Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[1:47]
Chair Price: This commission is called to order at 630.
[1:50]
Would you call the roll?
[1:54]
[Reading names]
[2:07]
Would you please join us for the Pledge of Allegiance?
[2:14]
[Reciting Pledge of Allegiance]
[2:38]
At this time we have no cards that are brought forward clerk?
[2:46]
Nothing on the comment cards?
[3:01]
>> No comments.
[3:03]
Chair Price: Thank you.
[3:09]
So at this time we will have comments from the public.
[3:14]
I have two cards that are submitted.
[3:16]
You have three minutes to respond.
[3:18]
I will call you up to the podium Here.
[3:23]
Kathy Ashford is the first one to come up and make
[3:30]
a presentation.
[3:41]
>> I just don't think it's a good idea to have a liquor store
[3:43]
next to a senior building.
[3:45]
I don't think that alcohol should be sold there and brought
[3:53]
on the premises and it's going to attract all kind of people
[3:58]
and it's just for the safety and well-being for seniors
[4:01]
that are living there.
[4:03]
That's my take.
[4:08]
I hope I'm presenting this properly.
[4:12]
Because there's a lot of homeless people coming around
[4:17]
and sleeping around there and doing all kinds of weird things.
[4:21]
So I think alcohol being sold would be a nuisance.
[4:28]
Is that it?
[4:33]
Chair Price: When we have this come up on the agenda later
[4:37]
would you like to come up and make comments about this?
[4:39]
We will be -- this is for stuff not on the agenda.
[4:45]
There are no other public comments
[4:48]
on items that are not on the agenda.
[4:50]
We will now move to The consent calendar.
[5:06]
I would someone like to make a motion on the consent calendar?
[5:14]
>> I will make a motion to approve the consent calendar.
[5:26]
Chair Price: Please take the roll clerk.
[5:31]
[Reading names]
[5:48]
We now move to public hearings.
[5:50]
The first one is on the library center.
[6:06]
>> I think they're loading up the Powerpoint.
[6:14]
Thank you.
[6:16]
Good evening chair and commissioners.
[6:19]
Next on the agenda is a design review
[6:23]
for the proposed community center located at Main Street.
[6:29]
Before I begin I just wanted to say how excited I
[6:33]
am to present this project to you all not just on my behalf
[6:38]
but on behalf of all the staff, the leadership
[6:41]
team friends of the Oakley Library City Council past
[6:45]
and present and residents who all envisioned this library
[6:51]
and have taken part in the various steps along the way.
[6:55]
As you know this is one of the biggest projects
[6:57]
the city has taken part in in quite a long time.
[7:01]
And we are all just excited about it.
[7:04]
But with that being said I will start my Powerpoint.
[7:12]
If the control works.
[7:23]
Next slide please.
[7:26]
So as you know the project site is here at our Civic Center
[7:32]
site on Main Street.
[7:34]
Next slide please.
[7:36]
Surrounding uses include single family residences
[7:41]
to the east and south and city Hall
[7:44]
to the west and commercial shopping
[7:47]
to the north of Main Street.
[7:49]
This application is requesting approval of a variance
[7:54]
for the proposed library and community center.
[7:58]
Originally the proposed library was going to be a new single
[8:03]
story approximately 13,000ft².
[8:06]
And this library was meant to replace the existing
[8:10]
library that shares a space with the library at Freedom High
[8:14]
School.
[8:15]
Some updated plans after publication of the notice
[8:19]
of public hearing the project team in conjunction with city
[8:22]
management agreed on a minor modification on square footage
[8:25]
that reduced overall square footage of the project by adding
[8:29]
approximately 500ft² of interior space and reducing the covered
[8:32]
exterior space.
[8:34]
The changes to the square footage of the library
[8:37]
and community center would result in approximately 13,030
[8:40]
square foot building which approximately is 12,000ft²
[8:44]
for the building.
[8:47]
A little over 1000ft² exterior space.
[8:53]
The overall building design and layout
[8:57]
does remain unchanged for Mac existing conditions at the site
[9:03]
here as you see is relatively flat.
[9:07]
There's a zone on the vacant parcel south heading up
[9:11]
towards the property lines south to the residential properties.
[9:16]
The site is developed with city park
[9:20]
and associated improvements including the amphitheater stage
[9:23]
area bathroom and parking and roadways.
[9:26]
The site south to City Park is currently
[9:31]
utilized as a staging area for city vehicles, vehicle parking
[9:36]
for other equipment that we have and storage of other equipment.
[9:43]
A little background as previously mentioned the Oakley
[9:47]
Library shares approximately 3000ft² of space within the high
[9:53]
school library and was originally intended
[9:56]
as a temporary facility.
[9:59]
The proposed facility is intended
[10:02]
to serve as the new permanent library and community resource
[10:06]
building for Oakley residents.
[10:08]
This project will bring a highly anticipated building library
[10:12]
to the heart of downtown Oakley.
[10:15]
I won't go through the entire background
[10:19]
as I previously mentioned since we became
[10:23]
a city I think we have envisioned
[10:25]
having our own library but most recently in 2023 efforts
[10:29]
to have that library built and brought forth began.
[10:36]
Many of the dates show meetings that staff
[10:41]
has had with City Council common design
[10:45]
and envisioning meetings with the public and other meetings
[10:51]
to discuss financing and things of that sort.
[10:54]
That ramped up in 2023.
[10:59]
So what we have before you is we have a design review
[11:03]
for the proposed library and community center
[11:05]
which includes evaluation of the site parking and circulation
[11:10]
landscaping and architectural design of the building
[11:14]
itself an overall consistency with the downtown zoning
[11:18]
standards.
[11:19]
We also have a variance request for setback variances
[11:23]
within the downtown core district
[11:25]
which will help a better integrate
[11:28]
the library with the surrounding facilities and public spaces.
[11:33]
As I mentioned the design review which
[11:36]
is required for new above ground buildings
[11:41]
we have before you the design review
[11:45]
helps the city ensure compliance with applicable standards
[11:49]
established by the city's zoning ordinance.
[11:52]
Through that design review we review
[11:56]
consistency with our parking standards
[11:58]
and landscaping and things of that sort as well.
[12:05]
Here we have the proposed parking and landscaping layout.
[12:11]
The parking layout is envisioned for the southern side
[12:19]
of the building which will also tuck it in and bring
[12:22]
the building forward in front of you.
[12:25]
45 spaces are proposed including Ada spaces.
[12:31]
The site also has a variety of landscaping
[12:35]
proposed which includes about 19 trees
[12:39]
a mix of shrubs ground covers and other plantings.
[12:43]
With those 19 trees we also achieve about a 50% shade
[12:48]
coverage for the parking area.
[12:56]
Here we see a rendering of what the building would potentially
[13:00]
look like.
[13:02]
The building is oriented with the primary entrance
[13:05]
and Le frontage facing the Civic Center park
[13:09]
area with Main Street beyond.
[13:11]
The facility is designed as a functional community
[13:14]
hub intended to replace the existing Oakley Library.
[13:18]
New orientation of the building also
[13:20]
helps it be visually prominent and welcoming to the public.
[13:26]
The design incorporates articulated roof forms covered
[13:31]
exterior areas and extensive glazing
[13:34]
to support interest natural daylight and a connection
[13:37]
between indoor and outdoor spaces.
[13:40]
Exterior materials include metal siding metal roofing
[13:44]
and aluminum frame doors and windows and storefront systems.
[13:48]
Wood board is incorporated into the design
[13:51]
to provide a break in materials.
[13:53]
The building's architectural design and material palette
[13:56]
are carefully selected to ensure long term
[13:59]
durability easy maintenance and civic esthetic that
[14:03]
reflects the Oakley community.
[14:06]
This is an example of the metal siding proposed
[14:10]
for the building and different lighting
[14:12]
to provide how it would look at different times of the day
[14:15]
or in the shade.
[14:19]
As I previously mentioned we also have the variance request.
[14:23]
The applicant is seeking variances
[14:25]
for the front setback facing east
[14:28]
towards the north cross lane.
[14:30]
The side setbacks and city park and south towards the existing
[14:37]
residential properties and then the rear setback
[14:39]
to the west towards City Hall in order
[14:42]
to allow for the proposed library to exceed the setback
[14:46]
maximums in the Downtown Specific plan in order to create
[14:51]
and enhanced library siting that allows minimal disruption
[14:54]
to the existing facilities.
[14:56]
To grant variance the Planning Commission
[14:59]
must make three findings for approval which
[15:02]
are outlined in the resolution.
[15:06]
The project is exempt from environmental Quality Act
[15:12]
pursuant to guideline section 15 in developments.
[15:18]
As I previously mentioned draft findings for the designer
[15:22]
and variance application can be found
[15:24]
in the proposed resolution.
[15:26]
As such staff recommends the Planning Commission
[15:29]
approved the proposed resolution and variance as conditioned.
[15:36]
I would also like to mention that the applicant team
[15:39]
or design team is here with a brief presentation that
[15:44]
will show some great pictures as well.
[15:46]
Thank you.
[15:52]
Chair Price: Any questions from the Commission?
[16:00]
Commissioner Oliveros: I do have a quick question
[16:02]
for the applicant if possible.
[16:04]
The design is great.
[16:07]
>> We will let them do the presentation.
[16:10]
Commissioner Oliveros: I got ahead of myself.
[16:13]
I'm too excited.
[16:18]
>> Thank you very much for this opportunity.
[16:20]
My name is Susie here with the project Architect
[16:24]
and together we will walk you through some
[16:26]
of the backstory on the design and how we got to this place
[16:31]
in our design.
[16:32]
This is always the test.
[16:36]
Look at that.
[16:37]
So part of our process is this gamma to listen and observe
[16:45]
and then to design and we've had a great opportunity
[16:48]
to do that with your community here.
[16:52]
Our process so far has been organized
[16:57]
into three phases so far gamma a validation phase which
[17:03]
was programing, a concept design phase which was the concept
[17:06]
and now we are in design development
[17:08]
and that's the point at which we submit for the planning
[17:11]
department preview.
[17:14]
As a foundational step we began with the spatial programing that
[17:20]
includes this great number of meetings you see there,
[17:24]
many of them with the library and with city staff,
[17:28]
15 informational interviews where we talk
[17:31]
to 26 people in the community.
