[0:17] Good afternoon, everybody. Today's meeting we have a presentation from the folks at the

[0:37] was made with some modifications and some revisions, and I would say at the end of that meeting the board said proceed with what you're going to do.

[0:47] One of the elements of that was what it looked like.

[0:53] And to that end, I believe the applicant has provided two versions, I guess, for lack of a better word of what it would look like.

[1:02] And I was looking for some board input as to the architecturals.

[1:08] In addition, he, the applicant, has submitted a stipulation,

[1:13] which is intended to incorporate the various elements of this project

[1:19] into a court order to settle the litigation.

[1:23] I think I spoke to Mr. Murphy.

[1:27] There are some concerns about the stipulation

[1:30] from board members need some revisions, so the board is not going to be approving any stipulation

[1:35] today.

[1:37] And I have the various comments from board members that I will share with him, but I think

[1:41] we should go over the architectures and if you have any other planners that, the same plan,

[1:47] maybe you can bring it up in a quick public about what that is, what's all about.

[1:52] And also, show the renderings and let's get a perspective from the renderings as to what

[1:56] The Board and the public feels as appropriate make sense.

[2:02] Sure.

[2:05] Good afternoon.

[2:06] We were last year, four months ago.

[2:07] We were here on November 15th.

[2:09] Four months ago?

[2:10] Time flies.

[2:11] November 15th.

[2:14] And at that time, we did present an updated plan that further reduced the impervious to a 40% limit and reduced the overall square footage.

[2:27] Additionally, down to plus or minus 52,000 square feet, it's that plan that is on the

[2:34] easel to my right and which Scott prepared and we reviewed at length the last time.

[2:41] We had gone through different considerations on impervious reducing the bike path eliminating

[2:47] from calculation, the one way access in the access to the well, et cetera, but so that

[2:54] hasn't changed, so we're happy to go over that again if you like. However, since then,

[2:59] just right, we did exchange comments on a stipulation, Jeff provided me some specific comments

[3:06] earlier today, all of which I'm going through with our client. We had no issue with the ones

[3:12] that Jeff raised previously.

[3:14] There's additional comments from board members though that I'll share with you tomorrow.

[3:17] Okay. Well, that's fine. But at least as far as the ones you've shared with me so far, I think we're good.

[3:23] Also with us today is David Pilotnik, who is the architect that has done some elevations.

[3:30] We did some earlier, we got some feedback about those, and David in response has prepared

[3:37] an alternate, which, again, we've circulated in small form, but David can review them in

[3:43] the larger elevations that he also has here as well.

[3:46] So, he'd like I'll introduce David, and he can go through that for you.

[3:49] Welcome.

[3:52] My name is David Pullout, and I come with PCS Architects on the Project Architects.

[4:00] We need to find a way that the folks in the audience can take a look at these, because I...

[4:04] Aren't they the same?

[4:05] No, they're different.

[4:06] Actually, they're different.

[4:07] They're different.

[4:08] They're different.

[4:10] They're different.

[4:10] I don't know the public.

[4:15] I thought you'd hold up and haven't picked a look at, and that's version one.

[4:18] sort of do the like they do with boxing matches, you know the first round

[4:30] I'll tell you a little bit about the building, the building is going to be constructed of wood frame

[4:36] and for the exterior materials we'll have

[4:40] are you going to be mites?

[5:07] So, as I have saying, the buildings are constructed of wood frame, and they have wood

[5:14] trusses, basically the exterior walls would be constructed of wood.

[5:19] The exterior material would be on the end path you can see on the end.

[5:24] and use these two renderers to pretty similar,

[5:27] but that the ends and the base will have so in the air.

[5:33] And the group would be an actual chain up,

[5:35] and there would be some use of some metal groups

[5:37] in some of the pages you can see

[5:39] before we're here to have a metal group.

[5:41] There also we'd be using some side up,

[5:44] there's a sign-dance, and there'll be some wood trends

[5:47] on vertical side, and you can see we made use

[5:50] of the couple on the buildings.

