and understanding that the
[2:10:39]
enforcement and Engineering are aspects
[2:10:41]
that we can control but that education
[2:10:43]
is a collective
[2:10:46]
responsibility so we can take these
[2:10:48]
steps but if the community is not
[2:10:49]
working collaboratively with us
[2:10:51]
and it will all be for and we'll be
[2:10:53]
addressing the next micro mobility issue
[2:10:56]
as it comes in a decade or so oh that's
[2:10:58]
going to come soon yeah sooner than a
[2:11:00]
DEC that's way sooner than yeah
[2:11:04]
um would you like me to move forward
[2:11:06]
with trying to create a city of connty
[2:11:08]
procedure
[2:11:11]
yes I say yes
[2:11:16]
yes I say
[2:11:18]
yes and then I did want to get a
[2:11:20]
clarification you said if we elected to
[2:11:22]
today we could put aop a stop sign on
[2:11:24]
King's Road the issue was whether it be
[2:11:27]
effective or not can you just clarify or
[2:11:29]
did I not hear that
[2:11:31]
correctly be
[2:11:34]
effective well you said in the beginning
[2:11:36]
so I I I know I I'm trying to be nice
[2:11:39]
and uh what was the word neutral with
[2:11:42]
the word is that the the article like I
[2:11:44]
sent out regarding the the town Bor and
[2:11:47]
bson Spa whatever their elected body is
[2:11:49]
is that they thought it was in the best
[2:11:50]
interest of the town and for town Safety
[2:11:53]
to put that stop sign there even though
[2:11:55]
they acknowledge that it did not meet
[2:11:57]
the criteria laid out by the
[2:11:59]
mutcd and that was how it was worded and
[2:12:02]
that's how it was stated as they wanted
[2:12:03]
to put it there because they felt it was
[2:12:05]
in the best interest of the Town um and
[2:12:08]
that's what I am saying is that you know
[2:12:09]
there's a lot of we just went through
[2:12:11]
some language here and I was reading out
[2:12:13]
on federal highways that states that the
[2:12:15]
jurisdiction ultimately has authority
[2:12:17]
over their jurisdiction you know the
[2:12:19]
mutcd is a manual it's not they're not
[2:12:21]
going to come out and cut it down in the
[2:12:23]
Boston spot article the dot acknowledged
[2:12:25]
that they would not put that stop sign
[2:12:27]
there but that the town has the
[2:12:29]
authority to do so me being a licensed
[2:12:32]
engineer I would prefer not to do things
[2:12:35]
contrary to the manual that you know I
[2:12:38]
want to school for so that is why you
[2:12:41]
know we we're I'm just trying I'm not
[2:12:42]
trying to to say that it's not possible
[2:12:45]
it's impossible for you to do it if you
[2:12:46]
do it you're going to get arrested
[2:12:47]
they're going to tear it down it's
[2:12:49]
impossible to do I'm just saying that
[2:12:50]
you not get a letter of recommendation
[2:12:52]
for me to put that stop sign there
[2:12:55]
because it's not not one of the tools
[2:12:56]
it's not one of the things that we do as
[2:12:57]
Engineers to control traffic but if you
[2:13:01]
believe it is affected it has been done
[2:13:04]
you will find stop signs you will find
[2:13:06]
signals in this city that have been put
[2:13:08]
up for reasons like this so that that's
[2:13:11]
where I'm trying to to put it the power
[2:13:13]
can still be at this table it does not
[2:13:15]
have to come through me to to do
[2:13:17]
something like this you know we have
[2:13:18]
signal superintendent we have the
[2:13:20]
ability to do things and they that's
[2:13:24]
what I kind of just wanted to make sure
[2:13:25]
everybody's aware of is that by me
[2:13:26]
saying that I don't support it does not
[2:13:28]
mean saying that anyone is going to come
[2:13:30]
and say it is
[2:13:31]
illegal thank you uh any other questions
[2:13:34]
there Mr Tor oh yes just relating to
[2:13:36]
that thank you um what would be the
[2:13:37]
legality of if we you know assigned a
[2:13:40]
stop sign to King's Road um and there's
[2:13:42]
a got terrible accident there and it's
[2:13:46]
not under any guidelines
[2:13:53]
I it's it's got to be the
[2:13:57]
guidelines for stop
[2:14:01]
sign
[2:14:06]
yeah to make it legal to make it legal
[2:14:09]
well I think it would be a mute point
[2:14:10]
also I don't see an Ence of as
[2:14:12]
completely disregarding or contradicting
[2:14:14]
your
[2:14:16]
recommendation Mr those type of
[2:14:19]
situations
[2:14:21]
hypothetically as opposed to any
[2:14:23]
particular site you put a stop sign up
[2:14:26]
where it's not recommended or the
[2:14:28]
studies don't support it you're going to
[2:14:31]
tend to see an increase in the rear end
[2:14:33]
collisions you're going to get they may
[2:14:35]
not be horrific accidents but you get
[2:14:39]
personal injury accidents you get damage
[2:14:42]
to cars you get people who do suffer
[2:14:45]
some uh injury as a result of somebody
[2:14:48]
stopping they're not geared to stop they
[2:14:51]
run into them and those things also over
[2:14:55]
time tend to decrease but the initial
[2:14:59]
placement of it tends to create more
[2:15:03]
events than not having it there thank
[2:15:06]
you Mr Mayor thanks Mr yeah regarding
[2:15:09]
the table in you know traffic table cing
[2:15:12]
device um I would recommend that maybe
[2:15:15]
you do it by ordinance giving the city
[2:15:18]
engineer the authority to uh develop a
[2:15:21]
policy that from time to time will be
[2:15:23]
updated according to the standards of
[2:15:25]
the uh Traffic Safety uh community that
[2:15:29]
way it's it gives him the city engineer
[2:15:32]
flexibility to update that anytime it is
[2:15:35]
updated it's brought back to the council
[2:15:37]
but just to delegate that and that if
[2:15:40]
you're being Comm if you're committing
[2:15:41]
to that table those traffic humming
[2:15:44]
devices um in the in the budget process
[2:15:48]
um that that would probably be a good
[2:15:50]
time to do it because then you're really
[2:15:52]
making the commitment you're making
[2:15:54]
we're going to spend x amount of dollars
[2:15:56]
for these types of devices and as such
[2:15:58]
we're delegating or not delegating we're
[2:16:01]
empowering or clarifying or uh clearly
[2:16:04]
setting forth that the uh the city
[2:16:07]
engineer has the authority and working
[2:16:09]
with the signals people and the police
[2:16:11]
department to develop this um standards
[2:16:15]
that will be PR presented to the council
[2:16:18]
and updated from time to time it's
[2:16:19]
necessary notice to the
[2:16:22]
council so always like asking before
[2:16:25]
designor ass signing work is that a
[2:16:26]
product your office can take on creating
[2:16:29]
that that language that
[2:16:32]
narrative creating the language
[2:16:35]
just the ordinance and and regarding a
[2:16:39]
policy we can work with the the engineer
[2:16:41]
office regarding that that we have a as
[2:16:44]
as Mr wall indicated there's a good
[2:16:45]
template to work work off from the city
[2:16:48]
of Rochester that made this need to be
[2:16:50]
adjust
[2:16:51]
so we can work
[2:16:54]
with thank you any other questions or
[2:16:56]
comments uh so at this point the only
[2:16:59]
measure we're going to move forward with
[2:17:00]
is continuing with the study to outline
[2:17:02]
some additional locations and I'm going
[2:17:04]
to update that update this um then
[2:17:08]
