[0:39] - Mesdames et Messieurs,

[0:40] bonsoir. Pour cette première

[0:41] séance en 2025, les membres du

[0:43] conseil, moi-même vous

[0:45] souhaitons une très bonne année.

[0:47] Qui a 2025 puisse apporter santé

[0:50] et succès à vous et vos proches.

[0:54] Nous espérons que le congé des

[0:56] Fêtes vous a permis de faire le

[0:58] plein d'énergie et d'avoir de

[1:00] bons moments en famille. C'est

[1:05] avec immense tristesse que nous

[1:06] avons appris au début de l'année

[1:09] le décès de l'ancien maire,

[1:14] monsieur William Franklin

[1:15] McMurchie. Une figure

[1:16] emblématique de notre communauté

[1:17] avec un héritage de services

[1:20] publics inspirants. Nous lui

[1:24] rendrons un premier hommage au

[1:25] cours de cette séance. Encore

[1:29] cette année, la ville propose

[1:31] aux jeunes citoyens et

[1:35] citoyennes

[1:36] (---)

[1:37] scolaires du trois au 7 mars,

[1:38] les inscriptions sont déjà en

[1:43] cours. Rendez-vous dès

[1:46] maintenant sur la plate-forme

[1:47] pour réserver votre place. Au

[1:49] courant du mois de décembre,

[1:51] c'est avec tristesse que nous

[1:52] avons appris le décès de madame

[1:56] Jocelyne Déziel. Madame Déziel a

[1:59] travaillé de 82 à 2018 au

[2:02] Service des affaires juridiques

[2:04] et de graves de la Ville de

[2:06] Pointe-Claire. Ses anciennes

[2:08] collègues et les citoyens

[2:09] pourront se souvenir de son

[2:12] engagement et de son approche

[2:17] attentionné envers personne.

[2:18] Nous la remercions pour les 36

[2:21] années à la ville. Tous nos soit

[2:23] de condamner Anse à sa famille

[2:25] et ses proches. La programmation

[2:30] hiver 2025, encore cette saison,

[2:33] la ville propose une grande

[2:36] variété d'activités et

[2:38] d'événements culturels de

[2:39] loisirs sportif. Visitez le site

[2:42] Web de Pointe-Claire pour

[2:44] découvrir les différentes

[2:45] options qui s'offrent à vous.

[2:50] Mettez dès maintenant la date du

[2:53] samedi 1er février à votre

[2:55] agenda pour le

[2:56] (---)

[2:57] venait en famille de profiter

[2:58] des plaisirs des verts lors de

[3:00] ce traditionnel événement qui se

[3:02] tiendra au parc North vieux.

[3:07] Alors que l'hiver s'installe

[3:10] enfin, les amateurs de planeur

[3:12] pourront se divertir dans les

[3:14] différentes installations

[3:15] sportives hivernales de la

[3:17] ville. Vous pratiquez la

[3:20] regrettée aimait les marches en

[3:21] pleine nature? Les sentiers de

[3:23] Terra-Cotta sont accessibles

[3:25] toute l'année. Pour être plus

[3:28] actifs et actives, les

[3:30] nombreuses patinoires

[3:31] extérieures sont les lieux tout

[3:33] désigné pour patiner en famille

[3:36] ou jouer une partie de hockey

[3:37] entre amis. Dès que les

[3:40] accumulations de neige le

[3:42] permettront, les sentiers de ski

[3:43] au club de golf Guilde et les

[3:46] dix entiers hivernaux seront

[3:48] aménagés dans différents parcs.

[3:51] Surveillez les comptes médias

[3:53] sociaux et les situaient de la

[3:55] ville pour les annonces de leur

[3:57] ouverture. Good evening, ladies

[3:58] and gentlemen, for this first

[4:01] meeting of 2025, the councillor

[4:03] and I would like to wish you a

[4:04] happy new year. May 2025 bring

[4:07] happiness, health and success to

[4:08] you and your loved ones. We hope

[4:10] that the holiday season provided

[4:11] you an opportunity to recharge

[4:14] your batteries and spend some

[4:15] quality time with your families.

[4:18] As the new year began, we were

[4:19] deeply saddened to learn that

[4:21] former Mayor William Franklin

[4:23] McMurchie had passed away. He

[4:25] was an iconic figure in our

[4:27] community and leaves an

[4:28] inspiring legacy of public

[4:29] service. We will be paying our

[4:31] first tribute to him during this

[4:33] meeting. Once again, this year,

[4:36] the city is offering the youth

[4:39] of March break camp from March

[4:41] 3rd to March 7th. Registrations

[4:43] are already underway. Visit the

[4:46] looted platform now to reserve

[4:47] your spot. In December, we were

[4:52] very sorry to learn about the

[4:54] passing of Mrs. Jocelyne Déziel

[4:57] from 19 82 to 2018. Miss Déziel

[5:01] work for the City of

[5:03] Pointe-Claire. The City of

[5:04] Pointe-Claire's legal affairs

[5:05] department and clerk's office.

[5:07] Former colleagues and citizens

[5:08] will remember her for her

[5:10] unwavering commitment, genuine

[5:12] consideration she had for

[5:14] everyone. We are grateful to

[5:16] miss Déziel for 36 years of

[5:18] service to the city. Our sincere

[5:20] sympathies go out to her family

[5:21] and friends. Winter programming

[5:26] 2025. Once again, this season,

[5:27] this city is offering a wide

[5:28] variety of cultural, leisure and

[5:30] sports activities and events.

[5:32] Visit the Pointe-Claire website

[5:33] to discover the various options

[5:35] available to you. Save the date

[5:37] of Saturday, February 1st for

[5:39] winter carnival. Bring the whole

[5:41] family to enjoy winter fun at

[5:43] this traditional event in

[5:44] Northview Park. As winter

[5:47] finally sets in, outdoor

[5:49] enthusiasts can enjoy the city's

[5:51] various winter sports

[5:52] facilities. If you enjoy

[5:53] snowshoeing and walking in the

[5:54] great outdoors, the terracotta

[5:56] trails are accessible all year

[5:59] round. For the more active

[6:00] among, you skating rinks are the

[6:04] perfect place to enjoy families

[6:06] gaining out being or enjoy

[6:08] hockey with friends. If there is

[6:10] enough snow, and maybe there

[6:11] might be after tonight, the

[6:13] Beaconsfield ski trails and 12

[6:14] winter trails will be open in

[6:15] all the various parts. Keep an

[6:17] eye on the City social media

[6:19] accounts and website to find out

[6:20] more about when they will be

[6:23] opening. Madame Thibault?

[6:30] - Adoption de l'ordre du jour.

[6:34] Adoption of the agenda.

[6:35] >> For adoption of the general,

[6:37] I have a mover?

[6:41] >> District 6. The

[6:42] >> Senator?

[6:46] >> District 2.

[6:47] >> All in favour? Probably the

[6:49] most important part of this

[6:52] meeting Le conseil municipal

[6:53] rend hommage à monsieur William

[6:55] Franklin McMurchie, décédé le

[6:56] 1er janvier 2025 avant, en

[7:01] Ontario. Ancien maire et figure

[7:04] emblématique de notre

[7:05] communauté, il laisse derrière

[7:08] lui... un héritage durable et

[7:10] une empreinte indélébile sur

[7:12] notre ville. Ce soir, nous

[7:15] exprimons notre reconnaissance

[7:17] pour tout ce qu'il a fait pour

[7:18] notre ville. Didier, travailleur

[7:23] acharné et passionné, William

[7:26] Franklin McMurchie a consacré

[7:27] près de 57 ans de sa vie à

[7:30] servir Pointe-Claire. Il a servi

[7:33] comme conseiller municipal de 90

[7:36] à 98, avant d'être à lui maire

[7:38] de la ville en 98 à 2001.

[7:44] (---)

[7:45] Le 2001 à 2005, lors des fusions

[7:47] avec la Ville de Montréal et à

[7:50] nouveau maire de 2005 à 2013,

[7:54] devenant l'un des élus qui a

[7:56] servi le plus longtemps dans

[7:58] l'ouest de l'île de Montréal.

[8:01] Sous sa direction, la ville a

[8:03] connu des avancées

[8:05] significatives dans les domaines

[8:07] environnementaux, sociaux et

[8:11] culturels. Mais en Saskatchewan,

[8:13] monsieur McMurchie a déménagé à

[8:15] Montréal en 56, où il a commencé

[8:17] à travailler pour la Ville de

[8:19] Pointe-Claire comme

[8:20] (---)

[8:21] . Ce premier emploi marquera le

[8:24] début d'une carrière exemplaire

[8:26] dans l'administration publique

[8:28] est en politique municipale. En

[8:31] tant que maire, il a soutenu des

[8:34] initiatives telles que: la

[8:38] réduction

[8:39] (---)

[8:40] dans la ville, la réglementation

[8:41] des émissions des foyers à bois,

[8:46] l'ouverture du premier écocentre

[8:48] de l'ouest de l'île, elle a

[8:49] diffusions de points clairs de

[8:51] la Ville de Pointe-Claire. Il a

[8:54] également été un fervent

[8:55] protecteur des berges et du

[8:57] Bordeleau de Pointe-Claire. En

[9:00] investissant dans l'acquisition

[9:01] et la protection de ces

[9:03] écosystèmes fragiles, il permet

[9:06] aux citoyens aujourd'hui et les

[9:09] générations futures de profiter

[9:11] d'espaces publics donnant sur le

[9:14] Lac-Saint-Louis. Toutefois, il

[9:16] est surtout connu pour avoir été

[9:18] le fer de lance de la diffusion

[9:20] de Pointe-Claire, de la Ville de

[9:24] Montréal. En 2001, il a été élu

[9:27] représentant de Pointe-Claire au

[9:28] sein du nouveau conseil

[9:30] municipal de Montréal en tant

[9:32] que membre

[9:34] (inaudible)

[9:35] des citoyens de l'île de

[9:37] Montréal de Gérald Tremblay. Un

[9:40] parti politique qui a promis de

[9:42] décentraliser la nouvelle

[9:43] mégapole et de permettre aux

[9:45] membres de son caucus de faire

[9:49] (inaudible)

[9:50] la diffusion, si jamais le

[9:51] gouvernement provincial

[9:53] autoriser les citoyens à voter

[9:54] pour cette option lors du

[9:56] référendum local. Cette province

[10:00] n'a pas été... cette promesse

[10:03] n'a pas été tenue. McMurchie a

[10:06] été le premier conseiller

[10:08] municipal à quitter le caucus de

[10:10] Tremblay. Il a pris la tête de

[10:12] la Compagnie de l'ouest de l'île

[10:13] en faveur de la diffusion

[10:16] municipale. Ce faisant, il a

[10:19] fait preuve d'un véritable jeu

[10:24] courage politique face à

[10:25] l'ensemble de la

[10:26] (---)

[10:27] structure d'agglomération

[10:30] injuste et un processus

[10:33] référendaire tout aussi

[10:34] inéquitable visant à maintenir

[10:36] les banlieues fusionner à

[10:39] l'intérieur de Montréal. Il a

[10:40] pris cette décision à un moment

[10:43] où la plupart de ses collègues

[10:46] des autres banlieues avait soit

[10:48] changé de position pour soutenir

[10:49] la nouvelle mégapole, soit

[10:51] choisi de rester neutre.

