[3:30] Great, now we can begin. We can

[3:38] start right now. Beautiful. Hello,

[3:42] everyone. This is the

[3:44] regularly scheduled meeting of the Syracuse

[3:46] Landmarks Preservation Board,

[3:48] and today is September 17,

[3:50] 2026. Present at today's meeting

[3:52] are

[3:53] Nicole Freginato,

[3:54] Kyle Gregory,

[3:55] Jeff Romano,

[3:57] Hillary Donahue,

[3:58] Samuel Prescott,

[4:00] and Kate Alwider.

[4:02] Excuse me,

[4:03] Howard, and

[4:05] we're waiting for Pat. Yes.

[4:06] Okay, thank you. Can I have a

[4:09] motion to accept the minutes of

[4:10] August 27th?

[4:12] I will make a motion to accept the

[4:13] minutes. Do

[4:14] I have someone to back her up? I

[4:15] second that.

[4:17] Any changes or modifications to those

[4:18] minutes? There is no audience. All in favor,

[4:23] according to what was presented. Against?

[4:26] Abstaining? The motion is approved.

[4:30] Public hearings, excuse me. The

[4:33] board will now conduct

[4:34] public hearings on

[4:35] today's agenda. First, the

[4:38] applicant or the applicant's representative will be invited

[4:39] to describe the scope of the

[4:41] project work and submit

[4:42] any materials and documentation

[4:44] related to the proposal to the board

[4:46] . Next, those who

[4:48] wish to speak in favor of the proposal

[4:50] will have the opportunity to address

[4:51] the board. Then, those who

[4:54] wish to speak out against it may

[4:56] address the board. Finally, the

[4:59] applicant or representative will have the

[5:01] opportunity to make

[5:02] final comments to the board. Following the

[5:05] public comments, the board

[5:06] may vote to approve, approve with

[5:08] conditions, or deny the request that has

[5:10] just been heard. The board

[5:12] may also decide to uphold its decision

[5:14] until the next public hearing.

[5:16] If the hearing is closed, no

[5:19] additional information will be allowed to be recorded in the minutes, except for that which

[5:21] the board may request. That

[5:23] information will be available for

[5:25] public review with

[5:27] board staff. Staff, submit our

[5:29] first application.

[5:30] That would be me. Very good. The first

[5:34] application is CA-26-19. It is a

[5:37] certificate of suitability for 120

[5:39] Dorset Road. It's for

[5:43] garage repairs and new doors. Actually, it's

[5:46] more of a

[5:48] garage reconstruction and some new doors. The

[5:51] property is located in the

[5:53] Berkeley Park Preservation District. And

[5:56] we have Tom DiTullio here to

[5:58] speak on behalf of the project.

[6:00] Good morning. Good morning, board of

[6:01] directors. How are you today?

[6:02] Brilliant. Thank you.

[6:03] Okay, can I bring you something to wear when you're

[6:04] introducing yourselves?

[6:05] Clear. I'm Tom DiTullio. Tom Thomas J.

[6:07] DiTullio Architects, 237 Woody Ave,

[6:09] Syracuse, New York.

[6:11] Thank you, sir.

[6:11] A few of these every now and then,

[6:13] so... Actually, it became,

[6:15] as Kate said, more of a

[6:16] rebuild than a simple

[6:18] repair. Once we went inside and

[6:20] started inspecting, the walls

[6:21] are basically brand new walls, brand

[6:23] new concrete walls, brand

[6:24] new concrete block walls, which are

[6:26] different from the ones the house already has. On

[6:29] three sides of it. And we have

[6:32] excessive deterioration and faults such as

[6:35] bowing, cracks and some

[6:37] excessive deterioration around both

[6:41] sides. So, we're going to have to

[6:44] dig around there. The only problem is

[6:46] that we have a rear easement

[6:47] where the power lines run through

[6:49] the back of Dorset, right here

[6:50] on the hill. Therefore, we cannot

[6:52] reinstall electrical equipment

[6:53] there or near the neighbors. Well, we'll have to do a

[6:55] lot of digging by hand and use

[6:56] small machinery. To keep the

[6:58] cost down and prevent the poor man from

[7:00] paying $100,000 for a garage, we're

[7:03] trying to do everything we can.

