[0:16] - Bonsoir et bienvenue à la

[0:18] séance du conseil municipal du

[0:21] mardi 23 mai.

[0:24] >> Good evening and welcome to

[0:27] the regular meeting of the

[0:28] municipal council on Tuesday,

[0:30] May 23rd. And now the city clerk

[0:35] will take on the adoption of the

[0:37] agenda. BEACONSFIELD SÉANCE

[0:42] ORDINAIRE DU CONSEIL MUNICIPAL

[0:50] - En faveur.

[0:55] - À l'unanimité.

[0:59] - Alors, avant d'inviter le

[1:02] commandant, nous avons une

[1:05] présentation ce soir à faire, un

[1:10] résident qui a passé plusieurs

[1:12] années sur le comité consultatif

[1:15] d'urbanisme, qui a donné

[1:16] beaucoup, beaucoup de lui-même à

[1:19] ce comité. Maintenant, il veut

[1:24] passer à autre chose. Mais on

[1:27] voudrait le reconnaître ce soir,

[1:29] reconnaître sa contribution au

[1:35] comité d'urbanisme. Et je veux

[1:38] demander à monsieur de rajouter

[1:39] quelque chose.

[1:41] >> In fact, tonight is a special

[1:43] night for all of, us I think,

[1:45] and for Serge who joined us this

[1:46] evening. As George just

[1:48] mentioned, he was on our

[1:50] planning advisory committee for

[1:51] 12 years, actually. Quite a

[1:54] dedicated 12 years, I might add.

[1:58] Surge, the years I've been here,

[1:59] he's been here as, well we've

[2:01] interacted many times on a

[2:02] monthly basis on various

[2:05] projects on the PC. Sege Sege so

[2:07] it is our, we are delighted to

[2:10] see again surge and to wish you

[2:13] well and I know you are stepping

[2:14] down. With other projects in the

[2:19] works these days. We didn't want

[2:21] that to go by unrecognized at

[2:22] the same time. But beyond that,

[2:27] I think you've been a great

[2:28] example, I think, of community

[2:31] engagement and resident

[2:33] engagement and some of the

[2:34] things we do as part of this

[2:35] committee. I think we also

[2:38] appreciate your dedicated years

[2:41] of volunteer-ism that you've

[2:42] given to that. You've helped

[2:44] along other members and

[2:46] everybody here to help build our

[2:48] city over the last 12 years. We

[2:49] think about it in that

[2:51] perspective. I also think you

[2:54] better our city in a lot of

[2:55] ways. For all of those things

[2:56] and many other, things we want

[2:57] to thank you for all your

[2:58] contributions and you are here

[2:59] tonight, for those on the

[3:01] webcast, we wanted to extend our

[3:04] thanks to yourself and have

[3:06] everybody be aware of that at

[3:07] the same time. So, with that in

[3:09] mind, we have a little something

[3:10] to present to you, Serge.

[3:16] - Je vais demeurer, demander à

[3:18] monsieur de se joindre à nous.

[3:22] (applaudissements)

[3:52] - On va commencer par faire une

[3:54] revue d'urbanisme.

[4:31] - Merci beaucoup, merci, très

[4:32] apprécié.

[4:50] >> It's not over.

[4:51] >> Thanks, guys.

[4:59] - Et maintenant, je vais

[5:01] demander aux commandants Sauvé

[5:03] de venir dire quelques mots sur

[5:05] les activités qui se passe à

[5:07] Beaconsfield. Merci.

[5:11] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire.

[5:14] Membre du conseil, citoyen,

[5:16] citoyenne, il n'y en a pas,

[5:18] peut-être en mode écoute. Je

[5:21] vais vous présenter un petit

[5:25] bilan divisé en section,

[5:27] sécurité routière, patrouille à

[5:30] vélo et activités

[5:31] communautaires. Donc, sans plus

[5:35] tarder, pour la sécurité

[5:37] routière, nous avons maintenu

[5:39] une présence soutenue auprès de

[5:42] l'école Saint-Rémy au début et à

[5:43] la fin des classes concernant

[5:46] les automobilistes qui ne

[5:47] respectent pas la signalisation

[5:48] aux abords de l'école. Plusieurs

[5:50] constats d'infraction ont été

[5:51] émis. À l'école de Beaconsfield,

[5:54] même chose, le non-respect de la

[5:57] signalisation, beaucoup de

[5:58] patrouilles en mode visibilité

[6:00] et respect de la signalisation

[6:01] aux abords de l'école. L'école

[6:05] Sherbrooke Académie junior,

[6:07] plusieurs patrouiller encore en

[6:08] mode visibilité pour faire

[6:09] respecter la signalisation aux

[6:12] abords de l'école. Nous avons

[6:15] également participé à l'ONG

[6:18] qui... des opérations nationales

[6:20] concerter le 28 avril au 4 mai,

[6:23] partage de la route. Donc,

[6:29] beaucoup de constats

[6:30] d'infraction émis à la ville de

[6:32] Beaconsfield en lien avec cette

[6:33] opération. Nous avons aussi

[6:36] procédé à une grosse opération

[6:37] de vitesse au coin de

[6:39] Saint-Charles, qui est une zone

[6:42] accidentogène dans notre

[6:44] secteur, 505, une zone

[6:48] résidentielle de 40 kilomètres

[6:50] heure. Saint-Charles et

[6:52] déconnait ainsi que Beaconsfield

[6:54] et Shore, 30 kilomètres heure,

[6:57] la zone. Toutes ces opérations,

[7:00] beaucoup de constats

[7:01] d'infraction ont été émis. Comme

[7:02] vous le savez, la dernière fois,

[7:04] je vous ai parlé de la

[7:05] patrouille à vélo qui sillonnent

[7:06] et rue de Beaconsfield. Nous

[7:09] avons deux patrouilleurs à vélo

[7:10] cette année. Durant tout le

[7:11] mois, du 24 avril au 23 mai,

[7:15] nous avons procédé à une

[7:16] patrouille du parc Angel ou d',

[7:19] à l'intention des usagers du

[7:20] parc. Beaucoup d'avis formelles

[7:21] ont été émis. Pour les chiens

[7:25] sont Ales. D'autres opérations

[7:29] sont planifiés, des opérations

[7:31] répressives sont planifiés au

[7:33] cours des mois de mai et juin.

[7:38] Le 28 avril, à l'école JFK, il y

[7:40] a eu une marche pour l'autisme

[7:42] avec les étudiants et le

[7:43] personnel de l'école,

[7:45] sécurisation et encadrements de

[7:46] la marche avec les patrouilleurs

[7:47] à vélo. Une belle participation

[7:48] lors de l'événement. Ensuite, le

[7:53] 24 avril, il y avait à

[8:01] Beaconsfield le défi des braves,

[8:03] patrouille des divers points,

[8:04] activités, lors du rallye, une

[8:08] belle participation encore une

[8:09] fois des patrouilleurs à vélo.

[8:12] Je vais vous en parler tantôt

[8:14] avec notre activité

[8:15] communautaire, mais il y a le

[8:17] grand

[8:18] (inaudible)

[8:19] . D'ailleurs, monsieur Bourelle,

[8:20] on s'est vu lors des événements.

[8:23] Pour les agents sociaux

[8:25] communautaires, le 25 avril, on

[8:30] a fait une co-, une formation,

[8:35] une formation policier

[8:36] intervenant, direction et

[8:38] direction adjointe des écoles.

[8:39] Ils ont tous reçu une formation

[8:44] avec la Division de prévention

[8:46] et sécurité urbaine. C'est une

[8:49] section au SPVM communautaire,

[8:51] corbeau. Et les enquêtes du

[8:54] SPVM. Le 25 avril, on a aux 200

[9:01] de Woodside, au United Church,

[9:04] on a fait une visite de

[9:07] courtoisie et plusieurs ses

[9:08] conseils de sécurité donnés aux

[9:11] divers organismes dans l'Église.

[9:13] Recommandations faites au...

[9:16] recommandations de sécurité

[9:17] faites aux propriétaires pour

[9:18] optimiser les mesures de

[9:19] sécurité en place. Le 28 avril,

[9:23] même chose. Au 202 Woodside,

[9:26] nous avons qu'on continue avec

[9:28] plusieurs rencontres et des

[9:29] organismes. On a aussi rencontré

[9:30] les gestionnaires de l'Église.