there's one other recommendation because
[2:17:09]
I know we get emails like from people
[2:17:11]
about the 25 miles hour we're going to
[2:17:13]
get them consistently I think that we
[2:17:15]
should put out some statement or
[2:17:16]
something that we are working on because
[2:17:18]
we're being compared well Albany did it
[2:17:20]
you haven't done it
[2:17:21]
so to your point Mr manini if we want to
[2:17:23]
let at least let people know the
[2:17:25]
direction we're moving in sure and and
[2:17:27]
once again Aly like I said they have
[2:17:30]
done it m but it's not done right so if
[2:17:33]
we do everything and we and we hurry and
[2:17:35]
we try to do it we we may close to them
[2:17:38]
so I mean right now if you'd like to
[2:17:41]
that that's perfectly acceptable to say
[2:17:42]
that we're looking at it and then if we
[2:17:43]
say that we're looking at it we're going
[2:17:45]
to do it then we're tied with all
[2:17:46]
because they haven't done it
[2:17:50]
okay well we'll put together our
[2:17:53]
PSA from you to do that oh when don't
[2:17:56]
you like to see us back
[2:17:57]
on um well when when should we think
[2:18:00]
about having you guys come back to us
[2:18:03]
it's give two cycles and we'll come back
[2:18:06]
and I can do update to and we can put
[2:18:07]
that on there Brian's already uh I just
[2:18:09]
so he's already pulled data we already
[2:18:11]
have data from uh PD to try to recommend
[2:18:14]
a second spot and then that'll give me
[2:18:16]
some time to put together our own format
[2:18:18]
with that and then Mr O'Brien can put
[2:18:20]
together his language and you can see
[2:18:22]
what we what we've gotten but uh I think
[2:18:25]
kind of trying to do it this way maybe
[2:18:26]
with a couple of updates and this this
[2:18:28]
group approach I think that will be more
[2:18:30]
positive to trying to get some results
[2:18:32]
out of it and then getting the
[2:18:33]
information into the the mayor's data
[2:18:35]
report um now that we we know what we're
[2:18:37]
looking for and then U I believe um both
[2:18:41]
Brian and then Michael Hamilton are inas
[2:18:43]
but they both signed up for the clear
[2:18:44]
database so they're going to start to
[2:18:46]
try to pull some GIS data so we'll see
[2:18:48]
what that has GIS geographic information
[2:18:51]
it's a mapping where we can try to see
[2:18:53]
hot spots and things like that so a lot
[2:18:56]
of information out there is just how you
[2:18:57]
do that together thank you uh any other
[2:19:00]
questions or comments to fall Public
[2:19:01]
Safety I just do want to um reiterate
[2:19:03]
that again my my goal was um I always
[2:19:07]
knew that there were going to be streets
[2:19:09]
that needed to remain at a higher speed
[2:19:12]
um given the traffic density and and
[2:19:15]
traffic flow as well as the fact that
[2:19:16]
there will be districts like School
[2:19:18]
District um that would be still at
[2:19:21]
probably 15 mph so I just wanted to
[2:19:23]
clarify that I knew that um and that you
[2:19:27]
know and totally support that we have to
[2:19:30]
do you know certain in certain areas
[2:19:32]
that will be higher speed and I would
[2:19:34]
just also like in I say in my defense of
[2:19:37]
it but the when we were here previously
[2:19:41]
these requests they seemed like a
[2:19:42]
mountain with the state guidelines which
[2:19:45]
were expc very explicit in perspective
[2:19:49]
80 percentile they had five steps that
[2:19:51]
he would go through we generated a
[2:19:53]
report that was 30 pages for one street
[2:19:55]
and then we generated 25 the federal
[2:19:57]
guidelines being simplified allow us to
[2:20:01]
do things so much more streamlined and
[2:20:04]
efficient that this is just what we're
[2:20:06]
doing with the consultant is just going
[2:20:09]
through checking everything making sure
[2:20:11]
we're you know we have what we want even
[2:20:13]
the conversations that I had today with
[2:20:14]
Brian to get to that map with just those
[2:20:16]
two streets you know that's efficient
[2:20:18]
like I said is I I don't want to ber it
[2:20:21]
but like this map here this is the only
[2:20:22]
reason is that this particular map here
[2:20:25]
is I just always remind myself that if
[2:20:27]
we were a town or a village most of the
[2:20:30]
what color streets are they the green
[2:20:33]
and the red streets we wouldn't be able
[2:20:35]
to do it cuz they wouldn't be ours they
[2:20:36]
would be somebody else's jurisdiction
[2:20:38]
and so you know if they're not doing it
[2:20:40]
they're not even entertaining it I just
[2:20:42]
want to make sure that we're stepping
[2:20:43]
forward correctly um so you know have
[2:20:46]
faith and I will I will be back and
[2:20:48]
we'll have it could you send would you
[2:20:50]
mind sending this I will send this out I
[2:20:52]
meant to I was trying to hand it out and
[2:20:54]
I did not have the but I will send it to
[2:20:58]
to thank you thank you very very much
[2:21:01]
any other questions thank you very much
[2:21:03]
any other questions or concerns for
[2:21:04]
public Committee hearing on may have a
[2:21:06]
motion to
[2:21:08]
adourn so second all those in favor I we
[2:21:12]
are adjourned like to call to order the
[2:21:14]
finance committee we have two items on
[2:21:16]
the agenda tonight the first of which is
[2:21:18]
a call for public hearing to collect
[2:21:19]
feedback from City residents on the cdbg
[2:21:22]
CV funding to prevent prepare for and
[2:21:25]
respond to coronavirus projects Mr
[2:21:33]
P hi my name is Ban Kar I'm looking for
[2:21:36]
the second public hearing for the uh the
[2:21:40]
C CD BG fund we got for the Corona virus
[2:21:44]
pray of prent and uh that to do with
[2:21:48]
that so uh
[2:21:50]
that's my ask
[2:21:52]
is thank you any questions or comments
[2:21:56]
when was the first public heing
[2:21:58]
he it should be uh in the beginning of
[2:22:01]
2022 so Mar that was the first one of
[2:22:03]
March
[2:22:03]
2022 and in terms of the reporting um
[2:22:06]
how does this work in terms of
[2:22:08]
development and they being a part of the
[2:22:10]
reporting because I know they're very
[2:22:12]
involved with cdbg so this part of it is
[2:22:14]
this also include something that
[2:22:16]
development has to report the HUD or is
[2:22:18]
this separate in the par from that it
[2:22:20]
says I think it's a separate funding
[2:22:23]
this 2.6 Grand million was for the
[2:22:27]
separate from what B had so this was for
[2:22:30]
the deployment for the Wi-Fi you know
[2:22:33]
and we did uh um work with Daily Gazette
[2:22:37]
for the community uh development news
[2:22:40]
and things like that so probably can see
[2:22:42]
the news in their Gip code on their area
[2:22:45]
what is going on and also one was the
[2:22:47]
stay well that is uh we partnered with
[2:22:50]
hospital to put on um one device called
[2:22:54]
ion to see if somebody has fever or
[2:22:57]
anything like that for the uh immun
[2:23:00]
deficiency uh
[2:23:03]
patient thank you any other questions or
[2:23:07]
concerns yes Mr chairman it's just it's
[2:23:09]
part of the close out
[2:23:11]
process because of this pot of money
[2:23:13]
it's under the car's act they required
[2:23:15]
if you do if you get the money one
[2:23:18]
public hearing and then this is the
