Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:01]
This webinar is being recorded. So we
[0:04]
will next move to our introductions and
[0:08]
welcoming remarks. So I will turn it
[0:10]
over to Fred.
[0:14]
» Oh, unmute yourself real quick, Fred.
[0:19]
» Thank you. Uh thank you very much,
[0:21]
Paige. Uh welcome everyone. My name is
[0:25]
uh Fred Bon. Um just a little bit of an
[0:28]
update for you. Since we last spoke, um
[0:32]
I've accepted sort of a new role with uh
[0:34]
New York State Parks. Uh about three
[0:37]
weeks ago, Commissioner Moer named me as
[0:40]
acting deputy commissioner for
[0:42]
operations.
[0:44]
Going to continue with this project. Uh
[0:45]
tonight's a big night, so I didn't want
[0:47]
to let go of this project in this new
[0:49]
role. So uh um I'll just kick it over to
[0:54]
Kathy in a in a second. Kathy has been
[0:56]
named as the acting regional director
[0:58]
for the Fingerlake State Park System. So
[1:01]
Kathy, would you please be kind and
[1:02]
introduce yourself?
[1:05]
» Hello everyone. My name is Kathy
[1:06]
Nordfanzo and I am the acting regional
[1:09]
director for the Fingerlakes region.
[1:11]
Thank you.
[1:13]
» Uh James
[1:15]
uh good evening everybody. Um my name is
[1:18]
James Jeffrey. I'm the park manager for
[1:19]
Harriet Hollister uh the Honeyway Boat
[1:22]
Launch and Stony Brook State Park. and
[1:24]
uh I'm happy to be with you tonight. Uh
[1:26]
I'll take it over to Zach.
[1:30]
» Good evening everybody. I'm Zach
[1:31]
Ballard. I'm the Fingerlakes Regional
[1:33]
Trail Coordinator. Uh and I will kick
[1:37]
that over to Charlie or to Elena, I'm
[1:39]
sorry.
[1:40]
» Yes. Hello. I'm Elena Burns. I'm the
[1:43]
assistant district manager of
[1:45]
environmental stewardship in the
[1:47]
Fingerlakes. So I'll kick it over to
[1:49]
Charlie.
[1:51]
» Hi everyone. My name is Charlie Apaleo,
[1:53]
Fingerlakes Regional Biologist, and I'll
[1:56]
kick it over to Lindsay.
[1:59]
» Hi, I'm Lindseay Donroski. I'm an
[2:01]
environmental analyst covering the
[2:03]
Fingerlakes and Central Region, and I
[2:05]
complete environmental reviews.
[2:08]
» All right, thank you every
[2:10]
» Oh, Paige. Yes,
[2:13]
» The voice, the technology for the
[2:15]
evening. I am Paige Barnum. I uh lead
[2:18]
the planning section. Our group is based
[2:19]
in Albany. we cover statewide. And we
[2:22]
also have joining us on the call uh
[2:24]
Chris Morris. I'll give you the mic for
[2:26]
a second, Chris Morris.
[2:31]
» Sure. Thank you. Just want to unmute
[2:33]
myself. Um Chris Morris, I'm the
[2:35]
planner. Uh work with Paige in our
[2:38]
Albany office and uh
[2:41]
cover trails statewide um and work with
[2:45]
Zach and others in the regions quite
[2:47]
frequently. Thanks.
[2:49]
Thanks, Chris.
[2:50]
» Excellent.
[2:51]
» Thank Thank you, everyone. Thank you,
[2:52]
team parks. Um, so a couple of thoughts
[2:56]
as we we get going. I just want to
[2:58]
remind everybody sort of the the purpose
[3:01]
and the goals uh around uh this project.
[3:05]
Um, and I just want to say I'm
[3:07]
incredibly proud of uh the state parks
[3:10]
team that assembled around this review
[3:12]
of the trail system at Harriet Hollister
[3:15]
Spencer. Um it has been a a good amount
[3:19]
of work. It has been thorough work. It
[3:21]
has been uh processing a lot of your
[3:24]
feedback and input. Um it's been using
[3:27]
signs to do evaluation of the park
[3:30]
infrastructure
[3:32]
uh the natural areas of the park. So
[3:33]
it's a been a really thorough
[3:35]
comprehensive comprehensive review. And
[3:39]
I'll go back to the original reason for
[3:41]
for doing this and remind people that
[3:43]
what we have at Harriet Hollister or
[3:46]
what we had at Harriet Hollister and
[3:48]
we're we're we're presenting to to
[3:50]
tonight. Harriet Hollister had an awful
[3:53]
lot of recreational trails that were not
[3:57]
authorized recreational trails. A number
[3:59]
of a number of folks had uh uh created
[4:03]
their own trail systems. Not all trails
[4:05]
were marked. We ran into a public safety
[4:08]
concern where first responders were
[4:11]
having difficulty understanding where
[4:13]
they were in the park, where injured
[4:15]
individuals were in the park. And so we
[4:18]
wanted to take a step back and do a sort
[4:20]
of a comprehensive overview of the
[4:22]
existing trail structures, see which
[4:24]
ones made sense and which activities uh
[4:28]
made sense on that that trail system. So
[4:30]
really focusing in first and foremost on
[4:33]
safety. That's core to our mission.
[4:36]
Um we wanted to eliminate the
[4:38]
redundancies within the trail system uh
[4:41]
to manage those trail systems better to
[4:43]
to make them uh uh available for
[4:46]
generations to come and respect uh the
[4:48]
the natural area that we have. Um
[4:52]
improving environmental stewardship and
[4:54]
and protecting the resource. One of the
[4:56]
things that we that came about from this
[4:58]
is that Harriet Hollister is an
[5:00]
incredibly special special uh natural
[5:03]
area and Elena and the biologists will
[5:06]
get into that in a little bit, but we
[5:07]
discovered things about this piece of
[5:09]
property that we had not known prior to
[5:11]
this project. And then we needed to take
[5:14]
a look at whether it would be possible
[5:17]
to uh allow for equestrian use based on
[5:20]
on requests that we had received. Um,
[5:24]
and I'll just be clear at the get-go
[5:26]
here, after considerable uh evaluation,
[5:30]
taking a look at what that activity
[5:31]
represents, taking a look at feedback
[5:34]
from other user groups, uh we have
[5:36]
determined that that is not a compatible
[5:39]
use uh within the Harriet Hollister
[5:42]
property. It's never been allowed within
[5:43]
the property and after taking a deep
[5:46]
look into possible ways to try and
[5:48]
incorporate it uh due to the the the
[5:51]
challenging natural areas and park
[5:53]
infrastructure uh we have determined
[5:55]
that it is not possible to allow
[5:58]
equestrian use uh at Harriet Hollister.
[6:01]
Okay. Um so uh let's go to slide six and
[6:09]
we'll talk about sort of just the
[6:11]
overview of the property.
[6:17]
So what we're looking at is and you're
[6:20]
major users of the property currently uh
[6:23]
the property is uh just a little over uh
[6:26]
1500 acres uh as of July. We have a
[6:30]
significant acquisition, another 117
[6:33]
acres that's in the queue that we're
[6:35]
working on the Fingerlakes, a very
[6:37]
special piece of property uh that faces
[6:41]
Hanoi uh uh lake. Um and it is a
[6:45]
fourseason facility. This park operates
[6:48]
uh all 12 months of the year. Uh it has
[6:51]
multiple activities, winter activities,
[6:54]
uh hiking, snowshoeing, mountain biking,
[6:58]
birding, uh uh cross-country skiing,
[7:01]
snowmmoiling. It's a really uh
[7:03]
incredibly valuable uh recreational
[7:07]
asset to the state park system. Okay.
[7:10]
So, that was not lost on us and we
[7:12]
really spent a lot of time uh getting
[7:14]
feedback from all of those user groups
[7:16]
and that's what we've used to guide our
[7:19]
uh our plan moving forward. Okay.
[7:34]
All right. Thanks, Fred.
[7:36]
I think I'll take it from here unless
[7:38]
there's anything you want to add to this
[7:39]
last slide here.
[7:42]
» No, you know, and again, no changes to
[7:45]
the current recreational usage uh
[7:47]
equestrian usage will not be allowed uh
[7:49]
on the property. Um just want to make
[7:52]
sure that's uh uh clear for all.
[7:57]
» All right. Thanks, Fred. So, as he
[8:00]
mentioned, you know, we've been along
[8:01]
this ride for a little bit. We last saw
[8:04]
all of you um at town hall back in March
[8:07]
2025. And so what we've got here on the
[8:09]
screen right now is sort of a
[8:10]
color-coded timeline to sort of show you
[8:13]
what's been happening um since last
[8:15]
year. So of course uh green here sort of
[8:17]
represents the the basic planning
[8:19]
activities overview. Um we had our
[8:21]
public comment period because of course
[8:23]
we took uh question and comments and had
[8:25]
sort of a discussion uh town hall then
[8:28]
back in March 25 and ran our public
[8:30]
comment period. Um we'll definitely go
[8:33]
into more detail in the presentation
[8:34]
about what we heard through public
[8:36]
comment and how it really shaped um the
[8:39]
trail plan that we're going to go
[8:40]
through tonight. Um so thank you to
[8:42]
everyone that participated. I believe we
[8:44]
had um over 110 um between individuals
[8:47]
and organizations participating. So um
[8:50]
wonderful engagement and we really
[8:51]
appreciate your feedback because it
[8:53]
absolutely impacted the outcomes from
[8:55]
this project. Then we get into spring
[8:57]
and summer of last year, parsing through
[9:00]
all those comments, having team
[9:01]
meetings, talking about the different
[9:03]
insights and perspectives that you all
[9:05]
had to offer. Here in orange, we've got
[9:08]
uh our trails group and sort of what
[9:10]
they've been up to in the past year.
[9:12]
They've installed trial counters and did
[9:14]
some data gathering. They did in-person
[9:17]
surveys and parking lot observation.
[9:19]
Perhaps some of you ran into them out on
[9:20]
the site. Um they were doing that work
[9:22]
through spring into early last fall. And
[9:25]
of course they were doing more GIS sort
[9:28]
of like ground truthing and trail
[9:29]
condition studies um throughout the year
[9:32]
because as I'm sure you all know there's
[9:34]
a very different environment at Harriet
[9:35]
Hollister in the winter than there is
[9:36]
the spring versus the summer. And
[9:39]
finally here we have our stewardship our
[9:41]
environmental group in the sort of
[9:43]
purple grape colored um timeline at the
[9:47]
bottom. You'll hear a lot about vernal
[9:49]
pools later and the great assessment
[9:52]
that went into that that really
[9:53]
influences again um the changes to the
[9:56]
trail network that we're going to see.
[9:58]
Um I'm not going to go too in depth on
[10:00]
this as um we've got some great
[10:01]
biologists on the call who will give you
[10:03]
a little bit more detail about the work
[10:05]
they've been up to, but some more plant
[10:07]
surveys, invasive species research.
[10:11]
Uh we have vegetation studies again,
[10:15]
invasive species treatment and of course
[10:18]
um year round all of our respective
[10:19]
disciplines are working on trail
[10:22]
restoration initiatives tackling
[10:24]
invasive species. So that's sort of a
[10:27]
broad overview and now I'm going to kick
[10:29]
it over to our park manager James who
[10:32]
will um talk again about sort of you
[10:35]
know from the outset we really wanted to
[10:37]
address safety and operational concerns.