[5:52] like what I do is like going to love a work here just to show you some materials that we

[5:58] used that we would be thinking about, the representative materials that we would be using.

[6:05] And these are the colors or not. That's certainly the colors that we would be using

[6:09] but we would try to stay within Earth and then the colors I get.

[6:13] Well, if you could, so the residents, if you could just use their water.

[6:19] they're they're they're oriented you're going to have to get to a mic to go to a

[6:27] mic or saw them please because most of the people you know kind of know where

[6:35] some of these buildings are but I believe this is coming from 263 this is the

[6:40] building that's going to be next to where the lamp factory is and that is going to

[6:46] the CVS, if that's how I take it. I'm going to be talking to you right here. It would be

[6:52] yeah it would be helpful for people to kind of know where those buildings are going to be situated

[6:56] on the property. I'm going to go to use a lot of the better behind or something here.

[7:10] Well that's what I'm just talking to you for here. You see that building, you see that building

[7:14] on the background. The difference between the two random things is that one shows

[7:27] I have to admit that I said to Mr. Murphy, when I first saw that rendering, it seemed like a awful

[7:35] expanse of roof line, straight after each other, and I said, maybe you can do something that

[7:41] provide a little more colonial and break up with a roof.

[7:43] So if it's ugly, then it's my fault, but that maybe what was produced as a result of those

[7:48] comments.

[7:49] It looks great, like the dormers, the dormers, yes, they look like they belong on a trackhouse and

[7:56] Northeast Philly.

[8:00] They don't look like real dormers to me.

[8:01] They look like they're like something from the 70s.

[8:03] No offense.

[8:05] No offense.

[8:05] You know what I'm saying?

[8:06] They're not like real dormers.

[8:09] Well, you know, they could be back when they could be made and look like, you know, they're

[8:13] back that space up there and that's not a problem to do things like that.

[8:17] I guess the first question is,

[8:20] it's elevated.

[8:23] It's not, it's not.

[8:26] You know what I'm saying?

[8:27] So the question I guess is, do you prefer some

[8:29] break-up of the roof line or does the board

[8:32] in the public prefer that straight roof line that goes

[8:34] all the way back in the man's system?

[8:38] Some direction would be appropriate.

[8:41] I think the dormer is a nice idea.

[8:44] I think they look like they belong there.

[8:45] I don't know. I just just putting them on there to break the roof line doesn't make sense to me.

[8:50] Yeah. I mean, I noticed the roof line originally, but after you say it, Jeff, now it does look like I think something to break it up, doesn't it?

[9:03] No offense to you. They're very nice renderers. They're very nice renderers.

[9:11] And maybe the dormers have to see more that for that to that window.

[9:17] Maybe six over six or something else that gives a little more of a, as opposed just a piece of glass and sort of squatted down like you're in an old polka mill property or something.

[9:28] You know, like the northeastern.

[9:30] Same difference.

[9:39] All right, so everyone's kind of okay with the rendering, just a question, so are you suggesting that all the buildings would have the same look and feel?

[9:50] Yes, the CVS and everything was a CVS would be further over, right, so that will look the same.

[9:55] every one of them will have that okay and I guess the board should have some input and

[10:05] what the preferences of the stone work and the and the roof material. So if I think you

[10:11] had a board somewhere with that in it. This is a board of some representatives in the material. It's

[10:15] really doesn't really reflect the colors, but the stone patterns, you know, with the finish of the

[10:22] that would be routine goals from the vertical in the horizontal side of the side that would be using.

[10:30] The need for the materials that would be on the buildings.

[10:34] Is the rendering to pick any of those that are in your board, or they just do not?

[10:38] I'm doing that now.

[10:39] It's quite me as well.

[10:40] I mean, here's this would be the sum.

[10:43] It would be the value of that grouping that we talked about.

[10:46] This would be the actual chain goal.