[7:05] One of the things we are considering

[7:06] to save costs is the

[7:08] tilting door. We thought about ordering a

[7:10] wooden tilt-up door, and we can

[7:12] get them, but they take between 180

[7:13] and 200 days. So waiting that

[7:16] long, leaving us in winter and doing

[7:18] all the concrete work

[7:20] outside, would be a bit costly and

[7:21] inefficient. It would probably cost

[7:24] twice as much as the concrete work,

[7:26] having to heat and maintain it. That's

[7:29] one of the fears we have.

[7:30] Apart from that, everything will go back to

[7:32] exactly as it is now. I

[7:34] showed her photographs with salt water,

[7:36] and she has all the photographs of

[7:38] what's there now. The

[7:42] interior front of the garage and the

[7:44] main entrance beam have failed so

[7:47] drastically that the door is

[7:49] rotting halfway through. Okay, I'm

[7:52] going to look at the photos. Yes of

[7:55] course. As you can see, we don't want

[7:57] the failure to compromise the

[7:59] roof system and structure. So,

[8:02] with that in mind, it's a bit

[8:05] difficult to find cost savings to

[8:07] do something, but currently, one of

[8:12] the things we can offer would be to

[8:14] replace the doors with a

[8:15] metal door that looks the same. And it looks like

[8:18] the house, the garage, was built in the

[8:21] 1930s, 1940s compared

[8:24] to the house in that neighborhood, which is

[8:26] from the 1880s. So, this

[8:29] is during the pre-war, post-war,

[8:32] World War II era. Well, I think it

[8:35] was an addition. And as you can see,

[8:38] there are large old cracks all over the place

[8:42] , so we don't want to lose the

[8:45] garage and we don't want you to have to

[8:47] spend a lot of money on this

[8:49] garage. Everything is going to be ridiculously

[8:55] expensive, so that's something we're asking for:

[8:58] an exemption to use an

[9:03] insulated metal door instead of ordering

[9:05] a wooden door.

[9:15] If you want to go back to the inspection,

[9:16] Kate, go down a little. It should show the

[9:19] easement on the back.

[9:21] It should show the

[9:22] limited easement. It's quite close to where

[9:24] the garage is. And there's

[9:25] quite a steep slope going up.

[9:28] Therefore, we want to try to avoid that

[9:31] . Does

[9:33] the easement run down the side or

[9:34] is it at the back? It runs right along

[9:36] the back of the building. If

[9:39] you look at some of the photographs,

[9:40] you can see that the power lines

[9:42] run down the back of the

[9:43] property line there.

[9:45] This...? Excuse me, is the easement

[9:46] indicated in...?

[9:47] Yes, we have power lines

[9:49] crossing the bottom. You can look at the

[9:51] right side of the inspection and then,

[9:54] okay.

[9:54] Towards the bottom, where they

[9:56] pass. And because it's a very

[10:03] steep slope, you know, you want to excavate

[10:05] a platform so the equipment can

[10:07] work properly and then...

[10:11] But you know, there's no way to get in

[10:13] there and work efficiently with

[10:14] larger equipment.

[10:18] Let's go back to...Here we go. Okay.

[10:26] since this is a

[10:28] public hearing, I need to ask if there is

[10:30] anyone here who would like to speak in favor

[10:32] of this project. I haven't heard or seen

[10:36] anyone, is there anyone here who wants to

[10:38] speak out against this project? Let him show

[10:40] up. I haven't heard or seen

[10:42] anyone. I request that the

[10:46] public hearing be closed.

[10:48] Audience comments.

[10:49] Excuse me, the public hearing is now closed

[10:50] . Board comments,

[10:53] questions about this project?

[10:59] One question I have is: what type

[11:01] of material do you plan to use to repair

[11:04] the stucco? Do you plan to repair it with the

[11:07] same cementitious base?

