[0:02] Welcome to the Town of Dairy Planning Board meeting

[0:05] for May 6th, 2026.

[0:08] We start our meetings with a pledge of allegiance.

[0:10] If you would rise and join me, please.

[0:15] I pledge allegiance to

[0:17] the United, United States of America.

[0:18] America Republic One Nation under God,

[0:24] indivisible, with liberty and justice.

[0:32] Alright, we'll, we'll do some administrative first.

[0:36] We don't have a, an audience, and I assume all the members

[0:39] and staff here know how to get outta the building

[0:40] if the alarm rings.

[0:42] So the planning board voluntarily continues

[0:46] to offer remote participation.

[0:48] If any member of the planning board participates remotely,

[0:50] vote shall be by roll call.

[0:52] To attend this meeting remotely using a computer

[0:55] or smartphone, visit www dot zoom us.

[1:00] Enter meeting ID 7 5 4 6 6 3 9 1 2.

[1:05] You may also come in by phone for audio only.

[1:08] Phone number area code (646) 558-8656.

[1:14] Same meeting id 7 5 4 6 6 3 9 1 2.

[1:18] If you have any technical difficulties,

[1:20] call area code

[1:20] (603) 845-5585.

[1:26] If you're on the phone and you wanna be recognized, please

[1:29] hit star nine to raise your hand to

[1:32] and then once recognized, hit star six to unmute yourself.

[1:37] I will introduce the members

[1:39] and staff who are present this evening.

[1:43] In the audience is, is our economic

[1:46] development Director, Ms. Donovan.

[1:49] Our alternates. Mr. Ey and Mr.

[1:52] Appleton, planning Director Ms. Rubido.

[1:55] Good evening planning clerk.

[1:57] Ms. Wilson Town Council Liaison. Mr. Chase.

[2:02] Good evening, member Mr. Wood. Good evening, member. Mr.

[2:06] Menini. Good evening, vice chair. Mr. O'Connor.

[2:09] Good evening. On the far side is Mr.

[2:11] Preventer, who is the coordinator for, for Dairy Cam,

[2:13] who makes all the video magic work for us?

[2:15] Good evening. Mr. Church is

[2:20] apparently absent and Mr.

[2:22] Fishman is absent. So I would like to ask Mr.

[2:26] Ey to sit for Mr. Fishman.

[2:30] We have member Mr. Pier. Good evening Secretary. Mr.

[2:35] Alibi. Hello. And I'm Dave Nelson. I'm the chair.

[2:43] So under administrative business we have three

[2:45] matters of escrow.

[2:47] Item number 26 dash 13, Kenneth

[2:50] and Tunde. I ring.

[2:53] Okay, so the developers would be the IR family.

[2:57] This is a cash escrow parcel id.

[3:00] Location is map 32, lot 33 for Lennox Road.

[3:05] The request is to establish escrow in the amount

[3:07] of $12,161 25 cents for the above noted project,

[3:12] this escrow will be non-interest bearing.

[3:16] Mr. Chair also move. Second,

[3:19] Moved by O'Connor, second by Mamy to accept as presented.

[3:24] Mr. Chase? Yes. Mr. Wood? Yes. Mr. Menini? Yes.

[3:28] Mr. O'Connor? Yes. Mr. Ey? Yes. Mr. Pier? Yes. Mr.

[3:33] Maby? Yes. And chair votes? Yes.

[3:37] Next item is 26 dash 14 G and P holdings.

[3:41] LLC.

[3:43] Okay. And this is

[3:46] for the loading dock edition at Fortum Avenue.

[3:51] This is a cash escrow parcel ID.

[3:54] Location 3 5 0 15 dash three.

[3:57] The request is to establish cash escrow in the amount

[4:00] of $8,697 45 cents for the above noted project.

[4:05] This escrow will also be non-interest bearing.

[4:09] Mr. Chair also move also. Second

[4:12] Moved by O'Connor, seconded by Maby

[4:14] to accept as presented.

[4:16] Mr. Chase? Yes. Mr. Wood? Yes. Mr. Nini? Yes. Mr. O'Connor?

[4:21] Yes. Mr. Mamey? Yes. Mr. Here? Yes. Mr. Maby? Yes.

[4:26] The chair votes? Yes. And the last

[4:31] escrow item is 26 dash 15 for 33 East Area Road.

[4:35] Okay, for this one, the developer is Crystal, DOT Realty.

[4:39] It is cash, escrow, parcel id,

[4:41] location map 38 lot 2 33 East Derry Road.

[4:44] This is for a minor subdivision.

[4:47] The request is to establish cash escrow in the amount

[4:50] of $59,259 50 cents for the above noted project.

[4:55] This escrow will be non-interest bearing.

[4:59] Mr. Chair, there's no concerns on that.

[5:00] I'll also move this also.

[5:02] Second. Moved by O'Connor, seconded by Melanie

[5:04] to accept it presented.

[5:06] Mr. Chase? Yes. Mr. Wood? Yes. Mr. Menini? Yes.

[5:09] Mr. O'Connor? Yes. Mr. Mozzie? Yes. Mr. Pier? Yes. Mr.

[5:14] Maby? Yes. And chair votes? Yes.

[5:20] We will now go on to approval of minutes.

[5:21] We have the minutes of April 15th, 2026

[5:25] as everyone had a chance to re review, review them.

[5:29] Is, are everything fine or are there errors or omissions? Do

[5:34] I have to repeat that?

[5:36] You can just move to Mr. Chair.

[5:39] There is no corrections to this yet.

[5:40] Then I'll move to accept as written. Second. Alright.

[5:43] Move to by O'Connor.

[5:44] A second by Maldi to accept the minutes

[5:47] of April 15th as written.

[5:49] Mr. Chase, I'll abstain. I was absent that night. Okay.

[5:52] Mr. Wood? Yes. Mr. Menini? Yes. Mr. O'Connor? Yes.

[5:57] Mr. Ey? Yes. Mr. Pier. I'll abstain.

[6:00] I was not in attendance. Mr. Maldy? Yes.

[6:03] And the chair votes Yes.

[6:08] Correspondence.

[6:09] Mr. Chair, we have two pieces of correspondence today.

[6:12] Both are informational only.

[6:16] The first is an email from the NHMA New Hampshire

[6:19] Municipal Association.

[6:21] Just letting us know that the new

[6:23] and latest issue of New Hampshire Town

[6:25] and City Magazine is now available.

[6:29] And the other is an email that was received

[6:31] by our planning director from Michael McCormick,

[6:34] who's representing SI 61 Crystal Ave.

