[0:06] Bienvenue à la séance du conseil

[0:10] municipal de Beaconsfield du

[0:13] lundi 23 septembre.

[0:16] Welcome to the regular meeting

[0:20] of the municipal council of

[0:22] Beaconsfield of Monday,

[0:23] September 23. And now, we will

[0:27] accept the agenda.

[0:30] - Adoption de l'ordre du jour de

[0:31] la séance ordinaire de la Ville

[0:32] de Beaconsfield du 23 septembre

[0:33] 2024.

[0:36] >>

[0:37] Welcome to our meeting and now,

[0:38] you can say whatever you want

[0:39] and give us some report on the

[0:40] activities in Beaconsfield.

[0:41] - Je propose.

[0:42] - J'appuie.

[0:43] - En faveur.

[0:44] - À l'unanimité.

[0:45] - Merci. Nous avons notre

[0:46] nouveau commandant de PDQ un

[0:49] avec nous ce soir.

[1:01] >> Well, thank you for having me

[1:04] tonight. - Merci de me recevoir

[1:06] ce soir. Pour le bilan de la

[1:08] criminalité...

[1:09] For the review of the crime. -

[1:12] Vous n'êtes sans savoir qu'une

[1:13] opération au niveau des écoles

[1:14] qui ont été faites, donc en nom

[1:19] en a un

[1:51] ... Ça survient justement dans

[1:53] cette nouvelle ressource-là. Au

[1:55] niveau de la criminalité pour

[1:57] Beaconsfield, merci pour la

[1:59] période encore visé depuis les

[2:01] derniers conseil. Un rapport

[2:03] d'extorsion, une capacité

[2:05] affaiblie et un voies de fait.

[2:10] That's about it for the review

[2:11] of the crime, so thank you for

[2:13] your confidence. You may call me

[2:17] out or my agent at -- at anytime

[2:20] or you can reach the station one

[2:23] at PDQ1 at spvm.qc.ca. Be

[2:28] assured that we are concerned

[2:32] about any circumstances any

[2:35] questions for the commander

[2:36] while he's here? Je vais le dire

[2:37] en français... pleins que vous

[2:38] pouvez nous faire au PQ un et

[2:40] vous pouvez passer toujours pas

[2:41] le site Internet et mes agents

[2:43] vont faire un plaisir de vous

[2:44] répondre dans les plus brefs

[2:45] délais. Avez-vous des questions?

[2:48] - Merci commandant. Est-ce qu'il

[2:50] y a des questions?

[2:57] Yeah, if you want to go to the

[3:01] microphone, because this is

[3:02] being recorded. So, you have to

[3:05] be at the mic to ask questions.

[3:10] >> I have a question regarding a

[3:13] security after our flood.

[3:14] >> Could you identify who you

[3:16] are?

[3:17] >> I'm sorry? Okay, my name is

[3:20] Maria Harrison and I live on

[3:22] tower street. I was affected by

[3:24] the flood. I have a question

[3:27] about security because our

[3:30] garage doors were damaged. The

[3:33] you understand? Okay, the garage

[3:35] doors were damaged and we're

[3:36] still waiting to have them

[3:38] repaired. And they can easily be

[3:42] lifted up and have access into

[3:43] our homes, and we can't live

[3:45] there at the moment because we

[3:47] have no hot water and we're

[3:49] waiting for the repairs to be

[3:52] done. So, I'm asking that maybe

[3:55] or somehow, we can get some

[3:57] extra security in that area

[3:59] until we get things repaired and

[4:01] things are more, our homes are

[4:03] more secure.

[4:11] On ne connaît pas votre secteur

[4:12] où vous l'avez eu l'inondation.

[4:15] Where is that exactly?

[4:17] Hockey. >>

[4:18] [Inaudible]

[4:19] C'est sûr qu'il y a des

[4:20] patrouilles qui sont la jour et

[4:21] nuit. On a présentement plus

[4:22] d'effectifs sur la route, les

[4:24] vacances sont finis. Oui,

[4:26] effectivement, il y a des

[4:27] patrouilles dans le secteur.

[4:28] Est-ce qu'on va faire plus de

[4:29] patrouille parce que votre

[4:31] maison n'est pas sécurisé?

[4:32] Peut-être communiquer avec vos

[4:33] assurances souvent d'une autre

[4:34] façon s'il y a moins ces...

[4:36] moyens de sécuriser la maison.

[4:37] Mais c'est sûr qu'on est dans le

[4:38] coin. Si jamais vous voyez en

[4:40] comportement suspicieux ou

[4:41] quelque chose que vous n'aimez

[4:42] pas, vous savez que vous allez

[4:43] quitter pour un bon moment, vous

[4:45] pouvez communiquer avec le poste

[4:46] de police. À ce moment-là, on va

[4:48] s'assurer d'avoir une attention

[4:49] spéciale à cet endroit-là.

[4:50] Également, la sécurité publique

[4:52] qui fait des patrouilles.

[4:55] - Merci! If you have another

[5:00] question.

[5:07] >> Nora Graham on Creswell. You

[5:10] mentioned you are in the

[5:12] schools. Did you give safety

[5:15] tips to the children?

[5:19] Est-ce que vous m'entendez bien

[5:21] au...

[5:22] (inaudible)

[5:23] ?

[5:24] - On enregistre.

[5:25] - Oui, effectivement. Nos agents

[5:26] sociaux communautaires se sont

[5:27] promenées dans tous les écoles.

[5:29] Et puis, ils ont parlé justement

[5:30] avec les professeurs, avec les

[5:32] élèves, ils ont été présents

[5:33] partant toute la période que

[5:34] j'ai nommé. On va continuer tout

[5:36] le long de l'année des très

[5:37] présents au niveau des écoles

[5:38] pour donner justement des règles

[5:39] de sécurité au niveau de la

[5:41] sécurité routière. Mais

[5:42] également les sensibiliser au

[5:43] niveau de la drogue, les

[5:44] comportements à risque et les

[5:45] voies d'effets, etc.... C'est

[5:50] une très bonne suggestion. >>

[5:51] Okay, for safety on the roads,

[5:54] have you impressed on the

[5:56] children that if there are no

[5:57] sidewalks, they should be

[5:59] walking facing traffic? Because

[6:02] often, even the adults, they're

[6:06] walking with their backs to the

[6:08] traffic. You cannot hear an

[6:09] electric car. I stop and I tell

[6:12] them, but they don't listen.

[6:14] Maybe if you impress on them,

[6:16] they will listen and the kids

[6:17] will tell their parents.

[6:23] Je vais vérifier avec mes agents

[6:24] sociaux communautaires et je

[6:25] vous reviens avec les conseils.

[6:27] Merci pour le commentaire. >>

[6:30] Thank you. Any other questions

[6:33] for the commander?

[6:34] D'autres questions au

[6:35] commandant? >> Yeah, go to the

[6:40] mic, please. No, this is just a

[6:48] police question.

[6:55] Alors, bonsoir à tous, à toutes

[6:59] et à tous. Avant de commencer,

[7:03] j'aimerais prendre un moment

[7:05] pour penser à celles et ceux qui

[7:08] ont subi des dommages importants

[7:11] à la suite de la tempête Debbie.

[7:14] Au début du mois d'août... en

[7:17] moins de 48 heures, cette

[7:20] tempête a déversé une quantité

[7:22] incroyable de pluie. Nous à

[7:26] Simon quand environ 700 maisons

[7:28] ont été affectées. I would also

[7:33] like to mention that some of us,

[7:35] including myself, and several

[7:38] city employees, were affected by

[7:40] the flooding here in

[7:43] Beaconsfield. We, therefore,

[7:45] deeply understand the challenges

[7:47] that you have faced. Nous avons

[7:50] reçu de nombreuses questions par

[7:53] écrit pour la période des

[7:55] questions en lien avec les

[7:57] inondations. Je ne nommerai pas

[8:00] tous les questions, mais je vais

[8:02] nommer les noms de personnes

[8:03] qu'ils ont posé des questions.

[8:05] Il y a monsieur Stéphane poète

[8:07] Clarington, Richard Faucher,

[8:12] Elizabeth un

[8:13] (inaudible)

[8:14] tollé. Mairies Fresno

[8:16] (inaudible)

[8:17] Nicole Blanchard elle. J'espère

[8:21] que mes commentaires ainsi que

[8:23] le plan d'action que nous allons

[8:25] déposer plus tard ce soir

[8:28] répondront à plusieurs de ces

[8:30] préoccupations. The remnants of

[8:34] Hurricane Debbie made it the

[8:35] most destructive natural storm

[8:38] in Québec's history. With

[8:41] damages reaching over 2.4

[8:44] billion dollars. While the

[8:46] impact varied across different

[8:49] regions, Beaconsfield was hit

[8:51] particularly hard. Il est tombé

[8:55] 170 millimètres de pluie, ici,

[8:59] avec Quenneville, 9 août. À

[9:01] d'autres endroits, comme dans

[9:02] Lanaudière, plus de 220

[9:05] millimètres sont tombés. Pour

[9:08] vous donner une idée, la tempête

[9:11] de 1987 qui avait inondé

[9:14] Montréal et l'autoroute Décarie

[9:17] avait apporté 129 millimètres de

[9:20] pluie. Debbie a presque doublé

[9:22] cette quantité. Experts tell us

[9:27] these extreme weather events are

[9:29] going to be more frequent.

[9:32] Climate change is the main

[9:34] reason. These rapid changes in

[9:36] the weather are causing natural

[9:39] disasters that our cities and

[9:42] infrastructure and homes just

[9:43] are not built to handle. C'est

[9:48] pourquoi il est essentiel de

[9:49] faire tout notre possible pour

[9:51] limiter les dégâts. Mais même

[9:55] avec tous les améliorations que

[9:57] nous mettrons en place, il y

[10:00] aura encore des impacts

[10:03] importants, la force et la

[10:04] fréquence des tempêtes de vent,

[10:06] de pluie, de neige et des

[10:08] verglas cause des problèmes ici,

[10:11] au Canada et partout dans le

[10:15] monde. We must act now to reduce

[10:17] the impact of these problems

[10:19] wherever we can. Over the last

[10:22] five years, we have not only

[10:24] carried out regular maintenance

[10:26] programs on our infrastructure,

[10:29] but we have also invested over

[10:32] $10 million to improve our

[10:36] stormwater and sanitary sewers.

[10:39] While these improvements have

[10:41] helped reduce some of the

[10:42] damage, it's clear that more

[10:45] will need to be done to handle

[10:47] future storms. Ainsi, malgré nos

[10:51] efforts et ce que vous faites

[10:53] chez vous, ces catastrophes

[10:55] risquent de se reproduire. Nous

[10:58] devons nous préparer pour

[10:59] minimiser les dégâts, organiser

[11:01] des interventions rapides et

[11:04] sécuritaires et planifier des

[11:06] opérations d'aide efficace en

[11:08] tout temps et en toutes

[11:10] circonstances. Our team is and

[11:14] will remain vigilant, ready, and

[11:17] organized. I want to

[11:19] congratulate our entire

[11:20] municipal team, led by director

[11:23] general Patry swallow for the

[11:26] incredible work they have done.

[11:28] For after the rain stopped, they

[11:30] worked tirelessly and organize

[11:33] 18 days of collections between

[11:36] August the 14th and September

[11:37] the 4th, plus five extra debris

[11:42] pick ups between September the

[11:44] 6th and 19th. It took over 230

[11:51] truckloads term move 1233 tons

[11:54] of material. To put that into

[11:58] perspective, but they did, in

[12:01] three weeks, what we typically

[12:03] do in four months. Les dommages

[12:07] ont été si importants que nous

[12:09] avons reçu 430 des dont 27 était

[12:16] hors-délais, mais nous les avons

[12:17] quand même pris en considération

[12:18] et référer à nos experts en

[12:21] sinistres vu les circonstances

[12:23] exceptionnelles. Le gouvernement

[12:26] du Québec a déjà prévu adapter

[12:28] son programme d'aide pour cet

[12:31] événement. Ce qui,

[12:35] souhaitons-le, compenseront de

[12:36] nombreuses victimes. De notre

[12:38] côté, nous allons continuer à

[12:39] identifier les zones les plus

[12:41] vulnérables aux inondations et

[12:43] explorer des solutions

[12:46] novatrices pour contrer ces

[12:47] événements extrêmes. Tonight, we

[12:52] will table an action plan to

[12:55] make our community more

[12:57] resilient to extreme weather.

[13:00] This is item 60.2 on the agenda.

[13:04] The plan includes an analysis of

[13:08] the most affected areas, public

[13:11] awareness campaigns, and

[13:14] sustainable solutions to protect

[13:16] both our infrastructure and

[13:19] homes. We are also aiming at

[13:22] developing mutual aid scenarios

[13:24] with neighbouring cities to

[13:26] share best practices and support

[13:28] each other when necessary. With

[13:32] this plan will be made public

[13:34] and will be available on the

[13:36] City's website by Wednesday of

[13:39] this week. We will so, that was

[13:41] an answer to the questions that

[13:42] were related to the flooding and

[13:43] we have another person that sent

[13:44] us a written question, Madam

[13:45] Nicole Saint Andrew. Nous

[13:46] continuerons à agir pour

[13:47] prévenir les impacts de ces

[13:48] événements naturels, tout en

[13:49] sachant qu'il est impossible de

[13:50] les empêcher. Mais nous ferons

[13:51] tout ce qui est en notre pouvoir

[13:53] pour limiter les dégâts. Tant

[13:56] pour vous propriétés que pour

[13:59] nous, nos infrastructures

[14:02] municipales.

[14:21] Ma dame Nicole Colorado. I will

[14:26] summarize her questions. It's

[14:29] regarding the financing of

[14:31] friends for mental health.

