Planning Commission Meeting September 1, 2026

Lassen County, CA · · More Lassen County, CA meetings · More California meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT

This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.

These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:04] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America,
[0:09] and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation
[0:13] under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[0:26] » Mr. Paul, are you up?
[0:31] I want a second.
[0:35] It's a meeting.
[0:37] Remove. Oh, you haven't got the remote though.
[0:41] » I >> It's all new to me, sir.
[0:44] » Can we start over? >> Mhm.
[0:48] One second, I'll take a look.
[1:02] Okay. Okay.
[1:05] Commissioner Gigli? >> Here.
[1:07] » Commissioner Clark? >> Here.
[1:09] » Commissioner Askew? >> Present.
[1:11] » Commissioner Solomon? >> Here.
[1:13] » You said that Commissioner Porter is absent. He called in, you know, he was
[1:17] going to be absent.
[1:21] » Any other update on zoning activity? >> Well, one update is uh that we the the
[1:26] Board of Supervisors met about uh remote access to the meetings. And as
[1:31] you can see on the agenda, we included language for remote access. And there's
[1:36] a link up in the agenda on our website, so people can click on it and go to the
[1:40] remote access. There's also language that if
[1:44] uh you want to submit comments, it has to be in person or written comments in
[1:48] advance of the meeting. There's no mechanism for the public to be able to
[1:51] talk through the remote access. And there's a disclaimer that if broadcast
[1:56] is interrupted for any reason, the meeting will proceed in person.
[2:00] If there are any new items on the agenda, I also want to let
[2:03] you know that we went to on Skyline Road to the Board of
[2:07] Supervisors last week, and the board approved it unanimously.
[2:11] So, it's approved with conditions.
[2:20] I think that's all the update.
[2:24] Are there any other issues raised by commissioners?
[2:29] » Yes, it's a matter of our June meeting when the recycling
[2:33] the new recycling center was created. So, then I did not vote for it
[2:38] anyway. My husband and I were driving down
[2:40] Johnstonville Road, and I noticed that the recycling center
[2:44] on Johnstonville Road is for sale.
[2:48] And I said to him, "Well, wouldn't that wouldn't that have been a way that they
[2:51] bought right there? That would have been an improvement for that."
[2:55] The neighbors would have all been upset. And I thought, "Well, too bad."
[3:00] And um then a couple weeks later somebody
[3:03] approached me and said the Ingram's
[3:06] grant for that recycling center
[3:09] was written for the Johnstonville Road property. In fact, they had it in
[3:14] escrow. And then at some point changed gears and
[3:17] moved out to the property beyond the CHP. Anyway,
[3:21] I think that's information we could have used.
[3:25] I know that your interest was to table it
[3:29] and to learn a bit more. And I don't
[3:33] we can only make decisions on the information that we get. And I certainly
[3:37] didn't know that, and I asked one of the supervisors, they didn't know anything
[3:40] about it. We've got a group of poor people who are
[3:45] on their bikes and walk out to that recycling center, and I don't think
[3:49] they're going to make it out to the highway
[3:51] by the CHP. I think that's sad.
[3:54] And um
[4:00] it's sad. Um
[4:05] Anyway, just wanted y'all to know that. Could
[4:08] have gone a different route, but Oh, that's what I wanted to say is that when
[4:12] the new one opens, when the new one opens, is that one
[4:16] going to survive? I would I would recommend it doesn't.
[4:22] » I think they will be owned by the same person or someone else could come in
[4:26] there too.
[4:30] It was Johnson Road. Johnson Road is what it
[4:35] » It was Johnson Road. >> Something like that. My arrogance is
[4:38] that right there.
[4:40] Yeah, yeah. Yeah, my arrogance is where where Stein is. Stein is It's Stein is
[4:44] there. >> But anyway, um
[4:47] » I mean, we could have had a nice improvement update on something that
[4:50] would not upset anybody. >> I don't think it's up to the planning
[4:55] department to explore things like that. That is
[4:58] » Well, we didn't have any information on the the the building application that we
[5:03] get is the one we have to process. So, when we get an application, it's brought
[5:08] to the to the planning commission. We had
[5:12] I don't know if that would have made a difference in the processing of the
[5:14] application that was submitted to us cuz that was
[5:18] what was submitted was brought to But uh I did not know any have any
[5:22] information on the recycling center Johnson Road or whatever that
[5:26] Yeah. >> It it could have
[5:30] Oh, that's terrible. >> It had a great fit for that location. It
[5:34] would have just been so much better for everybody.
