Agenda
[0:00]
1. Preliminaries to the City Council Meeting
[0:29]
1.2 Citizens' Comments and Questions
[13:45]
1.3 Council Comments, General Announcements, and Proclamations
[21:27]
3. Consent Agenda of the City Council
[23:43]
4.1 An Ordinance Adopting a New Comprehensive Plan for the City of Carbondale
[26:18]
4.2 Ordinance Establishing a Portion of the East Side of North Robert A. Stalls Avenue, from East Sycamore Street to East Larch Street, as a "No Parking" Zone
[30:53]
5. Executive Session
Transcript
AI TRANSCRIPT
This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.
[0:01]
Good evening. It's 6 o'clock and we will call the Carbondale City Council meeting to order. First on the agenda is roll call, please.
[0:09]
Council Member Colombo.
[0:12]
Present.
[0:12]
Council Member Kilman.
[0:14]
Present.
[0:15]
Council Member Lowes.
[0:17]
Present.
[0:19]
Council Member Maxwell.
[0:21]
Present.
[0:22]
Council Member Roberts.
[0:23]
Present.
[0:24]
Council Member Stanfield.
[0:26]
Present.
[0:27]
Mayor Harvey.
[0:28]
Present.
[0:29]
and next on the agenda, citizens comments and questions.
[0:35]
City council meetings are deliberative sessions
[0:38]
by members of the governing body.
[0:40]
Civility and decorum are expected
[0:43]
and will be required at all times.
[0:46]
Public comment is encouraged at all public meetings,
[0:49]
but the primary purpose of the meeting is for the council
[0:52]
to discuss and determine public policy for the city.
[0:56]
Members of the public may address the city council
[0:58]
during the public comment agenda item
[1:01]
for only those items that are relevant to city business such as information about city events.
[1:08]
Issues that the municipality has the authority to address, previously debated items,
[1:14]
and items that the council may consider in the future.
[1:18]
The mayor shall strictly restrain comments and questions to matters that are relevant to city business
[1:23]
and shall not permit repetitious comments.
[1:26]
All other agenda items will also include an opportunity for public comments in accordance
[1:33]
with the rules adopted and codified by the city council.
[1:37]
Speakers should wait to be recognized before they proceed to the podium and should begin
[1:42]
their statement by first stating their name and whether or not they are resident of the
[1:47]
city.
[1:48]
A speaker who represents an organization or other person must identify the organization
[1:53]
or person.
[1:54]
Public comments are to be directed to the city council as a whole and not to individual councilmembers or individual city staff.
[2:04]
The city council and staff are not required to respond to comments and questions.
[2:09]
Speakers may comment up to four minutes per item once per person.
[2:13]
No speaker may give their allotted minutes to another person or group.
[2:17]
A maximum of 30 minutes will be permitted for public comments and a maximum of 20 minutes
[2:23]
per agenda item will be allowed for public comments on all of the items except public hearings.
[2:29]
Are there any citizens who wish to comment?
[2:34]
Mr. Cooper?
[2:49]
My name is James Cooper Jr., Carbondale Citizen.
[2:51]
I'm a medical discharge diagnosed with asthma, mental health disorders, disabled, afro-american
[2:54]
retic.
[2:55]
I want to thank anyone, black, white, brown and others, continuing to stand up
[2:58]
for democracy.
[2:59]
I have a mixture of a question or two prepped by a brief comment or to what I say is city business first amendment
[3:04]
Right freedom speech my speech is well under four minutes allowed for each of the speak
[3:08]
This is an update from last 16 city council meetings
[3:12]
I've received no summits appearing court from Jackson County court knowing the rest of me regarding the February 22nd 2018
[3:18]
Carpenter police report against me saying I'm breaking the law. I dispute it for the wreck for the public TV
[3:24]
audience and city council. Simple question. Respectfully, what's the reason why
[3:28]
Carminell Black Preachers, Carminell NAACP, say they offer everyone's due process,
[3:32]
law rights, equal rights, and against discrimination, haven't demanded slash
[3:37]
assisted in writing as I requested that Jackson County court prosecutors and
[3:41]
judges to exonerate me or take me a black man to jury trial regarding the
[3:46]
1992 Jackson County wrongful case against me, etc. This is city business.
[3:51]
the city council. The FBI
[3:53]
headquarters in Washington DC
[3:55]
internal revenue service.
