Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:04]
yes okay um I'd like to call to order
the Maplewood city council meeting for
[0:11]
Tuesday December
10th
[0:14]
and
uh when we do Zoom do we do a pledge of
[0:21]
allegiance I didn't bring a flag with me
uh
[0:26]
but uh I pledge allegiance
United States America and to
[0:34]
the
[0:38]
stand
[0:42]
indivisible thank you uh roll call
please council member
[0:49]
Perell council member
faulkingham council member Garcia here
[0:57]
mayor Greenberg here council member hom
here council member
[1:07]
Maddox and council member Paige here
okay mayor Greenberg a quorum is present
[1:15]
uh item number four is a motion to
excuse council members Carell uh
[1:19]
faulkingham and
Maddox so moved
[1:25]
seconded any
discussion
[1:28]
uh all those in favor I
I any opposed the council members are
[1:37]
excused uh item number five is the
approval of the Count Council
[1:42]
agenda I'll entertain a motion motion to
approve
[1:47]
seconded we have a motion to Second any
discussion uh all those in favor I any
[1:57]
opposed the council agenda is approved
uh item number six is the approval of
[2:05]
the November 12th 2024 city council
meeting
[2:09]
minutes I need a motion motion to
approve second second okay is there any
[2:17]
discussion I was not there so uh
[Music]
[2:23]
uh okay uh so Jackie can I vote to
approve those if I wasn't in
[2:33]
attendance that is a question I don't
have the answer to Mayor um I think
[2:39]
probably not so we may need to pass that
to the next
[2:42]
meeting okay uh then I will uh delay to
table uh I yes I'll need a motion table
[2:55]
can you motion to put it on the next
agenda instead of tabling okay that'll
[3:00]
easier procedurally motion to move to
the January agenda
[3:04]
seconded we have a motion to Second any
discussion uh all those in favor I I I
[3:13]
any
opposed the motion will be or the uh
[3:18]
approval of the minutes will be uh dealt
with in in January then the next meeting
[3:25]
item number seven is a public hearing to
hear citizens comments on a request by
[3:29]
the Maplewood Richmond Height School
District to reone 2555 Oakland Avenue
[3:35]
from PA public activity District to Sr
single family residential
[3:41]
district uh do we have anyone in the
audience that uh has raise their hand
[3:46]
for
this I do not see any Zoom hands
[3:51]
mayor okay
uh if that is the case then uh
[4:01]
unless
Dr well Dr Jameson will have a a chance
[4:05]
later on to to address this but uh as
far as the public forum I will consider
[4:10]
it
closed uh item number eight is the
[4:16]
public
forum uh which allows anyone that's
[4:20]
watching us or listening to us tonight
to address the Council on any matter uh
[4:27]
you keep in mind that there's a second
public C for him later in the meeting uh
[4:32]
so if you miss the first one or you hear
something that we've said that you'd
[4:37]
like to respond to you'll have another
opportunity is there anyone that has a
[4:42]
raised
hand no there is not ma'am okay so uh
[4:47]
public forum is now
closed sorry uh Mr John KN house I'll
[4:54]
allow him to enter okay uh at this point
[5:01]
Mr KN house if you unmute we'll be able
to hear you can you hear me now yes
[5:07]
sound great I I didn't know if I was on
um okay yeah I just want to uh just
[5:12]
briefly um I leave at 7461 Hazel Avenue
I'm sure you guys have uh know who I am
[5:18]
um I I just wanted to I know I sent an
email to some of the council people with
[5:22]
just a pck uh a couple pictures just to
illustrate um the box trucks that would
[5:27]
be that are parted on their present um
parking lot at side Project brewery and
[5:34]
where they are parked um that's where
the egress is going to be on to the new
[5:39]
um parking lot so I guess my our
family's concern is um if that egress is
[5:43]
going to be there where will they be
parking their box trucks um in the
[5:48]
future and and my concern is our
family's concern is they're going to be
[5:52]
parking the box trucks um at those two
parallel spots that are parallel to um
[5:59]
our backyard and if You' if you've
looked at the picture you can see how
[6:03]
tall those box trucks are how obnoxious
they look um so I know the buffering
[6:09]
will be there um but I guess we're just
hoping that with that visual you can see
[6:13]
that the most buffering we're going to
need is um whatever we can get you know
[6:19]
tall coniferous trees um so that that's
kind of my concern I guess we're just
[6:24]
asking if you could at least just
discuss that our concern that the box
[6:29]
trucks will be there instead of what it
was intended to be of of customer
[6:33]
parking um and it one more thing real
quick is you can see with uh that that
[6:38]
Pensky yellow truck the the other truck
is the food truck and I guess I I I
[6:43]
wanted to picture that there um because
that was that was there for several
[6:47]
weeks and I I think it it kind of just
we don't have a lot of faith in their in
[6:51]
their sensibility or their awareness of
of how that affects us as a neighbor um
[6:57]
and we're kind of depending on the
council and to make sure that everything
[7:01]
is done that um you know that
sensibility can can be there once that
[7:07]
new parking lot is there
[Applause]
[7:10]
so that's pretty much all I want to say
I've said a lot in previous uh meetings
[7:14]
but thank you for the
opportunity okay thank
[7:18]
you
uh I wasn't part of the previous
[7:23]
discussion but we'll have a discussion
with the
[7:27]
uh with S Pro project and express your
concerns to them uh and hopefully we can
[7:36]
come to a reasonable resolution of the
matter uh are there any other hands
[7:42]
raised at the public for the public
forum there or not okay then we'll move
[7:48]
on to item number nine which are
announcements we have some announcements
[7:52]
here yeah I just um keep I'll keep it
short and sweet uh Maplewood fire
[7:57]
department is going to be driving Santa
around and that is coming up on December
[8:01]
14th and 15th
um north side of Manchester on the 14th
[8:08]
uh Southside on the 15th they've got the
map posted on their Facebook page from a
[8:12]
couple days back um it's super fun
so you know it's fun good
[8:19]
times okay I mean last year I got to
ride in the fir truck so that was like
[8:24]
the highlight of my December I'm not
even joking about that but hopefully you
[8:28]
don't have to ride in the ambulance
anytime soon for
[8:33]
sure are there any other any other
announcements no okay uh item number 10
[8:40]
then is a uh a a report on the Mr School
District by Dr Bonita Jamison the
[8:48]
superintendent
uh and we have visual aids to uh to help
[8:55]
too
[9:07]
Dr Jameson you're still
muted good evening mayor Greenberg
[9:12]
Council and community members I come
before you today to give a brief update
[9:17]
on the happenings in Maple Richmond High
School District and if you can recall
[9:22]
last August I gave a presentation to the
city council in regards to our newly
[9:28]
adopted Ed strategic planning the
progress that we've actually made so
[9:32]
during that report I discussed primarily
all of the five priority areas in
[9:38]
addition to our mission vision and core
values tonight I will be giving an
[9:41]
update on two of our priority areas
which are for our students which is the
[9:46]
academic component of our plan and for
our resources which is both the
[9:51]
financial and Facilities aspect of our
[9:56]
plan so I want to start off with uh dist
and Rome by levels uh contrary to most
[10:01]
school districts in the state Mr has
continued to remain constant with our
[10:05]
enrollment and actually having increases
at both the elementary school and also
[10:10]
slight increases at some of the grade
levels at the high school but you can
[10:13]
see the numbers pk12 for the district we
have approximately 1 1550 students in
[10:20]
the district
currently um the district priority and
[10:25]
goals which is for our students the
academic component I do want to
[10:28]
highlight two designations that were
actually received um by Niche um in 2025
[10:35]
the district actually received an a
rating and actually ranked nine out of
[10:39]
459 districts within the state of
Missouri and for us news rankings for
[10:44]
best high schools the high school
actually ranked 24th in the state of
[10:48]
Missouri for the best high school in
Missouri this is the highlight of the
[10:54]
work that the staff uh under the
guidance of the Board of Education have
[10:59]
contributed for this year so uh we've
had a couple of Articles run in the St
[11:03]
Louis Post Dispatch highlighting some of
the growth that the district has had um
[11:08]
this year so we ranked fourth out of 552
districts within the state and we are in
[11:15]
the top 1% of the districts in the state
and we were ranked second out of the 23
[11:21]
school districts in St Louis County so
the comparison for those districts would
[11:24]
actually be a Webster Groves a Kirkwood
and there was only one District that
[11:29]
performed or earned higher percentages
than Maplewood Richmond Heights which
[11:33]
was our neighbors z brenwood uh we um
were highlighted in a several of our
[11:38]
