[0:48] - Mesdames et Messieurs,

[0:49] bonsoir. Good evening, ladies

[0:50] and gentlemen. Bienvenue à la

[0:51] séance du conseil du mois de

[0:52] mars. Welcome to the march

[0:53] council meeting.

[0:54] We will begin with Councillor

[0:55] members, Council members

[0:56] reports, starting with

[0:58] Councillor Cowan.

[1:01] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire. Je

[1:02] me suis récemment préoccupée sur

[1:04] le fonctionnement de

[1:05] (---)

[1:06] . C'est assez important, puisque

[1:07] chaque année, la gros dépense

[1:08] les quelque 90 millions de

[1:10] dollars que nous, les citoyens

[1:12] de Pointe-Claire, nous envoyons.

[1:15] Il jette étonné par certaines

[1:16] des choses que j'ai apprises.

[1:18] When you read, you learn things.

[1:20] I read the law. It turns out the

[1:21] law requires our merit to brief

[1:24] Council on agribusiness in any

[1:27] agribusiness as is instructed to

[1:28] by Council at a public meeting.

[1:29] This has never happened in my

[1:32] two terms. It may not have

[1:34] happened for the 20 years of

[1:35] existence of the actual. So it

[1:38] certainly is not Mayor Thomas's

[1:39] fault, but now that we know how

[1:40] the law reads, this should

[1:42] change. I think it is in the law

[1:45] for in an important reason, that

[1:47] is to help balance the imbalance

[1:50] of power that exists with Agglo.

[1:54] J'ai également appris que le

[1:56] conseil serait finalisé avec le

[1:57] soutien de notre représentant

[1:59] là-bas, le maire Thomas. L'achat

[2:00] d'une église à Rosemont The

[2:03] (---)

[2:04] pour 2,5 millions de dollars. Il

[2:07] m'a frappé qu'une partie de cet

[2:08] argent pourrait être utilisé

[2:09] pour financer la restauration du

[2:12] vieux moulin. J'aimerais que le

[2:15] maire nous dise s'il a évoqué

[2:17] cette possibilité avant de voter

[2:18] en faveur de l'achat. Et pendant

[2:21] que je reste sur un sujet,

[2:23] j'aimerais féliciter la Société

[2:25] de sauvegarde du patrimoine de

[2:27] Pointe-Claire d'avoir finalement

[2:29] convaincu

[2:30] (---)

[2:31] de qu'inclure une

[2:32] (---)

[2:33] qui empêche gages la

[2:34] restauration nécessaire et

[2:35] assure l'accès au public. Entre

[2:36] ces deux acteurs, d'après, moi

[2:38] ils ont organisé le meilleur

[2:40] résultat possible. Bravo! From

[2:44] my deep dive into Agglo affairs,

[2:46] I was also surprised to learn

[2:47] that Mayor Thomas is on the

[2:49] Economic Committee. When you

[2:50] brief Council next month on what

[2:51] has been happening and what will

[2:53] happen at the Agglo, I think we

[2:54] would all like to know the

[2:56] committee's stance on the

[2:57] Fairview forest and in the

[2:58] context of the Bagot storm

[3:00] development freeze there, and

[3:01] built 39, what Pointe-Claire

[3:03] through Mayor Thomas Xin, a

[3:06] representative of the Agglo, has

[3:07] urged the environment committee

[3:11] (inaudible)

[3:12] . Finally at the November

[3:13] council meeting, this is Susan

[3:14] Weaver who asked Mayor Thomas

[3:16] about the car the city had

[3:17] provided him until his accident

[3:19] almost a year ago. She deposited

[3:21] documents that raised several

[3:23] discrepancies she had asked him

[3:24] about which he brushed off. I

[3:26] reviewed those documents and

[3:27] found Mrs. Weaver's concerns to

[3:29] be justified. I now deposit for

[3:31] the public record my email to

[3:33] mayor Thomas dated 16 January,

[3:35] where I shared my conclusions

[3:36] and my requests that he explain

[3:38] the discrepancies Mrs. Weaver

[3:41] reported last November, and

[3:42] state for the public record the

[3:43] extent to which he had declared

[3:44] personal use of the city car for

[3:46] income tax purposes. A simple

[3:48] request that two months later

[3:50] remains unanswered. So those are

[3:52] my opening remarks. Thank you

[3:53] very much.

[3:57] >> Councillor Cousineau?

[4:02] Councillor Stainforth?

[4:05] >> Good evening. I would just

[4:07] like to mention that the

[4:08] Pointe-Claire youth advisory

[4:10] board is looking for candidates.

[4:11] So, if you are between the age

[4:13] of 14 and 21, or if you know a

[4:19] young person between the age of

[4:20] 14 and 21 that is interested in

[4:25] sharing their ideas,

[4:27] representing their community to

[4:29] help us organize at the city

[4:30] level and to make

[4:33] recommendations, please direct

[4:34] them towards the application.

[4:36] You can find it on our social

[4:38] media, on our web page and it is

[4:42] really

[4:43] (applause)

[4:44] I have really had a privilege of

[4:46] sharing this since the beginning

[4:47] of this board. The kids that I

[4:49] have met over the last seven

[4:51] years are really, really

[4:54] incredible human beings. I'm

[4:57] sure they are all going to turn

[4:58] out to be really incredible

[5:01] adults. So it is a great group

[5:03] of kids to work with. And so I

[5:05] just wanted to put that out

[5:07] there. That if you know

[5:08] somebody, please share that we

[5:09] are looking to construct our new

[5:12] board for 2025 - 2026. Thank

[5:16] you.

[5:19] >> Councillor Bissonnette?

[5:21] - Bonsoir. >> Good evening. It's

[5:22] good news finally after all

[5:24] these years. We are finally

[5:26] going to get lakeshore paved

[5:28] from

[5:29] (inaudible)

[5:30] . The borders, the sidewalk

[5:31] repair and

[5:33] (inaudible)

[5:34] it was supposed to be done a few

[5:35] years ago. Ça a été retardé,

[5:40] mais le contrat a été approuvé

[5:41] ce soir. La compagnie, c'est un

[5:48] contrat de 2 millions 532822. Ça

[5:53] va faire du bien. Ça fait

[5:56] longtemps que ça n'a pas été

[5:57] réparée.

[6:09] Merci à l'administration pour

[6:10] ça. Thank you.

[6:14] >> Councillor Homan?

[6:16] >> Good evening, everyone. Last

[6:18] week was spring break as

[6:19] everyone knows. I would like to

[6:20] thank administration for

[6:24] extending our snow park in

[6:26] Belmont sunnyside. I have only

[6:28] had wonderful, wonderful

[6:32] comments. I think it's going to

[6:34] have to become a yearly event

[6:36] for sure. It went very, very

[6:38] well. So thank you very much.

[6:39] That's all.

[6:41] >> Councillor Tremblay.

[6:45] Councillor Thorstad-Cullen.

[6:46] >> Good evening, everyone. Juste

[6:49] un petit avis que le demain, le

[6:52] 2 mars, c'est la journée portes

[6:54] ouvertes pour

[6:55] (---)

[6:56] . Et tous nos partenaires, c'est

[6:59] vraiment important pour nous. Et

[7:01] alors, c'est demain à 111

[7:04] (---)

[7:05] , dans le village de Valois. De

[7:06] 11 heures à 20 heures dans le

[7:09] soir. So just a reminder and a

[7:12] shout out for the open house for

[7:14] why it that is happening

[7:16] tomorrow at the site in that

[7:18] wall village. 111 Donegani. It

[7:21] is their open house today. So,

[7:23] if you can please drop by and

[7:25] support them. It is from 11 a.m.

[7:28] to eight PM on Wednesday March

[7:30] 12th. Thank you

[7:41] In response to Councillor Cowan

[7:43] before we get started briefly,

[7:44] the missing documents for Mrs.

[7:47] Weaver was the accident. I have

[7:48] the police report. It was not at

[7:50] one in the morning, it was at

[7:52] 7:50. I have the actual police

[7:53] report. And I do have a document

[7:55] signed by me specifying the car

[7:56] was to be used Pour des raisons

[8:00] familiales, domestiques.

[8:02] Personal, family and domestic.

[8:03] Personnelles, familiales, et

[8:04] domestiques. Those are the

[8:06] results of my searches so far.

[8:08] But the accident was indeed at

[8:10] 7:50 in the morning as I

[8:11] specified. Mesdames et

[8:13] Messieurs, bonsoir. Good

[8:14] evening, ladies and gentlemen.,

[8:17] Bienvenue à la séance du conseil

[8:18] de mars. Welcome to the march

[8:19] council meeting. Encore cette

[8:21] année, la Ville a offert une

[8:23] multitude d'activités pour la

[8:25] semaine de la relâche. Nous

[8:28] espérons que vous avez profité

[8:30] des différentes activités. Ou

[8:32] que cette semaine vous a permis

[8:34] de vous reposer et de passer de

[8:37] bons moments en famille. The

[8:40] city again offered a multitude

[8:41] of activities for spring this

[8:43] year and spring break this year.

[8:44] We hope you enjoyed the various

[8:46] effectivity's or that you were

[8:47] able to take time to rest and

[8:48] spend quality time with your

[8:50] family. La journée est national

[8:53] du droit des femmes, le samedi

[8:55] le 8 mars marque la Journée

[8:58] internationale du droit des

[8:59] femmes. En 2025, cette journée

[9:03] est d'autant plus particulière,

[9:06] puisque nous soulignons la 85e

[9:09] anniversaire du droit de vote

[9:10] des femmes au Québec. C'est une

[9:13] occasion de souligner tout le

[9:14] chemin parcouru, de saluer le

[9:16] travail accompli vers l'égalité,

[9:18] et de poursuivre les efforts

[9:25] afin d'évaluer vers une société

[9:26] toujours plus juste et

[9:28] inclusive. Saturday March 8th

[9:32] marked International Women's

[9:35] Day. In 2025, this day is all

[9:37] the more special as we celebrate

[9:38] the 85th anniversary of the

[9:40] women's right to vote in Québec.

[9:42] This is an opportunity to

[9:43] underscore how far we have come,

[9:45] to salute the progress we have

[9:46] made towards equality, and to

[9:48] continue our efforts to become

[9:49] an ever fairer and more

[9:51] inclusive society. Le 2 mars

[9:55] dernier, le gouvernement fédéral

[9:56] a tenu, au centre nautique de la

[9:58] Baie de Valois, les événements

[10:00] de remise de la médaille du

[10:03] couronnement du roi Charles III.

[10:06] Lors de cet événement, ce sont

[10:08] plus de 12 résidents et

[10:11] résidentes de Pointe-Claire qui

[10:12] ont été reconnus pour leur

[10:14] contribution importante. Leur

[10:18] engagement illustre bien le

[10:19] sentiment de communauté que nous

[10:21] avons à Pointe-Claire. Monsieur

[10:25] (---)

[10:26] a reçu la médaille en

[10:27] reconnaissance de ces 40 années

[10:28] de bénévolat au sein de l'unité

[10:31] de sauvetage volontaire de

[10:33] Pointe-Claire. Depuis quatre

[10:36] décennies, monsieur Marc jouent

[10:38] un rôle essentiel dans la

[10:41] sécurité de notre communauté.

[10:43] Son engagement illustre

[10:45] parfaitement les valeurs de

[10:47] solidarité et d'entraide qui

[10:49] font la force de l'unité de

[10:50] sauvetage. Nous adressons nos

[10:53] plus sincères remerciements à

[10:57] monsieur Graham Meg pour son

[10:59] apport inestimable à notre

[11:01] communauté. On March 2nd, the

[11:05] federal government held the King

[11:06] Charles III coronation medal

[11:08] event at the Bay developer

[11:10] nautical Centre. During this

[11:11] event, more than 12 point quite

[11:13] residents received recognition

[11:14] for their valuable

[11:17] contributions. Their engagement

[11:18] and commitment exemplifies the

[11:19] sense of community we have in

[11:21] Pointe-Claire. Mr. Graham model

[11:24] is awarded the king Charles

[11:26] three coronation medal in

[11:28] recognition of his 40 years of

[11:29] volunteer work at the

[11:31] Pointe-Claire volunteer rescue

[11:32] unit. For decades, -- has played

[11:35] in the central role in the

[11:37] safety of our community. His

[11:39] commitment perfectly illustrates

[11:41] the values of solidarity and

[11:44] mutual support that are the

[11:46] strength of the volunteer rescue

[11:49] unit. We extend our sincere east

[11:52] thanks to -- for his invaluable

[11:54] contributions to our community.

[11:56] Nous tenons également à

[11:57] souligner l'engagement des

[12:00] résidents et résidentes de

[12:02] Pointe-Claire honoré lors de cet

[12:03] événement. We would also like to

[12:05] highlight the commitment of the

[12:07] Pointe-Claire residents honoured

[12:08] during this event. Dr. Gordon

[12:11] --, George --, Stewart Grant,

[12:16] Terry Herbert, Terry Hawkins,

[12:18] Sheila Larsen, Geneviève Lucia,

[12:22] Debbie mag would, Peter Murphy,

[12:25] Alison Saunders, Deborah and

[12:27] Sharon Brad well, Diana --.

[12:33] Toutes nos félicitations.

[12:35] Congratulations to all La Ville

[12:38] tient à souligner l'engagement

[12:40] de nos athlètes. Nous entraîneur

[12:43] et nous entraîneuse ainsi que

[12:44] leur parcours inspirant. Nous

[12:46] avons été heureux d'apprendre

[12:48] qu'ils soient reconnus dans leur

[12:50] milieu. Lors du gala annuel de

[12:53] plongeon Canada, les plongeons

[12:57] (---)

[12:58] et que les

[12:59] (---)

[13:00] ont respectivement reçu le titre

[13:02] de plongeur masculin et féminin

[13:04] de l'année. Madame Lee à, quant

[13:09] à elle, a été honoré du titre

[13:12] d'entraîneur senior et monsieur

[13:14] James

[13:15] (---)

[13:16] de celui d'entraîneur junior de

[13:17] l'année. Nous soulignons

[13:21] également l'athlète étudiant

[13:23] Oskar

[13:24] (---)

[13:25] , résidents de Pointe-Claire,

[13:26] qui est récipiendaire du

[13:27] programme de golf Québec et

[13:31] Fondation

[13:32] (---)

[13:33] . Toutes nos félicitations pour

[13:34] les reconnaissances bien

[13:35] méritées. The City would also

[13:38] like to highlight the commitment

[13:40] of our athletes and coaches and

[13:41] their inspiring careers. We were

[13:42] delighted to hear that they were

[13:44] recognized in the wider diving

[13:46] community. At the 2025 and you

[13:48] will dive Canada gala, divers

[13:50] Nathan Zsombor-Murray and Caeli

[13:53] McKay were named male and female

[13:56] driver of the year respectively.

[13:59] -- Was named senior coach of the

[14:01] year and James Wynne received

[14:03] the junior coach of the year

[14:04] award. We also salute student

[14:06] athlete, Oscar Ricketts, a

[14:08] Pointe-Claire resident who was a

[14:10] recipient of the golf Québec and

[14:13] -- scholarship program.

[14:16] Congratulations to all these

[14:17] well deserved accolades, on all

[14:20] these well deserved accolades.

[14:23] Comme on a toujours dit, le

[14:25] comité consultatif jeunesse est

[14:28] à la recherche de résidents et

[14:30] résidentes âgés de 14 à 21 ans

[14:31] qui souhaitent devenir membres.

[14:34] Ce comité fait des

[14:36] recommandations au conseil

[14:37] municipal pour bonifier l'offre

[14:38] de services pour les jeunes et

[14:40] favoriser la participation à la

[14:42] Ville. C'est des jeunes de votre

[14:45] entourage souhaite s'impliquer

[14:47] pour faire une différence dans

[14:48] la communauté, inviter-les à

[14:51] déposer leur candidature. The

[14:54] youth advisory board is looking

[14:55] for resident it's aged 14 to 21

[14:58] who wish to become members. The

[15:00] board makes recommendations to

[15:01] the City Council to approve the

[15:03] wide range of services for young

[15:05] citizens and to encourage their

[15:07] participation in Pointe-Claire.

[15:08] If you know residents between

[15:10] the age of 14 and 21 who would

[15:14] like to get involved and make a

[15:15] difference in their community,

[15:17] please invite them to apply. Moi

[15:20] de la francophonie en mars.

[15:22] Partout au Canada et dans le

[15:23] monde, nous célébrons le Mois de

[15:24] la francophonie. C'est une

[15:27] occasion de mettre en valeur la

[15:29] richesse et la vitalité de la

[15:31] langue française, ainsi que les

[15:33] contributions des francophones à

[15:35] notre patrimoine culturel et à

[15:37] notre identité collective. Vous

[15:40] êtes invités à profiter des

[15:42] initiatives de la bibliothèque

[15:44] pour célébrer la richesse de la

[15:46] langue française. In March,

[15:50] across Canada and around the

[15:52] world, we celebrate the month of

[15:57] the Francophonie. This is an

[15:58] opportunity to showcase the

[15:59] richness and vitality of the

[16:00] French language and the

[16:03] contributions of Francophones to

[16:04] our cultural heritage and

[16:06] collective identity. You are

[16:08] invited to take advantage of the

[16:10] libraries initiatives to

[16:11] celebrate the richness of the

[16:12] French language. Nous avons eu

[16:18] d'autres bonnes nouvelles au

[16:19] cours des deux dernières

[16:20] semaines. La Société pour la

[16:22] sauvegarde du patrimoine de

[16:23] Pointe-Claire à signer un bail

[16:25] de 50 ans avec la chute des 16

[16:29] de Montréal pour le

[16:30] (---)

[16:31] de Pointe-Claire. Cela lui

[16:34] permettra d'effectuer les

[16:35] travaux de réparation et de

[16:38] restauration, dans la première

[16:40] phase débutera en 2025. À terme,

[16:44] elle espère pouvoir ouvrir le

[16:46] moulin au public par le billet

[16:48] de visite guidée et d'autres

[16:51] activités culturelles et

[16:53] éducatives. La première phase

[16:56] des travaux sera financé par des

[16:59] dons privés, dont plus de 350000

[17:02] ont déjà été recueillis.

[17:06] J'encourage la communauté à

[17:09] participer à cet effort, et à

[17:11] soutenir la Société du

[17:14] patrimoine, qui est un organisme

[17:16] de bienfaisance enregistré, et

[17:19] peut émettre des reçus aux fins

[17:22] de l'impôt. Je compte faire ma

[17:24] part pour les aider à ramasser

[17:26] des fonds, car ils espèrent

[17:30] obtenir suffisamment des argents

[17:32] privés ou de financement du

[17:33] gouvernement provincial pour

[17:36] pouvoir poursuivre les travaux.

