Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[1:59]
Mhm.
[3:54]
» Mhm.
[5:17]
» 17, if you're ready, please go ahead
[5:18]
start recording.
[5:27]
Excellent. Well, thank you for everybody
[5:29]
for showing up today. Um I'll start off
[5:32]
with introductions. I'm Beth Provan, I'm
[5:34]
PMAC chair.
[5:36]
Noel Gordon, PMAC member.
[5:38]
Ashley CS, public works.
[5:41]
David Keller, PMAC.
[5:43]
Steven Brophy, Royal Police Department.
[5:45]
Ann Leroux-Smyth, PMAC.
[5:47]
Anna Soltys, Development Services
[5:48]
Department. Brenda a civil engineer for
[5:50]
the city of Auburn.
[5:52]
I'm a civil engineer for the city of
[5:53]
Auburn.
[5:54]
And we have a small crowd today, but
[5:57]
hopefully that means we can go fast.
[5:59]
Okay, our first action item is approval
[6:01]
of minutes from our last meeting.
[6:03]
Do you have anybody who would like to
[6:05]
approve minutes from our meeting? So
[6:06]
moved.
[6:08]
I'll second.
[6:10]
Perfect. Everybody in favor? I. I.
[6:14]
That's great.
[6:15]
Okay, our first item of the agenda is
[6:17]
the bicycle friendly community survey
[6:19]
results, and Vern is going to take this
[6:21]
one.
[6:23]
Yes, good to talk to you all on this
[6:25]
stuff.
[6:49]
Okay.
[6:50]
I'm working on what this is about.
[6:54]
So we finally got our results from the
[6:56]
bicycle friendly community survey from
[6:58]
the League of American Bicyclists.
[7:00]
Um as you know in October of 2024,
[7:07]
we set a goal to be able to submit an
[7:10]
application to the League of American
[7:13]
Bicyclists to improve and increase our
[7:16]
award
[7:17]
uh level
[7:19]
uh for a bicycle friendly community. So
[7:22]
we took about 8 months to put that
[7:26]
application together. It was 92 pages,
[7:30]
93, somewhere right around there.
[7:32]
Um we submitted it in June of 2025.
[7:38]
And in December
[7:40]
uh well, in January we found out what
[7:43]
the results were
[7:44]
in January of this year. In that time
[7:48]
between we submitted
[7:51]
um, the application, um, the League of
[7:54]
American Bicyclists decided to, um,
[8:00]
perform a community survey in Provo.
[8:04]
And they asked us to help promote it and
[8:06]
support it, which we did.
[8:08]
Um, and so,
[8:11]
these are the results of that uh,
[8:13]
survey.
[8:15]
So, just a little bit of history here.
[8:17]
2003, Provo City applied, but received
[8:20]
no award or recognition
[8:23]
for their active transportation,
[8:25]
specifically bicycle infrastructure
[8:28]
improvements.
[8:29]
In 2012,
[8:31]
uh, it was submitted again, and we
[8:33]
received a bronze award.
[8:35]
And that award was good for 4 years. We
[8:38]
submitted in 2016, 2016,
[8:42]
uh, the silver award.
[8:44]
And then we got the gold award in 2025.
[8:48]
Again, it's good for 4 years. So, when
[8:50]
we're talking about friend, uh,
[8:52]
bicycle-friendly communities,
[8:54]
businesses, or universities,
[8:57]
we have two friendly businesses within
[8:59]
the city,
[9:00]
uh, one friendly university, which is of
[9:03]
course BYU.
[9:05]
Uh, we do have one local League Cycling
[9:07]
Instructor. Overall, Utah ranks the 14th
[9:11]
friendliest state for bicycling.
[9:13]
Can I talk about bikes? Yeah, and Provo
[9:16]
City is a bicycle-friendly one of those
[9:18]
two bicycle-friendly communities, aren't
[9:20]
they?
[9:21]
Um, we're a bicycle-friendly business,
[9:23]
too, as an employer.
[9:24]
>> Yeah, yeah, as a business as an
[9:25]
employer. Provo City? Yes. What does it
[9:27]
mean to be a bicycle-friendly business,
[9:29]
and what are the two businesses? I'm
[9:31]
curious. Well, one Provo City, I think,
[9:34]
and I'm not sure what the other one is,
[9:37]
to be honest. I would have to look on
[9:40]
their website and dig that up. But they
[9:42]
have to submit an application, and they
[9:44]
have to have
[9:46]
uh bike parking at their business. Um
[9:49]
and it's more than just bike parking,
[9:50]
and maybe even covered bike parking, if
[9:52]
I remember correctly. And there are
[9:54]
certain things that they maybe have
[9:56]
showers for their employees and uh at
[9:59]
the business, so they could commute in
[10:01]
and then freshen up before the work day.
[10:04]
Um there's all types of little nuances
[10:06]
that they get graded on when they submit
[10:08]
their application. Same thing with the
[10:10]
university or BYU.
[10:12]
Uh so, the university is the same way.
[10:14]
And then, when we submitted ours, ours
[10:16]
was, like I said, a 90-plus page
[10:19]
application that was
[10:21]
daunting, um to say the least.
[10:24]
Um
[10:25]
so,
[10:26]
when they did the survey,
[10:28]
um
[10:29]
92 communities, they surveyed 92
[10:32]
communities, and we were the second
[10:34]
highest
[10:36]
uh response rate of any community of
[10:38]
those So, we, you know,
[10:41]
second best.
[10:42]
Um we received 1,326
[10:45]
surveys.
[10:46]
And then, of course, Provo is one of two
[10:48]
gold communities in Utah. The other one
[10:52]
is Park City.
[10:56]
Uh Park City, so.
[10:58]
Um so, let's get into the basically the
[11:02]
survey results. Uh participants were
[11:05]
asked to select all that apply. So, we
[11:08]
had people that live here, people that
[11:10]
work here, or people that go to school
[11:11]
here.
[11:12]
Uh
[11:13]
some live in the neighboring city. Uh
[11:15]
they might commute in or whatever, or
[11:18]
they just uh got wind of it, and so they
[11:20]
took the survey.
[11:22]
Uh so, you can kind of see where people
[11:24]
are at.
[11:25]
Uh they ride a bike here, they're
[11:27]
actively involved in bike advocacy.
[11:29]
There's a a hundred or so that's
[11:31]
involved in
[11:33]
Um some involved in the statewide bike
[11:35]
advocacy.
[11:36]
Um some live here seasonal or part-time.
[11:41]
Our demographics, this is what they
[11:43]
didn't originally give me when I first
[11:46]
got the results. I had to uh
[11:49]
state the reason why I wanted this data.
[11:52]
And so I think the age cohorts were
[11:54]
really important for us to get. And then
[11:57]
also what was important to get is we
[12:00]
talk about
[12:01]
gender equality as as far as design and
[12:04]
also for disability, we wanted those
[12:06]
numbers.
[12:08]
So you can kind of see our age cohorts
[12:10]
there. Uh 31 to 45 being the largest
[12:13]
cohort. I was kind of thinking it might
[12:15]
be, you know, uh 22 to 30 but
[12:19]
it's close but it wasn't.
[12:21]
Um gender you can see pretty well split.
[12:24]
Um
[12:26]
49% uh are are the male and then then uh
[12:30]
women are make up I believe 46%.
[12:34]
Um
[12:35]
some chose not to answer.
[12:37]
Or affiliated with a
[12:39]
different type.
[12:40]
Um and then our disability um
[12:44]
I thought this was interesting about 11%
[12:47]
said yes, they have some type of
[12:49]
disability um in that respect. And so as
[12:52]
we
[12:53]
think about design of our infrastructure
[12:56]
for bikes and peds, uh certainly need to
[12:58]
keep that in mind.
