[0:04] - Bonsoir. Bienvenue à la séance

[0:07] ordinaire du conseil municipal

[0:09] du 25 septembre 2023.

[0:39] - À l'unanimité.

[0:48] - Bonjour, commandant. C'est à

[0:49] vous le plancher.

[0:57] - Merci beaucoup, Monsieur le

[0:58] Maire. Bonjour, tout le monde.

[1:02] Voici le rapport des activités

[1:05] du

[1:06] (---)

[1:07] du 22 août au 25 septembre pour

[1:08] la ville de Beaconsfield.

[1:17] Tout d'abord, nous avons, je

[1:19] l'avais mentionné un peu au

[1:20] dernier conseil, la rentrée

[1:21] scolaire qui s'en venait. Et

[1:22] voilà, c'est fait, et c'est

[1:24] réussi! Du 28 août jusqu'au 1er

[1:26] septembre, plusieurs opérations

[1:28] en sécurité routière ont été

[1:29] planifiées afin d'assurer la

[1:30] sécurité de nos tout-petits lors

[1:31] de la rentrée. Comme lors des

[1:34] années passées, vous avez été

[1:35] présent dans les 16 écoles du

[1:38] secteur. En prévention et lors

[1:41] d'opérations de répression pour

[1:43] faire respecter les règles du

[1:44] Code de la sécurité routière. Au

[1:45] total, on parle de 19

[1:47] opérations, prévention et

[1:49] répression. 41 constat

[1:52] d'infraction ont été émis lors

[1:53] des opérations. J'en profite

[1:57] pour parler du fait que la

[1:59] sécurité routière, c'est

[2:00] l'affaire de tous. Nous avons

[2:01] besoin de la collaboration de

[2:02] chacun pour assurer la sécurité

[2:03] de tous les usagers. Si vous

[2:05] avez des plaintes de circulation

[2:06] dans les zones scolaires de

[2:08] Beaconsfield, n'hésitez pas et

[2:10] communiquer par courriel avec le

[2:11] porte-de... postes de quartier

[2:12] un, pardon. Sécurité routière.

[2:16] En plus de toutes les opérations

[2:18] en sécurité routière, des agents

[2:20] patrouilleur du poste de

[2:21] quartier un pour le mois d'août

[2:22] et de septembre, l'agent de

[2:25] circulation a effectué un total

[2:27] de cinq opérations vitesse

[2:28] habitant Field. Le 23 août et le

[2:30] 7 septembre, c'était

[2:32] Beaconsfield et Chow, une

[2:34] opération vitesse. Le 24 août,

[2:36] Saint-Charles et Beaconsfield.

[2:41] (---)

[2:42] Le 30 août, Beaconsfield et ne

[2:44] veut, opération en lien avec la

[2:46] rentrée scolaire, présence aux

[2:48] abords de l'école afin de faire

[2:49] respecter la signalisation. Le 7

[2:51] septembre, c'était à l'école

[2:53] Saint-Edmond, opération vitesse

[2:55] en zone scolaire. Et finalement,

[2:57] le 5 septembre, Saint-Charles et

[2:59] Peace King, opération de vitesse

[3:01] sur le boulevard Saint-Charles.

[3:02] Pour ce qui est de la patrouille

[3:04] à vélo, le 29 août, le 30

[3:06] août... en fait, le 29 août,

[3:08] c'était à l'école Saint-Rémy. Le

[3:10] 30 août, à l'école primaire

[3:12] Beaconsfield et l'école John est

[3:14] Kennedy. Le 1er septembre,

[3:16] c'était à l'école on a Christmas

[3:22] Park et l'école Saint-Rémy.

[3:23] C'est une présence de policiers

[3:24] à vélo, plusieurs dépliants ont

[3:26] été remis concernant les

[3:27] infractions constatées. Très

[3:28] belle collaboration, en passant,

[3:29] avec la sécurité publique de

[3:30] Beaconsfield. Encore pour la

[3:35] patrouiller à vélo, une

[3:36] dernière, le 7 septembre. Une

[3:39] dernière opération de vitesse à

[3:41] l'école John F. Kennedy. Pour

[3:43] les agents sociaux

[3:44] communautaires, en lien avec la

[3:46] rentrée scolaire, le 28 août au

[3:48] 1er septembre, plusieurs écoles

[3:49] de Beaconsfield, dont Sherbrooke

[3:52] Académie junior, Sherbrooke

[3:54] Académie senior, l'école

[3:55] primaire Beaconsfield et l'école

[3:57] primaire John F. Kennedy,

[3:59] visitez par les agents sociaux

[4:00] communautaires. Plusieurs

[4:02] patrouilleurs préventives et

[4:03] interaction avec parents et

[4:04] enfants et le personnel

[4:05] scolaire. Remise de dépliants

[4:07] auprès des nombreux parents

[4:09] d'élèves. C'était plus en

[4:10] prévention avec les agents

[4:12] sociaux communautaires. Le 21

[4:13] septembre, encore une fois, les

[4:14] agents sociaux communautaires

[4:16] ont rencontré toutes les

[4:17] directions des écoles du

[4:18] secteur. Ça, c'est toutes les

[4:20] directions des écoles du

[4:21] secteur. Présentation, offre de

[4:22] services, signature de l'annexe

[4:24] C et des ateliers préventifs.

[4:28] Pour ce qui est de la

[4:29] criminalité des événements

[4:32] signalés, dans la ville de

[4:35] Beaconsfield, on parle de quatre

[4:37] vols de véhicules dans les

[4:39] secteurs résidentiels, deux

[4:41] tentatives de vol de véhicules,

[4:43] un véhicule volé et retrouver,

[4:46] un vol dans un véhicule, un

[4:48] délit de fuite avec blessés. La

[4:52] victime, c'était véhicules

[4:54] versus vélo. La victime était en

[4:56] vélo. Deux vols qualifiés sur

[4:59] personne, dans le coin de Elm.

[5:01] Et une introduction par

[5:02] effraction dans une résidence

[5:03] privée. Pour ce qui est de la

[5:07] fermeture de l'autoroute 40, je

[5:09] ne vous en avait pas parlé la

[5:10] dernière fois que j'étais venu

[5:11] au micro, mais j'ai un

[5:14] engagement. Et comme chef du

[5:17] poste de quartier un, je tenais

[5:19] à vous informer que je suis

[5:23] conscient des difficultés

[5:24] auxquelles vous avez dû faire

[5:26] face pour plusieurs week-end en

[5:27] raison de la fermeture de

[5:29] l'autoroute 40. Après la

[5:30] difficile fin de semaine du 19

[5:32] et 20 août, sachez que nous

[5:34] avons mobilisé une équipe

[5:35] composée de policiers du SPVM et

[5:37] de la SQ afin de faciliter la

[5:40] circulation des résidents du

[5:41] secteur, ainsi que des services

[5:43] d'urgence. Leur mission consiste

[5:46] est également à dégager les

[5:48] voies secondaires afin d'éviter

[5:50] de paralyser la municipalité de

[5:51] Beaconsfield.

[5:58] Je suis conscient également des

[6:00] nombreuses entraves qui ont eu

[6:01] lieu ces dernières années, et je

[6:03] vous suis reconnaissant d'avoir

[6:05] fait preuve de patience. Je

[6:07] tiens à vous assurer que je

[6:08] m'engage à travailler en

[6:09] collaboration avec les nombreux

[6:12] partenaires externes

[6:15] (inaudible)

[6:16] , la Sûreté du Québec, les

[6:17] municipalités de cette ville et

[6:18] Sainte-Anne de Bellevue, pour

[6:19] mettre en place une table de

[6:21] concertation. L'objectif de

[6:23] cette table est de faciliter la

[6:24] communication et de mieux

[6:25] planifier de futures entraves

[6:28] jusqu'en 2030, compte tenu de la

[6:29] construction du nouveau pont.

[6:32] Par ailleurs, je travaille

[6:35] actuellement avec la section de

[6:37] la coordination afin de

[6:38] développer un plan d'urgence de

[6:39] circulation en cas de fermeture

[6:42] du pont ou d'accident majeur sur

[6:44] celui-ci. En attendant, je tiens

[6:46] à vous remercier pour votre

[6:48] patience et votre collaboration

[6:50] face à ce défi colossal qui

[6:51] implique de nombreux

[6:52] partenaires. Merci de votre

[6:54] confiance. Vous pouvez en tout

[6:56] temps composer le on 280-0101

[7:01] pour rejoindre le poste de

[7:02] quartier un. Ou envoyez un

[7:04] courriel au PDQ1. Vous pouvez

[7:08] également consulter notre site

[7:11] Web

[7:12] (---)

[7:13] . Vous trouverez une grande

[7:14] quantité d'information. Soyez

[7:15] assurés de notre disponibilité

[7:17] pour que toute préoccupation

[7:18] soulevée par les citoyens de

[7:19] véhiculer Field.

[7:52] - Merci beaucoup, commandant,

[7:53] pour ce rapport d'activités.

[7:54] Est-ce qu'il y a des questions?

[8:14] - Monsieur le Maire, j'aurais

[8:15] une question?

[8:16] - Oui?

[8:17] - Bonjour, Monsieur le

[8:18] commandant. Merci pour votre

[8:19] intervention. Je siège avec des

[8:23] collègues et des membres

[8:24] d'administrations sur le Comité

[8:25] de la circulation. Je voulais

[8:26] vous informer que nos réunions

[8:27] redémarre le 6 octobre. On avait

[8:30] jusqu'à récemment la chance

[8:31] d'avoir un constable qui

[8:32] participait aux travaux du

[8:33] comité, constable Mathieu, qui a

[8:35] pris sa retraite récemment. Je

[8:37] voulais juste m'assurer qu'on

[8:39] puisse avoir

[8:40] (inaudible)

[8:41] ... qui participeraient à nos

[8:43] travaux. Je pense que ce que

[8:44] vous pouvez apporter comme

[8:45] expertise, comme savoir et comme

[8:47] contribution, ça aide grandement

[8:50] nos travaux. Je voulais

[8:52] simplement vous amener ça,

[8:54] amener ça à votre attention.

[8:55] - Oui, merci pour la question.