[10:54] Aujourd'hui, le niveau

[10:57] d'autonomie dont jouit

[10:58] Pointe-Claire est en grande

[11:00] partie dû à sa vision et à sa

[11:05] direction. Au fil des échanges

[11:07] que j'ai eues avec monsieur

[11:09] McMurchie, j'ai toujours

[11:12] apprécié sa sagesse, son sens de

[11:14] l'humour et la facilité avec

[11:16] laquelle les citoyens ordinaires

[11:17] peuvent s'adresser à lui. Je lui

[11:21] suis particulièrement

[11:23] reconnaissant d'avoir soutenu

[11:25] l'idée de donner au YMCA

[11:28] nouvellement acquis le nom de

[11:30] Lancet... ancienne mairesse,

[11:33] Olive-Urquhart. Le rôle qu'il a

[11:36] joué dans

[11:37] (---)

[11:38] l'histoire de notre vie,

[11:39] j'espérais que nous pourrions

[11:40] lui faire la distinction

[11:43] particulière de lui donner un

[11:44] parcours un bâtiment public en

[11:45] son honneur de son vivant. Ma

[11:50] préférence Halle et va toujours

[11:52] au parc situé à l'angle des rues

[11:55] Cartier et Lake Shore. Lorsque

[12:00] j'ai invoqué cette idée avec

[12:01] lui, il a insisté qu'il

[12:04] n'accepterait cet honneur que si

[12:05] le vote était unanime. Cela

[12:09] témoigne de son caractère et du

[12:11] niveau d'humilité que l'on

[12:13] trouve rarement chez les hommes

[12:15] politiques ou les personnes

[12:17] politiques. J'espère que nous

[12:18] pourrons arriver à cette

[12:21] unanimité quant Pointe-Claire

[12:22] lui doit littéralement son

[12:25] existence et lui sera toujours

[12:28] redevable. La Ville de

[12:30] Pointe-Claire présente ses plus

[12:31] sincères condoléances à la

[12:33] famille et aux proches de

[12:34] monsieur McMurchie. Nous sommes

[12:36] reconnaissants pour tout ce

[12:38] qu'il a accompli et nous nous

[12:40] souviendrons toujours de son

[12:42] dévouement envers notre

[12:44] communauté. Municipal council

[12:47] pays tribute to Mr. William

[12:50] Franklin McMurchie who passed

[12:51] away on January 1st, 2025 in

[12:54] von, Ontario. Former mayor and a

[12:57] cherished figure in our

[12:58] community, leave behind a

[12:59] lasting legacy and mark in our

[13:02] city. Tonight we honour him for

[13:04] all he has done for our city.

[13:07] Dedicated, hardworking and

[13:10] passionate, William McMurchie

[13:13] devoted 26 years of his life to

[13:14] serving Pointe-Claire. He served

[13:15] as a city council from 1990 to

[13:18] 1998 before being elected mayor

[13:20] and serving from 1998 to 2001.

[13:24] He would become borough mayor

[13:25] from 2001 to 2005 during the

[13:28] municipal mergers with the City

[13:29] of Montréal and before regaining

[13:32] his post as mayor of

[13:34] Pointe-Claire from 2005 to 2013.

[13:37] His tenure in office would make

[13:39] him one of the longest serving

[13:40] elected officials in the West

[13:42] Island of Montréal. Under his

[13:44] leadership, the City achieve

[13:46] significant progress in

[13:48] environmental, social and

[13:49] cultural sectors. Born in

[13:52] Saskatchewan, Mr. McMurchie

[13:53] moved to Montréal the 1956 where

[13:55] he began working for the City of

[13:57] Pointe-Claire as a student with,

[14:00] actually, all over. This first

[14:03] job marked the start of an

[14:04] exemplary career in public

[14:07] administration and municipal

[14:09] politics. As mayor, he led

[14:10] initiatives such as reducing

[14:12] speed limits in the city,

[14:14] regulating wood burning

[14:15] fireplace emissions, opening the

[14:17] West Island's first ecocentre

[14:21] and, of course, spearheading

[14:23] Pointe-Claire is the merger from

[14:24] the City of Montréal. He was

[14:25] also devoted protector of the

[14:28] shoreline and waterfronts of

[14:30] Pointe-Claire by investing in

[14:31] the acquisition and protection

[14:33] of these delicate ecosystems, he

[14:35] has ensured that today citizens

[14:37] and future generations can enjoy

[14:39] public spaces overlooking

[14:43] Lac-Saint-Louis. Bill would be

[14:44] best known for spearheading

[14:45] Point cleanse the merger from

[14:47] the City of Montréal. In 2001,

[14:49] he was elected to represent

[14:51] Pointe-Claire on the newly merge

[14:52] Montréal City Council as a

[14:54] member of Gerard Tremblay's

[14:56] Montréal Island citizens unit. A

[14:58] party which promised to

[15:00] decentralize the new major city

[15:02] and allow its caucus members to

[15:04] campaign for the merger if ever

[15:06] the provincial government

[15:07] allowed citizens to vote for

[15:08] that option in local

[15:11] referendums. When that promise

[15:12] was broken, Bill McMurchie was

[15:15] the first City Council to lead

[15:17] Trump's caucus and become a

[15:18] leader of the West Island

[15:19] campaign for the merger. In

[15:21] doing so, he demonstrated

[15:23] genuine political courage in the

[15:25] face of the entire political or

[15:27] provincial political

[15:29] establishment, which created

[15:30] both the unfair conglomeration

[15:32] structure and an equally unfair

[15:34] referendum process into keeping

[15:35] merged suburbs within Montréal.

[15:38] He also did this at a time when

[15:39] most of his colleagues among the

[15:41] former suburban mayors have

[15:42] either changed positions to

[15:44] support the new major city or

[15:45] had chosen to remain neutral.

[15:48] The level of autonomy that

[15:50] Pointe-Claire enjoys today is in

[15:52] large part due to Bill

[15:55] McMurchie's vision and

[15:56] leadership. In exchange as I had

[15:57] with bill over the years, I

[15:58] always appreciated his wisdom,

[16:00] his sense of humour and how

[16:02] easily approachable he was

[16:04] toward ordinary citizens. I was

[16:06] particularly grateful for his

[16:08] support for naming the newly

[16:09] acquired YMCA after former mayor

[16:13] Olive-Urquhart. He actually

[16:14] teared up when I spoke to him

[16:15] about it, it was quite touching.

[16:17] Given the important role he

[16:18] played in our city's history, my

[16:20] hope was that we could do have a

[16:22] special honour of naming a

[16:23] public park or building after

[16:25] him during his lifetime. My

[16:27] preference wasn't remain the

[16:29] unnamed park at the corn of car

[16:31] chain lakeshore. I think it

[16:32] spoke to his character and a

[16:35] level of humidity really found

[16:38] among politicians. When I raised

[16:39] the idea with, and he insisted

[16:40] that he would only accept the

[16:42] honour if the vote were

[16:44] unanimous. I hope we can find

[16:45] that unanimity. Pointe-Claire

[16:48] may literally owe him its

[16:50] existence and will always be in

[16:52] his debt. The City of

[16:53] Pointe-Claire extends its

[16:55] deepest condolences to Mr.

[16:57] McMurchie's family and loved

[16:58] ones. We are profoundly grateful

[17:00] for all he has accomplished and

[17:01] will always remember his

[17:03] unwavering dedication to our

[17:05] community. Thank you.

[17:07] >> 3.1, to approve the minutes

[17:09] of the regular meeting of

[17:10] December, third, 2024 in the

[17:12] Special meetings of December,

[17:13] 16th and December 18th, 2024.

[17:16] >> 4.1 do I have a mover?

[17:21] >> Eric Stork district 7.

[17:22] >> Seconder?

[17:24] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[17:26] >> All in favour? Question

[17:30] period. Période des questions.

[17:31] Je m'excuse, Madame Thibault. As

[17:37] usual Pour laquelle période de

[17:38] questions, vous avez été

[17:39] accueilli à l'entrée pour vous

[17:41] inscrire à la période des

[17:42] questions afin de vous permettre

[17:43] de demeurer à vos places jusqu'à

[17:45] l'appel de votre nom. Nous

[17:46] garderons 90 minutes pour la

[17:48] période des questions. Une

[17:50] personne à la fois au micro.

[17:52] Nous vous remercions d'attendre

[17:54] que le citoyen ait terminé de

[17:56] poser sa question et que vous

[17:58] soyez appelés avant de vous

[18:00] lever pour poser votre question.

[18:03] Nous accordons la priorité aux

[18:05] résidents et aux résidentes de

[18:08] Pointe-Claire. Les non-résidents

[18:09] pourront poser leurs questions

[18:10] par la suite, si le temps n'est

[18:12] pas écouler. For question

[18:16] period, you are greeted for the

[18:18] period so you can remain seated

[18:20] until your name is called. We

[18:22] shall stick to the 90 minute

[18:23] time limit for question period.

[18:25] One person at a time at the

[18:27] microphone. Thank you for

[18:28] waiting for a citizen to finish

[18:30] asking their question to be

[18:31] called before you get up to ask

[18:33] yours. We will give priority to

[18:36] Pointe-Claire residents and

[18:39] nonresidents can ask darkness

[18:40] afterward if time has run out.

[18:44] First person up

[18:51] .

[18:54] >> Hi, everyone. I would just

[18:55] like to start off by saying

[18:57] thank you to the City Council,

[18:58] the mayor and the administration

[19:00] for approving Athens Park last

[19:03] year. I also saw that it has

[19:04] been approved by the commission

[19:07] of Québec. So I'm very happy

[19:08] with that. My question is just,

[19:11] is there an estimated timeline

[19:13] for the next steps like the

[19:16] public consultation process for

[19:19] the land use an inauguration of

[19:21] the park?

[19:22] >> Very good questions. All of

[19:24] them.

[19:26] - Madame Verdun, est-ce qu'on a

[19:27] un horaire pour le parc?

[19:31] >> Estimated.

[19:32] À peu près? >> We do not, you

[19:34] have to do the signage so it

[19:35] would probably be during the

[19:37] [Inaudible]

[19:38] >> With the integration of the

[19:39] park be done before the

[19:42] consultation process to decide

[19:43] if there's going to be a

[19:44] playground or anything else

[19:45] added like that?

[19:46] >> That is what we have to

[19:47] decide with the City Council

[19:48] but, yes we can do the

[19:50] inauguration of the name of the

[19:53] park.

[19:54] >> Perfect.

[19:55] >> The name is solid.

[19:56] >> Thank you. Just a second

[19:58] question, I was also reading the

[20:01] 2023 parks and green spaces

[20:03] report that Pointe-Claire

[20:04] produced last year. I saw the

[20:08] park at the entrance of the

[20:09] village was referred to as class

[20:13] Cartier.

[20:14] >> That is the name we all call

[20:15] it.

[20:16] >> I did not see an official

[20:17] name published.

[20:18] >> It's not.

[20:19] >> Is there a reason for that?

[20:20] >> It has not been named yet.

[20:21] The park has not been named yet,

[20:23] officially. Which is what I was

[20:25] proposing. One of my proposed --

[20:28] propositions for my speech in

[20:29] Mr. McMurchie.

[20:30] >> Thank you.

[20:31] >> Thank you. I am.

[20:42] Ryan Derek.

[20:43] >> Good evening. I did not know

[20:45] how this process works. I am 6.1

[20:48] on the agenda. It's hard to ask

[20:49] a question about something that

[20:51] we have not talked about yet.

[20:53] >> I believe Mr. Derek gets an

[21:00] opportunity 6.1? No? Go ahead.

[21:04] >> 6.1. I am 191 Lakeshore, of

[21:05] easy I'm here to see if there is

[21:07] a decision on my house but I

[21:08] guess we are going to have to

[21:09] sit and wait until we hear about

[21:11] 6.1. It's hard to ask questions

[21:13] about something that we cannot

[21:14] --

[21:15] >> We have not yet voted on it.

[21:16] That is correct.

[21:20] >> It's hard to argue it because

[21:21] I have contested the original

[21:24] demolition decision so we do not

[21:25] know where we are at so I do not

[21:27] know what to argue about.

[21:28] >> Do you want to make an

[21:29] impassioned plea?

[21:30] [Laughter]

[21:32] >> Sure. I live in that house, I

[21:34] know the first demolition

[21:36] committee that they felt that

[21:37] the house was not deemed in that

[21:40] enough shape to be demolished

[21:42] but I believe the report was

[21:45] done -- was not done properly.

[21:46] They did not take into the

[21:48] proper consideration. They also

[21:49] inspected the house for 1963 in

[21:51] the middle of summer where the

[21:52] whole conditions in the winter

[21:54] changed. I can tell you my

[21:55] bedroom is minus five and this

[21:58] house is 63 years old. For me to

[22:00] take a house and unfortunately

[22:05] tearing down to build a new one,

[22:06] which is almost the same look as

[22:07] the new neighbourhood we have

[22:09] proposed. The cost of that to

[22:12] doing the renovations to bring

[22:13] the same thing that is going to

[22:14] cost me double. I can give you

[22:17] one estimation. On the general

[22:19] contractor, I know the

[22:20] estimation to do my house. If I

[22:21] build a house into a new house

[22:22] is gonna be 1 million dollars.