[13:01]
How often do you use a bicycle? Um at
[13:04]
least once a week, almost 700
[13:06]
respondents said at least once a week,
[13:09]
which is pretty pretty healthy.
[13:11]
Um some took the survey, over 200 of
[13:14]
them, "Well, I never use a bike."
[13:16]
I thought that was funny.
[13:18]
Um use in the last 30 days, you can see
[13:21]
that quite a few people use within the 1
[13:24]
to 7 days. It doesn't quite match,
[13:26]
right? At least once a week and then
[13:28]
once in the last 7 days it doesn't quite
[13:30]
match there, but um
[13:34]
you can see that there's a strong
[13:36]
group of people that do ride a bike. Uh
[13:40]
if you total those up, uh certainly with
[13:42]
every month they're out on the bike.
[13:46]
Primary purpose for your bicycle trips?
[13:49]
Um some people just use it for
[13:51]
transportation. Uh others use it for
[13:53]
exercise, recreation, and work. And then
[13:57]
there were a few that said they do not
[13:59]
ride.
[14:00]
And I'm assuming
[14:02]
um
[14:03]
that that's
[14:06]
um
[14:07]
some of the people that do not ride that took the survey.
[14:10]
Well over 200 people. So, it's kind of
[14:13]
interesting.
[14:15]
Welcome Counselor Whipple. Thank you.
[14:18]
I hope that wasn't a bike accident.
[14:21]
No.
[14:23]
But thank you. Okay.
[14:25]
You think there is a thing that is
[14:30]
Uh we're just going over the
[14:31]
bicycle-friendly community survey. Um
[14:35]
So, uh top five barriers that prevent
[14:38]
you from biking?
[14:39]
So, this was asked people who answered
[14:41]
that never to the question of how often
[14:44]
they bike. But I believe there's about a
[14:46]
little over 200 or approaching 250 that
[14:49]
said they never bike. And this is the
[14:52]
reason why. Uh one, don't have access to
[14:54]
bicycle. Uh live too far away from the
[14:57]
destinations that they need to go.
[15:00]
Um have a bike in a very long time and
[15:02]
not confident in riding.
[15:04]
Uh weather's not conducive to biking and
[15:06]
then I'm not physically able to.
[15:08]
So, um
[15:11]
what what I saw from that
[15:15]
was a positive thing. And the reason why
[15:18]
I saw that as positive it wasn't like
[15:20]
saying there's lack of infrastructure.
[15:22]
Okay. And we'll kind of talk a little
[15:24]
bit about that, too.
[15:26]
Top five changes that would help
[15:28]
encourage you to bike.
[15:30]
Uh not interested in biking at all. So,
[15:32]
now all of a sudden it shows up that we
[15:35]
want more trails and and off-street bike
[15:38]
paths.
[15:39]
So, that's where a lot of people feel
[15:41]
comfortable driving.
[15:42]
And then, I like the next three.
[15:45]
Eliminating distracted driving.
[15:48]
Slowing down car traffic and educating
[15:50]
drivers. All three of those to me are
[15:52]
the about the same topic, right? The
[15:54]
same issue. Falls in that same category.
[15:59]
Have you or your kids received any
[16:01]
bicycle safety training? Um this is
[16:04]
where I think
[16:06]
um our fellow nonprofit advocacy groups
[16:10]
are missing the boat. Um look how many
[16:14]
uh have no in that category in the last
[16:16]
5 years. Nearly 90%. We're just not
[16:19]
seeing it taught anywhere. It's not
[16:21]
being taught in the schools. It's not
[16:23]
being taught at safety fairs. It's not
[16:26]
being really promoted. Um so, I think
[16:30]
um that would be an area of emphasis if
[16:33]
I were a nonprofit and I was really a a
[16:37]
bicycle advocacy group, I'd be thinking
[16:39]
about that. I'd be looking into that.
[16:42]
Uh training received in K-12.
[16:45]
Uh you see what we finally did get some,
[16:48]
um but it's more than 2/3, you know,
[16:52]
basically not receiving any of that. Um
[16:55]
I like the back-to-school safety fairs
[16:57]
and when they come down and they teach
[16:59]
kids how to ride and give away free
[17:00]
helmets. They do these bike safety
[17:03]
fairs. I really like that.
[17:09]
Yeah. There's a couple schools that
[17:11]
really embrace it. Um and the highway
[17:13]
safety office is really a good
[17:15]
organization that helps promote some of
[17:17]
that.
[17:18]
Um
[17:19]
even zero fatalities
[17:23]
uh will help out
[17:25]
with
[17:26]
educating these elementary schools.
[17:29]
Bike Utah
[17:30]
has a curriculum, too.
[17:33]
Yeah, Bike Utah does have some
[17:36]
curriculum, and that's where I think
[17:38]
you know, they can't do every single
[17:40]
school in the state, of course. They're
[17:42]
underpowered and understaffed in that
[17:44]
respect, but
[17:46]
I think uh local advocacy for educating
[17:50]
um would would it could improve there.
[17:54]
Okay.
[17:55]
Uh let's move on to the next one. Are
[17:58]
bike paths or bike lanes available
[18:00]
within a quarter mile of where you live?
[18:03]
So, almost 2/3 have said, "Yes, there
[18:07]
are bike paths or paths away from the
[18:09]
road." But then, if you go to the bike
[18:12]
lanes,
[18:13]
look at that, 90%
[18:15]
live within a quarter of a mile of
[18:17]
on-street bike lane.
[18:19]
So, that is great, but I really like to
[18:23]
see how we can improve some of the bike paths away from the road, too,
[18:29]
or
[18:31]
do we need to convert some of these to
[18:33]
protected bike lanes so they feel more
[18:36]
comfortable in that respect?
[18:39]
How satisfied are you with how this
[18:40]
community is designed for making bike
[18:42]
riding safe?
[18:44]
Some were very satisfied, some were
[18:46]
somewhat satisfied. And then, if you
[18:48]
take a look at neither satisfied or
[18:51]
dissatisfied,
[18:53]
um all the way down to very
[18:54]
dissatisfied, you'll see that all those
[18:57]
add up to less than the amount that's
[19:00]
happy or somewhat satisfied.
[19:03]
So,
[19:03]
I I take that as as kind of a positive
[19:06]
thing, but also we need to continue to
[19:11]
um
[19:12]
implement our plans and build more
[19:14]
infrastructure.
[19:16]
Is it safe or dangerous to ride in a
[19:18]
bicycle in your neighborhood? Some
[19:19]
people think that it's fun.
[19:22]
When you give someone the middle
[19:23]
opportunity, it depends instead of
[19:26]
forcing them to say yes or no,
[19:28]
you're going to get a lot of that it it
[19:30]
depends type thing and that's what we
[19:32]
see here.
[19:35]
Always. Yeah.
[19:37]
No, it depends. Yeah.
[19:40]
You can always think of a situation that
[19:42]
you go either way. Yeah. Yeah, that's
[19:44]
funny.
[19:46]
Top reasons you feel it is dangerous to
[19:48]
ride a bicycle in your neighborhood. I
[19:50]
think these are important to realize
[19:52]
again that this centers around a little
[19:54]
bit of our traffic. Only one really says
[19:58]
too few bike lanes or bike paths. The
[20:00]
other four, in my opinion, kind of
[20:04]
relate to us as motorists,
[20:07]
distracted drivers or riders. So,
[20:09]
there's there's distracted bicyclists
[20:12]
out there, too. I'm going to say I'd
[20:14]
really be interested to see this broken
[20:16]
down between cuz they said fast-moving
[20:18]
traffic.