[14:34] Regarding the demolition process

[14:37] and regarding the annex a hiring

[14:39] for public works, animal

[14:42] services for all animals. Madame

[14:45] Colorado... Corado d'autres

[14:46] questions? Madame we will refer

[14:48] your questions to the

[14:50] administration and they will

[14:51] follow up with you on your

[14:54] questions. Thank you. And now,

[14:57] we're up to the questions period

[15:00] on the floor.

[15:06] >> -- 171 Westcroft. With regard

[15:09] to item 30.8 in the agenda, on

[15:13] behalf of West Island citizen

[15:16] advocacy, I would like to thank

[15:18] you for your contribution to our

[15:22] organization. We use a very

[15:24] wisely. Thank you.

[15:26] >> Thank you very much.

[15:33] Any other questions?

[15:36] Non.

[15:42] - Bonsoir à tous. Pour moi, ma

[15:44] question...

[15:46] - Donnez votre nom et votre

[15:47] adresse si vous plaît.

[15:48] - Oui, Johanne Gauthier.

[15:50] L'adresse: 198 s'Cunningham à

[15:53] Beaconsfield. Ma question est

[15:54] pour les permis de

[15:55] stationnement. J'aimerais

[15:57] vraiment essayer d'expliquer un

[15:58] petit peu notre situation, j'ai

[16:01] été très chanceux d'avoir notre

[16:03] conseil heure du district six

[16:04] qui m'a un petit peu aidé avec

[16:07] toutes mes questionnements, mais

[16:08] elle m'a suggéré de venir ici

[16:10] pour vous en parler. Nous

[16:13] habitons serait une erreur qui

[16:14] est quand même pas très

[16:16] passantes, c'est une loupe et si

[16:18] les gens viennent autour ce

[16:19] n'est pas une rue principale. En

[16:24] fait, on habite ici depuis 19

[16:26] ans et on a des jeunes enfants

[16:28] qui sont devenus maintenant des

[16:29] jeunes adultes et on a vraiment

[16:30] un gros problème dans la

[16:32] dernière année. On a toujours

[16:34] suivi les règles, on est

[16:36] contents avec Beaconsfield, on

[16:37] adore habiter ici, mais là on se

[16:39] fait dire qu'on a droit à trois

[16:42] stationnements par année par

[16:44] auto. Alors, vous comprendrez

[16:46] bien que dans notre côté à nous,

[16:48] on essaye d'aider nos jeunes

[16:49] adultes parce qu'ils sont les

[16:50] universités ou aux collèges et

[16:52] ils ont des emplois, bien sûr

[16:54] ils ont un véhicule. On est mal

[16:56] pris parce que tous nos voisins

[16:57] essaient de nous aider, mais

[17:00] finalement je n'ai pas d'aide

[17:02] vraiment dans les derniers mois.

[17:04] Mes voisins essaient de prendre

[17:05] les autos de mes enfants, mais

[17:07] en même temps on se dit: ça n'a

[17:08] pas de bon sens que... on

[17:11] comprend, quand c'est l'hiver,

[17:12] tout le monde autour veut nous

[17:13] aider. Mais là, on a trop de

[17:16] véhicules pour notre famille et

[17:17] on se dit: on exagère pas

[17:20] vraiment. C'est que juste entre

[17:22] 18 et 23 ans, c'est normal

[17:24] qu'ils aient leur propre

[17:25] véhicule. C'est normal qu'il

[17:26] reste encore à la maison et on

[17:27] veut les aider ne veut pas leur

[17:29] dire: finalement, on ne peut pas

[17:30] te garder à la maison parce que

[17:31] tu as un véhicule et ça ne fit

[17:33] plus dans le stationnement. Je

[17:36] veux juste savoir comment on

[17:37] peut procéder, à qui je peux

[17:39] demander de l'aide. J'ai demandé

[17:40] à la sécurité publique et ils

[17:42] ont dit dernièrement: madame, je

[17:44] suis désolé, mais vous avez trop

[17:46] demandé. J'ai dit: je ne

[17:47] comprends pas que j'ai trop

[17:49] demandé. Je pensais qu'on avait

[17:50] juste demandé justement. On est

[17:52] gentil, on appelle même s'il est

[17:54] 10 heures, 11 heures le soir.

[17:55] Les gens arrivent avec un permis

[17:57] et pour les visiteurs, c'est sûr

[17:58] que ça se passe bien parce que

[18:00] nos deux familles sont de loin,

[18:01] mais ils ne viennent jamais plus

[18:02] que trois fois par année nous

[18:04] visiter. On est correct de ce

[18:05] côté-là. Mais comment on peut

[18:08] faire pour aider nos enfants qui

[18:09] sont devenus des jeunes adultes

[18:12] et qui ont besoin d'un espace?

[18:14] Je me dis: l'hiver, c'est

[18:16] normal. Je comprends le

[18:17] déménagement. Mais pourquoi dans

[18:18] les autres saisons c'est si

[18:20] sévère et pourquoi est-ce que

[18:22] quand j'ai vu les avoir de

[18:23] l'aide, tout ce on dit à la

[18:24] sécurité publique: désolé, il y

[18:26] a des règles. Moi, je ne suis

[18:28] pas bien là-dedans. Je

[18:29] comprends, j'ai toujours

[18:30] respecté tous les règles de

[18:31] Beaconsfield, mais je ne trouve

[18:32] pas ça correct que noterais

[18:34] famille... on n'est pas les

[18:35] seuls en fait avoir une famille

[18:38] qui a beaucoup d'enfants et que

[18:39] les enfants commencent aussi

[18:40] avoir des partenaires. On se

[18:42] dit: ce n'est pas qu'on va

[18:43] accueillir un village au

[18:44] complet, mais il faut régler

[18:47] avec nos enfants. Il faut qu'on

[18:49] leur dise qu'ils ont un espace.

[18:51] - Pour la procédure pour

[18:54] regarder cette situation-là, je

[18:56] vais demander pour la présidence

[18:58] du comité de trafic de peut-être

[19:01] expliquer la procédure comment

[19:02] est-ce qu'elle peut faire sa

[19:04] demande et puis, ce sera

[19:06] considéré par le comité.

[19:09] - Alors, Madame, écoutez,

[19:12] malheureusement ou heureusement,

[19:13] dépendamment du point de

[19:14] victoire ce qui est de la

[19:15] procédure, présentement, elle

[19:17] est contenue dans le règlement

[19:19] municipal. Alors, vous faites

[19:21] bien de venir ici et de vous

[19:22] adresser à nous parce que la

[19:24] façon de procéder, si on veut

[19:26] changer les règles, c'est en

[19:27] s'adressant au conseil comme

[19:28] vous le faites ce soir.

[19:31] Éventuellement, ce que ça peut

[19:32] faire c'est amener une

[19:33] modification du règlement

[19:34] municipal pour permettre le cas

[19:36] échéant, peut-être. Je ne peux

[19:38] pas vous faire des promesses

[19:40] évidemment, mais amener une

[19:41] modification du règlement qui

[19:43] permettrait d'élargir, soit les

[19:45] heures de stationnement permis

[19:47] ou le nombre de permis qui

[19:48] peuvent être très émus dans une

[19:49] année. Autrement,

[19:52] l'administration malheureusement

[19:53] ne peut pas déborder de ce que

[19:55] le règlement prévoit. Alors,

[19:57] c'est une discussion qu'il

[19:58] faudrait qu'il y a à l'interne

[19:59] avec l'administration et le

[20:01] conseil pour voir dans un

[20:03] premier temps si des

[20:04] modifications sont effectivement

[20:07] requis et de quelle façon si on

[20:08] fait des modifications, on les

[20:10] fait de façon les plus

[20:13] efficiente, les plus efficaces

[20:15] pour tout le monde pour la

[20:16] communauté dans l'ensemble.

[20:18] - Ça pourrait commencer par une

[20:22] demande au comité de trafic qui

[20:25] ensuite, fera en recommandation

[20:26] au conseil et le Conseil

[20:28] décidera à ce moment-là.

[20:32] - On pourrait regarder

[20:33] effectivement de cette façon-là

[20:36] et on a une rencontre du comité

[20:37] sur la circulation à la fin du

[20:40] mois d'octobre. Honnêtement, par

[20:43] contre, je ne peux pas vous

[20:44] garantir que ce sujet-là va être

[20:45] à l'ordre du jour à ce moment-là

[20:47] parce qu'on a déjà des demandes

[20:48] qui émanent depuis quelques mois

[20:50] qui pourraient peut-être être

[20:52] traités. Mais on peut en prendre

[20:53] note et vérifier spécifiquement

[20:57] de quelle façon ça peut être

[20:59] modifié, si ça doit être

[21:00] modifié.

[21:01] - J'apprécierais parce que

[21:02] surtout quand on vient

[21:03] rencontrer des gens et qu'on

[21:04] explique notre cas et que c'est

[21:06] notre propre famille, on habite

[21:08] à cette adresse-là depuis

[21:09] presque 20 ans et qu'on me dit:

[21:11] désolé, je ne peux pas. Pour

[21:13] moi, c'est inconcevable qu'on ne

[21:15] me dise pas: on va voir ce qu'on

[21:16] peut faire et on me dit juste

[21:17] non, il y a des règlements.

[21:18] C'est comme ça, on suit le

[21:20] règlement. Sincèrement, ça cause

[21:22] des frustrations incroyables

[21:24] parce qu'on se dit: on ne se

[21:25] sent pas vraiment écouté et on

[21:28] ne sent pas qu'il y a quelqu'un

[21:30] qui veut nous aider. C'était

[21:32] juste comme: non, c'est comme

[21:33] ça. Je m'excuse, mais on ne

[21:35] s'ACTRA pas à la maison. On se

[21:36] dit: ça n'a pas de bon sens que

[21:38] c'est une famille qui habite. Là

[21:39] on ne parle pas que c'est plein

[21:41] de visiteurs qui arrivent.

[21:43] - Rappelez-moi votre nom de

[21:44] famille si vous plaît?

[21:45] - Gauthier. Est-ce que la

[21:49] conseillère Alexopoulos à vos

[21:50] coordonnées? Elle pourra mettre

[21:52] l'adresse courriel et j'entrer

[21:54] en contact avec. Vous

[21:55] - Ce serait gentil. Je veux être

[21:57] sûr que quelqu'un va me revenir

[21:58] là-dessus. Je comprends que ce

[22:00] ne sera pas tout de suite, mais

[22:01] au moins que c'est pris en

[22:02] considération et qu'on va

[22:03] avoir...

[22:04] - On va passer par le comité de

[22:06] trafic qui va regarder votre

[22:10] demande et ensuite, le comité

[22:14] fera une recommandation au

[22:17] conseil et le Conseil décidera à

[22:18] ce moment-là si oui, selon la

[22:21] recommandation,

[22:23] (inaudible)

[22:24] .

[22:25] - Est-ce que je peux poser une

[22:26] dernière question? À quel moment

[22:27] ou justement par rapport au

[22:28] déneigement... on sait qu'il n'y

[22:29] aura pas de la chute de suite,

[22:30] mais c'est quoi la

[22:32] réglementation? Est-ce que c'est

[22:33] fin octobre ou novembre ou ils

[22:35] disent qu'on n'a plus du tout

[22:36] droit de stationner dans la

[22:38] nuit, même avec un permis? C'est

[22:40] quand?

[22:41] - Je pense que ça commence en

[22:43] novembre.

[22:45] - Fin octobre.

[22:48] (inaudible)

[22:54] - On ne peut jamais stationner

[22:55] la nuit au complet, sauf avec un

[22:58] permis. Mais s'il neige, il y a

[23:00] un temps requis après lequel on

[23:02] ne peut pas se stationner quand

[23:04] il va avoir des opérations pour

[23:06] déneiger.

[23:07] - Je ne savais plus si c'était

[23:09] fait à octobre.

[23:11] - Ce n'est pas une question de

[23:13] date, c'est une question de

[23:14] tempête de neige il y a un délai

[23:15] pour quand la tempête commence,

[23:17] terminé après ça, il y a un

[23:19] délai respecté. C'est quand il

[23:21] neige. Il n'y a pas de date.

[23:22] - O.K., Mais on sait quand on

[23:24] normal, mi-octobre... on est

[23:27] correct.

[23:28] - Merci beaucoup de m'avoir

[23:29] écouté désolé pour les gens qui

[23:30] ont vécu les inondations. Je

[23:31] sais que ce n'est vraiment pas

[23:34] évident. Merci beaucoup,

[23:36] j'apprécie. Je ne veux pas être

[23:37] impoli, je suis obligé de

[23:39] quitter bientôt, mais j'apprécie

[23:41] énormément votre écoute.

[23:42] - Merci! Merci!

[23:50] >> Hi, my name is Desmond she

[23:51] for, 30 -- I had written a

[23:52] letter a couple months ago.

[23:57] J'ai fini les réformes... je

[23:58] m'excuse. I had a meeting with

[23:59] Mr. Chabot urban planning.

[24:02] Regarding property I own on

[24:04] lakeshore road. And I was told

[24:07] there was supposed to be

[24:08] addressed in August with but I

[24:12] was told, Mister Mayor, you are

[24:14] on vacation and supposedly it

[24:16] was going to be talked about at

[24:17] this meeting. I just wanted to

[24:18] know where I stand in regards to

[24:24] a park tax or an expropriation

[24:27] of the land because I planted

[24:29] develop that one, and I

[24:30] addressed a letter to the

[24:31] Council and I don't know if you

[24:35] guys had a chance to look at it.

[24:38] I took a shot. I probably know

[24:41] what the answer is but I just

[24:43] wanted here because I haven't

[24:45] had an answer as of yet. Mr. the

[24:50] mayor is not --

[24:51] >> No, I'm not aware, so, you

[24:54] know, I'm listening to you and I

[24:56] have no idea about the

[24:58] situation. Do we know?