[9:36] L'école JFK, le 28 avril, marche

[9:39] extérieures étudiante, avec le

[9:41] personnel scolaire, la marche a

[9:42] été faite avec la patrouille à

[9:44] vélo. Aucun incident signalé.

[9:46] Le... le 3 mai, au centre

[9:52] civique, une rencontre de

[9:56] concertation avec plusieurs

[9:57] partenaires locaux, dont

[10:00] plusieurs partenaires qui

[10:02] couvrent Beaconsfield. Les

[10:03] agents sociaux communautaires

[10:04] ont participé à la rencontre. Le

[10:06] 4 mai, rencontre de mise au

[10:08] point avec le gestionnaire du

[10:10] centre de pachas à Beaconsfield.

[10:13] Rencontre d'optimisation des

[10:14] bonnes pratiques pour augmenter

[10:15] la sécurité des unités au

[10:19] centre. Et le 9 mai, le centre

[10:22] d'actions bénévoles de l'ouest

[10:23] de l'île rencontre encore une

[10:26] fois avec les deux agents

[10:28] sociaux communautaires, une

[10:29] rencontre pour améliorer les

[10:30] bonnes pratiques. Et le oui cas

[10:32] aussi, le 11 mai,

[10:37] (intervention en anglais)

[10:38] , on est aussi le 15 mai, le

[10:40] CLSC du Lac-Saint-Louis qui

[10:42] couvre le secteur de

[10:45] Beaconsfield. Tout ça, juste

[10:47] pour vous préciser qu'on reprend

[10:49] le rôle de nos partenaires très

[10:51] au sérieux. Donc, tout le monde

[10:52] a été rencontré. Et finalement,

[10:55] pour finir, le 10 mai, 46

[10:58] boulevard Saint-Charles, nous

[10:59] avons participé au gros marathon

[11:03] avec monsieur le maire. Pour la

[11:05] criminalité, il n'y a aucun

[11:07] événement majeur ou accidents

[11:08] majeurs dans la ville de

[11:10] Beaconsfield dans le dernier

[11:12] mois. Donc, encore une fois, je

[11:14] vous remercie de votre

[11:15] confiance. Vous pouvez en tout

[11:17] temps composé notre numéro pour

[11:21] rejoindre le poste de quartier

[11:22] ou bien envoyer un courriel à

[11:25] notre adresse, c'est une voiture

[11:29] qui est conçue à chaque jour.

[11:34] >> Thank you for your

[11:36] confidence, you may call 28001

[11:38] if you want to speak to a police

[11:39] officer at anytime or you can

[11:42] reach us by email at P D Q one

[11:46] at SPVM dot Q C.ca. Thank you

[11:48] very much.

[11:52] - Est-ce qu' il y a des

[11:53] questions pour le commandant?

[11:55] Any questions for the

[11:56] commandment? Go to the mic,

[11:59] please.

[12:08] - La chose qu'on doit se

[12:10] demander, c'est sur les relevés

[12:12] d'infraction près des écoles, ça

[12:15] doit... je parle à travers mon

[12:18] chapeau, probablement des

[12:19] parents qui viennent mener leurs

[12:21] enfants à l'école. Ma demande

[12:25] serait: qu'est-ce que ça, ça

[12:26] pourrait faire partie du contact

[12:31] interne de publicité,

[12:32] d'annonces, parce que toutes les

[12:34] familles reçoivent la revue

[12:36] contact, et de mettre l'emphase

[12:38] au point de vue santé et

[12:41] sécurité que les zones de parcs,

[12:43] les zones d'école, que même si

[12:45] on est résident, même si on

[12:48] amène nos enfants à l'école, que

[12:51] c'est une zone de sécurité pour

[12:52] tout le monde. Je pense qu'en

[12:57] distribuant... lorsque vous

[12:58] distribuer le contact, que cette

[13:00] revue va dans toutes les

[13:02] familles, que les gens aient en

[13:04] première page, s'il le faut, des

[13:06] grosses photos disant que c'est

[13:08] très important pour tout le

[13:10] monde. Moi, c'est une

[13:11] suggestion.

[13:14] - Votre suggestion est

[13:16] excellente. On va certainement

[13:18] la prendre en considération dans

[13:20] le prochain contact. Je vous

[13:22] demanderais, au commandant, de

[13:24] vous répondre sur les parents

[13:27] qui font des excès de vitesse et

[13:30] qui se plaignent souvent de la

[13:33] vitesse.

[13:34] - Oui, malheureusement, en

[13:35] effet, ça arrive, les parents

[13:38] qui sont précieux le matin. Et

[13:40] ce n'est pas tous les parents

[13:42] qui respecte la signalisation

[13:43] aux abords des écoles. Mais

[13:45] juste avant qu'on fasse une

[13:47] opération de répression, je

[13:48] voulais juste amener le point,

[13:50] votre question est très bonne,

[13:52] mais il y a une approche aussi

[13:54] de prévention qui est faite avec

[13:56] les parents, à l'école, par les

[13:58] agents sociaux comme, à mon

[14:00] poste de quartier. Donc ça,...

[14:01] oui. Je ne connais pas encore la

[14:06] réalité du secteur, mais c'est

[14:07] un peu pareil dans chaque

[14:08] secteur. C'est toujours des

[14:13] plantes qui reviennent. Donc,

[14:15] l'approche, elle est continuelle

[14:17] auprès de la direction de

[14:18] l'école, de la direction de

[14:20] l'école qui avise les parents.

[14:22] - Merci beaucoup. Une autre

[14:23] question? Any other questions or

[14:25] any comments? Alors, merci

[14:28] beaucoup, Monsieur le

[14:29] commandant. Ça fait plaisir de

[14:32] vous voir à chaque séance du

[14:33] conseil. Merci. Now we will

[14:39] proceed with the written

[14:41] questions we have received. Then

[14:43] we will go to the floor. The

[14:46] first question is from Nicole on

[14:51] Crescent. She asked two

[14:53] questions. Question one is on

[15:00] 40.1 item. I noticed this item

[15:03] mentions pesticide laws. Does

[15:04] Beaconsfield use pesticides in

[15:05] sewer? Does Beaconsfield use --

[15:11] in or near the sewers? I hope

[15:15] not. Because the bait kills fish

[15:16] and many other animals. Please

[15:18] do not use rodent aside. Here is

[15:24] an article about how dangerous

[15:26] it is to aquatic environment.

[15:29] She is giving us an article.

[15:34] Please do not ever use it in or

[15:37] near sewers, the bait goes up

[15:39] the food chain and will end up

[15:41] in the rivers and in fish.

[15:44] Rodenticide cannot effectively

[15:46] be filtered out of the water.

[15:52] You have already asked this

[15:53] question before. This question

[15:56] has already been answered by the

[16:00] administration and the answer

[16:01] is, no, the city does not use

[16:05] rodenticide in or near the

[16:06] sewer. Question two, the new

[16:10] definition of building includes

[16:13] vacant lots. What will

[16:14] Beaconsfield do to ensure that

[16:16] the lots are being built on or

[16:19] in fact vacant and do not

[16:22] contain mature trees or wetland?

[16:26] Beaconsfield define vacant lots

[16:28] as a non environmental-y

[16:30] sensitive space with no mature

[16:32] trees? In this bylaw, which is

[16:37] item 40.2, the term vacant is

[16:41] used in the sense of a

[16:43] construction and not of the

[16:44] environment. Environmental

[16:48] protections are provided for the

[16:51] environment quality act, for

[16:54] example protection of wetlands.

[16:55] And other Beaconsfield bylaws,

[16:59] as an example, zoning for trees,

[17:01] it is not the intended purpose

[17:02] for this bylaw section to take

[17:05] such environmental elements into

[17:06] account. The next question it

[17:14] came from octane Via.

[17:18] - Bonjour, c'est sur l'item 45.

[17:24] 2. Le comité consultatif

[17:27] d'urbanisme a donné un avis

[17:28] défavorable à notre demande.

