[7:54] All right, please.

[7:57] I pledge algiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the

[8:03] republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and

[8:11] justice for all.

[8:17] » Council President >> here.

[8:20] » Council Vice President Michael >> here.

[8:22] » Council member Joerger >> here.

[8:25] » Council member Ed >> here.

[8:27] » Council member Andy here. >> Okay. Next up on the agenda is the uh

[8:33] consent agenda. register

[8:37] sanuss

[9:00] » no we um we do the payroll in house now which you're not

[9:04] those because those are all usually processed through paycheck

[9:09] but we've taken that um inhouse with the so we made those payments ourselves

[9:18] » yes it is the that is the security

[9:28] » okay anybody else have any questions on the

[9:34] So second I have a motion and second

[9:39] additional discussion. All those in favor signify by saying I

[9:44] otherwise have citizen comments

[9:50] staff reports. Captain sir good shiny. Thank you very much for you.

[9:57] » Thank you. Uh we had some recent staff changes which opened a super supervisory

[10:01] position for night shift. After a small in-house

[10:06] application process, we have appointed John Hartley as a sergeant for B nights,

[10:12] not to be confused with Landon Harley, who is already a sergeant on Bdays. So,

[10:18] we're excited for him and he's getting started with some of that supervisory

[10:21] training. Now, some of our officers participated in the

[10:25] street racers detail with IP and state police back on August 21st.

[10:30] Uh that's through grant money through the state. Those kind of spinners, those

[10:34] vehicles that take over the intersections. During that, our one of

[10:37] our officers spotted a reckless vehicle, stopped him. We were able to get a

[10:42] serious violent felon in possession of a firearm off the street as well as a

[10:46] driving arrest that was actually very close to town.

[10:51] We've had a couple of recent breakins and thefts around Arthur overton that

[10:54] area. We have a couple leads that we're following up on trying to see if we can

[10:59] gather out of that. We did have a firearm that stolen out of that. So,

[11:03] obviously that's kind of important for us to try to get back. We picked up our

[11:07] Polaris Ranger today. Um it was outside if anybody wants to do that. We have to

[11:12] get decals down still and then we're going to incorporate that into our

[11:16] driving training that will be coming up. Speaking of that, we have driving

[11:20] training later this month at the Marian County Fairgrounds. We've started a

[11:23] partnership with them and using some of their grounds they have when it's

[11:28] nobody's there. So that's very helpful that it's a nice large space. There's

[11:30] several different structures that we can use kind of elevate our training a

[11:34] little bit. We did stops which is traffic stops training there a couple

[11:38] weeks ago. Um got a lot of positive feedback from that. use our simulation

[11:42] firearms and Sergeant Landon Hartley conducted that training for us and again

[11:49] we got a lot of good feedback from our officers saying they liked it. So

[11:53] trailer retreat coming up on October 17th 3 to 5

[11:58] and chief wanted to mention that we are coming up on the 25th anniversary of the

[12:02] terrorist attacks on September 11. >> That's all I

[12:08] appreciate.

[12:12] We uh been digging into insurance both on the benefits and liability side quite

[12:17] a quite a bit. Um we get benefits meeting earlier with a somewhat quite

[12:23] trivial things. We're have a little bit of a tough year but we

[12:28] have some ideas on changes that will help that out for next year. On the

[12:33] liability side since we changed brokerage we've probably been meeting

[12:36] with Epic talking or meeting about times a week.

[12:41] We found a lot there to make changes on pretty significant got feedback. Not the

[12:46] worst I've seen. So that's that's a good good bar. But we are going to try to

[12:52] rewrite go to 111 with our liability insurance the same way we do with our

[12:57] health insurance on the same term. So everything was up beginning of the year.

