[1:20] Hello everyone.

[1:23] >> Hi.

[1:24] >> I don't I'm sorry it's at the ceiling. I

[1:27] don't have control about that camera,

[1:28] but you can see me in one of them. Um I

[1:31] know Lori's here. I'm sure she'll come

[1:33] down in a moment with her, myself, and

[1:36] Brandy. I believe that's enough for a

[1:38] quorum out of our five.

[1:42] I don't know whether or not Severin is

[1:44] going to join and didn't hear back from

[1:47] Chloe. So, at least be three of us

[1:50] voting.

[1:52] Um, but I have to wait for Lori to

[1:55] really start. So, we'll just Sorry. Hang

[1:59] tight for a minute.

[3:25] Hello.

[3:26] >> I lost out.

[3:27] >> Well, good. I know. I did, too. Well,

[3:29] Sean's here. I Lori is still not quite

[3:32] here yet, but

[3:35] >> I'm glad we have another voting member.

[3:43] We're just hanging tight for Lori for a

[3:46] minute.

[4:18] Well, I think she's walking down. I will

[4:20] go ahead and call the meeting to order.

[4:22] It's 503.

[4:26] Uh, let me write that down.

[4:28] I circulated meeting minutes in an email

[4:31] a few minutes ago. So, hopefully

[4:32] everybody had time to review that. My

[4:35] goal um today the agenda was sent out is

[4:38] to one approve our last meeting minutes

[4:40] from March 30th, 2026 and then also to

[4:44] do another review. We saw um you know

[4:46] the draft of the strategic plan um and

[4:50] matrix last meeting. Um

[4:55] we will consider it for approval today

[4:59] as well as that one pager that Daniel

[5:02] sent over. um earlier this week and he

[5:05] could present that and we can review it

[5:07] together in this meeting before we move

[5:10] into any sort of vote. But uh let's well

[5:14] first I'll uh this I am Kirsten Thompson

[5:18] the chairperson of the community

[5:21] development committee. Um also in

[5:23] attendance is Sever Johnson Lori Thomas.

[5:28] Uh Carrie Malovich is on the call as our

[5:33] um city council liaison as well as uh

[5:36] Brandy John's, community development

[5:39] committee member and we also have Daniel

[5:41] Jensen on the call from Sunrise

[5:43] Engineering. Um,

[5:48] if

[5:50] we could

[5:54] move to the next item on the agenda,

[5:56] approval of the March 30, 2026 meeting

[5:58] minutes.

[6:02] Would anybody like to make a motion?

[6:05] I'll make a motion to approve the

[6:07] minutes of March 30th, 2026.

[6:10] >> And I'll second that.

[6:13] Sever and second. Uh, all in favor?

[6:17] >> I

[6:20] >> Let me keep Randy.

[6:23] >> Okay. Uh, moving on to the next item.

[6:27] Daniel, if you'll just take a moment, if

[6:30] we could just do a quick review again,

[6:32] show some of the updates.

[6:35] I know there nothing too substantial has

[6:37] changed, but um if we could just review

[6:40] those and then answer any questions,

[6:42] we'll start there.

[6:44] >> Do you want me to share my screen so

[6:45] people can see the

[6:48] >> uh Are we talking about the Excel draft?

[6:50] >> Let's do both. Let's start with the

[6:52] Excel draft and then we'll go over the

[6:54] one page. Well, whatever it is, one or

[6:57] two pager. Um yeah, let's start with

[7:00] that Excel draft. If you could share

[7:01] your screen, that would be helpful for

[7:03] the rest of us. Okay. Here

[7:06] we go. So, as a reminder for everyone,

[7:08] we've been working on the general plan,

[7:10] planning commission's reviewing that's

[7:12] going to go to council for review. And

[7:14] the strategic plan outlines the goals

[7:17] that we are focusing on in the more

[7:20] immediate future over the next one to

[7:22] three years. And so, this document

[7:26] outlines those goals. We have the

[7:28] corresponding chapter in the general

[7:30] plan that these goals relate to. What

[7:33] the specific action step is, which

[7:35] general plan goal it relates to.