[17:30] Cependant, les motifs ne nous

[17:31] ont pas été expliquées. Ceci

[17:33] dans le contexte où, avec des

[17:35] preuves à la pluie sur les

[17:37] particularités du terrain avec

[17:39] fossé, entre les deux lots,

[17:41] voisins, et les mesures mises en

[17:43] place, soit barrières de

[17:45] caoutchouc plus pente pouvant

[17:48] être mesuré, les impacts sur une

[17:50] telle dérogation serait nul

[17:52] alors que les coûts pour

[17:53] effectuer la correction serait

[17:55] important. Sans considérer

[17:58] l'effet esthétique. Nous

[18:00] aimerions avoir les explications

[18:02] référant et échanger pour qu'une

[18:06] analyse raisonnable soit faite

[18:07] en vue de la prise de décision

[18:08] par le Conseil. Merci d'avance.

[18:15] Alors, le CCU a indiqué que la

[18:19] condition indiquée au règlement

[18:28] BEAC- 0 44, sur les dérivation

[18:30] mineurs, n'est pas rempli.

[18:34] L'application des dispositions

[18:35] du règlement de zonage ne

[18:37] causent pas un préjudice sérieux

[18:39] au demandeur. Nous vous invitons

[18:41] à contacter le Service de

[18:44] l'urbanisme qui pourra vous

[18:46] donner un complément

[18:48] d'information, si vous voulez

[18:49] bien les contacter. Et

[18:53] maintenant, nous allons à la

[18:55] période de questions du public.

[18:57] Public questions. Yeah, sure.

[19:10] >> My name is Peter Samson. I've

[19:14] been a resident and a taxpayer

[19:15] here for 39 years. Some of you

[19:18] already know me. I don't need to

[19:22] provide you with an address. I

[19:26] have a slightly unorthodox

[19:27] question to ask. If you bear

[19:30] with me, you will understand

[19:33] where I'm coming from. The do

[19:37] it, I have to start off in a

[19:39] strange way. I will ask the

[19:43] question and then I will go with

[19:44] the preamble, to bring you up to

[19:49] date on how this is come to

[19:50] light. About -- last year, as a

[19:57] matter of fact, I became a

[20:02] little bit concerned about the

[20:03] noise levels being generated by

[20:06] the Generac generators,

[20:11] emergency generators. And with

[20:15] good reason, I am flanked by two

[20:17] of these machines on my

[20:19] property. After six or eight

[20:24] hours of a planned outage, I

[20:33] wasn't happy with the situation.

[20:34] I looked for guidance. Just to

[20:38] go back, as I slipped up on the

[20:40] question, the question is, would

[20:45] it be possible to trade you,

[20:48] this council, up even or even

[20:54] sweeten the deal with the town

[20:55] of Blaine Ville? That's the

[20:59] question. It's an orthodox. But

[21:01] as I said, this goes back to

[21:04] last year and when I became

[21:10] concerned about the noise level,

[21:13] I contacted, discreetly, via

[21:16] email, both the Mayor and my

[21:20] councillor and began a little

[21:22] bit of discussion via email on

[21:24] what was going on. The fact that

[21:27] I couldn't find anything in the

[21:30] regulations within the city of

[21:34] Beaconsfield that addressed in

[21:35] this situation. There were

[21:38] absolutely no parameters. It was

[21:39] wide open. So, eventually, we

[21:45] ended up with my councillor and

[21:47] I having an in-person meeting

[21:49] because the emails or not really

[21:50] working very well. It wasn't

[21:54] really coming to a proper

[21:55] conclusion. About time, my

[22:02] councillor had been in touch

[22:03] with many of you. The feedback

[22:08] he had received from you was

[22:10] that this was really not a

[22:11] problem. You couldn't see it as

[22:15] being a problem. Every time

[22:19] there was a reason given for not

[22:20] doing anything, basically that

[22:25] reason came at the same calibre

[22:27] as my dog ate my homework. It

[22:30] was at that level. The final

[22:35] part of the discussion, the

[22:37] in-person discussion over my

[22:38] kitchen table, was, well, we

[22:42] don't want to do anything, we

[22:44] don't think it's a problem. Have

[22:45] you tried talking to this

[22:46] individual? In this day and age,

[22:52] where if you open a wrong card

[22:54] or you can get shot, I would

[22:59] have to go to my neighbour when

[23:03] they are not breaking the law,

[23:06] because there is the law, and go

[23:08] on their property, ring their

[23:14] doorbell, and no matter how

[23:16] nicely I would say, it I am

[23:17] telling them, I really don't

[23:18] like what you are doing. Okay?

[23:23] What could go wrong under those

[23:24] circumstances? The City supposed

[23:28] to be practically -- protecting

[23:30] me and my interest is telling

[23:31] me, go out there for yourself.

[23:34] Okay. That's what the Council

[23:38] had said to me through my

[23:41] councillor. Okay. I had to live

[23:44] with that. Now, fast forward to

[23:50] the beginning of April. A

[23:56] situation affected all of us. In

[24:00] my particular case, and I

[24:01] believe in the case of my

[24:02] councillor as well, we were out

[24:07] for 120 consecutive hours. So,

[24:12] at that particular point in

[24:13] time, we had the two Generac

[24:16] systems that started up, doing

[24:18] their wonderful duet. Followed

[24:22] by a third portable that is

[24:24] really noisy. And shortly

[24:30] thereafter, a fourth came. I had

[24:37] these generators, the noise

[24:38] being generated by them in a

[24:41] 270-degree radius from my house

[24:44] for the better part of 120

[24:47] consecutive hours. Does this

[24:52] sound like it's not a problem?

[24:57] You could have fooled me. When I

[24:59] was looking out of my kitchen

[25:03] window, looking at that

[25:04] neighbour, who had their house

[25:07] lit up like a television studio,

[25:12] I bore no malice towards them.

[25:13] Why? Because they were doing

[25:18] everything that was within the

[25:19] law.

[25:21] >> Will you be coming to a

[25:23] conclusion?

[25:24] >> Yeah. We come to the

[25:25] conclusion. The conclusion is

[25:27] that this Council has done

[25:29] nothing with regard to that.

[25:32] Yet, there is a Council that has

[25:33] done something. That Council is

[25:41] Blainville. They have

[25:46] regulations, 53, just covering

[25:51] nuisance noise. And they have a

[25:55] curfew! It says, even, even

[26:01] under emergency situations that

[26:05] the noise level, those machines

[26:06] have to be turned off from 9:00

[26:09] at night until 7:00 in the

[26:10] morning. What do we have in

[26:13] Beaconsfield? Zip. Okay? And

[26:18] then in a separate regulation,

[26:19] they also have something that

[26:23] governs the level of noise is

[26:26] acceptable for the machines.

[26:29] It's 55 decibels.

[26:34] >> Besides Blainville, are there

[26:35] any other cities that you know?

[26:37] >> No, I have not researched the

[26:38] entire world. This I became

[26:40] aware of and these are bylaws.

[26:42] They enforce them because I know

[26:45] that, in fact, in at least one

[26:47] case, I was told about that the

[26:49] police were at the door when

[26:52] people were going over the

[26:53] curfew.

[26:56] >> Okay. I'm going to ask Mr.

[27:00] below to give you more

[27:01] information about this.

[27:03] >> Thank you for the

[27:04] information. I understand it

[27:07] could be annoying to have so

[27:09] long hours of machines. I went

[27:12] through that near my property.

[27:16] Overnight, it is not nearly

[27:17] interesting, I find. These

[27:21] aren't exceptional

[27:22] circumstances. Last time was 25

[27:23] years ago. We can have the

[27:27] Blainville bylaw says it is that

[27:28] information. Thanks for letting

[27:29] us know.

[27:34] >> The thing I find so

[27:36] irritating is the fact that I

[27:38] raised this issue last year and

[27:41] if you were watching the TV, TV

[27:43] news, channel 12, okay, from

[27:47] five until seven every night,

[27:49] there are Generac commercials

[27:51] after Generac commercial after

[27:53] Generac commercial. This is not

[27:54] something that is going away.

[27:57] >> For the sake of transparency,

[27:58] I have a Generac.

[28:02] >> That's fine.

[28:03] >> Thank you very much. Yes,

[28:06] next.

[28:18] >> Hi, Frank. Item 40.9, I

[28:23] believe it is my property. I was

[28:28] just sitting there. I looked up.

[28:33] He mentioned nuisance. I said,

[28:37] well, let's look at the

[28:38] definition of nuisance. First of

[28:41] all, it's illegal. It's

[28:44] obnoxious. It's dangerous, okay?

