[0:11] the minutes for the August 10th, 2026

[0:14] meeting.

[0:14] >> Make a motion to approve.

[0:15] >> Motion by Dave.

[0:17] >> Second.

[0:17] by Tom. Any final uh questions,

[0:21] comments, or

[0:24] seeing none, all those in favor signify

[0:26] by saying I.

[0:27] >> I.

[0:28] >> Oppose. Nay

[0:30] minutes pass. The third item on the

[0:33] agenda is appearances. Uh we do have uh

[0:36] a public hearing in which um you can if you are appearing for the public

[0:41] hearing, you can do so under that. Uh

[0:44] otherwise um you are welcome to appear

[0:48] if you don't if it isn't under a public

[0:50] hearing. Um, and I see some people in

[0:54] the audience for like I said the bank

[0:56] and uh the fire station

[1:00] um and Winter Park builders uh are not

[1:04] public hearings. So if you wish to

[1:05] appear now you can

[1:10] second call

[1:12] and final call.

[1:15] All right. Then item four on the agenda

[1:17] is a public hearing for a conditional

[1:19] use permit to allow for the operation of

[1:21] a secondhand store at 1336 East Sumner

[1:24] Street uh zoned B3 General Business

[1:27] District. I declare this hearing open uh

[1:31] and reading of the public notice. Jacob.

[1:40] Sorry.

[1:41] >> Take your time.

[2:04] Okay. Notice of public hearing plan

[2:07] commission. Please take notice that

[2:08] pursuant to section 62.23 23 PN 7 PNDE

[2:13] of the Wisconsin state statutes and

[2:14] section 52.302 302 of the city of

[2:17] Hartford municipal code that a public

[2:19] hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. or

[2:21] thereafter on August 10th 20 or it

[2:24] should say August I'm reading the wrong

[2:26] one so I must have the wrong packet but

[2:28] it should be August or September

[2:31] >> uh 14th 2026 in the common council

[2:33] chambers at the lower level of the city

[2:35] hall 109 North Main Street by the city

[2:38] of Hartford plan commission to consider

[2:39] a request of Trisha's Seed LLC

[2:44] uh to apply for a conditional use permit

[2:46] to allow for a secondhand store at the

[2:50] property property of 1336 East Sumar

[2:54] Street, tax key 36-220-00001-

[3:00] 023,

[3:02] zoned B3, general business district. All

[3:05] persons wishing to provide testimony for

[3:08] or against the requested applicant

[3:09] application are invited to be present.

[3:11] Written comments may be submitted to the

[3:13] city clerk, Shana Cryamp, 109 North Main

[3:16] Street, Hartford, Wisconsin 53027. A map

[3:19] of the parcel and application can be

[3:22] reviewed in the planning zoning office

[3:23] by appointment 109 North Main Street

[3:25] Monday through Friday between the hours

[3:27] of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. contact

[3:30] 262-673

[3:32] 8272 dated this the

[3:37] 14th day of August 2026. Shannon

[3:40] Crowamp, city clerk, city of Hartford.

[3:43] This was published in the Daily News.

[3:46] >> Thanks. And then staff review, Jacob.

[3:48] All right. Uh, Trisha Shehed LLC uh is

[3:53] Patricia Oralbeck. Uh, the business

[3:56] owner is looking to establish She-Hed at

[3:57] 1336 East Sum Street. This is a

[3:59] pre-existing business that is located on

[4:02] uh State Highway 83 going towards the

[4:05] south. They're looking to relocate their

[4:07] business to this parcel. Uh 1336 East

[4:10] Summer Street is zone B3 uh general

[4:12] business district under the B3 zoning

[4:14] district. Secondhand store is a

[4:16] principal land use that is permitted as

[4:18] a conditional use. Uh after staff

[4:21] review, uh 1336 East Sumar Street is

[4:24] subject to the following. Compliance

[4:26] with building codes, property

[4:27] maintenance, and fire codes. Maintain

[4:30] hours of operation as stated in the plan

[4:32] of business operation. A a sign permit

[4:34] must be submitted for each sign. Signs

[4:36] must comply with chapter 54 of the city

[4:38] of Hartford Municipal Code. Vehicle

[4:40] parking, one space for each 350 square

[4:43] feet of floor area for retail sales,

[4:45] plus one space for each employee on the

[4:47] largest work shift. Pawn broker

[4:50] secondhand article dealers and

[4:51] secondhand jewelry dealers must comply

[4:53] with the requirements in 320

[4:56] section 3209 of the municipal code of

[4:58] the city of Hartford as applicable.