[3:57]
Jackson County State
[3:57]
Attorney Marcia Case, Ohio
[3:58]
Carminell City Manager, U.S.
[4:00]
Attorney for the Southern
[4:01]
District of Illinois. Illinois
[4:02]
Governor J.B. Pritzker, Carminell
[4:04]
NAACP, Carminell Police Chief,
[4:07]
Carminell Postmaster, Jackson
[4:08]
County Court Christian Hill,
[4:10]
Carminell Black Churches and
[4:11]
others are being certified mail
[4:12]
from Carminell Post Office
[4:14]
for court records and others.
[4:15]
My October 27, 2025 declaration
[4:18]
after David that I, James
[4:19]
James Cooper, Jr. was told by a library resource that various white
[4:22]
thoughts told Carmelette NWSP, Carmelette Black Preachers, being
[4:26]
intimidated and scared to shut up, don't talk against white
[4:29]
authorities to continue allowing me, black men, to be
[4:33]
persecuted by authorities and if they're being together and
[4:36]
assist the man in writing as I requested to Jackson County
[4:40]
Court prosecutors and judges to immediately summons me to
[4:43]
Jackson County Court and design them or take me to the
[4:46]
jury trial regarding the 1992 Jackson County Rome for
[4:48]
excuse me, case number 92 CF-85.
[4:51]
The file, Carminell Police Report,
[4:52]
they would kill them too.
[4:55]
This is a copy of that affidavit.
[5:01]
Also included with my October 27th affidavit
[5:04]
for records for the FBI, Carminell, NAACP,
[5:07]
all Carminell Black Churches, Carminell,
[5:08]
City Mans, Carminell Police, the courts
[5:10]
and others are copies of the Jackson County Court
[5:12]
Dock Sheet Entrance, case number 92 CF-85
[5:15]
as follows, 926 Docket Entry,
[5:18]
my September 22nd, 2025 Declaration Affidavit.
[5:21]
that some Jackson County court judge and prosecutors U.S. Attorney for some just
[5:24]
Illinois Stephen White winehole a racist and others operate like they include
[5:29]
clubs plan still trying to frame me James Cooper junior for any felony to
[5:33]
keep hitting the mask cover-up of me by the director and assistant director the
[5:37]
1992 Jackson County room for conviction against me case number 92 CF 85
[5:42]
involvement process to a misunderstanding this copy of that
[5:45]
Dr. Sheet. And the 715.2025 Dr. Sheet entrance to my June 21st, 2025 declaration of affidavit that
[5:56]
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois Stephen Wynnehoff and other
[5:59]
authorities have several Carmeldale Post Office employees and others in on the
[6:03]
corruption against me who are submitting statements for an affidavit for
[6:05]
search warrant although no crime to try to justify to a judge to issue an
[6:09]
illegal search warrant on my resident and go on a fishing exhibition for the
[6:13]
right violation and my June 23rd 2025 decorations that I told the FBI, Illinois
[6:19]
State Police and other authorities their confidential informants in on
[6:23]
corruption and others that my fifth amendment right is invoked at all times
[6:26]
maybe me being subject to the state and federal prosecution slash
[6:30]
persecution since for any felony including tax evasion these copy of
[6:35]
those doc doc sheet entries question
[6:40]
didn't some authorities go all around
[6:42]
Complaining making a big shout now see it work it out. That's county juror trial or is on rate me immediately
[6:49]
All glory goes God. Thank you.
[6:55]
Anyone else?
[6:56]
Yes,
[7:00]
no, no, no in the back
[7:08]
Hello, I'm Jennifer Lampkins. I am a resident of carbonyl and today I'm representing carbonyl United
[7:13]
We are having a free day drive
[7:17]
And we are collecting items from now until November 10th such things as hats and gloves hand warmers
[7:23]
hand sanitizer, duffel bags, blankets, sleeping bags,
[7:26]
clothing, shoes and boots, tents, small furniture,
[7:29]
toiletries, coats and jackets, household items and toys.
[7:32]
This will be for our free community day,
[7:35]
which will be Saturday, November 15th
[7:37]
at the Collaboration Center in Carbondale.
[7:40]
Homeless services will be from 11 to one
[7:42]
and that will include a hot meal, warm clothes,
[7:45]
hygiene kits, resources and referrals,
[7:47]
support and compassion.