[17:39] J'aimerais bien que la Ville

[17:40] puisse aider à financer ce

[17:42] projet. Malheureusement, le

[17:45] conseil a rejeté l'entente que

[17:46] j'avais négocié pour réaliser ce

[17:48] projet en 2022. En vertu de son

[17:51] règlement actuelle adoptée en

[17:54] 2024, le conseil aurait la

[17:56] possibilité de fournir des

[17:58] fonds, mais uniquement sur une

[18:00] base discrétions Neil, une fois

[18:03] que le projet de restauration a

[18:04] déjà été entièrement achevé.

[18:07] Cela signifie que, d'une manière

[18:10] ou d'une autre, l'argent

[18:12] nécessaire à la réalisation des

[18:14] travaux devrait provenir de

[18:16] collecte de fonds privés et

[18:17] d'autres niveaux de

[18:18] gouvernement. Puisqu'il n'y

[18:20] aurait aucune sorte

[18:23] (---)

[18:24] au montant que Pointe-Claire

[18:25] pourrait donner, on ne pourrait

[18:27] pas compter sur notre aide

[18:29] financière pour imputer ou la

[18:32] prévoir dans le budget d'un

[18:34] projet. L'archidiocèse a rejeté

[18:37] cette option et ne pensait

[18:39] jamais être rembourser. Il est

[18:43] important que les citoyens

[18:45] comprennent cette distinction,

[18:47] car elles expliquent pourquoi la

[18:49] Société de patrimoine on a mis

[18:52] un pas de l'avant à chercher de

[18:56] collecter des fonds par ses

[18:57] propres moyens. Certains

[19:02] critiqueront, sans aucun doute,

[19:04] le plan de la Société du

[19:06] patrimoine. Comme ils ont

[19:07] critiqué le mien en 2022. Mais

[19:10] le fait est que l'entente que

[19:12] monsieur Ouimet et moi avons

[19:14] négocié à l'époque et le bail

[19:17] que

[19:18] (---)

[19:19] à négocier pour la Société du

[19:20] patrimoine maintenant représente

[19:22] les deux seules scissions

[19:24] viables mis sur la table en plus

[19:26] de 20 ans. À mon avis, notre

[19:29] conseil aurait dû décider, il y

[19:32] a plusieurs années, d'acheter ou

[19:35] d'export prier le moulin et la

[19:37] bande de terrain aux bord de

[19:38] l'eau, au sud du couvent. Nous

[19:41] aurions pu alors créer une par

[19:44] Dumoulin pour nos citoyens. Le

[19:46] moulin à plus de 300 ans. Il est

[19:49] l'emblème de notre ville. Notre

[19:52] bâtiment patrimonial le plus

[19:55] important, il y a des vins seul

[19:56] de son genre au Canada! Le fait

[20:00] qu'il tombent et qu'ils tombent

[20:01] en ruine sous nos yeux devrait

[20:04] être une si

[20:06] (---)

[20:07] collective pour notre

[20:08] communauté. À une époque notre

[20:11] existence notre identité, en

[20:13] tant que pays, sont menacés, il

[20:15] est plus important que jamais de

[20:18] célébrer notre histoire, notre

[20:20] culture, et notre patrimoine.

[20:23] Espérons que ce projet ira de

[20:26] l'avant, et que notre ville

[20:27] pourra un jour être un

[20:30] partenaire plutôt qu'un obstacle

[20:31] à sa réussite. We had some good

[20:35] news in the last two weeks. The

[20:37] Pointe-Claire heritage

[20:38] preservation society has signed

[20:40] a 50-year lease on Pointe-Claire

[20:42] windmill with the archdiocese of

[20:44] Montréal. This will give them

[20:45] the ability to carry out repairs

[20:48] and restoration work

[20:52] (applause)

[20:53] -- This will give them the

[20:55] ability to carry out repair and

[20:57] restoration work with the first

[20:59] phase to begin in 2025.

[21:01] Eventually, they hope to be able

[21:02] to open the windmill to the

[21:04] public through guided tours and

[21:05] other cultural and educational

[21:07] activities. The first phase of

[21:09] work will be funded with private

[21:11] donations of which over $350,000

[21:13] have already been raised. I

[21:15] would encourage the community to

[21:17] get involved in this effort and

[21:19] support the Heritage Society,

[21:21] which is a risk -- registered

[21:25] and can shoot tax receipts. I

[21:28] plan to do my part to help them

[21:29] obtain funds as they look to

[21:30] obtain a funding for the

[21:31] provincial government to be able

[21:32] to continue with for the work. I

[21:34] only wish the city could help

[21:36] fund this project.

[21:38] Unfortunately, Council rejected

[21:39] the subsidy agreement that I

[21:41] negotiated with the archdiocese

[21:42] to do this in 2022. Under its

[21:44] current bylaw, adopted in 2024,

[21:56] PC-2972, Council could provide

[21:57] funds but only on a

[21:58] discretionary basis once a

[21:59] project has already been fully

[22:00] completed. This means that one

[22:04] way or another the money to

[22:05] carry out the work we have to

[22:06] come from private fund raising

[22:08] and other levels of government.

[22:10] Since there would be no

[22:11] certainty as to whether or how

[22:12] much Pointe-Claire might give,

[22:15] our financial assistance could

[22:16] not be counted on to borrow or

[22:18] plan for any project budget. If

[22:21] you don't know what you've got,

[22:23] you cannot plan for the long

[22:24] term. The archdiocese rejected

[22:26] this option as they didn't

[22:28] believe they would ever get

[22:29] paid. It is important that

[22:31] citizens understand this

[22:33] distinction, since it explains

[22:34] why the Heritage Society stepped

[22:36] up and is seeking to raise money

[22:37] on its own. Someone no doubt

[22:40] would be critical of the

[22:41] heritage societies plans just as

[22:42] they were critical of mine in

[22:44] 2022. But the fact remains that

[22:46] the agreement Mr. Weemaes and I

[22:49] negotiated then, and the least

[22:51] it Andrew Swidzinski has

[22:52] negotiated with heritage society

[22:53] now, represent the only two

[22:55] viable solutions that anyone has

[22:56] put forward on this issue over a

[22:57] period of more than 20 years. In

[23:00] my view, Council should have

[23:02] bought or expropriated eat

[23:03] window and district of

[23:04] waterfront south of the convent

[23:06] many years ago. And turned it

[23:07] into a windmill park for

[23:09] citizens. The windmill is more

[23:10] than 300 years old. It is our

[23:13] cities emblem, our most

[23:14] important heritage building and

[23:16] one of only 20 of its kind in

[23:18] all of Canada. The fact that it

[23:20] is falling apart before our eyes

[23:22] should be a collective

[23:23] embarrassment to our community.

[23:25] At a time when our existence and

[23:28] identity as a country are being

[23:29] threatened, it is more important

[23:30] than ever to celebrate our

[23:33] history, our culture and our

[23:34] heritage. Let's hope that this

[23:35] project will move forward and

[23:37] that our city can one day be a

[23:38] partner instead of an obstacle

[23:40] to its success. Merci.

[24:05] - 1.1 Adoption de l'ordre du

[24:06] jour.

[24:07] >> For the adoption of the

[24:08] agenda. Do I have a mover?

[24:13] >> Bob Bissonnette, district 2.

[24:15] >> Seconder.

[24:17] >> Tara Stainforth, district 4.

[24:18] >> All in favour?

[24:23] >> 2.1 Proclamer le 13 mai 2025

[24:24] comme étant la Journée du denim

[24:27] pour le cancer du sein dans la

[24:28] Ville de Pointe-Claire.

[24:31] >> 3.1 Approve the minutes of

[24:32] the regular meeting of February

[24:33] 4, 2025, and of the special

[24:34] meeting of February 19, 2025.

[24:36] >> For 2.1 and 3.1, do I have a

[24:39] mover?

[24:40] >> But Bissonnette, to strict.

[24:41] To

[24:43] >> Seconder?

[24:44] >> Tara Stainforth, district

[24:45] four.

[24:46] >> All in favour?

[24:47] >> Thank you.

[24:51] >> Question period.

[24:54] - Période de questions. Pour la

[24:57] période de questions, vous avez

[24:58] été accueilli à l'entrée pour

[25:00] vous inscrire à la période de

[25:02] questions. Afin de vous

[25:04] promettre de demeurer à vos

[25:06] places jusqu'à l'appel de votre

[25:07] nom. Nous garderons 90 minutes

[25:10] pour la période de questions.

[25:13] Une personne à la fois au micro.

[25:16] Nous vous remercions d'attendre

[25:18] que le citoyen est terminé de

[25:20] poser sa question et que vous

[25:22] soyez appelés avant de vous

[25:24] lever pour faire votre question,

[25:27] nous accordons la priorité aux

[25:29] résidentes et aux résidents de

[25:32] Pointe-Claire. Les non-résidents

[25:33] pourront poser leurs questions

[25:35] par la suite si le temps n'est

[25:37] pas écoulé. For question period,

[25:40] you were greeted at the entrance

[25:41] to register so that you could

[25:43] remain seated until you hear

[25:45] your name. We shall stick to the

[25:47] 90 minute time limit for

[25:48] question period. One person at a

[25:50] time at the microphone. Thank

[25:52] you for waiting for a citizen to

[25:55] finish asking their questioned

[25:56] and to be called before you get

[25:57] up to ask yours. We give

[25:58] priority to Pointe-Claire

[26:00] residents. Non residents can ask

[26:01] their questions afterwards if

[26:03] time has not run out. To start,

[26:06] we will begin with Terri omen.

[26:16] >> Hello. Do I have to see what

[26:18] district I'm in? All right.

[26:20] >> Your name.

[26:21] >> Terry Allmand.

[26:24] >> So, I do not attend the last

[26:28] council meeting, but I believe

[26:31] that the subject of 15-minute

[26:33] cities was brought up? Okay. I

[26:35] don't think it was brought up --

[26:38] >> Very briefly. In a passing

[26:40] comment, yes.

[26:41] >> In fact, when I was listening

[26:42] back I missed it. So it was

[26:44] pretty brief.

[26:45] [Laughter]

[26:46] But I think it's a pretty

[26:47] important subject. I know that

[26:49] I'm very curious about it and

[26:50] I've done a little bit of

[26:52] dabbling on the internet with

[26:55] it, so I would like to find out

[27:00] how much this has been

[27:02] investigated here at the

[27:03] Pointe-Claire level. I did go to

[27:04] the cop station to ask if they

[27:05] had anything. I asked here. I

[27:08] call the. They said I had to go

[27:10] through communications

[27:14] Pointe-Claire.com to see if I

[27:15] could get a pamphlet or any

[27:16] information on.

[27:24] Anyway, I'm bringing up here

[27:26] tonight to actually encourage

[27:29] everyone to be curious about

[27:31] this subject because 15-minute

[27:33] cities, although they all sound

[27:34] great, to me it almost sounds

[27:36] like a pharmaceutical commercial

[27:40] where it's all sunshine out in

[27:42] nature and all that, and at the

[27:43] bottom all the adverse reactions

[27:48] that could happen. In the hopes

[27:51] of avoiding a situation where we

[27:53] have a rowdy bunch here, if we

[27:55] could take the time now to

[27:57] investigate that subject at the

[28:01] Canadian levels, but it has also

[28:02] been introduced in other

[28:03] countries. So, if we could

[28:07] maybe, as a support to each

[28:08] other, maybe form 18? Obviously,

[28:14] Cynthia Homan is my councillor,

[28:15] but if anyone wants to join in

[28:17] or anyone else who doesn't mind

[28:18] doing some research, that would

[28:19] be great. Just to find out a

[28:21] little bit more about what are

[28:23] the pros and cons of this.

[28:25] Because it's only advertised as

[28:26] a pro. I don't know about

[28:32] anybody here, but there is the

[28:33] wording 15-minute city, but

[28:35] there also is the wording smart.

[28:39] Smart does not mean intelligent,

[28:41] it's an acronym. Does anyone

[28:42] know what the acronym stands

[28:43] for?

[28:47] >> I know a couple of them.

[28:49] >> I'm not surprised. I'm not

[28:50] trying to put anyone on the

[28:51] spot. So many people did not

[28:52] know. All the women at the cop

[28:54] station had no idea what I was

[28:56] talking about even when I

[28:57] mentioned 15-minute cities.

[29:00] >> It's relatively recent.

[29:02] >> Well, it's been around for a

[29:04] while. Maybe not here, but it's

[29:06] been around for a while.

[29:07] >> Well, Europe is always way

[29:09] ahead of. Us

[29:10] >> West?

[29:11] >> Europe is always ahead of us.

[29:12] >> Yeah. Well, okay, let's get

[29:13] ahead of it ourselves. We have

[29:16] to find out it's a done deal.

[29:18] Right? So I'm just going to tell

[29:21] you what the smart stance for

[29:26] when it says smart city.

[29:28] Surveillance, monitoring,

[29:30] analysis, reporting, technology.

[29:33] Does that sound like a nice walk

[29:35] in the park? To me, it sounds

[29:38] like big brother is watching. It

[29:40] sounds like, and I hit seen so

[29:41] many cameras go up, and I'm

[29:44] thinking am I going to jaywalk?

[29:49] [Laughter]

[29:50] You know? Like what is going to

[29:51] happen if I do? Just stupid

[29:53] little things that could get

[29:54] people in trouble like it has in

[29:57] say, for example, China, which

[29:58] is an extreme example. It's

[30:00] actually dissociated system

[30:01] where they have cameras

[30:03] everywhere and this smart city

[30:05] setup, there is face recognition

[30:11] -- you won't believe it. Tap --

[30:14] type in on your computers and

[30:15] find out. I encourage everyone

[30:16] to do that. In fact, I think it

[30:18] would be a nice thing if we as a

[30:21] community got to know more about

[30:23] it together. If there was a site

[30:25] that we could have provided by

[30:27] the City where

[30:34] we could find our findings on

[30:36] the net, probably trustworthy,

[30:37] but let's go see what is garbage

[30:39] and what is not, but then let's

[30:41] not pretend it's a

[30:43] pharmaceutical ad. Like, put

[30:44] some good stuff out there. Not

[30:49] everyone is going to want to

[30:50] meet behind someone's desk here

[30:51] at City Council. But maybe there

[30:53] is a place where we can send

[30:54] where we find out about it?

[31:01] Maybe one of the guys, maybe

[31:03] Cynthia, maybe some others,

[31:04] might want to get together and

[31:05] discuss it a little bit? And you

[31:07] can include us if you want,

[31:09] whoever wants to put something

[31:10] in. Does that sound like a

[31:12] reasonable request?

[31:13] >> Totally.

[31:14] >> Okay.

[31:15] >> Yeah.

[31:16] >> Mister Mayor, may I?

[31:17] >> Yes, absolutely.

[31:18] >> The 15-minute city concept

[31:20] was actually developed in Paris

[31:21] few years ago. It's one of the

[31:24] underlying concepts that has

[31:27] been propelling this whole --

[31:31] PMAD process with the City of

[31:32] Montréal that we are working on.

[31:33] That is the -- what is it? Yeah.

[31:40] It is the whole rethink of the

[31:42] island of Montréal. Actually,

[31:44] the Montréal metropolitan

[31:45] community. It goes right back to

[31:46] the 15-minute city. The R.E.M.

[31:49] is part of that.

[31:50] >> Absolutely. Absolutely.

[31:52] >> But the 15-minute city is an

[31:57] ideal. To achieve it is that

[31:58] when you walk out of your door,

[32:00] within 15 minutes you will be

[32:02] able to get whatever it is you

[32:05] need, groceries, a job. That is

[32:06] the idea. It's not something

[32:09] that is likely, especially in

[32:10] Pointe-Claire where we are

[32:11] already rather built, it's not

[32:13] likely ever to be achieved in

[32:17] total. But it is an ideal, an

[32:19] objective. It is why the R.E.M.

[32:21] is there. It's the concept

[32:23] behind the R.E.M. stations, it's

[32:25] the concept behind the transit

[32:27] oriented development at the mass

[32:28] transit stations. It is all part

[32:30] of that ideal and the working

[32:34] hypothesis is that if you have

[32:35] that, you will minimize the use

[32:36] of the car. So people get around

[32:40] by walking, by public transit

[32:41] and by bicycle. By doing that,

[32:44] it will have a very positive

[32:46] effect on the environment. Those

[32:48] are the objectives of the

[32:50] 15-minute city. As for the smart

[32:52] city, I mean when you say

[32:54] surveillance, are you looking at

[32:56] people? Yes, but another way of

[32:57] looking at it is if you are

[32:58] looking at vehicles, for

[33:00] instance. Like, if you want to

[33:01] control traffic on Saint John or

[33:03] the other major arteries, you

[33:05] can have a smart, not an

[33:07] acronym, but the actual word, a

[33:09] smart traffic signalling system

[33:10] that picks up, it has sensors

[33:13] around Saint-Jean and all the

[33:14] feeder streets, so that you

[33:16] realize that cars that are

[33:18] approaching St. Joe. And you can

[33:20] automatically, through

[33:21] artificial intelligence

[33:22] analysis, suggest the

[33:23] signalling. So you minimize

[33:25] congestion. So, yes, you want to

[33:26] make sure, I think that you are

[33:29] not recording everybody's faces,

[33:31] but it might be useful to

[33:32] records vehicles. You don't

[33:35] necessarily have to have the

[33:38] capability to check to know

[33:39] which vehicle. For the purposes

[33:41] of signalling, it does not

[33:42] matter. It just matters that

[33:44] there are so many because

[33:45] approaching no. How can

[33:48] signalling be modified to

[33:49] prevent congestion?

[33:51] >> I don't know how it is we

[33:53] have survived this long this

[33:55] far.

[33:56] [Laughter]

[33:57] >> To answer your question,

[33:58] there has been citizen

[33:59] involvement in all of this since

[34:00] the beginning.

[34:01] >> Sorry?

[34:02] >> There has been a citizen

[34:03] involvement in revising the

[34:04] Planning Program right from the

[34:05] beginning. There may not have

[34:06] been anything specifically on

[34:08] the 15-minute city, but that is

[34:10] an underlying principle.

[34:12] >> Well, I mean, I understand

[34:15] the idea of less cars. Although

[34:17] they did come back

[34:18] (applause)

[34:19] Give back some more parking

[34:20] spaces in Montréal because it

[34:21] went overboard. You know, in

[34:24] terms of the bicycle routes and

[34:26] all that. I think they had to

[34:27] make some modifications because

[34:29] it was way too gung ho.

[34:37] What makes me worried is what

[34:39] are the next steps behind all of

[34:40] the green statements. Good for

[34:42] the environment and that. What

[34:44] are the next things really? I

[34:47] have this feeling there might be

[34:54] more. It's worth investigating.

[34:55] That is what I'm saying. What I

[34:56] don't want to see is if somebody

[34:59] says you've got a 15-minute

[35:01] range to get everything you

[35:04] want, so therefore that is all

[35:05] you get.

[35:10] Well, I don't know. That is what

[35:12] I don't want. I don't want to be

[35:13] limited in my movement. No?

[35:15] >> No.

