[0:06] there. My own

[0:06] >> I didn't mean mold me.

[0:09] Start for AUGUST. 28.

[0:10] >> For storm is is is minutes

[0:14] from last month. I make a

[0:18] motion that said last month, a

[0:20] second, moon second say Aye.

[0:24] Guess the ayes have it. We

[0:29] have one guest. She doing

[0:33] adoptions I'm to hear sons. Jo

[0:33] Conner, the county assessor,

[0:35] the non voting member.

[0:36] >> And the secretary of the

[0:39] board.

[0:40] >> You need to come our Office

[0:44] of Corporation counsel. Great

[0:46] right now, board member.

[0:48] >> Cathy Gould Board member.

[0:50] >> Steve has a PRESIDENT.

[0:56] Brian Barton board member.

[1:02] Sends an rn. Yes, okay. You're

[1:03] a stand-up. Raise your right

[1:08] house for u n. We sort of

[1:09] talked coach Wooden and but

[1:12] truth so help you GOD. So this

[1:15] is on Homestead.

[1:17] >> Yes, believe that's

[1:21] correct. Coming Yes, and give

[1:22] the parcel member and I can

[1:27] tell you what, Page. Is on the

[1:27] science sheet.

[1:29] >> It's one said, I'm sorry.

[1:41] Yes.

[1:42] >> Yes, 1, 0, 4, 8, 7, 9, 2,

[1:43] is on page one. 63 of your

[1:57] agenda.

[1:58] And this is the homes

[2:02] that Ascension. You want to

[2:04] state your name and

[2:10] >> so what's going on? Certain

[2:11] and I'm sure there's a

[2:11] microphone hanging right

[2:13] there. Want to stand. You

[2:21] know, my stand right there.

[2:22] And I reside at 909, South

[2:25] East Street.

[2:28] >> a reason for. My presence

[2:31] years. That's it. Reside at 9.

[2:35] So the street. The homestead

[2:36] exemption for the property

[2:39] was. Seemingly removed for the

[2:45] tax year. Table 2026. 2025.

[2:46] I'm here because I would like

[2:50] to appeal. Removal of the

[2:51] homestead exemption due to

[2:54] never say. And I can provide

[2:55] context now are you can ask

[2:58] questions. Not familiar with

[3:01] your process.

[3:10] >> Calling you want to?

[3:11] >> State your name colleague,

[3:13] County Auditor's Office. Mean,

[3:21] when from? Real tlc? To

[3:24] individual names 2024, that's

[3:25] one of the very specific

[3:28] situations for that. The Nbn

[3:32] Co says that you have reapply

[3:32] for Homestead deduction

[3:33] because those are separate

[3:38] legal entities completely. You

[3:39] know, that's not something

[3:43] that we actively all. That

[3:43] transfer as part of the

[3:44] assessment process. That

[3:49] production comes off. So

[3:52] statute regarding very clear

[3:53] and it's very cannot apply

[3:56] retroactively.

[4:02] >> argument is that? My

[4:03] research not been able to find

[4:04] specifically where Dundee in a

[4:08] covid that stated. And if you

[4:10] will, the miners initiate an

[4:14] appeal one 30? Provide

[4:18] everything in the reasoning. I

[4:20] had a preference.

[4:20] >> The resources of the

[4:25] sources. Specifically parts of

[4:26] the unit and Unicode and then

[4:33] also for the areas that uses

[4:36] so stay 0. 5, 4, 7, 3, At the

[4:42] time. From my review had

[4:45] admitted any relevant

[4:46] reference that changed

[4:46] entitled to the same honor.

[4:51] Disqualified eligibility. I

[4:53] was not able to find any

[4:54] memorialized evidence of that

[5:01] actually. Part of the Indiana

[5:06] code and the only thing that I

[5:10] found was a footnote. On the

[5:11] website which that form is

[5:14] located, which said The change

[5:14] in title to property MAY

[5:18] disqualify. It for Homestead

[5:19] deduction or require the

[5:22] deduction to be refiled. In my

[5:22] opinion, it reasonable

[5:29] guidance. In addition to that.

[5:29] You don't have a recollection

[5:38] of receiving formal Guess what

[5:40] I'm asking for is. Evidence

[5:46] that. There was written.

[5:52] Guidance Eligibility is remove

[5:53] there is administrative change

[5:58] title.

[5:59] >> I think part of it is a

[6:00] case of the same owner. But

[6:02] Pelosi and individual are very

[6:05] separate legal owners. In

[6:11] fact, the actual individuals.