[5:01] Outdoor storage is strictly prohibited.

[5:03] So after reviewing all this, the plan

[5:06] staff recommends approval of the

[5:07] conditional use permit for secondhand

[5:09] store the city of Hartford's B3 general

[5:11] business zoning district uh with the

[5:13] following conditions. Uh compliance with

[5:15] the building codes, property

[5:16] maintenance, and fire codes. Maintain

[5:19] hours of operation as stated in the plan

[5:21] of business operation. Assigned permit

[5:23] must be submitted for each sign. Signs

[5:25] must comply with chapter 54 of the city

[5:26] of Hartford Municipal Code. of vehicle

[5:29] parking. Again, one space for each 350

[5:31] square feet of floor area for retail

[5:33] sales, plus one space for each employee

[5:35] on the largest work shift. Pawn brokers,

[5:37] secondhand article dealers, and

[5:38] secondhand jewelry dealers must comply

[5:40] with the requirements of section 3209 of

[5:43] the municipal code as applicable and

[5:45] outdoor storage is strictly prohibited.

[5:47] Uh so that is what we are recommending

[5:49] with those uh seven conditions.

[5:55] » All right. So the next part of the

[5:57] public hearing is appearances and favor.

[6:00] Anyone wishing to appear in favor?

[6:10] » Then please just state your name and

[6:11] address.

[6:14] >> 418 Hartford. And I'm here obviously to

[6:17] say that I'm in favor of it.

[6:19] >> Super. Thank you.

[6:20] >> Thank you.

[6:23] >> All right. Anyone else wishing to appear

[6:25] in favor?

[6:28] Last call. Anyone wishing to appear in

[6:30] favor?

[6:32] All right, then we go to appearances in

[6:34] opposition.

[6:37] Second call, appearances in opposition.

[6:41] And last call, appearances in

[6:43] opposition.

[6:45] All right, then I declare this hearing

[6:47] closed

[6:48] uh for discussion by plan commission.

[6:51] And Jacob, I just had a question for

[6:53] you. Uh, did you go over this all with

[6:56] uh the applicants?

[6:57] >> We sent this out to the applicant last

[6:59] week with our with our uh write up so

[7:01] that they were aware prior to the

[7:03] meeting.

[7:03] >> And as far as you know, is everything uh

[7:06] in order?

[7:06] >> We've been in discussion with them about

[7:08] several things. Uh I I believe possible

[7:11] accessory structure in the future or

[7:12] storage. So we have been in

[7:14] communication with them on some of the

[7:15] stuff, but uh again they're they're

[7:18] aware of that.

[7:20] Okay. Thank you. Anyone else questions

[7:23] or comments?

[7:25] >> Tom?

[7:25] >> Yes. Um on the building um and was

[7:28] handwritten. There's a fence that's to

[7:30] the west of the building. Um that fence

[7:33] is that going to be for um additional

[7:36] storage or uh what is what's the uh the

[7:40] reason for that?

[7:46] And so it's uh

[7:48] >> we

[7:49] go

[7:50] >> Jake Jacob will answer first.

[7:51] >> So I don't know for sure what it was

[7:53] for. I believe uh it was for uh

[7:58] I don't think it's for outdoor storage.

[8:00] It's mostly for uh

[8:16] I can't honestly answer what the what

[8:18] that uh fenced in area is for.

[8:21] >> Would you like them to answer since

[8:22] >> Yes, please. Yeah.