[22:24] To renovate its gonna cost me $2

[22:26] million and going to take me

[22:28] twice, if not three years,

[22:29] because I do not have to fight

[22:30] all. Have 1 million dollars to

[22:31] the house. I'm going to disturb

[22:33] the whole neighbourhood because

[22:34] it takes three years in my

[22:36] current house is in poaching on

[22:38] the property lines and stuff

[22:39] like that. I do not think there

[22:42] is a lot of things to consider

[22:44] besides walking around my house

[22:45] and saying that it's in good

[22:48] condition. When I moved into the

[22:49] house, it was from 1963 inside

[22:51] and a half or a young children

[22:53] and it was not safe to live in

[22:55] that style house. Since I'm a

[22:57] contractor, I spend my weekends

[22:58] and stuff renovating the

[23:00] bathroom and stuff like that to

[23:01] bring it up to standard some in

[23:02] my children get hurt. The fact

[23:04] that, yes, the house kind of

[23:06] looks in good shape cosmetics,

[23:07] there's tons of structural

[23:08] problems and electrical problems

[23:09] that you cannot see unless you

[23:11] have ex revision or you open up

[23:12] the walls like I did. It's

[23:15] really hard to fight something

[23:17] that you cannot talk about.

[23:18] >> Well spoken, Mr. Derek. Thank

[23:21] you.

[23:22] >> This is my attorney that is

[23:23] with me.

[23:25] >> You could sit down and she

[23:27] can take over, if you'd like.

[23:29] >> Hi, sorry. Thank you, I did

[23:31] not mean to interrupt him but I

[23:32] just feel like he forgot to

[23:34] mention an important point is

[23:36] that the previous decision from

[23:38] -- I read the decision of the

[23:42] committee. It seems it has been

[23:44] based solely on a report that

[23:46] asked the complete cost of the

[23:49] renovation $64,000. With all due

[23:51] respect, that is completely

[23:53] unrealistic. We have reports

[23:54] that say otherwise. Even the

[23:59] inspection before numbers, a

[24:01] very expensive list of things

[24:02] that need to do and it seems to

[24:05] me that the decision was fully

[24:07] based on that, on the 64,000

[24:09] dollar cost of reconstruction

[24:11] and considering the reports

[24:14] contradict that report, I think

[24:15] the committees could take that

[24:16] into consideration as well. At

[24:18] the end of the day, all the

[24:21] other requirements that we find

[24:23] in the bylaw, respect to the

[24:28] demolition of the movable, have

[24:30] been met. I think that is the

[24:32] only point that we need to take

[24:34] into consideration right now. In

[24:36] the report that says that the

[24:38] cost of demolition is only

[24:41] $64,000. He says, and I

[24:43] mentioned that in the appeal

[24:44] that we filed and I do not know

[24:47] if anyone had a chance to review

[24:49] it but we do mention that he

[24:51] mentioned several times that

[24:53] supplemental reports and

[24:55] analysis should be done in order

[24:56] to compliment this report

[24:58] because it is not complete so I

[24:59] would like for the committee to

[25:02] take that into consideration as

[25:03] well.

[25:04] >> Thank you.

[25:11] Philippe Pare.

[25:14] >> Good afternoon. My question

[25:16] is as follows, we are currently

[25:18] in 2025 and we are getting our

[25:21] to run your Mitchell stations

[25:22] later this year and our new bus

[25:28] system. Light metro, light rail,

[25:31] something. My question is as

[25:33] follows, both the Saint-Jean

[25:35] Industry Highway 40 crossings

[25:37] are still kind of extremely

[25:39] dangerous for pedestrians and

[25:41] cyclists to cross due to the

[25:43] sidewalks and all the car

[25:45] traffic. Can we please get

[25:47] somewhat of an update for the

[25:50] plan pedestrian crossing at St.

[25:52] John's and the restructuring

[25:53] that is going to be happening on

[25:58] Des Sources four be able to

[25:59] cross Highway 40 safely?

[26:03] >> Madame Vendôme do we have

[26:05] plans for improvement of the

[26:10] crossings?

[26:11] En avant des stations de renom?

[26:13] >> That we have in the CIP, we

[26:15] have a project with the and PQ.

[26:18] I do not have the timeline,

[26:21] unfortunately, but it's supposed

[26:22] to be a little bit after that

[26:25] the REM station is open but we

[26:26] are working on it.

[26:28] >> Thank you. For my sub

[26:29] question, if it's possible, --

[26:33] >> Just intervene, I do not mean

[26:34] to interrupt, there is a

[26:35] potential overpass.

[26:37] >> I know there is some --

[26:39] >> A pedestrian bicycle

[26:41] overpass, potentially. If all

[26:43] goes well, knock on wood, there

[26:44] is potential.

[26:46] >> For my second question, can

[26:49] we please ask you as you are a

[26:51] member of the Anglo council

[26:53] meeting in Montréal, to please

[26:56] ask the STM to get the ball

[26:59] rolling so we actually know how

[27:01] our bus network will be

[27:02] affected. They have been silent

[27:03] and silent and silent and

[27:06] nothing.

[27:07] >> They have actually got their

[27:08] plans ready and they have

[27:09] actually started proposing them

[27:11] to us. We are meeting with that

[27:13] as we speak.

[27:15] >> Thank you very much.

[27:16] >> And they are interesting

[27:18] Claude. Pat McGee.

[27:26] >> Hello, I'm Patrick McGee the

[27:29] architect filed for 191. I don't

[27:33] have a whole lot but to make

[27:34] sure that the demolition

[27:36] committee read the engineers

[27:38] report, my report as well as the

[27:41] independent contractors report

[27:42] on the costing analysis of

[27:44] bringing the home up to current

[27:47] standards. I do not believe they

[27:48] have read all the doctors prior

[27:50] to the last meeting. I want to

[27:52] know if they have prior to the

[27:53] decision that has been made

[27:56] first.

[27:57] >> I cannot answer that. Anybody

[27:59] on the demolition committee

[28:00] choose to answer that?

[28:03] >> Yes, yes and yes?

[28:06] >> Thank you Mr. McGee. Linda

[28:13] Dumas.

[28:17] [Inaudible]

[28:30] We had it once and

[28:32] [Inaudible]

[28:38] >> I personally love podiums

[28:42] myself.

[28:43] >> When your legs are wobbly.

[28:45] Good evening. Once again, I am

[28:53] here always regarding --

[28:56] >> Madam Dumas, if I can just

[28:59] ask you speaking to the

[29:00] microphone.

[29:01] >> I'm sorry. Is it working?

[29:02] >> Yes.

[29:03] >> Regarding the forest, the

[29:05] force being the Fairview forest,

[29:07] but when one is here for the

[29:10] Fairview forest, we are here for

[29:13] biodiversity, we are here for to

[29:19] try to make sure that the lack

[29:23] of this biodiversity does not

[29:25] become less. My preamble but I

[29:32] will be asking Mr. Eric Stork

[29:36] and Mr. Brent Cowan a question.

[29:39] I, in 2018, I moved here, there

[29:41] was the election when I found

[29:44] out about the forest. I have had

[29:47] a sign saved the first ever

[29:50] since but it was only two years

[29:53] ago, exactly, January 2023, that

[29:55] I first came to a council

[29:57] meeting ever in my life and I

[29:59] have since found out that a few

[30:01] other people are not necessarily

[30:05] long council meeting goers or

[30:12] speakers. This entity, this

[30:18] longer, I am now calling it a

[30:21] hospital, the forest is a

[30:24] hospital. Recently there has

[30:25] been doctors who have been

[30:28] prescribing that people --

[30:31] giving them a prescription to

[30:33] visit a forced. It's new in the

[30:35] news. I think it was from

[30:37] Ontario in the last number of

[30:38] weeks. When I first came in 2023

[30:42] to a special council meeting

[30:45] this was to get Madam Verdon to

[30:51] get to be able to speak to

[30:53] Cadillac Fairview. Cadillac

[30:58] Fairview I certainly want to say

[31:00] is being -- has been a

[31:04] decades-long contributor to our

[31:07] society. The corporation would

[31:08] not be here if not profitable.

[31:13] One, almost never mentions the

[31:14] name Cadillac Fairview and even

[31:17] less the Ontario teachers

[31:19] pension plan. With that

[31:24] preamble, I wish to talk a lot

[31:26] more about buying this. I have

[31:31] sent letters a year and a half

[31:33] ago to the OTTP saying let's

[31:39] negotiate this. You are

[31:41] educators, you are informed

[31:42] people, why on earth in the 24

[31:45] century something so sustainable

[31:50] for the human species. I have

[31:53] recently come to judge that we

[31:55] are not in a -- the planet is

[32:01] not in crisis, the climate is

[32:03] not in crisis, it's the human

[32:05] species, the plant species, the

[32:07] animal species. We are in

[32:09] crisis. Of course, most of us

[32:12] know that the abundance of what

[32:18] mankind, remnants of mankind did

[32:19] for over century has accelerated

[32:22] the situation that we are all in

[32:25] and even those who don't read

[32:28] about it certainly, if they put

[32:30] on the television or a friend or

[32:34] someone, an acquaintance, will

[32:35] say oh my goodness have you

[32:37] heard about the latest disaster?

[32:41] Disasters will always happen.

[32:42] They always have through the

[32:46] ages but it is over 40 years

[32:50] more well documented, worldwide

[32:53] by collaboration of scientists

[32:57] who forward their data that

[33:02] mankind and plants and animals

[33:06] are in a very, very tenacious

[33:11] situation. In the October 9th

[33:18] 1510 west, Mr. Eric Stork, you

[33:20] were quoted and you are asking

[33:23] and I heard maybe in December

[33:26] that you wish to have a formal

[33:29] evaluation of this forest. With

[33:36] all the information that is so

[33:43] apparent, more than a parent, it

[33:45] is logical, it is objective.

[33:49] Those people who are passionate

[33:51] about this, they bring their

[33:52] passion because of the logic and

[33:54] the objectivity of this

[33:59] existential crisis that we are

[34:01] faced with. I would like to

[34:04] know, Mr. Stork, why your

[34:07] interest has come about only

[34:09] three years in to this four-year

[34:16] mandate? Why you have come up

[34:20] with this now so late and never

[34:26] having spoken about really

[34:29] coming up ideas to keep this

[34:33] forest alive.

[34:36] >> I will answer. First, it

[34:39] sounds like a very politically

[34:41] motivated question.

[34:42] >> It is not. It is absolutely

[34:45] not.

[34:46] >> May I speak?

[34:47] >> Well, yes, first of all, it's

[34:48] not political.

[34:49] >> Perfect. My position on the

[34:50] Fairview force has not changed

[34:51] since day one. Not since day

[34:54] one. Anybody who lives in my

[34:55] district, who I've spoken to, my

[34:57] position has not changed. It

[34:59] came about because at 1.7

[35:01] citizens reached out to me.

[35:03] She's not in the room today. We

[35:05] were working an email so I had

[35:06] to address it. I came out with

[35:08] somewhat of a formal position on

[35:10] this and that was my position.

[35:11] My position has not changed from

[35:12] day one. It is a citizen's

[35:17] decision. We have to have the

[35:18] facts and we have to make this

[35:20] decision together as a city. My

[35:23] position has not changed and it

[35:24] came out of necessity to finally

[35:27] take the elephant out of the

[35:28] room in terms of cost,

[35:31] environment, impact, all those

[35:33] variables have to be put

[35:35] together, digested, something

[35:38] said in a decision made because

[35:39] it was going on for too long and

[35:40] I took the courage to come out

[35:42] and actually take that position.

[35:45] >> Am I able to speak?

[35:49] >> It's not a debate. Do you

[35:51] have a subsequent question for

[35:54] Council Brent Cowan? Madame

[35:56] Dumas, you are allowed to

[35:58] question.

[35:59] >> Can I reply? I cannot reply?

[36:01] >> You can simply reply but not

[36:03] address your subsequent question

[36:05] would have to be if you have a

[36:07] follow-up question. You

[36:10] suggested one to Senator count

[36:12] as well. If you use the

[36:13] subsequent question it could be

[36:14] to Councillor Stork but you lose

[36:16] the opportunity to question

[36:18] Councillor Cowan.

[36:19] >> It's not a subsequent

[36:21] question. You are deeming that

[36:22] I'm up here politically. I am

[36:25] not. You wonder if you are still

[36:29] wondering in the 21st century

[36:30] where have you been? Do you

[36:31] read? Do you study? Do you

[36:34] listen?

[36:35] >> Madame Dumas, these are all

[36:37] questions.

[36:38] >> Fine. I find it very, very

[36:39] weak. That is not a question.

[36:40] Extremely weak.

[36:41] >> You have a subsequent

[36:43] question?

[36:44] >> Yes. A bit of a preamble. The

[36:49] force needs to be paid for.