[8:57] Oui, on a l'agent Morin est un

[9:03] agent QSR qui est à la retraite

[9:05] présentement qui va être

[9:06] remplacé le 15 octobre. C'est

[9:08] certain que vous devriez avoir

[9:09] quelqu'un qui va participer au

[9:11] comité. En fait, il va y avoir

[9:14] un policier aux cinq comités de

[9:17] consultation des cinq comités

[9:18] qu'on dessert.

[9:19] - Merci.

[9:20] - Il y a une question...

[9:25] identifiez-vous, s'il vous

[9:26] plaît.

[9:27] - Yves Bergeron, de

[9:30] Beaconsfield. Vous parlez de

[9:31] jusqu'à 2030. Vous allez faire

[9:32] un programme jusqu'à 2030.

[9:38] Pendant 7 ans, on s'attend

[9:39] encore à avoir des travaux

[9:41] importants?

[9:43] - Je peux répondre.

[9:46] - C'est ça la question?

[9:47] - C'est votre question,

[9:48] Monsieur? 2030, c'est la date

[9:51] pour le nouveau pont. Il va y

[9:53] avoir des entraves sur

[9:55] l'autoroute 40 jusqu'à 2030,

[9:57] justement, pour les travaux sur

[9:58] le pont. Je vous ai parlé de la

[10:02] fin de semaine qui a été l'enfer

[10:04] un peu partout, dont pour les

[10:07] municipalités de

[10:08] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue et

[10:09] Senneville, qui ont coûté plus

[10:10] que n'importe qui. Suite à ça,

[10:14] l'importance du SPVM et de la

[10:16] SQ, justement, de communiquer

[10:18] avec le MTQ et de prévoir

[10:20] d'avance les fermetures, les

[10:21] entraves, parce que ce n'est pas

[10:24] juste les municipalités de

[10:26] Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue et cette

[10:27] ville. On s'en est rendu compte,

[10:28] je vous donne l'exemple...

[10:31] Baie-D'Urfé, c'était 1 heure

[10:33] d'attente de laver jusqu'à

[10:35] Lakeshore. C'était toutes les

[10:36] routes secondaires qui sont

[10:37] paralysés. Suite à ces fins de

[10:43] semaine là, j'ai vraiment

[10:44] discuté j'ai été catégorique

[10:45] avec la MTQ qu'on va devoir

[10:47] mettre une équipe de policiers,

[10:49] justement, pour pallier ça, en

[10:52] place, pour la circulation. Ce

[10:53] n'est pas juste une question de

[10:55] circulation et de sauver du

[10:56] temps, c'est aussi une question

[10:57] de s'assurer que les services

[10:59] d'urgence se rendent à

[11:03] destination attend... vous

[11:06] comprenez qu'on ne peut pas être

[11:09] dans le trafic. Il y a une

[11:10] caserne de pompiers sur Anciens

[11:12] Combattants. On doit être là,

[11:13] sur le terrain, justement pour

[11:15] faire face à ça.

[11:20] - Ce n'est pas une question

[11:22] additionnelle, c'est juste...

[11:24] j'apprécie vos efforts, mais cet

[11:26] été, on a eu des travaux sur la

[11:28] 40. Il prenait la voie de

[11:30] service pour prendre trois

[11:32] sorties. Kirkland faisait des

[11:33] travaux en même temps sur la

[11:34] voie de service. Je trouve ça

[11:35] aberrant. Une autre chose, c'est

[11:41] que les entrées sur l'autoroute,

[11:42] à cause des travaux, c'est

[11:44] dangereux. C'est absolument

[11:46] incroyable. Il y a à peu près

[11:48] 100 mètres pour entrer sur

[11:50] l'autoroute. Je ne peux pas

[11:51] comprendre que ce soit toléré.

[11:53] On entend sirènes tous les

[11:55] soirs, parce qu'il y a une voix

[12:02] pour joindre l'autre, et tout le

[12:04] monde attend, et ça cause des

[12:05] accidents tous les soirs.

[12:06] - En fait, ce dont vous parlez,

[12:08] c'est la fin de semaine qui a

[12:10] été l'enfer, le 19 et le 20

[12:11] août, quand ils ont fermé la 40

[12:13] pour dévier la circulation sur

[12:14] la voie de service. Et juste

[12:18] fermer la 40, voies de service,

[12:20] pour que les véhicules puissent

[12:22] reprendre la 40, ça a été

[12:25] l'enfer partout. C'est pour ça

[12:26] que les voies secondaires, ça

[12:28] touche le SPVM, le service

[12:31] d'urgence qu'on doit offrir aux

[12:32] citoyens. Il y a peut-être un

[12:33] enjeu de sécurité. Donc, c'est

[12:36] pour ça que suite à ça, j'ai

[12:40] rencontré les responsables du

[12:42] MTQ, justement, pour prévoir une

[12:44] équipe de circulation. Est-ce

[12:46] que ce... est-ce que ça arrivera

[12:49] à nouveau? Probablement, mais au

[12:50] moins, on va être mieux préparé

[12:51] la prochaine fois. En fait,

[12:53] c'est arrivé la fin de semaine

[12:54] d'après, la même entrave, la 40.

[12:56] Et c'était beaucoup mieux. C'est

[13:03] pas facile, hein? C'est beaucoup

[13:04] de partenaires, le MTQ, la SQ,

[13:07] le SPVM. On a aussi la Ville de

[13:09] Montréal qui est impliqué. Ce

[13:10] sont des tables de concertation.

[13:13] L'idée, là-dedans, c'est que ça

[13:14] ne tourne pas en rond et qu'on

[13:16] voit vraiment la différence sur

[13:17] le terrain.

[13:18] - Et souvent, ce sont des

[13:20] équipes qui travaillent en silo.

[13:22] - Exactement.

[13:25] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres

[13:26] questions?

[13:34] Alors, merci beaucoup,

[13:35] commandant.

[13:36] - Merci. Est-ce que je peux

[13:37] rajouter quelque chose, Monsieur

[13:38] le Maire? Je voulais juste dire

[13:39] qu'on a un système spécial. Tout

[13:43] citoyen qui appelle aux postes

[13:44] de quartier un sera rappelé par

[13:45] un policier. C'est important,

[13:46] c'est quelque chose que j'ai mis

[13:47] en place quand je suis arrivé il

[13:49] y a cinq mois, au poste de

[13:51] quartier un. Ce n'est plus un

[13:52] courriel, quand vous appelez,

[13:55] vous allez avoir un policier qui

[13:56] va vous répondre, qui va aller

[13:57] sur le terrain, qui va valider

[14:00] votre plainte. Je vous encourage

[14:01] à communiquer, et ça n'a pas

[14:02] besoin d'être par téléphone. Par

[14:03] courriel, on vous rappelle.

[14:04] Voilà.

[14:06] - C'est un excellent message,

[14:07] commandant. J'espère que les

[14:12] gens vont en prendre davantage.

[14:15] C'est en vous appelant, le PDQ1,

[14:17] qu'il va y avoir de l'action

[14:19] rapidement.

[14:20] - Oui.

[14:21] - Merci beaucoup, merci beaucoup

[14:22] pour cette initiative. On

[14:24] l'apprécie énormément.

[14:25] - Merci.

[14:26] - Merci.

[14:31] >> And now, we are going to -- I

[14:35] am going to answer the questions

[14:38] that we got in the mail. First

[14:43] question came from Nicole. I

[14:47] will resume the first three

[14:52] questions that were submitted,

[14:53] which will be answered by the

[14:54] administration. And I highly

[15:01] recommend in the future to ask

[15:02] that type of question that we

[15:05] summarized here, to go directly

[15:06] to the administration with her

[15:10] questions. The item that we are

[15:16] summarizing, by the

[15:18] administration, belated two

[15:20] St-Andrew, how are fees are

[15:25] applied, 45, 18, 19, and 20. And

[15:28] there was a question regarding

[15:31] pesticides, rodents, wildfires.

[15:33] Again, the administration will

[15:35] answer legal questions too

[15:37] Madame -- however, there were

[15:40] two questions that I'd like to

[15:43] answer, one was item 16.3 and

[15:49] 16.4, which is H friendly

[15:50] municipality. I love that you

[15:51] have an age-friendly

[15:54] municipality committee and goal.

[15:55] This is universal design that

[15:58] would make things accessible.

[16:00] However, there's still a lot of

[16:02] accessibility concerns in

[16:03] Beaconsfield. Please consider

[16:05] expanding and remit -- renaming

[16:07] a friendly Beaconsfield into

[16:11] accessibility Beaconsfield. The

[16:13] H friendly municipality

[16:14] committee and action plan refers

[16:16] to a municipality that has

[16:18] obtained certification from the

[16:19] Québec government AFM program.

[16:26] The term age friendly

[16:28] municipality means a

[16:30] municipality that encourages

[16:32] active participation, optimizing

[16:33] health, and safety of older

[16:35] citizens to improve their

[16:36] quality of life. And in concrete

[16:40] terms, and age friendly city

[16:42] adapts its structures and

[16:45] services so that seniors with

[16:48] disabilities and needs can

[16:49] access and have their points. As

[16:51] this is a certification, we

[16:54] cannot change the terminology

[16:55] according to our demands. The

[16:58] city of Beaconsfield has also

[17:01] adopted a universal

[17:02] accessibility action plan, which

[17:04] demonstrates that cities

[17:07] commitment taking full concrete

[17:09] measures to promote the

[17:10] inclusion, integration, and full

[17:13] participation of everyone in

[17:14] this territory. This plan is

[17:16] available for consultation on

[17:17] our website. Madame Alexopoulos,

[17:24] since you are chairman of the

[17:26] age friendly committee, is there

[17:29] everything, anything you would

[17:30] like to add?

[17:31] >> Thank you, Mister Mayor.

[17:34] Within the committee, Councillor

[17:40] Roger Moss, co-chair, we hold a

[17:42] meeting once every two months,

[17:44] and we discuss the issues that

[17:46] affect our senior residence and

[17:48] how to improve. And we actually

[17:51] have a grant coming to us. We

[17:53] applied for a grant from new

[17:54] horizons, that gives us

[17:56] structures and parks that will

[17:57] benefit our seniors. And we are

[17:59] always open to ideas if anybody

[18:01] has an idea, and they want to

[18:03] email us, and how we can

[18:04] improve, please do so. It is on

[18:05] the website. Thank you.

