[0:20] costly.

[0:28] » But like

[0:31] Yeah, it ruined our secondary water system.

[0:45] » Yeah.

[0:50] [clears throat]

[1:02] Okay.

[1:12] » Beautiful.

[1:15] [laughter]

[1:24] So, it is 5:31 and since we don't have a mayor, we need to elect a mayor proamp.

[1:31] Kelly, are you ready for us to be okay? I'd like to nominate

[1:37] uh David Burton for mayor promp. >> Better him than me. I second it.

[1:43] » All in favor? I I >> I

[2:23] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. >> Call the Carin City Council meeting to

[2:30] order. It is now. >> Can you turn on your microphone or put

[2:34] it to your face? >> What is that? your microphone.

[2:38] » Nobody can hear me. >> Okay, it's August. Do I need to start

[2:43] over? >> No.

[2:44] » Okay, it's August 27th and it is 5:33

[2:49] p.m.

[2:53] Okay. Do we have some opening ceremonies,

[2:57] » Michelle? >> Okay. Our opening ceremonies will be

[3:00] given by Council Member Toppam. Our

[3:18] father in heaven, we bow our heads before thee this day to ask a special

[3:21] blessing as we come together as a city council and a community. Please bless

[3:27] that we may be able to go through these agenda items with respect to one

[3:32] another, hear everyone out and make the decisions that are best for our city. We

[3:38] are also so very thank thankful for all of the moisture that we have received

[3:43] and pray that we can continue to receive

[3:49] what you think that we need. And we are so very thankful for this beautiful

[3:53] community that we live in. And I say these things in the name of Jesus

[3:56] Christ. Amen. >> And amen.

[3:58] » Please stand.

[4:02] » I pledge alce to the flag of the United States of America and to the

[4:10] stands one indivisible.

[4:21] » Thank you, Council Member Toppam.

[4:27] Are [clears throat] there any conflicts with anyone on the council tonight with

[4:32] anything on the agenda? >> No.

[4:35] » No. >> Thank you. Hearing none, we will now

[4:41] proceed with public comments. Is there anyone that would like to give

[4:47] a comment on something that they have in concern with the city that isn't on the

[4:53] agenda that they'd like to bring forth at this time?

[5:02] Well, seeing none, we will move to the consent agenda. This

[5:08] is regular items that are approved by the council regularly. Items six and

[5:14] seven. Six is the M minutes from the special work meeting August 13th

[5:20] and the city council meeting on August 13th of 2026 and the warrant register

[5:26] for August 27th, 2026. >> Mayor, I move to approve consent agenda

[5:34] items six and seven. I'll second it.

[5:38] » Okay, it's been moved and seconded. Approve the consent agenda. All in

[5:42] favor? >> I

[5:43] » I any Excuse me. Any opposed? Okay, the consent agenda passes.

[5:52] We'll now move to the action agenda number eight,

[5:57] which involves a temporary alcohol event permit for September 19th, 2026 for

[6:05] Sweet Pea Farm and Orchard DA Olrich, owner. I propose that we uh grant the

[6:13] temporary alcohol event permit for September 19th, 2026 for Sweet Pea Farm

[6:18] and Orchard uh Daich owner.

[6:24] » I'll second it. >> It's been moved and seconded that we

[6:28] approve the temporary alcohol event permit for Sweet Pea Farms for September

[6:32] 19th, 2026 for Dao Ultridge Oldrich, excuse me. All in favor? I

[6:40] » I >> I

[6:41] » Any opposed? Motion passes to approve the alcohol

[6:46] event permit. >> Uh item number nine, consider proposed

[6:52] zone change for parcel A-0026-000027-0000

[7:01] from A1 to R2. Dan, do you have a presentation on that?

[7:08] Um I don't we did discuss it last um last time in the work agenda um in

[7:14] detail. So I don't have anything planned to presentwise but I can certainly

[7:18] answer any questions. The uh the uh um property is in front of you um

[7:26] for the zone change request.

[7:31] So is there any discussion?

[7:38] Is there someone to answer questions? >> Okay. [clears throat]

[7:44] Um, listening to a lot of uh citizens uh

[7:49] both in the green area and the the little squares on the top of the page on

[7:56] the left. Um, do you know where I don't know if this proper to ask or

[8:03] not, but they've been asking I don't know. Um, do you know where the first

[8:09] street would go through to exit that property?