[13:02] Um separately uh from that uh the Indiana School Management Association

[13:10] uh is awarding the town an award at the leadership lunchon they have for

[13:18] professional management leadership community partner award. I am the

[13:20] president of that board. I want to be on record that I did not nominate

[13:25] that look questionable and the president

[13:29] boards getting award. So they they select Cumberland for

[13:35] promoting professional management of government in the state of Indiana.

[13:40] Then also December chamber chooses four communities from the nine county region

[13:46] to highlight and spotlight every year. So beginning of December, they are going

[13:52] to do spotlight on County Cumberland for their fourth quarter event here at town

[13:57] hall, but it's a ticketed event that the chamber puts on. So they're going to

[14:03] probably bring in some extra chairs and things for that. We are allowed to

[14:08] reserve x amount of tickets for those that want to attend from our

[14:12] organization. That will be right before as well as

[14:17] couple days before that.

[14:21] pretty pretty excited about that. We're getting somewhat of a regional

[14:25] recognition on the current initiatives right now. Then Christine and her staff

[14:30] been working with the businesses. They had the sunflower festival over the

[14:33] weekend. We got really good feedback on that.

[14:41] All the residents that attended all

[14:48] Thank you, sir. Public hearing additional

[14:52] appropriations. Is that correct?

[14:57] Open the public hearing.

[15:07] Close the public hearing on appropriations.

[15:11] Okay. Old business consideration ordinance 20269.

[15:15] Sir, you're ahead of you right now. You're fine.

[15:22] » Good afternoon. Um, this is ordinance 126-9. Um, it was introduced at the last

[15:28] council meeting. So, I'll be brief. Uh, this ordinance is up for vote today. It

[15:33] is an ordinance appropriating additional funds to the budget of the county

[15:38] with a grand total to7,000.

[15:44] I will be happy to answer any questions.

[16:02] Motion that we approve amendment 2026.

[16:17] » Have a motion second. Additional discussion. All those in favor signify

[16:20] by saying I. I. I. Thank you so much. Thank you.

[16:28] Okay, we have a public hearing for NX 5821 and 5823 West US40. I'll open the

[16:36] public hearing for that.

[16:43] See [snorts] comments I'll close the public hearing

[16:48] business in the ordinance 2026-10 properties. Miss

[16:55] » Thank you. Um this is the ordinance uh introduction for the annexation of the

[17:01] property that we just told you about hearing on. This is just for

[17:04] introduction this evening. Just to refresh your memory, this property is

[17:10] where houses and the industrial

[17:14] just buying it. So one of the lots is already in town while the area next in

[17:19] town and so two lots

[17:25] of impact essentially >> correct.

[17:41] All right. Any questions, comments? This only for only this evening.

[17:48] All right. Number two, consideration resolution 2026-09.

[17:54] » Yes. Um, so this is the resolution that adopts the fiscal plan for the laws that

[17:59] we just discussed. These are existing buildings. There's no proposed

[18:03] improvements on it. Um, so it's very minimal. [snorts]

[18:10] Any questions? All

[18:23] right. Any questions? This is an actual resolution.

[18:37] Resolution 26-09.

[18:47] I have a motion and second. Any additional discussion?

[18:52] All those in favor signify by saying I. I. Oppos. Otherwise have

[18:59] this open. You're on a run tonight. House Bill 101, the housing audit

[19:04] presentation. >> Yes. Um so I'll be brief.

[19:09] Um you have a copy of report as well as the presentation that was provided to

[19:15] commission in the council chair. I also added a copy of the draft minutes from

[19:19] commission the other night. No one attended the public hearing. I do know

[19:24] watched since then. I'm just going to highlight a couple of

[19:29] things that are in the in the PowerPoint. Um so one is the findings.

