Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:02]
Good evening and welcome to the
[0:03]
Good evening and welcome to the
[0:06]
Good evening and welcome to the
[0:10]
Good evening and welcome to the
[0:14]
regular meeting of the municipal
[0:16]
council on Monday, July 10th,
[0:18]
2023. We will now go to the
[0:23]
opening of the meeting.
[0:24]
>> Proposed.
[0:25]
>> Seconded.
[0:27]
>> Seconded.
[0:30]
>> Seconded.
[0:33]
>> Seconded.
[0:38]
>> Seconded.
[0:48]
So the PDQ1 commandment is not
[0:50]
here this evening.
[0:53]
here this evening.
[0:58]
here this evening.
[1:00]
here this evening.
[1:02]
here this evening.
[1:06]
here this evening.
[1:08]
here this evening.
[1:10]
here this evening.
[1:13]
There are two councillors not
[1:14]
with us tonight. There is
[1:18]
Councillor Martin Saint-Jean
[1:19]
from district to, and Councillor
[1:23]
Peggy from district six away
[1:27]
from this evening, they could
[1:29]
not attend the meeting. So we
[1:33]
will go now to the written
[1:36]
questions that we received. The
[1:40]
first question is from Mr. David
[1:43]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[1:50]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[1:54]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[1:59]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:01]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:03]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:09]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:12]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:15]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:18]
Colin on Rosedale. The question
[2:22]
the next question is from
[2:25]
Nicholas --. It is a very, very
[2:29]
long question. I will not read
[2:33]
it all but I will try to do a
[2:37]
resume of the question and --
[2:44]
makes comments regarding outdoor
[2:47]
rodenticide and outdoor traps.
[2:51]
The definition of government in
[2:52]
Beaconsfield bylaws. She also
[2:54]
mentions the ban on wildlife
[2:56]
eating and the possibility of
[2:59]
adding animal proof bins in the
[3:00]
parks. Miss, I have to say to
[3:05]
you that is a very highly
[3:09]
technical question you are
[3:10]
asking. Your question and
[3:14]
comments will be referred to the
[3:15]
administration. I also strongly
[3:20]
suggest to you that such
[3:22]
questions in the future he asked
[3:25]
directly to the administration
[3:29]
through info at Beaconsfield.ca.
[3:35]
Her second question is on angel
[3:38]
Woods. Why are Montréal and
[3:41]
Beaconsfield using punitive
[3:42]
police approach to human dog
[3:45]
conflict in angel woods? At last
[3:47]
month's meeting, a police
[3:49]
officer mentioned a police
[3:50]
surveillance and more tickets
[3:52]
regarding conflicts between dogs
[3:54]
and humans in angel woods. I
[3:57]
believe there are peaceful,
[3:59]
preventive ways to mitigate
[4:00]
this. One could be to hold
[4:03]
special events at the adjacent
[4:05]
dog park and another could be to
[4:07]
work with private owners in the
[4:09]
other municipalities to open
[4:11]
major woods to awfully dogs on
[4:13]
certain days or certain times.
[4:17]
Education about the impact of
[4:19]
off leash dogs could have --
[4:23]
given out the residents by in
[4:24]
email, snail mail, or at parks
[4:28]
or libraries or the animal page
[4:29]
on the website. Education about
[4:30]
that --
[5:28]
In the same manner as Toronto.