[18:07] >> Thank you. Second question

[18:12] from Madame Corrado's agenda

[18:16] item 30.9, ten, 11, 12,

[18:18] resolutions giving a favourable

[18:19] opinion on the recommendation by

[18:20] the Commission municipale du

[18:21] Québec, CMQ, of a property tax

[18:25] exemption for the properties

[18:26] identified as lots 2 424 402,

[18:32] 103 Biscayne. 1 417 500, 478

[18:36] Lord. And locked 2 424 016, 129

[18:41] Rowan. Also a lot 1 969 963, 330

[18:46] Sherbrooke. Why is there a

[18:50] recognition over property tax

[18:52] exemption, and how much

[18:53] financial assistance is

[18:54] involved. The immovable of that

[18:59] were identified here are used by

[19:02] the West Island seniors as

[19:05] temporary residential services

[19:07] for users with an intellectual

[19:11] disability, or an autism

[19:13] spectrum disorder, and

[19:15] therefore, they are asking the

[19:17] CAQ to be recognized as having a

[19:20] tax exemption under the act

[19:21] respecting municipal taxation.

[19:26] The city is not opposing the tax

[19:28] redemption. If it is approved by

[19:29] the CMQ. I have to also point

[19:33] out that the properties will now

[19:35] fall under the unused tax

[19:37] category. The other questions

[19:46] came from Mr. Gary pounce -- oh,

[19:52] I'm sorry. There is a third

[19:53] question here. Yes, on 275 L, if

[20:00] you approve this project, please

[20:02] mandate that the residents is

[20:04] all affordable housing, and not

[20:07] overpriced, market value Homes,

[20:08] that only which people can

[20:09] afford. Building vertically

[20:15] saves green space, please retain

[20:17] all the local businesses. It

[20:20] could all be incorporated into a

[20:22] mixed residential building with

[20:24] the housing on top and the

[20:25] businesses on the bottom. That

[20:27] way, no one loses their local

[20:31] business. Police also at an

[20:32] edition of public library to the

[20:33] site. Also, retain the trees on

[20:35] and around the site. Madame

[20:38] Corrado, this is not the city's

[20:44] project. And the services

[20:45] provided is up to the promoter.

[20:47] The space for commercial

[20:49] businesses will be determined

[20:52] based on the location of the

[20:54] project, and it is its potential

[20:55] for future commercial success.

[20:58] The planned project is mixed

[21:02] housing and commercial. And I

[21:03] have to point out that, very

[21:07] important here, that if item 40

[21:09] point to on the agenda tonight

[21:12] is adopted by Council, there

[21:14] will be a public consultation on

[21:17] the project on October 24th,

[21:20] where all residents will be able

[21:23] to participate and make

[21:26] comments, and also, exchange

[21:29] with the Council and exchange

[21:32] with the administration on this

[21:34] particular project and submit

[21:35] their concerns. Now, the next

[21:41] question is -- I have to look at

[21:45] my things here -- I thought

[21:49] there were two questions. Oh,

[21:55] okay. So, that was a question

[21:57] from Mr. pound, actually. Mr.

[21:59] pound, I'm sorry, but I did

[22:02] answer your questions on the CMQ

[22:04] property tax exemption. So, now

[22:08] you know exactly where that

[22:10] stance. Your second question is,

[22:14] Mr. pounds, 20.3 is an

[22:18] authorization of an initial

[22:20] expense of 309,000, all taxes

[22:25] included, for contract 60722-AR,

[22:29] for the construction of a new

[22:32] chalet at beacon Hill Park. The

[22:34] city originally estimated that

[22:35] the new chalet would cost $1

[22:37] million. Council approved over

[22:41] $3 million. Please, explain the

[22:42] additional expense of 309,000

[22:46] 323,000 -- those are the numbers

[22:49] that you have quoted, and I've

[22:51] quoted you. What I have to tell

[22:54] you here is that the additional

[22:57] expenses is $40,000 for the

[23:00] additional excavation, and

[23:04] 39,000 for the security system

[23:05] to be installed. There is a

[23:10] retaining wall that is also

[23:11] required. That is

[23:18] 160,745. And an additional --

[23:19] that's gonna cost 27,000. So

[23:21] that explains, I think, the

[23:23] 309,000. It's not exactly to the

[23:26] dollar because there are some

[23:29] additional other minor

[23:30] modifications that are also

[23:31] included. And now, it is up to

[23:37] the floor here for any questions

[23:38] from the floor.

[23:44] >> -- my question is an item

[23:51] 40.2 and 45.60. 45.16, the Elm

[23:57] blossom. I very much believe and

[24:03] government by rule of law, and

[24:06] I'm sure you do. And our bylaws

[24:09] are put in place to ensure that

[24:13] we have livable neighbourhoods.

[24:15] We have setbacks so that people

[24:18] don't encroach on our space. We

[24:23] have height restrictions so that

[24:25] buildings don't loom over us and

[24:26] we don't lose all sunlight. But

[24:33] this -- I read right through all

[24:34] of this. The developer is asking

[24:40] for 18 items to contravene all

[24:43] bylaws. And they don't

[24:45] contravene all bylaws nearly by

[24:47] centimetres or millimetres, but

[24:50] by whole metres. And some of

[24:52] them are multiple metres. And he

[24:55] is asking to do this in the

[24:56] middle of a neighbourhood. We

[25:03] have asked as a community, we

[25:05] have asked several times to have

[25:07] a meeting with the developer,

[25:10] and, Mister Mayor, we strongly

[25:13] suggested to the developer that

[25:15] he meets with us. And he

[25:18] obviously has no respect for

[25:20] your position or our position

[25:22] because we have not been able to

[25:23] meet with the developer. So, my

[25:25] first question is -- considering

[25:29] all of this, we request that we

[25:35] meet with the developer prior to

[25:38] any approval of this first

[25:39] draft. Once you go ahead with

[25:45] this, it is much more difficult

[25:46] for us to be heard., So, that is

[25:53] our first request. The second

[25:54] question that I have is --

[25:58] covers the very, very last item

[25:59] here. There are two members of

[26:03] the council who are on the

[26:04] Planning and Advisory Committee.

[26:08] And it says here -- which I

[26:11] don't understand at all how it

[26:12] could be said -- that the

[26:14] Planning and Advisory Committee

[26:17] is of the opinion that all the

[26:18] criteria are respected and the

[26:21] bylaws. And I would like an

[26:24] explanation of the process that

[26:27] says that a developer can come

[26:28] in, trample over all our bylaws,

[26:33] ask for setbacks which are

[26:37] contrary to everything we have

[26:38] in our neighbourhood, and

[26:41] height, also the same thing.

[26:42] Thank you.

[26:44] >> That's why we are going to

[26:46] have a public consultation on

[26:49] October 24th, so you can, in

[26:50] fact, express all your concerns

[26:55] and Council will certainly take

[26:57] them into consideration, what

[26:59] will be done and what will be

[27:01] said. Because we are not

[27:03] approving the project at this

[27:06] point. Basically, we are

[27:08] designing the bulk. And so, on

[27:13] the 24th, you will get an

[27:15] opportunity to really express

[27:17] your concerns about that. In the

[27:18] meantime, I hope that the

[27:26] developer here is very well. I

[27:28] would strongly suggest, strongly

[27:30] suggest to the promoter that he

[27:31] meets with the residents in the

[27:33] area, and explain the project,

[27:36] and explain and listen to their

[27:38] concerns, so that in the final

[27:41] project, you can also make sure

[27:45] that you incorporate some of

[27:47] those concerns, maybe not all of

[27:48] them, but some of those

[27:50] concerns, so that your project

[27:53] will be unacceptable project for

[27:55] the neighbourhood. So, I really,

[27:58] again, lead with the promoter to

[28:02] go ahead and organize that kind

[28:03] of meeting with the

[28:04] neighbourhood.

[28:06] >> Mister Mayor, you said that

[28:08] three times in just those strong

[28:12] words. The developer is

[28:13] obviously ignoring you -- as he

[28:15] is ignoring us.

[28:18] >> Well, you know, this would

[28:20] certainly come up on October

[28:22] 24th when we have a public

[28:23] consultation. And at that point,

[28:27] Council will have to take that

[28:30] into consideration, the fact

[28:32] that the promoter has not

[28:34] listened very carefully to the

[28:35] neighbourhood.

[28:38] >> Just in addition, my fear is

[28:42] if this passes tonight, then we

[28:44] have something written in stone.

[28:46] And it's much more difficult for

[28:48] us as residents to get our --

[28:54] our opinions across.

[28:57] >> I will let Mr. Chabot explain

[29:03] to you what we are going -- to

[29:05] it hasn't been adopted yet, but

[29:06] we will build on it later.

[29:09] >> Thank you, Mister Mayor.

[29:12] >> As you know, the area that is

[29:16] developed by the developer is a

[29:17] commercial area. So, there is

[29:20] nothing in the bylaw that fits

[29:22] that type of development that he

[29:24] is proposing, so that's why we

[29:26] are entering to the route of

[29:29] using the particular tiny

[29:30] program, which is included in

[29:32] the provincial law of urban

[29:33] planning. And it is exactly the

[29:36] same process that is the zoning

[29:39] change. So, today, like the Mr.

[29:42] mayor said, the proposition is

[29:45] for the parks. In the meantime,

[29:47] and I'm pretty sure he is

[29:48] hearing you right now, he has to

[29:51] meet with you. I said it clearly

[29:54] also, I transmitted the comments

[29:56] from Mr. Mayor. And I think at

[29:58] this time, because the project

[30:00] is going to go ahead,

[30:02] technically, depending on the

[30:03] council, he's gonna be meeting

[30:05] with everyone in the area, I'm

[30:07] pretty positive of that.

