Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:00]
here, it's much shorter than that.
[0:04]
» Commissioner Kramer.
>> Here.
[0:06]
» Commissioner Gamboa.
>> Here.
[0:08]
» Commissioner Kozar Ziki.
>> Commissioner Truszkowski.
[0:12]
» Here.
>> Commissioner Ouellette.
[0:14]
» Here.
>> Uh,
[0:16]
President Szabrowski.
>> Here.
[0:17]
» Thank you. Uh, looking for approval of
minutes of Plan Commission meeting of
[0:20]
July 8th, 2026.
>> So moved.
[0:24]
» Seconded.
>> Okay. Any discussion at all?
[0:28]
That's good to me. Uh, let's do a roll
call on that.
[0:30]
» Commissioner Ouellette.
>> Aye.
[0:32]
» Commissioner Gamboa.
>> Aye.
[0:34]
» Commissioner Truszkowski.
>> Aye.
[0:36]
» Commissioner Kozar Ziki.
>> Aye.
[0:38]
» Commissioner Kramer.
>> Aye.
[0:39]
» President Szabrowski.
>> Aye.
[0:40]
» Thank you.
All right. New business item A, PC
[0:44]
2026-24.
Discussion and necessary action on
[0:47]
application for a site plan, landscape
plan, and light plan review submitted by
[0:53]
Cartman for Roosevelt Racquet Club
located at 6190 West Loomis Road,
[0:57]
Greendale. Tax key number 6-630-468-002.
[1:03]
» I will take that one.
>> Can I give you just a very brief
[1:06]
introduction on this? So, this is
This is a modification to a new building
[1:11]
in a B3 zoning district. So, one of the
requirements from a purely from a zoning
[1:15]
standpoint for modification in the B3
zoning district is it has to go through
[1:19]
site plan,
lighting plan, and landscaping plan.
[1:23]
The This is Plan Commission, so the
purpose of this of this committee is to
[1:28]
recommend approval or denial, and then
ultimately the plan will be either
[1:33]
approved or denied by the Board of
Trustees. So, at the end of this we'll
[1:37]
either recommend approval or denial, and
then this has to go through the Board of
[1:40]
Trustees for final approval or denial.
Um, and then this is This is zoning
[1:45]
consideration. So, we have not received
a building permit application or
[1:49]
building plans yet. This is just the
site plan lights uh, lighting plan,
[1:52]
landscaping plan review.
Please.
[1:56]
» Thanks, Bob.
>> [snorts]
[1:57]
» Um, all right, so just
uh brief summary, the village received
[2:01]
an application from Advance Building
Corporation on behalf of Roosevelt
[2:05]
Racquet Club regarding the property
located at 6190 West Loomis Road. The
[2:09]
applicant is requesting to construct a
[clears throat] new parking lot and
[2:12]
commercial recreation facility offering
indoor racquet courts for reservations,
[2:16]
lessons, clinics, and league play
together with supporting retail, club
[2:21]
management, and second floor business
office space for SlabStox business
[2:24]
operations, a sports trading card
information and analysis company.
[2:29]
The subject property is zoned B3 general
business, and the proposed uses are
[2:33]
listed as permitted in the Greendale
zoning code. The property is located
[2:37]
directly north of Sendik's Fresh 2 Go,
and also borders a flood plain near the
[2:42]
north and west property lines. The
village engineer and village attorney
[2:46]
should review the proposed development
for compliance with flood plain
[2:49]
regulations and any relevant Wisconsin
state statutes.
[2:52]
After [snorts] review of the site plan
and submitted drawings, the proposed
[2:55]
building footprint does meet the FAR and
yard requirements. The building
[3:00]
elevation drawings show three separate
proposed exterior signs, and per section
[3:05]
17.21 of the code, signs, awnings, and
marquees are permitted. However, the
[3:09]
applicant must obtain a sign permit and
confirm that all regulations and village
[3:14]
ordinances are met prior to installation
of the proposed signage.
[3:19]
Per section 17.382,
the proposed structures should be
[3:22]
located to allow for ease of access and
entry. So, any any proposed structures
[3:28]
should be located to allow for ease of
access and entry for occupants and
[3:32]
pedestrians. The proposed bike racks,
when loaded, will obstruct the 5-ft
[3:37]
proposed sidewalk. Graef recommends
relocation or reconfiguration of these
[3:41]
bike racks to prevent sidewalk
obstruction. So, not required, but
[3:45]
recommended.
Um compliance of off-street parking and
[3:49]
loading has also been considered and was
discussed previously by the plan
[3:52]
commission
but like a couple months ago.
[3:56]
Since recreation is the primary use of
the subject property, staff feels the
[4:00]
recreation uses and employee parking
requirements are the appropriate
[4:04]
standards to follow to regulate parking.