[8:24] >> Jared or Patricia, you can come up.

[8:26] >> Yeah.

[8:34] It's for additional selling space to

[8:36] have like outside concrete planters or

[8:40] bird baths or whatnot. We wanted to have

[8:42] a secure place um so people couldn't

[8:45] steal the stuff. Like currently right

[8:47] now we have it all sitting outside in

[8:49] front of our shops. We just more for a

[8:51] secured place. And our hopes were that

[8:53] we could put an out building inside that

[8:57] fence and as well as in back and I think

[8:59] that's part of our packet too. Yes.

[9:02] >> Um, so and they wouldn't be storage.

[9:04] They would be additional selling space.

[9:06] >> Okay.

[9:07] >> I know how your store is now and you

[9:09] have a lot of lot of items out front.

[9:11] >> Yes. And that's our intent to put it

[9:13] behind the fencing area and then an out

[9:15] building if possible, but for sure the

[9:17] fencing area if we could.

[9:18] >> Very trusting.

[9:19] >> Yes, I know.

[9:21] >> Okay. Um All right. Yeah, makes sense.

[9:23] Makes I just

[9:24] >> Okay. Thank you.

[9:25] >> Sure.

[9:28] >> Would go ahead. So, would that become an

[9:31] possibly an issue as far as it being

[9:33] outside

[9:35] selling space as opposed to outside

[9:37] storage space?

[9:38] >> Uh, no. The exterior retail area would

[9:41] not be be an issue. Again, we would ask

[9:44] when we the fence gets approved that the

[9:48] street facing side has uh it it's pretty

[9:51] much going to be uh it's going to block

[9:54] all vision into that so that it kind of

[9:56] takes away from that possible uh

[10:00] aesthetic

[10:02] pos problem the problematic uh kind of

[10:05] issues that you can see with some of

[10:06] that outdoor sales stuff. So, we would

[10:08] ask for more of a privacy fence along

[10:10] the the Sumar Street portion. And then

[10:12] again, the sheds. I think the biggest

[10:14] issue with the sheds is fire code. Uh

[10:17] just because you can't be you have to be

[10:19] a certain distance from a building

[10:21] unless you're going to sprinkler and

[10:22] stuff like that. So, again, it it it

[10:25] becomes an issue.

[10:27] >> Thank you.

[10:29] >> Anyone else?

[10:32] >> If not, I would entertain a motion.

[10:35] >> I'll make a motion to approve.

[10:36] >> I'll second. Motion by Tom, second by

[10:38] Tony

[10:40] for uh sorry, approve.

[10:43] >> I know.

[10:45] >> Approving the proposed conditional use

[10:47] permit to allow for the operation of a

[10:48] secondhand store at 1336 East Sum

[10:51] Street, zone B3 General Business

[10:53] District.

[10:54] >> All right. Any final uh Oh, and uh per

[10:58] the uh seven uh recommendations of the

[11:01] planning staff.

[11:04] Um,

[11:05] any final comments or questions?

[11:08] Seeing none, all those in favor signify

[11:10] by saying I.

[11:11] >> I.

[11:11] >> Opposed? Nay.

[11:13] >> Motion passes.

[11:16] All right. Fifth item on the agenda is

[11:18] discussion and consideration of the

[11:19] proposed architectural review in the CC3

[11:22] downtown core district for First

[11:24] National Bank doing business as Forte

[11:26] Bank at 114 1116 West Sumner Street.

[11:30] Jacob.

[11:30] >> All right. Uh, First National Bank doing

[11:32] business as Forte Bank is proposing to

[11:34] do an exterior renovation of their uh,

[11:37] current 6,620 ft building located at 114

[11:41] 1114 and 1116 West Sumar Street.

[11:46] Uh, this is the location of that uh,

[11:48] right just right across the Johnson

[11:51] Street alley here or not alley but North

[11:53] Johnson Street right across from us

[11:55] here.