[20:20]
I would really be interested to see this
[20:21]
broken down
[20:23]
are they doing it from a person who's on
[20:25]
a pedal manpower bike or are they doing
[20:28]
it from a perspective of a person on an
[20:30]
e-bike? Yeah. And what is the breakdown
[20:33]
of oh, there's fast-moving traffic. Are
[20:35]
you talking about the cars? Are you
[20:36]
talking about e-bikes and all of the
[20:39]
electric stuff that's out there now that
[20:41]
are using the bike lanes along with
[20:42]
people who pedal bikes. I I would tend
[20:45]
to believe that this relates more to the
[20:47]
fast-moving vehicular traffic and the
[20:49]
only reason I say that is because this
[20:51]
is not a pedestrian survey.
[20:54]
I was If this was a pedestrian survey,
[20:56]
we got people that walk on our trails
[20:58]
all the time and then when we have
[21:01]
bicyclists or the the bicyclists with electric
[21:06]
scooters going really fast. It's It's
[21:09]
not very comfortable.
[21:11]
>> The only reason I asked that is because
[21:12]
distracted
[21:14]
drivers/riders implies that it's more
[21:16]
than just right. There is. Yeah, and it
[21:19]
could be motorcyclists, too.
[21:21]
You know.
[21:22]
Um
[21:24]
A motorcyclist can scare the heck out of
[21:26]
someone.
[21:28]
Just Just by Yeah, revving it up. At
[21:31]
least he can
[21:32]
Now And now And that's the whole point.
[21:35]
Do you know why motorcyclists do that,
[21:37]
right? So, you hear them that they're
[21:40]
there. They want their presence to be
[21:42]
known, so they don't
[21:45]
get hit. Um that's why a lot of them do
[21:47]
it.
[21:48]
Hi, Steve. Yep. Okay. It's also a matter
[21:51]
of pride.
[21:52]
Steve and I both ride motorcycles, so
[21:57]
I just want you guys to know how cool I
[21:58]
am.
[22:00]
If you spend $2,000 on those
[22:02]
well-cared-for
[22:04]
this thing
[22:05]
>> Noise goes along with that, too. I see
[22:07]
pedestrians. Most people see
[22:08]
pedestrians. I see willing observers of
[22:11]
my awesomeness.
[22:15]
We'll get We'll get that in a minute.
[22:17]
You're very proud of the new Harley
[22:19]
pipes they've converted on their bikes,
[22:21]
right? Or the lack thereof.
[22:26]
Okay, top three recommendations to
[22:27]
become more bicycle friendly. More
[22:30]
protected or separated bike
[22:31]
infrastructure.
[22:33]
Better driver behavior through education
[22:35]
and enforcement. And then finally, a
[22:37]
connected continuous bike route network.
[22:40]
And a connected continuous bike network
[22:43]
is a reflection on the region, not
[22:45]
necessarily just Provo by itself. So,
[22:48]
for me, it's the Provo-Orem region,
[22:50]
although we're doing a study right now
[22:52]
to connect Springville, and we're going
[22:54]
to be doing another study, uh it sounds
[22:56]
like, with the Lake Authority and MAG to
[22:59]
look at the extension of the lake and
[23:03]
Utah County to the Lake Utah going south
[23:07]
through Springville and Spanish Fork.
[23:10]
Top three hazards or barriers that
[23:12]
should be addressed immediately.
[23:15]
So this is education of drivers. There's This is a common theme
[23:19]
throughout this survey. is that
[23:23]
bicyclists are feeling unsafe because of
[23:27]
the distracted driving
[23:29]
uh behavior. So
[23:31]
um unprotected or missing bike
[23:32]
infrastructure. That's why I like to get
[23:35]
those connected. Um
[23:38]
Protected is another story. Uh there's
[23:41]
the protected bike lanes that we have on
[23:44]
Cougar
[23:45]
are people like them and people hate
[23:47]
them. There's not really anybody in
[23:49]
between. Uh even bicyclists themselves
[23:53]
will tell me, "I don't like it." or "I
[23:55]
love it."
[23:57]
Even them themselves are are saying,
[23:59]
"Hey, this is as controversial as a a
[24:01]
driver."
[24:03]
Then obstructions and maintenance and I think that's a common theme with
[24:07]
rocks and tires and just We see it all
[24:10]
over the interstate and we do a better
[24:12]
job with the maintenance and getting rid
[24:15]
of some of the obstructions.
[24:18]
Top three community efforts that are
[24:19]
deserving of praise.
[24:21]
Uh the bike trails and off-street. I
[24:23]
mean, people love the Provo River Trail.
[24:25]
It's a gem. We're happy to have it. I
[24:28]
wish we had more of it along the river,
[24:30]
but that's what we have.
[24:32]
Bike lanes and protected infrastructure
[24:34]
like Cougar Boulevard. Again, this is
[24:36]
coming from the the people that took the
[24:39]
survey and then bike walk Provo and
[24:41]
community programs. And then we love our
[24:44]
advocacy groups because they help
[24:46]
fulfill needs that
[24:50]
as a city we don't fulfill, right? Uh
[24:53]
they help with uh Uh, I and and we got
[24:56]
to continue to see our Provo Bike Club get up and running
[25:01]
again
[25:03]
because they do things that help us as a
[25:06]
community
[25:07]
uh, with giving away bikes, um,
[25:10]
teaching how to repair bikes, teaching
[25:12]
bike safety,
[25:14]
um, and quite frankly employing a few
[25:16]
people, too.
[25:18]
So, there are some positive things there
[25:20]
that we need to make sure that that particular uh, advocacy group
[25:25]
continues forward.
[25:28]
Uh, top three other comments and
[25:29]
feedback, feeling unsafe due to driver
[25:32]
behavior. I think we know that that's a
[25:34]
pretty common theme. Uh, strong divide
[25:36]
between bike support and car first
[25:38]
perspectives. And that is not a Provo or
[25:41]
a Utah thing. That is a nationwide
[25:44]
thing. And the upcoming transportation
[25:47]
bill,
[25:48]
um,
[25:50]
they're kind of inhibit all funding for
[25:53]
bicyclists and active transportation in
[25:55]
that bill. That would be wrong and that
[25:57]
would set us back.
[25:58]
>> What bill?
[26:00]
So, every five or six years the
[26:01]
transportation surface bill comes along,
[26:04]
surface transportation bill comes along.
[26:06]
At the federal level? At the federal
[26:08]
level. And it will come out probably in
[26:11]
September-October time frame of this
[26:13]
year.
[26:14]
And there are
[26:16]
reports that they are going to be
[26:20]
roadway centric instead of
[26:23]
uh, what we've seen in the past couple
[26:24]
of bills where we have support for both
[26:28]
bicycle infrastructure and pedestrian
[26:29]
infrastructure.
[26:31]
And then finally, lack of education
[26:33]
enforcement
[26:35]
uh, surrounding e-bikes and scooters.
[26:37]
Uh, this committee is no stranger to
[26:39]
that conversation.
[26:43]
Right?
[26:44]
Okay.
[26:45]
Um, recommendations to go from a gold,
[26:49]
which again only two communities in the
[26:51]
state of Utah are gold, Park City and
[26:53]
Provo.
[26:54]
And
[26:56]
um if we want to go to
[26:59]
five.
[27:00]
Um these are some of the recommendations
[27:03]
and they all
[27:05]
have
[27:06]
budgetary constraints for the most part.
[27:11]
And and you know, I can argue a couple
[27:13]
of those we need to do.
[27:15]
Um and a couple of those I can argue
[27:19]
we're doing great by this being a shared
[27:24]
responsibility across
[27:27]
departments of the city as opposed to
[27:30]
one full-time paid bicycle program
[27:32]
manager.