[8:13] So, [clears throat] there's going to be, excuse me, going to be the roadway on

[8:18] the north north end the 100 north would be the first roadway to go in and it

[8:23] also connect to the two roadways to the north as well. So there'd be three

[8:26] points of access >> like right off the bat.

[8:31] » Right off the bat, you can see the phase line in the middle [clears throat] right

[8:34] at the north end of the first one.

[8:40] » So 100 North and their their plan [clears throat] is

[8:45] to connect it to the existing roadway on 100 North,

[8:52] » but that road's not built yet. No, it's it ends just in front of that property

[8:58] over in the Aspen Cove subdivision. >> Yeah,

[9:01] » there's a a little line right there where the asphalt ends. You can see that

[9:05] kind of a dotted line. It would continue to that point.

[9:09] » So, it' exit there and roll down to 775 west

[9:14] » and then 660 north. >> Okay.

[9:16] » So, that's one access point. Then the other two roadways going northward would

[9:20] be the other two access points. So the two at the top of the page. Okay.

[9:30] » Is that property secured that's off from what is that on 100 north through that

[9:38] Aspen Cove subdivision right there where it joins. There's a little strip that's

[9:43] not owned by them, but they've been talking to the owner and she's and

[9:48] they've been agreeable to part ways with it and allow the roadway

[9:52] to pass through. >> They're agreeable in what way?

[9:57] » To allow the purchase to happen and let the the roadway pass through. And

[10:02] nothing's happened. The zone change has to happen first before they finalize

[10:06] agreements and see if everything will work out.

[10:12] So the two exits, the concern that citizens have and also

[10:19] myself is the two exits going to going north [clears throat] with our new 42

[10:27] well 60 foot rideway and 42 foot asphalt and actually rolls into those streets.

[10:35] Do you know how wide those streets are? The asphalt part

[10:40] Uh right there at the top it would be 42 feet wide.

[10:47] » Well, I mean >> asking on the on

[10:49] » going into that property. Oh, to the north.

[10:52] » How how wide those streets are? >> I don't I I can't tell you. I know it's

[10:56] it's built for what was standard when when it was built. Their concern is

[11:02] they're substandard roads um with no curbon gutter um and they're

[11:07] approximately 28 feet of asphalt. My last measurements. Yeah. So that's

[11:14] those are the my concerns.

[11:23] Well, and my concern is that that property hadn't been secured yet for

[11:27] that other access. It's just a tenative agreement.

[11:33] » We're not considering the subdivision though. We're considering a zone change.

[11:37] » So, [clears throat] they can develop it as it sits as an R1 with a few less

[11:41] houses or lots. The question is is whether R2 or not.

[11:47] » Okay.

[11:54] » Well, I'll make a motion for discussion that we leave it at an R1.

[11:58] It is an R1. >> It's an A1 right now.

[12:00] » A A1. >> Yeah,

[12:03] » that was an R1 when they bought it, right? Correct.

[12:06] » So, we were here a few city councils ago when it was going for R3. And at that

[12:11] time, it was recommended by the city council to make go to R2, which is why

[12:15] we're back here requesting the R2.

[12:24] So, to answer your question, Lyall, it's it's currently zoned as an R as an A1,

[12:31] » but if they want to do a subdivision with the current zoning, it will it will

[12:38] treat it like an R1. Does that make sense? They don't have to reszone in

[12:42] order to subdivide >> an R1.

[12:46] » It will be treated like an R1. >> Yeah. So, an R1 and A1 are basically the

[12:50] same >> when it comes to development. Yeah.

[12:52] » Okay. And they were trying to get the R3,

[12:56] which is the same, if I'm not mistaken, it's the same as the neighboring

[13:00] subdivision. They're trying to go for the same zoning. So now we're doing

[13:04] something a little less dense than what's neighboring. It's it's a

[13:09] development.

[13:12] » I just think the citizens around their main concern is like the density

[13:17] of it and putting all of that traffic through.

[13:21] And this is not your fault. like their substandard roads, you know, putting all

[13:24] of those homes and everything through their

[13:28] through their subdivisions. >> That's I think that's the main thing.

[13:35] Correct me if I'm wrong you guys, but like the phone calls that I've come that

[13:39] I have fielded is like they would like not to see as dense as it is around.