[11:57] It is CC2. So this isn't the CC3 is more

[12:01] the business core of the downtown. CC2

[12:04] is the extension of the commercial

[12:06] district specifically along uh the west

[12:09] Sumar East Sumar uh portion of the older

[12:12] part of the city.

[12:14] So this is the existing structure

[12:16] from the southeast

[12:20] again from West Summer Street view from

[12:22] the southwest and then the backside with

[12:25] the uh drive-throughs for the cashiers

[12:31] or the bankers

[12:35] and then along North Johnson Street

[12:37] looking towards uh West Sumar.

[12:40] Uh the proposed M materials are

[12:42] longboard uh 6-in tongue and groove

[12:45] planks, light cherry uh

[12:48] and then uh some other uh I'm not

[12:52] proficient on this, but vintage wood

[12:53] nitana it's an ash and then also using

[12:57] coping uh pack clad graphite as well as

[13:02] uh more of an ash gray.

[13:05] So this is the proposed

[13:08] uh again from the southeast street view.

[13:10] Uh the brick facade is of that planking.

[13:15] The signage we are not covering tonight

[13:17] because signage code is different and it

[13:19] doesn't it that doesn't need plan

[13:20] commission approval for signage that

[13:22] just goes that's interior unless they

[13:24] need to appeal.

[13:26] And then again, uh the renovation on the

[13:29] looking from the southwest street, the

[13:31] renderings there with the planking

[13:36] and then also then the canopy portion of

[13:39] the drive-thru is more of that ash plank

[13:42] wood look to it.

[13:45] So that is what uh is coming before you.

[13:48] Uh again, we're recommending approval of

[13:50] the architectural plan uh in the city of

[13:52] Hartford's CC2 downtown transition

[13:54] zoning district at 11:14 and 116 Western

[13:58] Sum West Sumner Street uh with the

[14:01] following conditions. A sign permit must

[14:02] be submitted for each of the new signs

[14:04] and they must comply with chapter 54 and

[14:06] then maintain compliance with the

[14:08] exterior material standards, which this

[14:09] does. So again, we have no issues with

[14:12] this and we recommend approval by the

[14:14] plan commission.

[14:15] >> Great. Thanks, Jacob. Yeah, I'd like to

[14:17] just say um it's always good to see uh

[14:20] when uh businesses in the city um take

[14:24] pride in in their uh buildings and you

[14:27] know want to keep it you know clean and

[14:28] up to date and and uh like I said this

[14:31] is quite an improvement. Thank you.

[14:33] Appreciate that. Anyone else?

[14:37] If not, I'll entertain a motion.

[14:39] >> I'll make a motion to approve.

[14:40] >> Motion by Dave.

[14:41] >> Second.

[14:42] by Tom.

[14:44] again. Um, oh my goodness. Sorry guys.

[14:49] For the approval of I'm just going to go

[14:52] back to this one.

[14:56] The architectural review in the CC2

[14:59] downtown transition zoning district

[15:00] 114116 Summer Street uh improvements.

[15:04] Any final questions, comments, or

[15:06] discussion?

[15:07] >> Seeing none, all those in favor signify

[15:09] by saying I.

[15:10] >> I.

[15:12] >> Oppos? Nay. Motion passes.

[15:18] All right. Next item on the agenda is

[15:20] discussion and consideration for a

[15:22] special exception for exterior material

[15:24] standards for fire station number two at

[15:27] 1455 Shower Drive.

[15:29] >> All right. Uh we 1455 Shower Drive. This

[15:32] came to us at the last plan commission

[15:34] meeting. Uh looking over the plans and

[15:38] also after what was approved by the plan

[15:40] commission. Uh there will be issues with

[15:42] the exterior material standards under uh

[15:44] chapter 52. Uh to address that, they do

[15:48] allow as you I don't I'm not going to

[15:49] read all of it in the in the packet, but

[15:51] there is an allowance for a special

[15:53] exception. A special exception's

[15:54] different than a variance. There is no

[15:56] need for a hardship. Uh this is just the

[15:59] plan commission and it stops here at the

[16:01] plan commission. doesn't go on to the

[16:02] common council uh to review and see if

[16:04] this is aesthetically pleasing enough

[16:06] and it would work in the surrounding uh neighborhood of of this development.