[7:38] Sometimes it's close to verbatim to the

[7:41] same goal. Other times it's maybe a

[7:43] little bit broader and encapsulates

[7:46] multiple goals. Other times this action

[7:48] step is more specific, right? And we may

[7:50] have one or two action steps uh to point

[7:53] us toward one of the general plan goals.

[7:55] So, they don't always perfectly align

[7:58] and that's just the nature of tasks, you

[8:00] know. Um,

[8:01] >> Daniel, could I interrupt you for a

[8:03] moment? This isn't the I don't I don't

[8:05] necessarily mind about the not the color

[8:08] coding, but this doesn't look like the

[8:09] version I sent that was a table.

[8:12] >> Yeah, you're right. Let's see. I have

[8:14] >> Sorry to interrupt you.

[8:15] >> Yeah. Um,

[8:17] you are right. Let's see.

[8:24] But I did like your explanation on how

[8:26] the goals are possibly the same or

[8:30] different because that that was one of

[8:31] my questions on how the strategic goals

[8:34] were different from the goals in the

[8:36] general plan.

[8:39] >> Yeah. And it needs to be updated as

[8:41] tasks move along, right?

[8:44] >> Sorry, what were you saying, Kirsten?

[8:46] Well, I feel like what you were saying

[8:48] is that you were talking about column C,

[8:51] which is pointing to

[8:54] >> what

[8:56] goal in the general plan the action step

[8:59] aligns with most closely.

[9:03] >> Yes, we have the action step and then

[9:04] the Yeah. And these don't always

[9:08] match verbatim, right?

[9:11] Um, so let's see. Oh, Kirsten, you sent

[9:14] it to me. I think what happened is I

[9:16] didn't

[9:18] save it in the file. So, let me pull up

[9:20] my email. Sorry.

[9:24] >> Yeah, if you you're welcome to not

[9:25] screen share if you don't want all of

[9:27] this.

[9:28] >> Yeah. Right now, are you just you're

[9:30] just seeing my one screen, right? Or do

[9:31] you see both?

[9:33] >> Uh just the one.

[9:34] >> Okay.

[9:37] >> He has a hidden screen. Yeah,

[9:39] >> I do. I have two monitors.

[9:48] While we're waiting, I'm I'm on my way

[9:50] driving home and the elk are kind of by

[9:52] the mailboxes. It's nice to see them

[9:54] out.

[10:04] Here

[10:14] we go.

[10:14] >> So, this is the one that you're talking

[10:16] about, the one on the right. Yes.

[10:20] >> Okay.

[10:21] >> There you go.

[10:22] >> There we go.

[10:23] >> Okay. So,

[10:26] >> if you're familiar with Excel, so the

[10:29] top allows you to then filter

[10:32] um like if you're planning commission

[10:34] and responsible parties, you could

[10:36] filter by just anything that applies to

[10:38] the planning commission. Or if you're

[10:40] like city council, what are things that

[10:42] are immediate? Then you could filter by

[10:45] things that immediately need to be

[10:46] looked at.

[10:47] >> How do you do that? Show.

[10:48] >> So, the little square on the each

[10:51] column. Um, that one's probably not like

[10:54] the best example. Go to responsible

[10:56] parties.

[10:57] >> Right here. Here we go.

[10:59] >> And then you would just click whichever

[11:01] one.

[11:02] >> We'd want these to be like as close as,

[11:05] you know, consolidated cuz it's going to

[11:07] be unique, like if there was spaces or

[11:09] something and

[11:10] >> it's going to then have Ted and Dave as

[11:13] two different things. But I think those

[11:15] mostly are not repeats. So anyway, and

[11:20] then um if if you scroll a little bit

[11:23] and I don't know, feel free to give your

[11:26] opinion. I do not necessarily want to

[11:30] die on the hill of these being

[11:31] colorcoded, but I didn't know if it if

[11:34] it was easier from a visual standpoint

[11:36] to kind of see the different

[11:39] uh topics

[11:41] um visually

[11:43] with separation of color or

[11:44] >> I like the color coding, but

[11:47] >> if it's too busy,

[11:48] >> it might not work when it's if it gets

[11:50] printed that would be too that it makes

[11:53] it hard to read, but if it's just in a

[11:55] electronic form arm. It's all right.

