Brevard City Council Special Meeting | October 30, 2025

Brevard, NC · · More Brevard, NC meetings · More North Carolina meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[4:19] Testing one, two, three. How are we doing?
[4:34] She said, "Well, at least." All right. So, are we
[4:38] I guess so. I don't know. Are we online?
[4:40] We might be. All right. Well,
[4:44] whatever. I will officially call to order our special meeting of the Bvard
[4:50] City Council on Thursday, October 30th. Welcome to everybody that has joined us.
[4:55] As always, it's great to see the public and hopefully we are broadcasting and
[5:01] welcome to everybody that's watching us online.
[5:05] This is a special meeting, so our agenda is somewhat abridged. Madame clerk, do
[5:10] we have a quorum? Yes, you do have a quorum. All members
[5:14] are present. I will just introduce everybody that is
[5:18] sitting up here. On my far right is our city attorney, M.
[5:23] Mckeler. Next to Mac is Councilman Lauren Wise. Next to Lauren is
[5:29] Councilwoman Pamela Holder. Next to Pamela is Councilman M. tomorrow. I'm
[5:35] Mayor Moren Copelof. On my immediate left is our city clerk Denise Hodston.
[5:40] Next to Denise is Councilman and Mayor Prom Gary Daniel. Next to Gary is
[5:46] Councilman Aaron Baker. And on the far left is our city manager Wilson Hooper.
[5:52] Okay, with that council, you've got the draft agenda. Are there any changes or
[5:58] modifications to the agenda? Do I have a motion to approve the
[6:03] agenda? So move.
[6:04] Second. All in favor? I.
[6:07] Agenda is approved. We will move right into public comments.
[6:13] Okay. The public is invited to speak during
[6:17] public comment at this time only on the item on the agenda for this special
[6:22] meeting. Anyone who wants to speak must register with the city clerk, which is
[6:27] what this list is. When it is your turn, step to the podium in front of city
[6:32] council. State your name and address clearly. Limit comments to three minutes
[6:38] or less and avoid repetition. Direct comments to the full council, not
[6:43] to an individual council member or to staff. And I will give you a warning
[6:49] when you have 30 seconds left. Okay. I will call people up in the order
[6:54] which you signed. Our first speaker is Anne Hollingsworth.
[7:05] Do I need to bring this down? Just like that.
[7:09] Like that. Yeah. Okay.
[7:10] Hello. Um, I know most of you, but for those who don't know me, I'm Ann
[7:15] Hollingssworth and I live at 187 East Main Street, downtown Breard. and my
[7:23] husband Danny and I own 78 South Broad Street, which is occupied by Headline
[7:29] Salon. Last week, we were out of town when you
[7:33] all had your uh regular monthly council meeting, and we had just become aware of
[7:38] the issue. So, we emailed all our concerns uh
[7:42] relating to why we did not want a loading zone in front of headlines,
[7:46] cycle works, and looking glass reality. I would like to personally speak with
[7:52] you now for the public record. Brooke McCall, the owner of Headlines, has been
[7:57] in business at that location for 28 years. She has an established clientele.
[8:03] Many of her longtime customers are older and can't physically walk blocks to get
[8:08] their hair done. She has told us she has lost many customers because of the lack
[8:13] of parking. Now, another factor that I thought of after I emailed you all is
[8:21] for not putting a loading zone is the lack of visibility. When you come out of
[8:26] First Citizens Bank onto Broad Street, the large tractor trailers would block
[8:33] the line of sight and this would be extremely dangerous because of the speed
[8:38] people come on Broad Street.
[8:42] And um that's all I have to say and I thank you for your time and
[8:47] consideration. Thank you, Miss Hollingsworth.
[8:51] Our next speaker is Doug Miller.