[2:23:19]
close out publicar hearing so this is
[2:23:21]
part of the closeout PO process so um
[2:23:24]
this is part of theed process back to
[2:23:29]
the thank you uh any
[2:23:33]
others may have a
[2:23:35]
motion so Mo I'll second all those in
[2:23:40]
favor the next item on the agenda is the
[2:23:43]
ARA der foundation/ Empowerment Center
[2:23:47]
uh and car resource center fund
[2:23:49]
reallocation m
[2:23:51]
good evening mayor and City Council
[2:23:54]
Members before I move into my
[2:23:56]
legislative request Madam president okay
[2:23:58]
if I just share for a
[2:24:00]
moment so we're here today talking about
[2:24:03]
ARA next week I'm coming up on my one
[2:24:06]
year here with the city of SKC so it had
[2:24:08]
me reflecting on that time my second day
[2:24:11]
on the job Anthony and Dereck says hey
[2:24:13]
Alex do you remind on reporting on R for
[2:24:17]
the city council and I came up here
[2:24:19]
really reading off of a paper trying to
[2:24:21]
figure it out so we have come a long way
[2:24:23]
in 12 months and I just wanted to say a
[2:24:25]
couple of thank yous um first off Mr
[2:24:27]
Mayor thank you thank you thank you
[2:24:29]
thank you for your open door policy
[2:24:31]
where allow me the space to come into
[2:24:33]
your office five out of five days to be
[2:24:35]
my authentic self with your leadership
[2:24:37]
and guidance given to me I appreciate
[2:24:39]
you to the city council members thank
[2:24:42]
you thank you so much thank you for your
[2:24:43]
dedication to the residents and taxpayer
[2:24:46]
here at the city and some of you thank
[2:24:48]
you for your support in more ways than
[2:24:49]
one you know who you are thank you for
[2:24:51]
the calls the check in I truly
[2:24:53]
appreciate it to my colleagues here at
[2:24:56]
the city of SKC who have made the
[2:24:57]
transition in this role and helping me
[2:25:00]
get acclimated to support answering all
[2:25:02]
of my silly questions Chris Wallen Chris
[2:25:04]
Lum Paul Leon Al the maintenance team
[2:25:07]
the Law Department ban and my buddies
[2:25:09]
and it codes Molly the entire Finance
[2:25:12]
team my city clerk family the mayor's
[2:25:15]
office and their team as I would say l
[2:25:17]
Dy and everybody and last but certainly
[2:25:20]
not not leas my wonderful wonderful team
[2:25:22]
in the department of development we have
[2:25:24]
succeeded four HUD audits in the last 12
[2:25:27]
months revamped our collaborative tree
[2:25:29]
program managed over $17.1 million in
[2:25:32]
federal funding 14 million of that is
[2:25:34]
the ARA funding that was pushed out to
[2:25:36]
our local organizations and nonprofits
[2:25:38]
and the City of SKC the remainder is our
[2:25:40]
cdbg home and ESG funding we've
[2:25:43]
identified the gaps in our processes
[2:25:45]
we've updated our internal processes and
[2:25:47]
procedures for Community Development
[2:25:49]
we've even implemented a new CRM system
[2:25:52]
to manage Our Community Development
[2:25:54]
Federal fundings we've established
[2:25:56]
internal workflows including other
[2:25:57]
departments we have increased in
[2:25:59]
capacity which was a big deal we on
[2:26:02]
boarded two part-time Community
[2:26:03]
Development team members a Community
[2:26:05]
Development supervisor and an assistant
[2:26:07]
planner and most of all the morale in my
[2:26:10]
department is boosted and I just wanted
[2:26:12]
to simply just take a couple minutes to
[2:26:13]
thank each and every one of you for your
[2:26:15]
partnership to the community for giving
[2:26:17]
me grace and patience as I learned in
[2:26:19]
the Justin this we've been walking all
[2:26:21]
year so get ready we're going to start
[2:26:23]
jogging so thank you and I I see the
[2:26:25]
mayor is getting terized so I probably
[2:26:27]
should move on my legislative request
[2:26:31]
you're not going anywhere right
[2:26:34]
no she's got she's got an official
[2:26:37]
shirt um so today we are addressing arpa
[2:26:41]
funding D Foundation Empowerment Center
[2:26:44]
and the Carver re resource center for
[2:26:46]
reallocation the arpa allocation for
[2:26:49]
Empowerment Center and D total $1
[2:26:52]
m75 $875,000 of that was allocated to
[2:26:56]
the Empowerment Center and2 200,000 was
[2:26:59]
allocated to the DOR Foundation the
[2:27:02]
Carver Center had
[2:27:04]
$1,250,000 allocated for their
[2:27:07]
Rehabilitation and that was noted in
[2:27:09]
resolution
[2:27:10]
22-
[2:27:12]
214 today the DOR Foundation is asking
[2:27:15]
to separate their $200,000 ARA
[2:27:18]
allocation from the Empowerment Center
[2:27:20]
in addition they are requesting
[2:27:24]
$139,400 from the Empowerment Center
[2:27:27]
allocation giving them a total of
[2:27:30]
$339,500 to be used for operating cost
[2:27:34]
at the 311 huet Street property the
[2:27:37]
second ask is the Empowerment Center the
[2:27:39]
Empowerment Center ARA allocation amount
[2:27:43]
that would be left if we give Derby the
[2:27:46]
additional
[2:27:47]
139,900 would be7 94
[2:27:52]
sorry forgive me the the Empowerment
[2:27:55]
Center balance to date is
[2:28:04]
$794,000 that they are asking for in
[2:28:08]
addition to their 200k the balance for
[2:28:11]
the Empowerment Center will be
[2:28:17]
[Music]
[2:28:19]
$654,900
[2:28:20]
[Music]
[2:28:22]
$1,250,000 remain with the Carver Center
[2:28:25]
in addition to the balance left from the
[2:28:27]
Empowerment Center of the
[2:28:35]
$654,900
[2:28:37]
4$ 1,
[2:28:43]
94786 thank you so the ask is the city
[2:28:46]
council consider the above that was just
[2:28:49]
noted
[2:28:50]
any questions or
[2:28:52]
comments inspect I fully support um the
[2:28:56]
idea of giving the Dory Foundation which
[2:28:59]
I always mispronounced I thought it was
[2:29:00]
du but okay um the uh
[2:29:07]
$39,375
[2:29:09]
3 um we attend a couple a few of us
[2:29:12]
attended the meeting the other day and
[2:29:14]
they are currently doing that work um so
[2:29:17]
this would allow them to continue doing
[2:29:19]
that work so I do support that um and
[2:29:23]
then obviously the next one is just what
[2:29:25]
the balance would then be for the
[2:29:26]
Empowerment Center um I still have some
[2:29:29]
questions about the the Carver um so I
[2:29:32]
wanted to hear a little bit more about
[2:29:34]
um that perhaps from in terms of I know
[2:29:37]
that in terms of the building and and
[2:29:39]
maybe from the mayor in terms of what
[2:29:41]
you what you thought um moving forward
[2:29:43]
with that but I I really would like to
[2:29:45]
support the I don't know if you want to
[2:29:47]
do this separately or as one but well
[2:29:50]
have to do sep resolutions for for the
[2:29:51]
um for J and then we'll have to discuss
[2:29:54]
the other part of
[2:29:55]
it so I'd be happy to make them well I
[2:29:58]
think we going leave it open to others
[2:30:00]
to have questions or comments okay any
[2:30:04]
so I I attended the meeting where um D
[2:30:07]
came and asked for their additional
[2:30:08]
funding and I just you know want to
[2:30:10]
point out that it's been a couple years
[2:30:11]
since we've been going down this road
[2:30:13]
with this funding and in the meantime
[2:30:15]
we've we've funded multiple other
[2:30:18]
projects and so we're getting to the