[11:58] >> Yeah.

[11:59] So, I don't have a strong opinion

[12:01] about that. If you don't want the color

[12:03] coding or if you guys feel like that's

[12:04] not going to be effective, but um

[12:09] Yeah. So, any opinions on the look and

[12:13] feel of this so far?

[12:17] Do we like it as is?

[12:20] I think most of this was input by, you

[12:23] know, Daniel meeting with Ted and

[12:25] meeting with um

[12:29] I don't know if you were able to get

[12:30] insights back. I It sounded like you

[12:32] were waiting to hear back if Wayne was

[12:34] going to get back to you.

[12:37] >> Yeah. So, I've not heard back. Um I've

[12:39] not met with Wayne. Also, uh PTR,

[12:45] I think it's PTR, not PRT. I always get

[12:47] that mixed up. PTR. Um, I have not heard

[12:51] back from them. I don't believe they had

[12:55] another meeting here in April. So, yeah,

[12:59] I don't know if it would change much.

[13:02] Um,

[13:04] >> yeah.

[13:06] >> Okay. Well, if we feel comfortable, this

[13:09] is supposed to be a living breathing

[13:12] document. It's not supposed to be

[13:13] something that

[13:15] um our committee they can't we want to

[13:18] be able to pass it forward to the city

[13:20] council and for them to add in tasks or

[13:22] work with the PTR committee to add in

[13:24] tasks um that they feel like will then

[13:27] help them accomplish the goals of the

[13:29] general plan. So, if we feel comfortable

[13:32] that this at least provides a starting

[13:34] point for council and city employees to

[13:38] be a a usable

[13:40] um city tracker

[13:44] um

[13:45] are there any thoughts about that? How

[13:47] do we feel about that?

[13:49] Okay. So, is there a way to make the top

[13:52] um row frozen so that as you scroll down

[13:55] it will always be visible?

[13:57] >> Good call. Um cuz I forget what column

[14:01] I'm in.

[14:02] >> It should be in view I think.

[14:07] And then freeze panes

[14:10] and

[14:12] kind of top row.

[14:14] Good thinking. Okay. And then

[14:22] so how are the general plan goals and

[14:24] the strategic plan goals? I mean, are

[14:28] they this?

[14:29] >> There aren't strategic plan goals.

[14:31] There's action steps

[14:33] >> that align with the general plan.

[14:36] >> Yes. So, these are the steps they're

[14:38] going to take and who's responsible for

[14:39] them to then get to the plan goal.

[14:44] » Any other is that as an action is

[14:47] completed, we would move to the next

[14:49] step. Right? The goals always stay the

[14:52] same until the goal is checked off. But

[14:55] this document would be um updated

[14:58] frequently hopefully, right? Hopefully

[15:01] actions get checked off and new ones get

[15:03] added on and two to three years from now

[15:06] this document looks very different.

[15:09] >> And maybe to help in the status column,

[15:11] should we just put in progress on all of

[15:14] them and then as they get completed

[15:16] they, you know, whoever completes it

[15:18] feels like they can then switch it to

[15:20] complete.

[15:22] >> Yeah. either that or they remove it. So

[15:25] I Yeah, I don't

[15:26] >> I would think you'd want a record

[15:27] though.

[15:31] » So I don't know if I would suggest

[15:32] removing it, but that'll be up I

[15:34] whatever that's up to the city council.

[15:35] >> I kind of I kind of like that idea of

[15:37] having that um in progress or completed

[15:41] so that it could continue to be shown.

[15:44] So if anyone comes back and says, "Oh,

[15:47] what are you working on? Well, we

[15:48] finished this. Now we're on to this."

[15:50] And then it shows the history as well of

[15:53] what's been done as well as the current.

[15:58] >> Yeah. Uh there looks like there was a

[16:00] hand raised if

[16:03] you would like to ask.