[6:36] Here in Derry. Again, this is just

[6:39] for the board's information only.

[6:40] No actions required at this point.

[6:42] That's gonna go to zoning. But there, there are photos

[6:45] of the property that would represent the roof

[6:48] and wall colors together at this building at 61 Crystal.

[6:54] Okay. Thank you very much.

[6:57] We now have other business.

[7:01] We have promo promo proposed amendments to the policies

[7:04] and procedures.

[7:06] So that is on in your packet, both physical and electronic.

[7:13] Has everyone had a chance to review those since the last set

[7:17] of changes at the

[7:21] last, last reading?

[7:32] Are there any, we'll give you a moment

[7:35] or two to look at 'em.

[7:36] Any any questions or comments?

[7:43] Okay. If

[7:48] not, what is the board's pleasure?

[7:54] We need two clean reads.

[7:56] So we would have a second clean read

[7:58] and then a vote at the next meeting.

[8:00] Yeah. So if there are no changes,

[8:01] Both would be to move it on to the fifth

[8:04] or sixth reading, whatever it was.

[8:07] Yeah. Well this is the first time you had actual changes

[8:10] to look at, so, okay.

[8:11] Yeah. So we would, we would do a second clean read

[8:16] and then a vote on the 20th if the board is okay

[8:19] with the draft as written.

[8:21] Okay. I'm,

[8:24] I have no problems with it Also.

[8:27] So I guess we don't, we don't,

[8:28] if there's no objections, we don't need a, a motion.

[8:30] We will. That's right. Move it to the next reading. Okay.

[8:37] We have an architectural design review

[8:40] for sign in the West Running Brook.

[8:42] District Parcel ID 0 5 0 3 9 1 Scottish Way,

[8:47] unit one for State Farm Insurance.

[8:51] Okay. So very similar to any application in the, the TBOD.

[8:55] The West Running Brook district requires

[8:57] that the planning board review the proposed signage

[9:02] before signed permit is issued.

[9:05] So State Farm Insurance is moving from 10 Manchester Road

[9:08] to the new commercial building located at one Scottish Way.

[9:11] And then the proposed signage for

[9:13] that unit is attached to your memo.

[9:15] And the recommendation would be to approve it as presented.

[9:19] Any comments or questions on the proposed signage?

[9:25] If not, what is the board's pleasure

[9:27] Mr.

[9:28] Chair? I move pursuant to the town

[9:30] of dairy zoning ordinance, article 12

[9:33] signs section 1 65 dash 1 0 1 12

[9:38] signs and the WRB to approve the sign designed, presented

[9:42] for State Farm Insurance.

[9:45] Possible 0 5 0 3 9 1 Scottish Way,

[9:49] unit one as presented.

[9:51] The board finds a sign as compatible

[9:53] with the surrounding buildings,

[9:55] meets the regulations contained in the ordinance

[9:58] and compliments the surrounding architect.

[10:00] I so move. Second.

[10:02] Moved by O'Connor, seconded by Maby to accept

[10:05] the sign as presented.

[10:07] Mr. Chase? Yes. Mr. Wood? Yes. Mr. Menini? Yes.

[10:12] Mr. O'Connor? Yes. Mr. Mozzie? Yes. Mr. Pier? Yes. Mr. Maby?

[10:16] Yes. Chair votes? Yes. Great, thank you.

[10:22] Next is planning director

[10:25] and chairman updates.

[10:28] Okay. So we have not any, any had any TRC recently,

[10:32] so I have nothing to update you with regard to that.

[10:35] However, our next meeting on the 20th,

[10:38] we'll have five applications.

[10:40] So, because that'll be a little bit more

[10:42] intense meeting than we've had.

[10:44] If you are not going to be present, please let me know

[10:47] as soon as possible because we really need

[10:49] to make sure we have a quorum that night.

[10:52] And I also just wanted to remind everyone

[10:55] that there is a planning

[10:56] and zoning conference this Saturday.

[10:58] You can attend virtually

[11:00] and if you want to sign up for that, please let myself

[11:03] or Caroline know and we can take care of that for you.

[11:06] It's really good training put on by the State

[11:11] Office of Planning and Development.

[11:13] So you're interested in that?

[11:15] Yeah. So I'm attending, they have three tracks.

[11:19] You have to sign up for one of them,

[11:20] but they don't stop you from skipping from track to track.

[11:24] New members might want to just absorb all the basics,

[11:28] but if you've, you know, been to them before

[11:29] and you want to go look at some special topics, you

[11:32] on a time slot basis,

[11:34] you can switch from from track to track.

[11:36] Yeah. Yeah.

[11:39] And the only thing I have is, Mr.

[11:43] Applicant, how you doing on your recruiting?

[11:47] I'm away outta East. No pressure. Okay.

[11:51] Oh, but we're the fun board. Come on. Fun. Fun.

[11:54] Yeah. We we're the board of, yes.

[11:55] So we're, it's the fun board. I'm, I'm

[11:57] Working on it, but I can't make any

[11:59] Promises.

[12:00] Okay. So that's all I have. Oh,

[12:02] I have one more item if I could.

[12:03] Oh. So we were informed this week

[12:06] that Sylvia von ACH will be retiring

[12:10] at the end of this month.

[12:12] She's the executive director

[12:14] for Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission.

[12:16] She has been my entire career a mentor to me

[12:20] and a, she has a, she has a very, she has a way

[12:25] of making planning fun.

[12:27] And she has taught me along the way, you know,

[12:32] you take the job seriously, don't take yourself seriously.

[12:35] And she's just been a guiding light

[12:37] and she's gonna be truly missed.

[12:39] Nate Miller will be stepping into her position and,

[12:43] and then I think the deputy executive director will be

[12:46] Suzanne Neighbor, whom you're all familiar with

[12:47] because she's helped us out on a lot of

[12:50] our outreach here in town.

[12:53] They will be having a going away party for Sylvia.

[12:56] If you're interested in attending that.

[12:58] It will be during the day, let me know.

[13:00] But she is,

[13:04] the commission's gonna be in great hands with Nate,

[13:07] but Sylvia will definitely be missed.

[13:10] Okay, great. Well thank you for that update.

[13:15] So now we have workshop number five

[13:18] to discuss proposed changes for

[13:20] Article six District provisions section 1 65 dash 33

[13:25] Central Business District.

[13:28] We've seen this several times before.

