[0:04] I got it. Got it.

[0:09] You're so awesome. Thank you so much. What was the trick?

[0:13] » You don't know.

[0:25] » Yeah. SC down. That's my

[0:57] You >> all set then?

[0:58] » Yeah. >> All right.

[0:59] » Sorry delay, technical problems. I'll call the meeting to order. It is like uh

[1:04] 6 5:45. Um, third order of business is the

[1:09] minutes from last meeting. And I did have one change.

[1:15] Um, line 218.

[1:24] » Can we can we do um the third parcel is owned by a trust managed by

[1:33] Helen Brandt.

[1:42] Anything else? >> I'll make a motion to approve the

[1:45] meeting minutes of July 27th. Second. >> All those in favor?

[1:49] » I I'll make a motion to approve the nonpublic meeting minutes of July 7th.

[1:56] Second. All those in favor?

[2:28] Next on the agenda, public library proceedings are here to talk about

[2:34] Bansson expansions project and uh request for some CIP funding.

[2:41] » Um so I had the opportunity last week to meet with a couple of trustees and the

[2:49] architects. Uh through that meeting we discussed the process. Uh basically what

[2:56] the process boils down to is uh the trustees have chosen an architect

[3:05] architect who will find us to enter into a scope of work which is in the memo for

[3:11] you. That scope of work is a feasibility study and conceptual design for uh a

[3:18] project at the library yet to be determined. Uh the scope of that work is

[3:25] $34,700.

[3:28] This would be the initial evaluation to determine

[3:34] exactly what needs to be done at the library to meet needs going forward.

[3:42] As part of this process, um, the

[3:47] architect will put out an RFPRFQ for construction managers to get a

[3:54] construction manager on board. Uh, sooner than later, it would find

[3:58] understanding through the conversation with the architect that the construction

[4:03] manager would be at risk so that it would be no investment to construct the

[4:08] manager when they came on board. Um the construction manager would

[4:15] provide an estimated cost of the construction for the feasibility and

[4:21] conceptual design based on a price per square footage. Um and it would not have

[4:29] a definitive number until la later on in the project. the

[4:36] architect felt comfortable that it would be close enough to be able to have bond

[4:42] funding. Uh if this project were to go forward, what would happen next is the

[4:48] architect would hold some public input sessions to hear what citizens have to

[4:55] say um in advance of going to the 2027 warrant.

[5:03] If it passes at the 2027 warrant, uh, from that point, next step would be

[5:09] to sign a contract with the architects to secure construction grade documents,

[5:19] which would allow the construction manager to go ahead and secure the subs

[5:25] to be able to build the additional renovation. Um, as noted in here, the

[5:34] project is estimated

[5:38] based on the cost provided from the architect at

[5:45] $31,700. However, when you look at uh section six

[5:51] of the standards, terms, and conditions of the agreement, um there is also a

[5:57] line for reimburseables. My conversation with the architect, he felt that $3,000

[6:03] would be sufficient for reinable for this phase of the project. Therefore,

[6:08] the trustees will be looking to leverage $34,700

[6:13] from the library building capital reserve fund to be able to perform scope

[6:18] uh service provided for the feasibility and conceptual design of the project.

[6:26] You do have in the packet as well uh what the selection process would be for

[6:32] the construction manager. Um and I think you can answer questions.

[6:40] » Do you know the correct balance? >> Um yes I did have it. It was about

[6:46] $90,000.

[6:56] I think it says >> yeah it right here.

[7:03] » Oh, I see it. Yeah, I missed it for a second. Sorry about that.

[7:07] » Did you turn that mic on?

[7:11] » As of December 25 and the newest another 10,000.

[7:20] » Great. Thank you.

[7:51] Did the trustes have anything else they wanted to present to us before?

