Transcript
SOURCE TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is downloaded from the source you provided but we haven't reviewed it for accuracy. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record. You can also request an AI-transcription of the audio file with the button to the left.
These are YouTube's auto-generated captions, not a human transcript — expect occasional errors, especially with names and technical terms.
[0:00]
She I don't know. She
>> Oh, well, I'll take purple then.
[0:06]
» Thank you.
>> What happened to my little one? You gave
[0:09]
me a little teeny tiny one.
>> Well, they do tell us
[0:16]
he gave me a little
[0:23]
besides
[1:03]
Hello. Can you hear me?
>> Can you hear us?
[1:08]
» Yes, I can hear you.
[1:17]
» Hold on. Here's a pen.
>> Give that to her. Get that to her.
[1:21]
That's my Broadway pen. I like
back.
[1:27]
» [clears throat]
[1:29]
» We just don't have anyone to come to our
meetings anymore. They'd be so
[1:33]
interesting.
[1:37]
» Boring is not bad.
>> No,
[1:43]
a little extra boring.
[1:48]
» Last time we had a Witchita documentary
documentary. Are you familiar with them?
[1:54]
I didn't really there was a person was
sitting right up there
[1:57]
» and I didn't see that she documented
anything for us. I tried to look online
[2:01]
and I didn't you see anything about
them?
[2:04]
» I've been to other meetings where they I
don't know if they I think they just
[2:08]
keep records. I'm not sure they actually
>> well they had they had one on
[2:16]
» I can't remember it was
>> I think whatever they have volunteers
[2:20]
for they had certain
[2:39]
Give this to Jan and she give it to
anyone. This is one for you. And
[2:47]
» is Emma coming? She said she was sick
and I told her not to come. She was
[2:52]
coming.
>> I know. She was told by and I said he
[2:56]
didn't trust me.
>> You said you're sick. It's not really a
[3:00]
question.
>> Well, don't sit too close to her because
[3:02]
she's still sitting.
>> I told her I said give her.
[3:06]
» Yeah. I told her to stay away from me.
>> Yeah. You don't need You don't need
[3:10]
whatever she's got.
>> No.
[3:13]
» [clears throat]
[3:15]
» So, I'm gonna wait for Emily.
>> Jason coming or
[3:20]
» Yes, he's coming. Uh he's uh he said he
might be actually he may be a little bit
[3:25]
late because he's his his uh office
hours have changed. So, he's working on
[3:30]
Wednesdays now. And but he says he just
has to to get everything signed up. So,
[3:36]
he thought he could make it. I told him
that we probably wouldn't get to much of
[3:40]
anything.
[3:44]
Here he comes.
>> Yay. Here you come. How are you doing?
[3:49]
» Good.
[3:56]
» I don't know.
[4:02]
I've had and this is the only two things
that she's handed out to us before we go
[4:07]
back,
>> I guess. I don't know.
[4:16]
» So, we're gonna wait for Emily to come
um because she's
[4:22]
sort of integral to this. Emily is the
is the manager of the animal shelter.
[4:27]
» Have you met her?
>> Have you been to the animal shelter?
[4:32]
» Oh, no.
>> You have and you met Emily?
[4:35]
» No, I haven't.
>> You should call Emily and have her take
[4:38]
you on a tour and visit. I think that'd
be very wise. I think if you're wanting
[4:42]
to learn a lot, that'd be the best way
to do it.
[4:57]
Yeah.
[5:15]
» I was
[5:20]
I believe.
[5:27]
» Hey, Alan.
[5:48]
So that's why I
[6:03]
» did that to buy home.
>> No, no, no. That was
[6:09]
I think
[6:13]
» Oh, yeah.
[6:17]
» Yeah.
[6:40]
take you to
move them out.
[6:52]
out west
[7:13]
sake. Well,
[7:24]
Not for sissies.
[7:36]
We're asking
[7:50]
» you by word.
[7:55]
Oh yeah.
[8:06]
» I guess I understand that W's the worst
for
[8:16]
[clears throat]
[8:21]
me.
That's not good. You must be really
[8:26]
sick.
[8:34]
» I had to figure out how to get
[8:50]
» that.
[9:12]
Well, you can you can qualify itchy skin
as pain.
[9:19]
I just don't think you were in a spot at
that time to make change.
[9:36]
» It should be
[9:42]
» as long as I think ahead.
[9:50]
That's part of
>> now. Let me look for something that I
[9:53]
think will be here.
>> Sometimes I'm not kidding.
[9:58]
» We hope Emily has not been pulled over
for drunk driving because she's taking
[10:02]
some medication. [laughter]
>> No, I'm not kidding. I just just
[10:05]
kidding. Just kidding.
>> Ellen, don't you remember that when we
[10:10]
did the bylaws, we made it where you're
supposed to raise your hand when you
[10:14]
vote? Yes, absolutely.
>> It's not in there and we can't find it.
[10:19]
» You're kidding me. Who's in?
>> Well, I think that we can go over the
[10:23]
minutes and probably pick it up from the
minute. I think
[10:27]
we're gonna I'm gonna say that's a
[10:32]
» jam behind that door.
[10:36]
» When we did the bylaws, we did say that
we wanted people to raise their hands
[10:40]
when they vote.
[10:44]
I don't disagree. I just don't remember.
>> Okay. Well, because it's not in the
[10:47]
bylaws right now.
>> Are those
[10:54]
» I think the chair should be able to
>> by you have
[10:58]
» I would go back and compare to your last
copy.
[11:01]
» Well, there that's what she that's what
Susan's doing.
[11:05]
» Okay, we're gonna start this meeting.
How are you doing, Emily?
[11:09]
» How are you doing, Emily?
ill.
[11:13]
» Okay. No, I you should have been in full
garb. You know, [laughter]
[11:18]
Emily's been sick and she's coming to me
not feeling very well.
[11:21]
» So,
>> is there time for my report?
[11:23]
» I'm sorry. We [clears throat] haven't
even started.
[11:25]
» No, we're just waiting. Yes. Go ahead.
[11:33]
» And and
>> I I want to do some housekeeping real
[11:36]
quick.
>> Okay. So, I brought these right here
[11:40]
because if it isn't in our ordinance, it
should be. Uh me and Stephanie will tell
[11:46]
you, she's been to every meeting, too,
since July of 2015 when this started.
[11:51]
And they used to vote and they get done
and say it was unanimous or 4:1 or 5 to2
[11:57]
or whatever. And I'm like, I didn't even
hear anyone or anything. So, we tried to
[12:00]
put it in the the deal to uh raise your
hand. Well, I've went one better. So if
[12:06]
you could see this, if you really
strongly and you you you want to be bold
[12:12]
and strong, you you you raise your hand
and be proud of that. If if it's so so
[12:17]
you but you're voting for it here and
then if it's 51% bring it down here. So
[12:23]
but I would like that everyone use
these. You don't have to do my little
[12:28]
all this, but just just raise it so Oh,
no. We can
[12:31]
» you're proud So you're proud of your
vote.
[12:36]
And you know what? You could be the
caretaker of the
[12:38]
» Yes. I'll take them at the end and bring
if you give me the the things.
[12:45]
» There you go.
>> I I cannot find those. I'm so sorry.
[12:48]
» Give me those. I'll bring those, too.
>> Yeah. So, that is my bad. I put them
[12:53]
away in a place I wouldn't forget. And
guess what?
[12:58]
I haven't been able to find them. I'm
Maybe someone moved them. I don't know.
[13:05]
But our board is so little.
We don't have a very big board yet. We
[13:10]
don't we won't ever have a big board.
>> While we're waiting, why don't we just
[13:14]
go around the the board? I'm George Theo
Harris from District Three.
[13:19]
» Susan Richardson, the mayor's
representative. Ellen Corner, district
[13:24]
one.
>> Nancy Bradley, district four.
[13:27]
» Jason Albertson, JB Johnson's district
>> district five.
[13:31]
» There you go. Okay. Shame on you.
>> Shame on you. [clears throat]
[13:35]
» Kick me out.
>> No,
[13:37]
» I'm fired.
>> And Stephanie McCarti is from
[13:40]
» And she's That's Stephanie. Hi,
Stephanie. And she's from District 2.
[13:44]
She's on She's on vacation, I think. So,
she's behind you.
[13:50]
» I am not on vacation. I'm traveling for
work.
[13:53]
» Okay. Well, I didn't know. That's good.
Better that you be on vacation, I'm
[13:59]
sure.
[14:05]
Okay. Okay. We'd like to start the
meeting. Um, I'm going to call the
[14:10]
meeting to order. And the first thing
that we need to to do on this meeting is
[14:13]
to approve the minutes from last
meeting. And Stephanie, you had a
[14:18]
question. [clears throat]
>> I have a Yes, I have a correction to the
[14:23]
person who's absent. We list Patricia as
absent and she is no longer on the
[14:28]
board. I have replaced her. So, we need
to have that struck from last month's
[14:32]
minutes, please. Thank you.
>> Then I have a correction,
[14:38]
and I think the vets would kill me if
they put red as the way it was.
[14:43]
» Yeah. Anyhow, it's on page two, and it's
under presented by Theo Harrison Corner,
[14:50]
and it's the second um little dot and it
says veterinarians made it more
[14:55]
difficult. And what I said was they make
it more difficult. And I think when I
[15:00]
talked to um Healey, she said she
thought since I was talking about the
[15:04]
veterinarians that I was thinking about
the veterinarians and I wasn't. Did you
[15:07]
read that? Did you notice that already?
And so I talked to her. I think we can
[15:12]
say they and then in parentheses the
city is making it more difficult. And
[15:16]
the reason I said that is because of the
Excel file they sent because we wanted
[15:20]
to make it simplified. So I'd like to
have that change to take it off. It's
[15:24]
not the veterinarians although we need
to get them to get on board. the process
[15:29]
process.
>> Yeah, the process
[15:31]
» and there there needs to be an addition
too. Um I was stating that I had sent an
[15:38]
email to Emily
um about licenses and
[15:45]
she uh told me that I needed to get with
licensing or the police department or
[15:52]
and licensing won't talk with me. So,
it's not because I've been rude to them
[15:58]
either. Oh, I've asked some questions
they did not want to give me answers to,
[16:01]
but they was never being rude. So,
that's not in the report here. And I
[16:07]
have email to document that. That's uh
they're tying our hands and we just
[16:14]
can't have that.
>> So, are you saying that you want that
[16:18]
added or is it
>> Yes, please.
[16:20]
» And where would you add that? Where
would it be?
[16:25]
Oh, it was near the end. Near the end,
remember?
[16:29]
» Yeah.
>> Okay. Um,
[16:34]
what I'm going to do is I'm going to uh
defer approving the minutes until we can
[16:40]
come in and get them corrected and then
bring it back to us. Does that make
[16:42]
sense?
>> I think people are asking for quite a
[16:45]
few things, especially what you're
asking for.
[16:47]
» And I could send her the emails and and
she could just she don't she don't have
[16:51]
to look at nothing. Well, it's what you
said in it's not the email
[16:55]
» I read. So I read them out of the
meeting.
[16:58]
» Yeah. So the email that I read.
>> So do I have a second to defer the
[17:04]
approval of the minutes till next
meeting.
[17:08]
» All those in favor raise your hands.
Okay.
[17:14]
Stephanie.
>> Oh, Stephanie,
[17:18]
are you there?
>> I'm here.
[17:21]
How did you vote on deferring the
minutes?
[17:23]
» Yes.
>> Okay.
[17:26]
» If I vote no, I'll put it in the chat so
Keley will know.
[17:31]
» Okay. But we want to know, not just Ke
because Key is not here.
[17:34]
» Okay. Just say yes or no on anything
that we vote on. Okay. Okay. The next up
[17:40]
is our um
is Emily um on uh
[17:50]
animal services report and we got a
chair up here. Do you want to just do it
[17:53]
if you do back there? I don't know if
you're going to be able to be heard.
[17:56]
» Can you guys hear me?
>> Well, it's whether they can hear you.
[18:01]
» Stephanie, can you hear me?
>> Yes.
[18:06]
[clears throat]
I'd rather not germ everybody up.
[18:11]
All right. Um
>> closer to June.
[18:14]
» Yeah.
The So you guys have the report that has
[18:20]
May and June on it since we were last
here.
[18:24]
And our intake for cats in May was 309
and 444 in June. Intake for dogs was 430
[18:33]
in May and 441 in June. Um we're right
around average numbers for last year. Uh
[18:40]
but our overall euthanasia rate for dogs
is lower. Cats pretty much race remains
[18:46]
the same. But the bulk of the euthanasia
for cats uh is still neonates or those
[18:52]
that have been badly injured.
Unfortunately with a heavy
[18:55]
overpopulation pro problem of mostly
unowned cats I believe um they get
[19:01]
injured a lot and that's a mercy
euthania isn't a big category for us.
[19:08]
» Any questions on the regular do or on
the regular
[19:13]
um I just have a question uh is this
higher this year or lower this year than
[19:18]
than years before
>> on intake? on intakes. Are we taking in
[19:22]
more animals or less animals?
>> About the same. It It's really very
[19:26]
close.
>> Very close. Okay.
[19:30]
» Any other questions?
[19:34]
No questions.
Are there any question on this?
[19:43]
The next report is the dangerous dogs
report. Um it's also published on the
[19:47]
website now. So, I I'll refraining from
reading it for you guys, but just take a
[19:52]
look at those and let me know if you
have any questions about anything.
[20:02]
And I guess I'm going to ask the same
thing. Um, maybe it would be helpful if
[20:07]
we had some sort of of comparison.
>> I remember. Yes, I I'll bring that next
[20:12]
time.
>> Okay. Yeah, because it'd be nice to know
[20:15]
whether we're going up or down on stuff.
>> I had a question. It says uh in May
[20:20]
there were more euthanas than intakes.
>> Whoa, that doesn't sound good.
[20:25]
» On dangerous dogs.
>> Yes.
[20:27]
» Okay. So, um and this one's a this is a
kind of wonky because it doesn't exactly
[20:34]
spell out what is happening very clearly
just in a statistic.
[20:39]
» Okay. So dangerous dogs can exist in
these these four categories are aren't
[20:45]
necessarily all related to the same
animals.