The applicant has provided a project
[4:08]
summary including a parking and
operations overview that states the two
[4:12]
uses are complementary with different
peak periods allowing the on-site
[4:17]
parking supply to serve the property
efficiently throughout the day.
[4:21]
The proposed parking area will supply 32
stalls which will serve a maximum of
[4:26]
nine employees during daytime hours and
during evening hours will serve 18
[4:30]
players, two employees, and a limited
number of transitioning patrons.
[4:35]
The plan commission should confirm
whether the spaces provided are
[4:39]
sufficient.
Per section 17.383
[4:43]
for a commercial use on a parcel of land
greater than 30,000 square feet which
[4:48]
this is, a market analysis prepared and
signed by an independent market analyst
[4:53]
acceptable to the plan commission may be
required. The plan commission shall
[4:58]
determine whether this requirement is
deemed necessary.
[5:04]
Pending further discussion, staff has
reviewed the submitted materials and is
[5:08]
recommending that the application be
approved subject to the following
[5:12]
conditions and additional
recommendations.
[5:15]
One, the plan commission shall determine
whether the proposed parking spaces are
[5:19]
sufficient. Two, the plan commission
shall determine whether a market
[5:23]
analysis for the proposed development
shall be required. Three, the applicant
[5:28]
must obtain a sign permit from the
director of inspection services prior to
[5:31]
the installation of any new signage and
four, review and approval of the site
[5:36]
plan by the village engineer, village
attorney, and director of inspection
[5:39]
services.
Thank you.
[5:42]
Let me know if you have any questions.
That's a lot.
[5:47]
» Questions?
[5:52]
» I I just with the lighting in the back,
is there a way to have like a
[5:57]
a shield on the back end of the whole so
that the neighbors don't get a bright
[6:01]
light in the back or
[6:10]
So I'm just wondering if
for there is one neighbor that's rather
[6:15]
close to this. So I was just wondering
how long the how late the lights will be
[6:19]
on or
you know, how bright is it going to be?
[6:22]
And sometimes I know when the street
lights are too bright, they can put a
[6:25]
dark shade on one side
to keep from flooding somebody's house.
[6:30]
Just curious.
>> I don't remember offhand how like the
[6:34]
timing of the lighting, but it does meet
the
[6:37]
requirements
>> Right. For lighting just to be there on
[6:40]
that.
[6:43]
» I mean hours of operation right now
publicly that we're saying is 8:00 a.m.
[6:48]
to 9:00 p.m. with possibility of opening
earlier based off of what we're planning
[6:51]
for work, which is likely what we'll do
depending on staffing.
[6:56]
But 9:00 p.m. would be like the latest
that we'd be open until with you know,
[7:00]
closing down and employees leaving. So
I'd assume with the 30 minute kind of
[7:03]
close down maybe period 9:30 I wouldn't
expect any bright lights to be on past
[7:09]
that.
And from the lighting perspective you
[7:11]
wouldn't
have an issue. So
[7:30]
» Would the lights be on all night or just
when you're open?
[7:33]
» I assume it's when we're open.
I think that we might have some sort of
[7:36]
light on the building like small just
you know, as a lot of buildings do.
[7:41]
Nothing crazy though.
>> Security?
[7:43]
» Yeah, security measure lighting, typical
thing around the perimeter but nothing
[7:46]
like that will should shine into your
neighbor's yards and stuff.
[7:51]
» Okay, just curious. Thank you.
[7:57]
» Anything else?
>> I guess
[8:00]
To what extent is there architectural
commentary? Just cuz I I have some
[8:06]
definitely comments on just overall
design and aesthetics.
[8:10]
Um
Is that
[8:12]
» Well
We'll be talking
[8:13]
» something we have to discuss?
>> I mean I think that you could you could
[8:16]
certainly bring it up, but whether
whether the the board could compel the
[8:20]
applicant to make a change, I think it's
a different topic.
[8:23]
» Okay.
So that wouldn't be for this meeting.
[8:26]
» Well, I think I think you could
certainly if you had like if you had
[8:28]
suggestions [clears throat] or
something, I think that the nature of
[8:30]
the suggestions would have to be
compared to the authority that we have
[8:33]
in chapter 17 for zoning to see whether
we could compel the applicant to make
[8:38]
the changes, but I think it's certainly
appropriate to to bring it up and talk
[8:41]
about them if you'd like.
>> You know, and that's always the concern.