[19:35] There are five kind of key findings that staff found as we analyzed um the

[19:40] ordinances as it relates to the house 101 those nine factors they have asked

[19:46] us to look at. So over the last five years [clears throat] all of our res

[19:53] that does tend to indicate to us that our ordinances are likely updated for

[19:56] what is being constructed. Number two,

[20:01] um none of the projects that were approved over the last five years would

[20:05] actually get permitted in our R1 or R4 districts, which are single family

[20:10] districts. They some of the standards would fit in

[20:14] our R5 or R six, but those are multif family districts or single companies not

[20:18] allowed. So, we do have some inconsistencies there. Um we do not

[20:23] permit residential in any of our commercial districts. So when you're

[20:26] talking about mixed use and some of those things, we are starting to see

[20:30] more communities include residential in some of their lower impact districts,

[20:35] but we do not allow that. Our middle housing districts are where we allow the

[20:40] most flexibility right now. Um, and lastly, the the typologies we have our

[20:46] comprehensive plan don't line up with our zoning district. So again just

[20:50] another inconsistency indicating that it's time for school amendments which as

[20:56] you'll recall we have contracted with HWC to do an update to our unified

[21:00] development ordinances control ordinance that's something that

[21:05] has started and will be completed by the end of next year. So a lot of the nine

[21:10] uh the items in that n those nine categories that we've been asked to look

[21:15] at will really get analyzed deeper as part of that process and looked at. But

[21:20] there are some recommendations that I just want to highlight that we'll be

[21:24] looking at this year and then some of the things that we'll analyze next year.

[21:28] So one is some process changes. Um the plane commission um would like to look

[21:35] at establishing a plaque committee. This is a smaller board. It takes the

[21:40] subdivision plat out of the plan commission to the smaller committee. Um

[21:44] it allows us to be a little bit more efficient, put some timing off on there

[21:50] and it does require us to have a minimum of one commission member there and the

[21:54] plan commission makes the appointment to that committee. Um it does require

[21:59] amendments to the ordinance. So we're in the process of drafting those. Those

[22:03] would be to go to P commission and then they would make recommendation to

[22:06] council ultimately council will make a determination of whether or not that is

[22:10] something um that you guys want to do. We're also recommending some things to

[22:16] expedite your development plan process. Um right now we require public hearing

[22:21] for that. However, under state code, we're not required to do that. So one

[22:25] that requirement we think needs to be

[22:28] modified. And then also um under Indiana code, the legislative body can designate

[22:34] that to the commission staff. A hearing be committee or commission. So we're

[22:40] recommending that that be a staff approval and that in fact we use our T

[22:45] committee which is our technical advisory committee with our engineers

[22:48] and department heads on it to um review those development plans. So those two

[22:54] changes will allow us um to save um a couple of on each of those processes. So

[23:01] ultimately we could be saving developers potentially a month if they're required

[23:05] of those. Um for the zoning recommendations, one

[23:10] of the things that we'll be recommending this year as part of our transition um

[23:16] we'll be bringing development changes so that we have zoning districts for our

[23:21] Marian County properties um that we don't a lot of legal non-conforming

[23:26] uses. And what we found is instead of a bunch of new districts. We believe we

[23:30] can make some modifications to our R5 and R six zoning districts that will

[23:36] solve a lot of those issues. Um that also lines up with some of those

[23:41] inconsistencies I identified in our findings. So we'll be looking at

[23:46] allowing single family in our five and our six and then also um modifying some

[23:52] of the speakers in there. That's something that will be coming back to PL

[23:57] council um late fall and that this year for consideration and that will put us

[24:04] in a good position um as we become an excluded town January one to be able to

[24:10] administer those comprehensive control ordinances um consistently on

[24:16] both sides post on the entire town regardless of what county

[24:21] and then um There's many items that we are asked to look at. Architectural

[24:26] standards, parking, um a lot of our development standards,

[24:32] um allowing different residential typologies.

[24:38] Those items really deserve adequate study with our comprehensive plan

[24:43] nearing completion. It's going to go through the approvals process this fall.