[20:48]
So for example um and and this is done
and it's done by calendar month. So
[20:55]
maybe I took a dangerous dog in on May
30th to the shelter, but that dangerous
[21:01]
dog's outcome might have been a
euthanatia or it might have gone back
[21:05]
home. Um, it might that dangerous dog's
uh intake could also be determined
[21:12]
nothing further. So maybe it didn't end
up with a dangerous dog determination,
[21:15]
but it came in as a dangerous dog
designation.
[21:19]
And then the outcomes for that same
month, let's say that it was euthanized.
[21:24]
Um, that process takes several weeks
typically before we make our
[21:29]
determination. The person has time to
come back with it. So, the intake isn't
[21:33]
necessarily going to add up to the
euthanasia number at the same time. And
[21:39]
um there are situations some sometimes
also where we're doing a dangerous dog
[21:44]
investigation, but we aren't in taking
the animal specifically into our
[21:47]
facility. It may be at a veterinarian.
It may be um at doing its home
[21:53]
quarantine for something that we are
going to assume is going to be something
[21:57]
nothing further and we're not requiring
that it come into the shelter while we
[22:00]
complete the investigation.
Um there there's just a lot of different
[22:06]
variables in that. So it doesn't
necessarily equal out to the same.
[22:10]
» And two, doesn't your euthanasia include
like if a citizen brings a pet in
[22:16]
» right you didn't intake it. Do you you
do you do an intake on those or do you
[22:23]
» um not typically those are gonna those
are going to be the um d the next
[22:28]
category which is dangerous dog. XUP
stands for uh owner surrender in our
[22:35]
um and and so those those mean that the
owner brought it to us. We didn't
[22:43]
necessarily complete a full
investigation because the owner is
[22:47]
saying, you know, this dog maybe it
attacked my f my child. It needs to be
[22:52]
euthanized. And so we wouldn't conduct
an investigation on that one, but it
[22:55]
would count towards the euth.
>> So those inverted numbers probably would
[23:00]
have made more sense for cats since they
have nine lives.
[23:07]
[clears throat]
[laughter]
[23:09]
» That's his voice. You do add humor. You
do add humor. Um, any other questions of
[23:15]
the report.
No questions. Thank you very much. And
[23:20]
you can put your head down and rest if
you want to.
[23:25]
» Okay. Next on the agenda on the the is
public comment.
[23:31]
And I don't have Who's can you bring up
the public comment or someone bring up
[23:35]
the public? Who signed up for public
comment?
[23:40]
very much.
[23:46]
» We just have one. We have such a few
public comments and Tony Wman.
[23:51]
» Thank you. Um yeah, I I agree. There's
hardly anybody here. There used to be
[23:56]
people from Humane Society. I don't
know, six or seven police officers. Um
[24:01]
people from the shelter, not just the
shelter supervisor. And now here we are.
[24:07]
Nobody. Um, I wanted to follow up. Um, I
missed the meeting in May, but I was at
[24:15]
the meeting in March, and I did make a
public comment then that I want to
[24:20]
follow up on, and it has to do with all
of the animals who are leaving this area
[24:26]
going to rescue, but we don't know what
rescue they're going to. Um Emily told
[24:35]
me in March that they were going the
cats were going to Missouri and
[24:38]
Wisconsin
and I'm wondering so they have a
[24:43]
scarcity of cats in Missouri and
Wisconsin.
[24:46]
» Yeah, we're not going to have any
questions.
[24:48]
» Oh, I'm sorry.
>> Anyway, that was my comment. They have a
[24:51]
that I was wondering, you know, do they
have a scarcity? And one of the reasons
[24:56]
that I bring this up again is because
first of all, there's been no
[25:03]
At least I haven't seen any resolution
to at least knowing where they're going.
[25:08]
But there's been a lot of public
information about a place called
[25:13]
Miranda's Rescue in Fortuna, California.
And this is a rescue where um they went
[25:21]
in and this place had been receiving
animals uh cats and dogs from area
[25:27]
rescues and shelters and what have you.
They couldn't adopt them out. They were
[25:31]
fundraising on them, making hundreds of
thousands of dollars and then killing
[25:35]
the animals. And so they found graves of
hundreds of dogs and cats that have been
[25:42]
killed over a certain amount of time.
It's called Miranda's Rescue in Fortuna,
[25:48]
California. I urge everybody to Google
that. And [clears throat]
[25:53]
if you don't know for sure that your
animals are going to a good rescue, it
[25:59]
might be going to a horrible death. You
don't know that. So that's comment.
[26:06]
Thank you very much. Okay. I didn't even
turn on my stopwatch.
[26:11]
Off you go. That concludes new business.
Um I mean that concludes the public new
[26:18]
business. We're going to have election
of officers and I'd like to start that
[26:22]
off with the election of the chairperson
and I would like to make a nomination
[26:27]
that Stephanie Mccernie um uh be elected
as our next chairperson. I'm worn out.
[26:35]
Is there a second?
>> Well, no. Is there any more?
[26:38]
» No. No, we have to. No. Okay. Are there
any? You're going to second it. Okay.
[26:43]
Are there any other nominations for the
chairperson?
[26:46]
» Yes. I make a nomination that you stay
as chair.
[26:50]
» I'm not going to do that. I have too
much to do. I have too much and
[26:53]
Stephanie is a very good person. She can
run a meeting very very well.
[26:58]
Are there any other nominations?
I close the nominations. Is there any
[27:03]
input? Can we have input from the from
the floor or do we not do that during so
[27:09]
glad you're here?
>> The board first and then the floor. I
[27:12]
would say
>> you would have on an election, you
[27:14]
wouldn't have input from the citizens.
It would just be the
[27:20]
» You wouldn't have input from the
>> Okay, that's I didn't know that. Okay.
[27:23]
Are there any discussion about this?
>> All I want to say is we've been there,
[27:28]
done that, and um
if uh
[27:38]
all I'm going to say, been there, done
that. Any
[27:42]
other comments?
I'm going to bring it to a vote. All
[27:46]
those in favor of Stephanie being the
chairperson, raise your purple or orange
[27:51]
hand, purple and your orange hand.
All those opposed.
[27:58]
Okay, there's one, two, three, four,
four. Stephanie.
[28:01]
» Oh, Stephanie. Do you want to vote for
yourself?
[28:05]
» Yes, I'll vote for myself. Thank you.
>> Okay. [laughter] Okay. One, two, three,
[28:10]
four, five, five, four, and one against.
So Stephanie, you're the new
[28:14]
chairperson. Now, I have a question. I'm
going to go ahead and go through the
[28:18]
rest of the the nominations, but should
Stephanie take over the meeting now or
[28:21]
should I continue with the meeting and
have Stephanie take over the next
[28:24]
meeting?
>> I would have her take over the next
[28:26]
meeting.
>> The next meeting. Okay. All right.
[28:29]
» Okay.
>> Yes. [clears throat]
[28:32]
» I make a motion, Susan, to be the the
vice chair.
[28:37]
» Okay. So that was the next thing up for
the first V. We have two vice chairs.
[28:42]
Okay. Okay. So we have a motion for
Susan to be the first vice chair.
[28:47]
» Can Susan clarify something?
>> Yes.
[28:50]
» Is there a sequence to the vice chair or
is just like level like is there first
[28:55]
vice chair, second vice chair?
>> First vice chair, second vice chair.
[28:59]
» I declined to be first vice chair.
>> Okay. Yes.
[29:03]
» Make a motion that Jason be the first
vice chair.
[29:07]
Ah, you're up. [laughter]
Okay. A second. I second that. I second
[29:13]
that. Is there any other nominations for
vice chair?
[29:18]
Stephanie.
Okay. Uh then we'll close the
[29:22]
nominations and we'll take a vote. All
those in favor of Jason being our first
[29:25]
vice chair, raise your hand.
>> Okay. That's one, two, three, four, and
[29:32]
raise it like [laughter] that.
>> Yes.
[29:34]
» Yes.
>> Yes. Good. Okay. Well, that's um that is
[29:40]
uh nomish. Okay. Five to zero.
>> Make a motion that the second vice chair
[29:47]
is Susan.
>> That's six to zero. Helen.
[29:51]
» Oh, six to zero.
>> It's five here. That's why six because
[29:54]
she's Yeah.
>> Okay. Six to Thank you for correcting
[29:58]
me.
>> Second, Vice Chair Susan,
[30:00]
» now that it's been clarified.
>> I'm willing to be second. You're willing
[30:04]
to be a second.
I will second that nomination. Is any
[30:09]
discussion?
You two can hash it out. Okay.
[30:13]
[laughter]
No, I'm not kidding.
[30:17]
» I would like to know if you ever took
the tour of the shelter with Emily.
[30:21]
» I have not taken the the tour with
Emily. [clears throat]
[30:27]
» I probably need to find time to do that,
too.
[30:29]
» And you need to, too. Okay. Well, I
think that that I think you missed the
[30:33]
one tour that they gave that they didn't
know that happened. Um,
[30:38]
» I I took a tour of the shelter with
Ellen. So, I have been to the shelter,
[30:44]
but have not been to the shelter with
Ellen.
[30:48]
» We'll do it sometime. It'll work out. I
think maybe you can go together and take
[30:52]
that tour.
>> Ellen, are there any more nominations?
[30:56]
» Yes, I know. Are there any more
nominations?
[31:00]
All those in favor, raise your hand.
[31:05]
Stephanie,
[31:09]
» yes or no? Stephanie?
>> Yes. Sorry.
[31:14]
» Is it yes?
>> Yes.
[31:16]
» Okay. All those against, one against.
Okay. So, that's one, two, three, four,
[31:22]
five, four, and one again. And one name.
So, uh,
[31:28]
you're on. you're on. And Stephanie, I
can't wait for you to take over next
[31:32]
month, next meeting. Okay. You do a good
job.
[31:36]
Okay. Now then, the next thing up is um
the uh
[31:44]
new is the old business. And I guess I'm
up on this. I've handed out a packet for
[31:48]
you. And Stephanie, did you get I sent
you what we're what I'm handing out,
[31:52]
which is just an overview of the of the
uh uh of the things that were voted for
[31:58]
and against. Did you get that today?
>> Yes, I got it.
[32:03]
» Well, you did get one, but you have that
from the last year from the last
[32:07]
meeting. Okay. Um
I contacted I'm not I contact Alejandro
[32:16]
AIO. I think that's her name, how she
pronounces it with the bin. Is it Casio?
[32:20]
Do you know Jan Alejandra? Anyhow, I
asked for an update for the number of
[32:26]
licenses that came in in the second
quarter, which would be the total for
[32:29]
the for the first uh I guess for the
first two quarters or the half a year in
[32:35]
the licensing. And I'm going to recoup
this. I'm going to remind I don't think
[32:39]
you're here. I'm going to just go over a
few things. Um when we and George when
[32:44]
George I asked to see how the licensing
was doing after they they uh um approved
[32:51]
some of the different things that we had
recommended in 2024 which was before it
[32:56]
was approved they had 15,28
licenses with a revenue of $268,981.
[33:04]
They also had eight veterinarians on
board. Um they had in 2025 they had
[33:10]
seven veterinarians on board and that
number dropped from 9,000 to 9,544
[33:18]
with a revenue of 1841
$184 that $184,000
[33:25]
and86 and800 $184,869
uh dollars of income. So the income
[33:33]
dropped not totally in half but it
dropped consistently and the numbers uh
[33:38]
almost dropped in half.
>> Is this number how many licensed during
[33:41]
that year?
>> Yes, this is during the year.
[33:44]
» What if some of those 15,000 in 2024 did
a three-year license?
[33:48]
» They didn't have that ability to because
it well they could have at the very
[33:52]
beginning. Okay. And we that's a
question that I have. Okay. That's a
[33:55]
question I ask the license department.
How many are are three years and how
[33:59]
many are are just one year or two years?
because they do have a one, two or three
[34:03]
year and I'll discuss that a little bit
later. Okay. And then what we saw and so
[34:08]
it went into effect the end of 2024.
Is that correct? I think it was approved
[34:15]
in September of 13.
September 13 of 2024. And but some of it
[34:21]
did not go into I don't know if they did
the three-year not until the 1 of 2025.
[34:27]
» Right. That's correct.
>> So that so that just sort of started in
[34:30]
2025. Correct.
>> Okay. Thank you. And then in 2026 up to
[34:34]
date, we have 3,95
[34:39]
licenses with the amount of 78,800.
>> Can you repeat that number?
[34:45]
» Okay. 3,95
licenses, excuse me, licenses.
[34:51]
78,800 [clears throat]
[34:54]
taken in. Now,
>> how many vets?
[34:57]
» Oh, three. Three veterinarians. And I
don't know if that has changed. U Emily,
[35:03]
do you know if it's changed? That's I
got this from Alejandra. I contacted her
[35:07]
and she was very kind and got this phone
last week.
[35:10]
» Yeah.
[35:15]
» So, um, we were all, I think, shocked at
the decrease because what we did when we
[35:22]
when we put the sub together was we
wanted to make the the licensing
[35:27]
increase. We wanted to get more dogs
licensed. And uh
[35:33]
the next I guess I can show you this and
I should have had this for the topic. I
[35:37]
I feel bad if you if you went through
the the uh PowerPoint notes that I have
[35:41]
over there and shared them around.
You'll see what we're talking about, but
[35:44]
I didn't have enough meds to buy enough
to print them off.
[35:49]
Making notes on this, but I can share.
>> Huh? [laughter]
[35:55]
» Look like there's a couple.
>> Yeah, there's more. I ran copies. I fig
[35:58]
you guys pass.
>> And so the second
[36:02]
» the page that you have here talks about
just a just a visual of what this looks
[36:07]
like. We handed this out last meeting
and I don't think you were here at the
[36:11]
last meeting, Jason. So that's why I put
this on here. And this shows the number
[36:16]
of history. In about 2010, we had over
40,000 around 40,000 dogs licensed. and
[36:22]
it has now dropped down to
hopefully we're going to get 8,000
[36:27]
licensed maybe if we we got almost 4,000
for the first uh half year. Hopefully
[36:34]
we'll get more but we don't know.
Um and then this is this is just the
[36:40]
revenue showing how much it went down. I
don't have 2023. I never did get 2023
[36:46]
but I think it sort of followed the
trend. And then 26 is the lowest it's
[36:50]
been in 25 years I think. And this is
all information that we got through the
[36:54]
subcommittee.
