[0:01] Yeah.

[0:03] >> Yeah.

[0:08] » Call this meeting to order. Planning

[0:10] Commission hearing and meetings

[0:11] currently July 8th, 2026 at 6 p.m. We'll

[0:14] start with the pledge of allegiance.

[0:18] » I aliance to the flag of the United

[0:21] States of America and to the republic

[0:24] for which it stands. One nation under

[0:27] God, indivisible, with liberty and

[0:30] justice for all.

[0:34] » Rolloff

[0:36] here.

[0:36] >> Dan Harsh here.

[0:37] >> Bradley F here.

[0:39] >> Here writing here.

[0:41] >> Any conflicts of interest disclose?

[0:43] >> Yeah, I'm related to uh Rick.

[0:47] >> Okay.

[0:48] >> Item number nine. Um I am for the item,

[0:53] but I'm I feel like being related. I can

[0:55] hold on it.

[0:56] >> Okay. Thank you. All right. Moving the

[0:59] hearings. I'll open up the hearing. Item

[1:01] number one, ordinance O202617,

[1:04] adopt title 110255

[1:06] boundary adjustments.

[1:09] Comments. Anyone online?

[1:13] I will close the hearing on item number

[1:15] one, ordinance 0202617 to adopt title

[1:18] 11255 boundary adjustments. Open up the

[1:21] hearing. Item number two, simple lot

[1:23] subdivision application for AB1331.

[1:26] Any comments? Anyone online?

[1:31] All right. I will close the hearing out

[1:34] for item number two, simple lot

[1:36] subdivision application for AV1331.

[1:39] Open up a hearing on item number three,

[1:41] simple lot subdivision application for

[1:43] AB1329F

[1:45] and AB1329G.

[1:47] Any comments? Anyone online?

[1:52] I will close the hearing out on item

[1:54] number three, simple lot subdivision

[1:56] application for AB1329F

[1:59] and AB1329G and open up your hearing on

[2:01] item number four, simple lot subdivision

[2:03] application for AB132A.

[2:06] Final answer online.

[2:11] All right, I will close out the hearing.

[2:13] Item number four, simple law subdivision

[2:15] application for AV132A.

[2:18] We'll open discussion and possible

[2:19] action on item number five, ordinance

[2:21] 0202617

[2:23] to adopt title 11.02055

[2:26] boundary adjustments.

[2:29] So the reason behind this is Jenna

[2:30] actually noticed that we didn't have a

[2:32] good any good ordinances for boundary

[2:34] adjustments while we had some for lock

[2:36] splits and the paperwork for that. So

[2:38] Jenna actually went and and kind of

[2:40] handled this all for us and and uh came

[2:43] up with this ordinance. So now we have

[2:44] some rules and some guidelines in place

[2:46] for boundary adjustments that we didn't

[2:48] have before. Um I read through it. I

[2:51] like everything. I think it looks good.

[2:52] It's pretty straightforward. But do you

[2:54] guys have any comments on it?

[2:57] Now would be the time

[2:59] >> and what type of boundary adjustments

[3:02] >> like lot line adjustments right?

[3:04] >> Just mirrors on all the state codes that

[3:06] are that we follow anyways. So we just

[3:10] >> what type of things would there be a lot

[3:13] of adjustment if the roads were online

[3:16] or

[3:16] >> Yeah. or even if someone like had two

[3:18] lots and wanted to change the the size

[3:20] of the two they're not making a new lot.

[3:23] They're just moving

[3:25] >> lot lines. Okay. Make one bigger or

[3:27] smaller.

[3:28] >> Yeah.

[3:29] >> Right. Yeah, it prevents like um anybody

[3:31] being landlocked or anything like that

[3:33] because they would just have the

[3:34] planning commission kind of has an

[3:36] authority to make sure that you know

[3:38] they see the plat stuff like that.

[3:40] >> Yeah, because as it is right now I don't

[3:42] think we really see them. We're supposed

[3:45] to

[3:45] >> and we don't have to tell you in all my

[3:48] time here I have seen

[3:49] >> Yeah, we're supposed to. This should

[3:52] >> there's a state code that Bradley

[3:54] actually as the planning commission

[3:55] authority has to um sign it but it

[3:58] doesn't have to come through planning

[3:59] commission but now I think this will

[4:01] make it kind of come through planning

[4:02] commission a little bit

[4:04] >> tidier

[4:04] >> yeah a little tidier

[4:07] >> I like it thank you Jenn

[4:11] » all right

[4:12] >> I'll make a motion to approve ordinance

[4:15] uh old-2026-17

[4:19] title item.2.05

[4:23] boundary adjustments.