[8:43]
Anytime you have something where you
need clear span, I understand that
[8:46]
limits your building type, right? You're
not just building it with stick built
[8:49]
normal construction, and usually that
means two things, either span you know,
[8:52]
like precast concrete, which it probably
wouldn't fit here, right? Or basically
[8:56]
like a pole barn, which kind of this is
a nicer pole barn really to to word it
[9:00]
nicely, but and I [snorts] I do like
that they do are doing like the entry
[9:04]
area where the office is and stuff. I
think that looks really nice. I guess my
[9:07]
only commentary or question would be on
the east facing, so the part that faces
[9:11]
Loomis, it's just like a
really high percentage of metal and
[9:15]
normally most communities don't look at
vertical metal panel, which is like
[9:18]
something you find on a farm farm
building as high quality material.
[9:22]
I would just think is there a way to
incorporate some other material that
[9:25]
maybe especially being right next to
Sandys corporate center, maybe some more
[9:27]
masonry, some functional windows, maybe
some full windows, fake windows, you
[9:32]
know, things that look like, you know,
spandrel glass where it just how do we
[9:35]
give it a little more soften the look
rather than looking like we have a you
[9:38]
know a 30 ft 20 ft
steel wall along Loomis Road. I mean the
[9:43]
building's fairly close in perspective.
It's not like it's 100 ft setback or
[9:47]
something.
I just I don't know is there anything
[9:49]
aesthetically that can be done? I'm
obviously not worried about the back.
[9:53]
I'm not worried about the part that's
recessed on the south like behind the
[9:57]
entry in the office area but especially
I think on the
[9:59]
east elevation that would be commentary
I don't want to provide is what can be
[10:03]
done to give it more character and let's
not smell like I said metal buildings I
[10:06]
usually think of industrial buildings
and this isn't that.
[10:09]
» Correct.
>> Especially with the given proximity to
[10:11]
Sandings.
>> Mhm.
[10:12]
The
metal walls are those the same walls
[10:16]
that are on the inside? Like so is the
steel panel also on the inside?
[10:22]
» So it is a it is a so it's a it's a high
quality metal building. And I think from
[10:26]
a just a real response to kind of what
your point was.
[10:30]
Um I think the the goal of this design
is it is pre-engineered building. So
[10:35]
there are some limitations I think from
a pre-engineered metal building we've
[10:38]
used more brick than normally so we were
really trying to be
[10:42]
uh cognizant of uh
from day one the owners here really
[10:47]
wanted this to look and feel like a
community.
[10:50]
And so the brick was really important
because even some of the colors we
[10:54]
looked at had
some of this uh examples down
[10:57]
down this street right here and down
Main Street to try to have this to be a
[11:00]
green and healthy look. Uh
they're they they understand their
[11:04]
customers and the community of customers
that come to the YMCA also they want to
[11:08]
And so we did do a fair amount to kind
of break down the scale along Loomis.
[11:13]
That wall is really only 20 ft. I think
it was 22 ft but it's certainly not a 40
[11:17]
ft wall
and the piers that are the brick piers
[11:20]
that create a rhythm in these things are
a nice way to kind of break that up. It
[11:25]
is a field house. It is a lot of
athletic performance Uh,
[11:30]
and putting windows there
uh on the east side doesn't really make
[11:34]
there to be glare issues. There's glare
issues for, uh, the the
[11:39]
facility that would not be conducive to
competitive,
[11:43]
uh, performances there.
Uh, but I think that the way that
[11:46]
treatment of the, uh, metal panel is
kind of gives a hint that there's a
[11:49]
window there.
It has It has a To me it has a very
[11:52]
field house look and feel to it.
Uh,
[11:55]
and so I think that to me it adds to
the,
[11:57]
uh,
the success in terms of how it looks.
[12:00]
This this uh uh uh
uh, meets that criteria.
[12:04]
» Yeah, I'll provide a couple more things.
Uh, you brought up the windows. Like we
[12:07]
intentionally put a window on the north
facing side of the lane because the
[12:10]
problem is with tennis, like especially
in your facility, we don't want glare,
[12:14]
we don't want sun coming on the court.
Like the worst you can have is partial
[12:17]
sun and shade somewhere in the court
while people are playing. Uh, it just
[12:21]
ruins the experience for people, in all
honesty. And then on the If you can see
[12:25]
on the east side, though, a lot above
the the R logo right there, there's a
[12:30]
window up there.
That goes into the office space that
[12:33]
Slab City will operate out of, so that
has no impact on like sun coming into
[12:37]
there. So trying to add an additional
window onto this property that like help
[12:40]
with what you're saying. All things you
guys said we agree with, too. Like we
[12:43]
went through five iterations from metal
building to this to try to get it to the
[12:47]
look and feel like Grind Down here,
Village Hall, down at the high school,
[12:50]
going around to get to where we are. We
want to feel like we're part of this
[12:54]
area, and you can't put a building like
this on Broad Street, but I wouldn't be
[12:57]
making it feel like Broad Street on
this.