So
[36:58]
we I I presented this at the last
meeting and I I did presented it badly.
[37:02]
I should have sent some of this stuff
out previously. Um but at the last
[37:06]
meeting there were some concerns about
the efficiency of the license of
[37:10]
subcommittee as to what they did and uh
they wanted to know what was what were
[37:16]
recommended and what was you know what
was accepted by the city. Okay.
[37:22]
And so I sent out very late last night
because well yesterday afternoon because
[37:28]
I ran across the the uh workshop uh
video where they discussed things. So we
[37:36]
the board presented
the uh recommendations this my
[37:42]
subcommittee presented the re
recommendations in May of 2023
[37:46]
and uh at that time it was voted on by
the board to pass on with the vote of
[37:52]
five yays one nay and one absence
abstain. So it passed and it was then
[37:58]
sent on to the police department.
Now our in May of 2023
[38:04]
and I looked at all the minutes because
I knew what happened but at each meeting
[38:07]
we asked where the meetings were where
where are the where the recommendations
[38:10]
and we really didn't get a good answer.
They said, "We don't know downtown
[38:14]
someplace." And so they were sort of
stalled. And then on the
[38:20]
uh I guess it was the March meeting of
2024,
[38:24]
Mike, who was a chair at that time,
reported that, hey, they're going to
[38:29]
start they're going to um we're in the
process and they hope to get them to the
[38:33]
city council in the next week in the
next month or so. And that was at the
[38:37]
March meeting. That was about a year
later.
[38:42]
I just uh Googled and IA said there's
130 to 150 dogs in Witchah and IIA is
[38:50]
never wrong. So if you multiply that
times 22.5
[38:55]
that's about the average cost of a
license. It's 15 if it's fake and
[38:59]
neutered but 50 if it's not. If you
average in all of that it's about 2250.
[39:04]
So that's two point 2,925,000
[39:08]
that could be collected that's not being
collected
[39:12]
» and and that's something that we talked
about in this in the slides. Now then um
[39:17]
in April of 2024 Jan presented for the
first time to the city um council the
[39:25]
recommendations and they prior to going
for that one period of time I think that
[39:30]
those recommendations were being looked
at. We we didn't expect all of the
[39:35]
recommendations to pass. You know, we I
I had no no thought that they would ever
[39:39]
license cats, okay? Much to much to
Georgia, but I knew that was probably
[39:44]
going to be one of the things that we
kicked out. But Dan, you got with law
[39:48]
department, PD, and the finance, and you
went through and looked at what
[39:53]
utilities
accept. Okay. And she presented it to
[39:57]
the city. And I just want I always like
to correct things when they're wrong. At
[40:01]
the last meeting, it was stated that the
city council voted no on our
[40:06]
recommendations, and that's not true. Uh
they were the recommendations weren't
[40:10]
given to them until after the city after
PD and uh uh finance and law said we can
[40:19]
accept such certain months. And um
>> but and I just want to clarify that this
[40:26]
first time she presented them, they were
at a workshop, not
[40:29]
» Yeah, workshop. No, it was a workshop.
I'm sorry after and it was after the PD
[40:34]
had looked at these your workshop. It
was after
[40:38]
» this is the first time it was presented
a workshop. I'm sorry I didn't say
[40:41]
workshop. Okay. Now then
>> Excuse me. No, PD was looking at them
[40:45]
before you did your workshop.
>> That's what I said. That's what I could
[40:48]
that's what I asked her.
>> Yeah, but I don't think she answered it
[40:50]
right.
>> She did. She shook her head. Yes.
[40:52]
» No. Yeah. And and I said that that
>> Yeah, they PD looked at it. Then you
[40:55]
took their recommendations and you
presented it
[40:58]
» and then you went before the city
council and they voted in
[41:02]
» 70. Yeah.
>> And and that was
[41:04]
» they didn't vote on the recommendations.
We just presented the present.
[41:07]
» No, no, not that they did later.
>> I'm let me finish George. Let me go
[41:12]
through this. Okay. All right. And so um
that was in uh April of 2024.
[41:20]
And uh the
the uh they were then presented after
[41:29]
the workshop to the city council in
September the September 13th meeting.
[41:34]
» It was August 13th.
>> August 13th. August
[41:37]
» because it was the same day as
neighborhood night out.
[41:39]
» Really? It was August, not September.
Okay. Well, I'm wrong.
[41:43]
» Okay. I will always admit that I'm
wrong.
[41:45]
» I don't know.
>> Don't worry. I sent it to you today and
[41:48]
it said August 13th. So, you're fine.
That's all right. Okay. So, it was
[41:51]
August 13th and they voted seven to zero
to accept all of the recommendations
[41:56]
that
>> in the or they were put into
[41:58]
» they were in the ordinance. Now, I have
been because I I sent the the video and
[42:03]
I wanted everyone to see it because I
think that a lot of stuff was said in
[42:06]
the workshop that I can't you know I
can't say everything there. But it was a
[42:12]
very very good workshop. There's some
good questions. But what I did in the
[42:15]
next six sheet is I printed off very
crudely their your um uh PowerPoint
[42:23]
notes for the workshop. Okay. And so I
wanted to go over that because people
[42:27]
want to know what was taken, what
wasn't. And so the first recommendation
[42:31]
was licensing both cats and dogs. And
they said, "Hey, we got enough
[42:35]
[clears throat] dogs licensing. We can't
do cats at this time." And I remember
[42:38]
talking to to uh Jan about that. And she
said, "That's a good idea, but not right
[42:42]
now." And so it's not like they said
never never never but maybe it is never
[42:46]
never
but they said that they wouldn't do that
[42:50]
at this time. So that one was one that
they didn't take with they took with the
[42:53]
dogs and not the cats. And the second
one was mandatory microchipping of cats
[42:57]
and dogs and this was actually put in
the the advisory board wanted to do
[43:02]
that. I mean the subcommittee wanted to
do that but we didn't think we could
[43:05]
until the police says hey we want you to
do that and said okay good we're going
[43:08]
to put it in. So, we were real happy
about that. And that, of course, was
[43:11]
supported. And then offering a
three-year license if a dog has a
[43:15]
three-year vaccine and offers no refunds
for unused years. Uh we I don't think we
[43:21]
put in the refund, but that was good
that we we put it in. We might have put
[43:24]
that in. But anyhow, uh they supported
that. So, that went through. And then
[43:30]
changing the licensing price to 15 and
50. I think there was some questions
[43:34]
about it should be 20 and 40, but it
ended up being 15 and 50. Okay, 15 for
[43:40]
altered and 50 for unaltered. And that
was we did that so that we could
[43:44]
encourage spay and neighboring of the of
the animals because that's one thing
[43:48]
that can happen. And the and the police
department supported that. And then we
[43:52]
increased the three dogs and three to
two dogs and two cats and three dogs and
[43:56]
three cats because a lot of us have
three dogs. I have three dogs. I hate to
[44:01]
say that, but I have three dogs. Now I
have three dogs. And the and the witch
[44:05]
supported the recommendation. And I
didn't think about it till I looked at
[44:07]
what you said that that's going to
probably drop down some of the animal
[44:11]
maintenance permits that they have to
do. So that's a plus. Okay. Because see
[44:14]
before if you had three you had to get
an animal maintenance [clears throat]
[44:16]
permit and now it's at four. Then they
added a dedicated employee to administer
[44:22]
the pet license.
And we thought if you have someone as an
[44:25]
employee that does it, you know that
that has paid $60,000. I think someone
[44:30]
said that at the meeting about $16,000
and you were taking in, you know, $800
[44:35]
to a million dollars that that they
could pay for themselves. But I guess
[44:38]
the city doesn't believe that. They
don't. Okay. Um and the next one was
[44:43]
partner with the Kansas Mayite to
vaccinate for rabies and licensed
[44:46]
animals before they leave the shelter.
We haven't gotten anything. What?
[44:50]
Nothing's happened with that other than
they are vaccinated for rabies. Right
[44:54]
now they are, but they're not gathering.
They're not taking in a license. the
[45:01]
it's really just more of an open
discussion at this point um with them
[45:05]
getting a new CEO and um talk talking
about the pros and cons of how that
[45:12]
impacts adoptions just with the
additional sticker costs and things like
[45:16]
that. So,
>> okay. Kind of like the veterarians.
[45:19]
» Yeah. So, it's just it's like it's an
open discussion. Um but
[45:24]
uh just yeah, I I I don't know that
they're against it. I think that Um,
[45:29]
part of the thing is too was when they
started doing the rabies was also when
[45:33]
we were kind of starting this
conversation and seeing how that how the
[45:37]
new, you know, online system would work
and how we can direct those. Um, I set
[45:43]
up a resource computer in my lobby that
we could try to uh also help people get
[45:48]
like their licenses that way. So, I
don't I mean it's it's open for
[45:52]
discussion. They're not
>> Does KHS give the adopes instructions?
[45:57]
» They do give them the instructions.
And so they have a new CEO. Is that an
[46:01]
interim?
>> They are very close.
[46:05]
» Very close. Oh,
>> yes.
[46:08]
» I I heard one of the concerns about the
license was that maybe the dog didn't
[46:14]
work out or cat or whatever didn't work
out, they brought back. So maybe we need
[46:17]
to put some language in there that if
they bring it back 30, 60, 80, 90 days
[46:22]
that that they can use that license for
another animal or something. I think
[46:27]
that would maybe circumvent that
problem.
[46:32]
» And something that um uh
was talked told to me by a veterinarian,
[46:39]
I can't think of her name. She's cute
because [clears throat] I'm so old that
[46:42]
there I think it's called a kiosk.
There's a little you know what is a
[46:45]
little thing I'm old. The little square
thing that you
[46:47]
» That's a QR code. a QR code that the QR
code could be set up at at the animal
[46:53]
shelter and at KHS and also in
veterinarians where they just have to
[46:56]
clean in there and do that. Do you have
anything like that?
[46:59]
» We don't have anything like that. That'd
be easy to do.
[47:02]
» Well, that the city would supply.
>> We could do that for sure.
[47:05]
» Yeah. And so that would be like
>> who's going to pay for the kiosk?
[47:09]
» Well, it's not QR code.
>> Okay. So they would provide us a QR code
[47:15]
» and that could be on a website or we
could just scan it off of
[47:19]
» that's that's what she it's um um
because she said they could do that even
[47:25]
when they walked out with the animal or
whatever
[47:27]
» like your archa can be printed on
>> printed on and it could be on a placard
[47:31]
or sign.
>> Yeah, that's what they're saying. They
[47:33]
can just do it. Okay. Anyhow, um but so
they're still working on it with the new
[47:39]
staffing kai.
>> I'm sorry.
[47:43]
» They're still working on that. The
reason behind that,
[47:47]
George, if you recall, was that the
biggest number of animals coming into as
[47:52]
new animals in the state come from the
humane society. They were our biggest
[47:57]
biggest source of new and new animals
coming in and um it would be nice to get
[48:02]
those on the licensing situation. What
do most rescues do when they I mean they
[48:09]
make sure they have the rabies. Most of
them make sure they're stayed and
[48:12]
neutered. Do they give out information
for licensing or do they
[48:17]
» Well, I can't I can't
>> or does anybody ask them?
[48:22]
» I can't I can't say. Well, I can't speak
for other rescues. We generally tell
[48:27]
about them. Did we tell about the ones
that you took about getting them? Well,
[48:30]
we knew that you would license them.
>> Maybe.
[48:34]
I can't remember because she was she
adopted a lot of Dutch dogs a long time
[48:37]
ago from us and you adopted dogs even
longer
[48:41]
» one
>> one yeah a dog
[48:42]
» but we did that through the business
where I was working they were licensed
[48:46]
to them
>> um
[48:50]
let's see so then we talked about
increasing the license inform
[48:54]
information or uh enforcement by saying
reminders and phone calls and you guys
[48:59]
thought it was being done or was were
told it was being done I have to tell
[49:03]
you that I don't know of anyone in the
recent five years or six years that has
[49:09]
gotten a reminder. I used to get a
little piece of paper for a long time
[49:13]
ago in the mail.
>> The pink postcard.
[49:16]
» The pink. That's what everyone says. The
pink postcard that come in. Didn't have
[49:19]
Do you still have that?
>> No. I've seen one of those in years.
[49:22]
» Long time ago. I've said the same that I
haven't seen one in a long time, but
[49:27]
they tell me that they are going out
>> and I would like to see them go out by
[49:31]
email just because
>> that would make
[49:34]
» Well, I just licensed one of and I had
absolutely no issues. Took me five or
[49:38]
six minutes to license my dog last week.
>> And
[49:42]
um it does ask you at the end whether
you want the reminder by mail or by
[49:48]
email.
>> Oh, I know.
[49:51]
But it it was very simple to use.
>> Have you gotten a reminder? Has it been
[49:56]
a year?
>> Um,
[50:00]
» no, it hasn't been a year. I just I I
did one early kind of to so that I could
[50:06]
test it out.
>> Well, I know that [clears throat] um
[50:09]
that the veterinarians that I know like
Chuck Olsson who was a very good person
[50:13]
who always collected the licensing and
now is not doing it u anymore. Um he
[50:19]
says he hasn't seen one of those peak
cards forever. And that was a good thing
[50:22]
for them because it brought the dog in.
Okay. So they
[50:25]
» they would always served as a reminder.
>> Uhhuh.
[50:28]
» Beyond just our
cards anymore. [clears throat]
[50:35]
» Send out texts or like I get a text that
>> Yeah.
[50:40]
Well, has [clears throat] Jan, do you
know if that's something that they're
[50:44]
looking into making something that will
like this whatever the program that
[50:49]
they're using? Will they do that? Well,
>> I've been told that they do send out
[50:53]
hundreds of
I don't know what they look like.
[50:57]
» I'm sorry.
>> I was
[51:04]
» Well, [clears throat] I I I can I I
don't think Blair Doom seen them. I
[51:08]
don't think uh Scare has seen them. I
don't think I've talked to Chuck Ulton
[51:12]
have seen them. You haven't seen them.