[30:10] >> Okay, you know, I am reading

[30:12] through this. And some of the

[30:14] items in this box, the storey

[30:19] building, we have an issue

[30:21] further down Elm. We don't want

[30:22] the same thing to happen in our

[30:23] area. And also, it looks to me

[30:27] like the developer is trying to

[30:31] crunch as many as many houses

[30:35] into that one blocked as he can.

[30:37] And if he does it the way that

[30:41] it seems to be, then he's got to

[30:43] cause a neighbourhood that is

[30:46] just not livable anymore.

[30:49] Anybody that lives there is

[30:50] going to be our neighbours too.

[30:53] They are not just gonna be each

[30:54] other's neighbours. They're

[30:55] going to be our neighbours too.

[30:56] And if he builds, as he says he

[30:58] is going to build, he is

[31:00] encroaching on our

[31:01] neighbourhood.

[31:03] >> We are not discussing tonight

[31:06] the design of the project. As I

[31:08] said, where he can work, what he

[31:13] can work with but the design of

[31:15] the project, how the project is

[31:17] actually finally going to look

[31:18] like, that will come up on

[31:23] October 24th in the proper

[31:24] consultation. And I certainly

[31:28] invite everyone with interest to

[31:31] come and make comments. At that

[31:34] time. And in the meantime,

[31:35] hopefully, the developer has met

[31:39] with the residents in the

[31:40] neighbourhood, and has listened

[31:42] to what they have to say. And he

[31:47] can come up. And it has happened

[31:50] at least one other occasion

[31:53] before, where a developer has

[31:54] met with the neighbourhood, has

[31:57] made some adjustments to the

[31:58] project, and the project got

[32:01] approved without any problem by

[32:05] anyone, everyone. But if the

[32:07] promoter, the developer is too

[32:12] stubborn to meet with the

[32:16] residents and listen to what

[32:18] they have, at the end, he may

[32:21] not have a project. So, I think

[32:23] it is very important that the

[32:27] developer listens to this very

[32:30] carefully, and goes ahead and

[32:32] makes the necessary arrangements

[32:37] to have one meeting, and maybe

[32:38] more than one meeting, if

[32:39] necessary with the

[32:40] neighbourhood.

[32:41] >> Thank you for hearing me out.

[32:48] >> I will entertain one or two

[32:50] more questions on this project.

[32:51] But no more.

[32:56] >>

[32:57] - Première des choses, il y

[32:58] avait déjà eu un zonage. Il a

[33:00] été changé pour commercial

[33:02] seulement. Ça, c'est il y a

[33:04] plusieurs années. Le zonage

[33:05] avait déjà été changé, je

[33:06] restais en arrière. Ensuite, on

[33:08] a voté un référendum disant

[33:11] qu'on ne voulait pas un deuxième

[33:13] étage, il n'y a pas si longtemps

[33:14] que ça. C'est un droit acquis,

[33:16] alors, puisqu'on l'a voté et on

[33:19] a dit: on ne veut pas un

[33:21] deuxième étage. Je suis d'accord

[33:22] pour le projet en avant, mais en

[33:24] arrière, à discuter. Ensuite, je

[33:27] ne sais pas si vous êtes au

[33:28] courant, mais il y a deux

[33:30] endroits contaminés, pas juste

[33:31] un. Parce que le nettoyage, il

[33:33] est là, maintenant. Mais avant,

[33:36] il était sur ce côté-là, il

[33:39] faisait face à Westruff. Il y a

[33:44] deux endroits contaminés, pas

[33:45] un. C'est à prendre en

[33:46] considération. Après ça...

[33:50] première des choses, pourquoi

[33:52] c'est nous, le côté nord, qui

[33:53] est obligé d'avoir tout ça. Des

[33:55] tours, des ci, des ça, vous vous

[33:57] avez les pompiers, l'hôtel de

[33:59] ville, le gym, les piscines.

[34:00] Nous, on ajuste les problèmes.

[34:04] - Vous savez, vos taxes sont

[34:08] affectés par le développement à

[34:11] Beaconsfield. Si on n'a pas de

[34:13] développement à Beaconsfield,

[34:15] malheureusement, vos taxes vont

[34:18] augmenter substantiellement.

[34:19] - Je suis d'accord avec ça...

[34:21] - Non vous, êtes d'accord avec

[34:22] plus de taxes?

[34:23] - Quand vous avez fait

[34:25] Saint-Charles, vous avez fait

[34:26] juste deux étages.

[34:27] - Vous êtes d'accord à payer

[34:28] plus de taxes?

[34:29] - Ça dépend. À Saint-Charles,

[34:30] vous avez fait du deux étages.

[34:32] Vous auriez pu en faire quatre.

[34:35] Sur Elm, après du tennis

[34:37] anciennement...

[34:38] - C'est quatre étages.

[34:40] - Oui, mais sur ce bord-ci, il

[34:42] n'y a rien.

[34:43] - Merci beaucoup.

[34:44] - C'est toujours sur notre bord.

[34:45] - Merci beaucoup. Est-ce que

[34:48] c'est encore sur le même sujet?

[34:51] Parce que je ne veux pas

[34:54] entendre 50 questions sur le

[34:55] même sujet.

[34:56] - C'est plus du point de vue de

[34:58] la logistique. Monsieur Chabot a

[35:01] dit que c'est l'équivalent d'un

[35:02] changement de zonage. Ça veut

[35:03] dire qu'il peut y avoir...

[35:06] comment vous appelez ça, un

[35:07] registre de signature? Ça...

[35:11] - Oui, absolument. À

[35:12] - Quel moment ce serait fait, à

[35:13] ce moment-là?

[35:15] - Oui, il y aura un registre de

[35:17] signature, évidemment. C'est un

[35:19] changement de zonage.

[35:21] Évidemment, s'il y a

[35:23] suffisamment de signatures qui

[35:25] s'objectent, à ce moment-là,

[35:27] selon le nombre de signatures,

[35:30] le conseil doit décider si on

[35:33] fait un référendum ou si on

[35:34] abandonne le projet.

[35:35] - Et ça, ça se fraie... après le

[35:39] 24 octobre? Où il y a un autre

[35:40] étape avant.

[35:41] - Le 24 octobre, après la

[35:43] consultation. Premièrement, on

[35:44] n'a pas établi l'échéancier

[35:46] parce qu'on ne veut pas présumer

[35:47] de la décision du Conseil. On va

[35:49] attendre de voir ce soir s'ils

[35:50] sont d'accord pour aller de

[35:51] l'avant avec le projet. À partir

[35:53] de là, le Service du greffe

[35:55] établit un échéancier très, très

[35:56] précis à l'intérieur duquel les

[35:58] dates sont données. À titre

[36:00] indicatif, un règlement sur les

[36:04] PPCMOI, la procédure d'adoption,

[36:05] c'est à peu près la même que

[36:07] ridiculement de zonage. Toute la

[36:09] procédure de consultation

[36:10] publiques, tout ça... qu'un

[36:12] règlement de zonage, pardon. La

[36:14] différence, c'est que le projet

[36:16] proposé fait partie intégrante

[36:17] du règlement. Donc, ce que vous

[36:19] voyez, c'est le projet, donc

[36:20] c'est le règlement.

[36:21] - Le règlement, de...?

[36:24] - La modification réglementaire.

[36:27] - Au lieu d'un changement de

[36:28] zonage?

[36:29] - Exact. Au lieu d'avoir des

[36:30] paramètres dans une grille

[36:32] d'usage, c'est le projet à

[36:34] proprement dit qui devient un

[36:35] peu comme le règlement.

[36:36] - D'accord. Mon autre question,

[36:38] c'est la suivante: pourquoi il y

[36:39] a deux lots?

[36:41] - Le promoteur doit construire

[36:43] par phase. Il y a des locataires

[36:45] commerciaux qui vont déménager

[36:47] dans les nouveaux locaux.

[36:49] - D'accord. Et en faisant de

[36:50] l'eau, vous pouvez faire une

[36:53] phase séparée d'une autre phase?

[36:54] - C'est ça. En plus, il y a

[36:56] aussi une autre série de l'eau

[36:57] avec les maisons de ville à

[36:58] l'arrière.

[37:00] - Et on tient compte aussi des

[37:02] réseaux huit... des ruisseaux

[37:03] souterrains, et tout ça?

[37:05] - Oui, et des déplacements de

[37:06] services. Parce qu'il y a un

[37:07] égout pluviales qui passe près.

[37:08] - Je pense qu'il y a déjà eu des

[37:10] ruisseaux en dessous de ça

[37:12] aussi.

[37:13] - C'est de la canalisation. Ça,

[37:14] c'est aux frais du promoteur. Il

[37:15] va devoir les déplacer.

[37:18] - Et vous avez tenu compte aussi

[37:20] de la pression de l'eau dans ce

[37:21] coin-là, tout ça?

[37:23] - Oui, il y a eu des

[37:24] vérifications qui ont été faites

[37:25] aux Travaux publics là-dessus.

[37:26] - Merci.

[37:27] - Merci beaucoup. Est-ce qu'il y

[37:29] a des questions sur d'autres

[37:30] sujets? Parce que je ne

[37:35] répondrai pas à d'autres

[37:36] questions sur le même sujet. Je

[37:37] pense qu'on a fait le tour de

[37:39] l'horizon là-dessus.

[37:43] >> Hi, I'm not gonna talk about

[37:44] that subject. I heard some

[37:49] yesterday that really shocked

[37:51] me. I'm getting older, as you

[37:53] know --

[37:56] >> By the way, happy belated

[37:58] birthday to you, Frank. I know

[38:00] it was yesterday.

[38:01] >> And 14 years I would be 100,

[38:03] and I would still enjoy it --

[38:05] >> Good for you.

[38:07] >> It Joe Schwartz, he's a very

[38:10] famous radio guy, chemist,

[38:16] running a society of science at

[38:19] McGill. And he said, with the

[38:22] project we've got over here for

[38:28] centennial hall, he said that --

[38:31] he did say about that project,

[38:33] but he said about McGill. He

[38:34] says we are getting all our

[38:36] books in the library, and

[38:38] putting them in the storage.