[6:11] >> We say what I'm asking the

[6:14] county to consider that it was

[6:16] ministry to change. There was

[6:27] no sale. Remain. The again

[6:28] from the information that had

[6:31] been provided me. Was nowhere

[6:32] that I find it right. And

[6:35] that. Eligibility is

[6:36] disqualified for a change in

[6:44] title. Like

[6:45] >> But also I know we we spoke

[6:47] on the I provided you at home.

[6:48] When you first call, you

[6:52] reference.

[6:53] >> You reference that it was

[6:56] in the nba and you I wasn't

[6:56] able to find specifically

[7:01] where. Build the requirement.

[7:06] And what it. I guess,

[7:09] supporting evidence that. I

[7:13] must first.

[7:13] >> You didn't see on the Web

[7:15] site where it said it MAY

[7:17] qualified be done. Give us a

[7:19] cause. However, well, I did.

[7:23] That's why we spoke for Before

[7:26] did so you're acknowledging

[7:30] that.

[7:31] >> a statement that I put it

[7:35] on the heel. It is the only

[7:39] reading the information.

[7:39] Acknowledging that the only

[7:42] thing I could find. A

[7:47] footnote. Subsequently seeing

[7:47] weight and change right checks

[7:50] morning. But at the time 54

[7:57] 73. Any relative reference a

[7:57] change in title to the same

[7:58] honor, disqualified

[7:59] eligibility? After further

[8:05] research. That clause was

[8:07] shown in a footnote on the Web

[8:08] saver. That form is found.

[8:09] That said that the change in

[8:11] use, we're told to a property

[8:13] MAY underline disqualify it

[8:16] may is not a certainty. And so

[8:19] that in I interpret that to

[8:22] mean that. It is up to the

[8:24] discretion of the county. I'm

[8:29] asking for question. Because I

[8:31] have resided at the home.

[8:33] Nothing has changed outside of

[8:40] estate planning. What to a

[8:40] change in title from

[8:46] administrative perspective.

[8:50] Taxpayer. You know that it's

[8:52] justified that. You all

[8:56] consider. Allowing me to

[8:57] reapply the Homestead

[8:59] deduction, too. The 2025 tax

[9:01] year. Based on information

[9:04] that. Was available to me the

[9:13] time.

[9:14] >> You know, from our

[9:20] standpoint, Eg realty transfer

[9:21] individual. There's no way we

[9:23] know. And these are the see

[9:26] people.

[9:27] >> They're the auditor's

[9:27] office. One is not where

[9:32] transfers. And don't get a

[9:32] notification from someone

[9:36] files and the only way that

[9:36] really aware that somehow home

[9:40] said. And be applied they come

[9:47] for office Cala speechless.

[9:47] Yes, after a lot of things

[9:48] send them over and might want

[9:49] check with the auditor of

[9:52] filing sort of deductions. In

[9:53] general. I don't have any idea

[9:54] what operations for on a daily

[9:58] basis. So my office to know

[9:59] this is the same person that

[10:04] was part of l c these are the

[10:06] specific carve-out, Indiana Co

[10:08] it's safe. The owner has 3 a I

[10:09] there's only a one-year carry

[10:13] over. We four-year state on 25

[10:17] that come fall. So did not

[10:24] Asian. Think we said this. Can

[10:24] be active. So 3 there, I think

[10:27] these people are not, but

[10:28] they're playing at that

[10:35] option.

[10:35] >> MR. Could maybe provide

[10:41] some context. Is. What was the

[10:43] deeds purpose? Was it? You

[10:43] mentioned estate planning. So

[10:47] you've always lived in Are you

[10:50] want hot new on title? And

[10:50] title.

[10:52] >> I was a member of the

[10:52] entity that previously had

[10:55] title to that to the And the

[10:57] reason for the change is that.

[10:59] My parents. Head on other

[11:03] assets. That interview was

[11:07] affiliated with those assets

[11:07] it was under the guidance of

[11:09] my attorney that I MAY. Want

[11:17] to. Ugg Realty had on other

[11:22] assets of which. Other family

[11:23] members of mine were going to

[11:28] be living in and they. We're

[11:30] considering recording those as

[11:31] their primary residences and

[11:32] considering applying for the

[11:33] homestead exemption as well.

[11:37] And we wanted to Queen. So

[11:39] that we would be in

[11:40] qualification that in

[11:41] compliance with any homestead

[11:44] tax exemption. Guidelines and

[11:45] it was under the guidance of

[11:49] our attorney that we we as the

[11:51] children of my parents who

[11:52] were the main shareholders of

[11:55] the original entity title 2,

[11:57] 909. So the street. And other

[12:01] assets that other. So once

[12:01] vine led the now currently

[12:05] live in. We separate them.