So, and I haven't seen I haven't gotten
[51:15]
anything from my dogs and I just my vet
tells me, "Oh, you need to bring them in
[51:20]
on." And so, because I haven't gotten it
for my dogs. So, anyhow, that's
[51:24]
something that that was sort of not not
against other than that they don't have
[51:29]
personnel to do the phone calls and I
can understand that. Ellen kid kids kid
[51:34]
it would be nice if we knew a
veterinarian that we could lean on to
[51:39]
ask them especially if they're like a
bird by his chair now where where where
[51:46]
the dots aren't being connected
>> well that's that'sant
[51:50]
» I can tell you that you know people they
want value for the money that they spend
[51:58]
and I work really hard at conferring
value to the services that they get at
[52:04]
my hospital. They don't feed value when
they're paying a license fee. They
[52:10]
think, well, it's just going to some
bureaucrat and where that money goes
[52:15]
goes in their deep pole and when they're
But what's the value of
[52:22]
of the license? Maybe if we f saw some
value, they would be willing to go the
[52:28]
extra mile to part with those dollars.
Okay. So, that's a marketing. It's a
[52:34]
marketing.
>> And I know that Councilman High brought
[52:38]
it up at the council meeting a couple of
weeks ago and about the licensing and he
[52:45]
would suggested threw it out there that
have the money collected help support
[52:49]
the animal shelter and the and the needs
of the
[52:54]
of the animals.
>> They look at it as a tax. You are taxed
[52:58]
for the privilege of owning a pet and no
one that this is what
[53:06]
» this is the feedback that I would have
gotten that I have gotten
[53:11]
[clears throat]
>> fortunate that he said that. No
[53:13]
» because Trish is here and she's going to
explain it here in a little bit. Now in
[53:19]
lubing,
>> one of the things, one of the things
[53:20]
that I I will tell you that um Dr. Cowan
um a friend of mine uh used to use Dr.
[53:28]
Cow when he was there and that's and
what he said was I quit gathering
[53:33]
licenses when I found out it was going
to the general fund because I thought it
[53:37]
went directly to the animal shelter and
directly to help the animals uh that
[53:43]
they took care of like
>> or it is a tax.
[53:45]
» Pardon?
>> Therefore, it is
[53:47]
Oh. Oh, there it is. Well, no, because
he said he said
[53:52]
» Well, but also isn't the shelter funded
by the general fund.
[53:56]
» Well, and so that's what But is but does
all of the money that we take in from
[54:00]
licensing? Does that show?
>> But that's where it comes from.
[54:04]
» Yeah. And and when you're talking about
the license licensing department, um I
[54:09]
talked to my councilman this afternoon
who is um
[54:15]
class at Dalton and he said that there
are 80 licenses in the city.
[54:22]
» Yes.
>> And by the end of this year they hope to
[54:26]
have there is um to have 30 of them
digital. So, and I think there's only a
[54:32]
couple of people that actually work in
licensing that handle all of this. So,
[54:36]
we need to keep that in mind as well.
>> Yeah, that's one of the problems.
[54:40]
[clears throat]
>> The dog license fee uh could actually
[54:46]
cover most of the animal shelter.
>> It but but the most but the the dog
[54:54]
shelter animal shelter is becoming like
the buses. You're just a lose. You're
[54:59]
going to lose. It's money thrown. Well,
it's not thrown away. Those people need
[55:03]
it. But what I'm saying is they're not
making money. The buses aren't making
[55:07]
money. Animal shelters not making money.
But they could get closer if they could
[55:11]
get that 2.
>> I wouldn't say making money. It's being
[55:14]
able to provide the services.
>> I I talked with the outgoing city
[55:20]
manager and he did say it goes to the
general fund that 1530 whatever $50. But
[55:26]
he said if we see that this is bringing
in $3 million, we are going to funnel
[55:32]
some money to the shelter. So it's not
they get it in and spend it on something
[55:37]
else. they would start funneling in
maybe not one for one but maybe does
[55:42]
have you ever heard that Jan that if we
get more money for any fee or whatever
[55:48]
that and it goes into the general fund
they'll see where that money comes from
[55:52]
and then they'll send some money that
way because that's where we're getting
[55:56]
the money from. Does that make sense?
>> That's what Bob
[56:01]
» It's not what I do.
>> I know. Well, he's not here anymore.
[56:04]
» Yeah. Well, but I'm sure this manager
will do the same thing.
[56:08]
» That's what I've been told, but I don't
know for sure.
[56:10]
» I don't.
>> Okay. Now then, um we're going to go on
[56:14]
to improve the online information about
dog licensing. And I think that's been I
[56:19]
think that's been done. I I didn't have
too much issues when I renewed my dog's
[56:24]
license, but you had a little bit of
problems.
[56:28]
» I don't know. I mean, I got to the end.
I put in all the information.
[56:31]
» Did it work?
>> And then it said, "We can't do that
[56:33]
right now." And so you still haven't got
your dog's license?
[56:36]
» No, it's going to go out to the shelter
like that.
[56:39]
» Okay.
>> But when I talked to you, you didn't
[56:41]
think they had done anything since the
last meeting.
[56:44]
» The license.
>> No, I brought up Susan's issue to them
[56:48]
in with some other questions and things
like that.
[56:51]
» They I brought up Susan's issue to them
um and some other with some other
[56:58]
questions and things like that for you
guys and you know, for myself. uh
[57:02]
they're, you know, they do a lot of
things. Yeah. So, um they didn't get
[57:07]
back to it. They did say that they um
were having challenges with the software
[57:11]
not doing some of the things it wanted.
I don't know if that's specifically
[57:14]
around dog licensing or other licenses,
but that they had set set up to have a
[57:21]
weekly meeting with the the software
company to get some of these things
[57:24]
fixed. Um, so I just I assume you know
when Susan and I talked, we try to
[57:29]
figure it out and troubleshoot them
[clears throat] whatever happens.
[57:35]
» Okay. So I think uh in the PowerPoint
that the WP supported the idea that they
[57:40]
needed to upgrade things and I think
they have I think that it's easier to
[57:44]
get to that that part and then u they
wanted to prior it just said you could
[57:51]
only do a renewal and not an initial but
now you can do an initial. I've not done
[57:56]
an initial yet. I've just done renewals
and then support book licensing uploads
[58:00]
for vets. And I'm wondering if that's
where the Excel file came in from. Do
[58:04]
you think? Because see that would be a
bulk. I looked at that because I I did
[58:08]
you look at that. I I got it for
spayneuter and I said, "Oh my gosh, this
[58:13]
is ridiculous." Um and maybe they didn't
realize how much more work it would be
[58:17]
for the veterinarians to do that than
just the little blue forms. Um and maybe
[58:22]
they were thinking that would be a bulk
upload, but when I talked to Stea and I
[58:26]
asked her about it, she said, "Well,
that's because then we just have to plug
[58:30]
it in because we don't have to do that."
And my hey my my thoughts and I said it
[58:34]
to her were so you're asking the
veterinarians to do your work for free
[58:38]
and she said kind of yeah and so I did
offer something that's different that I
[58:41]
think um I wish licensing was here
because u Olsen they hated just not
[58:48]
doing something but they were not going
to they got upset over that so they quit
[58:51]
collecting the money but what they had
been doing and I don't know how many
[58:54]
other veterinarians are doing this and
maybe they're considered one of the
[58:57]
three doing it at the end of every month
they take the rabies certificate
[59:01]
of all the dogs they gave a reg in fact
I'm starting to do that at the clinic at
[59:05]
the sputer clinic and end they put them
in a packet and they send them off and
[59:09]
then they can say here these are the
people they haven't spent anything but
[59:11]
you can send out something to say they
need to pay their license and so they're
[59:15]
saying that but I thought that it'd be
easier if the veterinarians just sent
[59:19]
out the rabies certificate because on
that certificate it's got everything
[59:22]
that you need to know about what would
go on except for maybe an email and you
[59:27]
could I guess I could add emails and
then if you collected did money, you
[59:31]
stamped it, paid. I've got a little paid
marker then how much they paid and then
[59:35]
put those aside and have those that
didn't pay and those that did pay and
[59:38]
send it in that way. But I do believe
that we need to look at incentives for
[59:42]
the veterinarians to do something like
that. Okay, incentives to do something
[59:45]
because it when we when we researched
this, it said if you don't do it at the
[59:49]
time of of the rabies, it ain't going to
get done. 25% is going to get done. I
[59:53]
talked to a friend of mine and she said,
"Oh, I forgot. I've got that license.
[59:57]
It's in my drawer, but I I forgot. I I
haven't turned it in yet. And it's
[1:00:00]
something that they forget the minute
they walk in the door, the license, you
[1:00:04]
know, the RA service, you know, stays
down. So that's what we learned and they
[1:00:08]
said we have to work with, you know, we
have to get something working with the
[1:00:11]
veterinarians. Um,
and they they approved that. And the
[1:00:17]
last three things that we had was
basically incentives to try to get
[1:00:21]
people to license their dog. Okay. And
um the first one was a benefit of one
[1:00:27]
free ride home. One of the vet, one of
the states had one free ride home.
[1:00:30]
Obviously, they didn't have any free
rides. They were very stingy about that.
[1:00:33]
If the dog was microchipped and
licensed, everything, they would not
[1:00:36]
pick they picked it up, they check in
their license, sign it, and they give it
[1:00:39]
back to them. There was no charge.
Nothing. No charge on for the first
[1:00:42]
time. But I think that they you said
they kind of already do that, Emily.
[1:00:48]
» Say it one more time. I apologize.
>> Oh, I'm so sorry, Emily. I know.
[1:00:53]
» No, I'm fine. Go ahead.
um that the PD and I know they do that
[1:00:57]
because they'll call us and say hey we
who's the owner of this dog because they
[1:01:01]
didn't register give us and they said
because we want to take it back to them
[1:01:04]
and not bring it to the shelter. So
you're doing that more often. We are
[1:01:08]
doing that more often.
>> Pardon?
[1:01:09]
» We are trying to do that more often.
>> Yeah, but you
[1:01:12]
» has to be home.
>> What?
[1:01:14]
» The owner has to be home.
>> Yeah. So you just can't just lose it,
[1:01:18]
» right?
>> Yeah. But anyhow, and then the last
[1:01:20]
three were uh something that Mike Marlet
looked into and it was really pretty
[1:01:25]
ingenious. Uh and it and in that
particular situation, it did increase
[1:01:29]
the numbers of licensing. That was that
really cool license where they had
[1:01:33]
little coupons that people, you know,
PetSmart and everything would give them
[1:01:38]
for $5 off or whatever. And so it
basically if they got you know how you
[1:01:42]
get those little coupon cards that you
buy and they've got a whole bunch of
[1:01:45]
things you can you pay $10 for it and
then you get $20 worth of stuff. And
[1:01:49]
they said that they had very good I
don't know which I don't know which
[1:01:53]
state it was that did that or city that
did that. Mike Mike was the one who
[1:01:57]
picked it up and I can't remember what
it was. But anyhow, um and those I think
[1:02:02]
uh we weren't we didn't know if that
would really go over but we were hoping
[1:02:05]
it would and maybe one day we could
because I think it would be a good
[1:02:09]
incentive for people to have a cool
license for their dog. Did Did you look
[1:02:13]
at the the slides?
>> I Well, I didn't look at this I I
[1:02:19]
watched the presentation.
>> Okay.
[1:02:21]
» And they didn't mention that. Yes. I So
I Okay. sounds, you know, who's going to
[1:02:27]
administer that? They're going to go
around and and solicit
[1:02:32]
» businesses for such a thing.
>> And that was a concern that they had,
[1:02:37]
» but I'm and I'm sitting here going, you
know, I think Smart Pick Wolf Gang would
[1:02:43]
love to have their names on there with a
little $5 coupon, that little thing that
[1:02:47]
they could click on, but I don't know.
But they said they didn't have troubles
[1:02:49]
getting people on. So, but it does take
time and we don't have
[1:02:53]
» so it's front end on the costs and so
someone's got to it's an investment and
[1:02:59]
so and the local government has to buy
into that idea of an investment.
[1:03:05]
» No, I understand that Mike said that by
the way he's pretty good at it. He said
[1:03:09]
hey I could do the program for you but I
don't think they would want to get in
[1:03:12]
their programming do because I could do
the whole program for you the credit.
[1:03:15]
Okay. So that's what was so those are
the recommendations. So basically,
[1:03:21]
uh, we just had a couple that you didn't
take, I think. Is that right? You So, so
[1:03:26]
the it was pretty much agreed upon by
the PD and the finance and, uh,
[1:03:32]
licensing at that time. Okay. Then it
was presented to the city council. I'm
[1:03:36]
going to correct myself and say August
13th, uh, and 2024, and it passed seven
[1:03:42]
to zero with the city council. And I
think the city say council people I I
[1:03:46]
listened to that video and they had a
lot of good questions that they were
[1:03:49]
asking you about it. So you know I think
they got involved with I think there's
[1:03:53]
some ideas. So that is that answers what
what was pro you know what happened with
[1:03:59]
the licensing. Um, and uh,
I
[1:04:06]
since then I've had some communication
with with you, Jan, about the fact that
[1:04:10]
maybe
that the licensing staff is overwhelmed
[1:04:14]
because you've added a whole bunch of
licensing hand. How many did they say
[1:04:17]
you have?
>> 80
[1:04:18]
» 80 different licenses. Do all licenses
bring in revenues or do you have
[1:04:23]
licenses that don't?
>> Most of them do not bring in enough to
[1:04:26]
cover. They bring in they cost money,
but they're they're so low dollar that
[1:04:31]
they don't it's not a money maker. So,
do you do you not agree that if you get
[1:04:37]
$800,000 in dog licenses that that's a
revenue for the city or not? Yeah,
[1:04:41]
» I don't know that it matters what I
think.
[1:04:43]
» Well, I mean I mean I guess does the
city not agree that because that was one
[1:04:48]
of the things is it gives the city
revenues that then they can just offset
[1:04:52]
some of the
>> I don't know where your 80,000 is. I
[1:04:55]
said 2.9 million, but go ahead.
>> I I understand, but I know I'm talking
[1:04:58]
about 800,000. Uh the money in like 2010
it was 800,000. I shouldn't say 80,000.
[1:05:03]
800,000. Uh that that should help. Um
anyhow um so we need to make licensing
[1:05:11]
easier for the staff and um I I'm
concerned about what that means. You
[1:05:17]
know, what is it that they're having
troubles? I'm assuming it's input
[1:05:21]
data entry. When I said easier, I didn't
mean I just mean I thought it was a good
[1:05:26]
time to come up with suggestions.