[8:58] that back up. Hey, Doug Miller. I live at uh South
[9:02] Calwell Street and have a business on West Jordan Street. So, obviously have
[9:07] an interest in this uh conversation and I attended the committee meeting that
[9:12] you guys had to go over this again last week. Was it this week or I don't
[9:16] remember. It was recently. Um [laughter] and I just thank you guys for moving
[9:20] with such urgency on this. I do appreciate the sense of urgency with
[9:23] which you're moving and I think that the uh decision that was made at the last
[9:26] committee meeting was a good one. I think there was some really good
[9:28] conversation. I feel like we came to a good um balance between you know making
[9:33] sure that the businesses uh needs are met and that the businesses who need to
[9:38] get deliveries needs are met and that the safety of the folks that need to
[9:41] move around is [clears throat] taken into consideration. Um we're not
[9:45] blocking any fire hydrants with this decision. So I know that was a concern
[9:48] from the city but I think there was good conversation. And I feel like ultimately
[9:51] that was a good decision. [clears throat] So I'm here to say I
[9:53] support it. I think that's the right move at this point to go ahead and put
[9:56] the loading zones in the places that were recommended by the committee.
[10:00] Thanks. Thank you, Mr. Miller.
[10:03] Our next speaker is Melissa Driver.
[10:10] Good evening. I know several of you, but for those of you who do not know me, my
[10:14] name is Melissa Driver. I live at 370 Maple Street here downtown. and my
[10:19] husband Joe Driver and I own Cycle Works which we recently opened back in July
[10:24] and are leasing from Paul Willander. He owns the remainder of the building as
[10:28] well and I work for him as an agent. So I use the building for multiple purposes
[10:33] and I appreciate that you all sent the this item back to a special committee.
[10:38] So, I want to thank you for that because that gave us the time to understand more
[10:42] about what was being proposed and also discuss with that committee what we had
[10:46] hoped for as we all plan this downtown master plan together that's beneficial
[10:52] for all of the businesses, not just individual businesses. So, I appreciate
[10:57] having the ability to have that input and not focus solely on where do we put
[11:00] food trucks, but also our livelihood as a business and a new business and a
[11:05] retail storefront. So, thank you for hearing us out at that committee
[11:08] meeting. I also am in agreement with the the recommendation that came out of that
[11:12] committee meeting and I'm looking forward to your approval of that
[11:15] recommendation to place the parking loading zone away from our building and
[11:20] allow there to accommodate still the remaining three spaces in front of our
[11:24] building. So, thank you very much and I hope that you come to agreement with it.
[11:29] Thank you, Mr. Driver. All right. And that is everyone that signed up for
[11:33] public comment. All right, we will move on to unfinished
[11:38] business, the South Broad Street restriping plan. And I guess city
[11:42] manager will be presenting. I'll kick us off and then I'll throw to
[11:45] David to take us through the alternatives that were discussed by the
[11:49] committee last week, including their recommendation. Um, just as a reminder
[11:54] to you council, but also for the benefit of our uh, audience in person and those
[11:59] who are watching the meeting online, this evening's meeting is the result of
[12:03] your instruction from October 20th to send the South Broad Street restrip
[12:08] restriping matter back to the downtown master plan committee for
[12:11] reconsideration and the need to have uh, you all confirm
[12:17] or not their recommendation as soon as possible so that we can transmit
[12:22] to NC DOT and them to their contractor before the contractor's upcoming
[12:29] completion deadline. Uh if we miss that deadline, um we'll have to assume the
[12:34] cost of this restriping if we get it to them on time, which this committee will
[12:38] enable us to do. Uh most the vast vast majority of the cost will be borne by
[12:43] them. Uh so as I said before, downtown master plan committee met last week.
[12:49] They reviewed their original proposal from May, heard some public comments,
[12:53] including some of the folks who've shared with you again today, and uh they
[12:58] reviewed several alternatives that were developed by uh staff, and they
[13:03] considered an alternative that was profered by heart of Bvard, which David
[13:08] will go over as well. Um finally, and this is very important, the committee
[13:12] also considered um information from the logistics and
[13:17] delivery industry, which Deie Harris reached down into her rolodex and called
[13:23] one of her contacts to provide to us. And I appreciate that because they were
[13:28] a stakeholder that we didn't have enough time to involve in this discussion, but
[13:32] they're an important one nonetheless. And so I appreciate her bringing that
[13:36] information to the committee and it informed our conversation uh quite
[13:40] helpfully in my opinion. So before I throw to David, the one
[13:44] thing I'll say is that the logistics folks that she brought information from
[13:50] agreed with us that none of our alternatives are great. There's not one
[13:54] that's perfect and doesn't have some trade-offs. Um, but I personally feel
[13:58] that the alternative which was chosen has the fewest negative tradeoffs and
[14:03] for that reason I also agree that it's a good way forward and so I'll now throw
[14:08] to David to take us through the various alternatives if you would please sir.