[11:09] Well, the stucco there has a

[11:11] much higher cement content than

[11:12] what we can buy on the market.

[11:14] We're going to use it. It provides

[11:16] much better waterproofing. One of the

[11:18] little tricks that

[11:20] old historical bricks have is that they

[11:22] usually have a high lime content and

[11:24] all their mortars because it gives them

[11:26] impermeability. And the mortar

[11:28] you buy now at S&M is a bit

[11:29] lower than that and tends to cut the

[11:31] brick anyway. So

[11:33] when you make stucco with this, you would use

[11:35] the higher lime content because

[11:37] you want a more waterproof one. And it will be

[11:39] sprayed to obtain the same stucco.

[11:41] Okay, we'll keep the same texture.

[11:43] Yes, we want to maintain exactly the

[11:45] same texture and it will be painted the same

[11:47] color as it is now.

[11:49] That was my main concern.

[11:56] My only comment about the slope

[11:58] . You feel that this small swelling

[12:01] right against the building is enough,

[12:03] or things should probably be

[12:04] moved.

[12:05] Well, what we're going to do is put

[12:07] some large green tiles behind

[12:08] the back when we create the

[12:10] slope, and some stone beds

[12:11] so we can drain the water and let it

[12:13] drain naturally towards the

[12:14] entrance area.

[12:16] Yes, I hate to see all the work done and then

[12:19] the problem repeats itself.

[12:21] In 3 more years, yes. Are

[12:24] you going to put a bookshelf back there

[12:26] ?

[12:26] Yes, we'll put a bookshelf back there

[12:27] .

[12:27] You will make a bookshelf to work on.

[12:31] Okay, it will be 3 or 4 feet

[12:32] deep and then we'll dig

[12:34] deeper and put in some larger stones

[12:36] for drainage. It

[12:38] will also work with the garden. They

[12:40] have a garden back there.

[12:41] Okay, so you'll divert it. You'll

[12:43] divert it around.

[12:44] Okay.

[12:45] And you will move it away from the structure. It will be

[12:48] a complete excavation of that

[12:50] back wall, right?

[12:51] Yes, we will have to get down to the

[12:52] foundations and verify that they are not

[12:54] compromised or faulty.

[12:55] Yes, okay.

[12:56] And then repair it if necessary.

[12:58] Okay. There's a

[12:59] lot I can't see. I don't know from the

[13:00] inside with 3 feet of snow and dirt

[13:02] against it, so.

[13:05] Okay. Any comments about the

[13:07] door?

[13:13] It is partially hidden from the

[13:14] street.

[13:15] Yes.

[13:15] Um, it's visible, but not directly on

[13:18] the street.

[13:20] Mhm. Well,

[13:23] yes, there is an elevation change of

[13:24] about 9 feet from the street side

[13:25] to where the garage is.

[13:27] Therefore, it's really difficult to see anything

[13:29] other than the crest of the garage from the

[13:30] street.

[13:31] Correct. So, we have a

[13:33] raised panel.

[13:35] Okay, let's try to imitate the door

[13:36] .

[13:38] The existing one is flat.

[13:39] Is the existing one a flat panel?

[13:41] It looks like a flat panel. Yes.

[13:45] Can they go to

[13:46] the image of the existing one

[13:47] towards the end?

[13:49] Yes, there's the proposal with the

[13:51] raised panel.

[13:52] And then,

[13:53] if we look at the existing one, it's a

[13:55] flat panel. Did they explore the possibility of

[13:58] looking at a flatter panel in the...?

[14:00] Unfortunately, all they have are

[14:03] raised panel designs. These days everyone

[14:11] wants more elegant things, so

[14:14] yes, but now we're, you know,

[14:17] changing the material and that, and also

[14:20] changing the design, or what the

[14:25] board of directors thinks about it. Does anyone

[14:28] want to comment on this

[14:29] ? If we can get a

[14:32] flat panel, I don't know if it's possible.