[12:11] More. I guess.

[12:12] >> So, know, it was a

[12:14] Homestead application in

[12:14] you're.

[12:15] >> Its name or if it was in my

[12:16] name and I was approved in

[12:18] 2022.

[12:20] >> And my my argument is that

[12:22] I remain in compliance. With

[12:27] ability requirements. I didn't

[12:28] have guidance from my attorney

[12:28] to reapply. Otherwise I would

[12:32] have.

[12:34] >> Engine real tv is an oc,

[12:37] but the nc the title was

[12:38] transferred to what was once

[12:39] an oc. It's just. 3

[12:45] individuals which I'm one of.

[12:46] >> Right now, it's just

[12:49] they've gotten. And for it

[12:50] coming up.

[12:51] >> you need to click on

[12:52] because it's abbreviated

[12:53] version of the actual title on

[12:56] Monday. The Deegan from me.

[12:57] >> That's what I'm just asking

[12:58] them to double check. Because

[13:00] right now have. Yeah, that

[13:02] right now for owners, that's

[13:03] all we've got, which looked

[13:04] into double checks because

[13:08] your system abbreviate, not

[13:08] welcome. Morning. Now I

[13:09] understand I'm not saying not

[13:10] I'm just asking them to double

[13:11] check their system to make

[13:11] sure it's correct on their

[13:15] side. Got Okay.

[13:16] >> So I think that has the

[13:19] perfect reason is again, one

[13:20] is e what's the story for

[13:24] reference. But 2, just what he

[13:25] was talking about, the Elysee

[13:28] having multiple members.

[13:30] Multiple members might be

[13:31] playing home, said on

[13:32] different properties, which is

[13:32] why Elsa's are so hard for us

[13:36] to. Because there could be 8

[13:37] members of the Al see, I don't

[13:40] know who's living Which is,

[13:41] again, a reason that the state

[13:46] is so strict on. We don't have

[13:50] any idea. You 6 properties and

[13:50] their 6 family members never

[13:54] be Sat on front lines. We

[13:55] react patients and they're

[13:56] starting come out about people

[13:59] in tracks. Because we would be

[14:00] would have any idea is a

[14:03] member if have always had

[14:05] access to So that additional

[14:07] information we have that

[14:07] coming

[14:10] >> So elsie's can fall from

[14:11] spent.

[14:12] >> They be approved. A

[14:14] individuals, 9.

[14:17] >> Applications self has being

[14:17] individuals. And if change

[14:20] whenever something strange,

[14:21] absolutely no way for us to

[14:23] correct Tonioli track. That's

[14:24] not information that we

[14:27] district here at the county. A

[14:30] question. Abort. MR. CHAIRMAN.

[14:34] Yes.

[14:35] >> want words your mouth, but

[14:36] you used the word. MAY tell me

[14:38] that again about that. You

[14:43] said MAY do what?

[14:44] >> If look for your dressing

[14:50] me or hurt. Believe, but want

[14:51] cancer.

[14:52] >> Yeah. So he he record.

[14:53] Seemed like our Web site where

[14:54] we've got a little note on

[14:58] their right now. You have

[15:04] >> Now I do. But I know it.

[15:06] The Web site and actually for

[15:07] the Homestead Act, publication

[15:09] has changed since I made this

[15:14] appeal and we spoke. Outside

[15:14] of just I don't know how to

[15:17] reference historical suit.

[15:19] >> I think my question is

[15:20] where you're referencing yet.

[15:23] You MAY remove it. No

[15:27] >> so we we don't even. Think

[15:29] we moved that actually handle

[15:30] by the assessor's office when

[15:34] transfers. Well, we have what

[15:35] we have on the website was

[15:36] that if you're making a change

[15:40] in how it all? It MAY that

[15:40] your deductions you need to

[15:42] reach out to us to find out

[15:44] because there are certain

[15:47] situations. Let's say we have

[15:48] a to you know, a husband and

[15:51] wife. Why passes away? In that

[15:52] situation? That's not

[15:54] situation.

[15:57] >> My comment is that if we're

[16:02] being reasonable. I wouldn't

[16:02] be on that page on our

[16:03] website. My side otherwise

[16:04] would have known to look

[16:08] there. That I didn't know why.

[16:10] That was PRESIDENT. To

[16:15] reapply. Windy on the state

[16:16] website looking at forms for

[16:17] homes, application unless

[16:20] otherwise was prompted to.

[16:21] >> So it should be noted the

[16:22] Indiana law states.