[5:32]
The laws and rules different
[5:34]
between Beaconsfield and Toronto
[5:37]
and we cannot compare ourselves
[5:40]
to them. As for the employees,
[5:44]
we do not receive the update
[5:46]
beforehand as it is an informal
[5:47]
profit presentation. Residents
[5:50]
are invited to watch the webcast
[5:51]
for each summer. By the, way the
[5:55]
police department in
[5:56]
Beaconsfield, PDQ1, is under the
[6:02]
jurisdiction of the Montréal
[6:03]
agglomeration. Next question is
[6:09]
from Mr. Lauren made who. The
[6:15]
question is on traffic lights at
[6:17]
woodland. When are you going to
[6:18]
fix the traffic lights at
[6:19]
woodland? Vehicles turning left
[6:23]
on the green for highway 20 west
[6:26]
exit ramp used to be greeted by
[6:28]
a green light on the south side
[6:29]
of the bridge allowing many
[6:33]
vehicles to proceed south. For a
[6:36]
few months, and we are now
[6:37]
greeted on the south side of the
[6:39]
bridge by a red light. The
[6:41]
bridge can accommodate eight
[6:43]
vehicles at the most. This
[6:45]
creates a backup on the exit
[6:46]
ramp during heavy traffic
[6:48]
volumes. It is really annoying
[6:49]
to have to wait several life
[6:51]
cycles when the problem could
[6:53]
Easily be solved by adjusting
[6:54]
the lights back to the way they
[6:55]
were a few months ago. First,
[6:58]
let me point out to you that I
[7:01]
use that intersection every day
[7:04]
and it is very frustrating
[7:09]
sometimes because the light
[7:11]
system does change. One thing
[7:16]
that must be pointed out is that
[7:20]
the programming is affected by
[7:23]
the frequent passing of trains,
[7:26]
approximately 80 per day. Every
[7:30]
time there is a train going
[7:32]
through, there is a change in
[7:37]
the programming that takes place
[7:40]
and it takes several minutes for
[7:42]
the change to get back to normal
[7:44]
again. If another train comes by
[7:47]
in the meantime, well, that goes
[7:49]
on again. So 80 times a day
[7:54]
there is some change in the
[7:56]
programming and that is caused
[7:57]
by the train. However, no
[7:59]
changes have been made to the
[8:01]
programming at woodland. Traffic
[8:03]
lights, since their installation
[8:04]
in 2018 -- no, not now. After
[8:14]
the question period you will
[8:15]
have the floor. The next
[8:18]
question is from Mr. Derek
[8:20]
pounds. The revitalization of
[8:25]
centennial park and merino. At
[8:28]
the 24th April 2023, council
[8:29]
meeting it was announced that
[8:31]
total grants of three point $1
[8:33]
million have been pledged from
[8:35]
the FCC and federal governments
[8:37]
towards building the proposed
[8:41]
revitalization of Centennial
[8:42]
Park and Marino. The aesthetics
[8:43]
of the project is a concern and
[8:46]
it is expected that the project
[8:47]
plans with the neighbour.
[8:51]
Question one is, what is the
[8:52]
footprint of the proposed single
[8:54]
storey building and park
[8:55]
remodel? The building will
[8:59]
occupy 2700 square metres and
[9:02]
the parking lot is going to be
[9:06]
5685 square metres. Question
[9:10]
two, as the proposed injury is
[9:13]
selected for praising this
[9:14]
project, professionals in the
[9:16]
fields of architecture and
[9:18]
landscape architecture and
[9:20]
municipal representatives in the
[9:21]
fields of culture and urban
[9:22]
planning. The process, Mr.
[9:25]
crowns, is ongoing right now.
[9:28]
It'll be confirmed by Council
[9:30]
resolution when it is completed.
[9:35]
And now we can go to the floor
[9:37]
for any questions.
[9:45]
[Inaudible]
[9:48]
>> Speaking to the mic, please.
[9:51]
>> Okay. This is over the many
[9:53]
years, this is the third time
[9:55]
this has happened. The first two
[9:57]
times I complained and it was
[9:59]
fixed in about a week. And now
[10:00]
it's been a couple months, it is
[10:02]
really quite annoying when you
[10:03]
have to wait two, three, four
[10:06]
traffic light cycles to make
[10:07]
that turn and go down woodland.
[10:13]
Dominique there told me there
[10:14]
was some adjustment made a month
[10:17]
or so ago to the lights. Ever
[10:18]
since then, it has been about
[10:20]
two months now, it is this
[10:22]
annoying waiting for all those
[10:24]
life cycles when you shouldn't
[10:25]
have to. If the lights were
[10:26]
fixed properly.
[10:28]
>> To answer your question, I go
[10:29]
through there every day. Right
[10:33]
now, I noticed that the
[10:36]
greenlight, when you turn left
[10:39]
from elm to gold south, the
[10:44]
lights are green and there is a
[10:49]
mayoral -- for the people who
[10:50]
want to turn. The lights are
[10:52]
green all the way. But from time
[10:57]
to time, it happens that it
[10:59]
doesn't work that way. It is
[11:00]
simply because trains are going
[11:02]
through. Every time a train goes
[11:03]
through, the programming is all
[11:09]
screwed up, I'm sorry, I'm going
[11:10]
to use the word all screwed up.
[11:13]
It takes a while before. I don't
[11:15]
know what Dominique has told you
[11:18]
but maybe she can explain.