[10:48] Well, it's hard to get it signed in with the stock out and, you know, we had a little

[10:54] donor back up here, which would have some size in there.

[11:00] So yeah.

[11:01] The buzz of the board, whether you want to weigh in on the materials or not, I mean, it's really

[11:04] up to you folks.

[11:08] You know, tonight, as we go forward, I think we should have something like that.

[11:13] I think you do.

[11:14] You're the architects and you're the designer.

[11:16] You pick your best thing, what you think is most appropriate and we'll look at the

[11:20] We have an injection more than you know, but it seems like you have pretty good taste

[11:24] Yeah, maybe you can just do what you do the final mix of options on the same

[11:50] The way it looks is going to be fine, and we'll be tweaking as we go, but I think the general look is good.

[11:58] Anybody out there want to weigh in on this now?

[12:00] Seeing nobody's here.

[12:03] Mr. Murphy, I just wanted to prime the get out.

[12:06] I'm not going to be wanting to approach any stipulation until most of the development work is done.

[12:12] I think there are just too many open-ended issues in here,

[12:16] If this and that, and then we shall do this sort of thing, we shall do that thing.

[12:22] I think that there's no off-site impact fees.

[12:24] I think it's a little too early, and I still don't know what happened to all the trees.

[12:29] One of the comments I said to Mr. Murphy was, we have an old agreement that we have to

[12:37] deal with.

[12:39] But there was some evidence to restore some trees and whatever.

[12:43] I think we need that.

[12:44] I look forward looking for more than just that to be attached to this part.

[12:48] Well, as I said, Jeff and I reviewed a handful of things, including this thing, for

[12:52] of you mentioned, and we're happy to include those in a revised draft of the stipulation.

[12:57] And we spoke about the outside impact fee, needing to include the terms and additions

[13:02] of the prior settlement with which we were not in Bob, but that involves the tree replacement

[13:06] issue.

[13:06] Who happy to do that?

[13:07] No, okay.

[13:08] Well, fine.

[13:10] We know that this isn't going to be executed, well, some of the British members.

[13:15] Correct.

[13:15] And soon as Jeff, if there's other issues of which I'm on a wear, I'll do it with those things.

[13:19] Board says fine and we air it publicly will make the boards, I think it's expressed their opinion into plan and was satisfactory.

[13:28] Right.

[13:28] Matter of funding up the loose ends and getting some things taken there of and incorporating architectures and all the things that are part of that process.

[13:37] But if you indicate, for example, number two, minor shifting of a location, I don't know what that is.

[13:45] We have, we've got the word, Shaolin here within 30 business days, and that always makes me nervous.

[13:52] That's the challenge of Shaolin doing something within a time term.

[13:57] We Shaolin through the final land development, if it's substantially complies with all aspects of this distillation, that also makes me nervous.

[14:04] I think there's a little too much on us to be doing here.

[14:07] We should use our best efforts to improve the pollining modules.

[14:11] And then that we don't have any way of looking at off-site impact fees.

[14:16] It's necessary.

[14:17] I think that's something I'm not willing to give up at this point.

[14:20] And we're not asking you to.

[14:22] Well, I know it's in here.

[14:24] No.

[14:24] Well, Jeff and I spoke today.

[14:26] Okay.

[14:27] Yesterday.

[14:28] I didn't get a chance to tell on my.

[14:30] And then 15 is a third party time state.

[14:35] And in litigation, I don't know at this point whether I hopefully know what it would do

[14:39] that.

[14:40] But we really don't have any control of the third party in your interventions.

[14:46] And whether we would have to help you defend those I'm not sure I'm willing to go into that.

[14:51] I'm always stipulation discipline.

[14:53] So those are the general and my things.

[14:55] And I have Mr. Sniders that I'll share with you in Mr. Collellis and other more members so

[15:00] Question for the file I can retrieve the issue we should get, flush it out.