[28:49] There is danger. Why are we

[28:51] using this word? Nuisance.

[28:58] >> What is your question? I'm

[29:02] not sure where you are going

[29:04] with this.

[29:05] >> It's the same in French as an

[29:06] English in your documents.

[29:07] Nuisance.

[29:10] >> Nuisance?

[29:11] >> There is no French word for

[29:12] it.

[29:13] >> What is your question with a

[29:14] nuisance?

[29:15] >> No, no.

[29:16] >> Have you experienced a

[29:17] nuisance?

[29:19] >> I opened that. I want to

[29:21] thank you. I sent you an email.

[29:22] I assume you looked at it. I

[29:27] have a way to solve the problem

[29:30] we have, I have. I hope when you

[29:34] come to that point, you consider

[29:38] that I've been here 50 years.

[29:40] >> What is the problem?

[29:42] >> The problem is what is a

[29:43] nuisance? Am I illegal? Am I

[29:46] obnoxious? I'm not any of that.

[29:52] >> Are you talking about

[29:55] measures that the City has

[29:57] taken?

[29:58] >> No, I'm talking about the

[29:59] words you use.

[30:01] >> Okay. I'm going to ask Mr.

[30:04] bottle to answer your question.

[30:06] I think he has a lot of

[30:07] information to give you.

[30:09] >> What? Yes.

[30:13] >> Generally speaking, the word

[30:15] nuisance is used when it could

[30:18] be dangerous, might be annoying

[30:19] for others. I believe you are

[30:23] having traction. Occasionally,

[30:28] with the fire department and

[30:30] other governmental agencies as

[30:31] well. I know there is a

[30:34] situation here that is being

[30:36] looked at and soon we will be

[30:39] able to fix it in the best, in

[30:42] your best interest at first and

[30:44] for you as well.

[30:45] >> I'm trying to do my best.

[30:49] I've obviously sent you a

[30:51] picture of what I plan to do and

[30:54] I don't see why I'm violating

[30:56] anything. I'm doing my best.

[30:59] >> I see that picture that you

[31:01] have sent.

[31:02] >> I sent it to the Mayor.

[31:05] >> I didn't see it. We have our

[31:07] bylaws. It's applying the bylaws

[31:12] as per our rules and sometimes

[31:15] the bylaws don't please one

[31:17] neighbour or many neighbours.

[31:19] Those are the bylaws. In order

[31:20] to allow you exceptions, we have

[31:21] to change our bylaws.

[31:25] >> I'm not asking for that, sir.

[31:26] All I'm asking is, nobody has

[31:29] ever complained to me. I know

[31:31] they maybe complain to you guys,

[31:32] but they haven't complained to

[31:33] me. I listen.

[31:37] >> As you heard, the previous

[31:40] resident the microphone

[31:42] complained that the neighbour

[31:43] was not appealing -- complained

[31:44] to the city about neighbours,

[31:47] not be the first time that

[31:49] someone complains to the city

[31:51] without notifying their

[31:52] neighbour.

[31:55] >> Anyway. I hope you do

[31:58] something, as a 50-year citizen

[32:01] of the city, I can salvage what

[32:04] I did wrong. Thank you.

[32:06] >> Thank you. Another question?

[32:25] - Bonjour, Mesdames et

[32:26] Messieurs. The city signed an

[32:35] agreement with and why our sea

[32:39] in November 2019 where item 14,

[32:44] -- La Ville sont gages à démolir

[32:45] assez frais le hangar à la date

[32:49] du cinquième anniversaire de la

[32:50] signature de l'entente. La Ville

[32:51] s'engage à construire à frais

[32:55] une nouvelle capitaine ris avant

[32:57] la démolition du club House et

[33:01] va soumettre les plans de la

[33:03] nouvelle capitaine rit. Since

[33:07] it, we are now three and a half

[33:09] years down the road, the

[33:10] deadline is five years. Since we

[33:15] can be expecting that this will

[33:18] require many millions to destroy

[33:19] and rebuild, my question is,

[33:23] what is the total budget as of

[33:26] today to demolish and rebuild

[33:27] these facilities?

[33:32] >> Again, I will ask Mr. Boileau

[33:34] to answer your question.

[33:42] >>

[33:43] - Nul n'est tenu à l'impossible.

[33:45] La pandémie a nui à nos

[33:46] activités. Nos relations sont

[33:53] excellentes, dans l'avancement.

[33:54] Est-ce que vous voulez que je

[33:56] vous répondre en anglais?

[33:59] - Tu peux répondre des deux

[34:00] bords.

[34:01] - Je suis un peu mélangé,

[34:02] désolé. Oui, une entente de 5

[34:04] ans. Cette année, dans le

[34:08] programme, il est prévu la

[34:09] démolition de la grange pour

[34:12] permettre de continuer à opérer.

[34:15] Probablement que ça va se faire

[34:17] vers la fin de cette année. Et

[34:19] puis, après ça, il y aura des

[34:21] projets pour considérer les

[34:26] plantations d'une capitainerie,

[34:29] également d'autres éléments sur

[34:30] le terrain, comme le club House

[34:32] et la piscine. Mais je ne pense

[34:35] pas qu'ils aimeraient ça qu'on

[34:38] démolisse le club-house

[34:40] maintenant, après 5 ans, si la

[34:41] capitainerie n'est pas là. Là

[34:44] capitainerie, ça permettrait de

[34:47] contrôler les entrées et les

[34:49] sorties. Probablement qu'un

[34:50] petit bureau de travail avec

[34:52] toilettes, utilitaire pour les

[34:55] usagers de ce secteur du parc.

[34:57] - Donc, je comprends de réponse.

[34:59] La première, c'est que le délai

[35:00] est reporté probablement.

[35:03] - Pas officiellement.

[35:04] - Ta formellement.

[35:05] - Pas officiellement, mais on a

[35:07] des raisons de croire que ça

[35:09] risque d'être retardé.

[35:10] - O.K.. Deuxièmement, quand vous

[35:12] faites le parallèle avec le

[35:14] parc, moi, j'entends... je ne

[35:19] parle pas de la construction,

[35:20] mais de la démolition.

[35:23] - Je pense que c'est plus

[35:25] 500000. Parce que ça a coûté

[35:28] 700000. On parle d'un chalet qui

[35:32] sert à des fins communautaires

[35:34] d'un district, d'un quartier, on

[35:37] parle de son utilité pour les

[35:39] usagers, évidemment. Est-ce que

[35:41] ça va être sain 100000 ou

[35:44] 750000? On y est pas encore.

[35:46] Mais on n'est pas dans un chalet

[35:48] de parc à grand déploiement.

[35:50] - Ça, est-ce qu'on va être

[35:52] informé, nous, d'une façon ou

[35:53] d'une autre, du fait que ça a

[35:55] coûté à la Ville autant où que

[35:57] ça va coûter à la ville autant?

[36:01] - Les informations sont publiées

[36:04] à chaque automne. Lorsque le

[36:08] Conseil adopte le plan.

[36:10] - Sauf qu'on ne voit pas les

[36:12] chiffres détaillés par projet.

[36:13] Ce qu'on, voit c'est le total.

[36:15] - Non, ça n'a pas à être rendue

[36:20] publique et on ne le fait pas

[36:21] pour des fins d'appel d'offres

[36:24] et éviter qu'il y ait des

[36:26] communications entre les

[36:27] soumissionnaires pour indiquer

[36:28] les prix. Ce n'est pas moi qui

[36:29] fais ces règles-là. Elles sont

[36:31] comme ça. Ça nous convient. Il

[36:34] est le prix total des projets.

[36:36] Et quand on fait un appel

[36:38] d'offres, vous connaissez le

[36:39] budget que la Ville a pris.

[36:41] C'est Davie publique au moment

[36:42] de l'appel d'offres. Il y a le

[36:44] budget qui est présenté au

[36:46] service électronique d'appel

[36:48] d'offres. Et ils ont trois

[36:51] semaines, dépendamment des

[36:52] projets, deux à quatre semaines

[36:54] pour soumettre un prix en

[36:57] fonction de ce qui était

[36:58] demandé.

[37:00] - Et le projet devrait être

[37:02] formellement adopté par le

[37:03] Conseil.