[10:39]
So, I will turn it over to James.
[10:42]
» Hi everybody. Thank you. Um, if you
[10:45]
weren't here for our last meeting, uh,
[10:47]
my name is James. I'm in charge of
[10:48]
operating and the maintenance at the
[10:50]
facility and just the daily operations
[10:53]
of what happens there. Uh, when I took
[10:55]
this position in, uh, 2022, I did
[10:58]
realize that there were some challenges
[10:59]
with the trail system that currently
[11:01]
existed. Um, it was a little bit complex
[11:04]
and it kind of lacked the appropriate
[11:06]
wayfinding market. Um there are a lot of
[11:08]
trails that weren't blazed in any way.
[11:11]
Um you know the published map that we
[11:13]
had line online did not align with what
[11:16]
was in the field. So there might be a
[11:18]
trail that you see on the map and then
[11:20]
you'll be somewhere completely
[11:21]
different. Um and the existing
[11:23]
infrastructure made it really hard for
[11:25]
me to prioritize, you know, where my
[11:27]
crews go. Say there's storm damage or
[11:29]
hazardous trees. Which trails are the
[11:31]
most used? What's more important? Uh,
[11:33]
and then finally EMS reached out to me
[11:36]
because there was an incident on the
[11:38]
property. They were looking for somebody
[11:40]
and they said, "Please do something
[11:41]
about the facility. We had a really hard
[11:43]
time finding this individual." And I
[11:45]
said, "Of course, I'll work on that."
[11:47]
Uh, but me, I wasn't exactly sure how to
[11:49]
do that right away. So, I have reached
[11:51]
out to the, you know, everybody on the
[11:52]
team here to, uh, try to put a plan
[11:55]
forward. Um, and I think what we have
[11:58]
developed between everybody really
[12:00]
alleviates a lot of these issues. Um,
[12:03]
but to get there, we had to collect a
[12:05]
whole bunch of data uh and find out
[12:07]
things about the facility that we needed
[12:09]
to know. Um, I'm going to kick it over
[12:11]
to Elena to least about the first
[12:14]
environmental process uh of the data
[12:17]
that they found. Thank you.
[12:21]
» Great. Thank you, James.
[12:24]
So, I'd like to provide a brief overview
[12:27]
of Harriet Hollister Spencer. Um the
[12:30]
main parcel is pictured here. You can
[12:32]
see the park boundary in this green
[12:35]
dashed line. Um so this particular map
[12:39]
um denotes the natural communities on
[12:42]
site. So there's several kind of greens
[12:45]
and browns that are lit up in this map.
[12:48]
Uh so the predominant natural community
[12:51]
on this site is the Appalachian oak
[12:53]
hickory forest. Um, and then there's
[12:56]
also Appalachian oak pine forest, which
[12:59]
you can see denoted in sort of a lighter
[13:02]
sandy color in the middle. And to the
[13:05]
south of the park, there's also some
[13:08]
conifer plantations denoted in green,
[13:12]
the light green. And then to the north
[13:14]
and the south, there are hemlock
[13:17]
northern hardwood forests ecosystems.
[13:20]
Those are uh strongly associated with
[13:23]
the riverine systems that eventually
[13:25]
make their way to the Honeyoi inlet. So
[13:29]
just taking a look at this map, you can
[13:31]
see that pretty much the entire uh park
[13:36]
is within a natural state, right? So we
[13:38]
have very limited development at this
[13:40]
park. You can see the parking lot
[13:43]
pictured in a gray coloration and then
[13:46]
the access road, right? So um this is a
[13:50]
prominent example of a large expanse of
[13:52]
contiguous natural habitat in the
[13:55]
overall area. I think it's worth
[13:56]
mentioning that the bordering properties
[13:58]
as well are also predominantly
[14:01]
undeveloped. So you know just a a huge
[14:04]
expanse of undeveloped area. So this
[14:07]
contributes to the ecological
[14:08]
significance of this park. And I think
[14:11]
frankly it's it's why this park is so
[14:13]
well loved because of this this natural
[14:16]
state which is pretty pretty impressive,
[14:18]
pretty neat.
[14:20]
And so the next map that I want to show
[14:24]
highlights significant communities
[14:27]
within the park. So again, we've got our
[14:29]
main parcel pictured here and there's
[14:32]
two two natural communities that light
[14:35]
up as being significant. So this
[14:37]
designation of significant uh this comes
[14:41]
from the natural heritage program. So
[14:43]
this is um a group of expert scientists,
[14:48]
zoologologists, ecologists, botnists.
[14:50]
They do work all over the state mapping
[14:52]
and inventoring
[14:54]
um these natural habitats. And so
[14:57]
habitats that they deem to be rare
[15:00]
within the state or of high quality,
[15:03]
they give this designation of
[15:05]
significant. So the two natural
[15:08]
communities that we have within the park
[15:10]
boundaries are the oak hickory and the
[15:12]
oak pine forest um which we saw in the
[15:15]
previous map. I also want to note just
[15:18]
across route 36 here we've got uh the
[15:21]
honeyo inlet uh wetland complex which is
[15:24]
also denoted as a significant natural
[15:26]
community. So again just a really
[15:29]
predominant example of highquality
[15:31]
intact natural communities at this site.
[15:35]
And so another important ecological
[15:38]
aspect of the park is the habitat value
[15:41]
for birds. So um Harriet Hollister
[15:44]
Spencer is within a designated important
[15:47]
breeding area or an IBA.
[15:50]
And so this IBA is designated as a state
[15:53]
priority for important habitats for the
[15:56]
conservation of bird populations. Right?
[15:57]
So it's recognized as being a
[15:59]
significant place for birds to survive
[16:01]
and thrive within the state. Um and one
[16:04]
of the key habitats that defines this
[16:06]
IBA is forested habitats, right? Which
[16:09]
we can see pretty clearly from this map.
[16:13]
And so we've we've talked broadly about
[16:16]
about the eco or the ecological
[16:18]
importance of this site. Um we do want
[16:21]
to take a deep dive into a specific
[16:24]
unique habitat type within the park. Um,
[16:27]
so one feature that makes this site so
[16:30]
special ecologically is the presence of
[16:32]
a large vernal pool complex. And like
[16:36]
Fred mentioned, we have learned a lot
[16:38]
over the past couple years from
[16:40]
extensive survey work and study. And
[16:44]
we'll be presenting some of our findings
[16:46]
tonight. So I will hand it over to
[16:48]
Charlie Epelo, the biologist who
[16:50]
oversees the project to discuss our
[16:53]
findings.
[16:56]
Thank you, Elena. Appreciate it. Um, but
[16:58]
yeah, so Harriet Hollister and the
[17:01]
forest around it are full of small
[17:03]
temporary wetlands called vernal pools.
[17:05]
Um, some of you may have walked right
[17:08]
past some of them without even knowing
[17:09]
it while walking the trails at Harriet
[17:12]
Hollister. Um, but basically a vernal
[17:14]
pool is pretty much just a a little
[17:17]
seasonal wetland. Um they fill up with s
[17:20]
snow melt and uh rain in the spring and
[17:23]
then they dry up over the summer as uh
[17:25]
the temperatures kind of warm up. Um
[17:28]
they typic they're typically very small
[17:30]
and shallow. Um and they're
[17:32]
geographically discreet, meaning they
[17:36]
there's no continuous surface connecting
[17:38]
them to a stream or a lake or any other
[17:41]
permanent water source. They're just
[17:42]
kind of on their own. Um, and because
[17:45]
they dry out every year, uh, they can
[17:47]
hold they can't hold permanent fish,
[17:49]
which is what makes these vernal pools
[17:51]
quite unique, um, and why they're so
[17:54]
important. So, frogs and salamanders and
[17:56]
nudes and a lot of a lot of
[17:57]
invertebrates are high highly vulnerable
[18:00]
to fish, and fish obviously need water
[18:02]
year round. So, a pool that disappears
[18:04]
every summer uh, ends up being one of
[18:06]
the most safest places or the most
[18:09]
safest place. um a lot of these uh
[18:11]
forest uh amphibians uh can lay where
[18:14]
they can lay eggs. Um and then so in
[18:17]
this particular slide here, the first
[18:19]
the top two photos show what uh Harriet
[18:23]
Hollister typically looks like in the
[18:24]
spring. You have full pools and then at
[18:27]
the bottom the bottom two photos here
[18:29]
are um of what it looks like in July
[18:32]
completely dried up. So we're good to go
[18:35]
to the next slide. Um so why do we care?
[18:39]
So, there's three reasons. Uh, first,
[18:41]
they're critical breeding habitat for
[18:43]
amphibians. Um, for a lot of species,
[18:46]
this isn't a preference. It's the only
[18:48]
place they can, uh, reproduce. Um, which
[18:51]
is super important. So, and second, uh,
[18:53]
is the diversity. It's not just for
[18:55]
frogs and salamanders. Um, there's a
[18:57]
whole range of different species that
[18:59]
use these pools for shelter, um, for
[19:01]
food, for habitat, um, and for their
[19:03]
size. They're some of the richest spots
[19:06]
in the forest floristically and just
[19:09]
with uh many different species utilizing
[19:11]
them. And then third, um they do a lot
[19:14]
of work for us. So they recharge
[19:16]
groundwater. They help um with flood
[19:19]
control and improve water quality. And
[19:21]
so when you put all of these different
[19:23]
things together, uh you get all of these
[19:26]
different characters and uh it qualifies
[19:28]
as a pretty significant a very
[19:30]
significant community. um uh relative
[19:34]
hot spots for diversity, niche habitat
[19:37]
you don't really find anywhere else. Um
[19:39]
pretty pretty sparse throughout the
[19:41]
state honestly. And um integral breeding
[19:43]
for amphibians is is exactly why we put
[19:47]
this these are the reasons why we put
[19:48]
two years of survey work into
[19:51]
understanding uh what we have here. So
[19:54]
we're good to go to the next slide. Um
[19:56]
and so using grant funding, survey work
[19:59]
ran across the springs of 2025 and 2026.
[20:03]
Um we started mapping, walking through
[20:07]
the property, surveying and locating uh
[20:09]
every pool we could find. Um then egg
[20:13]
mass counts. So our staff counted egg
[20:15]
masses and identified them down to
[20:17]
species. That answers two things things.
[20:20]
Um which species are actually using
[20:22]
these pools and how productive each pool
[20:25]
is. uh for productivity we used the
[20:28]
DEEC's criteria which accounts for the
[20:31]
species present in um and the number of
[20:34]
egg masses that we observed um that were
[20:37]
observed in each pool. Um uh we also
[20:40]
took physical measurements. So maximum
[20:43]
depth uh how long the pool holds water,
[20:46]
the pH, um all these things uh give us a
[20:50]
structure and chemistry of each pool and
[20:52]
that's how we kind of start to
[20:54]
understand what these plants and animals
[20:56]
actually need here at Harry Hollister
[20:59]
specifically. Um and we documented uh
[21:02]
plant communities uh in and around every
[21:04]
pool along with invasive species we came
[21:06]
across. We're good to go to the next
[21:08]
slide.