[36:53] Perhaps we have to convince

[36:54] Cadillac Fairview that it is --

[37:00] it is in their best interest in

[37:03] their own families interest and

[37:05] their progeny, et cetera, et

[37:07] cetera and our progeny to save

[37:10] what we have around us

[37:13] especially it's not the golf

[37:17] course and the golf course will

[37:21] probably or Beaconsfield golf

[37:22] course will probably come up one

[37:25] day but it is a much larger

[37:26] green space and it is not

[37:30] surrounded by a stranglehold of

[37:34] the island in pyramid billet-y.

[37:37] Mr. Cowan, in that October 9th

[37:43] 1510 west, you actually had an

[37:45] entire letter to the editor. I

[37:48] believe you ended it with «

[37:51] let's sum up the courage and the

[37:54] content of it » was paying for

[37:58] the forest. 20 million here, 10

[38:01] million there, et cetera, et

[38:03] cetera. I am wondering why,

[38:08] talking about elephants in the

[38:09] room, Cadillac Fairview being

[38:12] one, paying for this forest. In

[38:14] needs to be paid for, it is

[38:15] owned by somebody but there are

[38:20] ways of achieving it and

[38:23] certainly not dialoguing with

[38:24] the opponent. Cadillac Fairview

[38:27] is not the enemy, it is provided

[38:30] so much to this community over

[38:32] so many decades and some people

[38:36] call it Mecca I'm wondering why

[38:42] instead of only question or

[38:45] statements, Mr. Cowan, why don't

[38:48] you have some ideas, as I do,

[38:52] and I believe Madam Tara

[38:56] Stainforth has mentioned to me

[38:58] just in passing that she has had

[39:00] ideas. Why is that never

[39:02] discussed and could you -- I

[39:05] have ideas. What are your ideas

[39:08] for raising this money given

[39:11] that entire hospital complex all

[39:14] raised by fundraising? I will

[39:17] just and, I realize, the forest

[39:21] is a hospital. It is already

[39:23] built. We do not have to wait

[39:24] five or ten years for it. We

[39:27] just have to pay for it. Thank

[39:30] you.

[39:31] >> Thank you for the question. I

[39:32] think in that same letter that I

[39:35] did actually make a proposition

[39:38] and where I could see money come

[39:40] from. I said I thought

[39:41] Pointe-Claire could afford $10

[39:43] million. I said I believe there

[39:45] was a federal government program

[39:47] to support this kind of

[39:49] initiative. I cannot remember if

[39:50] it was ten or $20 million or

[39:52] something. I figured that the

[39:54] Agglo could match that will

[39:56] Pointe-Claire was putting in and

[39:57] I figured that the province of

[39:59] Québec could put in the balance.

[40:00] I wrote that on the letter.

[40:02] There is a concept of where the

[40:05] money could possibly come from.

[40:07] The challenge would be to try to

[40:10] convince them and those

[40:12] challenges are not in

[40:15] significant. That does not mean

[40:16] that they are insurmountable.

[40:18] One of the letter was to

[40:21] actually say two things. One,

[40:23] you have to pay for it. I do not

[40:25] see any alternative to preserve

[40:27] the land in the entirety and

[40:29] number two, I came up with what

[40:31] I could see is a way to fairly

[40:34] share the cost and then we could

[40:37] -- the city could possibly

[40:39] organize, the mayor could

[40:40] possibly organize then to

[40:42] approach these levels of

[40:43] government and build up the

[40:44] support. As far as I know. We

[40:46] have done very little, the city

[40:48] has done very little. That is

[40:51] the Mayor's responsibility to

[40:52] follow up on that and what I

[40:55] know that we have done is we

[40:57] sent a letter to Valérie Plante.

[40:59] I do not think she responded to

[41:00] it. I know that there was a

[41:02] meeting with the metropolitan

[41:06] community of Montréal and they

[41:07] were very not warm to the idea

[41:08] of doing anything with the

[41:10] force. These are the challenges.

[41:15] I acknowledge them.

[41:16] >> If we start the process, we

[41:18] can get there. Thank you.

[41:21] >> Just to clarify, I did speak

[41:25] to the CMM and the response was

[41:30] negative. CMM is the

[41:32] organization in the Montréal

[41:33] administration that is

[41:34] responsible for the acquisition.

[41:35] The question was asked to the

[41:36] right authorities and was

[41:38] actually done.

[41:39] >> When was that done?

[41:42] >> Two years ago. A year and a

[41:45] half, two years ago.

[41:46] >> I understand they have spent

[41:47] --

[41:48] >> One of the first things I did

[41:49] it was probably six months in,

[41:51] nine months in. Some around

[41:52] there that we got an answer. I

[41:54] was quite disappointed. I remain

[41:57] quite disappointed with the

[41:59] administration and it has some

[42:00] bearing on how I perceive them

[42:03] because they have uttered a

[42:06] program that I felt they did not

[42:08] substantiate in that response.

[42:10] That is my feeling on that. I

[42:11] was not pleased with that

[42:12] decision.

[42:13] >> I think they have run very

[42:17] low saving Hypertec and

[42:19] extremely other important and we

[42:20] are just as important because we

[42:22] are all part of that

[42:25] biodiversity.

[42:26] >> To speak to the elephant in

[42:27] the room, it's hard to put a

[42:29] price on survival. For me, we

[42:31] have spent more than 10 million

[42:33] on the Olive-Urquhart Sports

[42:37] facility. We have spent $21 on

[42:39] our public works. All of which I

[42:40] agree with. 10 million seems to

[42:43] be a pittance for our survival.

[42:46] I'm just putting in the grand

[42:48] scheme of things. That is the

[42:49] Mayor's interpretation of it.

[42:54] Ralph?

[43:00] Would you like to speak to some

[43:01] of the questions?

[43:03] >> I just wanted to say that the

[43:06] elephant is not in the room,

[43:08] it's in the parking. It's a very

[43:10] big elephant -- come closer.

[43:20] It's in court. You can do any

[43:24] kind of gestures.

[43:27] >> We are not going to have an

[43:28] exchange from the audience. We

[43:30] do not have exchanges from the

[43:33] audience.

[43:34] >> It's in court. Yesterday it

[43:36] was going to the court of

[43:39] Québec. It has been delayed

[43:44] again. We are in this situation,

[43:48] both sides of this conundrum, I

[43:53] will say it in French Les deux

[43:56] côtés sont à la merci de la

[43:59] Cour. Vous avez choisi de donner

[44:04] la décision à un autre parti.

[44:09] Alors, on peut spéculer. Mais

[44:13] c'est un jeu, un troisième parti

[44:15] qui va décider, regrettablement.

[44:19] Vous pouvez faire tous les

[44:21] signes de noms que vous voulez,

[44:24] c'est ça. Merci.

[44:27] >> Just as a preface, Mr. Claude

[44:30] Cousineau, I think you have a

[44:31] look at Bill 39 and what St.

[44:34] Bruno did, you will see there is

[44:35] actually very easy way out of

[44:36] that. It's not easy, it still

[44:37] takes time, of course but there

[44:38] is a method out of that and you

[44:40] have forgotten to consider that.

[44:44] Good evening.

[44:46] >> Please, and light me.

[44:49] >> It's been in the press. I am

[44:52] sure the city officials can tell

[44:53] you about Bill 39 allows you to,

[44:57] regardless of previous ownership

[44:59] or other cases, legal cases

[45:01] allows you to circumvent that

[45:03] and rate new bylaws for

[45:06] ecologically sensitive areas.

[45:07] >> Again, last comment on this,

[45:10] a judge is going to tell us what

[45:11] to do.

[45:12] >> The judge already has. Good

[45:17] evening, folks, tonight I want

[45:18] to ask you again about Fairview

[45:21] forest but I want to focus on

[45:23] the new PMAD. The revised one of

[45:32] the CMM. I'm curious to see what

[45:34] the City appreciates the greater

[45:36] obligation under the new PMAD

[45:42] and considering its usage in

[45:43] obligations under it. The

[45:46] organization I am a member of,

[45:48] say Fairview forest, and also

[45:49] Cadillac Fairview, both made

[45:52] submissions to the CMM and

[45:55] participated in its recent

[45:57] consultation on the PMAD

[45:59] revised. I want to first say I

[46:02] am very, very thankful to the

[46:05] Pointe-Claire City Councillors

[46:07] who wrote favourable comments on

[46:11] the CMM website advocating

[46:13] saving Fairview forest and

[46:16] supporting our submission. Was

[46:17] profoundly appreciated. I want

[46:19] to address the revised PMAD and

[46:22] it's greater assertion of that

[46:25] bylaw. The agglomerations, the

[46:27] regions and the municipalities

[46:31] must, must and here to the PMAD.

[46:35] And implemented faithfully. It

[46:38] is not a fuzzy guideline anymore

[46:41] but it's an explicit requirement

[46:43] of Pointe-Claire just like every

[46:46] other member of the CMM. The

[46:51] guidelines, objectives and

[46:54] criteria of the PMAD revised are

[46:58] inscribed as being required by

[47:01] law in the perspective of

[47:03] sustainable development and also

[47:06] aim, overall, to contribute to

[47:07] the fight against an adaptation

[47:09] of climate change and the

[47:11] protection of biodiversity. All

[47:13] things, of course, that Fairview

[47:15] forest does. I want to quote the

[47:20] PMAD revised exactly. Sorry,

[47:24] it's not exactly because I did a

[47:26] Google translation.

[47:29] [Laughter]

[47:30] A quote, « the compliance

[47:32] process provided for by the and

[47:38] shows that metropolitan planning

[47:40] is implemented in regional

[47:41] planning tools and a local

[47:45] example municipal planning

[47:47] tools. The SAD's or the RCM's

[47:56] must comply with the PMAD. They

[48:02] provide this metropolitan plan

[48:04] must be reviewed periodically

[48:07] ». And I quote. The PMAD goes

[48:09] on to say, in terms of the

[48:11] environment, the revised PMAD

[48:13] retains the choices of the first

[48:15] PMAD and reinforces them

[48:18] particularly with regard to the

[48:19] number one issue that it's in

[48:23] particularly in regard to his

[48:24] number one, increasing the

[48:26] target for the protection and

[48:28] conservation of woods of

[48:31] metropolitan interest. Forest,

[48:34] corridors and natural

[48:37] environments to 30% of the

[48:38] metropolitan territory by 2046

[48:42] in line with the commitments

[48:43] made that the 15th Congress of

[48:45] the party, example, COP15. It

[48:51] has been explicitly covered all

[48:53] the criteria Fairview forest

[48:55] meets. I know that of course

[48:57] Fairview forest issues are under

[48:59] study. I am thankful for that.

[49:00] That is great. However, this

[49:04] PMAD now is very clear. It

[49:08] demands compliance. And now

[49:12] supersedes many of the concerns

[49:13] and details that we get muddled

[49:15] up in and struggle with. My

[49:20] question for Pointe-Claire City

[49:22] Council is very simply, will the

[49:24] city comply with its obligations

[49:27] and then the newly revised PMAD?

[49:29] We'll use the tools in

[49:31] advantages given by the

[49:32] government of Québec, la 39, and

[49:36] the CMM with its freeze on

[49:38] Fairview for specifically and

[49:40] the revised PMAD and save the

[49:43] Fairview forest because it's

[49:45] actually obliged to? That's it.

[49:50] >> My answer is, I hope so. I

[49:52] certainly -- I certainly would

[49:54] like to. Yes?

[50:00] >> By the way, your analysis is

[50:02] very good. It's basically what

[50:04] the challenges are. If you look

[50:05] at the PMAD I think it's trying

[50:09] to blow and stop at the same

[50:11] time. If you look at the tree

[50:13] canopy, the 30%, listen I'm

[50:15] offer tree canopy all across

[50:17] Montréal. You talk about

[50:18] different areas that can be

[50:20] affected but I've actually sent

[50:21] an email and I still have not

[50:22] gotten a reply to what that 30%

[50:24] is because based upon what they

[50:26] want to do in terms of

[50:28] densification, in terms of

[50:30] housing and put that 30% on top

[50:32] of it, mathematically, when I

[50:35] look at it, how it can be

[50:38] achieved it's counter intuitive.

[50:41] It knocks its own head together.

[50:43] I ask a question, what is the

[50:45] 30% mean? I have not got an

[50:47] answer yet. If you digging

[50:48] deeper, you will see certain

[50:49] elements or it says they do not

[50:52] know where it's deemed as

[50:53] private, public. Could be

[50:55] parking lots and shopping

[50:58] centres. It could be a backyard.