[11:20]
>> Yes, I would like to take
[11:22]
that opportunity. I was just
[11:23]
reviewing my email, that was on
[11:25]
May 30th. I had explained there
[11:27]
had been some work completed
[11:29]
recently to correct a
[11:30]
malfunction on a pedestrian push
[11:33]
button. That was it. That was
[11:37]
it.
[11:38]
>> I, mean this was never a
[11:39]
problem.
[11:41]
>> The programming was never
[11:43]
been changed.
[11:45]
>> Something must have happened.
[11:46]
>> Yes. The trains go through.
[11:48]
>> It has nothing to -- do there
[11:50]
hasn't been a train for 15 or 20
[11:52]
minutes, it is still the same
[11:53]
thing. You get the green light,
[11:54]
you turn left, then you've got a
[11:55]
red light. You can have, at the
[11:57]
most, eight vehicles on the
[11:58]
bridge. You back, up if you
[12:01]
happen to be vehicle number
[12:03]
nine, you are not getting
[12:04]
through on that life cycle. It
[12:06]
is just annoying. I use that way
[12:09]
quite a bit coming off the exit
[12:11]
and turning left to go down on
[12:12]
the south.
[12:15]
>> Is there something that we
[12:17]
don't know for sure but we have
[12:19]
the impression that there are
[12:22]
many vehicles using that
[12:23]
intersection. I'm not sure why.
[12:26]
I don't have the numbers. It is
[12:28]
an impression. We have a
[12:29]
perception. I'm not sure if that
[12:31]
would be an explanation. It
[12:32]
could be. But to my knowledge,
[12:35]
asking my director of public
[12:36]
works, we didn't do any changes
[12:38]
in the sequences.
[12:40]
>> Something must have happened.
[12:41]
A couple months ago --
[12:43]
>> A power failure might have
[12:44]
done some changes when it got
[12:47]
rebooted after a power failure.
[12:49]
I'm just not sure. It's very
[12:53]
technical. I could have a second
[12:55]
check.
[12:56]
>> There was no problem.
[12:57]
>> We didn't make any changes.
[12:59]
>> It wasn't a problem until two
[13:01]
months ago.
[13:02]
>> After a power failure in
[13:03]
April.
[13:04]
>> Maybe.
[13:05]
>> Maybe. I'm just thinking
[13:06]
about it with you.,
[13:08]
>> If someone could look at it
[13:10]
and try to fix it because it is
[13:12]
annoying waiting multiple life
[13:13]
cycles.
[13:14]
>> I agree with you. We will
[13:15]
have it checked again. It could
[13:18]
be, I think we've had a power
[13:20]
failure at one point for several
[13:22]
days. And that intersection was
[13:25]
not working for several days.
[13:29]
And then we had one, I don't
[13:30]
know if it was affecting
[13:32]
woodland about a week ago. So
[13:36]
yes, we will have a chat.
[13:39]
>> Nothing has been really done
[13:40]
to change it at this point.
[13:41]
>> The first notification was
[13:44]
May 28th. The first notification
[13:48]
was May 28th.
[13:49]
>> That was a few weeks after it
[13:52]
started.
[13:53]
>> I can tell you every time a
[13:58]
train -- after a few minutes,
[14:00]
you see it come back.
[14:02]
>> Normally it comes back after
[14:03]
a while. I agree.
[14:06]
>> It is a terrible
[14:07]
intersection.
[14:16]
Bonsoir, Pauline
[14:17]
(inaudible)
[14:18]
. J'avais une question par
[14:19]
rapport au mois passé et ce
[14:20]
mois-ci. Le mois passé, à 60,3,
[14:29]
effectuer une opération pédestre
[14:30]
Hall sur les lourds, je ne les
[14:32]
nommerai pas, sous les noms de
[14:34]
(inaudible)
[14:35]
, Park Memorial et édifices
[14:37]
(inaudible)
[14:38]
, j'aimerais savoir ce que
[14:41]
c'était une opération cadastre
[14:42]
allant. Ce mois-ci, vous faites
[14:43]
une demande d'approbation pour
[14:46]
Le lotissement des propriétés
[14:48]
situées au 260, 288
[14:50]
Beaconsfield. Qu'est-ce que ça
[14:51]
veut dire?
[14:53]
- Je vais demander à monsieur
[14:54]
Boileau. On rassemble les trois
[14:57]
propriétaires ensemble?