[14:34] Yes, I don't know if we can get one.

[14:37] I will ask them beforehand to order the

[14:39] flat panel instead of the raised panel.

[14:42] And it's a big change in character.

[14:44] Yes.

[14:44] I'm

[14:49] trying to see if the aluminum door

[14:51] itself doesn't have wood grain,

[14:52] right? It's just flat steel.

[14:56] But we can make the

[14:57] wood grain a part of it. I

[14:58] 'm not asking, I don't think we want to

[15:00] . I

[15:00] 'm not asking for that. I'm just making

[15:02] sure it's not there.

[15:03] Without wood grain.

[15:04] Okay.

[15:05] Without wood grain. Yes.

[15:07] Well, we're trying to meet

[15:09] the board's expectations, so

[15:11] ... Well, we don't want to counterfeit the

[15:12] product, do we? Therefore,

[15:14] engraving wood grain on an

[15:16] aluminum panel is counterfeiting it from the

[15:18] board's perspective in terms of

[15:20] historical standards.

[15:22] That's not what my wife thinks about

[15:23] our garage door.

[15:25] So, if it's a smooth panel or

[15:27] smooth metallic aluminum, if it's possible

[15:30] for us to put a flat panel on it,

[15:32] I think that would be my request. And if

[15:35] the board agrees with that.

[15:36] Clear. Yes.

[15:37] Well, I'll check with the manufacturer to see if they

[15:39] make smooth panels. Will you

[15:41] say that again?

[15:41] I will check with the manufacturer to see if they make

[15:42] a door with a smooth panel.

[15:44] Yes, smooth, smooth, flat panel, not without

[15:47] relief, with a smooth finish. Any

[15:51] other comments? We need to consider

[15:54] whether to approve, disapprove, or approve with

[15:56] conditions. Are

[15:57] you going to do anything about the roof? I didn't see

[15:59] any.

[16:00] No, luckily the roof is in

[16:01] pretty good condition, and that's why

[16:03] we want to shore it up and do all the

[16:04] work we can before

[16:06] winter arrives and snow loads start to build up

[16:08] when we try to support it with

[16:10] temporary shoring and supports.

[16:14] Okay.

[16:20] Roof, soffit, all that

[16:21] existing work remains. And the front wall

[16:27] is rebuilt exactly as it was.

[16:29] The front wall will be rebuilt exactly as is,

[16:31] with wider molding panels that

[16:32] match the

[16:34] surrounding molding.

[16:35] Is the size of the door panel the

[16:36] same as the size of the

[16:37] existing openings? The

[16:38] same as the

[16:39] existing openings, yes. Right now they are a

[16:40] 9 x 7 foot door. So, it's either that one or

[16:43] 8 x 7. It's one of the two

[16:45] standard sizes.

[16:48] That door looks about 30 years old.

[16:53] So, it's not actually that old,

[16:55] but it's very deteriorated. Would there be

[16:57] any document?

[17:04] This is a later neighborhood designation

[17:06] . I don't know

[17:07] . Is the only documentation we

[17:09] have

[17:10] from 2017?

[17:11] Yes.

[17:12] When the district was like that

[17:13] , in the early

[17:15] 2000s. The photos would be from the

[17:17] early 2000s, I think.

[17:20] And that would include that or...Okay, I just

[17:22] want...

[17:24] Yes, and in fact I think the only

[17:26] images we have are of the house

[17:28] itself and not of the secondary structures

[17:30] .

[17:31] So, are we really that worried if it's

[17:32] a 30-year-old door? I

[17:36] mean, does it look like

[17:37] a 30-year-old door?

[17:38] To me it looks like the door of a house where I

[17:40] grew up. The house was built around

[17:42] the same time I was born. So yes

[17:45] , okay.

[17:47] You know, this one looks...Yeah, this one looks like

[17:51] Newark.

[17:53] Okay. OK. If there are any further questions

[17:56] , may I put a motion on the

[17:57] table, please? I

[17:59] move to approve the

[18:00] application as submitted. I

[18:03] second that.