[24:48] We're preparing for this Uno transition. We have HWC under contract to update our

[24:54] unified development ordinances. We think if we would be if we asked you to make

[24:58] changes now, we would be reacting um to kind of a suggestion versus doing a

[25:05] really good study to make sure we're being consistent with what our community

[25:08] is asking us to look at and give thoughtful study of these of what the

[25:16] standards should be in these districts. So, we're recommending that the

[25:20] remaining items be analyzed and considered as part of our uh update to

[25:27] the development board. That is a quick version of highlights of

[25:34] what is in um our audit on housing. Um ultimately, I think we have some good

[25:40] things in there with our housing, but we also do have some things that we know we

[25:43] need to address and there are some opportunities for efficiency. So, um,

[25:48] you're required under this new act to hold a public hearing on this, which we

[25:53] did at commission reporting back to the council and then we'll report to the

[25:57] state that we have this hearing and our findings.

[26:03] » I have a couple questions. When I reviewed the PowerPoint, I did

[26:08] have some concerns. very first one was on

[26:14] lot sizes lot sizes that causes me concern

[26:20] and I know it was also house bill that was addressed as to what type of

[26:28] house it will bring the second concern was it is odd it looks like now from R1

[26:34] to R4 now they're back to pushing double triplexes

[26:40] that they were so against that. And the third thing, yeah,

[26:45] » the market is the market is cyclical. So, if you do this long enough, as many

[26:51] as of us have watched the housing market,

[26:54] » you see what is old is new again. >> Yeah.

[26:58] » And so I I agree. When I first started out, you know, 25 years ago, R1 was

[27:05] single family, R2 was single family, delex, R3 was single family, delex,

[27:09] triplex, R4, and it went on. We got to a point where it was like all single

[27:14] family, everything else is mult.

[27:20] The other thing I thought was interesting was on R5, R six

[27:25] » because now they're looking at rather than having industrial zone area. Now

[27:31] we're shifting to able to put residential in there and doing almost a

[27:37] fixed use. I found that very interest.

[27:43] » Yeah. You know, a lot of the things you

[27:45] brought up is one of the reasons why a lot of those development standards we're

[27:49] recommending we take under consideration as part of our new process that to come

[27:56] in and make a quick decision. Now, I don't feel like we're doing the

[27:59] community justice. Um, we also haven't adopted the comprehensive plan yet and

[28:05] we want to make sure whatever we adopt with our standards aligns with that

[28:08] comprehensive plan. And so while these are things that we're being asked to

[28:13] analyze, I think that's exactly what we need to do is analyze them and then

[28:17] determine based on our community's guidance what's appropriate for us

[28:22] » and then ultimately if this, you know, we're going to do

[28:26] whatever the state requires of us, >> we'll probably have a new law by next

[28:29] July anyways. >> I know that's I guess that's where I was

[28:32] heading. >> Yeah.

[28:34] I sit on the House Rep's summer housing committee that is carrying this

[28:41] legislation now. It's not the same legislator as last year. The House

[28:46] leadership, the governor's administration moved it to the House

[28:49] Rep.

[28:55] And we were having really good conversations, but then it moved back to

[28:58] the national agenda after they their summer national conferences.

[29:05] So it's like they get in the chamber. So I came back in really good collaborative

[29:10] space and then after they went to their summer conferences they came back to

[29:14] basically 101 items.

[29:19] We're trying to work more into talking about incentives and less about regular

[29:32] [clears throat]

[29:38] » I do think it's good to take it under adisement and evaluating

[29:45] other things come spring.

[29:50] And when it comes to like a lot size concern, there's lot size, there's

[29:53] density, there's also form based code which gets away from those things, but

[29:57] it has other standards in place to get to what you want design. So it's

[30:02] important that we look at this comprehensively from all those different

[30:06] angles to figure out what's best for our community instead of just automatically

[30:10] like check something like let's do. So I'm

[30:16] not These things are necessary things we should do. These are things that

[30:28] » Thank you so much,

[30:33] » Mr. Consideration of 2026

[30:38] radio and ramp ADA analysis.