[7:57] » No, we just want to make sure you read over the proposal

[8:01] thoroughly from the architect and

[8:06] uh on the on the on his scope of service. This is Jason Mcome from FM

[8:14] his scope of service um where he's going to help us choose a

[8:21] construction manager. I asked him about the cost for that. He

[8:26] said it would be in the single digit house

[8:31] for the construction manager. And when we consulted with him and interviewed

[8:36] him, he strongly recommended a construction manager because they can

[8:41] help us establish budgets and help us stay on budget.

[8:47] He Jason McCome has been involved in many many library additions and

[8:54] renovations. So, um, if you could work on that, truck

[8:59] manager would be very helpful establishing a budget and helping us

[9:04] stay on. But so, I have a question for you folks.

[9:10] When when we hire a construction manager and construction manager invoice comes

[9:18] to, we come before you again for those funds from the CIP budget.

[9:25] That's a little bit down the road, but uh would that be the process?

[9:29] » Normally structure manager is a flat fee. There'll only be one in one.

[9:35] » She's talking about where the fun's going to come from. So they would come

[9:38] out of CIP. >> So we've got money in there.

[9:42] » Yeah. Every request for CIP funds doesn't come

[9:46] before this board initially. Um

[9:52] if if we say to move forward with this project um it would be wise to let us

[9:58] know ahead of time that the construction management going to cost X amount. I

[10:03] that will get brought back to the board and if there's any issues we might ask

[10:07] some questions but but typically the the uh CIP you know capital expenses are

[10:15] spent and then we approve them u afterwards that they came out of the

[10:20] right account they for the right purpose okay once I once I I see one

[10:28] hire construction man >> yeah you don't have to come back to

[10:32] necessary. Okay. Yeah. But do we come back to you for the funding? No, you

[10:39] would Carol would submit that as CF request. Okay.

[10:43] Uh then the other question I had um we had is on u SNP's proposal on the back

[10:50] page work that's not included in the proposed is an environmental study

[10:55] hazardous material assessments archaeological study and an NHS field

[11:01] historic 106 review is there a way to know or to determine

[11:06] in advance if those studies are >> what's the date of the area bridges

[11:15] » the dates 1905 well probably 1920 at that location

[11:20] » in all likelihood we've got lead paint there in all likelihood I'm not saying

[11:23] we do but we have probably lead paint there and probably pipes in those days

[11:30] and coming forth probably till the 50s yeah late 50s as covered a lot of the

[11:37] piping there so we may have asbestous there has so I mean That's something

[11:42] that you know we could probably get Mr. will to take a look at and uh excuse me

[11:48] and you know let let us know I mean it's a simple test take some chips of paint

[11:54] get the states to take a look at them the same with his best correct Sean

[11:59] » I would assume that was done when the >> 1996 was when the addition was done I

[12:04] think that was done during that time would we have records for that yes

[12:09] » it probably would be here somewhere

[12:15] you're off the spot. >> Also, um Jane has been very helpful

[12:21] emailing me, keeping me informed, uh helping me on this huge learning curve

[12:28] for me and some of the other trustees about this process. He did ask about a

[12:33] survey, a land survey. thought she meant another kind of survey

[12:38] and we have one for the community to fill out. Um, so

[12:45] I guess is that a question for the architect?

[12:49] » Would the planning board be the one that might request that?

[12:55] » The planning board may request that as part of site plan review, correct?

[13:05] But they may not have them. If there's a certain 96 that

[13:12] should be bought. It's it

[13:16] some people have used the tax maps for you know non

[13:22] unsigned non nonprofessional sorry. And I know that like if if you're way off

[13:30] with the setbacks and all that, it can be accepted, but I think this is going

[13:35] to be a tight lot. You may be approaching the setback and and the tax

[13:40] maps aren't accurate enough to make that determination. Um hopefully there's a

[13:47] there's a survey done back in 96 or at some prior you know development of the

[13:56] library which could be here. I did some files. I'm just trying to give you all

[14:01] » the things that you potentially could come in so we could help you with it as

[14:05] much as I the library has very small

[14:11] piece of property. The rest of the property around it is fire department.

[14:17] » Yeah.