articles for a 12% increase in total APR
points earned an 11% increase in English
[11:44]
and 6% increase in math overall so for
the district for our total annual
[11:49]
performance report score we earn 97% of
the scores and you can see for the
[11:55]
performance uh score which is the
academic component of the annual
[11:59]
performance report the district earned
135 points out of the 140 total points
[12:06]
and for continuous Improvement which is
in regards to our strategic plan which
[12:10]
um the two priority areas that I'm
reporting on today fit within continuous
[12:15]
Improvement we earned 59 out of the 60
points possible for the school
[12:21]
district um the next priority area that
I would like to highlight is for our
[12:26]
resources and this also includes fac
facilities and so here we talk about
[12:31]
looking at the systems within our
facilities and using the information
[12:36]
that we acquire for decisionmaking and
then also looking at uh transparency for
[12:42]
the community in regards to our fiscal
management so a couple of things the
[12:48]
district actually recently received an
unmodified opinion on its financial
[12:53]
statements for the fiscal year 2024 by
our Auditors KB and also unmodified
[13:00]
opinion on um the state and federal
reporting package and basically what
[13:04]
that means is that's the highest level
of uh recognition for Assurance issued
[13:10]
by Auditors in addition to compliance
with all uh regulations another area
[13:16]
that I would like to highlight um in
regards to the district's finances is
[13:21]
our ability to actually not only seek
out grants to off offset some of our
[13:25]
costs but to actually be awarded those
grants so part of the work and I didn't
[13:30]
talk about the academic component and
some of the work that we're doing around
[13:34]
Competency Based education but Maple
World Richmond Heights was one of a few
[13:39]
districts that received a $400,000 Grant
from the Missouri Department of
[13:43]
Elementary and secondary education um We
are continuing to improve the safety of
[13:48]
our facilities for our students and
community and we received
[13:53]
$25,000 Grant from the state department
for that as well as well as several
[13:58]
technology grants from
ITF so we've been working uh diligently
[14:04]
to not only be prudent in our
expenditures but to identify additional
[14:09]
streaming Revenue sources to offset cost
and as previously mentioned two of the
[14:14]
homes we are actually selling and giving
back to the city with the hopes of
[14:18]
having families to come in to uh
contribute to increasing enrollment
[14:22]
numbers for the uh District I also have
included here a historical operating
[14:27]
fund balance just give Community an idea
of where we have been from 2016 through
[14:35]
2025 which would be our ending fund
balance so starting from
[14:39]
2016 uh the district had approximately a
19% fund balance and as you can see it
[14:46]
continued to grow over time and you see
an increase going from 2019 all the way
[14:50]
through 2022 and we think about the
pandemic and Co and some of the funds
[14:56]
received from the federal government to
support support um our community during
[15:00]
the pandemic and now what you're seeing
now are intentional uh spin downs and
[15:05]
part of that is the district's uh effort
to actually improve the retention of
[15:11]
staff and very sizable raises were given
in the past two years which were
[15:16]
approved by the board but there is still
work yet to be done because the district
[15:20]
currently um ranks within the bottom two
from the St Louis County region for the
[15:25]
round 23 districts that are in the St
Louis County for certified staff teacher
[15:32]
salaries um so that's just an update
around where we are for our
[15:36]
resources um there are always
opportunities for Community to get
[15:41]
engaged including uh mayor and the
council um on December 17th if you have
[15:46]
not signed up the high school are having
capstones and you have an opportunity to
[15:52]
see and hear from our students as well
as giving feedback on their
[15:55]
presentations and they have put a lot of
work and time and then on December 19th
[16:00]
it's the Board of Education meeting
there we will be talking about um the
[16:05]
potential for a bond and also a
potential Debt Service transfer which
[16:11]
would be uh a tax rate a no tax rate
increase for the community if the board
[16:16]
decides to move forward and that will
hopefully give us an opportunity to
[16:21]
continue to compensate competitively our
teachers so that we can keep our valued
[16:27]
uh resources and if you are bored and
have absolutely nothing to do and are
[16:31]
looking forward to being around some
great individuals who are being of
[16:35]
service to the school district we do
have an opportunity for um our community
[16:40]
to join um several strategic plan
committees which are led by board
[16:44]
members and members of the maple
Richmond Height cabinet level
[16:49]
team that concludes my presentation for
this evening I welcome any questions you
[16:54]
may have
[16:59]
uh no questions for me just a comment uh
you touched on it but I want to say
[17:03]
congratulations and kudos for all of the
accolades every time I turn around I
[17:07]
read or or hear something about the
school district um a couple of which you
[17:12]
named and also you know I saw a report
recently that Mr is one of the only
[17:16]
districts that's been able to make gains
and continue to progress forward after
[17:20]
covid um
so thanks for all the work you're doing
[17:24]
I think it's it's at least being
recognized and um I appreciate it I
[17:29]
attended the work session recently that
you guys had to talk about the fund
[17:32]
balance and to talk about some of those
bonds and tax rate increases I know
[17:36]
there are challenges but I appreciate
the work that the administration and
[17:39]
board are doing right now so keep up to
good work thank you and I'd be remissed
[17:43]
to not mention the efforts that our
teachers put in to ensure that the level
[17:48]
of growth that we're seeing in our
students they put in a lot of time and
[17:51]
are committed to the vision and mission
of the district so thank you for that
[18:03]
any other
questions thank you very much for having
[18:08]
me thank you thank
[18:13]
you uh we'll move on to item number
11 which is a resolution of the city
[18:20]
council of the city of Maplewood
Missouri appointing Mary Killian to the
[18:24]
Human Services Commission in
establishing her term of office as
[18:28]
expiring on June 30th
[18:32]
2026 and I have a motion motion to
approve
[18:37]
seconded a motion and second any
discussion uh I think she'll be a good
[18:43]
addition to the commission uh roll call
vote
[18:48]
please council member
Garcia
[18:53]
yes mayor Greenberg yes council member
hom
[18:59]
yes council member Paige
yes resolution 2463 is
[19:06]
approved thank you item number 12 is a
resolution of the city council of the
[19:11]
city of Maplewood Missouri appointing
Janine I hope I got that first name
[19:16]
correct uh Janine Dallas to the Human
Services Commission and establishing her
[19:21]
term of office as expiring on June 30th
2027
[19:30]
seconded second is there any
discussion roll call vote please mayor
[19:37]
Greenberg yes council member
hom yes council member Paige yes council
[19:45]
member Garcia
yes hey resolution 2464 is approved
[19:52]
thank you item number 30 13 is a
resolution of the city council of the
[19:57]
city of Maplewood Missouri appointing
Adam valenc to the Human Services
[20:02]
Commission and establishing his term of
office as expiring on June 30th
[20:10]
2028 motion to approve
seconded uh we have a motion a second is
[20:16]
there any
discussion roll call vote please council
[20:21]
member
Garcia yes mayor Greenberg yes council
[20:26]
member hom yes
council member Paige
[20:34]
yes all right resolution 2465 is
approved okay uh item number 14 is a
[20:42]
resolution of the city council of the
city of Maplewood Missouri appointing
[20:45]
Paul McFarland to the sustainability
commission establishing his term of
[20:50]
office as expiring June 30th
[20:55]
2028 uh motion to approve seconded
we have a motion a second is there any
[21:02]
discussion roll call please actually I
do have one question you I I I'm looking
[21:07]
at the packet it shows expiring June
30th
[21:11]
2025 the update to the packet there was
a little mismatch in the agenda that uh
[21:17]
was posted separately from the packet
the experation dates are correct in the
[21:22]
packet that's posted online currently
okay okay any other disc
[21:29]
session then roll call please council
member Paige yes council member Garcia
[21:38]
yes mayor Greenberg yes council member
hom yes hey resolution 2466 is
[21:48]
approved thank you item number 15 is
Bill number
[21:52]
6265 an ordinance of the city council of
Maplewood uh the city of Maplewood
[21:58]
Missouri to reone 2555 Oakland Avenue
from PA public activity District to Sr
[22:05]
single family residenti residential
[22:10]
district I'll entertain approve
seconded uh is there any
[22:17]
discussion um Dr Jameson isn't available