[13:00]
And
at the end of the day, too, like part of
[13:03]
the thing that we're running into is
budget constraints. Like we're already
[13:06]
pushing up to basically like the maximum
amount of money that can be spent
[13:08]
through SBA loans to even do this
project. So adding more and more and
[13:11]
more like things to aesthetically build
it up is fantastic, but we don't We have
[13:16]
capital so far. Like we just kind of
We're trying to take things, put more
[13:20]
money into the space, which is actually
what we did. We put the windows on the
[13:23]
front, too. If you drive down the miss
going towards the freeway, like we put a
[13:27]
huge glass window that'll shine in up
into the lobby area upstairs where the
[13:31]
actual club members will be able to
access and non-members, too, to watch
[13:34]
down into the pickleball matches as
they're being played. It comes in
[13:37]
through the front where the pro shop
area is, more club space, stuff like
[13:41]
that. So,
and I definitely hear what you guys are
[13:44]
saying at the same time, but like with a
building this big, it's just from a
[13:47]
financial perspective, like all brick is
wouldn't be possible for us to even pull
[13:51]
off. So, we're I mean open to any
suggestions that you all would have in
[13:55]
terms of maybe making some of these
things that help out with what you guys
[13:58]
are saying, depending on what the
village board of trustees say, too, but
[14:02]
I will say like from the start, like we
sat down with Dan the architect and
[14:05]
Michelle the builder and said, "Hey, we
got to take this from metal building to
[14:08]
feeling like it's, you know, an athletic
facility that fits the Greendale kind of
[14:12]
like, you know, tradition." And that's
what we do. We want this building to be
[14:14]
here for as long as I live in longer,
hopefully, and uh like that's why we we
[14:20]
went at how we did.
[14:23]
» I I I get that. I understand that.
>> I just I don't know. It's
[14:26]
» It's a big metal wall. I I'll I'll leave
it at what it is. It's a big metal wall.
[14:30]
And like I said, I would think with
Sendik's literally sharing a drive with
[14:33]
Sendik's, you're going to see these two
buildings
[14:34]
» Right.
>> Yeah. You know, however many feet away
[14:37]
from each other. I'm not saying it
should all be masonry, don't get me
[14:39]
wrong. I think that would that would be
too much, but you know, even the band
[14:42]
that's on the bottom was an awesome
effort, but you know, probably want
[14:46]
landscaping around the base of that
building. I know there's a little bit
[14:48]
shown, but not a lot, but you know,
you know, it's just it because it does
[14:53]
project high in the air, you know, I
don't know. And I I totally can respect
[14:56]
the glare issue. I would agree. I didn't
think of that.
[15:00]
But that that being said, I worked on a
lot of projects where people use
[15:02]
spandrel glass, glass that's strictly
cosmetic to the outside, you know, once
[15:05]
again, it just gives it some kind of
character. Um I'm just thinking, how can
[15:09]
you tie it to the Sendik's building cuz
you're going to see them side by side.
[15:12]
» Mhm.
>> They're close. Just that that reality is
[15:15]
they're close. And
what could be done to just I'm not
[15:18]
worried about metal on the back. I'm not
worried about metal on even on the
[15:20]
sides. It's just can there be any more
ornamentation or something that breaks
[15:24]
up
big sheets of metal.
[15:26]
» think a a brick outline on this would
look on the front.
[15:30]
» I I think that could go a long way, but
the question is how high and what's that
[15:33]
cost? I get that, but yeah, I mean
[15:37]
That's
like when this came to the plan
[15:39]
commission a couple times ago, right?
That was the first thing that popped
[15:42]
into my head is
uh-oh.
[15:44]
» So, you're still rebuilding. You need to
I mean you need a lot of clear space. An
[15:47]
athletic field house.
>> Let's be real. This one looks better
[15:50]
than a lot of other field houses. I
think most field houses don't look
[15:52]
great. They mostly look really bad in
fact. This one definitely looks much
[15:55]
better than a lot of others, but I just
think being, you know,
[15:59]
so close to Sandex and so close to the
road is there just some other
[16:03]
ornamentation or something that isn't
steel panel that could be maybe added
[16:06]
within those? And I don't just mean
signage. I think signage helps a little
[16:09]
bit, but I'm sure there's a limit to
signage, right? You can't just put
[16:12]
signage everywhere. I just I don't know.
Is like I said, is there like a full
[16:15]
window or fake window or something where
it doesn't cause a glare, but you still
[16:18]
get a cosmetic that's maybe put in some
of those recesses or something? I'm just
[16:22]
throwing out ideas.
>> Thank you.
[16:24]
» We did consider like a spandrel panel
window and and ultimately, I mean this
[16:28]
might be a difference of opinion.