[14:23] » To the fire department closest to their property

[14:30] 96 edition at the library to the little square. Your addition isn't on the fire

[14:36] property and they want you're going the other way with this one.

[14:39] We're we're probably going to go out into the park back. So that's all fire

[14:44] department.

[14:48] Well, that's I mean we're already don't have enough space for the fire. So that

[14:56] makes the

[14:59] nervous.

[15:06] Well, we were taxpayers. I don't know if they're gonna

[15:14] if they do, would they keep this as a second location?

[15:21] » I I I get it. No, that was my my dream for that to happen. But that all that

[15:30] property behind us, the parking lot, that's all parking lot. Jim, have you

[15:35] had a conversation with fire chief here? >> Had a preliminary conversation with

[15:39] Chief Webly

[15:43] concerned about the amount of real estate they have. We

[15:47] did discuss this when we spoke last week. Um that there are concerns about

[15:53] where this addition is going to end. However, when we talk with SP and please

[15:59] correct me if I'm wrong. Um, the architect also stated he doesn't know

[16:05] until he gets in there and actually does a space means analysis

[16:09] what exactly the addition is going to be. uh to which you know maybe it's a

[16:16] reconfiguration of the existing footprint to better utilize the space

[16:21] and maybe it does require an addition where that addition plans uh the

[16:26] architectility

[16:29] that feasibility space needs conceptual plan

[16:38] » thank you very curious how

[16:47] just a couple of my thoughts in that number one instance

[16:52] the fire department space is pretty limited the way it's set up right now as

[16:58] far as expansion >> however if cross street became a dead

[17:03] end right where the boat is up into the back

[17:08] of the fire department in the back of a library.

[17:12] The end of that road and the adjacent town owned parking area

[17:17] could be reconfigured to absorb any fire department expansion.

[17:23] » Oh, I see. One way off of Maple Street. >> Yeah.

[17:27] » Make that a dead end. They have to still access the first

[17:34] parking lot. But so long as it was accessed there, any sufficient furnacing

[17:41] so they could go out. Um anyway, I I think there's some work

[17:47] around with those. >> Yes.

[17:50] » I guess one of my questions is the the the terminology of how when to hire the

[17:56] construction manager. Um I think bringing him on board to establish

[18:03] a a a an accurate budget is a good idea. Um it it looks like this that he's there

[18:09] though for the uh uh the public input process and and

[18:18] some of the other things that I'm not sure they're needed for. And again, I

[18:24] know that said that their their cost was estimated to be under 10,000,

[18:30] but I don't know if you're bringing him on right at the beginning or do you need

[18:35] him? Do you need him or her to decide what you want to build? Um or or can you

[18:41] go to them after the arguments with with the the architects um ideas of what

[18:50] the group wants? >> That's the question.

[18:56] He uh even if we didn't add on to the building

[19:03] but did some renovations in the building, it's still a cause

[19:07] construction cost and construction manager would help us along

[19:14] those lines.

[19:18] So even when we're discussing what is going

[19:23] to be built, where how big, even those initial discussions be

[19:29] strongly recommended a construction manager.

[19:33] So further than that, I'm not sure I can fully answer.

[19:39] » Okay. Um but was that >> that's typically the architect's job.

[19:45] The architect is going to come to the public meetings, not not the notic.

[19:52] Okay. It did. >> Yeah.

[19:55] I don't want to micromanage your process. I'm in favor of this. Okay.

[20:00] Sound good? >> Right.

[20:03] » That's that's uh the architect's next step in in the process is to and and

[20:09] it's a bit of a process. we um we will end up with a short list and we

[20:16] would interview them. The trustees would and Carol and Jason would be present for

[20:22] the interviews if the active. So uh so far he has um he attended a

[20:32] kickoff meeting and a programming discussion. He sat with Carol and Tisha

[20:36] and talked about needs and wants faith. uh teacher sitting in a little corner in

[20:42] the children's room and could use some storage space. So he knew all the

[20:47] questions to ask because of his experience with the library. I sat on it

[20:51] and then he has um measured the conditions of the existing buildings but

[20:56] we don't have the documentation yet that he will come up.