[16:27] >> That's

[16:29] >> there is a change in

[16:32] eligibility. The Homestead

[16:33] must be reapplied interchange,

[16:36] an owner and the ownership is

[16:38] specifically change.

[16:39] >> That requires a reply of

[16:39] the home said issue. That's

[16:42] straight from the Indiana Co

[16:43] Seductions.

[16:47] >> Can can you tell me what?

[16:48] >> and not 6, that it's any

[16:51] had 6 dash. 1.1, that's 12

[16:56] dash. 37. So.

[16:57] >> And MISS And MISS You at

[16:57] night. Don't MISS A disagree

[17:01] with that. I just think. There

[17:02] was an llc which she's a

[17:04] member of was in his name. And

[17:07] it's really close.

[17:07] >> But that also you let's

[17:10] remember, bells not in his

[17:11] name.

[17:12] >> So no evidence. It said me

[17:13] the corporations personally

[17:15] get it. But but he's a part of

[17:19] that corporation. It's just

[17:22] and how much money are Looking

[17:24] at here? On the last of

[17:27] action.

[17:34] >> Well, this

[17:36] >> 2024 his taxes were 9,000

[17:38] for the year with the homes

[17:45] deduction. That was yeah. That

[17:48] was with the homes that.

[17:50] Without the Homestead. They

[17:56] double.

[17:59] >> Can can you please state

[17:59] figure?

[18:03] >> It is for the year 19,000

[18:04] 8.56 And that includes storm

[18:05] solid waste fees as did the

[18:08] 9,000 from the previous year.

[18:09] >> And I'd also like to say

[18:11] that the state is very clear

[18:13] that the burden that following

[18:13] the homeowner, if you are

[18:14] making changes as a homeowner,

[18:15] you're supposed to be aware of

[18:18] what you do and we try to past

[18:20] obviously in the U.S. But now

[18:21] that we're down to the

[18:21] assessor, I know their staff

[18:24] is a really great about say,

[18:24] hey, go beyond office right

[18:27] now, they're making a change.

[18:28] So you can check on the

[18:29] deductions. I don't know how

[18:29] do this out of this hot,

[18:31] in-person or by mail you know,

[18:35] for him. I feel pain. The

[18:37] tourney for legal advice.

[18:44] Might be. To double check What

[18:47] are passionate home. Do a

[18:51] professional service. But had

[19:01] no idea to notify 3 of 5.

[19:02] >> I will state because I know

[19:03] it was stated that he didn't

[19:05] receive a form. 11 former 11

[19:07] would not tell him if he had a

[19:07] homestead deduction on his

[19:09] property or not just to the

[19:12] board is aware that formal

[19:13] evidence, just a notice of

[19:14] assessment does not talk about

[19:16] deductions or anything else,

[19:19] but so that when not of

[19:19] >> and what showed me that my

[19:20] taxes to fund the.

[19:25] >> It's a it just shows are

[19:26] assessed value. So it tell you

[19:27] anything about if you had a

[19:28] homestead deduction or not.

[19:30] And unfortunately, that's not

[19:36] it required on the form 11.

[19:39] >> So and is it is not easy.

[19:44] In ordinary person. 2. When

[19:45] something like this would be

[19:46] triggered unless you're

[19:49] looking for. Which I did and I

[19:49] couldn't find reasonable

[19:52] evidence that. There was

[19:54] military requirement. To

[20:00] refile.

[20:01] >> Did did you for me and I

[20:01] guess didn't look for him

[20:03] because I would not have known

[20:04] otherwise. This what I'm

[20:07] trying to articulate, I think

[20:07] >> they are ready for motions.

[20:10] Almost like a motion.

[20:11] >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I make a

[20:14] motion that we accept as I

[20:18] just can't imagine. I

[20:19] understand all the arguments

[20:20] but to double its taxes. That

[20:22] just does not seem. For this

[20:29] board member. Second. Been

[20:29] moved second and first

[20:33] session. Seeing none all in

[20:41] favor say Aye. Aye against. I

[20:44] So 2 to tie foe. Was your next

[20:53] month. 23 1 It will not be

[20:55] there next month. Just so the

[20:58] board where probably still for

[20:59] people. Yeah, we'll still have

[21:04] for that. Want too much you

[21:11] want 5 members.

[21:15] >> that's why I'm bringing in

[21:21] now

[21:22] >> And

[21:23] >> how Just saying that next

[21:23] month they're still going in

[21:28] before board members here. So

[21:31] it would But have come back

[21:32] again. So would you be willing

[21:33] we pushed back 2 months to

[21:34] make sure that we have 5

[21:40] members? Are just want go? And

[21:40] we just I mean, it's your time

[21:42] sided with wasted if we don't.