[18:04] Any comments or additions on

[18:06] this? OK. We have a

[18:10] motion on the table. Is everyone in favor?

[18:12] Yes.

[18:13] Against? The motion is approved.

[18:16] Thank you so much, guys. Good luck with the

[18:18] project.

[18:25] Thank you. We don't want that to happen.

[18:26] Thank you so much.

[18:31] Okay, I think it's my turn again. It's

[18:34] garage day.

[18:35] So yes, it's garage day. The

[18:38] next request is CA-26-20.

[18:42] Again, a certificate of suitability for

[18:44] 301 Highland Avenue. It is also a

[18:47] garage door replacement. Well,

[18:50] it's a garage door replacement. The

[18:53] district is the

[18:55] Sedgwick Highland Preservation District and the

[18:58] owner is here to talk

[19:00] about his project.

[19:03] Good morning. My name is Dan Stevens

[19:06] and I am one of the

[19:08] property owners.

[19:09] Welcome.

[19:11] Thank you.

[19:14] So, if you could

[19:15] quickly describe what your

[19:17] project is about and the reasons why at this time

[19:19] ...

[19:20] Sure. As you can see, the garage is

[19:26] separate from the residence. The garage

[19:31] itself is on Oak Street. I think it's roughly

[19:35] the sixth block of Oak

[19:38] Street. And the garage, I think the

[19:42] residence was built in 1901. I think

[19:46] the garage is about 20 years

[19:49] younger, but almost from the same period. In

[19:54] fact, there is one...you can't see it very

[19:56] well in the photograph, but there is a

[19:59] fireplace on the back wall inside the

[20:01] garage, which I believe was used to

[20:04] keep the vehicles warm

[20:06] while they were stored over the

[20:08] winter. So it's no longer in

[20:11] operation. It's just a kind of

[20:13] picturesque architectural relic.

[20:18] The doors have been in the snow and

[20:21] ice for a century and over time

[20:26] that has caused the

[20:29] lower door panels to

[20:32] gradually deteriorate despite

[20:35] painting and some restoration.

[20:43] Finally, the door, the

[20:47] right-hand door, had... There was a

[20:57] metal plate that was embedded in a

[21:00] wooden panel at the bottom of the

[21:03] door, and the chain and pulley system

[21:06] that raised the door was connected

[21:13] to that plate. The plaque, due to the

[21:15] deterioration of the surrounding wood,

[21:18] simply separated from the wood.

[21:23] Now there's a hole in the door. And

[21:26] I called three different

[21:29] door restoration companies to

[21:32] come and look at it. The three of them told me

[21:36] that it couldn't be repaired again. And they

[21:41] all recommended replacing the door

[21:46] with composite steel, which is the most

[21:49] modern thing in 2026, as far as I understand

[21:54] . To be able to do so, for two reasons. I

[22:02] have decided to request the repair of

[22:04] both doors, even though the

[22:06] left door still works. It's within

[22:11] the same timeframe. Over time, it will also

[22:15] fail for the same reasons of

[22:17] snow and ice. And I want them to look the

[22:20] same. I don't want one to turn

[22:22] one way and the other another.

[22:25] Additionally, the garage doors

[22:30] cannot be locked at this time

[22:33] . And if someone enters the garage...

[22:44] Both cars that were stored

[22:47] there were broken into last year. That's why

[22:51] I'm interested in ensuring that, as part of

[22:53] this project, we can also close

[22:56] the door so that no one but me

[22:59] can enter. I'll be happy to

[23:05] answer any questions.

[23:08] Thank you. Well, this is a

[23:11] public hearing, so I need to ask

[23:13] if there is anyone here in the audience

[23:14] who would like to speak in favor of this

[23:15] project. Nobody here. Does anyone want to

[23:20] speak out against this project?

[23:22] Nobody here. Then we can close

[23:25] the public comment. Board, any

[23:30] questions for the applicant? Any

[23:32] comments? May I

[23:37] speak for just a second? It

[23:40] 's on the table.