[30:52] That's okay.

[30:58] [clears throat]

[31:07] Analysis.

[31:10] [clears throat] The agreement is for 21,000

[31:18] exceed 21,000 [clears throat] walk down rail sidewalks on a five scale

[31:26] similar to scale

[31:31] also analysis as well.

[31:38] happy answer any questions you have on >> and when I read it I was thinking it was

[31:44] a lot more subjective than what it was they have some decent standard on how

[31:47] they scale correct >> yes

[31:53] what the characteristics of each number

[32:01] » there's a national engineering standard for the sidewalk analysis similar to

[32:06] phaser A lot of people

[32:10] think it's a little bit more subjective. I forced these two to do a class

[32:15] recently. So really on how those things actually are

[32:36] » contract Do I have any questions?

[32:41] » 21,000 is not to exceed.

[32:50] » I was just going to say it sounds expensive to me when it's done as to

[32:54] what what they find. It's been about 15 years since we've done a complete town

[32:59] to we've been working that entire time year about 60,000 or so you guys budget

[33:06] sidewalks but it's really time for an update so we can refocus

[33:12] those projects

[33:21] contract.

[33:27] Will they break will they break down just general

[33:31] repairs versus ADA um deficiency [clears throat] or

[33:38] deficiencies in the ADA

[33:42] reports? >> Well, it's all going to be rated within

[33:45] our GIS system the same way we do. that five analysis will be on there, but

[33:52] those numbers like on ADA will trip specific stuff like will be a priority

[33:56] one to do. Um, but you you have your condition deterioration and things in

[34:02] that because that all turns into ADA is considered because

[34:07] a tripping hazard cracking those type of things. So, it's

[34:11] all through the lens of ADA and then severity.

[34:15] like a general repair

[34:19] because that will become at some point probably a trip or hazard

[34:26] » bottom line we're completed the audit now the audit

[34:35] audit >> yeah we're completing it right now as

[34:37] long as we have an annual plan we're making progress towards ABA that

[34:43] we

[34:46] But how long will this take? >> I don't know when it'll probably

[34:54] four weeks and then we'll probably administration.

[35:15] This is an action.

[35:24] We approve the

[35:28] contract

[35:33] $21,000 about 15 $21,000 and the timing

[35:41] and sign

[35:45] motion is second compensation. All those in favor signify by saying I I

[35:52] » no eyes out. Thank you,

[35:55] » Mr. Lips. Looks like the rest of the evening is yours.

[36:01] [clears throat]

[36:10] » First before you use ordinance 2026-11. This would add several definitions to

[36:15] your code as well as some fines and a lot of roadway and trail regulations.

[36:22] driver for this has been a lot of calls and complaints about post calls, kids on

[36:27] scooters, emotives, things like that, trails, neighborhoods, post calls on

[36:32] trails, post calls in the neighborhood. Kind of defines that. It's not uh

[36:37] procluding like your typical ebikes, things like that. It's more focused on

[36:42] some of the emotives and making sure people that are driving on our roadways,

[36:47] that are experienced drivers train to drive

[36:52] A lot of it doesn't repeal a whole lot of code other than some of the parks

[36:57] code would change a little bit through this, but there's a fine section.

[37:02] Otherwise, if we move forward with this, we'll add new trail signage and rule

[37:07] signage entrances throughout the trail is kind of on our radar to do anyways.

[37:12] Um we want to put these new regulations very clearly have entrances to

[37:17] our trails. It does regulate roadways as well

[37:25] enough to operate on the roadway and follow all safety regulations. See more

[37:30] and more kids and I said scooters particularly ebikes just blowing

[37:35] intersections and I get hit by cars. So scary stuff like that.

[37:42] particularly wide spots of the trail

[37:48] of that nature introduction tonight only.