[37:04] - Oui, ensuite de ça, il y a les

[37:05] ouvertures. Il y a un dépôt au

[37:09] conseil, une approbation, un

[37:12] rejet, comme on le fait

[37:13] régulièrement, à chaque mois,

[37:14] absolument.

[37:17] - Aucune. Dernière question,

[37:18] c'est plus une remarque,

[37:19] peut-être. Monsieur le Maire.

[37:24] And you notice the water levels

[37:28] disappearing? I'm related to

[37:31] what happened two years ago the

[37:32] St. Lawrence River seaway,

[37:38] whatever group published the

[37:40] report and we commented. What

[37:43] they were saying is that, more

[37:47] and more, there will be problems

[37:48] with the water levels. What's

[37:51] happening? What has been

[37:52] happening in March, April it was

[37:56] the water flowing from the

[37:57] Ottawa River. Now, it is still

[38:02] high because now is the overflow

[38:03] from the Great Lakes. It is

[38:05] still okay. But still take no,

[38:10] keep track of those numbers when

[38:12] you answered to us two years

[38:13] ago, you said checking every

[38:16] month or whatever, I hope you

[38:18] are doing that every spring

[38:20] because the problem will grow,

[38:21] as you can see, around the --

[38:24] >> I check it every day, in

[38:25] fact. I know that Mr. Boileau

[38:31] and Mr. Shabbat --

[38:35] >> You agree a tie, don't you

[38:36] agree?

[38:37] >> Every year, it goes up. It

[38:41] goes up to slightly below what

[38:45] we consider minor, you know but

[38:53] the flow is controlled upstream.

[38:57] >> Up to a certain level, they

[38:58] said.

[38:59] >> The control upstream is not

[39:02] to flood the Lac-Saint-Louis.

[39:07] >> In the report, when they were

[39:09] saying, I can bring you back the

[39:11] report if you want, at one point

[39:13] they will have to make a choice

[39:17] between flood north or west that

[39:18] would be, let's say, the Great

[39:22] Lakes, or flooding the

[39:24] downstream here.

[39:25] >> Lake Ontario. There is an

[39:27] understanding now that

[39:30] Lac-Saint-Louis -- in 2019, the

[39:34] situation was worse.

[39:37] >> No, I agree.

[39:38] >> We still had no flooding.

[39:39] >> The report was about 2017 and

[39:40] 2019. They were saying, in the

[39:44] future, it will get worse and we

[39:46] have no control over the

[39:49] situation if it goes to high.

[39:50] >> We will get there when we get

[39:51] there.

[39:53] >> Well, that day it will be too

[39:54] late. Thank you.

[40:01] >> Other questions?

[40:07] - Bonjour. J'ai posé la

[40:09] troisième question. Si j'ai bien

[40:11] compris, la demande de

[40:13] dérogation a été boxé. Nous, on

[40:16] a souvent posé la question au

[40:18] département d'urbanisme pour

[40:20] savoir c'est quoi la raison,

[40:21] parce qu'on ne comprend pas du

[40:22] tout quelle est la raison. C'est

[40:24] pour ça que je suis là ce soir.

[40:25] Eux, ils m'ont dit de passer ici

[40:28] peut-être que je vais avoir des

[40:29] réponses. Donc, je pose la

[40:33] question. D'après nous, oui, on

[40:36] comprend qu'il y a un décret qui

[40:37] dit qu'on n'a pas le droit

[40:39] d'avoir des dalles de 2 mètres

[40:41] dans la cour voisine, mais tout

[40:43] ce qu'on a fait, c'était à la

[40:45] demande de notre contracteur. Il

[40:48] nous a mis devant le fait.

[40:51] Est-ce qu'on le fait comme ça ou

[40:52] est-ce qu'on ne le fait pas

[40:53] comme ça? On a dit que on

[40:55] pensait que c'était mieux. Mais

[40:57] il n'y a pas d'application à

[40:59] cause de l'eau de pluie. J'étais

[41:02] là, il m'a dit que c'était une

[41:05] demande de dérogation mineure et

[41:06] que ça allait passer, d'après

[41:08] lui. Nous, on a mis dédales,

[41:12] mais on ne savait pas si ça

[41:14] allait avoir un impact. L'impact

[41:17] dédale sur notre terrain, entre

[41:21] les deux mais ça, il y a

[41:23] vraiment un grand fossé, il n'y

[41:24] a personne qui nous répond. S'il

[41:28] y a un impact, je peux

[41:30] comprendre, si ça peut affecter

[41:32] notre voisin, si ça peut

[41:37] affecter, on comprend tout, on

[41:40] ne veut pas briser la loi. On ne

[41:41] savait pas. On s'était dit que

[41:46] c'était mieux comme, savent que

[41:47] c'était plus beau. C'est ça que

[41:48] je ne comprends pas. Ils nous

[41:50] ont recommandé de venir ici pour

[41:51] poser la question. Moi, je

[41:54] voudrais me défendre aussi. Ce

[41:56] n'est pas mal.

[42:00] - Je peux déjà vous donner une

[42:02] réponse ce soir. Vous aviez

[42:04] écrit votre question. Ma réponse

[42:05] tient toujours. Oui, ça va

[42:11] probablement être une chose que

[42:14] le conseil va adopter à la

[42:16] recommandation qui a été fait

[42:17] par le CCU. Mais je vous

[42:19] recommande fortement de

[42:20] retourner au CCU avec les

[42:24] arguments que vous avez et les

[42:26] informations que vous avez. Ça

[42:32] peut revenir au conseil avec les

[42:34] recommandations du CCU à ce

[42:36] moment-là, selon vous

[42:37] informations qui ont été donnés,

[42:38] avec eux. Alors, à ce moment-là,

[42:42] je présume que ça pourrait

[42:46] changer. Mais ce sont les

[42:48] experts, ce sont eux sur

[42:50] lesquelles on se fie pour

[42:52] prendre nos décisions. Alors, ma

[42:58] recommandation, comme je vous

[42:59] l'ai dit tout à l'heure,

[43:01] retourner au CCU après ce soir.

[43:03] - Donc, je dois reprendre avec

[43:05] eux?

[43:06] - Je pense qu'on va certainement

[43:10] donner les informations ce soir

[43:13] aussi. Retourner au CCU pour

[43:16] voir ce que vous pouvez apporter

[43:18] plus comme information, plus de

[43:20] détails, rencontrer les

[43:22] exigences. Et votre demande va

[43:27] revenir aux prochains mois. Et à

[43:29] ce moment-là, si les

[43:31] recommandations sont adoptées,

[43:36] votre dérogation, le Conseil

[43:38] agira en conséquence.

[43:39] - Oui. Merci beaucoup. Bonne

[43:40] soirée.

[43:45] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres

[43:46] questions? Any other questions?

[43:50] Alors, nous allons procéder avec

[43:53] l'agenda. Madame la greffière?

[43:58] >> Approval of the minutes of

[43:59] the Beaconsfield public

[44:01] consultation of April 24th, 2023

[44:03] at 7:30 P M.

[44:07] >> Second.

[44:08] >> All in favour?

[44:30] - À l'unanimité.

[44:35] >> Awarding of contract for the

[44:39] construction of a sidewalk on

[44:43] field fair, and Woodland, in the

[44:51] amount to

[44:57] $558,182.48 all taxes included.

[45:05] >> Proposed.

[45:34] Awarding of contract for the

[45:43] transportation of beaucoup

[45:44] leaves with two renewal options

[45:46] to the lowest confirming bitter

[45:52] GFL Environmental Inc., In the

[45:53] amount of $53, 462, all taxes

[45:57] included.

[45:59] >> In favour?

[46:21] Approbation de la liste des

[46:22] comptes à payer au 23 mai 2023,

[46:23] et de la liste des paiements

[46:24] préautorisés pour la période du

[46:25] 13 avril 2023 au 23 avril 2023

[46:26] et du 25 avril

[46:27] - Les 2023 au 10 mai 2023, pour

[46:28] un déboursé total de montants

[46:29] importants sous 3 076 676,21 $.

[46:30] 827800 dollars. Pour achat d'un

[46:34] camion et 340 858, 78,

[46:40] réfrigération pour le

[46:42] remplacement des contrôles hôtel

[46:44] de ville et Bibliothèque. 207

[46:51] diminue pour la construction de

[46:52] nouveaux chalets. Et finalement,

[46:57] les salaires Hackett sont 16000.