[4:25] >> Second.

[4:26] >> Motion second. Let's take a vote.

[4:27] >> I.

[4:29] >> Motion carried. On to item number six,

[4:32] simple lot subdivision application for

[4:34] AV1331.

[4:36] This is Aaron Stout at the Gooberry

[4:38] Lodges. If you guys remember, he came in

[4:40] about six months ago. Did preliminary

[4:42] platin event center. We approved it. He

[4:46] since realized he needed a bit more

[4:47] space for parking and he bought two

[4:49] acres next door that ordered it. Um, and

[4:52] when he did that, they did a lot split

[4:54] and he was not aware, I guess, at the

[4:56] time that he needed to do a lot split

[4:58] application. So, we told him he had to

[5:00] come back in and do it. This isn't, you

[5:02] know, given any zoning or anything. It's

[5:04] still OST. It's none of that. It's just

[5:06] we're we're kind of fixing the mistake

[5:09] that was made. Um, as of now, you know,

[5:12] it can't be built on. It can't be

[5:13] anything. It's just an OST lot,

[5:16] >> right?

[5:18] >> But he's still allowed to do his parking

[5:19] there, right?

[5:21] >> Yeah, that's my understanding.

[5:22] Preliminary right now is what he told us

[5:24] is a beef parking. That's fine, but

[5:26] we're not, you know, there's no zone

[5:27] change on it right now. We're not going

[5:29] to allow you to expand your bill. You

[5:31] know, he still has to follow his

[5:31] preliminary flat everything. This

[5:33] doesn't change that. I made that very

[5:35] clear with him that just fixing the law

[5:38] split that you

[5:38] >> already followed that law. We kind of

[5:40] questioned the parking on the first.

[5:42] >> We did

[5:44] pretty tight.

[5:44] >> Yeah. So, as I we kind of left with him

[5:47] is that as long as you know you're not

[5:49] you can't change anything. You have to

[5:50] know that sticks with the preliminary

[5:51] plan everything that we approved and he

[5:53] was good with it. So, he came in and did

[5:55] the application. So,

[5:58] >> I'll make a motion that we approve the

[6:00] simple lot application AB-1331

[6:04] for Aaron Stout.

[6:06] >> Second.

[6:06] >> Motion. Second. Let's take a vote. I

[6:08] >> I motion carries. On to item number

[6:12] seven, simple lot subdivision

[6:14] application for AV1329F and AV1329G.

[6:19] This is kind of a similar situation. Um

[6:22] the wells had bought this property and

[6:24] it was originally 160 acre parcel. They

[6:27] bought 80 acres and bought another 80.

[6:29] And the original owner when he did this

[6:32] lot split it. Um, but now that the wells

[6:35] own it, we've asked them, hey, like you

[6:36] need to come in and fix this. This needs

[6:38] to be corrected. And they've been, of

[6:39] course, willing to help and willing to

[6:41] come in and do it. Same thing at zone

[6:43] OST. Um, not giving any zoning or

[6:46] anything like that. It's just the

[6:47] previous owner made it two 80acre

[6:49] parcels and now they're having to come

[6:51] in and fix kind of the mistake, but they

[6:53] are fixing it and cooperating. So,

[6:55] that's nice. So, we'll just have after

[6:56] this it'll just be two 80acre parcels

[6:59] that are OST. So, not really a lot

[7:02] changing, but they're just doing doing

[7:04] what's necessary.

[7:08] You guys got any questions? I actually

[7:10] think they're on here right now online

[7:11] if we have any questions, but I think

[7:13] it's pretty pretty straightforward.

[7:21] » You guys good with it?

[7:23] >> Yeah. So, yeah.

[7:24] >> Just to the east of there.

[7:27] >> Uh, yeah. It's actually a little lower

[7:28] than where their subdivision is. Uh

[7:31] >> sort of behind Walters.

[7:33] >> Yeah. More behind Walters. Yeah.

[7:36] >> But

[7:38] >> Yeah.

[7:38] >> All right. Then you go ahead.

[7:40] >> Yeah. Are we approving?

[7:42] >> Yeah.

[7:42] >> Okay. I'll make a motion that we approve

[7:44] the simple lot subdivision application

[7:46] AV1329-f

[7:49] AB1329-G.

[7:52] The law split for TLW Investments LLC.