[2:30:19]
point where we have to be at the end of
[2:30:21]
this year have to allocate These funds
[2:30:24]
in order for that for it to you know
[2:30:26]
otherwise we would not be able to
[2:30:27]
allocate it to this agency so I'm in
[2:30:29]
full support of this keeping in mind
[2:30:31]
that initial initially Zuri asked for a
[2:30:34]
lot more money however in the process a
[2:30:36]
couple years ago they were put together
[2:30:38]
with the empowerments that are not at
[2:30:39]
their request but as as a decision in
[2:30:42]
development um prior so um to me for
[2:30:45]
them to ask now for this amount of money
[2:30:47]
um which is still overall less than what
[2:30:49]
they were asking for and it's not stated
[2:30:51]
here but their project is uh cost is
[2:30:54]
more because they have to they already
[2:30:55]
have a building but they have already
[2:30:57]
gone ahead and gotten the funding to do
[2:30:59]
the building initially they asked for us
[2:31:01]
for the funding but it took so long that
[2:31:03]
they um went to another source to make
[2:31:05]
sure that they had the money for the
[2:31:06]
funding so we would have to change it in
[2:31:08]
that way as well because the use of the
[2:31:10]
funds are now to do programming as
[2:31:12]
opposed to um rehabing the building
[2:31:15]
because but they've already got funding
[2:31:16]
for that so additional money and also
[2:31:18]
change of use the CH they in our in the
[2:31:22]
resolution previously done it was just
[2:31:24]
for programm and not for Rehab 200,000
[2:31:27]
so we would okay but we just have to
[2:31:29]
increase it yes all right so I'm I'm
[2:31:31]
fully in support of of of that and for
[2:31:35]
just for clarity the Empowerment Center
[2:31:37]
as it stands will not exist at 818
[2:31:40]
Albany Street which was originally the
[2:31:42]
process and some of the money that
[2:31:43]
you'll see that's gone from the budget
[2:31:45]
is went to into stabilizing the building
[2:31:47]
so but that's not where it would happen
[2:31:49]
so the Empowerment Center would be a
[2:31:51]
part of the caror Cooperative project
[2:31:54]
that that's being worked on uh so it
[2:31:57]
doesn't exists in its own as a stand
[2:31:59]
alone because you know people that's
[2:32:01]
been a question that's been kicked
[2:32:02]
around but the services that they would
[2:32:04]
provide would exist within um the Carver
[2:32:10]
building so um and and and let me just
[2:32:13]
say I do support uh that we continue
[2:32:15]
moving ahead and look for other funding
[2:32:17]
in order to do this project within with
[2:32:20]
in Harbor just taking a look at the
[2:32:22]
community and the investment that we
[2:32:23]
need to have happen people have
[2:32:25]
continually been asking I know it's been
[2:32:27]
a road and one organization who had it
[2:32:29]
and then they moved away from it that
[2:32:31]
doesn't mean that the need has gone away
[2:32:33]
the need still exists so um the city
[2:32:36]
we've identified ways to support other
[2:32:38]
organizations and agencies so I suggest
[2:32:41]
that we strongly look at ways and uh to
[2:32:44]
to uh support this organization and
[2:32:46]
agency in a community that's really um
[2:32:49]
that needs a service and Carver's been
[2:32:52]
staple know it's been a while and just
[2:32:55]
for the facts it wasn't people from the
[2:32:56]
community it wasn't under their control
[2:32:59]
that it went to its current state so
[2:33:01]
just want to state that as well but I
[2:33:02]
would support us not only giving this
[2:33:04]
funding but finding other ways to help
[2:33:06]
them get other funding and and nailing
[2:33:08]
down I know they said they have other
[2:33:09]
funding sources but nailing those down
[2:33:12]
and finding out what those gaps are so
[2:33:14]
to see if there's ways that we can um
[2:33:16]
close the gap they said they had a a
[2:33:18]
verbal commit from the county and I
[2:33:20]
forgot the other source Sant Barb and
[2:33:22]
Santa Barbara's office so they said they
[2:33:24]
had verbal commitments and I recommend
[2:33:26]
rather than counting them out that we
[2:33:28]
look at what those commitments are and
[2:33:29]
get them strong commitments and then see
[2:33:31]
how we can fill a gap to move this that
[2:33:33]
project forward as well any other
[2:33:36]
questions or comments on Mr yeah so I
[2:33:38]
would absolutely U 100% support our and
[2:33:42]
I would just note that I think that even
[2:33:44]
this um their request is extremely
[2:33:46]
humble um I think that's it's a very
[2:33:48]
humble request Bas of the work that
[2:33:50]
they've been doing already without us
[2:33:52]
being able to get them the resources
[2:33:55]
that they needed in a timely manner one
[2:33:57]
indicator of someone's dedication to a
[2:33:59]
project is that they're going to find a
[2:34:00]
way and so they haven't been just
[2:34:02]
talking they've been really doing and I
[2:34:04]
think that um you know not only do I
[2:34:07]
think that we need to support them with
[2:34:09]
they're ass I think that you know I
[2:34:10]
appreciate all the work that you're
[2:34:11]
doing in your office we're so blessed to
[2:34:13]
have you here and I think a big part of
[2:34:15]
that work is partnering with them to
[2:34:17]
even not only help them with the
[2:34:18]
resources that we can give them but
[2:34:20]
helping finding some more other
[2:34:22]
resources to support the work they're
[2:34:24]
doing I think it's absolute no-brainer
[2:34:26]
and I would really struggle to find out
[2:34:27]
why anybody else at the table would
[2:34:29]
think anything
[2:34:30]
different any other question there yeah
[2:34:33]
I attended the meeting as well my
[2:34:35]
question is on the
[2:34:38]
Carver there was some concern to have
[2:34:40]
enough money for the building
[2:34:43]
rehab um operational costs are another
[2:34:47]
is not part of the request
[2:34:50]
and that's another conversation but the
[2:34:52]
building do we will this 1.25 plus the 6
[2:34:58]
154,000 get us there do do we know would
[2:35:02]
look for the council to just deal with
[2:35:05]
the dur uh component of this tonight and
[2:35:09]
look to put together those other numbers
[2:35:11]
cuz right now I'm not comfortable with
[2:35:14]
enough money on the table to do the
[2:35:17]
appropriate rehab or the rehab that's
[2:35:19]
been outline in that building that we're
[2:35:21]
still working on that I been support
[2:35:25]
forward
[2:35:27]
that well that's why I'm saying they've
[2:35:29]
had other verbal commitments so we would
[2:35:30]
look to them to get those firm
[2:35:32]
commitments to see if they could get to
[2:35:34]
whatever that whatever the number is the
[2:35:36]
mayor stated at the meeting that it
[2:35:37]
needed to was going to be higher than it
[2:35:39]
was when they initially asked for but
[2:35:41]
they're not there's no one present from
[2:35:43]
the organization tonight but they did
[2:35:45]
say that they you know had a plan so we
[2:35:48]
would have to hear what their plan is
[2:35:49]
and how much funding they had to back
[2:35:50]
their plan okay Patrick yeah I'd like to
[2:35:54]
say that I mean again the players that
[2:35:56]
were here the other night I I support
[2:35:58]
them and I um have talked with both of