[27:34]
So,
[27:35]
um
[27:37]
that's some of the recommendations they
[27:38]
gave us.
[27:39]
And it's in our report card that they
[27:41]
give us as feedback.
[27:43]
Overall, I'm really happy and excited
[27:45]
that we went from silver to gold. I
[27:48]
think it's a real feather in the cap of
[27:50]
Provo City.
[27:52]
Just so you know, uh since that time
[27:55]
I've been in
[27:57]
asked to participate in two webinars
[28:00]
uh because we went from silver to gold,
[28:02]
which I have done.
[28:03]
And next week I 20 people were invited
[28:07]
uh to a international symposium being
[28:11]
held in Detroit next Wednesday and
[28:13]
Thursday. 20 people across the country
[28:16]
that deal with transportation mobility
[28:18]
in their communities.
[28:20]
And I was selected as one of those. I
[28:21]
didn't put in for it, but we got
[28:23]
selected. Um
[28:25]
and it's because of all the things that
[28:28]
we have here.
[28:30]
People don't realize we have a
[28:31]
world-class
[28:33]
rail system.
[28:35]
Both on the freight side, but more
[28:36]
importantly on the commuter rail side,
[28:39]
we have a world-class BRT system. Before
[28:42]
COVID, it was the second highest
[28:44]
ridership in the country.
[28:47]
Um only Portland was beating this out.
[28:50]
Um, and then we have done so well with
[28:54]
our uh bike and active transportation uh
[28:58]
infrastructure that we put forth and
[29:01]
have built.
[29:02]
And so, not to mention some of the
[29:05]
freight and some of that other stuff
[29:07]
that um
[29:08]
we have nationally recognized for.
[29:10]
You have a great transportation system,
[29:13]
you're going to have a great economy.
[29:16]
And just yesterday I heard that we were
[29:19]
that for the 19th year in a row, Utah
[29:22]
has the best economic outlook of any
[29:24]
state in the country.
[29:25]
Transportation has a lot to do with
[29:27]
that.
[29:28]
Okay, comments, questions, suggestions.
[29:30]
Uh I presented this in front of T-MAC.
[29:32]
You guys are the first ones to see it.
[29:34]
Uh it goes to City Council work session
[29:36]
if they want it. I submitted I think I
[29:38]
submitted it today.
[29:40]
Um
[29:41]
and then it will go to uh I'm presenting
[29:43]
it in front of Bike Walk on May 7th
[29:45]
uh at their
[29:47]
uh meeting at their monthly coordination
[29:49]
meeting.
[29:52]
Uh I'm going to make a comment but I'm
[29:53]
going to make a comment probably more
[29:55]
towards my neighborhood
[29:58]
versus T-MAC road.
[30:00]
Uh when we were talking about the
[30:01]
Southwest Provo plan, we talked about
[30:04]
integrating trails inside communities in
[30:09]
the Southwest and that was kind of
[30:11]
knocked down, unfortunately, but I think
[30:13]
it's going to be up to the council
[30:15]
whether they want to change policies and
[30:19]
developments, building developments and
[30:20]
building out especially in the area like
[30:23]
Southwest Provo to be able to add these
[30:25]
bike lanes and bike friendly communities
[30:28]
that would be separated from the main
[30:30]
traffic lanes and be able to up that
[30:33]
active transportation in that area.
[30:35]
Yeah, and I can let you know in our
[30:37]
review
[30:39]
um
[30:40]
uh both Development Services and Public
[30:42]
works get together every Monday and
[30:44]
Wednesday and we review projects.
[30:46]
There's a subdivision coming in.
[30:49]
And
[30:50]
first thing we said, right? Hey, that's
[30:52]
a that's a waterway and you need to
[30:55]
develop a bike trail along that trail
[30:57]
along that waterway.
[30:58]
So
[30:59]
I'm happy to hear that actually. Not
[31:02]
only is staff very cognizant of that,
[31:05]
but so is the planning commission and
[31:06]
city council.
[31:08]
I've seen nothing but Hey,
[31:10]
we're you know, if you're going to do
[31:12]
this, you need to add that. So
[31:15]
I've just been impressed with the planning commission and city council
[31:19]
being very aware of these types of
[31:21]
developments.
[31:23]
And getting them off of just the
[31:24]
collectors, right? Having the
[31:25]
neighborhood bike ways.
[31:29]
Thoughts?
[31:30]
And the council we got a couple council
[31:32]
members here, T-Mac members.
[31:36]
Again, we were the second best in the
[31:37]
country for having the most responses
[31:39]
and I think that said a lot of what
[31:42]
Joseph's not here today, but Joseph and
[31:44]
I immediately ordered 40 signs. We got
[31:47]
the council, we got the mayor's office,
[31:49]
we got everybody tweeting it out or
[31:51]
posting it on social media and then we
[31:53]
went out along the trail, we placed I
[31:55]
think we placed 40 or 50 uh
[31:58]
you know, garage sale political signs
[32:00]
all over along the trails, BYU campus.
[32:04]
By the way, we could only locate about
[32:06]
25 of them when we went to pick them up
[32:08]
a year month later.
[32:10]
Um
[32:11]
So really really happy about that and I
[32:14]
think that says a lot of Provo
[32:17]
residents who who want to be heard and they certainly have been with that
[32:22]
survey. Were they all Provo residents?
[32:24]
Did that controlled No. They were all
[32:27]
Provo residents. In fact
[32:28]
>> it more than once?
[32:29]
Um
[32:31]
I don't think they were allowed to do it
[32:34]
more than once. I can't remember, but
[32:37]
we'll go back to
[32:39]
the survey itself.
[32:41]
Uh
[32:43]
Where is that?
[32:46]
Here, let me go further back.
[32:48]
That was that it right there?
[32:50]
Uh participants were asked to select all
[32:52]
that apply, and you can see that there
[32:55]
were some that live in a neighboring
[32:57]
city.
[32:58]
Uh some work or go to school here.
[33:01]
Oh
[33:02]
there you
[33:05]
So, if you think this is valuable, we
[33:07]
just put it down for a work session for
[33:09]
5-10 minute presentation to you
[33:12]
and the rest of members.
[33:19]
And that's like
[33:21]
Oh, you can get your bike back through
[33:23]
the portal. So, that's what we tried to
[33:24]
explain to you all.
[33:26]
We said we have the mandatory bike
[33:28]
registration. In fact, it's not
[33:29]
mandatory, is it? It's voluntary.
[33:32]
It is mandatory.
[33:33]
>> It is mandatory. So, we have to
[33:35]
So, that allows the police officers to
[33:37]
return a stolen bike. Yeah, it really
[33:40]
helps.
[33:41]
Probably one of our biggest
[33:44]
advocacies as far as getting the stolen
[33:46]
bikes back is that bike registration.
[33:49]
And I think we need to say that. I
[33:51]
thought we did in the application.
[33:54]
>> No, like they got to come down to the
[33:55]
police department anymore. You literally
[33:56]
just submit it online. You guys believe
[33:58]
that people ride bikes to work
[34:00]
actually need to use them
[34:03]
Very easy to get your bike registered.
[34:05]
It's not like it's a
[34:07]
Why didn't you
[34:07]
>> register in a car?
[34:09]
No, I have to register my bike because
[34:11]
if they get my bike stolen, your odds of
[34:13]
getting it back are much, much higher if
[34:15]
it's been registered. And how much does
[34:17]
it cost? Is it free? Free. It's free.
[34:19]
>> It's free. As long as it says free, we
[34:21]
should be able to make that argument,
[34:23]
counselor.
[34:24]
Okay? And I think It used to be a
[34:26]
dollar. Bike walking encourages people
[34:29]
to do that. So, we just need to say
[34:32]
education back to education.
[34:37]
Okay, we showed that my chart again and
[34:40]
showed why people are bicycling. I
[34:41]
thought it said 0% for work.
[34:44]
For what?
[34:45]
Uh, is that before this one? Was that
[34:47]
one I think right?
[34:52]
Uh,
[34:53]
which chart?
[34:55]
The pie chart? And
[34:57]
0% for work, is that legit?
[35:00]
Transportation and recreation. I think
[35:02]
they're probably included that
[35:04]
transportation. So, that would be a
[35:06]
survey question.
[35:08]
>> Speaking like, are you a bike cop?
[35:10]
After you ride a bicycle to work? Well,
[35:11]
I think we we didn't know if they were
[35:13]
driving to work.
[35:14]
It just seems I understand like like in New York, right? They use
[35:19]
bicyclists to deliver packages and stuff
[35:21]
like that.
[35:22]
Somebody that rides a bike for their
[35:24]
job. Yeah, I I think it's
[35:27]
we don't have too many
[35:29]
people delivering packages in New York.
[35:32]
I know I see a lot of Door Dashers on
[35:35]
bikes.
[35:39]
In higher density cities, they're there.
[35:45]
Anything else anybody wanted to see? And
[35:48]
is this correct? I just did, of course,
[35:49]
Google Gemini is not the source of all
[35:51]
truth as I've discovered, but there are
[35:54]
no platinum level bicycle communities in
[35:56]
Utah. There's only three country wide is
[35:59]
what it says. Yes. That is That is
[36:01]
correct. Fort Collins became a platinum
[36:04]
level community
[36:05]
this year, this go around with us, and
[36:08]
Boulder lost their platinum community
[36:10]
because they didn't stay up and submit.
[36:13]
They didn't resubmit. Oh. And uh They
[36:17]
probably haven't degraded their
[36:18]
services. They just didn't do
[36:21]
That is correct. And that's kind of a challenge, you know,
[36:24]
with this cuz it does take a
[36:26]
considerable effort to put forth. That That's money, right? I mean, that's
[36:31]
Yeah. Yeah, it's too bad you can't just
[36:33]
say, "We're still here." and like skip
[36:36]
the paperwork. I know.
[36:38]
Put it this way. Um
[36:40]
with the amount of work that we put
[36:41]
forth and the amount of
[36:44]
funding that we were able to prove that
[36:46]
we put forth on active transportation
[36:48]
over the last 5 years,
[36:51]
if we were to receive a silver status
[36:54]
award,
[36:56]
I would have recommended that we're done
[36:58]
with the League of American Bicyclists.
[37:01]
Um just because if you can't get it
[37:04]
investing 21 million over the over the
[37:06]
last 5 years, how do you get it, right?
[37:10]
And so, um but they came through. And
[37:13]
I'm all supportive. Like I said, they've
[37:15]
asked me to participate in a couple
[37:16]
webinars now, and I'm totally
[37:19]
supportive, and their colleagues are very professional,
[37:23]
and um in fact,
[37:26]
I've been asked now to help review other
[37:28]
people's uh
[37:31]
applications,
[37:32]
um and be able to provide feedback. And
[37:35]
one of the things I'm going to provide feedback is those two items that
[37:39]
we just talked about. One is the bike
[37:41]
registration, and the other one is one
[37:43]
full-time person. Cuz I honestly don't
[37:46]
believe that one full-time program
[37:48]
manager is going to be able to do all
[37:51]
that all the departments participate in
[37:54]
and and bicycle infrastructure.
[38:02]
I'm going to this.
[38:05]
Yeah.
[38:06]
So, I I I want to be Yeah, this would be
[38:09]
my first year I get to review. It's such
[38:11]
a pain that no one can review additional
[38:14]
places that would apply
[38:16]
if it wasn't so lengthy. Yeah, I think
[38:18]
it is a little
[38:21]
intimidating and maybe even cost
[38:22]
prohibitive from other cities. I was
[38:25]
telling this to a consultant,
[38:27]
uh friend of mine, and she said, "Bern,
[38:30]
you know that's what we're here for,
[38:32]
right?"
[38:33]
I said, "I know, but
[38:35]
I didn't want to come in and spend money
[38:37]
right away on something I thought we
[38:39]
could do in-house.
[38:41]
Maybe next time in 4 years it might be
[38:43]
something, but now that we've got most
[38:45]
of the application filled out
[38:49]
and the way it is, I think it'll be
[38:50]
easier next time. We know where to
[38:52]
collect the data, we know how to obtain
[38:54]
the data, so I think in-house will be
[38:56]
the way to go next time. It'll be a
[38:58]
little easier for us.
[39:02]
Okay.
[39:02]
>> It says here, of course, once again,
[39:03]
this is Google Gemini, so but this says
[39:06]
that Provo, Park City, and Salt Lake are
[39:08]
all gold. Is Salt Lake not?
[39:10]
>> not.
[39:11]
There's an error. Not gold. Moab and
[39:13]
Cottonwood Heights, silver. Does that
[39:15]
sound right?
[39:16]
>> Uh yeah, that's probably that's probably
[39:18]
right. Yep.
[39:19]
And then Davis, California, Fort
[39:21]
Collins, Colorado, Madison, Wisconsin.
[39:23]
They say Provo's a recent upgrade to
[39:25]
gold was fueled by an investment of
[39:27]
approximately $21 million in bike
[39:29]
infrastructure since 2020 with another
[39:31]
46 million
[39:33]
projected over the next 5 years. Given
[39:35]
that trajectory, it is the most likely
[39:37]
candidate to eventually reach platinum
[39:39]
in the state. I cannot believe that
[39:41]
something is that accurate on that AI.
[39:46]
That was all accurate.
[39:48]
I don't like Gemini challenging you to
[39:49]
reach platinum.
[39:51]
What it sounds like. I didn't I didn't
[39:53]
say it was Provo, you know. That's that's spot on. Okay. Okay.
[39:59]
Awesome. Well, thank you so much.
[40:02]
I appreciate that.
[40:03]
Um we do have one item of business that
[40:06]
I kind of
[40:07]
brushed over real quick. Uh our June
[40:10]
meeting, because it's on June 18th,
[40:13]
and there are several members that are
[40:15]
not going to be able to.
[40:18]
Uh we would want to to move that one
[40:20]
week earlier to June 11th.
[40:29]
Just say yes, that's a good thing. I'm
[40:31]
very happy.
[40:32]
It's June 11th. And was there a reason
[40:34]
we didn't also explore June 25th?
[40:38]
I would like not cuz that is
[40:41]
5 days before my daughter's wedding.
[40:42]
Okay, I understand. It is my June 11th
[40:45]
sounds better. I think June 11th is 7
[40:48]
days before my son's wedding. Well, I
[40:49]
will not be I will not be as involved as
[40:52]
you were as a mom. I get that.
[40:55]
You know, fewer than Anybody else got
[40:57]
children Apparently this is the year for
[40:59]
marriage. The 25th will be done.
[41:02]
Patrice, you got children of marrying
[41:04]
age, don't you?
[41:05]
Yes.
[41:07]
You got 7 days, 5 days. I guess
[41:10]
Okay. And then that's it.
[41:12]
That work for everybody? June 11th? June
[41:14]
11th. Perfect. Okay, let's I we do we
[41:17]
have to say we move to
[41:19]
Is this an approval thing or just a
[41:21]
It's not an action item.
[41:23]
It's an action item. Um if you wanted
[41:26]
to, you could have someone make a
[41:27]
motion, but I think it's just us
[41:29]
advertising it correctly.
[41:32]
So, June 11th it will be.
[41:34]
Okay. We're going to go through this
[41:37]
next item pretty quick. Uh East-West
[41:39]
connectivity discussion, this is going
[41:40]
to be our big major
[41:42]
kind of thing for the year. Uh I've
[41:44]
already asked Burn to pull some numbers
[41:46]
for the next uh next meeting. We're
[41:49]
going to be pulling a lot of numbers
[41:50]
about road capacity, differences between
[41:53]
arterial connectors, all of that stuff
[41:55]
to kind of get an idea of what our roads
[41:58]
are in the city and what the capacity
[41:59]
they're at right now. Is there anybody
[42:02]
who has something a burning desire for
[42:06]
information that maybe Burn can provide?
[42:10]
And we're And this is regards to we're
[42:12]
talking from the lake to the mountains
[42:14]
is what we're we're looking at the whole
[42:16]
spectrum of East-West connectivity.
[42:24]
What she has asked me to put together,
[42:26]
just so you're aware, will go over the
[42:28]
functional classification of our street
[42:30]
system. So, we'll talk about locals,
[42:32]
collectors, and arterials.
[42:34]
Uh with that, we'll talk about uh
[42:37]
the cross sections that correspond
[42:40]
equally to the local collectors and
[42:42]
arterials if they were being built
[42:44]
today.
[42:45]
Standards have changed since 1849.
[42:48]
Um
[42:49]
and then
[42:50]
we will look at some volumes of our
[42:53]
East-West connections, a few
[42:54]
north-south, but mostly East-West. And
[42:57]
we'll look at volume to capacity ratios.
[43:00]
So,
[43:02]
um it's important to maybe look at And
[43:04]
these will be pre-numbers prior to the
[43:07]
820 North Bridge and 820 North closing.
[43:10]
So, we'll have some pretty good numbers
[43:11]
from 2023.
[43:13]
Um
[43:15]
and then we'll talk about that capacity.
[43:17]
And you guys can kind of look at that
[43:19]
and and
[43:21]
really start to say, "Well, jeez, if
[43:23]
we're at this much percentage capacity
[43:25]
already on the roadways, where's our
[43:27]
next East-West connectivity?"
[43:29]
We all know the barriers, right? We have
[43:31]
the river, we have I-15, we have the
[43:33]
railroad tracks, just to name a few.
[43:40]
I I've kind of also asked him to look at
[43:43]
how easy it is to get to university and
[43:45]
then the time from university to
[43:47]
freeways and our regional
[43:50]
transportation hubs and
[43:53]
universities is one of our major hubs,
[43:55]
also. So,
[43:56]
we can get to university, how does how
[43:58]
long does it take to get from university
[44:00]
to the freeway?
[44:01]
And we have major routes
[44:03]
of commuting and everything that affects
[44:06]
our
[44:07]
people coming in and
[44:08]
Yeah, University Avenue, sorry. Not Not
[44:10]
Parkway. Oh, I was going to make you say
[44:12]
G University, like Oh, I hear what
[44:15]
you're saying.
[44:16]
Well, yeah, we all know BYU is a little
[44:18]
chunk that you have to get around.
[44:20]
Right.
[44:23]
Any other
[44:26]
information you guys might want to look
[44:28]
at?
[44:31]
I think we've got some partial
[44:34]
connectors, right? Like it's a good
[44:35]
east-west if you're east of University
[44:38]
or if you're west of University, but
[44:40]
those two chunks don't necessarily look
[44:43]
continuous.
[44:44]
We've got much
[44:46]
far fewer continuous ones that go all
[44:48]
the way across.
[44:50]
Yeah, and we got a couple that are just
[44:52]
two blocks away for maybe I mean
[44:55]
a a full activity.
[44:58]
So, we'll we'll we can talk about that.
[45:00]
We'll show the plan and we'll just kind
[45:02]
of
[45:03]
talk about
[45:04]
uh
[45:05]
two connections that we do have planned
[45:07]
uh to make and then if the council came
[45:11]
across, you know, 100 million, what
[45:14]
other connections we wanted to do and so
[45:16]
we'll talk about the 920 overpass to
[45:19]
uh State Street uh
[45:21]
over the railroad crossing.
[45:23]
So, we'll talk about a couple fun
[45:24]
things.
[45:25]
I know something that citizens of talk
[45:28]
to me about on the west side is um
[45:30]
getting an ambulance getting to the
[45:32]
hospital on the west side.
[45:35]
You know, what happens if you run into
[45:36]
the train and how much longer it takes
[45:37]
and how much longer it would be if there
[45:39]
was better connectivity there, if we
[45:40]
could go go over the tracks under the
[45:41]
tracks so you don't run into the tracks.
[45:43]
I don't know, that's been a That's
[45:46]
something I didn't think about until
[45:48]
they talked to me about it, but they're worried about getting out if
[45:51]
there was some
[45:53]
disaster
[45:55]
get the higher land and ambulance trips.
[45:58]
And
[46:00]
I was talking to a gentleman last week
[46:03]
um talking about the west side,
[46:05]
particularly the southwest side. And how
[46:08]
they were saying they just don't have a
[46:09]
lot of transportation options and
[46:12]
I've been here a long time, so I
[46:14]
immediately said you have two new ones
[46:17]
that you didn't have 10 years ago.
[46:19]
Okay? That is the connection I-15 at
[46:22]
Lake View Parkway. That wasn't here 10
[46:24]
years ago.
[46:25]
And 500 West underneath the tracks or
[46:28]
underneath I-15 wasn't here uh
[46:32]
10 years ago, right? Uh we have those on
[46:35]
our plan. And so now instead of just
[46:38]
having them have to either go up to 920
[46:40]
or Center Street, now they got 5th West
[46:43]
and Lake View Parkway. So there's four
[46:45]
that Southwest Pro has connection to.
[46:49]
But
[46:50]
Brian, we have to evacuate somehow
[46:54]
you know, 30,000 people on the west
[46:56]
side, how would it do that?
[47:00]
Oh, excellent.
[47:02]
Brian's going to pull numbers for us the
[47:04]
next time we will On another point, I
[47:06]
also know that um
[47:08]
Polynesian is willing to do a punch
[47:10]
through. And that's one of the two that
[47:12]
we're going to show next week or next
[47:15]
month.
[47:17]
If you would have had it on the 25th,
[47:19]
that would have given me more time to
[47:20]
prepare, but you got me on the 11th, so.
[47:25]
Okay.
[47:27]
any other comments, questions,
[47:29]
concerns about about East West
[47:30]
connectivity. I'm interested to know
[47:32]
that Google Gemini thinks that the TMA
[47:35]
is currently conducting a data-driven
[47:37]
East-West connectivity study with key
[47:39]
areas of focus including the freeway as
[47:41]
a barrier, bench to freeway connections,
[47:44]
and the 820 North Corridor project. Is
[47:47]
it Is it listening to us? No, I'm asking
[47:49]
questions, but I'm kind of like oh, I
[47:51]
did not know this.
[47:53]
Anyway, there you
[47:59]
So Is that Microsoft's one or No, no, it's Google Gemini. Google Gemini.
[48:04]
Yeah. I I I actually just asked it how
[48:06]
well does the Provo um
[48:08]
transportation master plan Just prove
[48:11]
follow FHWA and other national
[48:13]
guidelines for spacing of facilities.
[48:15]
So, What did it say about that? Uh it
[48:17]
says we are lacking in east-west
[48:19]
connectivity.
[48:21]
That's half the discussion, right? And
[48:23]
the three principal things that are
[48:25]
problems are the I-15 Freeway, the Union
[48:28]
Pacific FrontRunner Rail Corridor, and
[48:31]
Provo River and topography. I I'm
[48:33]
serious. That thing is listening to us.
[48:35]
It's not. Right now.
[48:36]
>> But I am concerned that it thinks C-MAC
[48:38]
is doing this so much better.
[48:41]
So, there you go.
[48:42]
I have a buddy.
[48:44]
Okay. Thank you. Thank you for that.
[48:45]
I'll have to look at Gemini.
[48:47]
Okay. Our last item on the agenda is
[48:50]
engineering projects update.
[48:54]
Oh, I should be
[48:56]
Yeah, engineering project updates. I
[48:58]
don't have a official presentation that
[49:01]
uh
[49:02]
that I'm going to pull up, but I'm what
[49:03]
I'm going to do is In fact, I should go
[49:06]
Two weeks ago, I presented I was invited
[49:08]
as a guest speaker uh for one of the
[49:11]
classes of Professor McFarland who's out
[49:13]
of country.
[49:15]
Um I presented to a group of 45-50
[49:18]
students. The presentation was well
[49:20]
received. The city was
[49:22]
uh appreciated and applauded for all the
[49:24]
hard work we do, specifically targeting
[49:26]
transportation um areas, active
[49:28]
transportation to to be specific.
[49:31]
Uh the citizens were pretty short on
[49:33]
other methods that we look as city
[49:36]
officials, such as CDBG grants, MAG
[49:38]
grants, and UDOT grants, and other state
[49:41]
and federal grants that we apply for to
[49:43]
get some of these uh gaps or
[49:46]
safety active transportation issues uh
[49:48]
resolved in the quickest manner. So, uh
[49:50]
very I would say it was uh, a very
[49:53]
engaging class and um,
[49:55]
uh, very well received on their end um,
[49:58]
the presentation that I um, that I gave.
[50:01]
Uh, for this meeting, the projects that
[50:03]
I want to kind of go over um, we did
[50:06]
started our crack seal project about 3
[50:08]
weeks ago. The project is going well um,
[50:11]
it is a little bit on the slower side.
[50:12]
The weather has a lot to do with it.
[50:14]
Whenever we have rain and and cold
[50:15]
weather,
[50:16]
those are the days that um, our
[50:18]
contractor, they do not work. Uh, but
[50:21]
overall, they're targeting two areas,
[50:23]
the Grandview area as well as the South
[50:25]
State Street by California Avenue,
[50:27]
Nevada Avenue, those areas.
[50:29]
Um, no major issues or complaints, so
[50:31]
things are going well um,
[50:34]
our 9th East 9th South sidewalk project,
[50:36]
um, that project is about to start on
[50:39]
April 20th.
[50:41]
Uh, we did notify residents. Our
[50:43]
contractor's on board. Uh, we're ready
[50:45]
to go. Um,
[50:47]
get that project started.
[50:49]
Uh, 5th North Freedom Boulevard, the
[50:52]
signal project, we're going to be
[50:54]
redoing the signal at that location.
[50:56]
We're also going to be implementing an
[50:58]
innovation grant that I received last
[51:00]
year.
[51:01]
Uh, we're going to be implementing that
[51:03]
also as part of this project and our
[51:06]
contractor is
[51:08]
already on board. We're going to start
[51:10]
that project sometime the month of June
[51:12]
and July. Reason being, there's a
[51:14]
3-month
[51:16]
backlog of signal equipment. So, I
[51:18]
placed my signal order
[51:20]
to state furnished materials and they
[51:22]
told me we're going to wait 3 months.
[51:23]
So, once we have our equipment, we can
[51:26]
get started on that project.
[51:28]
Um, our two CDBG projects, we had our,
[51:31]
in fact, we had our pre-construction
[51:32]
today, this morning and we're going to
[51:35]
start those two projects on April 27th.
[51:39]
There's two neighborhoods we're going to
[51:40]
be targeting, Franklin neighborhood,
[51:42]
we're doing about 32 ADA ramps in
[51:44]
Franklin neighborhood.
[51:46]
And then we're going to go to Foothill
[51:47]
neighborhood where we're going to do Oh,
[51:49]
I can't even remember a whole bunch of
[51:51]
more ADA ramps, sidewalks,
[51:53]
um and and some driveways and things of
[51:56]
that nature.
[51:57]
Um our goal is to to bring those
[51:59]
sidewalks and ADA ramps to compliancy.
[52:01]
So,
[52:02]
we're looking forward
[52:03]
>> What's the situation that we do
[52:04]
driveway?
[52:07]
That if you want to get your driveway
[52:08]
done, is it
[52:10]
question?
[52:10]
>> No, we're when when when we have to pay
[52:12]
for a driveway. So, sometimes the access
[52:16]
if we're messing around converting uh
[52:20]
curb and gutter to uh standard curb and
[52:23]
gutters to the deep trough, you have to
[52:25]
chase that a little bit and so you have
[52:27]
to relay that the concrete between the
[52:30]
street and the sidewalk if there's a
[52:32]
park strip. And if it's monolithic or
[52:35]
combination where the curb and gutter's
[52:37]
right next to the street, and uh we have
[52:40]
to chase it on their actual driveway a
[52:42]
little bit. So, those are a couple
[52:44]
David, are there any other examples?
[52:47]
Okay. Yeah, in in this case, the reason
[52:49]
why we're going to be doing the
[52:50]
driveways, um in some cases it's about 3
[52:52]
4 ft driveway that we're going to be
[52:54]
redoing. In some cases there was a 15 ft
[52:56]
of the driveway that we're doing. Reason
[52:58]
behind because we got to make sure we
[53:00]
are meeting our slopes.
[53:02]
So, the slope requirements that we have,
[53:05]
if the existing driveways are not
[53:06]
meeting or if our project is making it
[53:09]
worse, then we got to cut farther more
[53:11]
than
[53:12]
Because of the sidewalk, yeah, not
[53:14]
because of their yeah. Because of the
[53:15]
sidewalk. Okay.
[53:17]
Um
[53:18]
Yeah, I mean those people those
[53:19]
residents they're excited. They're going
[53:21]
to get some part of their driveways
[53:22]
going to be brand new and um I'm all up
[53:24]
for it. I mean if it's part of our
[53:26]
project, we have to do it. We can't make
[53:28]
their situation worse than what it is.
[53:31]
Uh those are some of the projects. We
[53:32]
have a whole lot other projects as a
[53:34]
city that we're doing. Um
[53:37]
Some of them are currently uh speaking,
[53:40]
they are
[53:42]
out to bid. We haven't had a contractor
[53:43]
hired. A couple of them we had We do
[53:46]
have contractors hired, but we don't
[53:47]
have an exact date to get them started.
[53:49]
So, as we know more information and
[53:51]
details on those
[53:53]
uh most likely in the next month or two,
[53:55]
we'll be able to give you uh information
[53:57]
on the other ones.
[54:00]
That's it.
[54:04]
You can explain it.
[54:05]
Okay. We're going to look at the
[54:06]
presentation. Presentation, sure. Or you
[54:08]
can show the video the other
[54:10]
I'm going to have you put the video
[54:12]
together first.
[54:13]
We have three little videos today.
[54:15]
>> I thought this was going to be released
[54:17]
tomorrow, but evidently that busted my
[54:19]
bubble when she said she's already seen
[54:21]
it. Um I guess it was released today or
[54:24]
yesterday? Yesterday night. Yesterday.
[54:32]
Ready to play? Yeah, go for it.
[55:08]
Quick and short.
[55:09]
>> Okay. So, can you compose the music? I
[55:11]
did. That was uh yeah, I had made Yeah,
[55:14]
thank you.
[55:15]
Is that commercially available? Uh it
[55:16]
is, yeah.
[55:22]
And I just got a couple of
[55:23]
uh
[55:25]
non-music. I I didn't have time to write
[55:26]
three songs, you know.
[55:28]
You can go to the next slide.
[55:31]
So, this is just going to be a time
[55:32]
lapse of the last month of work. So,
[55:34]
kind of where when we met last in Q Max,
[55:36]
we hadn't had the girders set. So, this
[55:37]
is like just right before it. So, you
[55:39]
can go ahead and
[55:41]
do that.
[55:45]
Uh since then they've been framing uh
[55:47]
the deck. You can see there that works.
[55:50]
Uh
[55:51]
the waterline starting up in the top not
[55:53]
the top left corner there. So, we've
[55:55]
installed waterline, getting the deck
[55:57]
framed and re-barred.
[56:01]
And the waterline like existing water
[56:02]
that was flowing under the bridge
[56:03]
before? Well, it's going it would go
[56:05]
through the bridge the new bridge. So,
[56:07]
we were relocating essentially.
[56:10]
And then we've got those finished the
[56:11]
bottom floor of the trail. It's not the
[56:13]
finished floor, but the that's the
[56:15]
foundation floor of the trail in.
[56:18]
And then another moment wall poured the
[56:19]
weed walls there.
[56:21]
So, yeah, we're making progress.
[56:24]
Still on schedule to open for the 4th?
[56:25]
>> Mhm.
[56:27]
Good.
[56:28]
You know, the next 5 days.
[56:31]
And this is the whole project since
[56:32]
November.
[56:42]
Water line on the other side.
[56:44]
Basically.
[56:49]
That's Christmas break. So, here you go.
[56:53]
This one right here.
[56:56]
So, we've come a long ways and
[57:00]
I think a lot of the work been done so
[57:01]
far has been underground and then and
[57:03]
not very seen. So, next couple weeks
[57:06]
we'll start seeing things going really
[57:08]
quick with the deck being poured and
[57:10]
trail being finished and what not. So,
[57:12]
it'll go it'll pick up really quick the
[57:14]
next couple months.
[57:15]
Interesting Charles. When did you go
[57:16]
down to get the water? Yeah.
[57:29]
How much wider is the trail than it was?
[57:32]
Um It is wider, right?
[57:34]
>> It is. I think it's like 4 or 5 ft being
[57:37]
wider.
[57:38]
Got it. And then you're good.
[57:44]
Okay.
[57:45]
Project progressing, we're on time.
[57:46]
We're on track to open up summer
[57:48]
before the 4th is our goal. So, we're looking good right now. We got the
[57:52]
water line finished. It should be turned
[57:54]
on today.
[57:55]
And
[57:56]
we'll get storm drain and start grading
[57:58]
the road. So, you'll see quite a bit of
[57:59]
surface work around the bridge. Bridge
[58:01]
has still got some time to go, but
[58:04]
the utility and surface work around will start picking up here.
[58:20]
Our last item, uh University Avenue
[58:23]
Bridge replacement update. Um
[58:26]
They were running
[58:28]
um
[58:28]
our
[58:31]
Oh, what's it called?
[58:33]
Um ramming through our
[58:39]
a big pipe. Boring
[58:40]
>> casing. They're boring the casing. We're
[58:42]
push pushing through our casing and we
[58:45]
hit something.
[58:46]
Contractor hit something.
[58:48]
And uh we think they hit the old mill
[58:52]
race
[58:53]
uh water uh
[58:56]
way, but
[58:57]
um we don't know for certain.
[59:00]
That's going to result in the overall
[59:02]
project about a 3-month delay. Wow.
[59:05]
Um 7 weeks just to get the new casing.
[59:09]
They're going to step up the old casing
[59:10]
from like 56 to 72.
[59:14]
And that casing was going to be a full
[59:16]
inch thick.
[59:18]
And 72 inches tall. So,
[59:21]
they hope whatever was blocking their
[59:22]
way, they'll be able to
[59:24]
go through it.
[59:26]
So, the other casing hit that
[59:29]
and then got pushed up 7 in.
[59:32]
is enough to cause problems with
[59:35]
the railroad.
[59:37]
Okay, so that's kind of
[59:40]
the result of the delay. We got to get
[59:41]
railroad approval
[59:43]
uh to go to the bigger casing.
[59:46]
Um and of course this is all UDOT and their contractors working away, but
[59:51]
we're in
[59:52]
uh weekly meetings with them going over
[59:54]
this type of stuff.
[59:55]
So,
[59:57]
it might be as much as a 3-month delay,
[59:59]
but again, we've had some good weather.
[1:00:02]
Uh
[1:00:03]
we're
[1:00:04]
um
[1:00:06]
open they can make some of that up.
[1:00:09]
That's kind of where we're at on that.
[1:00:18]
Yeah, well Is Is not Is there water
[1:00:20]
going through it or anything or I don't
[1:00:22]
know people know that for certain. You
[1:00:25]
don't know? Yeah, there's got to be
[1:00:26]
water going through it, but we don't
[1:00:28]
know how much water is through it. Yeah,
[1:00:30]
there's personally no way that they're
[1:00:31]
used and some are
[1:00:33]
We've captured it at some places and
[1:00:35]
others it's still
[1:00:37]
Um there's probably water that flows
[1:00:38]
from groundwater. A lot of it's dirt
[1:00:40]
bottom. Um
[1:00:42]
so, it's kind of unknown. It's hard to
[1:00:44]
know. There's not really There's no
[1:00:45]
access points to it, so it's kind of an
[1:00:47]
unknown until you open it up.
[1:00:52]
What's interesting about this thing we
[1:00:54]
think
[1:00:56]
So, it's made of brick.
[1:00:59]
And the bottom is brick and the two
[1:01:01]
sides are brick and then
[1:01:03]
supposedly it has an arch brick cover to
[1:01:07]
it.
[1:01:08]
Which is amazing.
[1:01:09]
Um it
[1:01:11]
If this thing was above ground, it would
[1:01:12]
be historic. We couldn't even touch it.
[1:01:16]
But because it's below ground and no one
[1:01:18]
sees it,
[1:01:19]
think we're okay to move forward. So,
[1:01:21]
anyway, that's where we're at.
[1:01:24]
It's It's It's just Yeah. It is what it
[1:01:27]
is. We don't put water into it anymore,
[1:01:29]
like David said. We think we've captured
[1:01:31]
parts of the video. Okay. So, they have
[1:01:33]
captured a lot of
[1:01:34]
But it's more down this way, right? That
[1:01:36]
we put water. Yeah.
[1:01:38]
Okay.
[1:01:39]
So.
[1:01:40]
Kind of interesting.
[1:01:41]
So.
[1:01:43]
Out of those moments
[1:01:45]
It is. I mean, it was just like
[1:01:46]
Danielle's project 2 years ago when
[1:01:48]
we're tearing out the first uh
[1:01:51]
first west and a little bit of 6th
[1:01:52]
South. About 6 ft down, there's the
[1:01:55]
railroad tracks.
[1:01:58]
Yeah.
[1:01:59]
A rail ties, the whole bit. That was
[1:02:02]
kind of funny.
[1:02:03]
So. Yeah.
[1:02:05]
No.
[1:02:07]
Okay.
[1:02:07]
I open discussion and close discussion.
[1:02:11]
I think that's all I
[1:02:13]
have to say. Thank you so much and we
[1:02:15]
will adjourn.
[1:02:17]
Thank you.
[1:02:18]
And I dare you to say the same thing.