>> Okay.
[1:05:28]
» And when you come up with them, be
realistic about it that you don't want
[1:05:33]
like I don't know that the coupon card
is realistic because who is going to go
[1:05:37]
out?
>> Oh, I'm not going to That's not
[1:05:39]
» So that's what I meant. I don't mean
that the staff never complains.
[1:05:42]
Licensing doesn't complain. They have a
they have a very good department. I just
[1:05:46]
meant I think we did our best to take
your last set of suggestions and we used
[1:05:52]
a lot of them and I think we are open to
more suggestions but you just have to be
[1:05:57]
careful about not
working within what we have working with
[1:06:02]
the people we have. They're not going to
hire more people for this. I doubt maybe
[1:06:07]
I'm wrong. Sometimes they do things and
I'm surprised but they did buy a new
[1:06:12]
software. They do buy software to help
this stuff happen. So when I said
[1:06:16]
easier, I didn't mean easier on the
people. I just meant realistic.
[1:06:20]
» Okay. Now, is the software that you have
now just for dog licensing? Is it or for
[1:06:25]
all licensing?
>> They have they bought a subset for dog
[1:06:30]
licensing.
>> Okay. And have they looked at other
[1:06:33]
subsets because they're still using the
one that I had some complaints about,
[1:06:37]
correct? Or do they did they renew that
or did you look at other softwares?
[1:06:40]
» I don't look at the software. I just
know that they [clears throat] told me
[1:06:44]
that they pay a couple hundred,000 a
year. Were you not needing a couple
[1:06:49]
hundred,000 a year for that
>> for software for that
[1:06:53]
» for the license for the dogs license?
>> Oh, maybe it was 30,000. I'm sorry. I
[1:06:57]
need to get my numbers. I thought I
emailed you the number. I didn't get
[1:07:00]
that number. I didn't get that number.
>> Okay. I have the number. I see I feel
[1:07:04]
like they said like they have like they
have a software that's for all of the
[1:07:08]
licensing
>> and then there's
[1:07:10]
» but they have to buy a build. Yeah,
that's what I mean by that. They have an
[1:07:14]
add-on
>> for what they need and I'm I should not
[1:07:17]
butcher the numbers.
>> It's not I I think I'm butchering those
[1:07:21]
numbers. I have those numbers. Okay. I
thought I
[1:07:24]
» 30,000 sounds.
>> Yeah.
[1:07:26]
» And then a update fee every year.
>> Yeah. [clears throat] I love that.
[1:07:31]
» Well, um, so,
uh, I know that when you sent me an
[1:07:37]
email, you suggested that there be a
committee, a subcommittee or a committee
[1:07:41]
that works with Emily and then
eventually with the licensing department
[1:07:45]
to come up with ideas. And I think one
of the things is to come up with ideas
[1:07:49]
with um, for veterinarians to try to get
veterans to to buy into it. I mean, I'll
[1:07:55]
send one time you said we could send you
some cookies every week.
[1:08:00]
Remember you said that in September of
September mean you sent some cookies.
[1:08:04]
» Anyhow, so
>> it's amazing you buy them off
[1:08:06]
veterinarians off of food for
>> buy food. Send them send them something
[1:08:12]
from from firehouse subs or something
and that would be expensive. Anyhow, so
[1:08:17]
um I would like
>> and I know you're going towards the
[1:08:22]
subcommittee, but my question is the
board were really not working on
[1:08:26]
anything else at the time. I don't see
why we can't do this as a board instead
[1:08:30]
of doing a subcommittee because we would
have public input
[1:08:35]
and
um the research could be divided between
[1:08:39]
the six of us.
>> I mean, we've already got questions. I I
[1:08:45]
asked that to Jan and she said a
committee would be better. I asked her
[1:08:48]
if it would be getting if she got you
all I don't I mean just you you don't
[1:08:52]
meet often enough. You won't get a lot
done. Yeah.
[1:08:55]
» We also have we also have the authority
to have special meetings.
[1:08:59]
» Yes, I agree. You have this could be
your committee.
[1:09:02]
» Yeah.
>> I just didn't know if you want to
[1:09:04]
include citizens. Um if that was the
point of
[1:09:06]
» I was told at one point that the
subcommittees have to be public.
[1:09:11]
» Did you? Yeah. So, you've got citizens
there.
[1:09:15]
» Well, I'm gonna I'm gonna counter that
with a motion that we go ahead and do
[1:09:20]
what we asked the last meeting, which is
to convene the original subcommittee
[1:09:26]
and with the addition of Jason as a
veterinarian
[1:09:30]
uh and uh get with Emily because then we
can get it's it's not just us doing it
[1:09:37]
together. It's a as a committee and our
committee.
[1:09:39]
» Well, we have the committees. I mean
Janice said we could be the kinetics.
[1:09:43]
» Well, I'm talking about do you guys all
want to come together once a week?
[1:09:48]
That's what we did once a week and talk
about it. I think it'd be easier with
[1:09:52]
the committee. Uh but it al also the
committee then instead of the board the
[1:09:57]
committee in it and also had citizens on
there. Tony was on there. Um, uh,
[1:10:04]
a veterinarian and I don't know why I
don't I cannot think.
[1:10:09]
» Yeah, Teresa Burks was on there. She
wasn't on the board and then also Chris
[1:10:13]
was on there as a citizen. So, the
committee was did include citizens in in
[1:10:17]
the committee and with Emily on there
and you said that we should not go to
[1:10:22]
the work with the licensing yet, but we
should come up with some ideas. But we
[1:10:26]
we've had to talk with licensing to find
out what they would what they would
[1:10:30]
like. You can submit a list of questions
and we'll get them answered from them.
[1:10:35]
But they really don't have a dog in this
fight, no pun intended. Um they're
[1:10:39]
licensing. They don't owe this animal
services anything more than they don't
[1:10:45]
owe a board. They owe employees. They
owe city council. They have city of
[1:10:50]
Witchah um
[1:10:54]
people um answers, but they don't
directly answer to a board, a an animal
[1:11:00]
board. So, I think it's better to leave
them out of it and submit a list of
[1:11:05]
questions
>> uh and and it's up to us. We're supposed
[1:11:08]
to help you and get you the stuff you
need so you can run a committee or or
[1:11:12]
meeting
>> hold our feet to the fire, not theirs.
[1:11:17]
and we'll tell you if they're not
answering and that's not like them.
[1:11:19]
They're going to answer if we I'd like
to go through with the motion that we
[1:11:23]
do.
>> How are you going to publicize this
[1:11:26]
meeting these meetings?
>> Uh it usually was publicized uh at the
[1:11:32]
uh um on the the thing that they said
that we were meeting in such and such a
[1:11:37]
place.
>> But what's that thing
[1:11:39]
» on the police department thing? And I
don't know how can you how can you make
[1:11:43]
it?
>> It would be on the website. So if people
[1:11:46]
have put in their notice that they have
open meeting uh request if they want the
[1:11:50]
notice they will get personal notice for
the open meeting but they'll also they
[1:11:55]
can put it on the website about the
meeting.
[1:11:58]
[clears throat]
>> I'm going to take the driving of the bus
[1:12:01]
from uh from Ellen as she's been running
you over with it keep saying Jan did
[1:12:07]
this, Jan said this. Let's go with what
Jan said. Let's send her that's what she
[1:12:12]
said. Let's send them the questions and
let them answer the questions. We don't
[1:12:16]
need to have any meetings or any boards
or nothing. Just send You just heard
[1:12:20]
her.
>> Yeah, I just
[1:12:21]
» I mean I think we could come up with a
list,
[1:12:24]
» but we won't be doing No,
>> not tonight. I don't think we can do
[1:12:28]
that.
>> You We still have until seven. You
[1:12:32]
already know what most of the questions
are and we could just send them and
[1:12:36]
» might be the quickest way. Trust me.
I'm in favor of generating list of
[1:12:42]
questions. I think that's
>> okay.
[1:12:44]
» That's a a good use of our time that we
have.
[1:12:47]
» So, no second on the on the committee.
>> Okay. Then that motion fails and so
[1:12:53]
we're going to go through and generate a
list of questions, but it's that's going
[1:12:58]
to that's going to make it slower. I
will just tell you right off the bat,
[1:13:01]
it's going to make it slower, I think.
>> How could it be any slower from March
[1:13:04]
until August of another year? A year and
a half. Really? Because you guys had
[1:13:09]
your committee before I was on.
>> Yeah.
[1:13:11]
» And
>> it was March and it went till the next
[1:13:14]
year.
>> A lot of it didn't go into her. I We
[1:13:17]
can't go any kicking back. We'll just
send her some questions.
[1:13:22]
» Okay. And uh Jason, can can you I would
like to see
[1:13:28]
I would like to see more representation
from veterinarians to give us some ideas
[1:13:33]
how to get off. And I wanted to ask, do
you guys have a local organization of
[1:13:37]
that?
>> No, it's loose knit.
[1:13:39]
» Okay.
>> It's on Facebook,
[1:13:41]
» but you could at least start maybe with
that.
[1:13:43]
» Yeah, we could start with I I could
start with that. And uh there'll be
[1:13:49]
plenty of opinions. I will
>> Yeah, I mean there's vocal there's a
[1:13:54]
vocal minority as there always is,
>> right?
[1:13:58]
» And Chris Scar says she could do
something. Does she does she run some
[1:14:02]
sort of a talk or chat or something?
>> Christian Scare.
[1:14:05]
» Yeah.
>> Well, she's she participates in that
[1:14:09]
forum
>> in that form. Okay.
[1:14:11]
» Frequently, I say,
>> could I make a quick comment?
[1:14:15]
» Yes. Now, now we have Let me if Sorry,
I'm going to leave. Sorry, I have to be
[1:14:19]
somewhere. But I'm all for this. I will
help you get the information you need,
[1:14:23]
but I needed one list, not a scattering
of emails from different people asking
[1:14:28]
different questions. If you all would
come up with one list and email it to
[1:14:31]
me, I will get you the answer to
anything that I'm allowed to get you the
[1:14:35]
answer to. If I'm not allowed, I will
give you an answer why you don't get it.
[1:14:39]
» Okay.
>> And can we whoever sends that, can they
[1:14:42]
send it to all of us so that we're all
on the same page? As long as
[1:14:47]
we don't email everyone back.
>> Yes.
[1:14:50]
» Yes.
>> Okay.
[1:14:51]
» Okay. And I'd like to have any input
from the from the public. Okay. Um, I
[1:14:57]
went to my vets's office today and
talked to them about the licensing
[1:15:00]
because in the past I years ago I lived
in the county and anytime I got my dogs
[1:15:06]
vaccinated, they did county license. I
moved to the city and then they did the
[1:15:11]
city license. Well, my dog's not due
until September, so I haven't had it
[1:15:15]
this year. So, I went to ask him, "Are
they still doing that?" And I was told
[1:15:18]
no and I asked why. And I was told and
this is the office manager. I didn't
[1:15:24]
talk with that. And she said, "Well,
part of it is they want us to do the
[1:15:28]
spreadsheet. I don't have time for a
spreadsheet. They've got all this the
[1:15:32]
spreadsheet that they want me to put all
this information." And she says, "I
[1:15:35]
don't have time for this." Reason number
two is the vet wanted to send those in
[1:15:40]
with a check to pay for them. Licensing
will not accept that. They want it all
[1:15:45]
online.
>> It's been told. Yeah.
[1:15:48]
» So, that would be one question.
>> A credit card,
[1:15:51]
» you know.
>> Yes. What's the best way to record the
[1:15:55]
questions?
>> Yes. Yes. So, um,
[1:15:59]
» right.
>> Yeah.
[1:16:01]
» So, question and and that's something
that you need to check with the
[1:16:05]
veterinarians on that.
>> That's how it was in the old days.
[1:16:11]
» Send a check in.
>> Yeah. They'd send a check. We'd collect
[1:16:15]
the money. Then we'd send we had a pile
of stack of the triplicate forms and you
[1:16:23]
know and they'd send that stack in and
with a check and that's how that worked.
[1:16:28]
And then the county license I mean
hardly anybody paid the county license.
[1:16:33]
» I did.
>> You're a good person though.
[1:16:36]
You know,
>> I will say that when I went to pay that
[1:16:40]
um it was you could use a debit card,
credit card, and supposedly you could do
[1:16:45]
an a
straight out of your checking account,
[1:16:48]
which is what I wanted to do, but it
didn't. I like that. So, actually, I
[1:16:52]
think that would be another question.
>> Okay. Um,
[1:16:57]
» most clinics have a a credit card that
they could use for such a thing, but not
[1:17:04]
everyone would. Um, there's not a
there's not a uniform way that people
[1:17:09]
get, you know, they get paid
take payments. There are some places
[1:17:15]
that, you know, I still swiping the
swiping the credit card thing, you know,
[1:17:20]
so that makes it tough for
some of the less progressive
[1:17:25]
veterinarians to pay.
>> I mean, maybe we don't even worry about
[1:17:29]
them. It's the the ones that are up with
technology.
[1:17:32]
» Okay. So, the question to ask would be
uh what other ways can uh can the
[1:17:37]
veterinarians pay for the
>> you have to ask would be Go ahead.
[1:17:41]
» You know, willing would you be willing
Okay.
[1:17:44]
» To reconsider
being the collection agency.
[1:17:50]
» Well, that's the question for the vets.
I think we're trying to collect
[1:17:54]
questions, but
okay. That's a question that I would
[1:17:59]
have
>> because first we got to find out if they
[1:18:02]
are willing to do anything.
>> If licensing says no, then it doesn't
[1:18:06]
matter what.
>> Right.
[1:18:07]
» Right. full license
>> because the vets say no then it
[1:18:11]
» because it used to be they you you paid
your bill they sent it they handed you
[1:18:15]
the thing you wrote out a check and you
mailed it and I sometimes I would write
[1:18:20]
them a check and you just stuck it in an
envelope right there and it was mailed
[1:18:23]
to the city
>> let let if let's spitball is what we're
[1:18:27]
doing maybe six or eight good questions
let's not give them 20 or 30 but hold on
[1:18:31]
a second Helen please um
>> we have another Trish wants to come and
[1:18:37]
speak.