[14:12] Yes sir. Mayor Council good evening. First thing I would like to do is walk
[14:18] us through the current recommendation and then I can show you the different
[14:22] things that we considered. So, the first recommendation that you see, this is uh
[14:28] I made our mouse bigger so hopefully we can see a little better tonight. This is
[14:31] Broad Street in Jordan with Maine up here. What this proposal does or this
[14:37] option does is it takes the current ADA space that is somewhere in this general
[14:42] vicinity and it moves it to the end and it creates a 69 ft loading zone that is
[14:50] contiguous whereas before it was broken into two spaces and it adds one
[14:55] additional 22ft parking space. So that is uh
[15:01] option one of what we are asking you to approve tonight and what was approved
[15:06] and recommended by the downtown master plan committee.
[15:10] Option two, I'm sorry, op this is not option two.
[15:15] This is part two. Part two would paint the parking spaces that let me orient us
[15:23] again. This is Jordan Street and Broad Street. Part two would paint the parking
[15:28] spaces in front of Looking Glass Realy, the salon, the bike shop that we're
[15:33] speaking about tonight back as they are currently painted. It would move the
[15:38] loading zone across the street in front of Eldridge Motors. This would be a 40ft
[15:43] loading zone. This would accommodate a box truck, UPS truck, FedEx truck, those
[15:50] type of vehicles. I do want to go back for just a moment to the first
[15:53] recommendation. The 69 foot loading zone should
[15:59] accommodate one of the I'm going to refer to them as
[16:03] the US Foods trucks. That's the kind of mini tractor trailer looking trucks that
[16:08] we see around town. Those trucks are approximately 50 ft long with a 14 foot
[16:13] loading ramp out of the back then with another 5t for working space to get in
[16:17] and out of the ramp and then onto the crosswalk. So we feel this would easily
[16:22] handle the largest of the US food trucks. It would not handle,
[16:27] [clears throat] excuse me, it would not handle a full-size, you know, 53 foot
[16:31] tractor trailer, but I' I've not seen one of those try to unload in Bvard
[16:36] since I've been here. So, that's two recommendations that are
[16:40] in front of you. What I'd like to do next is just quickly run through several
[16:44] other considerations that we looked at.
[16:51] So, one of those is the option one that we just looked at and recommended to
[16:55] you. Option two
[17:00] was a smaller loading zone. This reduced the 69 ft loading zone down to 47 ft
[17:06] with a 22t parking space. Now, one thing I I do want to just say for
[17:10] clarification, all of these numbers are approximate. They're general. The GPS is
[17:15] not exact, and that's what we've used to get some of these dimensions between
[17:19] this and a combination of field measurements, but things may be a little
[17:23] smaller than what they're actually shown. We typically would make that
[17:26] difference up in the largest space. So the in this case, the 40 7 foot loading
[17:31] zone might be a little smaller, a little larger. In the first scenario, the 69
[17:35] foot might be a little smaller, a little larger. In this particular scenario, you
[17:39] add a second parking space. But the downside is this is no longer large
[17:45] enough to accommodate one of the I'll call it mini tractor trailers, the US
[17:50] food service type tractor trailer.
[17:56] The next option we looked at is what we originally had been proposed from the
[18:01] downtown master plan committee which was to leave the striping in front of
[18:05] looking glass realy blank and allow us to place temporary paint to decide which
[18:11] parking scenario or loading zone might work the best.
[18:17] The let me just go back to that for a second. The the con to this would be at
[18:22] some point we would be responsible for painting that parking in and the
[18:26] thermoplastic as well as whatever traffic control had to happen. So would
[18:31] not be a huge expense but it's definitely an expense that the city
[18:34] would have to take on.