but uh the the property is at the corner
[22:26]
of of Oakland uh facing the the high
school uh for those that don't know
[22:33]
where it is it was previously a single
family residential zone property and it
[22:40]
would be returned to single
family uh is there any any other
[22:47]
comments uh the city manager would like
to
[22:51]
make glad the house will be returning to
the market and uh adding another
[22:57]
residence to our community yeah that's
great news I'm really biased because
[23:01]
it's not far from where I live but it's
a really nice
[23:06]
neighborhood uh any other
discussion all those in favor I I I any
[23:14]
opposed uh SEC second reading bill
number 6265 an ordinance of the city
[23:20]
council of the city of Maplewood
Missouri to reone 2555 Oakland Avenue
[23:24]
from PA public activity District to Sr
single family residential
[23:30]
district motion to approve
seconded any further
[23:36]
discussion all those in favor I I any
opposed the motion will move to its
[23:44]
third and final reading to be held at
our next
[23:48]
meeting uh item number 16 is Bill number
6256 in ordinance of this city council
[23:56]
of the city of Maplewood Missouri
authorizing the city manager to execute
[24:00]
an
interoperable radio system user
[24:03]
agreement with St Louis County in my
understanding this is uh with regards to
[24:08]
the emergency Community Communications
radio
[24:12]
system and uh so uh what what is the
nature of the the
[24:20]
agreement U the agreement uh allows us
to basically uh share operations of our
[24:27]
emergency Radio Systems with St Louis
County um and this is an agreement that
[24:31]
is in existence now and will continue
now for another uh 10 years to allow
[24:38]
more coordinated emergency response
across the county is there any cost on
[24:42]
our part there is now okay are there
uh okay so uh I'll entertain a motion
[24:57]
motion to approve
seconded uh we have a motion to second
[25:01]
is there any
[25:04]
discussion I think you've answered the
questions that I had uh all those in
[25:09]
favor I I I any opposed uh second
reading bill number 6256 an ordinance of
[25:17]
the city council of the city of
Maplewood Missouri authorizing the city
[25:21]
manager to execute an interoperable
radio system user agreement with St
[25:26]
Louis County
motion to approve
[25:31]
seconded we have motion a second any
further
[25:34]
discussion all those in favor I I I any
opposed uh the third and final reading
[25:42]
will be held at our next
meeting we'll move on to item number 17
[25:48]
which is Bill number
6267 an emergency ordinance of the city
[25:52]
council of the city of Maplewood
Missouri amending the capital
[25:56]
Improvement fund Sewer Lateral fund
Firehouse bond fund Hanley Road special
[26:00]
allocation fund and the Cambridge common
special allocation fund budgets for the
[26:06]
fisal year beginning July 1st 2023
through June 30th
[26:13]
2024 uh would the city manager like to
briefly uh explain the need for the an
[26:22]
emergency ordinance yeah absolutely so
our audit is just about to be closed
[26:27]
obviously we want make sure that our
books are correct for the previous
[26:30]
fiscal year we only have one meeting
this month in order to pass this
[26:35]
ordinance before the end of the calendar
year which is the time that we need to
[26:39]
submit our audit findings um and our
financial reporting to the state of
[26:43]
Missouri to remain in
compliance okay so that means we'll be
[26:47]
reading it three times including the the
third and final reading uh right now so
[26:54]
uh for the first reading I'll entertain
a motion
[26:59]
motion to approve
seconded and we have a motion to second
[27:03]
is there any further discussion amongst
Council
[27:07]
here um all those in favor I I any
opposed uh second reading bill number
[27:17]
6267 an emergency ordinance of the city
council of the city of Maplewood
[27:21]
Missouri amending the capital
Improvement fund Sewer Lateral fund
[27:26]
Firehouse bond fund Hanley Road special
allocation fund and Cambridge common
[27:31]
special allocation fund budgets for the
fiscal year beginning July 1st 2023
[27:37]
through June 30th
2024 motion to
[27:42]
approve seconded we have a motion a
second any discussion all those in favor
[27:49]
I I I any
opposed uh final reading uh bill number
[27:56]
6267 an emergency ordinance of the city
council of the city of Maplewood
[28:00]
Missouri amending the capital
Improvement fund Sewer Lateral fund
[28:04]
Firehouse bond fund Hanley Road special
allocation fund and Cambridge common
[28:09]
special allocation fund budgets for the
fiscal year begin beginning July 1st
[28:14]
2023 through June 30th
[28:19]
2024 motion to approve seconded we have
a motion a second uh any
[28:26]
discussion uh roll call vote
please council member Garcia yes mayor
[28:33]
Greenberg yes council member hom
yes council member Paige yes he bill
[28:43]
number
6267 ordinance 6059 is approved thank
[28:50]
you uh item number 18 is Bill number
6263 an ordinance of the city council of
[28:57]
the city of Maplewood Missouri to reone
the northern
[29:02]
3,360 ft portion of 7443 Hazel Avenue
from single family residential district
[29:09]
to CB community business
[29:15]
district we need motion to approve
seconded okay we have a motion second is
[29:22]
zing discussion I wasn't part of the
first discussion at the last meeting uh
[29:28]
and we've heard from the immediate
nextdoor neighbor with his
[29:34]
concerns
uh but not necessarily a uh uh he he
[29:43]
wants issues to be addressed but uh
didn't necessarily Express
[29:50]
opposition
um yeah well I I had one item we we
[29:54]
talked about this at length um when this
was last on the agenda last meeting
[29:58]
meeting
um I think you know we had Mr King from
[30:02]
side project in the council chambers he
answered some questions for us one of
[30:06]
the questions I asked was if that space
would be planned to be utilized to move
[30:10]
the food truck back um based on my notes
his answer was no they want the food
[30:15]
they want the food truck to be as close
to the facility as possible um so I
[30:19]
expect that it's just temporarily being
parked there but I I think it would be
[30:24]
good if we could reiterate that that you
know the proposed use for customer
[30:28]
parking and based on the images that he
provided in the email Mr KN house
[30:33]
provided in the email that he sent
earlier this evening um all those trucks
[30:38]
both the food truck and the box truck
that's parked
[30:42]
there proceed way past any privacy fence
that could be put up so I do understand
[30:47]
the need for the buffering to be you
know as mature Conor trees as can be
[30:52]
planted um and I think if the city can
help to compel as part of this Pro Pro
[30:58]
those things to be done it would be in
the best interest of both the neighbors
[31:01]
and uh the business so that's my only
comment on the matter yeah I I agree um
[31:06]
there's a huge difference on impact if
you live right behind it if someone's
[31:11]
parking a sedan behind a fence versus um
you know a large box truck and you know
[31:17]
mayor Greenberg one of the points made
when it was asked last the last session
[31:22]
about if like the food truck would be
put back there is the food truck
[31:26]
functions as the kitchen for um side
project so they made the very strong
[31:32]
point that it makes no sense to make
your staff go farther between your
[31:36]
kitchen production site essentially and
your customers especially when you have
[31:40]
weather that's cold or hot you know so
um to council member H's Point that's
[31:45]
kind of why I'm hoping that this is just
a temporary placement well maybe another
[31:50]
part of the lot was being utilized for
something I don't I don't know it was
[31:53]
it's a bit surprising with the photos is
there a lever we can pull to react to
[31:58]
that if if that's becomes an issue I I
was sort of trying to figure I
[32:03]
understand what he's asking and I just
don't want to make sure we're not
[32:05]
setting up a situation here where six
months from now it's like well we voted
[32:09]
yes
so yeah certainly the the permit
[32:13]
approval process will allow us to to
guide essentially what we allow to have
[32:18]
in that space and then obviously the
enforcement uh processes have in place
[32:23]
can can help monitor that um certainly
we would uh lean on Mr ni to alert us to
[32:28]
any circumstances that were occurring
outside of what was approved for the use
[32:34]
and the staff
monitor so they would have to obtain a
[32:40]
permit for the fence uh one for any
construction on their property and of
[32:46]
course uh a permit for the the property
on Hazel so hopefully that will give us
[32:52]
an opportunity to uh to stipulate that
uh
[32:58]
that the the trucks should not
necessarily should not be located uh
[33:06]
where they currently are fair enough I
feel like Mr KN house has been very
[33:10]
reasonable so I just we meeting that
agreed
[33:14]
agreed is there any other discussion
here you need a roll call vote then
[33:21]
please council member Garcia yes mayor
Greenberg yes
[33:28]
council member hom
yes council member Paige
[33:37]
yes
okay he bill number
[33:42]
6263 ordinance
6057 is
[33:47]
approved uh item number 19 is Bill
number
[33:50]
6264 in ordinance of the city council of
the city of Maplewood Missouri providing
[33:55]
for a boundary adjustment between the
city of Webster grow in
[34:00]
Maplewood motion to approve
seconded okay motion a second uh since
[34:07]
we're transferring property to Webster
grow we're going to see a major
[34:12]
Financial windfall from this correct we
don't have to care for it yeah
[34:19]
exactly
okay so uh is there any discussion
[34:26]
here and
uh I believe Amber you're still muted so
[34:31]
if you wanted to add anything you'd have
to unmute nothing above and beyond
[34:36]
what's in the packet obviously this is
part of our partnership around improving
[34:40]
the space and allowing for that Park and
it Mak great sense to us to have Webster
[34:45]
Groves maintain the entirety of that
Park um so that we can focus our
[34:50]
attention on our other
facilities thank you uh I'll entertain a
[34:56]
roll call vote here then
council member Garcia yes mayor
[35:01]
Greenberg yes council member hom yes
council member paage yes hey Bill number
[35:10]
6264 ordinance 6058 is
approved okay item number 20 is old
[35:18]
business is there any old
[35:21]
business hearing none I'll move on to
item number 21 which is Council
[35:27]
communication
are there any Council
[35:32]
Communications U item number 22 is the
mayor's report and included in your
[35:38]
package was uh a recap of uh the events
that I attended at the National League
[35:44]
of cities City Summit in Tampa this year
uh I was somewhat over underwhelmed I
[35:53]
should say with regards to the quality
of the programming uh in comparison to
[35:58]
those programs that I attended
previously before covid uh it it was
[36:04]
still beneficial but I really need to
analyze whether it's worth uh uh
[36:11]
taxpayers money if I can't come back
with a whole lot of uh ideas and
[36:17]
inspiration as I have in the past uh so
uh if you have any questions with
[36:24]
regards to any of those uh you I would
say that the trip to the homeless
[36:30]
encampment uh the uh Tampa Hope was
probably the the most
[36:36]
interesting uh not that it you know that
we're going to set up a bunch of
[36:42]
pre-fabricated uh buildings in in
Maplewood but uh you know it it's not
[36:48]
just housing they have other programs
that I thought were helpful and there
[36:53]
were other uh seminars and workshops and
classrooms and presentations
[36:58]
dealing with uh uh housing and dealing
with other issues but
[37:05]
uh
uh and things like budgeting and there's
[37:10]
a lot of vendors at
the at in the ex exhibit hall that uh
[37:16]
that were helpful in working with other
communities and solving the same
[37:19]
problems that we're experiencing but
I'll be glad to take any of those
[37:24]
questions offline and uh yeah from any
of the council members item number 23 is
[37:31]
a city attorney's
report okay here we go I have nothing to
[37:38]
report this evening mayor okay uh and
item number 24 is the city manager
[37:43]
report I'm pleased to share that our
budget document for the current fiscal
[37:49]
year has received the government finance
officer
[37:52]
Association the work um that was the bud
that for this year um on prepared into
[37:58]
the document that is now posted on the
city's website um so we showed strength
[38:03]
and Improvement in several key areas
including um planning um and having five
[38:09]
years worth of budgeting uh in our
document versus the one so we're seeing
[38:14]
some improvement although they also
identified areas where we can continue
[38:18]
to improve which we will be focused on
in our departmental goal setting um
[38:22]
which will be shared with Council in
February tickets for the Sweet Tooth
[38:26]
tour went on sale yesterday um that
event will be January
[38:31]
2th please plan to join us it will be
cold but
[38:35]
delicious we are very excited to have
been able to Pilot a popup retail
[38:40]
initiative if you've been uh down Sutton
um next to wellbody you'll have seen
[38:45]
that reset vintage apparel which
currently has on bellw has a holiday
[38:49]
popup in that space on Sutton they're
already doing brisk business this is a a
[38:55]
a concept that we're piloting to see if
we might uh be able to provide this
[38:59]
opportunity to businesses to be able to
take up some of those vacant retail
[39:05]
spaces this has been so successful
within a short period of time um that we
[39:11]
expect there may be a long-term Prospect
for the business owner in that space can
[39:16]
can I ask one question did that work
because they're already a Maplewood
[39:19]
business and therefore they're kind of
like they've got their license and all
[39:23]
that if an outside non- Maplewood
business wanted to do that could we
[39:26]
accommodate that
you piloted it with only mle wood
[39:30]
businesses for that reason in order to
be able to turn that around fairly
[39:34]
quickly and provide for it in our
existing ordinances that being said um I
[39:39]
think we just need to do a little bit of
tinkering with our licensing and
[39:42]
ordinances to be able to offer this more
[39:48]
widely we're looking at that and and
planning and zoning is supportive and
[39:52]
aware of some additional adjustment
great
[39:57]
um and finally we do have uh the
schedule for the special business
[40:01]
district lunch and learn series now
those are
[40:06]
open to any interested uh party who
would like to come and learn for free um
[40:13]
from speakers so we'll be promoting
those on the city's
[40:17]
website
ahead okay item number 25 then is the
[40:23]
second of uh three public forums is
there any are there any hands raised
[40:28]
yes I am going to allow Mr KN house back
into the meeting and Mr KN house if you
[40:35]
could unmute can you hear me now yes
okay yeah I just want to clarify that
[40:40]
the food truck it hasn't been parked
like that for several months and I made
[40:43]
that I pointed that out in my email to
you guys today I I put it there I showed
[40:47]
that picture just to to get a view of
what it would be like if if they did
[40:50]
Park a a parallel um right along the
fence line um so I didn't want to
[40:55]
mislead anybody that that that hasn't
been like that for a few months since
[40:58]
they took that fence down and put it
back up the you the the yellow box truck
[41:03]
that was there so I just want to clarify
that didn't want to mislead anybody I
[41:05]
heard you talk about that earlier and I
appreciate you guys discussing it thank
[41:08]
you guys thank you all right is there
anyone else that would like to speak at
[41:14]
the uh public
forum there is not okay uh item number
[41:21]
26 is a business licensed revocation
hearing for map VAP L LC at 20 7213
[41:29]
Manchester Road uh will be will we be
dealing with this after the nor the
[41:36]
regular meeting
or we're cond meeting during the regular
[41:41]
meeting
okay
[41:45]
uh and then uh then I should move on to
item number
[41:51]
27 no let's go ahead and launch in okay
I'm the business owner is here here with
[41:57]
us so I'm okay bring him into the
meeting Mr
[42:03]
sirron and ask him to unmute and
identify himself hello I'm Joe siren
[42:08]
owner of
M great thank you so much thank you guys
[42:13]
so
much okay so uh for the per for purposes
[42:18]
of the record I'm Barry Greenberg mayor
the city of
[42:22]
Maplewood and there are uh we have three
m members uh four three members in
[42:29]
attendance uh
tonight uh Christa Garcia Eric paage and
[42:34]
Nick homa in addition Jackie
Graves uh Maplewood City attorney is
[42:41]
here and will advise the city council on
legal matters the Maplewood city council
[42:46]
is conducting a hearing to consider the
revocation of the business license
[42:49]
issued to map Vape LLC located at 7213
Manchester Road the hearing will be
[42:56]
conducted in accordance with section
14-55 of the Maplewood code of
[43:01]
ordinances and chapter 536 of the
revised statutes of Missouri referred to
[43:07]
as the administrative procedures
act M tea Hyde uh maplewood's resource
[43:15]
development and public engage engagement
manager is here and will be presenting
[43:20]
testimony and evidence to the city
council Mr Joe siren the M the owner of
[43:25]
map vape and holder of the business
license is attending is attending
[43:30]
tonight and uh uh Mrs M Graves uh would
you like to offer any exhibits into the
[43:38]
record at this time uh yes I would mayor
and just for clarification Amber um was
[43:44]
Mr siren provided with the documentation
as well or should we share a screen he
[43:49]
was provided with the documentation okay
thank you yes I saw it I'm sorry Mr
[43:55]
siren yes I did I did review it okay
thank you I I just to make sure you had
[44:00]
it okay um thank you mayor Greenberg I'd
like to let the record reflect that
[44:04]
several notices were mailed to Mr siren
including a first notice which was dated
[44:09]
June 17 2024 along with a revocation
notice from the Missouri Department of
[44:14]
Revenue dated June 12th 2024 a second
notice notifying Mr siren of a hearing
[44:19]