Whenever I see spandrel panel window, it
[16:31]
looks like there's something
uh so it's not
[16:35]
» There's always this kind of this notion
of uh covering up of a window that some
[16:39]
you don't know what's going on inside
and so it just looks fake and it looks
[16:43]
like they're trying to cover up what's
going on inside. So, we didn't think
[16:46]
that I said I don't think that gave the
right impression.
[16:50]
Uh and and I think there you know, I do
think there's we broke up the facade in
[16:54]
a manner
uh with the this the banding of the
[16:58]
metal panel in a manner. That just it
does create a little more pedestrian
[17:01]
feel.
Uh the building itself is about 2 ft
[17:04]
lower than Loomis. So, just for taking
advantage of the natural grading of the
[17:09]
site. Again, all of this is contributing
to a much more
[17:13]
uh you know, human scaled of facade I
think than
[17:16]
than what perhaps you're portraying it
as.
[17:18]
» Question for you. The brick on the north
side, and then even
[17:24]
northwest, I guess. There it looks like
there's a little bit of a brick line on
[17:28]
there, like a foot-ish or two. Is that
correct?
[17:33]
And if so, does that also carry all the
way across the southwest?
[17:38]
» There's some more graphics than just
this one of those. It's not in this
[17:42]
There's three different
>> Do you see what I'm seeing, Adam? It
[17:45]
looks like there's a little bit of brick
on the bottom.
[17:47]
» And in this corner?
>> No, no, no, no. If you go to Yep, yep,
[17:50]
right there on the bottom.
>> Yeah.
[17:51]
» brick on the bottom?
>> It looks like
[17:53]
» Yeah.
>> Are you talking about this
[17:55]
» Yeah, yeah. I mean, yeah, on here.
>> around the office here.
[17:59]
» That does go all the way around.
>> Well, okay, I shouldn't say on the back
[18:02]
side, but around like what faces of this
is that all
[18:04]
» It's in the bottom one.
>> So, like right here. You can't see that.
[18:10]
» How tall is that?
[18:14]
» Yeah, I think
>> I think he's talking about like here.
[18:19]
» You know,
um
[18:21]
I thought it was great. I mean, I don't
I don't
[18:23]
» Yeah.
>> I I'm I looked at the the thought that
[18:26]
went into putting the bricks in there,
having the different textures to the
[18:29]
facade, the different colors to the
side, the white on top kind of mimics a
[18:33]
window. I thought great care was taken
to try to soften this building. And for
[18:40]
And for the kind of building it is, I
appreciate it. I don't want you to think
[18:43]
I mean, we're we're a group, so we all
have different opinions.
[18:46]
» Yeah.
>> We we don't all have the same opinion,
[18:48]
so
I I think you did a good job.
[18:51]
» agree with you, but I agree on
>> [laughter]
[18:54]
» And I I I despise faux faux windows. I I
think that it it does like
[19:01]
it it um
gives it gives it a cheesy kind of look.
[19:05]
Um I I like the white the white on top
gives it a I feel like it is a transom.
[19:11]
Uh and I like the brick
uh down.
[19:15]
I I think from where we started, like
when they were talking about how we're
[19:18]
we're going to fit all this parking and
make it work next door, I think you guys
[19:22]
did a great job on figuring that out uh
on there. I like I like the glass in the
[19:27]
front entrance, so
I um
[19:31]
I I commend you guys for for the work
that you guys did on it. Um, you know,
[19:37]
things could always be better. I've been
critical of other projects over here on
[19:41]
use of materials and and stuff, and I
think the materials are appropriate. Uh,
[19:47]
I like the colors. Really like the green
and the white and the brick. Um,
[19:51]
so and uh for a commercial building you
want something that's nice but doesn't
[19:57]
is not crazy for maintenance, so that it
can always look clean
[20:01]
and doesn't you know doesn't take you
know uh and then
[20:05]
uh constant uh work to make it look
good, so
[20:09]
I'm very I'm very pleased with
what we have here.
[20:14]
» Thank you.
You asked a question on the brick
[20:17]
height.
>> Yes.
[20:18]
» Okay. Uh
2 by 4 is probably where it's
[20:29]
» What
What also What also helps, and I didn't
[20:32]
see in the lighting plan, is
um
[20:35]
any up-lighting that you have on the on
the wall in the evening would be would
[20:39]
be great. So, like you had a spotlight
on that R logo uh would be fantastic.
[20:46]
» want to have some sort of lighting on
the logo. I know the other gentleman
[20:48]
pointed out the logo on the side that
faces Lewis. We're not set on that being
[20:52]
a logo. I know we have to submit the
signage to the you know, get it approved
[20:54]
and stuff. We're also talking about
putting the Roosevelt Rapid Club logo on
[20:58]
one of my shirts on that side, so people
driving by don't have to try to pick up
[21:02]
our what is this logo what is this
place. This was just We were throwing on
[21:05]
many iterations of logos around the
outside We got this in submitted for the
[21:09]
time for this meeting, but that's not
like a finalized logo.