[13:31] There are a number of maps that are in your package

[13:37] and while it might be tempting the fates, I have

[13:40] the GS system on a laptop here and,

[13:42] and I'm gonna try to join the meeting and,

[13:43] and be able to share that screen so

[13:46] that we can drive it live and look at things in real time.

[13:50] So I don't know how well that is gonna work.

[13:53] Every time I try something new with av,

[13:55] there's always a bug.

[13:58] So am I allowed to

[14:02] Yes, Mr.

[14:03] Chair, you should have received a notification to join the

[14:05] as a panelist, which will allow you

[14:07] to share your screen. I'll try that one more

[14:11] Time.

[14:12] Oh, there it is. There you go. Okay.

[14:14] Rejoining a little spinny. All right.

[14:21] So share and Owen, we trust share this application window.

[14:27] Okay. Want sound?

[14:31] Alright, so let's kind of

[14:36] recap where we were

[14:37] and what we thought we needed to work on.

[14:40] Right? Most of the items

[14:45] I think were, were pretty set on,

[14:51] but we did want to continue to figure out

[14:53] what we're gonna do with a couple of items.

[14:56] And in specific the

[15:01] preservation of streetscape.

[15:03] The way that reads now,

[15:09] let's see if I can find that.

[15:10] I'll read that for you.

[15:16] So we have a, a maximum front yard depth similar to

[15:21] what we have in the TBOD.

[15:24] And item A says,

[15:25] when the lot width at the front lot line is 75 feet

[15:28] or less, the maximum yard depth shall be eight feet

[15:33] or the average of the existing yard depths,

[15:35] four 100 feet in every direction

[15:37] along the street, whichever is greater.

[15:39] And b, when the lot width at the front lot line is greater

[15:42] than 75 feet, the maximum yard depth shall be 25 feet.

[15:46] So we've got two, two sets of, of,

[15:50] of dimensions depending on the width of the lot.

[15:52] And it really has to do with aspect ratios.

[15:54] If you've got a really narrow lot,

[15:55] you don't want things set back too far.

[15:58] And what works with that is I parking

[16:03] restriction,

[16:08] which, where, where is that?

[16:14] Okay, the parking is that one

[16:17] all off street parking areas shall be

[16:19] provided in such a way that no vehicle will be required

[16:23] or will be likely to back into the street or access drive.

[16:28] We talked about that during our district walk about the

[16:33] dangers of, of vehicles backing right out into the street.

[16:36] Number two, no parking, storage

[16:38] or display of vehicles shall be allowed

[16:40] between the front lot line in line parallel with the front

[16:43] of the structure closest to the front lot line,

[16:46] which basically means you can't

[16:48] park cars in front of the building.

[16:51] Although in looking at the GIS one of the things

[16:54] that we don't really

[16:57] necessarily notice when we're doing a site walk is that

[17:00] the lot lines are often not where you would think they are.

[17:05] The paved street is not often in the center

[17:08] of the public right of way.

[17:10] And so where those paved sections are a, a bit offset,

[17:17] we can't really, the the,

[17:20] the planning board can't prevent folks from parking

[17:23] in the public right of way off the pavement.

[17:25] That would be a town council kind of regulation.

[17:29] But we, we, we just prevent them from parking

[17:31] heading in, in front of the building.

[17:33] And then otherwise, as

[17:35] provided in the land development control regulations,

[17:40] the idea was to provide some more flexibility

[17:42] for landscape and layout.

[17:45] No one suggested that they wanted to see, you know,

[17:48] parking lots in, in front of a building, like a,

[17:51] a strip mall style.

[17:52] So this is where we are at.

[17:56] Is everyone happy with that

[17:58] or do we wanna consider some other options?

[18:10] I would say we'd continue on

[18:12] with this one here, what you did.

[18:14] 'cause a lot of it came out when we did the sidewalk walk

[18:17] and we actually saw a lot of the visual there

[18:19] and it made more sense. So I would

[18:21] Concur.

[18:22] So I'm gonna try to drive the mouse

[18:23] and talk into the mic at the same time.

[18:25] We'll see how that works. So on the screen

[18:29] in front of you, the brown, the tan

[18:34] where, where you see the, the mouse currently that is the,

[18:38] the, the CBD and it kind of wraps around

[18:43] the, there's some residential district here, right there.

[18:47] And then north of it, the TBOD actually extends

[18:53] down into the core of the CBD.

[18:57] The CBD goes all the way back to Rollin Street wraps

[19:00] around down Birch Street, goes all the way down to,

[19:02] you know, the South Ave and beyond.

[19:05] And then it comes around the other side down Maple Street

[19:10] and down Central Street.

[19:15] So it's kind of a horseshoe shaped.

[19:17] And I'll notice that the lots that we primarily looked at

[19:23] were those along here along Birch Street

[19:26] and along South Ave, which are, are the smaller, you know,

[19:30] residential conversion.

[19:31] Lots. I'll, I'll observe that in other parts of

[19:35] that district there are some much more sizable parcels.

[19:41] I don't know how many of them are likely

[19:43] to be redeveloped in any short timeframe,

[19:47] but if we would like to, you know, consider special

[19:52] provisions for those, we can maybe try to identify them and

[19:56] and, and take a look at them on on the map.

[19:59] Does anyone have any, any thoughts on that?

[20:03] I'm, I'm happy to go either way, honestly.

[20:06] I mean I, I think given the redevelopment in Abbott court,

[20:10] that little triangle of central court, central Street

[20:15] where 1, 2, 3, 4 or five, six lot like

[20:18] So in right in Here.

[20:19] Yeah. Yeah. I think that there's some

[20:23] existing multifamily there

[20:26] and some single family 23 central is going

[20:29] before the zoning board tomorrow night for variance so

[20:33] that they can redevelop that lot.

[20:35] That is an area that might have,

[20:38] we might see redevelopment

[20:40] or reuse of those lots sooner than we would say

[20:45] anything further down Birch Street

[20:48] over near the gas station.

[20:51] So I could try to zoom in.

[20:54] This thing's awfully sensitive and I may just

[20:58] Completely lose It.

[21:02] Bear with me here. So one

[21:06] of the things I can do if I'm smart is I can use the

[21:10] measurement tool that's not the measurement

[21:13] Tool. Boy

[21:15] This mouse is kind of sketchy. Alright, let's

[21:17] Go over the laptop.

[21:22] So for example, this

[21:26] lot here,

[21:35] that's 79 or 81 feet depending on you look at, so most

[21:38] of the lots over there are gonna be above the 75 foot and

[21:42] therefore have the, the the 25 foot yes.