[2:36:00]
them the folks that were here the other
[2:36:02]
day from Carver um and I
[2:36:05]
just it's gone through a lot of changes
[2:36:08]
over the years um even just since I've
[2:36:10]
been on Council in terms of what the
[2:36:12]
mission statement was for the um
[2:36:15]
programming within the Carver so um I do
[2:36:19]
want to say that I support that aspect
[2:36:21]
of course of of what's Happening um and
[2:36:25]
I do appreciate also that I know that um
[2:36:28]
from M Carver's office that there'd be
[2:36:31]
support and there'd be technical
[2:36:33]
assistance which is something we've
[2:36:34]
talked about for a long time uh so that
[2:36:36]
would be really great as well um I would
[2:36:41]
say that one of the things that we did
[2:36:43]
when we did award them the initial arpa
[2:36:46]
funding when it was in a previous
[2:36:48]
incarnation um we had a we had a
[2:36:50]
contingency in terms of you know by when
[2:36:53]
they would get the remaining funds um in
[2:36:56]
place solidly to be able to move forward
[2:36:59]
with the project and so I just throw
[2:37:01]
that out to see what people think about
[2:37:02]
that and whether we need to do that
[2:37:04]
again because we are coming up on you
[2:37:07]
know a deadline of being able to spend
[2:37:09]
the money in a way
[2:37:12]
that you know we want to make sure that
[2:37:14]
money gets spent um by the time that the
[2:37:16]
federal government needs us to have it
[2:37:18]
spent so I just throw that out there so
[2:37:22]
I'd say what I feel comfortable um
[2:37:24]
saying is first I want to make sure we
[2:37:25]
give credit to the individuals that got
[2:37:27]
us this conversation that was the
[2:37:29]
original crew for like a better words
[2:37:31]
that was leading that Miracle on credit
[2:37:33]
conversation uh very much there was a
[2:37:34]
lot of learning and uh carrying this
[2:37:37]
conversation throughout truly a pandemic
[2:37:39]
uh and it was a credit to their uh
[2:37:42]
dedication not only to the community but
[2:37:43]
seeing that this building that was
[2:37:45]
dilapitated comes back to life uh from
[2:37:49]
that there were a lot of questions about
[2:37:51]
uh their ability to kind of structure
[2:37:53]
and make sure that ourselves as
[2:37:55]
legislators we feel comfortable
[2:37:57]
designated large swaps of money because
[2:37:59]
we need to have a plan in place and I
[2:38:01]
see the transition and transformation
[2:38:03]
that has happened since then with this
[2:38:05]
new uh I guess reinvigoration of this
[2:38:09]
current um project and how how it was
[2:38:12]
presented to us I understand that this
[2:38:15]
is not going to fully fill that Gap but
[2:38:19]
there have been other projects that have
[2:38:21]
not been fully allocated for and that we
[2:38:23]
have comfortably allowed them time to
[2:38:25]
continue as is reference YWCA and the
[2:38:29]
confidence and their ability to fill
[2:38:32]
those gaps I think there was a slight
[2:38:33]
hole not not and in compar in comparison
[2:38:36]
to the entire budget our reflection was
[2:38:39]
we trust that you will figure it
[2:38:43]
out as we've had these conversations it
[2:38:46]
has talked about equitability and being
[2:38:49]
transparent with not just our community
[2:38:52]
with this project uh again I think the
[2:38:54]
additional money allocating to that this
[2:38:56]
gets them closer I think as Miss pfield
[2:38:59]
has identified there are other players
[2:39:01]
external Partners who's similar to what
[2:39:04]
happened beautifully with my side where
[2:39:06]
this funding stream was able to be
[2:39:08]
identified to keep this resource within
[2:39:10]
our
[2:39:11]
city I am confident this will be able to
[2:39:14]
occur again and then in my conversations
[2:39:16]
with members of their program team it
[2:39:18]
was made clear that if we were able to
[2:39:20]
position the city in a way that we could
[2:39:22]
leverage our capacity that again will
[2:39:25]
make that Gap slightly smaller and then
[2:39:28]
just so I can capture this for everyone
[2:39:30]
in the room but also listening again
[2:39:32]
getting to the end of the year doesn't
[2:39:33]
mean the project has to be done the
[2:39:35]
money is has to be a lotted so there's
[2:39:36]
truly no timeline in place as long as we
[2:39:39]
can confidently say we are moving
[2:39:41]
forward I don't think it is anyone's
[2:39:42]
interest to have fund a project but
[2:39:46]
again keep it in line with the manner in
[2:39:48]
which we respond to other projects I
[2:39:50]
don't think saying no or waiting I think
[2:39:54]
that sends a disservice to
[2:39:56]
them so your to manag abely uh any
[2:40:01]
questions or comments I'm Sorry Miss
[2:40:03]
Patrick well I just I do want to back up
[2:40:05]
because some of the other organizations
[2:40:06]
that approached us for uh funding for
[2:40:09]
example thew to your
[2:40:13]
example has been in operation for
[2:40:17]
decades um successfully doing doing
[2:40:19]
their work so this is a is different
[2:40:22]
because we will be taking a chance on an
[2:40:25]
organization that has not at all started
[2:40:28]
their work
[2:40:30]
um in this in this Incarnation so again
[2:40:33]
I respect the leadership of the new
[2:40:36]
project um but it's apples and oranges
[2:40:39]
to try to compare it to something like
[2:40:41]
the YW because the YW has been
[2:40:43]
successfully doing their work for I want
[2:40:46]
to say like 100 years or something 135
[2:40:50]
years so you know we know that making
[2:40:53]
that investment um there was experience
[2:40:55]
and expertise there um with a track
[2:40:57]
record for how they were going to use
[2:40:59]
the fund so I just I just wanted to
[2:41:01]
clarify that Mr So to that um I would
[2:41:05]
say that when we talk about um funding
[2:41:08]
and funding allocation in terms of eff
[2:41:11]
what we have to understand is some
[2:41:12]
someone like the Y who has been around
[2:41:14]
for a long time doing a lot of valuable
[2:41:16]
work part of the reason why they can do
[2:41:20]
that work is because they have the
[2:41:21]
capacity to do the work so we're talking
[2:41:24]
about Grassroots initiatives and not
[2:41:26]
making decisions for people but making
[2:41:28]
decisions with people part of the the
[2:41:30]
culture if you will um of the original
[2:41:33]
intent was that things would have moved
[2:41:35]
a lot faster and even more maybe
[2:41:38]
efficient from a business lens if if the
[2:41:42]
leadership group there was just saying
[2:41:45]
this is what the community needs and
[2:41:46]
this is what we're going to do really
[2:41:47]
what they're saying is that they're
[2:41:49]
getting getting that feedback from the
[2:41:50]
community um they're leveraging um what
[2:41:53]
is tons of Highly highly skilled people
[2:41:56]
and highly skilled people uh skill sets
[2:41:58]
within the community to come together to
[2:42:01]
to to make this project work so when you
[2:42:04]
look at it through the lens of this is
[2:42:06]
community
[2:42:07]
based um and not just you know they
[2:42:11]
don't have the same capacity of some of
[2:42:13]
our big box nonprofits that have been
[2:42:15]
doing the work for some time then that's
[2:42:18]
literally the definition of equity is