[50:59] They have not given a pure

[51:01] definition of what that 30% is.

[51:02] That is what I'm really trying

[51:03] to find out because yes, we

[51:05] should comply and we can to

[51:07] comply but it's going to be --

[51:09] first of all they have to give

[51:10] that definition. It's going to

[51:11] be one of a challenge to balance

[51:13] that I think the PMAD revised,

[51:17] if you try to get everything

[51:18] done on their, something is

[51:19] going to fall through the

[51:22] cracks. I really do not

[51:23] appreciate them doing that.

[51:27] That's a law, they are not going

[51:28] fuzzy on that. There is no base

[51:29] in terms, of all, you can maybe

[51:30] do this, maybe do that.

[51:34] Densification the parking lot at

[51:36] Cadillac Fairview was a minimum

[51:38] of 60. Now they are going to

[51:39] blow in and come in and say it's

[51:41] going to be -- it has to be at

[51:43] least what? 20 to 50. They are

[51:45] putting the hard line in the

[51:47] sand now and I think what

[51:48] they're asking us to do, without

[51:50] giving us a proper definitions

[51:51] to give it a feasibility

[51:53] opportunity to see if it's

[51:54] actually feasible is unfair.

[51:57] It's unfair.

[51:58] >> They do mention other aspects

[52:02] besides canopy such as

[52:04] biodiversity, Browns, expats,

[52:05] all the different species, the

[52:07] 35 endangered species that are

[52:09] in Fairview forest. There are

[52:12] also criteria's beyond canopy.

[52:13] The canopy is one reference but

[52:14] they specifically refer to

[52:16] biodiversity and other issues as

[52:19] well.

[52:21] >> Thanks.

[52:22] >> If I could just give my own

[52:25] take on the 30% number. We are

[52:29] below 30% in Pointe-Claire so

[52:31] what that effectively tells me

[52:33] is we cannot build on green. We

[52:35] can build somewhere else but we

[52:36] cannot build on green. That is

[52:38] my take.

[52:41] >> The PMAD explicitly denied

[52:43] that especially for the areas

[52:44] that they froze. There are other

[52:47] legislations like 39 and other

[52:49] things that they have put in

[52:50] place for the city to take

[52:51] advantage of.

[52:54] >> Point taken. Point taken.

[52:57] Very well taken. Thank you very

[52:59] much. Councillor Tremblay?

[53:01] >> Thank you for your question.

[53:03] I think the important thing

[53:05] behind this issue is we do not

[53:06] want to get lost in quibbling

[53:11] overinterpretation and confusion

[53:12] over whether or not a and B

[53:14] means B. The ultimate problem

[53:16] that we have today is we are

[53:18] witnessing again another

[53:20] disaster in California is these

[53:22] kinds of issues are pervasive

[53:24] now throughout the world. I

[53:26] think the important thing we

[53:28] need to do, regardless of

[53:29] whether 30% or not, the

[53:32] important thing for this council

[53:33] to do is to be thinking of the

[53:35] future and its citizens, its

[53:37] health and safety. Ultimately,

[53:39] we need to be working towards,

[53:41] as I have said many, many times

[53:42] with the intention of aiming to

[53:46] solve this problem rather than

[53:49] whether we are complying or not

[53:51] an outing confusion to the whole

[53:52] picture. I think if these

[53:54] constructs the issue at hand and

[53:56] I think it's important to

[53:57] underline the fact that what we

[53:59] need today is a mental and

[54:02] economic, social paradigm shift

[54:04] in these areas. In order to be

[54:08] able to obtain those things, we

[54:10] need to start getting creative

[54:12] in every level. Political,

[54:14] business and social as well. I

[54:19] appreciate the question. I would

[54:20] not want to get to lost in those

[54:23] technicalities in that they are

[54:26] important in that they are not

[54:28] negligible aspects and what we

[54:29] are going through. The rule of

[54:30] law and all the qualifications

[54:32] that behind that is obviously

[54:34] important. Nothing's proceeds

[54:36] natural law. Until we learn to

[54:38] be able to work within those

[54:40] constraints, we are going to

[54:41] contingency difficulties that we

[54:42] have in the world today. Thanks.

[54:45] >> Thank you for the replies.

[54:49] >> Susan Weaver?

[55:00] >> It's about Council meetings.

[55:03] I'm not going to ask you again

[55:05] about cost and current City

[55:08] lease car so I will submit seven

[55:10] pages with that. I was

[55:14] concerning last November's -- I

[55:18] will go like that -- concerning

[55:20] last November's council meeting,

[55:22] I was curious as to why you made

[55:25] up a story during that meeting.

[55:28] It was a sort of a cocking-able

[55:31] story. It had said nothing it

[55:33] would've been the end of it.

[55:35] Actions and words are important.

[55:36] Your storyline was different

[55:38] from the insurance report. I

[55:40] decided to look at your Facebook

[55:42] page to check out digs. April

[55:45] 6th, you are on a cocktail and

[55:48] dinner gala in the evening. Then

[55:49] you went up north but after that

[55:55] the accident reported only next

[55:59] day. That is it. I am just going

[56:01] to hand in my seven page.

[56:04] >> Okay. I do not know what was

[56:07] met by caulk in bull. Miss

[56:11] Weaver, we do not yammer from

[56:12] the audience, we speak politely

[56:14] from the microphone. The

[56:19] accident happened with a car was

[56:21] recorded by the police and

[56:24] documented. I will go with

[56:25] whatever written documentation

[56:27] they submitted because that

[56:28] obviously is the truth. I never

[56:30] said anything other than the

[56:32] date I was -- it was a morning

[56:34] and I drove, I hit a deer, the

[56:36] police recorded the accident and

[56:38] that was the end of it. There is

[56:41] no conflict and there is no

[56:42] problem at all. It was in the

[56:44] morning on my way up to my

[56:46] mother in the hospital in the

[56:48] morning. Thank you, Miss Weaver.

[57:01] - Bonjour, Conseil. L'année

[57:07] passée, je me suis présenté à la

[57:09] consultation publique pour

[57:12] l'agglomération de Montréal.

[57:13] J'ai présenté quelque chose

[57:16] concernant les milieux vides. Et

[57:18] pour le village de

[57:19] Pointe-Claire. Après, ça on m'a

[57:21] invité pour représenter...

[57:24] - Parler un peu plus fort.

[57:26] - Vous m'entendez mieux?

[57:29] - Merci.

[57:33] - Après ça, ils m'ont invité à

[57:35] venir me présenter aux CMM pour

[57:37] la consultation publique au mois

[57:38] de décembre. J'ai présenté deux

[57:41] mémoire, un pour la forêt

[57:45] Fairview et pour les lieux

[57:47] humides, et un pour le village

[57:48] de Pointe-Claire, pour le

[57:51] patrimoine, qui n'est pas

[57:52] reconnu dans le C.A. Même à

[57:55] Montréal. J'ai répondu à madame

[58:02] Stainforth, elle avait commenté

[58:05] sur les mémoires. Madame

[58:07] Saint-force, je vous remercie

[58:08] pour ça.

[58:17] In the 1970s which was from two

[58:20] high schools, Saint-Jean, Thomas

[58:24] the city of Pointe-Claire to buy

[58:26] the great park that if a

[58:28] terracotta. Today, our planet is

[58:30] facing a bigger challenge,

[58:32] climate change. The effect are

[58:36] present all over the world in

[58:37] and around us and catastrophic

[58:41] events are present everywhere.

[58:42] We, as a society, we cannot be

[58:45] like ostriches and put our head

[58:46] in the sand. We must stand up

[58:49] against the society who wants to

[58:53] destroy ecological system and go

[58:55] against the climate change for

[58:57] profit only and make pressure

[59:00] with a lobbyist to different

[59:02] environment for their district.

[59:05] Like you mentioned in your

[59:08] comment, I quote, you force are

[59:11] the official role in mitigation

[59:13] and air pollution and producing

[59:18] oxygen. While the canopy cover

[59:20] helped regulate urban

[59:22] temperature by reducing the

[59:25] effect. The natural space are in

[59:28] disposable -- responsible for

[59:30] foreseeing and creating the

[59:33] city. And comment. The

[59:35] protection of the forest is

[59:38] supporting ecological balance

[59:41] and the use as a sanctuary for

[59:46] [Inaudible]

[59:47] Diversified species that may

[59:49] otherwise be displacement by

[59:53] urbanizing like the brown snake

[59:55] when the REM station erected on

[59:58] the southeast section of the

[1:00:00] force. We are asking to please

[1:00:04] support to save the Fairview

[1:00:05] forest like we did in 1970 with

[1:00:07] the City to protect the forest

[1:00:12] and for the one who cannot talk

[1:00:14] and for our children and future

[1:00:16] generation. My question is

[1:00:19] Est-ce que le Conseil des

[1:00:20] membres du conseil vont

[1:00:22] supporter la protection de la

[1:00:23] forêt Fairview comme leurs

[1:00:26] confrères ont fait dans les

[1:00:28] années 1970? Pour leur

[1:00:32] protection? In person Une

[1:00:34] réponse de tout le monde.

[1:00:35] - C'est à tout le monde, merci,

[1:00:37] Monsieur Lapointe. Pour

[1:00:39] moi-même, je trouve que la

[1:00:41] meilleure solution pour débuter

[1:00:43] et de faire des consultations.

[1:00:47] To speak to the people which we

[1:00:48] were supposed to do regarding

[1:00:49] the future the forest and what

[1:00:50] they thought and listen to their

[1:00:52] ideas and that would be a good

[1:00:53] way to get the ball rolling. As

[1:00:55] a Council, that would be a good

[1:00:56] way for us to show our

[1:00:59] willingness and to get the ball

[1:01:00] rolling in these regards. That

[1:01:01] is my answer to your question,

[1:01:03] sir. Hopefully it's a sufficient

[1:01:07] one.

[1:01:08] - La Ville de Pointe-Claire a

[1:01:09] fait le plan stratégique de 2023

[1:01:12] à 2030. Les réponses, les

[1:01:15] sondages des citoyens.

[1:01:17] Protection et restauration de la

[1:01:18] nature des environnements

[1:01:20] naturels. 23% ont répondu pour

[1:01:24] ça. Habitation, 14%.

[1:01:26] Infrastructures et mobilité

[1:01:28] active, 13%. La réponse des

[1:01:33] employés, les personnes... 18%

[1:01:36] ont répondu augmenter le

[1:01:39] verdissement dans les zones

[1:01:41] urbaines. Adopter une politique

[1:01:43] environnementale audacieuse.

[1:01:45] Appuyé des mesures d'efficacité

[1:01:50] (---)

[1:01:51] dans les bâtiments. Alors ça,

[1:01:53] c'est déjà défait, les

[1:01:56] questionnaires qui ont été

[1:01:57] faites par la Ville. Et on voit

[1:02:00] que les gens veulent la

[1:02:04] protection, la protection des

[1:02:07] changements climatiques. Est-ce

[1:02:10] que quelqu'un d'autre veut

[1:02:12] répondre?

[1:02:13] - Moi, je veux bien.

[1:02:15] - Allez-y.

[1:02:18] - Pour répondre à votre

[1:02:21] question, c'est sûr que la Ville

[1:02:23] va suivre la loi. Quoiqu'en dise

[1:02:28] monsieur Stokes avec, c'est vrai

[1:02:32] que c'est clair ici, il y a un

[1:02:36] juge qui a un ou plusieurs juges

[1:02:38] qui a décidé c'est quoi les

[1:02:41] responsabilités des villes, la

[1:02:43] possibilité d'exproprier ou quoi

[1:02:44] que ce soit. Là, à savoir en si

[1:02:50] l'interprétation de Fairview est

[1:02:52] correcte ou interprétation de

[1:02:57] Fairview Forrest est correcte.

[1:02:59] On va suivre les règles. Merci.

[1:03:04] - C'est les citoyens qui

[1:03:05] décident, c'est pas un... ils

[1:03:07] ont un vote comme nous autres.

[1:03:08] On a chacun un vote, comme une

[1:03:11] élection.

[1:03:12] - Je parle pas d'un vote. Je

[1:03:13] parle du juge de la Cour

[1:03:15] supérieure qui va décider

[1:03:20] d'interpréter qui a raison.

[1:03:22] - Mais il a déjà jugé...