[21:45] Setback. And so I guess the question is in that area, is

[21:49] that sufficient flexibility for development of those lots,

[21:54] Mr.

[21:55] Chair? I would say isn't there that one of the lots,

[21:57] isn't there a, a site plan coming in front of us pretty soon

[22:01] regarding the five condos

[22:03] that they're proposing? Or is that going

[22:05] That'll, that'll be at ZBA tomorrow night.

[22:07] That's tomorrow night with them.

[22:08] Yeah. But

[22:10] Yeah, so a big chunk of that's gonna have five condos.

[22:15] Yeah. Right.

[22:18] And of course that's probably got interior,

[22:20] interior access drives and, and all that kind of stuff.

[22:23] Yeah. And I think in that area

[22:25] the 25 foot setback is more appropriate than the eight,

[22:29] given the characteristics of that

[22:32] Part.

[22:33] Okay. Are there any other parcels

[22:38] that people are specifically interested

[22:42] and would like to drive to and,

[22:45] and take a look at on, on the map

[22:47] before we kind of try to wrap up on this if we're,

[22:51] if if we have consensus?

[22:56] Well, No,

[22:59] If you really look at that section down through there,

[23:02] there's only two properties that really have

[23:08] any kind of a setback to 'em.

[23:09] All the rest of them are right on the street. So,

[23:15] Well, I guess the question is when there's redevelopment,

[23:17] is it reuse, adaptive reuse

[23:21] or is it a tear down?

[23:23] Rebuild

[23:25] 23 I believe is gonna be a tear down. That's the, that

[23:29] Was where the fire Was.

[23:30] That was where the fire was.

[23:30] That one's gonna be a tear down.

[23:32] Yeah, I know it has changed

[23:35] because the, the variance is gonna be

[23:38] to eliminate the commercial portion of it, which

[23:42] goes against what we're trying to do here.

[23:45] It is. So,

[23:56] and yes, there are some, some, there's a couple

[23:59] of larger parcels there,

[24:01] but if you look at one, that would be

[24:07] a, if, if the time ever came, if you just to the left

[24:11] of your arrow, Mr. Chair

[24:13] Over here, Right there,

[24:15] that's a sizeable parcel. Alright. So that's,

[24:17] There's Quite a few buildings on it

[24:19] and it actually doesn't have any

[24:22] street frontage to speak of.

[24:25] It's Not given, they call it, they call it store

[24:27] of court, but it's really not a street,

[24:31] it's more of a driveway.

[24:33] So if they go to redevelop that, I mean that could be a a,

[24:39] a really nice project in there,

[24:40] but they really don't have any streets scape for that one.

[24:44] So that one didn't matter. Oh, you're forbidden

[24:47] Row.

[24:48] Okay. We, we'll try, I'm not trying that again.

[24:49] You could click on the vision link,

[24:50] it might give you what you need.

[24:54] So I'm not, I I

[24:59] I can't say that I'm opposed to the 25 foot setback.

[25:06] I, I can't get the little,

[25:07] It just seems to me that we're kind

[25:09] of piecemealing it from like Burt Street

[25:12] where we want eight feet to Central Ave.

[25:14] Which most of the houses

[25:15] or most of the structures are on the

[25:17] street except for a couple.

[25:19] And now you're saying, well it's okay for 25 foot there,

[25:23] it seems we're working against ourselves.

[25:27] I can't get to the 0.00 I had it for a second

[25:30] where I can hit the X to dismiss it anyway, it's gone.

[25:34] Okay.

[25:36] That's the only point that I wanted to make there. Oh,

[25:38] There it is.

[25:39] Okay. Yeah. So the screen sharing stopped.

[25:43] So I thought

[25:44] that if I clicked on the parcel identifier it would give you

[25:47] the, the acreage, but I guess

[25:48] It doesn't Oh, under, you'd have to under vision it would

[25:51] you have to click on vision, go into it

[25:53] Before you're right. It

[25:54] Used to be right there.

[25:56] So I I I guess the, the question is

[26:01] yes, we could have some that are tear downs

[26:04] and is is a, is a 25 foot maximum setback Okay.

[26:08] For, for those people. 'cause I,

[26:10] I think we still don't necessarily wanna a strip mall kind

[26:14] of development in this downtown area.

[26:16] Right? Anyone

[26:17] Disagree?

[26:18] No. Correct. Correct.

[26:19] Okay. Mr. Chair. Yeah.

[26:24] What about adding to par to

[26:29] line B or the average

[26:35] depth of the yard for 100 feet in every direction?

[26:38] Whichever is less.

[26:39] So it could be a maximum of a maximum of 25 feet

[26:44] or whatever the average is.

[26:47] So we don't have a, someone tearing down Well,

[26:51] So that, that's for the, the the 70 less than 75,

[26:54] which is a maximum of eight.

[26:59] Right? I'm saying for the ones greater than 75, 25 feet

[27:02] or the average of the average depth

[27:07] for a hundred feet in either direction,

[27:08] whichever those is, is less.

[27:10] So it would be a maximum of 25 feet. We,

[27:13] We, we could, I think in, in the areas

[27:16] that we were looking at, I could probably bring this up

[27:18] again if, if you wanna look at it again

[27:20] that the parcels are, are regular m

[27:23] and measuring along the street might be trickier than it is

[27:26] in the rows and rows of, of sort of uniform lots.

[27:30] I don't wanna create a a reg that's,

[27:32] that's difficult to interpret.

[27:34] But that's a, that's a, that's a good point,

[27:36] Right?

[27:37] I just wouldn't want someone to tear down, build something

[27:40] with a larger setback than the, the items around just

[27:43] because they're lots a little larger.

[27:46] And, and I guess that's gonna depend upon

[27:48] the, the vision of the developer.

[27:49] If they wanna have that downtown vibe, they'll,

[27:51] they'll sort of mimic what's around them.

[27:53] If, if they, if they really wanna be in general commercial

[27:56] and there's no land there and they're going here

[27:58] because that's all they got, then that's a different story.

[28:06] Anyone else think that we ought to make the 25

[28:11] also dependent upon neighbors?

[28:15] What's the thoughts on that?

[28:18] I, I don't think it's such a bad idea.

[28:22] If you, if you, I mean staying on Central Street,

[28:25] if you go down Central Street

[28:27] and once you go past central court on the even side

[28:30] of the street, all the houses are fairly

[28:33] even close to the road.

[28:35] If you look at the odd side of the street, you've got

[28:39] the garage that's right on the street, then the building

[28:43] behind it is set way back.