[16:05] >> Thank you. I love the idea of being able

[16:07] to track. I think it would also be

[16:10] helpful to have either the committee

[16:12] name

[16:14] or some identifier if you want to get

[16:18] more information. you know how to

[16:20] quickly just right here you look at the

[16:22] spreadsheet you know where we're at you

[16:24] know who's working on it

[16:26] and I think the archival needs to be

[16:29] accessed access to like if it was

[16:31] completed there needs to be a way to see

[16:35] what the steps were because hopefully

[16:37] there's also notes of what you know the outcome analysis did

[16:43] we like there was this element that we

[16:45] wouldn't do again because of blink blink

[16:49] Anyway, just my input

[16:52] >> and I tried to come in but the outside

[16:53] door is locked.

[16:55] >> Oh, I had to come through to the office

[16:58] door.

[16:59] >> Yeah, I had to do that, too. Um,

[17:08] » maybe we add like a Well, the person you

[17:11] would contact would be the responsible

[17:12] party.

[17:13] >> Do you want there be a place though if

[17:15] there's like notes? You know, if there's

[17:20] like she's like outcomes or issues or

[17:24] things that would that you would want to

[17:26] record any sort of additional

[17:28] information

[17:29] >> maybe just notes. Yeah. And then you can

[17:31] put

[17:31] >> well and I think some of them would be

[17:34] internal notes because you don't

[17:35] necessarily need everything there

[17:38] showing the steps but at least um the

[17:42] progress um that the steps that are

[17:45] important and then the the finished um

[17:48] because otherwise it would take up a lot

[17:49] of room that aren't maybe aren't

[17:51] necessary but we still want the record

[17:54] that it's been done and maybe how um

[17:59] » process

[18:01] I would just say just delete out

[18:03] >> Go ahead. Oh, go just delete out some of

[18:05] those notes on the side there in that

[18:06] side column because I think those were

[18:08] from our last meeting. And then um

[18:13] Okay. So, I feel like the notes I think

[18:15] would cover if there's any need for

[18:20] um whoever's working on that to add

[18:25] if there's issues, outcomes, things that

[18:27] are different

[18:29] um that changed and maybe why so

[18:34] would it be

[18:35] >> the difference is between the difference

[18:38] is between if if it's something that's

[18:40] being worked on that's more of a draft

[18:43] that may change compared to

[18:46] um what happened and and why or or

[18:50] something because remember all of these

[18:53] are public documents and sometimes if

[18:55] you have a public document that's

[18:57] working document um if it's if it's

[19:01] really only a draft and somebody takes

[19:03] it as if it's already been completed it

[19:05] could be a problem in communication so I

[19:09] would rather communicate what we

[19:11] actually have done not what we hope. Um,

[19:15] and make sure that those notes are more

[19:18] of a completion outline rather than a I

[19:21] think we're going to do because we don't

[19:23] want to get one of our employees saying,

[19:26] "Oh, well, I wrote that I was going to

[19:27] do this." And then the council says,

[19:29] "Well, no, we're not doing it that way

[19:30] or we don't have budget or whatever."

[19:33] That's confusing for residents. I'd

[19:35] rather it be this is what we've done.

[19:44] There we go. Project completion notes.

[19:47] And and I think that's like optional.

[19:50] I don't think that's something that they

[19:51] have to use, but if they feel like it's

[19:53] useful to add any other context, they

[19:56] have a place to do it.

[19:58] Um, okay. Well, let's then just review

[20:01] the other one, the word document. If

[20:06] there's no other questions or comments

[20:07] on that strategic plan

[20:11] matrix,

[20:14] >> I really liked this one pager, Danielle.

[20:17] I thought you capsulated it all in a

[20:20] very very thoughtful way. Um, any

[20:23] citizen who looks at that is going to be

[20:25] able to see that the structure and that

[20:28] it's reviewed and this is what it does

[20:30] and doesn't do. I really I really like

[20:33] this for our public facing and then as

[20:37] anyone has um questions they can contact

[20:40] the person that's going to be

[20:42] implementing or completing those

[20:44] projects.

[20:49] Agreed. I think it helps to show that

[20:52] this isn't trying to add goals in

[20:55] addition to the general plan. This is

[20:57] actionable steps that are

[21:00] translating into those general plan

[21:01] goals. And um I like that it outlines

[21:06] that there'll be a formal review and

[21:09] update um by staff annual. And

[21:16] I don't know I don't anything else

[21:18] anybody else comments questions about

[21:21] this feedback?