[35:16] >> You can guarantee that to me?

[35:18] >> No guarantees, but that is

[35:19] not the objective.

[35:20] >> Logically speaking you would

[35:21] say no. I know it would kill my

[35:23] husband. He plays hockey in

[35:25] Montréal West. If he could not

[35:26] go there or if he had to take

[35:27] the R.E.M. to do it. No? Okay.

[35:31] >> It's a controversial subject.

[35:33] I have met a lot of people that

[35:34] really don't like the concept

[35:41] . Thing for me is that it's

[35:43] completely undermined by the

[35:45] affordability crisis. People who

[35:46] work in Pointe-Claire cannot

[35:47] afford to live in Pointe-Claire.

[35:48] If you are working in retail or

[35:50] you are working in the

[35:51] industrial park, you are living

[35:52] out by Vaudreuil to afford to

[35:54] come in. So, it is completely

[35:56] undermined by affordability. So,

[35:58] we are a long way from

[35:59] accomplishing that goal.

[36:01] >> Yeah. Well, okay. I just

[36:03] thought I would bring it up.

[36:05] >> No, I appreciate it.

[36:06] >> Just to be aware of this.

[36:08] Also, to invite any research

[36:09] that anyone else finds out about

[36:11] it.

[36:12] >> Mayor Thomas, may I add

[36:13] something?

[36:14] >> Yes, absolutely.

[36:15] >> I understand your concerns.

[36:16] Of course, I think everyone here

[36:18] shares in the concerns of being

[36:20] under surveillance, but we have

[36:24] gone to conferences as council

[36:26] members and our staff as well,

[36:29] everything that has to do with

[36:30] smart cities. It has more to do

[36:31] with collecting data in order to

[36:33] make the city more efficient and

[36:34] to meet the needs of our

[36:35] citizens better. As Mr. Cohen

[36:39] was saying, we will collect data

[36:40] on car movement so that we can

[36:43] determine whether or not if a

[36:45] street should have a -- or not

[36:47] on it. How many cars are passing

[36:49] down the street? What is the

[36:50] speed of the car for traffic

[36:52] flow? We collected on the number

[36:53] of people signed up for

[36:55] swimming, for example, so that

[36:56] we can see where our service

[36:58] offering has to go. We have

[37:01] different systems that we are

[37:03] using at the city in urban

[37:04] planning and in engineering

[37:06] where they are collecting data

[37:08] and they are layering maps so we

[37:10] know where pipes are and we know

[37:11] where gaslights are. So we know

[37:13] what our soil samples are so

[37:15] that when we do a project we are

[37:17] well outfitted to move forward

[37:19] on that project. So while the

[37:22] acronym is certainly alarming,

[37:25] the way you have said it, we

[37:26] have been too smart city

[37:29] conference is, not conferences

[37:31] that are just smart city, but

[37:33] workshops rather. It has more to

[37:35] do with the use of technology

[37:37] and collecting our data to offer

[37:40] better services and a more

[37:41] efficient and more

[37:42] environmentally friendly

[37:44] sustainable service offering as

[37:45] cities.

[37:46] >> Okay. And I guess that comes

[37:48] at a cost as well? Putting

[37:49] cameras everywhere?

[37:51] >> We haven't put cameras

[37:52] everywhere. It is more we will

[37:55] put -- they are not permanent

[37:57] installations. For example, we

[37:58] will track traffic, but they are

[37:59] non permanent installations that

[38:00] we move around. Just like they

[38:03] have weather tracking so that we

[38:05] know how much to salt went to

[38:07] salt. So the air temperature is

[38:09] tracked in different locations.

[38:12] That's because that affects how

[38:13] much salt should go down

[38:14] depending on the temperature.

[38:15] So, we are collecting data like

[38:17] that. We are not so interested

[38:19] in collecting images of your

[38:21] face or anything like that.

[38:23] >> Not like China.

[38:24] >> It's more how many books and

[38:26] mandarin are checked out at the

[38:27] library. Do we have to have a

[38:28] better service offering? It's

[38:31] more things like that in order

[38:32] to provide better services.

[38:34] >> I would like to get some

[38:35] research to find out how the

[38:36] people in Cambridge, England, I

[38:38] think it's Cambridge, how they

[38:40] are responding to their

[38:42] surveillance. Anyway, I just

[38:44] want to open the page on that

[38:46] and get some feedback. Not just

[38:47] for me because we are not

[38:49] actually living it right now,

[38:51] but you know. Okay. That's it. I

[38:52] want to get a more time.

[38:53] >> Thank you. She let Larsen?

[39:00] -- Sheila Larsen.

[39:04] >> I am very grateful to hear

[39:07] the praise that has been given

[39:09] already to Council, to the

[39:12] Pointe-Claire Heritage Society.

[39:14] And I just wanted to add my

[39:16] voice as a citizen who has loved

[39:19] that windmill every year since

[39:22] 1971 when I moved here. And I

[39:25] have been dismayed to see it

[39:27] falling into disrepair. And I've

[39:30] been dismayed to see that we

[39:31] were not able to do something

[39:33] for it. I used to live next door

[39:36] to Jan proud foot who did an

[39:39] original painting of the

[39:41] windmill that became part of the

[39:43] symbol for quite a long time. So

[39:45] I wanted to honour the people

[39:48] who did the hardest work. And I

[39:49] do not know them all, I'm an on

[39:52] again off again kind of member

[39:54] of that society, and so I cannot

[39:56] name all the names but I know

[39:58] that Andrew -- Andrew Swidzinski

[40:01] and normal point I think our to

[40:04] keep people. They have worked so

[40:09] doggedly without support for so

[40:11] long. I think that what they

[40:13] have done is basically a

[40:16] miracle. And based on that, what

[40:19] I would like to see, and because

[40:21] to me it is an important symbol,

[40:23] and we need to feel good about

[40:25] things these days, there's too

[40:27] many things to feel distressed

[40:29] about and stressed out about. I

[40:31] would love it if the City would

[40:34] support a really good

[40:35] promotional campaign to get

[40:37] every citizen. I was thinking,

[40:39] you know, if every citizen of

[40:40] Pointe-Claire gave ten bucks,

[40:42] that would be pretty amazing.

[40:44] That would add a lot of money. I

[40:46] have personally given some money

[40:48] to it and I will try and do that

[40:49] all the way through their

[40:51] campaign. But they are going to

[40:53] need more help than that. And so

[40:55] that brings me to my question.

[40:57] And I know this has not been a

[41:02] happy discussion among Council,

[41:05] but to me I really wish and I

[41:08] hoped that Council would come

[41:10] together and say the thank you

[41:12] for doing your part, heritage

[41:16] society. Now we are going to

[41:18] come forward and we are going to

[41:19] give you that support that you

[41:21] need. Not all of it, but a real

[41:23] good boost that will mean to all

[41:27] citizens of Pointe-Claire, and

[41:28] to everybody beyond in the

[41:31] Agglo, that we care about that

[41:32] place. We care about our

[41:34] heritage. We are proud of it and

[41:36] we are going to protect it and

[41:38] build it and develop it. I watch

[41:44] little television shows about

[41:46] places in England where they get

[41:47] their windmills from 1400 or

[41:51] 1600 working again. And they buy

[41:55] stone ground flower from them. I

[41:56] keep thinking why can't we? You

[41:59] know, that is my question. Why

[42:01] can't we? And maybe can we?

[42:04] >> We can. In fact, from what I

[42:06] am told by some of the founding

[42:11] members, Claude Arseneault in

[42:13] particular, that the mechanism

[42:14] sits in a basement in

[42:17] Pointe-Claire village that has

[42:18] been imported from France and

[42:19] that has been sitting in there

[42:20] for over a decade, that has not

[42:21] been put into the windmill. When

[42:22] I negotiated the original deal,

[42:24] that was factored it to the

[42:27] process. Mr. Weemaes and I

[42:29] factor that in. The idea was to

[42:31] get a functional windmill. I was

[42:32] speaking with Jeff Kelly last

[42:34] night. Why can't Pointe-Claire

[42:36] have a windmill as good as

[42:37] anyone else is? I would love

[42:39] that. Jeff was saying he bikes

[42:41] out to the one in -- and he

[42:43] loves it because it works. The

[42:45] issue of course is that we do

[42:46] not opponent. So we have to find

[42:47] a way to make it happen with

[42:49] that owning it and that has

[42:50] always been the problem. We have

[42:51] to learn that we have to suck it

[42:53] up and do our job in some way

[42:56] shape or form and not leave it

[42:57] up to reach private donors. That

[42:59] is where we are at now with the

[43:01] Heritage Society. They've done a

[43:03] wonderful job of raising money,

[43:05] but to plan how they are going

[43:07] to renovated and what kind of

[43:09] windmill we are going to get,

[43:10] they can only do that if they

[43:11] have the money upfront. So here

[43:14] in lies the dilemma of the

[43:16] situation we are in. So the

[43:18] money upfront right now, they

[43:19] have 350,000, you are quite

[43:21] right. They need more. So we

[43:22] need to find a way to get more

[43:23] in some way shape or form. I

[43:24] would love it if our city could

[43:25] do that.

[43:28] >> So would I. That would make

[43:30] me very proud after a year of

[43:32] not feeling quite so proud. So I

[43:34] leave with that hope.

[43:35] >> Absolutely. Mr. Cousineau?

[43:38] >> Yes. We actually have

[43:42] $8,350,000.

[43:45] >> No, they don't. They have

[43:48] $350,000.

[43:49] >> May I comment, sir?

[43:50] >> Yes, absolutely.

[43:51] >> Okay, Mister Mayor. I was

[43:52] going to wait until the end of

[43:53] question period to sit down the

[43:54] chair because every time I have

[43:55] brought this issue up to

[43:58] councillors, you stuck your head

[43:59] in the sand. Once again, you are

[44:02] misrepresenting the truth. You

[44:03] are blatantly lying. Okay? I

[44:06] will explain it to you. Feel

[44:07] free to answer. You just said

[44:12] your deal. There was no deal.

[44:16] Then you mentioned that the deal

[44:17] they just signed is the same

[44:19] with the access. No, it's not.

[44:20] First of all, has anyone seen

[44:22] the deal with the archdiocese?

[44:24] By the way, I was the first one

[44:25] on Facebook to commend the

[44:28] society for what they did and to

[44:31] get --. I believe he is a

[44:34] business person and he knows

[44:35] what to do. And I believe he can

[44:37] help nudge them further. So,

[44:38] they have my full support. But

[44:39] to hear what I'm saying -- so

[44:41] you are seeing that in your deal

[44:43] -- was there guaranteed access?

[44:45] No, there wasn't.

[44:47] >> You just asked the question.

[44:49] >> Go ahead because I have all

[44:50] the documents in the back. I

[44:51] will go and get them and I will

[44:52] show them to you. So please

[44:53] answer my question.

[44:54] >> Okay. This is the big myth

[44:59] and counter fuse that comes

[45:00] around this issue. Access to the

[45:02] windmill. It is a small little

[45:04] space with a working mechanism

[45:06] that you do not want to go

[45:07] inside anyway. Nor should you

[45:08] have someone go inside anyway.

[45:10] >> You just said you are going

[45:11] to have guided tours!

[45:12] >> They are historic. I will

[45:14] answer your question. The access

[45:17] agreement, the access terms that

[45:19] were in the deal that Mr.

[45:20] Weemaes and I negotiated, were

[45:22] actually better than the access

[45:23] terms that are in the current

[45:25] arrangement. And I have read

[45:26] that out in this meeting two

[45:30] years ago. I read the actual

[45:32] terms of access in the original

[45:34] arrangement that Mr. Weemaes and

[45:35] I negotiated and the current

[45:36] one. And the terms are actually

[45:38] better.

[45:39] >> No, you did not.

[45:40] >> Yes, I did.

[45:41] >> Please provide what those

[45:42] terms are.

[45:43] >> Ladies and gentlemen of

[45:44] Pointe-Claire, you can go back

[45:45] -- I'm not finished.

[45:46] >> I'm not finished.

[45:47] >> Councillor Stork, I am still

[45:53] talking.

[45:54] >> Okay, but --

[45:55] >> Councillor Stork, I'm still

[45:57] talking. Excuse me, folks, I am

[45:58] the chair of this meeting and I

[45:59] will continue to answer the

[46:01] question. Councillor Stork, I am

[46:03] not finished yet. The

[46:07] arrangement that was negotiated

[46:10] by the so stated about one, the

[46:12] Heritage Society, included

[46:14] private members who do not want

[46:15] their names known. It is

[46:17] preferable not to. They are

[46:19] kind, generous human beings.

[46:21] Yes, one of the names mentioned

[46:22] is actually a person I spoke to

[46:24] and encouraged to do so. So I

[46:27] know exactly what is going on

[46:29] with this. The terms of access

[46:32] is a snare and a delusion. It's

[46:33] a small little place where you

[46:35] don't want people going in,

[46:37] especially with a working

[46:38] mechanism. It's a mythology.

[46:41] It's a way of distracting. The

[46:43] real issue is that we have to

[46:44] get the thing fixed. I would

[46:46] like it fixed so it works. Let's

[46:48] not get hung up on little terms.

[46:50] Let's get the job done. Let's

[46:52] get the money we need to get it

[46:54] done. Who cares about semantics

[46:56] and arguments and positions?

[46:57] >> I would like to finish --

[46:59] >> I am not finished. Who cares

[47:01] about semantics?

[47:02] >> Answer the question.

[47:03] >> Councillor Stork, would you

[47:04] let me finish? The answer -- the

[47:07] issue here is we want to get

[47:08] this thing fixed in any way

[47:10] shape or form. The archdiocese

[47:12] has $350,000. It needs a lot

[47:14] more. We have to find a way to

[47:15] get it to them. To get a working

[47:17] windmill requires a lot of

[47:18] money. And of story.

[47:20] >> Okay. I would just like to

[47:22] add some other points. So thank

[47:23] you for not answering my

[47:25] question. You said this

[47:28] documentation is decisional. No,

[47:30] it is not decisional. The

[47:33] documentation is not

[47:35] discretionary. We created a

[47:37] bylaw, a written bylaw, with

[47:39] money put aside in the bank. It

[47:41] is very simple. Whoever the

[47:45] owner of the building files

[47:48] reports, put some stuff to get,

[47:49] it says exactly what they are

[47:50] going to. Yes, they get paid at

[47:51] the end. Just like they are when

[47:54] they go to the provincial

[47:55] government. They are going to

[47:56] get paid at the end. We

[47:58] duplicated the procedure. The

[48:00] procedure that the provincial

[48:01] government will use for the

[48:02] heritage decided to get any

[48:03] money whatsoever. So it is not

[48:05] decisional. It is not

[48:07] discretionary. I can ask our

[48:08] legal department right now, but

[48:10] I can guarantee I know the

[48:11] answer. We created it. They fill

[48:13] in the documentation. We don't

[48:14] have the option of not giving

[48:16] them money if they say -- they

[48:19] do what they say they are going

[48:20] to do. It's a legal bylaw we

[48:21] have created. The money is put

[48:23] aside. They do what they need to

[48:24] do and they have to do the same

[48:26] thing with the provincial

[48:27] government when they go look for

[48:28] money as we are asking. But once

[48:30] they do that we hand them the

[48:32] money. I will be more than happy

[48:33] to hand them money. I'm not

[48:36] speaking on behalf of Council,

[48:37] but I guarantee you that they

[48:38] are happy with it as well. And

[48:40] no, we have not seen this new

[48:42] agreement. Obviously, you have,

[48:43] Mister Mayor. Let me finish. I

[48:47] am not finished, sir. Okay? I

[48:49] have not finished. So when you

[48:52] had this agreement in 2000 --

[48:54] when you had your agreement, it

[48:55] was done completely behind our

[48:57] backs. I had emails, I won't

[48:59] make them all public, I have

[49:00] emails between certain members.

[49:02] Nobody on council. Not even our

[49:04] DG involved in these

[49:05] discussions. Then you present us

[49:07] an argument and written

[49:09] statements that we will have

[49:10] full access to the windmill.

[49:11] There is nothing in your

[49:13] agreement with the previous deep

[49:14] G who is not even here to speak

[49:16] for himself. So my point is very

[49:18] simple. It's not decisional.

[49:21] It's not discretionary. It is

[49:22] there. And the archdiocese is

[49:25] fully access -- they can still

[49:26] go forward. Sign the

[49:30] documentation and we will hand

[49:31] them the money. If they give

[49:33] them a proxy, but they will have

[49:34] to go through the same process

[49:36] to get the money from the

[49:37] provincial government. So we

[49:39] have the money there. To say

[49:41] that the City is doing nothing?

[49:42] We are handing the $967,000.

[49:46] Just please go fill out

[49:47] paperwork. When you hire someone

[49:48] for renovations, do you give

[49:50] them all the money upfront? I

[49:51] don't. Can we possibly set some

[49:54] goals?

[49:55] >> You usually have to pay in

[49:57] installments.

[49:58] >> Well to a certain extent.

[50:00] Again, I'm more than happy to

[50:01] send the legal documentation.

[50:03] This is exactly how the

[50:04] provincial government doesn't

[50:05] for grants. And we are doing

[50:06] exactly the same thing. To say

[50:08] the City does not want to do it.

[50:10] The city. The city. No, we have

[50:12] done everything we can. We have

[50:14] offered the money. It is still

[50:15] available. It is still available

[50:16] to whomever applies for it as

[50:18] long as the owner signs off on

[50:19] it. So, the money is there. So,

[50:22] we need to move forward with

[50:23] this. We need to fix that

[50:25] windmill.

[50:26] >> I agree. And I don't want to

[50:28] continue this --

[50:29] >> We have not done everything

[50:30] we can. If we did what we could,

[50:33] the money would be upfront. And

[50:35] I have dealt with Stephen

[50:37] Maroney, the representative, the

[50:39] archdiocese, and I've negotiated

[50:40] with them. I know him quite

[50:41] well. And he in no way will

[50:45] start any kind of reparation

[50:48] process in an arrangement where

[50:50] they get paid at the end of the

[50:51] game. They will not do that and

[50:53] they refused to do that. So that

[50:54] is our bottom line. That is why

[50:56] since the current arrangement

[50:57] has been in place the windmill

[50:58] has been indicate. Nothing has

[51:01] happened and nothing will happen

[51:04] until someone changes the

[51:05] current arrangement which is

[51:07] inadequate arrangement. So what

[51:08] the archdiocese has done, it has

[51:10] gone out and done it themselves

[51:12] because they know the money is

[51:13] not going to come any other way.

[51:14] And the archdiocese is not going

[51:15] to start repairs and the other

[51:17] way. So they are saving the

[51:20] stalemate effectively. That is

[51:21] what is going on here.