>> I guess you know that
[1:18:39]
» trying to recognize me, George.
>> Yes, I've been trying to say
[1:18:43]
» Yeah, I wanted them to be able to
>> Anyone else that would like to speak?
[1:18:46]
Yes, Trish. Yes. Um, and you guys got an
email of what I was going to say, so I
[1:18:51]
don't I sent it through the board email.
>> Read it. Read it so everyone can.
[1:18:55]
» I don't need to [clears throat] read it,
but I'll recap the important parts in a
[1:18:58]
conversational way because that's
better.
[1:19:00]
» Okay. I don't have the email.
>> Well, that way we'll I can I can send it
[1:19:05]
to you different. Um, but basically I'm
here because I I haven't always lived in
[1:19:12]
Witchah and I've been surprised that it
the collecting the license didn't happen
[1:19:17]
at the veterinarian. And I think
considering the fact that 16 years ago
[1:19:22]
we had 40,000 licenses that were
collected and we've made $800,000 as a
[1:19:27]
city. Um, then now we're talking 8,000
licenses a year. That's that's a
[1:19:34]
significant problem in process and and
you're asking questions to figure out
[1:19:39]
how to fix those processes and I think
that's exactly what is needed but it's
[1:19:44]
also needed to have the citizen input to
push the getting the answers. We we all
[1:19:49]
have to be engaged in talking to our
city council people so that it becomes
[1:19:53]
something more important to them to get
pushed through. Um, and I think when
[1:19:58]
I've been talking to my veterinarian and
to other veterinarians, one of the
[1:20:03]
things is is they've told me about the
spreadsheet, which is just undoable.
[1:20:08]
Um, and then [clears throat] also I
think it's unrealistic and unfair for us
[1:20:12]
as a as a community to ask veterinarians
to do something that takes their
[1:20:17]
people's time and effort and energy
without paying them for it. So, I really
[1:20:21]
think it's important if we're asking
veterinarians to collect licenses for
[1:20:25]
the city, which is going to mean a
substantial revenue stream, whether it's
[1:20:30]
2.9 million, at least 800,000,
um then then we should be giving them, I
[1:20:37]
suggest just to chuck a number out
there, $2 per license. That seems like a
[1:20:41]
reasonable not nothing fee. something
that that could compensate for hopefully
[1:20:47]
it's not taking more than 10 minutes per
license uh in doing now maybe I'm wrong
[1:20:53]
I I'm not totally knowledgeable so but
just saying if we need to be able to
[1:20:59]
compensate for the work that they're
doing on the city's behalf and on our
[1:21:02]
citizens behalf because as I'm also
talking to my animal friendly friends
[1:21:08]
the people that I know that are picking
up strays around town I mean they you
[1:21:12]
know people that are just really
engaged. I talked to my one friend and
[1:21:16]
she's like, "Does does the city do
licenses? This is an animalged person
[1:21:22]
who doesn't know that the city does
licenses." And and [clears throat] she
[1:21:26]
goes, "Well, why why would you do
licenses, Trish?" And I said, "Well,
[1:21:32]
so that you can make sure that rabies
vaccines are done. So that you can help
[1:21:37]
to fund the animal services that the
city does." And to your point and your I
[1:21:42]
think everybody's point, I think it's
important in the marketing campaign that
[1:21:46]
the city might do that we do change how
we I know nobody likes designating
[1:21:53]
dollars because it makes budgeting
harder, but if we can say 50% of all
[1:21:59]
licensing goes specifically to animal
related issues in Witchah, then you're
[1:22:05]
what am I paying for? You're paying for
the shelter. You're paying for
[1:22:08]
spayneuter clinics. You're paying for
animal control officers. That's part of
[1:22:13]
that marketing piece and that buy in.
What What am I getting with this 15
[1:22:16]
bucks? What am I What am I getting?
>> People would be willing to pay
[1:22:22]
» if they knew that that money was going
towards
[1:22:26]
» all of this.
>> I agree because people hear the general
[1:22:29]
fund and although it comes out of the
general fund, all they hear is general
[1:22:32]
fund
>> and they don't know how much of that
[1:22:34]
goes%.
Well, because when I was talking to
[1:22:37]
Dalton this afternoon, I said because I
asked him about um the animal shelter in
[1:22:43]
general and he he said, "I just got it.
It's 900 pages and I haven't started
[1:22:46]
reading it yet."
>> The the budget.
[1:22:50]
» Oh, yeah.
>> So, um he will let me know.
[1:22:53]
» Well, and and I think that it help
>> He did say he did say that it he saw
[1:22:58]
that it has an increase. So
>> I I think it does make a significant
[1:23:03]
difference to the population, especially
considering that all the conversations
[1:23:07]
we're having around trust and
transparency that we do something that
[1:23:11]
is so transparent as to say licensing
income 50% equals animal issues. Bing
[1:23:18]
bing bing bing, right? That's something
very clear line because when it goes all
[1:23:22]
into the general fund then it becomes a
polit not a bad word but a political
[1:23:28]
decision as to what gets spent where and
if the public isn't engaged in speaking
[1:23:34]
loudly and forcefully for animals and
the spending therein then that may not
[1:23:40]
get funded in that year right something
else may be taking priority and if we
[1:23:45]
can if we can concrete ensure a certain
certain percentage of that licensing.
[1:23:51]
Again, it goes to the marketing. People
know that their money is going where
[1:23:55]
they care about. It's doing something
for them in their community. They're
[1:23:59]
sure of it. Um,
>> it's also education, which is one of our
[1:24:05]
» mandates.
>> Mandate. Well, what we're on. So,
[1:24:09]
» and what else, Trey?
>> So, I'm just going to recap with the
[1:24:12]
three things that I was asking. And
again, I'll get the email to you and all
[1:24:15]
the
>> It went to spam.
[1:24:17]
» Oh, okay. Great. Well, I mean, not
whatever, you know.
[1:24:21]
» Yes.
>> Um, partner with veterinarians to
[1:24:23]
collect license fees at the time of
rabies vaccination. I don't if
[1:24:28]
veterinarians are like my husband, you
don't tell them to do it. [laughter] You
[1:24:32]
ask them nicely and you have incentive
for why they could partner with the city
[1:24:37]
to do it. A $2 per license uh fee for
them that they get to keep. Um,
[1:24:42]
compensate clin modestly. $2 per license
to cover the time and encourage
[1:24:46]
participation. modernize and adequately
staff the licensing system so
[1:24:51]
veterinarians and residents can submit
information quickly and efficiently. And
[1:24:55]
it sounds like they're already doing
weekly conversations with the with the
[1:24:59]
the
coders with the programmers, right?
[1:25:03]
They're working on it. And sometimes we
can't just say get it done and it gets
[1:25:07]
done. It's in a process. Okay, we get
that. But we also have to say, but we
[1:25:12]
need to make sure the process works
because the QR code, my vet had a QR
[1:25:17]
code on the wall. I scanned the QR code.
It was it was not active. [laughter]
[1:25:22]
So, you know, it Yeah, it's one of those
things that I have tried to license my
[1:25:28]
dog before and ran into a dead end. And
so, we're all very busy. When we get
[1:25:33]
home, the piece of paper goes onto the
pile of to-dos and the urgent things
[1:25:39]
stay at the top. and everything else
floats down. And so I think it's very
[1:25:44]
obviously that's happening. 40,000
to 8,000.
[1:25:49]
That's that's an issue. That's something
that has to be corrected. And and it's
[1:25:55]
not because people love Witchah less or
their animals less. It's a process
[1:26:00]
issue. And that's where you as a board
are thankfully asking great questions
[1:26:06]
that can get to what those process
issues are so we can get them fixed and
[1:26:11]
we can [clears throat] get back to
80,000 licenses because from what I
[1:26:14]
understand there's probably over a
100,000 animals in dogs in Witchah that
[1:26:20]
could be licensed and if we're capturing
80 that's much more realistic. Um, and I
[1:26:25]
think we could do that. And then we're
getting into the millions of dollars in
[1:26:29]
revenue that, you know, people can
actually support spay and neuter clinics
[1:26:34]
so that we don't have as many stray dogs
and our shelters aren't overrun and all
[1:26:38]
the things. So thank you for your time
and thank you sincerely for your service
[1:26:43]
on this very important issue because
people don't come and
[1:26:49]
engage and serve the way you guys do um
in very many aspects and I you guys
[1:26:55]
thank you very much for what you do.
>> Yes, George,
[1:26:58]
» when you said $2, I saw uh Jason like
two and if it did take 10 minutes six
[1:27:05]
times two is 12. I pay my people more
than $12 an hour. So maybe three might
[1:27:10]
be a better number because that's $18 an
hour. I bet his
[1:27:14]
» that's a veterinarian conversation and
and I think the city should be open to
[1:27:18]
that.
>> Is it responsibility or are you giving a
[1:27:22]
convenience fee to the pet owner? You
don't have to go home and do this.
[1:27:26]
» That's what I was thinking about.
>> And so I think that's a debate at some
[1:27:30]
point. I would like to know um can you
send those of us that are not vets a
[1:27:36]
copy of this spreadsheet that
spreadsheet that they want you to
[1:27:40]
» I can I can print it out. Well, I'll
try. Yeah, I'll just send I'll just send
[1:27:44]
it to you. I'll send you what they sent
to you. Okay. You look at that. Now, my
[1:27:47]
thought is okay. Um Chris Gar said,
"Well, I don't want to be paid to do
[1:27:52]
this. I'll donate it back in there." So,
there are some vets who just wait just
[1:27:58]
wait. Just wait. Just wait. So I think
that I think that we need to talk to the
[1:28:04]
veterinarians. These are things that we
can ask the license committee. But we
[1:28:07]
also we can't do anything even until we
get a feeler on the veterary clinics.
[1:28:12]
And one of the police I think it was um
so I can't think of who it was that told
[1:28:16]
me he said you know a lot of veterary
clinics are not owned by corporates and
[1:28:20]
corporates have no buy in and are they
going to be the ones who said we're not
[1:28:24]
going to do that? You know she said
>> then we need to get the education out
[1:28:27]
there so that their clients say okay I
want this convenience.
[1:28:32]
Well, it's we need we need to talk to
the veterinarians. And so this is where
[1:28:37]
this is where maybe um you and I can get
together and figure out what we can send
[1:28:42]
out to the veterinarians. Okay.
>> Do you have like a list of all local
[1:28:47]
» Well, oh yeah, let's go to the yellow
pages, right?
[1:28:51]
» Yeah. No, I can put a list together. But
so that's something that we can do in
[1:28:55]
addition to getting questions for them.
But
[1:28:58]
» I want right now
I want to mention right now that I think
[1:29:03]
that we should have a special meeting
over this and have a special meeting for
[1:29:07]
just discussion of licensing and let the
public know that can come in and talk
[1:29:12]
about it.
>> I think we need some answers first.
[1:29:15]
» Well, I think that we're going to get
some answers and some more questions if
[1:29:19]
the if we have more people right that
are there. But I think maybe
[1:29:24]
» it will it's also be another time for us
to talk about it because we cannot just
[1:29:29]
we we're going to have to have a meeting
to talk about it.
[1:29:32]
» Well, and hopefully like say we do that
in 30 days or whatever or whatever.
[1:29:36]
» Well, I was thinking
>> um
[1:29:38]
» more like in two three weeks.
>> Okay. But hopefully we'll have answers
[1:29:43]
back from the licensing and
you might at least have some feedback
[1:29:50]
from the vets.
>> Well, I don't I don't think that I think
[1:29:53]
that we should go back and think about
what questions we have
[1:29:57]
» we do because that
>> and then come back and then come back in
[1:30:00]
a couple weeks and and have a I hate to
say this a special meeting. It'll be
[1:30:05]
like instead of a subcommittee just
going to be the whole board, okay? where
[1:30:08]
we can have it listed that we're gonna
be discussing licensing and people can
[1:30:11]
listen to what we're talking about and
maybe we can have some veterinarians.
[1:30:15]
» Let's talk to Emily and see if we can
use that room right there, you know,
[1:30:20]
that little conference room
>> and then they can go do their little
[1:30:23]
tour and say,
>> "No, no, because you have to be able to
[1:30:27]
let the public come and that's not
enough place for the public." Okay. So,
[1:30:30]
that would not work.
>> 50's public. How many more are coming?
[1:30:34]
20. I I do want to work on the question
because we've only got
[1:30:37]
» read back the questions that you wrote.
>> Okay. So far I just have um licensing
[1:30:42]
accepting checks or credit card a
payments and what other ways can people
[1:30:49]
or what are the ways people can pay? Are
they going to a cashless? That's really
[1:30:54]
um
and then would you well the vets that
[1:30:58]
was a question for the vets. So that's
really the only thing is payment. That's
[1:31:02]
only that's the only question I have. So
far
[1:31:04]
» I know
>> are same.
[1:31:06]
» Okay. And you have something you would
like.
[1:31:08]
» Quick comment. Vince Hancock. I
volunteer on Wednesday mornings at a
[1:31:12]
local senior center. I work with seniors
in technology. And as arguably the
[1:31:17]
fourth youngest person in this room, we
have a lot of seniors that like to have
[1:31:21]
options in payment. Meaning some of us
still remember that in God you trust,
[1:31:27]
all others pay cash. So, while I
understand our governments really love
[1:31:33]
to move to a cashless society because it
makes things easier for them, a lot of
[1:31:37]
us seniors say, "Hey, in fact, a lot of
the ones I work with say, I want a paper
[1:31:42]
invoice. Thank you." And others say,
"Text it or email it." But they want the
[1:31:46]
choice to be able to do that. And I
think it's appropriate for the citizens
[1:31:49]
to push back to say electronic options
are good, but when you take away the
[1:31:54]
older paper options of I would like to
pay in cash, I would like to pay with
[1:31:59]
check. I would like a paper invoice. I'm
even encouraging my seniors, if your
[1:32:04]
business, like say your utility business
wants to charge you a dollar a month for
[1:32:09]
getting a stamped envelope with a paper
invoice, that's a reasonable recovery of
[1:32:15]
their cost. But you just I I've had one
company, one utility company say, "Uh,
[1:32:20]
we will not give you uh paper invoices,
otherwise we're going to charge you $20
[1:32:25]
a month."