[21:47] You know over, but still a

[21:48] month before the taxable

[21:49] sales. Let's hopefully of

[21:52] time. Think we can get for

[21:55] SEPTEMBER.

[21:56] >> I'm happy to come and

[21:59] provide my return asked again

[22:03] for consideration.

[22:04] >> As well, think that will

[22:05] limit just have most

[22:09] competent. For now. That set

[22:13] up a the next month.

[22:16] >> We need again the next

[22:16] meeting with the SEPTEMBER

[22:25] 25th. That works for you.

[22:26] >> Only it were part what the

[22:28] one thing I would like to walk

[22:30] away with here is the you

[22:31] brought a specific provision

[22:35] and Indiana code. Can you

[22:36] provide me a resource to

[22:36] actually access that? In

[22:41] addition. You got on and when

[22:43] I can see it if and when the

[22:46] code was amended so I can

[22:47] reference the application.

[22:52] We're Hill. So they can see if

[22:53] it was amended from then to

[23:01] now. What was amended.

[23:01] >> Colleen so. And I tell you

[23:05] a But I just.

[23:06] >> I want to go on record that

[23:09] I ask you for that months ago.

[23:13] And you just directed me to.

[23:13] >> Well, but I actually gave

[23:18] you the co. The covid guidance

[23:20] on where to find that. And

[23:20] then subsequently I research

[23:25] and I provided. My findings in

[23:29] the appeal which every state I

[23:30] I want to go on record that

[23:34] the website has been updated.

[23:34] And form 5, 4, 7, 3, also been

[23:37] updated to include specific.

[23:42] Commentary. Relative to my

[23:43] case, specifically that if

[23:45] there is a change title. But

[23:54] it's no showing that. 54 73.

[24:00] For some That's also pill

[24:06] form. Yes, there's not there's

[24:08] no need to to that form that

[24:12] discloses ineligibility.

[24:12] Reference for change the

[24:15] title. So what I'm looking for

[24:16] is reference on where can find

[24:17] when if there is such when

[24:21] that was changed. Because I

[24:22] think that that would be in

[24:24] for a reference next time.

[24:26] >> I think that's something he

[24:28] would have talked to the state

[24:30] of Indiana. Good luck with And

[24:30] finance is a does those forms

[24:34] for us? Their website has

[24:38] control money of information

[24:39] there. That's also weakened on

[24:40] the state's website. Access in

[24:42] code and everything else.

[24:49] >> And as

[24:50] >> Okay. Here we go Thank you.

[24:59] Thank you, When are general

[25:06] come in AUGUST United? For

[25:07] >> the workers, I guess just

[25:11] go on until what You start and

[25:15] all check with her.

[25:30] >> one through 20.

[25:35] One parcel

[25:45] 1, 0, 6, 7, 2, 8, 1, only ones

[25:51] with joy harvest.

[25:56] >> Yes.

[25:57] >> And we were moved their air

[25:59] conditioning on that as well.

[26:10] >> Then you sign in.

[26:13] >> sign is that you know,

[26:13] table, you remember the time

[26:23] help them out. With that.

[26:25] Apart from the virus, we'll

[26:35] see. It's is it one listened.

[26:37] Okay. So then. What's a

[26:44] personal friend? Or 2? Well,

[27:10] 90. I was there to 12, 90.

[27:11] There's not open appeal on

[27:21] file on this. There's a 2024,

[27:29] but it was final. JULY 24th of

[27:37] 2026 and went to the people.

[27:38] So he's got notes here that he

[27:39] was. So I'm here today to ask

[27:45] for.

[27:54] >> Because language barrier.

[27:54] >> He is one that called he

[27:55] said that he would need a

[27:57] translator. I told him to

[27:59] check that. You see.

[28:01] >> That's the one we said. We

[28:01] didn't know the translate.

[28:05] What? Translator we would

[28:07] need. So.

[28:08] >> Okay. Language need it?

[28:10] Yes.

[28:13] >> So that's for peace.

[28:14] Burmese. Okay. So we can get

[28:15] one for next month's.

[28:18] >> Well, it will or

[28:18] >> first, I guess they have to

[28:23] reopen right? Well, but it's

[28:25] it's closing. Still have open

[28:26] that back up for them, too, to

[28:39] do that. That's why I'm

[28:41] bringing so that it can then

[28:46] she can work with

[28:47] >> But isn't on the agenda.