[16:14] Uh again, part of it if you look into

[16:18] our into the packet, so one of the

[16:21] things that talked about was the

[16:22] prevailing materials used on the

[16:24] building is in the same area. Uh there

[16:26] are two structures currently along uh

[16:29] County Trunk Highway K. uh that are uh

[16:32] that do have uh corrugated metal siding.

[16:36] One being uh 3 3462 County Trunk Highway

[16:40] K, which is Simples Auto Repair. Again,

[16:42] that is in the city of Hartford. It's

[16:44] set back a little bit, but again, that

[16:45] is uh Corrugated Metal. And the other

[16:48] one is 1457 East Summer Street, uh

[16:50] Cherry Auto. Uh that one is a main and

[16:53] that one's right up front in our one of

[16:55] our busiest corridors. uh for that uh

[16:58] this will be set back off of our

[17:00] obviously further down County Trunk

[17:01] Highway K and not visually you won't be

[17:05] able to visualize or visually see it

[17:07] from uh West Summer Street or East

[17:09] Summer Street as you go through the

[17:11] city. Uh and what they're proposing is

[17:14] uh this right here. Again, they're using

[17:17] uh metal paneling to kind of break up

[17:21] the the corrugated metal siding. It's

[17:23] that white um three or six inch uh

[17:27] paneling

[17:29] through there as well as then on the

[17:30] fire station two uh number is that u it

[17:34] is a metal clad but it it it has that

[17:37] simulated wood look which breaks up that

[17:39] uh corrugated metal siding. as well as

[17:42] you also have which you don't see with a

[17:44] lot of commercial developments is you

[17:46] see glass garage doors on fire stations

[17:48] which again really softens up that uh

[17:52] south facing or west facing uh portion

[17:56] of the fire station number two.

[17:59] And again, this is how it looks from

[18:00] that other angle.

[18:02] that wraps around to that one two

[18:04] windows there uh along the main uh

[18:07] administration administration portion of fire station number two. So we at

[18:12] this time planning comm or uh planning

[18:14] staff has no issues with the the

[18:17] granting of a special exception to allow

[18:20] uh for uh the the curricade metal

[18:23] paneling as presented.

[18:26] Since you're here, Tony, did you want to

[18:27] say anything or

[18:30] >> I think uh Jacob nailed it. But this

[18:32] also is the provision to not uh provide

[18:35] the masonry min.

[18:37] >> Correct. Correct. Yeah. And no masonry

[18:38] minimum.

[18:39] >> The masonary facade is out.

[18:41] >> Yeah. Okay. Yeah.

[18:42] >> Yeah. Okay.

[18:43] >> All right. Thanks, Jacob. Uh no, I I

[18:47] tend to agree with it, especially with

[18:48] the other two buildings um that's

[18:51] already there and and getting hammered

[18:53] on the budget. So,

[18:55] >> uh, anything else from commission?

[18:59] >> If not, I'd entertain a motion.

[19:01] >> I'll make a motion.

[19:02] >> Motion by Tony.

[19:03] >> Second.

[19:04] by Dave

[19:08] to approve the uh

[19:11] special exception for the exterior

[19:12] material standards for fire station

[19:14] number two, 1455 Shower Drive. Any final

[19:18] discussion or comments?

[19:20] >> Seeing none, all those in favor, seeing

[19:22] nobody by saying I. I

[19:24] >> oppose. Nay. Motion passes.

[19:31] » And item seven on the agenda, discussion

[19:33] of a subdivision concept plan for Winter

[19:36] Park Builders LLC.

[19:38] Jacob.

[19:39] >> All right. Uh the because this one is

[19:41] not an actual item and there's more of a

[19:43] back and forth, we do have the

[19:44] developers here so we can have

[19:45] conversation back and forth with them.