[15:07] If I understand everything that maybe is stretched but can we delay the stipulated agreement

[15:17] like barbers saying, so you get a little finer detail relying on the good faith of the board

[15:23] that we're, you know, amenable to going along and then it will flush out some of these

[15:29] if and then's that is that doable well and billbanners here representing Mr. Grasso as

[15:38] well as he was last time what I would say to that is that the prospect of now re-engineering

[15:43] another plan without having the comfort level of a document that we're all going to abide by

[15:51] unsure will make Mr. Grasso uncomfortable use important work if we're all operating in good faith

[15:58] that we can move ahead on this or whatever additional comments that I hear from Jeff tomorrow

[16:03] of the next day.

[16:04] And maybe we can talk about that.

[16:05] But the whole point of doing this was to try to give everyone the comfort that you're going

[16:09] to get what we all intend to provide to you, which is that plan plus whatever details and

[16:14] everything else we have to spell out.

[16:17] So I guess that is a question, Rick, that we probably-

[16:19] What are things where we all have to-

[16:21] They don't want to spend a whole lot of money on engineering, which would be significant if they

[16:24] don't feel that there's a-

[16:26] I like it. He has a tunnel and that somebody comes back and says, no, I want something else.

[16:31] So it's one of those things that most of our comments are not about architectural engineering things.

[16:36] It is about, you know, fundamental.

[16:39] Yeah. I mean, it's not about the dude with anything that's stormwater, but they've got to apply with the ordinance.

[16:43] We're going to think. We know that. Yeah.

[16:45] So if they are the same character of the comments that I've already heard from Jeff.

[16:50] I don't think that's going to be a stomach block.

[16:53] We just want you to know that there's some uncertainty because and what I make sure that

[16:57] this is precise is can be that your commitments are reduced to writing and that the plan

[17:03] is consistent with what's been presented.

[17:05] And we support all those.

[17:07] I'm good with all those.

[17:08] So I feel pretty confident that that's the case that we're going to be able to come up with something

[17:11] that gives everybody enough comfort to move ahead because we want to move ahead.

[17:16] We're anxious to move ahead.

[17:17] Can we now send any questions or comments from the board? Any questions or comments from the folks here?

[17:23] Neighbors.

[17:24] Okay. Do you have enough direction? Sort of?

[17:29] I guess.

[17:30] Hopefully.

[17:31] I hope I'm actually here to talk to Jeff and see if there's any other issues of which we are unaware of.

[17:48] Okay, any other visitors or public comments.

[17:56] Next meeting of us board is Tuesday, March 15th at 7pm.

[18:01] Daylight savings times everybody is March 13th.

[18:04] You have to set your clocks ahead.

[18:06] You lose an hour.

[18:07] That's Sunday morning.

[18:09] Washington D.C. Cherry Blossom Trip is April 2nd, it's $50,000 a person. You can sign up at

[18:16] dosairect.com. Red Cross Spring Blood Drive is Monday, April 11th, 227, the activity center.

[18:23] You can sign up at RedCrossBlood.org.

[18:28] The dosairect community garden survey is available on our website. We're thinking about doing

[18:33] a community garden and we want to make sure everyone has an opportunity to wait in on it.

[18:37] It would be down in the neighborhood of the Lower Stigland Parkway.

[18:42] There's an area of tank or parcel that we acquired in open space.

[18:46] We're looking at, perhaps, in any garden, but we want to do unless there's an interesting, you know, folks participating.

[18:53] And then, movie and ski tickets are available, contact the admin offices for the prices and what is in the available.

[18:59] Next slide, when the agenda is approval of the minutes from December 16, 2016, regular meeting of the board.

[19:09] Okay. Any questions, comments, corrections? All in favour?

[19:13] Aye. Aye. One abstent? One abstent? You were on our zone.

[19:18] So, they did watch the meeting. I like the record to show.

[19:21] I did watch the meeting.

[19:23] And the minutes? The minutes were.