[5:37] Anyway, just wanted to put that out there.
[5:40] » Um I have an item
[5:43] as far as uh received a uh
[5:46] email from Dana Hawkins at the time part of that concerning
[5:51] California associate.
[5:55] After Joe Clark that's coming up on October
[5:58] 23rd, 24th.
[6:01] Is there any provisions for any of us to >> I thought there was uh four there's
[6:06] enough budget for one representative to go. I would propose the chair as the
[6:10] chair. Um we have to have funds in our budget
[6:13] to be able to do that. And consulted with our fiscal officer and
[6:17] with the CEO and there was
[6:20] sufficient funds where we could do the travel authorization
[6:25] if you wanted to attend. >> Um is there anyone else that would like
[6:30] to attend? Council Foster.
[6:34] » I'm still looking at my calendar.
[6:41] » Hopefully put these during the holidays. >> [laughter]
[6:51] » I probably would. >> Okay.
[6:54] » If you do want to let me know and we can make the do the travel authorizations.
[6:59] Things we need to put in the budget. >> Good point.
[7:02] » Good point.
[7:09] » Okay, correspondence. Which one is
[7:13] I think Presentation by staff. Any other
[7:16] presentations?
[7:21] The minutes that were provided with the October 4th August minutes.
[7:26] » August 4th. >> August 4th minutes.
[7:31] It says August 4th. >> Yeah.
[7:37] » I think we can approve the August 4th minutes. Do we have a second?
[7:44] Second. Mr. Beatty
[7:46] Looking good.
[7:51] discussion All those in favor say aye.
[7:55] opposed Motion carried.
[8:04] This time we will open up to our meeting to
[8:08] items of pertaining to discussion from anyone in our audience. Uh from
[8:14] here on we will continue with our meeting.
[8:19] Seeing none. Our next resolution in line for adoption
[8:23] is 19 21 26.
[8:30] For our first item public hearing use permit uh 226-004
[8:39] Albrad.
[8:49] » Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Commissioners. My name is Matt Goetz,
[8:52] and I'm the senior planner with the Planning Department.
[8:54] Today I'll be presenting on lease termination number 2026-004.
[9:02] The property being Green Valley Enterprises at all, and it being
[9:06] Caltrans.
[9:13] Proposal for a non-public utility line for transmission of electricity and one
[9:17] legal parcel parcel multiple APNs necessitating right of way acquisition.
[9:23] Project site is zoned UCAP, upland conservation and agricultural preserve
[9:28] combining district, and is designated extensive agricultural in the Lassen
[9:32] County General Plan. Is there
[9:37] Project site is along Highway 395.
[9:41] It's approximately 4 miles north of the city.
[9:45] This is a minute site by the county and that's adjacent to the
[9:48] subject parcel.
[9:52] August 16th.
[10:00] Then we have a vicinity map of the area showing the project site and listing the
[10:05] hands as well as
[10:08] those transmission lines in red.
[10:12] You see where it's at in relation to the highway.
[10:22] The ordinance for application Lassen County Code Chapter 18.102 use permits,
[10:27] which states in part under section 18.102.035
[10:32] that the Planning Commission shall have the authority to approve condition or
[10:35] deny the use permit application.
[10:38] Lassen County Code Section 18.102.020 B2
[10:43] allows [clears throat] for public utility lines for transmission or
[10:46] distribution of electricity in all districts within the approved district.
[10:54] Project is exempt from CEQA under section 15061 B3 of the CEQA guidelines.
[11:03] We have a list of some of the conditions of approval which will also
[11:10] If anyone has a question regarding the application.
[11:18] » So, I I wanted to just point out the section that Matt cited. Caltrans is not
[11:22] a public utility, so we have a section in our zoning code which Matt just cited
[11:26] that says that non-public utilities when they have electric distribution lines,
[11:31] the transmission lines, that it requires a use permit. So, since they're not a
[11:34] public utility, often that section is applicable to Caltrans, and they
[11:39] indicate such in their packet as in their letter as well. But, that's why
[11:44] I'm reviewing it as for that line for the right-of-way acquisition.
[11:49] So, that's typically why it's there.
[11:55] » Another question, um why are they putting this new electric
[11:59] uh electric line? >> It's for
[12:02] lighting. Yeah, for the stations.
[12:25] » So, that part of it on the what they're displaying, what they're showing,
[12:30] that's within their jurisdiction. And within their jurisdiction, it's the
[12:33] right-of-way acquisition.
[12:37] » Uh I didn't pick that up in
[12:42] But, Caltrans is not Was it which is not so
[12:47] Uh probably not. The
[12:51] The owner had to sign up on the application.
[12:54] Uh but, uh they'll have to have an easement as well, which they'll have to
[12:57] execute. But, uh But, I've I've not had any indication
[13:01] that
[13:04] They just need to speak.
[13:07] So,
[13:29] Okay.
[13:32] » This time we will open up the public hearing portion on this item.
[13:36] If anyone in favor of this document, please come up to the left turn.
[13:45] Being no one here, open up the doors of all.
[13:49] Close the door.
[13:52] Please step up to the left turn. Thank you, Gary.
[13:59] Being no one coming forward, we will close the public hearing
[14:03] on this item. Back to the board for further
[14:05] discussion.
[14:13] No further discussion, we'll entertain a motion.
[14:25] I make a motion to uh
[14:29] » Uh disapprove this preliminary application 2026.
[14:39] » Okay, we have a motion to disapprove the proposal
[14:45] before us. Do we have a second?
[14:51] Second. The motion will
[14:56] It's not on the meeting. Okay. Motion to approve or not.
[15:01] Proposal.
[15:11] » Motion to approve it. Do you have the the number here? Which is what? 2026
[15:15] 108. >> Yes.
[15:19] It's uh the resolution number 9 201 6.
[15:29] We have a motion to approve the proposal. We have a second?
[15:38] » I got I got to go to the
[15:40] the minutes
[15:44] The issue was given since the district the district
[15:49] They actually think that I was in the district.
[15:52] So you can divide the money You know like that.
[15:57] First of all, I didn't even do the land acquisition
[16:00] and there was any issue in the way. That was one
[16:04] thing that was clear so
[16:11] If and granted it was a high priority job
[16:15] I'm very familiar with this location. I'm driven
[16:20] every time
[16:25] It can be a you know a little hostile it is in the winter time.
[16:29] But it's good.
[16:32] My biggest thing is you know it's over here.
[16:36] Um potential for
[16:40] causing a fire there.
[16:43] Look up side right here. So
[16:49] I'm going to get some down through the storm.
[16:53] I would put it in
[16:55] I would appreciate it. This is the risk I
[17:00] it's on. It's worth it.
[17:03] It's laid out. You know if it was something where it
[17:06] was underground mines and
[17:10] it would be a place to store but it's just the way it looks to me right now.
[17:27] » So you're responding to a motion that's on the floor.
[17:32] Sit there for a second. You have a motion on the floor from the
[17:36] commissioner of finance. Proposals.
[17:41] Second again.
[17:49] Thank you, Mayor O'Brien.
[18:00] So.
[18:03] You have a motion and a second. Proposals.
[18:13] Proposals in favor.
[18:19] Opposed.
[18:23] Mr. Terry, Terry.
[18:27] Three to one. Um
[18:29] that's the only item on the agenda.
[18:34] You have a motion on the floor. I would like to make a comment.
[18:37] We've been sitting on this board for over 15 years. Occasionally we will
[18:42] disagree.
[18:45] You know, Gerald and I disagree on items and you know
[18:49] disagree We can agree to disagree, so to speak,
[18:54] but I'm glad we brought out those
[18:56] disagreements of the board.
[18:59] Hopefully that uh I don't know if it's going to take or
[19:03] whatever. Talk to the public.
[19:07] Something that uh appreciated by the public. I appreciate
[19:11] the from the public.
[19:15] But, uh with that, uh it's
[19:19] a day and we'll entertain a motion to adjourn.
[19:25] » To clarify, you don't have to. >> Okay, we don't have to have an emotion.