[38:40] Nobody goes to the library

[38:42] anymore. I'm not saying it's

[38:44] happening here. And that's what

[38:46] he's gonna do there. And I

[38:49] suggested, look, three or four

[38:51] years ago, let's put a skating

[38:53] rink there, we have one,

[38:56] artificial one, have the whole

[38:57] West Island --

[38:58] >> Frank, I'd like to listen to

[38:59] you. But what is your question?

[39:00] >> That is part of the question.

[39:03] >> What is?

[39:04] >> It's a preamble. It's very

[39:07] important. You are wanting to

[39:09] build a library over there as

[39:10] well. We don't need another

[39:14] library. Now, why is McGill

[39:16] throwing out all these books

[39:18] into storage? They don't have

[39:20] any -- it's a big, big, big

[39:22] change.

[39:23] >> You have to ask again, I

[39:24] can't answer that.

[39:26] >> Oh, no, come on. That's not

[39:28] up there because they are

[39:29] setting the example --

[39:30] >> I have no idea.

[39:31] >> If you're gonna spend a

[39:32] fortune there --

[39:35] >> Frank, thanks for your

[39:36] questions. I don't know if

[39:38] McGill is throwing out books. I

[39:40] have a striking feeling that

[39:42] they are not on the book burning

[39:44] expedition --

[39:45] >> Storage, I said.

[39:46] >> But are they closing

[39:47] libraries?

[39:49] >> Yes, you're gonna have a

[39:50] digital one --

[39:51] >> That's my question. Are they

[39:53] removing books and replacing

[39:54] them with a digital version? Or

[39:55] are they closing libraries? Is

[39:57] the space still there? Great,

[40:00] thank you very much.

[40:02] >> But that doesn't matter. What

[40:03] are you gonna do with the books?

[40:05] Why are you building a library

[40:06] down there if you're not gonna

[40:07] have books anywhere --

[40:09] >> Can you complete your

[40:10] question, Frank?

[40:12] >> I'm asking you why don't you

[40:14] put our rink there so kids can

[40:17] play hockey because it is too

[40:19] expensive and Beaconsfield, to

[40:21] have a drink that is subsidized

[40:22] by the whole West Island it

[40:24] would be very cheap, and it

[40:26] would run all year around.

[40:28] >> Well, thank you for your

[40:29] suggestion --

[40:30] >> It's more than a suggestion.

[40:36] >> Any other questions? Autre

[40:41] question? Pas sur le sujet du

[40:43] centre d'achat. Merci beaucoup!

[40:48] Nous allons continuer avec

[40:49] l'agenda.

[40:58] - Approbation du procès-verbal

[40:59] de la séance ordinaire de la

[41:00] ville de Beaconsfield du 21 août

[41:02] 2023.

[41:05] - Proposé.

[41:06] - Secondé. En faveur.

[41:09] - À l'unanimité. Renewal of

[41:15] contract contract TP 2020-11, TP

[41:16] 2020-11 for the collection for

[41:17] the collection and

[41:18] transportation of waste, of

[41:19] waste organic matter and bulky

[41:20] waste for the year 2024 organic

[41:21] matter, with Services Ricova

[41:22] Inc., at an approximate cost of

[41:23] bulky waste, for the year 24 --

[41:24] I don't approximate cost $1,

[41:25] 215,000, all taxes of included.

[41:27] 1 million $215,000. That is with

[41:28] all taxes included.

[41:30] >> Seconded.

[41:32] >>

[41:33] - In favour. Proposé.

[41:34] - Secondé.

[41:35] - À l'unanimité. Rejet des

[41:39] soumissions concernant le

[41:40] contrat TP 2023-13 pour

[41:41] l'installation d'un marchepied

[41:43] rétractable au parc Brookside.

[41:51] - Je propose.

[41:53] - En faveur.

[41:55] - Avis de la limiter. In

[42:01] relation to an additional

[42:02] Authorization of an additional

[42:03] expense of $309,323.41

[42:05] $309,323.41,, all taxes

[42:07] included, for contract all taxes

[42:09] included 607-22-AR, for contract

[42:10] 60722-AR, for the construction

[42:12] of for the construction of a new

[42:14] chalet at Beacon Hill a new

[42:15] chalet at Park. Proposed?

[42:16] >> Beacon Hill Park. seconded.

[42:19] >> All in favour?

[42:23] >> Five.

[42:24] >> Against?

[42:28] >> Motion carried.

[42:37] - Approbation de la liste des

[42:38] comptes à payer au 25 septembre

[42:39] 2023 et de la liste des

[42:40] paiements préautorisés pour la

[42:41] période du 10 août 2023 au 20

[42:42] août 2023 et du 22 août 2023 au

[42:43] 13 septembre 2023, pour un

[42:47] déboursé total de 3972884,76$.

[42:56] - Alors, les montants les plus

[42:58] importants sont 544397 et 67, à

[43:06] excavation Roxboro, pour la

[43:08] réfection des chaussées souples.

[43:14] Économe us construction, 280673,

[43:21] et 197648, 46, pour la

[43:23] construction de nouveaux chalet

[43:25] au parc Beacon Hill. 215291, 83,

[43:32] les entreprises

[43:33] (---)

[43:34] pour les travaux ponctuels sur

[43:35] le réseau d'égouts pluviales. Et

[43:39] 128225, transports JR? Et fils

[43:45] pour le bouclage de l'aqueduc

[43:46] (---)

[43:47] . Et finalement, les salaires à

[43:53] 632837, on 04. Propose?

[43:57] - Je propose.

[43:59] - Appuyé.

[44:00] - En faveur.

[44:02] - À l'unanimité.

[44:05] >> Approval of a $150 approval

[44:06] of contribution to the

[44:07] Beaconsfield Oldtimers Hockey

[44:08] Association for the purchase of

[44:09] $150 contribution to the

[44:10] Beaconsfield old-timers an

[44:11] advertisement in their

[44:12] Beaconsfield Old Timers hockey

[44:13] association for the purchase

[44:14] Hockey Tournament Fundraising of

[44:15] programme for the the

[44:16] Beaconsfield year 2023.

[44:17] old-timers tournament organizing

[44:18] program for year 2023. Proposed?

[44:21] >> Seconded.

[44:22] >> In favour?

[44:23] - Proposé.

[44:24] - En faveur.

[44:25] - À l'unanimité. Approbation

[44:29] d'un appui financier de 500$ à

[44:30] Refuge pour les femmes de

[44:31] l'Ouest de l'Île pour l'année

[44:34] 2023.

[44:35] - Je propose.

[44:36] - Secondé.

[44:37] - En faveur.

[44:39] - À l'unanimité.

[44:42] >> Approval of a 500 dollar

[44:44] Approval of a $500 contribution

[44:45] to contribution to West

[44:46] Arthritis West Island Self Help

[44:47] Association Island South Elm

[44:48] association for year 2023 for

[44:49] the. Year 2023.

[44:51] >>

[44:52] - Proposé.

[44:53] - Secondé.

[44:54] - En faveur. Seconded.

[44:55] >> In favour.

[44:56] - À l'unanimité. Approbation

[44:57] d'un appui financier de 1000$ à

[44:58] Centre d'action bénévole

[44:59] Ouest-de-l'Île pour l'année

[45:01] 2023.

[45:02] - Proposé.

[45:03] - Secondé.

[45:04] - En faveur.

[45:06] - À l'unanimité. Seconded

[45:09] >> In favour.

[45:10] >> Approval of Approval of a

[45:11] $1,000 1000 dollar contribution

[45:12] contribution to West Island

[45:13] Cancer Wellness Centre for the

[45:14] year 2023. to West Island Cancer

[45:15] Center for year 2023.

[45:16] >> Proposed.

[45:17] >> Seconded.

[45:18] -

[45:19] >> Proposé. In favour.

[45:20] - Secondé.

[45:21] - En faveur. À l'unanimité. 30.7

[45:24] Approbation d'un appui financier

[45:25] de 1500$ à Accompagnement

[45:26] bénévole de l'Ouest pour l'année

[45:31] 2023.

[45:32] - Je propose.

[45:33] - Secondé.

[45:34] - En faveur.

[45:35] >>

[45:36] - À l'unanimité. Approval

[45:39] Approval of a $2,500

[45:40] contribution to of Friends for

[45:41] Mental Health 2500 dollar

[45:42] contribution for the year 2023.

[45:44] to friends for mental health for

[45:46] year

[45:47] - Je 2023.

[45:48] >> Propose.

[45:49] - Secondé.

[45:50] - En faveur. Proposed.

[45:51] >> Seconded.

[45:52] >> In favour.

[45:53] - À l'unanimité. Résolution

[45:54] donnant une opinion favorable à

[45:55] la reconnaissance, par la

[45:56] Commission municipale du Québec

[45:57] (CMQ)

[45:58] , d'une exemption aux fins de

[45:59] taxes foncières pour l'immeuble

[46:00] identifié comme étant le lot

[46:01] 2424402

[46:02] (103, Biscayne)

[46:03] .

[46:04] - Proposé.

[46:05] - Secondé.

[46:08] >> Seconded.

[46:09] >> All in favour.

[46:11] - Tous

[46:12] >> En faveur?

[46:13] - À l'unanimité. Giving

[46:16] Resolution giving a favourable

[46:17] opinion on the a favourable

[46:18] opinion recognition, by the

[46:19] Commission municipale du Québec

[46:20] (CMQ)

[46:21] , of a property of the

[46:22] Commission municipale du Québec

[46:23] tax exemption for the of a

[46:24] property tax exemption for the

[46:25] movable identified as lot

[46:26] 1 417 500 immovable identified

[46:27] as lot, 1417500 it is

[46:28] (478 Lord)

[46:29] . 478 Lord. Proposed.

[46:30] - Proposé.

[46:32] >> Seconded.

[46:33] - Secondé.

[46:34] >> All in favour.

[46:35] - Tous ceux qui sont en faveur?

[46:38] - À l'unanimité. Résolution

[46:40] donnant une opinion favorable à

[46:42] la reconnaissance, par la

[46:43] Commission municipale du Québec

[46:44] (CMQ)

[46:45] , d'une exemption aux fins de

[46:46] taxes foncières pour l'immeuble

[46:47] identifié comme étant le lot

[46:52] 2424016

[46:53] (129, Rowan)

[46:54] .

