[0:05] - Lundi le 15 juillet lundi le

[0:07] 15 juillet.

[0:09] >> Welcome to the regular

[0:11] meeting of the municipal council

[0:13] of Monday, July the 15th.

[0:16] And now we will go to the

[0:19] opening of the meeting and the

[0:21] agenda.

[0:22] - Donc, adoption de l'ordre du

[0:23] jour de la séance ordinaire de

[0:25] la Ville de Beaconsfield du 15

[0:27] juillet 2024, avec le retrait du

[0:29] point

[0:30] (---)

[0:31] qui est une nuisance aux 285,

[0:32] West Kraft.

[0:34] - Je propose.

[0:35] >> Propose.

[0:36] - Je seconde.

[0:37] >> - En faveur.

[0:40] - À l'unanimité.

[0:41] - Oui.

[0:44] - Alors, nous allons procéder à

[0:45] la période de questions

[0:48] immédiatement. Le commandant

[0:51] n'est pas avec nous ce soir,

[0:52] c'est à nouveau commandant au PQ

[0:55] à un. Il ne pouvait pas être

[0:57] avec nous ce soir, alors

[1:01] espérons qu'en août, il aura la

[1:03] chance de rencontrer tout le

[1:04] monde. Alors, la période de

[1:09] questions, la première question,

[1:10] c'est de madame Pauline vagues

[1:12] et Girard.

[1:15] (inaudible)

[1:16] Sujet: dérogation mineure. La

[1:20] question sur le 45.1 elle

[1:26] demande

[1:27] (---)

[1:28] une information pour la

[1:29] propriété située au 215, ferme.

[1:31] Sa préoccupation est à propos de

[1:33] l'école JFK. Si c'est pour

[1:35] permettre un agrandissement de

[1:37] l'édifice, il sera difficile de

[1:39] planter autant d'arbres qu'il y

[1:40] en a maintenant. Est-ce que la

[1:41] ville pourrait exiger que le

[1:43] toit de cet agrandissement

[1:44] soient couverts des végétaux?

[1:46] Sinon, le suggéré fortement. Ce

[1:48] couvert végétale pourrait

[1:50] d'ailleurs être intégré dans un

[1:52] projet pédagogique pour les

[1:54] étudiants.

[1:59] Pour cette question-là, voici la

[2:03] réponse, Madame Gérard. Pour la

[2:05] demande de dérogation mineure du

[2:11] 215, Elm, soit pour une demande

[2:13] moindre que le ratio de 1.1

[2:18] demander par le règlement, il

[2:19] est vrai que le site comporte

[2:20] beaucoup de contraintes faisant

[2:21] en sorte que le remplacement

[2:24] entier tel que prévu au

[2:25] règlement sera difficile à

[2:27] atteindre. Toutefois, l'objectif

[2:31] derrière cette norme du

[2:34] règlement est de limiter la

[2:36] perte de canopée que procurent

[2:37] les arbres dans la ville et à

[2:40] proximité d'îlots de chaleur. Il

[2:41] y a des alternatives qui sont

[2:43] étudiées par le centre de

[2:44] services scolaires afin de

[2:47] minimiser la perte de canopée

[2:49] tout en permettant la

[2:53] modernisation de l'aménagement

[2:54] et d'infrastructures sur le site

[2:56] tout en répondant aux besoins de

[2:58] la clientèle de cette école. La

[3:02] deuxième question sur le 45.3,

[3:08] demande de dérogation mineure

[3:09] sur la propriété située au...

[3:12] (---)

[3:13] entre le 134, l'arche et le...

[3:21] (---)

[3:22] ce projet demande plusieurs

[3:23] dérogation. On semble vouloir

[3:25] faire un édifice plus grand que

[3:28] permis sur une surface plus

[3:29] petite que permise. Est-ce

[3:32] vraiment raisonnable? Voici la

[3:34] réponse, Madame Girard. Pour ce

[3:37] qui est projetée

[3:38] (---)

[3:39] , les normes en vigueur dans le

[3:40] règlement d'urbanisme de la

[3:42] ville sont établis en tenant

[3:44] compte que plus de la majorité

[3:45] du territoire se comportent

[3:48] d'habitations unifamiliales

[3:49] isolées. Elles sont donc peu

[3:51] adaptées à des projets de

[3:54] bâtiments multifamiliaux. À

[3:56] proximité d'infrastructures de

[3:58] transport collectif comme le

[4:00] train de banlieue, ce qui

[4:02] explique les demandes de

[4:05] dérogation pour qu'il se

[4:06] réalise. La proposition en est

[4:09] une deuxième d'un projet

[4:11] similaire qui a fait l'objet

[4:12] d'une approbation en 2023. Dans

[4:15] le présent projet, il y a une

[4:17] amélioration du pourcentage

[4:19] d'espaces verts sur le terrain.