[21:13]
» Uplighting on the wall with the logo, I
think would be a a great touch.
[21:17]
» I do like the logo.
>> You do like the logo?
[21:19]
» I like the logo, too.
[21:24]
» Yeah, you do get a sense that this is a
some sort of like with the ball like,
[21:29]
you know, it that it does you're getting
racquetball out of that.
[21:33]
A racket sport here.
[21:37]
» Well, we do have stickers. They're quite
>> [laughter]
[21:41]
» So, this is a secondary logo that says
Roosevelt Racquet Club for those that
[21:45]
may not be from Greendale. Like, we'll
have multiple variations, but this just
[21:49]
helps people understand if you're
looking at it, it's got the R and you
[21:52]
see Greendale, Wisconsin, you have no
idea what type of business this is. So,
[21:55]
we have two variations of that logo.
Obviously, the other one's on my shirt
[21:59]
also and that's on the building for now.
But, they're interchangeable.
[22:02]
» It looked like a handle on it, so it
looked like a racket.
[22:05]
» One question I have for the design
designer. Um with the RTUs on the back,
[22:11]
are you
confident like obviously know you're not
[22:14]
going to be able to see these from the
north because of the tree line that's
[22:16]
there in the creek and you're not going
to see them from back because the back
[22:19]
has trees.
Is there any possible belief just given
[22:23]
the height of the structure that you
think you may even slightly see those
[22:26]
from like over Sendik's cuz I mean let's
be real, this is going to tower over
[22:29]
Sendik's. I just think that's one thing
that you build, you know, a very nice
[22:32]
building. Like I said, I agree that it's
a very beautiful building. Nothing
[22:35]
wrecks a beautiful building more than
seeing RTUs on a roof. Has there been
[22:38]
any thought of putting them on the
ground or has there been any thought on
[22:40]
screening because like you said, I would
just hate to have this beautiful
[22:43]
building and then you're putting this
big metal box on the back that cuz let's
[22:46]
be real, they don't they don't blend in
with the roof usually. They're usually
[22:49]
silver and shiny and
not the best looking.
[22:53]
» So, yeah, that's a
>> That's a good question. Um you know,
[22:56]
again, the site, you know, we we've been
eking every square foot out out of the
[23:00]
site for parking and for storm water and
for all the other requirements. So, we
[23:04]
would love Trust me, we would love to
put those on the on the ground, but
[23:07]
there's just not enough room. Uh so, we
have to we have to put them in the air.
[23:12]
We all these renderings are have those
uh
[23:16]
uh are to use uh modeled.
Uh in other words, none of them show
[23:20]
that. So, and we can continue What we
didn't I admittedly we did not do a uh
[23:25]
uh a view study uh from kind of
behind self of St. X. And we certainly
[23:32]
could do that. Um but we're there you
know, it
[23:36]
you get far away enough away from
anything uh the perspective will either
[23:41]
let you see it or it's too far away so
you can't see it. So, um we should We're
[23:44]
happy to to take that as those views and
let you see them if you're if that'd be
[23:48]
helpful. But we're pretty confident they
won't be uh
[23:51]
uh obstructive or
uh very
[23:54]
uh
uh
[23:56]
unesthetic from from standard.
>> What color are they?
[24:02]
» The the you you are we
they are whatever comes off the
[24:04]
manufacturer You can't paint those
things. Uh they're
[24:07]
I guess that's I will tell you. So, we
do have some samples not that you not of
[24:12]
the our
uh rooftop units, but uh some metal
[24:15]
panels and some bricks. Uh ultimately
the roof we probably didn't bring The
[24:20]
roof is going to be like a a French gray
uh uh color. And the rooftop probably
[24:25]
not the rooftop units typically are in
that that range.
[24:29]
» I've worked on projects where
and and I I've never gone this route so
[24:33]
I don't know how well it works where
they wrap like you wrap a vehicle to get
[24:37]
cuz I know painting is a little
different if there is a aesthetic
[24:40]
concern. I just cuz like I said, if it
don't match the roof, it's not a big
[24:43]
deal, right? But we know a lot of sheet
metal cuz there's usually sheet metal
[24:46]
involved in these is
shiny, glossy, and you know, stands out
[24:50]
like a sore thumb sometimes.
So, I just I don't know. Something to be
[24:53]
aware of and so.
Maybe you don't see it. Like I said,
[24:56]
it's hard to tell without a view.
>> So, it's not the same.
[24:58]
» We'll take a deeper dive into it.
>> No,
[25:00]
it's just like that.