>> Really?
[1:32:27]
» They're out of town, but still.
>> Now, now I will say that when I talked
[1:32:30]
to um
Alejandra with licensing, she kept
[1:32:36]
telling me that people are mailing in
their licensing, and if they're mailing
[1:32:40]
in their licensing, they've got to be
paid with ship,
[1:32:42]
» right? So, I'm not quite sure that
that's not happening.
[1:32:45]
» And that would be one of our questions
in
[1:32:48]
» from the vet. And another
>> Oh, they would accept from the vets.
[1:32:50]
Okay. I think from the people his check,
>> they would not accept his.
[1:32:55]
» Um, one other thing is I did ask the
question, would a $2 fee from the city
[1:33:02]
help you to offset your cost? Would you
be willing to do licensing then? And she
[1:33:07]
said, probably not. I don't have the
time. And they're saying too they can't
[1:33:11]
hire people to work in their office.
They've only got two people in their
[1:33:15]
office. They usually have four.
>> Okay. I'm gonna for Spain Kansas, we're
[1:33:19]
going to start except we're going to
start uh you know paying although we
[1:33:24]
have the poorest of the poor who are
going to say we only paid $50 for the
[1:33:28]
surgery and now you're going to pay
charge me $15 for a license. But we have
[1:33:31]
some people that would. Okay. But um um
>> so what other question? I just I know
[1:33:38]
» just wait. I just wait. I think and I
want to just something that we can that
[1:33:43]
Jason you and I and some other vets can
talk about or you know you can visit is
[1:33:47]
is that if you just print off which is
what Olsson does the rabies certificate
[1:33:52]
and they you stamp it. Do you still have
a stamp that you stamp or did you not
[1:33:57]
did you not get one of those? I was
we're number 61 as a vendor.
[1:34:01]
» I'm just a veterinarian. I don't Brenda.
>> It's It's not your Yeah, we need to have
[1:34:05]
» my wife who does that and she's she's
like, "Who's got time for this? Who's
[1:34:10]
got
>> Okay. Well,
[1:34:12]
» because we don't we have hard enough
time getting the stuff done that we need
[1:34:16]
to get done for the business.
>> And it is it is hard to do. And now we
[1:34:22]
it's it's I mean I hate to be that
devil's advocate because I'm I have to
[1:34:26]
pay for all this food, but I got a
business to run and it's like you you
[1:34:33]
want me to do what? This is my wife
talking. She's a veterinarian, too.
[1:34:37]
» She's you want me to do you want you
want us to do this? Oh, spreadsheets.
[1:34:42]
Oh, my head's going.
>> Oh, that was the worst thing they ever
[1:34:44]
did. But if all you do is I printed off,
in fact, I started printing off three
[1:34:49]
baby certificates. And maybe it's not
that hard, but when you add, it's a
[1:34:54]
mental hurdle, I guess. And then there
are some that like Kristen Scare, she is
[1:34:59]
a public service-minded person. She got
that from her dad. But this is a new day
[1:35:04]
and there's not that many people that
have a
[1:35:08]
public service. And that extends into
the professional realm, too. Even though
[1:35:13]
And it's like we as veterinarians, we
give, we give, we give. And now you're
[1:35:16]
asking me to give some more. So that's
this is going to be something that that
[1:35:21]
maybe you and I can work with and come
up with something with there. Yes,
[1:35:25]
Trish.
>> So that I want to get Nancy is rightly
[1:35:29]
so trying to get to questions and I
appreciate that, but I think that's one
[1:35:32]
of the questions that really is key to
ask
[1:35:34]
» because licensing needs to be asked. How
can we make the information system from
[1:35:41]
veterinarians to you easy and seamless?
you know where we're like scanning the
[1:35:49]
RA they send in the RA what they're
already doing the radius certificate
[1:35:52]
scanning those in and that is callulling
the I mean how can we make it so easy
[1:35:58]
it's not
>> well first we're going to assume that
[1:36:00]
the veterinarians will have buy in
>> sure
[1:36:03]
» so you have to market to them too not
only just the general public
[1:36:07]
» yes sir
>> I mean maybe even more so
[1:36:09]
» correct
>> so so I think what we need to do is
[1:36:13]
visit with the veterinarians and find
out who's in favor who's going to say no
[1:36:18]
and who would and maybe they have some
ideas and then then present that at the
[1:36:23]
meeting and say these are some ideas
that the veterinarian has given us will
[1:36:26]
you accept them okay what can you work
with us
[1:36:29]
» along with that question how can we make
it easier for vets to submit info I
[1:36:35]
think yes
>> and then also to say to see can you send
[1:36:40]
us the
the procedures you have now So that
[1:36:46]
» I'm gonna send out to you guys. Can you
>> I'm gonna send out the the the Excel
[1:36:50]
file I was ask to fill out. Okay. Yeah.
Did you look at that? Did your wife look
[1:36:54]
at that Excel file?
>> No.
[1:36:56]
» An Excel file. It would be nice if you
>> She looked at that.
[1:36:59]
» It's an Excel file.
>> But it would be nice if they they gave
[1:37:02]
you something that you've already got
this information and then downloaded.
[1:37:06]
» They they gave us something, but I'll
just tell you what. I'll send it out. I
[1:37:09]
almost did that and but I said, "Well,
anyway, I'll send it to you guys in a
[1:37:12]
couple."
>> All right. So, I have two questions so
[1:37:14]
far. Um I think I think maybe there was
a question that we might have gotten
[1:37:19]
lost which is what is the I would like
to know what is the breakdown of uh
[1:37:24]
people using the system to pay and
people paying by check
[1:37:30]
» or people mailing in their
>> Okay. So what is breakdown? Okay. So I'm
[1:37:33]
going to say
>> so how are people engaged with the
[1:37:37]
licensing system?
>> How are they getting their payments
[1:37:40]
made? Right. a check in the mail come
into
[1:37:44]
» and then also how many vets how many are
received by vets because you still have
[1:37:50]
» well I know but how many licenses was it
100 licenses was it 50
[1:37:54]
» oh you mean
>> you know I don't and I don't know if
[1:37:56]
they can numbers
>> right received
[1:38:01]
» and
I would also like to ask them how
[1:38:06]
manyear licenses have they come have
they in fact I've already asked them I
[1:38:10]
think didn't you Ask them that, Emily.
That was one of the questions. How many
[1:38:14]
three-year licenses have they taken in
and how are they
[1:38:17]
» two year, two years?
>> Or the two one, two or three years.
[1:38:20]
Break down how many licenses are one
year, two year, or three year. And I
[1:38:23]
asked him, "Why would you do two year?"
And she said, "Because we have some
[1:38:25]
people that come in from another city
that has a three-year license. They've
[1:38:28]
already paid for the one year from them.
And so, they're only going to be for two
[1:38:32]
years, so they only pay for two years."
And so, that's why they have one, two,
[1:38:35]
and three tiered situation.
>> I got a question for Jason real quick.
[1:38:40]
Get your crystal ball out. So, let's say
there's 140,000 dogs in Witchah.
[1:38:47]
Not how many of them are going to a vet?
Not forget the license for a second. How
[1:38:52]
many would you say percentage of those?
>> Huh? Less than a half round half. So,
[1:38:57]
70. So, [clears throat] 70,000. So, the
rest are just not not going to a vet.
[1:39:04]
» And that I think too comes down to
>> they're going to us for emergency stuff.
[1:39:09]
But as far as
>> not for the rabies shot, no. Ain't
[1:39:13]
happen. So what half? Okay.
>> Well, and also we do have an awful lot
[1:39:16]
of clinics do give free rabies now. We'd
have to engage in them to see how they
[1:39:22]
could get that done because we just But
let's go back to what what we're going
[1:39:25]
to ask to I that's why I think that's
why I think that we should because I've
[1:39:29]
got to go on to finish this thing up and
poor Emily sitting there thinking please
[1:39:34]
Ellen make it a short meeting. I think
that we need to have another meeting. uh
[1:39:39]
to just talk about the licensing and
have it be an open meeting and invite
[1:39:42]
some of the practice managers maybe to
come and and uh and give their input.
[1:39:50]
» Maybe we need to give more time to
prepare for that than two weeks.
[1:39:55]
» Well, I think I say we'll do
>> we can throw it out there.
[1:39:58]
» We [clears throat] can do it for three
weeks, not two weeks. We can do it in
[1:40:00]
three weeks. Have a meeting in three
weeks.
[1:40:02]
» Bring cookies.
>> Bring cookies. I'll bring food.
[1:40:05]
» I'll bring food. You're a good cook. you
can bring something. Um,
[1:40:10]
and I know that it's hard on people to
to do this, but I think if that's how
[1:40:14]
you're going to do that, we're going to
have to act like that. I mean, we can't
[1:40:17]
just say, "Well, let's all get
together." And I think we would have a
[1:40:20]
serious issue with co with coma being,
you know, sitting in this stuff because
[1:40:24]
right now we're able to talk back and
forth. We can't do that on the internet.
[1:40:28]
We cannot do that on email. And so I
think we just [clears throat] have to
[1:40:31]
have a meeting and uh and invite the
people that are interested with some
[1:40:35]
ideas and in three weeks do you think we
could talk within
[1:40:40]
» only try?
>> Okay. We could put out a How about if I
[1:40:43]
generate a survey
>> and how about if I generate a survey and
[1:40:48]
send it to you and have you look at it
and then
[1:40:50]
» I'll put my name on.
>> Don't put your name on it.
[1:40:52]
» I will put my name.
>> You'll put your name on. Okay. Good.
[1:40:54]
We'll generate a survey. Okay. To send
out.
[1:40:56]
» Put my name on.
>> And to put your name on.
[1:40:58]
» Okay. Question number five is several
people have said no reminders are being
[1:41:02]
sent out
>> and that's true.
[1:41:06]
» I I have to say so who gets the
reminders? Do you opt in for a reminder
[1:41:10]
like like you opted in? Right.
>> Right.
[1:41:14]
» So
>> did you get it?
[1:41:15]
» Well, I don't know because I just did it
till next year.
[1:41:18]
» And this one is actually I did a two
years. So I'm not going to know for two
[1:41:21]
years.
>> Why would you opt in? It should be it
[1:41:23]
shouldn't have opted.
>> Agreed. Agreed. But we if we find out
[1:41:26]
even
>> I have a big suspicion on how that's not
[1:41:29]
happening for most people. We've got
last year's 8,000 um things and this
[1:41:34]
year's 8,000 things or slated to be if
it trend whatever. I think they're only
[1:41:40]
doing people who did license last year.
So all the people who did, you know,
[1:41:45]
that because it's a process thing and
they're not going to waste money sending
[1:41:48]
mail because pit dogs died and so they
don't want to send out to people five
[1:41:52]
years ago who haven't sent in a license.
But if licenses have gone down so much
[1:41:58]
that they're only sending it to the
hardcore I'm going to give you my money
[1:42:02]
if I have to shove it down your throat
people. Then those are only the people
[1:42:06]
who are getting reminders anymore and
that's why nobody's seeing reminders.
[1:42:11]
It's a it's a process issue and so
they're sending them
[1:42:15]
» if they were if we're going to ask the
veterinarians how many get reminders.
[1:42:18]
How many of their their clients get I
don't believe that they're sending them
[1:42:21]
out. I hate to say this,
>> but I don't believe they're sending them
[1:42:24]
out.
>> And if your dog died, is there and you
[1:42:27]
get a reminder?
>> Is there a way to on there it says the
[1:42:30]
dog has been deceased? Yes. Okay. Yes,
>> it has. Yes,
[1:42:33]
» it's supposed to be on the reminder.
>> It used to be there.
[1:42:37]
» Okay.
inter led with that she is the president
[1:42:41]
of when which is the independent
neighborhoods for all of Witchah and she
[1:42:46]
has a page and she could get that
information out for us some
[1:42:51]
» plus we've got um College Hills the
neighborhood that I live in and we've
[1:42:55]
got the big um thing at the pool coming
up and why can't we talk to people have
[1:43:01]
people come with little things saying
hey did you remember we actually do have
[1:43:05]
licensing and here's what it goes four
and
[1:43:08]
» I've actually been invited to a
neighborhood association in district 4
[1:43:13]
to to kind of update because they've
never really been talked to about even
[1:43:19]
all the changes and so uh we're going to
be scheduling that and before and I I I
[1:43:26]
speak at the DAB and this is to you guys
about every two or three months an
[1:43:30]
update at the district advisory board
what's going on and that would once we
[1:43:36]
kind of have some ideas, I would really
encourage to do that. And then when I
[1:43:41]
first got on, I did email
um everyone who had a neighborhood
[1:43:46]
association or an HOA and I actually got
invited to a couple of events to hand
[1:43:51]
out uh information and I got pamphlets
from the shelter and and so we're
[1:43:56]
supposed to be doing some education and
and I would encourage
[1:44:01]
» and and we can once we get that
>> Where is that? Oh, I'm sorry. So
[1:44:07]
» off topic.
>> What's that?
[1:44:09]
» The flyer.
>> The flyer.
[1:44:10]
» Oh, flyer. Oh, for this.
>> Well, no,
[1:44:13]
» it does talk about licensing though.
Talks about just what we
[1:44:16]
» Does talk about anything about license?
I don't
[1:44:19]
» I don't think it did.
>> I don't know.
[1:44:20]
» I'd have to go look, but and and I know
that we're going to update some of those
[1:44:25]
flyers
>> and flyers or there's a flyer marketing
[1:44:30]
has a flyer in our lobby just for
license
[1:44:32]
» for licensing. Can you send that to us?
We only have dog license. Well, you mean
[1:44:37]
like not other random city licenses,
>> but 80 licenses. So, is there one just
[1:44:42]
for dog license?
>> Yeah.
[1:44:43]
» Cool.
>> Can you send could do email copy that
[1:44:46]
email? Sure.
>> Okay. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm gonna go
[1:44:50]
ahead because we do have so getting kind
of close and I'm just going like this.
[1:44:54]
Um,
no, that's I'm not I'm just I'm just
[1:44:57]
kidding. You weren't doing that. Um,
then can I make a motion that we agree
[1:45:02]
to meet in three weeks?