[47:03] - Proposé.

[47:11] >> The positive party treasurer

[47:13] financial statements as of

[47:14] December 31st, 2022. Lecture et

[47:18] dépôt des faits saillants du

[47:20] rapport financier pour l'année

[47:21] 2022 par le maire de la Ville de

[47:28] Beaconsfield.

[47:29] - Le rapport, je vais le lire.

[47:30] C'est un rapport du maire sur

[47:33] les faits saillants du rapport

[47:36] financier 2022. Et sur le

[47:37] rapport du vérificateur externe.

[47:40] Tel que l'exige l'article 105 de

[47:43] la Loi sur les cités et villes,

[47:45] je vous fais rapport des faits

[47:47] saillants du rapport financier

[47:49] 2022 de la ville de Beaconsfield

[47:51] et du rapport du vérificateur

[47:54] externe indépendant.

[47:59] >> Highlights of the financial

[48:00] statement as of -- 2022.

[48:03] Statements of the detailed

[48:05] results and the operating

[48:06] surplus are for tax purposes for

[48:09] the year ended December 31, 2022

[48:14] so operating revenues have --

[48:18] and fiscal charges and all

[48:20] located amounts totaling

[48:25] 52,000,839 $731. As such for the

[48:31] 2022 fiscal year, the total

[48:34] operating surplus from tax

[48:35] purposes which is a surplus for

[48:37] the fiscal year is 1 million

[48:41] $506,039. The portion of the

[48:45] surplus stems from revenues that

[48:46] were higher than expected.

[48:49] Notably property transfer taxes.

[48:52] Grants from different

[48:54] governments and interest income.

[48:55] The final portion it's

[49:04] attributed two savings in each

[49:05] of the departments in 2022. The

[49:14] an operating surplus was 1

[49:18] million $806,268. The allocated

[49:20] portion was 10,000,095 including

[49:29] 2,000,292 $528 for

[49:30] infrastructure. This also had an

[49:32] amount of 7,584,000 in reserve

[49:36] funds. Specifically and it's

[49:39] working. As of December 31 2022,

[49:45] the statement of financial

[49:47] position including a debt in the

[49:48] amount of 20 million $271,000

[49:52] grants from the government of

[49:53] Quebec would be used to

[49:57] reimburse 30.7% of this debt

[49:58] which is six point $2 million.

[50:03] Capital assets totally 7 million

[50:07] and including six point $2

[50:09] million of acquisitions made in

[50:12] 2022. Five point $2 million in

[50:16] infrastructure such as drinking

[50:19] water, wastewater, and $1

[50:21] million in building. Le 22 mars

[50:28] 2023, le Cabinet a signé le

[50:30] rapport du ministère

[50:31] indépendant. Après avoir

[50:33] effectué l'audit selon les

[50:34] normes d'audit généralement

[50:35] reconnues du Canada, l'opinion

[50:38] suivante a été émise: à mon

[50:41] avis, les états financiers

[50:43] donnent dans tous les aspects

[50:46] significatifs une image fidèle

[50:47] de la situation financière de la

[50:49] ville de Beaconsfield au 31

[50:52] décembre 2022. Ainsi que des

[50:55] résultats de longues activités,

[50:57] de variations de la dette nette

[50:58] et de leurs flux de trésorerie

[51:00] pour l'exercice terminé à cette

[51:01] date. Conformément aux normes

[51:04] comptables canadiennes, pour le

[51:06] secteur public.

[51:10] >> In conclusion, the 2022

[51:12] financial statement on the

[51:13] report from the independent will

[51:15] be tabled at this council

[51:17] meeting and be forwarded to --

[51:22] and the highlights will be

[51:24] published on the website of the

[51:26] city of Beaconsfield. I think

[51:28] the members of the municipal

[51:30] council and the managers for the

[51:31] work they do and their

[51:35] contribution to serve their

[51:37] citizens well and to achieve the

[51:38] goals of our organization.

[51:52] >> Filings of this bylaw, on

[51:57] permits and certificates to

[51:59] request a report signed by a

[52:01] professional within the meaning

[52:03] of section 31.42 of the quality

[52:07] act, one submitting an

[52:09] application for construction or

[52:11] subdivision permit, and to make

[52:12] connections to water storm and

[52:16] sanitary lines to obtain a

[52:17] certificate of authorization and

[52:18] submission of the draft by-law

[52:19] to a public consultation on June

[52:20] 19, 2023, at 7:30 PM.

[52:28] >> I give notice and I propose

[52:31] this as well.

[52:32] >> I second.

[52:35] >> In favour? Dépôt, avis de

[52:37] motion et adoption d'un projet

[52:41] de Règlement BEAC-046-6 intitulé

[52:42] « Règlement modifiant le

[52:46] Règlement de construction

[52:47] BEAC-046 afin de modifier les

[52:48] dispositions relatives aux

[52:50] appareils à combustion solide et

[52:54] d'exiger le raccordement des

[52:58] bâtiments principaux aux

[52:59] conduites principales d'aqueduc

[53:00] et d'égout pluvial et

[53:01] sanitaire » et soumission du

[53:02] projet de règlement à une

[53:03] consultation publique le 19 juin

[53:04] 2023 à 19 h 30.

[53:07] >> I second.

[53:10] >> All in favour?

[53:25] >> Adoption of bylaw entitled

[53:29] bylaw modifying bylaw --

[53:32] conserving permits and

[53:34] certificates in order to address

[53:37] certificates -- for the

[53:42] principal residence established

[53:45] usage relating to the principle

[53:47] establishment usage to modify

[53:49] the titles of the sections

[53:50] related to certificates of

[53:52] occupancy for a commercial usage

[53:54] in order to integrate the notion

[53:56] of the original usage of housing

[54:00] groups and the establishment

[54:01] usage from the lodging services

[54:07] C five, two require certificate

[54:10] of occupancy for commercial

[54:11] usage is and additional usage

[54:12] from the housing group if you

[54:17] citizen principal uses from the

[54:20] lodging services when. To define

[54:23] the procedures, and criteria for

[54:27] the validity and to provide the

[54:29] certificate of occupancy for

[54:31] principle resident

[54:32] establishment. The objective of

[54:36] this bylaw is clearly stated in

[54:38] the title and concerns lodging

[54:42] services, short term rentals and

[54:45] Beaconsfield.

[54:48] >> Proposed --

[54:51] >> Second.

[54:52] >> All in favour?

[54:58] Adoption, avec changements, du

[54:59] Règlement

[55:05] BEAC-045-16 intitulé «

[55:06] Règlement modifiant le Règlement

[55:07] BEAC-045 sur les permis et

[55:08] certificats afin d'abroger les

[55:09] dispositions relatives aux

[55:10] amendes pour la démolition, de

[55:12] référer au Règlement sur la

[55:13] démolition BEAC-152

[55:14] préalablement à l'obtention d'un

[55:15] permis de construction

[55:16] nécessitant la démolition d'un

[55:17] bâtiment, d'assujettir la

[55:18] démolition totale d'un bâtiment

[55:20] à l'obtention d'un certificat

[55:21] d'autorisation et d'abroger les

[55:23] dispositions relatives aux

[55:24] démolitions du présent

[55:29] règlement ». L'objet du

[55:30] règlement est clairement

[55:32] indiqué. La portée du règlement

[55:34] est sur l'ensemble du

[55:36] territoire. À noter que des

[55:37] changements ont été apportés

[55:39] suivant l'avis de motion et la

[55:40] consultation du public à

[55:41] l'article simple pour permettre

[55:42] de finaliser les dossiers

[55:44] présentement en cours avant

[55:45] d'entrer en vigueur et les

[55:46] nouvelles dispositions.

[55:48] - Je propose l'adoption.

[55:54] - Une seconde.

[55:55] - En faveur.

[55:56] - À l'unanimité.

[56:02] >> Adoption of -- on tariffs,

[56:08] the objective of this bylaw is

[56:09] to amend the tariffs to modify

[56:13] certain tariffs of the following

[56:14] sections. Certificate of

[56:17] authorization for demolition,

[56:18] the use of public and tariffs

[56:22] are also added in the leisure

[56:24] table, one and ten of appendix

[56:25] eight.