[28:47] It's not on the agenda. So

[28:52] those are on Well, we That's

[28:56] right. You know. Even though

[28:57] it's not listed as other

[28:59] business, we could still. It's

[29:02] being brought other business.

[29:05] Now. That's not how it All

[29:14] right. Put on next month Rio

[29:19] to reopen difference to work

[29:29] do they understand that? If

[29:33] you We'll just put it on for

[29:48] next.

[29:51] Back to Page Did I

[29:55] answer that? When MR. On your

[30:01] bill. Tomorrow. Far just

[30:05] better Joyce. Look at the

[30:08] photos because it could be

[30:08] that. So a lot of apartment

[30:19] complexes. First floor can be.

[30:35] Person again. 6, 7, 2, 8, 1,

[30:41] We changed all the way, So the

[30:47] photos. So that is what choice

[30:51] on that second building. Bill.

[30:51] So, yes, it was entered

[30:58] correctly. And then we are

[31:03] going out. Applying this is

[31:08] from 2017. This is why. We

[31:09] like so this is the buildings

[31:10] are going up. So if someone

[31:13] does come back saying where

[31:13] also fact 2017, Isabella,

[31:21] 2017, and they just aren't.

[31:22] And then we determined double

[31:36] a c.

[31:46] led on one, Want it went.

[31:46] We'll make a motion pay one

[31:51] through 27.

[31:52] >> Spend second for

[31:56] discussion. Seeing none offers

[31:57] say I I I guess you guys have

[31:59] it.

[32:19] 28 one. 62.

[32:30] One 43. Arson 104,

[32:40] 9, 1, 7, 3, assessment 0.

[32:46] >> This is a residential so

[32:47] Nats Park in cannot be

[32:51] improved. 1, 0, 4, 9, 9, 1, 7,

[32:55] 3,

[32:56] >> When a shift to be

[32:59] assessment center.

[33:01] >> I mean, it's not a city

[33:02] Parker, right?

[33:07] >> Went online and vigil. 1000

[33:12] are 14.0 43.

[33:12] >> that neighborhood park for

[33:26] kids play?

[33:27] >> I'll have to get with them

[33:28] and to find out what happened

[33:31] there. Table.

[33:38] >> consider

[33:43] >> It is not in a floodplain.

[33:44] Well close, but it's not

[33:45] properties on pk. One is on

[33:46] the belt, but

[33:48] >> assessment, honor. I It's

[33:51] not only the city.

[34:05] >> filings tending to donate.

[34:06] >> I mean, technically, yes,

[34:09] it is the way that the zoning

[34:09] line goes.

[34:11] >> d 8 stops here and that's

[34:18] he came on over there.

[34:19] >> Once online different

[34:20] things, right. But the issue

[34:22] police tax honor. So go ahead

[34:37] again.

[35:10] Ac sharing. Talk to

[35:14] >> One 13. Parcel 1, 1, 1, 6,

[35:22] 4, 7, There's no real reason

[35:27] why change or from. About

[35:33] 700,000. And 21 or

[35:36] Pennsylvania.

[35:41] >> Gabriel. We're getting off

[35:51] because a vacancy.

[35:53] >> Apartment building. It's

[36:03] not an apartment building.

[36:09] Still up. That doesn't bacon.

[36:11] Am I putting in the right

[36:13] personal 1, 1, 1, 6, 4, 7,

[36:17] This doesn't look vacant. As

[36:19] of 3. 24 26. Now this is a 24

[36:24] appeal. You know, 25 I mean,

[36:28] their cars there.

[36:28] >> Let's let's table one,

[36:29] please. And we'll get more

[36:44] information.

[37:00] >> 16. Parcel one of 3, 8, 9,

[37:10] 9, 2, The hotel. Mary, out

[37:14] there on Morrison Street, yes.

[37:20] Says based on or sales.

[37:21] Assessed based on sales and

[37:21] come on.

[37:23] >> Hotels?

[37:25] >> We can ease.

[37:28] >> One the 3 approaches to it.

[37:31] >> ones.

[37:32] >> This was one that we came

[37:32] to an agreement gave. If you

[37:42] remember. One where we it was.

[37:46] Sales that did the income. Got

[37:47] agreement that we thought was

[37:50] reasonable with the taxpayer.

[37:56] >> That's the 2020? The 24 if

[37:58] I went with 67 million rate.

[38:02] >> We got them to a draw 20

[38:03] 3.24 And we agreed to every

[38:06] direction for 20. 25 26.

[38:15] >> And 26 for 60 Million. So

[38:16] one down it was 76 Million.