[7:49]
Community services will be from one to four
[7:51]
for free groceries, community resources, raffle prizes, winter items and local
[7:56]
agencies and vendors. Let us come together and uplift our community. Thank you.
[8:01]
Okay, now Erika.
[8:10]
I'm Eric Bukers. I live here in Carbondale and I am speaking
[8:15]
today on behalf of the homeless community within Carbondale. Could you
[8:19]
adjust the mic please? Is that better? Okay, I'm speaking today on behalf of the
[8:25]
homeless community in Carbondale here. The first thing I'd like to address is
[8:29]
the recent escalation and aggression toward the homeless that has been going
[8:35]
on with city workers and the police. I've witnessed the systematic dehumanization
[8:42]
of the most vulnerable social strata of our society. My own home that I've been
[8:49]
living in since March was Bulldozed just last week and I don't even know
[8:54]
how many others were along with it.
[9:00]
We're told this is due to the refuse that accumulated,
[9:03]
but the truth of the matter is the garbage they came to clean
[9:07]
out was us.
[9:09]
We were the trash that those bulldozers were meant to clear.
[9:15]
And
[9:17]
despite all of that, we still continue to exist.
[9:21]
We're here.
[9:22]
Nothing has changed.
[9:24]
The only thing that changes is that we are now
[9:27]
scattered and dislodged from any sense of safety. So we come back to the same
[9:35]
question that I've been asking all year. Where do we go?
[9:42]
It's amazing how this
[9:44]
simple little question often stymies and stumps those that I ask. It doesn't
[9:52]
It doesn't seem like it should be that complicated, but I've even heard a member of the Carbondale
[9:59]
Police Force bluntly respond to it, not Carbondale.
[10:04]
That's deplorable.
[10:06]
It's disgusting and shameful in my mind.
[10:13]
I've been threatened to be banned from all city property simply for asking for some
[10:21]
documentation. This is ridiculous.
[10:26]
Anyone I ask this question to that actually tries
[10:29]
to give a reasonable answer gives me one of four or four basic answers to this. There's
[10:37]
good Sam, good Samaritan task, the warming center and the coalition for the homeless.
[10:44]
Now don't get me wrong these are all valuable resources and I'm not saying that there's
[10:50]
anything necessarily wrong with them, but they are not a complete safety net and plenty of
[10:55]
people fall through the cracks of these services. Good Sam is nearly always at full capacity.
[11:06]
Task and the coalition are helpful, but slow at best and often wind up coming to dead
[11:15]
ends anyway. And the warming center, we don't even know when or in what kind of capacity
[11:22]
it's going to open up. So there's a lot of brick work that we're running into trying
[11:31]
to find these services that help. So again, I'm pleading, trying out to anyone with
[11:39]
authority to do anything, where do we go? How much taxpayer money is wasted every year
[11:46]
in the asinine harassment and dislodging of unhoused people? Also, let's not even begin
[11:53]
to discuss how incredibly unconstitutional this all becomes when you consider the BRHA
[11:59]
or the IHRA, the Bill of Rights for the Homeless Act and the Illinois Human Rights
[12:04]
But alas, I'm not here bringing attorneys to sue for damages.
[12:10]
No, I'm here asking for basic human dignity and decency to not be persecuted simply for being unhoused.
[12:21]
The right to merely exist.
[12:24]
Every faith on earth preaches kindness to the poor.
[12:30]
Is yours any different?
[12:33]
There are thousands of ways.
[12:37]
If you agree with what was said, could you please stand?
[12:46]
Thank you.
[12:47]
Thank you for your time.
[12:51]
Anyone else?
[12:53]
Okay.
[13:00]
Hello.
[13:01]
My name is Victor Ludwig.
[13:02]
I'm not a resident, but I am your neighbor.
[13:07]
There's not much more to say than that other than this.
[13:10]
No more encampment sweeps.
[13:12]
It solves nothing.
[13:13]
It achieves nothing.
[13:14]
It hurts.
[13:15]
It damages.
[13:16]
is a clause at the sole of all involved.
[13:19]
So that's all I'm going to say.
[13:21]
No more encampment sweeps, because in the lack
[13:26]
of a comprehensive plan, we can at least
[13:28]
have comprehensive compassion.
[13:30]
Thank you.
[13:31]
Anyone else?