[28:45] Then the next building is on the street and the one

[28:48] after that is on the street

[28:49] and then the one that's gonna be

[28:51] redeveloped is sitting way back.

[28:52] And then the next two are right on the street

[28:55] and it's if you drive down

[28:57] and it's not the vision that we're trying to have here.

[29:02] So anything that would get that to what we are looking for,

[29:07] I'm in favor of if you only go a hundred feet

[29:13] and the average width of the lot is 80 feet,

[29:16] that means it's only gonna be the building on each side.

[29:19] You might wanna consider moving

[29:21] that up 200 feet on each side.

[29:26] Okay. Do you have some

[29:30] specific texts that you kinda think would effectuate that?

[29:36] I'm sorry, I'm not really paying full attention.

[29:38] I'm trying to get the GIS working again.

[29:42] So you wanna say for the, for the wider ones,

[29:45] go out 200 feet

[29:46] On each side?

[29:47] Yes. The average of

[29:48] Okay.

[29:49] 200 feet on each side.

[29:49] So when, so when the lot width at the front lot line is

[29:52] greater than 75 feet,

[29:53] the maximum yard depth shall be 25 feet

[29:56] or the average of the existing yard depths

[30:00] for 200 feet in every direction along the street,

[30:03] whichever is less.

[30:05] Yes.

[30:12] Let's see. And Mr.

[30:13] Chair, I usually find a baseball bat cures my

[30:16] computer problems very well.

[30:18] Well apparently I, I did something that I didn't like

[30:20] and it and it crashed though.

[30:21] Okay.

[30:23] That's unfortunate.

[30:24] So trying to get back to where we're supposed to be.

[30:36] No.

[30:59] So is does everyone like that amendment?

[31:05] I'm fine with it. Okay.

[31:06] Okay. So then we can go ahead and and do that.

[31:11] Yeah, they're composing a motion down there.

[31:14] Okay. I do have a question regarding the

[31:20] front lot line

[31:25] that is always, I know that it says it's the lot line

[31:29] where your front entrance faces,

[31:34] sometimes your front entrance

[31:39] is on a different street than your driveway

[31:43] and the fire department assigns addresses based on like,

[31:47] I just wanna make sure that we're clear when we're talking

[31:50] about what is the front when we've got multiple,

[31:54] like you might have a lot

[31:55] that has two streets or even three streets,

[31:58] Mr. Chair.

[32:00] Yep. Can I respond to that? Sure.

[32:06] A few years ago I was in charge

[32:07] of the whole southern district by doing the census

[32:11] and we all had it used to be done by paper.

[32:14] Yep. Similar to looking at some of our paper

[32:18] and what the census was trying to do was

[32:23] reposition what was going to be the address

[32:29] and I'm gonna lean more towards

[32:31] what the fire department's doing versus the driveway.

[32:35] 'cause the driveway wasn't part of it.

[32:37] We had to go up to every single front door

[32:40] and the front door was the main

[32:44] entrance for the whole thing.

[32:46] And that was changed in 2010 during that census thing.

[32:51] So I would go with the fire department

[32:53] 'cause typically I think they addressed the front door issue

[32:58] to do show some of that.

[32:59] Randy.

[33:01] Yeah, I agree with John that to try to keep

[33:06] everything uniform, that we ought to stick

[33:10] with another town department if that's

[33:12] fire department sets the addresses throughout the town

[33:16] and to stay uniform with that.

[33:18] I think we ought to say the front is what they give

[33:21] for the address rather than,

[33:23] well the fire department says this part

[33:24] of the house is the front,

[33:26] but code enforcement says the other side is the front.

[33:29] It's, it's just too confusing.

[33:31] I think we need one uniform designation

[33:35] and the easiest way is, is go with the master authority

[33:39] that at dish out the addresses.

[33:42] Yeah. Both the census

[33:43] and the American census still

[33:45] follows of the federal government.

[33:47] Yeah. Yeah. So it's, it's polite to look at Mr. Chase.

[33:52] But you gotta like speak into

[33:53] The mic.

[33:54] Oh, I'm sorry. I thought, I thought it was close enough.

[33:58] So the, the only thing I'll observe is

[34:00] that on corner lots,

[34:02] because wherever the frontage is,

[34:07] whatever the address is that will have a

[34:11] control on the, on the, the setback in order

[34:15] to preserve the street scape on, on that street.

[34:18] But as soon as you go

[34:19] around the corner onto the adjacent street,

[34:22] that is now the side setback, which only has a minimum

[34:26] and could be whatever you want.

[34:28] So on corner lots, if, if we try

[34:32] to prevent folks from parking cars in front of the building

[34:37] where their address is, there's nothing

[34:39] that stops them from going around the corner on the, on the,

[34:43] the side street, which is also a frontage setting that back

[34:48] however much they want and putting cars there

[34:50] because we talk about the frontage

[34:53] and so that, that's a loophole.

[34:55] Yep. I don't know if we have

[34:57] to obsess about it, but it is a loophole.

[35:01] There's gotta be compromises and give and takes.

[35:03] And I think for the main street scape, what we're looking

[35:06] for is, is we had this with the coffee shop Yeah.

[35:10] On North app. Yep. That's a perfect example of it.

[35:14] You maintain the street scape on the front.

[35:17] You can't not,

[35:19] you can't necessarily maintain it all the way around.

[35:22] Right. If you maintained it all the way around,

[35:23] they'd have nothing for parking, not even on street parking.

[35:27] So to me

[35:31] it would be a good compromise and be more building

[35:35] or friendly, you know, retail friendly to

[35:41] say the frontage is the address designated

[35:44] by the fire department and if they do happen

[35:47] to be on a corner lot

[35:49] and they get their curb cuts through code enforcement

[35:52] to have a driveway on that side. Okay. They have it.

[35:57] I mean I'm not opposed to that.

[35:59] I just wanted to point out Yeah that is a,

[36:02] a potentially unintended con consequence.

[36:04] Right. So

[36:08] what I hear other than adding the, the toner feet

[36:11] in either direction along the roadway for the,

[36:14] the wider lots, we haven't made any other changes so far.

[36:19] No, the only other change would be to that definition

[36:21] of front lot line based on this conversation.

[36:24] What I took away was that

[36:27] that lot line which directly abuts the street side a lot

[36:29] except for lots which have multiple lot lines which abut

[36:32] streets, in which case the front lot line shall be deemed

[36:36] to be that lot line abutting a street from which the address

[36:41] as designated by the fire department is located. Okay.