[14:59]
- Merci, Monsieur le Maire. Ce
[15:02]
qui nous amène à faire ça, avec
[15:04]
Hydro-Québec, pour amener
[15:06]
l'électricité au bon endroit. Il
[15:08]
y a des loups qui n'ont pas de
[15:10]
bâtiments. Hydro-Québec
[15:12]
apportera un monopole de
[15:13]
l'électricité. On est en train
[15:14]
de revoir avec l'électricité
[15:16]
nécessaire à la marina, avec la
[15:18]
démolition de la grange et tout.
[15:22]
C'est une question très
[15:23]
technique avec Hydro-Québec qui
[15:24]
nous amène à faire les
[15:26]
lotissement des lourds pour les
[15:29]
trois propriétés qui sont sans
[15:31]
Tony, elle mémorielle élan
[15:32]
Marina.
[15:33]
(inaudible)
[15:34]
.
[15:36]
- Qu'est-ce que ça veut dire
[15:37]
opération cadre Astral?
[15:39]
- C'est technique, on fait appel
[15:42]
à un arpenteur, on envoie ça au
[15:43]
Québec. Ça prend des mois, c'est
[15:46]
bureaucratique. C'est un
[15:47]
processus interne, c'est
[15:49]
technique pour faire un solo au
[15:51]
lieu de trois. Il y a trois
[15:52]
cadastre, on en fait qu'un seul.
[15:54]
- C'est de l'arpentage?
[15:55]
- Oui. Il doit y avoir les
[15:58]
bonnes mesures, il y a une
[16:00]
description technique des trois
[16:01]
Lowe qui va devenir d'un solo.
[16:06]
- Adam lisant: le lotissement de
[16:08]
la propriété, on avait
[16:09]
l'impression que vous séparez.
[16:12]
- On rend compresse l'eau.
[16:13]
- O.K., merci.
[16:23]
>> Any other questions? If not,
[16:28]
we will go to -- oh, yes?
[16:32]
- J'ai envoyé une question, je
[16:34]
ne connais pas la procédure. Je
[16:36]
vais envoyer il y a quelques
[16:37]
jours. Je ne sais pas si vous
[16:38]
avez reçu ma question. Le
[16:41]
problème de la mortalité des
[16:43]
oiseaux.
[16:45]
- Je viens de lire la réponse.
[16:49]
Vous êtes monsieur David Cohen.
[16:53]
Notre municipalité a tout
[16:57]
simplement décidé de ne pas
[16:59]
réglementer l'échapper. Il n'y a
[17:00]
pas de règlements pour les
[17:01]
Sharks à Beaconsfield.
[17:03]
- Pourquoi avez-vous décidé?
[17:04]
- Écoutez, c'est une décision du
[17:10]
Conseil, je ne peux pas dire
[17:11]
pourquoi. Je pense que le
[17:13]
conseil a décidé de ne pas
[17:14]
réglementer les choses.
[17:16]
- Est-ce qu'il y a un
[17:17]
justificatif? Est-ce qu'il y a
[17:20]
une logique?
[17:21]
- Non. C'est une décision qu'on
[17:23]
a prise. Je ne vais pas vous
[17:25]
dire exactement l'esprit de tout
[17:27]
le monde. C'est la difficulté.
[17:32]
C'est beau de réglementer
[17:33]
quelque chose. Le mettre en
[17:37]
pratique, c'est une autre chose.
[17:39]
On a décidé que pour
[17:41]
l'application pour les chats, ça
[17:43]
ne se fait pas simplement.
[17:47]
- Je suis extrêmement surpris
[17:49]
(rires)
[17:50]
de la façon dont vous expliquez
[17:51]
votre processus décisionnel.
[17:54]
- Écoutez, c'est une décision du
[17:56]
Conseil. Si vous n'êtes pas
[17:58]
d'accord...
[18:01]
- Je vais me présenter aux
[18:02]
élections, c'est ça? Au Canada,
[18:07]
il y a de bonnes pratiques dans
[18:10]
les municipalités canadiennes.
[18:11]
(inaudible)
[18:12]
(---)
[18:13]
On est au Québec et à Montréal.
[18:14]
On
[18:15]
- Est au Canada.
[18:19]
Qu'il y a de bonnes pratiques,
[18:21]
oiseau Canada. Je vous envoyer
[18:23]
des liens.