[21:26] It's so good. That's my comment. It is

[21:30] so good. It is so such an easier read.

[21:34] It is clean. It is professional. I'm

[21:37] really really impressed.

[21:40] >> I'm glad you like it, Diana.

[21:43] >> Thanks, Carrie.

[21:45] >> Well, thank you both.

[21:47] Well, you know, and as we get new new

[21:49] council people in the future and they

[21:52] the onboarding won't be as hard because

[21:55] the structure is there and then if they

[21:58] have a particular assignment, they'll be able to figure it out.

[22:03] >> Yeah. Well, um, if there's no other

[22:07] comments, questions, concerns, need for

[22:11] discussion,

[22:12] um,

[22:14] would we like to would anyone like to

[22:17] motion?

[22:21] » Um, I'll make

[22:24] what I'll do is

[22:27] >> go ahead, Daniel. So what I'll do then

[22:30] is I put this in in design within the

[22:32] general plan

[22:34] um right at the very beginning before

[22:36] chapter one right as like a standalone.

[22:40] It's not going to be part of the same um

[22:45] numbering system. So it' be like a Roman

[22:48] numeral like two or three whatever like

[22:51] right at right right after the table of

[22:53] contents or before the table of contents

[22:54] of the general plan. Right.

[22:57] Well, let's let's understand that. Are

[23:00] there are there feelings about that? It

[23:02] seemed like there was some that wanted

[23:04] this to be concurrent with the general

[23:07] plan and and part of it. Are there any

[23:10] opinions where they feel like it should

[23:12] be separate and is that a bother to

[23:14] anybody that would it would be part of

[23:16] that first few pages of the general

[23:19] plan?

[23:20] >> I think we're talking that the one the

[23:22] one pager would be in that general plan.

[23:25] the specifics would not the table the

[23:28] table will not be part of it but the

[23:30] that one pager is is um I think that

[23:33] would be helpful to have that at the

[23:35] beginning um just to showcase that it is

[23:38] in conjunction with but it's a

[23:40] standalone document

[23:45] » so maybe right after the table of

[23:47] contents before chapter one

[23:50] >> yeah just to show that there is action

[23:52] because I think that's what a lot of

[23:54] people don't realiz is we have a general

[23:56] plan but and people will say okay that's

[23:59] good until the next time but that will

[24:02] show that there's actually action steps

[24:04] being taken with regards to the general

[24:06] plan but it won't show any specifics of

[24:09] what action is being taken at the moment

[24:12] because that will depend on the action

[24:14] item itself in the other document.

[24:19] » Okay. Well,

[24:21] any comments on that? Do we need to

[24:23] change the cover so that it like go back

[24:26] to the cover the very front like does it

[24:29] need to say Wooden Hills general plan

[24:31] and I mean put both documents listed

[24:35] there?

[24:36] >> I don't think so because we're not

[24:38] putting the other one in there. We're

[24:39] just going to put this one sheet that

[24:41] says it's going to be its own document.

[24:44] But that but it is just the general

[24:46] plan. It's it the strategic plan will

[24:49] not be a part of but because they're two

[24:51] for two different audiences. The general

[24:53] plan is is as you would say owned by the

[24:56] planning commission um with approval of

[24:59] the council where the strategic plan is

[25:01] a standalone document for the council

[25:04] than to dictate to themselves or to

[25:06] staff on action items.

[25:09] >> Is it confusing that it's just suddenly

[25:12] in there? There's

[25:15] um should it be like incorporated into

[25:17] that introduction section

[25:21] >> or we could put it as one of the

[25:23] appendix at the end as an appendix

[25:26] whichever.

[25:27] >> Yeah, I feel like that's almost better

[25:29] just like Yeah,

[25:30] >> I feel like it would be kind of odd to

[25:32] like you open it all a sudden there's a

[25:34] strategic plan but you don't really see

[25:35] anything about it.

[25:38] >> It's just kind of a Yeah, I like the

[25:40] appendix. Okay.

[25:45] » Okay. Well, anything else to settle,

[25:47] Daniel?

[25:49] >> I don't think so.