[36:45] Yeah. Now there is one other thing that I,

[36:49] I brought up with Ms.

[36:50] Roberto before the, the meeting.

[36:53] I do like the idea of taking Mr.

[36:56] Pier's architectural exceptions

[37:01] in the district and putting it in the architectural design

[37:04] guidelines section of the LDCR.

[37:06] However, he's allowing coupa's

[37:10] and other structures to be a

[37:11] above the maximum height specified in the zoning ordinance

[37:16] for those particular architectural elements.

[37:18] We can't have the LDCR override the zoning ordinance

[37:22] unless in the zoning ordinance we say maximum height of

[37:27] above C level of X except

[37:30] where a conditional use permit is granted subject

[37:33] to the architectural design regulations section YYY.

[37:37] And that will give us the ability to say, okay,

[37:39] you got a cupula that can go above the maximum height

[37:42] and we'll grant you a conditional use permit so

[37:45] that we won't be a follow of the zoning ordinance.

[37:47] Yeah. Okay.

[37:49] So that would would be my suggestion to fix that.

[37:52] That's, yeah. Anyone have any different thoughts?

[37:57] No. Can you just say that again except

[38:01] where a conditional use permit been except

[38:03] Where a conditional use permit is granted pursuant

[38:07] to section and quote the section

[38:10] of the LDCR that we're adding that talks about

[38:16] structures in the, in the CBD

[38:19] 1 70 86 3.

[38:21] Okay.

[38:23] I, I don't, I don't have the numbers in front of me so

[38:25] Yeah.

[38:26] Okay. So we would amend that item six

[38:31] and it would be no building

[38:32] or structure within this district shall be higher than 425

[38:36] feet above sea level a SL as measured to the highest point

[38:39] of the roof except

[38:40] where a conditional use permit, blah blah blah. Yeah. Okay.

[38:44] Mr. Wood, So the only thing I was wondering is going

[38:48] back to once again the eight foot 25 foot setback rather

[38:53] than using a hundred feet

[38:54] or 200 feet, would it make more sense to just use X number

[38:57] of lots in any other direction?

[39:01] If The concern is you might only get one or two lots

[39:04] and then it could be four.

[39:07] I mean, I, I guess a hundred feet is always a hundred feet

[39:11] lots can be, you know, merged.

[39:14] So the, the, the number of lots could change over time.

[39:17] I don't know if that is a problem.

[39:20] It's just something that could happen.

[39:21] I was just thinking for simplicity's sake rather than

[39:27] Anyone have feelings one way or the other

[39:30] and it's kind of 61 half a dozen the other. Yeah,

[39:32] It really Is. Yeah.

[39:37] I just wasn't sure because I know the concern was yeah,

[39:40] with a hundred feet you might only get one lot. True.

[39:43] So the other thing I'll say is we, we need

[39:45] to get this like 85% correct.

[39:48] We, you know, pre is the enemy of good enough so often

[39:52] and for that 15% that we can't foresee, that's

[39:56] what variances are for.

[40:03] Alright. Does anyone have any other

[40:06] items than the ones we've enumerated they would

[40:09] like to see in the next reading?

[40:12] Did we go over the

[40:17] Oh, the Parking lot?

[40:18] The parking level We the parking Oh parking lots

[40:22] and parking structures have now have separate

[40:24] definitions. Yeah we

[40:26] Prob we probably should talk about that.

[40:29] Where is that in the, what page is that

[40:30] On?

[40:31] What's your first page

[40:32] Right after the maps?

[40:36] Alright, so we have a definition,

[40:37] multi-level parking facility,

[40:39] a specialized structure designed

[40:40] to house vehicles on multiple levels either

[40:42] above or below ground.

[40:45] And we changed a parking facility to a parking lot,

[40:48] which is a surface level parking.

[40:52] And where do we say you can have one and not the other?

[40:58] So in on page three you would have, instead of a parking

[41:03] facility, it would be multi-level parking facility.

[41:06] Alright, so we're not allowing surface parking lots only

[41:09] multi-level parking facilities.

[41:11] Yes. Yes. Okay. I think that's what we intended.

[41:14] That's what we intended. We,

[41:15] we didn't want somebody taking down any more buildings

[41:19] and putting in parking lot.

[41:20] We, this came up both on the sidewalk

[41:23] and during, I think it was workshop number three.

[41:25] Right. And we decided we don't want any more

[41:27] surface parking lots.

[41:28] But if somebody wants to

[41:31] put in a parking garage either ancillary

[41:34] to their building or if

[41:35] The abot court garage was compliant.

[41:36] Correct.

[41:38] So what we're trying to do is it's, it's, it's retail.

[41:43] I mean they charge, so it's whether it's ancillary

[41:46] to their commercial business or whatever,

[41:50] or they just want a pay parking

[41:52] garage that would be allowed.

[41:55] But tearing down buildings to put just

[41:58] a paved parking lot, you know.

[42:01] Okay. We, we don't want any more paving of paradise.

[42:04] Mr. Bel here I fully support

[42:08] and I like the splitting of the definition.

[42:10] I just wonder if we should include the last sentence from

[42:13] the definition of parking lot

[42:15] and also include that with the multi-level

[42:17] parking facility definition.

[42:19] It says such use shall be devoted to the parking

[42:22] of passenger cars and specifically

[42:24] exclude unregistered vehicles.

[42:27] Not sure it's necessarily intent,

[42:29] but just wanna make sure that someone's not gonna build a

[42:32] used car multi-level facility or something like that.

[42:37] I'm Okay with that. You mean like a carvana?

[42:39] Yeah, something like that. Would would,

[42:41] would we not want one of those in this area?

[42:44] I think we would call that retail.

[42:46] Yeah. Motor vehicle sales. I mean

[42:47] They're for sale, right? Yeah, yeah,

[42:48] Yeah.

[42:49] But I I see what you're, I see what you're saying.

[42:52] You don't want someone to,

[42:54] To Yeah.

[42:56] Yeah. I was, I was gonna say, so could

[42:59] Someone would maybe quickly pave

[43:02] a parking lot in order to put junk cars in it?

[43:04] 'cause it's not a big investment.

[43:06] I can't imagine anyone would go to the expense

[43:08] of building a parking garage to put junk cars in. Well,

[43:11] No, and I think what what, where we may

[43:16] get ourselves into trouble there is,

[43:18] so let's use the ABBA court.

[43:20] Part of the spaces in there are designated

[43:23] to the apartment building.