[21:02] So we're we're barely in step two on a scope of services.

[21:13] I would just add the construction manager, the construction manager really

[21:18] is not going to be coming on board until step 17, which is 17 or 19 uh just

[21:24] before the third public engagement session, which that's going to put us

[21:31] if everything goes really smoothly uh in time frame for budget for. So, I I think

[21:39] that the way that they have it played out is is about accurate. It's going to

[21:44] take them a little bit of time to get the RFP out interview, but I I think

[21:52] that it is in alignment with what I've seen in the past.

[22:00] » Okay. Thank you. Any other discussion?

[22:09] Um, we want to have a motion as far as um approving.

[22:17] Again, we're not approving the contract. That's up to you, but approving funding

[22:21] for the CIP for this month. >> Yes.

[22:25] » Yes. Want to make that motion? >> I will make that a motion. Yes.

[22:28] » 34. Yeah. 34. Yes. All right. All those in favor?

[22:36] Thank Thank you all for your time and a special thank you to you Jim. Thanks for

[22:41] doing that memo for us that was very helpful.

[22:49] » Thank you for having us. >> Yeah, thank you. Thank you. Welcome to

[22:53] all the excitement.

[22:57] Is there going to be

[23:05] Oh,

[23:15] » next agenda name change.

[23:23] You hold the hand. I'll take care of this.

[23:36] How you doing? I'm good. >> Can you turn your microphone on for us?

[23:40] Thank you.

[23:45] » Thanks. And thanks for responding so quickly. Uh sent in a request. I

[23:50] recently purchased a property on a very small road in North Lincoln called

[23:56] Partners Court. Uh the street u basically has one house

[24:02] on it. Uh the the street does hook back around behind

[24:08] where John Landry had his landscaping business and there's a big cell tower up

[24:14] there. There's also an empty lot that at one point had a trailer on it.

[24:20] Potentially it could be used at some point in the future. Uh when I went to

[24:26] look at this property

[24:30] five different homes to go look at one of them was s

[24:34] I continued to go to Parker Street instead of Parker.

[24:39] Uh so then I had to call the realtor and find out where the heck he was. And it

[24:46] turns out that's a common problem that uh package deliverers have

[24:54] three screens in Lincoln all with the name Parker

[24:59] Parker and Parker. Uh and there's Parker Motel. Um uh say

[25:08] it's adding someone concerned about having confusing names uh for purposes

[25:14] of not just convenience problem my case but um so first

[25:21] responders responding to a firearm alert you know maybe maybe they go to my go to

[25:28] the parker's court address instead of going to Parker Street was 10 minutes an

[25:33] ambulance firefighter uh

[25:38] by so uh I thought it was important that put in this request uh come up with a

[25:49] different name that avoids the confusion. Uh I was even away for a week

[25:54] and a half. Somebody was watching the house had broken windshield

[25:59] uh and they left the car in the driveway. She didn't get a call

[26:06] repair company that's saying where's your car they were on Parker Street.

[26:15] It's pretty clear that we need the trains today.

[26:19] There's a lot of good options. I think there's a lot of public sentiment in

[26:23] favor names like daily drive Robinson Road and of course Ham Highway.

[26:34] So,

[26:39] uh, so talked about it a little bit with kind of it's the it's one of the closest

[26:46] properties to right across the street

[26:52] maybe half mile directly is Liberty. Um, and uh, Liberty

[26:59] View would be great already. Liberty road liberty cabins

[27:05] used to the name Liberty uh be nice to have create the same problem we have

[27:11] now. So uh I u thought about red view

[27:18] has potential names u my understanding of reading the rights

[27:24] power and the decision from us for this. So uh bring this up see what information

[27:33] process he wanted to do and based on what I see the property being I would

[27:39] say you know Landri's uh uh business of what Parker Courts

[27:47] back around but he he uses the route three address

[27:53] um when he goes pretty much just his

[27:59] that >> have you talked to Donnie about it?