[46:55] - Je propose.

[46:57] - Secondé.

[46:58] - En faveur.

[47:01] - Savent unanimité.

[47:04] >> Resolution giving a

[47:05] favourable Resolution giving a

[47:06] favourable opinion on the

[47:07] opinion on recognition, by the

[47:08] Commission municipale du the

[47:09] recognition Québec

[47:10] (CMQ)

[47:11] , of a property by the

[47:12] Commission municipale du Québec

[47:13] tax exemption for the, for

[47:14] immovable identified as lot a

[47:15] property tax exemption for an

[47:16] immovable identified as lot

[47:17] 1 969 963 1969963

[47:18] (330 Sherbrooke)

[47:19] ,. 330 Sherbrooke.

[47:22] >>

[47:23] - Proposed.

[47:24] >> Seconded.

[47:25] >> In favour. Proposé.

[47:26] - Secondé.

[47:27] - En faveur.

[47:28] - À l'unanimité. 30.13

[47:29] Participation à un colloque

[47:30] organisé par l'Association des

[47:31] directeurs généraux des

[47:32] municipalités du Québec

[47:33] (ADGMQ)

[47:34] pour la direction générale des

[47:35] municipalités du Québec du 12 au

[47:36] 13 octobre 2023 à Québec.

[47:37] - Je propose.

[47:39] - Secondé.

[47:46] >>

[47:47] - All in favour -- en faveur?

[47:48] - À l'unanimité. I was thinking

[47:51] ahead. Approval of a $125

[47:56] contribution to 125 dollar

[47:57] contribution Villa Beaurepaire

[47:58] for the purchase of an for the

[47:59] advertisement in their Gala

[48:00] programme for the year 2023.

[48:01] purchase of an advertisement in

[48:02] the Gala four year 2023.

[48:03] Proposed?

[48:04] -

[48:05] >> Proposed seconded..

[48:06] >> All in favour.

[48:08] - Secondé.

[48:10] - En faveur?

[48:11] - À l'unanimité. Demande de

[48:12] révision de la décision du

[48:13] Comité de démolition du 13 juin

[48:15] 2023 concernant le bâtiment

[48:16] situé au 69, Circle.

[48:24] - Proposed.

[48:27] >> What do you propose?

[48:30] >> I am proposing --

[48:31] >> In favour of the demolition?

[48:33] >> Yes.

[48:34] >> I second in favour of the

[48:35] demolition as well.

[48:36] >> Okay. 4 in favour of the

[48:42] demolition. And I will vote on

[48:44] this one because I am also in

[48:45] favour of that demolition. So, I

[48:49] normally don't vote, but I vote

[48:50] in favour. I vote against.

[49:00] -- motion carried. The vote is

[49:13] to maintain the decision is not

[49:15] approved. We call the vote was

[49:21] on maintaining the decision, so

[49:22] it's not approved because there

[49:24] are votes against.

[49:27] >> The decision, can't be left

[49:29] to the demolition committee --

[49:31] [Inaudible]

[49:33] >> Who seconds that? Roger -- so

[49:44] 4, boats 4, maintaining

[49:45] demolition. Maintain the

[49:51] decision -- yes, I'm sorry. So

[49:53] it is four against. And I vote

[49:56] again on that one because I

[50:00] wanted my vote to be registered

[50:02] here.

[50:05] >> The decision of the

[50:07] demolition committee to reject

[50:10] the demolition is maintained.

[50:11] The appeal is refused.

[50:18] >> Do you want to say something,

[50:19] Councillor Mercuri?

[50:23] >> Mayor, just a moment. I have

[50:24] to explain -- the recommendation

[50:30] for the decision. So, a proposal

[50:33] to maintain the demolition

[50:37] committee decision is based on

[50:39] the good standing of the

[50:43] immovable as we have discussed

[50:44] in the past. And also the

[50:48] reasonable cost of restoring and

[50:50] the immovable as it is presently

[50:52] showing.

[50:55] >> Thank you very much,

[50:57] Councilmen Mercuri?

[51:00] >> I thought I'd say a few

[51:03] words. I know the owners of the

[51:05] property are here in the

[51:06] audience this evening. I think

[51:08] they married a few comments. You

[51:11] know, the vote was four, two,

[51:18] four against demolition and two

[51:19] in favour. Myself, I am in

[51:21] favour of demolition, okay? You

[51:26] know, I understand that the

[51:29] motivation is that good standing

[51:31] of the property and the costs to

[51:36] repair or renovate. But when I

[51:38] look at the report, I conclude

[51:40] otherwise, okay? The building is

[51:44] from 1952. Je is English better

[51:49] for you guys? Peux le faire en

[51:50] français ou en anglais... okay.

[51:52] The building is from 1952. It is

[51:55] 70 years plus old. When you look

[51:56] at the evaluation, that the rain

[52:02] is 475,000, the building is

[52:05] 120,000, you can take a few

[52:06] dollars. So, the value of your

[52:08] property is not in the building.

[52:12] But it's in the land. Yes, the

[52:14] engineers report says the break

[52:16] is in good condition. The

[52:19] luminous siding is okay, some of

[52:20] it is heaved up and there could

[52:22] be water infiltration. And the

[52:23] shingles are good. That's

[52:25] positive. But the report also

[52:31] says that your garage is

[52:33] detaching from the frame of the

[52:34] home. It is sinking and must be

[52:37] demolished. The report states

[52:41] that -- so, your roof

[52:47] ventilation is possibly in

[52:49] existent. They can't find any

[52:51] opening to the roof. The windows

[52:53] and doors are 30 to 35 years

[52:54] old. We have exceeded their

[52:59] useful life. No leap holds, so

[53:06] there is poor spacing

[53:08] ventilation behind the brick

[53:09] work. So, no drains, surprising

[53:19] and worrisome giving the

[53:20] flooding that we have. The

[53:24] interior walls have cracks. And

[53:27] they noticed a major fissure

[53:29] along the ceiling, which

[53:33] indicates that their roof has

[53:36] transferred part of the

[53:38] structural weight from the roof

[53:40] to the walls. That is in the

[53:42] report. And that the engineer

[53:44] has found that additional

[53:47] framework was added to solidify

[53:48] the structure. The basement is

[53:55] only 74 inches high. I'm not a

[53:56] tall guy. But it's a bit over

[53:58] six feet, you are much taller

[53:59] than me, young men, so that's

[54:01] gonna bump your head. The

[54:03] electrical needs to be changed.

[54:05] And the repair largely exceeds

[54:08] the value of the building, these

[54:10] are all conclusions of the

[54:12] report, so, I'm having a hard

[54:15] time accepting that the building

[54:17] is in a good state, and that the

[54:19] cost is reasonable. So, for

[54:23] those reasons, I voted in favour

[54:24] of the demolition. And we can go

[54:27] into a discussion about

[54:30] demolishing homes and changing

[54:32] neighbourhoods. I hear a lot

[54:34] from residents that are

[54:36] concerned about bigger homes

[54:37] going up on properties, that is

[54:39] true, there is a concern about

[54:41] that. But we have other bylaws

[54:42] in place with setbacks, and we

[54:44] have a really strong CCU that

[54:50] ensures that new buildings fit

[54:51] into the area. And when we look

[54:52] at the other homes around, there

[54:55] is a mixture, it seems that this

[54:56] neighbourhood is in development.

[54:58] Now, as a city, we are either

[55:01] allowing for homeowners to do

[55:02] what they are allowed to do on

[55:03] their property, or not. And so,

[55:09] for myself, I was in favour of

[55:11] the demolition. However, the

[55:14] majority rules in the vote was

[55:15] against your demand. So, thank

[55:19] you for listening, thank you,

[55:20] Mister Mayor, for the time.

[55:23] >> And, Councillor Mercuri, for

[55:27] the exact reasons that you had

[55:29] verbally expressed so well, I

[55:32] also would have favoured the

[55:33] demolition.

[55:36] >> Mister Mayor, just to add --

[55:39] I am sorry that the decision was

[55:41] what it is. We try to encourage

[55:48] the communities of Beaconsfield.

[55:49] We want good families, good

[55:51] development of our homes. We

[55:52] want homes that will be here for

[55:53] another 50, 75 years. And for

[55:56] the reasons that Councillor

[55:59] Mercuri gave tonight, I also

[56:00] decided that the House is not

[56:02] worth building upon, that

[56:04] demolishing it would have made a

[56:06] lot more sense than you would

[56:07] have got in your dream home that

[56:08] you wanted. I'm just sorry, and

[56:13] my fellow councillors have the

[56:15] reasons, and they follow the law

[56:17] of what they're supposed to do.

[56:19] I do respect that. And we all

[56:22] judge according to, you know,

[56:23] our own thoughts. And hopefully,

[56:26] you can renovate and make it

[56:27] look pretty. Good luck.

[56:34] >> Any other comments from other

[56:35] councillors? Thank you. Let's

[56:40] move on.

[56:48] >> Request for approval of a

[56:51] contract Inc. project, Request

[56:52] for approval of a first draft

[56:53] for a specific alteration

[56:54] construction project, alteration

[56:55] or occupancy proposals for an

[56:56] immovable --

[56:57] (SCAOPI)

[56:58] located at for and it movable,

[56:59] 275 Elm, Beaconsfield PPCMOI,

[57:00] located at (projected lots 275

[57:01] Elm , Beaconsfield . Projected

[57:02] lot 6 555 296 6555296, and and

[57:03] 6 555 297. 6555297 of the

[57:04] Cadastre of Québec) in zone off

[57:05] the Cadastre C330 of Québec in

[57:06] zone C330 of Zoning By-law 720

[57:09] of zoning

[57:10] (Project PP-12-1)

[57:11] bylaw 720, the project PP-12-1,

[57:12] and, upon approval, that the

[57:13] project be presented at a and

[57:14] upon public consultation on

[57:15] approval, the project needs to

[57:16] be represented at a public

[57:17] October 24, 2023, at

[57:18] consultation on 7:00 p.m.

[57:19] October 24th, 2023 at seven PM..

[57:23] - Proposed

[57:24] >> Proposed.

[57:25] >>.