[21:10]
So, yeah. Um, so what we found, here's
[21:12]
what we found. Um, on a on mapping,
[21:16]
there's significant complex of vernal
[21:18]
pools spread across this property and we
[21:21]
now have a solid picture of where we are
[21:24]
and how they're distributed. Um, our
[21:26]
colleagues at Natural Heritage Program
[21:28]
came out to help with us with that
[21:30]
effort as well. Um, but on egg masses,
[21:33]
we detected eight species using these
[21:35]
pools. In 2025, 58 pools had eggs and 40
[21:39]
of those met uh DEEC's criteria for uh
[21:43]
productive pool. And then in 2026, 65 uh
[21:47]
pools had eggs and uh 55 were deemed
[21:51]
productive. Um so over the two years,
[21:54]
about 60% of every pool we documented
[21:57]
had egg masses in it, which is a is very
[22:00]
high. It's a very productive site. Um,
[22:03]
these pools are integral to how local
[22:05]
amphibians reproduce and uh the species
[22:08]
we're seeing do well uh with the
[22:11]
elevation here and the relatively low
[22:14]
disturbance uh throughout the site as
[22:17]
well.
[22:18]
Um the physical measurements are still
[22:20]
being analyzed uh because conditions
[22:22]
vary a lot from from pool to pool. But
[22:25]
um in 2025 data points in uh the the
[22:29]
data points in a consist consistent
[22:31]
direction. Um the pools do best uh the
[22:34]
pools that are doing best are deeper um
[22:37]
and they hold longer. They're they're
[22:39]
relatively undisturbed. Um and uh the
[22:43]
plant data told a similar story. A lot
[22:45]
of our pools have plant communities
[22:47]
diverse enough to meet uh the standard
[22:49]
for significant floral quality.
[22:52]
Um, and this is where kind of everything
[22:55]
comes together. So, our highest scoring
[22:57]
pools um are way out into the forest,
[23:00]
well away from any trail. Um, and our
[23:03]
lowest scoring pool sits right next uh
[23:06]
right next to the parking lot um where
[23:09]
there's typically a lot of disturbance.
[23:11]
Um, every one of six uh lowest scoring
[23:14]
pools on on this property is uh directly
[23:18]
next to a trail or a parking lot. Um and
[23:21]
that pattern is across the the whole
[23:25]
data set. Um the pools farthest from
[23:27]
disturbance have high the highest
[23:29]
ecological diversity and the lowest
[23:32]
occurrence of invasives. And then the
[23:33]
pools closest to the trails have the
[23:35]
lowest diversity and and the most
[23:38]
invasives, which is what makes the
[23:40]
conserving these communities so
[23:42]
important, especially in areas where
[23:44]
invasive encroachment is most likely.
[23:48]
But um yeah, I'll kick it back to Elena.
[23:54]
» Great. Thank you, Charlie. And yes, big
[23:58]
thank you to Charlie and his team, Abby
[24:01]
Welch, who's sitting next to me right
[24:03]
now. This was a tremendous survey
[24:05]
effort, two-year survey effort. We now
[24:08]
have a solid understanding of the
[24:10]
ecological significance of this site.
[24:13]
So, this is a critical breeding habitat
[24:16]
for amphibians. Um, so one of the
[24:18]
biggest threats facing amphibians today
[24:21]
is habitat loss and habitat degradation.
[24:25]
Um, and as you can see from these
[24:27]
photos, some of the existing trails are
[24:30]
directly next to or cutting right
[24:32]
through vernal pools. And I recall
[24:34]
someone mentioning in the previous
[24:36]
public meeting that yes, like they they
[24:39]
saw tadpoles like within the proximity
[24:42]
of of that trail system. So um this this
[24:46]
creates impacts uh to the species
[24:48]
themselves you know from direct
[24:50]
mortality getting crushed um but it also
[24:53]
impacts the breeding habitat. So it
[24:56]
causes issues with water quality, soil
[24:59]
compaction and trampling vegetation.
[25:02]
So, as Charlie mentioned, our data
[25:04]
suggests that there's lower ecological
[25:07]
diversity in vernal pools that are
[25:09]
closer to trails and higher incidence of
[25:12]
invasive species from that disturbance.
[25:14]
So, that makes sense. Um, so overall,
[25:20]
um, the site has low incidence of
[25:22]
invasive species.
[25:25]
However, where invasive species do occur
[25:29]
is predominantly along trails. So you
[25:31]
can see this map pictured here. We've
[25:33]
got the invasive species lit up in this
[25:36]
red color. Um so you can see visually
[25:39]
that invasive species are found along
[25:42]
trails somewhat into the interior. We've
[25:44]
got some larger infestations, these
[25:47]
polygons. Uh but they tend to spread via
[25:50]
trail systems. And so these were all
[25:53]
considerations in the trail planning
[25:56]
process over the past couple years. And
[25:59]
our goal during this this process is to
[26:04]
achieve a balance right between the
[26:06]
recreation and the preservation of this
[26:08]
unique site. So I'll summarize some of
[26:12]
our conclusions from the ecological
[26:14]
assessment on the next slide.
[26:19]
So it turns out that the vernal pool
[26:22]
complex at Harriet Hollis Hollister
[26:25]
Spencer is much larger than we
[26:27]
previously thought. Um
[26:32]
the egg mass surveys over the past two
[26:35]
years revealed that this is a highly
[26:37]
productive site. So we have many many
[26:40]
many amphibians coming using these
[26:43]
pools, breeding in these pools. uh so
[26:45]
much so that this site is now recognized
[26:49]
as one of the most important breeding
[26:50]
habitats in the state for amphibians.
[26:54]
Right? So this is so neat. We have this
[26:56]
incredible ecological feature at this
[26:58]
park, right? And we want to ensure that
[27:01]
we're protecting this sensitive habitat.
[27:04]
So what an excellent opportunity that we
[27:06]
have to do that. And so looking back at
[27:09]
the data, we determined that the trails
[27:12]
likely have a negative impact on these
[27:14]
vernal pools, right? So like Charlie was
[27:17]
mentioning, uh we found that vernal
[27:20]
pools closer to trails have lower
[27:22]
biodiversity and lower productivity,
[27:25]
right? So in other words, uh we found
[27:27]
less native plant species documented
[27:30]
within those pools closer to trails and
[27:33]
parking lots and amphibians. They're not
[27:35]
using those pools as readily. Um, so
[27:38]
we're still assessing whether or not
[27:40]
there are specific features that
[27:42]
amphibians key into when it comes to
[27:44]
selecting the vernal pools for breed for
[27:47]
uh breeding purposes. Um, but that
[27:49]
assessment is still ongoing. Um, and I
[27:52]
want to mention we we worked very
[27:55]
closely with our partners, our
[27:57]
collaborators at natural heritage
[27:59]
program um, on the survey work. They
[28:02]
helped rank the pools. We prioritized
[28:05]
areas so that we could make informed
[28:07]
decisions during this process. Um, so we
[28:10]
really honed in and focused on several
[28:13]
key modifications that would have the
[28:15]
greatest impact towards conserving these
[28:18]
vernal pools and the amphibians that
[28:20]
that depend on these, right? This is
[28:22]
their their breeding habitat. As Charlie
[28:24]
mentioned, it's it's not a choice,
[28:26]
right? These are critical for um these
[28:29]
populations.
[28:31]
And so our goal was very much
[28:33]
missiondriven, right? Achieving that
[28:35]
balance between recreation and
[28:37]
stewardship. Um so to conclude the
[28:41]
stewardship section of the program, uh I
[28:44]
wanted to convey that this site is
[28:46]
special. This site is unique, right?
[28:49]
It's why we're all here. It's why we
[28:51]
love this park. Um, we certainly don't
[28:53]
want our activities and recreation to na
[28:56]
negatively impact this unique habitat um
[28:59]
and the special critters that that
[29:01]
depend on it. And so I'd like to close
[29:04]
this section uh with an invitation and
[29:08]
an opportunity to come out and visit a
[29:11]
vernal pool and learn firsthand about
[29:14]
these unique habitats. So the tentative
[29:18]
date as of now is April 2027. So, this
[29:22]
is the next breeding season for
[29:24]
amphibians. Um, so we'll be working
[29:26]
closely with Paige and James to ensure
[29:30]
this event is publicized. So, please
[29:34]
come out, bring your families, bring
[29:36]
your friends, and we hope to see you out
[29:39]
there. Thank you.
[29:56]
So, uh, again, we're going to go back to
[29:59]
the public feedback that we took. Um, we
[30:02]
had our, uh, attendance in person
[30:05]
meeting back, uh, in March, a little
[30:08]
over a year ago. Uh in addition to that
[30:11]
we received over 110
[30:14]
uh comments uh submitted from
[30:17]
individuals organizations.
[30:19]
Um, and these comments there's I'm not
[30:23]
going to go through the whole entire
[30:25]
slide, but it was a very very robust and
[30:29]
comprehensive and diverse group of uh
[30:32]
audience that uh that weighed in on uh
[30:35]
what they valued uh with Harriet
[30:38]
Hollister. Okay. So, I do want to make
[30:41]
it clear that we received great public
[30:44]
comment and that was all taken into
[30:46]
serious consideration as we put our plan
[30:49]
as we put our plan forward.
[30:54]
» Thanks, Fred. I think we'll next go to
[30:58]
Zach who will speak to trails. And I um
[31:03]
think if you go through the
[31:04]
presentation, Zach, for your your
[31:07]
portion of the presentation, um you'll
[31:09]
really emphasize, you know, the the
[31:11]
impact public feedback had on some of
[31:13]
the more trail specific uh decisions.
[31:18]
» Yeah, thanks Paige. Thanks, Fred. Um so
[31:21]
yeah,
[31:23]
we have been working for the past two
[31:25]
years on developing a plan to,
[31:31]
for lack of a better word, simplify the
[31:33]
trail system at Harriet Hollister. Um
[31:37]
we did this through a number of means.
[31:40]
Uh most recently, we we considered your
[31:44]
public feedback after our meeting in
[31:46]
March. Um, as we mentioned in the
[31:48]
beginning of the meeting, we had trail
[31:50]
counters out on the ground to kind of
[31:52]
track usage. Um, we talked to folks in
[31:56]
the parking lot. Um, we did some, you
[31:58]
know, kind of impromptu and and, uh,
[32:01]
informal surveys there. Uh, we looked at
[32:04]
the submissions that that people handed
[32:06]
in after the public meeting and we took
[32:09]
all that to heart. Um, you know, to to
[32:12]
reiterate what James had mentioned at
[32:15]
the top of the meeting, a lot of the
[32:17]
impetus for this was health and safety
[32:20]
issues. Um, kind of a lack of uh
[32:25]
appropriate wayfinding signage. I know a
[32:28]
lot of you are very familiar with the
[32:30]
park and very familiar with the trails.