[4:23] Notamment... ainsi qu'un nombre

[4:24] de cas de stationnement basé à

[4:27] proximité aux transports

[4:28] collectifs et sur l'utilisation

[4:30] des cas des bâtiments voisins de

[4:32] même type. Il est aussi à noter

[4:35] que ce type d'habitation répond

[4:37] à un besoin criant en logement

[4:39] sur l'île de Montréal. The next

[4:44] question comes from --

[4:46] from Saint Andrew.

[4:49] The subject is objection to

[4:54] minor --

[4:55] and new constructions.

[4:56] She indicates her objections to

[4:58] the minor exemption request at

[5:02] 215 elm for the replacement of

[5:05] --

[5:06] trees.

[5:07] She also indicates her

[5:08] objections to the construction

[5:09] of new building at ten Madsen

[5:13] 66, Raquel, and a new extension

[5:16] at 79 Saint Andrew.

[5:19] The objection to the minor

[5:20] exemption request is noted, and

[5:23] the comments will be transferred

[5:25] to the administration.

[5:30] Next question comes from two

[5:34] questions actually, from Mr.

[5:37] Derek --

[5:38] in Sweet Briar.

[5:40] The first question is on 20.3,

[5:46] authorization to sign a lease on

[5:47] water property with the Québec

[5:48] government for deepwater

[5:51] Charlotte yacht club and

[5:53] confirmation of its purpose.

[5:58] 20.4, request for approval for

[6:00] dates of sale,

[6:08] 1 416 984 and 1 417 002 in

[6:10] accordance with sections for 511

[6:13] following the cities and towns

[6:14] act following the non payment of

[6:16] taxes in 2023.

[6:19] We can come back to question

[6:23] one, re: agenda item 20.3 and

[6:29] 20.4 for 15 July 2024.

[6:31] The council meeting appears to

[6:34] be --

[6:35] please explain in transparent

[6:36] terms where is the deep water

[6:40] ashore lot that you wish to read

[6:43] from the Québec government

[6:44] interference purpose.

[6:45] Since the city has owned the

[6:47] yacht club for decades.

[6:48] In 2024, request approval of the

[6:51] tough sale project by which the

[6:53] City seeds block 1 416 984 and 1

[6:59] 417 002.

[7:03] Mr. pounds is kind of putting

[7:06] together those two questions and

[7:09] referring to the two questions,

[7:11] and so I will try to answer his

[7:15] questions.

[7:16] Items 20.3 and 20.4 or not

[7:20] linked.

[7:21] Item 20.3 is regarding the

[7:24] deepwater short lot located at

[7:28] the Beaconsfield yacht club.

[7:30] The City must leased the

[7:32] deepwater, not the land,

[7:34] adjacent to the Beaconsfield

[7:37] yacht club property where the

[7:40] club is located.

[7:41] Since it is the property of the

[7:42] government of Québec, our

[7:46] previously's had expired, and

[7:48] this resolution is to request

[7:49] the authorization to sign a new

[7:54] lease.

[7:55] Item 20.4, 20.4 it is regarding

[8:01] the sale of lots located in

[8:04] Lakeview north which are sold in

[8:06] 2023 during the auction sale for

[8:08] non payment of taxes which took

[8:11] place in June 2023.

[8:13] These lots were sold to an

[8:16] individual who purchased both

[8:17] lots for the amount of unpaid

[8:20] taxes perched plus certain fees.

[8:22] The law provides a one-year

[8:23] period during which the previous

[8:25] owners can buy back the land.

[8:28] The previous owners have not

[8:29] done so, and a one-year period

[8:32] is now over.

[8:33] Therefore, the buyer can now

[8:35] receive deed of sale to become

[8:36] the official owner of the lots.

[8:43] His other question is on items

[8:48] 30.2, 30 point, three and 30.4.

[8:50] A warning about issue of or teen

[8:54] million --

[8:55] dollars following a public call,

[8:59] 30.3 resolution of an extension

[9:02] relating to a long term bonds in

[9:03] the amount of 14,491,000, which

[9:07] will be carried out on July

[9:09] 25th, 2024.

[9:10] Transfers from on appropriated

[9:15] surplus as of December 31, 2023,

[9:18] two appropriated surplus upon

[9:21] recommendation of the finance

[9:24] committee.

[9:25] And please advise that the

[9:27] amount of the an appropriated

[9:29] surplus of December 31st, 2023,

[9:36] and the 14 million dollar bond

[9:39] to finance the restoration

[9:42] project.

[9:43] If your answer is no, then how

[9:44] will it be used?

[9:46] Well, the amount of the an

[9:48] appropriated surplus being

[9:50] transferred is one point $5

[9:54] million, and it is being

[9:55] transferred as follows.

[9:56] One billion dollars for

[9:59] balancing future leisure's,

[10:02] $400,000 for the centennial,

[10:06] $100,000 for professional

[10:08] services, and 91,820 from the

[10:13] angel reserve through the

[10:15] professional services reserve.

[10:18] This amount is not combined with

[10:20] the bond.

[10:22] Neither used to finance the

[10:24] where creation Centre

[10:27] restoration project.

[10:28] They are unrelated.

[10:29] The bond is used to refinance

[10:31] past projects and depths

[10:38] debts.