[7:56] >> Second. Motion second. Second vote.

[7:58] >> I motion carry.

[8:02] On to item number eight, simple lot

[8:06] subdivision application for AB1328A.

[8:10] This is about a 60acre parcel. It's

[8:12] right at the end of

[8:14] um

[8:16] Daybreak Mesa.

[8:18] They are splitting up into two parcels.

[8:21] No road going through, nothing like

[8:23] that. I did talk with the engineer Zach

[8:24] that when we had this whole water issue

[8:27] go on um our engineer Nate at Sunrise

[8:30] recommend that a possible outcome is to

[8:32] take the water line up Main Street and

[8:34] connect it over to the water line on

[8:36] Daybreak Mesa. So I already talked with

[8:38] Zach and told him that part of this was

[8:40] we would say that we need a 26 foot

[8:42] public utility easement um to connect

[8:44] Main Street to Daybreak Mesa however

[8:46] they see fit. We don't we don't really

[8:48] care. Obviously shortage route is better

[8:50] for us but whatever works. Um, and they

[8:52] said that'd be no problem. Everything

[8:54] else on it seems good to me. That was

[8:56] the only thing. And so when if we make a

[8:59] motion, we'll have to put clarify in the

[9:01] motion that we need that easement. But

[9:03] >> why don't you do the motion then?

[9:05] >> All right. Anyone have

[9:06] >> But I I got some comments on that one.

[9:09] >> Uh, this one was brought up before

[9:11] slightly different. They were going to

[9:12] pass it through into Main Street. I'm

[9:14] glad they they stopped it from going

[9:16] into Main Street. I know there's a lot

[9:18] of public sentiment in the town about

[9:20] going from at connecting with that Main

[9:23] Street on that and I'd like to have some

[9:26] sort of a wording uh where we have to

[9:28] have an impact study before they can

[9:30] ever connect it in the future to Main

[9:33] Street.

[9:34] >> Okay. Yeah, we they've been very easy to

[9:36] work with. They've made whatever changes

[9:39] we need. So, I I don't see a problem

[9:41] with that, but we could definitely put

[9:42] something like that in the motion.

[9:44] >> Okay. Yeah. I just I just know there's a huge public sentiment about uh acting

[9:49] up to that. So, I just want to make sure

[9:51] we have as much protection as we can.

[9:55] >> Okay. Anyone else got any questions or

[9:59] comments for the engineer or the

[10:00] applicant? If not, I'll make a motion.

[10:04] >> All right. Then I'll make a motion we

[10:06] approve the simple lot subdivision

[10:07] application for AB1328A

[10:10] pending. They give us a 26 foot wide

[10:13] public utility easement connecting Main

[10:15] Street to Daybreak Mesa. And if in the

[10:18] future there's ever an interest of

[10:19] connecting that road that there is an

[10:20] impact study done and we understand what

[10:23] that could be like.

[10:25] >> Second.

[10:26] >> Motion second. Let's take a vote.

[10:28] >> I I

[10:28] >> I motion carries.

[10:31] >> Thank you for

[10:32] >> Thank you.

[10:34] All right. On to item number nine.

[10:36] condition use permit application for

[10:37] Rick Trimmer. He's requesting for

[10:40] approval of a condition use permit to

[10:41] allow three single family dwellings to

[10:44] operate a short-term rentals on proposed

[10:45] lots 103 um located northeast of Ranch

[10:49] Road in the A 20 zone. If you remember

[10:52] this last meeting or maybe the one

[10:54] before I came in and we did the zone

[10:56] change and the lot split and all that.

[10:58] Um what he's wanted to do is just put a

[11:00] house on the three different parcels

[11:01] that we hit lot split and uh which is

[11:04] fine, but he's wanting them to be

[11:05] conditional use permit and or sorry

[11:08] short-term rentals and our our ordinance

[11:10] says you can't be within 300 ft of each

[11:13] other. I think it is

[11:16] >> meets that. But it's also um our

[11:18] ordinance allowed me to only have one

[11:20] >> okay rental and this will allow him to

[11:22] have three short-term rentals in the

[11:24] town of Apple Valley

[11:25] >> because I think the 300 but

[11:28] >> whatever. Yeah,

[11:29] >> both of those basically.