[32:33]
um as as
[32:35]
you know land managers here, what we
[32:37]
were running into is folks who were
[32:39]
visiting Harriet Hollister um who
[32:41]
weren't as familiar were getting lost uh
[32:44]
and they were they were making it known
[32:46]
to us that they were having a difficult
[32:47]
time uh navigating the trails. Um
[32:52]
we also took into consideration
[32:54]
uh trail redundancy. So essentially
[32:56]
where we have trails on top of trails,
[33:00]
uh trails that run parallel to one
[33:02]
another, um trails that are getting
[33:05]
used, trails that aren't getting used,
[33:07]
and trying to focus in on what we can do
[33:09]
to simplify this map, simplify the
[33:12]
trails on the ground, so we as a an
[33:15]
agency can direct our attention and and
[33:18]
maintain the trail system to the best of
[33:20]
our ability.
[33:23]
um and also make it safe for for
[33:25]
everybody who is here using the park. Um
[33:28]
what you see on this first slide is the
[33:30]
original map that is on your left. Um in
[33:34]
the center was our first proposed draft.
[33:38]
Um
[33:40]
and on the the right is our finalized
[33:43]
map. And so the differences that we're
[33:45]
going to lay out, the differences that
[33:47]
we're going to talk about um are are
[33:50]
things that we close. So we we did
[33:52]
eliminate some trails. Uh things that we
[33:55]
will retain. Um and a lot of the things
[33:59]
that we are retaining are based directly
[34:02]
on your feedback in the comments that we
[34:04]
got um after our meeting in March and
[34:08]
through surveys we conducted uh over the
[34:10]
past year plus. Um we added additional
[34:15]
trails that we had originally removed.
[34:17]
Uh, and that's a direct response to your
[34:19]
comments. And just overall when I put
[34:22]
this map together and when we developed
[34:24]
this map, the big thing I was trying to
[34:26]
do was to be objective and develop trail
[34:30]
loops and trail systems
[34:34]
um that
[34:36]
are going to be usable that hopefully
[34:39]
maintain the trails that are are
[34:41]
actively being used um
[34:45]
and also aren't having an extreme uh
[34:48]
impact on the stewardship and
[34:50]
environmental concerns um that Elena and
[34:53]
Charlie just discussed. Um so we're
[34:56]
going to zero in on a few changes. Uh so
[34:58]
Paige, if you want, you can advance
[35:00]
slides here.
[35:03]
So this is a little bit uh I'm going to
[35:07]
say it's a little bit hard to see
[35:08]
because we have maps and we have zoomed
[35:11]
in areas on maps. Um, so this first area
[35:15]
is the the blue spruce route uh loop or
[35:17]
the spruce run. This is a good example
[35:20]
of of trails where these were running
[35:23]
directly through a large vernal pool
[35:26]
complex. So after we did that uh draft
[35:30]
proposal map that we presented in March,
[35:33]
we received a lot of data about vernal
[35:37]
pool complexes and how active those
[35:40]
vernal pool complexes are at Harriet
[35:42]
Hollister. So it was in our best
[35:46]
interest and the best interest of the
[35:48]
site to to shutter some of those trails.
[35:52]
So this slide shows the original map
[35:54]
again on the far left, the proposed
[35:57]
draft that we presented in March in the
[35:58]
center and now um the finalized map that
[36:02]
we have on the right. Um so we
[36:05]
eliminated a leg uh of that that loop.
[36:09]
Um and and that was again in response to
[36:12]
the vernal pool um complex that that was
[36:16]
essentially right in the center of of
[36:18]
that that uh western leg of the the red
[36:21]
spruce sloop. So some of the things we
[36:23]
shut down, some of the things we removed
[36:25]
uh were were there uh were taken away
[36:28]
primarily to protect vernal pools um and
[36:31]
environmental concerns. Okay, we can
[36:34]
move to the next slide.
[36:38]
Um, this is another example of of a a
[36:42]
larger trail loop that was was removed
[36:44]
due to vernal pools. This is uh part of
[36:47]
the single track uh loop, the the S6
[36:51]
loop. Um, lot of different names, a lot
[36:54]
of different markers for it. Um, but
[36:56]
this runs into again the the western
[36:59]
side of the park. uh and it was an area
[37:02]
that was uh directly uh in conflict with
[37:05]
with a pretty substantial vernal pool
[37:08]
complex. So um we still tried to
[37:11]
maintain as much of that loop as we
[37:15]
could. Um so just kind of removed an
[37:17]
area that was was going to be in
[37:19]
conflict with those vernal pools.
[37:22]
From a trail maintenance perspective,
[37:24]
vernal pools often indicate an area is
[37:26]
going to be wet, um have a lot of
[37:29]
standing water, uh you know, especially
[37:32]
in the shoulder season. So, you know,
[37:34]
another thing we looked at is is our
[37:36]
ability to to maintain those areas. Um
[37:40]
you know, one of our goals moving
[37:42]
forward now that we've kind of uh
[37:44]
consolidated the trail system in the map
[37:46]
is to to have a more active role in in
[37:50]
improving trails. um and and doing
[37:52]
maintenance on the trail system that
[37:54]
that we we have moving forward.
[37:57]
All right. So, uh we can move ahead to
[37:59]
the next slide.
[38:03]
Uh another example right here. Uh not to
[38:06]
get too too crazy with the vernal pools,
[38:09]
but you can see it on the map. There's a
[38:11]
big blue [laughter] a big big blue body
[38:14]
of water right there. Um this trail
[38:17]
there's a few different alignments that
[38:19]
are are actually on the ground. This
[38:21]
this map really only shows one of them.
[38:24]
Um so this was an area of concern uh due
[38:27]
to vernal pool complexes. And if you
[38:29]
want to jump ahead to the next slide um
[38:31]
we can show how that's changed. Not a
[38:34]
drastic change. This is essentially uh
[38:37]
you can see it. It's kind of faint on
[38:38]
the map on the left on the draft map. We
[38:41]
essentially just eliminated one section
[38:43]
of trail and realigned it to another
[38:45]
section of trail that was I believe
[38:48]
getting used more um you know and and
[38:52]
was an active trail unmapped but still
[38:54]
being used. So you know this is a case
[38:57]
where we we didn't actively remove a
[38:59]
section of trail. We essentially
[39:01]
realigned it to another um another trail
[39:04]
that was unmapped but was still being
[39:07]
used. So this kind of falls into that
[39:09]
category of
[39:11]
trying to protect vernal pool and
[39:13]
environmental assets uh and then trying
[39:15]
to eliminate um trail redundancy and
[39:18]
keeping a trail within that that
[39:21]
vicinity that that is actively getting
[39:24]
used. Um
[39:26]
so all right we can advance to the next
[39:28]
slide.
[39:32]
Change number four. This is uh
[39:36]
this was an interesting spot. Still is
[39:38]
an interesting spot. Um
[39:42]
this was a difficult area because
[39:44]
there's a whole lot of trails in there.
[39:46]
Um this is the original map. Um there's
[39:49]
a lot going on. Um you know, this is a
[39:52]
spot that's heavily used with a lot of
[39:54]
crisscrossing trails, a lot of trails
[39:56]
that run parallel to one another. um
[39:59]
trails that are utilized by everybody
[40:02]
who comes to the park. Um the
[40:04]
unfortunate thing in this area is that
[40:06]
not all of them were used consistently.
[40:09]
Um some of them were mapped and they
[40:11]
appeared to not have been used in who
[40:14]
knows how long, years most likely. Um
[40:18]
and this is one of the areas where
[40:20]
people can be uh real close to the
[40:22]
parking lot, but they can walk in
[40:24]
circles until the end of time and have
[40:26]
no idea where they are. Uh, so this was
[40:28]
a spot we wanted to try to simplify um
[40:33]
if for anything from a a health and
[40:35]
safety perspective to try to make this
[40:37]
area more more navigable for people who
[40:39]
aren't completely familiar with the
[40:41]
park. Um, so as you see here in this
[40:44]
slide, um, our draft map from March, uh,
[40:48]
we simplified this area. Um but then
[40:51]
based on public comments um based on
[40:54]
some feedback on that map uh we we
[40:59]
basically altered the loop so we have a
[41:01]
longer run in that section and maintain
[41:04]
certain aspects and certain trails uh
[41:07]
trail alignments that were getting uh
[41:09]
heavily used um that we had originally
[41:12]
um you know kind of taken off the map in
[41:14]
the the dra uh draft proposal. Um, so
[41:17]
again, not there there are changes, but
[41:20]
not all of them are are significantly
[41:22]
dramatic. Um, you know, a lot of this is
[41:24]
is it's about cleaning up the map more
[41:27]
so than cleaning up a lot of the trails
[41:29]
on the ground. There will be trails that
[41:32]
are shuttered um that that have been
[41:34]
used historically and are continually
[41:36]
being used. Um, but the the majority of
[41:40]
what has been changed is on paper. what
[41:44]
is on the ground is not going to be
[41:46]
significantly off uh altered. As I said,
[41:49]
I did my best to try to maintain
[41:52]
the loops and the longer loops that were
[41:55]
available in the park, trying to create
[41:58]
uh continuity
[41:59]
um within the trail systems uh that we
[42:02]
have as as much as I can and at the same
[42:05]
time um doing our best to to really uh
[42:10]
respect those environmental concerns uh
[42:12]
that that were brought up over the past
[42:14]
year.
[42:16]
All right. If you'd like, we can uh we
[42:18]
can advance forward.
[42:22]
Then on the bottom, this is another
[42:24]
thing. After evaluating public comments,
[42:26]
uh this map shows an area where there is
[42:30]
a a trail. It is a trail that gets used.
[42:32]
We all know it gets used. We all know
[42:34]
it's there even though it's not on the
[42:35]
map. Um originally on our draft map, uh
[42:38]
we can jump forward to our next slide.
[42:41]
Um, we had kept that area off the draft
[42:45]
map that's on the left. Um, but after
[42:47]
some public feedback, uh, we decided to
[42:51]
keep,
[42:52]
I think, the, uh, the Rattler. Um, we're
[42:55]
going to keep that one. And, uh, you
[42:58]
know, again, this allows us, it's
[43:01]
institutionalized. It's on the map.
[43:03]
we're going to do um a better job with
[43:05]
getting in there and trying to again
[43:07]
maintain these trails and and you know
[43:10]
keep them up the snuff so it's uh it's a
[43:13]
safe safe trail for for everybody
[43:15]
involved.
[43:17]
All right, we can jump ahead from that
[43:19]
slide
[43:21]
and uh moving forward. Um I think James,
[43:26]
are you taking this one on?
[43:29]
» Yep, that's me.
[43:31]
» Yeah. So, uh, I'll kick this over to
[43:33]
James.
[43:34]
» All right. Thank you, Zach. Uh,
[43:36]
honestly, the the next steps I'm super
[43:38]
excited about. Um, you know, we've got
[43:41]
signage in the facility that would be
[43:43]
upcoming. Uh, currently the kiosk has,
[43:46]
uh, an image of the map that's posted.
[43:49]
Uh, currently all the trails represented
[43:51]
on that map. Uh, Zach and the trails
[43:54]
crew put blazes that match the colors.