[37:52] » You might have questions over 2026-1 did you

[37:58] read a lot of other neighborhoods? >> I always research what's being done in

[38:04] the area. It's pretty hot issues. So pretty much all Indiana

[38:13] recently

[38:16] recently look at those based on complaint where

[38:22] those

[38:26] is just defining some regulations not really procluding

[38:31] things entirely except for greens trails sidewalks

[38:41] in those fines get some revenue back towards

[38:44] [snorts] >> I have a couple questions. Um, what's

[38:47] the difference between multi-use trails and our greenway trails?

[38:52] » Multi-use trail would be like your perimeter trails and things like that

[38:58] like you know branch corner has a trail around the outside of it that be a

[39:01] multi-use trail whereas the greenways are

[39:06] Py trail things are listed in there. >> Okay.

[39:11] Just really don't know how somebody would be able to tell the difference

[39:15] like >> but like these scooters

[39:20] are allowed on sidewalks. They can go 15 or 20 miles hour.

[39:27] » Yeah. >> And then I guess they're allowed on the

[39:31] multiuse trails. Am I correct?

[39:36] » You are correct. And some of that is to keep them out of the roadways.

[39:41] So there's certain areas where you don't want them in the roadways.

[39:46] Transit is a thought. So that's why most communities have gone in that direction.

[39:51] I just don't know how anybody reading it could tell the difference like oh well

[39:57] you know multi-use trail that's they're thinking they can get on the trail

[40:01] » but and then on the sidewalks >> it it does break out um

[40:08] in definitions at the top

[40:12] » the greenway specifically being trail by trail

[40:16] » yeah I saw >> multiuse

[40:19] » I didn't know what the multi We use blocks.

[40:23] » Yeah. It's those groups of 8 ft or wider that are not the designated water

[40:29] greenway trails because typically your greenway trails are more of your large

[40:34] most interconnected network whereas a lot of times your multi-use path is your

[40:40] off-road pedestrian cyclist safe transit to keep people out of the roadway.

[40:45] » Okay. >> Kind of like

[40:50] 700 or something. >> That's right.

[40:52] » Okay. >> That's not your major recreational

[40:55] trail. It's more of your pedestrian cyclist. Don't be in the road here

[41:00] preferably for >> So we put signs up or we are regular

[41:05] trails and we put you know it will list like no.

[41:11] » Yep. We didn't break it completely out. >> Exactly. Put everything there. We put it

[41:16] at every entrance was one of the things I was talking with the PD about because

[41:20] they already have some confusion. So whether you're looking at stuff already

[41:23] because a lot of our neighborhood connectors don't have trailer rules

[41:26] coming in. So there's some people who may never go to a trail head but use our

[41:30] trips all the time. So they're not actually seeing those rules.

[41:34] » Yeah, I think that's a good idea.

[41:39] » Anybody else? >> Okay. Introduction ordinance 2026-12

[41:48] policy. >> Our briement policy we've operated under

[41:52] for years doesn't have a lot of clear definitions and it's been not uniformly

[41:57] applied in different situations. It's an area where there's been times complaints

[42:01] from supervisors and staff. So the aim of this ordinance is to clean up those

[42:06] definitions and be very clear as to um what can happen where so there's not

[42:11] debate. It also kind of tries to pull the supervisors out of it HR. So there's

[42:16] less of that um just inter department struggle and face within that looked at

[42:23] surrounding communities kind of what their policies are a lotments and basic

[42:42] reason I like it very close rel

[43:04] I did like that change the policy I thought that was more than fair

[43:13] about how many comments policy.

[43:18] Okay. Final ordinance 2026-13 adopting employee ethics policy.

[43:27] » Yes. This would kind of take some state policies and put it into employee ethics

[43:31] policy. Further define that, expand upon that. Um it's also part of transparency

[43:36] initiative on different processes and takes in account historic HR complaints

[43:41] other issues as we kind of gone through and finally HR a little bit more but the

[43:47] goal is really just transparent government and making sure we're

[43:51] practicing things ethically up and down clearly defining that to staff conflict

[43:57] of interest other areas for

[44:02] you did nice job on the 16 pages. I know the first four or five are on the

[44:09] origins itself. I mean always to make relevant. I thought you did a

[44:14] nice job trying to break it down different areas, different people,

[44:18] different sections, different responsibilities

[44:21] that

[44:33] » council comments.