[1:03:25] - Merci. There has already been

[1:03:28] a judgment on Bill 39? Hasn't

[1:03:31] there? It's already been

[1:03:32] president and it was favourable

[1:03:33] to the protection. There has

[1:03:35] already been -- I do not know

[1:03:36] how many cases -- at least one.

[1:03:37] Has there not?

[1:03:41] >> They were supposed to go be

[1:03:44] in court yesterday. It was

[1:03:49] delayed. I don't know who

[1:03:51] demanded but it was accepted by

[1:03:53] the judge to put it back. We

[1:03:57] will find a date soon. Who made

[1:04:02] the request, maybe it's

[1:04:03] Fairview, maybe it's the CMM. I

[1:04:06] do not know.

[1:04:08] >> It was Cadillac Fairview.

[1:04:10] There was an appeal, I am

[1:04:12] presuming, and there has been a

[1:04:14] judgment and there has been an

[1:04:15] appeal from what I understand.

[1:04:21] Was there not a judgment? And

[1:04:23] St. Bruno. Absolutely. There is

[1:04:24] precedent already. I know, that

[1:04:27] is my interpretation.

[1:04:30] >> I will actually write

[1:04:31] something. I think there is one

[1:04:32] little thing. The definition of

[1:04:37] a high ecological value and that

[1:04:39] is a definition that has to be

[1:04:40] determined. It was determined

[1:04:42] St. Bruno, but it has not been

[1:04:44] determined in St. Bruno -- St.

[1:04:46] play where. That's exactly what

[1:04:48] we have to, to investigate, to

[1:04:49] get our facts and then we can

[1:04:52] move forward. That is the crux

[1:04:53] of the argument. It has to be

[1:04:56] deemed environment of high

[1:04:57] ecological value. I think your

[1:04:58] legal department would support

[1:05:00] me on that.

[1:05:02] - Vous n'avez pas répondu à ma

[1:05:04] question.

[1:05:05] - Une autre question?

[1:05:06] - Ma question: est-ce qu'il va

[1:05:08] supporter de sauver la forêt

[1:05:10] Fairview?

[1:05:11] - Je vais supporter la décision

[1:05:13] du juge.

[1:05:15] - Mais je pense que monsieur

[1:05:16] Lapointe demandait à nous de

[1:05:19] répondre, pas le juge.

[1:05:24] - Monsieur Lapointe, bien, il y

[1:05:26] a quelques minutes, je m'exprime

[1:05:28] sur le sujet. Donc, vous

[1:05:30] comprenez un peu ma position

[1:05:31] là-dessus.

[1:05:33] - Je crois que vous connaissez

[1:05:34] ma position aussi. Depuis cinq

[1:05:38] ou 6 ans, j'ai toujours

[1:05:43] supporté... j'est toujours

[1:05:44] supporté qu'on conserve cette

[1:05:48] forêt-là. C'est plus une

[1:05:49] question de trouver comment le

[1:05:51] faire avec les sous, au lieu de:

[1:05:55] est-ce qu'on devrait le faire?

[1:05:59] >> My answer, Mr. Lapointe, is I

[1:06:01] would like to hear from people

[1:06:03] as much as anything because I

[1:06:06] believe they deserve to speak on

[1:06:07] this and I think there is an

[1:06:10] immense amount of talent in our

[1:06:13] population that is knowledgeable

[1:06:14] and that can bring enhanced

[1:06:17] ideas and enhance our decisions

[1:06:19] and make a stink better and

[1:06:22] perform at a higher level. I

[1:06:24] think we owe to the population

[1:06:25] to allow that to happen which is

[1:06:26] why I would like us to have a

[1:06:29] consultation with the

[1:06:30] participation process to hear

[1:06:31] from the people on this matter.

[1:06:33] That is my answer.

[1:06:36] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres

[1:06:38] réponses?

[1:06:42] >> I think I made my position

[1:06:44] pretty clear.

[1:06:46] - Monsieur Bissonnette? >> I

[1:06:48] have written my position, many,

[1:06:50] many times in many different

[1:06:53] forms and many different

[1:06:54] locations, rather.

[1:07:00] - Merci.

[1:07:02] - Je pense que c'est tout.

[1:07:03] Merci, Monsieur Lapointe.

[1:07:13] >> Good evening. I have not been

[1:07:17] able to come to every council

[1:07:19] meeting and so maybe some things

[1:07:22] have passed me by when I

[1:07:24] could've been here listening

[1:07:25] more intently but I have been

[1:07:30] passionate about the environment

[1:07:33] and saving the environment for

[1:07:35] as long as I can remember. Even

[1:07:38] though my memory is getting

[1:07:40] shorter, it goes back a long

[1:07:42] way. It is partly why I chose to

[1:07:45] come to live in Pointe-Claire,

[1:07:47] to stay in Pointe-Claire, even

[1:07:49] after my family all moved away

[1:07:51] was because of the protection of

[1:07:53] green spaces, the nature and why

[1:07:57] I chose to move to a town house

[1:08:00] where I get terracotta in my

[1:08:02] backyard, which is a very, very

[1:08:04] special gift. I am certainly one

[1:08:07] of the people who is passionate

[1:08:09] about saving Fairview forest,

[1:08:11] you know that already and I have

[1:08:17] participated in most of the --

[1:08:19] fourth of the five public

[1:08:21] consultation sessions that the

[1:08:23] city organized through a

[1:08:25] consulting firm and somebody

[1:08:28] along the way decided that we

[1:08:29] could not speak about Fairview

[1:08:32] forest during those public

[1:08:34] consultation sessions, even ones

[1:08:37] that were about private green

[1:08:39] space, for heaven's sake.

[1:08:41] Anyway, we did. We did anyway.

[1:08:43] The hundred or so people that

[1:08:45] were in the room talks about

[1:08:47] saving Fairview forest in spite

[1:08:50] of what we were told what we

[1:08:53] could not say. While it was not

[1:08:54] going to be recorded, it was

[1:08:56] certainly loudly heard. Frankly,

[1:08:59] I do not think we need another

[1:09:01] consultation. I think the

[1:09:03] dedication of people for the

[1:09:05] last, what, three years, four

[1:09:08] years of standing outside on a

[1:09:11] Saturday and whatever the

[1:09:14] weather, every single Saturday.

[1:09:17] I am not one of the most devoted

[1:09:18] ones, but I admire those who

[1:09:20] are. That says a lot. The people

[1:09:22] who honk their horns and give us

[1:09:25] a thumbs up. The people that

[1:09:27] have signed petitions. I think

[1:09:29] we have heard from Pointe-Claire

[1:09:31] people. The green spaces are

[1:09:34] special and important to us and

[1:09:35] we need to save it. I was quite

[1:09:40] surprised when I learned tonight

[1:09:42] that one of the points on the

[1:09:45] agenda, point number just a

[1:09:49] minute, let me get it here, 11.1

[1:09:54] approved of sale to be entered

[1:09:57] into with the five regarding

[1:10:02] lots of the catastrophe Québec.

[1:10:03] De la Faune et des parcs.

[1:10:12] It was pointed out to me that

[1:10:14] that specific area is the green

[1:10:19] space between the canoe and

[1:10:21] kayak in club and the -- which

[1:10:27] I've actually traverse not long

[1:10:29] ago when I have to park at the

[1:10:30] canoe club to get into an event.

[1:10:35] I know it's a lovely part. I

[1:10:37] know it's waterfront. It is

[1:10:39] green space. I have questions

[1:10:43] and I will put them into one.

[1:10:45] First of all, I'd like to know

[1:10:47] what this is about. It is coming

[1:10:50] up as approving a deed of sales

[1:10:54] so I'd like to know what is

[1:10:57] this, why is this, who is this,

[1:11:01] what does this mean, how did

[1:11:03] this come about? I just missed

[1:11:07] December. I do not remember this

[1:11:10] being mentioned in November

[1:11:12] December, whenever I was here,

[1:11:13] how did this come about without

[1:11:14] citizens knowing and what is

[1:11:15] this about? I would like that

[1:11:18] answer.

[1:11:19] >> From what I know on the

[1:11:22] matter, it's an administrative

[1:11:26] exchange. I think it has been

[1:11:29] given to the City of

[1:11:30] Pointe-Claire. We are taking

[1:11:31] over our own land from the

[1:11:33] provincial --'s at the

[1:11:34] provincial government or the

[1:11:36] federal? Provincial. It is an

[1:11:38] administrative manoeuvre nothing

[1:11:39] really has changed except we are

[1:11:41] now more responsible for its

[1:11:43] management. That's what I

[1:11:45] understand. Does anybody want to

[1:11:46] elaborate on that?

[1:11:48] >> Basically part of the part

[1:11:50] was still owned by the

[1:11:54] environment ministry, it just

[1:11:56] transferred to the city but we

[1:11:57] recognize at the same time that

[1:11:59] they use it for more than 50

[1:12:02] years.

[1:12:03] >> Okay. It would've been clear

[1:12:05] if it said it was indeed a

[1:12:08] purchase. It means we are

[1:12:10] getting it, is that what you are

[1:12:12] meeting? They are selling, we

[1:12:13] are buying, it is going to be

[1:12:15] Pointe-Claire and it will come

[1:12:17] under our environment rules and

[1:12:21] caring for keeping our

[1:12:22] environment? Is that correct?

[1:12:23] >> It will still be a park. It's

[1:12:25] the same thing. It's a transfer

[1:12:27] between us and the Environment

[1:12:30] minister.

[1:12:31] >> What I understand, the rules

[1:12:33] of waterfront still or other

[1:12:35] levels of government. The water

[1:12:37] is overlooked by other levels of

[1:12:41] government.

[1:12:42] >> I know, usually, the border

[1:12:43] is also to be naturally

[1:12:45] protected so we do not have the

[1:12:46] erosion in that kind of thing.

[1:12:48] >> You got it.

[1:12:49] >> That makes it a little clear

[1:12:51] Simpson on the environment

[1:12:52] committee to not, I thought I

[1:12:54] should've known something about

[1:12:56] this because the way I read it,

[1:12:58] it sounded like it could've been

[1:13:00] us getting rid of the land and

[1:13:01] I'm glad to hear we have not.

[1:13:03] Thank you.

[1:13:09] - Geneviève Lussier?

[1:13:16] - Bonjour, tout le monde. Thank

[1:13:19] you everybody. I was about to

[1:13:21] ask about 11.1. Mr. Stork

[1:13:23] answered outside and that's good

[1:13:24] and it's good to get

[1:13:25] clarification about that point.

[1:13:26] I also want to ask about a

[1:13:29] follow-up about Mr. Stork had

[1:13:32] said about the PMAD provision.

[1:13:36] Right now, Fairview forest

[1:13:39] appears into the if it gets

[1:13:44] passed in the spring, was there

[1:13:45] planning to do, Je ne sais pas

[1:13:48] si c'est madame Verdun ou

[1:13:49] monsieur Thomas qui peut me

[1:13:50] répondre, mais c'est quoi le

[1:13:52] processus légal? What is a legal

[1:13:54] process going forward at the

[1:13:56] municipal level? If the City is

[1:13:58] to comply to that one is a legal

[1:14:03] process going forward after that

[1:14:05] gets passed in the spring? I

[1:14:07] guess, what is a timeline for

[1:14:09] that?

[1:14:10] >> Very good question. Madame

[1:14:12] Verdon, avez-vous une réponse?

[1:14:13] Madame Verdon?

[1:14:17] >> Can I answer in French? -

[1:14:18] Oui, pas de problème.

[1:14:19] - Dans le fond, le processus,

[1:14:21] présentement, on ne se conforme

[1:14:23] pas. On se conforme au schéma

[1:14:25] d'aménagement de l'agglomération

[1:14:26] de Montréal. Donc, le chez

[1:14:28] madame May d'agglomération de

[1:14:30] Montréal doit se conformer au

[1:14:31] pénal qui doit se conformer aux

[1:14:32] (---)

[1:14:33] environnementales. Nous, on doit

[1:14:35] attendre que le schéma de la

[1:14:36] main l'agglomération soit

[1:14:39] changée pour conformer aux PMAD

[1:14:40] et ensuite la ville doit faire

[1:14:43] ses règlements de conformité au

[1:14:45] schéma.

[1:14:46] - O.K., Le schéma d'aménagement

[1:14:48] récemment a été changé par

[1:14:49] rapport à la forêt Fairview et

[1:14:50] aussi. Ils ont fait un

[1:14:51] changement qui est un projet de

[1:14:52] règlement, je pense. Mais c'est

[1:14:53] à 50% de la forêt au moins.