We have to find out the time and the
[1:45:08]
place
and it has to be on I can well Stephanie
[1:45:15]
she's not with us anymore. Stephanie can
send out something uh
[1:45:21]
whatever or else I'll do it until next
meeting. I don't know. But we do need to
[1:45:26]
we you know this has been going on too
long and we need to start looking at it
[1:45:30]
[clears throat]
>> and uh this is a good good thing that's
[1:45:33]
come up here.
>> Three weeks would be August 5th.
[1:45:37]
» I mean if we could make it exactly
halfway in between or okay that would be
[1:45:41]
good.
>> July and September.
[1:45:43]
» Okay.
>> Halfway in between September.
[1:45:46]
» That would be the n Whoops.
>> That'd be four weeks.
[1:45:49]
» That' be the 12th. And by that time,
maybe we would have time to to really do
[1:45:54]
a good show.
>> Come up with something a draft and then
[1:45:57]
Okay.
[1:46:00]
» And I'm gonna send you guys what they
sent us. And I think you're going to be
[1:46:04]
shocked.
>> Well,
[1:46:07]
they're going to be shocked with with
what they sent to the veterinarians
[1:46:11]
because there's two things that you got
to do and you got to do one then you got
[1:46:15]
to go into another thing. You got to
import into subject. It's a mess.
[1:46:18]
» Okay. There's eight Wednesdays between
this meeting and the next.
[1:46:24]
» So it would be it so we'd either do it
the 12th or the 19th would either be the
[1:46:27]
fourth or fifth week.
>> Uh
[1:46:31]
» 12th
>> 12th.
[1:46:34]
» Okay. Uh and so we'll do the we'll do
the 12th and see. Um I'll send out
[1:46:40]
» Well, we can What's What do you guys I
don't need to send out I think because
[1:46:44]
we've got everyone but Stephanie here.
Yeah, you just send it. We Well, send it
[1:46:49]
to me and then you can send it to
everybody else too as a CC.
[1:46:54]
» Okay. CC survey.
>> No, no, no.
[1:47:01]
» Talking points for veterinarians.
>> Oh, I Yes, I can do that.
[1:47:07]
» Okay. So,
>> so we have five questions. I think
[1:47:13]
» we have five questions for them.
Yeah, that was it.
[1:47:17]
» Licensing.
>> I have licensing the the money, how
[1:47:21]
they're paying payment options, which
covers quite a bit of um how can we make
[1:47:26]
it easier for the vets to submit info
the break. Okay, that's question number
[1:47:31]
three is the breakdown um between
digital checks in the mail um or how
[1:47:37]
many came through the vets. And then
question number four is how many one,
[1:47:41]
two, and threeear licenses. And then
number five is on the reminders.
[1:47:46]
» Okay. Well, I would do a number six one.
I'm gonna say what do they think would
[1:47:51]
be could would help them. So I would
suggest
[1:47:53]
» Okay.
>> What could you what information could
[1:47:56]
you give us that would make your job
easier? Okay. So that would be this the
[1:47:59]
next one.
>> Can I can I recommend just I'm not
[1:48:02]
trying to change but no it's what you're
wanting to ask which is how how can what
[1:48:07]
are your recommendations for getting
licenses back to the 40,000 license
[1:48:13]
level.
>> That's that's
[1:48:16]
not the quite that's not the
>> Can you repeat what you said?
[1:48:19]
» Okay. Say what would make
>> what would make their job easier to get
[1:48:24]
this taken care of and then
>> participation. Yeah. Awesome.
[1:48:28]
» And then they could say, "What do they
recommend we do too?" So that would be
[1:48:31]
two different questions.
>> Well, I'm my question is what what do
[1:48:35]
they think they can do?
>> Yes.
[1:48:38]
» In their changing in their process to
get
[1:48:41]
» Yeah.
>> I mean, they know their process. They
[1:48:43]
know
>> 40,000 is to 8,000 is a huge change.
[1:48:48]
What they can give suggestions to you
guys and how they think they can get
[1:48:53]
back up to 40,000. I would think they're
professionals. Let them problem solve.
[1:49:00]
» Okay. So, the problem that we have now
is that we've got some questions.
[1:49:03]
Hopefully, you can type them up and send
them out to everybody, but we cannot
[1:49:08]
talk about it. Okay. Because we cannot
do anything. I mean, we can talk three
[1:49:13]
and three,
>> but we're can we can talk, but but so
[1:49:17]
that's why we need to have a committee
because we can't do this. We cannot do
[1:49:22]
this by the by email. We can't because
it's going to end up getting us in
[1:49:26]
trouble because people are going to be
saying, "What about this? What about
[1:49:29]
this?" And all a sudden we have
discussion over not the same questions,
[1:49:33]
but we have a discussion over the same
agenda item. Okay.
[1:49:37]
» If we get the answers [clears throat]
>> and one of us has questions on the
[1:49:43]
answer, we could always send it to Emily
>> and she can send it on.
[1:49:48]
» I don't know.
We can do that. We cannot do that. But
[1:49:52]
you could you could just email Jan, but
you can't email the rest of us.
[1:49:55]
» But then but then that's that's coming
back and forth. That is that is a
[1:49:59]
meeting. Okay. If Jan answers it and
answers all of us, that's breaks or even
[1:50:03]
for that breaks coma. So I will I'll
verify this. But I'll tell you what they
[1:50:08]
say. You don't even you know you you
>> I'm not saying that we that we send our
[1:50:14]
questions to all of us.
I'm saying if we have a question on the
[1:50:20]
response, we could send it to Jan or to
Jan or or
[1:50:24]
» but I think I think that the question
should be all it should not be just an
[1:50:29]
individual here and here and here and we
don't I think it should be a questions
[1:50:31]
that come as a poll. Okay. So let's just
what's going to happen is we're going to
[1:50:36]
go ahead and have a meeting in in a
month. Okay. Time and place will be
[1:50:41]
determined
>> and and do we think we'll have answers
[1:50:43]
to those questions at that time? No.
Well,
[1:50:47]
» I hope so. Why would we not? We can send
those away.
[1:50:50]
» We can talk about
send those to Emily to send to
[1:50:56]
Emily and Jen. Will you take those
>> and send those to them? Okay. And tell
[1:51:01]
them that we would like answers by the
next meeting which would be
[1:51:08]
» 12th of August.
>> August.
[1:51:12]
What was
>> I saw? What was your question for what
[1:51:16]
did you
>> Well, I I was trying I thought I was
[1:51:19]
trying to get to the same place, but but
it's what would their recommendation be
[1:51:24]
» how to get licensing back up to previous
high levels of 40,000 licenses? What are
[1:51:32]
their re process recommendations? And it
would whether that's email reminders of
[1:51:36]
past or working I mean whatever. What
are their recommendations for getting
[1:51:41]
back up to past higher levels?
>> It's somewhat same. I'm just saying what
[1:51:48]
that's
I'm trying to say what how is it going
[1:51:52]
to be made easier? Okay. How can we do
that? Because I'm saying
[1:51:56]
» recommendations to make this
>> what what is what is the most difficult
[1:51:59]
thing about this that's hard for you to
do or something like that.
[1:52:02]
» Yeah. So I have two on that. I have what
would make your job easier? What
[1:52:06]
obstacles you
>> face? That's a good What obstacles do
[1:52:10]
you face? That's a good That's a good
way of putting it.
[1:52:12]
» Yeah. So, I think that there are two two
parts of it.
[1:52:17]
» Do you have any recommendations?
>> What do you think about how things come
[1:52:20]
into
>> Okay.
[1:52:22]
» I know we elected you first chair for a
reason. [laughter]
[1:52:28]
» Okay.
>> We have seven questions.
[1:52:31]
» Okay. And you're going to send those?
>> I will send all of us to
[1:52:37]
» CC. Yeah, just send them all and that
should be maybe by the end of the week.
[1:52:41]
» Oh yeah.
>> Okay.
[1:52:43]
» Um
and I'll send you what I've got.
[1:52:46]
» Okay. Any other questions? We got to go
on because almost to leave and I've just
[1:52:51]
got a few more things to go over.
>> I have one question. The animals that
[1:52:55]
get reclaimed from the Witcht Animal
Shelter, uh, when they go out to the the
[1:53:00]
door with their owners, are they
required to buy a license?
[1:53:03]
» Yes, they are.
>> Yes, they are. So, when a when an animal
[1:53:07]
is picked up by animal control, you can
buy when an animal's picked up, they
[1:53:09]
pay, if it's not spay or neuter, they
pay a $75 spay and neuter. They pay a
[1:53:14]
$15 license fee and they pay for a
rabies vac. No, they don't. Yeah, they
[1:53:20]
do pay for $25 for a rabies vaccination.
And then they also have to pay whatever
[1:53:25]
else cost.
>> Well, and I would say that they pay the
[1:53:28]
$15 for the for the license, but that
doesn't mean that they get the license.
[1:53:32]
They still have to go proof because a
lot of times, well, most of the time
[1:53:37]
animals are licensed. They also don't
have rabies or they don't have anything
[1:53:41]
they need.
>> And that's and we get
[1:53:44]
» and so they have to go get the rabies or
get them spayed neutered and then they
[1:53:48]
can get the actual license. But I don't
know that a lot of them get back.
[1:53:53]
» Well, we get the ones that come in from
city vouchers from you guys. They get
[1:53:57]
everything because we tell them that we
say, "Okay, now did you pay for the
[1:54:00]
rabies? Did you pay for the for the
spade duter?" And no, the license
[1:54:03]
doesn't come to us with that. But now
that you got the rabies that said the
[1:54:06]
license is free of course you take all
this stuff and you've already paid for
[1:54:09]
the license, but you have to take it
back. So that we do that on a regular
[1:54:12]
basis. Okay. Okay. Any questions? Okay.
We're going to go on with just I I
[1:54:18]
presented last time I presented a a uh
something that you guys couldn't read
[1:54:23]
and so I I peaceiled it and I want to
talk to you about the KGA AFI
[1:54:29]
regulations uh that are changing and I
mean I'm so frustrated I don't know what
[1:54:34]
to say because I found out more
information. So this is a process that
[1:54:37]
has to go through. Uh it no it was not
we did not have any regulations that
[1:54:43]
went live at all. that was the program
that allowed them to um do this by email
[1:54:50]
instead of tape and page. And so I think
Stephanie was a little confused about
[1:54:53]
that. But on September 2025, the uh the
regulations were submitted by the state
[1:55:00]
agency to the department. They went to
the state agency. Then they went to the
[1:55:04]
department of administration. They
passed through that. They went to the
[1:55:08]
attorney general's. And guess what
happened? the attorney general found out
[1:55:11]
something was not right with the with
the recommendation. So they sent them
[1:55:15]
all the way back to the state agency.
Okay. And so now they went back to the
[1:55:19]
state agency. They are went through the
department of administration and as of
[1:55:23]
today they're stuck in
the AG's office, the attorney the
[1:55:28]
attorney general's office and um nobody
knows what's going on with those
[1:55:33]
regulations except hopefully KPA has
filed a coma requirement
[1:55:40]
uh for what the new regulations look
like because they started off in one
[1:55:44]
way. They went through here the attorney
general said uh oh there's a problem
[1:55:47]
with this and we don't like it. So they
sent it back. So they made some changes
[1:55:50]
then they sent all the way back and now
we want to know whether those changes
[1:55:53]
are going to be sufficient or not. Then
they still have to go through a bunch of
[1:55:57]
different things. So I just want to let
you know that the regulations as of I
[1:56:03]
think it was in 2022 or no 2023 when pay
when they when they
[1:56:10]
» kicked everybody's behind because they
decided they wanted to be really nasty.
[1:56:15]
And so the uh regulations that determine
all these terrible things that rescues
[1:56:21]
and shelters have to do are still stuck
in the AG's office. Still stuck in the
[1:56:26]
AG's office. It's so frustrating. But
this is a this a whole deal about how
[1:56:31]
what these things go through. And um if
if they get to this the uh step four um
[1:56:38]
if they get through and go through step
four, step five, then the regulations
[1:56:42]
will be made public to the public and
then there'll be a public hearing and
[1:56:47]
then if that doesn't go back, they can
also then go back and go go return to
[1:56:52]
step two. Okay. So, it's just
frustrating. It's just real frustrating.
[1:56:57]
So, um they're not they're not anywhere.
is you know if you know us if you know
[1:57:05]
someone if you can contact your you know
senate your senator or your
[1:57:08]
representative
>> is this the one and which can you just
[1:57:11]
for the record say which one you're
talking about which
[1:57:14]
» this is the regulations this is all the
regulations
[1:57:16]
» all the regulations
>> for k for AFI against and I say against
[1:57:20]
because I feel it's against uh animals
in the animal shelters um about
[1:57:27]
requirements that they can't be moved
here or there neonatals have to starve
[1:57:30]
to death
>> that's what I Yeah.
[1:57:33]
» No, the neonatals, the neonates, but
they're not regul They not regulations.
[1:57:37]
They were ordinance and that failed.
Okay. So, that does not go included in
[1:57:41]
the regulations. Yes.
>> Just got a couple quick things. Um, I
[1:57:45]
had a crown drilled on today. So, if I
said or made nonsense at times, the
[1:57:50]
dentist may have went a little too far
up into my roof of my mouth and the
[1:57:55]
novacane might have penetrated my
cranium. Um,
[1:58:00]
in July of 2015 is when the animal board
started, July of 2015. So, we're talking
[1:58:06]
11 years ago. Um, and Stephanie and I
were the only two individuals who have
[1:58:12]
been to every meeting since then. And
then also, Chief Snow is reti retiring
[1:58:17]
in uh August if you haven't heard. And
she's coming to speak to me neighborhood
[1:58:24]
on um the 20th of uh July. and then
Grand View Metal Arc on the 21st and uh
[1:58:32]
we're making her a cake a bulk night and
uh and we're going to send her off uh
[1:58:37]
into her retirement.
>> Okay. And they hired one of somebody
[1:58:41]
today.
>> You know who it was?
[1:58:43]
» Chief Meyers and he's out of Houston. I
believe he's second in command in
[1:58:48]
Houston.
>> Out of out of state.
[1:58:50]
» It'll be on at 56. Okay.
>> It'll be on at 56.
[1:58:53]
» Do I hear a motion to adjurnn?
>> I move we adjourn. I'll second.
[1:58:58]
» All those in favor?