[18:38] Option four, we looked at converting the entire area in front of Looking
[18:44] Glass Realy, again, the bike shop, the salon into an 82 foot approximate
[18:50] loading zone. This would be uh more than suitable for the mini tractor trailer.
[18:56] And it would move the ADA space that's currently in front of Looking Glass
[19:01] Realy across the street and would add a ramp with that parking space. It's very
[19:07] likely that [cough] [clears throat] currently two parking
[19:10] spaces here that may result in the loss of a parking space, an extra parking
[19:16] space. If we do that, we really need to just get out there and place it. Make
[19:19] sure we have adequate sight lines in and out of the driveways on both sides of
[19:24] looking glass motors. You can see there's a driveway on each end. So in
[19:29] this scenario, if we assume that we maintain the parking space, the two
[19:34] parking spaces here in front of Eldridge Motors, there would be a loss of the
[19:39] three parking spaces on this side of the road in front of Looking Glass Realy.
[19:45] Another option we looked at is what we call option 4A.
[19:50] Option 4A again has an 82 foot loading zone from Looking Glass Realy down in
[19:55] front of the salon and bike shop. It leaves the spaces in front of Eldridge
[20:00] Motors alone, but it converts the last space on Jordan Street into an ADA
[20:06] space. This space, in my opinion, is uh very well suited for an ADA space
[20:12] because it's very flat, very centrally located, has easy access to the
[20:16] crosswalk, but it is, however, a lot further distance from the headline
[20:21] salon, which the current space is uh we believe that's probably the primary
[20:26] user. The next scenario we looked at, we'll
[20:31] call it option five. Option five converts the spaces in front
[20:38] of Looking Glass Realy to a smaller loading zone, a 60-foot loading zone,
[20:42] which would allow us to maintain one parking space and it moves the ADA space
[20:48] across the street. The downside to this scenario is the mini tractor trailer is
[20:55] 64 feet from the front of the truck to the end of the loading ramp plus the
[20:59] workspace. So the 69 ft would push the driver of that truck and unless he
[21:05] pulled all the way up into this parking space, it would push his unloading
[21:10] activities into the intersection, probably blocking access to Jordan
[21:15] Street. It does maintain one additional parking
[21:20] space here. So you have a loss of two parking spaces with this particular
[21:23] scenario.
[21:26] Option 5A does the identical thing but preserves the spaces in front of
[21:31] Eldridge Motors and moves the ADA space up at the end of Jordan Street. We do
[21:38] have concerns that I'm going to go back an option. If the ADA space in any of
[21:42] these scenarios is placed on this other side of the road, we are potentially um
[21:48] this is kind of true in any case because we don't know where folks are going, but
[21:51] if it was someone that was a client of the hair salon, they are going to have
[21:54] to cross the road and back up. The majority,
[21:59] it's hard to say majority of the businesses are on the other side of
[22:03] broad, but in this particular area, there are probably more businesses on
[22:07] the other side of broad.
[22:12] Option six that we looked at creates a 55- ft loading zone moves the
[22:19] ADA space to the end of this range. The 55 ft loading zone again has the
[22:25] same issue of not being able to accommodate the mini tractor trailer,
[22:28] but it would easily accommodate one or two box trucks. It also puts the
[22:34] accessible parking space in an ideal location for folks at the salon and it
[22:40] maintains it if nothing else on that side of the road.
[22:49] That's the options that we reviewed. The heart of Bvard brought a another idea to
[22:54] the table. [snorts]
[22:58] While I don't have that exact proposal laid out, I do have the dimensions of
[23:03] that area that we can look at.
[23:10] Me just a second here. I'll try to make this a little bigger. We can see it
[23:12] better.
[23:35] Okay. So, in this particular scenario,
[23:40] I've just laid some dimensions out here, but what you currently have on East
[23:44] Jordan Street, so let me orient us again. This is East Jordan Street. This
[23:47] is Broad. This is Coyote's right here on the corner.