[23:41] In fact, I can give you this. This is a

[23:46] little more information about the...

[23:53] Thank you.

[24:00] So they're cut off. That, uh, uh,

[24:02] Mr. Stevens and I had

[24:05] also talked about all the different

[24:08] window arrangements, and, uh, this

[24:12] was the window arrangement he

[24:15] included in his application, uh, and, uh, there are

[24:19] also simpler ones

[24:22] available; But we had,

[24:26] uh, as you can see, uh, they are some that

[24:30] perhaps look a little more like what we have

[24:32] now.

[24:33] Yes. Did

[24:37] you consider making two

[24:41] window panels that replicate what's there

[24:43] now? Did you consider that option?

[24:49] I wanted to discourage people from looking out of

[24:52] the windows. There's really no

[24:56] point in having windows. The cars

[24:58] live there. They don't look out the window.

[25:03] That is an existing window. You can

[25:05] see that he is, uh, I guess at my

[25:07] height. Then, someone on the street

[25:10] can come in and look and see what's

[25:12] there. The higher windows seem to

[25:19] discourage that, and people just

[25:22] walk right past, which is what I want them to

[25:25] do.

[25:26] So, I had the same question,

[25:28] but I was wondering, and I understand the

[25:29] concern about security, of

[25:31] course. But would they be open to

[25:34] adding lower-level windows and

[25:36] putting a privacy film on

[25:37] both? Therefore, you would still

[25:40] maintain the overall appearance and

[25:41] proportion of the glazing, but

[25:43] no one would be able to see inside.

[25:45] Therefore, the privacy film would

[25:46] also add an extra layer

[25:48] of durability against the possibility of

[25:52] people breaking the glass or something

[25:53] like that. Therefore, it wouldn't be the same as

[25:56] the steel panel, but you would retain

[25:57] the look, the overall proportion of the

[25:59] glazing, and prevent

[26:01] people from seeing inside for a

[26:02] minimal additional cost.

[26:06] Yes, I'm open to that, definitely. In

[26:18] the last 5 years, there have been two

[26:21] incidents where people came and

[26:24] broke the windows of two cars.

[26:28] Yes. I thought this provision was

[26:35] more likely to discourage that. That's why I

[26:39] prefer it, but it's not the hill where I

[26:42] want to die.

[26:47] Well, what we're talking about in

[26:48] this case is maintaining the

[26:50] visual character of the garage.

[26:52] Yes. That's why

[26:53] having the double row of lights

[26:54] was always there. It let the

[26:56] light in. You can, you know, there are other

[26:58] windows in the garage, but it presents

[27:00] a more street-friendly facade

[27:02] and your garage is a couple of

[27:05] feet from the sidewalk. It is very pronounced. And

[27:08] I'd like you to include a picture of

[27:11] the house with the garage too, because it's

[27:13] a striking combination, I think. The

[27:15] house. The house is great. But just to

[27:20] show the character that was included,

[27:22] even though the garage is 20 years

[27:25] younger, I think it

[27:26] charismatically connects the house and you're on

[27:29] the edge of the district. And so, for

[27:32] me, it's very important to maintain those

[27:34] characteristics even though we're on the edge

[27:36] because once we start to lose

[27:38] that pedestrian scale or that

[27:39] fenestration pattern, we start to degrade the

[27:41] edge of the district's edge. You don't know what

[27:44] I mean. Do you understand what I'm

[27:45] saying?

[27:46] Well, this is true. I suppose if

[27:50] you think of the Sedgwick district as if it

[27:53] were the Monopoly board, this

[27:55] is Baltic Avenue. And it really is.

[28:00] It's just around the corner from

[28:03] Highland Ave. It's on your way to

[28:05] Oak Street. So, it's not the area we

[28:08] 're looking at, it's not what people

[28:12] think of as the classic

[28:15] Sedgwick district. Across the street, across

[28:20] Oak Street, there is a 217 Highland

[28:24] Avenue. It's empty and has been

[28:29] for almost 10 years.