[2:42:21]
that you're giving people what they need
[2:42:23]
in order to be successful luckily to the
[2:42:25]
why for years and years of funding and
[2:42:28]
support um and other nonprofits that
[2:42:31]
have benefited from um uh systemically
[2:42:34]
unjust and inequitable system of course
[2:42:37]
they're in a position to do some of the
[2:42:39]
work that they're doing look at a a
[2:42:42]
project like um what we're referring to
[2:42:45]
as Carver at this point you know they
[2:42:47]
haven't had that institutional support
[2:42:49]
for um the decades so I don't expect so
[2:42:53]
to your point it is apples apples to
[2:42:55]
oranges but maybe if we're looking at it
[2:42:57]
from a different advantage point it's
[2:42:59]
just highlights the extreme inequitable
[2:43:01]
and injust treatment of small community
[2:43:04]
um nonprofit trying to do big work and
[2:43:06]
I'm glad that we're all in support of D
[2:43:08]
because I think that even though
[2:43:10]
something like d has not came to us
[2:43:12]
multiple times over decades fund and
[2:43:14]
they've been doing work in the community
[2:43:16]
for 180 years so it's like when we think
[2:43:18]
about that just because we haven't seen
[2:43:20]
the work that's been done um in that
[2:43:22]
more in that broader scope of like a a
[2:43:25]
nonprofit sector the people that are at
[2:43:29]
the helm of this have been doing the
[2:43:30]
work collectively I would say for for at
[2:43:33]
least 100 years all the people that you
[2:43:35]
have the leadership so you have to
[2:43:37]
really make sure that we're
[2:43:37]
acknowledging that because that's the
[2:43:39]
definition of
[2:43:43]
equity we're not doing that any other
[2:43:46]
questions or comments uh m um so I just
[2:43:50]
wanted to highlight that with the
[2:43:53]
investment that the city is making on a
[2:43:54]
crave name connection it's important
[2:43:57]
that we address the Carver Center one
[2:44:00]
way or another um so I just want to
[2:44:03]
stress that we we have a lot of money
[2:44:05]
that we are putting in um to that
[2:44:07]
project so to we need to find a way to
[2:44:10]
execute it I know that um the mayor has
[2:44:13]
suggested that the city may keep
[2:44:15]
ownership and give the co-op a pathway
[2:44:17]
to ownership but that still doesn't take
[2:44:19]
that still doesn't take the pressure off
[2:44:21]
the city with being able to find the
[2:44:23]
funds for The Gap um it's not a one
[2:44:27]
person thing here this is going to take
[2:44:28]
the collective um the collective group
[2:44:32]
because or else the mayor will be upset
[2:44:33]
with me for
[2:44:35]
saying so um yes I was going to bring
[2:44:38]
the Craig name that's coming up so I
[2:44:39]
think that's important that we keep that
[2:44:41]
in mind we would just want to have a
[2:44:42]
building that's standing there and I
[2:44:43]
don't want to call it deric cuz it's you
[2:44:44]
know uh it's not deric it's actually
[2:44:47]
standing pretty strong for the number of
[2:44:48]
years in it's been there it's you know
[2:44:50]
and the um the mlc group PRI to this did
[2:44:52]
some Sweat Equity inside so they really
[2:44:55]
tried really hard but let's keep in mind
[2:44:57]
they weren't actually given any um
[2:44:59]
funding necessarily it was on a
[2:45:00]
reimbursement basis which was
[2:45:01]
challenging for a small organization and
[2:45:05]
to say that you know the Y has been
[2:45:07]
doing work for a very long time but
[2:45:08]
they've also got continuous support even
[2:45:10]
in this instance the money that we um
[2:45:13]
providing for this project for um
[2:45:16]
consistently cdbg over the years so they
[2:45:19]
have that track record because we've
[2:45:20]
been supporting it over those years so
[2:45:23]
we when we start looking at newer
[2:45:24]
organizations I'm going to use the Coco
[2:45:26]
house they've been around for a while
[2:45:28]
and they did a lot on their own um and
[2:45:30]
the reason they're able to substate even
[2:45:31]
though they're much newer than the YW is
[2:45:34]
because the city provided that support
[2:45:36]
as well and they moved forward so I and
[2:45:39]
I see us trying to do the same kind of
[2:45:41]
thing with the Carter which has been
[2:45:44]
there for very long time but because
[2:45:46]
because of the leadership at the time it
[2:45:48]
it just went on
[2:45:49]
so um to respond to a community response
[2:45:52]
and then as a city to to look at it the
[2:45:54]
same way we look at some long
[2:45:56]
established agencies like the why I
[2:45:58]
think it's important for us to do and
[2:46:00]
not to just have it standing there we
[2:46:01]
can't build beautiful around it and do
[2:46:04]
this wonderful cman connection and
[2:46:05]
narrow the streets and have a bike path
[2:46:07]
and do all that stuff and then have the
[2:46:08]
building there unkempt so I I really we
[2:46:12]
have to you know pull that plan together
[2:46:14]
help with that plan so that it can move
[2:46:16]
forward and the city's keeping ownership
[2:46:18]
until they can move a pathway then
[2:46:20]
that's fine but something we can't just
[2:46:22]
say nothing any other questions or
[2:46:26]
comments uh so hearing n
[2:46:30]
sorry I I fully support public
[2:46:33]
initiatives and and now as a associate
[2:46:35]
commissioner of the state we invested a
[2:46:37]
$9 million project into how we grow 9
[2:46:41]
million grow yeah how do we you know Jal
[2:46:44]
Justice settings how do we grow like so
[2:46:46]
the big box AG don't get bigger how do
[2:46:50]
we find ways to invest in those
[2:46:52]
Community Based agencies that serve the
[2:46:53]
community that live that the agencies in
[2:46:57]
those communities are growing and not
[2:47:00]
necessarily those larger agencies um so
[2:47:02]
I I fully support this initiative the
[2:47:05]
only
[2:47:06]
what sorry so so but but working at a
[2:47:11]
nonprofit I do see the challenges in in
[2:47:13]
in m in maintaining and getting these
[2:47:15]
funding sources and how labor intensive
[2:47:17]
they are um um first thing I think we
[2:47:20]
need to look at is do we have enough to
[2:47:22]
do we have the building if we
[2:47:26]
do and haror project doesn't come up
[2:47:30]
with the funding to start operational
[2:47:32]
programming do we not give them the
[2:47:34]
building I mean are there contingencies
[2:47:36]
we like our commitment here is to reh
[2:47:38]
have a building and do we move ahead
[2:47:41]
with that but if the operational funding
[2:47:44]
is not there or we're not satisfied with
[2:47:47]
that we still transfer ownership and we
[2:47:49]
give them opportunities to start
[2:47:51]
operations and then decide that I I mean
[2:47:54]
I don't know if those are options to
[2:47:55]
consider but I I think as much as we can
[2:47:58]
as a body and work with the count and
[2:47:59]
make this work we should make it work I
[2:48:02]
I like the concepts I I like the
[2:48:04]
opportunities of programming in the
[2:48:06]
communities that they serve um just like
[2:48:09]
how do we collectively find a way to
[2:48:11]
help them make that work it's possible
[2:48:13]
um I like the momentum I like The
[2:48:15]
Passion of the people that allow to
[2:48:16]
serve their community and and and
[2:48:18]