[28:02] » I I haven't talked to him about specific needs

[28:05] » but about changing but I I would I would uh

[28:13] would like to request final.

[28:20] » What about the cell tower? Does that have an address on board? You know, I

[28:25] don't know what the cell power does. >> Well, that would be important because if

[28:28] there ever is an outage, you know, we would want to know somebody that's going

[28:33] to fix the outage, we would want to know where they have to go,

[28:36] » right? And obviously, I think talking with those people, talking with Donnie

[28:42] and you know being I think under the conversation we have to have a public

[28:46] hearing on this. >> My understanding is you don't

[28:51] » I don't object to one. this.

[28:59] » I like your suggestions. Ridgel line for skyline views. There is a ridge view

[29:06] um of the village. >> Anyway,

[29:10] » yeah. >> Okay.

[29:11] » Yeah. If the village is a bridge view, but your suggestion was ridge line

[29:18] view. >> Yeah. I actually kind of changed that to

[29:22] sky skyline.

[30:00] Parker Road is at the end of Cor Street. It's the the service road that

[30:08] that goes into there's one

[30:13] » from Parker Street is at the end of Parker Parker Road. Take a right. It

[30:17] goes up national forest access road street because it is on

[30:23] the access to

[30:35] I know

[30:39] my other question is without the mobile phone there

[30:44] is there a reason this can't be you know

[30:48] » 342 341 I guess be on the outside of US

[30:55] » well it is possible be something on there

[30:59] own that line he was considering putting something

[31:04] there this year has it worked out we do have uh reciprocal

[31:11] rights to use I have the right to go seven

[31:16] court has the right to go up and around uh the landing building and has the same

[31:24] right of way to use the rest of the streets.

[31:27] » Okay. So, so >> it does

[31:31] multiple multiple laws. Okay.

[31:36] » He's he is concerned that he does build a

[31:40] trailer there that with the vehicles he has

[31:46] might not

[31:57] the legal address for Tomy's place in 749 US right that

[32:04] address is not court as far as the town goes

[32:19] This is green screen. I'm sorry. 7.9.

[32:24] » Okay. >> This one

[32:27] is >> but in order to access that still come

[32:30] up here. >> So the legal address is that

[32:34] » right? I mean, not that I'm just being here

[32:39] with with two properties on it be wise to rename it rather than I

[32:45] want to try to make it a number of people. Um

[32:49] I mean I don't have any favorite thing. Obviously we don't want

[32:55] I don't want to use you know wedge or anything that's that's

[33:01] » a duplicate moment but you said sky view is nothing else. Skyline. Sky view.

[33:07] Either one. >> Skyline.

[33:09] » You had skyline view. I think sky whatever skyline view

[33:15] » just means sky views along side

[33:20] » do skyline drive

[33:27] skyline sky view is fine. >> Yeah.

[33:31] Um you are going to talk to before you do anything. Yeah.

[33:36] Once you've done that, you'll find

[33:40] us the cell towers address. >> It is that US route three.

[33:47] » It is safe. >> Correct.

[33:50] » Yeah. I wasn't a big fan. Somebody suggested cell tower

[33:57] tower.

[34:00] So effective change.

[34:07] So, are you all right if I reach out just to confirm

[34:12] that it compies with their regulations and then have their next meeting

[34:20] my understanding change the name? >> Yeah, it has to be compliant with their

[34:27] standard. So, and what they're going to do is make sure there's nothing exactly

[34:31] what we're running into here that is similar

[34:35] problem. So, if you like I get that te up with them and make sure there's no

[34:42] conflict

[34:46] you >> want to talk to Donnie about that just

[34:49] verify. Yeah, verify and then once you get back to Jim then check with um

[34:58] » just yeah cover the basis that I'll send out on the road

[35:09] next

[35:13] own property right next to me even though

[35:19] They are so I'll just let them know

[35:25] from the panel that we discuss.

[35:31] » Okay. >> Perfect.

[35:37] I mean the state is the other. >> That's right.

[35:55] Thanks. >> Thanks, Jerry.

[36:15] Next, next on the agenda is an question. Really just a Okay. Yeah, I'm requesting

[36:25] my sister.

[36:29] She really wanted to uh So, this is the common land under

[36:34] Wooden Loop that was up for deed earlier this year. We got a deep waiver for it

[36:38] and I reached out to the town's legal council and to the tax association legal

[36:44] council and talked with a few other collectors in the area and then Becky

[36:48] and I kind of tried to trace the lead and went through a a good point that was

[36:53] brought up and I was consulting with the other tax collectors is how did they get

[36:56] a permit to continue building those unit?

[37:01] So I was like that's a good point. I traced it back and what we'd come up

[37:05] with between Becky and I either this happened, this transfer happened

[37:11] August 18th, so Becky would have been here less than a month at that point. So

[37:15] either it was an error on her part or she missed it where it said in the deed

[37:20] an undivided interest in all common land also transferred.

[37:24] But she also pointed out on the assessing side of it that that land

[37:30] valuation was being absorbed into those units as they were built, but the bill

[37:34] that we were sending to New Jefferson school base was not going down. So in

[37:39] either case, this was an affecting issue.

[37:42] Uh I think it's RSA 1714. I put it in the packet.

[37:48] » At that time, we didn't even have an assessment a lot. So it could have been

[37:52] Yeah. I mean I feel like this kind of perfect storm something somewhere

[37:56] slipped. Um but that RSA states that if it is an issue, it must be caught within

[38:04] the same year in order to rebuild the new owner. So we don't really have any

[38:09] reports. Um but the good thing is that land has all been absorbed as of today.

[38:14] So that's back on the tax. Um it's just a matter of

[38:21] them.

[38:24] » Right. Right. Yeah.

[38:29] » All right. And then the total paid is 4327.

[38:36] » Yeah. So that's all uh original tax bills and then fees and costs associated

[38:43] with noticing and we may have to 23 24

[39:05] » there won't be any more next in the future because

[39:10] correct. So that land has all been so

[39:17] thank you. That was kind of a pain. That was a lot. We really did a great

[39:28] ladies. Bye bye.

[39:38] All right.

[39:41] » Um, just a few things. Um

[39:48] with me uh 534,26.98

[39:57] 40 471,561.71

[40:01] of that is uh the weekly manifest that contains two bond payments one with the

[40:08] police station one other so that's why that is as high as it is

[40:15] uh payroll um total for payroll is 49,17166

[40:26] and payroll tax liability is $13,4285.

[40:32] So that's your manifest for the week. Uh we've been working. We actually have our

[40:37] first uh CIP meeting tomorrow. Myself planning and the fire chief up. It

[40:44] shouldn't be too bad, but we've been doing a lot of studying and reviewing

[40:48] and understanding CI documents that process. Um I was able to reach out and

[40:55] coordinate what I was hopeful was going to be an attorney for the

[41:00] tip district. found out today unfortunately that he has a conflict

[41:05] that he's not going to be able to represent us. So I reached out next one

[41:10] on the list of birds. So hopefully I'll have something about that in the coming

[41:17] week. Um and the planning department I can sit

[41:23] here and say has been uh very much inundated the past couple weeks with

[41:29] workload. Um, one of the things that we are running into that and I'm going to

[41:34] have more of a presentation for you at the next board meeting on it. U so

[41:40] Dailyaly had asked previously about life safety uh at Airbnbs and whatnot. We're

[41:48] getting a lot of uh code questions coming into the office relative to

[41:54] building code and etc. Um so I am hopeful that for next week or in two

[41:59] weeks um that I can have a little more information for you based on select

[42:05] daily previously requested item about air fees. Um short of that um

[42:13] that's what I have for you at this point on how managers report uh I did also

[42:20] have a conversation with Jay and I attended a lot of borders grant meeting

[42:27] um with one country council we're in fairly good condition as far as

[42:33] one country council is concerned and the northern borders are concerned

[42:39] for the selfie water tank project. However, um because of that project and

[42:47] we haven't mobilized for construction yet, we are not able to apply for any

[42:53] additional grants through northern borders which the window is open right

[42:58] now. So hopefully next year we will have been able to expend those funds and

[43:05] we'll be able to apply grant funding. uh one of the areas that uh they talk about

[43:12] it next year we're still in what they describe as distress area uh sewer pump

[43:19] station very good project you know that sewer pump station needs attention um

[43:24] and name is working to program some engineering products to tackle that

[43:33] project a little bit so that's what I have for you in

[43:40] Thank you.

[43:47] » Thanks. Yeah, Sean. Um, we brought to the board's attention from a few weeks

[43:50] ago some pictures of a tower that had rotted boards. Um, and I think we gave

[43:57] cease and desist of allowing any people to go up there. Has that been corrected

[44:03] to the best of your knowledge? >> No.

[44:06] » Okay. You see, you haven't heard back from them. So, to so it's not being

[44:11] utilized as an observation. They're not using it right now. U they

[44:17] did open and uh Mike went up and told them that the it's

[44:25] on stay shut until get a structural engineers review on it.

[44:33] So, that's where it stands as far as I know right now. Any

[44:38] update, Ryan? Yeah, I can said more or less the same thing.

[44:44] » Go to the Jill's office.

[44:49] » Thank you. Um, Mike was waiting on the third party

[44:56] to review it, the engineers to review it.

[45:01] » I don't know if you guys saw the picture. Yeah,

[45:04] » I was assuming it was a simple uh replacing the boards thing, but no, it's

[45:09] not. >> I don't think so myself because a lot of

[45:13] fasteners are backing out gaps. >> Okay.

[45:16] » Um I see quite a bit of pressure treated across the street. Uh it looks like

[45:21] they're probably going to make a serious attempt to fix it, but uh that's not me

[45:25] to decide. >> Gotcha.

[45:30] » Thank you. Thank you. One other issue, Jim. In one of the

[45:36] reports, uh the water systems that are being attacked around the country, we

[45:43] said we're at non-compliance in one area. What was that?

[45:52] » Security. >> Yeah. Um

[45:56] so we are having our system evaluated to ensure that we meet cyber security

[46:02] requirements as outlined by state and federal law to

[46:08] ensure that we are not subject to any kind of a

[46:14] terrorist attack on our water cyber terrorist.

[46:24] So we're doing an evaluation just to comply with state standards, federal

[46:29] standards. Correct. Thank you. >> Does the state do that the investigation

[46:34] or the private company? >> The state has a third party.

[46:38] » Okay. >> Firm that comes out and performs that.

[46:44] » Yeah. so that everybody in the state is given that

[46:49] same evaluation performed by the same firm uh to ensure that we're compliant

[46:56] with standards. >> Thank you. I was advised in that meeting

[47:01] that we are considered extremely low risk but that doesn't

[47:07] mean that there's no risk. >> Right. Right.

[47:10] » Thank you.

[47:14] So >> okay then I'll open up for um public

[47:19] participation

[47:32] » then I will close public participation and we will move on um nonpublic. Yeah,

[47:39] I got one item that I would like to discuss with you in publication.

[47:45] » Reputation. All right. Um, I'll make a motion.

[47:50] » We go to

[47:57] a long conversation.

[48:03] » Okay. >> Well, it might be. You need to talk to

[48:05] me. I can have them. >> Okay. Um, these two guys are actually

[48:18] » Okay, I'll be right back.

[48:24] » Ryan, thank you. >> It's always like right. I think I

[48:28] figured out

[48:38] um okay we'll get that

[48:57] Take away two blond payments.

Lincoln NH Select Board Meeting 08 10 26

Transcript