[23:52] What you presently have in this location are three parallel parking spaces that
[23:57] kind of run the length of the building. They start down here where this driveway
[24:03] entrance goes in. They start 11 ft up from that and you have three parking
[24:08] spaces that move up 32 foot from the corner approximately. I
[24:15] just measured off the uh traffic signal pole. There is a fire department
[24:21] connection onto the building. There's also a fire alarm control panel access
[24:26] door into the building that we definitely would not want to block the
[24:30] fire department connection, but we also probably would not want to block the
[24:34] door as well. Here's a photo where you can see the
[24:40] this is the fire department connection here. And I believe I've got another
[24:44] photo that shows the door.
[24:54] So, here you can see the fire department connection and the door. Another issue
[24:59] of concern with East Jordan Street is that it does have two lanes as you exit.
[25:05] So, it's got one lane if you're turning straight or if you're going straight or
[25:09] turning left and it has another lane if you're turning right. when they recently
[25:14] repaved the signal control loops for that traffic light were brought a lot
[25:20] further down the street on Jordan. I'm not exactly sure why that is. I suspect
[25:25] it has to do with the stacking count for the light to change. So, this really
[25:30] pushes the usable space a lot further down East Jordan Street, especially if
[25:36] you want to give cars space to drive around any potential loading zone that
[25:41] might be there.
[25:45] to get stacked into the traffic count. So those loops come down somewhere in
[25:51] this neighborhood where I'm showing my area arrow right now.
[25:59] Mr. Hooper, is there anything else you would like me to show [clears throat] or
[26:02] review with them? The other um thing we brought up to the committee that they uh
[26:07] considered was the fact that the downtown master plan uh foresees one day
[26:13] East Jordan Street being converted into a road with a bike lane on it and we
[26:19] didn't want to foreclose on that possibility by using that space as a
[26:24] loading zone. And then finally, with the way that the road is oriented, one way
[26:29] going west to access that loading zone, the trucks would have to drive a big
[26:35] loop uh around East Main Street, making that tight right turn off of South Broad
[26:43] onto East Maine, or that conflicted, and when I mean conflicted, I mean a turn
[26:49] that faces a lot of oncoming traffic coming left off of North broad onto East
[26:56] Maine. And so just the traffic situation that it would create by forcing trucks
[27:02] to drive all the way around the block to get pointed in the right direction on
[27:06] that uh potential loading zone was something that we brought up to the
[27:10] committee that they considered when they were making their recommendation.
[27:14] [clears throat]
[27:18] Okay. Anything else, Mr. Manager? No, ma'am.
[27:22] All right. Council, we are looking for a decision tonight. Do I have a motion?
[27:27] Staff is recommending that you approve the recommendations from the downtown
[27:34] master plan committee. Do I have a recommendation to approve those?
[27:40] Do I have a motion? A motion. Okay.
[27:42] Um, a motion that we approve the recommendation from the committee um at
[27:47] this past meeting. Do I have a second?
[27:50] Second. Okay. We'll open it for discussion. Miss
[27:53] Holder. Um I'm co-chairperson of that committee
[27:59] and um we did not take lightly what needed to happen to
[28:07] uh not hurt businesses that would may be affected by parking a truck there. But
[28:12] we know that loading zones are necessary. And so the idea to take it
[28:16] across the street was a a good one. and I felt like the best option and I'm glad
[28:22] that we were able to come to where we are now to this point to move forward.
[28:28] Mr. Mororrow, it seems like we found consensus as well
[28:33] and that's always good. [clears throat] Mr. Weiss.
[28:37] Yeah, I think um someone stated there's no perfect answer to this problem. Um, I
[28:42] think the original plan in front of looking glass was perhaps the easiest
[28:45] for drivers, but um, we I think the impacts outweighed the ease for drivers.
[28:51] And I like this solution in front of coyotes
[28:55] because it also gets the trucks more where they're likely to be needed. So,
[29:00] um, in in light of the not great options, I think this is the best one.