[1:14:56] C'est le milieu humide est plus

[1:14:58] une bordure de bottés de 30

[1:15:00] mètres. Ça va faire partie de ça

[1:15:03] aussi?

[1:15:04] - Oui, ça va être ça. Dans le

[1:15:06] fond, le schéma qui a été changé

[1:15:09] et avec les plans de milieux

[1:15:11] humides, ils ont des plans... je

[1:15:13] sais de raccourcir les

[1:15:14] raccourcis. Dans les milieux

[1:15:16] humides. Ils doivent aussi, tous

[1:15:17] les MRC, dont la l'agglomération

[1:15:19] de Montréal doit avoir la

[1:15:20] gestion des milieux humides. La

[1:15:22] Ville doit pouvoir se conformer

[1:15:24] aussi à cette disposition-là du

[1:15:26] schéma.

[1:15:27] - O.K., Donc, au moins 50% de la

[1:15:30] forêt

[1:15:31] (---)

[1:15:32] qu'on ne va pas toucher?

[1:15:33] - J'ai pas exactement les

[1:15:35] chiffres avec moi, mais oui,

[1:15:37] dans le fond, on va devoir se

[1:15:39] conformer aux plans des milieux

[1:15:42] humides de la région.

[1:15:44] - O.K., On commence avec ça.

[1:15:45] Parfait, merci beaucoup.

[1:15:52] - Ils auraient Home?

[1:15:58] - Bonsoir. Alors, moi, je

[1:16:01] voulais remercier le conseil.

[1:16:04] Monsieur Cohen et la direction

[1:16:06] de la ville d'avoir embarqué

[1:16:10] dans le projet des jardins

[1:16:12] communautaires dans le quartier

[1:16:14] en Haïda. Je suis très

[1:16:16] reconnaissante. Je veux faire de

[1:16:18] ce jardin-là quelque chose qui

[1:16:19] va être porteurs pour notre

[1:16:22] quartier. Et je veux impliquer

[1:16:23] le plus de gens possible

[1:16:24] là-dedans. Et je voulais vous

[1:16:26] remercier.

[1:16:28] - Merci beaucoup. Robert Peck.

[1:16:39] >> Thank you City Councillors, I

[1:16:41] am a former resident of

[1:16:44] Pointe-Claire. My father was a

[1:16:45] World War II veteran who settled

[1:16:46] in Lakeside Heights and I grew

[1:16:47] up on circle Road so it's my

[1:16:49] first time back in about 40

[1:16:53] years. I was a 35-year Canadian

[1:16:55] diplomat. My last assignment was

[1:16:57] ambassador to Greece. I am to

[1:16:59] lean a long-standing and I'm

[1:17:01] here basically to add my voice

[1:17:03] of support for the Athens park

[1:17:05] initiative. If I could just very

[1:17:07] briefly say why. I went to

[1:17:11] Northview elementary school and

[1:17:13] then Lindsey Place high school.

[1:17:15] Athens pizza was very much a

[1:17:17] part of our lives. It followed

[1:17:19] for subsequent generations in my

[1:17:21] own family and I am sure it's

[1:17:23] true for many other families in

[1:17:26] Pointe-Claire. For thousands of

[1:17:27] Pointe-Claire residents in those

[1:17:28] in the surrounding area, Athens

[1:17:31] pizza headed Greek Canadian

[1:17:33] employees represented the

[1:17:34] generosity and kindness of

[1:17:36] Greece known. Athens pizza was

[1:17:40] also emblematic of the hard work

[1:17:41] and sacrifice of the ways of

[1:17:43] Greek in immigrants in the post

[1:17:44] war period who came to Canada to

[1:17:46] start a new life and the

[1:17:47] proposed plan for Athens Park

[1:17:49] with on only honour the founder

[1:17:51] of Athens peas -- pizza but the

[1:17:55] important contribution of

[1:17:56] persons of Greek heritage so

[1:17:57] that the community of Québec and

[1:18:00] Canada. My question is very

[1:18:01] simple, how can individual such

[1:18:03] as myself practically support

[1:18:05] efforts to move this initiative

[1:18:07] along leading to an early

[1:18:09] integration of Athens Park in

[1:18:10] the celebration? The park, in my

[1:18:12] mind, symbolically has

[1:18:14] importance that transcends the

[1:18:15] borders of Pointe-Claire. There

[1:18:17] is my question. I have a second

[1:18:20] question on something totally

[1:18:21] different with the national

[1:18:22] focus of the night but I'd be

[1:18:25] interested in any comments.

[1:18:27] >> You are a subsequent

[1:18:29] question. All I can say is, we

[1:18:31] are all on board. I mean it's a

[1:18:34] good initiative. What I could

[1:18:36] encourage you to do is to come

[1:18:39] back and keep doing this every

[1:18:40] month. Come back we month and

[1:18:41] remind us. I think it's well in

[1:18:43] the minds and everybody is

[1:18:48] pleased. It's pretty much a

[1:18:50] unanimous thing. I do not see

[1:18:51] any problems. You are, right

[1:18:54] bureaucracy can only slow things

[1:18:55] up. You putting it in our faces,

[1:18:59] it's never a bad thing.

[1:19:00] >> Thank you.

[1:19:01] >> Now your subsequent national

[1:19:03] question.

[1:19:04] >> Could everybody pay attention

[1:19:06] to this kind of presentation or

[1:19:10] discourse because a matter of

[1:19:11] heritage is coming up and as a

[1:19:14] current concern in this is exact

[1:19:17] point of heritage. The

[1:19:20] ambassador was talking about was

[1:19:21] the definition of heritage or an

[1:19:24] aspect of heritage of the city

[1:19:26] is an important memory in that

[1:19:28] important memory is being

[1:19:31] conserved in this way. I just

[1:19:33] wanted to mention this is

[1:19:34] exactly the kind of thing we are

[1:19:36] thinking about now in trying to

[1:19:37] define heritage in

[1:19:40] Pointe-Claire, in operational

[1:19:42] way, in other words, how would

[1:19:44] help proper decisions going

[1:19:46] forward. This is an example.

[1:19:48] >> Thank you. My second

[1:19:50] question, I am here basically to

[1:19:52] make a pitch about something I'm

[1:19:53] very, very passionate about. I

[1:19:55] have been leading a national

[1:19:57] campaign regarding the national

[1:19:59] field of honour, which as you

[1:20:00] know, is a national historic

[1:20:01] site located in Pointe-Claire.

[1:20:04] It is the largest Canadian and

[1:20:06] allied veterans cemetery in

[1:20:08] Canada with veterans from 23

[1:20:12] countries and it's on our

[1:20:13] backdoor here in Pointe-Claire.

[1:20:15] As a former Canadian ambassador,

[1:20:16] I have visited the graves of

[1:20:18] Canadian soldiers around the

[1:20:20] world meticulously maintained in

[1:20:22] perpetuity by the Commonwealth

[1:20:24] work race Commission. The last

[1:20:25] post fund, with two I have been

[1:20:27] working with for quite some

[1:20:29] years now, a nonprofit

[1:20:30] organization that is when the

[1:20:31] cemetery for Décarie basically

[1:20:33] is running out of money. They

[1:20:35] have four years in which has

[1:20:36] long. Their endowment would be

[1:20:37] completed in a few short years,

[1:20:39] largely because of rising

[1:20:41] overhead costs and declining

[1:20:43] revenues for burials, which is

[1:20:44] one of their major revenue

[1:20:46] streams. With the recent federal

[1:20:47] cabinet shuffle in Ottawa, we

[1:20:49] now have the third minister of

[1:20:51] veterans of here that we have

[1:20:52] been working with. The new MP,

[1:20:55] who is now the minister, is

[1:20:57] Darren Fisher, he's an MP for

[1:20:58] Nova Scotia. Two Montréal area

[1:21:01] liberal parliamentarians, you

[1:21:03] all know Francis the local MP

[1:21:07] and

[1:21:12] [Inaudible]

[1:21:13] Have been champions. I also lead

[1:21:14] with another former ambassador,

[1:21:15] petition to the House of Commons

[1:21:16] last September where we had

[1:21:18] nearly 1500 signatory which

[1:21:21] included two former ministers of

[1:21:23] former affairs, a former

[1:21:24] Governor General who all said

[1:21:26] let's get this done. In the

[1:21:27] scheme of things, it is peanuts.

[1:21:29] This is not big money we are

[1:21:30] talking about. The last veterans

[1:21:34] affairs minister made a private

[1:21:37] visit last November to the field

[1:21:40] of honour and we thought

[1:21:43] something was in the offing.

[1:21:44] Alas, in the government

[1:21:46] following economic statement, we

[1:21:48] guide a statement saying as we

[1:21:50] have been told before, we will

[1:21:51] continue to work with the

[1:21:52] national field of honour to find

[1:21:55] a way to preserve the legacy of

[1:21:58] veterans but there was no money

[1:22:01] attached like there were four

[1:22:02] other initiatives so it fell

[1:22:06] flat. As we all know, the 80th

[1:22:09] anniversary of the Second World

[1:22:10] War in 2025. My appeal to you

[1:22:13] all tonight is what better

[1:22:14] occasion for Canada to honour

[1:22:15] the sacrifice and legacy of

[1:22:17] veterans who rest in the

[1:22:19] national field of honour by to

[1:22:21] announce the federal government

[1:22:22] will ensure that the cemetery

[1:22:25] will be maintained and taken

[1:22:26] over by the government of

[1:22:28] Canada. I should add that the

[1:22:29] National Post Fund has offered

[1:22:31] to transfer gratuitously the

[1:22:35] properties, the federal

[1:22:36] government, as well as a 900,000

[1:22:38] dollar in the trust fund. It's a

[1:22:41] gift to the federal government.

[1:22:43] My request to all of you is, we

[1:22:46] are pushing the new ministers

[1:22:48] veteran affairs and what remains

[1:22:50] of the government. We all know

[1:22:51] that there is going to be an

[1:22:52] election in the fall but that

[1:22:53] will not be probably until the

[1:22:55] spring. We are urge, urging

[1:22:58] minister Fischer to get it done.

[1:23:00] My question is, could I request,

[1:23:04] respectfully, that the City

[1:23:07] Council pass a resolution urging

[1:23:10] minister Fisher, the Middle East

[1:23:12] are a veteran affairs, to take

[1:23:14] the necessary steps to ensure

[1:23:16] perpetuity the viability and

[1:23:17] sustainability of the field of

[1:23:19] honour, a national historic

[1:23:20] site, in the boundaries of

[1:23:22] Pointe-Claire? That is my

[1:23:23] request, that is my question.

[1:23:24] Thank you.

[1:23:25] >> It sounds like a reasonable

[1:23:27] one and I cannot speak for the

[1:23:28] rest of Council but I thank you

[1:23:30] for your encouragement.

[1:23:33] >> Thank you. Thank you very

[1:23:34] much.

[1:23:39] - Louise arrêt? C'est la fin de

[1:23:44] la période de questions.

[1:23:49] >> Sorry, may I just add

[1:23:51] something?

[1:23:52] >> Absolutely.

[1:23:53] >> Just so it does not fall

[1:23:54] through the cracks, would you

[1:23:56] mind emailing madame Verdon your

[1:24:00] request? Like I said, there's a

[1:24:01] lot of things that come across a

[1:24:02] table in that way we can ensure

[1:24:03] that we get it done.

[1:24:11] - 5.1 Avis de motion et dépôt

[1:24:12] d'un projet de règlement

[1:24:13] décrétant un emprunt à long

[1:24:14] terme et une dépense en

[1:24:15] immobilisations de 500 000 $

[1:24:16] pour le remplacement et la mise

[1:24:17] à niveau de la flotte des

[1:24:18] véhicules du service des travaux

[1:24:19] publics et des immeubles. Le

[1:24:22] type de véhicules visés sont

[1:24:24] avec utilitaires, une

[1:24:25] camionnette, une rétro

[1:24:27] excavatrice, une déchiqueteuse

[1:24:28] et deux remorques. 5.2, a notice

[1:24:31] of motion filing of a draft

[1:24:37] by-law amending Zoning By-law

[1:24:38] PC-2775 in order to clarify

[1:24:39] definitions related to terrace

[1:24:40] and garden structures, and to

[1:24:41] regulate the development and the

[1:24:42] use of commercial terraces and

[1:24:43] microterraces.