>> Uh but would you I would like to mention
[25:03]
that uh just offhand, I know we're just
looking at this from a zoning
[25:07]
standpoint, but from a building code
standpoint, I believe with the slope of
[25:09]
the roof, that these rooftop units would
need some access platform. So, there
[25:12]
will be some kind of access platform out
there that will then affect the the
[25:16]
cosmetics and how that would look.
[25:20]
» They need to have access. They need to
either have a fall protection of some
[25:24]
sort, I guess. It could be a railing,
could be a
[25:26]
davit into the roof. So, we we do we
understand we have to figure that out.
[25:31]
» Is there ability
>> It's just like a
[25:33]
a fence of some type that just blocks it
then.
[25:36]
» No.
>> I mean
[25:37]
» When was it?
>> I mean, there's those they make the
[25:40]
systems that hang off the units for that
purpose, but it's something Yeah, I
[25:43]
don't know. I That would be my worry is
it now I I'm not thinking about that. If
[25:46]
you have to have a platform or a rail,
my worry is those often become yellow.
[25:51]
Um you know, is there a way to not allow
them to be yellow? You know, where any
[25:54]
of these things have to, you know, match
a building color, roof color?
[25:57]
» The one thing I'll say is I'm not an
engineer or anything close to it, but
[26:01]
when you're standing anywhere on the
sidewalk that goes down to Luna's, it's
[26:04]
the same thing. If it's on like the far
side of the building, it's on the close
[26:08]
side towards the west. And with how big
the front facade is and where it's
[26:12]
positioned with the slope of the roof,
and I feel like I wouldn't be able to
[26:17]
see it. I'm also just a dude that walks
on the street and says first thing.
[26:19]
» Like that one you do obviously.
>> But so, I I just Like just if you look
[26:24]
at the renderings and how it would be
set and like I feel like you would
[26:27]
literally have to be as far in the back
corner of Sundix to like even try to see
[26:32]
it. So, it's
>> Sure.
[26:33]
» Just like passing day I I get what
you're saying. Like I agree like let's
[26:36]
try not to ruin a beautiful building
with a giant shiny box. So,
[26:40]
» Yeah.
>> I think we'll do everything we can to
[26:42]
make sure that it looks like it fits
with the
[26:44]
» I think as long as there's thought put
into it, that goes a long way.
[26:47]
» Yeah. I think that
>> Sure.
[26:49]
» I don't know. You could
>> You can't make every building look
[26:50]
exactly the same.
>> Yeah.
[26:52]
» Well, one last thing. I mean, you guys
nailed it. So,
[26:55]
» I mean,
this you know, branding is a big part of
[26:58]
it. So, I think this is pretty cool.
This is quality. Meaning that, you know,
[27:01]
people drive by and be like, it's a cool
I mean, you get all kinds of you know,
[27:03]
marketing is a big deal. So, you get all
kinds of cheesy logos out there.
[27:06]
» Well, we're starting at the Green Apple
Market this Saturday, so I'll let you
[27:10]
see us if you guys want to talk to us
more there.
[27:12]
» Exactly, but you know what I mean?
>> We'll have a little bit of tan, we'll
[27:14]
have backdrops, we'll have actually the
building renderings if you guys like it
[27:17]
tonight, we're going to bring out there
if you guys like it.
[27:20]
Um, yeah.
>> So, yeah, logos, color scheme, all that
[27:23]
stuff is really kind of cool. You guys
you guys nailed it.
[27:25]
» Thank you.
>> Um, but we're not talking money. Just
[27:28]
one thing I'm going to throw out there
cuz I I was just going to hand this off
[27:31]
to Paul later on anyway, but uh, you
have stair the the uh, courts are lower?
[27:35]
» Yeah.
>> So, make sure you got access to those.
[27:37]
» Yeah, there's also there that goes up
there.
[27:39]
» So, that's a two-stop? That elevator
goes it goes down to the court level as
[27:43]
well?
>> Yeah.
[27:45]
» Then you got it. Okay.
>> staircase and elevator and it goes to
[27:48]
the lower the foundation of the
>> Yeah. Excellent. Cuz I was looking at
[27:51]
that, I was like, I didn't see any doors
on the back side of the elevator. I was
[27:53]
like, oh man, I hope they didn't do
that. Then you're good.
[27:56]
» Mhm.
This is purely a recommendation, but
[28:00]
with these colors I'd highly recommend a
black roof and that gray and the grays
[28:03]
can get really kind of weird.
So, it's purely a recommendation.
[28:07]
And that's me from roofing for like 30
years, so.
[28:12]
» I just put a black roof on my house and
it looks really sharp.
[28:15]
» [laughter]
>> I If you want to come look at my house,
[28:17]
you can.
>> GREEN SIDING
[28:20]
» AND A BLACK [laughter] ROOF. SO, the
green looks really close to that color.