[44:43] Um, I was an update on the church. Um,

[44:48] specifically the way it looks like I've had people

[44:54] call me and are just appalled. >> Yeah, we've been having some

[44:58] conversations about that as well. Captain about it yesterday. He's getting

[45:03] some action with the health department going. We start communicating with the

[45:07] chief over there that's in charge of working with the health department.

[45:11] the sheriff's office. >> So,

[45:15] » are making strides on that since the fire has gotten a lot worse because

[45:18] there was a fire on the western most building. It's really put a lot on the

[45:23] eastern most building. We know there's some outstanding violations on current

[45:27] owner and some other factors with current owner that be happy to talk with

[45:33] you guys about meeting oneonone basis.

[45:39] Appreciate reaching out kind of getting that ball rolling because we were

[45:42] getting a lot of calls. I know councelor is getting a lot of calls and I talked

[45:46] about it seeing if they could bring resources or he could lean on the health

[45:50] department as well some of those items. >> Can the health department the one that

[45:56] burned declar

[46:01] » they did an order today on an inspection on the other one.

[46:05] They have a judge's signature for that one and I think seven or eight day

[46:10] evacuation of everybody should be done by a certain date and if it's not then

[46:14] we can go. >> Both of them are just

[46:16] » both. Yes. >> Yeah. The the one that had the fire is

[46:19] supposed to be empty as of now. The other one they have several days to get

[46:23] out and then we can kind of enforce that with the judges signature.

[46:28] » Okay.

[46:31] » Hopefully we can get them at least there. Last time I was grass to be cut

[46:36] really bad. >> I highly doubt [clears throat]

[46:40] » that is something that we need to get on to Mar County about

[46:50] » we have leans and the city has leans and it's headed towards

[46:54] » it like Indianapolis needs to cut it you know somebody needs to cut it clean up

[47:01] trash >> I think the tax bills

[47:14] I don't think she's trying aggressively to sell right

[47:19] now.

[47:22] She's trying to sell

[47:26] in order to sell it.

[47:30] » So when 27 something like that. We can deal with

[47:36] that.

[47:40] » Yeah. We can give them a certain amount of

[47:44] time. They don't get it done. We can cut it and put on it.

[47:47] » Yeah.

[48:05] That's a good thing.

[48:14] » Just finished building cracks yesterday. >> Excellent.

[48:22] Okay. So then the paint later

[48:30] color something else. >> We got blue. It's not perfect match for

[48:35] the majority of the go and paint white stripes back over

[48:42] the blue. >> Uh then

[48:47] I talked to The most common thing I probably wasn't about criminal justice

[48:53] stuff was about trash. We got that worked out January 1. Everybody's

[48:58] garbage sitting in their driveway. We have Marian County worked out with the

[49:02] city. They're still under contract for additional two years. We have the

[49:06] documents out

[49:14] back with them. If not, my recommendation was going

[49:19] at the end of that contract term both sides.

[49:27] » That's not unless we do a separate

[49:32] expand.

[49:36] might

[49:40] » um I don't think we'll know something like that until November.

[49:45] So it's it's difficult with administration changes and a lot of

[49:49] department has also turned over the past six months not just the mayor's office.

[49:56] a lot of people working

[50:05] office pretty much every single department.

[50:17] » Do you think anybody else?

[50:22] » All right. >> You're going to have Everything that was

[50:26] introduced tonight by budget introduction

[50:31] public hearing the second

[50:40] sustainability

[50:45] We have lots of spreadsheets that

[50:57] do

[51:11] You know, >> keep Julia

Town Council

Transcript