[10:39] That will cover the written

[10:40] questions that we have received

[10:41] and that we will go for more

[10:44] questions.

[10:53] >> May I ask why cutting 60

[10:58] trees is at 215 Ellen is

[11:03] considered a minor exemption?

[11:04] That is a lot of mature trees,

[11:06] and I thought that Beaconsfield

[11:07] was one of the cities that was

[11:09] really big on protecting their

[11:11] trees?

[11:13] >> Yeah, I think that you

[11:14] already asked that question.

[11:16] >> I did, but it is an important

[11:18] question to ask.

[11:19] >> And I say that the objection

[11:20] for the minor objection request

[11:22] is voted, and the comments will

[11:24] be transferred to the

[11:25] administration.

[11:26] So, the administration will take

[11:28] care of your question.

[11:29] >> What I was trying to say is

[11:32] that I was walking and Angel

[11:35] woods today and a notice that it

[11:36] was much cooler when there were

[11:37] a lot of trees.

[11:39] It would save the school a lot

[11:40] of money leaving the trees where

[11:43] they are and would cut down on

[11:46] problematic behaviour within the

[11:48] school, but kids would have a

[11:50] much higher success rate, and

[11:53] they would learn a lot better

[11:54] with having trees than having

[11:56] more pavement.

[11:57] They need trees.

[12:00] >> We have a request for a minor

[12:03] objection at 45.1 on the agenda,

[12:07] and the council will vote on

[12:08] that one.

[12:10] >> Thank you.

[12:11] That is what I am referring to.

[12:12] I hope you guys vote to save the

[12:14] trees because it is really

[12:16] important.

[12:17] >> Thank you.

[12:26] >> Hi, my name is Frank.

[12:30] The policeman is not here, and

[12:33] so I am having a question that

[12:38] the police could get involved

[12:42] with.

[12:43] Just for the fun of it, I am

[12:44] standing here --

[12:45] I am a cop and I'm standing here

[12:47] with my gun, and I'm telling you

[12:48] that hey, on my street,

[12:52] Stonehenge Drive, there are

[12:56] complaints constantly, and

[12:58] people are using that for a

[13:02] highway.

[13:03] Highway number two sometimes.

[13:04] The street is only 24 feet wide.

[13:06] There is no sidewalks, and

[13:10] people have complained

[13:12] constantly, Frank, there is a

[13:13] stop sign there, Frank!

[13:14] >> Did you call SPVM to

[13:18] complain?

[13:19] Did you do that?

[13:20] >> Hey, hold it, the story has

[13:21] been going after 20 years!

[13:22] >> Why don't you call SPVM.

[13:26] The commandant is not here

[13:27] tonight, but call and he will

[13:28] tell you exactly what I'm going

[13:31] to tell you.

[13:32] If you noticed any problems with

[13:35] traffic, in the speeding, please

[13:38] call SPVM and they will take

[13:39] care of it.

[13:41] >> Well I am on my veranda and I

[13:42] see this guy going 60 miles an

[13:44] hour.

[13:45] I am worried about >>.

[13:47] I am the oldest guy on the

[13:49] street, right?

[13:50] >> Call the SPVM.

[13:51] Call SPVM.

[13:52] >> I called them more than once.

[13:55] >> Well, keep going.

[13:56] >> And then what?

[13:58] No, the street is getting worse.

[14:02] They can't use it as a highway!

[14:04] >> Frank, that is a police

[14:07] manner.

[14:08] Call SPVM.

[14:09] Thank you.

[14:10] >> Well, that is not fair at

[14:12] all!

[14:13] You should have something to say

[14:14] about this!

[14:15] >> Thank you very much.

[14:17] >> My councillor here would like

[14:19] to say something.

[14:24] >> What I can tell you is that

[14:28] we are concerned with the speed,

[14:33] and there is an issue.

[14:35] There is also a process.

[14:36] I agree with the mayor that the

[14:40] SPVM can be called.

[14:41] Someone filed a request with the

[14:43] traffic advisory committee, and

[14:45] what is going to happen in the

[14:46] near future is that the speed

[14:48] serve it will be conducted, and

[14:50] as the case may be, measures, if

[14:53] appropriate, will be taken to

[14:54] slow down traffic.

[14:56] >> You know, I made a sacrifice

[14:58] by not driving my cars.

[15:01] No, I just want to make that

[15:04] clear.

[15:05] I am breathing carbon monoxide,

[15:07] Mister Mayor!

[15:08] And I have only so many years to

[15:11] live.

[15:12] >> Thank you very much, Frank.

[15:17] >> Any other questions from the

[15:18] floor?

[15:24] Thank you very much.

[15:25] So we will go on to the agenda.

[15:32] Adoption of --

[15:34] June 17th 2024.

[15:37] >> Proposed.

[15:39] >> Seconded.

[15:40] >> All in favour?