[19:47] It's not like your typical uh plan

[19:49] commission agenda item because it's

[19:51] solely discussion. Uh so again, Winter

[19:53] Park builders, uh they're looking to

[19:55] build on uh these there's three parcels.

[19:58] Uh the one parcel is split by uh West

[20:01] State Street and then the one far

[20:04] southern parcel there that's highlighted

[20:06] with the 18 in it, that is the HADC,

[20:09] City of Hartford uh own parcel. uh as

[20:13] part of this uh as we move forward, we

[20:15] will be looking to reszone this at our

[20:18] next plan commission meeting and moving

[20:19] on to common council as this project

[20:21] moves forward. So again, there's we had

[20:24] received no comment from any of the

[20:26] other departments, engineering, fire,

[20:28] police, water, electric or sanitary. Uh

[20:31] again, the HADC, City of Hartford parcel

[20:34] will be reszoned in in October here. Uh

[20:37] and the only really environmental issues

[20:39] here is there are small patches of

[20:41] wetlands. Um again any type of

[20:44] development near those will require uh

[20:46] wetland delineation for them and any

[20:49] applicable permitting through uh the DNR

[20:52] to if they they look like they're

[20:54] relatively small if there's going to be

[20:55] any fill. I don't think they're Army

[20:57] Corps. They're not connected to the

[20:58] Rubicon River in any way. So I I don't

[21:01] foresee them being waters of the nation

[21:03] of the United States of America, more

[21:04] waters of the state type of scenario.

[21:07] And then uh there are no flood planes

[21:08] located on these three uh parcels that

[21:10] we have to worry about. Uh so again uh

[21:13] from a planning perspective uh we don't

[21:15] have any issues uh

[21:18] looking at it uh based off of what we

[21:22] had prior when we created TID 14 for

[21:25] this parcel uh or as part of this uh as

[21:29] part of this development that to go with

[21:31] the DJS uh we had around 600 units of

[21:35] dwelling units at about close to 100

[21:38] acres. So that comes out about 61 units

[21:40] per acre. Uh, and this is a mix of

[21:42] single family as well as villas, uh,

[21:47] town homes and then also multif family

[21:50] apartments.

[21:51] And then I'll pull up the

[21:57] PowerPoint from the developer.

[22:06] And this was the prior uh layout. It's on the side.

[22:12] Again, north is facing that way, but

[22:15] this is kind of how it was planned out.

[22:17] Uh just north of uh West State Street.

[22:21] And again, this is the portion that will

[22:23] most likely or it's actually the south

[22:26] the southern portion of West State

[22:27] Street that'll be developed first and

[22:29] then moving along to eventually this way

[22:32] to the to the north.

[22:35] and Scott can fill in if any more.

[22:38] >> Hi, Scott Simon with Winter Park

[22:41] Builders. I just wanted to come in front

[22:43] of you to see how you felt about the

[22:44] development, what you were thinking for

[22:47] the future. I know this is part of your

[22:49] planning area. We've been working with

[22:51] staff for over a year now and we've been

[22:53] working with Tom and with um everybody

[22:56] else trying to see what the best fits

[22:58] would be. We started with the basis of

[23:00] working off the Tracy Cross report that

[23:02] was done for you in 2024

[23:05] and a lot of our product is based on

[23:07] what they had recommended.

[23:09] What we have now is just a regular

[23:12] drawing showing you where things are

[23:14] going to be. We're going to be closing

[23:15] on the parcel at three separate times.

[23:17] So, um, based on our most recent

[23:19] discussion with staff, they had said

[23:22] that there is the greatest need for

[23:23] multif family now. So, we're probably

[23:26] going to try to push that forward when

[23:27] we were going to keep bring that at the

[23:29] end. Wanted to see if you had any issues

[23:31] with that. And the pictures that he's

[23:34] taking past you now, if you go back one,

[23:36] please. That's what our ranch villas

[23:39] will look like. There are between 1,400

[23:41] and,600 square ft. And there's three

[23:44] different floor plans and exposures if

[23:46] needed. If not, that's sort of the

[23:48] baseline. If you want to go on to the

[23:50] next one, those are our it's three-story

[23:54] town homes. They're called terrace

[23:55] residents for us cuz they're two in a

[23:57] building. So, it's just again the type

[24:00] of feel we're trying to bring and we

[24:02] wanted to make sure that that was good

[24:03] with you.

