[0:10] Thank you.

[0:13] All right, we'll get the

[0:16] See where you August 11th

[0:19] DRC meetings kicked off and going. It is

[0:22] 10:00 a.m. So

[0:24] First item of a business um

[0:29] If that's okay with the DRC, we may

[0:31] adjust the the order of the agenda cuz

[0:34] we do have the applicant here for the

[0:35] Scenic Ridge plat phase E preliminary.

[0:38] Is there any concern with moving that up

[0:41] first to review?

[0:42] >> No, let's move him up.

[0:43] >> Okay.

[0:44] Sounds good. So the first item we'll

[0:47] review is the Scenic Ridge subdivision

[0:51] phase E.

[0:52] Um this is part of the

[0:55] Scenic Ridge the last the final

[0:58] uh phase that we'll start reviewing

[1:00] relate to this project. It's up on the

[1:02] East Bench off of 1200 East and 450

[1:05] South.

[1:07] Um

[1:08] phase currently under

[1:10] that we're reviewing today is the the

[1:12] red section indicated here.

[1:15] Um

[1:15] there's three proposed lots and then the largest eight lot associated with

[1:19] this this phase.

[1:22] Um

[1:22] this is a preliminary review of this

[1:25] application.

[1:26] Um and so the DRC's role today is to

[1:30] provide a recommendation to Planning

[1:31] Commission.

[1:33] Um some background on it. This

[1:36] subdivision all the improvements have

[1:38] currently been

[1:40] uh

[1:41] constructed. Um

[1:43] and the utilities are stubbed to the

[1:46] lots as um were previously so um again

[1:50] all infrastructure has been installed.

[1:52] This is just a review of of the plats

[1:54] and phases related to this site.

[1:57] So um with that the DRC with any

[2:00] thoughts or comments or questions that

[2:02] we may have. So,

[2:04] starting with Aspen with planning.

[2:07] >> I don't have any comments.

[2:08] >> Okay.

[2:09] Randy with building?

[2:11] >> I've got three addresses on this, but I

[2:13] know it's realized it's just preliminary

[2:15] at this point, but that is ready. So,

[2:17] other than that, I have no comments.

[2:18] >> Okay. We'll add those to it. So,

[2:21] Ryan with fire?

[2:22] >> No, these improvements are already in,

[2:24] so there's nothing else.

[2:25] >> Okay.

[2:26] Jason?

[2:27] >> I don't have any comments, and

[2:29] we'll just chime in on redlines as

[2:30] needed.

[2:31] >> Okay.

[2:32] Uh there's not a whole lot of comments

[2:34] on here. I'll kind of just start with

[2:35] the plat.

[2:36] Um

[2:37] just a verification and check on the

[2:39] boundary description.

[2:41] Um

[2:42] to make sure that the section ties seem

[2:45] a little off, so we just wanted to check

[2:46] those, make sure we're good there.

[2:48] is a note that needs to be

[2:49] included on all plats.

[2:51] Um basically just saying the contractor

[2:54] needs to understand that um

[2:58] that all ins- uh improvements need to be

[3:01] installed according to San San Clemente

[3:03] standards and specifications.

[3:05] Um

[3:07] I'll probably address this next comment

[3:09] on the following sheet. It could

[3:11] illustrate it a little better.

[3:13] Right now shown on the the plat itself

[3:17] is

[3:18] just these three lots being split off

[3:21] from the main lot.

[3:22] Um

[3:24] typically when there's a fourth when

[3:26] there's a parcel remaining after the

[3:30] rest of it that's not going to be

[3:31] installed, the entirety of the project

[3:34] needs to be included within the plat

[3:35] itself.

[3:36] And so, it's something we

[3:39] um

[3:40] we do need to confirm a little bit. I'd

[3:42] work with you on that and this nail a

[3:43] little bit on the including that in the

[3:48] entirety of the project of that lot

[3:51] within the plat itself.

[3:53] Um so otherwise it remains a parcel that's still a

[3:58] single parcel being split into four

[4:00] lots. And um

[4:04] when that and one one's building lot as

[4:06] well when they're all improved finalized

[4:09] lots they typically include it on the

[4:11] plat itself.

[4:12] So we'll need to work on work through

[4:15] that with you on this one.

[4:17] >> something that

[4:20] Josh

[4:21] who put in the lot with

[4:23] >> Yes.

[4:25] Yep. So uh basically this plat sheet

[4:28] would just expand a little bit and

[4:30] include the entire boundary for for

[4:33] yours. So.

[4:36] just for the record the question was

[4:38] is who addresses that and that would be

[4:41] the the engineer and the surveyor doing

[4:43] the project.

[4:46] Okay other than that I don't there's

[4:48] only one other comment um

[4:51] it's regarding the the channel behind

[4:53] there.

[4:54] Um with this phase going in

[4:56] um we do need to coordinate on

[4:59] making sure that facility is is

[5:01] installed. Whether it's the channel

[5:03] itself

[5:04] or which is the city's responsibility or

[5:08] the pipe which um

[5:10] for the development agreement would need

[5:12] to be installed. So we just need to work

[5:13] and make sure that that's that's getting

[5:15] done with this phase.

[5:19] Other than that I don't believe we had

[5:21] any other

[5:22] comments.

[5:28] No.

[5:33] Okay.

[5:34] Um

[5:35] with that if there any other comments or

[5:37] thoughts

[5:41] seeing none I would would look for a

[5:43] motion.

[5:48] » I'll make the motion we move it forward

[5:50] to the planning commission based on the

[5:52] red lines being addressed.

[5:53] >> Okay.

[5:54] I have a motion. Is there a second?

[5:56] >> I'll second that.

[5:57] >> Second by Randy.

[5:59] Any

[6:00] thoughts or comments on the motion?

[6:03] No?

[6:04] All in favor, please say aye.

[6:06] >> Aye.

[6:06] >> Any opposed?

[6:08] Okay. Motion passes. Um we'll get these

[6:10] sent over to you and work on on that

[6:12] plan. So,

[6:13] thank you, Neil.

[6:15] Um

[6:16] next item on the agenda. Are you here

[6:19] with the vet clinic?

[6:19] >> Yes.

[6:20] >> Maybe we'll So, okay, we'll jump the vet

[6:22] clinic up as well cuz we have there.

[6:25] So, next item on the agenda we'll it

[6:28] will review is review the Santaquin Vet

[6:31] Clinic.

[6:32] This is a site plan

[6:34] um

[6:35] located on the west side of town

[6:37] adjacent to the Santaquin Peaks

[6:39] Industrial

[6:40] uh subdivision.

[6:42] This is not it's adjacent to it, so just

[6:46] kind of to the to the east of the

[6:49] subdivision that was installed a couple

[6:51] years ago. Um another point of reference

[6:53] is the TPW site, which is kind of north

[6:55] and and east of of this site.

[6:59] Um this is a site plan application. Um

[7:02] so, the DRC is the final approval body

[7:04] for for this application.

[7:07] Um

[7:08] and

[7:10] yeah, with that with that we'll go

[7:12] around DRC with any thoughts or

[7:13] comments. All right, Leslie.

[7:15] >> Will we go to the landscaping page on

[7:17] page nine, please?

[7:18] >> Mhm.

[7:20] >> Some additional landscaping needs to be

[7:22] shown. Uh for example, the spaces right

[7:24] behind the building. We need to know

[7:26] like what material's being used because

[7:29] the whole site must be landscaped. Uh we

[7:31] also need a data table provided to show

[7:34] that 8% of the site is being landscaped.

[7:38] Um keep in mind that 50% of landscape

[7:41] materials needs to be live plant

[7:43] material. That's measured at the full

[7:45] plant maturity.

[7:47] And then around the trash enclosure, we

[7:49] need to require four shrubs per three

[7:51] sides.

[7:53] And then same with the plant island,

[7:55] some shrubs need to be included in that

[7:56] as well.

[7:59] >> Ashton, if I can maybe piggyback on that

[8:00] a little bit. Uh

[8:02] can you help us understand uh directly

[8:04] behind the building? Do you have any

[8:06] plans there for either driveways or

[8:08] walkways or

[8:10] Right right where the the cursor is,

[8:11] right in between the parking and the

[8:12] building. Is there plans for that or

[8:15] >> Uh

[8:16] I'd have to check.

[8:19] I'm not sure yet.

[8:21] >> Is that Is the light on the microphone

[8:23] on?

[8:24] >> Turn the little green light on.

[8:25] >> All right, there we go. Okay, I'm not

[8:28] sure on that. I know that they do want

[8:30] to

[8:31] uh access from the parking lot back

[8:33] there obviously to the basement of the

[8:35] building. So

[8:35] >> Perfect. Yeah, if if if you can just

[8:37] show some If you can show that and then

[8:39] as Ashton talked about, and really the

[8:41] landscaping is is that access road to

[8:44] the north cuz everything down below will

[8:46] be kind of a future phase, but you know,

[8:48] the area immediately behind I mean,

[8:50] you've shown everything on the sides and

[8:52] the front, but that whole area that he's

[8:54] highlighting is is really what we're

[8:56] honing in on on the landscaping

[8:57] requirement. But any other details about

[8:59] access and things like that will will

[9:01] really help us to to you know,

[9:04] understand what what the plan is for the

[9:05] site.

[9:06] >> Can I ask a question there? I mean, a

[9:08] lot of vet clinics use stalls or

[9:10] something for

[9:12] It doesn't make sense to require

[9:13] landscaping if they're going to rip it

[9:15] out and put

[9:16] future enclosures for there for animal

[9:18] care. You know what I mean? Is there

[9:19] going to be stalls back there? And

[9:21] that's something we're going to need to

[9:21] ask the the vet. Does he have horse

[9:24] stalls or pens or kennels for dogs? It

[9:27] makes no sense to require them to

[9:28] landscape it and spend that money to rip

[9:31] it out and put a kennel there.

[9:32] >> Well, and I guess that's the thing is is

[9:34] we need to know what the plan is cuz if

[9:35] right now if it's all just going to be

[9:37] kind of blank and vague vacant, then our

[9:38] code requires that it be, you know, uh

[9:41] improved to some point. Now, it may not

[9:43] be

[9:44] landscaping,

[9:45] um

[9:46] uh in the traditional sense, but at

[9:47] least have some sort of a ground cover

[9:49] so that it's not just, you know, uh

[9:51] raw.

[9:52] >> I just don't want to see him be required

[9:54] to put all these trees and shrubs if

[9:55] he's going to put kennels there and have

[9:57] to rip it all out. There's no sense

[9:58] wasting money.

[9:59] >> We'll show what the plan is. We'll talk

[10:01] with the architect and the vet, so see

[10:03] what they want. So.

[10:04] >> And if their plan is to do that in the

[10:05] future, then for the time being they

[10:07] need to do something to treat the ground

[10:08] so that it's not just weeds.

[10:12] Right, but this is This is a site plan

[10:15] for an improvement.

[10:19] » Okay. Anything else, Aspen?

[10:22] >> Just on the site plan on page two,

[10:24] um if you'll just continue the

[10:26] pedestrian access for the future trail

[10:28] that will run along Summit Ridge

[10:30] Parkway.

[10:35] Oh, and then your parking stalls in the

[10:36] back, they're only 18 ft, which we

[10:39] allow, but it has to have a 5-ft wide

[10:41] landscaped area or a 6-ft wide sidewalk.

[10:44] >> Okay.

[10:45] >> So, just keep that in mind.

[10:48] And that's everything.

[10:50] >> Okay.

[10:51] Randy, it's building?

[10:53] >> I don't have anything at this point, so.

[10:55] >> Okay.

[10:56] Ryan?

[10:57] >> I know that there's a fire hydrant that

[10:59] you show more on the southeast corner of

[11:01] that.

[11:02] Uh I know John and I have discussed that

[11:04] there's one potentially already going to

[11:06] the north.

[11:08] >> Yeah. So, on that

[11:10] So, part of

[11:12] um

[11:13] the agreement was that we did need to

[11:14] provide a fire hydrant for the site.

[11:17] Right now, the fire hydrant's it's been

[11:20] stubbed out, pipe has been stubbed out

[11:21] of the out of the We've connected the

[11:24] 10-in line and stubbed it to about right

[11:26] here. We haven't brought the fire

[11:27] hydrant up just because we wanted to

[11:29] make sure we weren't conflicting with

[11:30] the site plan.

[11:32] Okay, so we're

[11:34] right now where the pipes currently

[11:36] extended is roughly in this area.

[11:39] And so with that, if we have a fire

[11:41] hydrant here in this location,

[11:44] um the thought is that we wouldn't need

[11:46] to install this fire hydrant or the

[11:49] applicant wouldn't be required required

[11:51] to install that fire hydrant as part of

[11:53] their site plan.

[11:55] >> Okay.

[11:56] >> so long as that's within 100 ft, which

[11:59] we can do that, that fire hydrant

[12:01] wouldn't be needed.

[12:02] >> Correct. You don't have to put two that

[12:04] close together.

[12:04] >> Okay.

[12:05] >> Yep.

[12:08] So.

[12:09] Hey, anything else, Ryan?

[12:11] >> No.

[12:11] >> Okay. Jason?

[12:13] >> I don't have anything to add except I

[12:14] think we need to add a note um

[12:17] for just architectural renderings, when

[12:19] she get that ready, just give that to us

[12:21] and and uh because of this being

[12:25] uh

[12:26] kind of a specific industrial site with

[12:28] uh

[12:29] the specific agreement that

[12:31] uh is there with the city, we'll review

[12:33] it kind of more internally. There's not

[12:34] necessarily you know, official ARC

[12:37] review, but any anytime you get that rendering

[12:40] uh ready to go, send it to us and we'll work with with you on that.

[12:45] >> Okay.

[12:45] >> Um that's a redline. I don't think that

[12:47] made it there, so we

[12:47] >> It did not.

[12:48] >> add for AR or architectural review.

[12:52] Um but on top of the redlines that you

[12:54] have, I don't have any have anything

[12:55] more to say.

[12:57] >> Okay, we'll go through these here real

[12:59] quick, anything that we haven't covered.

[13:01] Um

[13:02] and just comment on the the dimension of

[13:05] parking stalls, making sure those meet

[13:07] our code there. Um it seems like they

[13:10] may be a little short. Is that

[13:13] correct?

[13:14] >> Well, yeah, cuz if we allow the 18 in

[13:16] today,

[13:17] either the lines are

[13:18] >> We'll have to have sort of landscaping

[13:20] or sidewalk here, 6-ft sidewalk there,

[13:21] so.

[13:23] We've already talked about access to the

[13:24] building from that parking lot.

[13:27] Um

[13:28] And that access there, it's really just

[13:30] striping

[13:31] for that connection cuz you're able to

[13:33] come right up necessary to the property

[13:35] line. And then as we get that trail

[13:38] built, there'll be a connection at that

[13:40] point.

[13:43] » And will you just label this triangle

[13:45] piece that's not necessarily getting

[13:47] constructed out just as a future phase?

[13:49] >> Okay.

[13:50] Or whatever that yeah.

[13:52] >> Whatever it's going to be.

[13:53] >> it's planned to be future phase. But

[13:56] just so it's clear on there.

[13:57] >> Hey John, and in that

[13:59] what they he's labeled as pond one,

[14:00] that's serving the the entirety of the

[14:02] project or just the the first phase if you will?

[14:07] >> Right now it's designed to take all of

[14:08] the storm water from the parking lots

[14:10] and everything and store it there. It

[14:12] flows in and into a curb inlet down here

[14:15] in this corner and then dumps in.

[14:17] >> Okay.

[14:17] >> So if there's

[14:19] >> So is that going to have to be developed

[14:20] that would need to be resized?

[14:22] >> Resized.

[14:22] >> Okay. And I do know what and I guess you

[14:25] have a red line on it, but I I think you

[14:26] showed a pipe

[14:28] going from that pond just just uh

[14:31] >> That's correct. That's right here.

[14:32] >> Just going onto the Yeah, we we we can't

[14:35] have that. Uh you got to keep the the

[14:37] storm water completely on site and

[14:40] controlled on site. You can't have a

[14:41] pipe that just is

[14:43] put you know, shooting that water off

[14:45] onto the adjacent property which

[14:46] happens.

[14:46] >> Yeah, so that would be the overflow

[14:49] meaning the rim of that box once that

[14:51] pond fills completely then what's spill

[14:53] over into that box. There's no lower the bottom of the pond

[14:58] isn't flowing out of that. It's just

[15:01] when it starts to overflow so it doesn't

[15:03] go over into all that wall that we have

[15:06] there that it gets captured by that box

[15:08] and then is conveyed under.

[15:10] >> So yeah, regardless of that, you you

[15:12] can't have a pipe that's overflowing off

[15:14] into the adjacent property. If if an

[15:16] event gets big enough that it naturally

[15:18] overflows then that's that's going to be

[15:20] a

[15:21] I you know, I would just worry about the

[15:22] retaining wall.

[15:23] The structural integrity of the

[15:24] retaining wall having water just go onto

[15:27] that, but

[15:28] >> Whether it's say yeah.

[15:30] >> No, it can't be necessary pipe. If they

[15:32] want to do some surface improvements

[15:34] after to to get it there,

[15:36] um that would be adequate on that.

[15:38] >> Okay.

[15:42] um let's see. Going to this, the other

[15:44] comment is we can provide you updated

[15:47] GIS cuz this is something that actually

[15:48] was just installed within the last

[15:49] month. We'll send you updated GIS with

[15:52] the fire line that we talked about

[15:54] earlier, the fire hydrant line, and the

[15:58] uh culinary connection. It's actually

[16:00] 2-in connection that's been installed

[16:02] there.

[16:02] >> Okay.

[16:05] » Um one other item we wanted to discuss

[16:08] is the sump location. Um

[16:12] this is a sump that

[16:13] captures what's coming off of Summit

[16:15] Ridge Parkway. We just like to um

[16:19] coordinate uh the location of that.

[16:21] Where it's located is um

[16:24] provides maintenance struggles down in

[16:27] the future for it wherever need to. We'd

[16:29] rather prefer that to be outside the the

[16:33] uh

[16:33] asphalt there for the drive approach.

[16:36] Um and to relocate that and push it

[16:38] either further kind of north so it's out

[16:40] of there. Um south it gets kind of

[16:42] complicated with utilities. Uh maybe a

[16:44] little spot here, but as you said, we

[16:47] would probably help participate in the

[16:48] construction of that.

[16:49] >> Okay.

[16:50] >> So, but if we can just update that to

[16:52] show getting it out of the park strip out of that drive

[16:55] approach.

[16:59] Um let's see.

[17:01] If I talked about that, that's the

[17:03] outfall.

[17:06] I believe and that's the landscaping

[17:08] comments. I believe that's it.

[17:11] So,

[17:13] that's all the comments we've got on

[17:15] this. If there's any others,

[17:17] um

[17:18] I look forward to any other thoughts or

[17:20] questions on this.

[17:24] » Thanks, Scott.

[17:25] >> Okay.

[17:28] If not, I would look for a motion.

[17:33] » John, I think with the uncertainty of

[17:34] what's happening behind the building

[17:35] with the landscaping or or walkways or

[17:39] potential stalls for animals or

[17:41] whatever, uh I think there's a little

[17:42] bit more information we need to be able

[17:44] to approve this site a motion that we

[17:46] table this site plan.

[17:47] >> Okay.

[17:48] Got a motion to table. Is there a

[17:50] second?

[17:53] » I'll second that.

[17:54] >> Seconded by Ryan.

[17:56] Any discussion on that?

[17:59] If not, we'll go to vote. All in favor

[18:01] of tabling, please say I.

[18:02] >> I.

[18:03] >> Any opposed?

[18:04] Okay, motion passes.

[18:06] We'll get these sent over to you again

[18:08] so you can make the those corrections.

[18:10] So. Okay. Thank you.

[18:14] Final item on the agenda is uh review of

[18:17] the Tanner Flats

[18:20] phase five subdivision.

[18:23] Um this is

[18:26] um south of what's currently being

[18:29] constructed. Um so this is you know,

[18:31] I'll back up a little bit. This is

[18:32] Summer Ridge Parkway. Tanner Flats is

[18:34] located on the the east side of Summer

[18:36] Ridge Parkway.

[18:38] Um and that let's say they've had a

[18:40] couple of phases they've been under

[18:42] construction over the last two or three

[18:43] years.

[18:44] Um this is the fourth phase of it.

[18:47] Um and there'll be one more phase after

[18:50] that.

[18:51] Um

[18:53] Excuse me. So, this is a final

[18:55] subdivision application. So, the DRC is

[18:58] the final approval body for this.

[19:01] So, that will go around. Aspen?

[19:04] >> Uh just some cleanup items. As you can

[19:07] see on the cover page it says phase

[19:09] four. If we can correct that to say

[19:10] phase five. And then just a reminder

[19:13] with the park requirements, currently

[19:16] you've been issued 44 building permits.

[19:19] Um you just need to be aware 64 more

[19:21] park improvements need to be done and

[19:23] then no more building permits can be

[19:25] issued until all the parks are done at

[19:27] 104.

[19:30] So.

[19:30] >> So, and they have begun construction on park improvements now, but they still

[19:36] have 20 or so building permits to pull

[19:38] before that kicks in.

[19:40] Okay?

[19:41] >> Um I think that's everything from

[19:42] planning.

[19:43] >> Okay. Randy?

[19:46] >> I went I remember going through this the

[19:48] addressing on this, but I don't know

[19:50] whether I got it into this file, but

[19:52] we'll get on there and get it to them.

[19:54] >> Yep.

[19:55] >> Okay.

[19:56] Other than that, nothing.

[19:57] >> Okay. Ryan?

[19:58] >> No, I don't have anything.

[19:59] >> Okay. Jason?

[20:01] >> I don't have anything either.

[20:02] >> Okay.

[20:03] Um there's one I'm going to point out.

[20:07] For the most part, everything weren't

[20:08] any other major uh comments on it. Um

[20:13] there's one that's

[20:15] uh

[20:15] does need to be addressed. It's on the

[20:17] plan and profiles regarding the storm

[20:19] drain.

[20:20] Um

[20:22] right now as it's currently the design

[20:26] doesn't match the preliminary approval

[20:29] that was done. Um

[20:32] and even the amended approval that was

[20:35] done a couple about a year and a half or

[20:37] so ago.

[20:38] Um

[20:39] right here on this sheet the storm drain

[20:43] would drain back to uh

[20:46] it drains away from the storm drain

[20:49] retention basin that we talked about

[20:50] earlier. And so there would be an

[20:52] outfall somewhere on the south side of

[20:55] the project. So, this does need to be

[20:57] corrected uh to more closely match the

[21:00] preliminary design and to make sure

[21:02] we're not sending storm drain

[21:05] back uh where it shouldn't be going.

[21:08] So, and then there's a

[21:11] one of the plan views doesn't match the

[21:13] profile

[21:14] on there. So, those are those are really all the

[21:22] only comments that we have on this on

[21:24] this set of plans.

[21:30] So, is there any other comments,

[21:32] thoughts, or

[21:33] questions on it?

[21:35] All right.

[21:38] If not, I would look for a motion.

[21:42] » I'll make a motion to conditionally

[21:44] approve Tanner Flats phase five final

[21:47] review once all redlines are addressed.

[21:49] >> Okay.

[21:51] We have a motion. Is there a second?

[21:53] >> I'll second that.

[21:54] >> Seconded by Randy.

[21:56] Any thoughts on the motion or

[21:57] discussion?

[21:59] Seeing none, we'll go to vote. All in

[22:00] favor, please say aye.

[22:02] >> Aye.

[22:03] >> Any opposed? Okay.

[22:05] Motion passes.

[22:06] Um

[22:07] move on with that. Sounds good.

[22:10] Last item on the agenda is uh approval

[22:13] of the meeting minutes from July 28th

[22:16] DRC meeting.

[22:19] >> I'll make a motion to approve the

[22:20] meeting minutes of July 28th, 2026 for

[22:23] DRC.

[22:25] >> Is there a second?

[22:26] >> Second.

[22:26] >> Seconded by Ryan.

[22:28] All in favor, please say aye.

[22:30] >> Aye.

[22:31] >> Any opposed?

[22:32] Okay. Minutes are approved.

[22:34] And if there's not anything else needed

[22:37] but to discuss by the DRC, I'll look for

[22:39] a motion to adjourn.

[22:40] >> So moved.

[22:42] >> We are adjourned at 10:22.

Santaquin City Development Review Committee Meeting - August 11, 2026

Transcript