[15:43] - À l'unanimité. >>

[15:44] [Inaudible]

[15:47] Octroi d'un mandat de gré à gré

[15:49] pour la rénovation de la

[15:51] patinoire à Services EXP inc.,

[15:55] Pour la somme de 53 256,42 $,

[15:56] toutes taxes incluses

[15:57] (RGC 2024-11)

[15:59] c'est le contrat

[16:01] (---)

[16:02] .

[16:03] - Je propose.

[16:05] - En faveur.

[16:07] - À l'unanimité.

[16:11] >> Authorization to install the

[16:14] fibre optic into the --

[16:16] right of way.

[16:19] - J'appuie.

[16:20] - En faveur.

[16:23] - Ça unanimité.

[16:33] 20.3 Autorisation de signature

[16:34] du bail hydrique avec le

[16:35] gouvernement du Québec pour un

[16:36] lot de grève en eau profonde

[16:37] (Yacht Club de Beaconsfield)

[16:38] et confirmation de son objet.

[16:39] >> In favour.

[16:40] - Unanimité.

[16:41] >> Request for approval of the

[16:44] project by which the city of

[16:46] Beaconsfield seeks lot

[16:56] 1 416 984 and 1 417 002 in

[16:57] accordance with sections 511

[16:58] andfollowing of the Cities and

[16:59] Towns Act following the sale for

[17:00] non-payment of taxes process of

[17:01] 2023

[17:04] >> Proposed?

[17:05] >> Seconded.

[17:06] >> In favour.

[17:09] - À l'unanimité. 30.1

[17:12] Approbation de la liste des

[17:13] comptes à payer au 15 juillet

[17:14] 2024, et de la liste des

[17:15] paiements préautorisés pour la

[17:16] période du 6 juin 2024 au 16

[17:17] juin 2024 et du 18 juin 2024 au

[17:20] 3 juillet 2024, pour un déboursé

[17:21] total de 3 649 383,81 $.

[17:30] >> Proposed.

[17:31] >> Seconded.

[17:32] >> In favour.

[17:36] - À l'unanimité.

[17:44] A warning of the bond issue of

[17:49] $14,491,000 following a public

[17:50] call for tenders.

[17:53] Proposed.

[17:55] >> Second.

[17:57] >> In favour.

[18:01] - À l'unanimité.

[18:06] 30.3 Résolution de concordance,

[18:07] de courte échéance et de

[18:08] prolongation relativement à un

[18:09] emprunt par obligations au

[18:10] montant de 14 491 000 $ qui sera

[18:11] réalisé le 25 juillet 2024.

[18:13] - Je propose.

[18:15] - Je seconde.

[18:17] - En faveur.

[18:20] - À l'unanimité. Transfers from

[18:25] unappropriated surplus as of

[18:26] December 31, 2023, to

[18:27] appropriated surplus

[18:28] (upon recommendation of the

[18:29] Finance Committee)

[18:30] .

[18:31] >> Proposed.

[18:33] >> Seconded.

[18:34] >> In favour.

[18:38] - À l'unanimité. Adoption du

[18:41] Règlement BEAC-158 intitulé «

[18:43] Règlement visant à soustraire le

[18:44] territoire de la Ville de

[18:45] Beaconsfield de l'autorisation

[18:46] d'un logement accessoire ».

[18:48] L'objet de ce règlement est de

[18:49] permettre à la Ville de se

[18:51] soustraira une nouvelle loi

[18:52] provinciale qui permet

[18:53] l'aménagement d'un logement

[18:55] accessoire. Il s'applique sur le

[18:59] territoire entier de

[19:00] Beaconsfield.

[19:01] - Proposé.

[19:02] - J'appuie.

[19:03] - En faveur!

[19:07] - À l'unanimité. Authorization

[19:12] to correct nuisances at 106

[19:14] Florida and to bill the costs to

[19:15] the owner, in virtue of By-law

[19:17] BEAC-033.

[19:19] >> Proposed.

[19:20] >> Seconded.

[19:21] >> In favour.

[19:24] - À l'unanimité. 40.3 Demande

[19:27] d'autorisation de corriger les

[19:28] nuisances au 134, Fairlawn et de

[19:29] facturer le coût des travaux au

[19:30] propriétaire, en vertu du

[19:31] Règlement BEAC-033.

[19:35] - J'appuie.

[19:36] - En faveur.

[19:39] - À l'unanimité.

[19:40] Authorization to correct

[19:41] nuisances at 275 Elm and to bill

[19:46] the costs to the owner, in

[19:47] virtue of By-law BEAC-033 - Je

[19:49] propose.

[19:51] >> In favour.

[19:53] - À l'unanimité. Le point 40.5 a

[19:57] été retiré.

[20:04] Demande d'autorisation de

[20:05] corriger les nuisances au 460,

[20:06] Beaconsfield et de facturer le

[20:07] coût des travaux au

[20:08] propriétaire, en vertu du

[20:09] Règlement BEAC-033.

[20:10] - Proposé.

[20:11] - Secondé.

[20:12] - En faveur.