[13:48] Uh, I'd like to ask Dan a question about density. What's the difference in your

[13:54] calculation of density from A1 to R2? Um, the difference is [clears throat] in

[14:02] the lot size for single family residences.

[14:08] Um,

[14:11] if if there's R2, so their proposed subdivision is single family residences.

[14:15] Obviously, they could change it and do do something else with twin homes or

[14:20] something. From a single family resident standpoint, if these parcels were were

[14:27] at the minimum of 7,500 square ft, um it would be one thing. The the reality is

[14:34] is the parcels average probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 82

[14:39] 8,300. There's parcels that are close to R1. They're almost 10,000 square feet.

[14:45] There's a bunch of parcels that are larger than 8,000. There's a few parcels

[14:50] that are smaller, just smaller than 8,000. 78 78 78. And um these

[14:57] [clears throat] are the smallest ones on this right side.

[15:00] Um these parcels, there used to be four here. Now there's three. So, um,

[15:05] anyways, my point is is they they're getting 35

[15:10] parcels in the subdivision laid out. They could go smaller, but

[15:15] that's the way they've laid it out with parcels about that large. So, if they if

[15:19] they if we don't approve the zone change and it stays A1, they're basically going

[15:24] to have to force them to do 10,000 square foot lots instead of like 80,

[15:30] whatever the average is of all those. I ran the math figuring that see if it

[15:34] averages about 8,200 it basically means um a couple less lots

[15:40] like in the neighborhood of I don't know four or five lots less but effectively

[15:46] it's going to look pretty similar um if you just if you add up the acreage

[15:54] divided by 35 then divide it back out by 10,000 um it instead of 35, it's

[16:02] probably, I don't know, 28, 29. I don't know. I'm not not laying out their

[16:07] subdivision. I'm just trying to do raw math. So, you may squeeze a little bit

[16:11] of density out of there, but it's already not as dense as it could be

[16:14] under R2. That's my point. >> But that's under their [clears throat]

[16:19] proposal now. But it could be denser. I mean, there is the possibility of that.

[16:25] So, if they were to come back with a with twin homes, twin homes uh require

[16:30] 10,000 square feet for both homes to sit on, giving you effective density of

[16:37] 5,000 square feet per lot is the maximum. Um, obviously that's more homes

[16:42] in there than this. Um, so yeah, theoretically it could come back with a

[16:48] different thing and be 5,000 square foot per residential unit.

[16:53] Okay, we have a motion to leave it at A1 with no zone change, but we I don't

[17:00] believe we had a second. >> I second it.

[17:04] » Okay, we have a motion in a second to leave it as without zone change is A1.

[17:11] Is there any more discussion?

[17:16] And all those in favor of the motion on the table, please say I.

[17:23] » I. >> I.

[17:24] » I. >> Any opposed?

[17:28] » I. >> No. I'm I.

[17:33] » Excuse. What was your vote, Council Member?

[17:35] » It was a no vote. No. >> Okay. So, three to one. So,

[17:40] » no. I voted with the rest of you. >> Oh, you vote I.

[17:43] » I voted I. I just >> that's why I asked for clarification.

[17:47] I'm sorry. So >> the vote was unanimous. So there will be

[17:52] no zone change. It'll remain A1. >> Okay.

[17:58] » Thank you. >> Thank you.

[18:04] Uh the next item for business is item number 10. Consider cooperative land

[18:12] realignment, road dedication and property exchange agreement with Lance

[18:17] Shotwell relating to parcels A-491-

[18:23] 0491-00002

[18:26] and a-492-000014-0000.

[18:33] Okay. [clears throat] Is there any presentation on this?

[18:39] » Yeah. So, we did have a conversation about it. Gave a pretty good

[18:42] presentation last time just moving forward to work. I mean to action, but

[18:48] I'm wondering if anybody had I I did show the

[18:52] the diagram last time, did I not? >> Yeah, you did.

[18:55] » Um and and and explained it. I just wondering if the council has any um

[19:02] has any questions um on this before we start down the path of all of the steps

[19:08] to do this. At the end, of course, the council will have the option whether or

[19:11] not to trade the property. We've just got to do a lot of work to massage it

[19:16] and abandon roads and and define new roads and redraw property boundaries in

[19:22] order to make it happen. And we just need to have an agreement as we start on

[19:25] that process. So, You're not agreeing to trade the

[19:29] property yet. That's the last step. >> Yeah.