[57:26] - Seconded. Seconded

[57:27] >>

[57:28] - In favour..

[57:32] >> In favour. I also will vote

[57:34] on this in favour? One because I

[57:35] think I would break the tie. So,

[57:37] against. So, I broke the tie and

[57:47] I will move on with the approval

[57:49] of the first draft. As I said,

[57:52] it's a box, it's not the

[57:56] project.

[57:57] >> Mister Mayor, if you may, I

[57:58] would like to comment.

[57:59] >> Sure.

[58:00] >> I voted in favour of this

[58:02] project, as it is being

[58:04] presented today, but if the

[58:07] promoter is listening, and for

[58:09] you, Madam, for example and your

[58:11] neighbours, I want you to know

[58:13] that although I voted in favour

[58:15] for that today, I'm completely,

[58:19] not completely comfortable with

[58:20] it. For me, it's an opportunity

[58:22] to get out in the open,

[58:24] publicly, a project that has

[58:25] been talked about, that's been

[58:27] made available to the public at

[58:30] the first showing at about this

[58:31] time last year. And so, there

[58:34] will be as a result of tonight's

[58:36] vote, a consultation process,

[58:39] where you and your neighbours

[58:40] and members of the community

[58:41] would be able to address and

[58:44] speak of their issues. You have

[58:45] mentioned in your question to

[58:47] Council and to the mayor earlier

[58:49] your fear of things being

[58:51] written in stone. Well, this

[58:52] stone is now out there but it's

[58:54] yet to be written. And as far as

[58:58] I'm concerned, it is a split

[59:00] vote, it's a very tight vote

[59:01] tonight. Again, I'm not 100%

[59:02] comfortable. And as a result of

[59:08] the following steps, which

[59:10] changes can be brought to the

[59:13] project, I hope that some of my

[59:16] reservations, and perhaps some

[59:17] viewers will be addressed as

[59:19] well, and I want you to be

[59:21] assured that if things were to

[59:22] remain exactly as they are

[59:25] today, my favourable quote

[59:26] tonight would translate to a

[59:28] negative vote in the future.

[59:30] >> Mister Mayor, can I say

[59:31] something? I heard you loud and

[59:36] clear, and I'm with you. We did

[59:39] voted -- the box is a bit too

[59:41] big. A lot of us have concerns

[59:42] as well.

[59:47] >> Any other comments? Okay, we

[59:51] will keep on moving.

[59:59] - La consultation publique est

[1:00:01] le mardi...

[1:00:02] - Le 24 octobre.

[1:00:04] - Oui.

[1:00:10] - Demande de dérogations

[1:00:11] mineures pour la propriété

[1:00:12] située au 240, Beaurepaire la

[1:00:15] recommandation est d'approuver.

[1:00:18] - Opposé.

[1:00:19] - J'appuie.

[1:00:21] - En faveur.

[1:00:26] - En unanimité. Request for the

[1:00:29] approval of site Request for the

[1:00:30] approval of the Site Planning

[1:00:31] and planning and integration

[1:00:32] Architectural Integration

[1:00:33] program related to Programme a

[1:00:34] building -- for relating to a

[1:00:35] building permit application for

[1:00:36] a new main building located at a

[1:00:37] new building 30 Madsen located

[1:00:38] at. Street Madsen. The

[1:00:39] recommendation is to refuse --

[1:00:40] internalizing the project.

[1:00:42] Council is deemed to approve --

[1:00:48] the recommendation of the CCU is

[1:00:51] to refuse but Council is to

[1:00:52] prove.

[1:00:54] >> So, do we have to vote on the

[1:00:55] recommendation?

[1:00:56] >> No, we can vote on the

[1:00:57] approval by Council.

[1:00:59] >> Okay, so the vote is for the

[1:01:04] approval of this request.

[1:01:07] >> All in favour.

[1:01:08] >> All in favour.

[1:01:11] >> Anonymous.

[1:01:17] >> Perhaps we should

[1:01:18] [Inaudible]

[1:01:20] >> Yes, please, okay. Thank you.

[1:01:30] -

[1:01:31] >> Proposed. Un proposeur pour

[1:01:32] l'approbation?

[1:01:33] - Je propose.

[1:01:34] - Secondé.

[1:01:35] - Merci, Madame Godin. À

[1:01:36] l'unanimité.

[1:01:45] - Demande d'approbation du plan

[1:01:46] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:01:48] architecturale relatifs à la

[1:01:49] demande d'un permis de

[1:01:50] construction pour un nouveau

[1:01:51] bâtiment situé au 57, dès qu'une

[1:01:52] fière de la. Recommandation est

[1:01:53] d'approuver.

[1:01:58] - Approuver.

[1:01:59] - Secondé.

[1:02:00] - En faveur.

[1:02:01] - À l'unanimité.

[1:02:03] -

[1:02:04] >> Request for the approval of a

[1:02:06] site planning of we the site

[1:02:09] planning an architectural

[1:02:11] integration program. Relating to

[1:02:12] a building permit application

[1:02:13] for the extension of the main

[1:02:14] building located at 564 Chester

[1:02:19] >> The recommendation is to

[1:02:23] refuse but --

[1:02:24] >> So we're going to vote on the

[1:02:26] refusal?

[1:02:28] >> We could have a per position

[1:02:29] to approve.

[1:02:31] >> Proposed.

[1:02:33] >> Seconded.

[1:02:34] >> Second to approve. All in

[1:02:36] favour of approval.

[1:02:40] - Irene à limiter.

[1:02:47] - On demande l'approbation du

[1:02:49] plan d'implantation

[1:02:50] d'architecturale propres à Tiff

[1:02:51] à la demande d'un permis de

[1:02:52] construction pour un nouveau

[1:02:53] bâtiment situé au 137, Gilbert.

[1:02:55] La recommandation est

[1:02:56] d'approuver.

[1:02:57] - Proposé.

[1:02:58] - Secondé.

[1:02:59] - En faveur.

[1:03:00] - À l'unanimité.

[1:03:03] -

[1:03:04] >> Request for the approval of a

[1:03:05] site planning an architectural

[1:03:07] integration program relating to

[1:03:08] a new building permit

[1:03:09] application for the main

[1:03:12] building located at 472 Pine.

[1:03:15] They want to approve.

[1:03:18] >> Proposed.

[1:03:19] >> Seconded.

[1:03:20] >> All in favour. Relatif à la

[1:03:27] demande d'un permis de

[1:03:28] construction pour le bâtiment

[1:03:29] situé au 21, Sutter.

[1:03:31] >> The recommendation is to

[1:03:32] refuse.

[1:03:33] >> Proposed.

[1:03:34] >> Seconded.

[1:03:35] >> All in favour.

[1:03:37] - Unanimité.

[1:03:39] >> Requests for the approval of

[1:03:41] the site planning an

[1:03:42] architectural integration

[1:03:44] program relating to a building

[1:03:45] permit application for the

[1:03:46] extension of the main building

[1:03:47] located at 36 hands. The

[1:03:50] recommendation is to approve.

[1:03:52] >> Proposed.

[1:03:53] >> Seconded.

[1:03:54] - En faveur.

[1:03:55] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[1:03:58] d'approbation du Plan

[1:03:59] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:04:02] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:04:03] de construction pour un nouveau

[1:04:04] bâtiment principal situé au.

[1:04:10] 45.12 125, St-Andrew. La

[1:04:13] recommandation est de refuser.

[1:04:14] - Proposé.

[1:04:15] - Secondé.

[1:04:16] - En faveur. À l'unanimité.

[1:04:18] >> Request Request for the

[1:04:19] approval of the Site Planning

[1:04:20] and for the approval of a site

[1:04:21] Architectural Integration

[1:04:22] planning an Programme

[1:04:23] architectural relating to a

[1:04:24] building permit application for

[1:04:25] the program relating to

[1:04:26] extension of the main a building

[1:04:27] permit building located at

[1:04:28] application for the extension of

[1:04:29] the main building located at 211

[1:04:30] Lakeview. The 211, Lakeview.

[1:04:31] Recommendation is to refuse.

[1:04:32] >> Proposed.

[1:04:33] >> Second.

[1:04:34] >> In favour.

[1:04:40] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:04:41] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:04:43] architecturale relatif à la

[1:04:44] demande d'un permis de

[1:04:45] construction pour

[1:04:46] l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[1:04:47] principal situé au 564, Chester.

[1:04:51] - Proposé.

[1:04:52] - Secondé.

[1:04:53] - En faveur.

[1:04:54] - À l'unanimité.

[1:04:55] >> Request for the Request for

[1:04:56] the approval of the site

[1:04:57] planning and approval of the

[1:04:58] Site Planning and Architectural

[1:04:59] Integration Architectural

[1:05:00] Integration Programme Programme

[1:05:01] relating to a building permit

[1:05:02] relating to a building permit

[1:05:03] application for the application

[1:05:04] for the modification of the

[1:05:05] facade of a main building

[1:05:06] located at 118 Madsen

[1:05:07] modification of the facade of. A

[1:05:08] main building located at 118

[1:05:09] Madsen. The recommendation is to

[1:05:10] approve.

[1:05:11] >> Proposed.

[1:05:12] >> Seconded.

[1:05:13] >> -- Demande d'approbation du

[1:05:18] Plan d'implantation et

[1:05:19] d'intégration architecturale

[1:05:20] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:05:21] de construction pour la

[1:05:22] modification de la façade du

[1:05:23] bâtiment principal situé au 128,

[1:05:25] Angell. La recommandation est

[1:05:28] d'approuver.

[1:05:29] - Opposé.

[1:05:30] - Secondé.

[1:05:31] - En faveur. Request for the

[1:05:32] - À l'unanimité. Approval of the

[1:05:33] Site Planning and Architectural

[1:05:36] Integration Programme relating

[1:05:38] to a building permit Request for

[1:05:39] the application for the approval

[1:05:40] of the Site Planning and

[1:05:41] Architectural Integration

[1:05:42] Programme modification of the

[1:05:43] facade of a main building

[1:05:44] located relating to a building

[1:05:45] permit at application for the

[1:05:46] modification of the facade of a

[1:05:47] main building located at 240,

[1:05:48] Stonehenge. 240, Stonehenge. The

[1:05:49] recommendation is to approve.