[19:25] Reflected, what I saw on television.

[19:29] So, is it anything?

[19:30] I'd let report at this moment.

[19:36] And then the touch of editor, I have a few things. First, I have a memo on training for the APM conference for my self-enotum to attend and then for myself to attend the P-Sats conference with the board.

[19:49] I see that you're going to try and learn something about drones with special, you know, potential ordinances, drafts.

[19:55] It's going to probably come on this kind of conference for us, okay, is there a motion to approve the request for training?

[20:02] So move, second.

[20:04] All in favor.

[20:05] All right.

[20:06] All right.

[20:07] Thank you.

[20:09] Setting the work budget session.

[20:11] Thank you.

[20:12] Yes.

[20:13] The way the means to meeting that and I want to do that spring budget work session like we did last year.

[20:20] And pretty sure we have a little discussion before the meeting that the date starts is April

[20:24] 12, which believes that Tuesday, not Thursday, and then Tuesday June 14th, and it probably

[20:33] will.

[20:34] Well, this is Tuesday.

[20:35] And Thursday, June 14th or four, is everyone okay with those two days waiting to make

[20:39] them or not?

[20:40] I'm okay.

[20:41] I just want to comment about the 12th, because Sean, I mean, he's going to become into the

[20:44] ways of means, parking, wreck, and EAC, which is like six, seven straight hours.

[20:50] So?

[20:51] I'm just bringing it up.

[20:53] Have a problem with that, Sean?

[20:54] I appreciate it. If there's any compassion on the board, you could pack me like a lunch or meal.

[21:02] That's four o'clock. Yeah, I don't be a person and I'll be a long time.

[21:06] Yeah, well, not getting into this.

[21:10] Okay, but that's seriously. It's a long day for you.

[21:13] It's a long day for you.

[21:16] Both states are good? Yes.

[21:19] We'll let the ways we need to meet you now.

[21:21] We'll get that every kind of.

[21:23] June 14th at 4.

[21:24] June 14th.

[21:25] All right.

[21:25] Next item is this snow.

[21:30] Show no.

[21:31] Fair.

[21:31] Show no.

[21:32] Yes.

[21:33] The board will recall that we had advertised through the piece

[21:36] That's magazine twice for the sale of the show will be all.

[21:40] We actually had the burrow of Sair, which is on the New York border.

[21:45] Come down.

[21:45] Look at it.

[21:46] Mr. Snyder had to be here the day that they were here, so he got to meet them.

[21:53] They absolutely loved the show reveal and their board is their council, excuse me, their borough council.

[21:58] There's a February 25th approved the purchase of the show reveal for $10,000, which was our minimum fit on that.

[22:07] And our recommendation would be for us to go ahead and sell it to the borough of Sayer.

[22:13] have Mr. Garton prepared the appropriate documentation.

[22:16] This is blind to execute it and when it's prepared and then they'll come down and pick it up

[22:22] and we will make sure when they come will transfer the tags and everything like that while they're here.

[22:28] I did draft it and I will be sending it out to all the board members tomorrow for your

[22:43] I'm sorry you've heard the sound right you'll prove offering it for sale, but not to sale to say or

[22:48] I make a motion we approve the sale to say a second then. Okay, all in favor. All right. All right, I'm sorry. Thank you

[22:54] I'm coming to the supervisor Sean

[22:57] No, I've had no

[22:58] Meetings except for the Decado Conference and Saturday. So I'll defer thank you. No comment. Okay. Okay. I get the accumulator time. I

[23:09] That's just that three things.

[23:11] At the pension meeting, it was brought up about with our two experts, Deborah and Jim Kennedy,

[23:23] that our MMO is not going to basically change much.

[23:26] It's going to be much more than $300,000, that's an example.

[23:29] So the recommendation was if our cash flow permitted it to put in $50,000 now because they can do, in most cases, better with the $50,000, then we can do in a 1% CD where it is now.