[43:56]
So, now that data, uh, reflects what you
[43:59]
see in the field. Um, Zach had mentioned
[44:02]
that some of the decommissioned trails
[44:05]
still exist on site, but when you come
[44:07]
to an intersection with your map, you
[44:09]
would see this trails marked red, that
[44:12]
one has no markings. Uh, and you'd be
[44:15]
able to correlate that with your
[44:16]
directions. Um, during this whole
[44:19]
process, um, I've, you know, I'm a fan
[44:22]
of interpretive signage, just saying
[44:24]
things about plants and animals that
[44:26]
live in the park. Uh, and over the past
[44:28]
couple seasons, there's a lot to say
[44:30]
about this park. Uh, but I've been
[44:32]
hesitant to put any of this material out
[44:34]
before I was confident I had wayfinding
[44:36]
materials out. Uh, so now that we have a
[44:40]
clear direction of the facility, I would
[44:42]
like to see um, you know, signs that say
[44:46]
you are here. If you need help, here's
[44:48]
some information. I'd like to see signs
[44:50]
about salamanders and ferns and all the
[44:52]
uh you know the natural assets in the
[44:55]
park uh so people can learn about these
[44:57]
things um you know in the summer and in
[45:00]
the winter. Uh and as far as trail rehab
[45:05]
in the future uh now that we can
[45:07]
prioritize what trails need what and
[45:10]
what are more important. uh we can
[45:12]
decide, you know, which ones get more
[45:13]
gravel or which ones during a uh storm
[45:17]
event should I have my staff go to first
[45:19]
and make sure is accessible. Um you
[45:22]
know, these are all things that I'm
[45:23]
looking to overall improve the facility
[45:26]
that, you know, I think at the end of
[45:28]
this uh all of the users will enjoy. Uh
[45:31]
so I'm really excited about the future
[45:33]
for the facility. Um, and to talk more
[45:36]
about our next slide is uh Lindsay.
[45:47]
All right, you can probably see and hear
[45:49]
me. Thank you, Jeff. Um, as the plans
[45:51]
come together, um, as with all projects
[45:54]
at state parks, um, the project will
[45:56]
undergo an environmental review of some
[45:59]
kind. um class uh projects or actions um
[46:04]
are typically classified according to
[46:07]
uh criteria within secret regulations.
[46:10]
There's general three types of
[46:12]
classification. A type two action is
[46:15]
already determined not to have a
[46:17]
significant impact on the environment.
[46:19]
An environmental review under SECRA um
[46:22]
is essentially not move forward at that
[46:24]
point. Um
[46:26]
a type one action is the opposite of
[46:28]
that. it's more likely to have a
[46:30]
significant adverse impact on the
[46:32]
environment. And then everything in
[46:33]
between a type two and a type one is an
[46:35]
unlisted action. So that's three
[46:38]
different ways of thinking about um a
[46:40]
project or an action under secret.
[46:43]
And even when an action or a project is
[46:45]
classified as a type two, an
[46:47]
environmental review is still completed.
[46:49]
So there's various aspects um such as
[46:51]
division uh sorry review by the division
[46:54]
of historic preservation um permits that
[46:56]
might be needed depending on what's
[46:58]
proposed um and general alignment with
[47:00]
agency policies or best management
[47:02]
practices that's good to um consider as
[47:05]
we move forward with the project. And so
[47:07]
I just wanted to touch on that and um
[47:10]
pass the presentation back to the next
[47:13]
presenter.
[47:21]
All right, there we go. Unmuted. Hello
[47:23]
again. So, we have reached the end of
[47:25]
our formal presentation, which brings us
[47:28]
to the part I think most of you, now
[47:30]
that we've gone through it, are excited
[47:32]
about. You might have some questions or
[47:34]
comments you'd like to make. I've been
[47:36]
trying to keep track of them um here in
[47:39]
a spreadsheet, and I have them all in
[47:42]
the chat. So, I'm just going to start
[47:44]
working my way.
[47:46]
» Um,
[47:46]
» Paige, let me let me just interject for
[47:48]
one one minute. I've been keeping track
[47:50]
of the comments, too, and and I want to
[47:52]
go back to something and I I forgot to
[47:54]
say this at the get-go, but you know,
[47:56]
the the one of the big things that we
[47:59]
are really hoping to come from this is
[48:02]
that all of the user groups will adopt
[48:04]
the map that we are presenting this
[48:06]
evening. so that we've got one common
[48:09]
map that is available for not only park
[48:12]
staff and user groups but most
[48:15]
importantly for our first responders and
[48:18]
uh in case of we of of emergency
[48:20]
situations. So please please please
[48:24]
stand by the promise you made and let's
[48:27]
all agree that this is the map that
[48:29]
we're going to be using moving forward.
[48:31]
So this is the map for your websites.
[48:33]
This is the map for when you are running
[48:36]
events. Uh this is really important for
[48:40]
us to manage this property in the future
[48:44]
and to make the improvements that uh uh
[48:46]
Zach is is is planning on on doing to
[48:49]
the trails uh so that we're putting our
[48:51]
resources most effectively forward for
[48:54]
the public's benefit.
[48:56]
And I'll also go back to the fact that I
[48:59]
seeing all of the questions and the
[49:01]
comments about uh horseback riding at
[49:04]
the facility. It's important to remember
[49:06]
that that has never been an allowable
[49:09]
activity at Harriet Hollister. It's
[49:12]
taken place. We know that it's taken
[49:14]
place, but uh we were asked to consider
[49:18]
whether it would become an available
[49:21]
activity. And based on our research that
[49:25]
we've shared with you this evening, the
[49:27]
comprehensive research that was done
[49:30]
both on uh natural areas, trail
[49:32]
conditions, what the impact of uh
[49:35]
horseback riding would be in this very
[49:37]
special place. We have determined that
[49:40]
that is not a compatible activity at
[49:42]
Harriet Hollister. Okay. So, I I I
[49:46]
apologize for disappointing our
[49:48]
equestrian friends. Uh but um we will
[49:52]
not be opening up Harry Hollister uh to
[49:55]
horseback riding. It's never been
[49:56]
allowed. It's been resigned as not being
[49:59]
an allowable activity. And uh so uh
[50:03]
we're just we we've got to maintain that
[50:05]
line, I'm afraid. Okay. So uh Paige,
[50:08]
I'll kick it back to you. We can move
[50:10]
into those questions uh that you were
[50:12]
starting to compile.
[50:14]
» Sounds good. And I see that we have two
[50:16]
folks uh with their hands raised. So, I
[50:19]
think uh I'll call on you first. So, uh
[50:23]
I see a hand raised by Chris and I am
[50:27]
going to unmute you and it should pop up
[50:29]
a little prompt on your screen, Chris.
[50:31]
Um allowing you to speak. So, give me
[50:38]
» They tried to shut that down
[50:41]
and um somebody went back to the
[50:44]
original
[50:46]
D transfer or whatever that was where it
[50:49]
gave and it was like
[50:50]
» I remember Ray like whatever and that's
[50:52]
why he was going to be
[50:53]
» Well got the from us for us but it
[50:57]
was
[50:58]
from Harriet Hollister
[51:03]
or it was from the original owners to
[51:05]
Harry or whatever, but it wasn't
[51:10]
to the state
[51:13]
where it would have said
[51:16]
um okay, horseback riding is allowed.
[51:22]
» Thank you, Chris.
[51:33]
All right. Next in our queue, I believe,
[51:35]
is Lindsay Labella. I will be unmuting
[51:38]
your mic.
[51:40]
All right, Lindsay, your mic is live.
[51:44]
» Hi, Brad. I know you were saying that
[51:47]
the horsebacks were never allowed. We
[51:50]
know it happened. I mean, we've been
[51:52]
riding there for eons. Um, we did
[51:56]
respectfully get off of the property per
[51:59]
your request to do this study.
[52:03]
You have yet to actually state what
[52:05]
specifically the horse traffic was doing
[52:09]
that would be worse than the bike or
[52:11]
foot traffic. Can you please explain the
[52:14]
exact reasoning with metrics as to why
[52:17]
horse traffic would be so detrimental?
[52:20]
Sure. So, I'll start and I'll I'll I'll
[52:22]
kick it over to, you know, some of the
[52:24]
other technical experts here, but you
[52:27]
know, horseback riding is uh more
[52:30]
damaging to trail infrastructure,
[52:32]
especially trails that are naturally wet
[52:35]
areas. Uh uh and so as we were doing
[52:38]
that assessment, we looked at the impact
[52:41]
knowing what we do know about horseback
[52:43]
riding activities and other state park
[52:46]
facilities
[52:47]
uh and how that could possibly be
[52:50]
incorporated at Herod Hollister. Uh that
[52:53]
review, the weight of the courses, the
[52:56]
impact on the trail surface, uh that's
[52:59]
what uh allowed us uh to to to make this
[53:01]
determination. And uh uh Chris Morris,
[53:05]
are you are are you on any comment on
[53:07]
that to follow up?
[53:10]
» Yeah, I mean I would agree. I think um
[53:12]
you know some of the items that we
[53:14]
touched on if uh at the original meeting
[53:18]
or you know if we are to include this
[53:22]
activity, right, the conditions that the
[53:24]
trails need to be in for them to be
[53:26]
appropriate for equestrian use, right?
[53:28]
um just because it's a informally um
[53:32]
unauthorized use that occurs
[53:33]
occasionally. You know, if we are
[53:35]
opening up trails to a user group, we
[53:38]
want to make sure that those trails uh
[53:40]
meet the standards that that we need as
[53:43]
parks to to welcome that activity.
[53:45]
Right? So, um I think that's one of the
[53:48]
considerations here is that the soil
[53:50]
conditions, the environmental
[53:51]
conditions, the width of the trails, the
[53:53]
trail networks, um and the existing
[53:56]
allowed uses uh are all uh not
[54:00]
compatible with equestrian use.
[54:04]
I I'm trying to wrap my head around that
[54:07]
because the park has been doing just
[54:10]
fine with the equestrian use that you
[54:12]
can actually expect there already prior
[54:15]
to the one incident that shed light on
[54:17]
this issue.
[54:19]
I mean equestrians are more than happy
[54:21]
to adjust our time, you know, ride there
[54:23]
from July to October when the ponds have
[54:27]
dried up.
[54:29]
We don't have a problem with modifying
[54:32]
our times to go out there to be included
[54:34]
in this so we all can enjoy it and you
[54:37]
can have our support to be able to work
[54:40]
to protect areas like this versus
[54:43]
excluding us.
[54:49]
» Again, I'm I'm standing by my prior
[54:52]
statement. This was not an allowable
[54:54]
activity. This has not been an allowable
[54:56]
activity. And when we take a look at
[54:59]
what an increase in that activity would
[55:03]
represent in the facility should it be
[55:05]
allowed, it was determined that we
[55:07]
cannot maintain our roles of being
[55:11]
stewards to these public lands, these
[55:13]
very special public lands that we've
[55:15]
come to learn about and accommodate the
[55:19]
the the user groups that are also using
[55:21]
it. So, uh we are simply standing by
[55:24]
what was already in place. We're not
[55:26]
making any changes. We're simply
[55:28]
reinforcing what had already been the
[55:31]
standard practice of of use at Harriet
[55:33]
Hollister.
[55:36]
» And just so folks know when I I do a
[55:39]
podcast about this for the area, what is
[55:42]
the ramifications
[55:46]
should somebody go over there and trail
[55:49]
ride?
[55:51]
Well, there there is currently there has
[55:53]
been historically there has been signage
[55:56]
noting that that's not an allowable
[55:58]
activity. Um that signage is regularly
[56:01]
removed. Okay. So that's destruction of
[56:04]
state parks property.