[28:32] Yes.

[28:33] Anyway, nobody is looking at that

[28:36] property. The house adjacent to 217

[28:42] Highland Avenue, 215 Highland Avenue

[28:45] , is also unoccupied. Nobody lives

[28:50] there either. It's been empty for a while.

[28:57] If you continue down Highland Avenue or

[29:01] Oak Street, sorry. The next

[29:05] building is another garage. And next door is what

[29:09] used to be a

[29:15] photography shop.

[29:17] That's closed too. So, there's

[29:20] not much there. It's not Old

[29:22] Sturbridge Village. Nobody comes to

[29:24] walk around and look at these properties. It's

[29:27] just a building where

[29:30] cars live. And I'm trying to keep

[29:33] the cars protected.

[29:34] Understood. But are you open to a

[29:38] film that, as Cal mentioned,

[29:40] would be a privacy film for

[29:42] that?

[29:43] Yes, I am.

[29:45] Okay, I think that's a

[29:46] really good comment, a

[29:47] really good solution. Any other

[29:51] board members who would like to

[29:52] comment? And then we have to

[29:56] draft a motion here. And then

[30:04] do we make single-row windows that are

[30:06] simplified, more like the

[30:07] Stockbridge model?

[30:08] Yes, I guess I don't know. I

[30:10] agree with a row of windows.

[30:12] I would prefer the Stockbridge model.

[30:15] I appreciate the additional set of

[30:17] vertical lines on the doors. You

[30:19] know, it's not just the standard.

[30:21] Yes, the appearance of the large blackboard is

[30:22] ...

[30:22] Yes, complementary to what's there. It's

[30:24] a good catch.

[30:26] Yes.

[30:32] No further comments?

[30:33] Was that a motion or...?

[30:34] No, any other comments?

[30:37] May I make

[30:38] any further comments? Go ahead, but

[30:39] if there is a motion, please

[30:41] introduce it.

[30:44] I propose approving the project as

[30:46] presented, with a change from

[30:48] Prairie windows to

[30:50] Stockbridge windows for the top row of windows

[30:52] .

[30:57] Okay, we have a motion. Do we have

[30:59] someone to support her?

[31:06] I suppose I'd like to see the

[31:07] small additional glazing.

[31:08] Okay, we could... We can...

[31:11] amend that.

[31:14] Yes.

[31:15] Okay.

[31:16] Or if there is no one to second it,

[31:18] then that motion fails. And

[31:20] then a new

[31:22] motion can be made. OK.

[31:23] If we don't have anyone to

[31:26] second it, that motion will fail.

[31:29] OK. Please, let's put a new

[31:31] motion on the table.

[31:34] I propose accepting the request as

[31:36] presented, with the modification that

[31:37] we keep the windows in the

[31:39] second row, but with the

[31:40] vertical mullions. And a

[31:47] privacy film to discourage people from

[31:50] looking. Do

[31:51] we have anyone who supports that motion

[31:53] that's on the table?

[31:55] Support.

[31:56] Any discussion or

[31:58] modifications regarding this? No one is

[32:03] in favor of the motion.

[32:09] I.

[32:10] Against? The motion is approved.

[32:13] Thank you so much. Thank you.

[32:15] Any questions? They can

[32:17] contact Kate. It's very simple.

[32:24] If you have any questions,

[32:30] that's fine. Okay

[32:30] , thank you very much. Thank you so much.

[32:32] Thank you.

[32:33] Great. Keep it up.

[32:34] Thank you. I have nothing more for

[32:41] you today. So, there are no new

[32:46] issues or any particular topics for discussion

[32:47] at this time. Well,

[32:55] unless someone else has something. No.

[32:58] It's fine.

[32:59] Good motion to adjourn the session.

[33:02] Support. Is everyone in favor?

[33:05] Yes. The

[33:06] motion is approved.

[33:08] Very good.

[33:10] job.

Syracuse Landmark Preservation Board Meeting 09-17-26

Transcript