[20:14] - À l'unanimité. Authorization

[20:17] to correct nuisances on the

[20:21] vacant lots 6 266 981 and 6 266

[20:26] 982

[20:27] (79 Elm)

[20:28] and to bill the costs to the

[20:29] owner, in virtue of By-law

[20:31] BEAC033 >> Proposed.

[20:33] >> I second.

[20:34] - En faveur.

[20:37] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[20:41] d'autorisation de corriger les

[20:42] nuisances sur le lot vacant 6

[20:43] 266 766

[20:44] (205, Alton, côté nord)

[20:46] et de facturer le coût des

[20:47] travaux au propriétaire, en

[20:48] vertu du Règlement BEAC-033.

[20:51] - Proposé.

[20:55] - Secondé.

[20:56] - En faveur.

[20:59] - À l'unanimité.

[21:03] Request for a minor exemption

[21:04] for the property located at 215

[21:05] Elm the recommendation is to

[21:06] refuse.

[21:07] >> Proposed.

[21:08] >> Seconded.

[21:10] >> What is the recommendation?

[21:12] To refuse?

[21:13] In favour of the recommendation?

[21:18] - À l'unanimité. >> Is the

[21:20] recommendation to cut 60 trees?

[21:22] >> The question period is over,

[21:25] so --

[21:26] >> Yeah, but everybody is

[21:27] [Inaudible]

[21:28] --

[21:29] >> No, I am sorry, this is not a

[21:30] question period.

[21:31] >> It was refused.

[21:32] >> It was refused.

[21:34] >> It was refused.

[21:35] >> Why?

[21:36] >> It was refused to cut the 60

[21:39] trees.

[21:40] >> But we cannot have questions

[21:42] until after the question period.

[21:48] - 45.2 Demande de dérogation

[21:49] mineure pour la propriété située

[21:50] au 533, Church. La

[21:51] recommandation est d'approuver.

[21:52] - Proposé.

[21:54] - Secondé.

[21:55] - En faveur!

[21:58] - À l'unanimité. Demande de

[22:01] dérogations mineures pour la

[22:02] propriété située au lot projeté

[22:04] 6 576 815

[22:09] (entre le 134, Larch et le

[22:10] 144, Larch)

[22:11] . La recommandation est

[22:12] d'approuver.

[22:13] - Proposé.

[22:14] - J'appuie.

[22:15] - En faveur de la

[22:16] recommandation.

[22:20] >> I refuse.

[22:21] (inaudible)

[22:22] >> You refuse?

[22:24] [Inaudible]

[22:26] >> Motion carried.

[22:35] - Demande d'approbation du Plan

[22:39] d'implantation et d'intégration

[22:41] architecturale

[22:42] (PIIA)

[22:43] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[22:44] de construction pour un nouveau

[22:45] bâtiment principal situé au 10,

[22:46] Madsen. La recommandation est de

[22:47] refuser.

[22:48] - Proposé.

[22:49] - Secondé.

[22:50] - En faveur.

[22:51] (inaudible)

[22:52] >> I

[22:56] [Inaudible]

[22:57] .

[22:58] I am against the recommendation.

[22:59] >> You are voting against it?

[23:02] - Donc... >> Motion carried.

[23:07] Request for the approval of the

[23:08] Site Planning and Architectural

[23:09] Integration Programme relating

[23:10] to a building permit application

[23:11] for a new main building located

[23:14] at 66 St-Louis.

[23:15] The recommendation is to refuse.

[23:16] >> Propose.

[23:17] >> Seconded.

[23:18] >> In favour of recommendation.

[23:23] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[23:26] d'approbation du Plan

[23:27] d'implantation et d'intégration

[23:28] architecturale

[23:29] (PIIA)

[23:30] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[23:31] de construction pour un nouveau

[23:32] bâtiment principal situé sur un

[23:33] lot projeté 6 576 815

[23:37] (entre le 134, Larch et 144,

[23:38] Larch)

[23:39] . La recommandation est

[23:40] d'approuver.

[23:41] - Proposé.

[23:43] - Secondé.

[23:44] - En faveur de la

[23:46] recommandation.

[23:49] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[23:54] approval of the Site Planning

[23:58] and Architectural Integration

[24:01] Programme relating to a building

[24:02] permit application for a new

[24:03] main building located at.

[24:06] 1 Angell --

[24:07] >> Proposed, seconded.

[24:09] >> In favour as a

[24:10] recommendation.

[24:12] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[24:15] d'approbation du Plan

[24:16] d'implantation et d'intégration

[24:18] architecturale

[24:19] (PIIA)

[24:20] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[24:21] de construction pour

[24:22] l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[24:23] principal situé au 79,

[24:24] St-Andrew. La recommandation est

[24:25] de refuser.

[24:26] - Proposé.

[24:27] - Secondé.

[24:28] - En faveur de la

[24:30] recommandation.

[24:32] - À l'unanimité.

[24:38] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[24:39] d'implantation et d'intégration

[24:40] architecturale

[24:41] (PIIA)

[24:42] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[24:43] de construction pour

[24:44] l'agrandissement du bâtiment

[24:45] principal situé au 148,

[24:46] Evergreen. La recommandation est

[24:47] d'approuver selon les plans

[24:48] déposés le 8 juillet 2024.