[18:24]
(rires)
[18:25]
. Ça pourrait aider vos
[18:27]
fonctionnaires à regarder la
[18:29]
problématique. Je trouve ça pas
[18:32]
vraiment convaincant ce que vous
[18:33]
dites.
[18:34]
- Je vous remercie.
[18:37]
(inaudible)
[18:38]
(---)
[18:39]
.
[18:40]
- Pourquoi ne l'a-t-il pas reçu?
[18:45]
- Vous l'avez envoyé acquis?
[18:53]
- Je pense que l'information a
[18:56]
été donné. Peut-être qu'il ne
[18:58]
l'a pas reçu. L'information a
[19:00]
été donné. La décision a été
[19:02]
prise. À être obligés de
[19:03]
respecter la décision du
[19:04]
Conseil.
[19:06]
Si vous n'êtes pas d'accord,
[19:08]
écoutez, je ne peux pas vous
[19:09]
suggérez quoi faire.
[19:14]
>> Last meeting when the police
[19:16]
report came, it was mentioned by
[19:20]
him that cars are being stolen.
[19:24]
The number was significant. I
[19:28]
don't want the press to get this
[19:32]
story before the Beaconsfield
[19:33]
people know about it. Right now,
[19:36]
the press, I have not seen any.
[19:41]
We better keep track of these
[19:42]
numbers. Are they going up or
[19:44]
not? The policeman is not here
[19:46]
this time. That is okay. But I
[19:48]
am just saying, in what
[19:51]
direction is it going? That's
[19:52]
all.
[19:55]
>> I have no idea.
[19:57]
>> Well, cars are being stolen.
[19:58]
Thank you.
[20:01]
>> If you want to complain to
[20:02]
somebody, complain to the
[20:03]
police. We are not the
[20:08]
policeman. There is nothing we
[20:10]
can do. I mean, we have heard
[20:14]
the command and tell us several
[20:17]
times to people to lock their
[20:18]
cars, to make sure that they
[20:20]
don't keep the Keys close to the
[20:25]
doors so that the Keys can be --
[20:27]
but other than that, put your
[20:29]
car in the garage.
[20:31]
>> This is endemic to all West
[20:33]
Island, is that what is probably
[20:35]
the case?
[20:36]
>> It's not only in Beaconsfield
[20:37]
that cars are being stolen.
[20:38]
Thank you.
[20:48]
- C'est avec grande tristesse
[20:49]
que je vous informe du décès de
[20:53]
Barbara Barclay, résidant de
[20:55]
longue date de Beaconsfield.
[21:00]
Mrs. Barkley would've been 85 on
[21:02]
July 21, 2023. Mrs. Barkley was
[21:08]
president of the Beaconsfield
[21:10]
historical society from July
[21:15]
2003 until the end of 2016 we.
[21:20]
She owned the only property in
[21:25]
Beaconsfield that recognized by
[21:27]
the government as a historical
[21:29]
monument. Her property is
[21:33]
located on Thompson Park. She
[21:36]
was born in England and it was a
[21:39]
professor at Concordia
[21:40]
university. Her family has
[21:46]
expressed the desire to grieve
[21:49]
in private and a celebration is
[21:54]
planned for the end of the
[21:56]
summer. So very sad to hear
[22:01]
about her death. And now we will
[22:02]
go to the regular agenda.
[22:07]
(---)
[22:09]
. 10.1 Approval of the minutes
[22:11]
of the City of Beaconsfield's
[22:13]
Public Consultation of June 19,
[22:14]
2023, at 7:30 p.m.
[22:18]
>>
[22:19]
- À l'unanimité. Proposed.
[22:20]
>> Second.
[22:21]
>> All in favour?
[22:32]
2.1 Adoption de l'ordre du jour
[22:33]
de la séance ordinaire du
[22:34]
Conseil de la Ville de
[22:35]
Beaconsfield du 19 juin 2023.
[22:37]
- En faveur. 20.1 Renewal of
[22:38]
contract TP
[22:39]
- 2020-10 for the supply and À
[22:40]
l'unanimité. Delivery of 2,200
[22:42]
tons of crushed stone for the
[22:50]
year 2024 with Carrière Dolomite
[22:53]
1996, Adam approximate cost
[22:55]
- Of 48,000, all taxes included.
[22:58]
>> Proposer. All in favour?
[23:01]
- À l'unanimité.