[25:51] >> Um, if we feel good about that one, that

[25:55] word document being added into as an

[25:58] appendix item to the general plan, just

[26:01] saying that the city has a strategic

[26:03] plan matrix and this is kind of what it

[26:05] does and what it is. And then we provide

[26:09] to the city that working file that

[26:11] allows them to track uh actionable steps

[26:15] leading toward the general plan goals

[26:18] um for their use if desired. So if we

[26:23] all feel good about those things,

[26:27] would anybody like to motion to approve

[26:31] >> the strategic plan?

[26:33] >> This is Diana again. I can't mo move,

[26:36] but I had one more comment. I'll lower

[26:37] my hand.

[26:38] >> Go ahead.

[26:39] >> I It is

[26:41] I You guys are just gonna see I I'm tr

[26:46] showing my true self. I really cannot

[26:47] stand if the doc any document if someone

[26:51] were to pick it up that and it's

[26:52] important like this pick it up and it's

[26:55] out of context. They don't know what it

[26:56] is. Can we

[26:59] maybe the bottom of every single page

[27:01] Woodland Hills, Utah, you know? identify

[27:05] at least where it is. Like just seeing

[27:08] Woodland Hills strategic plan overview

[27:10] is triggering for me and I don't I don't

[27:12] want to be I already show I'm already

[27:14] showing my craziness, but Woodland

[27:16] Hills, Utah feels more appropriate. I

[27:19] just think we need to be careful that we

[27:20] don't leave out something that if

[27:22] someone were to

[27:24] >> take it out of context,

[27:26] >> they just don't have enough info to put

[27:28] it where it belongs. That that's a great

[27:30] idea because I actually get quite a co

[27:33] few calls from Woodland Hills,

[27:34] California asking me questions about

[27:36] things. So maybe putting Woodland Hills,

[27:39] Utah so that it it's in order and out of

[27:43] not in and that it's in context each

[27:45] page if it was taken out of context.

[27:47] Someone could say, "Hey, this isn't

[27:49] there's something missing."

[27:52] Is that okay, Daniel? this point

[27:55] >> you do

[27:56] >> I think we have control over the

[27:58] Woodland Hills Utah strategic plan

[28:00] overview name I think the general plan

[28:02] has moved on into the hands of the

[28:05] planning commission and city council u

[28:09] but I think it's something that could be

[28:11] carried forward Carrie that would

[28:13] >> or or one of our planning commission

[28:16] members if

[28:17] >> we can yeah we can say that as it goes

[28:21] forward um but if the doc document

[28:24] hasn't been completely finalized. If if

[28:26] Daniel wants to just put that little

[28:29] clarification that it's Wooden Hills,

[28:30] Utah on every page, that's I don't see

[28:32] where anyone would have fault with that.

[28:35] >> No. Yeah, that'd be fine.

[28:39] >> Okay. Well, I will let everyone else

[28:42] handle that. Uh but for today, we have

[28:46] the strategic plan overview and the

[28:48] strategic plan matrix.

[28:51] Would anyone like to make a motion?

[28:56] I motion to accept.

[28:59] I'll

[29:00] >> second that. All in favor?

[29:03] >> I

[29:06] >> Okay.

[29:08] 528. Brandy.

[29:12] Second.

[29:14] Lori.

[29:15] Unanimous.

[29:17] Okay. Well, um I do not

[29:22] see a need to meet again until we know

[29:26] um the timeline of when this will go

[29:29] before the council and then if there was

[29:32] any needs that arose from that. Um so at

[29:36] this point I don't have another date to

[29:38] set for this community development

[29:41] committee to meet um and

[29:45] until I have a little more information.

[29:47] So um with that I think we can adjurnn.

[29:51] >> I move that we adjourn.

[29:53] >> Great. Seconded severed

[29:56] at 528

[29:59] and

[30:01] second. Uh all in favor

[30:04] >> I great. Thank you Daniel. Thank you

[30:07] Carrie. Thank you Diana for your

[30:09] comments. Very helpful. And thank you

[30:10] Brandy to joining during your busy time.

[30:13] >> All right. Thanks everyone. have a good

[30:15] night

[30:15] >> and

Community Development Meeting April 27 2026

Transcript