[28:23]
» I'm with you on that one.
>> [laughter]
[28:25]
» Green and black roof.
And red brick.
[28:30]
All right.
>> [laughter]
[28:34]
» Where we at?
Good?
[28:36]
» Yeah.
>> Yeah, so before before we would go
[28:38]
through and do a roll call and vote, I
just want to make sure that we're
[28:41]
addressing all the things that Kristen
put specifically in her report. Um, like
[28:45]
the bike racks they talked about um,
minor modifications to the bike racks. I
[28:49]
assume that's okay with with the
applicant. Uh, the sign permitting, I
[28:53]
received your okay with that also.
Um, the number of parking spaces, I just
[28:57]
wanted to to formally bring that up.
Planning Commission saw the number of
[29:00]
parking spaces and was like, "Okay with
that."
[29:02]
Um, the storm water management plan will
be reviewed by our village engineer as
[29:06]
was noted on there,
um, including the proximity of the flood
[29:10]
plain.
Uh, I think the other the other big
[29:12]
thing was the market analysis. So,
Kristen had brought that up in her her
[29:15]
review. It is the Planning Commission's
option to require a market analysis. Uh,
[29:21]
but if Planning Commission decides to
waive it, it doesn't have to be done.
[29:24]
» What's what's that?
>> What would be the purpose for us to see
[29:27]
it?
>> What's that?
[29:29]
» The it's a, you know,
a market study to show what?
[29:33]
» Just to show, I mean, would this
business fit in the community? Do you
[29:36]
think feel it would be successful? Like
a market analysis is going to kind of
[29:40]
tell you, um, the answers to those
questions.
[29:42]
» feel like with being such a, you know,
niche business, but in a good way,
[29:45]
right? And obviously they wouldn't
spend, you know, what, upwards of $4
[29:48]
million to spend a building if they
didn't think there was a market for it,
[29:51]
right? So, I don't think that'd be
needed.
[29:54]
» Oh.
>> I don't think we should be the ones to
[29:57]
tell you that. It's something you wanted
to do.
[29:59]
» And that's between you you and your
lender.
[30:02]
» [laughter]
[30:05]
» Yeah, that's coming from a lender.
>> [laughter]
[30:09]
[snorts]
>> Okay.
[30:12]
» I can support that. So, I'll make the
motion.
[30:14]
» Okay.
Make a motion to approve basically
[30:18]
everything with what she has.
>> Exactly.
[30:20]
» I'll second that.
Um, any other discussion?
[30:23]
I ask for a roll call, please.
>> Commissioner Allet?
[30:27]
» Aye.
>> Commissioner Gamboa?
[30:29]
» Aye.
>> Uh, Commissioner Trzebiatowski?
[30:32]
» Aye.
>> Commissioner Kozerski?
[30:34]
» Aye.
>> Commissioner Kramer?
[30:35]
» Aye.
>> President Sprosky?
[30:37]
» Aye.
[30:40]
» All right.
>> Thank you, guys.
[30:42]
» Um, so so with that being approved,
we'll work to have that on the board
[30:46]
trustee meeting, which will be 13 days
from today.
[30:51]
» You're so excited. This is not a
carwash.
[30:54]
» Yes, it is.
Uh
[30:58]
that's a good question.
Let me pull out my cheat sheet.
[31:09]
public hearing needed.
>> No. No public hearing.
[31:17]
» No, there's there's no public hearing
needed, but there will there's going to
[31:19]
be time for our citizen comments.
But there's not going to be a formal
[31:23]
public hearing in public. Uh so like
there we're not going to notice it and
[31:26]
so on, but there will have the
opportunity for citizen comment.
[31:29]
» It'll be like a meeting in this room,
though, right?
[31:31]
» Correct.
[31:37]
» And the neighbors behind you are
thrilled that you're not a carwash.
[31:42]
And you're actually going to block the
noise from Loomis Road for a lot of the
[31:44]
neighbors.
Yeah.
[31:48]
Mhm.
>> Okay.
[31:50]
» [clears throat]
>> All right. I'm going to make a motion to
[31:52]
adjourn.
>> Second.
[31:54]
» All right.
[31:56]
» I.
>> I.
[31:57]
» I.
>> Commissioner Rowlette.
[32:01]
» I.
>> Commissioner Gamboa.
[32:02]
» I.
>> Uh Commissioner Szepanski.
[32:04]
» I.
>> Commissioner Kozarizky.
[32:06]
» I.
>> Commissioner Kramer.
[32:07]
» I.
>> President Szepanski.
[32:10]
All right. Thank you, guys.
>> Yeah, thank you.
[32:12]
» See you in uh 15 days.
>> [laughter]
[32:25]
» The park committee we just don't say
anything.
[32:27]
» Good. I like stuff like that.