partner with us and I I would just like
[2:48:20]
to you know um keep that momentum going
[2:48:23]
and see what we can do both as the
[2:48:24]
council and the county and look at ways
[2:48:27]
we can make this work so I would say in
[2:48:30]
part to that there's a reflection of
[2:48:33]
teamwork and that no one person or no
[2:48:36]
one organization is successful on their
[2:48:37]
own I would say case in point by that
[2:48:40]
lovely lovely uh uh depiction of all the
[2:48:43]
work that you've done in a short amount
[2:48:45]
of time truly is a reflection of not
[2:48:47]
yourself it is the the supports that you
[2:48:49]
have surrounding you in no way as you
[2:48:52]
discussed the Carver project has there
[2:48:55]
any sense of concern or weariness I
[2:48:57]
think it is all the more confidence that
[2:48:59]
if you can apply the successful measures
[2:49:02]
that you allowed to successfully Drive
[2:49:05]
these other projects into closing which
[2:49:07]
truly is an accomplishment I don't know
[2:49:08]
if anyone remembers where we were a year
[2:49:10]
ago uh we are in a truly different place
[2:49:12]
thank you to your leadership and joining
[2:49:14]
this Sky family Sky Team um but where
[2:49:18]
they are now is not a depiction of of
[2:49:21]
where of where they will remain is kind
[2:49:24]
of what I'm getting at so there's no
[2:49:26]
wishful thinking or or hopeful
[2:49:27]
conjecture truly that the like you said
[2:49:30]
the momentum is going forward so are we
[2:49:31]
going to salate that or are we going to
[2:49:33]
get behind them and push harder and I
[2:49:35]
think we do that by making the decision
[2:49:37]
tonight and allowing Miss Carver to
[2:49:39]
continue doing the work that is evident
[2:49:41]
so that this group this this this
[2:49:43]
community carver can move forward and
[2:49:46]
then we transition our Focus to
[2:49:48]
addressing how how do we bring in Secure
[2:49:50]
those funding those funding streams and
[2:49:51]
those dollars so that we have that not
[2:49:53]
as a hope but as a a a a cemented
[2:49:58]
commitment so with that any other
[2:50:00]
questions or
[2:50:02]
comments Mr Harley so just I don't I I I
[2:50:06]
really want to be mindful that cuz what
[2:50:09]
I'm hearing I don't think that we are uh
[2:50:13]
pting one agency's records against
[2:50:16]
another I want to be clear that that
[2:50:18]
that's that's what I'm hearing from any
[2:50:19]
of my fellow council members what I'm
[2:50:22]
what I'm thinking I'm hearing inment
[2:50:24]
from is concerns about sustainability
[2:50:27]
once you make the investment in the
[2:50:28]
project and I think that the Equitable
[2:50:31]
response to that is to assist as much as
[2:50:34]
we can help to capacity build to make
[2:50:36]
sure that um that that the project is a
[2:50:39]
success and really just check the way
[2:50:44]
that we are valuing the skill sets of
[2:50:47]
the people that are involved with the
[2:50:48]
project CU again even though there might
[2:50:49]
not be that institutional um length of
[2:50:53]
track record there's definitely um
[2:50:56]
individual success in the work that's
[2:50:59]
been happening in the community and that
[2:51:00]
is one of some of the things that people
[2:51:02]
like at the big nonprofits that's the
[2:51:05]
talent that they seek to go hire people
[2:51:07]
from the community to do what they're
[2:51:09]
doing so that's a really um valuable
[2:51:11]
skill set so I think that we I just want
[2:51:13]
to uplift and amplify that and at the
[2:51:14]
same time I think that we all are kind
[2:51:16]
of talking the same language or just
[2:51:17]
trying to figure out the best we for
[2:51:19]
right yes I just have to say in defense
[2:51:23]
of my profession of being in nonprofit
[2:51:26]
and being a fundraiser in nonprofit from
[2:51:28]
which I'm now retired but I have to say
[2:51:31]
that I don't consider big box as an
[2:51:35]
appropriate term for a Bethesda house a
[2:51:37]
SCA a YWCA a City Mission they're all
[2:51:42]
organizations that struggle
[2:51:45]
struggle to well I'm just saying I mean
[2:51:48]
I I guess I I just have to say that
[2:51:50]
they're all in my mind small nonprofits
[2:51:53]
serving this community meeting a need
[2:51:56]
each one of them has a mission that they
[2:51:57]
are definitely um you know serving the
[2:52:01]
people that come to them for services
[2:52:03]
and they all I can tell you from my
[2:52:06]
years of working in this community um as
[2:52:09]
a fundraiser they are out there pound
[2:52:12]
indoors um every day trying to find the
[2:52:16]
funding that they need uh to exist to
[2:52:19]
excel to succeed so none of them have
[2:52:22]
money trees in the backyard as my father
[2:52:24]
used to accuse me of thinking he had um
[2:52:27]
they all are needing to really pound the
[2:52:30]
pavement and look for dollars um so I
[2:52:34]
just I just I support what yall are
[2:52:36]
saying and I'm I I'll vote the way
[2:52:40]
you're saying but I just want to go back
[2:52:43]
the agencies that I had in mind were not
[2:52:45]
anything that was started locally they
[2:52:48]
ser State have every Community
[2:52:50]
throughout the state got yeah okay
[2:52:53]
thanks yeah so for clarity um there are
[2:52:57]
these things like so let's just talk
[2:52:59]
about the the the infrastructure really
[2:53:02]
quickly about the the agencies that I'm
[2:53:04]
talking about when I say Big B
[2:53:07]
nonprofits I'm talking about you know an
[2:53:09]
operation budget you know that's you
[2:53:11]
know over you know5 $6 million you know
[2:53:14]
what I mean that's what that's what I
[2:53:15]
mean um do you could tell through my
[2:53:19]
voting record of supporting these
[2:53:20]
agencies um and my uh contribution
[2:53:24]
showing up over the years that I
[2:53:26]
definitely support and value them what
[2:53:28]
I'm saying is that if we look at the
[2:53:31]
city's track record of how we've been
[2:53:33]
allocating funds to certain nonprofits
[2:53:36]
it's been happening over a period of
[2:53:38]
time years and years and years and I
[2:53:41]
continue I think we should continue
[2:53:42]
along that path but it's but we need to
[2:53:44]
be clear that when we're talking about
[2:53:47]
Equitable we can't just say that word if
[2:53:49]
we're not going to do
[2:53:50]
it doing it is looking at the scope of
[2:53:53]
what people's capacity is recognizing
[2:53:56]
the strengths and then are if we're in a
[2:53:58]
if we're in a position to help them then
[2:54:00]
we can't just support them in words we
[2:54:01]
need to do it in actions and that's what
[2:54:03]
I'm saying so again I feel like the
[2:54:06]
conversation is going towards like we're
[2:54:08]
starting to pit them against each other
[2:54:10]
and that's not what we need to be doing
[2:54:12]
no I don't think anybody's doing that
[2:54:13]
what I'm saying is what I'm saying is
[2:54:16]
the man's point I speak for myself very
[2:54:18]
very clearly is that I I've never
[2:54:21]
insinuated that did any of these
[2:54:22]
nonprofits have more money than what
[2:54:24]
they know to do with I'm saying that if
[2:54:26]
there is a set plot of money then we
[2:54:28]
have decisions to make and we need to
[2:54:29]
make those decisions equitably if we're
[2:54:30]