[23:51] So their recommendation was to see if the cash flow could advance or not advance but pay in advance $50,000.

[23:59] And the pension board unanimously approved that.

[24:03] So I'm bringing it here saying if the consensus is to have the Stephanie and Ken Snyder and Ken Wallace or whoever,

[24:11] to take a look at that and see if the cash flow can support sending in extra amount of dollars.

[24:18] Well, we have a ways of means meeting, I don't know the April 12th, is that should we have a

[24:24] fall budget reported at that time, where's it too long to wait?

[24:28] We could analyze it between now and then and have it reported then and you could

[24:32] take an action or be an advertised meeting if we need to, because we don't have to

[24:36] them a moment until such a journey.

[24:39] Is that work?

[24:40] Yeah, and I wouldn't think we'd take very long to.

[24:41] I agree.

[24:42] Okay, my second thing is I'm a reasonably intelligent person. I'll start with that and I've read this EMS letter from Chuck a few times and I honestly don't quite understand it

[24:57] And then the next step is he's looking for a support. So I don't know what I don't know what

[25:04] What you know the balancing

[25:07] A billing by anybody

[25:09] I thought it was a confusing request to Chuck Fussler as they had the CVM meal and he's looking for something, make up money.

[25:21] The loss there, I'm not quite sure what it is, you know.

[25:24] We can ask for more content, we can ask for content.

[25:26] The board wants to help them, that's fine.

[25:29] I just don't understand.

[25:31] Yeah, I think he's looking for support.

[25:32] There's legislation that's pending as well.

[25:34] And then this balance billing thing, which is, I guess,

[25:37] then the Pennsylvania insurance commission is saying

[25:41] that they don't, they won't be able to balance bill

[25:43] on an ambulance ride.

[25:45] So typically, if they're not certain portion isn't covered

[25:49] if it's 600 and they only get 300,

[25:52] they want to balance bill the other 300 to the insured.

[25:56] I think he's just asking for the work.

[25:58] Not necessarily our financial skills work.

[26:01] Yeah, that's how we do that.

[26:01] No, that's how I read it.

[26:02] Yeah, no no, no.

[26:03] You don't have to share a ready to?

[26:04] Does he want to suspend, what do you want us to do?

[26:07] Right.

[26:07] What kind of support?

[26:08] Yeah, exactly.

[26:08] What for?

[26:10] Third thing is, as I mentioned, I watched him eat, and I think, Shawn mentioned that the

[26:15] parking wreck is looking to do some additions and maybe I'll say, cosmetics, that's probably

[26:20] not a fair thing.

[26:21] For the amphitheatre, I would like to see before I get to that step, where were

[26:28] at with the amphitheatre?

[26:31] What's what's what's profit in loss? What's our sheet? What we have planned for this year?

[26:36] I mean, I speak people give us donations and we still have a fiduciary responsibility to spend those donations properly and I can't

[26:45] Vote for that unless you get some clarity on

[26:49] How many events? How they're doing is it going to be you mean repitalized me, right?

[26:53] I'm not voting on anything. I'm asking for Sean to ask to regard that you go ask me

[26:57] Yeah, I think that was to mention that there was still a sponsorship opportunity that they

[27:04] are available.

[27:05] But going forward, I know Parkal Red currently is working on both of the list, a punch list,

[27:12] prioritizing those, you know, what still, but they still want to accomplish, you know, improvements

[27:16] and such on the community as well as a schedule for the concert series.

[27:22] So they're looking at both sides, habits and credits, you know, what they still want to do

[27:25] and other fundraising opportunities as well.

[27:30] And the schedule, so I think we can get a report from the next park and wreck what they have planned for instance.

[27:37] They've expanded that series such a concert.

[27:39] All right, and they've added some additional events or shows and concerts.

[27:44] And there's still some others that they're talking about now.

[27:47] Although the window is closing for sponsors to get on like on the printed material and everything.