[23:25]
20.3 Renewal of contract TP
[23:27]
2021-06 for the repair of street
[23:28]
and park lighting units, traffic
[23:30]
lights and electrical panels at
[23:33]
an hourly rate for the year 2024
[23:39]
with A.J. Théoret, entrepreneur
[23:41]
electric, Inc. at an approximate
[23:43]
cost of 25,000, all taxes
[23:44]
included.
[23:56]
- Pour la fourniture de services
[23:59]
de plantes
[24:00]
(---)
[24:01]
avec, au coût approximatif de
[24:04]
29000 dollars toute taxes
[24:05]
incluses.
[24:18]
20.5 Renewal of contract TP
[24:20]
2023-01 for the supply and
[24:22]
transport of metal containers
[24:23]
for dry materials for the year
[24:26]
2024 with 9386-0120 Québec Inc.
[24:34]
(ENVIRO 360)
[24:35]
, at an approximate cost of $48,
[24:36]
000, all taxes included
[25:08]
20.7 Renewal of contract TP
[25:09]
2023-03 for the maintenance and
[25:10]
repair of the building HVAC
[25:12]
systems for the year 2024 with
[25:17]
refrigeration Inc., at an
[25:19]
approximate cost of of $10, 000,
[25:22]
all taxes included
[25:34]
pour la perdu 8 juin 2023 au 18
[25:37]
juin 2023, du 20 juin 2023, au
[25:40]
29 juin 2023, pour un déposé
[25:42]
total de 2 millions 237721
[25:45]
dollars et 50 400.
[25:49]
- Voici les montants les plus
[25:50]
importants. 234000
[25:55]
(---)
[25:56]
,
[25:57]
(inaudible)
[25:58]
pour la construction d'un
[25:59]
nouveau chalet par québécois il.
[26:05]
222386 a transport GRC pour
[26:07]
(inaudible)
[26:12]
Batherson St. Minnesota Law
[26:17]
(inaudible)
[26:18]
pour la réfection des chaussées
[26:20]
souple. 120416
[26:24]
(---)
[26:25]
pour le remorquage déchausser et
[26:27]
l'espace de stationnement et des
[26:29]
terrains sportif,
[26:34]
408398 pour les salaires
[26:44]
40.1 Adoption of By-law
[26:45]
BEAC-045-17 entitled « By-law
[26:47]
modifying By-law BEAC-045 on
[26:48]
permits and certificates to
[26:49]
request a report signed by a
[26:52]
professional within the meaning
[26:53]
of section 31.42 of the
[26:56]
Environment Quality Act when
[26:58]
submitting an application for a
[27:00]
construction or subdivision
[27:03]
permit and to make connections
[27:04]
to water, storm and sanitary
[27:06]
sewer lines subject to obtaining
[27:08]
a certificate of authorization »
[27:19]
-- it is to have vacancy.
[27:24]
>>
[27:25]
- Proposed. À l'unanimité.
[27:26]
>> Seconded.
[27:27]
>> In favour? 40.2 Adoption du
[27:28]
Règlement BEAC-046-6 intitulé
[27:30]
« Règlement modifiant le
[27:31]
Règlement de construction
[27:32]
BEAC-046 afin de modifier les
[27:33]
dispositions relatives aux
[27:34]
appareils à combustion solide et
[27:35]
d'exiger le raccordement des
[27:36]
bâtiments principaux aux
[27:37]
conduites principales d'aqueduc
[27:38]
et d'égout pluvial et
[27:39]
sanitaire ».
[27:49]
L'amendement à l'objectif est
[27:51]
annoncé dans le titre du nouveau
[27:54]
règlement et une portée sur
[27:55]
l'ensemble du territoire de la
[27:56]
ville de Beaconsfield.
[28:00]
- Proposé, est-ce qu'on est. En
[28:01]
faveur.
[28:02]
- À l'unanimité. 40.3 Adoption
[28:03]
of By-law
[28:10]
BEAC-070-4 entitled « By-Law
[28:15]
modifying By-law BEAC-070 on the
[28:16]
use of drinking water in order
[28:17]
to modify provisions regarding
[28:18]
new landscaping » the objective
[28:23]
is to allow the watering at all
[28:25]
times of new lines and new
[28:28]
planting of trees or shrubs in
[28:29]
the new landscaping for a period
[28:32]
of 15 days. It applies to the
[28:33]
whole territory of Beaconsfield.
[28:37]
>>
[28:38]
- À l'unanimité. Proposed.
[28:39]
>> Second.