[17:33]
The concept design included all of those meetings there
[17:37]
plus three community engagement sessions
[17:40]
which were wonderful opportunities for us to hear
[17:43]
directly from folks also.
[17:45]
And then finally the design development we have done
[17:49]
a number of meetings with the library and with the city staff
[17:52]
and with our core team and the subsets of that including Parks
[17:58]
and Rec, the IT folks, etc..
[18:01]
So it's been a pretty inclusive process
[18:04]
and it is based on that that we have developed this design
[18:08]
starting with project goals.
[18:11]
Fundamental project goal for this project
[18:13]
that we heard from the community as well as many of you
[18:16]
here in this room is that the library and community center
[18:19]
should be a welcoming hub where residents of all ages
[18:23]
and backgrounds can come together
[18:25]
for enrichment and connection.
[18:28]
This is a place that will serve as a centerpiece
[18:31]
of your downtown Civic Center and it's
[18:34]
designed to embody Oakley's family
[18:37]
friendly and characteristic supporting collaborative feeling
[18:42]
that you get when you visit and you are in this town.
[18:47]
And supporting collaboration come
[18:49]
a lifelong learning and smart development
[18:52]
has been incorporated into our thinking
[18:56]
complete with indoor outdoor connections?
[18:59]
Cost efficient spatial organization,
[19:04]
cost efficient construction methodology.
[19:07]
Cost has been at the core of every decision we've made
[19:11]
and all of this plus sustainability integrated
[19:15]
into a design that's meant to capture the essence.
[19:24]
With these goals as our foundation
[19:26]
we then went into programing sessions with the city
[19:30]
and library staff.
[19:31]
We came to a 1200 zero square foot library
[19:34]
over half of that is attributed to the library itself
[19:38]
and the support spaces and the remainder
[19:41]
is for shared community spaces like the large community room
[19:45]
and dedicated city spaces also within the plan.
[19:49]
So you can see those spaces that are to scale on the left
[19:56]
and the spatial adjacency is what
[19:58]
should be next to what is in the diagram on the right.
[20:02]
We also had the opportunity to spend some time
[20:06]
on your site looking and the park is obviously
[20:11]
a huge asset to your community life and the city
[20:15]
and it's already a great local public gathering
[20:18]
space in its own right.
[20:21]
We spent some time researching and taking consideration
[20:25]
of the environmental factors.
[20:27]
We learned things that you already
[20:29]
know like it's hot in the summer here.
[20:33]
Not so much in the Bay area we will say and it is foggy
[20:37]
and chilly in the winter and this site
[20:40]
offers this excellent orientation opportunity
[20:43]
for north facing natural Daylit library spaces and community
[20:48]
spaces and a south facing move for mounting
[20:55]
arrays for electricity.
[20:57]
We also map the site's critical landscape elements.
[21:02]
You have some tremendous trees come on that beautiful oak
[21:07]
heritage tree there on the Western side of the site come
[21:11]
a vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns
[21:14]
and these outlook opportunities from the library site itself
[21:18]
all of which complement and work well together
[21:21]
except for your existing bandshell and restroom building
[21:27]
and we were delighted when we were given the green light
[21:30]
by city staff and council to remove and replace those two
[21:35]
components as part of this project which we think
[21:38]
is great news for the project and for the park.
[21:41]
In our analysis we also recognize the importance
[21:45]
of that pedestrian connector that
[21:47]
goes from City Hall and then the paths that
[21:51]
go through the park towards the City Hall or Main Street
[21:56]
all of which are very important.
[21:58]
With input from the city staff we
[22:02]
are proposing that the vehicular traffic be one way moving
[22:08]
east to west to kind of cut off the tendency for people
[22:14]
to use the shortcut through that parking lot that would be south
[22:19]
of the library site making it more pedestrian
[22:23]
friendly and safer.
[22:26]
And we spent some time on your delta really
[22:30]
taking that in and understanding what that's about
[22:33]
and what that feels like as a way
[22:36]
to figure out how we might incorporate
[22:38]
the feeling of the delta into this library design which
[22:42]
takes us to design.
[22:43]
This is a plan you have seen and you're probably
[22:47]
familiar with now as mentioned the design approach is
[22:51]
to place that new building tight towards that central walkway
[22:57]
as we've been calling it and with a grand porch
[23:02]
that looks out towards the central pavilion which
[23:06]
now sweeps across this design instead of being a three
[23:11]
quarter or two thirds it is now a full half circle
[23:15]
that sweeps across the northern side of the park opening
[23:19]
that up for your wonderful special Friday
[23:23]
night and weekend events you have on this site.
[23:26]
In the building itself gamma the shared spaces for the city
[23:31]
and city spaces are on the left in blue
[23:34]
and the library public spaces are in orange with the library
[23:39]
operations in that pink band that's on the bottom
[23:42]
and you can see the parking lot in that plan.
[23:48]
So the approach we adopted for bringing the delta in
[23:54]
was the sense you get when you're on the delta
[23:56]
there's the open water and then there's
[23:59]
that wonderful magical transition between the Delta's
[24:03]
edge and solid ground.
[24:05]
We brought that thinking into the site plan.
[24:15]
Our approach here is the amphitheater
[24:20]
if you will is open water and that
[24:23]
transitions through this rich variety of spaces which
[24:26]
is the pavilion gamma Delta inspired landscaping
[24:31]
that big grand front porch and into the reading
[24:34]
room with these glorious north facing windows
[24:37]
and there's that south facing roof
[24:40]
that you can now generate electricity
[24:43]
for this all electric project.
[24:48]
And here is the rendering you've seen before.
[24:54]
The library is on the left side and the community room
[24:59]
is on the left side and the pavilion is right in the middle
[25:03]
and behind that is the main porch and the entry
[25:07]
into the library, one of the two entries into the library.
[25:13]
And here is the site plan.
[25:18]
Chris will talk about the floor plan here in a minute
[25:20]
but you can see there's the reconfigured amphitheater,
[25:23]
the pavilion right there pushing out into the amphitheater
[25:28]
zone, the rich landscaping on either side of the walkway that
[25:33]
takes you to the porch and takes you into the lobby and community
[25:40]
center rooms.
[25:42]
With that I will let Chris walk us through the plan.
[26:00]
>> I know we are limited at times so I will cover this
[26:02]
at a bit of a high level.
[26:04]
We have our shared entry hall in yellow
[26:06]
which allows access for the building from both park
[26:09]
side to the north and also the parking lot side to the south
[26:13]
which puts you in that same central hall
[26:15]
and then everything is accessed off of that.
[26:18]
As you mentioned you have the library programing
[26:21]
on the right which is in red.
[26:24]
Specifically located the adults teens and children's area
[26:28]
against that northern side which is
[26:31]
right against the large windows that face the park's
[26:34]
so you can see what else the community is doing
[26:38]
and also get views of the great greenery and surrounds.
[26:43]
Similarly on the left hand side of the plan
[26:45]
we have community spaces in city spaces and the main program
[26:50]
being that community room that similarly
[26:52]
is right against the north side double doors that open out
[26:57]
to the patio so it kind of enhances this connection as
[27:01]
much as possible.
[27:03]
I just want to bring up a few changes
[27:07]
we made since the community outreach sessions.
[27:10]
We heard a few different things which we have tried
[27:13]
to incorporate into the plan.
[27:15]
One was is there any way we can make the library any bigger
[27:19]
given the limited scope and budget and we were able to push
[27:23]
the glass wall just about eight feet which got us that 500ft²
[27:30]
behind us and the library is super excited about that and we
[27:34]
are excited to just give that little bit of generosity
[27:37]
into the plan.
[27:37]
We also heard a lot of feedback about making that area bigger.
[27:46]
So we have reworked the Bookstacks a little bit
[27:49]
to provide more seating for the teens
[27:51]
and also provide some seating with the stacks
[27:54]
next to it that can serve as a overflow.
[28:00]
In the children's area we heard a bit about wanting sensory play
[28:04]
and rotary has donated panels that we
[28:08]
will go into that section.
[28:11]
And then lastly we heard comments about the exterior
[28:15]
bathrooms where those are best located
[28:17]
and we have moved those to the southeast corner of the building
[28:21]
with a path directly to the playground area which
[28:25]
was a big concern for parents.
[28:30]
Here is just a taste of -- these aren't fully developed but gives
[28:35]
you an idea of the spaces in the community room.
[28:39]
It will have an exposed wood structure
[28:40]
to provide warmth inside alongside a wood
[28:43]
ceiling and those full height windows
[28:47]
on two sides of the community room to the greenery beyond.
[28:52]
This is looking from the adult section, the adult seating
[28:58]
area along the glass wall and then the covered porch
[29:01]
as well both defined by a slightly lower roof that
[29:05]
is a more human scale next to the grander scale.
[29:14]
And then the kids area similarly is against that large glass wall
[29:20]
so you can get a good sense of daylight and view to the outside
[29:24]
then there's the sensory panels.
[29:29]
For exterior materials durability and low maintenance
[29:38]
and affordability we're kind of the main drivers here
[29:43]
so we're choosing a metal siding that does that.
[29:51]
A big generous roof that provides
[29:55]
shade and then again indoor outdoor connection.
[30:00]
We talked about this a little bit.
[30:04]
This is just another photo of the exterior materials
[30:08]
we are proposing.
[30:10]
It's a pretty neutral palette that
[30:12]
allows plants surrounding it to really take the forefront
[30:15]
and have their shadows get cast against this more
[30:19]
neutral palette.
[30:20]
In the middle siding there is the main siding
[30:23]
that goes towards the park and has a slight pattern that
[30:26]
captures the light and also reflects
[30:28]
a little bit of the surrounding nature similar to the water
[30:32]
in the Delta which is kind of a reflection back.
[30:40]
So here is what we are calling the Paseo which
[30:45]
is a path from North Cross to City Hall.
[30:48]
You can see the dome in the background.
[30:49]
You can see the rich variety of small intimate seating
[30:54]
areas and larger seating areas beyond the plant palette that
[30:59]
references the Delta, reedy plants and grasses and then
[31:04]
trees and large overhangs for shade.