[43:25] So somebody has a classic car, whatever

[43:30] and for, they don't run it for a couple of years,

[43:33] they're paying for the parking space

[43:35] but they don't register it for a couple of years,

[43:38] but they're paying for that parking space.

[43:40] Are we now telling them you can't do that as soon

[43:42] as you know, you're going away to Europe

[43:46] or whatever for a while, the registration runs

[43:48] out before you get back.

[43:49] You've gotta get it out of there.

[43:51] I'm, we Couldn't

[43:52] Really put, I think that the cost structure of that kind

[43:55] of environment would be self-regulating.

[43:58] I think so. And I think we would be intruding on

[44:03] their rights.

[44:04] I mean they're paying for that space.

[44:08] I doubt somebody's gonna go in there

[44:10] and pay for 50 spaces to put used cars in there.

[44:15] So to your point, I believe it would be self-regulating.

[44:17] I just don't wanna get ourselves in trouble with,

[44:20] with the general public on, on something.

[44:22] You know, as small as that.

[44:25] Adding it to that, I agree with it on the, the

[44:28] surface level parking,

[44:30] But I really, I would hesitate

[44:33] to put it on the multilevel

[44:34] parking facility for those reasons.

[44:37] Alright. Any other things we, we wanna review or revisit?

[44:42] The only thing I would just ask if the board could indulge

[44:45] me and just review the wording of the purpose statement

[44:48] and make sure that it meets the intent

[44:50] of why we're doing these changes.

[44:52] Alright, so Which is right at the top of page,

[44:56] the first page of the draft.

[45:00] So the bottom of page one or the top of page one, one

[45:03] Top of page one purpose.

[45:06] Alright. So is that part of the ordinance?

[45:09] Generally, anytime that we do the zoning changes,

[45:12] we always, it's this one,

[45:13] especially when it goes to town council.

[45:15] We always have a thing says the purpose

[45:17] of these changes is, so

[45:18] This, this is not normative part of the ordinance.

[45:21] It's not part of the, this will be, this is a separate

[45:23] thing that goes with the legal notice and all that.

[45:26] And it identifies why we're making the changes.

[45:29] So I just wanna make sure that everyone is in agreement with

[45:32] that and, and it meets the intent of why we're doing

[45:34] This.

[45:35] All right. So the proposed changes recognize the changing

[45:37] landscape of Southern Hampshire.

[45:39] We are increased housing density, height of buildings

[45:41] and commercial market trends require some form of adaptation

[45:45] to create opportunity for economic growth

[45:48] and development in the Cory area

[45:50] of the downtown while maintaining the historical character

[45:53] of the central business district that changes

[45:56] recognize the smaller lot sizes

[45:57] and land use patterns that have emerged in the district.

[46:02] A question four, does that tie in with our master plan?

[46:05] It does. Yeah. I think it sounds good.

[46:10] Okay. I see nodding heads. Okay.

[46:13] Thank you. Okay. All right.

[46:17] So we we happy on on the

[46:22] CBD changes for now until we get to public hearing.

[46:26] So we'll have a first, well we could do a first

[46:30] reading under other business

[46:33] next meeting if you would like.

[46:36] Okay. And then if everything is okay, we can

[46:39] schedule a public hearing.

[46:41] Okay. Excellent. Okay. Alright.

[46:44] Finding my agenda.

[46:47] The next item is workshop number one for changes

[46:51] to the architectural design regulations, which

[46:54] were proposed by Mr.

[46:55] Pier. So let's,

[46:57] that's a separate document, so let's look at that.

[46:59] Oh, there, it's,

[47:04] and what, what staff has done is they've, they followed the,

[47:10] the numbering precedent we have set for,

[47:15] I think that one is West running Brook.

[47:20] District two is neighborhood commercial district

[47:22] and three becomes central business district.

[47:25] Right. Okay.

[47:27] So general, in addition

[47:32] to the requirements outlined above

[47:35] the following architectural design standards shall apply

[47:37] for all structures in the central business district

[47:41] B architectural element exceptions

[47:44] non habitable architectural features

[47:46] in a apartments including

[47:48] but not limited to clock towers, cupolas, steeples,

[47:51] bell towers and chimneys may exceed the maximum elevation

[47:55] established by up

[47:59] to 20 feet.

[48:01] Provided that such features do not collectively exceed

[48:05] 33% of the total gross roof area.

[48:11] One of the things I would suggest for

[48:14] legal cross-referencing is we could add in that

[48:19] sentence may exceed the maximum elevation limited

[48:23] established in section blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

[48:27] Which is the, the zoning ordinance where it gives

[48:30] that number to include that outward reference there.

[48:35] Okay. And then in the zoning ordinance

[48:38] where we talk about a initial use permit, we're gonna point

[48:41] to section one 70 dash 86.3.

[48:47] So that pointers in either direction.

[48:51] C, performance and design standards for increased height to

[48:55] mitigate visual impact of building mass

[48:57] and preserve pedestrian scale.

[48:58] Any building or structure exceeding six stories

[49:01] or 65 feet in height

[49:03] as measured from the average finished grade at the street.

[49:05] Frontage shall comply with the following standards

[49:08] during site plan review, upper story setbacks,

[49:14] step setbacks, the exterior front wall

[49:17] of any story located at a height greater than 65 feet

[49:21] above the average finished grade shall be set back

[49:23] by a minimum of 10 feet from the primary

[49:26] exterior front wall of the lower stories.

[49:29] We, we see that a fair amount in, in current

[49:34] trendy architecture where, you know,

[49:37] you've got different roof lines,

[49:39] you've got different setbacks.

[49:40] The building is not just a box. Right.

[49:43] It's funny, a lot of your larger cities did that.

[49:46] They had a New York city had a, had a formula,

[49:51] the, you know, setback to the hyper of the base

[49:54] of the structure across the street, blah, blah blah.

[49:57] Then they did away with it in the seventies, they put

[50:00] that in, in the thirties

[50:01] they did away with it in the seventies.

[50:03] Now they've gone back to it again.

[50:05] So that you don't have these, not that we're gonna get any

[50:08] that big, but you don't have these giant boxes.

[50:11] I agree with it. I think, I think it adds, adds to the,

[50:16] So number two, no interrupted length

[50:19] of any facade shall exceed 150 horizontal feet facades

[50:24] exceeding one 50 feet in length shall incorporate wall

[50:27] playing projections

[50:29] or recesses having a minimum depth of three feet

[50:33] to reduce perceived building mass.

[50:38] Just as a scr thing.

[50:42] The first word facade in that

[50:47] sentence has the fancy French little descender

[50:49] on the sea and the second one doesn't.