[13:32]
Oh, wait, please don't clap.
[13:35]
If you agree with what Victor said, please stand.
[13:37]
Clapping is not a difference.
[13:40]
Thank you so much.
[13:43]
OK, anyone else?
[13:45]
Okay. Next on the agenda. Council comments, general announcements and proclamations. Let's
[13:53]
start on my right, Ms. Kielman.
[13:59]
Yeah. No. Ms. Maxwell? Ms. Roberts? No.
[14:06]
I don't want
[14:07]
to come back, but okay. Mr. Colombo. I'll be brief. I set my business cards out there
[14:14]
on the chairs this evening so that if you have ideas, if you have concerns, if you have
[14:20]
any feelings in general around how we are engaging with our homeless population in Carbondale,
[14:25]
I'd love to hear from you.
[14:27]
In just the past couple days, I've had an opportunity to engage our city manager, mayor,
[14:31]
and a couple of other staff regarding what a comprehensive homelessness action plan
[14:36]
might look like for Carbondale, and that includes your input and your contributions.
[14:43]
So please be in contact. I appreciate your time.
[14:48]
Mr. Loth.
[14:50]
Can we get an update from staff about what actually happened with respect to the encampment and who.
[15:02]
Was manning the bulldozers, staffing the bulldozers?
[15:06]
If they're referring to the relocation that occurred a couple weeks ago, that was a direct
[15:12]
result of private property owners who decided that they wanted to clean out their privately
[15:18]
owned property. And the police department was contacted as a result of they were bringing
[15:23]
in equipment to execute their plans to clean that up. And there were people that
[15:27]
refused to allow them to bring their equipment onto their own privately owned land. So the
[15:32]
The police department went, assisted them with getting onto their property, and was forced
[15:38]
to provide warnings to individuals that if they did not leave, they could be subject
[15:41]
to arrest for trespassing.
[15:45]
And just so I'm clear, there was no sweep by city staff of anything?
[15:50]
City did not initiate the removal of anyone.
[15:56]
The city provided notice so that everyone had an ample opportunity to know that the
[16:01]
The property owners were coming in there to do that work and they decided based on the
[16:07]
conditions of their property that that's the response they wanted to have.
[16:12]
Thank you.
[16:13]
I know that those things do happen with some cities, some places, but not here.
[16:18]
And I do also appreciate how much some people enjoy cosplay and LARPing, but this is not
[16:27]
the place for it.
[16:28]
I
[16:37]
don't encourage that behavior, and
[16:43]
you know it's great and it's wonderful that we sit and
[16:52]
listen to you, but you cannot stay and listen to us.
[16:56]
No comments, please.
[16:59]
Mr. Los, were you done?
[17:01]
Yes, I was actually done.
[17:03]
Mr. Sandfield.
[17:06]
No.
[17:07]
Okay.
[17:08]
Oh, I'm sorry, Ms. Roberts.
[17:10]
even though everybody just left.
[17:13]
I still want to say this, and I'm sorry that people decided to leave
[17:18]
instead of sticking around to have good conversations around this
[17:23]
because there are good conversations happening around this issue.
[17:28]
And I want to begin by recognizing the difficult and complex conversations
[17:32]
that our community has had around homelessness and housing, obviously.
[17:36]
These discussions have shown just how deeply
[17:39]
Carbondale residents care about helping those in crisis
[17:43]
while also preserving safe and livable neighborhoods.
[17:47]
It's important that we take what we've learned
[17:49]
from everything we've all been through
[17:51]
and channel this energy into solutions
[17:54]
that are realistic, transparent, and effective.
[17:59]
Homelessness remains a serious challenge,
[18:02]
not only in Carbondale but throughout Southern Illinois,
[18:05]
well, I mean really throughout the nation, but in our vicinity throughout the region.
[18:11]
And it requires a coordinated regional response.
[18:15]
A lot of that work is already happening.
[18:18]
Organizations such as BOOTS, SI, a coalition of more than 30 Southern Illinois nonprofits
[18:24]
that are focused on housing insecurity, Take Action Today, which recently convened
[18:29]
a regional homelessness summit in West Frankfurt, the Southern Illinois Coalition for the
[18:34]
homeless and veterans focused organizations such as Project Die Hard are already developing
[18:41]
partnerships that a regional task force would require. Our goal should be to build on these
[18:48]
efforts and strengthen collaboration across city and county lines. Homelessness doesn't
[18:55]
stop at borders and neither should our compassion and our planning. The engagement I've seen
[19:01]
shows how deeply people care about helping others
[19:05]
and also about maintaining safe, livable neighborhoods.