[25:01] >> I can shed some light on it.

[25:03] We did receive your letter and

[25:05] we had a discussion about it but

[25:06] you should be receiving a

[25:08] communication back.

[25:09] >> Well, we will let Patrice.

[25:13] >> Yeah, because of some

[25:15] vacations lately, among the

[25:17] council members, -- talk with

[25:20] them all together to come to a

[25:22] conclusion as to your request if

[25:24] you're going to see the 10% of

[25:25] the land, if you're going to pay

[25:27] the park fee. That's your

[25:29] request, if I remember because

[25:31] our first inclination was to

[25:33] have the land but you came back

[25:36] with that letter at the Council

[25:38] to consider if it would be a

[25:42] park fee instead of seeding land

[25:44] to the city. You prefer to pay

[25:46] the park fee, so not everyone

[25:48] has mentioned --

[25:49] >> Mister Mayor, I understand

[25:52] there's a property that I own on

[25:54] Lakeshore and my goal is to

[25:56] develop it. And as I've

[25:58] developed other houses in the

[25:59] city, I understand that there is

[26:01] a park tax that has to be paid

[26:03] which is 10% of the land value.

[26:07] And there is a clause in the

[26:08] bylaw that the City has the

[26:09] right to expropriate 10% of the

[26:12] land. So, --

[26:14] >> It's not expropriation. It's

[26:17] the sides of property, let's say

[26:19] it's 10,000 square feet, well,

[26:21] the city is entitled to say, we

[26:23] don't want the money, we want

[26:25] 1000 feet. It's not

[26:26] expropriation, it's just the way

[26:28] the owner would pay the park

[26:31] fee. So, it's money or land.

[26:34] That's the question and we are

[26:35] going to come back to you on

[26:36] that.

[26:37] >> I was okay with either or

[26:38] because out of my control but

[26:41] when I had estimates done for

[26:42] the City to take the 10% of the

[26:45] land away, I don't know, it's

[26:47] not expropriation, to take the

[26:50] 10% instead of the cash, it's

[26:54] costing a very high amount

[26:55] because there's demolition of a

[26:57] garage, there's a new fence that

[26:58] has to go up, those soil testing

[27:00] that the City and I just, you

[27:04] know, there are all these

[27:06] things.

[27:09] >> We receive your letter.

[27:11] >> Okay, because I wrote it a

[27:12] couple months ago, that's all. I

[27:14] was hoping to, I was told I was

[27:16] going to have an answer today.

[27:18] >> Well, we will get back to you

[27:20] but I believe that it's probably

[27:21] going to be the 10% money

[27:25] instead of the land.

[27:27] >> That would --

[27:29] >> But I have to make sure that

[27:33] that's the agreement.

[27:35] >> It's a large sum of money and

[27:40] I would just like you, Mister

[27:41] Mayor, if you had a chance to

[27:42] take two minutes and read the

[27:44] letter you wrote, and you will

[27:46] see the things, the

[27:49] circumstances of which it's been

[27:51] discussed. I know some of the

[27:53] councillors are very much for

[27:55] taking the land and it's, you

[27:58] know, I will leave it with you.

[28:00] >> We will get back to you.

[28:01] >> Thank you very much.

[28:02] >> Thank you for bringing it up.

[28:07] >> Hello. My name is Marie for

[28:10] no. I'm a homeowner at 375 elm.

[28:13] There are nine of us here from

[28:17] 375 elm or corner elm and tower.

[28:21] The town houses that were

[28:23] completely devastated and still

[28:25] continue to be, not only as a

[28:27] result of the event that you

[28:28] just described, but also this is

[28:30] not our first go around. So,

[28:33] I've submitted a few questions

[28:35] and I know you'll be going over.

[28:37] And so have some of my friends.

[28:42] What I would like to share with

[28:43] you today, though, and as I

[28:45] speak on the mic, is that as you

[28:48] are speaking about how this is,

[28:50] you know, a lot to do with

[28:52] climate and the hurricane that

[28:54] just took place, we, at the

[28:56] corner of tower and alum, I've

[28:58] had this issue. I won't say long

[29:00] before climate issues because

[29:01] that's been going on for quite

[29:02] some time but there has been a

[29:04] repetitive pattern. So, with all

[29:06] due respect, while this was

[29:09] clearly the worst, there has

[29:10] been a pattern of reputation

[29:11] that's taken place across these

[29:15] properties that I think

[29:17] disrespects what we've been

[29:18] living through just as a simple

[29:21] result of this. So, that needs

[29:22] to be addressed and through the

[29:24] question, we respectfully ask

[29:25] for an audience with yourself,

[29:28] whoever you deem necessary and

[29:30] Peggy to address this. What I

[29:32] would like to address

[29:33] immediately though, because I

[29:34] know some of my friends also

[29:35] have some questions, is the fact

[29:37] that the parking is going to

[29:38] become an issue and will

[29:40] continue to be an issue, and is

[29:41] an issue. As many of us can't

[29:45] park in our garages and for

[29:47] different reasons, we will

[29:48] choose not to continue parking

[29:49] in our garages as the rainy

[29:51] season continues into fall. We

[29:53] have a limit as far as our

[29:55] insurance policies are concerned

[29:56] and also a personal expense

[29:58] limit where we can't just keep

[29:59] replacing our cars every two

[30:01] years. And with the upcoming

[30:04] changes in the parking

[30:06] restrictions, because the snow

[30:07] clearance and ongoing garbage

[30:09] issue which I know that I've

[30:10] spoken to Doug -- about with

[30:13] limited tolerance, we need to

[30:16] address what's going to be

[30:17] happening. In terms of parking,

[30:19] what other solutions can be

[30:21] made? As we enter a rainy

[30:24] season, as it's been proven

[30:25] through history, we have an

[30:27] issue with our underground

[30:29] garages as they form a mouth and

[30:31] an intake for water. We're at a

[30:33] point now where Mary many of us

[30:34] in our insurance policies have,

[30:36] they've been exhausted. So, we

[30:38] need actually concrete

[30:40] resolutions and solutions,

[30:42] starting with parking, starting

[30:44] with tolerance when it comes to

[30:46] parking. Revision of that but

[30:49] also, I am hoping that in the

[30:50] questions that you address, that

[30:52] we've all written, that you will

[30:54] provide us with an audience that

[30:56] we can actually address what's

[30:58] particularly happening. Not to

[31:00] forget what's happening across

[31:02] Beaconsfield but it is sizeable.

[31:03] There are 22 homes. A number of

[31:05] which continue to be uninhabited

[31:07] because of deplorable living

[31:08] conditions that are not

[31:10] representative of a first world

[31:11] country, let alone Beaconsfield.

[31:13] And I think that something that

[31:14] we should actually be not

[31:16] satisfied with. It's

[31:17] unacceptable and it's actually,

[31:19] you know, disgusting. Oxford and

[31:21] other countries would be

[31:22] addressing this differently.

[31:26] >> I will ask our director

[31:28] general to answer your question.

[31:31] >> Okay.

[31:32] >> Yeah, real sorry for what

[31:33] you're going through for

[31:34] everyone. It's horrible. I know

[31:37] you had issues in 2022 and I

[31:40] believe that some of the work

[31:41] that we did this year was very

[31:43] helpful. We spent -- point $5

[31:46] million in that area.

[31:47] >> Wasn't helpful, sorry.

[31:56] >> If you do not allow him to

[31:58] answer the question and be

[32:00] interfering with his questions,

[32:02] he will not answer. So, would

[32:04] you please stop and let him

[32:06] answer the question?

[32:14] >> So, we had a severe rain in

[32:17] July. I think it was close,

[32:19] around 60 millimetres,

[32:20] everything went well, we were

[32:21] very happy with that. Of course,

[32:23] August nine was horrible and

[32:27] extreme weather. In one hour, it

[32:28] was 50 or 60 millimetres in one

[32:31] hour. That really the ground was

[32:35] all wet already. We had already

[32:37] received about 80 millimetres

[32:38] and then around five PM, another

[32:40] 50. So, that was very

[32:42] challenging for you guys first

[32:44] and then for us in the city, so

[32:47] tonight, we are tabling your

[32:49] report. Hopefully that's going

[32:50] to bring us light to some

[32:53] actions that the City could take

[32:54] and hopefully also for residents

[32:57] to improve their own homes at

[32:59] certain areas. I know you had

[33:01] done some work to prepare for

[33:03] that but this storm was way over

[33:05] our capacity. And we are, for

[33:09] example, I know this week, we're

[33:10] meeting with the one of our

[33:13] consultant firms that's been

[33:14] doing a study. Hopefully we get

[33:17] some results before the end of

[33:19] the year of recommendations, how

[33:20] to improve. We want to ask them

[33:22] to add all the information that

[33:26] we gathered from the flood into

[33:29] this report, to help us get

[33:31] better recommendations and a

[33:33] better know how. So, I don't

[33:35] think we'll get answers to

[33:36] everything that we're looking

[33:37] at. But hopefully, we will get

[33:39] some and that were able to

[33:41] improve some of our

[33:43] infrastructures in the near

[33:44] future. I don't think it is

[33:45] going to be done within a year.

[33:47] It's going to take a few years

[33:48] but there is some work that

[33:49] could be done to improve our

[33:52] infrastructure in the near

[33:53] future. About your specific

[33:54] situation there, the area and

[33:57] tower and elm, I have to

[33:59] understand a little better

[34:00] what's going on there to that

[34:01] intersection. I have to talk

[34:02] with our engineers but I would

[34:03] be happy to, you know, have a

[34:06] discussion with you and your

[34:07] neighbours at one point, just to

[34:09] explain, you know, how we see

[34:11] things and how we could

[34:12] hopefully improve your

[34:13] situation. I still need to get

[34:15] some reports on that data and

[34:18] better understanding of

[34:19] everything that was going on.

[34:21] It's been challenging, the last

[34:23] week has been very challenging

[34:24] for everyone here at the city

[34:25] and not as much as you guys, I

[34:28] understand that because you're

[34:30] mostly involved. We're looking

[34:31] at a technical point of view,

[34:32] how we can bring some relief to

[34:35] the people in that area. So,

[34:37] hopefully we can get that. I

[34:39] could give you my email address

[34:40] but if you write info at

[34:42] Beaconsfield, you know, and ask

[34:44] to talk to the director general,

[34:46] tell me what questions or

[34:48] concerns you like us to address

[34:49] and we could prepare something

[34:53] for you. I'm not sure in which

[34:55] timeframe but hopefully I could

[34:57] do that in a month, you know? In

[34:59] 3 to 6 next weeks, hopefully,

[35:01] depending on the information we

[35:02] will get but I will get back to

[35:04] you.

[35:05] >> Some of the questions will

[35:06] come out because they were

[35:07] submitted as part of this

[35:08] meeting, so I know you need to

[35:09] address them, right? That's what

[35:10] my understanding is when we put

[35:11] a question online at the W W W,

[35:14] right? So, some of whom will

[35:17] appear, am I mistaken? When it

[35:18] comes to the questions that we

[35:20] submit on the website prior to

[35:22] this meeting? And my being

[35:25] clear?

[35:28] >> You don't understand? So,

[35:30] prior to the meeting, we can

[35:34] ascribe our questions separate

[35:36] to the ones I'm asking tonight.

[35:38] Where all do those questions go

[35:40] and who addresses them and when?

[35:41] It's tonight, right?

[35:44] >> Here we have the question

[35:46] period, so

[35:47] [Inaudible]

[35:48] >> I'm not sure I understand.

[35:49] >> You mentioned my name but

[35:50] there was kind of very little --

[35:52] >> Are you talking about the

[35:54] questions -- well, I was hoping

[35:57] to answer them with my report

[36:00] tonight. So, those are the five

[36:02] questions that were written to

[36:05] us. Now, any other questions

[36:09] that goes to info at

[36:12] Beaconsfield, that's answered

[36:16] pretty promptly by, I believe,

[36:21] by Dominic, right? By Dominic,

[36:26] the clerk who answers those

[36:27] questions that info at

[36:29] Beaconsfield. She finds out the

[36:30] information and she replies with

[36:32] the information.

[36:34] >> Okay, there is somewhat

[36:36] complex. I don't know if they

[36:37] will be so black and white. It

[36:38] does require strategy. My other

[36:41] comment is, though, in the

[36:42] meantime while the rest of us

[36:44] continue to incur personal

[36:46] expenses as a result of this,

[36:48] and in some cases, you know,

[36:50] while Beaconsfield continues to

[36:51] do its analysis, it's features,

[36:53] and all the rest, we are paying

[36:55] out of pocket. Ongoing either

[36:57] through our insurance, or

[36:58] personal expenses, and ongoing

[37:00] as the climate issue is not

[37:04] getting any better, if that's

[37:05] what you want to call it. We

[37:07] have had issues prior to this.

[37:09] There is been recorded pattern

[37:10] and I'm just curious as to what

[37:14] happens for all of those

[37:15] expenses that we are incurring,

[37:16] and we will continue to do so in

[37:18] the foreseeable future as we

[37:21] wait for this to be hatched.

[37:26] >> Well, the City does not have

[37:27] any funding for people that are

[37:30] going through the government

[37:34] might have programs to which I

[37:35] stand, that's another question.

[37:36] Un sinistre.

[37:41] Not sure to which extent they

[37:43] would support people that went

[37:46] through that flood, for example.

[37:48] It depends on the series of

[37:49] conditions that I'm not aware of

[37:50] and I believe residents could

[37:53] apply directly to the government

[37:55] for that. The city is not

[37:57] involved.

[37:58] >> And how about the reduction

[37:59] in our property values? Because

[38:02] many of us have received letters

[38:03] from the City of Montréal

[38:05] approaching us with that.