[51:22] >> And I would just finish by

[51:24] saying that I hope there can be

[51:26] something in between. I see that

[51:28] there is a grant being given to

[51:29] the lakeshore General Hospital

[51:31] Foundation. I am sure the City

[51:33] gives grants to people who

[51:35] haven't given their past

[51:38] expenses or the expenses for

[51:39] which they are asking for the

[51:41] money. Are you sure -- I am sure

[51:44] there are other presidents as

[51:45] well. I would hope that the city

[51:47] would show the goodwill and to

[51:49] want to preserve our heritage.

[51:52] Not only to preserve, but to say

[51:54] that windmill for all of us here

[51:56] in Pointe-Claire. And so I hope

[51:58] we can find some middle ground

[52:00] somewhere. I think we need a lot

[52:03] more finding of middle ground.

[52:04] Thank you.

[52:05] >> May I comment?

[52:06] >> Yes, absolutely.

[52:07] >> Yes, we do give grants. We

[52:09] give grants to nonprofit

[52:13] organizations that we support,

[52:14] that support our citizens. I

[52:17] 100% support what we put in

[52:19] place to give $8 million of hard

[52:22] earned tax payer money that they

[52:24] have given to us to do the job

[52:27] that the church is legally bound

[52:28] to do, which they are not doing.

[52:30] Okay? I want this to be very

[52:32] clear. They are legally bound to

[52:33] take care of their building and

[52:34] they have not done it. This is a

[52:37] four billion dollar organization

[52:40] and -- in Canada alone. They

[52:41] have 400 and $90 million in

[52:45] cash. Okay? These are the

[52:47] statistics. And they can't front

[52:50] $950,000 until the project is

[52:52] done? When we are going to hand

[52:53] the money over? This might not

[52:55] be a very popular opinion that I

[52:56] am sharing right now, but I

[52:58] support fixing that, but I do

[52:59] not support giving the hard

[53:00] earned money of my residents to

[53:03] somebody, carte blanche, without

[53:05] them even being -- willing to

[53:09] collect paperwork. That is where

[53:10] I stand on this issue. We are

[53:12] talking about a multi billion

[53:13] dollar organization. I am never

[53:15] going to vote to grant them

[53:17] money beyond what we have done.

[53:19] This is to safeguard our

[53:21] citizens money and to make sure

[53:23] that this project goes through

[53:24] in the best way possible. Nobody

[53:27] gets carte blanche had a cheque.

[53:29] When we are talking about grants

[53:30] that we give our nonprofit

[53:32] organizations, we are talking

[53:33] about $15,000, not 1 million

[53:36] dollars.

[53:38] >> And there is what the

[53:40] windmill is rotting.

[53:41] >> That is based on their

[53:42] finances I have to say. They

[53:43] have to fill out the paperwork

[53:44] and submit their finances. If

[53:46] they have earned too much money,

[53:47] their current goes down. That is

[53:49] how it works. So when a four

[53:51] billion dollar organization is

[53:52] coming to us, we do want to get

[53:55] this fixed, yes, but are they

[53:56] the most worthy of our money?

[53:58] Probably not because they,

[53:59] bylaw, should be fixing it

[54:00] themselves. But we all want to

[54:02] see this thing get fixed. That

[54:03] is why we have pledged 1 million

[54:06] dollars. It is not because they

[54:07] deserve it.

[54:08] >> And the windmill is currently

[54:11] the thing that suffers because

[54:13] they own it and they are not

[54:14] going to do it. So the only way

[54:16] around it is what the Heritage

[54:17] society has done. Because they

[54:19] have realized that this impasse

[54:21] that you have just heard is the

[54:22] reason why it will continue to

[54:24] rock. So whether we think it is

[54:26] just or not, we have to save it.

[54:29] That is what the Heritage

[54:31] society has done. They have

[54:33] realized that it's not going to

[54:34] happen appear. So they are doing

[54:36] it themselves. You just heard

[54:38] why. Susan Weaver?

[54:46] >> So, in light of your new

[54:49] information that you have a

[54:50] police report, I would like you

[54:53] to may be submitted to legal

[54:55] affairs so we can have access to

[54:57] information and compare it.

[54:58] Because the insurance company

[55:00] goes by what they have written.

[55:03] >> Well, the shortage of Québec

[55:05] trumps an insurance company who

[55:06] wasn't even there. I'm just

[55:07] telling you. The police officers

[55:09] there Trump the insurance

[55:10] company that find out after the

[55:11] fact. I'm just telling you.

[55:12] >> If it's an authentic

[55:14] document, could you please --

[55:17] >> Yes, it is authentic.

[55:18] >> And you will submit it?

[55:20] >> Of course. Of course. I will

[55:22] give it to madame Thibault.

[55:23] Absolutely. Alain Dubé look?

[55:29] >> Okay. First, concerning the

[55:31] windmill, I was part of that

[55:33] police with captain. T'j'fou. At

[55:35] the time of Mr. Mayor Belvedere

[55:40] and with Mr. Cousineau, we

[55:42] worked very hard to find a ways

[55:46] to get going with the windmill

[55:49] situation. And we ended up

[55:51] facing a situation where we need

[55:54] the help from the government,

[55:58] the Ministry of Heritage, and we

[55:59] also need help from the

[56:02] archdiocese. And we need help

[56:04] from the City. And we need help

[56:06] from all the -- and we need help

[56:09] from all kinds of people if

[56:10] people can get together and sit

[56:11] down and get to an agreement.

[56:13] There is a way. But I cannot see

[56:16] -- who has maybe ten members,

[56:19] very brave workers, get anywhere

[56:24] unless there are three big money

[56:28] makers that get together. We try

[56:32] our best to get those people

[56:34] together. It did not happen

[56:37] unfortunately. It would be great

[56:38] if it did. But I don't like to

[56:41] hear you guys, especially Mister

[56:44] Mayor, please, it's not my

[56:45] fault, it's their fault. T'j'We

[56:47] are not children here to listen

[56:49] to those things --

[56:50] >> Excuse me, I never said it

[56:51] wasn't my fault. Did I ever say

[56:53] that?

[56:54] >> What I'm trying to say --

[56:55] >> Excuse me.

[56:56] >> There is a way to get all

[57:01] together. I see the comment of

[57:05] Mrs. Stainforth. It's a great

[57:07] comment. I mean it's impossible

[57:08] for her not to say, come on, we

[57:11] are not going to put all our

[57:13] money into that. We need

[57:14] collaboration from the

[57:15] government. We need

[57:16] collaboration from the church.

[57:17] We need that. Unless we get

[57:19] that, we are not going to go

[57:21] anywhere. That is my opinion.

[57:23] Now, this is not the reason why

[57:24] I am here at the microphone. I

[57:26] am talking about something else.

[58:17] [Speaking French]

[58:55] [Speaking French]

[59:25] [Speaking French]

[59:59] Il ne peut pas le faire parce

[1:00:00] que tu vas par année. Autrement,

[1:00:01] il y a des gens qui feraient ça

[1:00:02] à toutes les fins de semaine,

[1:00:04] qui en feraient leur gagnait,

[1:00:05] leur gagne-pain, ils feraient

[1:00:07] des ventes de garage. Mais il y

[1:00:08] a une limite. On ne peut pas en

[1:00:10] faire plus que deux. Là-dedans,

[1:00:13] il n'y a pas de limite sur les

[1:00:14] événements spéciaux. Ça, ça veut

[1:00:16] dire qu'il y a un port qui peut

[1:00:18] décider des demandes et des

[1:00:20] événements spéciaux à toutes les

[1:00:21] fins semaines de l'été, il n'y a

[1:00:22] pas de limite. Alors, ça, c'est

[1:00:24] la première chose à laquelle

[1:00:25] j'aimerais vous interpeller pour

[1:00:28] (---)

[1:00:29] pendant que vous faites les

[1:00:30] petites modifications concernant

[1:00:32] l'architecture des terrasses.

[1:00:33] Peut-être que vous pourriez en

[1:00:34] même temps réfléchir à l'idée de

[1:00:35] dire que s'il y a des événements

[1:00:37] spéciaux, combien d'événements

[1:00:39] spéciaux est-ce qu'un bar, un

[1:00:40] club, ou n'importe quelle place

[1:00:42] peut faire dans une été. Il y a

[1:00:44] une limite, s'il vous plaît.

[1:00:46] Deuxième chose, il n'y a pas

[1:00:49] seulement la quantité, mais il a

[1:00:51] la force du bruit, le son, la

[1:00:55] puissance du son. Dans toutes

[1:00:56] les communautés du West Island,

[1:00:58] il y a des limites de son. 40

[1:01:01] décibels, 50 décibels,

[1:01:03] dépendant, Kirkland,

[1:01:05] Pierrefonds, je ne le sais pas.

[1:01:08] Ici, jamais vous parler du son.

[1:01:11] Jamais ce règlement ne concerne

[1:01:14] la quantité de son. Ça peut

[1:01:17] aller jusqu'à 100 décibels, je

[1:01:18] le sais, j'ai vécu l'expérience,

[1:01:20] j'étais un voisin d'un bord. Je

[1:01:21] suis voisin d'un bar qui, lui,

[1:01:23] ne se gêne pas pour mettre les

[1:01:26] sécure dans le tapis. C'est

[1:01:30] intolérable, et la société, si

[1:01:31] vous voulez, la sécurité

[1:01:34] publique, ils sont tannés de

[1:01:35] recevoir des plaintes et des

[1:01:36] plaintes, et des plaintes. C'est

[1:01:38] trop fort! Pourquoi est-ce que,

[1:01:43] contrairement à toutes les

[1:01:44] autres villes, vous ne

[1:01:45] réfléchissez pas à une limite de

[1:01:48] son concernant les événements

[1:01:50] spéciaux. C'est deux choses,

[1:01:52] deux points, que je retrouve

[1:01:54] pas, ici. Que je ne retrouve pas

[1:01:56] ce soir. Le son, la force du

[1:02:00] son, la quantité de décibels,

[1:02:02] qui me semble qu'il devrait y

[1:02:04] avoir une limite, parce qu'à

[1:02:06] Dorval, ils n'ont pas besoin

[1:02:07] d'entendre ça., Et, en même

[1:02:11] temps, la fréquence des

[1:02:12] événements spéciaux. Les espèces

[1:02:14] de party! J'aimerais ça, si vous

[1:02:17] plaît, que vous vous posez la

[1:02:19] question, est-ce que vous avez

[1:02:20] pensé à ça? Est-ce qu'il va se

[1:02:21] passer quelque chose à ce sujet?

[1:02:24] - Oui, je pense qu'on a des lois

[1:02:26] contre le bruit. Don't we have

[1:02:30] noise limits in our nuisance

[1:02:32] bylaw? Do we not?

[1:02:34] - Dans le fond, monsieur Dubuc,

[1:02:35] la façon dont on voulait

[1:02:36] adresser cette situation-là pour

[1:02:37] les terrasses, c'est qu'on

[1:02:38] pallier cette ligne-là avec

[1:02:39] notre règlement de nuisance.

[1:02:41] Vous allez voir, je discutais

[1:02:43] avec

[1:02:44] (---)

[1:02:45] , à partir du mois d'avril, une

[1:02:46] adoption d'un changement dans

[1:02:47] les règlements de nuisance, ou

[1:02:48] qu'on va venir adresser ces

[1:02:51] sections-là, et parce que le

[1:02:52] bruit, on ne va pas seulement le

[1:02:53] gérer pour les terrasses, mais

[1:02:54] aussi pour l'ensemble de la

[1:02:55] ville, dans le fond.

[1:02:58] - Si vous permettez, Madame

[1:03:00] Verdon, monsieur Dubuc. Dans le

[1:03:01] règlement de nuisance, je vous

[1:03:03] invite à les voir. J'ai sous les

[1:03:05] yeux présentement. Attendez un

[1:03:07] instant. J'imagine que vous avez

[1:03:09] consulté le règlement de zonage

[1:03:10] avec les modifications pour le

[1:03:12] zonage pour les terrasses, mais

[1:03:13] vous n'avez pas regardé le

[1:03:14] règlement de nuisance?

[1:03:17] - Je ne l'ai lu au complet, et

[1:03:19] jamais il y a été question de

[1:03:22] décibels ou jamais il a été

[1:03:24] question de fréquence des

[1:03:26] événements spéciaux.

[1:03:28] - Il n'y a pas de fréquence.

[1:03:30] Nous avons des dispositions

[1:03:33] concernant le fait de causer, de

[1:03:36] permettre de mettre un bruit

[1:03:37] entre 23 heures et 7 heures le

[1:03:41] matin, du bruit qui incommodent

[1:03:42] le voisinage. Ça, c'est interdit

[1:03:44] par le règlement.

[1:03:46] - Ça date du maire Arthur

[1:03:49] Séguin.

[1:03:50] - Oui, ça date. Mais c'est quand

[1:03:51] même des dispositions qui

[1:03:52] actuellement sont applicables,

[1:03:53] et même appliquées quand il y a

[1:03:55] des plaintes de la Sécurité

[1:03:56] publique., Alors soyez informés

[1:03:57] que ça existe. The en moins, on

[1:03:59] a des questions de décibels,

[1:04:01] juste terminer et ensuite je

[1:04:02] vous le saluer. Pour les

[1:04:04] questions de décibels, il y a

[1:04:05] dans le règlement de nuisance un

[1:04:08] nombre de décibels, 50 décibels

[1:04:10] entre 21 heures et 7 heures, et

[1:04:12] 60 décibels entre 60 et 21

[1:04:14] heures. Ça ne correspond pas

[1:04:16] nécessairement à votre demande,

[1:04:18] ça concerne uniquement les

[1:04:20] appareils de type thermopompes.

[1:04:22] Alors, on a la disposition. Mais

[1:04:24] il n'y a rien qui empêche, qu'on

[1:04:25] a travaillé le règlement des

[1:04:27] terrasses, monsieur Dubuc,

[1:04:29] monter parfaitement a été

[1:04:31] interpellée pour s'assurer qu'il

[1:04:32] y avait une cohérence entre la

[1:04:34] volonté qu'on avait pour

[1:04:36] réglementer les terrasses dans

[1:04:37] les règlements d'urbanisme, pour

[1:04:39] s'assurer que le règlement de

[1:04:42] nuisance à laisser de façon

[1:04:43] cohérente. Alors, c'est

[1:04:45] exactement ce que madame Verdon

[1:04:46] nous a mentionné. On va attacher

[1:04:48] des dispositions du règlement de

[1:04:50] nuisance. On va réviser le

[1:04:52] règlement de nuisance pour voir

[1:04:53] où est-ce qu'on doit intervenir,

[1:04:54] pour justement couvrir le bruit

[1:04:57] et le nombre d'événements, le

[1:05:00] demandeur va être limitée à un

[1:05:01] certain nombre d'événements

[1:05:03] ponctuels dans l'été. On ne veut

[1:05:04] pas nécessairement, et ça je

[1:05:05] pense que ça avait été... je me

[1:05:07] demande même s'ils n'avaient pas

[1:05:08] été ajustés dans le nouveau...

[1:05:10] ce que vous avez entre les

[1:05:11] mains, est-ce que c'est le

[1:05:12] premier projet de règlement?

[1:05:14] C'est pas le règlement?

[1:05:15] - J'ai essayé d'obtenir, il n'y

[1:05:17] a rien de disponible.

[1:05:18] - Le règlement de zonage, le

[1:05:20] second projet qu'on adopte ce

[1:05:21] soir et là. Et ça me surprend,

[1:05:24] parce que j'étais vraiment sous

[1:05:26] l'impression, attendez-moi un

[1:05:28] instant, que nous avions oui les

[1:05:32] discussions concernant les

[1:05:35] limites qu'on doit... la limite

[1:05:39] de fréquence des événements où

[1:05:40] un propriétaire pourrait

[1:05:42] dépenser les règles qui sont

[1:05:43] mentionnés là-dedans. Mais si

[1:05:45] vous permettez, ça va me faire

[1:05:47] plaisir de vous donner plus de

[1:05:48] renseignements dans les

[1:05:49] prochains jours ou semaines, si

[1:05:52] vous voulez me communiquer votre

[1:05:53] adresse courriel. Ça va me faire

[1:05:55] plaisir de vous donner plus de

[1:05:56] renseignements. Mais soyez sans

[1:05:58] crainte, les préoccupations que

[1:05:59] vous avez là, elles ont été

[1:06:02] adressées.

[1:06:03] - Parce qu'en ce moment, je vous

[1:06:06] vois en train de modifier

[1:06:10] tranquillement les questions

[1:06:12] architecturales. C'est très

[1:06:13] clair. Vous allez voter ce soir.

[1:06:16] Plein de petits amendements, la

[1:06:18] quantité de personnes qui

[1:06:19] peuvent avoir sur une terrasse,

[1:06:20] de quoi ça a l'air, une

[1:06:22] micro-terrasse, une plus grosse.

[1:06:24] Je vois que vous essayez de

[1:06:25] préciser des choses avec

[1:06:26] beaucoup d'attention. De façon

[1:06:29] carré... quasi chirurgicale!

[1:06:30] Mais quand c'est le temps de

[1:06:32] parler de quelque chose qui

[1:06:33] embête une grande quantité de la

[1:06:35] population, il n'y a rien.

[1:06:37] - Mais, Monsieur Dubuc, c'est

[1:06:39] que ce n'est pas dans la

[1:06:40] réglementation de zonage de

[1:06:42] construction que nous pouvons

[1:06:43] régler les problèmes de

[1:06:45] nuisance. Nous avons un

[1:06:46] règlement pour cela. Alors, ma

[1:06:48] suggestion était aux autres

[1:06:49] équipes à la Ville, attendons

[1:06:51] d'avoir des règlements

[1:06:52] d'urbanisme modifiées pour

[1:06:55] s'assurer que le conseil va

[1:06:57] voter en faveur de ce

[1:06:58] règlement-là. Une fois que cela

[1:07:00] sera fait, on va venir

[1:07:01] harmoniser le règlement de

[1:07:02] nuisance pour s'assurer que les

[1:07:05] nouvelles dispositions n'est pas

[1:07:06] comme conséquence de créer des

[1:07:09] nuisances, de nouvelles

[1:07:10] nuisances, ou d'empirer des

[1:07:11] nuisances existantes. Mais, il

[1:07:14] faut quand même attendre que les

[1:07:15] règlements soient adoptés, vous

[1:07:16] en conviendrez avec moi.

[1:07:17] - Est-ce que vous pouvez me

[1:07:18] donner une idée de votre

[1:07:20] calendrier pour ces

[1:07:21] modifications?

[1:07:22] - Comme madame Verdon l'a dit.

[1:07:23] Ce, soir on adopte le second

[1:07:25] projet pour le règlement de

[1:07:26] zonage, mais en avril, on va

[1:07:27] amorcer la procédure pour la

[1:07:30] modification des nuisances, le

[1:07:31] cas échéant. Donc, il y aura un

[1:07:33] avis de motion est un projet. Et

[1:07:34] l'adoption du règlement de

[1:07:35] nuisance sera fait pour mes.