[56:06]
» That's not I'm I'm about I'm about to
[56:09]
finish I'm about to please Lindsay give
[56:11]
me a second here. So we have installed
[56:15]
more permanent signage uh that uh it
[56:18]
would be very difficult. It would be
[56:21]
pretty it would be criminal to destroy
[56:23]
these signs. It is criminal to destroy
[56:25]
these signs. So you risk you risk uh
[56:28]
being warned by park police should they
[56:30]
be on site. Uh and you also risk being
[56:33]
ticketed by park police should they need
[56:35]
the uh the the individual uh to be
[56:38]
non-compliant, non-listing. So there is
[56:41]
a risk of being of receiving
[56:44]
» I'm sorry. Go ahead please. My question
[56:46]
actually is what is that ticket and what
[56:48]
is the cost?
[56:49]
» That's at the that's at the discretion
[56:51]
of park police.
[56:56]
» They just make up a price.
[57:00]
» Well, they issue a ticket and then it
[57:02]
goes to court and the judge determines
[57:04]
that.
[57:07]
» That doesn't seem
[57:10]
lawful. Usually our laws state that you
[57:14]
have there is a consequence for your
[57:17]
actions on paper written. I'm just
[57:20]
curious what that actually is.
[57:27]
» Again, it would be uh uh not allowed use
[57:32]
uh trespass perhaps. There's a number of
[57:34]
of regulations that uh horseback riding
[57:37]
would be in violation of
[57:39]
» The park police would determine.
[57:42]
Go ahead.
[57:45]
» I will deal it. I will talk to my
[57:48]
environmental lawyer since you don't
[57:50]
actually know the answer.
[57:52]
» That's that's fine. Yeah.
[57:57]
» All right. Thanks, Lindsay. I want to
[57:59]
get to while we're on the equestrian
[58:01]
topic, I'll I'll um go back up to our
[58:04]
first question. Just want to sort of
[58:06]
cover the equestrian questions and then
[58:08]
we'll move on to um some of the trail
[58:11]
ones.
[58:12]
So, um comment from Pauline Burns of the
[58:17]
New York State Horse Council.
[58:20]
Equestrians are not allowed access to
[58:22]
Harriet Hollister. um says, "Please
[58:25]
provide a list of other opportunities
[58:26]
where trail riders might have access to
[58:28]
trails on public lands. We keep losing
[58:30]
ground and access to trails." Um so I
[58:34]
don't know if Chris or Fred you want to
[58:35]
sort of comment on a statewide
[58:37]
perspective about some other trail
[58:39]
options.
[58:43]
» Um yeah, I mean I can feel that one.
[58:45]
page. Uh, you know, I don't have a map
[58:47]
in front of me with all of the different
[58:49]
um potential locations, although we did
[58:52]
look at that and to see what was
[58:54]
reasonable distance from Harriet
[58:55]
Hollister for other uh equestrian
[58:58]
destinations. I know for parks
[59:00]
specifically, um, you know, I think the
[59:03]
closest geographically as the crow flies
[59:05]
would be Jennese Valley Greenway, which
[59:07]
uh allows equestrian use. Um, and then
[59:09]
as you go a little bit further out, uh,
[59:11]
I think the next closest places are more
[59:14]
than likely DEEC, um, facilities, uh,
[59:17]
that allow equestrian use. Um,
[59:21]
so I don't have a list off the top of my
[59:23]
head of all the locations nearby that
[59:26]
could allow that use. Um, but it isn't
[59:29]
something that blanket, you know, is is
[59:31]
not allowed. In fact, there's many
[59:32]
places that do allow it both in parks
[59:34]
and DEEC.
[59:36]
» Thanks. And I'll I'll add one comment to
[59:38]
Pauline. I believe on um state parks
[59:41]
website you can go to um a page and
[59:44]
filter by activity and you can specially
[59:46]
select out equestrian use. And I think
[59:49]
it brings up about 20 25 state park
[59:53]
facilities. My memory is not spot on on
[59:55]
that, but definitely check out our
[59:56]
website where you can um filter out by
[59:59]
equestrian use and it'll take you to
[1:00:01]
that park specific website. Um, I see
[1:00:03]
you've got your hand raised, so let me
[1:00:05]
unmute your mic.
[1:00:08]
All right, Pauline, your mic is
[1:00:11]
» Yeah, I had a couple of questions I
[1:00:13]
actually just put in the comment box.
[1:00:15]
One of them was that in March of 2025,
[1:00:18]
there was some discussion about
[1:00:19]
designing a threemile loop for
[1:00:21]
equestrian equestrians and I think that
[1:00:24]
got u hopes up that equestrians would be
[1:00:27]
allowed. Can you explain why that loop
[1:00:30]
um was it ever designed or considered?
[1:00:39]
» Uh go ahead, Zach. I was I was Yeah, I
[1:00:43]
was trying to fill the void. You got it.
[1:00:44]
» Yeah. Yeah, we can we can I can take
[1:00:46]
this on. So So yeah, Pauline, we we did
[1:00:49]
consider that. I mean it was something
[1:00:50]
that uh you know we looked at um
[1:00:54]
pretty pretty heavily. Um and one of the
[1:00:58]
big drivers for this uh and the reason
[1:01:02]
why we didn't go with that loop um is is
[1:01:06]
the loop we set out uh was it conflicted
[1:01:11]
with a lot of these vernal pool areas.
[1:01:14]
um that threemile loop, the initial
[1:01:18]
design for that was to try to balance a
[1:01:22]
longer ride for equestrians at Harriet
[1:01:24]
Hollister without having a lot of
[1:01:27]
significant impact on other trail users
[1:01:31]
essentially
[1:01:33]
to make a long loop that would you know
[1:01:35]
be worth riding and worth the trip to
[1:01:37]
the park um but also not kind of lead to
[1:01:42]
conflicts with other user groups.
[1:01:44]
Um, you know, the elephant in the room
[1:01:46]
right now, I think, is that a lot of the
[1:01:48]
public comments, you know, the
[1:01:51]
overwhelming bulk of public comments,
[1:01:54]
um, requested that we didn't consider
[1:01:57]
equestrian use and that we didn't allow
[1:01:58]
it, that we kept it as an unallowable
[1:02:00]
use in the park. Um, that that guided
[1:02:03]
the decision, but, you know, ultimately
[1:02:05]
it was that balanced with um the
[1:02:08]
environmental concerns that that came to
[1:02:10]
light after our meeting in March. Um so
[1:02:13]
that that drafted horse loop um you know
[1:02:17]
that ran through a lot of the areas that
[1:02:21]
uh that have these vernal pool
[1:02:23]
complexes. Um it also uh are areas of
[1:02:26]
trail sections of trail that we we um
[1:02:29]
have decommissioned on on the finalized
[1:02:32]
map. So, you know, again, we were trying
[1:02:36]
to be as objective as possible, trying
[1:02:38]
to consider every bit of information
[1:02:41]
that we had at our disposal. Um, so
[1:02:46]
yeah, you know, the ultimate decision
[1:02:47]
was to to maintain um, you know, the
[1:02:51]
rule that had had been in place
[1:02:52]
historically.
[1:02:56]
» Thanks, Zach. All right. I know we're at
[1:02:59]
7 o'lock, so I want to keep us moving
[1:03:02]
through questions. So, um, can always
[1:03:04]
return to a topic. Um, but I want to get
[1:03:07]
to some more, uh, trails sort of
[1:03:11]
questions we've got. Uh, Craig asks, "Is
[1:03:14]
there any talk about adding trails
[1:03:16]
further south down by Dutch Hollow
[1:03:18]
Road?"
[1:03:23]
» Uh, I can feel this one again at the
[1:03:26]
moment. Um,
[1:03:29]
no. Uh, we have basically been focusing
[1:03:33]
most of our attention right now on the
[1:03:36]
main parcel. Um, you know, we're trying
[1:03:39]
to devote our efforts there. Um, you
[1:03:43]
know, in the future, it's not to say
[1:03:44]
that that's not a possibility, but as of
[1:03:46]
now, we're kind of keeping that that
[1:03:49]
section of of Harriet Hollister uh as
[1:03:51]
is. um because we we've spent a lot of a
[1:03:56]
lot of our mental capacity um focusing
[1:03:58]
on the main main parcel and James I
[1:04:01]
don't know if you have uh additional uh
[1:04:04]
information on that but
[1:04:09]
you know at the moment you know we've
[1:04:11]
been trying to you know through this
[1:04:13]
whole process we really discovered you
[1:04:15]
know a lot about the facility uh and how
[1:04:18]
sensitive some of these places are um
[1:04:21]
and Many of the people in this room, you
[1:04:23]
know, we're we're advocates for
[1:04:25]
recreation. You know, I I'm here to
[1:04:27]
promote my facilities and say, you know,
[1:04:30]
I these are the amenities I offer.
[1:04:32]
Please come to this park and do these
[1:04:33]
things. Um so, when we're reviewing the
[1:04:37]
equestrian question, um that section of
[1:04:40]
the property that had very little data
[1:04:43]
for it, uh has also ended up having a
[1:04:47]
lot of assets that's good for it. Um so
[1:04:49]
if we were to develop anything in those
[1:04:51]
areas certainly what's sensitive and the
[1:04:55]
reviews of these uh sections would take
[1:04:58]
some time for us to you know process um
[1:05:02]
and I think as far as you know
[1:05:04]
equestrian or any other user you know
[1:05:07]
when we looked at the data and looked at
[1:05:09]
the property you know I have to say you
[1:05:12]
know once we open up the park to a new
[1:05:16]
user group that not had that had not
[1:05:18]
already been allowed. We had to be on
[1:05:21]
the same page that the facility itself
[1:05:23]
could take the impact of now me going
[1:05:26]
online and putting on Facebook, come to
[1:05:28]
my park. These are the activities I
[1:05:30]
provide. And I think once we had all of
[1:05:32]
that data collected with the comments
[1:05:35]
and all the decision-m sort of is what's
[1:05:37]
gearing us is where we can uh you know
[1:05:41]
develop certain areas and where we
[1:05:42]
can't. Um but you never know if more
[1:05:45]
lands are required. There's always
[1:05:47]
things that can happen in the future.
[1:05:48]
You know, I am still trying to, you
[1:05:51]
know, I still would like to invite as
[1:05:53]
many users as I can have that safely can
[1:05:55]
use the property and follow the mission
[1:05:57]
statement of the agency uh for
[1:06:00]
recreation and for protecting the
[1:06:02]
environment. Um, so really, you know,
[1:06:04]
the future's wide open, but at the
[1:06:06]
moment we're focused on this specific
[1:06:08]
topic. I hope that is my long-winded way
[1:06:11]
of answering your question.
[1:06:13]
» Thanks, James. All right, Brian's had
[1:06:16]
his hand patiently up, so Brian, I'm
[1:06:18]
going to unmute your mic.
[1:06:22]
» Thank you, Paige. Um, Brian Warwick,
[1:06:24]
I've been uh
[1:06:26]
» Using the park for about 30 years.