[38:07] >> Where did you get that

[38:08] information about property

[38:09] value?

[38:10] >> Many of us got a letter

[38:11] directly from the City of

[38:12] Montréal with a file number,

[38:13] with a claim number, and we had

[38:16] a phone number to call where we

[38:18] were asked the extent of the

[38:21] damage done to our physical

[38:23] property. We have to send photos

[38:25] and because of that, they're

[38:27] going to be reducing our

[38:28] property values.

[38:30] >> Well, property valuation is

[38:33] not establish that way. Property

[38:35] valuation is established every

[38:36] three years and we are not aware

[38:39] of any program whatsoever right

[38:42] now to review or reevaluate any

[38:47] properties, whether it be in

[38:49] Beaconsfield, Kirkland, or

[38:50] anywhere else. And it's based on

[38:54] market price. It's not based on,

[38:57] you know, whatever else. So, I

[39:01] think that you got the wrong

[39:02] information because there is no

[39:05] reevaluation being taken place.

[39:06] >> I provided in my questions on

[39:09] the website the actual reference

[39:12] number and I invite you, Mayor

[39:15] Bourelle, to investigate that,

[39:17] because myself and others spoke

[39:18] to the City official and many of

[39:22] us all separately got the same

[39:24] message that they're going to be

[39:26] devaluing our homes as a result

[39:28] of it. So, there must be some

[39:29] exceptions going on. I'm

[39:31] concerned about zoning but the

[39:32] file number is there.

[39:33] >> We will look into that. Mr.

[39:39] Boileau will look into that but

[39:40] it would be extremely unusual

[39:42] for them to do this and I'm not

[39:44] aware of any reevaluation of any

[39:47] properties, whether it be

[39:48] Beaconsfield, Kirkland,

[39:51] Pointe-Claire or anywhere where

[39:53] there was a lot of flooding. I'm

[39:56] not aware of any reevaluation

[39:58] taking place. So, we will check

[40:01] it out but I dealt very much

[40:03] doubt very much that it will be

[40:05] done because it's based on

[40:07] market value. It's based on

[40:10] basically transactions that have

[40:12] taken place over the last two or

[40:14] three years. So, it is not based

[40:18] on the fact -- that you were

[40:21] flooded.

[40:22] >> You should have a

[40:23] conversation with him though.

[40:25] >> We will talk to Montréal and

[40:28] find out, for sure.

[40:29] >> Yeah, Mister Mayor, when we

[40:30] saw this, the day we wrote to

[40:33] the -- department and we're

[40:34] waiting back from them. We were

[40:36] surprised to see that.

[40:37] >> Okay, I can send you a

[40:38] photograph if you'd like a

[40:39] letter that every seat.

[40:40] >> You can't do the address

[40:42] there and ask it to be directed

[40:43] to me.

[40:44] >> My final question, will you

[40:45] be reevaluating the parking

[40:47] situation in the bylaws along

[40:50] elm? Because there is a shortage

[40:51] of a. We cannot all be parking

[40:53] at Montrose Park. There isn't

[40:54] always parking at Montrose Park.

[40:56] We're not all going to be

[40:59] trolling Montrose park to see

[41:00] when there is parking available.

[41:02] There needs to be something

[41:04] done. November 1st is coming. I

[41:06] don't think that it's reasonable

[41:08] at this point because it's not

[41:10] reasonable now and until there

[41:12] is a freeze and until we feel

[41:16] comfortable that our cars are

[41:17] not at risk, as our basements,

[41:20] we can move them, unfortunately,

[41:21] and a physical property. I mean,

[41:23] it's going to be a challenge for

[41:24] us to feel safe, comfortable,

[41:27] and that it's a trustworthy

[41:29] environment for us to place our

[41:33] cars. So, can you look into

[41:36] that?

[41:37] >> Yeah, we will be to be

[41:38] honest, I'm not sure there is an

[41:39] easy fix here. There's so much

[41:43] space and there are so many

[41:44] cars. So, on garbage day, we

[41:48] have to collect the garbage. So,

[41:51] that's difficult. You cannot

[41:52] park on the streets. I know

[41:53] someone mentioned they got, they

[41:55] gave so many tickets. It was

[41:57] very few, very few tickets.

[41:59] >> I was one of them.

[42:00] >> Sorry about that but it was

[42:02] very few tickets that were given

[42:03] out. Not tons of tickets. So, I

[42:07] have the data for my team and

[42:09] they've informed me they were

[42:10] being tolerant and I understand

[42:13] why they were doing that.

[42:15] >> I beg to differ but they

[42:17] apparently were told not to be

[42:18] tolerant.

[42:21] >> I think you have to let the

[42:22] rumours away.

[42:23] >> No, I spoke directly to Mr.

[42:25] Haas about that.

[42:26] >> Mr. Haas's job is not to be

[42:28] tolerant. He has to have the

[42:30] bylaws respected but if that was

[42:31] the case, if that was the case,

[42:33] sorry, Mister Mayor, could you

[42:34] give me a minute more? Just for

[42:36] information. For statistics. So,

[42:43] since August 9th, we gave six

[42:45] tickets. That's not bad in six

[42:48] weeks.

[42:49] >> Depends on who receives them

[42:50] I suppose and what that does to

[42:51] somebody who's already paying

[42:53] tens of thousands of dollars.

[42:54] >> One person got three tickets

[42:56] for two cards about the cars

[42:57] were kind of abandoned on the

[42:59] street. They can't move within

[43:00] 24 hours and we got a complaint

[43:02] from someone that the cars were

[43:03] parked there abandoned with flat

[43:06] tires. That does not help. One

[43:10] was on a fire hydrant so out of

[43:13] six tickets, that's not money.

[43:14] >> No, I guess it counts when

[43:16] it's you.

[43:17] >> Of course but that doesn't

[43:18] mean it's everyone and --

[43:20] >> I'm only talking about myself

[43:21] and actually, there's another

[43:22] person to.

[43:23] >> I believe you and it's

[43:25] frustrating to get a parking

[43:26] ticket, I know.

[43:28] >> So, I would like for it to be

[43:30] waived.

[43:31] >> We can't remove. If you think

[43:32] we were wrong, you have to go to

[43:34] court. We can't remove tickets,

[43:35] that's not the way it works.

[43:36] >> And those were based on, some

[43:38] of them were based on complaints

[43:40] that we got.

[43:42] >> Yeah, we got three residents

[43:45] I think.

[43:46] >> I was parked in front of a

[43:48] hedge, so I don't know who lives

[43:49] there, but yeah.

[43:50] >> We're not running after you

[43:52] guys to give tickets.

[43:54] >> I don't have any further

[43:56] questions, thank you.

[44:06] Bonjour. Pauline

[44:07] (inaudible)

[44:08] Gérard. Plusieurs savent, je

[44:10] suis présidente de la Société

[44:12] historique de Beaconsfield.

[44:13] J'aurais peut-être un certain et

[44:14] que les services...

[44:16] éclaircissement propos de la

[44:17] situation, surtout au coin de

[44:19] Hull. Cette maison, cette

[44:21] résidence est construit

[44:22] par-dessus un ruisseau. Alors,

[44:27] c'est compréhensible qu'il y a

[44:28] plus d'eau peut-être si le

[44:31] réussir n'a pas été bien drainé,

[44:33] s'il y a de l'obstruction pour

[44:34] que l'eau coule plus, ça fait un

[44:38] apport d'eau un peu plus grand

[44:40] et il y a plusieurs ruisseaux

[44:41] qui arrivent à cet endroit-là,

[44:43] Pierre ruisseau qui passe en

[44:44] dessous de la place que je

[44:47] pense, les tuyaux arrivent bien

[44:48] à cet endroit-là pour traverser

[44:50] la voie ferrée. Monsieur

[44:52] Boileau, peut-être qu'il

[44:53] faudrait regarder sur les cartes

[44:54] de la ville. Je ne sais pas s'il

[44:55] y a des cartes qui identifie où

[44:57] étaient les Russes sûrement

[44:58] qu'ils soient mis dans des

[44:59] tuyaux. J'ai même entendu dire

[45:01] qu'à certains ruisseaux n'aurait

[45:02] pas été mis dans les tuyaux,

[45:06] donc peut-être qu'ils sont

[45:10] encore...

[45:11] - Je ne suis pas certain qu'on a

[45:12] des cartes à des ruisseaux en

[45:13] tant qu'il était, les vieux

[45:15] réussi. Sûrement que

[45:16] (inaudible)

[45:17] effectivement, dans ces

[45:18] secteurs-là il n'y en avait un.

[45:19] En fait, la ville en tant que

[45:22] telle à 39 bassins de drainage

[45:24] sur les, donc à proviennent du

[45:27] nuage, trois trois vers le lac

[45:29] et un s'en va aux rues sur

[45:30] l'Anse-à-l'Orme. Il y en a trois

[45:31] qui se déversent vers le sud. On

[45:32] a 39 bassins de drainage

[45:35] jusqu'au côté sud, 36 qui se

[45:37] déversent au lac en fait. Ce

[45:39] n'est pas cinq, comme dynamique,

[45:41] ça prend de l'analyse, des

[45:43] mesures de Libye dans les

[45:46] conduites et tout, mais ça va

[45:47] faire partie des analyses qu'on

[45:48] va faire prochainement. C'est

[45:50] sûr qu'il y a des ruisseaux

[45:51] souterrain des anciennes

[45:54] rivières ou des réseaux comme

[45:55] vous, dites on sait qu'il y en a

[45:56] quelques-uns. Je ne suis pas sûr

[45:57] qu'on les connaît tous.

[45:58] - Six ont été mis dans des

[46:00] tuyaux, il devrait... ils ont

[46:03] été mis dans les travaux publics

[46:05] imagine. Il y avait aussi même

[46:08] un étant assez grand pour que

[46:09] les enfants aillent à la pêche

[46:11] un peu au nord de cet

[46:13] endroit-là. Alors, avec le

[46:14] temps, ça revient peut-être. Je

[46:19] sais qu'il y a des endroits où

[46:20] la Ville a fait même... au tout

[46:22] début, avant 1950, avait hésité

[46:24] à laisser des constructions fait

[46:27] surtout au sud de la 20, dans le

[46:31] coin de lac Viau et dans le coin

[46:33] de Jasper et dans ce coin-là.

[46:35] Ils y avaient Desmarais Cash.

[46:37] - Ça fait longtemps que je suis

[46:38] à la, ville mais je me rappelle

[46:39] pas des six années-là.

[46:42] - Finalement, les développeurs

[46:44] ont réussi à convaincre la Ville

[46:46] de le faire et il y a quelques

[46:47] autres endroits aussi à

[46:49] Beaconsfield que ça s'est fait.

[46:50] - Vous avez raison et ça fait

[46:52] partie du défi que les villes

[46:53] rencontraient présentement.

[46:55] Partiellement Québec in flotte,

[46:56] mais les changements

[46:57] climatiques, ça n'a pas de

[46:58] frontières. On peut le voir avec

[46:59] le gouvernement qui parle de

[47:02] restrictions dans les zones

[47:03] inondables, qui parle de changer

[47:05] les règles dans les zones

[47:08] inondables. On est pratiquement

[47:09] pas affecté à Beaconsfield. Mais

[47:10] les gens qui sont sur la

[47:12] Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, la

[47:13] Rivières-des-Prairies, le lac

[47:14] des Deux-Montagnes vivent des

[47:15] situations présentement avec les

[47:16] nouvelles normes, des nouvelles

[47:18] lois que le gouvernement met en

[47:19] place par rapport à les secteurs

[47:21] de zones inondables. Ce n'est

[47:23] pas nouveau.

[47:26] (inaudible)

[47:27] Il a voulu se rapprocher de

[47:28] l'eau, les voies ferrées, ça

[47:29] arrivait pas là, on prend des

[47:32] matières, on mettait ça sur les

[47:33] trains. Les gens habitaient

[47:34] proche, parfois collées sur l'.

[47:36] Ou de l'autre côté de la voie

[47:38] ferrée, les choses ont changé.

[47:40] Les activités anthropologique

[47:41] ont fait qu'on se retrouve dans

[47:42] des situations aujourd'hui où on

[47:43] se dit: comment on a fait ça?

[47:45] Comme on a permis ça? On est où

[47:46] on est et on y a des gens qui

[47:48] vivent là. Il y a des gens qui

[47:51] ont... comment je dirais? Ça

[47:52] leur histoire fait partie de la

[47:54] ville depuis des

[47:56] (inaudible)

[47:57] Devils. Il faut composer avec ça

[47:58] présentement. Si les défis de

[48:01] l'urbanisation. On est confronté

[48:02] à ces problématiques-là. S'il y

[48:04] avait des anciens ruisseaux et

[48:05] des anciennes rivières et qu'on

[48:06] a mis les mains sur dessus, il

[48:07] faut qu'on soit capable de

[48:08] composer avec ça. Je ne pense

[48:09] pas qu'on va capables de changer

[48:10] le passé. On va essayer

[48:12] d'améliorer le futur.

[48:14] -

[48:15] - Ce n'est quand même pas si

[48:16] vieux que ça comme édifice.

[48:17] J'étais surpris qui permet...

[48:19] mais semble qu'il y avait des

[48:20] lois qu'il y a une certaine

[48:21] distance qui doit être respectée

[48:24] avant de faire une construction

[48:25] par rapport à un cours d'eau.

[48:28] - Il n'y a pas de cours d'eau.