[56:40] L'objet du règlement et

[56:42] d'établir un nouveau cadre

[56:43] réglementaire pour les

[56:44] démolitions de bâtiments à

[56:45] Beaconsfield et sur l'ensemble

[56:46] du territoire de la ville.

[56:50] - Opposé.

[56:51] - En faveur.

[56:53] - À l'{city_council} unanimité.

[56:57] >> Adoption of the second draft

[57:01] bylaw entitled zoning bylaw 720

[57:05] to the class of use lodging

[57:08] services to modify provisions

[57:10] for housing. To prescribe

[57:15] specific provisions concerning

[57:17] principle resident

[57:18] establishments to modify

[57:20] provisions regarding science

[57:21] permitted without -- to modify

[57:26] and our definitions concerning

[57:28] logic services to the index to

[57:31] allow usage of the class of use

[57:36] the lodging services in -- in

[57:38] zones H119, C120, C208, H231,

[57:40] H235, C309, H315,

[57:45] H343 and H344, and to modify the

[57:49] limits of zone H231 in order to

[57:56] enlarge zone H115 within zone

[58:03] H231« . and the objective of

[58:04] this bylaw is clearly started

[58:05] not and its title. The

[58:12] residential zones as indicated

[58:13] in the bylaw, they may also be

[58:16] -- the zones may also be

[58:18] consulted by referring to the

[58:19] public notice stated April 14,

[58:21] 2023 on the City website.

[58:25] >> All in favour?

[58:30] Adoption du Règlement 720-128

[58:33] intitulé « Règlement modifiant

[58:35] le règlement de zonage 720 afin

[58:36] d'ajouter la définition de

[58:37] bâtiment accessoire, d'abroger

[58:38] le terme démolition et sa

[58:39] définition et de modifier les

[58:40] définitions de mur extérieur et

[58:41] de superficie d'emprise au

[58:48] sol ». Donc, encore une fois, le

[58:50] règlement est motivé et concerne

[58:53] les démolitions. Le règlement

[58:56] s'applique sur l'ensemble du

[58:57] territoire. Je propose.

[59:01] - En faveur.

[59:04] - À l'unanimité.

[59:09] >> Authorization to correct

[59:11] nuisance and to build a cost to

[59:13] the owner in virtue of the bylaw

[59:16] be zero 33.

[59:25] Adoption du Règlement Nous

[59:29] allons regrouper les points en

[59:31] 40. Dix à 40. 50. 720-127-1

[59:36] intitulé « Règlement modifiant

[59:37] le

[59:41] Règlement de zonage 720 afin

[59:42] d'ajouter un usage

[59:43] spécifiquement prohibé à la zone

[59:44] H101 », et tenue d'un registre

[59:45] le 6 juin. 40.10 Donc, chacun

[59:47] des autres points à ces zones

[59:50] spécifiques. Il y aura

[59:51] enregistre le 6 juin. Et les

[59:54] amendements de ces règlements

[59:56] sont pour ajouter un usage

[59:59] spécifiquement prohibé. Soit

[1:00:01] l'usage d'établissements de

[1:00:02] résidence principale. Et les

[1:00:05] zones spécifiés, les zones

[1:00:07] spécifiés sont spécifiés dans

[1:00:09] chacun des amendements. On peut

[1:00:11] également concerner, consultez

[1:00:13] la vie publique avec des cartes,

[1:00:14] qui se trouve sur le site Web de

[1:00:15] la ville.

[1:00:20] >> All in favour?

[1:00:34] Nous allons maintenant au point

[1:00:36] 45.

[1:00:37] >> Un. Request for minor

[1:00:39] exemption located at 20 to

[1:00:41] Glendale the recommendation is

[1:00:42] to approve.

[1:00:45] >> Proposed?

[1:00:46] >> Second.

[1:00:47] >> All in favour?

[1:01:08] Nous allons regrouper les points

[1:01:13] >> Request for 45. Minor

[1:01:14] exemptions for the property

[1:01:18] located at 132, -- and it is

[1:01:21] projected -- also the projected

[1:01:29] address and protected lot's as

[1:01:33] well as 142, 134, 136 large. It

[1:01:41] is -- the recommendation is to

[1:01:43] approve.

[1:01:45] >> Proposed.

[1:01:47] >> Second.

[1:01:48] >> All in favour?

[1:02:14] >> Request for the approval of

[1:02:16] the architecture integration

[1:02:17] program leading to a building

[1:02:19] permit application for a new

[1:02:20] main building located at 119

[1:02:25] Lakeview. They were submitted

[1:02:32] but however, the Council may

[1:02:36] choose to approve the permit. We

[1:02:43] can approve.

[1:02:47] >> Who is approving it? All in

[1:02:50] favour of the approval?

[1:02:56] >> The plan dated May 9th, 2023.

[1:03:31] >> On the projected lot the

[1:03:34] recommendation is to refuse?

[1:03:37] >> All in favour?

[1:03:55] La recommandation est approuvée.

[1:03:58] - Proposé.

[1:03:59] - Je puis.

[1:04:00] - En faveur.

[1:04:03] - À l'unanimité.

[1:04:05] >> Request for the approval of

[1:04:07] the site planning an

[1:04:09] architectural duration program

[1:04:10] relating to a building permit

[1:04:11] application for the building

[1:04:12] located at -- the recommendation

[1:04:14] is to refuse.

[1:04:17] >> Proposed.

[1:04:18] >> Second.

[1:04:19] >> All in favour?

[1:04:26] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:04:27] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:04:28] architecturale

[1:04:29] (PIIA)

[1:04:30] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:04:31] de construction pour un

[1:04:36] --

[1:04:42] >> Request for the approval of

[1:04:43] the site planning and

[1:04:46] integration program relating to

[1:04:47] a building application for the

[1:04:50] main building located at it --

[1:05:03] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:05:05] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:05:09] architecturale

[1:05:10] (PIIA)

[1:05:11] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:05:12] de construction pour la

[1:05:13] modification de la façade du

[1:05:14] bâtiment principal situé au 434,

[1:05:15] Concord. La recommandation est

[1:05:16] d'approuver ce plan. Le nouveau

[1:05:18] plan a été remis en date du 16

[1:05:19] mai. Pour une approbation.

[1:05:23] - Proposé.

[1:05:24] - Secondé.

[1:05:27] - Pour... on est d'accord sur le

[1:05:29] plan du 16 mai.

[1:05:34] - À l'unanimité. D'accord.

[1:05:40] Request for the approval of the

[1:05:42] site planning and architectural

[1:05:46] integration program to modify

[1:05:47] the already approved the program

[1:05:50] at 63 Madsen.

[1:05:54] >> All in favour?

[1:05:59] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:06:00] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:06:01] architecturale

[1:06:02] (PIIA)

[1:06:03] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:06:04] de construction pour la

[1:06:05] modification du plan déjà

[1:06:06] approuvé au 134, Madsen. La

[1:06:10] recommandation est d'approuver.

[1:06:11] - Proposé.

[1:06:12] - Ce qu'on est.

[1:06:13] - En faveur.

[1:06:14] - À l'unanimité.

[1:06:24] -- the recommendation is to

[1:06:27] refuse.

[1:06:29] >> Second.

[1:06:31] >> All in favour? Demande de

[1:06:37] certificat d'autorisation pour

[1:06:38] l'installation d'une enseigne

[1:06:39] pour le commerce situé au

[1:06:40] 445-447, Beaconsfield. La

[1:06:43] recommandation est de refuser.

[1:06:44] - Opposé.

[1:06:47] - Secondé.

[1:06:48] - En faveur.

[1:06:51] - À l'unanimité. Nous allons

[1:06:57] regrouper les points

[1:07:03] >> 45.19 et les suivantes. A

[1:07:04] request for the approval of site

[1:07:05] planning an architectural

[1:07:07] integration program for the

[1:07:08] subdivision of the property

[1:07:09] located at 132-134-136 Larch

[1:07:11] (projected lot 6 576 817)

[1:07:12] .

[1:07:21] 140 large for the projected lot

[1:07:24] and the property located at 142,

[1:07:28] 144, and 136 large. The

[1:07:32] projected lot, --

[1:07:39] >> Proposed.

[1:07:40] >> Second.

[1:07:41] >> All in favour?

[1:08:08] - Proposé.

[1:08:09] - J'appuie.