[19:08]
I hope that those seeking to help the unhoused
[19:11]
can also shift their energy now
[19:13]
towards regional cooperation and solutions.
[19:17]
Thank you.
[19:18]
Ms. Kielman.
[19:21]
So as we all know, SNAP and link benefits
[19:23]
are not going to be dispersed on November one.
[19:26]
That's an impending perspective reality
[19:29]
that is harrowing to so many in our community and a few days ago I asked the city manager
[19:34]
to look into what means were available legal or otherwise for us to engage with this impending
[19:42]
issue and he was very thorough in his response tracking down all sorts of lines of inquiry
[19:51]
into specifically something that I'd asked is whether or not we could maybe mandate
[19:57]
that grocers provide out of date or soon to be expired foods directly into the
[20:03]
hands of food banks prior to disposal. And it looks like a number of our
[20:09]
grocers are already doing that. Kroger and Schnooks currently donate to their
[20:14]
food pantries and other food pantries on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. On
[20:19]
Fridays, Walmart also makes good donations to the Good Samaritan and
[20:23]
and Victory Dream Center,
[20:26]
there are grocery stores that we could work on, that we should
[20:32]
encourage as a community to make donations of their soon to be expired food.
[20:38]
Food insecurity is going to be an ever more pressing issue, especially as things get colder,
[20:44]
as more people are off work due to the federal shutdown, as economic conditions deteriorate,
[20:51]
And as we continue to work on but not achieve solving problems like poverty and homelessness,
[20:59]
which we obviously have a very, very complicated but necessary to engage with situation.
[21:06]
And so I wanted to brief you all that I am working on it.
[21:12]
I will be reaching out and touching base with all of my colleagues on it over the
[21:16]
coming weeks. But I did want to keep the community informed that that is a line of thought that
[21:21]
we're pursuing at the city.
[21:28]
Next on the agenda, Consent Agenda please, Mr. Reno.
[21:33]
Item 3.1 is approval of City Council meeting minutes from October 14, 2025. Item 3.2 is
[21:39]
approval of a warrant for period ending October 10, 2025 for FY26, warrant number 1522 and
[21:45]
the total amount of $2,670,669.48.
[21:50]
Item 3.3 is an approval of Wells Fargo warrant for the period
[21:54]
ending September 30th, 25 for FY26 warrant number
[21:57]
09, 2025 in the amount of $172,361.26.
[22:03]
Item 3.4 are appointments and reappointments
[22:06]
to boards and commissions.
[22:07]
Item 3.5 is a resolution authorizing the city manager
[22:10]
to execute an engineering agreement with TWM,
[22:13]
Incorporated of Swansea, Illinois,
[22:14]
in the amount of $58,251 for the design of Phase 2 Northwest Bike Trail from New Arrow
[22:21]
Road to East Airport Road.
[22:23]
Item 3.6 is an ordinance approving a budget adjustment to increase the CIP Local Improvement
[22:28]
Fund budget, adding CIP PB2602, furnishing and installing a new RTU at the Police Department
[22:35]
and award of purchase and installation of a new rooftop AC unit RTU at the Police
[22:40]
Department to Southern Illinois piping contractors of Carbondale in the amount of
[22:44]
one hundred twenty four thousand five hundred fifty dollars item three point
[22:47]
seven is approval of the listed consent agenda items thank you is there an item
[22:54]
that any council member has a question about or needs pool okay is there a
[23:01]
motion for consent agenda yes miss Gilman I move that we approve all
[23:07]
consent agenda items. Ms. Roberts. I second that. Any questions from council or discussion?
[23:15]
Questions or discussion from citizens? Roll call please.
[23:23]
Councilmember Colombo. Yes.
[23:27]
Councilmember Kilman. Yes. Councilmember Lowe. Yes. Councilmember Maxwell. Yes.
[23:37]
Councilmember
[23:38]
Mr. Stanfield.
[23:39]
Yes.
[23:41]
Mayor Harvey.
[23:42]
Yes, and that motion passes.
[23:44]
Next, we have General Beasness of the City Council.