[38:17] And we dropped it to 67 for

[38:32] 26.

[39:06] Page. 1.2 7, 2, 1, 4, 5,

[39:07] at a questions for dated

[39:13] building design.

[39:21] >> That's a new one for too.

[39:22] What's the at the Dayton

[39:28] building? Design. Why are we

[39:32] caring something or?

[39:35] >> it

[39:37] >> Table that want to please.

[39:40] I don't like reasoning. Need

[39:46] to see why.

[39:52] >> before. There was.

[39:55] >> In 2017, we did a chain

[39:59] know he withdrew 2017, this is

[40:00] not grand jurors decision

[40:03] because they never is was

[40:05] withdrawn and less gave some

[40:06] obsolescence or something some

[40:10] point. I don't know that take

[40:16] a look Yeah.

[40:17] >> So question I don't know

[40:17] Make a motion page. 28 for

[40:26] one. 62. Second or first

[40:26] question seeing none all in

[40:31] favor. My most was the one. To

[40:34] prove all ones we table,

[40:35] correct. So all in favor say

[40:45] Aye. Aye.

[40:46] >> Appeals from the air and

[40:50] off one. 63 201. The cna on

[41:01] you know. Seemed to be a lot

[41:06] of No assessment system. Yeah,

[41:07] a lot of them the failure to

[41:13] appear. Campaign one. 33 with

[41:13] table 2 next month We just

[41:22] moved in they want. Sent 1, 1,

[41:24] of emotions as one 2 for 2.

[41:31] 201. It's been moved to second

[41:33] and first question seeing none

[41:35] all in favor say Aye. Aye

[41:39] against the ayes. Have it.

[41:54] Withdraws pages to prove 2.43

[41:55] I make a motion that separates

[41:58] 2, 2, through 2.43 So at that

[41:59] spending in second, any

[42:03] further discussion. Seeing

[42:04] none offers say Aye. Aye. The

[42:07] ayes have As page to 44

[42:13] through 2.79 And actually got

[42:13] a couple.

[42:16] >> yes, so the first one is on

[42:18] to page 2, 7, 2, parcels, 704,

[42:21] 3, 9, 2, 7, For Goodwill Lady

[42:23] Seager.

[42:27] >> They submitted the

[42:28] >> to be transferred on

[42:29] DECEMBER 31st, which our

[42:33] office is closed. So their

[42:34] transfer date on their Di was

[42:39] marked for 2026. The deed

[42:39] itself was signed DECEMBER

[42:42] saying 2025, but their

[42:43] official transfer date was as

[42:47] of 2026. So they're requesting

[42:49] that exemption be approved

[42:49] even though it has a transfer

[42:53] in 2026. It was a 1, 9, 3, 2,

[42:57] 5,

[43:01] >> Parcel, 819-704-3927. So

[43:02] the execution date was in

[43:08] 2025. Transferred until 2020

[43:13] >> So of your fsa. Okay. And

[43:18] that's a recognition award.

[43:19] And has different I just

[43:22] reckon you guys to make that

[43:29] this ok.

[43:31] >> It's not going to be on the

[43:32] agenda, because I table it for

[43:34] this month that they need more

[43:37] time. It was 703-5792.

[43:40] >> Minutes and on this and up,

[43:45] no, that time.

[43:46] >> It's a part of good will

[44:01] different. It time next. A

[44:12] question.

[44:17] >> Page 2.45? Partial, 1, 0,

[44:24] 0, 2, 5, 7, 7, says Political

[44:25] subdivision is that the

[44:34] Supreme Court.

[44:37] >> 88

[44:39] >> As a couple on here,

[44:43] different values. And I was

[44:55] about 12.2 2.54 Parcel 1, 0,

[44:58] 4, 7, 4, 1, has 2.1 least

[45:03] Supreme Court.

[45:08] >> I on the building.

[45:09] >> And that's why parents here

[45:11] answer that question.

[45:12] >> Well, I think I'm that I

[45:16] they were all. Can students to

[45:17] tournament parcels, correct?

[45:22] Bill does 2 parcels.

[45:30] >> the a

[45:40] >> Wallace 21% 23.1% And I'm

[45:46] sorry, page. To 61. For for 1,

[45:57] 1, 0, 0, 8, 7, 9, It's not a

[46:00] new hotel. Isn't.

[46:01] >> sit us and believe it is

[46:04] the double checked.

[46:05] >> 1, 1, while you're there

[46:10] are 8, 7, 9,

[46:13] >> I don't like is the this

[46:15] That's the office tower that

[46:15] was bought. What's the

[46:19] reasoning on that one?