[24:05] >> No, I thought they they looked very good

[24:07] and I know you guys uh had challenges

[24:10] with that site and uh um trying to make

[24:13] these things work uh isn't always easy.

[24:16] Um I'm assuming that was the case.

[24:19] >> Part of it. Yes.

[24:20] >> Yeah. Well, thank you. Appreciate that.

[24:23] Anyone else? How many units to the

[24:25] multif family?

[24:26] >> We're looking at 200 of the apartments

[24:28] plus or minus. Um the two other people

[24:31] I've talked to about doing it with are

[24:32] about 150 to 180. We're looking at a

[24:36] portion that would be single family for

[24:37] rent and town home for rent as well.

[24:40] Again, not definitive numbers, but no

[24:41] more than 100 is what we're thinking

[24:43] right now. Um single family

[24:45] approximately 100. Ranch villas just

[24:47] over that. And the town homes are the

[24:50] terrace homes just over that.

[24:52] and Jacob, there wouldn't be an issue

[24:55] with um I guess developing the

[24:59] multifamily portions before the single

[25:02] family portions would there.

[25:03] >> I I generally like doing multif family

[25:05] first because once you got the single

[25:07] family in, no one ever wants to multif

[25:10] family coming in next to them. So that's

[25:12] usually why I like multif family first.

[25:13] >> Good point. Sure.

[25:14] >> Yeah,

[25:16] >> there you go. Just a question for you,

[25:19] Scott. As far as the the terrace

[25:20] terraces here, from a parking

[25:23] standpoint, do they have their own

[25:24] parking? Do they have are they parking

[25:27] on the street or how does that work?

[25:28] >> Every unit has a two-car garage along

[25:30] with a 24T pad behind it. So, each one

[25:33] can take four cars and they're rear

[25:35] loaded off of an alleyway for appearance

[25:37] as well.

[25:38] >> Excellent.

[25:39] >> Yes,

[25:40] it's good.

[25:42] >> Anyone else?

[25:42] >> Good.

[25:43] >> I think they look great.

[25:45] >> No, it's uh

[25:46] >> they look really good. Yes, looks great,

[25:49] Scott. We we appreciate the work you've

[25:51] put into this and uh of the ones that

[25:54] have come before us, this one is looking

[25:56] very very good. So, appreciate it.

[25:58] >> Thank you. And thank you for your time.

[26:01] >> Thank you.

[26:03] >> Um and at this point, I I see you just

[26:06] have this marked as discussion,

[26:07] >> correct? Yeah. Uh so that there won't be

[26:09] any action as

[26:11] >> No, it's just feedback for the developer

[26:12] to go back and if they have to change

[26:14] anything in their in their designs or

[26:16] any number changes that you'd like to

[26:19] see or anything like that or uh it is

[26:21] also going in front of the common

[26:22] council the conceptual at the at the

[26:24] next common council meeting.

[26:26] >> Okay. Um and I'm sure you went over this

[26:28] and if you had any issues I I would have

[26:31] thought you would have brought them up

[26:32] by now and

[26:33] >> we would had Yeah, we would have brought

[26:34] them up already.

[26:35] >> Sure. Super. Well, no. Well, appreciate

[26:37] it again. Thank you. Uh, so then on to

[26:40] item eight, uh, adjournment.

[26:42] >> Make a motion to adjourn.

[26:43] >> Motion by Dave,

[26:45] >> second by Tom to adjurnn. Any final

[26:47] discussions or comments? Seeing none,

[26:49] all those in favor signify by saying I.

[26:51] Oppose. Nay. We are adjourned.

Planning Commission / September 14, 2026

Transcript