[23:47]
Item 4.1, please.
[23:49]
Item 4.1 is in ordinance adopting a new comprehensive plan
[23:52]
for the City of Carbondale.
[23:54]
Plan Carbondale was recommended to be adopted
[23:56]
as Carbondale's comprehensive plan
[23:57]
by the Planning Commission at their August 13, 2025 meeting.
[24:01]
The plan was then presented to the City Council
[24:03]
on August 26, 2025.
[24:05]
The attached edits and additions
[24:06]
have been made to the plan in response to comments and requests for more information from council.
[24:11]
Information that has been added includes the city's most recent interest in the dark skies initiative,
[24:16]
more detail on park land acreage, and appendix referencing other city plans and data sources that inform the plan document.
[24:23]
All changes have been deemed by staff to be in keeping with the overarching goals and intent of the plan,
[24:30]
so as not to require another public hearing and review by the planning commission.
[24:34]
The plan can be found online at plancarbondale.com and there are attachments with the revised
[24:39]
plan.
[24:41]
The recommended action.
[24:45]
The recommended action is to approve an ordinance adopting a new comprehensive plan for the
[24:49]
City of Carbondale.
[24:50]
Is there a motion from Council?
[24:52]
Mr. Colombo.
[24:54]
I would move that we approve an ordinance adopting a new comprehensive plan for the
[24:58]
City of Carbondale.
[24:59]
Is there a second?
[25:00]
Mr. Stanfield.
[25:01]
I'll second that.
[25:03]
Any discussion from Council?
[25:04]
So, Mr. Roberts.
[25:06]
I was lucky enough to be on the committee for this,
[25:09]
and working with Molly Maxwell,
[25:13]
I don't know how to officially address you,
[25:17]
but for spearheading this enormous project
[25:20]
was an excellent experience for me,
[25:24]
and I think that the group came up
[25:27]
and the committee ended up with a really excellent
[25:36]
Plan so I am glad that we are here. Thank you for all the work you've done and I appreciate you adding on all the extras
[25:43]
I requested other comments from council on this side
[25:51]
Comments or questions from citizens roll call, please
[25:56]
Councilmember Colombo
[25:58]
Yes
[26:00]
Councilmember Killman. Yes
[26:02]
Councilmember Lowes. Yes
[26:05]
Councilmember Maxwell
[26:08]
Council Member Roberts. Yes. Council Member Stanfield. Yes. Mayor Harvey. Yes, and that
[26:18]
motion passes. Next is item 4.2. Mr. Reno. Item 4.2 is an ordinance establishing a portion
[26:25]
of the east side of North Robert A. Stahl's Avenue from the Sycamore Street to East Large
[26:29]
Street as a no parking zone. The community development staff is proposing that the
[26:34]
block of Robert A. Stahl's Avenue between East Sycamore Street and East
[26:38]
Large Street be designated as a no parking zone. Staff receive several
[26:41]
complaints concerning traffic being restricted on this block to one lane
[26:45]
due to people parking on both sides of North Robert A. Stahl's. The width of the
[26:49]
pavement in this area is approximately 30 feet. By the time a car
[26:52]
parks on the east and west sides of the street in this block, the usable
[26:56]
width of the road is reduced to less than 15 feet. Drivers do not feel safe
[27:00]
using the road for two-way traffic when such parking is present. The
[27:03]
The inability for two cars to pass has led to traffic congestion at times and complaints
[27:07]
from motorists to city staff.
[27:09]
Other parts of Robert Estall's have signage designating no parking or have no issues due
[27:13]
to residents as having sufficient off-street parking.
[27:16]
This section of road is well-traveled with New Zion Church located in the adjacent block
[27:20]
to the south in the Irma Hayes Community Center in the next block south.
[27:24]
Numerous residents are in the neighborhood as well, including several Jackson County
[27:28]
Housing Authority residents.
[27:30]
I think that is not a true street which has the condition this particular block staff
[27:35]
is trying to rectify the situation by speaking with residents about the parking habits there
[27:40]
in an opera vehicles and commercial vehicles being parked there.
[27:43]
His attempt is not always been successful.
[27:45]
Therefore staff request the designation of a no parking zone order to facilitate safe
[27:50]
to a traffic.
[27:52]
The city code also addresses this issue in section seventeen dash eight dash three
[27:56]
in relation to pavement with parking.