[31:06]
This is an image of the new pavilion which
[31:11]
serves the functions you guys had before for performances
[31:15]
and movies, concerts but it also adds this other level
[31:20]
of programing where it can be for picnics or small gatherings.
[31:24]
An event on Saturday so it opens up
[31:28]
new possibilities for the park.
[31:31]
And finally just an overview aerial of the park
[31:36]
with the new library.
[31:38]
So thank you all and I'm ready to take any questions.
[31:49]
>> Thank you.
[31:51]
>> Any questions for the applicant?
[31:57]
Commissioner Oliveros: First and foremost thank you very much.
[32:00]
I am very excited about this and I
[32:02]
did attend one of the planning sessions
[32:04]
so as I was hearing your feedback I said good
[32:07]
that they are adding this.
[32:09]
I think what makes anything successful is that you get input
[32:12]
from the community to make sure that it benefits it.
[32:15]
And also that it's aligned with our mission and vision which
[32:19]
it truly is.
[32:20]
One question I did have on the design
[32:24]
were two questions I know this is just a sample
[32:29]
but just to confirm this park will
[32:31]
be staying the same correct?
[32:41]
>> I'll answer that.
[32:42]
So you're talking about the playground portion?
[32:49]
>> My second question is one of the feedback that I did have
[32:53]
and it is for the pavilion area where it will be performing is
[33:01]
it incorporating the sound and lighting already?
[33:05]
Because it's currently set up now at night time
[33:08]
we have a very hard time listening to the sound and
[33:12]
or the lighting.
[33:14]
When it's start time we can't really
[33:16]
see what's going on on the stage so I
[33:18]
know that's something that was asked in the feedback session
[33:21]
so I don't know if that was reconsidered or considered.
[33:28]
>> I don't know if that building gets into this amount of detail
[33:32]
but definitely some feedback we'd be happy to take back
[33:35]
to the city management and I'm sure those are elements that
[33:39]
they are talking about when we rebuild that amphitheater.
[33:44]
Commissioner Oliveros: That was it for me.
[33:47]
Thank you.
[33:50]
Chair Price: No other questions?
[33:51]
I will now close the public hearing for deliberation.
[33:54]
Would any commissioner like to make a motion?
[34:10]
[Reading names]
[34:23]
The motion passes.
[34:30]
Chair Price: We are now moving to item 4.2.
[34:55]
>> Thank you.
[34:56]
The next item on tonight's agenda
[34:57]
is the main street liquor use permit.
[35:02]
The property is located south of Main Street with the Oakley Town
[35:07]
Center to the west and the Edgewood Drive to the east.
[35:11]
Here is a map that shows the surrounding neighborhood
[35:22]
in the area where the supermarket grocery
[35:25]
store will be located.
[35:27]
A little background the parcel currently consists
[35:34]
of a three story 130 unit age restricted and affordable
[35:39]
senior apartment complex with a one story 5667
[35:44]
square foot commercial space that fronts Main Street.
[35:48]
The General Plan designation is commercial
[35:52]
and zoning is general commercial as well.
[35:55]
The property is surrounded by residential and commercial uses
[35:59]
and the grocery store supermarket proposes to operate
[36:05]
from 7:30 a.m.
[36:06]
To 10 p.m.
[36:07]
Seven days a week.
[36:09]
The applicant is requesting approval of a use permit
[36:14]
to sell distilled spirits alongside other grocery store
[36:17]
slash supermarket offerings including
[36:20]
fruits vegetables and snacks.
[36:23]
No physical changes are proposed for the exterior of this site
[36:28]
or a change in product inventory.
[36:31]
The distilled spirits would be located
[36:34]
within an approximately eight by ten foot shelf
[36:37]
space behind the secure customer service counter only accessible
[36:41]
to an employee.
[36:43]
Why do we have a conditional use permit?
[36:52]
They sell those spirits for off site consumption
[36:54]
have been interpreted as liquor stores
[36:57]
under the Oakley Municipal Code and pursuant to that code
[36:59]
section require a conditional use permit
[37:01]
to establish this use.
[37:04]
The proposed project conforms to the required findings
[37:08]
for approval in the Oakland Municipal Code
[37:10]
partly due to its limited scope and permitted
[37:13]
use of the supermarket grocery store.
[37:18]
The required findings for conditional use permits
[37:21]
are primarily concerned with ensuring quality site
[37:24]
development when a new business is constructed
[37:27]
and that the adjacent infrastructure
[37:28]
is able to accommodate the new land use.
[37:33]
The small size of the shelf space dedicated to the distilled
[37:37]
spirits helps address the concern expressed
[37:40]
within the municipal code.
[37:41]
Furthermore the applicant would integrate the new use
[37:46]
into broader displays within the grocery store.
[37:51]
With liquor purchases occurring at the point of sale
[37:55]
counter like other items.
[38:00]
The project is categorically exempt from the requirements
[38:05]
pursuant to section 15 301 existing facilities.
[38:09]
And staff is recommending the Planning Commission adopt
[38:13]
the resolution approving 2603 Main Street Liquor 2026-001
[38:19]
as commissioned.
[38:22]
Thank you.
[38:35]
Chair Price: Any questions from the Planning Commission?
[38:42]
>> I have a couple of questions but I recommend we have that
[38:45]
members of the public feedback on this.
[38:53]
Chair Price: Are there any comments
[38:55]
from the applicant that would like to come forward and speak
[39:00]
to this?
[39:08]
>> The applicant is here but I don't think they have a full
[39:10]
presentation.
[39:11]
They're just here if there are any questions by the Commission.
[39:15]
Thank you.
[39:19]
Chair Price: This time I have two public comment
[39:21]
cards of people who would like to speak
[39:23]
and the first one is Kathy Ashford.
[39:38]
>> Again I will say that I think alcohol would be a nuisance
[39:43]
for seniors and could attract who knows what type
[39:51]
of environment is going to be coming and I'm not trying
[39:53]
to have a biased attitude but I just don't think it's a good
[39:56]
place for seniors.
[39:58]
We try to live a quiet life and I
[40:03]
think it would probably draw a lot of different kind of people
[40:06]
especially with alcohol on Friday nights seven days a week.
[40:16]
So the same response I said earlier
[40:19]
that I think it would be a nuisance.
[40:22]
Thank you.
[40:29]
Chair Price: We have one other public comment Lynda Carter.
[40:40]
>> Good evening.
[40:41]
I didn't know I would be talking either.
[40:43]
I just wanted to reiterate what my predecessor said
[40:46]
about the fact that with the people that
[40:49]
moved in there have moved in there for it
[40:51]
to be a quiet place to relax and at a certain time of the evening
[40:56]
it's quiet and there isn't a lot of traffic or noise
[40:59]
and especially the people that live on the north
[41:01]
side of the building it's going to face the parking lot.
[41:05]
These are the people that are coming into this
[41:08]
are going to be going through.
[41:09]
It's just not something --
[41:11]
I know we signed a paper knowing something commercial
[41:14]
would go into that area but I don't
[41:16]
know that anybody realizes this is
[41:18]
what was going to go in there so I just want to again state
[41:21]
that I wish they wouldn't be selling alcohol just
[41:24]
for the sake of the people that live there
[41:27]
and the peace of the community currently
[41:29]
for it to not be disturbed.
[41:31]
Thank you.
[41:37]
Chair Price: Thank you.
[41:38]
I will now close the public hearing for deliberation.
[41:40]
Are there any comments from the commissioners?
[41:56]
Commissioner Ireland: I had a lot of questions.
[41:58]
I was concerned about the effect so I
[42:00]
do have a few questions in my main concern
[42:03]
is about any kind of guardrails in place here.
[42:05]
Reading through the resolution it
[42:07]
seems like if there was a problem
[42:09]
there is an allowance for withdrawal
[42:10]
so without getting too granular I
[42:12]
think I'd like to better understand what that looks
[42:14]
like if there is a problem.
[42:16]
It looks like the period goes through a one year period
[42:19]
and then there is some kind of renewal process.
[42:22]
Is that automatic and someone would
[42:24]
have to step in to withdraw it or what does that look like
[42:28]
as far as renewal of this?
[42:35]
>> The use permit would grant the sale of the distilled
[42:38]
spirits .
[42:41]
The grocery store supermarket is a permitted use.
[42:45]
They are able to sell beer and wine
[42:49]
without the requirement of a use permit
[42:52]
as the presentation mentioned.
[42:56]
It is the sale of distilled spirits
[42:59]
for off site consumption that triggers
[43:02]
that use permit requirement.
[43:06]
The resolution as you've mentioned
[43:08]
does have those built in triggers
[43:10]
that if it does become a nuisance the Community
[43:13]
Development director along with the police chief
[43:15]
can revoke that permit or if it does become a nuisance then
[43:23]
they can speak to that a little bit more at.
[43:31]
>> So condition of approval number seven I believe
[43:33]
you're referring to.
[43:34]
It was written in a way to provide
[43:38]
city staff with a bit of flexibility
[43:41]
if there's minor inconveniences that could be potentially
[43:45]
addressed by the police chief and or community development
[43:48]
director and we could implement those on the business.
[43:51]
If there was a more egregious offense or a bigger nuisance
[43:56]
we always have the opportunity to bring the item back
[44:00]
to the Planning Commission for reconsideration.
[44:02]
That reconsideration can include anything from modification
[44:06]
to conditions of approval such as the hours of operation,
[44:10]
the size of the shelf space, and even revocation of the use
[44:15]
permit which would remove their ability
[44:17]
to sell the distilled spirits.
[44:18]
So all of those options are on the table in the resolution as
[44:23]
presented tonight.
[44:26]
Commissioner Ireland: So if this does turn out
[44:28]
to be an issue if yourself the community development director
[44:32]
or city police feel like there's a problem we
[44:34]
do have an opportunity to come back from this come on not just
[44:37]
once we say yes it's going to be a thing in perpetuity.
[44:42]
>> Absolutely true.
[44:45]
Commissioner Ireland: That's my main concern in.
[44:47]
And we have a couple of public comments tonight
[44:49]
and I don't know if this is appropriate but were there
[44:52]
any other comments you were seeing
[44:54]
from any members of that community or anyone
[44:56]
around about this that had called the planning
[45:00]
department as questions or anything like that?
[45:04]
>> I did not receive any.
[45:12]
>> Okay.
[45:43]
>> Just to quickly clarify for the commission if you want
[45:45]
to receive additional public testimony you would need to move
[45:48]
to reopen the public hearing.
[45:51]
>> I could pause my time if we want to open up public comment.
[46:01]
Commissioner Ireland: If you can fill up a card
[46:03]
you can come up and make a comment if you'd like.
[46:11]
And we are happy to wait.
[46:14]
We can take our time.
[46:15]
I would greatly appreciate that.
[46:19]
Chair Price: We will reopen the public hearing
[46:23]
and address these comments coming forward.
[46:45]
>> Thank you.
[46:47]
We are all very old seniors.
[46:51]
Sickly and can't hardly get around
[46:53]
so the alcohol is a problem but the problem
[46:58]
is security and the parking, the way
[47:04]
the cars are going to come in.
[47:06]
So that's the problem we are having and we
[47:11]
know that they sell alcohol right up the hill
[47:15]
and there's another place.
[47:17]
Why do we have to sell it next door to us?
[47:22]
When we become seniors, we wanted
[47:25]
to get away from that kind of stuff not add to it.
[47:31]
So we moved that to have a resting place, not a place
[47:36]
where there's going to be lots of noise and lots
[47:40]
of people acting stupid because they are drinking alcohol.
[47:46]
Can you understand?
[47:52]
You don't want all of that.
[47:56]
So I'm asking you all tonight to consider what you're doing
[48:01]
and think about how you want your life to be when
[48:05]
you get to be as old as we are.
[48:08]
Thank you.
[48:19]
Chair Price: That is all the public comment.
[48:21]
Did we have any other cards that were turned in?
[48:25]
>> No other comment cards.
[49:06]
Chair Price: Next, Ava Jackson please.
[49:09]
That was the one that was -- all right.
[49:22]
Rosetta Samson?
[49:38]
>> I live in the apartments there at 2605 Main Street.
[49:45]
I've been there for four years and the way
[49:51]
they have the parking is to the side of the store
[49:56]
and there's a gate there that we come out
[49:59]
of and it's going to be very congested
[50:03]
and the way we go in which is wrong,
[50:08]
there are two entrances when we are coming from lucky shopping
[50:12]
center we turn into the first one and we go around to the left
[50:18]
and go in.
[50:19]
Then when we come out all the way around we go out on the same
[50:25]
one --
[50:26]
on a different one.
[50:28]
And it should be reversed because when we go in,
[50:32]
we go to the right and it's the first one we go in
[50:36]
and the ones coming out are going to be in front of us.
[50:41]
And another thing there has been a lot of riff Raff
[50:44]
there that try to come in some of the people that
[50:48]
live there have their friends or whatever
[50:51]
and there's a lot of different people.
[50:55]
They will sleep on the bench outside and all of this stuff
[50:59]
and have liquor there I don't think
[51:02]
so unless they have a security guard
[51:05]
because it is going to be terrible
[51:08]
and that's not where I want to be.
[51:12]
We waited for this place before COVID to open
[51:17]
and I just wish no liquor.
[51:21]
They can go to Lucky's and get their liquor.
[51:32]
I said security.
[51:34]
Of the store is going to be open that late they
[51:37]
need to have security.
[51:41]
Thank you.
[51:56]
Chair Price: Looking for a comment
[51:58]
from one of the commissioners?
[52:09]
Commissioner Ireland: The only other question I had here
[52:11]
and I did send this ahead of time just
[52:14]
to make sure his advertising.
[52:15]
If this is passed it is limited to essentially a cabinet is
[52:20]
what it looks like and the display needs
[52:22]
to be kept in that area.
[52:25]
It sounds like there is already a city municipal code
[52:29]
about advertising signage outside that if this is approved
[52:33]
it would not be permitted for them to put
[52:36]
large signs on the exterior of the building
[52:39]
or anything like that.
[52:41]
>> They would still be subject to our sign ordinance and any
[52:44]
other requirements therein.
[52:48]
Commissioner Ireland: I'm not super familiar with the sign
[52:51]
limits so perhaps I should have read it before the meeting.
[52:53]
That would preclude advertisements
[52:55]
for distilled spirits like this?
[53:01]
>> Generally we don't permit large advertisements of beer
[53:03]
and things like that.
[53:11]
Trying to think of what sign you may have in mind.
[53:19]
Commissioner Ireland: Excuse the hyperbole
[53:21]
but a giant sign that says buy tequila in here.
[53:24]
It seems like the scope of this is intended to be small
[53:27]
and my one concern is always is guardrails with what you don't
[53:31]
think about that could happen and it
[53:32]
seems like we have a way to claw it back
[53:36]
but I'm concerned about what slips through the cracks given
[53:39]
the nature of where this is going to be which again I
[53:42]
have some concerns about.
[53:47]
>> Understood.
[53:48]
Any indoor signage we don't necessarily
[53:51]
look at but windows signage common
[53:58]
signage they may think of having on the exterior would all
[54:02]
be reviewed or we would look at in our limited
[54:06]
by the sign ordinance.
[54:14]
Vice Chair Harvey: Is this the same location that our police
[54:16]
department went in and evaluated and looked at how small it was
[54:21]
going to be and they didn't really think that there would be
[54:24]
-- >> Typically as part of our review process we route plans
[54:29]
out to public use to review.
[54:32]
There weren't any adherent concerns
[54:35]
with their proposal for a secure area
[54:41]
where cabinet behind the counter that would be similar to other
[54:49]
previously approved distilled spirit use permits.
[55:02]
Commissioner Goudie: The public concern
[55:03]
is about a lot of the double dashes
[55:06]
there a way that we can fix something
[55:08]
because the store isn't even open yet
[55:10]
so they're going to experience this without the liquor.
[55:15]
>> Is part of the use permit that is not proposed to change
[55:21]
the site circulation parking come a number of parking stalls
[55:27]
it was all previously reviewed in around 2019 when the overall
[55:32]
project was reviewed it was more in depth formal review of that
[55:38]
was conducted then which at that point the commercial aspect
[55:44]
of the project was also reviewed but again that was back in 2019
[55:51]
the original project.
[56:03]
Commissioner Goudie: Would that On the property owner
[56:05]
if they decided for a security guard or something like that?
[56:09]
>> The security guard component I don't know if that would
[56:12]
necessarily be a condition we can impose .
[56:20]
A supermarket or grocery store .
[56:29]
>> I can chime in a bit.
[56:30]
It would be a unique condition.
[56:32]
I will say that.
[56:33]
We have several of these similar types
[56:36]
of use permits for convenience stores mostly
[56:38]
and the liquor store is a bit misleading.
[56:42]
When people think liquor store they
[56:44]
think a store that is predominantly selling liquor.
[56:47]
This is a small -- relatively small area to hold the distilled
[56:55]
spirits so the conditional use permit being presented tonight
[57:00]
limits how large of an area they can store and display liquor
[57:06]
and it's approximately ten foot by eight foot area behind
[57:10]
the counter so this is not going to be similar to a store where
[57:14]
you may walk in and have shelves of liquor available
[57:17]
for the public to grab and take up to the counter.
[57:21]
This would require someone that wanted to purchase the distilled
[57:25]
spirits to go up to the counter and ask for the clerk
[57:28]
to provide them and sell them that specific bottle
[57:32]
or whatever they may be purchasing.
[57:34]
Security has not been something in my memory
[57:39]
at least that we have required for this type of use.
[57:43]
I think if we were at a point where the issues were such
[57:47]
that security was required we would definitely
[57:51]
be questioning whether the conditional use permit could
[57:55]
be approved.
[57:56]
I don't know if we have a reason to believe that.
[58:00]
I understand many of the concerns
[58:02]
and I definitely understand where those are coming from.
[58:05]
At this point we have not heard from our police department
[58:11]
of any issues with any of the other recent ones
[58:13]
to have very limited sales and this one is similar to that.
[58:22]
I would say just looking at the other approvals we have not
[58:27]
seen such issues reoccurring.
[58:33]
Staff we can provide this input.
[58:36]
The applicant is here.
[58:38]
I would encourage the commission to ask them what their plans are
[58:42]
and what plans they have in place to try
[58:44]
to minimize loitering or people that may be breaking the rules.
[58:48]
This is not for on site consumption.
[58:51]
This is for off site consumption.
[58:54]
You purchase it and take it home.
[58:57]
So that would be my recommendation
[58:59]
is to allow the applicant to come up and address
[59:02]
some of these and staff will continue to try to address them.
[59:08]
>> If the applicant is willing I think we could ask
[59:10]
if they're willing to address any of these concerns about
[59:13]
on site consumption and security issues that have been brought up
[59:16]
because it's a delicate situation.
[59:20]
Commissioner Oliveros: Just to confirm only beer and wine is
[59:24]
going to be sold there?
[59:36]
>> Good evening everybody.
[59:37]
So with regards to the signs it was stipulated by the landlord
[59:49]
that we cannot have any outside signs so besides our normal
[59:55]
business signage that's it.
[59:57]
We are not going to say we sell this or that.
[1:00:00]
Is just going to be our name of the store and that's it.
[1:00:05]
That's regarding the sign.
[1:00:09]
With regards to parking or entrance
[1:00:15]
we each have our own entrance.
[1:00:19]
So the seniors come to their residential space
[1:00:23]
or whatever you want to call it they have their private interest
[1:00:25]
and we have our own private entrance
[1:00:28]
but with regards to the exit it is one exit so we share an exit.
[1:00:35]
However it is spaced well and anybody
[1:00:38]
that has a driver's license should be
[1:00:40]
able to exit without a problem.
[1:00:43]
With regards to -- with regards to security we are security.
[1:00:56]
We have had stores in the surrounding area for the last 15
[1:01:00]
or 20 years with a good track record of no crime happening
[1:01:06]
in front of the stores or the surrounding areas .
[1:01:10]
And we have a very good name and reputation for our stores.
[1:01:16]
I think their main concern is noise
[1:01:20]
so it doesn't matter if it's a store
[1:01:23]
or if it's a bungee jumping place for kids or trampolines.
[1:01:27]
I think they just want quietness but as for people
[1:01:31]
who I think their problem is more so
[1:01:35]
with the landlord if anything.
[1:01:37]
We are running a normal business and applying for a normal part
[1:01:43]
of modern supermarket to occur.