[48:30] Ils sont souterrains, où ils

[48:31] sont tous canalisés. Les cours

[48:33] d', autres ils y allaient

[48:35] ruisseau mais d'un bloc, la

[48:37] Russie sauce Saint-James, les

[48:38] roulés sur l'Anse-à-l'Orme. Il

[48:39] n'y a pas une tonne de ruisseaux

[48:41] qui sont répertoriés à

[48:42] Beaconsfield. Ce sont des

[48:43] anciens réussit. Il n'y avait

[48:46] pas de loi avant qui touche les

[48:48] réussir. La Loi sur

[48:50] l'environnement, ça ne fait

[48:51] pas... comme on la connaît

[48:52] aujourd'hui, ça ne va pas 50 ans

[48:53] que les comme ça.

[48:54] - Ce sera considéré.

[48:55] - La Loi sur l'environnement

[48:56] n'avait pas dedans. Ça ne fait

[48:58] pas longtemps et célébrer qui

[48:59] sont responsables de faire

[49:00] respecter la Loi sur la qualité

[49:02] d'environnement, le long du lac.

[49:05] On a aucune responsabilité.

[49:07] - Est-ce que vous avez une

[49:09] question?

[49:10] - Vous pouvez essayer de voir

[49:12] pour aider à trouver une

[49:14] solution, peut-être aller voir

[49:15] les anciens Russo si vous les

[49:18] trouvez. Je voulais savoir à

[49:19] propos de Thompson, la Ville

[49:24] ne... prend possession du chemin

[49:26] Thompson? Est-ce que la rue

[49:28] Thompson appartient déjà à la

[49:29] ville aussi ça va être un autre

[49:31] dossier?

[49:33] - C'est un dossier que ça fait

[49:34] trois étés qu'on travaille

[49:36] dessus et on va finalement

[49:37] réussir à faire une entente avec

[49:38] les propriétaires du secteur. En

[49:41] fait, l'étude des propriétés de

[49:42] la rue et du centre du terrain

[49:44] de tennis, l'espace, vers le

[49:46] savaient pas à qui ça

[49:47] appartenait. On a travaillé

[49:48] là-dessus depuis deux années. À

[49:50] faire des recherches, des

[49:54] recherches centenaires ou

[49:56] presque, jusqu'au début du

[49:57] dernier siècle, 1910.

[50:00] - 18 180. 11

[50:01] - On a reculé loin en arrière

[50:04] pour faire la recherche des

[50:05] titres et avec toutes sortes de

[50:09] changements légaux, avec tous

[50:11] les actes des propriétés qui ont

[50:12] changé il y a de l'information

[50:13] qui s'est perdu, les lois ont

[50:15] changé et on a voulu mettre ça à

[50:17] jour avec les gens du secteur

[50:19] qui souhaitait utiliser aménager

[50:22] l'espace vers, mais comme je

[50:24] leur appartenait pas et ce

[50:25] n'était pas clair si sa

[50:26] partenaire ou à nous, il avait

[50:28] rien de clair là-dedans. On

[50:29] s'est entendu, on a fait une

[50:30] entente avec laquelle on va

[50:31] aller devant un juge pour dire:

[50:34] écoutez, ça fait plus que

[50:35] s'entend que ce problème-là

[50:36] dure. Est-ce qu'on est capable

[50:39] de venir devant vous, Monsieur

[50:41] le juge, Madame la Juge, pour

[50:43] faire en sorte que ce bout de

[50:47] terrain-là où la rue appartient

[50:48] à la Ville... l'autre bout de

[50:52] terrain appartient aux

[50:53] riverains, Larry. C'est un peu

[50:54] ça l'entente finalement. On est

[50:55] bien content. Comme j'ai dit un

[50:58] peu à la blague, aux élus: je

[51:01] suis content, je pense que j'ai

[51:02] finalement résolu le problème

[51:03] parce qu'il y avait une

[51:04] résolution de 1959 qui mandate

[51:06] le DG de régler le problème. Ce

[51:10] n'était pas dans ma famille,

[51:11] c'est parce que j'espère que

[51:12] j'ai réglé les problèmes. Je

[51:14] n'avais pas les mêmes moyens

[51:15] technologiques que lui et

[51:16] certainement pas la même équipe

[51:18] professionnelle qui m'a appuyé

[51:19] pour arriver à ces résiste-là.

[51:21] - L'espaces verts demeurent

[51:23] propriétés des riverains?

[51:24] - Oui.

[51:25] - Ils vont payer des taxes?

[51:26] - Exactement. C'est peut-être

[51:29] pour ça que les discussions

[51:30] étaient plus longues.

[51:31] - La rue qui s'appelle rue

[51:33] Thompson pointe, est-ce qu'elle

[51:34] appartient déjà la ville?

[51:37] - On l'a municipalité récemment.

[51:43] Dans le fond, on l'a toujours

[51:44] entretenu, mais on

[51:46] l'municipalité officiellement

[51:47] par les avis durant l'été.

[51:50] - O.K., Merci.

[51:58] - Bonjour, Jennifer Marsh, je

[52:01] demeure au trois huit sept fois

[52:03] Road. On va rester dans les

[52:05] mêmes eaux, sans faire de jeu de

[52:08] mots. C'est ça, je viens en fait

[52:10] pour ma résidence à moi, mais

[52:11] aussi pour notre secteur. La

[52:13] réflexion en général, c'est

[52:16] Wayne

[52:17] (---)

[52:18] dans les rues environnantes. On

[52:19] est impactés par les inondations

[52:21] du 9 août, mais au-delà de ça

[52:24] même des pluies et qui sont plus

[52:26] abondantes que d'habitude, il se

[52:28] forme une accumulation et un

[52:30] manque de dénivelé qui ne permet

[52:32] pas d'évacuer l'eau. Bref, ça

[52:34] c'est la mise en contexte. La

[52:36] question suit... on était très

[52:38] encouragé de voir que dans les

[52:40] pourtours du parc et Shannon,

[52:42] vous fait des trappes d'aqueduc.

[52:43] Il y a des choses qui sont en

[52:45] branle et on se demandait. Vous

[52:46] mentionnez tout à l'heure qu'il

[52:47] y avait des zones qui avaient

[52:48] été identifiés comme plus d'une

[52:50] Érable. J'étais curieux de

[52:52] savoir si la rue Fletcher, plus

[52:54] précisément, fait partie de ces

[52:56] zones vulnérables à qui ont été

[52:58] identifiés par la Ville de

[52:59] Beaconsfield.

[53:03] - Je ne dirais pas qu'on a

[53:04] identifié spécifiquement des

[53:05] zones encore. On est encore en

[53:08] train de collecter l'information

[53:10] et d'essayer d'avoir une idée

[53:12] claire sur une carte de la

[53:14] ville. C'est où les secteurs

[53:16] affectés? Quels sont les

[53:17] secteurs? On a une idée, mais on

[53:18] est en train de travailler

[53:20] là-dessus pour s'assurer qu'on a

[53:21] tous les bonnes informations,

[53:23] justement pour travail des

[53:24] consultants pour nous aider à

[53:26] apporter les solutions

[53:28] appropriées pour... qu'on

[53:29] souhaite cette situation-là ne

[53:30] se répètent plus chez nous

[53:32] résidents. Il y a des

[53:35] particularités qui sont un peu

[53:36] difficile à évaluer et à

[53:37] mesurer. Je ne sais pas, vous

[53:38] semblez dire que vous avez déjà

[53:39] eu des problèmes dans le passé

[53:42] avec... sur Fletcher. Quand les

[53:44] pompiers demande à Hydro-Québec

[53:45] de fermer l'électricité, ça

[53:47] n'aide pas les résidences avec

[53:49] les pans submerge cibles. Ça

[53:51] c'est quelque chose que j'essaie

[53:52] de comprendre, l'étendue de

[53:55] cette fermeture-là, je suis en

[53:57] communication avec Hydro-Québec

[54:00] et j'essaie d'avoir

[54:01] l'information de leur part.

[54:02] Évidemment, les pompiers, leur

[54:04] priorité c'est de sauver des

[54:05] vies. Ce que j'ai compris

[54:08] sommairement c'est que sur

[54:09] Amelia avait des garages qui

[54:10] avaient été inondées comme il a

[54:12] été rapporté, les pompiers

[54:13] devaient rentrer dans le garage

[54:14] et pour faire ça, il fallait que

[54:16] l'électricité soit fermé, donc

[54:18] jusqu'à où ça a causé la

[54:19] fermeture, d'une part? Et

[54:21] d'autre part, ce que les service

[54:23] d'incendie a dit c'est qu'ils

[54:24] ont constaté qu'il y avait des

[54:26] transformateurs qui explosait

[54:27] cette soirée-là. Tout ça

[54:29] ensemble ça a fait un plus grand

[54:30] secteur, dont le secteur

[54:31] Sherwood, si je peux l'appeler

[54:32] comme ça. Donc ça évidemment ça

[54:34] n'a pas aidé. Quelles sont les

[54:37] mesures de

[54:38] (inaudible)

[54:39] qui peuvent être mis en place

[54:40] par les citoyens? Ce n'est pas

[54:42] simple s'il n'y a pas

[54:43] d'électricité, tu as beau avoir

[54:44] une pompe submersible ou deux ou

[54:46] quatre qui marchent électricité.

[54:47] Ça n'aidera. Pas

[54:48] - Content de savoir qu'ils

[54:49] avaient identifié ça comme un

[54:50] secteur névralgique, le secteur

[54:52] de Sherwood. Je voulais aussi

[54:54] savoir avec qui est-ce qu'on

[54:55] peut s'adresser pour justement

[54:57] peut-être avoir le suivi des

[54:59] choses et les niveaux de

[55:00] priorité et peut-être la

[55:01] planification qui va avoir lieu

[55:02] dans notre secteur?

[55:04] - Selon le plan d'action qu'on a

[55:06] soumis, on va faire des analyses

[55:07] durant cet automne. On espère

[55:09] être capable d'avoir une idée

[55:11] des travaux qui pourraient être

[55:12] mis de l'avant durant l'hiver.

[55:15] Je ne me rappelle plus Parker,

[55:16] mais je pense qu'au début de

[55:20] l'année prochaine ou dans les

[55:21] six premier de la nuit

[55:22] prochaine, on va avoir une idée

[55:23] des travaux qu'on va être

[55:24] capable de mettre de l'avant

[55:25] selon certaines priorités.

[55:27] Particulièrement, ça ne me donne

[55:29] rien sur le plan technique de

[55:30] tout réparer le côté nord, si ça

[55:33] bloque au côté sud, ça va

[55:34] bloquer pareil. Il faut regarder

[55:36] vers où on va regarder en

[55:37] premier. Il y a toute une

[55:39] stratégie d'entretien et puis,

[55:41] des réflexions des

[55:43] infrastructures, ou des

[55:44] plantations d'infrastructures

[55:46] qui doivent être effet en tenant

[55:47] compte de l'hydraulicité des

[55:50] réseaux et du comportement des

[55:52] puits évidemment. Une des choses

[55:55] qu'on a commencé l'année

[55:57] dernière, le mandat a été donné

[55:59] en a ou l'année dernière et on

[56:00] va voir les rapports cet

[56:01] automne, comme j'ai mentionné

[56:02] tout à l'heure. On va faire

[56:03] rajouter les informations des

[56:06] pluies, mais c'est d'utiliser

[56:08] nos fossés comme des bassins de

[56:11] rétention et présentement, on

[56:12] pense qu'il y a trop de fossé

[56:13] qui sont fermés et qui devrait

[56:16] être réouvert. On pensait déjà

[56:18] salin des dernières. C'était

[56:20] différentes situations qui

[56:21] étaient beaucoup moins

[56:22] problématiques, beaucoup moins

[56:25] répandu ou étendue chef-d'oeuvre

[56:26] et dire. On pense que ça c'en

[56:28] est un des moyens. On va étudier

[56:30] ce qu'ils appellent les jardins

[56:31] d', ou les parcs éponge

[56:32] eux-mêmes et planter des bassins

[56:33] de rétention, ajouter des

[56:36] sections de drainage. Ça va

[56:37] faire partie des réflexions. Ce

[56:39] ne sera pas court, mais on va

[56:41] revenir au conseil avec des

[56:42] plans d'action mise à jour et

[56:45] avec des nouveautés, des

[56:47] informations qui vont venir. Il

[56:48] va y avoir des mandats, des

[56:49] contrats qui vont subvenir au

[56:50] fur et à mesure. De quelle façon

[56:52] vous serez informés? Je vous

[56:55] invite d'inscrites à nos moyens

[56:56] de communication, Beaconsfield

[56:59] vous informais il y en a

[57:00] d'autres aussi, Facebook et

[57:01] tout. J'espère que vous êtes

[57:02] là-dessus. Au début de l'année

[57:04] prochaine, je dirais que si vous

[57:07] les contacter, info à béquilles,

[57:09] Field

[57:10] (inaudible)

[57:11] si vous voulez que ce soit le

[57:12] directeur général, les

[57:13] directeurs publics ça va faire

[57:14] plaisir de vous écouter. On est

[57:15] capable de vous informer.

[57:16] Parfois on n'est pas en mesure

[57:17] de vous informer parce qu'on n'a

[57:18] pas nécessairement l'information

[57:19] même si vous nous écrivez 12

[57:20] fois dans les 12 dernières

[57:21] semaines, ça nous donne pas plus

[57:23] d'informations. Malheureusement,

[57:24] ça prend quand même du temps

[57:25] faire ces analyses-là.

[57:26] - Merci, bien apprécié.

[57:28] - Bienvenue!

[57:40] >> Hi, I noticed the last three

[57:42] deputies were from Elmo Street,

[57:43] all complaining about the same

[57:44] thing, about the flooding.

[57:49] Well, I would ask why doesn't

[57:53] the City of Beaconsfield request

[57:56] from the STM that there be a bus

[57:59] that goes along Elm Street?