[1:06:28]
» I got to say, I I other than the Bear
[1:06:31]
Pond, which is what we called that
[1:06:33]
vernal pond that the mountain bike trail
[1:06:35]
kind of skirts um toward the uh uh
[1:06:39]
southern edge of it. I didn't know there
[1:06:42]
were that many vernal ponds there. So,
[1:06:44]
uh, congratulations for finding every
[1:06:45]
one of them. Question about, uh, natural
[1:06:49]
heritage and what that might mean for
[1:06:52]
the future uses of the park. Do they
[1:06:54]
play a role, um, in in influencing uh,
[1:06:59]
preservation, stewardship, uh,
[1:07:01]
guidelines and and possibly limiting
[1:07:04]
use?
[1:07:08]
» Yep, I I can take that one. Yeah. So our
[1:07:12]
our partnership with natural heritage
[1:07:15]
program is such that they play an
[1:07:18]
advisory role right. So like we take
[1:07:21]
their input and then we decide as the
[1:07:25]
agency like with with James with Fred
[1:07:29]
with Kathy we decide what's appropriate
[1:07:31]
for the site. Um so they they we
[1:07:35]
collaborated
[1:07:36]
extensively on this particular project
[1:07:39]
just because of the significance of this
[1:07:41]
site. Um but that doesn't necessarily
[1:07:44]
mean that that they will dictate um you
[1:07:47]
know how we decide to interpret the data
[1:07:50]
and and use the site. So as of now I
[1:07:53]
think this concept I mentioned like we
[1:07:56]
we really honed in. So we were like, you
[1:07:59]
know, where are locations where it's
[1:08:01]
absolutely missionritical?
[1:08:03]
You know, trails that are bisecting
[1:08:05]
protective verna pools, like those are
[1:08:07]
the ones we we focused on to to take
[1:08:09]
offline, right? Because that's going to
[1:08:11]
have the biggest ecological impact in
[1:08:14]
terms of of restoration. Um, so removing
[1:08:17]
some of those sections of trails,
[1:08:20]
uh, from our perspective,
[1:08:24]
it it's going to have the biggest
[1:08:25]
impact. So something we didn't talk much
[1:08:27]
about, we talked a lot about the
[1:08:28]
breeding habitat, but so these pools are
[1:08:31]
all all over the park, very close
[1:08:33]
together. So they're a complex,
[1:08:36]
right? And so amphibians,
[1:08:39]
they're hanging out in the upland
[1:08:41]
forest, right? And then in the spring,
[1:08:42]
we call that it's an explosive
[1:08:45]
migration. And I'm sure folks that live
[1:08:46]
in the area, like you see these animals
[1:08:49]
on the roads, like they're they're
[1:08:50]
coming down in droves. There's just
[1:08:52]
thousands. And so they come down to
[1:08:55]
these these pools for their breeding.
[1:08:57]
And so having trails bicting all these
[1:08:59]
vernal pools, that's that's also an
[1:09:01]
impact, right? So they're they're trying
[1:09:03]
to get from their upland habitat to
[1:09:05]
their breeding habitat. So taking
[1:09:07]
certain sections offline, that provides
[1:09:09]
additional connectivity. You know, we're
[1:09:12]
decreasing the impact on the breeding
[1:09:14]
habitat as well. So again, we we we
[1:09:17]
really tried to focus here so that we
[1:09:19]
achieve that balance.
[1:09:23]
Well, it looks very well done so far.
[1:09:25]
What I've seen looks great. U my other
[1:09:27]
two questions are are um trail use wise.
[1:09:30]
Uh in the wintertime, uh the trails have
[1:09:32]
been well groomed for Nordic skiing by
[1:09:35]
the Rochester Cross Country Ski
[1:09:36]
Foundation. Is that going to be allowed
[1:09:38]
to continue?
[1:09:43]
» Uh yes, that activity would be allowed
[1:09:45]
to continue. uh we would most likely a
[1:09:48]
lot of the core of what is on the trail
[1:09:52]
map still uh reflect some of the uh race
[1:09:56]
data and some of the you know the
[1:09:58]
permits that receive are also the
[1:10:00]
highest used of some of these things.
[1:10:02]
You know we may have to slightly alter
[1:10:04]
uh what paths are getting groomed. Like
[1:10:07]
I said we kind of some of the trails
[1:10:09]
that we remove parallel of you know
[1:10:12]
maybe you would only groom one of the
[1:10:14]
two. So there'll probably be a little
[1:10:15]
bit of, you know, tweaking of what your
[1:10:18]
normal map is. Uh but we expect the
[1:10:21]
winter operations to be very similar.
[1:10:24]
» Thank you. Uh lastly,
[1:10:27]
» Any planned trail works uh in the future
[1:10:32]
uh the
[1:10:34]
Grock group and a a friend group of that
[1:10:38]
I'm part of called the guild. We can
[1:10:40]
muster 20 plus bodies to help out
[1:10:42]
whenever that happens. So if you need
[1:10:45]
that help or you'd like that help, let
[1:10:47]
us know.
[1:10:49]
» Yeah. And that that'd be excellent. And
[1:10:50]
that's one thing I will throw out since
[1:10:52]
you mentioned it and I think another uh
[1:10:56]
another participant in the meeting had
[1:10:58]
asked about this. Uh I am very open to
[1:11:02]
having you know volunteer help uh having
[1:11:05]
volunteer input um to come in and give
[1:11:08]
us a hand. I know, you know, there's
[1:11:10]
been a lot of work done on these trails
[1:11:12]
and it has been very much a a
[1:11:14]
communitymaintained resource. um as we
[1:11:17]
we move through the next uh you know few
[1:11:20]
months uh and into the next year um I
[1:11:23]
will work with with James uh and Paige
[1:11:27]
and we can uh get some dates on the
[1:11:29]
calendar and get a mechanism you know to
[1:11:32]
coordinate some work days uh and get a
[1:11:34]
better communication flow between what
[1:11:37]
uh my team is doing and what our plans
[1:11:38]
are um with you know the greater
[1:11:41]
community that's using using Harry
[1:11:42]
Hollister um
[1:11:46]
when interested feel free to to reach
[1:11:49]
out to me and if you're saying hey we
[1:11:51]
see this we'd like to do something like
[1:11:53]
this you know we can we can work on that
[1:11:54]
as well um I think you had another
[1:11:57]
question
[1:11:58]
» Z let me let me just jump in real quick
[1:12:00]
because I I just want to support you in
[1:12:02]
this because we do have great experience
[1:12:04]
working with Fingerlakes Trail Council
[1:12:07]
um Fingerlakes Land Trust uh we've we've
[1:12:10]
we've worked with a lot of and Zach
[1:12:13]
manages those those those partnerships
[1:12:15]
and those improvements incredibly
[1:12:17]
incredibly well.
[1:12:19]
» Good. Good. I'm I'm sure Zach is
[1:12:21]
familiar with anyone who's been trained
[1:12:23]
by the inbetral care crew, too. So, we
[1:12:26]
we're all schooled by them.
[1:12:28]
» Great.
[1:12:28]
» Uh Zach, is your email the same? Uh Zack
[1:12:31]
Ballard at parks yorkgov.
[1:12:33]
» Uh yeah, it's Zachary. Ballard
[1:12:36]
parks.gov.
[1:12:37]
Yep. and we we have marked both sides of
[1:12:41]
of the tree on the trail.
[1:12:44]
» All right, great. Thank you.
[1:12:46]
» Thanks, Zach. Thanks, Brian. You've done
[1:12:48]
a good job, everyone, at sort of
[1:12:50]
naturally transitioning. I think we've
[1:12:52]
covered
[1:12:54]
all of the sort of trails questions. So,
[1:12:56]
I want to get us back to a few
[1:12:58]
stewardship comments. Um, Kobe writes,
[1:13:01]
"I really appreciate the scientific
[1:13:02]
assessments and the work the team has
[1:13:04]
done."
[1:13:05]
Uh, we've got another good comment from
[1:13:08]
I think we've got a couple Lindsies on
[1:13:10]
the call, but uh, one of our Lindsay has
[1:13:12]
joined us. So excited about the research
[1:13:14]
regarding amphibians and vernal pools. I
[1:13:16]
hope the parking area can have some
[1:13:17]
education about vernal pools and
[1:13:19]
importance and signs. Walking the closed
[1:13:22]
trails, reminding folks of the
[1:13:24]
importance. I think James, you spoke to,
[1:13:26]
you know, your own enthusiasm for um,
[1:13:29]
educational signage and interpretation.
[1:13:31]
So, great comment there. Um, one of the
[1:13:35]
questions that was uh earlier is do the
[1:13:40]
ecological findings affect the
[1:13:42]
designation as a recreation area? For
[1:13:44]
example, will it become a wildlife
[1:13:46]
management area? I don't know if Elena
[1:13:49]
or Charlie, um, you want to take that
[1:13:51]
on.
[1:13:56]
Brad, you might have to help me out on
[1:13:58]
this one. Um, I believe the wildlife
[1:14:02]
management area, that's a a DEC specific
[1:14:05]
agency. I don't believe we have that
[1:14:08]
within this agency. Um, so that's my
[1:14:11]
understanding is is that's not going to
[1:14:13]
change. It's still going to be a
[1:14:14]
recreation area.
[1:14:16]
» I think that's correct. That's correct,
[1:14:18]
Elena. Uh, WAS are are a DEC construct
[1:14:22]
designation. Uh, state parks does not
[1:14:24]
have similar. So, uh, recreational
[1:14:27]
activities. Uh, this is a recreation
[1:14:30]
area. Yep.
[1:14:34]
» Yeah. Lindsay, the only thing that I can
[1:14:35]
think or sorry, Elena, um, the only
[1:14:37]
thing that I can, um, we have park
[1:14:40]
preserves. Um, and
[1:14:44]
this is not a designated park preserve.
[1:14:46]
it could potentially receive that
[1:14:49]
designation in the future based on, you
[1:14:51]
know, the ecological findings that we've
[1:14:53]
had, but that's not part of this
[1:14:55]
planning exercise
[1:14:56]
um at this time. But yeah, WMA is a is a
[1:15:01]
DEC designation. Um parks, we generally
[1:15:04]
have uh you know less designations than
[1:15:07]
DEC does.
[1:15:11]
» All right.
[1:15:13]
Um, another comment that has popped up a
[1:15:16]
couple of times in our chat is what is
[1:15:19]
the future of hunting at the site? Will
[1:15:23]
it be an allowable use? Will be banned?
[1:15:29]
» Uh, there'll be no change in in the the
[1:15:32]
hunting activities in the at the at the
[1:15:35]
property.
[1:15:41]
All right, let's see. Um, skimming
[1:15:45]
through my Oh, we've got some other
[1:15:48]
comments in the chat. Stina asks, "Zack,
[1:15:52]
how are the differences in summer versus
[1:15:54]
winter usage of trails considered? And
[1:15:56]
was the groomability of the new loops
[1:15:58]
for skiing considered? There are places
[1:16:00]
where it seems that the single track has
[1:16:02]
been retained instead of the wider
[1:16:04]
trails, making it impossible to groom.
[1:16:09]
Yeah, it was a consideration. Um, again,
[1:16:12]
some of some of the things you're seeing
[1:16:15]
may be relative to uh vernal pool
[1:16:18]
complexes and so we we altered where the
[1:16:22]
trail went. Um,
[1:16:25]
we have the vernal pools mapped. Uh,
[1:16:28]
they aren't on this public map for for a
[1:16:31]
number of reasons.