[29:06] And I and I and I also appreciate the downtown master planning committee uh
[29:10] giving this some extra thought. Mr. Baker,
[29:15] yeah, just a couple questions. You mentioned that we heard back from some
[29:20] of the comp logistics companies. Can you just briefly summarize what they what
[29:27] their input was? Um they agreed that putting it down the
[29:32] hill in front of the bank was probably not a great option. And that was
[29:35] something that was discussed at the committee meeting, but uh was put to bed
[29:39] pretty early because of the feedback of the um logistics folks. Uh they also
[29:44] agreed that navigating over to East Jordan Street and the large trucks um
[29:49] would be tough because [clears throat] most of their traffic of course uses
[29:52] broad as the main artery in and out of town. Um, and then they, as I said, also
[29:58] agreed that none of these solutions were great, but that the one that the
[30:02] committee recommended was, as Council Member Weise said, sort of the the least
[30:06] bad of the decisions.
[30:10] And have we had any other conversations with the DOT contractor on their timing,
[30:16] or we're still kind of unsure of when that might actually happen?
[30:20] We suspect it'll happen very soon. We think that they lost a few days due to
[30:25] weather. Um and so their um deadline has been extended by a few days. Uh so I
[30:32] think we're going to get in under the deadline. But as for when they're going
[30:35] to actually be out there and install it, probably within what the next two weeks.
[30:43] [clears throat] They initially indicated they were going
[30:46] to start early this week. So we were really pressed on time. So
[30:50] the weather helped us. So I suspect they'll they're probably delayed on the
[30:54] job they were working on. I suspect they'll start sometime next week if not
[30:59] early the week after is my guess. Okay.
[31:02] And of course they've got the whole, you know, footprint of the entire project to
[31:06] do. And so I don't know what order they're going to do it in, but they
[31:09] might not get to this part for a while because they got to go from the college
[31:13] all the way to the Sunset Motel. Yeah. Well, um, last thing I'll say is
[31:17] just thanks to the staff and the committee for doing some last minute um,
[31:24] rescheduling and spending some more time on this that they probably didn't uh,
[31:29] bargain on. So, uh, I think we've reached a a good consensus and heard
[31:35] from the necessary uh, stakeholders and I'm comfortable with moving forward.
[31:42] Mr. Daniel. Yeah. Uh, this proposal comes to the
[31:46] council with a unanimous vote from the downtown master plan committee and but I
[31:51] would like to state that my vote was made with the intention of moving this
[31:58] uh proposal to city council. Um, and I'd also like to remind the
[32:06] council that the downtown master plan committee was formed to advise us on the
[32:13] implementation of the downtown master plan. An issue that is politically
[32:19] fraught as downtown parking should ultimately be the sole responsibility of
[32:25] this council. And indeed, that's what this vote tonight will do.
[32:31] The issue I have with this proposal is that it's essentially what's in place
[32:36] now. Uh it's the same proposal that the downtown master plan uh made uh
[32:44] previously and was implemented and um it obviously it doesn't work. Uh, I have a
[32:52] video on my phone uh from a week ago, a little more over a week ago, of a
[32:58] tractor trailer parked on East Jordan uh unloading
[33:03] and the uh loading zone in front of coyotes was empty. They had the option
[33:10] to park there and they did not. Um, and I [clears throat] realize that where
[33:16] to place these loading zones is a difficult decision,
[33:21] but staff's proposal, original proposal, which I believe is the most practical uh
[33:27] location has craw caused great concern with the
[33:30] merchants affected by that location. [clears throat]
[33:34] And although I understand why these folks feel as they do, I truly believe
[33:40] that their concerns are largely misplaced.
[33:46] Though it would be much easier for me personally to go along to get along on
[33:52] an issue beset with peril on all sides and an issue that can easily be
[33:58] rectified if it's later determined that it needs to be. So, um, I was not going
[34:04] to be able to support this. All right. All right. Is there any
[34:10] further discussion? All right. Then I have a motion and a
[34:15] second. I will call for a vote. All in favor?
[34:17] I. Opposed?
[34:19] I. Okay. Four eyes, one nay. Eyes have it.
[34:23] Motion passes. All right.
[34:27] That was the only item on our agenda. And with that, I just need a motion to
[34:36] adjurnn. So move.
[34:37] Second. All in favor?
[34:39] I. We are adjourned. Thank you.
[34:44] All right.