[24:50] - Proposé.

[24:52] - Je seconde.

[24:53] - En faveur de la

[24:55] recommandation.

[24:57] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[24:58] approval of the Site Planning

[24:59] and Architectural Integration

[25:02] Programme relating to a building

[25:03] permit application for the

[25:04] extension of the main building

[25:05] located at 367 Balmoral.

[25:10] The recommendation is to

[25:11] approve.

[25:12] >> Proposed.

[25:13] >> Seconded.

[25:14] >> In favour of the

[25:15] recommendation.

[25:16] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[25:19] d'approbation du Plan

[25:20] d'implantation et d'intégration

[25:21] architecturale

[25:22] (PIIA)

[25:23] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[25:24] de construction pour la

[25:25] modification de la façade du

[25:26] bâtiment principal situé au 83,

[25:28] Charleswood. La recommandation

[25:29] est d'approuver.

[25:30] - Proposé.

[25:31] - Secondé.

[25:32] - En faveur de la

[25:33] recommandation.

[25:35] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[25:37] approval of the Site Planning

[25:38] and Architectural Integration

[25:40] Programme relating to a building

[25:41] permit application for the

[25:43] modification of the facade of a

[25:45] main building located at 373

[25:47] Beaurepaire.

[25:48] The recommendation is to

[25:50] approve.

[25:51] >> Proposed.

[25:52] >> I second.

[25:53] >> In favour of the

[25:54] recommendation.

[25:55] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[25:57] d'approbation du Plan

[25:58] d'implantation et d'intégration

[25:59] architecturale

[26:00] (PIIA)

[26:01] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[26:02] de construction pour la

[26:03] modification du plan déjà

[26:04] approuvé au 30, Madsen. La

[26:06] recommandation est d'approuver.

[26:07] - Proposé.

[26:08] - Je seconde.

[26:09] - En faveur de la

[26:11] recommandation.

[26:13] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[26:15] approval of the Site Planning

[26:16] and Architectural Integration

[26:18] Programme relating to a building

[26:20] permit application to modify the

[26:21] already approved plan at 57

[26:23] Beaconsfield.

[26:24] The recommendation is to

[26:26] approve.

[26:27] >> Proposed.

[26:28] >> Seconded.

[26:29] >> In favour of the

[26:30] recommendation.

[26:31] - À l'unanimité. Demande

[26:33] d'approbation du Plan

[26:34] d'implantation et d'intégration

[26:35] architecturale

[26:36] (PIIA)

[26:37] relatif à la demande d'un permis

[26:38] de construction pour la

[26:39] modification de la façade du

[26:41] bâtiment principal situé au 519,

[26:42] Westhill. La recommandation est

[26:44] d'approuver.

[26:45] - Proposé.

[26:47] - En faveur de la

[26:49] recommandation.

[26:50] - À l'unanimité. Request for the

[26:52] approval of the Site Planning

[26:53] and Architectural Integration

[26:54] Programme relating to a building

[26:56] permit application for the

[26:58] modification of the facade of a

[26:59] main building located at 599

[27:04] Chester The recommendation is to

[27:05] approve. >> Proposed.

[27:06] >> Seconded. >> In favour of the

[27:07] recommendation. - À l'unanimité.

[27:11] Demande d'approbation du Plan

[27:12] d'implantation et d'intégration

[27:13] architecturale

[27:14] (PIIA)

[27:15] pour le lotissement des lots

[27:16] projetés 6 576 815, 6 576 816 et

[27:19] 6 576 817

[27:25] (132, Larch à 146, Larch)

[27:26] . La recommandation est

[27:29] d'approuver.

[27:30] - Proposé.

[27:33] (inaudible)

[27:39] >> In favour of the

[27:41] recommendation.

[27:42] - À l'unanimité. Acceptance of

[27:48] an amount of $330,924.00 for

[27:53] park fees to be paid by the

[27:54] owner of lot 2 424 121, 132-146

[27:58] Larch, and the projected lots

[28:03] our 6 576 815, 6 576 816 and 6

[28:07] 576 817 to the City, according

[28:10] to By-law BEAC128 concerning

[28:14] contributions for the

[28:15] establishment, maintenance and

[28:17] improvement of parks,

[28:19] playgrounds and natural areas on

[28:20] the City of Beaconsfield's

[28:21] territory.

[28:22] >> I am pleased to propose.

[28:24] >> Second.

[28:26] >> In favour.

[28:28] - À l'unanimité. Demande de

[28:31] prolongation des délais en vertu

[28:32] de la Loi sur l'aménagement et

[28:33] l'urbanisme au ministère des

[28:34] Affaires municipales et de

[28:35] l'Habitation.

[28:38] - Je propose.

[28:40] - En faveur.

[28:42] - À l'unanimité. Nomination in

[28:45] view of permanency as Agent de

[28:46] patrouille municipale to

[28:47] position 7002.