[28:40]
>> In favour. 45.1 Demande de
[28:44]
dérogations mineures pour la
[28:45]
propriété située au 381, Church.
[28:51]
La recommandation est
[28:52]
d'approuver.
[28:55]
- Proposé. Secondé.
[29:00]
- À l'unanimité. 45.2 Request
[29:01]
for a minor exemption for the
[29:03]
property located at 328
[29:06]
Sherbrooke the recommendation is
[29:07]
to approve.
[29:09]
>> Proposed.
[29:10]
>>
[29:11]
- En faveur. Second.
[29:12]
>>
[29:13]
- À l'unanimité.
[29:15]
>> Robert, are you?
[29:19]
>> No, sorry. 45.3 Demande
[29:23]
d'approbation du Plan
[29:24]
d'implantation et d'intégration
[29:25]
architecturale
[29:26]
(PIIA)
[29:27]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[29:28]
de construction pour un nouveau
[29:29]
bâtiment principal situé au 131,
[29:30]
Woodland. La recommandation et
[29:31]
de refuser.
[29:34]
- Proposer.
[29:35]
- Secondé.
[29:36]
- À l'unanimité. 45.4 Request
[29:37]
for the approval of the Site
[29:38]
Planning and Architectural
[29:39]
Integration Programme relating
[29:41]
to a building permit application
[29:42]
for a new main building located
[29:43]
at 137 Fieldfare the
[29:48]
recommendation is to refuse.
[29:50]
>> Proposed.
[29:51]
>>
[29:52]
- Seconded.
[29:53]
>> In favour. À l'unanimité.
[29:58]
45.4 Demande d'approbation du
[29:59]
Plan d'implantation et
[30:00]
d'intégration architecturale
[30:01]
(PIIA)
[30:02]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[30:03]
de construction pour un nouveau
[30:04]
bâtiment principal situé au 137,
[30:05]
Fieldfare.
[30:07]
- Proposé.
[30:08]
- Secondé.
[30:09]
- En faveur.
[30:10]
- À l'unanimité. 45.6 Request
[30:13]
for the approval of the Site
[30:14]
Planning and Architectural
[30:15]
Integration Programme relating
[30:16]
to a building permit application
[30:17]
for the extension of the main
[30:19]
building located at 95 StLouis
[30:24]
the recommendation --
[30:27]
>> Proposed.
[30:28]
>> Seconded.
[30:29]
>> In favour.
[30:38]
45.6 Demande d'approbation du
[30:39]
Plan d'implantation et
[30:40]
d'intégration architecturale
[30:41]
(PIIA)
[30:42]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[30:43]
de construction pour
[30:44]
l'agrandissement du bâtiment
[30:45]
principal situé au 99,
[30:46]
Lakeshore.
[30:47]
- Proposé.
[30:48]
- Secondé.
[30:49]
- En faveur.
[30:50]
- À l'unanimité. 45.8 Request
[30:51]
for the approval of the Site
[30:52]
Planning and Architectural
[30:53]
Integration Programme relating
[30:54]
to a building permit application
[30:55]
for the extension of the main
[30:56]
building located at 119 Angell.
[31:01]
The recommendation is to refuse.
[31:03]
>> Proposed.
[31:04]
>> Seconded.
[31:05]
>> In favour.
[31:10]
45.9 Demande d'approbation du
[31:11]
Plan d'implantation et
[31:12]
d'intégration architecturale
[31:13]
(PIIA)
[31:14]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[31:15]
de construction pour
[31:16]
l'agrandissement du bâtiment
[31:17]
principal situé au 417, Doric.
[31:18]
- Proposé.
[31:19]
- Secondé.
[31:20]
- En faveur.
[31:21]
- À l'unanimité.
[31:33]
45.10 Request for the approval
[31:34]
of the Site Planning and
[31:35]
Architectural Integration
[31:38]
Programme relating to a building
[31:39]
permit application for the
[31:40]
extension of the main building
[31:41]
located at 516 Church. The
[31:46]
recommendation is to refuse.
[31:47]
>> I propose.
[31:48]
>> Seconded.
[31:49]
>> In favour. À l'unanimité.
[31:53]
45.11 Demande d'approbation du
[31:54]
Plan d'implantation et
[31:55]
d'intégration architecturale
[31:56]
(PIIA)
[31:57]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[31:58]
de construction pour la
[31:59]
modification de la façade du
[32:00]
bâtiment principal situé au 113,
[32:01]
Lynwood.