going to say that word every other five
[2:54:34]
minutes so i' say as I prepare to call
[2:54:37]
for a motion I would say just so it's
[2:54:39]
clear and understood my position in no
[2:54:41]
way do I plan to deviate from getting to
[2:54:44]
a a point where you are comfortable with
[2:54:47]
supporting all all this money in my mind
[2:54:49]
needs to go to Carver uh Point Blank and
[2:54:52]
I thank the work that your team has done
[2:54:54]
and getting us to this pathway and I
[2:54:55]
think with that that is one of what's so
[2:54:58]
many remaining steps in line to get them
[2:55:01]
into a grand opening where the community
[2:55:02]
can truly Embrace this resource once
[2:55:04]
again uh so with that if there are no
[2:55:07]
other questions or comments um so yeah
[2:55:10]
so I just want to point out Miss M
[2:55:12]
Carver has mentioned this before that in
[2:55:15]
terms of looking at the funding sources
[2:55:16]
she's looking at how who we funded over
[2:55:19]
and over again in ways to increase that
[2:55:21]
funding to other organizations that have
[2:55:23]
not had the ability to do that so that
[2:55:24]
is something among the all other many
[2:55:26]
things that she's doing so well that
[2:55:28]
that she is looking at so we you as a
[2:55:30]
council be able to see that coming
[2:55:31]
forward as
[2:55:35]
well uh kind left I looking for some
[2:55:39]
discretion do we need to look at each of
[2:55:41]
these items
[2:55:42]
individually on this one okay perfect so
[2:55:44]
may I have a motion about proceeding
[2:55:46]
forward with the Dury reot so Mo second
[2:55:50]
all those in favor I I and then the
[2:55:53]
remaining items we will come before the
[2:55:55]
council again and we'll come back with
[2:55:57]
discussion after this all right thank
[2:55:59]
you again thank you thank you thank you
[2:56:01]
are there any other items to follow the
[2:56:03]
finance committee none may have motion
[2:56:05]
to adourn so move second all those in
[2:56:07]
favor I we areour thank you I'd like to
[2:56:10]
call the order of City development and
[2:56:12]
planning there are 11 items on the
[2:56:15]
agenda okay I'm just going to wait a
[2:56:17]
minute cuz it look like the room the
[2:56:18]
clear
[2:57:13]
pass sneaky could you move him away from
[2:57:14]
the
[2:57:16]
door no thank
[2:57:23]
you they're going to listen to
[2:57:32]
the okay so I've called together um City
[2:57:35]
development planning our first item on
[2:57:37]
the agenda is a word bidden contract for
[2:57:39]
disconnected City Hall ventilation
[2:57:40]
replacement Mr
[2:57:42]
Wallen hello hi I feel unpopular now
[2:57:50]
uh so the first one we have here SED
[2:57:52]
City Hall ventilation
[2:57:54]
is no no I'm just trying
[2:57:59]
that this is one of two bids we did not
[2:58:02]
get a bid for the mechanical portion of
[2:58:05]
it it is out uh as a rebid right now but
[2:58:07]
there's no reason that we can't reward
[2:58:09]
the electrical portion of it um what
[2:58:12]
this is to do is one of my bucketless
[2:58:14]
projects when I started uh was to
[2:58:17]
reinstate the broken ventilation system
[2:58:20]
in City Hall um that system will not um
[2:58:24]
affect most of the rooms however it will
[2:58:26]
affect the bathrooms and it will affect
[2:58:28]
the council chambers room as those are
[2:58:30]
the rooms that have uh ventilation
[2:58:33]
systems in them all the ventilation
[2:58:34]
system does is exhaust air and pull air
[2:58:37]
from the hallways it is technology from
[2:58:40]
1940 but it will uh allow the building
[2:58:44]
to breathe a little bit um and so we
[2:58:47]
would like to put that system back into
[2:58:50]
place any questions or comments I'll
[2:58:53]
move in I'll second all in
[2:58:55]
favor thank you item number two is award
[2:58:58]
bidden contract for the SKC City Hall
[2:59:00]
Clock Tower restoration to Midstate
[2:59:03]
Industries L
[2:59:05]
limited so this is uh exactly it says
[2:59:08]
restoration of the existing Clock Tower
[2:59:10]
um as we know the anniversary the Clock
[2:59:12]
Tower from the down recently we they
[2:59:15]
covered that and um The Clock Tower does
[2:59:18]
refurbishment uh a lot of the wood that
[2:59:20]
makes up some of the decorative pieces
[2:59:22]
is rotten um there is peeling paint what
[2:59:25]
we wanted to do is repaint but we don't
[2:59:27]
want to repaint onto bad wood um we also
[2:59:29]
are going to Reg gold the the Dome
[2:59:32]
replace the clock faces in the works and
[2:59:34]
make sure right now they're a little
[2:59:36]
loose so the times are different around
[2:59:38]
so it would be a total refurbishment of
[2:59:40]
the clock power um Midstate Industries
[2:59:43]
is the group that is also doing the
[2:59:45]
refurbishment of the northbury pump
[2:59:47]
station
[2:59:48]
they're familiar with the city we worked
[2:59:50]
with them on several projects so we're
[2:59:51]
comfortable with them and their price
[2:59:54]
was significantly less than the second
[2:59:57]
bit which is also and the money is
[2:59:59]
already in the budget for the capital
[3:00:01]
budget for this yes this is coming from
[3:00:03]
a capital facility code not any kind of
[3:00:05]
an arban code this was something that we
[3:00:07]
bonded this year
[3:00:09]
okay yes Mr Toro oh hi thank you um the
[3:00:13]
difference between the
[3:00:14]
$1,608 and 800 and down to what they sh
[3:00:19]
what is the difference the 58 why why is
[3:00:22]
it so different yeah I did not call the
[3:00:24]
second bidder oh okay
[3:00:27]
I I didn't see that I saw PT just they
[3:00:31]
would have made a lot more
[3:00:33]
money we we call that leaving money on
[3:00:35]
the table I don't know why I see number
[3:00:37]
one and number two there you go got
[3:00:41]
it I did talk with them just to let you
[3:00:44]
know I thought the question would come
[3:00:45]
up um this is a spring project not a
[3:00:47]
winter project just the scaffolding
[3:00:49]
alone we talked with u Midstate just a
[3:00:52]
scaffolding alone will take a month to
[3:00:54]
set up wow so once the scaffolding gets
[3:00:56]
set up takes a month to set up then we
[3:00:59]
have work we're going to be into just
[3:01:02]
inclement weather and we thought that
[3:01:04]
instead of trying to leave it up or do
[3:01:07]
just start in the spring get it done
[3:01:09]
because it's going to be very elaborate
[3:01:10]
to give me
[3:01:11]
this any other questions or comments
[3:01:14]
I'll move it I'll second all those in
[3:01:16]
favor I I thank you item number three
[3:01:20]
was going to be the ceremonial renaming
[3:01:22]
of the city street um was put on Mr mud
[3:01:24]
Mr mud was unable to be here tonight so
[3:01:27]
we will I'll ask him and we'll probably
[3:01:29]
move that out for two weeks um you know
[3:01:32]
the information is in your packet and
[3:01:33]
I'm sure that all of you have received
[3:01:35]
emails regarding this particular
[3:01:37]
discussion so we'll bring that back in
[3:01:39]
two
[3:01:41]
weeks remaining items are all for um
[3:01:45]
executive session their property sales
[3:01:48]
so I would entertain a motion to go to
[3:01:51]
the executive session so I'll second all
[3:01:54]
those in favor I IA session members of
[3:01:57]
the public would have to leave
[3:02:00]
[Music]