[28:53] >> Proposed. >> I second.

[28:55] - En faveur.

[28:58] - À l'unanimité. Procès-verbal

[29:00] de la réunion du Comité

[29:01] consultatif d'urbanisme du 26

[29:02] juin 2024. >> So I propose the

[29:09] minutes, nothing new to report

[29:10] other than the project we went

[29:11] through.

[29:12] >> Do you want to report

[29:13] something?

[29:14] >> There is nothing over and

[29:15] above the project.

[29:16] So you are proposing?

[29:18] >> I second.

[29:19] >> In favour.

[29:22] - À l'unanimité. Deposit of the

[29:24] minutes of the Demolition

[29:25] Committee meeting of May 14,

[29:27] 2024.

[29:28] Il s'agit d'un dépôt.

[29:31] >> Any comments on the depot?

[29:33] - Le dépôt, oui, merci, Monsieur

[29:35] le Maire. Le dépôt porte sur la

[29:38] demande d'autorisation de

[29:39] démolir deux maisons au huit,

[29:42] ils ont, est au 66, Saint-Louis,

[29:44] le 14 mai dernier. With regards

[29:50] to eight --

[29:51] and St. Louis.

[29:54] In both cases, it was determined

[29:56] that the poor condition of the

[29:59] building for the demolition, --

[30:01] Et aussi en considérant que si

[30:03] on était pour y aller avec une

[30:06] rénovation, une restauration de

[30:07] l'édifice, le coût des travaux

[30:09] était pour être supérieur à la

[30:10] valeur de l'immeuble.

[30:11] So, in both cases, the

[30:13] demolition was awarded.

[30:15] - Merci.

[30:23] Nomination d'un membre au Comité

[30:24] consultatif de circulation.

[30:27] - Alors, je propose la

[30:29] nomination de monsieur Michael

[30:31] (---)

[30:32] ...

[30:33] - Peut-être parler un peu de...

[30:34] - Oui, alors c'est un résidant

[30:35] de Beaconsfield dans le district

[30:37] cinq, six

[30:50] Alors il nous fait plaisir de

[30:52] l'accueillir comme membre du

[30:53] comité consultatif de

[30:55] circulation.

[30:58] >> Who is seconding?

[31:00] - Secondé.

[31:02] - En faveur.

[31:06] - À l'unanimité. Authorization

[31:08] to create and set up a Steering

[31:09] Committee for the renewal of the

[31:12] 2023-2027 AgeFriendly

[31:13] Municipality Policy and Action

[31:14] Plan.

[31:15] >> I propose.

[31:17] >> I second.

[31:19] >> Do you have any comments?

[31:21] >> I'm very excited.

[31:22] We have

[31:23] [Inaudible]

[31:24] >> Could you put it on the mic?

[31:27] >> There we go.

[31:28] We are very excited.

[31:29] This is something that is

[31:30] mandated by the government that

[31:31] we have to do as the committee,

[31:35] and we have organized the

[31:37] steering committee with some

[31:40] residents, and myself, I will be

[31:41] the chair, and Mr. Moss will be

[31:44] the co-chair.

[31:45] We will start working in the

[31:47] fall.

[31:48] >> Thank you.

[31:51] In favour.

[31:52] - En faveur.

[31:57] (inaudible)

[31:59] À l'unanimité.

[32:00] - Oui...

[32:01] - Proposée par madame

[32:03] Alexopoulos est sur... approuvée

[32:07] par monsieur Moss. Modification

[32:11] de la résolution 2024-06-236

[32:12] autorisant la fermeture

[32:13] partielle de rues lors de

[32:14] l'événement de la compétition

[32:15] des nageurs au Club de Natation

[32:16] Beaurepaire le 8 août 2024 de 7

[32:17] h à 20 h afin de modifier la

[32:18] fermeture partielle à une

[32:20] fermeture complète et de

[32:21] préciser les coûts sanitaires.

[32:24] - Proposé.

[32:26] - Secondé.

[32:27] - En faveur!

[32:30] - À l'unanimité.

[32:31] Rescinding of resolution

[32:35] 2024-04-166 regarding the lease

[32:36] agreement with Beaurepaire

[32:37] Nursery Group for the use of the

[32:39] Beacon Hill chalet for the

[32:41] school year 2024-2025.

[32:43] >> I propose.

[32:45] >> I second.

[32:46] >> In favour.

[32:50] - À l'unanimité. Projet Imagine

[32:52] - décision du jury confirmant le

[32:53] choix du lauréat du concours

[32:54] d'architecture

[32:55] pluridisciplinaire pour la

[32:56] construction d'un centre

[32:57] culturel multifonctionnel, il

[32:59] s'agit du projet

[33:00] (24-SP-195)

[33:01] . Il s'agit d'un dépôt.