[11:30] >> So he he talked to the, you know, the

[11:33] only house around it is his house

[11:35] already that he owns and the property

[11:36] that you drive through um sold him the

[11:39] land and is very understanding of what's

[11:41] going on that he wants to do a

[11:42] short-term rental. So, yeah, he does

[11:44] have to have a conditional use permit,

[11:46] but I feel like as long as the the

[11:48] neighbor, which is him, as well as the property owner is good with it and

[11:52] everyone's in in agreeance with it, I

[11:54] don't see any issues with it. I'm I'm

[11:55] happy to grant it to him. But

[11:57] >> this is a bubbling Wells area, right?

[11:59] >> Yeah. Yep.

[12:00] >> He's got that shortterm rental that's on

[12:01] the hill.

[12:02] >> It's right next to

[12:04] >> How many other short-term rentals are

[12:06] out that way?

[12:07] >> Um, he's got the one on the hill

[12:09] currently. I think he is a short-term

[12:11] rental.

[12:12] >> Yeah, he does. Yeah, but they're all

[12:13] basically greater than 300 ft and

[12:16] they're not really in a subdivision or

[12:18] anything. So, he's just asking to have

[12:20] more than one short-term rental in the

[12:23] town of Apple Valley. And I think he

[12:25] eventually wants to bring his kids

[12:27] there. He's like doing this.

[12:28] >> Yeah, that's the goal. It's to be a

[12:29] family compound. He just

[12:31] >> he just how he has to make it

[12:33] financially work.

[12:36] Yeah. Is that my only concern is it if

[12:39] it's shortterm rentals with those

[12:41] private roads out there so that could be

[12:43] a

[12:46] >> when you start having people traveling

[12:48] on private rooms there.

[12:50] >> Well, the mayor better get those roads

[12:52] dedicated time.

[12:59] » No. Is that the one Forest has been

[13:00] commenting on in our emails?

[13:02] >> Yes. He made a couple complaints. Um,

[13:05] I've talked with the applicant, the

[13:07] engineer. I I think we got all our ducks

[13:10] in a row. Um,

[13:11] >> I don't think there's any problems. If

[13:13] there was, we wouldn't have put it on

[13:14] the agenda, but uh, some people just

[13:16] like to complain a little bit,

[13:18] >> you know, right? As long as you got

[13:20] >> Yeah.

[13:20] >> make sure everything.

[13:22] >> Yeah. I think everything's good. Me and

[13:23] Jenna both review it. I I think we have

[13:25] all our

[13:25] >> back home. They They're new

[13:28] construction.

[13:29] >> Yeah. Yeah. Rent, they'll be all new.

[13:31] >> And it's a higher end. It's not a little

[13:34] cracker box nightly rental.

[13:36] >> Everything out there is high.

[13:38] >> Yeah, even that one he already has up

[13:39] there. It's really nice.

[13:41] >> So the crowd

[13:44] fire

[13:49] » roadway, you know,

[13:53] » they like to have

[13:56] >> Yeah, the applicant is very been very

[13:59] workable. Made the road up to higher

[14:00] standards. everything everything we've

[14:02] asked he's done. Um so I think as far as

[14:04] access and everything goes it's safe

[14:06] really the only thing is he'll have

[14:08] three instead of one you know um which I

[14:12] don't think is a big deal but

[14:13] >> this one on that same well that was

[14:16] discussed last time.

[14:17] >> Yeah.

[14:19] I mean it's at the end of the day it's

[14:21] four houses on 80 acres total or even

[14:23] more than that 100 acres. So

[14:26] >> that's what we like right.

[14:28] >> Yeah. Super low density. Uh you guys

[14:31] don't have any problems with it or

[14:32] questions and we could just make a

[14:34] motion.

[14:38] » You want to do it?

[14:39] >> Yeah, I'll re or I'll make a motion that

[14:41] we approve CUP application AB1361-B

[14:46] AB1361-d

[14:50] second.

[14:50] >> Motion second. Second vote.

[14:52] >> I

[14:55] motion carries. All right. Onto the

[14:57] minutes of June 10th, 2026 planning

[14:59] commission hearing meeting. I looked at

[15:01] them. They all look good. I didn't see

[15:03] any issues unless you guys did.

[15:07] All right. Well, then I make a motion we

[15:09] approve the minutes of June 10th, 2026

[15:11] planning commission hearing and meeting

[15:14] second.

[15:16] >> That lead.

[15:18] >> Motion to second. Take a vote.

[15:20] >> I I

[15:21] >> I

[15:22] >> motion carries.

[15:24] >> Motion we adjourn. Second motion second

[15:27] take a vote I

[15:30] >> meeting

7 8 26 Planning Commission Hearing and Meeting Video

Transcript