[58:01] There is no bus that connects

[58:05] the 411 to, I forget which bus,

[58:08] but the bus that is up on

[58:10] Sherbrooke. There is no bus, you

[58:12] have to walk that will. Ways of,

[58:13] course everybody has to drive,

[58:14] because there's no bus. And if a

[58:17] person can't drive, they have to

[58:19] walk. It's just elm street has

[58:23] been completely forgotten, that

[58:24] whole area. It's literally the

[58:26] wrong side of the tracks. I used

[58:29] to live off Elgin, and it is an

[58:32] impoverished area. Not everybody

[58:35] is like that rich developer who

[58:36] was here earlier who just left.

[58:41] So the thing is, I don't have a

[58:44] lot of money. I now live in the

[58:48] Beaurepaire area, but you know,

[58:51] I'm lucky to have somewhere

[58:52] that's affordable. But the point

[58:56] is please invest more in elm

[58:59] street, and please ask that

[59:00] there be a bus that goes along

[59:02] elm. It would not be too hard to

[59:03] ask, it would solve a lot of

[59:05] problems, it would reduce the

[59:08] poverty, it would help with

[59:09] climate change. It just makes

[59:11] sense. It makes so much sense. I

[59:13] don't know why nobody's ever

[59:15] thought of it.

[59:16] >> Madame corridor, we will take

[59:18] it up with STM. And we don't run

[59:22] STM, but we can take it up with

[59:23] them.

[59:24] >> Thank you. The other thing

[59:26] is, if you're actually concerned

[59:28] about climate change, why at

[59:30] every single event or they're

[59:32] not vegan options. Animal

[59:36] agriculture is one of the

[59:37] biggest contributors to climate

[59:39] change after fossil fuels. Why

[59:42] is every single food truck all

[59:45] meat and dairy options? Why is

[59:47] there not vegan often, or better

[59:48] yet, make the entire thing

[59:50] vegan, why not? This is a pita

[59:56] certified compassionate city,

[59:58] why are there no offence that

[59:59] any the Beaconsfield events.

[1:00:01] >> I will take a question as a

[1:00:02] suggestion, and I will refer it

[1:00:04] to our team that does organize

[1:00:05] all of our activities, outdoor

[1:00:07] activities.

[1:00:08] >> Thank you. The other thing

[1:00:09] that I'm going to keep bringing

[1:00:11] up is the lack of animal

[1:00:13] services in Beaconsfield. There

[1:00:15] is a chicken, a lost chicken,

[1:00:17] running along Montrose Park

[1:00:20] area.

[1:00:21] >> I -- you had written a

[1:00:23] question on that period.

[1:00:25] >> Yes.

[1:00:26] >> I have said before that we

[1:00:29] would submit it to the

[1:00:31] administration, and they will

[1:00:32] get back to you.

[1:00:33] >> Yes. By the way, the refuge

[1:00:36] -- has a space for the chickens.

[1:00:38] So if you're municipal patrol,

[1:00:40] people to pick the checkup,

[1:00:42] please bring the chicken to --

[1:00:44] >> We will ask the

[1:00:45] administration to take it up.

[1:00:46] Thank you.

[1:00:47] >> The sanctuary, they have

[1:00:51] space.

[1:00:52] >> Thank you.

[1:00:53] >> You're welcome.

[1:00:57] >> Hello, I'm Raymond Massey, I

[1:00:59] live at 373 Callum Street, unit

[1:01:03] number three. I just want you

[1:01:06] guys to realize, all of you, how

[1:01:08] hard this has been for all of

[1:01:11] us. This is tremendously,

[1:01:12] probably the most traumatic

[1:01:13] thing I've ever gone through in

[1:01:14] my life, I've been a homeowner

[1:01:16] all my life, I live in

[1:01:18] Beaconsfield now for ten years.

[1:01:21] I have a funny question, though

[1:01:22] I do want to know why the first

[1:01:24] five years that was there was

[1:01:25] never a flood, not even close to

[1:01:26] a flood, and now the last five

[1:01:29] years that I've been here, I've

[1:01:31] gone through, this is my third

[1:01:34] flood.

[1:01:35] [Inaudible]

[1:01:36] >> Yeah, but we can't blame

[1:01:37] everything on climate change, I

[1:01:38] think there's something going on

[1:01:39] in reference to -- first of, all

[1:01:40] I've been in contact with CN for

[1:01:42] the COVID bridge that goes

[1:01:44] underneath the railroad tracks.

[1:01:46] That has got to be checked and

[1:01:47] it's got to be cleared. And I

[1:01:49] asked the City guys to look at

[1:01:51] it.

[1:01:52] >> It was all clean in June, May

[1:01:54] or June.

[1:01:55] >> When you had the Sanivac

[1:01:56] people there, and then they

[1:01:58] said, you can't touch CN because

[1:02:01] that's then. I contacted CN,

[1:02:04] they said or side is clean, but

[1:02:06] we don't know about CP's side,

[1:02:09] which is crazy, cause it's in

[1:02:10] the same tunnel. But it's just

[1:02:13] ridiculous, the amount of stuff

[1:02:14] we've gone through, and she's

[1:02:15] right, the amount of personal

[1:02:17] money we are wasting right now.

[1:02:18] I, mean we can potentially lose

[1:02:21] hundreds of thousands of

[1:02:23] dollars, every person here,

[1:02:25] because of the facts our

[1:02:28] valuation goes down or something

[1:02:30] else. We can't sell our houses,

[1:02:32] or were on insurable. What is

[1:02:34] going to happen if we become an

[1:02:36] insurable? That is a major

[1:02:38] problem we have to live with.

[1:02:41] And I think -- I don't want to

[1:02:42] say, I mean, I don't even know

[1:02:43] what to talk about with this

[1:02:45] anymore, because we've been

[1:02:46] here, this is my third time I'm

[1:02:47] here. And every time I've come

[1:02:49] here, it's because of flooding.

[1:02:51] I, mean everybody has pretty

[1:02:52] much touched it today, but I

[1:02:55] don't know where to go, guys,

[1:02:56] because we are stuck, we are

[1:02:58] literally stuck. What a tax

[1:03:00] break? Maybe all of us residents

[1:03:02] could get a tax break for one

[1:03:04] year? As a token, -- believe,

[1:03:06] meat that is not going to cover

[1:03:08] half the costs are even close to

[1:03:09] the costs that it's costing us.

[1:03:11] And she's, right in the tens of

[1:03:12] thousands of dollars. I, mean

[1:03:14] are deductible on our interest

[1:03:16] right now, we've tripled our

[1:03:18] insurance in the last five

[1:03:19] years, because nobody wants to

[1:03:21] really ensure us. Who's going to

[1:03:23] help us pay for that? Nobody.

[1:03:28] You guys aren't -- I don't feel

[1:03:30] very welcome right now in

[1:03:31] Beaconsfield. I don't feel like

[1:03:33] the city of Beaconsfield, excuse

[1:03:35] my language, doesn't give.

[1:03:38] Nobody is doing nothing. You

[1:03:40] know, since the flood, I have

[1:03:42] not seen one person from

[1:03:43] Beaconsfield come by and say how

[1:03:44] are you guys doing. But before

[1:03:47] the flood, there was that guy

[1:03:49] whipping around with his

[1:03:51] electric car, oh man, he was

[1:03:52] going back to see us almost

[1:03:53] every three days, telling us

[1:03:55] that these new pipes that they

[1:03:56] put in, which I think was a

[1:03:57] waste of money, by the way,

[1:03:59] because all you've done now is

[1:04:01] he brought more water quicker to

[1:04:03] our area. That's it. And I even

[1:04:05] told you, but by the way, your

[1:04:07] contractor, when he was there,

[1:04:09] and that July rain, it came

[1:04:11] back, it backed up, I had to put

[1:04:13] two pumps in my to ditch is to

[1:04:16] get -- and I gave him the --

[1:04:20] who's a number two on that. And

[1:04:23] the contract said you will never

[1:04:24] get flooded again. I said no,

[1:04:26] you're wrong. And you know what

[1:04:27] he told me? He said it's the

[1:04:29] distribution. It's not us. We

[1:04:31] are going to put in new types,

[1:04:32] but it's where it's going,

[1:04:34] underneath that covert bridge. I

[1:04:36] think there is something blocked

[1:04:38] at the and and I don't know, I

[1:04:40] can ask, you probably can't tell

[1:04:42] me, but that's the problem, I

[1:04:44] think. And I've been watching

[1:04:45] that culvert bridge for five

[1:04:47] years now since the first time

[1:04:48] it got flooded, and every time

[1:04:50] it goes up and raises, almost

[1:04:53] when it touches close to that

[1:04:55] bicycle path bridge that's right

[1:04:57] there we are in trouble, and

[1:04:59] then it backs up into our

[1:05:00] ditches, and that's where it

[1:05:01] backs up onto the street. I do

[1:05:04] understand that the August 9th

[1:05:07] was bizarre, that was, like

[1:05:09] okay, we all get that, but I

[1:05:11] mean, you know, we are living

[1:05:12] this. I still don't even have

[1:05:14] electricity yet. I don't even

[1:05:16] have a water and drier, I've

[1:05:17] been going to my kids house to

[1:05:19] be watching. I mean, guys, we're

[1:05:22] really stuck. We are -- excuse

[1:05:24] my language --

[1:05:27] >> It is a terrible situation, I

[1:05:29] agree.

[1:05:30] >> It is.

[1:05:31] >> We will look at the culvert.

[1:05:32] >> I mean, Dominic knows who I

[1:05:34] am, I've emailed to him many

[1:05:35] times, he knows all my story.

[1:05:37] And I even told her that in a

[1:05:38] letter, and I told her, that --

[1:05:40] the biggest problem you have is

[1:05:42] the distribution of water. Once

[1:05:44] it gets there, it has to go. And

[1:05:46] the little lady mentioned it

[1:05:48] before, her. She's right.

[1:05:51] Because you know what? Before, I

[1:05:53] remember what it was in that

[1:05:54] area, there was Rivers and there

[1:05:56] was little ravines. And yet,

[1:05:58] don't tell me, it's not that

[1:05:59] long ago they built there, it's

[1:06:00] only 15 years our place, the

[1:06:02] last one. So it's not that long.

[1:06:06] You should have a note of where

[1:06:07] that's built on. You know what I

[1:06:08] think they should've done? They

[1:06:10] should've raised all the

[1:06:11] buildings about the land level

[1:06:13] flat, and then we wouldn't have

[1:06:14] had this problem. But they

[1:06:15] should've told -- c, the

[1:06:17] contractors, they didn't do much

[1:06:20] there. Anyways, that's my

[1:06:21] question.

[1:06:22] >> Thank you very much. Thank

[1:06:25] you.

[1:06:33] [Inaudible]

[1:06:34] In the tunnel. All the water

[1:06:35] down.

[1:06:36] >> Sir, please. Now we are going

[1:06:38] to continue with the meeting.

[1:06:39] >> Mister Mayor, may I just say

[1:06:41] a word?

[1:06:42] >> Sure.

[1:06:43] >> Thank, you Mr. Masse, for

[1:06:45] coming here tonight and talking

[1:06:46] to us. I think some of us have

[1:06:50] been there on our own to visit

[1:06:51] your place and see the history.

[1:06:53] It's interesting what you say

[1:06:54] about the culvert. Just the

[1:06:56] other day in the last few days,

[1:06:58] I guess it was last weekend at

[1:06:59] our caucus, anyway, when we met,

[1:07:02] Monday night, right, some of us

[1:07:06] were along with the DG, we were

[1:07:09] actually visiting Meadowbrook

[1:07:10] and looking at just that area,

[1:07:12] because the water from your

[1:07:13] covert flows underneath the

[1:07:15] train tracks and underneath the

[1:07:17] highway and it collects just

[1:07:18] along the Beaurepaire, and there

[1:07:21] is actually a canal area that

[1:07:26] goes under what we call

[1:07:27] Meadowbrook, and we see there is

[1:07:28] a great big huge caged in area

[1:07:32] trying to keep up with the

[1:07:34] debris. So we have looked at it.

[1:07:35] We're kind of aware that the

[1:07:37] bottleneck kind of thing, at

[1:07:38] least I'm just talking

[1:07:41] personally. But the thing is

[1:07:42] though we are lucky -- looking

[1:07:44] at that, and I'm interested in

[1:07:48] hearing what he said tonight,

[1:07:49] but there is a jam up. And

[1:07:51] obviously one serious, your

[1:07:54] homes are very vulnerable, we

[1:07:56] recognize that.

[1:07:57] >> Yeah, I'm just going to make

[1:07:58] another point, I noticed that a

[1:08:00] lot of houses, especially those

[1:08:02] on elm and some of the ones on

[1:08:04] Meadowbrook, they're built on

[1:08:06] top of Meadowbrook. So

[1:08:08] Meadowbrook has been put inside

[1:08:10] pipes and pushed under peoples,

[1:08:13] you know, foundations and that.

[1:08:17] Basically, you are clogging the

[1:08:19] earth arteries, and if you clog

[1:08:22] arteries Iran and up with a

[1:08:23] death cloth and end up with an

[1:08:24] embolism. You have given the

[1:08:25] earthen embolism. I would

[1:08:27] suggest instead of trying to

[1:08:28] block the earth arteries, like

[1:08:31] Meadowbrook, instead of blocking

[1:08:33] the rivers and streams, instead

[1:08:34] of continue to block them and

[1:08:36] force them here and there, just

[1:08:38] let them go over they want to,

[1:08:39] go and try to work with nature

[1:08:41] rather than against nature, to

[1:08:44] try to use natural ways to

[1:08:47] control the water.

[1:08:50] >> Thank you very much for your

[1:08:54] suggestion. Yes, this is the

[1:08:55] last one.

[1:08:57] >> What about -- I've heard

[1:08:59] stories about sponge parks,

[1:09:02] sponge parks to absorb water.

[1:09:04] >> Yes.