[33:03] - Un dépôt. Alors, je vous

[33:05] dirais tout simplement informer

[33:07] que le Projet Imagine correspond

[33:11] à une étape clé avec la

[33:13] sélection du projet. Un paysage

[33:15] réinventer par l'équipe Lemay

[33:19] Bouthillette Parizeau elle les

[33:22] honore. Alors, la ville saluent

[33:25] les 32 équipes ayant soumis des

[33:30] candidatures de haut calibre. Le

[33:33] jury coprésidée par Anne-Marie

[33:37] Parent et Gavin affectes... on a

[33:42] sélectionné quatre finalistes en

[33:43] avril, à chacun présentant une

[33:47] identité architecturale unique.

[33:51] Lors des auditions publiques du

[33:52] 2 juillet, les finalistes ont

[33:54] présenté des projets respectant

[33:56] le caractère naturel du site,

[33:59] mettant en valeur le paysage

[34:01] riverains et le patrimoine

[34:03] collectif de Beckham fils. Le

[34:06] projet retenus s'intègre

[34:09] harmonieusement dans le paysage

[34:11] pittoresque du parc Sainte-Anne

[34:15] Yale réponses aux

[34:16] recommandations du rapport sur

[34:17] les consultations publiques et

[34:18] les ateliers créatif pour la

[34:22] revitalisation du parc de

[34:25] Sainte-Agnès et la propriété

[34:26] lors de règne. Ce projet

[34:29] permettra aux citoyens de vivre

[34:30] une expérience unique dans un

[34:33] environnement bucolique. Alors,

[34:36] voilà. C'est une équipe, Lemay,

[34:39] Bouthillette, Parizeau

[34:41] (---)

[34:42] qui a été choisi.

[34:44] - Est-ce que je pourrais juste

[34:46] ajouter?

[34:47] - Oui.

[34:48] - C'est la présentation numéro

[34:49] 4. Juste au cas où qu'on ne se

[34:51] souviennent pas de tous les

[34:52] noms...

[34:53] - C'est une bonne chose de le

[34:54] souligner. C'est la présentation

[34:55] numéro 4. Oui.

[35:01] (rires)

[35:02] (inaudible)

[35:04] Imagine project - mandate to the

[35:06] administration regarding the

[35:07] architectural competition.

[35:08] >> Proposed.

[35:10] >> Seconded.

[35:12] >> In favour.

[35:15] - À l'unanimité. Résolution

[35:19] concernant la position de la

[35:20] Ville de Beaconsfield concernant

[35:21] la hausse des coûts de la taxe

[35:22] sur l'immatriculation des

[35:23] véhicules de promenade de la

[35:24] Communauté métropolitaine de

[35:25] Montréal

[35:26] (CMM)

[35:27] .

[35:28] >> Proposed.

[35:29] - En faveur.

[35:30] >> I second.

[35:32] - À l'unanimité. Mayor's report

[35:33] on the decisions made by the

[35:35] Agglomeration Council at its

[35:36] meeting of June 20, 2024.

[35:43] - Oui, j'aimerais rapporté qu'il

[35:44] y a eu une consultation

[35:48] prébudgétaire qui a été à partir

[35:51] d'avril 2024 jusqu'à la fin de

[35:54] juin. Il y a eu 31 mémoires qui

[35:58] ont été déposés à la

[36:02] consultation de la Commission

[36:03] des finances. Et c'était sur le

[36:09] transport collectif, alors

[36:11] c'était spécifiquement sur le

[36:13] transport collectif. Et ce soir,

[36:18] j'aimerais déposer le rapport

[36:22] des recommandations de la

[36:24] Commission sur les finances.

[36:34] - Dépôt des rapports des

[36:36] directeurs.

[36:38] (bruit)

[36:49] (inaudible)

[37:23] (problème technique)

[37:41] (problème technique)

[37:59] (problème technique)

[38:14] - Alors, merci beaucoup. Thank

[38:17] you very much for attending the

[38:19] meeting.

[38:20] [Inaudible]

[38:24] [Inaudible]

[38:27] And I will begin to remind you

[38:35] as he has told you,

[38:38] [Inaudible]

[38:39] will be

[38:41] [Inaudible]

[38:44] and everybody is invited to come

[38:48] to

[38:49] [Inaudible]

[38:50] .

[38:51] And yes, we as we both have to

[38:55] identify yourself

[38:57] [Inaudible]

[38:58] I'm sure that you will be able

[39:00] to tell whether

[39:04] [Inaudible]

[39:05] and so thank you very much.

[39:07] [Inaudible]

[39:11] - Les inscriptions.

[39:13] [Inaudible]

[39:19] -

[39:21] -

[39:23] - So it's very important that

[39:26] you actually register first to

[39:28] be able to

[39:33] [Inaudible]

[39:34] and have a preferred seat at the

[39:36] [Inaudible]

[39:37] .

[39:38] Please make sure --

[39:43] align with the

[39:44] [Inaudible]

[39:53] [Inaudible]

[39:57] and thank you very much, and see

[40:02] next month.

[40:04] I will not be here next month,

[40:06] and so

[40:08] [Inaudible]

[40:09] will be presiding the meeting.

2024-07-15 - Conseil municipal de Beaconsfield

Transcript