[19:33] » I'll just say I talked to Dan about this a couple of times because I was

[19:37] concerned and I support this. I I I looked at all the different situations

[19:44] and all and the the reasoning and and what would the city would gain and

[19:50] versus and what would be resolved. And so I I support this exchange.

[20:06] Well, I'll move to approve the cooperative land realignment road

[20:10] dedication and property exchange agreement with Lance Shockwell relating

[20:14] to the parcels that were stated. >> I'll second it.

[20:19] It's been moved and seconded that we consider cooperative land realignment

[20:24] road dedication and proper exchange agreement with Lance Shotwell relating

[20:29] to the parcels as stated. All those in favor

[20:33] » I >> I

[20:34] » I >> I

[20:35] » any opposed it vote is unanimous. So,

[20:41] » Kelly, I'm going to send it back to you. >> It is approved to consider this land

[20:46] exchange to proceed anyway. Okay. Uh we will now go to the work

[20:53] agenda which involves I guess we go right to

[20:58] reports. So, I don't know. Council member Topham,

[21:04] do you want to start? >> I would love to start. All right. I I

[21:08] attended a theater board meeting. They talked about um all of the people who

[21:12] are booking the theater. It seems like we've got a pretty good list of um

[21:18] events and things that are happening in the theater with like a homeschool

[21:22] academy and Beacon Academy and such. Um one thing that I do want to put out to

[21:26] the public is that we're having a really hard time finding people that want to

[21:30] direct plays in Peruan. Um, and so as of right now, we don't have another play

[21:36] that is scheduled for this year that's put on by the community theater board.

[21:42] So if you are somebody who would like to direct a play or anything, get with me,

[21:48] get with Jet Smith, get with Jennifer Terry. Um, we'll get you on the

[21:53] uh theater agenda and we will talk about it. There are a few for the following

[21:58] year, like for 2027 and even in 2028 that we're going to do, but there's

[22:02] nothing for the remainder of this year. So, um, that's sad. So, I just want to

[22:09] shout that out there. So, >> hopefully we can get some people.

[22:13] » So, that could change if they >> It could change if somebody

[22:16] » just didn't realize that they could do that. Maybe. Um, I know Shelley Porter

[22:22] has reached out to all of her contacts and and such and she's coming up dry, so

[22:28] we need some good people who want to direct some plays.

[22:32] » Okay. >> Anything else?

[22:35] » Um, no. >> Okay. Thank you, Council Member Barton.

[22:41] » Uh, yeah, just an update. We were able to attend the UMS. Uh Ronnie rode up

[22:47] with me for a couple of days and Dan and Jeremy were there and couple of

[22:52] takeaways. We are short short of power and short of transmission lines moving

[22:58] forward into the next years and there's a lot of good ideas to solve a lot of

[23:04] those problems. But it's going to take a lot of work and it's going to be an

[23:08] uphill battle. But the thing I was amazed about was how well received Dan

[23:13] and Jeremy are. They're very wellliked and and respected

[23:18] through those channels. So, I think we got a we got great people in there.

[23:22] » Were you more surprised that I was wellliked or Jeremy?

[23:25] » Well, Jere I was Jeremy. I was like everybody knows him, hugging on him and

[23:28] like respect. I mean, not that I was surprised, but it was just

[23:32] » it was just neat to see. [clears throat] >> There's a lot that Jeremy does on the

[23:37] various boards of the various projects and he's a he's a chairman of of a of a

[23:43] UMP's board. That's really important. It takes a lot of administrative stuff to

[23:48] be involved in Uamps and Jeremy carries the lion share of it. He he really does.

[23:55] A lot of cities, they will pay a former mayor or former city manager or somebody

[24:01] that was involved for years just to keep current with everything going on with

[24:06] you Amps. And we're fortunate to have Jeremy do that. He does a great I agree.

[24:11] I will say that we need to protect him because everybody up there wants him

[24:14] back or wants to get him. So anyway, >> I I can veto his retirement or his being

[24:22] poached. I I tell him that all the time. Okay. Thank you.

[24:27] » Anything else? >> That's it for me.

[24:30] » Council member Dean. >> Uh planning and zoning was cancelled. So

[24:34] I had it pretty easy for the last two weeks.

[24:38] » That's it. I don't have anything. I think Dan's

[24:42] going to cover what I, you know, as far as the water. So,

[24:47] » yeah, I've got a few things. Um, first thing I'm going to start with, um,

[24:52] hopefully good news. Uh, next Thursday, um, we will be we're on the agenda for

[24:57] CIB to go up and ask and make our presentation for um, hopefully grant

[25:03] funds for the library. Um, hopefully they'll give us grant money. we may have

[25:08] to take a loan or a partial loan, partial grant.

[25:13] They are they sent a letter out to a bunch of cities and said, "Please

[25:18] reconsider even applying. We don't have enough money to to loan grant out." Um,

[25:25] probably better for you to stay home. And luckily, we didn't get one of those

[25:29] letters, but Marcus, our our you guys met Marcus when we appointed our

[25:33] municipal adviser, he says he's never seen an agenda this big with requests

[25:37] from CIB. Um, and we are number 25 of 27 people

[25:43] that will go in front of that board to ask for funding. So, we've been game

[25:49] planning that and getting ready. Uh, Marcus feels good about it. Um,

[25:53] hopefully it it goes well. I will not be in attendance. I could not believe that

[25:59] it when we got the agenda that it's the exact same day of my knee surgery and

[26:03] I've been waiting for like eight months. So, I can't reschedule. So, Molly's

[26:08] going and Molly is the secret weapon when it comes to

[26:10] » She really is >> getting getting people to commit stuff

[26:13] to the city. >> It's true.

[26:14] » And Corey's going and um we we might have Jerry there. Um if but they only

[26:20] give us two to three minutes. And I mean I love Molly. This is not a diss on

[26:23] Molly. If you think Molly can keep it to under three minutes when she talked

[26:26] about passionately about Perwin City and the community center, I don't know.

[26:30] » Said no one ever. >> So, um, and Marcus will be there, of

[26:34] course, to steer us. Right. So, that's happening next week. Um, hopefully,

[26:38] fingers crossed that goes well. [clears throat] Um, that was positive

[26:41] fun. Hopefully, the next one is the bridge. I am just really extremely

[26:47] frustrated. um Inbridge the gas company in case anybody doesn't know keep track

[26:52] of what they've changed their name to this week. They have decided that they

[26:57] have to get update the um um stream alteration permit even though

[27:03] there's a stream alteration permit to cover the prog process that originally

[27:07] they were going to bore the new gas line under the the road that it is just too

[27:14] many boulders and stuff which is smart. I didn't know how they were going to

[27:17] ever bore it. I figured they were going to get midbore and have to trench it.

[27:21] Well, they've now determined after doing their potholeing and stuff that they are

[27:24] going to have to trench it. Unfortunately, federal money, UD do

[27:28] process, they now have to modify the stream alteration permit, which they

[27:33] probably won't get that done until October.

[27:37] » I'm just beyond frustrated. Um, we're going to get a bridge, but I can't

[27:42] honestly say exactly when. So, what does that do with like all of our funding and

[27:45] stuff that we've >> funding is good. U DOT's already expand

[27:48] extended it. We luckily had a a large buffer because our we got such good

[27:54] bids, but I'm guessing I mean I who knows what'll happen if if we didn't

[28:00] have that buffer. I would really be sweating bullets.

[28:03] We're going to get a bridge and I and and and it should get done under what

[28:07] the funding that we have. It's just we want this thing done yesterday and we're

[28:12] just sick of it being delayed. But that's what we're looking at. Just found

[28:16] out that today. I knew that they were questioning the stream alteration

[28:19] permit, but I just saw today that that they are for sure going to have to

[28:23] reapply. And so and the state takes 30 days on an accelerated time frame to get

[28:30] that modified. Um the diversion, uh we did have a a a

[28:35] scare with the diversion. Actually had part of the project flood. um in recent

[28:40] floods and um there was there was a little bit of

[28:46] friction afterwards trying to figure things out between our engineer and the

[28:50] and the soils um engineer and the the uh contractor and ourselves, but I think

[28:58] we're back on track. um that they had to uh go down and remove a bunch of

[29:04] material and put material back on. Specifically, the the bedding that this

[29:09] the the the filter material that that keeps um any any dirt from getting into

[29:16] the the drain line because you the drain line needs to take water out from under

[29:21] the structure, but we don't want any any sort of dirt to go through because it'll

[29:24] eventually erode. So, they had to make sure that the the fabric and there's a

[29:28] specific type of sand and everything that filters all that out. They had to

[29:32] make sure that was okay. They had to clean out the the lines and and and they

[29:36] had to take out a bunch of material that had been installed just on the dirt burm

[29:40] or the dirt portion of the dam. So, um they're back on track. That was going to

[29:44] probably delay them a little bit. Um and but but but JP was just eager to get

[29:50] going. In fact, some of the frustration was they wanted to immediately get

[29:54] building and we needed the engineers to make sure we figured out and which we

[29:59] needed them to press pause and figure out to do it right. We don't want to

[30:02] have a dam that's leaking or is is somehow um

[30:08] um not built to the standard it's supposed to be. So, um we're we're back

[30:13] on track there. Um, the last thing that I have to share is that the reservoir

[30:18] company turned the Yankee out um, today, which means we should get water

[30:24] tomorrow. Um, is 20 turns a full turnout?

[30:28] » It's It's hitting the weird right now. >> Just barely got a text just now that the

[30:32] weird is a five. >> So, the water is has got here this

[30:36] evening. >> So, I think that and obviously there's

[30:41] only a certain amount of water. It only gained about 3 feet in elevation during

[30:44] the time it was off. >> Yeah.

[30:46] » Um I I'm guessing the farmers are making a big push to to get a last big cutting

[30:52] out of it. Aldo and I talked, do we go back to a two-day a week watering

[30:57] because we'll probably maybe have the water and I what I told Aldo is I said

[31:01] I'll prepare all the communications and if we see that it actually starts

[31:06] overflowing and we're at that point we may as well be using the water that

[31:10] point maybe we'll go back. from a red to a yellow status. But probably my guess

[31:14] only for a few weeks, three weeks. >> I think with the rains and whatever and

[31:18] just leave it the way it is for now. I think it's going to be shortlived. And I

[31:22] really think as far as a the farmer standpoint, we we're going to try to get

[31:28] across with one good watering and then shut it off for the season would be my

[31:33] guess. Just just to hedge our bet for another dry winter.

[31:37] » If if we don't and that's fine. We cannot do that. People are going to

[31:41] complain that water's pouring over the overflow and we're on one day a week,

[31:45] but that's the tricky thing. It's moving fast back and forth and the confusion.

[31:51] We we don't want to move between the numbers very often. But that's the

[31:55] that's the conundrum. So, for the time being,

[31:58] » well, that being said, I think you could probably open it back up to two. I think

[32:01] you I think we'll be two weeks cuz we'll have Robinson Reservoir and then we'll

[32:06] be able to call for Brian Head Pond which is not much but it it adds some

[32:10] water. >> Does it?

[32:11] » So I think we'll have good water for for two weeks at least

[32:16] » if let's see it's the end of August. If we get another we stretch it two two

[32:20] three weeks. >> Yeah.

[32:22] » About when it gets shut >> about when we shut it off anyways.

[32:24] » Yeah. >> So so that's the last of my updates.

[32:30] » Okay. Thank you. How about Calie? Do you have anything?

[32:34] » How about you, Scott?

[32:48] » Okay. Thank Thank you. >> Is that your report?

[32:56] » Okay. Thank you. [clears throat] >> Now we're on the record. Scott's being

[32:59] serious. >> Okay. Um, do we have a close session?

[33:04] » We do. We need to go into close. >> Oh, well. [clears throat] Okay. Well, I

[33:09] thought we were going to hit a record here. So,

[33:12] » we we we couldn't hit a record without Molly here.

[33:15] » Okay. Okay. >> Throwing a monkey wrench.

[33:18] » Anyway. Okay. Uh, I'll entertain a motion to go into close session.

[33:24] » Can I ask? need to discuss strategy sessions to discuss pending or imminent

[33:28] litigation. >> I'll make a motion to go into close

[33:31] session as Dan has stated. >> I second it.

[33:37] » Okay, it's been moved and seconded that we go into close session to discuss the

[33:41] items that Dan has listed. I guess roll call vote.

[33:47] » Rochelle Top and I. David Burton I Bart I

[33:51] » John D I >> Okay, thank you for coming everyone. I'm

[33:56] sorry I didn't invite everyone and welcome everybody at the beginning like

[34:00] Molly does, but we're glad you

Parowan City Council Meeting 8-27-2026

Transcript