[46:20] >> Well, tensions 49% owned by

[46:24] Capital Improvement Board.

[46:25] >> think just because they own

[46:29] we should be.

[46:32] >> I don't know how evening

[46:33] Capital Improvement Board owns

[46:36] 29 per cent of that off

[46:38] >> and the Army Building

[46:44] Facilities Corporation get It

[46:45] says most there this the

[46:49] building. Yet. See it owns it.

[46:56] Yes. But don't apply for a 9%.

[46:57] So been the support I would

[47:00] you in hands 49%. I'm not even

[47:01] sure they are required to

[47:02] apply for an exemption. I

[47:05] think there's a state statute.

[47:08] So if you exempt, I believe

[47:10] so. I mean, I think need. Look

[47:17] at And again. 2012, there's

[47:18] new statute that kind of

[47:22] blanket. Exempted. Don't

[47:33] remember you know. Council

[47:35] look into case. You that's a

[47:52] or whatever. That's I To see.

[47:56] I want to one's

[47:56] >> Supreme Court from kind of

[47:59] care. A court injunction. On

[48:01] that do.

[48:06] >> The union unions. We're

[48:07] doing. But his last month in

[48:10] week. Nothing updated. Okay.

[48:16] We're just and give. Thing

[48:25] new.

[48:27] >> I make a motion page 2.44

[48:28] Through 2, 7, a lot to 79 with

[48:28] them on the site of one of the

[48:35] table. Second for discussion.

[48:36] Seeing none all in favor say

[48:39] Aye. Aye. The ayes have it.

[48:45] >> We MR. Johnson on here.

[48:46] >> MR. Johnson was that we

[48:47] didn't know he was going to

[48:50] invite. He said he was going

[48:52] to come. So basically what

[48:55] happened was he was sent one

[48:56] for teens and one fifteens to

[49:00] the address in pd.

[49:00] >> That he hadn't updated. And

[49:01] so he actually never received

[49:06] the form 4 this hearing. So he

[49:08] was asking the the be re.

[49:09] Those appeals be reopened

[49:10] since he never actually

[49:14] received the form. But yes, it

[49:20] not arsenal. If there's 2 its

[49:28] 701, 6 to 0, 9, and 700-2482.

[49:29] >> Do do know is the kernel

[49:32] address the correct address?

[49:33] >> Thank you. Said that was

[49:34] his old address.

[49:37] >> So still hasn't updated it

[49:38] as far as I'm aware because I

[49:40] to show him where to get the

[49:42] change of address form. But

[49:43] then how did he know he missed

[49:47] it?

[49:47] >> Because he called because

[49:54] he. He finally got sent the

[49:55] form one 15. And so then he

[49:57] called asking what that was

[49:58] about.

[49:59] >> And then I explain it to

[50:00] him and he said he never got

[50:02] the win for teens. I asked

[50:03] that address was correct in

[50:06] That's as old one. And he has

[50:10] like 3 different.

[50:11] >> Parcells. But these 2 women

[50:13] believed to JULY. The JULY

[50:17] peta, yes, they were just last

[50:22] month.

[50:22] >> He was told that here and

[50:26] right.

[50:27] >> Yes, I told him that was

[50:28] today what floor? And he said

[50:32] he was coming. So I guess it's

[50:35] up to you. If you want to.

[50:40] >> Open it or

[50:43] >> so did get the one 15

[50:44] enough to win 14? He said the

[50:47] one 15 was finally forwarded

[50:48] to him, but he didn't get the

[50:49] one for teens for either

[50:52] parcel. And he did it on the

[50:54] 3rd one either. But that was

[50:57] one that hadn't gone to

[50:58] hearing it. So it is able to

[51:00] change it to a day when he

[51:03] could come. That?

[51:04] >> That's what that's where

[51:08] she is it's still an incorrect

[51:10] >> show them where to get the

[51:11] form. And he said he was going

[51:19] to.

[51:19] >> So we need a motion reopen

[51:23] under.

[51:25] >> Record if you there's

[51:27] nothing to it. Yeah, there's

[51:30] nothing on agenda. It's under

[51:33] his other business that I

[51:33] don't.

[51:37] >> need to do. They have to

[51:37] their There's not open This

[51:38] was just from the taxpayer to

[51:42] come back and ask to open So.

[51:43] >> Since the taxpayers not

[51:43] here, is really anything for

[51:45] them to act So you don't have

[51:48] to do anything.

[51:53] >> Acting on right? We do need

[51:59] to act on And I want anything

[52:04] else come forward. We're

Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals

Agenda

Transcript