[1:06:00] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[1:06:01] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:06:03] architecturale relatif à la

[1:06:04] demande d'un permis de

[1:06:05] construction pour la

[1:06:06] modification de la façade du

[1:06:07] bâtiment principal situé au 300,

[1:06:08] Penn. La recommandation est

[1:06:09] approuvée.

[1:06:11] - On posait.

[1:06:13] - Secondé.

[1:06:14] - En faveur.

[1:06:15] - À l'unanimité.

[1:06:16] >> Request for the approval of

[1:06:17] the Site Planning and

[1:06:19] Architectural Integration

[1:06:22] Programme for the subdivision of

[1:06:23] the property located at 275 Elm.

[1:06:27] >> The recommendation is to

[1:06:29] approve.

[1:06:30] >> Proposed.

[1:06:31] >> Seconded.

[1:06:32] >> In favour. I would make sure

[1:06:37] now, in favour. You are not --

[1:06:40] Robert, you are not --

[1:06:42] >> Subdivision, yes.

[1:06:44] >> You are? Okay. That's great.

[1:06:46] Unanimous.

[1:06:57] Demande de certificat

[1:06:58] d'autorisation pour

[1:06:59] l'installation d'une enseigne

[1:07:00] pour le commerce situé au 240,

[1:07:01] Beaurepaire. La recommandation

[1:07:04] est approuvée.

[1:07:05] - Proposé.

[1:07:06] - J'appuie.

[1:07:07] - En faveur.

[1:07:08] - À l'unanimité.

[1:07:09] >> Acceptance of an amount of

[1:07:14] 73260,00$ for practice to be

[1:07:16] paid by the owner of lot 1417237

[1:07:19] (30 Madsen)

[1:07:20] to the City, according to By-law

[1:07:21] BEAC128 concerning contributions

[1:07:22] for the establishment,

[1:07:23] maintenance and improvement of

[1:07:24] parks, playgrounds and natural

[1:07:27] areas on the City of

[1:07:28] Beaconsfield's territory.

[1:07:34] >> Proposed.

[1:07:35] >> Second.

[1:07:40] (problème technique)

[1:08:02] (problème technique)

[1:08:12] - À l'unanimité.

[1:08:17] >> Acceptance of an amount of

[1:08:19] $45,854.80 for park fees to be

[1:08:20] paid by the owner of lot 1417495

[1:08:21] (131 Woodland)

[1:08:22] to the City, according to By-law

[1:08:23] BEAC128 concerning contributions

[1:08:24] for the establishment,

[1:08:25] maintenance and improvement of

[1:08:26] parks, playgrounds and natural

[1:08:28] areas on the City of

[1:08:29] Beaconsfield's territory.

[1:08:37] - En faveur.

[1:08:38] - À l'unanimité.

[1:08:50] - J'appuie.

[1:08:51] - En faveur.

[1:08:52] - À l'unanimité.

[1:08:58] >>

[1:09:00] - Je propose. Nomination in view

[1:09:01] of

[1:09:02] - Permanency as Technicien en

[1:09:03] génie civil et inspecteur to

[1:09:04] position 5102 en faveur.

[1:09:05] -.

[1:09:15] Proposé.

[1:09:18] >> Any comments Mister Chairman?

[1:09:20] >> Just a reminder, there will

[1:09:23] be public

[1:09:24] - Consultation on October 24th.

[1:09:25] Le 24 octobre. Details will

[1:09:27] follow. There will be

[1:09:28] communications on that for that

[1:09:29] particular project as well.

[1:09:32] - Merci.

[1:09:33] >> I second.

[1:09:35] - En faveur.

[1:09:37] - À l'unanimité.

[1:09:40] >> Recommendation to

[1:09:41] Hydro-Québec for reviewing their

[1:09:43] budgetary shun maintenance cycle

[1:09:45] with the purpose to increase the

[1:09:46] frequency of interventions on

[1:09:47] the City of Beaconsfield's

[1:09:49] territory.

[1:09:50] >> I propose.

[1:09:53] >> I second.

[1:09:54] >> In favour.

[1:09:57] - À l'unanimité. 45.15 Demande

[1:10:00] d'approbation du Plan

[1:10:01] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:10:02] architecturale

[1:10:03] (PIIA)

[1:10:04] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:10:05] de construction pour la

[1:10:06] modification de la façade du

[1:10:07] bâtiment principal situé au 300,

[1:10:08] Penn.

[1:10:10] -

[1:10:11] >> Proposed.

[1:10:12] >> Second.

[1:10:13] >> In favour. Request for

[1:10:15] financial à l'unanimité. Support

[1:10:17] for the update of the policy and

[1:10:18] action plan for Age-Friendly

[1:10:22] Municipalities for 2023-2027.

[1:10:27] >> Proposed.

[1:10:28] >> Second.

[1:10:29] >> In favour.

[1:10:34] - Désignation de la

[1:10:35] représentation de la

[1:10:36] municipalité pour le suivi de la

[1:10:37] demande d'aide financière pour

[1:10:38] la mise à jour du plan d'action

[1:10:40] municipalités amies des aînés.

[1:10:42] 2023, 2027.

[1:10:46] - En faveur.

[1:10:48] - À la unanimité.

[1:10:50] >> Approval of the final report

[1:10:52] on the financial assistance

[1:10:53] granted by the Union des

[1:10:54] Municipalités du Québec and the

[1:10:55] Government of Quebec as part of

[1:10:56] the Fous du français project for

[1:10:58] the year 2022-2023.

[1:11:05] >> Proposed.

[1:11:06] -

[1:11:07] >> In favour. Alinéa limité.

[1:11:10] - Autorisation pour la fermeture

[1:11:12] de rue pour l'événement du jour

[1:11:14] du français le 4 novembre 2023

[1:11:16] de 10 heures à 11 heures.

[1:11:17] - Je compose. Je propose,

[1:11:21] pardon.

[1:11:22] - Appuyé.

[1:11:23] - En faveur.

[1:11:24] - À l'unanimité.

[1:11:25] >> Authorization to allow the

[1:11:26] Friends of Beaurepaire Village

[1:11:27] to host a special Marché Beau,

[1:11:28] Holiday Market event in the

[1:11:29] Christmas Park tennis court

[1:11:31] parking area, to use the Park's

[1:11:32] chalet on Saturday, November 25,

[1:11:33] 2023, from 1 to 8 p.m. and that

[1:11:38] costs for First Aid Services be

[1:11:39] paid by the City.

[1:11:44] >> Proposed.

[1:11:45] >> Seconded.

[1:11:46] >> In favour.

[1:11:48] - À l'unanimité. 45.15 Demande

[1:11:53] d'approbation du Plan

[1:11:54] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:11:55] architecturale

[1:11:56] (PIIA)

[1:11:57] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[1:11:58] de construction pour la

[1:11:59] modification de la façade du

[1:12:00] bâtiment principal situé au 300,

[1:12:01] Penn.

[1:12:09] >> Proposed.

[1:12:11] >> Second.

[1:12:12] >> All in favour.

[1:12:15] >> I was thinking in -- it

[1:12:18] sounds like we're getting a spot

[1:12:19] the rec center, but we're not

[1:12:21] getting a spot the rec center.

[1:12:22] You know? If

[1:12:26] >> Your shirt?

[1:12:27] >> I could be wrong but that's

[1:12:28] not what we voted on.

[1:12:31] >> Mayor's report on the

[1:12:32] decisions made by the

[1:12:33] Agglomeration Council at its

[1:12:34] meetings of August 24 and

[1:12:35] September 21, 2023.

[1:12:39] >> Since I was replaced at that

[1:12:41] meeting by Councillor boss, any

[1:12:43] comments, Councillor boss, on

[1:12:47] the August 24 meeting?

[1:12:48] >> I have no comments on the

[1:12:51] September -- I'll make it short.

[1:12:54] Anyway, we spent, the City of

[1:12:58] Montréal spent a lot of money

[1:13:00] that week. And

[1:13:03] [Inaudible]

[1:13:04] The kitchen kind of thing. It

[1:13:06] was supposedly needed by the

[1:13:08] City of Montréal and paid for by

[1:13:10] the Anglo, including the rear

[1:13:12] taxes that were being overtaxed

[1:13:14] on that the last few years, and

[1:13:17] continuing to go forward. So we

[1:13:19] have absolutely no say as

[1:13:22] Beaconsfield or as with the

[1:13:26] association of the large suburb.

[1:13:28] That's more of the same for me

[1:13:30] but it was an interesting

[1:13:31] experience. Mister Mayor.

[1:13:36] >> Thank you very much. I found

[1:13:39] the same thing -- with a lot of

[1:13:42] money being spent.

[1:13:50] - Dépôt des rapports des

[1:13:51] directeurs.

[1:13:53] - Il n'y a pas de dépôt. Merci.

[1:13:57] >>

[1:13:58] - Closing of meeting.

[1:13:59] >> I'll alors, c'est say la

[1:14:00] levée de la I love it this

[1:14:01] sounds -- séance. Qui propose?

[1:14:07] Alors, tout le monde est en

[1:14:09] faveur. Les gens sont en faveur

[1:14:10] de la levée de la séance. Merci

[1:14:13] beaucoup pour avoir été parmi

[1:14:14] nous ce soir.

[1:14:17] >> Thank you very much for being

[1:14:18] with us this evening. And to

[1:14:20] those of you that have been

[1:14:23] watching the webcast, again,

[1:14:26] thank you for the interest and

[1:14:28] the activities of the city.

[1:14:31] Merci beaucoup pour ceux qui

[1:14:33] nous voient sur la webdiffusion.

[1:14:37] Votre intérêt en la ville de

[1:14:40] Beaconsfield est très précieux.

[1:14:42] C'est très apprécié. Alors merci

[1:14:43] et à la prochaine rencontre le

[1:14:44] mois prochain. Thank you and see

[1:14:48] you next

[1:14:49] | | |

[1:14:51] Monday.

[1:14:52] | | |

2023-09-25 - Conseil municipal extraordinaire de Beaconsfield

Transcript