[1:09:05] >> And I heard that the City of

[1:09:06] Montréal is looking into --

[1:09:08] that.

[1:09:09] >> Yeah, yeah. I don't know if

[1:09:10] you guys have talked about that

[1:09:12] or --

[1:09:13] >> We -- if you read the action

[1:09:14] plan.

[1:09:15] >> Okay.

[1:09:17] >> Those are all the things that

[1:09:18] I'm sure the administration will

[1:09:21] look at and see what can be

[1:09:24] done. Obviously, we realized

[1:09:26] that we need to improve, and we

[1:09:30] know that we are going to face

[1:09:33] similar storms in the future, so

[1:09:37] we need to improve our

[1:09:41] infrastructure. That's why we

[1:09:43] produce on action plan to do

[1:09:47] this, and the action plan right

[1:09:49] now is, you know, kind of vague,

[1:09:52] a little bit, because we haven't

[1:09:54] done all the work to get it

[1:09:58] done. But anytime anybody has a

[1:10:02] question, info at Beaconsfield,

[1:10:05] and it will be answered.

[1:10:10] >> Okay.

[1:10:11] >> So now we are going to

[1:10:12] continue with the agenda. Yeah?

[1:10:15] Madame la greffière. >> Adoption

[1:10:18] of the minutes of the city of

[1:10:21] Beaconsfield regular Council

[1:10:22] meeting of August 26, 2024.

[1:10:23] >>.

[1:10:24] >>.

[1:10:25] >>

[1:10:26] >> Proposed.

[1:10:27] >> Seconded.

[1:10:28] >> In favour.

[1:10:29] Renouvellement du contrat

[1:10:34] technique TP 2020-10 pour la

[1:10:35] fourniture et le transport de 2

[1:10:36] 200 tonnes de pierre concassée

[1:10:37] pour l'année 2025 avec Carrière

[1:10:38] Dolomite

[1:10:39] (1996)

[1:10:40] inc. Au coût approximatif de 48

[1:10:41] 000 $, toutes taxes incluses

[1:10:45] .

[1:10:46] - Proposé.

[1:10:47] - J'appuie. >> In favour. À

[1:10:53] l'unanimité. Renewal of contract

[1:10:56] TP 2020-11 for the collection

[1:10:58] and transportation of waste,

[1:10:59] organic matter and bulky waste

[1:11:02] for the year 2025 with Services

[1:11:03] Ricova Inc., at an approximate

[1:11:06] cost of $1,100 000, all taxes

[1:11:07] included.

[1:11:11] >> Could you please stop,

[1:11:13] because -- let the people leave

[1:11:14] that don't want to be here for

[1:11:16] the rest of the meeting. So go

[1:11:18] ahead and leave please now.

[1:11:27] Thank you for coming.

[1:11:33] >> All taxes included,

[1:11:37] $1,100,000.

[1:11:38] >> Second.

[1:11:39] >> In favour. À l'unanimité.

[1:11:44] Renouvellement du contrat TP

[1:11:45] 2021-11 pour la fourniture de

[1:11:46] services professionnels pour le

[1:11:47] programme préventif quinquennal

[1:11:48] du réseau d'aqueduc pour l'année

[1:11:49] 2025 avec Management Simo inc.

[1:11:51] Au coût approximatif de 131 000

[1:11:52] $, toutes taxes incluses.

[1:11:59] - Proposé.

[1:12:01] - Secondé.

[1:12:02] - En faveur.

[1:12:04] - À l'unanimité.

[1:12:06] Renewal of contract TP 2023-01

[1:12:08] for the supply and transport of

[1:12:09] metal containers for dry

[1:12:10] materials for the year 2025 with

[1:12:12] 9386-0120 Québec Inc.

[1:12:16] (E360S)

[1:12:19] , at an approximate cost of

[1:12:21] $51,000, all taxes included.

[1:12:25] >> I propose.

[1:12:28] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:12:33] Octroi de gré à gré d'un contrat

[1:12:34] pour les travaux d'entretien de

[1:12:35] la piscine Beaurepaire à

[1:12:36] Piscines et Spas Poseidon pour

[1:12:37] la somme de 35 636,50 $ toutes

[1:12:38] taxes incluses

[1:12:39] (RGC 2024-15)

[1:12:45] .

[1:12:49] - Je seconde. >> In favour.

[1:12:53] >> Would I please ask the

[1:12:55] councillors that do approve and

[1:12:58] second to please use the mic so

[1:13:00] that we can register your

[1:13:02] approval and your seconding?

[1:13:05] Thank you.

[1:13:08] >> Awarding of a mandate by

[1:13:09] mutual agreement for the removal

[1:13:10] of bulky items and objects

[1:13:11] soiled by torrential rains on

[1:13:12] August 9, 2024, to Paysagiste et

[1:13:15] Déneigement NJ, for the

[1:13:18] approximative amount of

[1:13:20] $130,000, all taxes included

[1:13:21] (RGC 2024-16)

[1:13:24] .

[1:13:27] >> Proposed.

[1:13:28] >> Second.

[1:13:29] >> All in favour.

[1:13:33] Aller dans le métier. Octroi

[1:13:35] d'un mandat de gré à gré

[1:13:36] concernant des travaux de

[1:13:37] correction de drainage à

[1:13:38] 9129-2201 Québec inc.

[1:13:39] (Travaux Routiers Metropole)

[1:13:40] Pour un montant approximatif de

[1:13:41] 130 000 $, toutes taxes incluses

[1:13:42] (RGC 2024-17)

[1:13:43] .

[1:13:49] - Je propose.

[1:13:51] - Je seconde. Secondé.

[1:13:56] >> All in favour? - À

[1:13:58] l'unanimité. Authorization to

[1:14:01] participate in the group

[1:14:02] purchasing program of the City

[1:14:03] of Montréal for the purchase of

[1:14:04] de-icing salt for the next four

[1:14:05] (4)

[1:14:06] winter seasons, from 2024-2025

[1:14:07] to 2027-2028.

[1:14:13] >> I propose.

[1:14:14] >> I second.

[1:14:16] >> All in favour? À l'unanimité.

[1:14:21] Approbation de la liste des

[1:14:22] comptes à payer au 23 septembre

[1:14:23] 2024, et de la liste des

[1:14:24] paiements préautorisés pour la

[1:14:25] période du 15 août 2024 au 25

[1:14:26] août 2024 et du 27 août 2024 au

[1:14:27] 11 septembre 2024, pour un

[1:14:28] déboursé total de 3 808 139,16

[1:14:30] $.

[1:14:40] - Les montants importants sont

[1:14:45] 475840, cinq approches RCA pour

[1:14:48] des comptes progressive de

[1:14:49] numéro 2 concernant les travaux

[1:14:51] des réhabilitation de la jeter.

[1:14:54] Cat 130187, 15, pour

[1:14:59] (---)

[1:15:00] Chevalier morale architecte.

[1:15:02] Honoraires pour la présence,

[1:15:04] présentation concernant le

[1:15:06] concours d'architecture

[1:15:10] pluridisciplinaire pour le

[1:15:11] centre culturel. 297558 et 34,

[1:15:17] économise contre Hudson pour le

[1:15:19] décompte... progressive numéro 4

[1:15:21] concernant la construction d'un

[1:15:22] nouveau chalet. 177257 et 15,

[1:15:27] construction Arcade. Pour des

[1:15:29] comptes progressifs numéro 1

[1:15:30] concernant la rénovation de la

[1:15:35] patinoire. 587587, 0 sept.

[1:15:43] - Je propose.

[1:15:44] - J'appuie.

[1:15:45] - En faveur. >> Approval of a

[1:15:51] $150 contribution to Bluefins

[1:15:53] Swim Club for the purchase of an

[1:15:55] advertisement in their regional

[1:15:56] Swim Meet programme for the year

[1:15:58] 2024.

[1:16:01] >>.

[1:16:02] >> Proposed.

[1:16:03] >> Seconded.

[1:16:04] >> In favour? À l'unanimité.

[1:16:12] Approbation d'un appui financier

[1:16:13] de 500 $ à Action jeunesse de

[1:16:14] l'Ouest-de-l'Île

[1:16:15] (AJOI)

[1:16:16] pour l'année 2024.

[1:16:17] - Je propose.

[1:16:18] - J'appuie.

[1:16:19] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:16:22] Approval of a $500 contribution

[1:16:24] to Arthritis West Island Self

[1:16:25] Help Association

[1:16:26] (AWISH)

[1:16:27] for the year 2024.

[1:16:30] >>.

[1:16:32] >> Second.

[1:16:33] >> In favour?

[1:16:35] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un

[1:16:37] appui financier de 500 $ au

[1:16:38] Refuge pour les femmes de

[1:16:39] l'Ouest de l'Île

[1:16:40] (RFOI)

[1:16:41] pour l'année 2024.

[1:16:42] >> Propose.

[1:16:43] >> Seconded. - En faveur.

[1:16:47] - À l'unanimité. Approval of a

[1:16:50] $1,000 contribution to West

[1:16:53] Island Volunteer Accompaniment

[1:16:54] Service

[1:16:55] (ABOVAS)

[1:16:56] for the year 2024.

[1:16:57] >> I propose.

[1:16:58] >> I second.

[1:16:59] >> In favour.

[1:17:02] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un

[1:17:04] appui financier de 1 000 $ au

[1:17:05] Centre de bien-être de

[1:17:06] l'Ouest-de-l'Île

[1:17:07] (WICWC)

[1:17:08] pour l'année 2024.

[1:17:12] - Je propose.

[1:17:13] - Je seconde.

[1:17:14] - En faveur.

[1:17:16] - À l'unanimité. >> Approval of

[1:17:20] a $1,500 contribution to West

[1:17:23] Island Citizen Advocacy

[1:17:24] (WICA)

[1:17:25] for the year 2024.

[1:17:26] >> I propose.

[1:17:28] >> I second.

[1:17:29] >> In favour?

[1:17:31] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un

[1:17:34] appui financier de 2 000 $ au

[1:17:35] Centre d'action bénévole

[1:17:36] Ouest-de-l'Île

[1:17:37] (VWI)

[1:17:38] pour l'année 2024.

[1:17:44] >> Second.

[1:17:45] >> In favour? - À l'unanimité.

[1:17:49] Approval of a $3,000

[1:17:50] contribution to Friends for

[1:17:51] Mental Health

[1:17:52] (FMH)

[1:17:53] for the year 2024.

[1:17:56] >> Proposed.

[1:17:59] >> Second.

[1:18:00] >> In favour? Allez limiter.

[1:18:07] Approbation d'un appui financier

[1:18:08] de 3 000 $ à Table de Quartier

[1:18:09] Sud de l'Ouest-de-l'Île

[1:18:10] (TQSOI)

[1:18:11] pour l'année 2024.

[1:18:13] -

[1:18:14] - Je propose.

[1:18:15] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:18:18] Approval of a $3,500

[1:18:20] contribution to Low Vision

[1:18:21] Self-Help Association

[1:18:22] (LVSHA)

[1:18:23] for the year 2024.

[1:18:28] >> Proposed.

[1:18:29] >> Seconded.

[1:18:30] >> In favour?

[1:18:32] À l'unanimité. Approbation d'un

[1:18:34] appui financier de 15 000 $ pour

[1:18:35] les frais de location de glaces

[1:18:36] pour la saison 2024-2025 à

[1:18:37] l'Association de ringuette

[1:18:38] Beaconsfield Kirkland

[1:18:39] (BKRA)

[1:18:40] .

[1:18:43] >> Propose. - Je seconde.

[1:18:46] - En faveur.

[1:18:48] - À l'unanimité. Compensation of

[1:18:51] overtime hours worked by

[1:18:52] managers during emergency

[1:18:53] measures following the

[1:18:54] torrential rains of August 9 and

[1:18:55] 10, 2024.

[1:18:58] >> Proposed.

[1:18:59] >> Second.

[1:19:00] >> In favour? Aline admit et. À

[1:19:06] l'unanimité, pardon. Demande de

[1:19:07] dérogation mineure pour la

[1:19:08] propriété située au 215, Elm. La

[1:19:11] recommandation est approuvée.

[1:19:12] - Proposé.

[1:19:13] - Secondé.

[1:19:14] - En faveur.

[1:19:15] - À l'unanimité.

[1:19:24] Contre... pardon.

[1:19:28] - C'est unanime, contre. Pour

[1:19:30] être clair, je suis contre.

[1:19:32] - À l'unanimité, la dérogation

[1:19:34] est refusée. Request for the

[1:19:40] approval of the Site Planning

[1:19:41] and Architectural Integration

[1:19:42] Programme

[1:19:43] (SPAIP)

[1:19:44] relating to a building permit

[1:19:45] application for a new main

[1:19:46] building located at 10 Madsen.

[1:19:47] The recommendation is to refuse.

[1:19:48] >> Propose.

[1:19:49] >> Second.

[1:19:51] >> In favour of recommendation?

[1:19:55] À l'unanimité. Demande

[1:19:56] d'approbation du Plan

[1:19:57] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:19:58] architecturale

[1:19:59] (PIIA)

[1:20:00] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:20:01] de construction pour un nouveau

[1:20:02] bâtiment principal situé au 107,

[1:20:03] Woodland.

[1:20:06] La recommandation d'approuver.

[1:20:08] - Proposé.

[1:20:09] - J'appuie.

[1:20:10] - En faveur de la

[1:20:11] recommandation.

[1:20:13] - À l'unanimité.

[1:20:15] Request for the approval of the

[1:20:16] Site Planning and Architectural

[1:20:17] Integration Programme

[1:20:18] (SPAIP)

[1:20:19] relating to a building permit

[1:20:20] application for a new main

[1:20:21] building located at 372

[1:20:22] Chantilly. The recommendation is

[1:20:24] to refuse.