[1:16:33]
um kind of a more broader thing to look
[1:16:37]
at outside of the environmental
[1:16:38]
concerns. Uh I took the the maps that uh
[1:16:43]
showed the the uh yearly cross-country
[1:16:46]
ski races. You know, we looked at usage
[1:16:50]
um and we looked at maps from from the
[1:16:53]
cross country ski groups um that weren't
[1:16:56]
our maps that weren't state parks maps.
[1:16:58]
They were, you know, the the maps
[1:17:00]
generated by the groups. um and just
[1:17:03]
made an attempt as much as we could um
[1:17:07]
to check all of the boxes that we were
[1:17:09]
looking at and also maintain the ski
[1:17:12]
ability of these trails and and
[1:17:14]
hopefully with that maintain
[1:17:17]
um you know the ability to maintain
[1:17:20]
those in in the winter. Um
[1:17:23]
so so yeah it it was it was considered
[1:17:26]
and you know again we were looking at a
[1:17:28]
a number of different factors. Um but
[1:17:32]
being able to maintain uh as much of the
[1:17:34]
the the trails that were used in in ski
[1:17:37]
races and and crosscountry skiing was
[1:17:39]
part of that.
[1:17:42]
And as we move into this winter, I think
[1:17:44]
a lot of this is going to be the
[1:17:46]
conversation with the with the groups
[1:17:48]
and with the groomers and, you know,
[1:17:50]
finding how his season went. And if we
[1:17:53]
have to, you know, tweak the edges of
[1:17:55]
things to make that turn radius better,
[1:17:58]
um, you know, we're we're open to, you
[1:18:01]
know, making sure that some of these
[1:18:03]
things align, uh, as long as we're
[1:18:05]
sticking within our general structure of
[1:18:07]
the the map we've provided.
[1:18:09]
» Yeah. And and one of the goals moving
[1:18:11]
forward that is I mean we've we've
[1:18:13]
alluded to it is that this is
[1:18:16]
the start of a process you know moving
[1:18:20]
forward we are going to look more
[1:18:23]
comprehensively at trail improvements
[1:18:26]
um you know maintenance schedules uh you
[1:18:30]
know better signage better wayfinding um
[1:18:33]
now that we have kind of agreed on the
[1:18:35]
map and consolidated the trail
[1:18:38]
internally
[1:18:39]
um and we're getting that message out to
[1:18:41]
you all. Um we can start to move forward
[1:18:44]
with the processes that we we have to do
[1:18:46]
on our end to to make these things
[1:18:48]
happen. Part of that is is again still
[1:18:50]
still taking taking your input and you
[1:18:53]
know you know we welcome it to to make
[1:18:55]
this this park um usable for everybody.
[1:19:01]
» Thanks. All right. Um, couple
[1:19:05]
stewardship questions and I see folks as
[1:19:08]
we are in the last 10 minutes of our
[1:19:10]
time together this evening. For those of
[1:19:12]
you who have joined us and have to drop
[1:19:13]
off, we greatly appreciate your
[1:19:15]
attendance this evening and for those of
[1:19:17]
you that have volunteered to get
[1:19:19]
involved with trail uh stewardship and
[1:19:22]
work. Um, very appreciative of that
[1:19:25]
support. So Elena, for you and your
[1:19:28]
colleagues, we have a question about
[1:19:32]
um I lost Albert has a comment. Um we've
[1:19:35]
talked a lot about vernal pools. Um what
[1:19:37]
about impacts on bird populations?
[1:19:42]
» Yes. Yes. Good question. So there's a
[1:19:46]
lot of there's a lot of data in the the
[1:19:49]
literature that demonstrates that trails
[1:19:52]
do have impacts on bird populations.
[1:19:55]
um they tend to have lower density
[1:19:59]
populations. Um you know, areas within
[1:20:02]
forested habitats that are close to
[1:20:04]
trails, they're lessly less densely
[1:20:06]
populated. Their reproductive success is
[1:20:10]
lower. Um so I I think that's well
[1:20:13]
understood. Um, in the scientific
[1:20:15]
community for this particular exercise,
[1:20:19]
we decided to focus on the Bernal pools
[1:20:22]
because of the the statewide
[1:20:24]
significance that kind of tipped um
[1:20:27]
above, you know, that ecological
[1:20:30]
concern, but it's absolutely valid. Um,
[1:20:34]
the other thing we had to consider uh
[1:20:36]
throughout this process, right, is
[1:20:38]
finding that balance. So
[1:20:41]
really the only way to try to reduce
[1:20:44]
impacts on birds is to eliminate uh
[1:20:46]
human presence, right? So we'd have to
[1:20:49]
further shrink uh the existing
[1:20:51]
opportunity that's at the park. So
[1:20:53]
again, it's it's trying to find that
[1:20:55]
balance. Um so we didn't specifically
[1:20:58]
collect any data on that at the site,
[1:21:00]
but I I think it's you know, we have an
[1:21:03]
understanding that there is an impact.
[1:21:06]
» Thanks, Elena. And another surgical
[1:21:08]
question from Craig. Is there any plan
[1:21:11]
to treat him woolly adelgid? It seems
[1:21:13]
like a lot of hemlock are being
[1:21:15]
affected.
[1:21:17]
» Yes. Yes. Great question. So we are
[1:21:21]
currently conducting treatments at
[1:21:24]
hemlock or at her hollister. So the the
[1:21:27]
southern ravine that kind of hits you
[1:21:30]
can see it in the screen here um on the
[1:21:32]
southern part of the property that
[1:21:34]
hemlock stand has been treated. So
[1:21:36]
typically treatments are on a 5 to
[1:21:39]
sevenyear cycle.
[1:21:42]
And so that was treated I want to say
[1:21:44]
maybe two years ago. So we're going to
[1:21:46]
go back in probably another two years to
[1:21:49]
re-evaluate. And yet you can see it's
[1:21:51]
this dark green polygon at at the south
[1:21:55]
end. We decided not to treat the
[1:21:57]
hemlocks at the north end because we
[1:22:00]
just have these two little pieces,
[1:22:03]
right? But this is a consideration now
[1:22:06]
because this area is is going to be um
[1:22:09]
coming online. We're acquiring a parcel
[1:22:12]
in this area. So once we get that
[1:22:14]
parcel, we'll assess that hemlock stand
[1:22:16]
and see if it's appropriate um for
[1:22:19]
treatments. But also to the south,
[1:22:21]
particularly along Reynolds go, there's
[1:22:23]
a really beautiful hemlock stand. Um
[1:22:27]
similarly, like we we are treating that
[1:22:29]
that's on our radar. So, every seven
[1:22:32]
years we'll we'll cycle back and hit
[1:22:33]
those trees again. But, yep, great
[1:22:36]
question.
[1:22:40]
» Thanks, Elena. Um, doing sort of one
[1:22:43]
last spin through our comments here and
[1:22:47]
Chris Morris, I think you've been sort
[1:22:48]
of keeping an eye out to
[1:22:52]
um or other folks, them panelists we
[1:22:54]
have this evening if there's anything
[1:22:56]
we've overlooked. know there's a lot of
[1:22:59]
of comments in here. Um not seeing any
[1:23:02]
active questions, but if anyone has had
[1:23:06]
their question missed, please type that
[1:23:08]
into the chat. We're sort of down to our
[1:23:11]
our last five minutes. So, um I don't
[1:23:14]
know, Fred, uh James, Kathy, if you want
[1:23:18]
to have any closing remarks while people
[1:23:20]
might be typing any last thoughts they
[1:23:21]
have. Greatly appreciate the discussions
[1:23:24]
and the chat and and your thoughts are
[1:23:26]
all recorded. um in their chat
[1:23:28]
transcript.
[1:23:32]
» Yeah. Look, James, I'll kick it to you
[1:23:34]
and then I I'd like to have last word if
[1:23:36]
you're if everybody's okay with that.
[1:23:40]
» Sounds good. Um I just wanted to let
[1:23:41]
everyone know. Um if you have any
[1:23:44]
questions, please feel uh free to reach
[1:23:46]
out. Uh it's James Jeffrey at
[1:23:49]
parks.ny.gov
[1:23:50]
or call the uh number for Stony Brook
[1:23:52]
State Park. Uh, I'll be happy to field
[1:23:55]
um questions as they come up and I look
[1:23:57]
happy I mean I'm happy to be working
[1:23:58]
with everybody and I look forward to you
[1:24:01]
know where we're going in the future
[1:24:02]
here. So, thank you everybody
[1:24:06]
» And James thank you. I mean you you and
[1:24:08]
your your staff do a phenomenal job of
[1:24:11]
of managing this parcel. Um, and I also
[1:24:15]
want to just shout out to Elena and
[1:24:18]
Zach. uh the the amount of work, the
[1:24:21]
collaboration between sort of your two
[1:24:23]
desks was really really strong and I'm
[1:24:27]
really proud of the balance uh that
[1:24:30]
we've been able to strike with our our
[1:24:32]
stewardship responsibilities and
[1:24:34]
acknowledging the the incredible value
[1:24:36]
we have for this as a recreational area.
[1:24:39]
Um it's complicated. It's it's it is not
[1:24:43]
simple and just everybody from the park
[1:24:46]
side did a a great job. So I did want to
[1:24:49]
recognize everyone uh publicly for that
[1:24:51]
fine fine work. Um again I I I also want
[1:24:55]
to thank our users. You know state parks
[1:24:58]
we are here to serve you. Uh we want to
[1:25:01]
uh to make sure that we are providing
[1:25:03]
the best experience, the safest of
[1:25:05]
experiences. Um I'm incredibly proud of
[1:25:09]
the the the the state park system. Um, I
[1:25:12]
think personally I think it's the best
[1:25:14]
park system uh in the United States and
[1:25:17]
uh Harriet Hollister is a real real gem
[1:25:20]
in that in that system. So um please
[1:25:23]
come out and use it. Bring your friends.
[1:25:26]
Uh this is yours to celebrate and and
[1:25:28]
and use within the the structure that uh
[1:25:32]
the problem can can accommodate that
[1:25:34]
activity. Um don't hesitate to reach out
[1:25:37]
to us uh in the future. you know, we
[1:25:39]
look forward to the partnerships and in
[1:25:41]
terms of the improvements we can make at
[1:25:43]
Harriet Hollister. Uh but really uh
[1:25:46]
thank you very very much for your time
[1:25:48]
this evening and your passion for this
[1:25:51]
property um and to work with us in the
[1:25:53]
future. Thank you very much.
[1:26:03]
» All right, that concludes our
[1:26:05]
presentation and comment period for the
[1:26:08]
evening. Thanks everyone for joining us
[1:26:10]
with this recording. We in the next
[1:26:12]
couple of days are going to be working
[1:26:14]
on kind of refining the transcript and
[1:26:16]
we will get this uploaded to um our
[1:26:18]
YouTube page. So if you have friends
[1:26:22]
that were hoping to join us tonight were
[1:26:24]
unable to make it, you can point them to
[1:26:26]
that recording. Um we will be sending
[1:26:28]
out to everyone that registered for this
[1:26:30]
meeting the direct link to that uh
[1:26:32]
video. So thank you again and have a
[1:26:35]
nice evening.