[1:07:37] Alors, l'idée, c'est d'avoir

[1:07:38] quelque chose de final, si

[1:07:40] besoin avait de changer le

[1:07:41] règlement de nuisance, pour la

[1:07:43] prochaine saison estivale.

[1:07:45] - Pour celles du mois de mai?

[1:07:47] - Idéalement. Dans le meilleur

[1:07:50] des mondes. Un règlement adopté

[1:07:52] pour mes.

[1:07:53] - O.K.! J'espère que vous

[1:07:55] comprenez la raison pour

[1:07:56] laquelle je suis là.

[1:07:57] - Je suis... je comprends

[1:07:59] parfaitement, mais vous n'êtes

[1:08:00] pas le seul citoyen à avoir

[1:08:02] adressé la situation. Ces

[1:08:04] préoccupations. Là

[1:08:05] - Merci beaucoup.

[1:08:12] >> Maria --? Did I get that

[1:08:16] right, Maria? Okay.

[1:08:21] >> I am here -- good evening. I

[1:08:23] am here to ask a question

[1:08:28] regarding in the flooding

[1:08:29] incident of last weekend which

[1:08:32] took place on long meadow. Okay?

[1:08:36] But I would first of all like to

[1:08:40] thank publicly the fire

[1:08:45] department, public security,

[1:08:47] including the group of

[1:08:49] volunteers, I think they are

[1:08:51] from rescue something rather.

[1:08:52] >> Volunteer rescue, absolutely.

[1:08:54] >> They were fantastic. They

[1:08:56] held us up for those crazy 48

[1:08:58] hours and believe me it was

[1:09:00] crazy. When our sub pump it was

[1:09:03] flooded, inundated, by the ditch

[1:09:06] that separates the western side

[1:09:08] of long meadow from the golf

[1:09:10] course. We were at 102 long

[1:09:14] meadow. We were one of four

[1:09:16] houses at least that were

[1:09:18] affected. Thankfully with all

[1:09:20] these people that were involved

[1:09:22] we were able to contain the

[1:09:24] flooding within our house to the

[1:09:27] supplement it. Right? We could

[1:09:31] not -- our yard was minimally

[1:09:33] flooded, although our neighbours

[1:09:35] down the road had quite the

[1:09:38] adventure in their basement. It

[1:09:39] was flooded. I also appreciate

[1:09:44] the rapid response from my city

[1:09:46] council person and from the city

[1:09:51] manager delineating the measures

[1:09:54] that were taken including

[1:09:58] addressing the debris left in

[1:10:00] the ditch by Hydro Québec when

[1:10:03] they trimmed the trees. It

[1:10:05] blocks the flow of water. Also,

[1:10:08] the golf course which apparently

[1:10:10] at this time assumes

[1:10:13] responsibility for leaving a

[1:10:14] flap open. You know, we are

[1:10:18] dealing with our insurance. They

[1:10:21] told us, go ahead, deal with

[1:10:23] your insurance. We will take

[1:10:24] that responsibility. It does not

[1:10:27] reassure us though that this

[1:10:30] won't happen again. This is the

[1:10:32] second event. I have been at

[1:10:35] that house with my husband,

[1:10:36] Jonathan McLelland, for 23

[1:10:38] years. I think we have done all

[1:10:40] we could. We are on a high water

[1:10:44] table, we know that. We have

[1:10:45] three some pumps. We have flood

[1:10:47] sensors. We have a Generac

[1:10:50] because the power goes off in

[1:10:51] that area very often. We are

[1:10:54] covered. I cannot build a wall

[1:10:58] protecting my property from that

[1:11:00] ditch. Right? No, I am assuming,

[1:11:06] we have asked over the years, at

[1:11:08] least 23 years we have been

[1:11:09] there, we have asked for permits

[1:11:10] from the City at least four

[1:11:12] times if not five, and every

[1:11:15] time front stairs, driveway,

[1:11:17] propane tank, generator, it

[1:11:18] centre. The city sends

[1:11:21] representatives to see if we are

[1:11:23] being negligent. Are we

[1:11:25] respecting what we said our

[1:11:27] permit was about? After the job

[1:11:30] is done, to check that, you

[1:11:33] know, you need to cover your

[1:11:34] propane tank more, et cetera.

[1:11:36] That is an example. My question

[1:11:40] is, I'm assuming the City

[1:11:43] authorized the permits that were

[1:11:45] given to the Beaconsfield golf

[1:11:48] course to assume all of that

[1:11:50] drainage work that they have

[1:11:51] been doing since last summer. Is

[1:11:55] the city -- can the city

[1:11:58] reassure me that the same

[1:11:59] mechanism that is used for the

[1:12:00] private citizen, to follow up on

[1:12:05] the permits that we have been

[1:12:06] authorized, is the same

[1:12:07] mechanism in place to ensure

[1:12:10] that the work is being done?

[1:12:13] >> It's an excellent question.

[1:12:14] We have a similar struggle on

[1:12:18] Austin. It is flooded regularly

[1:12:19] in a similar manner. Do we have

[1:12:22] a guarantee of control over the

[1:12:24] golf course so that we can have

[1:12:27] repeated events of this kind of

[1:12:29] thing?

[1:12:30] >> Unfortunately, this is a

[1:12:33] tribunal matter between the golf

[1:12:34] course. But, yes, the golf

[1:12:36] course has permits and stuff

[1:12:37] like that, then we have the same

[1:12:38] process that we have for regular

[1:12:40] citizens.

[1:12:41] >> Are you checking that process

[1:12:43] because obviously this is the

[1:12:44] second time that that ditch

[1:12:48] apparently, and it has never

[1:12:49] happened before they began the

[1:12:51] drainage work, but this is

[1:12:52] happened. So this is a new

[1:12:54] event, a new type of situation,

[1:12:59] and I would like the City to

[1:13:00] assure me that -- there is

[1:13:06] nothing else I can add. If even

[1:13:11] my sump pump is organized

[1:13:13] properly, and it is, it will not

[1:13:15] prevent my yard from flooding.

[1:13:18] Do I need to put sandbags

[1:13:19] against my patio door? You know

[1:13:22] those homes are split level.

[1:13:24] There is a street level. The

[1:13:28] water will come right in through

[1:13:29] that patio door and the basement

[1:13:31] windows on the side. There is

[1:13:34] nothing else. There's nothing

[1:13:36] else we as private citizens can

[1:13:37] do. That is what I would like

[1:13:38] some reassurance from the city

[1:13:40] that you are following up that

[1:13:41] work.

[1:13:42] >> Well, I know someone in the

[1:13:44] room who barricades their house

[1:13:45] every year. It does untold --

[1:13:49] yeah. Yeah. And I have been to

[1:13:51] visit Stephanie's house. It is

[1:13:53] an issue. We've got to do

[1:13:55] something. I agree. I think,

[1:13:58] from what my DG, Madame Verdun

[1:14:01] is saying, it's that there's

[1:14:03] litigation going on right now.

[1:14:04] So we cannot speak on it

[1:14:06] specifically on our part.

[1:14:07] >> Okay.

[1:14:08] >> Is there litigation?

[1:14:09] >> No. It's because these two

[1:14:12] private citizens, the golf

[1:14:13] course and the citizens, so it's

[1:14:15] not something that the City will

[1:14:17] interfere between two citizens.

[1:14:19] But if we had some work that the

[1:14:23] golf course has to do, the City

[1:14:26] will for sure follow-up with

[1:14:28] them.

[1:14:29] >> I'm asking you to do that

[1:14:30] because I cannot go there. The

[1:14:33] person from the golf course was

[1:14:35] very friendly. They say climate

[1:14:37] with your insurance. I will do

[1:14:39] that, but I cannot go there and

[1:14:41] supervise that they are

[1:14:44] respecting the permit that they

[1:14:46] requested. You know? The City

[1:14:49] has a responsibility, I believe,

[1:14:53] as I have a responsibility as a

[1:14:55] private citizen when I ask for a

[1:14:57] permit to make sure that I

[1:14:58] follow what the permit is that I

[1:15:01] requested.

[1:15:02] >> If they are requesting a

[1:15:04] permit for work, we will follow

[1:15:06] the permit.

[1:15:07] >> Are you saying that you are

[1:15:08] not sure if they have?

[1:15:10] >> Right now, I don't know. I

[1:15:14] don't know the permits in place

[1:15:15] for all citizens in

[1:15:16] Pointe-Claire. I'm not sure --

[1:15:19] >> Because it's a humongous job

[1:15:21] that they've been doing since

[1:15:23] last summer. Anyone who lives in

[1:15:25] the area knows that it's a

[1:15:29] tremendous amount of work. And I

[1:15:31] would assume that they would

[1:15:33] need to request something from

[1:15:35] this city which may have an

[1:15:37] environmental impact. So I'm not

[1:15:43] clear on what you are saying.

[1:15:47] >> I don't know all the permits

[1:15:49] that people are requesting right

[1:15:51] now. This is a private matter. I

[1:15:52] think it would be better for you

[1:15:53] to contact me tomorrow and we

[1:15:54] will look at it.

[1:15:57] >> So that's it? To contact you

[1:16:00] directly?

[1:16:01] >> Exactly. Because I do not

[1:16:03] have all the

[1:16:05] [Inaudible]

[1:16:06] With me.

[1:16:07] >> We can certainly look into it

[1:16:08] by all means, since it. What are

[1:16:09] the environmental standards have

[1:16:10] been respected and if they are

[1:16:13] breaching city law. We can look

[1:16:15] into that for sure. Absolutely.

[1:16:16] >> Okay. Thank you.

[1:16:17] >> We have a similar situation

[1:16:20] on Austin every summer. Okay.

[1:16:21] >> Thank you.

[1:16:23] >> Jonathan McLelland?

[1:16:31] >> Hi. I will be quick. My wife

[1:16:33] just spoke and she mentioned

[1:16:34] what I wanted to say. It appears

[1:16:37] I am living in a flood zone. It

[1:16:39] has been two floods in six

[1:16:41] months. I just wanted to say how

[1:16:43] much we appreciate Pointe-Claire

[1:16:47] rescue and all of their efforts.

[1:16:49] They brought us eight pump. My

[1:16:53] question is around -- I

[1:16:54] understand they are volunteers

[1:16:56] through the fire department. I

[1:16:58] want to know what is the city

[1:17:01] doing to properly reconvince

[1:17:04] these people?

[1:17:05] [Laughter]

[1:17:07] >> I guess they are not paid,

[1:17:09] but I thought just off the top

[1:17:10] of my head they could get a

[1:17:12] break on taxes?

[1:17:13] >> They get great toys, the best

[1:17:15] ways they can put their hands

[1:17:16] on.

[1:17:17] [Laughter]

[1:17:18] >> But seriously, to depend on

[1:17:19] volunteers. This is a crisis

[1:17:20] situation we had for 72 hours.

[1:17:21] Without them my house would be

[1:17:23] flooded. At least four other

[1:17:24] houses on Longmeadow. It's a lot

[1:17:27] of money.

[1:17:28] >> Yep.

[1:17:30] >> It's costing. That is my

[1:17:33] question.

[1:17:34] >> It's a great question.

[1:17:35] >> Could the city do more?

[1:17:38] >> Well, that's a good question.

[1:17:40] These are excellent questions.

[1:17:42] My first term, my first time in,

[1:17:44] I went and watched the flooding

[1:17:46] on Austin. Phone to rescue must

[1:17:48] have been there for four or five

[1:17:50] days with pumps going nonstop.

[1:17:52] They saved six or seven houses.

[1:17:54] >> You call them and the answer.

[1:17:55] >> They are unbelievable. They

[1:17:57] are our guardian angels. They

[1:17:59] are absolutely our guardian

[1:18:00] angels. I want to speak to -- I

[1:18:03] mean, Mr. Tanguay can speak to

[1:18:04] this more specifically, but it's

[1:18:06] public security that I think --

[1:18:08] that looks after. Volunteer

[1:18:10] security is -- not the fire

[1:18:13] department.

[1:18:14] >> Not the fire department?

[1:18:15] >> No, Pointe-Claire Public

[1:18:16] Security. We value them

[1:18:18] immensely. We do give them the

[1:18:20] best equipment we can possibly

[1:18:21] give them whenever we can

[1:18:23] because they are a gift from

[1:18:24] heaven. So we do try our best to

[1:18:25] keep them happy. I don't know, I

[1:18:27] think they are volunteer rescue.

[1:18:29] Is there remuneration in any

[1:18:31] way, shape or form? I don't

[1:18:32] think. So

[1:18:33] >> It's all voluntary.

[1:18:34] >> They are all volunteers. Our

[1:18:37] job, which I think we do fairly

[1:18:38] well, is to try and give them

[1:18:39] the right equipment to do what

[1:18:40] they have to do.

[1:18:41] >> Okay. If I was part of

[1:18:43] Council I would suggest that in

[1:18:45] the budget, that there's at

[1:18:46] least a Christmas bonus or

[1:18:48] something because they deserve

[1:18:49] it.

[1:18:50] [Laughter]

[1:18:51] Thank you.

[1:18:52] >> There is a Christmas party.

[1:18:53] >> There is a Christmas party!

[1:18:56] We value them immensely.

[1:18:58] >> You guys get drunk and they

[1:19:00] watch.

[1:19:01] >> No, no.

[1:19:02] [Laughter]

[1:19:03] All right, --.

[1:19:11] >> First, I just wanted to

[1:19:14] mention something just off the

[1:19:18] cuff about your remarks about

[1:19:20] Brent Cowan. My understanding, I

[1:19:22] could be confused, but my

[1:19:24] understanding is that the Agglo

[1:19:26] and the CMM are two separate

[1:19:28] political organizations. So, it

[1:19:33] could be that the mayor has a

[1:19:35] seat on a committee on one and

[1:19:37] the CMM, the other, has a freeze

[1:19:39] on the Fairview forest. But they

[1:19:41] are two separate political

[1:19:43] bodies.

[1:19:44] >> The Agglo -- the CMF and put

[1:19:46] a freeze at the Agglo put a

[1:19:48] freeze and we put a freeze.

[1:19:49] There are three. Yes, they are

[1:19:52] separate, but they are all

[1:19:53] related. The mayor of Montréal

[1:19:54] sort of has a vice grip on both

[1:19:56] the CMM and the Agglo.

[1:19:59] >> Yeah. But essentially what

[1:20:02] happens first in terms of the

[1:20:05] payment of the CMM, then it has

[1:20:08] consequences. Hydro studies, for

[1:20:10] example, by the agglomeration

[1:20:11] and someone. So there is that

[1:20:12] kind of collaboration, but they

[1:20:14] are separate organizations. And

[1:20:16] in with, just off the top --

[1:20:17] >> Also, just to state, unless I

[1:20:20] have been misinformed, I believe

[1:20:21] there are two. It is CMM and the

[1:20:25] City of Pointe-Claire that have

[1:20:26] freezes on. I am unaware of an

[1:20:28] egg will freeze.

[1:20:29] >> First I've heard of it also.

[1:20:30] I would love to learn more. It's

[1:20:32] interesting.

[1:20:34] >> Anyhow. You have a question?

[1:20:37] >> Yes. The other thing I want

[1:20:38] to say is, again off the cuff,

[1:20:42] but it is so exhausting to

[1:20:44] listen to you guys played. It is

[1:20:47] so tiring. You know, I'm even

[1:20:51] getting emotional about it

[1:20:52] because it has been years now

[1:20:53] that we are trying to do

[1:20:55] something for Fairview forest.

[1:20:58] And I'm afraid it's going to

[1:20:59] fall victim not to a real valid

[1:21:04] reason why it can be saved, but

[1:21:06] because of some political

[1:21:07] football. It's going to suffer

[1:21:11] the same way the windmill does

[1:21:13] or anything else you guys are

[1:21:14] going to fight about. And you've

[1:21:16] got to find some way, even

[1:21:17] though there's not a lot of time

[1:21:19] left in your term, and you are

[1:21:20] already getting into electoral

[1:21:22] politics, but you've got to find

[1:21:23] some way -- you don't have to

[1:21:25] like each other, but you have to

[1:21:27] work together. It's like

[1:21:29] Pointe-Claire is a microcosm of

[1:21:30] what is happening in politics

[1:21:32] everywhere. And the citizens are

[1:21:34] the victims here. Things like

[1:21:36] Fairview forest are the victims.

[1:21:40] It's exhausting. It really is. I

[1:21:42] say that on the bottom of my

[1:21:43] heart. Okay. I wanted to give

[1:21:48] City Council a heads up on

[1:21:50] recent awards. The mayor stole

[1:21:53] my under. Two recent awards

[1:21:56] given to two members of safe

[1:21:58] Fairview forest. The

[1:22:00] organization, for those who

[1:22:01] don't know, save Fairview forest

[1:22:03] is a nonprofit community

[1:22:05] organization. It's 100% totally

[1:22:07] run by unpaid volunteers. There

[1:22:10] are people who worked tirelessly

[1:22:12] and selflessly and with a lot of

[1:22:15] dedication to saving

[1:22:16] Pointe-Claire's last substantial

[1:22:19] unprotected forest. So, two

[1:22:22] members of safety forest

[1:22:24] Organization were recently made

[1:22:26] recipients of the king Charles

[1:22:27] third coronation metal. This

[1:22:31] medal is awarded to Canadians

[1:22:32] who have made a significant

[1:22:34] contribution to any particular

[1:22:36] province, territory or region,

[1:22:37] or community of Canada. So the

[1:22:40] first one is already spoken

[1:22:42] today. Someone who I'm so proud

[1:22:44] to know personally, she let

[1:22:46] Larsen. She is a king Charles

[1:22:47] medalists and a member of safe

[1:22:49] Fairview forest. She is a

[1:22:50] dedicated active member of the

[1:22:51] forest and I see here most

[1:22:54] Saturdays, even in the most

[1:22:55] blowing and freezing of weather

[1:22:57] conditions, standing vigilant

[1:23:00] for Fairview forest and our

[1:23:02] weekly demonstrations. I also

[1:23:03] know her very fondly as raging a

[1:23:05] granny. She is a member of

[1:23:08] countless boards here in

[1:23:09] Pointe-Claire and community

[1:23:11] groups. She also sits on the

[1:23:12] City of Pointe-Claire's

[1:23:14] environment and sustainable

[1:23:15] development advisory committee.

[1:23:17] The second one, Jan Lucia, is

[1:23:21] also a member and president of

[1:23:23] safe Fairview forest. She is now

[1:23:25] also a king Charles medalists.

[1:23:27] And Francis Scarpaleggia who

[1:23:30] awarded her the medal described

[1:23:31] her as follows. Jen is one of

[1:23:34] the most civic minded and

[1:23:36] engaged citizens I know. She is

[1:23:38] deeply committed to her

[1:23:39] Pointe-Claire community and its

[1:23:41] quality of life, as well as to

[1:23:43] the broader issues of local and

[1:23:45] global environmental protection.

[1:23:48] Among the many recognized

[1:23:50] commitments, Jen received the

[1:23:51] king Charles award for was her

[1:23:53] work advocating for Fairview

[1:23:56] forest and also her work for

[1:23:57] bread basket and the

[1:23:58] Pointe-Claire environment and

[1:24:00] sustainable development

[1:24:01] committee. So I think they are

[1:24:04] well deserved and I can

[1:24:05] personally attest to their

[1:24:07] incredible contributions they

[1:24:08] make to Pointe-Claire. So I just

[1:24:10] had to get that in. Sorry. So my

[1:24:13] question, at a recent city

[1:24:14] council meeting and a resolution

[1:24:15] was passed, and I know you guys

[1:24:17] may had lots of problems is

[1:24:19] before you got a final

[1:24:21] resolution, asking the city

[1:24:22] administration to furnish

[1:24:24] Councillors with more

[1:24:25] information of the various

[1:24:27] aspects of the law and the

[1:24:29] conditions needed and the

[1:24:33] consideration and requiring --

[1:24:35] acquiring Fairview forest. One

[1:24:36] of the steps taken in that

[1:24:37] regard is a call for tenders to

[1:24:38] have an eco systemic study done

[1:24:40] on Fairview forest. So I would

[1:24:45] like to know if the contract has

[1:24:48] been awarded to be company it.

[1:24:53] Secondly, part of the same

[1:24:54] question, can we please receive

[1:24:55] the parameters asked to be

[1:24:58] studied in the contract? So,

[1:24:59] what exactly are they going to

[1:25:02] be studying? In eco systematic

[1:25:04] study is a very broad term and

[1:25:05] it can mean so many different

[1:25:07] things. Second question, has the

[1:25:09] city taken notice of and applied

[1:25:12] to or considered receiving

[1:25:15] funding under the new Canada

[1:25:17] Québec agreement to protect and

[1:25:19] conserve nature, with up to 100

[1:25:22] million dollars of new money?

[1:25:26] >> That is in your wheelhouse,

[1:25:28] Jill. You want to take a stab at

[1:25:30] that one? Particularly the first

[1:25:36] part of the question.

[1:25:38] >> With respect to the eco

[1:25:40] systemic study. Essentially, the

[1:25:43] contract has not been awarded

[1:25:44] yep. Stay tuned basically. With

[1:25:50] respect to the content of the

[1:25:52] study itself, the study looks

[1:25:54] at, and I will paraphrase a bit,

[1:25:57] it looks at how the environment

[1:25:59] essentially the natural

[1:26:01] Infrastructure Services our

[1:26:03] natural environment. In essence,

[1:26:07] it looks at the sequestration of

[1:26:13] carbon. It looks at how our

[1:26:14] green spaces essentially

[1:26:17] contribute to the rain water

[1:26:21] management, so on and so forth.

[1:26:23] It looks at various criteria

[1:26:24] that are looked at. It's for the

[1:26:26] entire territory of the City of

[1:26:27] Pointe-Claire but the studies

[1:26:28] being done.

[1:26:30] >> All right. Are those

[1:26:32] parameters available for the

[1:26:34] public?

[1:26:40] >> Through the access to

[1:26:43] information, it will be -- no?

[1:26:45] [Inaudible]

[1:26:50] >> Once the contract is awarded,

[1:26:51] it will be accessible. --

[1:26:54] >> If I may just comment as

[1:26:56] well? The tender process has

[1:26:58] finished, but now it has to go

[1:26:59] in front of the selection

[1:27:00] committee to actually finalized

[1:27:02] this election along with the

[1:27:04] parameters as I understand it.

[1:27:06] >> Okay. Thank you.

[1:27:08] >> Thank you. Stephanie Myers?

[1:27:12] You are done? Keep it rolling?

[1:27:14] Okay. Was it about the golf

[1:27:15] course? Okay. I visited Miss

[1:27:19] Myers's house and every year she

[1:27:21] has to protect her home from

[1:27:23] flooding. She works at it

[1:27:25] nonstop, nonstop. Okay.

[1:27:32] On est cinq points deux, je

[1:27:34] pense?

[1:27:35] - Cinq points, un déposé le

[1:27:37] rapport concernant le registre

[1:27:39] été tenu du 17 au 21 février

[1:27:40] 2025, relativement au Règlement

[1:27:41] PC-2988. Qui était un règlement

[1:27:45] d'emprunt pour la flotte de

[1:27:47] 500000 dollars,, et aucune

[1:27:51] signature n'a été recueilli.

[1:27:55] >> 5.2, Notice of motion and

[1:27:56] filing of a draft by-law

[1:27:57] amending Zoning By-law PC-2775

[1:27:58] to clarify the application of

[1:27:59] certain rules concerning the use

[1:28:02] of specific lands located in

[1:28:04] zones N2 and Cb9 when the

[1:28:05] boundaries of such lands have

[1:28:07] been modified by the

[1:28:08] implementation and operation of

[1:28:10] the Réseau Express Métropolitain

[1:28:12] (R.E.M)

[1:28:13] .. As part of the construction

[1:28:15] operation of the of the Réseau

[1:28:19] Express Métropolitain

[1:28:20] (R.E.M)

[1:28:21] ., The boundaries of certain

[1:28:22] zones in N2 and Cb9 were

[1:28:23] affected by an exploration

[1:28:25] procedure. This affected certain

[1:28:26] buildings and imposed additional

[1:28:28] constraints on the occupation

[1:28:29] and sitting up the buildings,

[1:28:31] the structures and construction

[1:28:32] on set lots, and land affected

[1:28:34] by the expropriation. The draft

[1:28:36] bylaw aims to modulate the rules

[1:28:38] governing the occupation land

[1:28:39] and the sitting of the buildings

[1:28:41] when 18th of servitude has been

[1:28:42] assigned between the parties and

[1:28:43] the City of Pointe-Claire as an

[1:28:46] intervenor, and when this deed

[1:28:47] has been published in the Québec

[1:28:48] land registry. The bylaw

[1:28:50] contains no provision subject to

[1:28:51] the approval by way of a

[1:28:52] referendum.

[1:28:54] - 5.3. Avis de motion et dépôt

[1:28:56] d'un projet de règlement

[1:28:57] modifiant le Règlement PC-2787

[1:28:58] sur les plans d'implantation et

[1:28:59] d'intégration architecturale on

[1:29:00] dans le but de supprimer

[1:29:04] certaines dispositions en

[1:29:05] matière de démolition à la suite

[1:29:06] de l'adoption du nouveau

[1:29:07] règlement sur la démolition des

[1:29:08] immeubles, et de revoir la

[1:29:09] terminologie associée à

[1:29:10] l'intérêt patrimonial ainsi

[1:29:12] qu'au caractère spécifique de

[1:29:13] Pointe-Claire. Dans une

[1:29:14] perspective d'efficacité, de

[1:29:16] cohérence réglementaire, la

[1:29:17] modification proposée vise à

[1:29:19] retirer du règlement PC-2787

[1:29:21] toutes les références à la

[1:29:23] démolition d'immeubles, puisque

[1:29:24] ces dernières seront dorénavant

[1:29:27] régis par le Règlement PC-2787.

[1:29:30] On agite les définitions

[1:29:32] immeuble patrimonial et

[1:29:34] bâtiments quant aux

[1:29:36] caractérisation spécifiques de

[1:29:37] Pointe-Claire. On

[1:29:38] (---)

[1:29:39] écrit dans les fiches de

[1:29:41] caractérisation réalisé par le

[1:29:42] groupe patriarche. Ces dernières

[1:29:43] sont regroupées dans

[1:29:44] l'inventaire patrimoniale étude

[1:29:46] patrimoniale bâti de

[1:29:47] l'arrondissement de

[1:29:48] Pointe-Claire, publié en 2005.

[1:29:50] Lequel contient plus de 160

[1:29:51] fiches des cultive concernant

[1:29:52] des bâtiments patrimoniaux, les

[1:29:55] bâtiments reconnus pour leurs

[1:29:56] intérêts au niveau architectural

[1:29:58] et paysager contribue aussi à ce

[1:30:00] caractère.

[1:30:03] - Pour cinq points de cinq

[1:30:04] points trois, un Who gives these

[1:30:05] notices of motion? Do I have a

[1:30:07] mover? Who gives them, yes.

[1:30:09] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[1:30:12] >> Thank you. 5.4, Adoption of a

[1:30:16] first draft by-law amending

[1:30:17] Zoning By-law PC-2775 to clarify

[1:30:20] the application of certain rules

[1:30:21] concerning the use of specific

[1:30:22] lands located in zones N2 and

[1:30:25] Cb9 when the boundaries of such

[1:30:26] lands have been modified by the

[1:30:29] implementation and operation of

[1:30:30] the Réseau Express

[1:30:31] Métropolitain.

[1:30:35] >> 45.4, do I have a mover?

[1:30:37] >> Brent Cowan, district number

[1:30:39] eight.

[1:30:40] >> Seconder?

[1:30:41] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[1:30:43] >> All in favour?

[1:30:44] >> Thank you.

[1:30:48] - 5.5. Adoption d'un premier

[1:30:49] projet de règlement modifiant le

[1:30:50] Règlement PC-2787 sur les plans

[1:30:51] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:30:52] architecturale dans le but de

[1:30:53] supprimer certaines dispositions

[1:30:54] en matière de démolition à la

[1:30:55] suite de l'adoption du nouveau

[1:30:56] règlement sur la démolition des

[1:30:57] immeubles, et de revoir la

[1:30:59] terminologie associée à

[1:31:00] l'intérêt patrimonial ainsi

[1:31:01] qu'au caractère spécifique de

[1:31:02] Pointe-Claire. 5.6, Adoption

[1:31:07] with modifications,, of a second

[1:31:12] draft by-law amending Zoning

[1:31:13] By-law PC-2775 to clarify

[1:31:14] definitions related to terrace

[1:31:15] and garden structures, and to

[1:31:16] frame the development and

[1:31:21] operation of commercial terraces

[1:31:22] and microterraces. The second

[1:31:25] draft bylaw differs from the

[1:31:26] first draft adopted on January

[1:31:27] 14th 2025. The main change is

[1:31:30] concerned the following. The

[1:31:31] addition of a definition to

[1:31:33] clarify the concept of that

[1:31:35] music. Some definitions have

[1:31:36] been reviewed and corrected to

[1:31:37] simplify them or facilitate

[1:31:38] their understanding. Setback

[1:31:41] distances have been added to

[1:31:42] protect the tranquillity of

[1:31:43] areas where the predominant

[1:31:45] permitted uses residential.

[1:31:47] Clarifications have been added

[1:31:48] to facilitate coexistence

[1:31:51] between two adjacent

[1:31:53] establishments. Heating

[1:31:54] appliances powered by

[1:31:55] electricity have been added to

[1:31:56] the list of authorized

[1:31:57] equipments. Clarifications

[1:31:58] regarding universal

[1:31:59] accessibility have been

[1:32:00] introduced. Regulation of

[1:32:02] musical and cultural

[1:32:03] performances, with or without

[1:32:04] sound application. A calculation

[1:32:07] method for determining the

[1:32:08] minimum and maximum area of a

[1:32:09] commercial terrasse has been

[1:32:11] added. Clarifications to specify

[1:32:13] that a terrasse can be divided

[1:32:14] into several zones have been

[1:32:16] added. The operating hours of

[1:32:19] tourists is

[1:32:20] (applause)

[1:32:21] The operating hours of interest

[1:32:22] have been reviewed and certain

[1:32:23] provisions are subject to the

[1:32:25] referendum approval process. A

[1:32:26] notice will be published on the

[1:32:27] City's website identifying the

[1:32:28] zones concerned on the way in

[1:32:29] which qualified voters may apply

[1:32:31] to have a register opened, as

[1:32:32] well as the number of signatures

[1:32:34] required for a referendum to be

[1:32:35] held.

[1:32:38] - 5.7. Adoption avec

[1:32:39] modifications d'un règlement

[1:32:40] modifiant le Règlement de

[1:32:41] construction PC-2786 concernant

[1:32:42] le calcul de la capacité

[1:32:44] d'accueil de même que les règles

[1:32:46] relatives à l'aménagement d'une

[1:32:47] structure au-dessus d'une

[1:32:48] terrasse commerciale. Le

[1:32:50] règlement est différent du

[1:32:51] projet de règlement adoptée le

[1:32:52] 14 janvier dernier, puisqu'un

[1:32:54] nouveau chapitre est situé

[1:32:56] exigences relatives à

[1:32:57] l'adaptation de bâtiments pour

[1:32:58] parcours sans obstacles a été

[1:33:00] ajouté au Règlement de

[1:33:03] construction PC-2786. Cette

[1:33:04] modification vise à répondre à

[1:33:05] une demande reçue concernant à

[1:33:07] l'accessibilité des terrasses

[1:33:08] qu'ils établissement est

[1:33:10] associé. Les autres

[1:33:11] modifications effectuées ne

[1:33:12] change pas en substance les

[1:33:13] dispositions réglementaires.

[1:33:14] Elle concerne l'ajout de

[1:33:16] précision de clarification dans

[1:33:17] le but de faciliter

[1:33:18] l'application réglementaire du

[1:33:20] Règlement.

[1:33:22] >> 5.8, Adoption with

[1:33:23] modifications of a by-law

[1:33:24] amending Site Planning and

[1:33:26] Architectural Integration

[1:33:27] Programme By-law PC-2787 in

[1:33:29] order to regulate commercial

[1:33:30] terraces. The bylaw is slightly

[1:33:33] different from the one adopted

[1:33:34] on January 14th. However, the

[1:33:36] essence of the draft bylaw

[1:33:37] presented on January 20th

[1:33:38] remains unchanged. The main

[1:33:40] changes consist in simplifying

[1:33:42] certain provisions, eliminating

[1:33:44] redundancies, and adding

[1:33:46] clarification to facilitate the

[1:33:47] implementation of the bylaw.

[1:33:50] 5.9. Adoption avec un

[1:33:51] modifications d'un règlement

[1:33:52] modifiant le Règlement des

[1:33:53] permis et certificats PC-2788

[1:33:54] afin de préciser les

[1:33:55] informations requises au dépôt

[1:33:56] d'une demande de certificat

[1:33:57] d'autorisation concernant une

[1:33:58] terrasse commerciale de même que

[1:33:59] la durée de validité dudit

[1:34:00] certificat d'autorisation.

[1:34:03] L'essence est la portée du

[1:34:04] règlement n'ont pas changé

[1:34:05] depuis l'adoption de celui-ci le

[1:34:06] 14 janvier 2025. Quelques

[1:34:09] ajustements mineurs ont été

[1:34:10] effectués dans le but de

[1:34:12] clarifier ou de préciser

[1:34:13] certaines exigences quant au

[1:34:14] contenu de certains documents.,

[1:34:18] 5.10, Adoption with

[1:34:20] modifications of a by-law

[1:34:21] amending Village Code PC-2880 in

[1:34:22] order to specify that commercial

[1:34:23] terraces or commercial

[1:34:24] micro-terraces are not governed

[1:34:25] by the Village Code. A

[1:34:29] clarification has been added to

[1:34:30] the content of the draft bylaw

[1:34:32] adopted on January 14th, to

[1:34:34] specify that modification

[1:34:35] applies to both commercial

[1:34:37] dresses and commercial micro

[1:34:38] terraces.

[1:34:42] - Pour 05. Do I have a mover.

[1:34:45] 05 à 05. 10 >> Seconder?

[1:34:50] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,

[1:34:51] district three.

[1:34:52] >> Before voting, I will take a

[1:34:53] moment to explain why I will be

[1:34:54] voting against this bylaw. It's

[1:34:57] based on the prohibited --

[1:34:59] >> Excuse me. Just before you

[1:35:01] add something. Can you specify

[1:35:03] two which will be voting

[1:35:04] against? Is it the block?

[1:35:05] >> The bylaw. The block.

[1:35:08] >> The whole one?

[1:35:09] >> 5.5 to 5.10?

[1:35:12] >> Yes.

[1:35:13] >> Perfect.

[1:35:14] >> I will be voting against the

[1:35:15] bylaw based on the prohibitive

[1:35:16] activities on commercial

[1:35:17] terrasse is at section 5.26 Jay.

[1:35:20] This section is much too

[1:35:22] restrictive for my liking.

[1:35:24] First, there is what I would

[1:35:25] call excessive or over the top

[1:35:28] ban on activities such as

[1:35:31] dancing, theatrical for cinema

[1:35:32] to aggravate -- theatrical or

[1:35:36] cinematic craft fake

[1:35:37] performances as well as concerts

[1:35:38] and shows using loudspeakers or

[1:35:39] any other sound amplification

[1:35:42] devices, which I find is

[1:35:44] definitely excessive. This goes

[1:35:46] too far it takes us into

[1:35:47] footloose territory. It would be

[1:35:48] much more reasonable to allow

[1:35:50] the 60s and address any concerns

[1:35:52] about noise and nuisance but

[1:35:54] including specific limits based

[1:35:56] on decibels level workplace and

[1:35:58] proximity to residential homes.

[1:36:01] The bylaw already includes very

[1:36:03] strict limits to the hours in

[1:36:04] which music can be performed,

[1:36:06] and a cap on the number of

[1:36:08] participants on the terrasse

[1:36:09] which, in my view, is perhaps

[1:36:11] too low for summer crowds. We

[1:36:14] saw that especially at studio

[1:36:16] 77. Second, the bylaw allows for

[1:36:18] events with sound amplification,

[1:36:20] not dancing, to be authorized by

[1:36:22] the City on a case by case basis

[1:36:24] the special events. Again, I

[1:36:27] object to the principle that we

[1:36:28] should start by banning

[1:36:29] everything and then allow

[1:36:30] exceptions on a discretionary

[1:36:31] basis with no clear criteria. In

[1:36:34] a way that will force business

[1:36:35] owners to wade through red tape

[1:36:38] while being open to favouritism,

[1:36:40] possibly, and arbitrary

[1:36:41] decision-making. The rules

[1:36:42] should be clear and provide the

[1:36:43] same opportunities to everyone

[1:36:46] who follows them. Finally, the

[1:36:49] bylaw limits the opportunity to

[1:36:50] get a permit to activities that

[1:36:51] have been previously authorized

[1:36:53] by special events. The work

[1:36:56] previously is important here. It

[1:36:57] can easily be interpreted to

[1:36:58] mean that only business --

[1:37:00] businesses and terrasse is that

[1:37:02] hosted activities prior to this

[1:37:03] bylaw being passed would be

[1:37:05] allowed to host them in the

[1:37:06] future. Studio 77 may be

[1:37:09] grandfathered in and other

[1:37:10] business is, but new business is

[1:37:11] trying to get outdoor shows in

[1:37:13] Pointe-Claire and coming here is

[1:37:14] maybe out of luck. This is

[1:37:16] arbitrary and I think unfair. In

[1:37:18] the last couple of decades,

[1:37:19] Pointe-Claire has gone a little

[1:37:21] too far in the direction of a

[1:37:22] war on fun, in my opinion. You

[1:37:25] increasingly need to have a

[1:37:27] permit of some kind to do

[1:37:29] anything, whether you are a

[1:37:30] homeowner hosting an event on

[1:37:31] your street or running a

[1:37:32] business. Pointe-Claire south

[1:37:33] was once a resort town for

[1:37:35] tourists and had great indoor

[1:37:36] live music venues like the

[1:37:38] maples, the Edgewater at the

[1:37:40] pioneer. The success of studio

[1:37:42] 77 shows that conference after

[1:37:43] the pioneer was knocked down, it

[1:37:45] shows us that the market is

[1:37:46] still there and may even

[1:37:47] increase overtime. Along with

[1:37:50] the war on fun, Pointe-Claire

[1:37:51] has also seen aggressive

[1:37:53] residential development at the

[1:37:54] expense of commercial spaces.

[1:37:57] Developers and city planners

[1:37:58] often promised mixed use

[1:37:59] developments, but the result

[1:38:00] tends to be all presidential. It

[1:38:02] is simply more profitable for

[1:38:04] developers to build

[1:38:05] residentially only, while a

[1:38:07] luxury home owners don't like to

[1:38:08] have the noises and smells of

[1:38:10] bars and restaurants or grocery

[1:38:11] stores beneath them. My belief

[1:38:14] is that, here we go, that it

[1:38:16] claustrophobic 15-minute city

[1:38:17] made up of 600 square foot

[1:38:19] condos has an even greater need

[1:38:21] for businesses that give

[1:38:23] residences places together,

[1:38:25] socialize, and be entertained.

[1:38:29] That is the reason I will be

[1:38:30] voting against it. So, from 5.5

[1:38:33] to 5.10. Yes?

[1:38:35] >> Before you vote in gets to,

[1:38:36] are we including 5.5 which is

[1:38:39] concerning --

[1:38:40] >> Architectural?

[1:38:41] >> You are okay with 5.5, but

[1:38:43] then you vote against 5.6 and

[1:38:44] onwards?

[1:38:45] >> Yes.

[1:38:46] - Merci, Madame. So, all in

[1:38:50] favour? Against?

[1:38:55] >> Thank you.

[1:38:56] >> Okay.

[1:39:02] - 6.1?

[1:39:04] - 6.1. Accorder un soutien

[1:39:05] financier pour un montant total

[1:39:06] de 600$ à la Villa St-Louis.

[1:39:09] C'est fait et d'accorder pour

[1:39:11] faciliter

[1:39:12] (---)

[1:39:13] .

[1:39:14] >> 6.2, Grant financial support

[1:39:15] for a total amount of $ 1,600 to

[1:39:16] Les Amis du Vieux-Moulin. Les

[1:39:18] Amis du Vieux-Moulin. Requesting

[1:39:19] a donation for the City of

[1:39:21] Pointe-Claire to fund an

[1:39:22] activity for their golden age

[1:39:23] Club. 6.3. Deux Accorder un

[1:39:25] soutien financier pour un

[1:39:26] montant total de 35000$ à la

[1:39:27] Fondation Hôpital Général

[1:39:28] Lakeshore. Ce don de la Ville de

[1:39:30] Pointe-Claire pour mettre à

[1:39:34] l'information Fondation Hôpital

[1:39:35] Général Lakeshore. D'investir

[1:39:36] pour évaluer la qualité des

[1:39:37] soins de santé fournis et

[1:39:39] améliorer la qualité de vie de

[1:39:40] tous ceux qui franchissent leur

[1:39:41] porte. Le calcul est basé sur 1

[1:39:43] dollar tant qu'il est pour tous

[1:39:44] les résidents de Sinclair.

[1:39:46] >> 6.4, Authorize the lending of

[1:39:47] equipment for various events /

[1:39:48] fundraisers held on the

[1:39:49] territory of the city. The

[1:39:50] events concerned are Empty

[1:39:52] Bowls, which is a fund-raiser

[1:39:53] organized by bread basket. A

[1:39:56] softball tournament to benefit

[1:39:57] the lakeshore hospital organized

[1:39:58] by CP H. And poutine fist, we're

[1:40:00] gonna buy -- production.

[1:40:05] >> For 6.1 to 6.4, do I have a

[1:40:08] mover?

[1:40:09] >> Eric Stork, that including

[1:40:11] poutine fest.

[1:40:12] >> And a seconder?

[1:40:14] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.

[1:40:16] >> All in favour?

[1:40:19] - 7.1. Déposer le procès-verbal

[1:40:20] de la réunion du 27 novembre

[1:40:21] 2024 du Comité consultatif

[1:40:22] Stewart Hall.

[1:40:28] >> 7.2, File the minutes of the

[1:40:29] December 10, 2024, meeting of

[1:40:30] the Traffic Committee. 7.3.

[1:40:31] Déposer le procès-verbal de la

[1:40:32] réunion du 12 décembre 2024 du

[1:40:33] Comité d'art public. Ouais

[1:40:35] >> 7.4, File the minutes of the

[1:40:36] January 29, 2025, meeting of the

[1:40:37] Youth Advisory Board.

[1:40:47] >> 10.2, File the report

[1:40:49] concerning authorized

[1:40:50] reimbursements in connection

[1:40:51] with municipal

[1:40:52] councillors'research and support

[1:40:53] expenses, for fiscal year 2024.

[1:40:55] - 10.3. Déposer le rapport des

[1:40:56] dépenses des élus

[1:40:58] (frais de représentation,

[1:41:00] frais de congrès et colloques,

[1:41:01] frais de déplacement)

[1:41:02] pour l'année 2024.

[1:41:06] >> 10.4, Adopt a Policy on the

[1:41:07] establishment of immovable

[1:41:08] subcategories and division of

[1:41:09] the City's territory into

[1:41:10] sectors. Through this policy,

[1:41:11] the City of Pointe-Claire aims

[1:41:12] to pursue the following

[1:41:14] objectives

[1:41:15] | | |

[1:41:16] Based on mobile subcategories

[1:41:17] and the division of its

[1:41:18] territory into sectors. To adopt

[1:41:19] practices that optimize the

[1:41:20] city's efforts when preparing a

[1:41:21] new property assessment rule. To

[1:41:23] ensure that the process of

[1:41:25] developing a new assessment role

[1:41:27] proceeds with that delay and

[1:41:28] within the established

[1:41:29] deadlines, in accordance with

[1:41:30] the framework set out in the --

[1:41:32] municipal taxation. To guarantee

[1:41:34] the presence of a necessary data

[1:41:35] in the new property assessment

[1:41:37] role as well as been short its

[1:41:38] validity and integrity. To meet

[1:41:40] the city's objectives in terms

[1:41:41] of tax planning. Finally, to

[1:41:43] ensure that clear and precise

[1:41:44] information is available to the

[1:41:46] assessor one preparing a new

[1:41:47] property assessment --.

[1:41:49] - 10.5. Eux Autoriser

[1:41:50] l'utilisation des réserves aux

[1:41:51] livres pour effectuer le

[1:41:52] remboursement du refinancement

[1:41:53] de décembre 2025. Nous avons des

[1:41:55] règlements d'emprunts qui ont

[1:41:56] des soldats refinancer pour

[1:41:57] lesquels nous désirons payer

[1:41:59] comptant. Nous comptons donc

[1:42:00] utiliser nos réserves actuelles

[1:42:01] pour effectuer le rapport

[1:42:02] seulement du refinancement

[1:42:03] prévus à la tête suivante, soit

[1:42:05] le 17 décembre 2025. Pour un

[1:42:08] montant de 7 millions 718000

[1:42:11] dollars.

[1:42:13] >> 10.6, Authorize the

[1:42:14] participation of the City of

[1:42:15] Pointe-Claire in the purchasing

[1:42:16] consortium for the 2025-2026

[1:42:17] winter season, for the calls for

[1:42:18] tenders prepared by the City of

[1:42:19] Montreal for the supply and

[1:42:20] delivery of winter abrasives and

[1:42:22] deicing salt. In order to

[1:42:25] benefit from favourable

[1:42:26] financial conditions, the City

[1:42:27] of Pointe-Claire wishes to join

[1:42:29] the purchasing group for the

[1:42:30] City of Montréal to procure

[1:42:32] deicing salt required for its

[1:42:33] operations. The approximate

[1:42:34] annual quantity is around 6000

[1:42:37] tons, but it may vary up or down

[1:42:38] depending on climate change. In

[1:42:40] the event of a neat exceeding

[1:42:42] 6000 tons annually, for

[1:42:44] administrative efficiency

[1:42:45] purposes, the amount maybe

[1:42:46] increased if the necessary funds

[1:42:47] are available.

[1:42:49] Pour 10. >> 4

[1:42:52] Do I have a mover?

[1:42:54] >> Paul Bissonnette, district.

[1:42:55] To

[1:42:56] >> A seconder?

[1:42:57] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[1:42:58] >> All in favour?

[1:43:00] >> Thank. You

[1:43:02] - 12.1. Déposer la liste des

[1:43:04] changements au personnel par

[1:43:05] décisions déléguées pour le mois

[1:43:06] de mars 2025.

[1:43:08] >> 12.2, Approve the list of

[1:43:09] non-delegated staff changes as

[1:43:10] of March 11, 2025.

[1:43:11] - 12.3. Approuver une elles

[1:43:12] modification à la politique sur

[1:43:13] les déplacements à la demande de

[1:43:14] l'employeur. Les montants sont

[1:43:15] réalisés à la hausse comme à la

[1:43:17] baisse. Le 1er mai de chaque

[1:43:18] année en fonction de l'indice

[1:43:19] moyen des prix à la

[1:43:21] consommation. Sous l'indice

[1:43:22] Transport privé province de

[1:43:23] Québec de l'année civile

[1:43:25] précédente. Au 1er mai 2025, les

[1:43:28] montants augmenteront d'un

[1:43:30] sous-.

[1:43:36] - Pour 12 points deux à 12

[1:43:37] points trois Do I have a mover?

[1:43:40] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,

[1:43:42] district three.

[1:43:43] >> And a seconder?

[1:43:44] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.

[1:43:46] >> All in favour?

[1:43:47] >> Thank you. 14.1, Exercise the

[1:43:51] renewal option provided for in

[1:43:53] the contract entered into with

[1:43:54] Conception Paysage Inc., for the

[1:43:56] year 2025, in the amount of $

[1:43:57] 26,472.65, taxes included, for

[1:44:02] professional services for the

[1:44:03] monthly and annual inspection of

[1:44:05] the City's playgrounds.

[1:44:07] Inspection of the city's

[1:44:08] playgrounds is essential to

[1:44:09] ensure safe play areas for

[1:44:11] children. Every year, detailed

[1:44:12] monthly inspections of each

[1:44:13] piece of equipment art carried

[1:44:14] out by a professional service.

[1:44:17] - 14.2. Se prévaloir de l'option

[1:44:18] de renouvellement prévue au

[1:44:19] contrat intervenu avec 9042-0845

[1:44:20] Québec inc.

[1:44:21] (Mario C. et fils)

[1:44:22] , Pour l'année 2025, au montant

[1:44:23] de 93752,79$, taxes incluses,

[1:44:25] pour des travaux de plantation

[1:44:28] et d'entretien horticole

[1:44:29] incluant arrosage des boulevards

[1:44:30] Saint-Jean et des Sources, de

[1:44:31] l'avenue Holiday et Place de la

[1:44:32] Triade. Ce contrat sert à

[1:44:35] maintenir la pérennité des

[1:44:36] végétaux et à maintenir la

[1:44:37] pauvreté des aménagements.

[1:44:41] >> 14.3, Exercise the renewal

[1:44:42] option provided for in the

[1:44:43] contract entered into with Waste

[1:44:44] Management Québec Inc., for the

[1:44:46] period of April 1, 2025, to

[1:44:48] March 31, 2026, in the amount of

[1:44:49] $ 1 979 615.77, taxes included

[1:44:56] for the collection and transport

[1:44:57] of domestic waste, compostable

[1:44:58] materials, bulky items,

[1:44:59] Christmas trees and roll-off

[1:45:00] containers.

[1:45:02] - 14.4. Se prévaloir de l'option

[1:45:04] de renouvellement prévue au

[1:45:05] contrat intervenu avec Colas

[1:45:07] (anciennement Meloche,

[1:45:08] division de Sintra)

[1:45:09] et Construction DJL, pour la

[1:45:10] période de la mi-mars 2025 à la

[1:45:12] mi-mars 2026, au montant de

[1:45:14] 329679,32$, taxes incluses, pour

[1:45:16] la fourniture et le chargement

[1:45:18] d'enrobés bitumineux. Le mélange

[1:45:20] bitumineux sont nécessaires pour

[1:45:21] la réparation et l'installation

[1:45:23] des conduites d'eau, des égouts,

[1:45:25] des nids-de-poule, et des

[1:45:26] fissures de la chaussée, ainsi

[1:45:27] que pour la réparation des

[1:45:28] trottoirs adjacent à la

[1:45:29] chaussée.

[1:45:32] >> 14.5, two Exercise the

[1:45:34] renewal option provided for in

[1:45:35] the contract entered into with

[1:45:36] Environnement Routier NRJ Inc.,

[1:45:37] for the period of April 1, 2025,

[1:45:38] to March 31, 2026, in the amount

[1:45:39] of $ 121,427.40, taxes included

[1:45:46] for the collection by crane and

[1:45:48] transportation of waste

[1:45:49] materials from semi-buried

[1:45:50] containers. This contract

[1:45:52] ensures that all residual waste

[1:45:53] a committed in the city's semi

[1:45:55] brick containers will be

[1:45:56] collected at a regular frequency

[1:45:59] using proper equipment and

[1:46:00] ensuring proper disposal at the

[1:46:02] respective collection sites.

[1:46:03] - 14.6. Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:46:04] le remplacement et

[1:46:05] l'installation de raccordements

[1:46:06] de service pour l'année 2025, à

[1:46:09] EDJ, pour un montant total de

[1:46:10] 477076,76$, taxes incluses. Ce

[1:46:16] contrat est requis pour

[1:46:17] effectuer sur demande des

[1:46:18] travaux de remplacement et

[1:46:19] d'installation de raccordement

[1:46:20] de services résidentiels pour

[1:46:21] l'année 2025.

[1:46:24] >> 14.7, To award a contract for

[1:46:25] rental services of portable

[1:46:26] sinks, portable toilets and

[1:46:27] sanitary trailers for the years

[1:46:29] 2025, 2026 and 2027, to Sanivac

[1:46:34] for a total amount of $

[1:46:35] 188,591.19, taxes included, with

[1:46:37] the years 2028 and 2029 in

[1:46:39] option. These toilets and

[1:46:43] portable sinks and sanitary

[1:46:44] trailers are intended for use at

[1:46:45] various outdoor sites, with

[1:46:47] rental periods varying according

[1:46:48] to their need. The purpose of

[1:46:49] this approach is to maintain

[1:46:50] service and meet the needs of

[1:46:52] the population in the city's

[1:46:53] various parks and green spaces.

[1:46:55] According to the calendar of

[1:46:56] other activities also.

[1:46:57] - 14.8. Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:46:59] la fourniture et la livraison

[1:47:00] d'arbres pour l'année 2025, à

[1:47:02] Pépinière Jardin 2000 inc., pour

[1:47:04] un montant total de 199585,10$,

[1:47:07] taxes incluses. 14 points en 14

[1:47:11] points six. 14 points huit, je

[1:47:14] m'excuse. Do I have a mover?

[1:47:16] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[1:47:18] >> And a seconder?

[1:47:20] >> All in favour?

[1:47:25] >> 15.1, To exercise the renewal

[1:47:27] option provided for in the

[1:47:28] contract entered into with

[1:47:29] Av-Tech Inc., for the period of

[1:47:32] April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2026,

[1:47:35] in the amount of $ 47,362.79,

[1:47:39] taxes included, for maintenance,

[1:47:40] inspection and repair services

[1:47:41] for generators in the city of

[1:47:42] Pointe-Claire.

[1:47:44] - 15.2. Se prévaloir de l'option

[1:47:45] de renouvellement prévue au

[1:47:46] contrat intervenu avec A.S.I.

[1:47:47] Expert Aquatique, pour la

[1:47:48] période du 1 avril 2025 au 31

[1:47:49] mars 2026, au montant de

[1:47:51] 5793,30$, taxes incluses, pour

[1:47:55] la fourniture et la livraison de

[1:47:57] produit chimiques pour les

[1:47:58] piscines de la Ville. Ce contrat

[1:48:01] prévoit la fournitures et

[1:48:02] livraisons sur demande de

[1:48:03] différents produits chimiques

[1:48:04] pour les piscines intérieures du

[1:48:06] Centre aquatique du

[1:48:07] (---)

[1:48:08] . Ces produits assurent que les

[1:48:09] piscines restent opérationnels

[1:48:10] et fonctionne de manière

[1:48:11] optimale.

[1:48:13] >> 15.3, To exercise the renewal

[1:48:14] option provided for in the

[1:48:15] contract entered into with Trane

[1:48:16] Canada ULC, for the period of

[1:48:17] April 1, 2025, to March 31,

[1:48:22] 2026, in the amount of $

[1:48:25] 85,858.52, taxes included, for

[1:48:27] the supply and the delivery,

[1:48:29] upon request, of various

[1:48:30] mechanical parts for HVAC

[1:48:31] systems. This contract provides

[1:48:33] for the supply and delivery on

[1:48:35] request of various mechanical

[1:48:36] parts for the heating,

[1:48:37] ventilation, air conditioning

[1:48:39] systems of the city's various

[1:48:40] buildings.

[1:48:41] - 15.4. Approuver une

[1:48:42] modification au contrat

[1:48:43] intervenu avec Aquatechno

[1:48:44] Spécialistes Aquatiques inc.,

[1:48:45] pour la fourniture et livraison

[1:48:47] de produit chimiques pour

[1:48:48] piscines et jeux extérieurs,

[1:48:50] pour un montant de 15601,84$,

[1:48:52] taxes incluses. L'augmentation

[1:48:55] des coûts fait suite à l'achat

[1:48:57] allemand extrêmes des leaders

[1:49:00] nier, qui a nécessité d'utiliser

[1:49:02] davantage de produits chimiques

[1:49:03] pour la qualité des piscines

[1:49:05] extérieures de la ville.

[1:49:07] >>

[1:49:08] >> For 15.1 to 15.4, do I have a

[1:49:10] mover?

[1:49:14] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[1:49:15] >> And a seconder?

[1:49:17] >> Tara Stainforth, district

[1:49:19] four.

[1:49:20] >> All in favour?

[1:49:21] >> Thank you. 16.1, To authorize

[1:49:24] the signature of the notice and

[1:49:25] consent to the reorganization of

[1:49:28] Groupe ABS Inc. in reference to

[1:49:29] the contract for professional

[1:49:30] services for geotechnical

[1:49:31] studies, environmental

[1:49:33] characterization and material

[1:49:34] quality control for municipal

[1:49:37] infrastructure rehabilitation

[1:49:38] for 2024, with two years in

[1:49:42] option. So the contract is

[1:49:43] partly in effect between the

[1:49:44] city and Groupe ABS Inc., --

[1:49:46] under the same contract.

[1:49:47] - 16.2. Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:49:48] la réfection des sentiers et de

[1:49:49] l'éclairage au parc Northview, à

[1:49:52] Groupe Damex, pour un montant

[1:49:54] total de 619023,68$, taxes

[1:49:57] incluses. 16.3, To award a

[1:50:02] contract for the repair of Du

[1:50:03] Bord-duLac-Lakeshore Road, from

[1:50:04] Raynor Avenue to the entrance of

[1:50:05] Highway 20, to Ali Excavation

[1:50:06] Inc., for a total amount of $

[1:50:10] 2,732,822.74, taxes included.

[1:50:14] The Works covered by the

[1:50:16] contract include resurfacing and

[1:50:17] related works on the section

[1:50:19] between rain Avenue and the

[1:50:20] Highway 20 ramp.

[1:50:21] - 16.4. Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:50:23] la reconstruction du et

[1:50:24] rond-point ouest de l'avenue

[1:50:25] Cedar, à Construction G-Nesis

[1:50:26] inc., pour un montant total de

[1:50:28] 965442,78$, taxes incluses. Les

[1:50:35] travaux consistent à la

[1:50:36] reconstruction de l'avenue

[1:50:37] Centre, incluant le remplacement

[1:50:38] de la conduite d'aqueduc, les

[1:50:40] égouts sanitaires et les coûts

[1:50:41] pluviales. Le remplacement des

[1:50:43] raccordement de services, la

[1:50:44] construction d'une bordure en

[1:50:45] béton de chaque côté, le pavage

[1:50:47] de la rue et la remise en état

[1:50:48] des lieux.

[1:50:51] >> 16.5, Award a contract for

[1:50:53] the replacement of street lights

[1:50:54] on Ashington and Inglewood

[1:50:55] avenues, to Laurin Laurin Inc.,

[1:50:57] for a total amount of $

[1:51:00] 324,684.80, taxes included. The

[1:51:03] city intends to replace the

[1:51:04] lighting system on Ashton and

[1:51:06] Inglewood avenues including

[1:51:07] basis, lamppost, conduits and

[1:51:08] all piece is required for the

[1:51:09] project.

[1:51:10] - 16.6. Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:51:11] des services professionnels pour

[1:51:12] l'inspection de la structure

[1:51:13] située sur le boulevard

[1:51:14] Saint-Jean au-dessus des voies

[1:51:16] du CN, du CP et de l'avenue

[1:51:18] Donegani, à IGF axiom inc., pour

[1:51:20] un montant total de 71164,50$,

[1:51:23] taxes incluses. La Ville devrait

[1:51:26] retenir les services

[1:51:27] professionnels d'une ferme pour

[1:51:28] effectuer les activités

[1:51:30] d'inventaires, d'inspecteur

[1:51:31] général et le calcul de la

[1:51:33] capacité portante ces

[1:51:34] structures.

[1:51:40] >> Holden. Hold on. Sorry. My

[1:51:43] mistake. 16.7, Approve the

[1:51:46] evaluation criteria to be used

[1:51:47] for projects involving the

[1:51:48] supply and the installation of

[1:51:49] play modules. This grid will be

[1:51:50] added to the eighth standard

[1:51:51] grids authorized and can be used

[1:51:53] for several playground model

[1:51:54] projects. Do I have a mover?

[1:51:59] >> Paul Bissonnette, district.

[1:52:01] Two

[1:52:02] >> And a seconder?

[1:52:03] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.

[1:52:04] >> All in favour? Yes,

[1:52:08] Councillor Cousineau?

[1:52:09] >> On that final, we have been

[1:52:13] asked by one owner On a eu des

[1:52:17] demandes, et je vais l'en

[1:52:18] français, par un propriétaire

[1:52:23] qui est après rebâtir sa maison.

[1:52:26] J'ai l'assurance qu'on va tout

[1:52:27] faire pour ne pas allonger son

[1:52:30] projet ou nuire à son prochain.

[1:52:32] - Monsieur Cousineau, est-ce que

[1:52:33] vous pouvez faire référence à un

[1:52:35] point dans l'ordre du jour pour

[1:52:36] nous guider?

[1:52:37] - Excusez-moi. Ça, c'est...

[1:52:41] - 16 points quatre?

[1:52:42] - Oui.

[1:52:44] - C'est le contrat pour la rue

[1:52:45] cet art, c'est ça?

[1:52:46] - Oui

[1:52:47] (rires)

[1:52:48] .

[1:52:49] - C'est noté. Une chose que je

[1:52:50] vous ai amené.

[1:52:59] - 17.1 Assemblée publique

[1:53:01] concernant une demande sur les

[1:53:02] projets particuliers de

[1:53:03] construction, de modification ou

[1:53:04] d'occupation d'un immeuble

[1:53:05] (PPCMOI)

[1:53:06] situé au 27, avenue Salisbury.

[1:53:07] Donc, une fois que j'aurai donné

[1:53:08] les détails du projet, les gens

[1:53:09] dans la salle auront l'occasion

[1:53:11] de s'exprimer s'ils le

[1:53:13] souhaitent. En raison d'un

[1:53:15] incendie, le bâtiment a perdu

[1:53:19] les droits acquis dont il

[1:53:22] bénéficiait. La reconstruction

[1:53:23] de salon funéraire tel que

[1:53:24] présentez déroge aux

[1:53:25] dispositions du Code villageois.

[1:53:27] La Ville doit donc se prononcer

[1:53:28] sur une demande effectuée en

[1:53:29] vertu du Règlement 29 57, sur

[1:53:32] les projets particuliers de

[1:53:33] construction de modification

[1:53:34] d'occupation d'un immeuble. Les

[1:53:36] aspects non conformes nos

[1:53:38] règlements sont: la marge

[1:53:40] latérale proposée ne respecte

[1:53:41] pas la marge latérale maximale

[1:53:44] réglementaire exigée tant du

[1:53:45] côté droit que c'est du côté de

[1:53:47] l'accès véhiculaire. Le taux

[1:53:50] d'importation superbement était

[1:53:51] inférieure au minimum requis de

[1:53:52] 40% dans cette zone. Coefficient

[1:53:55] d'occupation tout ça proposé est

[1:53:57] inférieure au minimum exigé dans

[1:54:00] la zone huppé quatre. La largeur

[1:54:03] de la façade proposée dépasse la

[1:54:04] largeur maximale permise pour

[1:54:06] chaque pan de façade, soit 12

[1:54:08] mètres. Et le pourcentage de la

[1:54:10] façade localisé dans la zone de

[1:54:12] façade tel que défini au Code

[1:54:14] villageois est inférieure au

[1:54:15] minimum requis, soit 90%. Notez

[1:54:18] que le projet de résolution

[1:54:20] qu'on ait des dispositions

[1:54:21] propres à une résolution

[1:54:23] susceptible d'approbation

[1:54:24] référendaire.

[1:54:31] - On continue?

[1:54:32] - Il, s'il vous plaît.

[1:54:36] >> 17.2, which is a public

[1:54:37] meeting regarding a specific

[1:54:39] construction, alteration or

[1:54:42] Occupancy Proposals for an

[1:54:43] Immovable

[1:54:44] (SCAOPI)

[1:54:45] request situated at 1890,

[1:54:46] boulevard des Sources. The

[1:54:49] company has submitted an

[1:54:51] application under by law --

[1:54:53] specific -- in order to carry

[1:54:56] out a project that deviates from

[1:54:58] the zoning bylaw -- for the

[1:55:00] purpose of expanding and

[1:55:02] reorganizing its operations. The

[1:55:04] aspects that do not comply with

[1:55:05] the bylaw are extension of the

[1:55:08] industrial use belonging to

[1:55:09] class the one, which is

[1:55:10] transport and storage, in zone

[1:55:12] and 25, which is not permitted.

[1:55:15] Project to consolidate and

[1:55:16] expand the company's operations

[1:55:17] in zones and 25 and and 29

[1:55:20] through a campus tie project,

[1:55:21] which is not permitted. Decrease

[1:55:23] of the forest space index to

[1:55:26] 0.18, while the regulatory floor

[1:55:28] space index is 0.33 in the

[1:55:31] concert zones. Development of

[1:55:32] parking spaces in zone and 29

[1:55:34] with a front yard which is not

[1:55:36] permitted. Development of

[1:55:38] parking spaces for trucks and

[1:55:40] trailers in the secondary yard

[1:55:43] in zone N25 which is not

[1:55:47] permitted. Setback within the

[1:55:48] project for the development of

[1:55:49] parking spaces that does not

[1:55:50] comply with the minimum

[1:55:51] regulatory setback requirement.

[1:55:54] Area of the secondary front

[1:55:55] setback used to park eight fleet

[1:55:57] of trucks and trailers in zone

[1:56:00] N25 exceeds the maximum area

[1:56:02] allowed. Glazed areas on the

[1:56:05] front facade of the new

[1:56:06] buildings that do not meet the

[1:56:07] minimum regulatory area

[1:56:10] requirements. Cancellation of --

[1:56:12] offences in the front and

[1:56:14] secondary yards which is not

[1:56:15] authorized. Insulation of a

[1:56:17] fence in the front and secondary

[1:56:18] front yards that exceeds the

[1:56:19] maximum permitted height. This

[1:56:21] draft resolution contains

[1:56:23] provisions, making it resolution

[1:56:24] subject by approval by way of

[1:56:26] referendum.

[1:56:33] - 17.3. Adopter un second projet

[1:56:34] de résolution pour un projet

[1:56:35] particulier de construction, de

[1:56:36] modification ou d'occupation

[1:56:37] d'un immeuble au 27, avenue

[1:56:39] Salisbury autorisant la

[1:56:40] construction d'un salon

[1:56:41] funéraire. Donc, la première

[1:56:43] portion de la consultation

[1:56:44] publique portait sur ce projet.

[1:56:46] On comprend qu'aucun commentaire

[1:56:47] n'ont été reçus ce soir. La

[1:56:49] second projet de résolution est

[1:56:52] donc présenté au conseil.

[1:56:54] - Pour 17.3 Do I have a mover?

[1:57:01] 17.3 is it not?

[1:57:02] >> 17.3.

[1:57:08] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[1:57:09] >> And a seconder?

[1:57:11] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,

[1:57:12] district three.

[1:57:13] >> All in favour?

[1:57:15] >> Thank you. 17.4, Adopt a

[1:57:19] second draft resolution for a

[1:57:20] Specific Construction,

[1:57:21] Alteration or Occupancy Proposal

[1:57:22] for an Immovable at 1890 Des

[1:57:24] Sources Boulevard authorizing

[1:57:25] the construction of a new

[1:57:26] building and the redevelopment

[1:57:28] of the Manitoulin Transport

[1:57:30] site, in several phases.

[1:57:36] Do I have a mover?

[1:57:37] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[1:57:38] >> And a seconder?

[1:57:40] >> Turf Stainforth, district

[1:57:41] four.

[1:57:42] >> All in favour?

[1:57:43] - Merci.

[1:57:45] - 17.5. Adopter un premier

[1:57:46] projet de résolution pour un

[1:57:47] projet particulier de

[1:57:48] construction, de modification ou

[1:57:49] d'occupation d'un immeuble au

[1:57:51] 600, boulevard Saint-Jean dans

[1:57:52] le but de régulariser l'usage

[1:57:54] existant « Brasserie

[1:57:55] (E-2)

[1:57:56] » de même que la terrasse

[1:57:57] commerciale, de transformer une

[1:57:58] partie de la brasserie en un

[1:58:01] restaurant D-1, et d'agrandir le

[1:58:02] bâtiment aux fins d'améliorer la

[1:58:04] fonctionnalité des opérations au

[1:58:05] sein de l'établissement. Les

[1:58:07] principales composantes du

[1:58:09] projet présenter sont les

[1:58:11] suivantes: régulariser l'usage

[1:58:12] non conforme de brasserie et

[1:58:13] deux, transformer une partie de

[1:58:14] la brasserie en usage

[1:58:16] restaurant, de maintenir une

[1:58:17] capacité d'accueil total de 272

[1:58:20] places assises, régulariser la

[1:58:22] terrasse existante, dont la

[1:58:23] superficie maximale de 225

[1:58:25] mètres carrés, il a capacité

[1:58:27] maximale de 177 places avec tous

[1:58:29] les équipements immobiliers et

[1:58:31] associés. Construire un bâtiment

[1:58:32] accessoire en remplacement de

[1:58:33] souliers existant pour

[1:58:35] l'entreposage des pactes

[1:58:36] gestions de matières duel. Le

[1:58:38] projet de résidus

[1:58:39] (---)

[1:58:40] dispositions propres à une

[1:58:41] (---)

[1:58:42] .

[1:58:44] - Pour 17.5 Do I have a mover?

[1:58:47] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[1:58:49] >> And a seconder?

[1:58:50] >> Paul Bissonnette, district

[1:58:51] two.

[1:58:52] >> All in favour?

[1:58:53] >> Thank you. The persons

[1:58:57] present may interests Council on

[1:58:59] the item 17.6 to 17.8. 17.6 is

[1:59:05] Consider a minor exemption

[1:59:06] request concerning the property

[1:59:07] situated at 57 De breslay

[1:59:08] avenue.. It is to permit the

[1:59:10] width of a house that has more

[1:59:11] than one floor to occupy 75.5%

[1:59:14] of the width of the lancet,

[1:59:16] rather than the maximum

[1:59:17] permitted of 70%.

[1:59:21] >> For 17.6, do I have a mover?

[1:59:26] Yes, if you will. At the

[1:59:28] microphone.

[1:59:33] >> I am Stephanie Myers at 55

[1:59:35] Avenue to Bradley. I am voting

[1:59:37] in favour of this. These people

[1:59:39] have been very forthcoming with

[1:59:40] what declined to do at this

[1:59:42] location. I have been at that

[1:59:44] location for ten years. Sadly,

[1:59:46] I've lost my neighbour, she

[1:59:48] passed, she had been there her

[1:59:49] whole life. Since that time I

[1:59:51] know it's a bungalow and I know

[1:59:52] we value bungalows. I value a

[1:59:55] bungalow. But it's been tossed

[1:59:56] around and bought and sold it.

[1:59:58] Proposals have come and gone. It

[2:00:00] has sat vacant and nobody cares

[2:00:02] for it. The trees have never

[2:00:03] been trimmed. The yard is

[2:00:04] garbage. I would fully support

[2:00:08] having a nice home with a family

[2:00:09] who wants to live in the

[2:00:11] neighbourhood. Who wants to live

[2:00:13] in the neighbourhood with

[2:00:14] children for my children to play

[2:00:16] with. So, as much as I'm not

[2:00:18] looking forward to the

[2:00:19] construction, I would vote

[2:00:20] heavily in favour and passing

[2:00:22] that went through.

[2:00:23] >> Thank you, Chris Myers. So,

[2:00:28] for 17.6 do I have a mover?

[2:00:30] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[2:00:32] I moved to accept the Planning

[2:00:36] Advisory Committee

[2:00:37] recommendation to allow the

[2:00:38] minor exemption.

[2:00:39] >> And a seconder?

[2:00:40] >> Second and by Tara

[2:00:42] Stainforth, district four.

[2:00:43] >> All in favour?

[2:00:47] - 17.7. Considérer une demande

[2:00:51] de dérogation mineure concernant

[2:00:52] la propriété située au 155,

[2:00:53] avenue Broadview. Pour permettre

[2:00:55] un agrandissement avec un marge

[2:00:57] de recul avant de huit points 3

[2:00:59] mètres plutôt que la marge de

[2:01:00] recul minimal requis de 10

[2:01:01] mètres.

[2:01:03] Do I have a mover?

[2:01:04] - Pour 17.7 >> Cynthia Homan,

[2:01:08] district five.

[2:01:09] >> And a seconder?

[2:01:10] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.

[2:01:11] >> All in favour?

[2:01:16] >> 17.8, Consider a minor

[2:01:17] exemption request concerning the

[2:01:18] property situated at 119 Chesnut

[2:01:19] avenue. It is in order to permit

[2:01:22] a Florida space index of 0.34

[2:01:24] rather than the maximum

[2:01:25] permitted of 0.3. It is to

[2:01:27] permit the width of a house that

[2:01:29] has more than 14 to occupy 81%

[2:01:31] of the width of the land site

[2:01:32] rather than the maximum

[2:01:34] permitted of 70%. To permit also

[2:01:36] an extension with a front

[2:01:37] setback of 6.15 metres rather

[2:01:39] than the minimum required of

[2:01:41] 7.50 metres. And an extension

[2:01:43] with the right side setback of

[2:01:46] 2.04 metres rather than the

[2:01:47] minimum required side of 2.4

[2:01:50] metres.

[2:01:55] Do I have a mover?

[2:01:57] >> Eric Stork, district seven.

[2:01:58] >> And a seconder?

[2:01:59] >> Paul Bissonnette, district

[2:02:01] two.

[2:02:02] >> All in favour?

[2:02:03] >> Thank you.

[2:02:05] - 17.9. Considérer les plans

[2:02:07] d'implantation et d'intégration

[2:02:08] architecturale relatifs à la

[2:02:09] propriété située au 57, avenue

[2:02:10] de Breslay. Pour l'ajout d'un

[2:02:12] deuxième étage.

[2:02:14] >> For 17.9, do I have a mover?

[2:02:19] No?

[2:02:20] >> 17.9.

[2:02:21] >> 0.9.

[2:02:22] >> Bryan Cowan, district eight.

[2:02:23] >> A seconder?

[2:02:28] >> All in favour?

[2:02:29] >> Thank you. 17.10, Consider

[2:02:32] the site planning and

[2:02:34] architectural integration

[2:02:35] programme plans with respect to

[2:02:36] the property situated at 155

[2:02:38] Broadview Avenue. It is an

[2:02:41] extension on the left side of

[2:02:42] the existing homes over two

[2:02:44] storeys.

[2:02:50] Do I have a mover?

[2:02:51] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.

[2:02:53] >> And a seconder?

[2:02:56] >> All in favour?

[2:03:02] >> Mrs. Thorstad-Cullen, please.

[2:03:06] - 20, levée de la séance.

[2:03:07] Closure?

[2:03:08] >> Foreclosure, do I have a

[2:03:09] mover?

[2:03:10] >> Tara Stainforth, district.

[2:03:11] Four

[2:03:12] >> And a seconder?

[2:03:13] >> Eric Stork, district fourth.

[2:03:14] - Merci tout le monde. Thank you

[2:03:17] for your patience.

2025-03-11 Conseil de la Ville de Pointe-Claire

Transcript