[1:08:10] - En faveur.

[1:08:12] - Donc, à l'unanimité.

[1:08:16] Acceptance of an amount of

[1:08:20] $27,824.40. To be paid by the

[1:08:22] owner of the lot 242 and 109

[1:08:28] Jasper to the bylaw concerning

[1:08:31] the establishment of parks,

[1:08:36] playgrounds, and natural areas

[1:08:37] on Beaconsfield's territory.

[1:08:40] >> In favour?

[1:09:04] Proposed?

[1:09:18] >>?

[1:09:21] - À l'unanimité.

[1:09:23] >> Minutes of the Planning

[1:09:25] Advisory Committee meeting of

[1:09:26] May 23rd, 2023.

[1:09:28] >> Any comments, Mister

[1:09:30] - Non, je n'ai Chairman? Aucun

[1:09:32] commentaire that was in there

[1:09:33] additionnel.

[1:09:39] >>

[1:09:40] >>

[1:09:41] >> I second.

[1:09:42] >> All in favour?

[1:09:46] >> Any comments, Mister

[1:09:48] Chairman?

[1:09:49] >> No

[1:09:51] - Non, nous n'avons pas de

[1:09:53] Recommandations comme tel. Je

[1:09:54] propose.

[1:09:57] - On Pfizer. En faveur.

[1:10:01] - À l'unanimité.

[1:10:04] >> Request the Government of

[1:10:05] Quebec to implement solutions

[1:10:07] for making the Quebec

[1:10:10] destination red network more

[1:10:11] reliable and robust.

[1:10:15] >> Proposed.

[1:10:16] >> All in favour? What I am also

[1:10:20] in favour.

[1:10:22] [Laughter]

[1:10:23] - À l'unanimité.

[1:10:35] >>

[1:10:36] - Je proposed?

[1:10:37] >> Propose.

[1:10:38] - Seconde.

[1:10:39] - Second.

[1:10:40] En faveur.

[1:10:41] - À l'unanimité.

[1:10:42] >> Tabling of the -- reservoir

[1:10:43] of the report, know the report

[1:10:46] regarding the ice storm of April

[1:10:47] 5th, 2023, and the prolonged

[1:10:51] power outage.

[1:10:52] >> Any comments, Mr. --?

[1:10:57] - Je vais fait ça dans mon

[1:10:58] rapport de directeur.

[1:10:59] >> It was a very busy period,

[1:11:02] those five days. Brought a lot

[1:11:04] of overtime and a lot of work,

[1:11:07] put a lot of stress on the

[1:11:09] public works for coming weeks,

[1:11:11] and a little difficulty to move

[1:11:14] on with our other projects as

[1:11:16] many of our employees have been

[1:11:18] working on the collection of

[1:11:20] branches all over the city for

[1:11:23] six or seven weeks now. This

[1:11:26] week should be back to almost

[1:11:30] normality. Next week the

[1:11:33] redshirt regular branch pickup

[1:11:35] schedule, and some branches have

[1:11:39] come out after we went by. But

[1:11:40] that is part of the game. We

[1:11:42] still see branches in the trees,

[1:11:44] here and there, when we drive

[1:11:46] around. It was an important

[1:11:52] emergency measure for us. I just

[1:11:53] want to highlight the work of my

[1:11:56] whole team and the public works

[1:11:58] team as well, communication

[1:12:00] team.

[1:12:02] >> Thank.

[1:12:03] - Merci beaucoup.

[1:12:19] - Proposé.

[1:12:20] - J'appuie.

[1:12:21] - En faveur.

[1:12:22] - À l'unanimité.

[1:12:23] >> Monday to the administration

[1:12:25] of the Beaconsfield to practice

[1:12:27] second payment of -- the

[1:12:28] invoices of contributions for

[1:12:29] the year 2023 to the -- of

[1:12:33] Montréal.

[1:12:34] >> I just want to underline,

[1:12:36] again, that this is being paid

[1:12:41] under protest.

[1:12:43] >> Proposed?

[1:12:44] >> Seconded.

[1:12:44] >> All in favour.

[1:13:01] - Proposé.

[1:13:05] - Secondé.

[1:13:06] - En faveur.

[1:13:08] - À l'unanimité. Vous votez

[1:13:15] contre. À l'unanimité, d'accord.

[1:13:18] - Je surveille toujours, pour

[1:13:19] être certain.

[1:13:20] - D'accord.

[1:13:23] >> Mayor's report on the

[1:13:25] decision to make -- immersion

[1:13:27] meeting of

[1:13:30] - 18 2023.

[1:13:31] Oui. Je n'ai pas beaucoup à dire

[1:13:34] là-dessus, mais j'aimerais tout

[1:13:37] simplement souligner que

[1:13:40] l'Assemblée publique d'adoption

[1:13:41] des recommandations de la

[1:13:47] Commission sur le rapport

[1:13:50] prébudgétaire, sur les

[1:13:53] recommandations prébudgétaires

[1:13:54] pour le budget de Montréal,

[1:13:58] cette assemblée a été remise au

[1:14:00] 22 juin. À partir de 15 heures.

[1:14:04] Et ce sera en visioconférence.

[1:14:09] Et aussi sur le Web caste.

[1:14:12] Alors, si les gens sont

[1:14:13] intéressés à suivre toutes les

[1:14:20] recommandations qui seront

[1:14:21] faites par la commission, les

[1:14:28] recommandations prébudgétaires

[1:14:29] pour la Ville de Montréal,

[1:14:30] écoutez, le 22 juin à 15 heures,

[1:14:36] en ça va certainement vous

[1:14:37] distraire beaucoup d'écouter

[1:14:38] tout ça.

[1:14:46] - Oui, absolument, les quatre

[1:14:48] rapports habituels qui sont

[1:14:49] déposées. Mais je voulais

[1:14:50] souligner le projet connectons

[1:14:53] qui est en cours présentement

[1:14:55] pour obtenir une subvention.

[1:14:57] C'est piloté par Andrew

[1:14:59] Duffield, le directeur, avec

[1:15:03] d'autres personnes de

[1:15:04] l'organisation. Il travaille

[1:15:07] avec

[1:15:08] >> Des actionnaires stakeholders

[1:15:09] and partners in et des

[1:15:10] partenaires. The municipality

[1:15:11] and during the summer they are

[1:15:13] going to be surveying the people

[1:15:15] and residents when they are

[1:15:16] going to come at various events,

[1:15:19] such as heritage week or

[1:15:21] concerts. So don't be afraid if

[1:15:23] you see someone coming near you

[1:15:27] with a pad and a pan, pencil,

[1:15:30] and a questionnaire. We want to

[1:15:31] hear about you, for example,

[1:15:34] what can be done to help people

[1:15:36] to create better links in their

[1:15:37] neighbourhood. Obviously what we

[1:15:40] went through during the power

[1:15:41] outage, for sure some of those

[1:15:44] connections could be very

[1:15:46] helpful in this situations for

[1:15:49] some of our residences. Just a

[1:15:52] heads up. If you see Andrew --

[1:15:55] coming towards you, he's got a

[1:15:56] 20 minute questionnaire, but if

[1:16:00] you connect well with him it

[1:16:01] might go on 15 or 20 minutes.

[1:16:04] Thank you very much.

[1:16:13] - Est-ce que quelqu'un propose

[1:16:14] la levée de l'Assemblée? Qui

[1:16:15] seconde?

[1:16:19] - Je seconde.

[1:16:20] - En faveur. Tout le monde est

[1:16:22] en faveur. Même Robert est en

[1:16:28] faveur. Alors, merci beaucoup.

[1:16:32] Merci de nous avoir écoutés.

[1:16:35] >> Thank you for the people that

[1:16:36] are in the room, for all of you

[1:16:39] that are still here, to have

[1:16:41] come to this meeting. And four

[1:16:43] --

[1:16:44] Pour ceux qui sont sur la

[1:16:46] webdiffusion, encore une fois,

[1:16:47] on vous remercie de l'intérêt

[1:16:49] que vous avez.

[1:16:51] >> As you have in your city, we

[1:16:53] are extremely grateful to you to

[1:16:55] listen to what we have to say,

[1:16:57] and all the activities of the

[1:16:59] city. Thank you, goodnight, and

[1:17:01] see you next month.

2023-05-23 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript