Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
Copy of a YouTube video held by the Internet Archive.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
Captions were copied from the YouTube video.
[0:01]
and start the meeting. We will start
[0:03]
with the pledge of allegiance.
[0:06]
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the
[0:09]
United States of America and to the
[0:11]
republic for which it stands, one nation
[0:15]
under God, indivisible, with liberty and
[0:18]
justice for all.
[0:22]
» Moving on to roll call.
[0:26]
>> Commissioner Benner
[0:27]
>> here. Commissioner Hooper
[0:29]
>> here.
[0:30]
>> Commissioner Buckeye
[0:31]
>> here.
[0:31]
>> Commissioner Tucker
[0:32]
>> here.
[0:33]
>> And Alderman um Leazison Patrick Fehey
[0:37]
is absent. So we have a quorum.
[0:40]
>> Okay. Moving on to the approval of the
[0:43]
agenda for tonight's meeting.
[0:45]
>> So uh before before we uh do an approval
[0:48]
for the agenda, I want to make a couple
[0:50]
changes. One, I want to remove the I
[0:53]
left this on there, the August 17th,
[0:55]
2026 minutes. So, we're just going to
[0:57]
strike that out. Also, under new
[1:01]
business item 8, um the first one there,
[1:05]
SGHC029-26
[1:08]
is misnumbered.
[1:10]
The uh rather than I'm hoping it's going
[1:13]
to be 034-26,
[1:17]
but I don't know that yet. Uh that's
[1:19]
just an internal tracking number for us
[1:21]
anyway, but I did want it to be
[1:22]
reflected on the record. So, uh, I'll be
[1:26]
inserting the correct number into that,
[1:28]
uh, once I put it back in the system and
[1:30]
it gives me a new number. Um, but that's
[1:32]
all the changes I have.
[1:39]
I'll make motion to approve the agenda.
[1:42]
>> I'll [clears throat] second.
[1:43]
>> Okay. I have a motion and a second to
[1:45]
approve the amended agenda. All in
[1:47]
favor?
[1:49]
>> I. Any opposed?
[1:53]
Okay, moving on to the approval of
[1:54]
minutes from our last meeting of August
[1:56]
26th, 2026.
[2:22]
Are you going to make that change?
[2:24]
>> Yes, I will be making a change on the on
[2:26]
the back page. Looks like you're all
[2:28]
looking at it. Um third line down, it's
[2:31]
not president, it's precedent. So, I
[2:34]
will be making that change.
[2:40]
» I will make a motion to approve with the
[2:43]
modified change. Second. Okay, I have a
[2:47]
motion and a second to approve the
[2:49]
minutes from the last meeting with the
[2:50]
modification of the spelling. All in
[2:53]
favor?
[2:54]
>> I. Any opposed?
[2:58]
» Okay, moving on to the introduction of
[3:00]
evidence.
[3:01]
>> I would like to uh have entered into
[3:03]
evidence the St. Genevie Municipal Code,
[3:06]
the um Heritage Commission guide design
[3:09]
guidelines for the city of St. Genevieve
[3:12]
uh National Register District and the um
[3:17]
all of the submitted evidence and
[3:20]
applications with each case before you
[3:22]
tonight.
[3:23]
>> Motion to approve the uh evidence.
[3:25]
Second. [clears throat]
[3:26]
>> I have a motion and a second to accept
[3:28]
the evidence. All in favor?
[3:30]
>> I.
[3:31]
>> Any opposed?
[3:34]
Okay, moving on to old business.
[3:39]
Okay. So, um the walking tour uh mobile
[3:43]
app grant uh they'll be having their
[3:47]
final public forum on Thursday uh
[3:50]
September 24th. Um, and that's uh right
[3:53]
before our city count a little bit
[3:54]
before our city council or sorry board
[3:56]
of alderman meeting uh here at city hall
[3:59]
in this room at 3 p.m. So uh they're required to have so many public
[4:03]
forums and this will be the final one so
[4:05]
that we can get moving on with the
[4:07]
project.
[4:09]
Uh next item up uh the the next year's
[4:13]
grant which is the GIS historic data
[4:15]
layer update. Um really there's no further updates. uh we're
[4:20]
filling out some some more paperwork
[4:22]
now. So, we're kind of in that paperwork
[4:23]
process um with the state to finalize
[4:26]
everything. So, it still kind of is at
[4:28]
the same stance that it was except we
[4:29]
are filling out some more additional
[4:31]
paperwork. So, as soon as I get any more
[4:33]
information, I'll pass that along.
[4:37]
And the next item um was from uh two
[4:42]
meetings ago. Um so, it's at 288.
[4:46]
Actually, it's a vacant lot between 288
[4:48]
and 296 South Main Street. And this is a
[4:50]
resubmitt. Um, so if you look at um it's
[4:54]
original application. Um, however, I did
[4:57]
alter my [clears throat] um report to
[5:02]
show um
[5:06]
what they are submitting for approval.
[5:08]
Um, as you can see there, uh, what
[5:11]
[clears throat] you all asked them to
[5:12]
do. Uh if you remember what was there
[5:14]
before in the picture there before was
[5:16]
kind of like a a gamble type roof uh
[5:20]
narrower structure. Um totally different
[5:24]
style. Um the other one that that did
[5:27]
get approved looks almost identical to
[5:30]
this. Um and they did include uh a
[5:33]
picture of what the material is and it's
[5:36]
actually wood. Okay.
[5:38]
>> So that is a wood material so it's not
[5:40]
fake. So um yeah, obviously it's not
[5:43]
full log, but um that that is the
[5:46]
material type on both structures.
[5:48]
>> Okay. So they are resubmitting that uh
[5:52]
before you tonight. Um and I feel that
[5:54]
they they've met the requirements of
[5:56]
asking what you all have wanted from
[5:58]
them, they are here. Uh if you have any
[6:01]
questions for them, um they are here if
[6:03]
you have any questions.
[6:04]
>> Thank you.
[6:07]
>> I thank you for putting together this
[6:08]
package. Their request is I think we're
[6:12]
it's very nicely done.
[6:15]
>> Make a motion for presented.
[6:17]
>> What a question.
[6:19]
>> Just coming here in case you guys got
[6:20]
any questions. You're a fun group to
[6:22]
talk to.
[6:22]
>> Sorry, it's all me.
[6:24]
>> Wasn't there one we denied for the faux
[6:27]
log sighting?
[6:28]
>> No,
[6:30]
>> it was the one. No, that was the one
[6:31]
that he was talking about that looked
[6:33]
like a shed.
[6:33]
>> It was turned the other direction and it
[6:35]
was just
[6:36]
>> a different make sure we were being
[6:37]
consistent. This This is almost
[6:39]
identical to the one we approved.
[6:41]
>> The one you like?
[6:42]
>> This was the sighting that we did like.
[6:45]
>> Was that like that Dutch?
[6:48]
>> Well, we thought the siding was fake. I
[6:50]
thought that that was not real sighting.
[6:52]
So, we were like, "Well, that ain't
[6:53]
good." Then I went and actually looked
[6:54]
at it, knocked on it, and it's Yeah,
[6:57]
it's real. It's real log siding,
[6:59]
>> right? I Yeah. I just wanted to double
[7:01]
check cuz I started
[7:02]
>> And then I We modified the other house.
[7:04]
>> This is the one.
[7:05]
>> It's going to be That's the one. That's
[7:07]
the first one,
[7:07]
>> right? Yeah, it was the first one.
[7:09]
>> No, it's been changed to the
[7:10]
>> I don't necessarily mean them. I mean,
[7:12]
has the board seen one before that we
[7:15]
have denied?
[7:16]
>> I don't recall.
[7:17]
>> I don't remember. Okay. I just remember
[7:19]
it coming up before and I just wanted to
[7:20]
make sure that we were being consistent.
[7:22]
>> Yeah. I don't think so.
[7:24]
>> Okay.
[7:25]
>> I was say especially if it's new. Now,
[7:27]
if it was trying to match a replacement,
[7:29]
that would be a totally different story.
[7:31]
Yeah.
[7:34]
>> That was it. I'm sorry. I'm a child.
[7:37]
Yeah.
[7:37]
>> Okay.
[7:39]
I like to make a motion to approve it as
[7:41]
presented.
[7:43]
[clears throat]
[7:47]
» Somebody else has something else.
[7:52]
» I have a motion to approve the amended
[7:56]
certificate of appropriateness to
[7:57]
construct the new home at the vacant lot
[7:59]
between 288 and 296 South Main Street.
[8:03]
Do I have a second?
[8:05]
>> Second. Okay, I have a motion and a
[8:07]
second to approve. All in favor?
[8:10]
>> I I Any opposed?
[8:19]
» I didn't hear you. Sorry.
[8:22]
I didn't hear you. I'm sorry.
[8:26]
[laughter] I didn't hear you. I
[8:27]
just wanted to be sure. Yeah. The eyes
[8:30]
have it.
[8:31]
>> Okay, guys. So that's all you need for
[8:34]
Thank you guys. Thank you.
[8:36]
>> We'll be in touch with the permits.
[8:37]
Okay.
[8:38]
>> Well, thank you.
[8:39]
>> Sorry, Wendy. I'm sorry.
[8:40]
>> I didn't hear either. She's right next
[8:42]
to you. I'm sorry. [laughter] Look at
[8:43]
me. I'm What did I do?
[8:44]
>> I just wanted to be
[8:53]
handle this. Okay, moving on to
[8:57]
the next item. to receive a certificate
[8:59]
of appropriateness for the installation
[9:01]
of vinyl windows in place of wood
[9:04]
windows on the side and rear of the
[9:06]
building at 145 Washington Street.
[9:10]
>> Okay. So you have before you the
[9:12]
application
[9:14]
and my report there uh which shows a
[9:17]
picture of of the the schoolhouse um as
[9:21]
it's called and then uh they had
[9:23]
submitted something for windows there
[9:25]
but um the [clears throat] contractor uh
[9:29]
Mr. Bayer there standing in front of us
[9:31]
um brought this which this includes what
[9:35]
they what they're now proposing not
[9:37]
vinyl windows uh but this is a
[9:40]
fiberglass type window that uh when when
[9:43]
you really look at the finish of it has
[9:46]
uh especially if you look at this top
[9:47]
one here it has the wood look finish to
[9:49]
it. Uh they're here to answer any
[9:52]
questions you have about that
[9:53]
installation. Um, and I'll pass this
[9:56]
around so you guys can see that.
[10:00]
>> And my apologies. I I had first told
[10:02]
Alex we'll go with a vinyl type window,
[10:07]
but um uh I'm all about the historic
[10:10]
preservation. So my my point was vinyl
[10:14]
is vinyl. It looks vinyl. Um, and Marvin
[10:19]
comes out and Anderson as well have
[10:22]
really good windows that have a lot of
[10:25]
simulations to the wood. Um,
[10:27]
>> seen these before.
[10:28]
>> And [clears throat] anytime I'm dealing
[10:30]
with a brick building or something like
[10:32]
that, I I really get worried about the
[10:36]
today's quality of wood. So, um, and I
[10:41]
do understand that we have to have wood
[10:43]
on the front. [clears throat]
[10:46]
>> Or do we?
[10:49]
>> At this point, yeah,
[10:52]
I'm not going to fight with them.
[10:54]
[laughter]
[11:03]
That's just a brochure that uh the
[11:06]
architect give me. just kind of give you
[11:09]
the script
[11:10]
>> and they will do them custom 6 over6
[11:13]
exactly what's there. They'll replicate
[11:15]
precisely what is already existing
[11:16]
there.
[11:17]
>> Yeah.
[11:18]
>> So it would it not look like what it
[11:20]
does now.
[11:27]
» Yeah. Hopefully it won't fall apart like
[11:30]
that.
[11:33]
Fiberglass will last a long time.
[11:40]
I think the way they are.
[11:45]
[clears throat]
[11:45]
>> Do we have any additional questions?
[12:03]
» I'm just a big fan of wood.
[12:06]
What's that?
[12:06]
>> I I'm a huge fan of replacing the wood
[12:09]
with the wood.
[12:10]
>> Yeah.
[12:12]
>> My my biggest thing honestly, Mark, in that is the quality of wood today.
[12:17]
No, I and I
[12:19]
>> and it it it it trust me as many years
[12:23]
I've been doing this and watching
[12:26]
today's wood, you know, um
[12:28]
>> all the new growth wood,
[12:30]
>> it it just you know, if you get 10 years
[12:32]
out of out of a window anymore, you're doing great. and and and and it's
[12:38]
sad, but [clears throat] that's why I've
[12:40]
been on this hunt trying to, you know,
[12:43]
everybody was doing vinyl vinyl and it's
[12:44]
like it looks vinyl and it's like I Kim,
[12:49]
is there something out there? And like I
[12:51]
said, Marvin and I I believe Anderson
[12:54]
are two of the companies that
[12:56]
[clears throat] that um have a really
[12:59]
good simulation of wood. And um and so
[13:03]
that's kind of what I wanted to do was
[13:06]
uh you know I know in the past that
[13:08]
they've passed vinyls on the sides and
[13:11]
the back, but
[13:12]
>> we don't want to trash the building up.
[13:15]
We want it to look as authentic as we
[13:17]
can.
[13:17]
>> Right.
[13:18]
>> And these came recommended by the
[13:20]
architect who does a lot of restoration
[13:22]
of historic in St. Louis.
[13:24]
>> Do you have any pictures of the windows
[13:27]
as they are now that are in the
[13:29]
building? You know,
[13:30]
>> I went up and looked at
[13:32]
>> Yeah,
[13:32]
>> I'm sure I do.
[13:34]
>> I probably do.
[13:35]
>> This one right here, the whole front
[13:37]
gone.
[13:37]
>> Yeah, I know a couple of them are. I was
[13:39]
just curious.
[13:41]
[laughter]
[13:42]
>> I mean, for the most part, most of them
[13:44]
are in pretty decent shape. You just
[13:45]
have a lot of really bad feeling paint.
[13:49]
>> Uh the frames are gone [clears throat]
[13:52]
and and most of them like on the
[13:55]
>> Yeah. I mean, as I as I was looking at
[13:58]
them.
[13:58]
>> So, we have a few from a distance that
[14:00]
you can zoom in on if you want to look
[14:02]
at.
[14:04]
>> Absolutely.
[14:05]
>> Here's a few. I mean, it has a lot of
[14:07]
windows is the other consideration. It
[14:09]
was a schoolhouse, so it's all
[14:10]
symmetrically
[14:12]
>> windowed. There's like 15 or 16 of them,
[14:14]
I think.
[14:15]
>> I thought I took some the other day.
[14:18]
>> And those are Oh, man. Yeah.
[14:29]
And I can show you my
[14:33]
» if you want.
[14:33]
>> Yeah. No. Yeah. It's not working, is it?
[14:35]
Yeah.
[14:37]
>> Have some from the front.
[14:39]
>> That whole side is supposed
[14:43]
to side.
[14:44]
>> Mhm.
[14:48]
» Those are the same ones from the front.
[14:50]
Oh, here's in the Oh, well, this is a
[14:52]
different view of the side. Um, and the
[14:55]
sort of front side. Yeah, this will show
[14:56]
you some
[14:58]
That's just the east side.
[15:03]
The front two are particularly battered.
[15:17]
» Anybody else want to see the existing
[15:18]
windows?
[15:20]
I touch something. [laughter]
[15:22]
Anybody else want to see them? Do you
[15:23]
need to see them? Do you want to see
[15:24]
them?
[15:25]
>> Yes. How far off are they from the left?
[15:26]
>> You want to see the how far off?
[15:30]
>> Well, it's the storm window in front of
[15:31]
them. It's hard to see the
[15:32]
>> picture in front of this.
[15:33]
>> Right.
[15:34]
>> I didn't see storms on them.
[15:37]
>> They do. Well, some
[15:39]
>> some of them had storm windows for
[15:41]
probably 20 years.
[15:42]
>> It's not too far off. Um but it's hard
[15:45]
to see through the storm window,
[15:46]
>> which is right. Yeah. So with hers
[15:49]
a wooden window [clears throat]
[15:51]
over the top
[15:52]
>> right
[15:52]
>> got
[15:53]
>> and that whole side of the
[15:55]
>> Yeah. Well, the whole thing is
[15:58]
>> Yeah. That's that's one of the
[16:00]
>> Yeah. Not a big fan of
[16:03]
>> can be seen just by a drive by,
[16:05]
>> right? Yeah. However, I will say this.
[16:07]
We are thinking he's uh making the point
[16:10]
about um you know, can you see it from
[16:12]
the road? And currently, yes. But we do
[16:15]
plan to put a kind of a hedge in the
[16:16]
front. So, some of those windows that
[16:18]
are now clearly visible from the street
[16:20]
on the east side of the building might
[16:21]
be a bit more obscured from the street.
[16:23]
Just also to say that
[16:25]
>> I don't [clears throat]
[16:27]
touch.
[16:28]
>> Yeah. Yeah. I don't think you're by time
[16:31]
those windows get in in there. Unless
[16:34]
they literally go up and
[16:37]
>> inspect them, I doubt if they're ever
[16:39]
going to see that it's it's not wood.
[16:42]
[clears throat]
[16:43]
>> Are they external or internal? Wait. The
[16:48]
>> Yeah. [clears throat]
[16:50]
Are the muttons are they are those
[16:52]
between Are you getting double pain?
[16:54]
>> Yeah.
[16:54]
>> Are they between the pains or are they
[16:57]
external?
[16:59]
>> I'm not.
[17:01]
>> Let me let me take a look at that
[17:02]
because I [clears throat]
[17:05]
There's a few different ones that
[17:09]
um and he just gave me this brush here
[17:11]
cuz I was like, "Do you have anything on the Marvin windows?
[17:16]
Um,
[17:20]
» are you talking about the divider
[17:21]
pieces?
[17:22]
>> I think they're external.
[17:24]
>> I think they're doing it anyway.
[17:28]
These are internal.
[17:32]
» I'll be honest with you, I can't answer
[17:33]
that, but I can I can
[17:36]
>> definitely, but we need to make that
[17:38]
decision tonight and I I get it.
[17:41]
Um,
[17:44]
most of them are on the inside out.
[17:48]
Yeah.
[17:50]
Um, maybe a six over six kind of like
[17:53]
this. So, I'm going to say that's
[17:57]
probably going to be I would say inside,
[17:59]
but I can double check that.
[18:01]
>> Okay. Okay. So,
[18:16]
Oh yes.
[18:24]
Turn off.
[18:35]
Do we have any additional questions?
[18:39]
I think so.
[18:44]
» Are we ready to make a motion?
[18:45]
[clears throat]
[18:49]
» Just text to find
[18:52]
just in I'll be off chance at
[18:56]
>> I'm going to make a motion to deny
[19:00]
based on um materials and uh I don't
[19:06]
know the exact code. Do you need the
[19:10]
exact code or do you assume you describe
[19:11]
it?
[19:13]
>> You describe it.
[19:14]
>> Um based on the materials and the street
[19:18]
view.
[19:23]
Okay. I have a motion to deny the
[19:25]
certificate to install the fiberglass
[19:29]
replacement windows based on our
[19:32]
ordinance of
[19:35]
replacement with light materials and the
[19:37]
view from the street. Do I have a
[19:39]
second?
[19:41]
>> I second.
[19:42]
>> Okay, I have a motion and a second to
[19:44]
deny. All in favor?
[19:47]
>> I.
[19:48]
>> Any opposed?
[20:02]
Okay. So motion is denied.
[20:06]
Request denied. Sorry.
[20:09]
>> Thank you.
[20:16]
So basically if you know if something
[20:18]
else you come up with let us know.
[20:21]
>> So let me ask you what
[20:24]
>> wood
[20:27]
repair the ones that are currently in
[20:29]
there or replace with wood.
[20:30]
>> Okay.
[20:34]
But yet you pass
[20:37]
certain buildings in this town with
[20:40]
final windows that look
[20:42]
>> this rougher than the
[20:44]
>> this is a contributing landmark
[20:45]
structure.
[20:46]
>> Okay.
[20:47]
>> Versus just a regular contributing
[20:50]
structure.
[20:51]
>> Okay. I just want I'm not I'm just
[20:53]
trying to understand it. So
[20:56]
[clears throat]
[20:58]
So it has to be wood
[21:00]
>> 100%.
[21:02]
Okay. I'll work on that.
[21:04]
>> Thank you.
[21:13]
Okay, moving on to
[21:17]
our next
[21:18]
applicant, SGHC 030-26
[21:22]
to receive a certificate of
[21:24]
appropriateness to demolish the existing
[21:26]
[snorts] rear porch and construct a new
[21:29]
one with the same width but longer at
[21:32]
672 North Fourth Street.
[21:34]
>> Okay. So before you you have the
[21:37]
application
[21:40]
and you'll see my report there uh which
[21:44]
shows in a smaller view there up at the
[21:47]
top a picture of the existing porch as
[21:50]
it sits currently.
[21:52]
And then down below is a small rendering
[21:55]
of what they're going to be requesting
[21:58]
to put back. As you can see there off to
[22:01]
the left hand side, you can still see
[22:03]
the entryway. Um that's still present.
[22:07]
So that's showing you that it's not
[22:08]
getting any wider. It's just going to be
[22:10]
coming out 14 ft uh projecting out from
[22:13]
the home.
[22:13]
>> Also, um the I put some packets in front
[22:17]
of you guys. Uh it was Bill Hart's old
[22:19]
house and George. So uh before they
[22:22]
moved, they called us out to work on the
[22:24]
porch and it has rotten rafters. So all
[22:27]
we did was sister in because Bill and
[22:28]
Georgia didn't want to take the whole
[22:29]
thing down, which I recommended to take
[22:31]
it down in the first place. They just
[22:32]
didn't want to pay the money to get it
[22:34]
taken down when they were moving. So now
[22:36]
the homeowners now see the pictures and
[22:37]
they want to take the roof off which
[22:40]
just extended another 6T. You can't see
[22:42]
anything from the street and after it's
[22:44]
done you still cannot see anything from
[22:46]
the street. Um basically just want to
[22:48]
make it a little bit bigger that way
[22:49]
they can sit on that area and um have
[22:51]
dinner outside.
[22:54]
like all the the layout, the roof pitch,
[22:57]
the materials, they'll all be the same.
[22:59]
The only thing we're adding is screen
[23:01]
screening it in.
[23:09]
» And this is the contractor.
[23:11]
>> I'll be [laughter]
[23:13]
>> Sorry, we hadn't got quite to all my
[23:15]
stuff, but yeah.
[23:16]
>> Sorry about that.
[23:16]
>> No, you're good. You're good.
[23:19]
>> I didn't hear that.
[23:22]
>> What? I didn't hear.
[23:23]
>> We don't have any questions. I have no
[23:24]
question. Okay. I don't have a question
[23:25]
either.
[23:25]
>> Okay.
[23:27]
>> Have a motion.
[23:29]
I make a motion approved as presented.
[23:31]
>> I'll second. Okay. I have a motion and a
[23:33]
second to approve the demolition of the
[23:35]
existing rear porch, replace it with a
[23:38]
new rear porch. Um, same pitch, same
[23:41]
style, but we'll be adding the screen
[23:44]
and the additional footage. All in
[23:47]
favor? I.
[23:48]
>> Any opposed?
[23:51]
I
[23:52]
>> have it. Okay.
[23:57]
Same house.
[23:58]
>> Yes. So, moving on.
[24:01]
>> Moving on.
[24:02]
>> Don't go [laughter] anywhere. Yeah, I'm
[24:03]
not going anywhere.
[24:04]
>> Same same property.
[24:07]
This is now related to the garage and
[24:09]
you will see application.
[24:11]
Um, you'll see my report. You'll see the
[24:14]
picture of the garage. It is the one on
[24:16]
the left hand side of the photo, not the
[24:18]
one on the right with the cat in front
[24:19]
of it. Um,
[24:21]
>> black cat. Yep.
[24:23]
>> It didn't cross it didn't cross our path
[24:25]
yet, so we're good. Um, so at down at
[24:29]
the bottom, you'll see a smaller version
[24:32]
of their their drawing. Sorry, I
[24:33]
couldn't get that any bigger on that
[24:35]
particular view. Um, and then included
[24:38]
past that are uh photos provided um of
[24:43]
the existing uh garage as that sets in
[24:47]
its current condition. Then there's a
[24:49]
site plan of this the size garage they want to construct or requesting con
[24:55]
to construct which is a 24 by 36
[24:58]
and then a copy of their plans. Uh again
[25:01]
one is was included there was smaller uh
[25:04]
the renderings of what that what that's
[25:06]
going to look like um that they're going
[25:09]
to build. Here's a bigger picture. I
[25:12]
>> think he might have a full one there if
[25:13]
you
[25:15]
So, u the neighbors have the identical
[25:17]
garage. They also have vinyl siding.
[25:20]
It's white vinyl siding on their house.
[25:22]
The neighbors is also white metal
[25:24]
siding. And then the existing home has
[25:27]
white vinyl siding. Our plan is to just
[25:30]
match the existing siding on the home.
[25:33]
Um, also if you look at the garages from
[25:35]
street view, the neighbors and the
[25:38]
garage that we're wanting to replace,
[25:39]
they will look identical. Um, they'll
[25:42]
sit the same distance off the street,
[25:45]
um, the homeowner already got property
[25:47]
like the survey and all the setbacks are
[25:49]
good. So, we're good to put this
[25:52]
structure on the property. Um, so all
[25:55]
we're doing, uh, the homeowner wanted
[25:57]
to, uh, replace this garage now due to
[26:01]
there's no way for him to park his
[26:03]
vehicle inside the garage.
[26:05]
>> The wife can't open the garage door cuz
[26:08]
it's on it's an older probably like 80
[26:10]
lb door that they have to slide, which
[26:12]
every time George opened it, I think he
[26:14]
did everything he could to open it. And
[26:16]
they kept a Mini Cooper. Uh, them cars
[26:19]
are very small. um and a push mower in
[26:22]
the garage. It has a dirt floor. There's
[26:25]
no wiring in the garage. There's a
[26:27]
little bit of termite damage. I did
[26:29]
didn't get any pictures of that. Um but
[26:31]
we'll be going back with white vinyl
[26:33]
siding, two garage doors instead of one.
[26:36]
um same 4-in gutters going around the
[26:39]
structure of the garage
[26:42]
and it'll look identical to the
[26:43]
neighboring property which I also on top
[26:46]
of it the neighbor um they share a
[26:49]
driveway so when one's not home or the
[26:52]
other they use the other driveway to
[26:54]
park in due to I guess lack of parking
[26:56]
spaces and um on four street it's very
[26:59]
well known to go very over the speed
[27:02]
limit so It's
[27:05]
be awesome if we could put a twocar
[27:08]
garage up.
[27:10]
>> What are the chances you get them to put
[27:12]
a twocar carport up?
[27:15]
>> Uh
[27:17]
that probably not very highly. Just uh
[27:20]
they have a expensive truck. They're
[27:22]
they got another vehicle they're
[27:23]
purchasing. And then they're also right
[27:25]
now they're um paying for storage over
[27:28]
at uh PJ's. Um they're storing some
[27:31]
stuff in there due to just the lack of
[27:33]
space in the garage now.
[27:35]
>> Um right now they're on the exterior of
[27:37]
the garage. It's just like cement board,
[27:40]
>> but it it's like breaking apart, falling
[27:42]
off the back of the garage. Um like I
[27:44]
said, there's no electric. There's
[27:46]
rotten wood inside of it.
[27:49]
>> Mhm.
[27:50]
>> Yeah. So like they'd pull in. I was
[27:53]
trying to see the
[27:54]
>> I uh I gave some of you a packet uh to
[27:57]
kind of see what the truck looks like in
[27:59]
front of the garage.
[28:01]
>> So, it's 9 foot 1 and 1/2
[28:05]
>> and it'll be white garage doors to match
[28:07]
the neighboring um white siding to match
[28:10]
the existing house. Same roof pitch just
[28:13]
a little bit wider.
[28:19]
And then uh also electric ran to the
[28:24]
garage so they can have lights and the
[28:25]
garage door can open.
[28:27]
I thought
[28:28]
>> they had electric in the garage
[28:29]
>> there. Yeah, there's no electric.
[28:31]
>> No.
[28:31]
Well,
[28:32]
>> it's odd that they have a light above
[28:34]
the door then.
[28:34]
>> That's a motion the battery operated.
[28:38]
>> Okay.
[28:48]
I bet it was going to rain
[29:00]
along that street. Um, there's also I
[29:03]
think every house on that street has a
[29:05]
twocar garage identical to the detached
[29:08]
garage that you guys will be looking at.
[29:10]
>> My issue isn't with the design. I'm
[29:13]
concerned that it's a contributing
[29:14]
structure that we're wanting to tear
[29:16]
down.
[29:21]
» Yeah. The garage.
[29:23]
>> Yeah. It's a contributing structure.
[29:25]
>> Yeah. Especially the the way that it's
[29:27]
constructed, the siding, the the the
[29:31]
standing seam roof.
[29:33]
>> There's not a the house has a it's not a
[29:35]
standing seam. It's ribbed.
[29:37]
>> The house does the garage. It's not
[29:39]
standing seam.
[29:42]
>> Watch. It's
[29:43]
>> It's that barn metal barn, right?
[29:46]
>> I mean, we can go We can go back with
[29:47]
the barn metal in the new garage, too.
[29:49]
>> Just making a point.
[29:54]
» The main thing is just the homers. They
[29:56]
can't they're not like they really can't
[29:58]
use it. They have a push mower inside. I
[30:00]
think uh George and Bill along, they had
[30:03]
the exact same thing. just a Mini
[30:05]
Cooper, which not everybody has that
[30:07]
small of a car.
[30:16]
» And they're absolutely opposed to no
[30:19]
carport on the other side.
[30:20]
>> No.
[30:22]
>> I just I just don't see a sense in
[30:25]
taking contributing structure
[30:28]
that's used basically [clears throat]
[30:28]
for storage and destroying it.
[30:31]
>> They they don't really you can't really
[30:32]
store anything in there. It's and it has
[30:34]
a dirt floor
[30:36]
>> that can be modified.
[30:38]
>> Yeah.
[30:41]
» But what about parking vehicles inside
[30:43]
of it?
[30:45]
>> Well, that's why how many of us park in
[30:47]
our driveways now?
[30:51]
>> I have a carport in my yard also for my
[30:53]
camper. Not saying
[30:55]
>> it wouldn't fit in the garage.
[30:58]
>> [clears throat]
[31:00]
>> That's that's I mean kind of why I was
[31:01]
saying you know the uh doing like if they would do not
[31:08]
even if you could even possibly possibly
[31:09]
do two of them you come off the front or
[31:11]
even off the side with like the carport
[31:14]
>> they share a driveway so you have about
[31:16]
15 ft until you the driveways come
[31:18]
together.
[31:19]
>> Yeah I see that. Yeah, I see they'd be
[31:22]
from the aerial view.
[31:30]
I agree with Tommy s
[31:33]
like to see that especially that you
[31:34]
know the only one left on the street.
[31:36]
>> Yeah, I mean we can't
[31:38]
>> because of the guidelines.
[31:39]
>> Well, right.
[31:50]
So they're not open to any modification.
[31:55]
» Well, then I think that just we're at an
[31:58]
end.
[32:01]
>> Any further discussion before we
[32:05]
make a motion to deny?
[32:07]
>> I'll second.
[32:08]
>> Okay. I have a motion and a second to
[32:10]
deny the certificate to demolish the
[32:12]
existing garage and replace it with the
[32:15]
larger garage at 672 North Fourth. All
[32:17]
in favor?
[32:19]
>> I. Any opposed?
[32:23]
» There you have it.
[32:24]
>> There's uh nothing that you guys can do
[32:26]
about it, but they said that if they
[32:27]
didn't record, they're just going to go
[32:29]
ahead and sell the place. So, I don't
[32:31]
know if they're going to see progress
[32:33]
with the porch. I'll reach out to them,
[32:35]
let you know, and see what they want to
[32:37]
do from there.
[32:37]
>> Okay.
[32:38]
Yeah. So, just let us know so we
[32:40]
can know how to proceed building
[32:41]
codewise. Okay.
[32:43]
>> Okay. Thank you.
[32:53]
Okay,
[32:56]
hold on. Sorry, I need to I didn't flip
[32:58]
fast enough. [laughter]
[33:02]
Okay, moving on to our next certificate.
[33:07]
SGHC 032-26
[33:10]
to receive a certificate of
[33:11]
appropriateness to demolish an existing
[33:14]
garage to make room for an addition to
[33:16]
the existing home at 350 Robert Street.
[33:21]
>> Okay. So, in your packet, you'll have an
[33:23]
application.
[33:25]
Um, I know this is getting very
[33:26]
repetitive here. And you'll
[33:28]
[clears throat] have my report. Um, you
[33:30]
can see a a colored picture of the
[33:34]
garage with the car in front of it
[33:36]
there. Um, and then down below is the
[33:39]
overhead view of the property. It's kind
[33:41]
of hard to see the garage there. Even if
[33:44]
I zoomed in, you really can't cuz the
[33:45]
trees in the way. Um, also in your
[33:49]
packet again, bigger picture of the one
[33:51]
that was on my report. Uh, also are
[33:54]
these are black and white pictures.
[33:57]
They looked better on the computer
[33:59]
screen than they did when we printed
[34:00]
them out. I tried lighting them up as
[34:02]
much as I could. Um, this is a more
[34:04]
current picture than than the ones that the one that I had off Google
[34:10]
Earth. Um, so what they're requesting
[34:14]
again is to demolish this garage. Um,
[34:17]
and the reason they're going to demolish
[34:19]
this garage, they want, and that's the
[34:21]
next item on the agenda. Um, they're
[34:24]
wanting to add on to the back part of
[34:25]
the home. They can't do that with that
[34:28]
garage there. They can't add on to the
[34:30]
home with the garage in place.
[34:34]
and the people doing the work,
[34:37]
construction work, are are here to
[34:39]
answer any questions uh that that we may
[34:41]
have uh for them.
[34:49]
» They're coming straight off the back of
[34:50]
the house.
[34:51]
>> Pardon me?
[34:52]
>> Coming straight off the back of the
[34:53]
house?
[34:53]
>> Yes, sir.
[34:55]
>> Yeah. Where the existing porch is, it's
[34:57]
going to be the width of the house. And
[35:01]
then I believe it's 25 ft or
[35:04]
>> that's not getting any wider.
[35:06]
>> No, it is not.
[35:07]
>> Okay.
[35:08]
>> And and no porch steps or anything
[35:10]
coming off the side of it
[35:13]
of of the garage.
[35:15]
>> The garage
[35:16]
>> of the house when you extend it. Nothing
[35:18]
come off to either side, just to the
[35:19]
back. She's wanting to have wood steps
[35:23]
come down to access the driveway off to
[35:27]
I mean as you're going out then to the
[35:29]
left. That would be the back of the
[35:31]
house.
[35:31]
>> And that's this this square floor plan.
[35:34]
>> Yes, sir.
[35:34]
>> Thank you.
[35:40]
Do we know the current distance from
[35:43]
>> Looks like about
[35:44]
>> the house to the I mean yeah cuz looking
[35:45]
at this picture it looks like it there's
[35:47]
a
[35:47]
>> it
[35:50]
yeah um
[35:50]
>> it it ends up being probably about 2 and
[35:53]
1/2 ft. Part of the issue is is to get
[35:56]
any of the excavators or anything back
[35:59]
there. it is in the way to do any to add
[36:04]
on or to do the next item.
[36:09]
And as we run into, well, it's not in
[36:12]
very good shape, but it's also not
[36:14]
usable for the size of it and whatnot.
[36:19]
>> They can't get equipment in on the other
[36:21]
side of the house.
[36:22]
>> It's not their property.
[36:26]
>> I don't believe so. or when I talked to
[36:29]
Eddie Fischer, Eddie Fischer said he
[36:31]
could not go on that side. How whatever
[36:33]
for whatever reasons, that's exactly
[36:35]
what he said.
[36:36]
>> It may be higher up elevation that they
[36:38]
can get up. So, what they're asking is
[36:39]
if you're facing the house on the right
[36:41]
hand side, there's let's say 35 ft or so
[36:46]
of of property there. Is there is there
[36:49]
an elevation difference?
[36:51]
>> It doesn't look like you can see the
[36:52]
vehicle in this tree. Yeah, that's what
[36:54]
I was looking at and I drove by the
[36:56]
other day and I just didn't curve.
[36:58]
>> I didn't get a chance to go by this. Did
[37:00]
you get to see this?
[37:04]
The other thing um so so that we're all
[37:07]
aware and I know we're kind of putting
[37:08]
these together because if one doesn't
[37:11]
happen the other one kind of so um not
[37:14]
to jump ahead but um if they were to
[37:18]
just add on to the house and leave that
[37:21]
uh structure there, they would then have
[37:23]
to go for a variance because I would
[37:25]
have to deny that request to construct
[37:27]
that house addition because the existing
[37:32]
garage would then be in the sidey yard
[37:34]
which is not allowed by zoning
[37:36]
requirements.
[37:38]
>> And also
[37:40]
the garage would now have to meet the
[37:42]
setbacks of the house
[37:44]
>> for zoning requirements because it's
[37:46]
within 10 ft of the house. So it
[37:48]
wouldn't. So they would have to then get
[37:50]
a variance for that. I'm not saying that
[37:53]
for I'm just throwing it out there that
[37:54]
that's what the requirements would be.
[38:00]
I was fine with the addition on the back
[38:02]
of the house. Pardon me.
[38:03]
>> That's what I was finding with the
[38:04]
addition on the back of the house.
[38:05]
[laughter]
[38:10]
I
[38:10]
>> was looking.
[38:11]
>> Is it on a foundation or a slab for the
[38:13]
garage?
[38:15]
>> It is not on a found. I mean I um It's
[38:18]
not
[38:19]
>> tell because there's so much junk in
[38:20]
there.
[38:22]
>> I mean sometimes from the outside you
[38:24]
can tell. I I I drove by and I couldn't
[38:26]
get a good
[38:26]
>> I couldn't either. I wasn't going to
[38:28]
walk up there, but
[38:29]
>> I do the binoculars doing this watching.
[38:31]
[laughter]
[38:31]
>> That's not creepy at all.
[38:33]
>> No, I was standing outside the
[38:36]
>> I didn't tell them that everybody was
[38:37]
going to be doing that, but I figured
[38:38]
that that was the case. [laughter]
[38:40]
>> Well, I mean, some do, some don't. I
[38:42]
always do. Just
[38:43]
>> I I would,
[38:44]
>> you know,
[38:46]
>> there is no slab
[38:49]
and answer to the question.
[38:52]
>> Okay. So, it's just a flooding.
[38:53]
>> Yeah, it's just on a flooding system.
[38:55]
Yeah.
[39:00]
Gosh,
[39:02]
>> I don't know any kind of stuff because
[39:05]
>> I know
[39:08]
>> because the garage was built at
[39:09]
approximately the same time as another
[39:11]
contributing structure,
[39:12]
>> right? Yeah. So there's this kind of
[39:14]
like
[39:15]
>> well I mean honestly if I could pick it
[39:16]
up and then move it for the construction
[39:20]
and then pop it back down because I mean
[39:22]
I have even thought about the the other
[39:24]
issue is is by virtue of the way the
[39:27]
roof line goes then you're right at the window level for that one side. And
[39:34]
I had even thought that, you know, I
[39:36]
mean, even if you could make something
[39:37]
that's shorter that's looking similar to
[39:39]
it off to that side to where maybe
[39:42]
you've got the steps that are covered or
[39:45]
the steps that are going down into the
[39:47]
structure, but given the fact of where
[39:50]
it's at and how it is, it definitely
[39:55]
impedes
[39:57]
um,
[39:59]
you know, the the addition
[40:04]
and she has had a water situation in her
[40:08]
ba her the current basement. And the
[40:11]
other thing that I was concerned about,
[40:13]
well, I mean, obviously if you do
[40:14]
guttering and whatnot, but I didn't want
[40:16]
the additional water situation between
[40:19]
the two of those.
[40:22]
I'm turning it right over here.
[40:31]
Is this the house?
[40:37]
existing house is here.
[40:38]
>> This Okay. Yeah. Okay. Well, there it
[40:39]
is. Never mind. I see it now.
[40:48]
» Well, so
[40:52]
variance would have to extend past the
[40:54]
full length of the garage.
[40:57]
>> Yeah. The variance would be simply to
[41:01]
allow the structure to remain in place
[41:04]
and the hardship would be the the historical
[41:11]
>> Mhm.
[41:12]
>> consideration of the structure.
[41:16]
What I can't guarantee is Well, I
[41:19]
haven't had that here yet, so I don't
[41:21]
know what the right
[41:22]
>> what the press that that is set.
[41:25]
[laughter]
[41:27]
I found another sample.
[41:31]
This is the 350.
[41:33]
>> Oh, thank God.
[41:34]
>> It's It's okay cuz I kept looking at I
[41:37]
was fling back and forth and I'm like,
[41:38]
"Wait a minute." No. Okay.
[41:39]
>> Okay. Okay.
[41:43]
» What happened? I get in a hurry.
[41:47]
I'll fix it.
[41:58]
Yeah. So on my report there uh where the
[42:01]
request is listed uh I got the address
[42:03]
right at correct at the top but I
[42:06]
brought it from the one previous so it
[42:08]
will say 350 Roberts
[42:11]
>> the one for the additions that way also.
[42:14]
>> Yeah. Yeah. They're both I brought them
[42:16]
both from the same thing. So they're
[42:17]
going to be the [laughter] same way.
[42:20]
I was like, "Wait a minute. Am I on the
[42:21]
wrong
[42:23]
covered by the letters?"
[42:25]
>> That's what I was thinking. So, I'm just
[42:27]
wondering how deep
[42:29]
>> you don't know how deep that existing
[42:30]
garage is, do you?
[42:33]
>> I should have measured it. I believe
[42:35]
that it is around
[42:37]
>> 24. Oh, no. It's not even It's not that
[42:40]
long. It's I mean, I don't even I'm not
[42:42]
even 100%. A car might be able to fit in
[42:44]
it lengthwise. So, it's definitely not a
[42:48]
truck. I'm I'm going to say 12 ft long.
[42:58]
» I mean, I know we can do with a
[42:59]
landmark, but I'm also pressing in here.
[43:06]
» I see what you're saying. Would you be
[43:07]
able to do that?
[43:08]
>> That's I don't know cuz it's on footing,
[43:11]
not a true bound. was talking about
[43:13]
being able to raise it up and just move
[43:15]
it back,
[43:17]
but then there's going to be a bed here.
[43:22]
>> How much room behind the the shed to the
[43:24]
end of the edge of the property line
[43:26]
behind it?
[43:27]
>> I think that would be
[43:30]
sure looks like it's I think this is the
[43:33]
garage.
[43:34]
>> I feel like this is the garage.
[43:40]
That's the option because
[43:41]
>> yeah, as long as we're 10 ft away from
[43:43]
the hole like
[43:44]
>> Okay.
[43:44]
>> like 5T the actual side of the room.
[43:50]
>> Especially if it's only on my head.
[43:52]
>> Yeah. [snorts]
[43:53]
>> No, that's why I said in my head this
[43:56]
>> Yeah. If it's not on a slab, man. They
[43:57]
didn't do [clears throat] all the
[43:59]
grinders were not on any kind of a slab
[44:01]
or anything. Sometimes they're just set
[44:03]
right on.
[44:03]
>> I would just had a slab or or a simple
[44:06]
port footing. They just set bolted down.
[44:09]
That's most of them are that way that
[44:10]
are that style. Yeah. And so it's
[44:13]
>> it's almost a port the original portable
[44:16]
building most.
[44:16]
>> I mean I'm not married to this. This is
[44:18]
just a hey,
[44:20]
>> right?
[44:21]
>> We could ask for a clarification if that
[44:23]
could come out. They can look into it
[44:25]
and they may come back.
[44:26]
>> Come out somewhere. Right. Was it
[44:30]
come out right here actually?
[44:37]
» Yeah. almost worked.
[44:40]
>> I would prefer that than this. I'm just
[44:42]
saying it
[44:45]
>> comes down to it.
[44:47]
>> I see it. Probably not that
[44:52]
problem.
[44:55]
Is there a possibility that we could
[44:59]
ask the homeowner to look into the
[45:02]
possibil feasibility of moving that if
[45:05]
it's capable of being moved and then
[45:06]
come back and if that fits and can be
[45:08]
moved to another area of the property
[45:12]
to be to allow for the construction
[45:14]
[clears throat]
[45:16]
that we can get take care of both things
[45:19]
keep you a small storage garage
[45:21]
>> in a different location and get your
[45:23]
building
[45:24]
>> okay So my my next question is and I
[45:27]
know that he was talking about the h the
[45:29]
proximity to the house then uh would
[45:33]
there be a specific spot that is
[45:36]
recommended by the committee?
[45:38]
>> Straight back straight back.
[45:41]
>> Yeah. As long as it's 5 ft to not have
[45:43]
to go through any additional meetings,
[45:47]
variances or anything like that. You
[45:49]
would have to be at least 5t off the
[45:51]
property line, which should be easy
[45:53]
enough to meet at that location, and be
[45:56]
10 feet, no closer than 10 ft to the
[45:59]
wall of the house, not the e, but the
[46:01]
wall of the house.
[46:03]
>> Okay.
[46:04]
>> So, essentially, for all intents
[46:06]
purposes, scoot it back and over just a
[46:09]
little bit. And where that measurement
[46:11]
starts is right at the back of that
[46:13]
house. So, from from there, you measure
[46:15]
10 ft and
[46:17]
>> the addition.
[46:18]
>> Yes.
[46:18]
>> Yeah. 10 ft from the addition and 5 ft
[46:19]
[clears throat] from the property line.
[46:21]
>> I'm sure she would not be opposed to
[46:23]
>> and that would save a wonderful building
[46:25]
and get get the addition built at the
[46:28]
same time.
[46:28]
>> Okay. I I I'm I'm
[46:30]
>> unless there you have a better
[46:32]
alternative.
[46:34]
>> I mean,
[46:36]
unless they could come up with a way to
[46:38]
just, you know, just get the bearings,
[46:40]
leave the garage where it's at
[46:42]
>> is what I'm saying. But I'm I look for
[46:45]
the stairs come out
[46:46]
>> a little L and stuff. Well, the steps
[46:49]
are coming out 20 ft back from the
[46:52]
existing back. So, I think it's still
[46:54]
going to come out probably there at the
[46:56]
side of the house or it'll be at the
[46:58]
side in the side of the garage from what
[47:00]
I'm just looking at the pictures,
[47:02]
>> right?
[47:02]
>> You know,
[47:06]
» you mean as far as the drawings?
[47:08]
>> Yeah, I was I was just going by this.
[47:10]
You know, these stairs here. Here's the
[47:12]
back of the existing house.
[47:14]
>> Yes. Your steps come out come out the
[47:15]
side, but you're still 20 ft back right
[47:18]
here.
[47:20]
>> This
[47:23]
No, it's not. No, it's not. No, it's
[47:24]
not. I'm sorry.
[47:26]
>> No, it's not.
[47:26]
>> Yeah. Here's the existing driveway. And
[47:28]
the garage sits right in through here.
[47:31]
>> I was just I was looking at this here
[47:33]
and I for some reason I think there was
[47:35]
extension line here. So, no, that would
[47:38]
actually maybe work.
[47:39]
>> Oh, yeah. Then that would work because
[47:40]
then the stairs would
[47:42]
>> step would probably come up right here.
[47:44]
That's correct.
[47:45]
>> So that could be a better option for
[47:50]
>> move in the garage. She just have to do
[47:52]
the get a see if they can get a variance
[47:54]
which I really don't think they would
[47:55]
have a problem with honestly but you
[47:57]
never know.
[47:57]
>> It it it would if if it's coming as a
[48:00]
recommendation from
[48:02]
>> from us the commission.
[48:03]
>> Yeah. Then that would resolve it tonight
[48:05]
if we wanted it. If in fact I think that
[48:08]
and and I'm just putting this out here
[48:10]
because if I can
[48:13]
I think she would prefer moving it back
[48:16]
if it's possible
[48:18]
>> be as opposed to having it you know like
[48:21]
I said yeah right beside it because then
[48:23]
the view is going to be the roof.
[48:25]
>> Sure.
[48:26]
>> So I mean I can go back and ask her but
[48:29]
it it would be my opinion based on her
[48:32]
>> right
[48:33]
>> and what they're what they're hoping
[48:35]
for. Gotcha.
[48:39]
» Nobody knows of any reason in the
[48:41]
guidelines that we can't, right?
[48:44]
>> Yeah. I've gone through seen anything
[48:46]
>> because the location is not a
[48:48]
>> Yeah.
[48:50]
>> You know, it's not it's not an event or
[48:53]
you know something, but the property
[48:55]
happened right there. So
[48:56]
>> yeah,
[48:59]
>> I'm just hypothetically throwing this
[49:01]
out here and I'm not even adding it into
[49:03]
the mix just for my own personal
[49:06]
knowledge since we're talking about
[49:08]
moving it or something like that and you
[49:09]
we're talking about the variances.
[49:12]
If in fact it could hypothetically move
[49:16]
forward to where they could walk out of
[49:18]
the addition and into it, which that's
[49:20]
not possible based on whatever's
[49:22]
happening. Would that be I mean,
[49:26]
not that I'm going to run into this
[49:27]
again at some point in time, [laughter]
[49:28]
but I'm just saying. So I I I mean I
[49:31]
guess there is some flexibility as long
[49:33]
as the structure stays on the property
[49:36]
within
[49:39]
>> an appropriate
[49:39]
>> set back from the house
[49:40]
>> because the way lots are designed here.
[49:43]
It's super common for this time period
[49:45]
to see the garage right where it is or
[49:48]
all the corner cuz we're transitioning
[49:50]
from like carriage houses into garages
[49:52]
at this time. Correct.
[49:53]
>> So it still fit it fits the sight line,
[49:56]
etc.
[49:57]
If it weren't this perfect storm, it
[49:58]
would probably be a no. It just so
[50:00]
happens that for this situation, moving
[50:03]
it backwards.
[50:04]
>> Okay. Then I I would have to say that
[50:05]
she would be
[50:07]
very willing to do that.
[50:09]
>> To answer your variance question though,
[50:11]
typically speaking, to obtain a variance
[50:14]
and and receive a variance, it's not
[50:16]
just a matter of, you know, you you
[50:18]
approach a commission like this and ask
[50:19]
them for a variance and they sit and
[50:22]
decide, do we want to allow it or not?
[50:23]
It's can this be done legally anywhere
[50:26]
else on the property?
[50:28]
And if in this case, let's just use this
[50:32]
case. If we were moving it forward, does
[50:34]
that make its current condition worse?
[50:37]
>> Gotcha.
[50:38]
>> Or equal. So if it's an equal condition,
[50:41]
so it's not like moving in front of the
[50:43]
house. Um, it's still meeting the front
[50:46]
yard setback, let's say. So it's still
[50:48]
meeting it's still kind of in line with
[50:50]
where it was. it's not making the
[50:52]
condition worse. Um, and it would
[50:56]
receive a recommendation from this
[50:58]
commission
[51:00]
to save that structure, then I would say
[51:04]
that's a good case for various. I can't
[51:06]
by any means tell you that it's going to
[51:08]
get approved,
[51:09]
>> but that would be a good case for that.
[51:12]
Uh, regardless of of the situation, you
[51:15]
always have to look at in in when you're
[51:17]
doing that, can I do this anywhere else?
[51:20]
So a good example that if if the
[51:22]
property dropped straight off once it
[51:24]
went to the back you can't build it
[51:26]
there without
[51:27]
>> right
[51:27]
>> some massive amount of uh construction.
[51:30]
So those would be good reasons to great
[51:32]
variances.
[51:33]
>> Excellent. Okay
[51:40]
pictures.
[51:43]
» Do we have any other questions?
[51:45]
>> I don't know.
[51:47]
So we just so
[51:50]
just table it for a a relication when
[51:53]
they make that decision. So
[51:55]
>> I would I can I go ahead and say that would be fine.
[52:00]
>> I'm sure that she you know I'm sure that
[52:02]
she's she wants the addition and I'm
[52:05]
sure that you know that would be
[52:08]
>> I mean just cuz we approve it doesn't
[52:09]
mean she
[52:10]
>> we got to approve it with the with the
[52:13]
with that being moved before the
[52:15]
construction starts on the other
[52:16]
portion. whatever
[52:18]
condition.
[52:19]
>> Can we can als she can also leave it
[52:21]
where it's at and do the addition, but
[52:22]
you just have a little narrow.
[52:24]
>> Yep. So,
[52:24]
>> right.
[52:25]
>> Yep.
[52:27]
>> So, okay. So,
[52:30]
>> basically, we can go ahead and approve,
[52:33]
which I I'd go ahead and uh make a
[52:35]
motion to approve uh the addition.
[52:41]
» So, you want you want to hit the
[52:43]
demolition one first since that's what
[52:44]
we're on. Okay. I said, "Well, deny the demolition and approve the
[52:51]
construction."
[52:51]
>> Okay.
[52:52]
>> Yeah. Approve the construction with the
[52:55]
>> caveat.
[52:58]
I move that we deny the certificate of
[53:01]
appropriateness for the demolition of
[53:03]
the existing garage.
[53:04]
>> Second. Okay.
[53:06]
>> Okay. I have a motion and a second to
[53:09]
deny the certificate of appropriateness
[53:11]
to demolish the existing garage at 350
[53:16]
Robert Street.
[53:18]
All in favor? I
[53:20]
>> I
[53:22]
have it. I'm sorry you didn't ask for
[53:24]
posts or there's else here. [laughter]
[53:27]
>> I got ahead.
[53:29]
>> Any post?
[53:30]
>> Eyes have it now.
[53:31]
>> Okay. All right. Moving on to SGHC
[53:35]
033-26
[53:36]
to receive a certificate of
[53:38]
appropriateness to construct an addition
[53:41]
to the rear of the existing home at 350
[53:44]
Robert Street.
[53:46]
I'll make a motion to approve the
[53:48]
addition of the uh rear of the house
[53:52]
Robert Street
[53:55]
>> with with
[53:56]
>> with
[53:57]
>> Yeah, with that
[53:59]
>> with
[54:00]
>> So, are we providing both options?
[54:02]
>> I I think so. I think she's
[54:04]
>> I just think with the approval of of the
[54:06]
site plan by by city hall, whichever
[54:09]
those that they approve, as long as the
[54:11]
house is moved, it's
[54:13]
>> as long as as long as Yeah.
[54:15]
>> Okay. So with the addendum,
[54:17]
>> okay,
[54:17]
>> that either the garage be moved back
[54:23]
>> say
[54:24]
>> to the 10 ft
[54:27]
>> measurement
[54:29]
>> or
[54:30]
>> with approval of a variance, it can stay
[54:32]
in its current location.
[54:35]
>> Yes.
[54:37]
with the addition to be built around it,
[54:39]
near it, next to it, adjacent [laughter]
[54:46]
» Okay.
[54:48]
I have a motion to approve the
[54:51]
certificate of appropriateness to
[54:53]
construct the addition to the rear of
[54:55]
the home
[54:57]
with
[54:59]
[laughter] the exception to either move
[55:02]
the garage
[55:04]
back into the yard further to be able to
[55:06]
meet the required measurements or
[55:10]
based on city approval to get the
[55:12]
variance to leave the garage in its
[55:15]
current position.
[55:17]
and then build the addition alongside
[55:20]
it.
[55:21]
>> Okay,
[55:21]
>> that's what I got.
[55:23]
>> I got that. I got that. [laughter]
[55:26]
» I have a second.
[55:28]
>> I'll second [laughter]
[55:29]
motion and a second. All in favor?
[55:32]
>> I Any opposed?
[55:35]
>> The eyes have it.
[55:38]
» That's that's a for everybody.
[55:41]
[laughter]
[55:42]
>> Okay. Thank you everybody.
[55:44]
>> Thank you.
[55:49]
Okay, moving on to administrative
[55:51]
approvals.
[55:52]
>> I have none.
[55:55]
» Any other business?
[56:02]
» Oh, okay. So, [clears throat] you guys
[56:04]
remember when when
[56:07]
the ship they got a hold of us? Ed for our input on the fourth street
[56:13]
bridge.
[56:15]
They've sent me um an email asking me
[56:18]
also for our input on the Main Street
[56:22]
Bridge North Gabri. I'm sorry. I said,
[56:25]
"Yeah, North Main." So, I got I have I
[56:30]
don't know if you guys ever saw the
[56:31]
letter. I think Bill sent it out to
[56:32]
everybody. Um
[56:34]
>> I actually have a I found a copy of
[56:36]
that. I got copies of um I was just
[56:39]
going to kind of go ahead and
[56:42]
kind of go off of what he wrote from
[56:44]
that and quick so you guys all see it
[56:49]
there.
[56:50]
>> Thank you.
[56:51]
>> Sure.
[56:51]
>> Well, that was the letter that Bill
[56:52]
wrote.
[56:54]
>> He kind of wrote as a
[56:55]
>> Yeah, Bill wrote it and then he put all
[56:57]
of us
[56:58]
>> um I think pretty much go with the same
[57:01]
format pretty much the same thing. Um,
[57:04]
it was built in 1940, by the way.
[57:06]
>> And it was in this guy's report and I
[57:10]
knew it, but I couldn't I couldn't get
[57:11]
into it. That's why I asked you about
[57:13]
it.
[57:14]
>> Um, but anyways, um, so there is a typo.
[57:23]
» I I just on this document, uh, second
[57:25]
paragraph, US highway system.
[57:31]
Well, you know, it is what it is. But,
[57:34]
um,
[57:36]
we'll we'll change that. But, um, yeah,
[57:38]
I mean, and I'll get it out to you guys.
[57:42]
I'll send it to you, too, if you want to
[57:43]
read it also. But, I mean, it's not
[57:46]
something I'm going to do tonight or
[57:47]
anything, but it'll be a few days. So,
[57:49]
cuz I got So, I got that in a word
[57:52]
document. So, do you want me to send it
[57:53]
to you and then you can just change
[57:56]
whatever you want to change? Awesome.
[57:57]
Yep. Okay.
[57:59]
>> Um cuz I might get with you with some of
[58:01]
the uh architectural working.
[58:06]
I think I might be able to get it. So,
[58:08]
but I I sent I emailed you guys this
[58:11]
whole report or on the bridge and
[58:13]
everything that they all sent to us or
[58:15]
sent to me so that you guys can read
[58:17]
through it also. Okay. So,
[58:20]
>> okay. Any other residents?
[58:22]
>> Go ahead.
[58:24]
>> Okay. Do we have any public comments?
[58:27]
Yeah, I have a quick question. I uh
[58:30]
submitted something uh early last week
[58:33]
about putting a shot on my uh property
[58:36]
and I was told to be here tonight.
[58:39]
>> What? I'm [clears throat] not aware what
[58:41]
>> it's 373 South Fourth Street.
[58:45]
>> I I don't I don't have that application.
[58:48]
So, our building inspector might have
[58:50]
it, but I'm
[58:51]
>> Well, that's who I spoke with, and he
[58:52]
said I had to have it emailed to him by
[58:54]
the beginning of uh last week, which I
[58:57]
did,
[59:00]
>> and I was want to have it uh started
[59:02]
Wednesday if I could.
[59:04]
>> Do we want to look at it?
[59:06]
>> I was told that it was u you know, I did
[59:08]
need a permit just to make sure that I
[59:10]
had to come through you all and be here
[59:12]
tonight.
[59:12]
>> Yeah, he doesn't need a permit for the
[59:14]
What size shed was it?
[59:15]
>> It's a 10 x 12.
[59:17]
>> Yeah. So he doesn't need a permit.
[59:18]
>> So it's a top shed.
[59:20]
>> We can talk about talking about
[59:22]
>> Yep. So
[59:24]
373.
[59:25]
>> Yes. You said 373 South Four Street.
[59:27]
>> Okay.
[59:30]
Give us just a second here.
[59:31]
>> Oh, sure.
[59:32]
>> Fact. I might be able to get this thing
[59:35]
to work.
[59:37]
>> Oh, yeah. You can pull it up on here.
[59:41]
>> 373.
[59:44]
have something weird playing, right?
[59:48]
Surprised he uh [laughter]
[59:50]
>> Oh, he's going to put up there
[59:53]
like
[59:58]
that happen. One of the HBC's
[1:00:01]
>> David was turning it on for Zoom, but it
[1:00:03]
was like playing a loop of something and
[1:00:04]
so he thought it was a person
[1:00:06]
>> for the Do you remember this? Just me?
[1:00:09]
Okay, I'm crazy. It's true.
[1:00:12]
I mean maybe
[1:00:14]
>> was it there was something? Yes, I do
[1:00:16]
remember there was something else with
[1:00:18]
the zoom
[1:00:19]
north fourth.
[1:00:21]
>> South fourth.
[1:00:26]
It did help.
[1:00:27]
>> I have copies with me if they have these
[1:00:30]
as well.
[1:00:31]
>> Yeah. Can we?
[1:00:32]
>> Sure.
[1:00:37]
Thank you.
[1:00:37]
>> That sounded like it hurt.
[1:00:38]
>> It did. Thanks.
[1:00:46]
existing
[1:00:51]
for
[1:01:06]
a nice page. It's nice for back Yeah.
[1:01:12]
>> All the way back there.
[1:01:12]
>> Yeah. See, what I would do is So, this
[1:01:14]
is our garage way back.
[1:01:16]
>> So, I was going to do is keep it the
[1:01:17]
same sight line for the garage and then
[1:01:20]
have it. It'll be 10 ft off the ground.
[1:01:22]
I was going to go 6 ft off the back
[1:01:24]
>> and the property line. And then if you
[1:01:26]
go further,
[1:01:27]
>> it shows you the uh contract. And that's
[1:01:30]
the shed right there.
[1:01:32]
>> And I made it white with the black roof
[1:01:34]
to to match the rest of the existing
[1:01:36]
buildings.
[1:01:37]
>> Try to keep everything the same.
[1:01:40]
is outside from the street.
[1:01:41]
>> Yeah, it's not even visual. Do you guys
[1:01:43]
want to see?
[1:01:43]
>> Yes, please.
[1:01:54]
» The decision, but I think it's a pull.
[1:01:57]
[laughter]
[1:01:58]
>> Well, at least we can say we officially
[1:02:00]
pulled it out.
[1:02:01]
>> I have to like lay in my head. I have to
[1:02:03]
lay it out like if I'm driving down
[1:02:04]
Fourth Street, [laughter]
[1:02:06]
>> which drives me nuts. All the maps in
[1:02:08]
town. Another to
[1:02:11]
>> you see on that road.
[1:02:13]
>> Do you Yeah, it so we're going
[1:02:18]
>> He wants to in here right in the back
[1:02:20]
the garage.
[1:02:21]
>> Yeah, that's what I was saying. Like
[1:02:24]
>> Oh, and what is what is all the way
[1:02:27]
behind it? Is there anything behind?
[1:02:29]
>> Mm-m.
[1:02:29]
>> No, they're probably landing troops,
[1:02:30]
right? Right here.
[1:02:31]
>> Yeah,
[1:02:32]
>> here.
[1:02:33]
>> And it's going to be like 6 ft off the
[1:02:35]
back. I was going to go at least 6 ft
[1:02:38]
just so I make sure I'm
[1:02:39]
>> within six and six. I'm going to go 10
[1:02:42]
>> six and it'll be 10 off the side cuz I'm
[1:02:45]
going to go the exact uh sight line with
[1:02:46]
the garage.
[1:02:48]
>> Yeah, as long as I like
[1:02:51]
it's going to be matches the garage.
[1:02:54]
>> I mean, and that up into Rosary Edition
[1:02:56]
and there's
[1:02:57]
>> Yeah, that's backyard backyard. That's nowhere.
[1:03:02]
>> That's pretty good.
[1:03:05]
>> [clears throat]
[1:03:07]
>> Yeah. With where it is, it shouldn't be
[1:03:08]
visible from the other street either.
[1:03:10]
>> Yeah. Yeah. It's kind of hidden from
[1:03:12]
everything.
[1:03:12]
>> Yeah.
[1:03:13]
>> And and no alley, you know,
[1:03:15]
[clears throat] so just
[1:03:17]
>> Yeah.
[1:03:18]
>> So, we're going to get it about the time
[1:03:20]
like you said. [laughter]
[1:03:22]
>> I didn't make a motion before you even
[1:03:24]
>> You want to You go right ahead.
[1:03:29]
» Yeah. See the way the other
[1:03:30]
>> It's in that bottom corner.
[1:03:34]
>> Right in there. Oh, right on. Yeah. All
[1:03:36]
right. Yeah. Okay.
[1:03:39]
>> Well, I will make a motion to approve as
[1:03:43]
>> Oh, okay. Well, I will second.
[1:03:44]
>> Okay. [laughter]
[1:03:46]
>> I have a motion and a second to approve
[1:03:49]
the shed addition in the backyard at 373
[1:03:54]
South Fourth Street. All in favor?
[1:03:57]
>> I. Any opposed?
[1:04:00]
>> Nice have it.
[1:04:01]
>> Well, thank you for hanging with us. Do
[1:04:04]
you need this or can you
[1:04:05]
>> Do you want to keep?
[1:04:06]
>> Uh yeah, let me hang Let me hang on to
[1:04:08]
it. You'll get you'll get a copy with
[1:04:10]
your with that when we issue the permit.
[1:04:13]
>> need to keep all that.
[1:04:13]
>> So, we'll be on on the permit for it
[1:04:15]
tomorrow. So,
[1:04:17]
>> uh we'll give you a call when we have it
[1:04:18]
ready. It's a matter of doing the paper.
[1:04:20]
>> Just run on down here and grab it.
[1:04:22]
>> Yep. It's a matter of doing the
[1:04:22]
paperwork.
[1:04:23]
>> Can my father-in-law pick it up?
[1:04:25]
>> Anybody can pick it up.
[1:04:26]
>> Okay, great. Yep.
[1:04:27]
>> Cuz he he's at home and I I work 30
[1:04:29]
days.
[1:04:29]
>> Okay. And the fee is $35 for the permit.
[1:04:33]
No problem. So, just pray when we come
[1:04:35]
pick it up.
[1:04:35]
>> Yep. Yeah. If you give me at least try
[1:04:38]
and give me till noon if you can. Sure.
[1:04:40]
>> That way give me time to get the
[1:04:42]
paperwork done.
[1:04:42]
>> Oh, sure. No, no problem at all.
[1:04:44]
>> All right. Thank you, sir.
[1:04:47]
>> Thank you.
[1:04:47]
>> You too.
[1:04:49]
>> Is there a way uh Steve I think you
[1:04:53]
talked with Steve? Is there a way that
[1:04:54]
he can call one of you guys or all of
[1:04:56]
you guys to kind of just hear why he got
[1:04:58]
denied
[1:05:00]
>> or is there like a statement that you
[1:05:02]
guys will be sending him of why it got
[1:05:04]
denied?
[1:05:04]
>> I mean,
[1:05:05]
>> yeah, it'll
[1:05:06]
>> Yeah. Yeah. We'll do a we'll do a a kind
[1:05:09]
of a letter, if you will, stating why it was denied.
[1:05:12]
>> Okay.
[1:05:13]
>> Y what the motions are.
[1:05:15]
>> I guess tomorrow he'll be calling you
[1:05:16]
about the porch to see if they want to
[1:05:18]
proceed with that.
[1:05:19]
>> Okay.
[1:05:19]
Is that something that need to be
[1:05:21]
like decided tonight or is that
[1:05:23]
something that he can call you and kind
[1:05:24]
of talk over?
[1:05:25]
>> No, they
[1:05:26]
>> we've already approved the
[1:05:27]
>> Yeah, the porch the porch is approved.
[1:05:31]
>> Yeah. And and it has a what a six-month
[1:05:33]
time on it, too.
[1:05:34]
>> Yeah. So, so once it's approved and you know and you have that in your hand,
[1:05:39]
you got 6 months to build it.
[1:05:41]
>> So, we're good.
[1:05:42]
>> All right. Thank you. Yes.
[1:05:43]
>> Thank you.
[1:05:47]
» Okay. Are we ready to adjourn? Motion to
[1:05:50]
adjurnn.
[1:05:51]
>> I think I have a motion and a second to
[1:05:53]
adjurnn. Oh,
[1:05:55]
>> all in favor? Yoinks.