[27:58]
Parking section 3 of that reads if the current average daily traffic count at the time of
[28:03]
the completion of the improvement on a local street consists of 1000 vehicles per day or
[28:08]
less and parallel parking is allowed on both sides of the street the minimum width for such
[28:12]
street must be 34 feet which width shall be determined as set forth in section a
[28:17]
one of the section of the code while that particular code section addresses rebuilt
[28:22]
or repaired street staff feels it is a good measure of the proper street width for streets
[28:25]
with parallel parking. Feedback from members of the neighborhood and the New Zion Church
[28:29]
Pastors indicates support for this modification to the on-street parking. The recommended
[28:34]
action is to approve an ordinance establishing a portion of the east side of North Robert
[28:38]
Estall's Avenue from East Sycamore Street to East Large Street as a no parking zone.
[28:42]
Is there a motion?
[28:46]
Ms. Kilman.
[28:47]
I move we approve an ordinance establishing a portion of the east side of North Robert
[28:51]
Estall's Avenue from East Sycamore Street to East Large Street as a no parking
[28:56]
the parking zone. Thank you. Is there a second? Mr. Maxwell. I second that. In a discussion
[29:02]
from council, Mr. Stanfield. Yeah, why is that particular spot designated for no parking
[29:10]
happen? Why is that particular spot a problem? It really relates to the on street parking
[29:17]
that exists there for some particular residents that have more vehicles than they have parking
[29:22]
allowed for it. They're personal residences. So we've just received a lot of feedback from
[29:28]
community members there that especially when it's dark and when there's busier times, Sundays,
[29:34]
for church and things, it's very difficult for two-way traffic to move through there.
[29:40]
Thank you.
[29:41]
Mr. Colombo.
[29:43]
And this is kind of a follow-up question to that. When I travel through there, it
[29:48]
seems that there's kind of one particular set of vehicles that may belong to just
[29:52]
a single individual or a company or something like that, trailers and other items seemed
[29:56]
like that was causing some of this congestion. Is that relatively accurate?
[30:00]
Is it accurate that this is kind of an impact of one or two individuals, not abundance of
[30:04]
folks that would use that for parking?
[30:06]
Yes, and those individuals have been addressed about specific violations that may be observed,
[30:11]
but overall, there's nothing that restricts the vehicles from being there.
[30:15]
It's just that given the design of the roadway and the amount of traffic moving through
[30:19]
there, it just doesn't allow for safe movement of two-way traffic with vehicles parked there.
[30:28]
Questions or comments from citizens?
[30:35]
Council Member Colombo. Yes. Council Member Kilman. Yes. Council Member Lowe's. Yes.
[30:43]
Council Member Maxwell. Yes. Council Member Roberts. Yes. Council Member Stanfield. Yes.
[30:51]
Mayor Harvey. Yes, and that motion passes. Next on the agenda, Item 5, Executive Session.
[31:00]
item five point one is a motion to enter into executive session to discuss the
[31:03]
setting of a price for the sale or lease of property owned by the public body
[31:07]
discussion by the public body and executive session of the below listed
[31:10]
exceptions is permitted by the Illinois Open Meetings Act in the event that
[31:13]
any action is to be taken as a result of the discussions held in the
[31:17]
executive session final action will be taken only upon return to open
[31:20]
session and will be preceded by a public recital of the nature of the
[31:23]
matter being considered and other information that will inform the
[31:26]
public of the business being conducted. The exception here is according to Illinois statute
[31:32]
six, the setting of a price for sale or lease of property owned by the public body. The recommended
[31:37]
action is to enter into executive session to discuss the setting of a price for the
[31:41]
sale or lease of property owned by the public body in accordance with Illinois Meetings
[31:44]
Act with the appropriate section cited. Thank you. Is there a motion to enter into
[31:51]
executive session? Ms. Kielman. I move that we enter into executive session to
[31:55]
to discuss the setting of the price for the sale or lease of property owned by the public body is there a second.
[32:03]
Mr. Roberts second that with the court with the clerk call the role please.
[32:10]
Council Member Colombo. Yes. Council Member Kilman. Yes. Council Member Lowes.
[32:17]
Yes. Council Member Maxwell. Yes. Council Member Roberts. Yes. Council Member Stanfield. Yes.
[32:24]
You're Harvey.
[32:26]
Yes.