Agenda
Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
[0:07]
>> It is 5:30 p.m.
[0:08]
And I will call the Public's Works Committee to order.
[0:11]
Roll call.
[0:13]
All members are present.
[0:14]
Next on the agenda is public comment
[0:16]
and we have no one in the gallery for public comment
[0:18]
and we have one person online.
[0:20]
Anyone else for public comment?
[0:23]
Second call for public comment?
[0:30]
Third and last call?
[0:32]
All rights.
[0:32]
I will close public comment.
[0:35]
Presentations com I don't believe we have any.
[0:38]
The consent agenda.
[0:41]
Do we have anyone that needs anything
[0:44]
removed from the consent agenda or do I have a motion?
[0:47]
>> A motion to accept.
[0:50]
>> Second.
[0:51]
>> A motion and a second.
[0:53]
Is there any further discussion?
[0:55]
All in favor?
[0:59]
>> Aye.
[1:00]
>> It is approved unanimously.
[1:02]
We will move on to our discussion action items and we
[1:04]
will start with 26-0789.
[1:08]
Ordinance to amend 13.010 solid waste recycle --
[1:13]
waste recycling and disposal.
[1:17]
>> We had a request from the Fire Department.
[1:20]
When you change your oil and car you can drop off your waste
[1:24]
and they will recycle it?
[1:25]
We had a request from them to see
[1:27]
if we can move it to the DPW.
[1:31]
They don't really have the people to sit and watch it.
[1:36]
Parking became an issue.
[1:38]
And it makes total sense to us actually.
[1:41]
We don't have any issue with it but it
[1:43]
does involve an ordinance change as you
[1:45]
can see with the attachment.
[1:47]
Moving it from the public safety building to the public Works
[1:50]
building.
[1:53]
Our overhead door and we do have cameras there.
[1:58]
If anything were to happen, we could see on the footage.
[2:02]
It would only be from 7 a.m.
[2:03]
To 3 p.m.
[2:04]
When it is staffed.
[2:06]
We would recommend approving the ordinance change.
[2:10]
>> Okay thank you.
[2:14]
>> I will make a motion to approve.
[2:16]
>> I just want one quick thing.
[2:18]
For the benefit of anybody listening out there in TV land,
[2:23]
like Dan said, the hours are 7 a.m.
[2:27]
To 3 p.m..
[2:28]
Correct?
[2:29]
>> Yes.
[2:31]
>> If you need to dump oil until 3 p.m.
[2:33]
Until 9:00 at night, you can go to either advanced --
[2:36]
excuse me --
[2:38]
AutoZone or O'reilly Auto Parts.
[2:41]
They both accept waste oil up to varying amounts.
[2:44]
See the store for details.
[2:46]
Okay.
[2:47]
We have a motion from Alder.
[2:51]
Do we have a second?
[2:52]
A second from Alder Anderson.
[2:54]
Any further discussion?
[2:56]
Seeing none all in favor?
[3:01]
>> Aye.
[3:02]
>> The motion is approved unanimously.
[3:03]
Moving on.
[3:06]
>> I will send them the first signatures.
[3:08]
Sorry.
[3:09]
And then next up, 0780.
[3:14]
>> Yes.
[3:15]
This is the transit development plan we've been working on
[3:18]
and we will be bringing it back in October
[3:21]
because we will be asking for rate increases that
[3:25]
are reflected in the plan.
[3:27]
We're not asking for action tonight's.
[3:28]
We want to get it as an attachment
[3:32]
because it is a literally 100 page document
[3:35]
and it'll give you guys a month to review it
[3:37]
and if you have any questions.
[3:41]
You got it for October.
[3:45]
>> We will place this on file.
[3:48]
And we will move on.
[3:56]
>> 0779, municipal financial agreement.
[4:01]
State-Municipal Financial Agreement (SMFA) for Waldo Blvd
[4:04]
- Fleetwood Drive to I-43
[4:04]
.
[4:05]
Go ahead Greg.
[4:07]
>> Didn't we just do this?
[4:09]
The part that we're looking at.
[4:13]
It's already been six years ago and they're not looking at it.
[4:19]
They say they're looking at funding it for 23 for.
[4:30]
They had sent that to us and they are basically saying they
[4:33]
had put on a two inch -- that typically lasts two to 10 to 15
[4:38]
years.
[4:38]
It's right around the 2030 mark we're looking at.
[4:45]
The 2034 mark that we're looking at.
[4:47]
All we have to do is pay the portion of the design cost.
[4:50]
It's just looking for a committee to approve.
[4:53]
Start working on the design.
[4:54]
I'm sure that'll take a while since it was not
[4:56]
coming up for a while.
[4:57]
It'll be over a couple year period
[4:59]
probably that they'll be working on it.
[5:07]
The statement municipal agreement with the dot.
[5:16]
>>
[5:20]
>> Discussion?
[5:21]
>> I realize the dollar amount the city would be in for is
[5:23]
relatively small compared to the cost of the overall project.
[5:26]
Since we're talking it'll be so far out,
[5:29]
as their likelihood that'll change when we do get to it?
[5:35]
>> I don't think -- well let's see.
[5:37]
I don't think so.
[5:39]
But I thought it said that it was.
[5:51]
We just saw that it was not to exceed.
[6:10]
Priority plan development is capped at two 20,189 so I
[6:17]
don't think that they can.
[6:18]
At least they can't without coming back to us
[6:20]
and asking for approval for more.
[6:22]
It just makes sense for prices to go up over time.
[6:25]
>> Before talking 2034.
[6:28]
>> Yeah I know.
[6:29]
This kind of just came in the last week or so.
[6:31]
And just put it on here.
[6:33]
I don't know if they hired a consultant or not.
[6:35]
It'll probably be a while before they do go on.
[6:39]
We just thought we got it and I thought we'd bring it forward.
[6:42]
>> Thank you.
[6:49]
>> I will make a motion to approve.
[6:55]
>> Do we have a second?
[7:02]
>> Was originally part of the plan initially when it was
[7:04]
getting redone all the way from R to a Maritime.
[7:09]
It was actually pulled out during the design phase.
[7:13]
When they decided to do the overlay.
[7:16]
I'm surprised they actually brought it back this quick so
[7:19]
that's a good thing.
[7:22]
>> They did overlay that part and they have to do it again.
[7:31]
That's a good thing.
[7:33]
For the design portion.
[7:36]
>> All right.
[7:36]
Any further discussion?
[7:37]
All in favor?
[7:42]
>> Aye.
[7:42]
>> It's approved unanimously.
[7:44]
I will send that for signatures.
[7:45]
Next up on the agenda.
[7:49]
0777.
[7:50]
Resolution for street lights for Abbey Ridge Subdivision phase
[7:55]
two.
[7:58]
Who wants this one?
[8:01]
>> I can take it I guess we got actually come in the next three
[8:06]
are very similar.
[8:09]
We have to do each one with the motion
[8:12]
and make each one separate.
[8:14]
But um, they're all for the roadway
[8:16]
lighting for various developments.
[8:18]
The subdivision for those two states for fir and juniper court
[8:22]
that are going in.
[8:24]
And then deerbrook crossings.
[8:26]
That's an extension of Deerbrook drive up there.
[8:29]
And also the Abbey Ridge.
[8:32]
That is where the developer is fronting or contributing.
[8:56]
I don't know why but they are all pretty similar.
[9:08]
So I guess we're looking to have you
[9:11]
recommend the approval of the resolutions pending staff.
[9:16]
>> Finalization.
[9:17]
>> Yeah it's on the cover page.
[9:20]
>> So I guess we're just looking to have that >> All right.
[9:24]
We'd be looking for recommendation
[9:25]
to approve pending staff finalization.
[9:27]
Do we have any discussion from the committee?
[9:30]
All right.
[9:32]
Seeing none I will ask for a motion.
[9:35]
I would like a motion to approve?
[9:38]
>> Second.
[9:40]
>> Okay.
[9:40]
Anderson a second and in that order.
[9:44]
All right.
[9:45]
Any other questions?
[9:46]
All in favor?
[9:50]
>> aye.
[9:52]
>> The motion passes unanimously.
[9:53]
Let's set that.
[9:56]
As mentioned, we also have 26-0776 Resolution for Street
[10:04]
Lights for Mariner's Lux Subdivision
[10:06]
, under the same conditions.
[10:07]
Any discussion?
[10:09]
Seeing none, I will ask for a motion.
[10:13]
>> I can make a motion to approve.
[10:15]
>> Second.
[10:16]
>> Anderson and--.
[10:20]
Sounds like a colony team.
[10:24]
All in favor?
[10:27]
Aye.
[10:28]
The motion passes unanimously.
[10:30]
Same item.
[10:31]
Dear book crossing subdivision under the same conditions
[10:35]
and circumstances.
[10:36]
Any discussion on this one?
[10:39]
Seeing none, I will roll the question all in favor? aye.
[10:49]
>> You need a motion.
[10:50]
>> Oh come on I need a motion?
[10:52]
That's right.
[10:56]
Okay.
[10:57]
Once again.
[10:59]
Any further discussion?
[11:02]
All right.
[11:03]
All in favor?
[11:08]
>> aye.
[11:10]
>> There we go.
[11:10]
There were no previously tabled items.
[11:12]
And the last thing is we need a motion for an adjournment.
[11:16]
>> So moved.
[11:18]
>> Second.
[11:19]
>> A motion and a second.
[11:21]
We are adjourned.