[1:20:25] >> Propose.

[1:20:26] >> Second. - En faveur de la

[1:20:30] recommandation?

[1:20:32] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[1:20:37] d'approbation du Plan

[1:20:38] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:20:39] architecturale

[1:20:40] (PIIA)

[1:20:41] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:20:42] de construction pour un nouveau

[1:20:43] bâtiment principal situé au 535,

[1:20:44] Cedar. La recommandation est de

[1:20:46] refuser.

[1:20:47] - Proposé.

[1:20:48] - Secondé.

[1:20:49] - En faveur de la

[1:20:51] recommandation?

[1:20:52] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[1:20:54] approval of the Site Planning

[1:20:56] and Architectural Integration

[1:20:58] Programme

[1:20:59] (SPAIP)

[1:21:00] relating to a building permit

[1:21:01] application for the extension of

[1:21:02] the main building located at 233

[1:21:03] Cadillac. The recommendation is

[1:21:06] to refuse.

[1:21:07] >> Proposed.

[1:21:08] >> Second. En faveur de la

[1:21:11] recommandation.

[1:21:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[1:21:13] d'approbation du Plan

[1:21:14] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:21:15] a rchitecturale

[1:21:16] (PIIA)

[1:21:17] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:21:18] de construction pour la

[1:21:19] modification de la façade du

[1:21:20] bâtiment principal situéau 65,

[1:21:21] Devon. La recommandation est

[1:21:24] d'approuver.

[1:21:25] - Proposé.

[1:21:26] - Secondé.

[1:21:27] - En faveur de la

[1:21:28] recommandation?

[1:21:29] - À l'unanimité.

[1:21:32] Request for the approval of the

[1:21:33] Site Planning and Architectural

[1:21:34] Integration Programme

[1:21:35] (SPAIP)

[1:21:36] relating to a building permit

[1:21:37] application for the modification

[1:21:38] of the facade of the main

[1:21:39] building located at 113

[1:21:40] Brentwood. The recommendation is

[1:21:43] to refuse.

[1:21:44] >> Proposed.

[1:21:45] >> I second.

[1:21:46] >> In favour of the

[1:21:47] recommendation? - À l'unanimité.

[1:21:51] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:21:52] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:21:53] architecturale

[1:21:54] (PIIA)

[1:21:55] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:21:56] de construction pour la

[1:21:57] modification de la façade du

[1:21:58] bâtiment principal situé au 188,

[1:21:59] Chestnut. La recommandation est

[1:22:00] de refuser.

[1:22:02] - Proposé.

[1:22:05] - Secondé.

[1:22:06] - En faveur de la

[1:22:08] recommandation?

[1:22:09] - Allez unanimité. Request for

[1:22:13] the approval of the Site

[1:22:14] Planning and Architectural

[1:22:15] Integration Programme

[1:22:16] (SPAIP)

[1:22:17] relating to a building permit

[1:22:18] application for the modification

[1:22:19] of the facade of a main building

[1:22:20] located at 519 Westhill. The

[1:22:21] recommendation is to approve.

[1:22:23] >> Proposed.

[1:22:24] >> Second.

[1:22:25] >> All in favour? À limiter.

[1:22:31] Acceptation d'une somme de 64

[1:22:32] 999,00 $ à des fins de frais de

[1:22:33] parcs que le propriétaire du lot

[1:22:34] 1 417 475

[1:22:35] (107, Woodland)

[1:22:36] doit payer à la Ville,

[1:22:37] conformément au Règlement

[1:22:38] BEAC-128 concernant les

[1:22:39] contributions pour fins

[1:22:40] d'établissement, de maintien et

[1:22:41] d'amélioration de parcs,

[1:22:42] terrains de jeux et espaces

[1:22:43] naturels sur le territoire de la

[1:22:44] Ville de Beaconsfield.

[1:22:49] - Je propose.

[1:22:51] - J'appuie.

[1:22:52] - En faveur d'accepter ce

[1:22:55] montant?

[1:22:56] - À l'unanimité.

[1:22:58] Nomination in view of permanency

[1:22:59] for the position of

[1:23:00] Contremaître, mécanique et

[1:23:01] signalisation, retroactively to

[1:23:02] September 4, 2024.

[1:23:09] >> This is Frederick --

[1:23:13] Nomination in view of permanency

[1:23:14] as Opérateur Annexe A-1

[1:23:15] (I)

[1:23:16] to position 5235 at the Public

[1:23:17] Works Department.

[1:23:18] - Je propose.

[1:23:19] - Je seconde, mais

[1:23:20] (inaudible)

[1:23:21] .

[1:23:22] - En faveur.

[1:23:23] - À l'unanimité. Nomination en

[1:23:26] vue de permanence à titre de

[1:23:27] Surintendant, Travaux publics et

[1:23:28] environnement au poste 5207.

[1:23:32] - C'est à qui la chance?

[1:23:34] - Proposé.

[1:23:36] - Secondé.

[1:23:37] - En faveur.

[1:23:38] - À l'unanimité.

[1:23:49] >> This is Kurt Van rent wick.

[1:23:52] >> Propose.

[1:23:56] [Inaudible]

[1:23:59] I'm wondering what exactly does

[1:24:01] it mean that

[1:24:02] [Inaudible]

[1:24:03] >> I'm sorry, but you cannot

[1:24:05] interrupt the council meeting,

[1:24:07] so --

[1:24:08] >> I'm just wondering what's

[1:24:09] happening with --

[1:24:10] [Inaudible]

[1:24:12] Just four public --

[1:24:14] >> It's a blue collar working at

[1:24:16] public's work doing jobs on the

[1:24:18] road, and snow operations and

[1:24:21] branch pick up and asphalt and

[1:24:24] water and sewer. It has nothing

[1:24:26] to do with a dog shelter.

[1:24:29] >> And please, do not interrupt

[1:24:31] the council meeting, please.

[1:24:34] >> So, Kurt Van rhetoric. - Je

[1:24:38] seconde.

[1:24:39] - En faveur.

[1:24:41] - À l'unanimité. Nomination en

[1:24:43] vue de permanence à titre

[1:24:44] d'Opérateur Annexe A-1

[1:24:45] (II)

[1:24:46] au poste de 5239 au Service des

[1:24:47] travaux publics.

[1:24:53] Le nom c'est Amin assumait n'.

[1:24:57] - Je propose.

[1:24:59] - J'appuie.

[1:25:00] - En faveur.

[1:25:02] - À l'unanimité. Adoption of the

[1:25:06] policy RH-002 Harcèlement

[1:25:08] psychologique ou sexuel au

[1:25:09] travail et traitement des

[1:25:11] plaintes. Je propose.

[1:25:17] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:25:20] Procès-verbal de la réunion du

[1:25:21] Comité consultatif d'urbanisme

[1:25:22] du 4 septembre 2024.

[1:25:29] - Je propose.

[1:25:30] - Je seconde.

[1:25:31] - En faveur.

[1:25:33] - À l'unanimité.

[1:25:35] Deposit of the minutes of the

[1:25:36] Demolition Committee meeting of

[1:25:37] August 6, 2024. - Est-ce qu'il y

[1:25:43] a des commentaires, Monsieur le

[1:25:45] président du comité?

[1:25:46] - Oui, merci Monsieur le Maire.

[1:25:48] Alors, vous le 6 août dernier

[1:25:51] dans le cadre de cette réunion

[1:25:53] du comité de démolition qui

[1:25:54] portait sur les sept Avenue Kirk

[1:25:58] Woodcock, nous avons un journaux

[1:25:59] à nos travaux pour obtenir plus

[1:26:01] d'informations que nous avons

[1:26:02] depuis obtenu. Nous devrions

[1:26:05] reprendre cette séance dans les

[1:26:06] deux prochaines semaines.

[1:26:10] - Alors, c'est un dépôt.

[1:26:12] And she's very practical, open

[1:26:13] minded individual who -- you

[1:26:14] know, good environmental habits

[1:26:15] here in Beaconsfield. - Oui.

[1:26:16] Nomination d'un membre au Comité

[1:26:17] consultatif de l'environnement.

[1:26:25] - Je propose Yvan Bourque, comme

[1:26:28] membre du Comité de

[1:26:29] (inaudible)

[1:26:30] . Madame Bourque est une

[1:26:32] résidant de Beaconsfield depuis

[1:26:33] 30 ans. Elle est impliquée et

[1:26:36] bien informé sur les questions

[1:26:40] de l'environnement et...

[1:26:51] je propose madame Bourque.

[1:26:52] And she also, you know, likes to

[1:26:54] do a lot of research on this

[1:26:55] program, so we understand that.

[1:26:57] So I think she'll be good at --

[1:27:04] Ratification of a title

[1:27:05] regularization agreement between

[1:27:06] City of Beaconsfield and the

[1:27:07] Association Thompson Point for

[1:27:08] lot 1 418 653

[1:27:09] (Lakeshore Road, Thompson

[1:27:10] Point sector)

[1:27:11] .

[1:27:12] - Qui seconde?

[1:27:13] - Je seconde.

[1:27:14] - En faveur.

[1:27:15] - À l'unanimité.

[1:27:24] >> Proposed.

[1:27:26] >> And you must be very happy,

[1:27:28] Dominique, about this

[1:27:29] settlement.

[1:27:30] >> I'm happy for everyone.

[1:27:31] [Laughter]

[1:27:33] >> I seconded.

[1:27:34] >> All in favour?

[1:27:37] - À l'unanimité. Résolution

[1:27:39] concernant le plan d'actions

[1:27:40] préliminaire recommandé par

[1:27:41] l'administration suite aux

[1:27:42] pluies diluviennes et

[1:27:43] inondations du 9 et 10 août

[1:27:44] 2024.

[1:27:48] >> Propose. - J'appuie.

[1:27:50] - En faveur.

[1:27:53] - À l'unanimité. Development and

[1:27:57] implementation of the Plan

[1:27:58] municipal de gestion des actifs

[1:27:59] (PGA)

[1:28:00] for Water and Buildings to

[1:28:02] optimize the management of

[1:28:04] municipal assets of the City of

[1:28:05] Beaconsfield. Je propose.

[1:28:09] - J'appuie.

[1:28:10] - En faveur.

[1:28:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande de

[1:28:14] lettre d'appui aux Centres de la

[1:28:15] jeunesse et de la famille

[1:28:16] Batshaw pour le projet

[1:28:17] d'infrastructure du campus

[1:28:18] Beaconsfield sur le terrain du

[1:28:19] CIUSSS de

[1:28:20] l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal.

[1:28:23] (---)

[1:28:24] Je propose.

[1:28:26] - Je seconde.

[1:28:31] - En faveur.

[1:28:34] - À l'unanimité.

[1:28:39] Authorization to allow the

[1:28:41] Friends of Beaurepaire Village

[1:28:42] to host the Marché BEAU Holiday

[1:28:44] Market event in the Christmas

[1:28:45] Park tennis court parking area,

[1:28:47] to use the Park's chalet on

[1:28:48] Saturday, November 23, 2024,

[1:28:49] from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. and that

[1:28:54] costs for First Aid services be

[1:28:55] paid by the City.

[1:28:58] >> Proposed.

[1:28:59] >> Second.

[1:29:01] >> In favour?

[1:29:05] - À l'unanimité.

[1:29:11] Autorisation de signature de la

[1:29:12] Convention d'aide financière

[1:29:13] 2024-2025 auprès du ministère de

[1:29:14] l'Éducation, du Loisir et du

[1:29:16] Sport dans le cadre du Programme

[1:29:17] d'aide financière pour la

[1:29:18] gratuité de la formation des

[1:29:19] surveillants-sauveteurs et des

[1:29:20] moniteurs aquatiques.

[1:29:24] - Je propose.

[1:29:25] - Je seconde.

[1:29:26] - En faveur.

[1:29:27] - À l'unanimité. >> Mayor's

[1:29:32] report on the decisions made by

[1:29:34] the Agglomeration Council at its

[1:29:35] meeting of September 19, 2024.

[1:29:40] >> Well, there was a very smooth

[1:29:44] meeting, and none of the

[1:29:46] demerged municipalities objected

[1:29:47] to anything on the agenda, so

[1:29:50] everything was approved

[1:29:52] unanimously. And we did spend a

[1:29:53] lot of money.

[1:29:55] [Inaudible]

[1:29:56] >> No, I'm sorry, you cannot

[1:29:58] interrupt the meeting.

[1:30:00] [Inaudible]

[1:30:01] >> I'm, sorry you cannot

[1:30:02] interrupt the meeting. And I

[1:30:06] will ask that you be removed if

[1:30:09] you continue.

[1:30:14] Dépôt des rapports des

[1:30:15] directeurs.

[1:30:18] - Rien de particulier à

[1:30:20] signalerai, Monsieur le Maire.

[1:30:22] Surtout travailler des pluies

[1:30:26] (inaudible)

[1:30:27] honnêtement.

[1:30:28] - Merci!

[1:30:30] >> Closing of meeting. - Je

[1:30:32] propose.

[1:30:36] (rires)

[1:30:37] Alors, merci beaucoup.

[1:30:39] And thank you very much for

[1:30:40] those of you that stayed here

[1:30:42] until the end of the meeting.

[1:30:44] It's much appreciated that you

[1:30:46] show a real interest in your

[1:30:48] city and not only in your area.

[1:30:52] And you are here to listen to

[1:30:55] all the activities of the

[1:30:57] Council. I really appreciate

[1:31:00] your presence. - Et ceux qui ont

[1:31:04] regardé la webdiffusion, merci

[1:31:07] beaucoup pour votre intérêt dans

[1:31:08] la ville de Baie qu'ils Field.

[1:31:13] Next month, again, we will see

[1:31:15] you. Thank you.

[1:31:22] | | |

2024-09-23 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript