[0:06] Alors bonsoir et bienvenue à cette séance ordinaire du conseil municipal du 23 février

[0:19] 2026. Welcome to our Regular Council meeting of February twenty third twenty twenty six.

[0:27] Nous allons procéder à l'ouverture de la séance avec l'adoption de l'ordre du jour.

[0:34] Il y aura une modification à l'ordre du jour au point 60.6 point 60.6, étant

[0:45] l'autorisation de la fermeture complète de rue pour l'événement Marché BO the

[0:49] authorization of the complete Street closure of the event at Bull market. Ça sera

[0:55] probablement et fort sûrement à un conseil prochain. Donc, ouverture ou adoption de

[1:01] l'ordre du jour? Adoption of the City of Beaconsfield Regular Council of February

[1:08] Twenty twenty. Adopté. Alors, avant de passer à la période de questions du public Before we

[1:20] move to the public question period the commandant of our SP commandant of the SPVM at the

[1:28] police de quartier Station number one. Monsieur le commandant Gosselin est avec

[1:34] nous. Bonsoir, monsieur le commandant. Bonsoir. Merci d'être avec nous. Merci

[1:39] beaucoup. On vous écoute. Merci. Euh. Bonjour tout le monde. Je vais commencer. J'avais une

[1:45] petite discussion à l'extérieur avec quelqu'un parmi vous qui me posait des questions sur les

[1:49] introductions par effraction, mais j'ai une annonce à vous faire. En fait, le 12 février

[1:53] dernier, on a procédé à l'arrestation de trois suspects d'introduction par effraction.

[1:58] Suite aux enquêtes qu'on a faites, ces trois suspects ont été arrêtés. Il y a eu des

[2:03] perquisitions à leur domicile ainsi qu'à une unité d'entreposage. On est en train

[2:08] de déterminer maintenant quels dossiers sont reliés. Ces trois suspects là. Comprenez que

[2:15] l'analyse de toutes les pièces qui ont été saisies est un travail de moine. Donc toutes

[2:20] les reliées aux différentes introductions par effraction, surtout que ces suspects là

[2:25] travaillaient sur toute l'île et même la périphérie. On sait qu'ils ont fait certaines

[2:31] introductions par effraction dans notre secteur. Dans le pédicure, on est encore en

[2:35] train de déterminer lesquels pour fermer les dossiers. Également, ce que je

[2:40] mentionnais avec la dame mentionnait peut être d'amener des petits points de prévention.

[2:46] Effectivement, la majorité des vols sont pour des bijoux ou des objets de petits, De voir

[2:52] des des télévisions se faire voler, ça ne se fait plus maintenant. Donc la dame me

[2:59] suggérait de vous mentionner quand vous partez en voyage, de peut être mettre vos bijoux ou

[3:03] vos objets de valeur dans des coffres forts ou à la banque. C'est une excellente un

[3:08] excellent moyen de prévention également. Ce que j'aimerais rajouter Vous connaissez vos

[3:13] secteurs mieux que je peux les connaître. Donc si vous voyez des personnes suspectes sur vos

[3:17] rues, ne jamais hésiter à nous appeler pour qu'on puisse aller enquêter sur le sujet. Si je

[3:23] continue au niveau des activités qui ont été faites avec mes patrouilleurs, mes

[3:28] patrouilleurs à vélo ont fait plusieurs patrouilles dans le parc Angel Woods, ont donné

[3:34] plusieurs avertissements pour des chiens sans laisse et également des constats

[3:37] d'infraction. Donc de faire attention de garder vos chiens en laisse. Au niveau de la

[3:44] sécurité routière, on a fait depuis le début de l'année, là, plus de 22 opérations en

[3:49] répression, dont la majorité pour des opérations de vitesse et principalement sur le

[3:55] boulevard Saint-Charles. Au niveau de mes activités, de mes agentes sociocommunautaires,

[4:00] nous avons fait plusieurs présentations sur la cyber sécurité auprès de nos jeunes

[4:05] dans les écoles, entre autres à l'école Christmas Park et à Bgsf SS. On me demandait au

[4:13] dernier conseil les cafés avec un policier. J'ai pas la date encore parce que c'est vraiment

[4:20] un programme qui est corporatif, mais en fait, il est possible qu'on ne fasse pas cette

[4:25] journée là à Beaconsfield, qu'on le fasse dans un autre de mes municipalités, mais j'ai

[4:29] demandé à mes policiers de répertorier tous les événements qu'il peut y avoir dans chacune

[4:33] des municipalités, entre autres Beaconsfield, où mes policiers pourraient venir faire un acte

[4:36] de présence. Et si vous avez d'autres activités que vous aimeriez qu'on participe ou que

[4:42] vous désiriez faire un café avec un policier un peu plus personnel, on est toujours

[4:47] ouvert à faire ça. Je vous invite si justement, il y a des activités que. En fait, ce que

[4:53] j'ai demandé à mes policiers patrouilleurs, mes policiers de mon groupe de soutien, mes

[4:58] agents sociocommunautaires vont beaucoup sur des activités communautaires. Mais j'ai

[5:01] demandé cette année que mes policiers patrouilleurs s'implique également de plus en

[5:05] plus. Donc, comme je vous disais, on est en train de répertorier toutes les

[5:09] activités qu'on peut avoir dans les cinq municipalités. Et ce que je demande à mes policiers,

[5:14] c'est vraiment de faire un acte de présence, de venir vous jaser pour, euh, faire du

[5:19] rapprochement avec vous, de créer des opportunités de rencontres. Fait que si vous

[5:24] avez des choses spéciales, n'hésitez pas à rentrer en communication avec nous. Vous

[5:27] pouvez par notre site internet, sur le site du SPVM poste de Quartier un, nous écrire

[5:33] directement à ma lieutenante ou à moi si vous avez des questions. Merci, commandant.

[5:38] Est-ce qu'il y a des questions pour le commandant? Do you have questions? Please go to the

[5:43] microphone? Président Actually, I leave in your own words and I love going there and I love

[5:56] seeing the dog, you know, including the flesh. Hyper tiger dog, You know jump up on

[6:04] me and give because they don't bother me and the lack of animal services in Beaconsfield.

[6:11] Really really concerns me because I'm terrified that when there isn't a proper humain

[6:20] animal service or spk enforcing the laws that the police are devoted to any dog complaints

[6:27] in place like Andrew would now I know the sound by the agglomeration and not be

[6:33] beaconsfield, but it really concerns me because it's just a matter of time before the dog

[6:38] is being shot by police last year. There were two cases of dog being shot by the SPVM at

[6:45] this really concerns me that as a certified compassionate city. It would be a real shame

[6:53] anywhere for the dog and being shot by the police and I hope that never happened in

[6:58] Beaconsfield, and this is exactly exactly what we need human education and why we need

[7:04] to move beyond the tiny dogpound behind this building and why we need to have the

[7:12] proper humane society or spk. For the commandant. My question is will the SPVM revised its

[7:24] procedural regarding animal services and does the SPVM have canine encounter training to

[7:33] human. Dog situation. Si vous permettez, je vais répondre en français. Madame Corrado, Ça

[7:46] vous va? En fait, pour répondre à votre question, nos procédures, c'est pas la

[7:57] procédure d'abattre des animaux, à moins que ce soit un cas de légitime défense. Pour répondre

[8:05] à votre autre question qui était si on avait des formations ou. Policy. Mais

[8:16] Miss Corrado, we will not have the debate with the commandant is your question if? You want

[8:28] to clarification. Okay, so come back to the microphone, so that everyone here and online at

[8:35] home can better understand you. My French is not good. So I'm not sure what the word in

[8:41] French Procedural is a procedural or the policy that the police follow that the

[8:50] common that will will make sure that the other police officer following the procedure of the

[8:56] police is that the police follows so that it that policing is kept consistant

[9:01] throughout the and they have procedural or policy and different things, including

[9:06] animal control and also asking about the training after so you want training on the procedure.

[9:15] Yes, we have policy for the animal control and yes, we have formation for that. Question is.

[9:27] This one last question, madame Corrado, is is it focused on animal control or animal

[9:36] protection and when it was last updated because I know in Toronto, the procedural are

[9:43] they basically are promoting the killing of animals and they talk about livestock running to

[9:47] the streets there from the century. So when it was the policy adopted and is it animal

[9:55] control or animal control is not under the. SPVM control, it's for the spk or other

[10:07] organisms. It's not for it from the SPVM. Merci. Merci. OK, before we move with the

[10:17] question period. Avant la période de questions, j'aimerais faire quelques

[10:22] commentaires et quelques remarques ici. Mes collègues du conseil ont aussi quelque chose

[10:26] à dire. Je les invite par la suite à prendre la parole et on procédera par la suite à la

[10:31] période de questions. Donc, j'aimerais vous parler de certains points à l'ordre du

[10:36] jour qui sont sujets à un vote plus tard ce soir. Comme précédemment mentionné, lors

[10:47] notamment de l'adoption du budget et pour une sixième année consécutive, notre calcul

[10:52] de la quote-part pour les services d'agglomération, qui a été imposée unilatéralement par

[10:58] le gouvernement du Québec, représente une surtaxe de plus de 2 millions de dollars cette

[11:04] année, bien que les nouvelles valeurs foncières, entrée en vigueur le 1eʳ janvier dernier,

[11:09] réduisent normalement la quote-part payable par Beaconsfield cette année, nous

[11:16] estimons encore donc verser 2 millions de dollars de plus que si le contrat avait été

[11:20] respecté. Le contrat de 2008, où toutes les villes, incluant Montréal et le gouvernement du

[11:26] Québec, avaient été respectées. Love again, this evening, we are posing under items, sixty

[11:33] point one, two authorize the payment under protest of our agglomération share as a result

[11:42] if this resolution passes our claim will now exceeded twenty-two million dollars.

[11:50] Furthermore I think it's important announcement that a lot of people have been

[11:54] wondering about when is the trial or the hearing and take place and so our legal action

[12:03] against the Quebec government and the city of Montreal has reached a decisive milestone,

[12:08] The superior court of Quebec has scheduled the hearing for this lawsuit that we have

[12:16] launched for the period from January twenty-seven to February fifteen two thousand

[12:22] twenty-eight as the first date first firm that allowing for a complete examination of the

[12:31] dispute until then the city will continue to act diligently to protect the financial

[12:36] interest of us the citizens while remaining open to the far and equitable resolution if

[12:45] Possible. Être membre de l'agglomération comporte son lot de défis et parfois une

[12:52] bonne dose de frustration. Mais un point demeure essentiel et je pense que tout le monde est

[12:59] d'accord, il vaut infiniment mieux être une ville au sein de l'agglomération qu'un

[13:06] arrondissement au sein de Montréal. Better to be a city within the agglomération, then

[13:10] to be the bureau of Montreal. Bien que notre localisation sur l'île fasse de nous des

[13:18] Montréalais, géographiquement, nous demeurons de cœur et d'esprit des résidents de

[13:23] Beaconsfield avant tout. C'est une réalité dont nous bénéficions. Pardon? Une

[13:29] réalité qui n'a pas toujours été acquise. Some twenty years ago specifically on January

[13:37] first twenty twenty two thousand and six Beaconsfield became one again et city

[13:46] autonomous in some respect after four years of being a borough with biosurfit within

[13:52] the then amalgamated city of Montreal. Cet anniversaire marque un moment déterminant de

[13:59] notre histoire municipale, un moment où notre communauté a retrouvé sa voix, son identité

[14:06] et sa capacité d'orienter son avenir. Twenty years ago this reconstitution followed the

[14:12] Provence with the process of first municipal realization or murder in the early two

[14:20] thousands after the two thousand four referendum that the Quebec government held the

[14:26] adoption of the Quebec decree reconstituée in Beaconsfield, allow us to emerge again as a

[14:34] self governing municipality within Montreal. The agglomeration. So as we marked

[14:43] this milestone. I find it very important to recognize the people who leadership and

[14:48] dedication have shape the beaconsfield that we know today over the past twenty years five

[14:54] Meyer and numerous counselors have devoted their time and energy to better in our

[14:59] community through public services doesn't have committed residence hundreds of committed

[15:06] residents have also step forward as volunteers offering their time knowledge and

[15:11] expertise to strengthen our program committee and civic life and contributes to the

[15:19] character of that we have as a municipality. J'aimerais par contre souligner au premier

[15:26] rang de cette continuité se trouve Monsieur Patrice Boileau, dont la contribution à

[15:31] Beaconsfield s'étend sur près de quatre décennies. Son long mandat, son professionnalisme

[15:36] et sa profonde connaissance institutionnelle ont été essentiels pour assurer la

[15:42] stabilité. La transition de Beaconsfield, d'une ville à un arrondissement. And then after

[15:48] that from a borough to once again a city. Director general since two thousand and six

[15:57] January first, two thousand and six the very year our city regained its status as a city.

[16:03] Il a guidé notre administration avec constance et intégrité à travers les changements de

[16:08] conseils, l'évolution des structures régionales, la complexité croissante de la

[16:13] gouvernance municipale. Félicitations et merci, Monsieur Boileau. Merci. And so

[16:27] just the second and so looking forward. Looking back is one thing, but looking forward is

[16:34] probably even more important. This Twentieth Anniversary is a moment to reflect for sure on

[16:39] how far we've come since two thousand and six et ringwood city the strength and identity

[16:44] and community that continue to drive. Alors regardons désormais vers les 20

[16:50] prochaines années et essayons d'intégrer les valeurs qui nous caractérisent, qui guideront

[16:57] notre constitution, notre démocratie locale et qui feront de nous une communauté vibrante.

[17:04] Proud and ready to tackle the challenges ahead. Je vous remercie. Maintenant, la parole

[17:10] à mes collègues du Conseil. Madame Godin Oui, merci. Oui, j'ai eu les félicitations,

[17:16] monsieur Boileau. Je voulais juste prendre un moment pour faire un petit speech pour le

[17:23] comité de culture et loisirs. On est à la recherche d'un nouveau membre pour se joindre

[17:28] au comité de culture. And let your committee is looking for a new members, and the details

[17:33] are in the current contact magazines the committee looks to advise the council on

[17:38] various culture and leisure initiatives and we draw on the strength of our resistance and

[17:44] the committee. So if you would like to apply, please look in the contact or online and thank

[17:51] you. Merci. Thank you anybody else. Madame Léveillé. J'aimerais. J'aimerais

[18:00] remercier Monsieur Boileau pour ses 20 ans de service avec la ville de Beaconsfield. Bien que

[18:05] je ne connaisse. Depuis un peu de temps, il est évident qu'il fait preuve d'un dévouement

[18:11] exceptionnel, d'un engagement sans faille et d'une véritable passion pour notre communauté.

[18:15] Tout au long de ces deux décennies, Monsieur Boileau, votre travail a eu un impact

[18:20] durable sur notre ville et a inspiré tous ceux qui vous entourent. J'aimerais vous

[18:23] remercier pour votre excellent service. Félicitations pour cet accomplissement. Je. Casser

[18:34] mercredi. Thank you Patrice. Congratulations. I I did not prepare a speech for any words,

[18:42] but I'll I'll speak from the heart. It's been nine years that I have worked with you and

[18:49] and years before that sitting sitting in the in the audience watching watching what you do.

[18:58] It's not hard to find them that are quantified. There are people out there that have

[19:04] degrees and that have the qualification. But it's a rare occasion that you find someone

[19:10] that is incredibly qualified and truly care about what they do and care is about the people

[19:17] on your team. You're the first leader you. You care for your people. But you're the first

[19:25] leader also of our city and it's been cleared to me from day one. You care about

[19:32] Beaconsfield and for that I thank you and not just as the council as the residents of

[19:37] Beaconsfield. Thank you for your years of service and more to come. Well, I think of the

[19:47] words of being said Patrice again myself I've known Patrice for years coming into two

[19:53] council and I've been amazing years. I think I've learned a lot not only from Patrice, but

[19:59] everybody but the specific Patrice we've interact with a lot over the years. I think

[20:03] like to think I have learned something from us to but, but I think one thing is clear and

[20:09] I'm sure it'll be a team. I'm here in already is just in terms of in terms of your

[20:15] devotion to the city. It's remarquable. It's unwavering and it's sincère. And it's

[20:21] something we see every day and everything emails exchange and everything you do it at the

[20:26] heart of everything you do and I think we feel that coming from you as well, so we also

[20:31] feel that in that we really feel. There's a way that we have working alongside us when

[20:36] we think of those things in terms of devotion to the community on the inside people

[20:41] may not see that we see it all the things and various they do they think that we do, but in

[20:46] terms of a leader. I say it's off for that it's extremely I know you take that very

[20:51] seriously as well, but it's something that I don't think that the public necessary six

[20:55] on a daily basis for us weekly basis like we do so I want to thank you for that and managing

[21:01] the city, so well from the leadership perspectives, so I really appreciate that and

[21:04] thank you for that and continued success in that direction. So thank you,

[21:08] Patrice. Merci. Oh Castle Rock of sound. Thank you very much. Congratulations. Queen. Last

[21:22] but not least, hopefully Patrice as a new counselor. Just like to thank you for all

[21:28] your help getting us up to speed your years of experience. Really show you when we have

[21:33] questions and we need to find out what what we need to know how to do our job? You've been

[21:40] in this resource for us. So I thank you for that. Thank you and you may wonder why we're

[21:46] doing it in the third week of February, but. Absent for the January council meeting. That's

[21:53] when we would have done it normally because that was marking the Twentieth

[21:58] anniversary of both the city becoming well becoming a city and Mister Boileau being

[22:06] nominated as the general. On va procéder à la période de questions. WE have a new

[22:12] procedure last month, I forgot the question at the end. So we have thirty minutes for the

[22:19] question period. If you have a question, please proceed to the microphone, I would prefer if

[22:24] you have a question that you all line up at the microphone that will give me an idea of.

[22:31] Combien de personnes veulent poser des questions? It's one question and one follow up

[22:37] question and I'll try to answer as many questions as possible. So a brief introduction and

[22:48] then the questions. Corrado President of saint Andrew avenue and my question is well

[22:58] the city council. Please listen to the oppositions regarding the demolition at one hundred

[23:07] eleven saint Andrew Avenue, the proposed rebuild will be. Probably twice as big as the

[23:18] current building and my question is how long with the demolition and the rebuild take

[23:27] and what would be doing to. Give residences any you know about when the demolition is

[23:39] going to be with the city. How all this city deal with added dust and pollution and nose and

[23:48] disruption of the street with with construction vehicles. How will the city consider either

[23:58] rejecting ideally rejecting this. This demolition or at the very pleased with this city,

[24:06] consider reducing the size of the proposed new building and will will this question is with

[24:15] this city council, Please look at the opposition and review the demolition decisions made

[24:24] by the Demolition Council. All of the information that you referred to is part of the

[24:32] field that will be decided upon on tonight as we get to that IDM on the agenda. I can't say

[24:42] very much right now as to where we're going to be headed. What you're one of your question was

[24:50] how long will the demolition take usually demolition is overweight. Within forty eight

[24:58] hours of its start in terms of dust and noise control. WE have believes that applied and what

[25:09] I can tell you is perhaps we can look with the administration to see if

[25:15] residences can be informed ahead of time, we will try and find out if that's possible or

[25:23] not, and if it is will try and do that thank you. Good evening everyone, of course. It's about

[25:36] the bus on the montrose. My name is Nancy Ryan, I'm a resident Montrose background at

[25:42] the meeting between the residents and the STM in January. It was confirmed that

[25:47] the city of Beaconsfield was actually involved in the bus route. Discussion contrary to

[25:53] some common in prayer committee meetings. My question is on the basis of the council and city

[26:01] director decide what information is shared and when with the Beaconsfield taxpayers

[26:07] and how does this align with the promise of transparency made by the maire? Intellection

[26:14] time. Well, thank Ryan, we communicate the information that is in our position and

[26:23] belong to us in this particular case and as mentioned before the entire information that was

[26:32] provided to you as part of the two meetings that the STM held with mount rose. Residence was

[26:39] the Propriété. Propriété. Propriété belongs to the STM and we were not at liberty to

[26:48] disclose it. So the problem was at the STM said that you were involved with the decision

[26:55] making without consulting, the people most likely and that debated that we want you know

[27:04] the need that we were consulted. WE were consulting, we attended meetings that has been

[27:11] expressed before that does not give us the liberty to divulge the plan that the STM shared

[27:17] with us. It's the same thing for different ministry and different services. If the

[27:25] agglo has a plan for. Le grand parc de l'Ouest and Angels would untel they're ready to go

[27:32] public with it and fortunately. WE can not share the information that being

[27:37] presented to us. I'm looking forward to many more in the future. Good evening everybody.

[27:50] My name is David Aurel, President of fairway drive, also President of Beaconsfield

[27:55] Citizens Association. My question evening revolves around municipal tax. It is

[28:01] comes to not being aware, but I've pulled all the people in my neighbourhood as far as

[28:10] about six streets left and right and everybody evaluation seems to have gone through the

[28:15] roof. I personally for my own residence municipal. Evaluations went up a hundred

[28:25] thousand dollars. What does that representing fifteen pour 100? Two? To make a more

[28:37] accurate. Thank you so I took the liberty. Of reading your exposé or money from the maire

[28:48] in this morning and quite frankly you left me more confused than I was when I got

[28:55] out of bed this morning, so doing due diligence all day. I have discovered that basically

[29:04] the tax right that we received our our tax is that we just probably everybody just go in

[29:10] the last week or so is based on that evaluation and the percentage attributed to each

[29:19] of the city or the agglomération and they are all together to make the final

[29:23] price that you pay so my question is who determine the new evaluation role of the

[29:33] house because for mind to go up the hundred thousand dollars along with my neighbours and

[29:39] people as far as six streets away. We're all wondering who will look up and said we're out

[29:46] and left field. Yeah. So the answer to your question is the city of Montreal, the

[29:53] Evaluation service de l'évaluation foncière. That essentially take the value so

[30:01] the role that was deposited in late September early October that came into force on January

[30:08] the first the evaluation of our property is on the territory and it's the same thing

[30:13] everywhere else on the island is it's a polaroid a snapshot of the market value in July,

[30:19] twenty twenty four and so they take you know different neighborhoods. They look at the

[30:27] cells. They look at increase the value as a result of permits, bing bing issued for

[30:35] renovation I apologize and so on and so far. So the way we presented the budget and its

[30:42] it's a something that happens every three years when there's a new role, we that part. Is it

[30:48] now, we will go with the average value or the value of the average homes in

[30:55] Beaconsfield. One point one million dollars and this meant for twenty twenty six and

[31:01] increase from the previous budget year of 6.6 %, which is the average increase in value

[31:08] as a result of the assessment role that came in for all of the sixty eight hundred

[31:15] properties on the territory and so depending on in your case twelve point 6.2 %. So our you

[31:25] know the number that we end up with that 3.8 % tax increase for that specific property

[31:33] increase that 6.6 %. Well, you are your share of the pi sixteen. Plus pour 100 balloon

[31:42] up and that's unfortunate some people as I've mentioned in the letters that you received in

[31:48] the mail and the contact and as part of the presentation of the budget last month, some

[31:54] residents the majority of residence. Seventy pour 100 are below. Trois point 3.8 % and I

[32:02] believe if I remember correctly thirty to be presented are in fact getting a tax reduction as

[32:10] a result of the shift in value the relative shift in value, so that's the long and the short

[32:19] answer is the evaluation is conducted every three years by Montreal. ITS Montreal. That's

[32:27] doing something of random calculation as two because nobody is certainly visited my

[32:34] house two evaluate the establishment of value. It's not random and it's not random.

[32:40] It is based on cells is based on cells in a given area. Quinze Mercury. Thank you.

[32:50] Maire Saint-Jean David. Thanks for the question. If if you are concerned with the evaluation

[32:58] of your property. There is a process by which you can challenge that with Montreal.

[33:03] Now, I don't remember off the top of my head with the daily are the deadlines, but it's all

[33:09] on their website and and if you are concerned with that I truly you to just évaluation foncière

[33:15] Montréal and just follow the process because everybody that I like I said I have gone at

[33:23] least, it doesn't streets in every different directions and I'm out about something people

[33:27] now and. Everybody is this one up approximately one hundred fifty. Neighborhood three years

[33:37] ago. It was up to fifty pour 100 increase in evaluation some neighborhood had remained

[33:43] pretty much at the same level others are going up. And so you know I understand where you are

[33:49] coming from its its shocking to some absolutely just can't help others have a question or

[33:57] related when this is another other thing to some of you may have done this, but in those

[34:03] that are now we're just further to what if you go to property assessment. Montreal is

[34:08] something like that it will take you where you can actually see your assessment online and

[34:12] the historical numbers of their, but if you scroll down a little bit, there's a video and

[34:16] there's a little video that kind of explain how they calculate? How much approach is

[34:20] the calculation where the criteria involved with you give you a Description descriptive

[34:24] of their their approach and their search of philosophy around how that's put together.

[34:29] So it's in it's really hard to explain all that and finally we don't have all that information

[34:34] that type of your finger, but there's a video and it's my video just on that point alone.

[34:38] So property assessment was just Google that you'll see years and then you can scroll down.

[34:43] There's a video there I found it very helpful when I looked at the back. And I looked at it

[34:48] again. Not too long. So it's helpful and anybody else. It's something to have a look at

[34:52] thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening. Mr Maire Counselor Boileau. Dominique

[35:12] and Nathalie. Nathalie. It's there's there's a light on it. So I'm sorry, I can't see. I

[35:22] don't know if this is the time and the meeting to bring up what I want to bring up, but

[35:27] you are your secret and you don't want to leave in Beaconsfield. I've been living

[35:36] in the West Island for a long time Beaconsfield residents for ten years and I send you all

[35:43] and email, which was rather long on Friday, because I had a lot of points to cover, but I

[35:50] think they're all important points around the treatment of January. There was this notice

[36:00] that was put in our mailbox. I'm at group accueil and there for a long time is planning to

[36:06] leave there for the rest of my life. Not so sure now anyway, this talks about the building

[36:14] to be built on the tennis court right in front of our home that we went and it doesn't seem

[36:20] proposed building. It is a building. It was like it was a done deal and it is now, I

[36:27] didn't talk to a lot of my neighbour. WE don't leave in a high rise. It's winter time. WE

[36:32] came out like a little flower in the spring time. WE don't see our neighbors and in the

[36:37] winter time. WE go from our care to our individual doors and go inside in spring time.

[36:43] WE talked to people so however, I've talk to everybody received this because I spoke to the

[36:52] neighbors and I said are you going to the information station on February eleventh

[36:57] about the new building building on the tennis court, and they went what what you talking

[37:03] about and I explained and they were not pleased, but I didn't talk to people well. I would

[37:16] have asked for a reply from everybody to my email. So I hope I will receive it and I

[37:22] hope you will take into consideration the point that I've brought up because my

[37:27] father was the building inspectors. I used to go on building with him. Take this

[37:31] note. I'm not somebody who's just you know I've had for houses. I've built one. I have

[37:36] a little bit of knowledge about this and I would just hope reading the back of somebody's

[37:41] cars. And then I'll finish. I think it's really important to read my letters. And it's on

[37:48] the back of one of your business. Car it's our mission is to provide and inclusive

[37:53] community which offers a high quality of life and respect the environment both natural and

[37:59] man-made through responsible and innovative management. Nobody wants this building,

[38:06] nobody who has the tennis court wants this building to be built. Thank you. You don't have

[38:12] questions. That's all my question is so regarding that project. Thank you. Later this

[38:23] evening. Okay, I don't know if you were here, but just prior to this morning, we had a

[38:29] public consultation meeting and so next month. There will be here a public consultation

[38:36] meeting. So you're welcome to and that's what I would bring up again you and it's that

[38:43] before the whole meeting starts great good to know. Thank you very much welcome. My name is

[38:57] Nikki. I just moved to Beaconsfield. Recently actually and it was a life-long goal of

[39:01] me and my husband to moved to Beaconsfield because we love the area. I'm sure you all know

[39:06] of me cause I've made quite a bit of noise. WE bought a one point two million dollar house

[39:11] where and twenty years old that are for this. What are hard earned money? WE didn't have

[39:15] help from our parent or anything, we both the house and marches, we renovated it for

[39:19] nine months and we moved to get notified by not you guys No-one sitting here, you need to

[39:26] everyone, but by residences telling me that I was gonna be put right in front of my house.

[39:31] Not only is going to be right in front of the house. I'm not. I don't ask a question. I'm

[39:37] gonna stop. Apologise but the language you are using calling us. I have proof that you guys

[39:42] are here. You can see it down. Please. I spoke to Mr Aref Salem, who is the chairman of

[39:48] the board of directors at the STM? Mission impossible. The reasons why not now the city

[39:55] that was coming to filibuster and I will not allow you to call everyone around the table

[40:01] here. Lire so please it down or apologize me. I don't want. OK? No ok everybody, please.

[40:23] Calling you. A lire. For calling you, I have a question so get to the question please,

[40:31] I was so I spoke to Mr Salem asking you to get to the question. Ma question I spoke

[40:42] forty five on the phone with mister you ask it. I'm sorry sir. But I will conduct this

[40:53] morning the way I see it fits if you do not approve, you may leave. You know it. She said

[41:00] more than three words asking for functional. OK, let's see you have a question. Yes, but

[41:08] I'm I'm just building up to it. Not everyone. Thank you, but it up to for longer than I didn't

[41:14] take up that much time the council that you should respect for citizens as well. Monsieur

[41:21] Lebel, Monsieur Lebel, I will get to my questions apologize. Monsieur Lebel, I will not

[41:30] tolerate this I've just asking for respect on both sides. Yes, you haven't anything except

[41:36] speak out of order. You have a question Get in line and ask the question untill such time

[41:43] that you are in line at the microphone, please remind caillots. Miss you have a

[41:51] question for me. Aref Salem on the phone and he told me that it was not possible that

[41:59] resonance were not aware that I was coming on rose drive and you said in the last council

[42:06] meeting and I have it here. Meilleur Saint-Jean indicate that the city of Beaconsfield

[42:11] has not been informed of how many routes will save the rem and the city expect the STM to

[42:17] make the information public soon. I don't know what you're reading from the meeting. The

[42:24] December meeting that you just posted in our. Ago may be well that at that time. WE went in

[42:32] the position to come on it and we weren't informed officially of what they would be so just

[42:38] for my understanding the master of the STM, Chairman of the board of directors is not right

[42:45] when he is promising me. He he told me. It's impossible. The residence were not middleware.

[42:50] So you're telling me. That's not accurate that the terms of the board of the city. And what

[42:55] I told you. I'm commenting on what we were allowed to tell our residence and when we were

[43:02] allowed to tell the residence what we said all along was that untill such time that the STM

[43:07] is ready to roll out its roots and make it refonte public. WE can't come the only exception

[43:16] that happen was the one regarding the two what we now know to be the two eleven x,

[43:22] which is proposed. On mount Rose, ailment and Mount rose. Yes and the reason why we want

[43:31] the reason why we the reason why we commented on that was because question that been here

[43:37] and we put the residents of mount roses with it in contact with the STM. Just my name is

[43:46] when the city of Beaconsfield, except the right on rose accepted that we never accepted

[43:52] the right and rose, we were not decisions all in establishing the right on the month rose. So

[43:57] you never accepted with the STM. You never say we accept as it was probably the previous mail.

[44:03] I know was done before the previous maire Beaconsfield never see that with the STM and

[44:08] said that we expect we accept that the right. He's gonna go on rose drive. I can't do What

[44:14] did we did not do that It could before someone would have had to accept the STM does not walk

[44:20] into the city and choose the right well, we can agree to disagree on that get in and who

[44:28] accepted it. WE do not accept that the city of Beaconsfield, did not accept the STM bus

[44:35] general. Your question. To make it a little lighter if you can. But you don't have to my name

[44:47] is Desmond Schaefer. My question is I don't know who to ask the question to because I

[44:55] asked questions to urban planning who told me to ask my counselor which I did and my

[45:04] counselor responded to me to ask urban planning. So I'm getting the run around and I

[45:11] see the property that I own is coming up on today's agenda which one is it one of the five

[45:18] lake view? And what is the question? If you bring it up, there is two, there's two,

[45:28] there's two things like after the inspection as you know when you build, it's a brand new

[45:33] construction and when you build a house you have to give a fifty thousand dollars deposit

[45:40] to as a guarantee that everything is. Conforme to the what was approved and city by

[45:50] those. So there was two stipulations that the inspector came up with the second one. I

[45:59] fully agree with is that we have to. WE have to take a little bit of earth away to to

[46:06] make it level. We're finished just before just after the first snowfall. WE couldn't get

[46:11] a level on it. But now we we know we have to do that the first one where it is the.

[46:21] Relating to the building permits application to modify and already approved plans. So

[46:26] what happened here was without my knowledge as it was happening, we heard contractors

[46:33] and the contractors, there's three gables in front of the house, the pignon and they make

[46:39] them out. There is here and the committee is doesn't approach of it. I went back to the

[46:50] contractor after the facts and he said it was designed flaw and in order to insulate the

[46:58] house properly and not have a vice caché somewhere down the line or something like that

[47:04] there is that in order to get the proper insulation access to that those are those areas of

[47:11] the house. OK, So what is the question is what do I do to get my fifty thousand dollars

[47:18] deposit back if the committee doesn't agree with this is where I'm completely within the

[47:24] laws of the city. That's the question. Well, there are from what I understand there are two

[47:31] things that plays. There is the zoning and there's the architectural integration and

[47:37] the items that you're pointing out to are part of the review process under the planning and

[47:44] architectural integration. Of the CCQ. The public advisory committee makes recommendations

[47:52] to council and we will be voting later on tonight on those two items. Understand I

[48:01] tried to try to get forward on this before the tonight a month. Now I'm trying to get answers

[48:09] to understand that the process can be difficult and confusing sometimes, but I can't tell you

[48:18] more than than what I have already told you and I always the sea, you have given your

[48:25] recommendations and I'm asking you to I don't know if you just go with what they say. Are you

[48:32] actually? You guys actually look at it individual and say this. This guy is about to lose

[48:37] fifty and for eight like I don't know if you, if you are as a fellow citizen. You feel

[48:43] from you a little bit in this. You know if you are just go now, you don't recommend it. But

[48:48] like I know you guys, have a say and you know how I was trying to stand with you look

[48:56] at the files. WE don't always agree with the recommendations. Sometimes we see them are side,

[49:04] so ok. So I know you have looked at them. I'm gonna take the site and thank you. I guess

[49:10] I will wait and wait and see what happens. You are welcome. Still have time with you, miss.

[49:23] I want to thank you first of all all of you and thank you. You're of us Somewhat éradique

[49:35] presence of people. I want to actually model of the behavior that I think should be expected

[49:41] of citizens asking questions. So that's the question is about the bachelor. The boring below

[49:50] for eighteen point 6 million $ and if I wanted to leave you with a few phrases. You would

[49:58] be about risk transparency that servicing and the implication of that for resident tax

[50:08] players powers with corresponding and I thank you for your response and you

[50:13] confirmed my understanding of how this is all going to proceed. You are also indicated

[50:19] that the administration is going to review the possibility of producing and amortization

[50:24] illustrations to help citizens understand what is actually going on? So my question is

[50:30] could council of the voice. Whether the year. Repayment projection could which were

[50:37] included principal interest will be prepared and published. So that's for the year

[50:42] repayment projections, including principles and interests will be prepared and

[50:47] published and when might expect to see that be available, we all live within budget. WE all

[50:55] know that price is go up. WE all can afford to make decisions when we know what is

[51:00] coming ahead if it's going to be an increase and so that's the context within which I'm

[51:06] asking questions so risk transparency that servicing and the implications for citizens.

[51:13] Thank you. Thank you, Duncan. I just want to know that you are concerned as a taxpayers or for

[51:22] taxpayers our shared before we are counselor or Mayer. WE are residents of this city and

[51:30] we're taxpayers as well so that concern is shared by everyone in the room what I've told you

[51:38] and what all right here for the benefit of everyone is that will look into what can be done

[51:43] because we're playing with different scenarios and if possible, you know the

[51:49] information will be made available. So thank you for your question. WE have been at

[51:58] it for thirty minutes, but with the approval of my fellow member of council. I would

[52:04] continue this question period for the time being your back and that's ok. If however, if

[52:14] you want to address us on the specific idem, we can call you up when we get to date Idem,

[52:22] and we'll move on with the with the rest of the questions. Hmm. Thank you alright. Monsieur

[52:30] Lebel. Good evening. Hi there. So I wasn't actually gonna come speak tonight because I didn't

[52:36] really have a question prepared at the time. I wanted to address the situation. I was

[52:40] addressed by our council by my name, Mister Maire himself. I don't think that's very far

[52:45] very responsible, especially since the only reason why I spoke out of turn in the

[52:49] council. Today was because one of the residents held at the person in the question, and I

[52:53] ask our council to please respectfully as that citizens and council. Respect the manner

[52:58] of the core of the hearing right now that being said I do have something that I had

[53:03] prepared that I was going to ask. Me just pull it up. So. I'm really frustrated because I

[53:12] was shown for doing something that I would otherwise think was a good hacked by saying,

[53:16] please act responsibly and this in the scenario instead of being told that I shouldn't

[53:20] speak out of turn, I would really appreciate some clarity on the threshold of the

[53:24] community support of community support is required for you to consider the minor significant

[53:29] enough to take a clear position today at three hundred and twenty-four residents have

[53:34] signed our petition expressing concerns about the boss and roses drive for for context.

[53:39] The council of District six was elected with only five hundred and more than half the number

[53:45] of residences formerly voice concerned on a single issu it suggests meaningful community

[53:51] engagement. Could you please clarify what number or percentage of citizens our

[53:56] criteria used to determine when you will support citizens on the matter that is affecting us.

[54:02] Now, I can not because it's a moving target depending on the different issues at different

[54:07] times involving different people in different reality. You know so hundred people

[54:14] doesn't constitute support. Well that petition that you referred to is on change org.

[54:27] It's not the petition that I've been able to see if you access to it multiples times No, you

[54:36] have not even emailed the link and when you click on that link the only information that you

[54:44] see is the number of potential signing. That's not true that it also have you information

[54:49] and what you see if you are calling, if I'm not calling you, it's not false, that's it, but

[54:55] it is because if you open the link to give you access to the information that citizens have

[54:59] calculate not so are you calling me? You know I'm not. I'm telling you. I'm telling

[55:04] you the truth and you're telling me that you're not looking into the information

[55:07] that are providing you, Mister Lebel. Sorry that you take offense that I called you by

[55:12] your property. I don't appreciate that at all well sir, I'm I'm saying that I was not

[55:17] in council. And you addressed me so now, I'm addressing back. That's all of this

[55:23] Argumentative combative. I'm not not your no. I'm not and you and council. All right. You

[55:33] are. I'm gonna be clear one last time. Just listen to me. Listen to me, Please Captain.

[55:42] Just captain. Captain. Please give me a moment. Monsieur Lebel. You can listen to me.

[55:56] You don't need the microphone. I also like. Alright, I have not called allô. I'm just

[56:01] checking. I I'm not calling you. I'm telling you that my experience is that when I get

[56:08] to that website. I'm not in a position to evaluate. How many people are well, I can see the

[56:16] number of people who have seen. I don't know where they are are. I don't know if they live in

[56:21] Beaconsfield. I don't know where that I see a number, but beyond that number. There's

[56:27] another there's another number for me at least that matters in this file, and it's the fact

[56:32] that twenty-seven hundred users will have with in five hundred years of their property access

[56:41] to the bus to take them to the room or to the Beaconsfield train station and so that to me

[56:48] is fundamentally a good thing for the community. This is also a statement by our mayor,

[56:52] because the bus is not run in both directions for all two thousand seven hundred citizens.

[56:58] I'm not gonna hurt you the fact with you. I thank you for coming here tonight and good

[57:02] night. Is there is fundamentally something that I have done to you that has it

[57:06] like made you aggressive toward me. Cause I don't know what I've done. I don't aggressive

[57:10] towards you. So it's a matter of perspective and yes, I have thank you and you are done. No

[57:21] sir. I'm sorry. The question period. There are people behind you. I've heard you have

[57:25] answered your question. You're not interested in what I have to say and you want to hear you.

[57:31] It's not about it's a question period. If you want to speak to me if you want to speak further

[57:37] with me later tonight. I'm available. But right now we're going to move to someone else

[57:42] was waiting in line. I think that's where. Yes. Absolutely after I think so much for the

[57:53] ghost. Roland. Ça y est, j'habite 45 45 ans à Beaconsfield. Okay, donc je

[58:07] vois dans votre que vous avez envoyé là, vous allez faire des emprunts pour 25 millions au

[58:15] total grosso modo. Donc vous avez les revenus de de Beaconsfield, des taxes, ce qui

[58:21] reste après avoir payé la ville de Montréal, c'est environ 17 millions. À part les autres,

[58:27] les les vidanges, il faudra payer le vidangeur, l'eau, il faudra payer. La ville, c'est

[58:33] des autres dépenses. Je vous écoute. On va arriver à votre question, là, c'est à quel taux

[58:38] vous empruntez? Sur combien d'années? Et ça va tomber combien sur nos impôts, là?

[58:46] Parce que déjà, les deux dernières années, ça a augmenté, la mienne a augmenté. 1000 et

[58:55] quelque chose. Donc, ça va avoir un effet sur les impôts sur le long terme, là. Combien

[59:02] d'années que vous allez bien, c'est ça? Oui, effectivement, quand on emprunte, il faut

[59:09] repayer l'emprunt et les intérêts, à défaut de faire ça, on va affecter nos impôts

[59:16] directement. Mais oui, et comme les emprunts qui ont été contractés il y a 20 ans, 25

[59:22] ans, quinze ans, dix ans l'an dernier, vous empruntez plus que ce que le revenu là, donc

[59:30] plus ou moins là. C'est ce que je vois, c'est que c'est exagéré. Si votre question est

[59:38] est ce que est ce qu'il va? Est ce que votre question est, est ce qu'il va y avoir un impact?

[59:43] Est ce qu'on doit payer? Oui. Quelqu'un a étudié l'impact que ça va avoir sur le long terme?

[59:47] Oui et there is a question from Mr Duncan. Spécifiquement en lien avec l'emprunt du Centre

[59:56] culturel. Et l'exercice doit être fait effectivement ou a été fait en fait. Oui, Okay

[1:00:05] merci merci. Dernière question Goodevening This is for one, one one saint Andrew, We're

[1:00:15] gonna we're gonna have it time to go to one one one when we get to the winter really sorry.

[1:00:22] I'm sorry. I just so you don't want me to hear my question. Now is that what you're saying?

[1:00:30] Okay, okay okay. You'll be our last question of the evening. Good evening. Sweet right for

[1:00:46] years. Yes, I'm gonna question. You've got the twenty 7 millions that you have given to

[1:00:54] the contract in Dorval. Did anyone else caught on that? Yes, sir. Yes, the question is in

[1:01:05] the last budget you. There is all family and the world allocated to remove the of the

[1:01:17] place of the the old yes Club-House club house is the part of that contract. Yes, sir.

[1:01:27] So it be twenty-seven, it'll be less and twenty-seven millions, including the demolition of the

[1:01:35] club-house, Yes and to and to add to your to my answer to your first question. WE had

[1:01:43] received twelve beads for this contract, which is phenomenal and the first six beaters the

[1:01:53] first six company providing the price. We're all within I don't remember three point five or.

[1:02:03] About four five of the lowest confirming better. So not only did we get a lot of beads.

[1:02:10] There were very competitive with one another good. Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay.

[1:02:23] I would just gonna come on what you know about the boss and roses. Period we started

[1:02:32] question period with you. I was just gonna say that. Why are you going away? The two from

[1:02:39] bordeaux-lac and putting roses. Why did you just get a new bus and put it on why you take away

[1:02:46] the two eleven. You're not doing anything. The stm is why cstm. Why is the STM taking

[1:02:54] away. The two eleven, which is served me and plenty of other people, so that the track and

[1:02:59] the north of the track and all starting on mount roads, which is going to take me twenty

[1:03:04] minutes where to walk to from saint Andrew. Why don't you take it with the STM create a

[1:03:11] new bus and put that on elm. I map out of route on and that would work starting from And

[1:03:17] why does it not go from? Where to gare doesn't connect with the gare. This was delivered to

[1:03:24] the the McDonald campus. That you have are for the STM. And why did they choose the two

[1:03:35] eleven and renamed the route to go to a different place. I do not know that they're doing.

[1:03:42] Madame Godin. Nicole is going to offer to sit down and maps out the roots wherever you want

[1:03:51] to start and end together. WE can do that after the meeting and we can use the simulators

[1:03:56] to see exactly where you need to go and what the change you would like for you. OK, merci.

[1:04:03] Thank you. Given the time and the extended period that we've used for the present question.

[1:04:24] Those who are not in attendance and that have provided questions for me to read and

[1:04:30] answers, you'll receive answers through the administration within the next week or so will

[1:04:39] will you? But just not tonight and right now. Thank you. So item ten point one.

[1:04:55] L'approbation du procès-verbal de la séance extraordinaire du Conseil de la ville de

[1:04:59] Beaconsfield du 19 janvier 20 26 à 10 9 h. Je propose juste secondes en faveur. Item ten

[1:05:11] point to point two of the city of Beaconsfield special Council from January Twenty twenty six

[1:05:19] bpm. I proposed all in favor. Item 10.3 L'approbation du procès-verbal de la séance

[1:05:30] extraordinaire du Conseil de la ville de Beaconsfield du 22 janvier 2026 à 8 h 15. Je

[1:05:38] propose. Je seconde en faveur. Idem of the city of Beaconsfield. Published

[1:05:48] consultation Twenty twenty six. Propose. Approbation du procès-verbal de la séance

[1:06:02] ordinaire du Conseil de la ville de Beaconsfield du 26 janvier 20 26 à 10 7 h 30. Je

[1:06:08] propose. Idem Twenty point un. Of the contract with start that over there, we go people at

[1:06:23] home can hear so twenty one is the ritual of the contract TP twenty twenty five of five for

[1:06:29] the maintenance and repair of our hvac. Système de ventilation heating and cooling

[1:06:34] invisible building for the year of twenty twenty six with Navy refuge Réfrigération, inc.

[1:06:41] Adding Approximate cost of twenty-two thousand two hundred and two and twenty-two all

[1:06:46] taxes included proposed a second. Item twenty item 20.2 Ratification de l'octroi du

[1:06:57] contrat d'assurance. Dommages de la ville de Beaconsfield pour la période du 1eʳ janvier

[1:07:01] au 31 décembre. 20 26 Autorisation du paiement de la prime Société d'assurance

[1:07:08] Bénévent incorporée pour un montant total de quatre 20 798 et 43, toutes taxes incluses.

[1:07:15] Suite à l'appel d'offres réalisé par l'Union des municipalités du Québec, l'UMQ,

[1:07:21] dans le cadre de Regroupement des municipalités de l'île de Montréal, le RM i m, je propose,

[1:07:29] je. Seconde en faveur. Item twenty point three contract twenty five GC for the

[1:07:41] construction of a multipurpose cultural center of the city of Beaconsfield to three access

[1:07:47] construction, inc. For the amount of twenty-seven millions thousand dollars thousand

[1:07:54] dollars taxes included in purpose. Item 20.4. Je propose résolution autorisant une

[1:08:15] dépense et la signature d'une entente avec le ministère de la Culture et des Communications.

[1:08:22] Emcc pour l'intégration d'une œuvre d'art dans le cadre du projet Centre culturel

[1:08:30] multifonctionnel de Beaconsfield. Je seconde alors. Il s'agit d'une dépense

[1:08:37] maximale de 143 730 $, qui est une obligation qui découle de la subvention que le ministère

[1:08:45] nous a octroyé pour la construction du Centre culturel, Alors, en faveur. Item twenty

[1:08:55] point of this is the mandate of the Union des municipalités du Québec with regard to the group

[1:09:00] for purchasing common of insurance products relating to the protection of reputation of

[1:09:04] Elected Officials Senior officers against Defamation harassment and hate speech as

[1:09:10] well as criminal, Liability insurance and matter of Occupational Health and safety

[1:09:17] Safety I propose. Item 30.1. Je propose l'approbation de la liste des comptes à payer au 23

[1:09:30] février 2026 et de la liste des paiements préautorisés pour la période du 16 janvier 2026 au

[1:09:38] 25 janvier 2026 et du 27 janvier 2026 au 12 février 2026, pour un déboursé total de

[1:09:49] 2 752 447 $ et douze cents. And so this month, it's relatively small amount if we compare it

[1:09:55] to next month when we come back and we have the agglo portion of our payment will be closer

[1:10:03] to twenty twenty five million dollar. Les dépenses principales qui sont couvertes

[1:10:10] par ce dépôt sont une somme de 166 881 $ à Construction Matos Inc. Pour des travaux de

[1:10:21] construction de la capitainerie sur le site de la Marina Centennial et 367 432 $ et 25

[1:10:30] ans. Paiements d'intérêts sur la dette à long terme, tel que nous l'avons prévu au budget

[1:10:34] adopté le mois dernier, et ce qui vaut la peine d'être mentionné, les autres montants

[1:10:42] sont plus petits. Item item thirty point two. Merci. Merci. So all in favor. First of all.

[1:10:55] Secondary and then we both all in favor. Here we go. We'll get it right. Thank you. Merci. IDM

[1:11:02] Thirty point two. Approbation d'un appui financier de 2 000 $ à la Bourse commémorative Topps

[1:11:09] pour l'année 20 26. Je propose. J'appuie en faveur. Item 30.3 Approbation d'une contribution

[1:11:23] financière de 300 $ et 51 à 13 Associations communautaires, culturelles et sportives

[1:11:30] représentant jusqu'à 50 % des frais de base de la prime d'assurance responsabilité de

[1:11:36] BFL pour l'année 20 26. Je propose. Un sac en faveur. Merci. Item Point fort. La

[1:11:53] participation Annual Conference of the l'Union des municipalités du Québec, l'UMQ

[1:12:00] from the Thirteenth, Twenty Twenty six and Quebec City and approximate cost of

[1:12:07] reimbursement of traveling expenses and other related cost secondary. Five. Donc item 30.5.

[1:12:22] C'est un autre congrès, donc participation du maire au congrès annuel de la Fédération

[1:12:27] canadienne des municipalités FCM. Autrement dit, du 4 au 7 juin 2026, Edmonton, Alberta,

[1:12:33] au coût approximatif d'un 1 195 $ plus remboursement des remboursements des frais de

[1:12:40] transport, de logement et d'autres dépenses afférentes proposées. Je seconde en faveur.

[1:12:53] 8.6. Participation of the Director General of the Annual Conference of the Union des

[1:13:00] municipalités du Québec. From Thirteenth to fifteen twenty twenty six in Quebec city and

[1:13:05] the approximate cost of eight hundred knight dollars plus reimbursement of traveling and

[1:13:09] lodging expenses and other related costs. Y propose. Item 30.7. Je propose la

[1:13:24] participation du Directeur général au congrès annuel de l'Association des directeurs

[1:13:28] généraux des municipalités du Québec à des gmq, du 10 au 12 juin 2026 à Saint-Hyacinthe, au

[1:13:38] coût approximatif de 930 $ plus remboursement des frais de transport, de logement et

[1:13:43] d'autres dépenses afférentes. Jeffery en faveur. De directeur General and the Annual

[1:13:58] Conference of the Canadian Association of Municipal Administrator. Cvma from my

[1:14:04] twenty-fifth to Twenty-seven Twenty Twenty six in Whistler, British Columbia and the cost

[1:14:10] of seven hundred and seven dollars plus reimbursement of traveling and lodging expenses

[1:14:14] and other related costs. Réglementation Item 40.1. Oui, je donne un avis de motion pour

[1:14:31] le dépôt. Avis de motion et adoption du premier projet de règlement 720 131 intitulé

[1:14:38] Règlement modifiant le règlement de zonage 720 Afin de modifier le nombre de matériaux

[1:14:44] de revêtement pour les bâtiments Multifamiliaux H3 d'ajouter des normes

[1:14:50] spécifiques à la zone H336 Concernant le pour centage de pente d'allée d'accès au

[1:14:57] stationnement et de modifier les normes concernant les usages Multifamiliales, H3 et

[1:15:03] habitations communautaires H4 pour la zone H336, afin de les rendre conformes au plan

[1:15:10] d'urbanisme de la ville de Beaconsfield et soumission du premier projet de règlement à

[1:15:16] une consultation publique, le 23 mars 20 26 à 10 9 h. J'appuie en faveur. Idem for

[1:15:28] the point two. Son avis du motion. Feeling of motion. Adoption of draft. Bylaw. Big

[1:15:34] one. Sixty five. That's one. Entitled. Bella bella by one sixty five concerning the

[1:15:40] planning program to specify the maximum number of stories permitted inside the sector to

[1:15:45] be transformed or built by one and add a one sector to be transformed or built in five

[1:15:52] and the planning program of the city of Beaconsfield and submission of the draft below

[1:15:56] to the public consultation on march twenty twenty twenty Seven PM I propose. Items 40,3

[1:16:11] Dépôt et avis de motion de projets de règlement 177 intitulé Règlement autorisant

[1:16:17] des dépôts des dépenses en immobilisations, immobilisations et un emprunt

[1:16:22] de 1 000 405 $ 405 0 $ pour la réhabilitation. Réhabilitation structurant, structurant de

[1:16:34] conduites adéquates et d'égouts sanitaires. Je propose n'est qu'un avis de motion. Merci,

[1:16:42] Madame. Items 40.4. Avis de motion Feeling of motion of draft. Bylaw. Big one. Seven

[1:16:52] below to authorize capital. Expenditure in the land of two hundred. Dollars reconfigure

[1:17:00] the Woodlands and highway twenty intersections. Merci. Thank you. Items Forty five.

[1:17:07] C'est un autre avis de motion dépôt et avis de motion du projet de règlement By 179

[1:17:13] intitulé Règlement autorisant des dépenses en immobilisations et un emprunt de 1 200 000 pour

[1:17:21] divers travaux et études pour l'amélioration du réseau du réseau. Je m'excuse. D'Égout

[1:17:28] pluvial. Merci. Merci. Item point six. I give notice of motion for the feeling and

[1:17:37] notice of motion of draft. Bylaw. By entitled to authorize capital expenditure and a lot

[1:17:45] of two million five hundred thousand dollars for the replacement of mechanical unit

[1:17:49] at the public works building in the municipal garage. Merci. Item 40.7 Je donne un avis. Je

[1:18:00] donne un avis de motion pour le dépôt et avis de motion du projet de règlement By 181

[1:18:06] intitulé Règlement autorisant l'emprunt de 18 000 18 600 000 $ pour la

[1:18:14] construction d'un centre culturel multifonctionnel avant subventions et contributions

[1:18:19] privées. Merci. Alors, nous allons procéder. WE will have two Idem date pertaining to

[1:18:30] demolition review of the decision of the demolition committee. The first one is for

[1:18:37] the building on Beaconsfield Boulevard. Date trois Thirty six If you want to go to the

[1:18:46] microphone. Bien. Bonjour. Bonjour. Merci pour l'écoute. Tantôt, on avait fait bref de

[1:18:56] poser la question dans le fond de voir à la révision qui a été mise en place le 2 décembre.

[1:19:04] Approchez vous un peu du micro s'il vous plaît. Je me présente, je suis Francis Roy, je suis

[1:19:09] représentant, J'accompagne M. Angelo, propriétaire du 366 à Nice. To meet you and the

[1:19:19] committee on the good work and the esprit de Noël. Here tonight at the very onset of

[1:19:27] our meeting. But I guess the question for me. This evening is this an opportunity for me

[1:19:34] to defend the position that was taken in respect to the request for the demolition of three six

[1:19:43] six. I can tell you that we've we have the file. WE have what you've provided. It's been

[1:19:49] provided to every member of the council. Is there is something specific that would like to

[1:19:55] address or stress this evening, we. Juste de revoir, donc rapprochez vous du micro. C'est

[1:20:04] bon. Ayez pas peur, c'est rare. Je m'entend dans une micro. Le point est qu'on essayait de

[1:20:09] revoir s'assurer que les conseillers avait bien vu. Bon du départ, on voyait pas comme

[1:20:17] étant une demande de démolition par la suite pour se rendre compte qu'un pour centage de

[1:20:24] rénovation sur la demeure, vu certains points qu'on a statué dans le dossier, euh portait à

[1:20:31] croire qu'on dépassait largement le côté raisonnable d'imputer des frais de

[1:20:39] rénovation puis d'avancer là dedans. Le point était dans ma question que j'aurais pu poser

[1:20:43] tantôt pour être assez bref, est ce que le Conseil aurait besoin, avec ce qu'on a renvoyé,

[1:20:51] vu qu'on a demandé un appel à, de retourner dans le dossier de la firme Gris Orange qui a été

[1:20:58] mandaté par la ville de Beaconsfield, d'amener des précisions à un point, parce

[1:21:03] qu'on voit ici que c'est pas une prospection, mais il y a un point qui est réellement

[1:21:09] monétaire qu'on essaie d'amener à voir. Il y a trois, trois point qui était le côté

[1:21:15] historique qui a été mis de côté, mais qui a été vu comme typiquement une demeure

[1:21:21] québécoise, comme beaucoup de maisons dans le coin de 1960 à 1980, il y a plusieurs points

[1:21:29] qu'on essayait d'apporter pour assurer que le Conseil aille bien, pris conscience que

[1:21:36] c'était pas juste un coup de dé puis qu'on arrivait à ces points là aujourd'hui pour

[1:21:40] qu'on puisse arriver à un vote de vote par le Conseil puis qu'il soit réfléchi. On a vu

[1:21:48] qu'il était rentré par rapport au conseil de février 1 point, qu'il y avait un manquement

[1:21:55] d'incohérence dans la discussion. C'était même pas le point qu'on voulait amener. On

[1:22:01] comprend bien que c'est pas ça que vous vouliez dire, mais que c'était un point qu'on voulait

[1:22:06] céder, point qu'on voulait amener, qui était selon nous irraisonnable de pouvoir

[1:22:13] arriver avec une valeur de la maison détériorée, qui se détériore avec les années. Puis,

[1:22:21] puisque mon client est arrivé à voir, à faire une rénovation sur un immeuble qui présentait

[1:22:27] pas les qualifications pour que je puisse arriver et donner une valeur. Parce qu'on va

[1:22:36] comprendre que ça se peut que ça soit la dernière décembre, le dire. Alors, comme je vous

[1:22:41] dis, on a pris connaissance de l'ensemble du dossier. Peut être que, pour répondre à votre

[1:22:49] question, si quelqu'un autour de la table a une question pour vous, ben je vais laisser la

[1:22:55] parole aux conseillers qui voudraient vous poser des questions. Mais je pense que ce

[1:23:01] que nous avons reçu était. Bien, disait, disait ce que ça devait dire. Oui, de mon point de vue

[1:23:09] à tout le moins. Okay, alors euh, pas de question. Merci pour votre intervention. Est ce

[1:23:18] que pour le lancer en appel, comment que ça va statuer? On va recevoir, On va on va le

[1:23:24] voter là, à vous voter ce soir? Oui. Ah ok. Oui oui oui OK. Merci merci merci merci. Alors,

[1:23:33] madame. Madame Godin Oui, euh, Demande de révision de la décision du Comité de

[1:23:41] démolition du 2 décembre 2025 concernant le bâtiment situé au 306 Beaconsfield, vous proposez.

[1:23:48] Je propose que la demande soit refusée, la demande, soit la demande de révision, soit

[1:23:56] refusée. D'accord. Est ce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui seconde? Motion. Pardon. Merci. Alors

[1:24:07] qui? Quels sont ceux qui sont en faveur du maintien? Oh no no no no, it's ok. I just want to

[1:24:15] make sure. I am I'm going properly because you will help us out. Or comme after the vote

[1:24:20] if you don't mind before you, absolutely okay. Thank you, thank you, thank you for

[1:24:26] bringing it up because I was just going to move on and it's been it's been an interesting

[1:24:30] evening. Yes. But afterwards make sure I'm voting properly cause I want to make sure I

[1:24:37] understand the motion. OK? So first, thank you for the opportunity to speak this

[1:24:41] evening on this file. And and let me be saying, you know our role on council is not always

[1:24:51] agree. WE need to take a look at whatever the item is on the agenda, you know and where

[1:24:56] necessary debate challenges each other respectfully and then vote how we believe is

[1:25:03] right and and whether we're right are wrong. Well, we gotta votes how we believe is right

[1:25:09] and in the interest of in this case the hormones, but also in my opinion in the case of the

[1:25:17] public interest. Okay? So I look at this file in two big budget the property owner and

[1:25:24] what's in the public interest and we saw earlier this evening during the public consultation

[1:25:31] that we're we're modifying our bylaw on sanitation occupancy and maintenance of buildings as

[1:25:38] it applied to whether it's a building or are just somebody's home right. We're ensuring that

[1:25:45] there are standards that preserves and sustained the building and set minimal

[1:25:52] conditions for for living. You know we are trying to protect what we have right. If not it

[1:26:02] be a little bit too easy to just wink wink Nudge nudge leave the Windows open, let the

[1:26:08] water run and perhaps have a home fall into this repair kit quickly. WE don't want that to

[1:26:14] happen in Beaconsfield, Okay, but with that in mind when does the imposition of conserving

[1:26:23] the building become two great of and ask, okay, so when is saying dear home owners, you

[1:26:32] must conserve repair Refurbished your home. No you're not allowed to demolish

[1:26:38] it when does that become two great of and ask and when I look at this file. It was built

[1:26:46] in nineteen fifty nine on a nice size lot thousand square feet if I converted to fit

[1:26:52] properly and when you look at the value of the home. So here we are talking about valeurs

[1:26:59] foncières and the Montreal website and you can see the value of the property, the

[1:27:05] actual building, the house itself has a value of one hundred and thousand six

[1:27:12] hundred dollars on a total value of one point, almost two million dollars. So the value

[1:27:18] in this property is not the house. It's the land. But when we look at the report. Yes, two

[1:27:30] correct. Yeah. One point, one line zero to be Exact. So you think thank you one point two

[1:27:37] millions is a little short of one point two million. Okay, so and when we look at the reasons

[1:27:44] for our initially. Declining or refusing the demolition request it was on the good state and

[1:27:53] estimated reasonable cost of repairing the home bringing it back up to snuff, not expanding

[1:27:59] not hiding on note making it a while fixing it the end and we have three different coats when

[1:28:08] provided by our our engineer from the city and to provide the far away from the from the

[1:28:14] owner, the coat to fix the houses are between five hundred and twenty five thousand to

[1:28:21] five hundred and sixty thousands of renovations on a house, that's worth a hundred

[1:28:28] thousand six hundred to me that does not make sense to me. I'm always speaking for myself here

[1:28:36] that does not make sense to me. That's two great of the financial. Ask in this case and

[1:28:44] when we look at the report, saying that it's a good state. Okay foundation problem roof

[1:28:53] problème Lack of installation pour drainage Windows Cladding Stone Electrical The star

[1:29:01] smokes. I mean I guess it's really what's in good state or not okay? So I look at that and

[1:29:08] I say when I'm looking at the home owners. This is so great of an imposition when I think

[1:29:15] now of the public interest and I want to be clear again that I'm speaking for myself. If we

[1:29:23] are to refuse this demolition with this home and this condition with that financial

[1:29:30] burden start thinking of everybody else at home around Beaconsfield, start thinking of

[1:29:36] our propertyvalue start thinking of people that want to buy our home invest in

[1:29:41] Beaconsfield and bring their money to our city. We're all you got one thing going for us

[1:29:47] and beaconsfield about the great people and us. WE don't have industry. WE don't have

[1:29:52] commercial. WE are a real estate business here in Beaconsfield. It's about the

[1:29:57] home and so myself as a counselor when I think of the public interest. So forget the

[1:30:03] residents. I see this as in the public interest to allow this to go forward for what it means

[1:30:10] and the broader scope of all home owners and I happen to be the share of the finance

[1:30:16] committee have also and it means for our city from the financial perspective. So thank

[1:30:21] you for allow me to speak and I'll leave it at that you are welcome anybody else. Now, I

[1:30:31] was just going to like I appreciate counselor, you know opinion, etc. There are more

[1:30:38] than just one criteria that the committee review is there are over thirteen of them. So one

[1:30:45] of them is the one that you've brought up, but there are others also in terms of the

[1:30:49] state of the amovible, and the one that brings to the character of the area, its

[1:30:55] architecture, etc. So there is not just the one element to look at so it's like a global

[1:31:00] global thing. Is there any one else that would like to add to this, Non that my. Let me leamy

[1:31:14] think that we so it's proposed the second. It's commented. WE can vote so I'm going to work

[1:31:23] it this way. All those in favor of improving the review process and overturn the committee

[1:31:33] decision to refuse the demolition demolition allowing the demolition Yes, so all in

[1:31:40] favour of that so I have three and presumably all those in favour of maintaining the

[1:31:50] committee decisions and refusing the demolition and we have three. So it is a type of

[1:31:59] youth and as a result the request for the views of demolition committee, did not

[1:32:06] receive the number of votes. Idem for the point nine. It means that the decision to

[1:32:18] refused. The demolition is maintained. Idem for the point nine. La demande de révision de

[1:32:34] la décision du comité de démolition du 2 décembre 2025 concernant le bâtiment situé au

[1:32:39] un un un saint Andrew. Est ce que j'ai quelqu'un qui qui appuie ici cette personne? Oui,

[1:32:50] c'est That's okay. Good evening and counselors spoken to Dominique about this already.

[1:32:58] I'm a residents of saint Andrew. I leave at one saint Andrew and I've been there for two years

[1:33:04] and on the left side of me house went up on the right side of me a house went up. There

[1:33:11] are cookie-cutter of each other. The same individual has both one and one eleven saint Andrew

[1:33:16] is going to be putting up another house exactly the same and there's a house that looks

[1:33:22] exactly the same and if I had wanted to leave in the development. I would have moved

[1:33:27] to Vaudreuil, not Beaconsfield and Beaconsfield. I think has a lot of charming older homes.

[1:33:32] Some of them are are in need of repair and absolutely understand that excuse me, but

[1:33:38] I feel like and I've spoken Dominique at l'anact about this that that perhaps and I can't

[1:33:46] have a say and whether you know this demolition goes ahead. However, I felt that and I did

[1:33:50] a bit of assessment and I understand that when it is given to an owners to take down

[1:33:57] the house, the things are considered such as the building conditions the potential for

[1:34:04] renovation and the neighborhood caractère and I feel good to have for identical houses

[1:34:10] within the Stones. Straw is going to die tract from the character of the neighborhood,

[1:34:14] and I know that and I find that found this out and I know it wasn't beaconsfield decisions,

[1:34:19] but certain neighborhood are given some kind of special designation and it but our

[1:34:23] street doesn't happen to be one of them sadly and probably a lot of those home where we were

[1:34:28] summer cottages at some point and just go out and to but my house is and it was built in

[1:34:34] fifty-five. So I feel that perhaps I may not have the same as I said in stopping this and

[1:34:40] and and but I would like to know given that I believe the planning commission has some

[1:34:47] role in saying what kind of house is built where and when what role that they will take

[1:34:52] moving forward given that I'm not the only person that addicted to this demolition,

[1:34:57] they were five of us on this street for very same reason. So that's kind of like my point

[1:35:01] and that I wanted to have to be addressed. Thank you. Thank you for your right. You know the

[1:35:10] following process after a demolition is obviously for for the house to be to be built.

[1:35:18] However, as part of the demolition process beyond the nature of what is going to be

[1:35:25] built meaning. Here we are we going to be allowing or are we discussing a residential home

[1:35:34] single family dwelling? Is it gonna be the same type of usage for the next building. At this

[1:35:43] level that we're at right now. The demolition committee is not its not one of the criterion.

[1:35:49] You know what the house may or may not look like afterwards once its it's built to replace

[1:35:56] the one that being being demolished having said that my colleague counselors null is

[1:36:03] the shards of the public Advisory Committee review the buildings that are being

[1:36:10] proposed suggested to council for approach to be built. La conseillère Godin Would you

[1:36:17] been speaking clearly is also very much interested in in the public advisory committee works.

[1:36:26] She is substitute member and feeling when counselor null is absent. So that something that

[1:36:37] you know is is not yet determined or definite far from it. Yep familiar with the

[1:36:46] procedure so if there's been five objections to the demolitions. It went ahead

[1:36:51] anyway, so now what is the role of the planning committee in terms of the kind of structure

[1:36:56] that would be built on that spot so the planning committee is to its mandate and there are

[1:37:04] residences on that committee, its mandate is to make recommendations to council on

[1:37:11] building or projects that in their evaluation. I'll see it bluntly feets in and sometimes

[1:37:21] you know, it doesn't it takes more than one kick at the go before the project gets

[1:37:28] favorably recommended to the council and approved here, so that's really how it's it.

[1:37:34] That's the next process wants and if the property in question is being demolished questions.

[1:37:44] Are there are there guidelines or regulations regarding this process that I could consult,

[1:37:52] unless it's a specific and perhaps counselor annual you can help me out, but unless

[1:37:57] it's a specific character area. There is a general category that would apply. Head. First

[1:38:08] off the demolition and the new building completely separate, they don't overlaps completely

[1:38:14] independent decision to that whatsoever so if you look at the full life will have a home

[1:38:19] is demolished eventually there usually a new one that is that wants to go up in its place, so

[1:38:24] that separate process and it's mostly information on there. I believe the criteria. There is

[1:38:28] well, I'm not mistaken. It's been a while since I looked at them on the website. You see

[1:38:32] them every month, but but there there and it's essentially the for the most of the same

[1:38:38] criteria that every municipality use these are really driven by the provincial

[1:38:42] government and the criteria, but what about that is that we also interpret it all these

[1:38:46] criteria locally and then the see you for example, not only are the couple members of her

[1:38:52] and planning, but there are actually expanded, but we have seven members of Beaconsfield

[1:38:57] residents that are also involved in that for various parts of the city who are also

[1:39:01] the best of make up the composition of that I know that wasn't your specific question.

[1:39:05] But you give you a fuel for the approach that used in that, and so I think. Mentioned to it one

[1:39:12] of the criteria integration and so on the looking for integration. We're not looking

[1:39:15] at just doing the cookie-cutter approach and necessarily. It could be different style of

[1:39:19] bring for about what's great in the area and is probably one of the challenges. WE have and be

[1:39:24] used when one, that's when that comes through to make sure to do our very best to try and

[1:39:28] find something great work that can mean a lot of different things to different people.

[1:39:32] However, we so we will we try to take it. That's all we have so many residents actually on

[1:39:38] that committees as well and who are trying to do that by the way, it is required that they

[1:39:43] have training on this at the same time, so anyway without going further on it. It's a

[1:39:47] process and there is a company that we meet once a month. We're going to go through the

[1:39:51] number of this project as an example of the output of some of those meetings, and it will

[1:39:56] be part of your consideration to what the I responded to the announcement that demolition

[1:40:05] was was given, and then I was informed that it may go to your committee. The planning

[1:40:12] committee is now, I'm not try to ensure that it. Went to this way and if I'm not being clear

[1:40:20] demolition tonight. This is. Just the demolition whatever happens after that are the new

[1:40:27] building, completely independent. It is nothing about this next point on the

[1:40:30] agenda. For example, you know so if you know what if and when whatever happens with the

[1:40:39] demolition or what not even if it for example, even if the demolition didn't happen and

[1:40:45] somebody renovated the building put in addition on it was still comes to the the planning

[1:40:50] advisory committee to to look at how does that hope project integrated? So what so forth

[1:40:54] the same thing if if the demolition goes through and a new home is built it will be

[1:40:59] the same approach to the site. You are the reason. I just want to add so the demolition

[1:41:08] committee made the decision some time ago and tonight that decisions based on the request

[1:41:15] that we received. So that's what's happening tonight? OK, ok, and then after that it's

[1:41:19] the it goes to the ok. I agree with everything she said I love and I already said I leave on

[1:41:33] the hundred and third saint Andrew, So I I moved from Toronto from Scarborough

[1:41:41] actually to Beaconsfield, three years ago and Scarborough Beaconsfield is going to look

[1:41:48] like Scarborough after all these demolitions and rebuild with cookie-cutter house. With

[1:41:57] completely. Please, please say no to this demolition at the house. That's right now is

[1:42:04] absolutely beautiful and think it will be really nice if it could be restored, you know I

[1:42:09] hope somebody. Else buy it. Restore it to its its. Original et original condition because

[1:42:19] that would be so much better than turning that beautiful house and the garbage corrado.

[1:42:28] OK for the point, so all in favor of maintaining the decision of the demolition

[1:42:37] committee. To allow the demolition, that's the decision of the demolition to meet you

[1:42:44] all in favor. It's ok. Thank you. OK. Item forty five points one. OK. So now we're going to

[1:42:57] urban planning project. Donc, cher conseil de la part de la Sécu et le comité consultatif

[1:43:05] d'urbanisme, je propose que vous accepteriez leur recommandation d'approbation

[1:43:09] pour les items suivants de 45.1 à 45.9. So the council on Behalf of the Advisory

[1:43:15] committee and proposing that the council accept the recommendations to approuve

[1:43:20] items forty five points one two forty five points nine. Specifically the item are forty

[1:43:28] five one, the request for a minor exemption for the property located at one

[1:43:33] fourteen regions also. Un Demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:43:39] architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis de construction pour

[1:43:42] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal, situé au trois logos selon option C. Et ça, ça veut

[1:43:47] dire du BRIC item fifty forty five points three excuse me. This is a request for approval

[1:43:55] of again planning and architectural integration programs relating to the

[1:43:59] building permits application for the extension of the building located at the one

[1:44:04] region again for approval. 45.4 Demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:44:12] architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis de construction pour

[1:44:15] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal situé à 24 Saint Louis. Forty Five Points Five

[1:44:21] request for approval for the side planning and architectural integration programs relating

[1:44:25] to the building permis application for the extension of the building located at

[1:44:29] twenty six Manresa Marissa. 45.6 Demande d'approbation pour Plan d'implantation et

[1:44:37] d'intégration architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis de construction pour

[1:44:41] l'agrandissement du bâtiment principal situé à trois, trois, neuf Berwick Forty five points

[1:44:47] Seven his request for approval of the sight planning and architectural integration

[1:44:51] programs related building permits application for the modification of the sad of the

[1:44:56] building located at one sixty Juniper. 45.8 Demande d'approbation pour un plan

[1:45:03] d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale relatif à la demande d'un permis de

[1:45:07] construction pour la modification d'un façade du bâtiment principal situé à 280

[1:45:14] 96 Pine Tree. Finalement. 45.9 Request for the approval of the sight planning and

[1:45:21] architectural integration programs related to the building permits application to

[1:45:25] modify the already approved plans at five one Beaconsfield so again. Dixième forty five

[1:45:34] point one to forty five points Nine arts request in your approval of someone to. All and

[1:45:43] favour. Merci. Thank you. Donc la prochaine groupe, c'est à dire de 45.1 à 45.4.

[1:45:53] Excusez-moi. 45 Pardon 45.10 45.14. So the following item de la part de. Encore une fois, de

[1:46:04] la part du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme. Je propose que vous accepteriez leur

[1:46:10] recommandation de refus pour les items. 45.1 point 10 à 45 quatorze Selon The Planning

[1:46:17] Advisory Committee and Proposing the Council Accept the recommendations to refuse

[1:46:21] the following item from forty five point one zéro forty five point ten rather to fourteen,

[1:46:30] so this refers to the following following address. Un demande d'approbation sur 45.10 Demande

[1:46:41] d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale relatif à la

[1:46:44] demande d'un permis de construction pour l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[1:46:47] principal, situé à 41 Circle Forty Five Point Eleven, The request for the sight planning

[1:46:52] and Architectural integration planning program relating to the building permits

[1:46:57] application for the modification of the façades and building located at forty five

[1:47:01] sweet Briar moving on to the point three. Un dépôt. Excuse moi. Oui. Bon. 45.12 C'est pour

[1:47:15] une demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale

[1:47:19] relatif à la demande de permis de construction pour la modification d'un plan déjà

[1:47:24] approuvé au 185 Lake View. Ensuite, 40 Forty five point One tree. This is the request

[1:47:32] for approval for the sight planning and actual integration programs to carry out back

[1:47:36] filling work at the property located at one in five lake view and finally. Finalement.

[1:47:43] 45.14 Une demande d'approbation du plan d'implantation et d'intégration architecturale

[1:47:48] relatif à une réalisation des travaux de remblai de remblai sur la propriété située au 301

[1:47:55] London. Donc, en résumant les To resume the project forty five points to forty five for

[1:48:03] in our for refusal and for council votes on that I50. Thank you. Merci. Item fifty

[1:48:16] point one for the nominations in view of Permanently as Chef de section Projets to position

[1:48:24] fifty one hundred and proposed 50. Item 50.2 Nomination en vue de permanence à titre d'agent

[1:48:36] au service à la clientèle et à la réception. Au poste de 2111, je propose. Je. Seconde en

[1:48:44] faveur. Merci. Fifty point Three propose The view of pregnancy as. Technicien en

[1:48:54] génie civil et inspecteur Two position One zéro six. Fifth point One 51 53.1 sur Fifty

[1:49:10] Three point un. Processus. Processus verbal de la réunion du Comité consultatif

[1:49:16] d'urbanisme du 3 février 2026. Donc, I don't have a lot of other comments. WE just went

[1:49:22] through all those projects that took place at that particular meeting, but forward looking at

[1:49:26] mention. Donc, je voulais juste mentionner que la prochaine réunion qui va avoir lieu pour

[1:49:30] le le six, le Next Meeting for the Planning Advisory Committee will be on the third the

[1:49:36] deadline espace obviously is for those projects being seen, you would have already

[1:49:40] submitted your plan, so. But just as a general comment I think this is also getting to

[1:49:46] be of the very busy time of the year when the spring approach of people do have project.

[1:49:50] You're definitely good to get them into the C.C.W for March and April. It does get it. So

[1:49:56] sometimes these things can take to review given the volume of the project, so if you like

[1:50:02] something be reviewed by now is the time if not already starting dose project to have a

[1:50:07] look at that and discuss them with the urban planning department for for submission.

[1:50:15] So proposed. Fifty three two and proposing many of the advisory committee meeting of

[1:50:26] December, twenty twenty five. Or not particularly, except residences by now, we will have

[1:50:37] all received in the mail. No contact. So there you go. Yes, thank you. Fifty 3.3. Le dépôt

[1:50:51] du procès-verbal de la séance du comité de démolition du 17 février, pour préciser un

[1:50:58] énoncé du procès-verbal de la séance du 2 décembre. C'est une correction de texte. Six point

[1:51:07] One. Mandat à l'administration de la ville de Beaconsfield de payer le premier versement des

[1:51:14] quotes-parts, des factures et des contributions pour l'année 20 26 à l'agglomération de

[1:51:20] Montréal. Sous Protêt. Je propose un second. 60.2 Adoption des modifications à la

[1:51:34] politique éditoriale concernant le bulletin municipal. Contact. Section. Votre conseil. GRS

[1:51:42] comme trait d'union zéro zéro deux. Je propose. Je. Seconde en faveur. Dépôt du item 60.3

[1:51:56] déposée de The City Report on the participation aux élections municipales. Officers in the

[1:52:01] Professional Development program. Entitled municipal Ethics and good conduct in

[1:52:06] municipal after all of my colleagues have been good students and have followed the

[1:52:14] training and I completed mine today. So we'll be back with that the same that same items

[1:52:21] next month for my for my training. 60.4 Résolution en appui. Sorry go ahead, you can

[1:52:31] do it. Résolution en appui à la Journée nationale de promotion de la santé mentale positive le

[1:52:40] 13 mars 2027. Je propose juste secondes. Alors tous en faveur. Excellent! Idem 6.6 is the

[1:52:52] request for approval of a custom traffic sign for the city of Beaconsfield. Yes! So

[1:53:03] this custom sign is for the light at the well different lights for pedestrian crossings

[1:53:13] in the different the way the three areas that we have with with traffic lights all of them

[1:53:21] worked with pedestrian crossing. They all worked and and the sign in question is simply to

[1:53:29] indicate that there on the circle. There's no need to press a button or if there is a

[1:53:34] lack of a button people eventually will have their priority to cross the lights

[1:53:42] are on a cycle. So this will be installed shortly now that we've adopted it or we will

[1:53:51] adopted. I guess all in favor. Thank you for confirming what I just said. Item 60.6 est remis

[1:54:03] à un autre conseil. Point 70.12 séances du conseil d'agglomération Agglo Meeting

[1:54:13] General Twenty night was for the purpose of adopting the agglo budget and more recently

[1:54:21] on the night last week. There was a number of items on the agenda, but one thing that I

[1:54:27] think is worth mentioning is that the city of Montreal, the agglomération including the

[1:54:33] d'emerging municipality are in favor and adopted a resolution asking the Quebec government to

[1:54:43] consider its dismissal of the programme de l'expérience québécoise, which is forcing

[1:54:53] people who have been working in and living in our community for a long time to leave there is

[1:55:02] no grandfather close, which in the opinion of everyone at the council is wrong. So we're

[1:55:09] asking that if the government government wish to make changes to its programs. That's one

[1:55:14] thing, but those who came here. On est certain set of guidelines expecting certain

[1:55:22] things to happen and sur certain representant representation being made to

[1:55:27] them that this would lead to permanent residency should be grandfathered their valuable

[1:55:35] contributor both from an economic and the social standpoint and so we supported

[1:55:41] that resolution. Rapport des directeurs point 80.1. M. Boileau. Rien de spécifique à

[1:55:50] mentionner, Monsieur le Maire. Merci. Alors nous n'avons pas de nouvelles affaires. Je

[1:55:54] propose ou quelqu'un propose t il la levée de la séance? Je croyais qu'il avait pu avoir

[1:56:02] une dernière période de question du pouvoir. J'avais une question peut être légitime

[1:56:07] à poser. On va fermer la séance et vous pourrez nous poser la question parce que la période

[1:56:13] de questions est terminée. Alors je propose à la veille de la séance, je seconde en faveur.

[1:56:26] Merci. Good evening everyone, Thank you for being here in the room and for following us. A

[1:56:32] Donc merci

2026-02-23 Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript