[0:01] Good evening. We will go ahead and call the meeting to order. It is uh 5:00 pm.

[0:06] Roll call. >> Chairman Ferris

[0:10] » here. >> Commissioner [clears throat] Haymon

[0:12] » here. >> Commissioner Mont Dragon

[0:13] » here. >> Commissioner Poxis

[0:14] » here. >> For present. We have a quorum.

[0:18] » All right. If you all rise for the pledge of allegiance, please.

[0:25] » Ready to begin. I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and

[0:31] to the republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with

[0:38] liberty and justice for all. >> Thank you.

[0:47] I am requesting a motion um for approval of the agenda.

[0:52] » So moved. >> I'll second.

[0:54] » Ferris >> I.

[0:55] » Haymon. I >> M dragon

[0:57] » I >> I

[0:59] » motion carries. >> Okay. Um we are

[1:05] swearing in a new commissioner,

[1:10] » Mr. Bowen.

[1:22] Raise your right hand. >> I state Oh, [snorts] sorry. I, Eric,

[1:30] » doly affirm affirm >> that I will support and defend

[1:34] » that I will support and defend >> the Constitution of the United States

[1:37] » Constitution of the United States >> and the Constitution of the State of

[1:41] California >> and the Constitution of the State of

[1:43] California >> against all enemies

[1:45] » against all enemies, >> foreign and domestic.

[1:48] » foreign and domestic. >> That I will bear true faith and alian

[1:52] true faith and allegiance >> to the Constitution of the United States

[1:56] » to the Constit Constitution of the United States

[1:59] » and the Constitution of the State of California.

[2:02] » Constitution of the State of California. >> That I take this obligation free

[2:06] » that I take this obligation freely >> without any mental reservation

[2:10] » without any reservation >> or purpose of evasion

[2:13] » or purpose of evasion. and that I will well

[2:16] » and that I will well >> and faithfully discharge

[2:18] » and faithfully discharge >> the duties upon which

[2:21] » the duties upon which >> I'm about to enter

[2:23] » I'm about to enter ma'am

[2:32] » thank you all thank you Eric

[2:36] um we will um make a motion to approve the minutes at the next meeting

[2:42] um non-aggenda the public comments. Uh, persons wishing to address the

[2:47] commission on matters that are within the commission's jurisdiction and do not

[2:52] already appear on the agenda may do so at this time. Pursuant to the Brown Act,

[2:55] the planning commission may not take action on an item that that does not

[3:00] appear on this agenda. Oh, I'm sorry. Speakers are limited to five minutes.

[3:03] The public comment section of the agenda is limited to a total of one hour. Each

[3:08] speaker is asked to provide his or her name.

[3:16] Hello there. My name is Kelly Betts. Last Wednesday, the issue of backyard

[3:21] poultry was brought before the city council and they agreed to add it to the

[3:24] agenda for discussion at a next city council meeting. At the request of

[3:28] Councilman Blades, I am here today before the planning commission to

[3:31] discuss the current municipal code and possible amendments that could be made

[3:35] to accommodate backyard poultry following a future decision by the city

[3:39] council. The current municipal code does not contain any specific language as to

[3:44] the allowance or forbiddance of backyard poultry in residential zoning. This lack

[3:50] of communication has led the public to believe that poultry is allowed in

[3:53] Ridgerest, and countless citizens already own backyard chickens, ducks,

[3:58] quails, and other birds. Recent events have brought this into

[4:02] question as some residents have been told that they must remove their birds

[4:06] from the pre premises without warning and any chance of remediation.

[4:11] The current municipal code requires cleanliness of all animal habitations

[4:15] regardless of species and it forbids loud and continuous animal noises such

[4:20] as barking and crowing. I agree with these requirements. However, this does

[4:24] not specifically say that backyard birds are not allowed under any circumstance.

[4:29] even when cleanliness and noise are not in question. I propose that we amend the

[4:34] current municipal code to include allowances and limitations regarding

[4:37] poultry just as we have these specifications for cats and dogs. I have

[4:42] taken an active part in community discussion regarding this issue,

[4:45] including online and in person at community events. I have personally

[4:50] spoken with hundreds of residents about their thoughts on this issue. Our

[4:53] petition already has almost 400 signatures in only one week.

[4:58] The most common comment that I have heard from residents is that they

[5:01] thought owning backyard chickens was already allowed. Common concerns were

[5:06] that there should be limits to the number of birds you can have and that

[5:08] roosters should not be permitted in residential areas. I personally agree

[5:12] with this. My opinion and suggestion is that a resident shall own no more than

[5:17] eight female chickens or four ducks and no specified limit on quailes due to

[5:22] their very small size. This number is based on the number of eggs that a

[5:25] typical family would need for personal use and is based on the fact that chicks

[5:29] must be purchased in quantities of four from local suppliers. I also suggest a

[5:34] ban on the commercial sale of eggs and a complete ban of roosters in residential

[5:39] zones unless explicit permission is granted from the city based on lot size

[5:44] and other requirements. I believe that making these changes to the municipal

[5:47] code will save the time, money, and resources of animal control and code

[5:52] enforcement officers by giving them discretion to act on situations and

[5:57] complaints that actually constitute animal care negligence versus having to

[6:02] respond to every tip that a chicken simply exists. I would be happy to hear

[6:06] any concerns that you might have concerning this request and will gladly

[6:10] respond with ideas on how to address any potential conflicts. I respectfully ask

[6:14] that you begin looking into the current civil code and contemplate ways that it

[6:18] could potentially be amended following a decision decision by our city council

[6:23] members at a future city council meeting. Thank you for your time.

[6:26] » Thank you.

[6:31] » Are we engaging questions or no? >> No. Okay. Thank you.

[6:35] » Comment. >> Any other public comment?

[6:42] Okay. Moving on, we will go ahead and open the uh public hearing. This is an

[6:47] abatement of APN 34304234-0000-5,

[6:55] a consideration of an abatement to the property due to buckled and obstructed

[7:00] sidewalks RMC 14-59 and 11-3

[7:06] uh 3C. Property owner uh Dan Wyn, APN 343 04234-0000-5

[7:17] staff report.

[7:27] Good evening. Tonight, I am requesting approval to abate a buckled sidewalk and

[7:32] vegetation obstructing the sidewalk at the intersection of East Church Avenue

[7:36] and South Lincoln Street. APN 343 042 34005.

[7:44] As you can see, this portion of the sidewalk is entirely unusable, forcing

[7:48] pedestrians to step off of the sidewalk and into the roadway to navigate around

[7:52] this obstacle, which is not only dangerous, but may be difficult, if not

[7:56] impossible, for those with physical limitations.

[8:00] Since the case was initiated on August 21st, 2025, I have made repeated efforts

[8:06] to contact the property owner. Six notices have been mailed, three

[8:10] citations have been issued, and numerous telephone calls have been placed. In

[8:15] addition, I've utilized multiple available resources to research updated

[8:19] mailing addresses for the property owner. Despite these efforts, I have

[8:23] received no response from the property owner. Additionally, I've attempted to

[8:28] contact who is believed to be relatives and associates of the property owner via

[8:32] phone. Unfortunately, many of these telephone numbers were either

[8:37] disconnected, no longer belonged to the intended individuals, or did not result

[8:41] in contact with anyone responsible for the property.

[8:45] Based on these efforts, I believe every administrative approach available to the

[8:49] city has been exhausted. With the violations remaining uncorrected, we are

[8:54] requesting the removal and replacement of the buckled portion of the sidewalk

[8:58] as well as the complete uprooting of the tree to ensure that this issue does not

[9:03] occur again. With that, I'm available to answer any questions you may have.

[9:10] » Thank you. Uh, commissioner comments, Mr. Bruin, we'll start with you.

[9:15] » Uh, just this is actually we we had trimmed this bush back previously before

[9:19] we started this abatement. Correct. And it went through like a parks uh a

[9:24] streets maintenance trim back back in 23 I believe. Uh this this existed with the

[9:30] same lot. I'm just putting written that on record that thank you guys for coming

[9:34] forward. Thank you. Very thorough abatement, very thorough process, but

[9:38] this is not something that just came up in 25. This person's ignored it for

[9:41] easily a good three to six years at this point. Um and I applaud your efforts in

[9:46] getting it moving forward. Thank you. >> Thank you.

[9:52] I'm curious how many or how many years the person has owned this lot. I'm

[9:57] assuming a very long time if we can't get a hold of them.

[10:02] From what I from what I remember, I believe it said as early as 2005.

[10:08] The property owner used to be a resident of Ridgequest uh Rididgerest and

[10:12] obviously they are no longer. However, they still do own this lot.

[10:18] I think what uh looking at especially the picture that's on the screen there

[10:23] like it's not worn down. Obviously there's not a lot of foot traffic or

[10:26] anything that uh because people can't walk by there.

[10:30] » Uh not questioning your means and methods and everything you did. I think

[10:33] you're all doing a great job, but I'm just curious how many other parts of the

[10:36] sidewalk on vacant lots around the city that might be damaged due to the

[10:41] earthquake or old trees that used to be on

[10:45] properties. Um, so it almost it almost seems like you're going to be chasing

[10:51] your tails for a very long time uh around the city. So I'm curious if this

[10:55] is something that the public works department can maybe go around and look

[10:59] and maybe one week out of the year they go around

[11:03] and they try to do the best they can at least on the brush. The cost of

[11:08] repairing sidewalks is expensive. So [clears throat]

[11:12] on that note, we did talk, code enforcement and I did talk previous to

[11:16] this on the state because we do have a sidewalk survey that was done. So we

[11:21] know all of the sidewalks that need to be repaired and as of

[11:26] this this year um they sent out 44 cases um that have had up to the 30

[11:35] days, right? So, [clears throat] there's still more that are outstanding, but

[11:38] they haven't even had the notice for 30 days. So, out of those 44 cases, 30

[11:42] people have already fixed the sidewalks. Um, the vacant properties, they are a

[11:48] continuous issue because people don't live here. So, they may not even know.

[11:52] They don't know the sidewalks broken. They don't know that the weeds are

[11:54] overgrown. But we have been working on that for all of this year to get those

[12:01] trimmed and getting those uh property owners, which has actually spurred them

[12:05] to decide whether or not they want to continue keeping this property or

[12:08] whether they're ready to list it. So, it's kind of advantageous to us to get

[12:12] them to pay attention to their property. Um the abatement will be just to fix the

[12:17] sidewalk and remove that. It's not a hugely costly thing, but it is costly to

[12:22] our community. And hopefully we can get those that

[12:28] haven't responded, hopefully we can get multiple of them together so that when

[12:31] we get people to go out and get fix them, it could potentially lower the

[12:35] cost. And if memory serves me right, especially for the residents, if uh they

[12:40] get a break on the permit for doing this, right, since they've had a

[12:44] citation, uh I don't think they pay full cost. I

[12:49] don't think it's a complete discount, but they don't.

[12:52] » So, they do receive a discount on the permits uh because it is a code

[12:56] enforcement case.

[13:00] » I didn't know you had a sidewalk survey. So

[13:03] » yes, >> I like it.

[13:05] » Our good our good packed volunteers. >> That's all I have.

[13:12] » Um, so on the final abatement notice, was that mailed or was that posted on

[13:16] the property? >> This was mailed to the uh owner's

[13:19] mailing address on file. >> Does it have to be posted on the

[13:22] property or >> if if there was actually a structure on

[13:26] the property? Yes. However, this is a vacant lot, so it is not required.

[13:32] Okay. Cuz I'm just thinking if we post it [clears throat] in this case, it

[13:37] probably wouldn't make a difference, but if you post it on the property, maybe

[13:39] there's a neighbor that knows or a friend that drives by and sees it and

[13:44] could contact the owner. But I think this is beyond that point at this point.

[13:48] Um, my other question is I see there's like multiple pictures with different

[13:54] dates. Um, has the city done anything to like warn the public, hey, there's a

[13:59] trip hazard. go around maybe like safety cones, a sign.

[14:04] » Nothing that I'm aware of. >> Okay. I think we should consider when

[14:08] it's like something like this that's critical. Someone can just be walking

[14:12] down the street and trip. So, and code enforcement sees it, maybe put out like

[14:17] a cone or even I mean even just trim the tree back. It's you know just a pair of

[14:22] clippers. trim them back a little bit so that it's not it's obviously a hazard,

[14:26] but if we can do something about it to prevent an accident, we should.

[14:31] » Thank you.

[14:37] » Uh gentlemen in uh code enforcement. I think you guys are doing a great job. I

[14:41] appreciate the uh the thoroughess of your report. Provides a level of clarity

[14:46] that makes this side fairly easy. So, thank you for for that. have a feeling

[14:51] you had a really good teacher. Um, we'll take a public comment right now if we

[14:56] have any.

[15:00] No. All right. At this time, I'd like to

[15:03] request a [clears throat] motion um to approve this abatement.

[15:08] » All motion. >> Second.

[15:11] » Ferris. >> I

[15:13] » I >> Mond Dragon

[15:16] » I. >> Foxes.

[15:18] » I >> bre

[15:19] » I >> Five eyes. Motion.

[15:20] » You said Eric had to start there. >> The new guy.

[15:24] » Thank you. >> All right. Thank you, sir.

[15:29] » Thank you, Officer Capelli. >> Uh

[15:34] brings us to parcel map uh waiver 26-01. Uh Tvali Center. uh consideration of a

[15:42] parcel map waiver to subdivide two parcels into three parcels zoned general

[15:47] commercial 1400 North Norma Street APN 419-020-41

[15:54] staff report. [clears throat] >> So this is a parcel map waiver to divide

[15:59] the existing uh parcel. This [clears throat] parcel

[16:03] is completely developed. So that's why we do a parcel map waiver, not a track

[16:07] map um or a parcel map. all of the uh infrastructure that serves this is

[16:12] already in existence. Um so this is on North Norma Street. Um there's a gas

[16:19] station, the happy hours, and a couple of other existing tenants.

[16:27] So this is how they're proposing to divide this. So then you would have

[16:31] three separate parcels on here um for tenants

[16:37] um for just the ease of dividing it. It would also um include the CCNRs as

[16:46] usual for these where there is that reciprocal access agreement for the

[16:50] different businesses and then it lays out exactly who's responsible for which

[16:54] portions of the parking lot and stuff like that. So that helps us with

[16:58] maintaining these things should they become an issue in the future. The

[17:03] applicant is on the phone, so if we have questions for him, you guys can reach

[17:08] out. Um staff is recommending that we do this parcel map waiver. Um any

[17:13] questions?

[17:18] » I have one. How are they handling the three parking

[17:22] spots at the intersection of the three lots?

[17:28] It's uh if you look at line uh where the we know this is the gas station, the

[17:34] office space and the the restaurant. Those are the three, you know, complexes

[17:38] there. Um I can understand how they've drawn the line uh in the north line um

[17:45] 0626 East. That's clearly the back of the building. And I can see how they

[17:50] tried to create the um other subdivide line, but it ends up subdividing

[17:55] uh slightly three parking spots on the corner

[18:01] that technically fall within both parcel three and parcel one. And I'm just

[18:07] curious if that those have been designated for the the gas station,

[18:11] designated for the office building, or has there been some discussion in terms

[18:14] of who has the uh maintenance and and um towing rights and all the above for for

[18:20] those three spots?

[18:23] » So, the the developer or developers rep is on the phone.

[18:29] » Yes. Um can you hear me? >> Can you hear?

[18:32] » Yes, sir. >> Um yeah, absolutely. the uh three

[18:35] parking spaces was given to parcel one to accommodate the amount of square

[18:39] footage necessary for the parcel map waiver. So the responsibility is on the

[18:45] uh mini mart or gas station that is there uh in that partial one.

[18:51] » Thank you sir. >> You're welcome.

[18:57] So based on the occupancy load of the restaurant area, uh that building should

[19:04] have somewhere in the ballpark of 45 to 60 parking stalls. So you don't have

[19:10] anywhere near that. And my understanding in this case, same

[19:16] owner, one parcel turning into three. What happens when one of the parcels

[19:21] sells at some point? Maybe it's a year, maybe it's a hundred years from now, but

[19:25] either or the new uh owner, if it were to ever sell, now doesn't have the

[19:30] required parking spaces available. So, in all honesty, the the parking section

[19:37] needs to be expanded for that uh restaurant area to include a lot more

[19:42] parking spaces because if that ever were to sell, it

[19:48] won't have the necessary amount that it has. uh the three parking stalls for the

[19:55] um gas station. Is there no parking stalls

[19:59] directly in front of the store? I'm assuming no.

[20:01] » There is. >> Okay.

[20:04] So, are the are those three in that little bubble are those the ADA uh

[20:11] required parking spots? >> No, those are in front of the store.

[20:15] » Okay. I will say the CCNR generally is going to lay out the percentage that

[20:20] each parcel is responsible for. So that and that will travel with the land that

[20:27] will not be struck and no matter how this is sold and I have not personally

[20:31] seen the CCNRs. That's a Travis review, not me. [clears throat] But we can make

[20:36] sure that the CCNRs does lay out that they are responsible for

[20:41] the percentage that would meet the need of that current use. But that doesn't

[20:45] mean it's always going to be that use. [clears throat]

[20:48] But the whole the whole three parcels are going to be responsible in some way,

[20:54] shape or form for the entirety of the parking. So even though parcel 3 is

[20:58] heavy on the parking right now, usually that reciprocal agreement is

[21:03] going to include what percentage they're all. And so in the future, you know, if

[21:08] parcel 3 still owns, you know, still has the major portion of the parking,

[21:13] they're going to negotiate with that tenant based on what that tenant needs,

[21:16] right? So that's probably in the tenants's lease. Um, that's how we've

[21:21] seen it in the past. So that could very well be the case here, but I have not

[21:25] reviewed that document.

[21:29] Yeah, the the agreement's one thing, but uh

[21:34] if it changes ownership, that agreement doesn't has to be re rewritten and

[21:39] redone. >> It would probably be in their lease

[21:42] because the CCNR will always stay recorded with the the actual

[21:49] uh parcel map waiver. So on that parcel map waiver, you'll see that CCNR, it's

[21:54] going to have that agreement no matter how it changes hands. Um, but it would

[21:59] be, yeah, it would need to be negotiated with them because that could not, that

[22:04] could not be a restaurant tomorrow and then it could be an office and maybe

[22:08] that parking works. But whoever's managing that property is going to have

[22:12] to determine the use for their tenants and make them responsible for whatever

[22:16] portion of that parking lot as far as repairs because the CCNRs is going to

[22:22] determine, you know, you're responsible for 50% of the repairs or and they're

[22:27] responsible for 25, right? But in our current in its current

[22:34] occupancy, how many parking spots should that

[22:38] » I would have to know the size of the dining room.

[22:40] » So it's uh one parking space per 300 square foot of dining. So not the whole

[22:46] building, just the dining.

[22:52] » Thank you. >> But yeah, thank you.

[22:56] » Sure. Uh, no I don't have any questions. I just what Cody was asking about the

[23:02] parking spots. So I hope they have a good agreement so that uh if parcel 3

[23:09] ends up being empty and the other two parcels have tenants then if the parking

[23:15] lot needs to be fixed or repairs done that we don't get into a situation where

[23:20] well I don't have any tenants or in income coming in so I'm not going to fix

[23:23] it. So, I hope there's something in there that addresses that.

[23:27] » Okay.

[23:31] » All right. [clears throat] I think that those would be addressed by the land

[23:35] owner, the landlord. And so, it really isn't a and then Yeah. And then again,

[23:40] to Eric's point, code enforcement to make sure that that's brought up to

[23:44] standard. So, I don't think that's something that as a planning commission

[23:47] we need to necessarily um worry ourselves with necessarily. I I

[23:53] am a little concerned that to Cody's point, if if part of these if

[24:00] this parcel sells, that really does make that a a a tough spot for that

[24:06] restaurant right now. But I guess that's that's up to them. Um, and it really

[24:11] isn't isn't the the role of the planning commission to to pre-negotiate that

[24:18] based on something that might happen in the future. So,

[24:23] um, do we have public comment? Any comment from the developer,

[24:30] sir? >> No.

[24:32] » No. Okay. At this time, I'd like to request a motion for approval.

[24:38] I'll make a motion for approval of the recommendation of the staff report.

[24:43] Specifically, since they gave me language, I move that the planning

[24:46] commission adopt a resolution finding that the project is exempt from SQA and

[24:49] approve parcel map waiver 2601 subject to the findings and conditions of

[24:53] approval contained in the draft resolution.

[24:57] » I'll second >> Ferris

[25:01] » I. >> Heymon

[25:02] » Iregan >> I

[25:05] » ruin >> I.

[25:06] » Five eyes. Motion carries. Okay, we will go ahead and close the uh

[25:12] public hearing and move on to discussion and other

[25:16] action items. Um, this is committee assignments.

[25:23] » So, we have one vacancy

[25:29] on committees um right now.

[25:34] Also, if anybody wants to move because there is infrastructure, economic

[25:39] development and then quality of life. Um, the vacancy is on quality of life. I

[25:45] am assuming that Breuan is able to fill that spot.

[25:53] » Volunte.

[25:56] » So, that meeting is on the first Tuesday of the month at 5:30 p.m. and they meet

[26:01] over in the Ker McGee Center. Um, and then

[26:04] » from here >> No, we're still here.

[26:06] » Yeah. When when did we >> Their agenda says they're at the Kirby

[26:09] Center. So, >> but I will update that on my list. So,

[26:14] they meet in this room. >> Okay.

[26:20] » And then I think we're good for now. That was it. Does anybody Everyone else

[26:25] is good. No schedule changes. Good for now.

[26:29] » Good for now. >> Okay. Thank you, Eric, for taking that

[26:33] on. >> Happy to do it.

[26:34] » Um, commissioner comments and committee reports. I have nothing to report and no

[26:40] comments. >> I have nothing.

[26:44] » I have nothing. >> Nothing to report. Infrastructure is

[26:48] done until tomorrow. >> Very good.

[26:51] » Uh, I have two things. Everyone, I wanted to uh make sure that a compliment

[26:55] went out to the city uh for the work that's being done on uh the medians and

[27:01] the trees. Um everything that we are continuing to do to improve the

[27:06] appearance and quality of our community is always a positive and I think that's

[27:08] a very good positive step forward. Um, second, I just want to echo my thanks

[27:13] and appreciation for the opportunity to serve uh the city again, and I look

[27:17] forward to serving on quality of life and uh seeing us uh strive towards a

[27:22] summer date that I look forward to seeing.

[27:26] » Thank you. Staff items. Um, as you are probably already aware,

[27:34] the um, state department of housing

[27:38] community development, they did approve our housing elements. So, we now have a

[27:44] certified housing element. Yay. Um, so the next thing is prepare yourselves for

[27:50] about 40 um, code amendments. Uh, you're welcome. We will try to do them as

[27:58] as much as we cover, right? Because I don't want to just bring 40 to you in

[28:02] one motion and there's not really any kind of discussion of but we will not

[28:09] break them into 40 different meetings. Um

[28:12] » how long do we have to put them in in effect by the

[28:15] » by January? >> By January.

[28:17] » Okay. >> So

[28:19] » 10 10 a month for the next >> So just like right now. Um yes. and it

[28:24] just takes three meetings in six months to do it.

[28:28] So, it should be fine. Um, and the next thing that you guys will

[28:34] see will be um zone changes because we have a lot of zones that we have known

[28:39] needed to be corrected. Um, so that will be coming now that our housing element

[28:45] is adopted. Um the reason for holding off is the housing element includes the

[28:50] vacant sites. Um and also all of our figures for meeting the arena. So our

[28:55] our regional housing allocation um is all based off of the zoning. Um we'll

[29:02] still meet RENA. That's not there's things like professional office with

[29:07] apartments in it. Um which is fine because it is a conditional use. But the

[29:12] the big problem is is when people try to purchase these things, they're not

[29:16] necessarily financable or title doesn't want to do it. Um so it becomes an issue

[29:22] when they are existing multifamily structures. There's no reason for the

[29:25] zoning to stay professional office. Um some other things, there's things that

[29:31] are in the flight path. Um and I had talked to the developer about

[29:37] two years ago and so they were happy with the idea proposed. So, we'll see

[29:41] that come. Um, and also potentially agricultural zone will change to match

[29:48] the same zone as that property um that's out there on Brady, Mayan, Richest

[29:56] Boulevard, and Los Flores because that is the um largest impact. Um, however,

[30:02] due to state housing laws, when we downzone something, which that has to be

[30:07] downzoned. Um, when we downzone something, we have to swap. So, we have

[30:11] to make it up. Even though we far exceed our reena numbers, um, as far as

[30:16] vacancy, we don't build to meet the reena numbers. So, we still have to

[30:21] swap. So, I can't get rid of an estate lot and create what

[30:26] essentially would be half the density um, without swapping for something else.

[30:31] So that's where the professional office and all of those things that are kind of

[30:34] corrections will come in handy in this process. So you will see that probably

[30:40] at the beginning of next year um we'll get through the holidays. But I look

[30:45] forward to everyone's input and if you have anything else that you and even the

[30:49] public if you know of something you hear of something um and you're watching we

[30:55] are you know looking at different sites. So, if there's something that you know

[30:58] of that we may not um this will be more of a conversation. It'll be more

[31:04] interactive. Um and we'll have more time to deal with that as well so that it

[31:08] doesn't come as a surprise to any property owners. Um but that's it.

[31:13] That's all I have. >> Thank you, Heather.

[31:17] Anything from you gentlemen? All right. We will go ahead and adjourn

[31:22] the meeting at 5:31. Thank you all. Thank you, sir.

Planning Commission Meeting 8/26/2026

Transcript