[50:50] Oh. The seed

[50:57] free building designs shall incorporate varied roof lines

[50:59] utilizing peaches such as gables, hip roofs, stormers

[51:03] or decorative parapets

[51:04] to prevent continuous monotonous roof planes.

[51:08] And for rooftop mechanical screening.

[51:11] All rooftop mechanical equipment including

[51:13] but not limited to HVAC units, elevator overruns,

[51:16] ventilation systems shall be fully screened from public view

[51:21] from adjacent street level and abutting properties.

[51:24] I would add to that list of, of not limited to

[51:28] solar panels having just recently gone there.

[51:34] Right. And then it's a screening show,

[51:38] be architecturally compatible with a primary structure

[51:41] and may utilize parapet walls

[51:43] or enclosed architectural features.

[51:45] So all of that sounds, sounds very good to me.

[51:49] And a couple suggestions for including

[51:52] explicitly including solar panel farms

[51:54] and maybe the front forward

[51:56] and backwards section references.

[51:59] Okay. Make it easy for people to figure out where the, the

[52:03] do moving moving pieces are.

[52:05] I think sounds good to me. Do we need to, any comments,

[52:08] Questions?

[52:09] Would you have a height on the solar panels? Huh?

[52:11] Because would you have a height on the solar panels?

[52:15] No, I'm just saying you, you screen 'em because

[52:17] Some of 'em that's on the side, they can be up 20,

[52:20] 30 feet high in, in inside one's yard.

[52:26] Well this is in the CBD,

[52:27] so I don't think it's gonna be someone's yard, but, okay.

[52:30] Okay. Anyone have thoughts

[52:34] on deletions?

[52:36] Additions proven. Oh, those all sound good to me.

[52:40] Sounds good to everyone.

[52:43] Do we need conditional use criteria

[52:48] Or Is it just gonna be a way

[52:49] Of i I Well the intent is that

[52:54] the criteria is in

[53:01] 1 70, 86 0.3

[53:05] B, the exceptions.

[53:09] So I mean, you could even get more specific and, and

[53:12] and reference paragraph B there for the, the

[53:17] conditions that have to be found.

[53:19] Okay. True for, to grant the conditional use permit. Okay.

[53:25] That works. Mr. Moey, do you have a question?

[53:27] Yeah, so for the rooftop thing,

[53:29] I know it says mechanical screening, do we have

[53:30] to be worried about any sort

[53:31] of light fixtures at the top of there?

[53:34] So if they had to work on any of this stuff, would we,

[53:36] would we be any concerns

[53:38] of any lighting things up there? Just throwing it out

[53:44] There.

[53:45] I don't remember seeing any plans that came to us

[53:49] with lighting fixtures for maintenance work.

[53:53] Okay. Just, just a thought.

[53:54] And if there were, I mean it would only be used

[53:56] during maintenance, so Yeah.

[53:58] You can use God as an example.

[54:00] I mean if you have a a, a roof deck on which you're parking,

[54:03] you're probably gonna have lighting up there.

[54:05] But in this case we ended up for Vidor, we ended up covering

[54:10] that over with the solar structure.

[54:12] Just a thought. Yeah.

[54:17] I mean I think there's other portions of the

[54:21] LDCR that deal with photometrics and light spell, so Okay.

[54:27] Probably gonna be covered even if someone wants to do that.

[54:29] That was my only thought. Anyone else?

[54:35] Okay, so that was just a couple of minor,

[54:38] almost editorial things.

[54:40] Okay. And then we're done with that one. Right.

[54:44] It feels good to be done. Nail bites. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.

[54:48] And then so now we're onto board member comments.

[54:54] Mr. Chase, Mr.

[54:56] Vy is taking a seat on the Southern

[54:58] New Hampshire Planning Commission as

[55:00] A full member.

[55:01] Oh, nice. And,

[55:05] and congratulations are, are due to Brian Fishman

[55:10] and his family because he has a new son.

[55:13] Excellent. Oh, that's good.

[55:18] Mr. Chase. If I may,

[55:21] I was a little discouraged yesterday.

[55:24] I I had the privilege.

[55:25] I saw Town Council appointed me as a member

[55:28] and then today I received my first email from the Southern

[55:30] New Hampshire Planning Commission

[55:32] that this next meeting was canceled. And the executive,

[55:36] The executive Director is retiring.

[55:39] So I'm putting on a brave face today.

[55:40] I'm sure, I'm sure they were not

[55:41] related. I'm putting on a brave

[55:43] Face, but it's hard to not read between the lines.

[55:48] Oh yeah. Yeah. Nate will do a nice job. Yeah.

[55:51] So everyone, I we do have fun here. We do. Yeah.

[55:56] Any other board member comments?

[55:58] Thank you for yesterday. Very informative.

[56:01] Class six wrote

[56:02] and so thank you to you Elizabeth,

[56:05] for sending me to that workshop yesterday.

[56:07] You know what, what I loved was Caroline.

[56:10] Caroline, thank you Caroline for sending me that

[56:11] Workshop.

[56:12] So the attorney was giving the class not only really

[56:15] knew the term discontinued subject to gates and bars.

[56:18] 'cause I've gotten queer eyes from people

[56:20] on the board when I use that term.

[56:22] But she knew the historical agricultural origin of it

[56:25] and I was very impressed.

[56:27] Yes. Both attorneys. Was it Christine?

[56:29] Both attorneys were very impressive yesterday. Yeah.

[56:32] That was, that was a, that was a very informative workshop

[56:34] yesterday, so thank you.

[56:36] Good. Yeah. That's gonna be recorded, isn't it?

[56:42] It will be good. I gotta

[56:43] It be, I gotta watch that.

[56:44] I wanted to watch that one, but I was unable to. Yes.

[56:46] It's worth your time Mr. Chase. Yes. To watch that.

[56:48] I they were, as a matter of fact, yes,

[56:50] they were recording it.

[56:51] 'cause we took a lunch break and they turned off the

[56:53] recordings and stuff and they did say yeah.

[56:55] Able to go back online later. You can rewatch it again.

[56:58] Yeah. It's, you get access to it.

[57:00] Yeah. Good. Okay. Any other comments?

[57:04] If not, somebody like to make a motion to adjourn.

[57:08] So moved. Move Mr. Chair. Second.

[57:10] Moved by second by Melanie to adjourn.

[57:13] All those in favor say aye. Aye. Move. Stand. Adjourned.

Planning Board - 05/06/26

Agenda

Transcript