[1:01:48]
I think that's about it.
[1:01:50]
Is there anything else I can address?
[1:01:56]
Commissioner Ireland: One question
[1:01:57]
I would have is a mixed use development
[1:01:59]
do you see your business as your customers are more
[1:02:02]
coming into the area from the rest of Oakley and other areas
[1:02:06]
or are you supporting the residents of the building
[1:02:08]
that you're in?
[1:02:09]
Where do you see a mixture of that?
[1:02:13]
>> We are a store open to everybody.
[1:02:17]
We come from China.
[1:02:19]
We close at 10 p.m..
[1:02:21]
So it's not like a 2 a.m.
[1:02:24]
Store.
[1:02:25]
As far as customers are concerned
[1:02:29]
whoever wants to be a customer they're allowed to come.
[1:02:36]
As long as they are able to purchase
[1:02:38]
and are respectful customers and we have good relationships
[1:02:43]
with the Oakley Police and as long
[1:02:48]
as we are keeping things safe then I don't see a problem.
[1:02:52]
And we also reserve the right to refuse service to anybody.
[1:02:58]
Commissioner Ireland: That was the only question I had.
[1:03:02]
Thank you.
[1:03:07]
Commissioner Oliveros: Does the landlord or tenants
[1:03:09]
live here in Oakley?
[1:03:12]
>> We are here in Oakley.
[1:03:16]
Commissioner Oliveros: So you know that we
[1:03:17]
are a bedroom community.
[1:03:21]
It means that everything shuts down around 8 p.m.
[1:03:25]
Here so I don't understand the reason of opening until 10 p.m..
[1:03:31]
I think we are putting guardrails
[1:03:34]
we would probably need to revisit
[1:03:36]
what those hours look like.
[1:03:39]
The second piece is has there been a traffic report analysis
[1:03:45]
of how many people are driving through there and have we seen
[1:03:50]
a huge influx of traffic that this needs to be here between
[1:03:56]
the hours of the evening which is --
[1:04:02]
I'm just curious if there's been a traffic report
[1:04:04]
analysis on this.
[1:04:07]
>> Not on this specific conditional use permit before
[1:04:11]
you tonight.
[1:04:12]
As Jose mentioned the 2019 senior Residence Mixed Use
[1:04:17]
project was proposed to the city as on a commercial piece
[1:04:22]
of property to have mostly apartments with a small --
[1:04:28]
500 zero square foot or less commercial component
[1:04:31]
and at that time the site plan was analyzed and went
[1:04:35]
through all of the environmental study and everything checked
[1:04:38]
out.
[1:04:39]
So if there are issues with the apartments
[1:04:43]
and the operation of the gates or whatever
[1:04:45]
it may be with residents being able to exit the gates
[1:04:50]
and I know there have been issues completely unrelated
[1:04:53]
to this project tonight with the gates and things like that
[1:04:57]
in the past that management has had to work out,
[1:05:00]
that is really not on the applicant to solve.
[1:05:04]
Those are gates for the customers --
[1:05:06]
for the residents to get into the gated off portion of parking
[1:05:11]
because the site has a gated portion which is on the sides
[1:05:15]
of the apartments and the back of the apartments and then there
[1:05:19]
is what we would call public parking that is in the front
[1:05:22]
of the building for would be tenants to talk to customers
[1:05:28]
of the commercial locations where they can use those.
[1:05:32]
So two separate parking areas but there
[1:05:36]
is a gate that you access from the public parking
[1:05:40]
to the private parking.
[1:05:44]
A traffic study not so much.
[1:05:47]
What we look at is is circulation safe?
[1:05:50]
Is there a turning radius for things of that nature.
[1:05:56]
Commissioner Oliveros: I think as any business
[1:05:59]
that's going to open that should be part of their analysis right?
[1:06:03]
Does it make sense to be selling this here
[1:06:06]
where Lucky's is right next door.
[1:06:11]
How is this going to benefit the senior community there?
[1:06:16]
What is in it for them?
[1:06:24]
>> I understand.
[1:06:24]
Going back to your first question regarding
[1:06:26]
why we are open until ten.
[1:06:29]
If the community is a bedroom community then being open until
[1:06:34]
-- and not much traffic will occur after eight so it
[1:06:38]
doesn't really matter whether or not we are open from seven
[1:06:42]
to eight or 7 to 10 but those extra two hours does give
[1:06:46]
a little bit of leeway for any people who --
[1:06:52]
if they want to make a late night bowl of cereal and they
[1:06:55]
forgot their milk and they don't have any milk and just want
[1:06:58]
to go real quick to the grocery store.
[1:07:00]
I understand.
[1:07:03]
It's just a part of business.
[1:07:08]
Commissioner Oliveros: And second
[1:07:11]
question how does this benefit the senior community?
[1:07:15]
>> It's a supermarket.
[1:07:18]
Commissioner Oliveros: Those are all my questions.
[1:07:20]
Thank you.
[1:07:26]
Chair Price:
[1:07:26]
any other comments from the commissioners?
[1:07:29]
We will now close the public hearing.
[1:07:32]
Would any commissioner like to make a motion
[1:07:34]
to adopt the resolution?
[1:07:38]
Commissioner Oliveros: I do not approve this resolution.
[1:07:51]
Commissioner Ireland: It seems like we have strong guardrails
[1:07:53]
but I just don't see a compelling reason to approve.
[1:07:57]
Is just too close to a community so I'm not
[1:07:59]
going to make a motion.
[1:08:09]
Can I ask a question of the city attorney just as a process
[1:08:14]
because I don't think we've quite
[1:08:16]
had this happen where none of the commissioners
[1:08:18]
want to make a motion to approve do we table
[1:08:20]
or what is the next step for us?
[1:08:26]
>> If there is no motion then no action has been taken
[1:08:28]
on the item .
[1:08:32]
In addition a commissioner could make the motion to table
[1:08:35]
the item to a specific date in the future at the next Planning
[1:08:40]
Commission meeting or when in the future so
[1:08:42]
that could be an alternative motion
[1:08:44]
to table this item to a future meeting.
[1:08:46]
For further discussion.
[1:08:48]
Otherwise there no action taken on item.
[1:08:55]
Vice Chair Harvey: I will make a motion to table this agenda item
[1:08:59]
until the next --
[1:09:05]
>> Can I ask a clarifying question of the Commission?
[1:09:07]
Normally when we are tabling an item
[1:09:09]
or continuing it to a date certain
[1:09:12]
there is some direction provided to staff
[1:09:14]
or additional information the Commission wants us to analyze.
[1:09:18]
We don't want to just bring back the same thing on June 16th
[1:09:23]
so we would ask that if that is what the Commission is going
[1:09:28]
to end up doing that staff provides some additional
[1:09:31]
direction.
[1:09:31]
What do you want us to look into?
[1:09:34]
Do you see a solution to this to move forward?
[1:09:37]
Are there additional conditions on signage or anything
[1:09:40]
that you want us to look at and bring back
[1:09:42]
for consideration in addition to what's already being
[1:09:50]
Commissioner
[1:09:50]
Ireland: I would definitely support coming back
[1:09:51]
in looking at this because I do want
[1:09:52]
to balance the right of the applicant with the residents.
[1:09:55]
I think my larger concern is how this affects
[1:09:58]
the residents and not just the issues that came up
[1:10:01]
but selling distilled spirits is another step
[1:10:05]
beyond a normal market and I understand
[1:10:10]
that but I would just like to understand better
[1:10:12]
how we are going to prevent any issues especially with things
[1:10:16]
going on being right next to a resident
[1:10:20]
selling that kind of liquor.
[1:10:23]
Commissioner Oliveros: They're not even open
[1:10:25]
yet so we don't know what that traffic will
[1:10:28]
look like so I think we are getting ahead
[1:10:32]
of ourselves of this whole piece in terms of this.
[1:10:35]
Can we wait and see how this traffic
[1:10:40]
is going come out how the residents are feeling in terms
[1:10:43]
of noise and Vice Chair Harvey: Could we
[1:10:49]
have an evaluation of any possible changes that could be
[1:10:52]
made to approve the traffic >> Could you repeat
[1:10:57]
the last part of that again?
[1:10:58]
Vice Chair Harvey: Could we have an evaluation
[1:11:01]
of possible solutions to the difficulty of the exit?
[1:11:11]
>> We could bring something back as a report.
[1:11:13]
This use is permitted.
[1:11:14]
It is a permitted grocery store.
[1:11:16]
The only change they want to make is a ten by eight
[1:11:20]
foot section to sell distilled spirits.
[1:11:22]
It should have zero impact on traffic or parking or anything
[1:11:25]
like that.
[1:11:26]
They are replacing -- if there are concerns with the selling
[1:11:30]
of distilled spirits whether it is signage hours of operation
[1:11:34]
etc.
[1:11:35]
Loitering, those are the types of items
[1:11:38]
we would from a planning perspective look to address.
[1:11:44]
The traffic although heard they are not
[1:11:49]
proposing the use of a store today.
[1:11:53]
So we're not looking at whether there's
[1:11:56]
adequate parking or there's adequate circulation.
[1:11:59]
That's already established.
[1:12:01]
So we could look at solutions or potential solutions related
[1:12:07]
to the sale of distilled spirits or the display of distilled
[1:12:11]
spirits or the signage that is associated
[1:12:13]
with distilled spirits or security whatever it may be.
[1:12:18]
Things that are related to specifically the sale.
[1:12:22]
That's what we should be focusing on.
[1:12:26]
And I think I've heard one of them
[1:12:30]
was the potential impact on the senior community that
[1:12:34]
lives in the adjacent apartments or connected
[1:12:37]
apartments I should say.
[1:12:39]
That's one item I don't know if there's a second specific item.
[1:12:46]
Commissioner Ireland: Specifically I
[1:12:47]
understand the parking and other issues are ancillary
[1:12:50]
and that's just going to come with running a market.
[1:12:54]
My specific concern is what level
[1:12:56]
of impact adding distilled spirits on the residence
[1:12:59]
is going to have.
[1:13:00]
I know we have this permitted and there's
[1:13:02]
a grocery store around the corner
[1:13:04]
and a gas station around the corner
[1:13:05]
so I do want us to be consistent but we
[1:13:09]
do need to properly balance property owner rights here
[1:13:14]
but I am especially nervous because this is a senior living
[1:13:18]
facility.
[1:13:19]
I think it's just a little bit different situation mixed use
[1:13:23]
is what it is and there will always be an impact
[1:13:25]
but I just want to understand what that's going to look like.
[1:13:28]
Thank you.
[1:13:29]
And I do want to thank the staff for preparing a very
[1:13:32]
thorough report and I apologize in some ways
[1:13:35]
but want to make sure at least to myself
[1:13:37]
that we are careful about this moving forward.
[1:13:43]
>> They are selling beer and wine no matter what.
[1:13:45]
That's just part of the supermarket.
[1:13:49]
So my main concern would just be if there is loitering.
[1:13:56]
I know the parking is a big issue
[1:14:00]
but if there's a diagram that shows how they would
[1:14:03]
be parking how that would work.
[1:14:09]
That might be a little more .
[1:14:19]
Commissioner Ireland: So I would ask for staff recommendation
[1:14:22]
and.
[1:14:22]
I know this meeting was in the middle of a month
[1:14:25]
normally at the first of the month.
[1:14:27]
I would assume that the first meeting in June is too quick.
[1:14:31]
Does that mean we need to look at this again
[1:14:34]
first week of July?
[1:14:36]
I want to be reasonable to the applicant.
[1:14:37]
I don't want to keep them hanging.
[1:14:39]
We are obviously okay but that's a lot
[1:14:41]
of work for staff in two weeks.
[1:14:45]
>> The meeting in June will be the third Tuesday.
[1:14:49]
However it is still a pretty quick turnaround of one month.
[1:14:54]
One of the positives about continuing to a date certain is
[1:14:58]
that the public hearing is continued so there is no re
[1:15:01]
noticing requirement so that can help staff a little bit with
[1:15:07]
processing time .
[1:15:11]
June 16th may be a pretty quick turnaround.
[1:15:13]
I would say either the June or July
[1:15:17]
meeting would be adequate times to continue this.
[1:15:23]
Commissioner Ireland: Is it feasible or reasonable
[1:15:25]
for us that it be added to the June agenda
[1:15:28]
and if not move it to July?
[1:15:32]
Take a moment.
[1:15:43]
Jose is requesting if we do continue to a date certain
[1:15:48]
and that would be the July meeting.
[1:15:53]
Commissioner Ireland: I would make a motion
[1:15:55]
to move this to July meeting and revise it
[1:15:58]
with staff recommendations.
[1:16:05]
>> I think we need to make that date specific correct?
[1:16:12]
Commissioner Ireland: July 7th for that motion.
[1:16:16]
Commissioner Goudie: I will second it.
[1:16:20]
Chair Price: We have a motion and a second.
[1:16:25]
Clerk please.
[1:16:27]
[Reading names]
[1:16:41]
Motion passes.
[1:16:45]
Chair Price: Thank you.
[1:16:47]
Moving to the regular calendar.
[1:16:50]
Do any commissioners have any questions for staff?
[1:17:02]
Commissioner Ireland: Talking about 5.1?
[1:17:03]
I did have a general question just
[1:17:06]
want to make sure that the Planning Commission is
[1:17:09]
confirming that this is in compliance with the General
[1:17:13]
Plan.
[1:17:14]
I apologize.
[1:17:23]
>> We do have a presentation.
[1:17:25]
Commissioner Ireland: I will save that for after.
[1:17:35]
>> Good evening chair price vice chair Harvey commissioners
[1:17:38]
and members of the public.
[1:17:40]
I'm the public works director city engineer for the City
[1:17:45]
of Oakley.
[1:17:46]
Tonight before you I am presenting the five year capital
[1:17:50]
Improvement program and the request tonight
[1:17:53]
would be to adopt the resolution finding
[1:17:55]
that the program that I'm presenting tonight
[1:17:58]
is consistent with our General Plan.
[1:18:04]
Next slide.
[1:18:07]
The public Works Department has had a very busy year
[1:18:12]
as you have seen and noticed there has been construction all
[1:18:17]
throughout our growing city of.
[1:18:19]
There are several projects as listed
[1:18:21]
in the report that have been completed
[1:18:23]
in fiscal year 2025 and 2026.
[1:18:26]
I will spare you all the details on all of them but just a few
[1:18:32]
to highlight was the Laurel road Widening project
[1:18:39]
that included repaving Ohara in coordination
[1:18:44]
with the Oakley Shops Development that has been opened
[1:18:50]
at that Northeast corner.
[1:18:52]
Some other notable projects I want to highlight
[1:18:57]
is the East Cypress Road widening just east
[1:19:02]
of Rubens Way.
[1:19:04]
This is a coordination effort with the developers
[1:19:10]
for the subdivision and that built the full infrastructure
[1:19:16]
for East Cypress Road in that segment with the median
[1:19:21]
and that has been completed.
[1:19:24]
And the two other notable projects I want to highlight
[1:19:28]
is adjacent projects on Sellars Avenue
[1:19:35]
and that was for the reconstruction for the pavement
[1:19:39]
for a full reclamation in coordination with the developer
[1:19:44]
also for that subdivision as they install sewer and water
[1:19:50]
utilities for Sellars.
[1:19:56]
As for current project highlights we have some --
[1:20:01]
many projects that are currently in the process.
[1:20:06]
Just three of the ones that I'd like to highlight
[1:20:09]
is this project has been in our books for several years.
[1:20:17]
This is at the Northwest corner of Carpenter Road and Rose
[1:20:21]
Avenue.
[1:20:22]
If you haven't visited the site I highly suggest you do so.
[1:20:27]
You can start to see the magnitude
[1:20:31]
and the size of this park has several fun amenities.
[1:20:36]
This is a splash pad that will have several features
[1:20:42]
for the kids to play and enjoy during the summer months.
[1:20:45]
It also includes shade structures and two play
[1:20:52]
structures for the children and this
[1:20:53]
will be a great amenity to the neighborhood
[1:20:56]
and future residents for this area.
[1:20:59]
The second bullet item is all too familiar.
[1:21:03]
Our East Cypress Road widening project.
[1:21:06]
I think I have gained a few white hairs over the last years
[1:21:09]
building this project.
[1:21:11]
It's the three segment currently in construction
[1:21:18]
between the Avenue to Bethel Island Road.
[1:21:21]
The project is in the thick of it with construction as you see.
[1:21:26]
We hope to complete the full segment by summer
[1:21:30]
next year with the Canal Undergrounding
[1:21:34]
for the second phase progressing on the South Side
[1:21:37]
this summer so more large pipes coming into the site
[1:21:42]
to underground that canal.
[1:21:44]
The third bullet item here is our Oakley Library
[1:21:47]
and Community Center.
[1:21:48]
As you heard Jose present to us this evening
[1:21:53]
it's a beautiful library that is going to break ground here
[1:21:57]
in fall this year if all goes well with design
[1:22:02]
and getting all of the permits issued
[1:22:04]
that's another great amenity and a huge investment to our city.
[1:22:10]
Looking forward to see that project materialize
[1:22:15]
and take off right before my eyes in front of my office.
[1:22:21]
As for upcoming projects there are many.
[1:22:25]
As you see in the five year plan there's
[1:22:28]
over 43 projects in there.
[1:22:30]
Not all of them are funded for next fiscal year
[1:22:33]
but there are several projects, exciting projects
[1:22:36]
that are going to be progressing for next year.
[1:22:40]
The first few that I will talk about are --
[1:22:48]
currently we are looking to advertise the resurfacing of two
[1:22:53]
large neighborhoods the Magnolia Park neighborhood and Teakwood
[1:22:56]
neighborhood and that's going to be happening in construction
[1:23:00]
this summer.
[1:23:01]
The second project on the slide is our annual maintenance
[1:23:07]
for our 50/50 program replacing sidewalk and curb and gutter.
[1:23:13]
The third -- this is an annual improvement to look at areas
[1:23:21]
where we can introduce speed bumps as part of our traffic
[1:23:27]
program for our city.
[1:23:29]
More annual maintenance projects.
[1:23:35]
This is our Ada program replacement project to replace
[1:23:43]
all of -- in our city that don't meet Ada standards.
[1:23:49]
Our signal modernization project which
[1:23:52]
continues to modernize our signals especially
[1:23:56]
some of the older ones we have in our city and the fiscal year
[1:24:02]
26 and 27 Street where repair and maintenance project.
[1:24:07]
The three segments of roadway we are focusing on
[1:24:11]
for designing this upcoming year is Laurel road as you enter
[1:24:16]
into our city come on the widest portion between the railroad
[1:24:21]
tracks there to Empire starting to look a little tired so we
[1:24:27]
are looking at the best way to improve that asset.
[1:24:30]
The second roadway we are looking at
[1:24:32]
is Main Street between Laurel and East Cypress.
[1:24:37]
That's another segment there starting
[1:24:41]
to have several base failures that will need to be addressed
[1:24:45]
and the third segment we are looking at
[1:24:48]
is Empire Avenue between Laurel to Main Street
[1:24:52]
and that is essentially the northern half of Empire North.
[1:24:58]
That's another segment we will be looking
[1:25:00]
to design this upcoming year.
[1:25:04]
Another exciting project we are looking
[1:25:08]
to finish design and start construction this summer
[1:25:11]
is CIP 343.
[1:25:13]
This is our City Hall remodel for the police department.
[1:25:18]
This project will remodel the reception area
[1:25:21]
in the front gamma expand the evidence and records office
[1:25:25]
spaces and create additional report writing office spaces
[1:25:30]
and construct a new conference in City
[1:25:34]
Hall with private doorways to secure the access to the police
[1:25:38]
Department.
[1:25:38]
This is consistent with the growing needs of our police
[1:25:42]
department as we continue to hire more officers to meet
[1:25:46]
the demands of our city.
[1:25:50]
Another exciting upcoming project this year is --
[1:25:56]
this is an accessible pathway as you may know right now it has
[1:26:05]
a path surrounding the entire park that is not paved and this
[1:26:12]
project we are looking to pave that path and also improve some
[1:26:19]
ramps and access to the areas of the ball fields to allow for use
[1:26:33]
This project is a high priority from our city Council
[1:26:37]
when we did the budget retreat.
[1:26:39]
This is CIP 211.
[1:26:42]
This is Main Street and Rose Avenue intersection.
[1:26:44]
This is to signalize the current intersection and it serves
[1:26:50]
multiple districts such as Ironhorse ,
[1:26:56]
East Bay regional parks and the water District to the north.
[1:27:00]
This intersection will be a four legged signal.
[1:27:05]
The design has been completed.
[1:27:07]
We are looking into advertise this project in the coming
[1:27:11]
months as council balances the budget
[1:27:15]
and we will begin construction this summer.
[1:27:20]
The other signal project I've been waiting for is CIP 268.
[1:27:28]
This is Main Street and Delta Road as many of you
[1:27:33]
have traveled that area it is very difficult to make
[1:27:36]
that left turn on Delta Road and becoming
[1:27:40]
difficult to make that right turn out of Delta Road.
[1:27:43]
This project also has been fully designed
[1:27:46]
and we are looking to also advertise this project
[1:27:49]
to construct this summer.
[1:27:52]
This also received high support from City Council.
[1:27:59]
This project is O'hara Avenue near Grapevine Lane.
[1:28:05]
This is a continuation of the improvements we've installed
[1:28:10]
of O'hara widening it.
[1:28:14]
This completes the gap between the Pheasant Meadow subdivision
[1:28:19]
that was recently constructed all the way to the north
[1:28:25]
where we ended the sidewalk.
[1:28:29]
This completes O'hara's four lane configuration
[1:28:34]
for a general plan for this segment
[1:28:40]
and will include bike lanes and a sidewalk.
[1:28:44]
This project is also designed and we are waiting for Council
[1:28:49]
to approve the budget to advertise this project
[1:28:52]
and begin construction this summer.
[1:28:57]
The next project is Main Street widening just north
[1:29:04]
of Laurel road.
[1:29:06]
This project is -- there's a gap in Main Street on the southbound
[1:29:12]
direction.
[1:29:12]
As you see there there are some trees and fences
[1:29:18]
that will need to be removed to widen
[1:29:21]
the roadway to its ultimate four lane configuration.
[1:29:24]
There will be some associated with this project
[1:29:31]
still in design not quite ready to go to construction yet
[1:29:34]
but we are hoping to move the project forward
[1:29:37]
in the coming year and when that is obtained
[1:29:41]
we will proceed with construction.
[1:29:48]
Last but not least is the most exciting project
[1:29:52]
that has been in the books for many decades.
[1:29:55]
This is the CIP 273 Laurel road extension between --
[1:31:35]
[No Audio]
[1:32:01]
>> I do want to take a moment and say thank you especially
[1:32:04]
for getting across town the improvements here but the Delta
[1:32:09]
Street light potentially the Laurel expansion gamma Cypress
[1:32:14]
and as someone who lives out in that area these improvements are
[1:32:18]
--
[1:32:19]
I just want to say thank you to you and your team
[1:32:23]
for making all this happen.
[1:32:25]
I know it is a ton of work.
[1:32:29]
>> Thank you Commissioner Ireland.
[1:32:31]
All the white hair is worth it hearing comments like that.
[1:32:36]
Chair Price: Any other questions?
[1:32:40]
>> Thank you.
[1:32:41]
Chair Price: Would someone like to make a resolution
[1:32:45]
to adopt this?
[1:32:48]
Commissioner Ireland: I will make a motion to approve it.
[1:32:57]
[Reading names]
[1:33:10]
Motion passes.
[1:33:18]
Chair Price: Thank you.
[1:33:20]
Moving to agenda item 6.1 staff reports.
[1:33:29]
>> Just a couple of items to provide information .
[1:33:31]
The first one is in two nights so on Thursday May 21st at 6
[1:33:37]
p.m.
[1:33:38]
Right here in the Council chambers
[1:33:39]
the Oakley Police Department will
[1:33:41]
be holding their military equipment report community
[1:33:43]
Meeting which is an annual report that the police
[1:33:46]
department does so if the public would like to attend
[1:33:49]
it will be right here on 6 p.m.
[1:33:51]
This upcoming Thursday.
[1:33:53]
Second announcement is the city will be holding the Memorial Day
[1:33:57]
ceremony on Saturday May 23rd and that will be approximately
[1:34:02]
from 10 a.m.
[1:34:03]
To 11 a.m.
[1:34:03]
Right here in the Civic Center Plaza and that is Saturday
[1:34:07]
the 23rd and then my final announcement we kind
[1:34:11]
of addressed earlier but the next Planning Commission meeting
[1:34:14]
is scheduled for June 16th and that is the regular date that
[1:34:18]
was approved when those 2026 dates were approved.
[1:34:22]
The commission has been paying attention
[1:34:25]
to when meetings fall on election days
[1:34:29]
so that people don't need to decide between going to vote
[1:34:32]
or coming to the Planning Commission meeting.
[1:34:34]
They went ahead and scheduled it for the third Tuesday of June
[1:34:37]
so June 16th will be the next Planning Commission meeting.
[1:34:40]
That concludes all of my reports.
[1:34:43]
Thank you.
[1:34:49]
Chair Price: Any reports from commissioners?
[1:34:53]
Commissioner Oliveros: Just to save the date for October 21st
[1:34:56]
doing our first Oakley Business forum partnering in this space
[1:35:00]
to help all of our local businesses really thrive.
[1:35:05]
We've been doing business analysis and surveys serving
[1:35:09]
a lot of the small businesses here in Oakley just
[1:35:12]
to get a feel for what support they need so we are really
[1:35:16]
excited to bring a one of a kind forum
[1:35:19]
that we are going to set ourselves apart
[1:35:22]
from our neighboring cities so I would love if you're
[1:35:27]
able to fill out the survey if you do own a business
[1:35:30]
or know of someone who owns a business here in Oakley that
[1:35:34]
is in our Chamber of Commerce website
[1:35:38]
and hopefully we get a good group of folks coming out.
[1:35:43]
Chair Price: Thank you.
[1:35:45]
Any other reports?
[1:35:48]
Request for future agenda items from the commissioners?
[1:35:58]
Now moving to item 7.1.
[1:36:25]
>> Thank you commissioners.
[1:36:26]
Tonight we have a work session on objective design standards.
[1:36:29]
First we will start with some background.
[1:36:32]
Design guidelines are the city's adopting
[1:36:38]
a direction for what quality development should
[1:36:40]
look like in Oakley.
[1:36:41]
They apply to all types of development
[1:36:44]
from a single family residential development
[1:36:47]
a multifamily residential development
[1:36:49]
a commercial development, industrial.
[1:36:52]
Tonight will be exclusively talking
[1:36:54]
about residential development.
[1:36:58]
These standards can cover the amount of open space
[1:37:03]
in a development's design com a small architectural aspect
[1:37:08]
such as window trim to more impactful standards
[1:37:12]
around building massing.
[1:37:14]
They really cover a wide range of architectural aspects
[1:37:17]
and design aspects of a housing project.
[1:37:22]
We hope decision makers applicants and the public
[1:37:26]
evaluate whether a project fits the community's character
[1:37:30]
and expectations for site planning building design
[1:37:34]
landscaping streetscape and compatibility.
[1:37:41]
Over the last decade come a the California Legislature
[1:37:46]
has passed a series of laws intended to streamline housing
[1:37:50]
production by requiring certain types of projects
[1:37:53]
to be reviewed solely against objective standards.
[1:37:57]
At the same time as that cities have been required
[1:38:02]
to zone for additional housing.
[1:38:06]
This has pushed cities to adopt more objective design standards.
[1:38:13]
Let's cover what odds are.
[1:38:18]
Objective design standards are design requirements
[1:38:20]
that are clear measurable knowable in advance
[1:38:24]
and applied in the same way to all qualifying projects.
[1:38:28]
Here's an example.
[1:38:30]
An example here is instead of saying the building should
[1:38:35]
be compatible with the neighborhood,
[1:38:37]
an objective standard might say primary building entries should
[1:38:41]
face the public street or publicly accessible walkway.
[1:38:45]
That way the developer and the builder
[1:38:47]
knows a little bit more what we are
[1:38:50]
looking for while they are designing it
[1:38:52]
before they get to our review and then on to a public hearing.
[1:38:57]
The goal is not to remove good design.
[1:39:00]
The goal is to define what good design means
[1:39:03]
in measurable enforceable terms that applicant staff decision
[1:39:06]
makers and the public can all understand before an application
[1:39:10]
is submitted.
[1:39:11]
In Oakley we have two illustrated manuals
[1:39:16]
that have residential design guidelines.
[1:39:19]
We have the 2003 Residential Design guidelines
[1:39:22]
and then we have the downtown specific plan.
[1:39:25]
They have a mix of subjective standards
[1:39:29]
and objective standards and in the downtown it's more modern
[1:39:34]
and it has more objective standards.
[1:39:36]
We feel that it has sufficient objective standards
[1:39:40]
that it does not need to be modified but the 2003
[1:39:44]
Residential design guidelines are a little bit more subjective
[1:39:47]
and so we are looking to update those.
[1:39:50]
With this project we are talking about tonight.
[1:39:55]
As Oakley continues to grow come a new housing
[1:40:00]
may be proposed whether we have these standards in place or not.
[1:40:04]
Objective design standards give us
[1:40:06]
the tools to make sure that new housing fits in
[1:40:09]
with our community and is nice to live in.
[1:40:12]
Projects are well evaluated to our standards,
[1:40:16]
housing is reviewed efficiently and consistently
[1:40:20]
and we meet the requirements of state law.
[1:40:24]
Without adopted objective standards
[1:40:26]
the city has limited ability to shape
[1:40:28]
the design of housing projects that
[1:40:30]
qualify for streamlined review.
[1:40:32]
These standards are how we ensure housing construction is
[1:40:35]
aligned with our goals and values
[1:40:38]
while still welcoming new Oakley residents.
[1:40:43]
We have some areas of focus we want your feedback on in.
[1:40:47]
We want to see if we're on the right track.
[1:40:50]
While we provide some draft guidelines to you
[1:40:53]
we are not expecting you to provide us
[1:40:55]
with specific details on each of the guidelines.
[1:40:57]
Rather staff would like to know what
[1:41:00]
areas of the guidelines we should focus
[1:41:02]
on and for you to provide us any significant topics you
[1:41:06]
may feel we may be missing.
[1:41:13]
The first one we have is public Safety.
[1:41:18]
This one took a little bit of explaining to my colleagues
[1:41:22]
because we already extensively reviewed Public Safety.
[1:41:25]
It's a huge priority for us.
[1:41:27]
When we get a project in it doesn't
[1:41:29]
matter that the design guidelines
[1:41:31]
don't tell us to do this.
[1:41:33]
We routed out to these agencies.
[1:41:36]
The fire department the police department
[1:41:39]
and we require that projects incorporate their comments
[1:41:45]
and so anyone who is familiar with reviewing
[1:41:49]
housing projects will turn their head at this do we need this?
[1:41:53]
We have staff and our team who have been in public hearings
[1:41:57]
for these streamlined projects and the public
[1:42:01]
wants it explicitly said.
[1:42:03]
When it comes time for public comment
[1:42:06]
on these streamlined housing projects
[1:42:08]
come a public safety comes up and they don't just
[1:42:11]
want to hear from staff that it was routed.
[1:42:19]
The other instigator of this is when
[1:42:22]
we are at the permit counter and we
[1:42:25]
have someone who wants to build a housing development.
[1:42:28]
We will slide over our guidelines
[1:42:30]
and they start thinking about their project
[1:42:32]
from that perspective.
[1:42:34]
I would like them to think about it
[1:42:35]
from the early pages about public safety evacuation routes
[1:42:40]
things of that nature so when they
[1:42:42]
go to their architect that's the first thing on their mind.
[1:42:49]
Next is site design.
[1:42:51]
Another area of focus for us.
[1:42:54]
We want new housing to be a nice place to live.
[1:42:56]
We want good site design open space pedestrian pathways
[1:43:01]
and connections to ways of getting around.
[1:43:05]
That's important to us.
[1:43:10]
We are also looking at the building envelope.
[1:43:13]
Rather than being overly prescriptive
[1:43:16]
about every aspect of design planning staff
[1:43:19]
are focused on ensuring that building envelopes are
[1:43:22]
appropriate within the surrounding area
[1:43:25]
that they do not dominate the surrounding landscape where
[1:43:29]
possible and that they are sensitive to nearby existing
[1:43:32]
homes.
[1:43:32]
An example of that is many cities
[1:43:35]
are stepping back their top floors
[1:43:37]
when they are close to shorter residential buildings
[1:43:41]
like in this example here.
[1:43:47]
For us that's more important than making sure
[1:43:50]
we have a certain percentage of glazing
[1:43:53]
or so many feet of some type of architectural feature.
[1:44:00]
When we talk about the smaller design aspects
[1:44:03]
we want buildings that look good and hold up over time
[1:44:06]
but our standards need to be realistic about cost.
[1:44:09]
If design requirements push project costs to high housing
[1:44:13]
does not get built and that does not help anyone.
[1:44:16]
We want to require articulation and facade variation
[1:44:21]
without dictating every inch of every cornice or glazing area.
[1:44:27]
We want to focus on the elements that matter
[1:44:30]
and how a building looks and feels
[1:44:32]
from the street or other common areas.
[1:44:36]
Another focus of ours is community feedback.
[1:44:41]
At our public outreach meeting residents
[1:44:44]
shared priorities that are shaping our approach.
[1:44:47]
We heard that we should build communities not just
[1:44:50]
housing gamma people want neighborhoods with shared spaces
[1:44:53]
not just rows of buildings.
[1:44:55]
We heard design should encourage interaction between neighbors.
[1:44:59]
We also heard we should allow creative freedom for architects
[1:45:03]
standards should set a floor not a ceiling prescriptive rules
[1:45:08]
that force every project to look the same going
[1:45:12]
against good design.
[1:45:13]
We are writing clear minimums while leaving room
[1:45:17]
for architects to bring creative high quality solutions.
[1:45:22]
In Oakley as far as I remember we
[1:45:26]
have had a philosophy of not focusing on the most
[1:45:31]
difficult parts of a project.
[1:45:33]
We want to dive head first into that work
[1:45:35]
so the most fleshed out parts of this project
[1:45:37]
are these nitty gritty standards for how
[1:45:39]
the architectural details should be designed
[1:45:42]
and how the site should be designed.
[1:45:44]
We've attached two draft chapters
[1:45:46]
for you attached to the staff report.
[1:45:50]
Attachment one covers multifamily and mixed
[1:45:55]
use residential standards including site design street
[1:45:59]
connectivity pedestrian pathways vehicle access parking lot
[1:46:04]
screening utilities and service areas and primary entry design.
[1:46:15]
Attachment two covers single family residential standards
[1:46:20]
including building form and massing facade projections
[1:46:24]
second floor setbacks story separation facade materials
[1:46:29]
and covered porch design.
[1:46:37]
Another aspect we need to talk about
[1:46:40]
is when we get really technical.
[1:46:42]
Each day Oakley's planning team is
[1:46:45]
working to make construction and land use more
[1:46:47]
accessible for residents.
[1:46:49]
We usually roll our eyes when we see folks in our profession
[1:46:52]
make things overly complicated.
[1:46:54]
We are asking for your support and patience
[1:46:57]
on some aspects of this project that we feel
[1:47:00]
need to get into the weeds.
[1:47:02]
For example urban planning has started
[1:47:05]
using the term which is just a large walkway for residents
[1:47:10]
that connects folks to areas of a housing complex.
[1:47:13]
We saw that used in the library project
[1:47:16]
today which was a good win that was mentioned in the first item.
[1:47:21]
During the years of living in Oakley and going to school here
[1:47:25]
we never use this term but as a planner in 2026
[1:47:28]
I am finding it a good way to communicate
[1:47:31]
what we need in a project.
[1:47:33]
Additionally there's a state law that
[1:47:36]
only allows us to use pre 2018 subjective standards to review
[1:47:43]
some projects.
[1:47:44]
So you will likely see us carry over those standards
[1:47:47]
and that can be confusing.
[1:47:49]
We will make sure to explain that.
[1:47:52]
We hate to have to get technical in that way.
[1:47:55]
We just want it clear and simple in order
[1:47:57]
to get us the projects we want we will likely implement that.
[1:48:03]
Those are our areas of focus.
[1:48:06]
Let's go over the next steps.
[1:48:08]
Tonight we are seeking your feedback on our overall focus
[1:48:13]
and direction.
[1:48:14]
We'd love to hear your thoughts.
[1:48:16]
We will then do the same with the City Council in July.
[1:48:20]
We will complete a draft of the regulations
[1:48:22]
and provide those to you later this year
[1:48:25]
for review and potential recommendation to the City
[1:48:27]
Council.
[1:48:28]
We will then seek City Council approval.
[1:48:31]
While we do want to strengthen our guidelines quickly and get
[1:48:35]
quality regulations on the books we are not great artists
[1:48:38]
and will likely seek a consultant
[1:48:40]
to develop an illustrated manual after we get it approved.
[1:48:44]
Thanks for your time commissioners.
[1:48:46]
We welcome your questions and feedback.
[1:48:55]
Vice Chair Harvey: Thank you for the report
[1:48:57]
that was very informative.
[1:49:00]
Commissioner Oliveros: The architect part
[1:49:01]
where you mentioned giving architects
[1:49:03]
free autonomy to design I thought that was amazing.
[1:49:07]
So does this mean that is it the architects
[1:49:11]
that the city works with or the architects
[1:49:13]
that the builders work with?
[1:49:17]
>> That's a great question.
[1:49:18]
It's the architects that the builders work with and just
[1:49:20]
to give you some details on that we only had a few folks come
[1:49:25]
to our outreach meeting.
[1:49:27]
One of them was an architect who happens to live in town
[1:49:32]
and people are making the case that we always
[1:49:36]
require multiple materials on the front facade
[1:49:38]
and what if you did a farmhouse on a large portion of it.
[1:49:44]
That should be sufficient and it was a good argument
[1:49:46]
so we are thinking on that.
[1:49:51]
Commissioner Oliveros: That's great.
[1:49:54]
It's an attraction for bringing new families
[1:49:59]
and I love that term so thank you for that.
[1:50:14]
Commissioner Ireland: I do want to emphasize
[1:50:16]
that leaving some creative freedom is a good thing
[1:50:18]
and we need to balance that with our need
[1:50:20]
to create a robust set of design standards
[1:50:24]
and just as a general comment I fully
[1:50:26]
support getting as technical as you need
[1:50:29]
to to have specific criteria identified so there is no wiggle
[1:50:34]
room and language especially if language among design
[1:50:37]
is evolving.
[1:50:38]
New word for me tonight.
[1:50:42]
So I'm not sure if you're looking for a feedback
[1:50:46]
but there were a few things I had questions on that
[1:50:49]
if it's not going to cause too many issues just to consider.
[1:50:52]
We talked about public safety.
[1:50:55]
That was one of them but how we can ensure that fire codes are
[1:50:58]
up to date and also site access specifically things
[1:51:02]
like access of fire trucks.
[1:51:04]
We talk a lot about evacuation but just
[1:51:06]
ensuring we have access for police or regular vehicles.
[1:51:11]
There's a few other items when I looked
[1:51:15]
over the preliminary working drafts
[1:51:17]
and I may have missed it because I
[1:51:19]
am somewhat new to all of this but things like density
[1:51:22]
requirements, coverage limits.
[1:51:26]
One item I did not see in there and I know we are --
[1:51:35]
light standards for how exterior lighting is done as well as tree
[1:51:39]
planting ratios so we can make sure we still have a proper
[1:51:43]
landscaping so the intent of my comments is I don't want
[1:51:45]
to create an environment where we're not allowing for that
[1:51:48]
creative freedom we talked about but we do need some kind
[1:51:52]
of objective design standards especially given how planning is
[1:51:55]
changing in the state and I want to say thank you for being
[1:51:59]
proactive and the whole team for addressing this issue.
[1:52:03]
>> Thank you Commissioner and that's very helpful feedback
[1:52:06]
because I can either add it to the drafts or if we have it
[1:52:10]
somewhere else when I bring you the drafts I can tell you where
[1:52:13]
that is so that's very helpful.
[1:52:15]
Thank you.