[27:52] You know, because they have to go to print soon. There's still that's still expanding the venues for the rest of the year

[27:58] So we can try to get that from the night. I mean, I'm not if you could do if you want to bring a great if Karen wants to stop by for five minutes

[28:04] That's great. I just bring it to the meeting on the in the ways of being unable for June

[28:09] We have it already. I'm good whenever

[28:12] Yeah, you know me here. There's time frames for some kind of report if they're ready. I mean, especially if they want to do some work during the summer

[28:23] You're suggesting that at the April 12th meeting, that was a means committee meeting or the other was a means committee.

[28:31] The April 12th or the June 14th.

[28:33] Okay.

[28:33] Whenever they're ready for it.

[28:35] Yes, I'm ready for it.

[28:36] It's fine.

[28:38] Thank you.

[28:38] That's all I have.

[28:39] Thank you.

[28:41] Nothing for this one.

[28:42] Thank you.

[28:43] All right.

[28:43] Moving on to the long maintenance did for 2016.

[28:47] You memo from Dick John.

[28:50] Any questions?

[28:52] The recommendation is to prove one-year-long maintenance extension.

[28:58] Now, rating increase with green landscape contractors for $114,520.

[29:06] I'll make that motion.

[29:07] I'll second questions on favor.

[29:10] I can tap grant.

[29:14] Yes.

[29:15] This is a form of policy that we need to approve resolution

[29:20] that will designate three people from the township that will review the inspection and construction management from.

[29:29] This is all part of the tap grant will be paid for by the 1 million point two tap grant.

[29:34] But it is policy that has to be put into our electronic data management program with PENDA.

[29:41] And this will be working with DVRPC, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission,

[29:46] and setting this up and selecting a construction management engineering company to oversee that project.

[29:53] And so that is what the resolution sets for three of those people being the bidding system.

[30:00] First of all, we'll be done through the RFP system. We'll be done through the PEN.com ECMS program, the electronic management,

[30:07] and then they'll be selected in all of the paid forth through the tap grant.

[30:12] Sir, may you stand there, request?

[30:15] Sir, may you do for the resolution?

[30:17] Why do you identify who are the three people just so that?

[30:19] Definitely, may some would be serving as from the township manager,

[30:22] does not need to take John, his director of operations, and then Tom Kalsos, the White and

[30:27] High Community Voluntary.

[30:30] I'll make that motion a second.

[30:32] All in favour?

[30:33] All in favour?

[30:36] Egel's Capacamation for Caldha, David Roberts.

[30:39] 2nd number 71, is your motion to approve the Proclamation?

[30:43] So moved.

[30:45] All in favour?

[30:46] Kiles Court of Honor is April 10, 2016.

[30:50] He did the ADA accessible pedestrian bridge at Peace Valley Park.

[30:56] So, when you walk over, I think I'll have an Eagle Scout project.

[31:01] I wonder if I can.

[31:02] All right.

[31:03] Our next item on the agenda is our announcements.

[31:06] We are done.

[31:08] Next being of this board is February 15th at 7 p.m.

[31:11] By 2 p.m. March 15th at 7 p.m.

[31:13] Daylight savings time is March 13th.

[31:16] Set your clock ahead of one hour.

[31:18] Washington D.C. Cherry Blossom trip is April 2nd, $50 a person, you sign up at DawesTimeRect.com,

[31:27] Red Cross Spring Blood Drive, April 11th, 2 to 7 at the Activities Center, and you sign up

[31:32] for that at RedCrossBlood.org.

[31:35] The Community Township and DawesTimeCommunity Garden Survey, please go to DawesTimePay.org, take

[31:42] a moment to do the survey, would like to get your input.

[31:45] And movie and ski tickets are available by contacting the administrative offices for prices and availability.

[31:52] Is there any other business?

[31:54] No.

[31:55] Here you know, we are Jones.

[31:56] Thank you very much.

[31:56] There are things to sign.

[31:58] To see you all.

Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting

Transcript