[32:04]
La recommandation est
[32:05]
d'approuver, selon les plans
[32:08]
nouveau déposer le 3 juillet
[32:09]
2023.
[32:10]
- Proposé.
[32:11]
- Secondé.
[32:12]
- En faveur.
[32:13]
- À l'unanimité. 45.12 Request
[32:17]
for the approval of the Site
[32:18]
Planning and Architectural
[32:19]
Integration Programme relating
[32:21]
to a building permit application
[32:22]
for the modification of the
[32:23]
facade of a main building
[32:25]
located at 596 Beaconsfield. The
[32:30]
recommendations to approve.
[32:31]
>> Proposed.
[32:32]
>> Seconded.
[32:33]
>> In favour.
[32:34]
- À l'unanimité. 45.13 Demande
[32:36]
d'approbation du Plan
[32:37]
d'implantation et d'intégration
[32:38]
architecturale
[32:39]
(PIIA)
[32:40]
relatif à la demande d'un permis
[32:41]
de construction pour la
[32:42]
modification du plan déjà
[32:43]
approuvé au 7, Windsor. La
[32:46]
recommandation est d'approuver.
[32:48]
- Proposé.
[32:49]
- Secondé.
[32:50]
- En faveur.
[32:51]
- À l'unanimité. 45.14 Request
[32:53]
for the approval of the Site
[32:55]
Planning and Architectural
[32:56]
Integration Programme relating
[32:57]
to a building permit application
[32:59]
to modify the already approved
[33:00]
plan at 550 Lakeshore. The
[33:05]
recommendation is to approve.
[33:08]
>>
[33:09]
- À l'unanimité. Proposed.
[33:10]
>> Seconded.
[33:11]
>> In favour.
[33:17]
45.15 Demande d'approbation du
[33:18]
Plan d'implantation et
[33:19]
d'intégration architecturale
[33:20]
(PIIA)
[33:21]
pour le lotissement de la
[33:22]
propriété située au lot projeté
[33:23]
6 582 066
[33:24]
(adresse projetée 90, Devon)
[33:25]
. Il s'agit du parc devant. La
[33:27]
rencontre de soins d'approuver.
[33:28]
- Proposé.
[33:29]
- Secondé.
[33:30]
- En faveur.
[33:31]
- À l'unanimité. 45.16 Request
[33:33]
for the approval of the Site
[33:34]
Planning and Architectural
[33:35]
Integration Programme for the
[33:38]
subdivision of the property
[33:39]
located at 260, 286, 288
[33:41]
Beaconsfield. Sentinel park with
[33:48]
the marina and mineral Park. The
[33:50]
recommendation is to approve.
[33:51]
>> Proposed.
[33:52]
>> Seconded.
[33:53]
>> In favour.
[34:02]
- 50.1 Nomination en vue de
[34:03]
permanence à titre d'Animatrice,
[34:04]
culture et loisirs au poste
[34:05]
6103.
[34:06]
- Proposé.
[34:07]
- Secondé.
[34:08]
- En faveur.
[34:09]
- À l'unanimité. 50.2 Nomination
[34:11]
in view of permanency as
[34:15]
Préposé à la clientÃle to
[34:16]
position 5003.
[34:32]
- 50.3 Nomination en vue de
[34:33]
permanence à titre d'Opérateur
[34:34]
au poste de 5223.
[34:35]
- Proposé.
[34:36]
- Secondé.
[34:37]
- En faveur.
[34:38]
- À l'unanimité.
[35:13]
- Les statistiques sur les
[35:14]
visionnement du Conseil, les
[35:17]
rapports des centres de
[35:19]
communication, on le rapport des
[35:20]
permis.
[35:34]
- On serait rendu à la levée de
[35:35]
la séance.
[35:36]
- Nous sommes maintenant rendus
[35:37]
à la levée de la séance.
[35:41]
(---)
[35:42]
.
[35:53]
(rires)
[35:55]
- À l'unanimité.
[36:27]
Alors ceux qui sont sur la
[36:29]
webdiffusion, merci beaucoup de
[36:32]
nous avoir suivi encore une fois
[36:34]
ce soir pour la réunion du
[36:35]
conseil.
[36:39]
On apprécie énormément votre
[36:41]
intérêt à nos activités de la
[36:43]
ville. Je vous souhaite un bon
[36:45]
été.