dated October 1st 2024 along with a
second revocation notice from the
[44:24]
Missouri Department of Revenue dated
August 27th 2024 and a third notice uh
[44:30]
which was dated November 20 November
excuse me 14th 2024 notifying Mr siren
[44:36]
of this hearing which was mailed to Mr
siren via certified mail the notices are
[44:41]
offered and accepted into evidence as
exhibit one and for the council they can
[44:46]
be found um in your packet at Pages 49
through
[44:51]
57 I'd like to note that pursuant to
section
[44:55]
14-55 of the Maplewood code of
ordinances it states that prior to
[44:59]
conducting this hearing the city clerk
shall mail written notice to the leny
[45:03]
that's Mr siren at their last known
address as shown in the records of the
[45:07]
city clerk advising the leny of the date
time and place of this hearing and the
[45:11]
reasons for considering the revocation
of the license as uh we have done that
[45:16]
as set forth in exhibit one the
requirements of
[45:20]
14-55 for notice have been
satisfied in addition chapter 14 of the
[45:27]
staplewood code of ordinances including
specifically chapter 14 Article 2
[45:31]
Division 1 section
14-23 c regarding the prerequisites for
[45:37]
business licenses and 14- 54 A3
regarding the grounds for revocation are
[45:43]
offered and accepted into evidence as
Exhibit 2 they are included at the
[45:47]
packet at page 67 to 68 I also want to
read into the record uh those two
[45:53]
sections section 14-23 c states sales
tax license pursuant to Missouri revised
[45:59]
Statute section
[46:11]
144.350 4 A3 States in addition to any
other revocation procedure contained in
[46:17]
this code any license issued under this
chapter may be revoked for any of the
[46:21]
following reasons subsection 3 states
failure of the license e to pay any
[46:26]
license fee or any applicable state tax
arising from the business activity or
[46:30]
premises licensed finally I'm offering
and introducing into the record exhibit
[46:36]
3 this is Missouri's uh certification of
the revocation order which is dated
[46:40]
November 22nd
2024 confirming uh that the lensee lacks
[46:46]
a valid state tax license and this is in
the packet at Pages 69 through
[46:54]
71 and actually the certification on
that is dated November 22nd 2024 the
[47:01]
revocation order for exhibit 3 is dated
August 27th 2024 just for clarification
[47:09]
and again that's exhibit 3 these are all
the exhibits I'm offering at this time
[47:13]
mayor okay does anyone have any
objection to exhibits number one through
[47:19]
number
[47:22]
three then
uh as a matter of information Miss Hyde
[47:27]
will first present evidence to the city
council pertaining to the grounds for
[47:31]
revocation as set forth in the notice Mr
siren will have an opportunity to make
[47:37]
any objections to the evidence and to
cross-examine any
[47:42]
witness uh both parties have the right
to call and examine witnesses to
[47:47]
introduce exhibits and to cross-examine
any Witnesses called to testify in this
[47:52]
matter once Miss Hyde has finished
speaking Mr siren will will be entitled
[47:58]
to call witnesses present any evidence
in opposition to the requested
[48:02]
revocation of the business license the
members of the city council are
[48:06]
generally familiar with the facts given
rise to the request for revocation based
[48:11]
upon the notice of revocation and other
documents presented to the city council
[48:17]
members and all parties Miss Hyde are
you prepared to
[48:24]
proceed yes
[48:35]
and uh Mr siren are you prepared to
proceed I don't know if I am at this
[48:41]
time I did not realize what was uh this
whole procedure was about I just would
[48:45]
like to State um I know that I was
behind on the sales taxes and I made
[48:50]
arrangements with the the Missouri
Department of Revenue and um had paid
[48:55]
them a big chunk of money up front it
was making monthly payments so I don't
[48:58]
know what had happened between there and
now I had sent in the information when I
[49:03]
was uh served by one of your members I
gave them copies of oh no I actually
[49:07]
mail emailed them in and that that was
the last I've heard about this until I
[49:13]
actually got another email from I guess
whoever sent me the email that I'm on
[49:17]
right now from so the the the question
that I have for uh Miss Graves is uh if
[49:25]
he proceeds at this time
uh we need to move forward with this
[49:31]
uh uh if if there's additional
information that needs to be
[49:38]
addressed uh we can deal with it later
in this proceeding or at a subsequent
[49:45]
proceeding is that correct uh well mayor
the hearing is scheduled for the evening
[49:51]
and was noticed for the evening as set
forth in the notices which was clear as
[49:55]
to the purpose tonight
um if there's some reason that the
[49:59]
council needs to adjourn this hearing
prior to conclusion uh you could do so
[50:05]
um for example for the re one of the
reasons you stated uh but uh the
[50:11]
intention would be that it completed be
completed this evening well I would like
[50:15]
more time if you don't mind to contact
Missouri Department Revenue again and
[50:19]
see what exactly is going on because I
have I've made a payment arranges with
[50:22]
them to have the money come out directly
out of my business account and I do know
[50:26]
what is going on um and I gave like I
said when this happened I had to fire my
[50:31]
my my tax guy back from
2022 and uh then I found this out was
[50:37]
all behind on these taxes so I made the
arrangements took money and paid them
[50:40]
off to get the caught up on this budget
billion I guess you call it for 18
[50:45]
months and now I'm in this with you guys
so if anything I would like another
[50:49]
opportunity to call the Missouri
Department revenue and see if I can
[50:52]
straighten this out with him myself
before we go any further if that would
[50:55]
be okay
uh there are other facts that are
[51:01]
pertinent
to to this hearing and uh that's only
[51:07]
one of the uh the issues you know to be
addressed here
[51:13]
so if we should move forward with this
and discuss the other uh the other
[51:21]
issues
here and uh I'm looking for legal uh
[51:27]
Direction here
since mayor the the hearing should
[51:33]
proceed unless there is a motion to
adjourn the hearing that gets the
[51:37]
majority vote of the council otherwise
you should continue to
[51:42]
proceed okay uh in that case uh I'll
petition the council here to to
[51:51]
determine uh whether we want to proceed
I think that uh that we should move
[51:58]
forward with this uh there's a lot of
testimony and information that uh that
[52:07]
we would need to hear and that doesn't
mean that we'll have every in all of the
[52:13]
facts available to us but uh uh I would
at least like to
[52:20]
get uh what we do know and there's
substantial amount of information out of
[52:25]
the way
uh does do any of the council members uh
[52:32]
not want to continue with the
hearing I don't I agree with mayor
[52:37]
greenberger that we should proceed here
that's my stance it seems like there
[52:41]
have been plentiful communication it it
you know and and
[52:49]
writing yeah and
you it this could go on forever based
[52:55]
upon you know getting each and every
piece of information uh and I agree with
[53:02]
council member Paige that the there have
been opportunities as uh demonstrated by
[53:09]
the notifications that have been
uh uh provided to uh Mr siren so
[53:19]
uh in uh Miss Garcia do you
have um
[53:27]
an
opinion I think I don't know that it's
[53:31]
worth continuing tonight given that Mr
siren has explained that he has been
[53:37]
working with the state so if there is a
sinking issue between Communications at
[53:44]
the state level that might be leading us
to have a conversation in
[53:49]
error that's the only concern I have so
what's the most recent communication we
[53:54]
have from the state
[53:58]
if we're going to get into that uh we
may want to go ahead and proceed into
[54:02]
the hearing um that is but go ahead I
believe that um the last notice that we
[54:09]
received based on the documentation that
was entered into evidence and the
[54:14]
exhibits um
was a notice dated August 27th 2024
[54:22]
which was the second or
third which was the second revocation
[54:27]
notice that we received from the
state the state provided us with a
[54:32]
certified copy of that document on
November um
[54:38]
22nd yep fine November
22nd so about three weeks
[54:44]
ago so
uh uh I certainly don't want to
[54:50]
contradict council member Garcia but
there's three of the four of us that
[54:54]
would would like to move forward
with this and uh
[55:00]
uh I I can see the the potential for
continuations you know uh
[55:08]
infinitely in this matter uh if we don't
uh address it
[55:13]
now so um based on our
uh uh our vote uh I'd like to swear in
[55:23]
the the witnesses Miss Hyde Mr siren uh
would you both raise your right
[55:30]
hand do you swear that your testimony
here today shall tell the shall be the
[55:35]
truth the whole truth and nothing but
the truth I do I
[55:40]
do okay Miss Hyde please
proceed Council as you know my name is
[55:46]
Tanish sh Hyde and By Appointment of the
city clerk of the city of Maplewood I
[55:51]
manag business licensing for the city as
the resource development and public
[55:55]
engagement manager this matter involves
mape Vape LLC located at 7213 Manchester
[56:02]
Road pursuant to section
14-23 c of the Maplewood city code no
[56:09]
Merchant shall maintain a city business
license without a valid state sales tax
[56:14]
license the Missouri Department of
Revenue notified the city on June 12th
[56:20]
2024 of the revocation of make Vapes LLC
state sales tax license the LI C
[56:27]
subsequently obtained a certificate of
no tax due on July 2nd
[56:33]
2024 and in response I issued him a city
renewed business license for 2024
[56:40]
2025 correct the Missouri Department of
Revenue again notified the city on
[56:46]
August 27th 2024 of a second license
revocation following the certified nosis
[56:52]
to the ly Mr sirron provided me with an
email that contained a state payment
[57:00]
agreement on October 3rd
2024 upon verification with the
[57:06]
Department of Revenue on October 7th
2024 the state confirmed the business
[57:12]
lack of valid sales tax license as
certified by the revocation order dated
[57:17]
November 22nd
2024 whereas section 14- 54 A3
[57:25]
authorizes revocation for failure to pay
required sales tax cause exist to revoke
[57:31]
the business license of map Vape
[57:41]
LLC unmute here
[57:47]
um Mr Mr siren do you have any questions
from Miss Hyde you'll be able to present
[57:54]
your own statement
what she did say is correct the only
[57:57]
thing that I never got anything other
from the state was that I was getting my
[58:02]
license revoked as far as I was set up
with automatic uh direct dep um debit
[58:08]
from my account per month for the next
so many months until it was caught up
[58:13]
they I made the deal with them giving a
a a three-month upfront which I did and
[58:18]
then the payments are supposed to come
out of my account so from
[58:22]
here I that's I got need I need to
contact the Missouri Department of
[58:25]
Revenue ask him why either they didn't
take the money out or the money came out
[58:29]
and they didn't credit my account
properly so it's one of the two
[58:33]
things I mean I've been in business here
for 10 years in in the city of Maplewood
[58:37]
and I've never had a problem you guys go
back and look all my stuff ever being
[58:40]
behind on my taxes until the last two
years and that's the truth so I mean you
[58:45]
can go look at your all my records
[58:49]
yourself
[58:54]
so uh
all right can I ask a question I don't
[58:58]
know what the rules are
here yeah uh so I'm noticing on the
[59:04]
payment plan like five payments should
have been made already do we have
[59:07]
anything from the state like so we are
we Flying Blind on that issue do we know
[59:11]
if those five pay right so if you sorry
I don't mean to interrupt but August I
[59:15]
know August September and October will
definitely come out I see them on the
[59:19]
plan I don't see any way to verify that
that's
[59:23]
happened council member paid just the
way this would work is the city presents
[59:28]
its evidence and then Mr siren can rebut
that evidence so I see so we need to see
[59:32]
effectly what I would suggest is that he
should provide that evidence the city is
[59:36]
not required to determine that he made
payments or
[59:44]
not yeah I guess what I'm saying is if
that could be provided right now that
[59:48]
might have an impact on my
opinion so you need me to provide that
[59:54]
the payments were coming out yeah right
that would be evidence that I didn't I
[1:00:00]
wasn't prepared for any of that I didn't
like again this is the first thing I
[1:00:03]
didn't know what I didn't know what this
was about besides me coming to talk to
[1:00:05]
you guys about the licensing that was
all I I wasn't prepared for anything
[1:00:09]
besides this just to talk to you guys
about it I read through the stuff and uh
[1:00:14]
the letters that uh that I guess Mrs uh
Miss Hyde had sent me today uh or
[1:00:21]
yesterday I guess it was and uh just
came to the meeting this why I'm here I
[1:00:27]
had no I reculation what else was going
to happen besides me talking to you guys
[1:00:30]
about the taxes talking about what's
going on Missouri Department revenue and
[1:00:33]
then me me resolving it with them and
then that's what that's what I was
[1:00:37]
assuming was going to happen so I'd like
to give Miss Hyde an opportunity to ask
[1:00:44]
questions at this point
sure um I don't really have a question
[1:00:50]
as I stated he did email me that payment
plan and I followed up with the state
[1:00:56]
to make sure because I I got a notice
saying that he was not in compliance so
[1:01:02]
then I followed up once he submitted
that he actually had a payment plan and
[1:01:07]
their response was he did not have a
valid sales tax license and I would also
[1:01:13]
like to say I sent this notice certified
mail on November 14th and it is stamped
[1:01:19]
that it was received on November 19th
and it had all of the information for
[1:01:23]
today's hearing so
I I don't know what
[1:01:28]
else I I could have
done no I'm not blaming I'm not saying
[1:01:34]
I'm not putting the blame on anybody if
anything it's on me I get that but I
[1:01:38]
just need more time to fix it with the
Missouri Department of
[1:01:42]
Revenue I mean if I call them up and
they're like give me more money to get
[1:01:46]
it back on on track I have no problem
doing that I just don't want
[1:01:49]
to I'm not trying to skip out on not
paying my taxes put it that way I
[1:01:54]
wouldn't have I wouldn't have done all
this to keep my life if I didn't think I
[1:01:57]
I got the non non- tax due when I got
the re the the license renewed from
[1:02:07]
them I me the thing I'm reading is to
resolve the matter prior to the hearing
[1:02:12]
number two says provide proof of payment
to our office no later than December 4
[1:02:16]
and I guess what I'm hearing from Miss
hey is that we never received that
[1:02:21]
information
[1:02:29]
I I'm sorry I don't have that gu that
piece with me I got the stuff that she
[1:02:32]
sent
me and the the payout agreement that I
[1:02:38]
had with Missouri Department Revenue
that's all I
[1:02:43]
brought well I I think it's a valid
point that uh Mr Paige made with regards
[1:02:50]
to you know the notification was given
with regards to the expectations
[1:02:56]
that we have so that we can actually you
know adjudicate this this matter uh and
[1:03:02]
without that information it makes makes
it very difficult for us to do our
[1:03:07]
job
uh and so I am you know at this point
[1:03:14]
I'm not sure
exactly uh you know what you could if
[1:03:20]
you're not prepared to provide us with
the information that we've asked for uh
[1:03:26]
you know the question I have is you know
should we you know pardon me wants to
[1:03:31]
move forward and uh and then uh you know
addressing the concerns of council
[1:03:38]
member Garcia you know we want to we do
want to have all the
[1:03:43]
information uh sure before making you
know any type of decision but you know
[1:03:49]
the the process has been established
notification has been given and
[1:03:54]
subsequently
uh we don't have the in you know any
[1:03:58]
information to uh to
support uh uh in particular in in this
[1:04:06]
case you know the payments uh having
been made to the sure well would you
[1:04:11]
guys be willing to give me like another
two to three weeks so we can meet again
[1:04:15]
and I can bring you everything and have
this all sorted out by
[1:04:18]
then and then you guys could go through
all this and I have everything to prove
[1:04:22]
what I've done not done and then you can
make your decision from there
[1:04:28]
you know I I would need some reassurance
that we're we're that we would be able
[1:04:33]
to at that time address this the the
concern that one of the concerns I have
[1:04:38]
is that uh you know we're allowing the
business to
[1:04:45]
continue uh
operation uh and we obviously have
[1:04:53]
evidence to indicate that uh the
business hasn't met the the requirements
[1:04:59]
uh in order to to conduct business and
so I'm in in that respect I'm reluctant
[1:05:08]
to uh to postpone the the proceedings
but I'd like to hear from the other
[1:05:14]
council
members Mr siren was it your
[1:05:19]
understanding that the only thing needed
to reinstate your license
[1:05:26]
with the state was to get on the tax
payment plan because it feels like it
[1:05:31]
feels like there's two things going on
and that Miss Hyde had said she had
[1:05:35]
reached out and to the state and been
told the license was still
[1:05:39]
revoked but you're saying no no I have a
payment plan and I mean like to me it
[1:05:45]
just sounds like maybe there's one more
step that was missed to say yes I have a
[1:05:50]
payment plan with the state and also
maybe there's I mean
[1:05:54]
it maybe there's another form or
something random that's being Miss I
[1:05:58]
don't know that because I never had to
go throughs before because when I would
[1:06:01]
always go down there I give you guys my
my yearly Ledger and then I give you the
[1:06:05]
no tax due to get my license renewed so
when I found that these taxes were bowed
[1:06:10]
they they like you're going to you're
going to have to pay this big chunk of
[1:06:12]
money and get on this payment plan and
then they'll give me a no tax due to get
[1:06:16]
my license renewed that's what I did so
it's all I've done and then I was doing
[1:06:20]
the payment plan and now it seems like
something happened that I didn't make
[1:06:23]
the payments or something and and if I
did they didn't count them towards me
[1:06:27]
and now I'm getting in this whole
situation so I just feel like I need
[1:06:30]
more time to do my own research I didn't
do any research I I was literally
[1:06:35]
looking at this thinking you guys wanted
to discuss this whole situation with me
[1:06:39]
and then telling me hey this is what
needs to happen Mr siren you either fix
[1:06:42]
this or we're going to whatever I did
not know this was the last draw what I
[1:06:47]
was coming to this meeting I
just I'm sorry I didn't take it as
[1:06:51]
serious as I thought I should have I'm I
was dealing with Missouri Department
[1:06:54]
Revenue so
I'll just be
[1:06:59]
honest we appreciate your cander on it
uh go ahead yeah I have a question maybe
[1:07:05]
for attorney Graves I share the mayor's
concerns um feels to me like there are
[1:07:11]
two issues here and the one we're
dealing with is just the Maplewood
[1:07:13]
business license the evidence that we
have is from the Department of Revenue
[1:07:17]
um and I my understanding is that we
can't continue the Maplewood business
[1:07:21]
license if the state sales tax is not up
to date so we've given notice um and to
[1:07:30]
ask for evidence of the payment by
December 4th which we don't have if we
[1:07:34]
were to adjourn and extend an additional
timeline so that Mr siren could provide
[1:07:40]
that evidence to us are we in any legal
Jeopardy does that put the city you know
[1:07:45]
because we're allowing that business to
continue to operate is that a problem
[1:07:49]
for
us so
[1:07:52]
I so council member H I do not believe
that is a problem for the city um I
[1:07:58]
would note the revocation order states
that um Mr siren cannot operate uh map
[1:08:05]
Vape um under Missouri law um and that
continuing to operate um without a valid
[1:08:11]
Missouri retail sales tax is a
misdemeanor uh so there are very real
[1:08:16]
consequences for Mr siren I I do not
believe there there are consequences for
[1:08:20]
the
[1:08:23]
city yeah I I don't want to be in the
business of gotcha time with a 10y year
[1:08:28]
long business so I I'm I'm softening my
perspective here I do think reading
[1:08:32]
these letters a little bit more
carefully be advisable going forward
[1:08:36]
correct you're right I I again I I take
ownership from that I'll be I'll be
[1:08:41]
honest yeah know fair enough I mean
that's that's fine um so I don't know I
[1:08:46]
I feel like our hand I'm sort of like
nak council person home is I I feel like
[1:08:50]
our hands are a little tied here um but
I also don't want to do something we
[1:08:54]
can't
you know Rectify if we've got it
[1:09:00]
wrong well the the different scenarios
here one if we if we revoke the business
[1:09:06]
license then uh what would be the
process to reinstate the business
[1:09:14]
license and Tiffany do you have a is
that your area of
[1:09:20]
expertise I it probably should be I can
state that I can answer that mayor um he
[1:09:26]
can reapply for a license and a license
can that has been revoked may not be
[1:09:31]
reissued until the basis for the
revocation has been cured so he would
[1:09:36]
have to prove to the city that uh this
is no longer an
[1:09:41]
issue is there a step between approval
and revoc like is there a suspend or is
[1:09:47]
it this or that not under our code okay
thank
[1:09:53]
you well I also hold it to o license too
that's that's a part of my business and
[1:09:58]
a retail license and a merchant license
so I do have all three of
[1:10:03]
those sorry we're closed yeah
[1:10:10]
sorry may I just note for the record
just before we before we move on that um
[1:10:17]
I'm gonna suggest that the email that
Tiffany had with the Department of uh
[1:10:22]
Revenue which is at Pages 58 and 5 n of
the packet be marked as exhibit four for
[1:10:28]
this
[1:10:37]
hearing uh based on the information that
attorney Graves gave us you know about
[1:10:42]
reinstatement of a business license it
it feels to me like no matter which
[1:10:46]
direction we
go they're we're going to have to have a
[1:10:49]
resolution with the Department of
Revenue and Mr siren before we like if
[1:10:54]
we adjourn tonight that's going to have
to happen or else we're going to be
[1:10:56]
doing this again uh we're going to have
to have evidence of payment and make
[1:11:00]
sure that the resolution with the
Department of Revenue is all ironed out
[1:11:04]
and if we revoke then once that's ironed
out we can always issue another business
[1:11:08]
license so um to me it feels like we
land in similar places no matter what
[1:11:13]
the path forward tonight is I I actually
had one thought about that though and I
[1:11:18]
I should probably know this and I don't
would I don't know I'm assuming if he
[1:11:22]
had to reapply for another business
license after we revoked one whatever
[1:11:25]
fees are associated that would be back
in
[1:11:28]
force is that a I I should know this but
is that a significant
[1:11:34]
amount does anybody know what that fee
is I do not know for this
[1:11:40]
business yeah I know I know it cost me
you up money to get a license every time
[1:11:45]
I I renew it every single year and then
The Upfront does cost more but I just
[1:11:50]
don't want to I mean if I can save this
from you guys closing me down and give
[1:11:53]
me another three weeks to fix this I
mean if I have to I'll take I'll pull
[1:11:57]
money out of my 401k to freaking pay
this I don't care I just didn't want to
[1:12:01]
have to do that I'll take penal I'll
take penalties and hits on that to be
[1:12:05]
honest with youut down either way
because sounds like you're committing a
[1:12:09]
crime if if you continue to operate
business whether we say so or not so i'
[1:12:13]
I'd be careful there fee that he paid
for um 2425 was
[1:12:21]
$19.72 okay so not not
substantial so so one one scenario then
[1:12:26]
would be to revoke the license and then
as soon as Mr siren could provide
[1:12:33]
evidence of uh of his standing with the
state then I'm assuming at that point uh
[1:12:40]
he would be allowed
to uh apply and we would approve a
[1:12:45]
business license does that sound
correct yeah but was going to happen
[1:12:50]
I'll lose all my business and I'll be
out of business I can't do that well
[1:12:55]
well what I'm saying is that 10 year
following here you
[1:13:00]
know well you know it seems like this
hinges upon the uh the state
[1:13:08]
acknowledging that you're in in decent
standing with them so you know in your
[1:13:15]
opinion how long would it take for you
to ascertain
[1:13:19]
that I think by the first of the year
for sure I mean I'll call them tomorrow
[1:13:23]
and figure out if I can get this done
tomorrow but I I've tried to call them
[1:13:27]
before on Monday and they were so busy
they put me on a on a call back they
[1:13:32]
never call me
back
[1:13:36]
so I mean I I'm happy to sit on it for
till our next meeting but I I don't
[1:13:41]
think that solves Mr siren's problem it
still doesn't sound like he should be
[1:13:44]
operating his business whether or not we
put this off or act today either way as
[1:13:50]
far as the state's concerned I'm not
sure uh I don't think that solved your
[1:13:53]
problem but you know I like I said I
don't I don't want to be in the gotta
[1:13:57]
business if this is an honest mistake or
there's some documentation that this
[1:14:01]
that's just there that we don't have in
front of us I mean I the letter was
[1:14:05]
clear you should have had it tonight but
again I you know I'm I'm willing to sit
[1:14:09]
on it for a couple weeks if we need
to yeah I agree with council member
[1:14:14]
Paige
um I resp I also think though that it's
[1:14:19]
not really our purview to manage what's
going on with map vape and the state of
[1:14:24]
Missouri Department Revenue we're just
talking about our business license
[1:14:27]
tonight um I'll just Echo that yeah I
think these these letters were clear and
[1:14:33]
I I'm all about Second Chances so if if
you have evidence to show that you've
[1:14:38]
paid and you can provide that evidence
to us um I'm willing to you know adjourn
[1:14:43]
this now I guess my qu my question is so
now that we've we've got you here Mr
[1:14:47]
siren and this is all clear if we get
back in January and we have to do this
[1:14:51]
again I think it's safe to say that I
would be comfortable
[1:14:55]
with the revocation and moving forward
if you can't provide and you don't have
[1:14:59]
this cleared up um my question for
attorney Graves is if we adjourn this
[1:15:04]
now do we have to come back and do this
entire thing again with entering
[1:15:08]
exhibits into evidence and hearing or
can we pick up where we left off we will
[1:15:11]
be able to pick up where you left off
okay okay my my other question is what
[1:15:15]
happened I have is all figured out and
I'm bringing you the the information to
[1:15:18]
your guys office and it's all taken care
of do we have to meet again or are we
[1:15:22]
back are we then okay or do we have to
meet
[1:15:26]
regardless if you provide the
documentation which shows that you are
[1:15:32]
um good with the state of Missouri and
that you have a Missouri retail sales
[1:15:37]
tax license not just that you've paid
made payments um
[1:15:44]
then I don't did I miss something here
did I was was I supposed to like buy get
[1:15:49]
another did I miss getting the license
renewed is other saying the revocation
[1:15:53]
order from the Department of Revenue
states that you are notified that your
[1:15:58]
res your retail sales tax license was
revoked by the state of
[1:16:03]
Missouri so the information we've been
provided is that you do not have a sales
[1:16:08]
tax license to operate in
Missouri okay then I need to get a hold
[1:16:13]
of because I was very confused I I
didn't I don't even have anything from
[1:16:16]
them saying I don't have a my license
ever revoked it says that I made an
[1:16:21]
agreement with him and I got my no tax
due so I could get my license renewed
[1:16:24]
with the state of uh Maplewood so I need
to you got to give me some time to call
[1:16:30]
to get this taken care of I I'm will
whatever and I I'll need a little
[1:16:35]
guidance but whatever motion I need to
make to say let's sit on this till the
[1:16:40]
next meeting in January I'm willing to
make
[1:16:43]
um whatever that whatever that verbage
is well I I think that you know the idea
[1:16:52]
here is that it if we don't proceed with
the revocation right now then uh Mr
[1:17:01]
siren's going to be operating at his own
risk with regards to the
[1:17:06]
state uh and
so either way all of this has to be
[1:17:12]
resolved before the next meeting so
correct so the idea would be that we
[1:17:19]
wouldn't you there'd be no need for a
revocation hearing if everything is
[1:17:25]
taken care of if it's not taken care of
then I think it's very clear which
[1:17:30]
direction you know uh we would be going
on on the revocation yeah fair enough I
[1:17:37]
be I be I I understand completely I
appreciate your
[1:17:42]
guys um so I I just have one question on
Clarity based on something that mayor
[1:17:46]
Greenberg said it no matter what action
we take here tonight seems to me like M
[1:17:52]
Vape is operating outside the bounds of
the law right right now because there is
[1:17:57]
no sales
tax there is no valid state sales
[1:18:03]
tax uh certificate or no matter what we
do here so like this is something that
[1:18:08]
has to be handled with the Department of
Revenue we just can't issue a business
[1:18:12]
license in Maplewood if that other
license doesn't exist is that is that
[1:18:16]
accurate Jackie or yes that's accurate I
we are not we the city are not the ones
[1:18:23]
to determine whether or not uh Mr siren
is in violation of state law all we can
[1:18:28]
say is that here's our city business
license and our city business license
[1:18:33]
says that you can't have a our code says
you can't have a business license if you
[1:18:37]
don't have the state retail sales tax
license yeah so if he's operating
[1:18:42]
without a state retail sales tax license
either he shouldn't be issued a business
[1:18:47]
license or if he has one the code says
that it should be revoked
[1:18:52]
so does that answer your question mom
yeah it does and I I've I mean I think
[1:18:58]
there's enough gray area and potential
for miscommunication that I'm willing to
[1:19:03]
you know adjourn and give until the next
the January meeting to see if uh this
[1:19:08]
can be settled with the state and the
evidence that we need produced so that
[1:19:12]
we don't even need to either have the
hearing or if we can't iron it out we'll
[1:19:17]
come back here and pick up where we left
off if we do it' be a fast meeting I
[1:19:21]
yeah I agree with that and I think uh
I'm totally willing to believe that the
[1:19:25]
state is operating like a Swiss watch
right so I like I've dealt with these
[1:19:28]
kind of issues so I I don't want to just
and I if it doesn't hurt us then we're
[1:19:32]
just sort of sitting on the sidelines
and letting it play out and I'm
[1:19:37]
perfectly fine with
that I don't want to put um unnecessary
[1:19:42]
impediments in the way of a business
yeah seeing that this might be easily
[1:19:47]
enough
resolved so so just to be clear uh Mr
[1:19:54]
siren you're going to be contacting the
state of Missouri uh and you know we
[1:20:00]
just I just want to you be clear that
what you know I understand the the
[1:20:07]
difficulties of dealing with the state
uh but this this does need to be
[1:20:13]
resolved I agree and whether you have to
go to Jesse or or what you have to do
[1:20:19]
I've I've haven't been in that exact
situation but I've experienced the same
[1:20:24]
frustration with the the workings of the
the state of Missouri uh and it's you
[1:20:30]
know it's imperative that you
uh get you know back in the good graces
[1:20:38]
of the state of Missouri and then at
that point
[1:20:42]
uh the your your uh business license
with the state of I mean with the city
[1:20:49]
of Maplewood should just be pretty much
a formality I would think
[1:20:54]
and so uh you know I don't want to leave
this
[1:20:59]
until uh our next meeting I want I I
really want to see this resolved right
[1:21:05]
away uh and uh so that we don't have to
you know to go through this uh this
[1:21:13]
process uh because as as you know if if
we have to go through this process a
[1:21:19]
month from now uh I think we we all know
what the outcome is going to be and fair
[1:21:25]
enough it doesn't help the it doesn't
help you obviously it doesn't help the
[1:21:29]
city of
Maplewood uh and uh I don't want to see
[1:21:34]
one of our businesses in trouble with
the state of Missouri either me either I
[1:21:38]
I don't
so so at this point
[1:21:45]
uh uh this isn't a normal Council matter
uh from a legal
[1:21:51]
perspective uh should we then make a
motion to adjourn the hearing to January
[1:22:01]
14th
14th okay then I'll entertain a motion
[1:22:06]
at this point motion to adjourn the
revocation hearing to January 14
[1:22:12]
2025 I need a second
seconded we have a motion in the second
[1:22:18]
uh we've already had our discussion
unless there's any other comments that
[1:22:22]
anyone wants to make so it this point uh
we need a we need a Voice vote or a uh
[1:22:30]
roll
[1:22:33]
call I'm not
sure uh you just do a roll
[1:22:40]
call okay uh Danel would you like to
your council member Garcia yes mayor
[1:22:50]
Greenberg yes council member hom yes
[1:22:56]
council member Paige
yes okay okay so uh please take care of
[1:23:04]
it uh you know if there's anything that
the city can do to help you know we will
[1:23:09]
try but the the fact of the matter is
your issue is with the the state of
[1:23:14]
Missouri and
uh
[1:23:18]
uh yeah good luck thank you guys I
appreciate your patience and I will take
[1:23:23]
care of this I prise you all right good
luck thank you Merry
[1:23:29]
Christmas like yep yep have a good night
so let me get back to my notes Here uh
[1:23:38]
with regards to the meeting uh that was
item number
[1:23:44]
26 uh item number 27 is a motion to hold
a close session is there a need to hold
[1:23:49]
a closed
session uh then
[1:23:55]
item number 28 is adjournment do we have
a motion motion to adjourn second we
[1:24:02]
have motion a second uh all those in
favor I I I any
[1:24:08]
opposed uh
the uh the meeting is
[1:24:13]
adjourned and so you know I wouldn't
mind you know staying here and talking
[1:24:18]
about it but uh needs to be a public
meeting so we really can't do that so uh
[1:24:24]
hopefully we won't need to have any
discussion before next
[1:24:27]
time so uh quick question city
manager the the the tech updates in our
[1:24:36]
Council chamber so that started this
this week last week almost concluded
[1:24:42]
it'll be done next week oh awesome okay
we'll have our next meeting in person I
[1:24:48]
mean my sofa is comfier than my chair
there you can bring it to the council
[1:24:53]
chamber then
[Laughter]
[1:24:58]
okay well uh if there's other other
questions we can't conduct business but
[1:25:04]
uh we can still ask uh you know staff
questions if we want to uh but it sounds
[1:25:10]
like we've we've explored that and so uh
uh we'll be meeting again on uh and as
[1:25:17]
soon as uh Tiffany as soon as there's
any evidence that he's in compliance
[1:25:23]
please let us know
uh but I I hope that he got the
[1:25:29]
message uh because I think I think the
message is very clear and uh you know
[1:25:34]
people need to do their homework when
they're you know when they're running a
[1:25:39]
business so uh the meeting is adjourned
I guess uh we can all leave the meeting
[1:25:46]
and I hope everyone has a wonderful
Christmas Hanukkah New Year and uh
[1:25:54]
uh look forward to getting back together
in January yep happy holiday holidays
[1:26:01]
all have a good night than everyone bye
bye bye