[1:24:46] - 5.3 Avis de motion et dépôt

[1:24:47] d'un projet de règlement

[1:24:48] modifiant le Règlement de

[1:24:49] construction PC-2786 concernant

[1:24:50] le calcul de la capacité

[1:24:51] d'accueil de même que les règles

[1:24:52] relatives à l'aménagement d'une

[1:24:54] structure au-dessus d'une

[1:24:55] terrasse commerciale. >> 5.4,

[1:25:02] Notice of motion and filing of a

[1:25:03] draft by-law amending Site

[1:25:04] Planning and Architectural

[1:25:05] Integration Program By-law

[1:25:06] PC-2787 in order to regulate

[1:25:07] commercial terraces.

[1:25:12] - Avis de motion et dépôt d'un

[1:25:13] projet de règlement modifiant le

[1:25:14] Règlement des permis et

[1:25:15] certificats PC-2788 afin de

[1:25:16] préciser les informations

[1:25:17] requises au dépôt d'une demande

[1:25:18] de certificat d'autorisation

[1:25:19] concernant une terrasse

[1:25:20] commerciale de même que la durée

[1:25:22] de validité dudit certificat

[1:25:24] d'autorisation. >> The motion

[1:25:27] 5.6 Notice of motion and filing

[1:25:28] of a draft by-law amending the

[1:25:29] Village Code PC-2880 in order to

[1:25:31] clarify that commercial terraces

[1:25:34] are not governed by the Village

[1:25:35] Code.

[1:25:38] >> Who presents these notices of

[1:25:41] motion? 5.1 to 5.6.

[1:25:46] >> Brent Cowan. District 8. 5.7,

[1:25:47] Adoption of a first draft by-law

[1:25:48] amending Zoning By-law PC-2775

[1:25:49] in order to clarify definitions

[1:25:50] (---)

[1:25:51] les principales modifications

[1:25:52] proposées selon le type de

[1:25:53] terrasse concerne les usages

[1:25:54] permettant l'aménagement et

[1:25:55] l'exploitation, la localisation,

[1:25:56] les règles relatives à

[1:25:57] l'aménagement et le

[1:25:58] positionnement. No

[1:26:12] Les activités permises ou

[1:26:14] prohibée, la capacité d'accueil

[1:26:16] maximale tenant compte des

[1:26:17] moyens d'évacuation des

[1:26:19] (---)

[1:26:20] de même que du nombre minimal de

[1:26:21] cases de stationnement requis.

[1:26:23] Ainsi que les heures

[1:26:24] d'opération. Certaines

[1:26:26] dispositions sont sujet à

[1:26:27] l'approbation des personnes

[1:26:28] habiles à voter. Une

[1:26:30] consultation publique sera tenue

[1:26:31] dans quelques semaines avant

[1:26:34] l'adoption du second projet est

[1:26:35] un avis sera publié pour donner

[1:26:37] les détails de cette

[1:26:39] consultation. Après l'adoption

[1:26:41] du second projet, un avis sera

[1:26:42] publié qui s'adressera, elle,

[1:26:44] aux personnes habiles à voter du

[1:26:46] secteur. Enfin, une version

[1:26:48] finale sera présentée au Conseil

[1:26:50] pour une adoption finale.

[1:26:58] >> 5.8 Adoption of a first draft

[1:26:59] by-law amending the Construction

[1:27:00] By-law PC-2786 regarding the

[1:27:02] calculation of occupancy

[1:27:03] capacity as well as the rules

[1:27:04] related to the construction of a

[1:27:05] structure above a commercial

[1:27:06] terrace. The purpose of such an

[1:27:08] amendment to establish the rules

[1:27:09] to ensure the quality and safety

[1:27:10] of people on commercial

[1:27:12] terraces.

[1:27:14] - 5.9, Adoption d'un premier

[1:27:15] projet de règlement modifiant le

[1:27:16] Règlement sur les plans

[1:27:17] d'implantation et d'intégration

[1:27:21] architecturale PC-2787 afin

[1:27:22] d'encadrer les terrasses

[1:27:23] commerciales. Dans le but de

[1:27:24] mener une équité, un équilibre,

[1:27:25] une saine cohabitation et une

[1:27:27] cohésion dans le développement

[1:27:28] ou le développement du

[1:27:29] territoire. Il est important de

[1:27:30] définir les objectifs et des

[1:27:32] critères pour encadrer

[1:27:33] l'aménagement et l'exploitation

[1:27:34] des terrasses commerciales, et

[1:27:36] ce peu importe la localisation

[1:27:37] de ses dernières à l'intérieur

[1:27:38] du territoire de paix

[1:27:40] Pointe-Claire.

[1:27:43] >> 5.10 Adoption of a first

[1:27:44] draft By-law amending the

[1:27:45] Village Code, by-law PC-2880 of

[1:27:46] the city of Pointe-Claire, in

[1:27:47] order to clarify that commercial

[1:27:49] terraces are not governed by the

[1:27:50] Village Code. The purpose of

[1:27:52] this amendment to clarifying

[1:27:53] harbour new harmonized to rule

[1:27:55] applicable to commercial

[1:27:57] tariffs.

[1:27:58] - Pour 5,7 à 5,10? Do I have a

[1:28:02] mover?

[1:28:03] >> Prepare to move this motion

[1:28:05] or like to explain to everybody

[1:28:06] this is a first draft bylaw.

[1:28:09] There is the plan to have a

[1:28:10] public consultation going

[1:28:12] forward to get everybody to

[1:28:14] weigh in on this first draft

[1:28:18] does not mean it's the final

[1:28:19] version. It gives the

[1:28:20] opportunity for those, that kind

[1:28:22] of feedback. The -- putting in a

[1:28:25] commercial terrasse operation,

[1:28:26] there is always going to be the

[1:28:28] issue of promoting business

[1:28:30] versus the nuisance to

[1:28:32] potentially to businesses on the

[1:28:34] side and residents that might

[1:28:35] live nearby. This is a difficult

[1:28:40] balance to effect and that is

[1:28:42] why it's important to have the

[1:28:43] feedback of the people that will

[1:28:44] be involved in that opportunity

[1:28:46] will be there. With that said, I

[1:28:48] move the adoption of the first

[1:28:50] draft bylaw identified at 5.7

[1:28:54] through 5.10. Brent Cowan.

[1:28:57] District 8.

[1:28:58] >> And seconder?

[1:29:01] >> Eric Stork. District 7.

[1:29:02] >> I would like to speak to 5.7

[1:29:04] and 5.10. Pour moi, je votre

[1:29:09] contre les

[1:29:11] (---)

[1:29:12] cinq points sept à cinq points

[1:29:13] dix, parce qu'ils appliquent

[1:29:14] l'adoption d'un nouveau projet

[1:29:15] de règlement avec lequel je suis

[1:29:16] en désaccord. Ils contraindra

[1:29:20] excessivement les commerçants de

[1:29:22] Pointe-Claire avec la

[1:29:24] bureaucratie et limitera leur

[1:29:25] capacité à s'engager dans des

[1:29:28] activités commerciales à

[1:29:29] l'extérieur de leur

[1:29:31] établissement, comme les

[1:29:32] terrasses, les cours, etc.. Plus

[1:29:36] important encore, ce règlement

[1:29:38] perpétuera une tendance en cours

[1:29:41] depuis des années, voire des

[1:29:44] décennies, en limitant la

[1:29:45] capacité des citoyens de

[1:29:47] Pointe-Claire à s'amuser sans

[1:29:49] problème à l'extérieur et à

[1:29:52] l'intérieur des établissements

[1:29:53] commerciaux. Les clauses du

[1:29:55] règlement que je trouve

[1:29:57] excessive sont les suivantes:

[1:30:00] sur les terrasses commerciales,

[1:30:02] les activités telles que la

[1:30:05] danse, les représentations

[1:30:07] théâtrales ou cinématographique

[1:30:10] ou les spectacles utilisant des

[1:30:13] haut-parleurs ou tout autre

[1:30:15] appareil d'amplification du sont

[1:30:17] sont interdits. Donc, la danse,

[1:30:22] les haut-parleurs et

[1:30:23] l'amplification du sont sont

[1:30:25] interdits. Sérieusement. La

[1:30:28] capacité... deuxième: la

[1:30:30] capacité maximale de la terrasse

[1:30:31] et le nombre de places

[1:30:34] correspondant à la moitié des

[1:30:36] places intérieures de

[1:30:38] l'établissement, ou 25 places.

[1:30:40] Dans le cadre du studio 77, cela

[1:30:44] signifie 27 personnes au total

[1:30:46] et nous savons tous qu'il y a

[1:30:48] toujours eu beaucoup plus que

[1:30:50] cela et que le nombre de

[1:30:52] personnes n'est jamais

[1:30:54] (---)

[1:30:55] dangereux ou problématique.

[1:30:57] Comme nous le savons tous, les

[1:30:58] lieux de spectacle ont été

[1:31:00] traités avec

[1:31:02] (---)

[1:31:03] pendant de nombreuses années,

[1:31:05] voire des décennies. Et

[1:31:06] j'aimerais que cela change. Je

[1:31:09] conviens que les établissements

[1:31:11] commerciaux ne devraient pas

[1:31:13] être autorisés à perturber ou à

[1:31:17] nuire à la qualité de vie de

[1:31:19] leurs voisins et que le volume

[1:31:21] sonore devrait toujours être

[1:31:24] contrôlé. Mais j'ai l'impression

[1:31:25] que la Ville peut faire

[1:31:27] davantage de compromis afin de

[1:31:29] s'assurer que les citoyens de

[1:31:31] Pointe-Claire ne perde pas la

[1:31:32] possibilité de célébrer et de

[1:31:34] profiter de la vie de manière

[1:31:37] raisonnable, en particulier dans

[1:31:38] leurs villages commerciaux. I

[1:31:44] debated because Councillor Cohen

[1:31:46] was indeed correct, will be a

[1:31:48] consultation process, but I

[1:31:49] quite simply do not like the

[1:31:51] first draft for the reasons that

[1:31:53] I have just specified in French

[1:31:54] but I will elaborate in English.

[1:31:58] I am against 5.7 and 5.10

[1:32:01] because they involve the

[1:32:02] adoption of a new draft bylaw

[1:32:03] that I disagree with because I

[1:32:06] feel little overly constraint

[1:32:08] Pointe-Claire merchant with

[1:32:09] bureaucracy and limit their

[1:32:10] ability to engage in commercial

[1:32:12] activities on the outside of

[1:32:13] their establishments example,

[1:32:15] terraces, courtyards, et cetera.

[1:32:17] More importantly, this bylaw

[1:32:19] will perpetuate an ongoing trend

[1:32:21] for years even decades limiting

[1:32:23] the ability of Pointe-Claire

[1:32:25] citizens to have harmless finds

[1:32:27] both inside and outside of

[1:32:28] commercial establishment. The

[1:32:31] clauses of the bylaw that I find

[1:32:33] excessive are, number one, a

[1:32:35] commercial terraces activities

[1:32:37] such as dancing, theatrical or

[1:32:41] cinematography performances or

[1:32:42] shows using loudspeakers or any

[1:32:44] other sound amplification

[1:32:46] devices are prohibited. So

[1:32:48] dancing, speakers and

[1:32:52] amplification interests are

[1:32:53] prohibited. Seriously? For me,

[1:32:55] that is a little harsh. Number

[1:32:57] two, the maximum terrasse

[1:32:59] capacity shall be the number of

[1:33:00] seats corresponding to half the

[1:33:02] establishment indoor seating or

[1:33:04] 25 seats. In the case of studio

[1:33:07] 77, which is big for

[1:33:08] Pointe-Claire Village, this

[1:33:09] would mean 27 people total. We

[1:33:12] all know that there are many

[1:33:13] more than that and that the

[1:33:15] volume of people never seem

[1:33:17] cramped, dangerous or a problem

[1:33:18] in the events that occurred

[1:33:21] there. As we all know, live

[1:33:24] entertainment have been treated

[1:33:25] to this day for many years and

[1:33:27] decades now and I like this to

[1:33:28] change. I agree that commercial

[1:33:30] establishment should not be

[1:33:31] permitted to disrupt or

[1:33:32] adversely affect the quality of

[1:33:34] life with their neighbours and

[1:33:35] sound volume should always be

[1:33:37] controlled but somehow I feel

[1:33:39] that more compromise can be made

[1:33:40] on the part of this city in

[1:33:42] order to also ensure that

[1:33:43] Pointe-Claire citizens do not

[1:33:45] lose out on the ability to

[1:33:46] celebrate and enjoy life in a

[1:33:49] reasonable matter especially in

[1:33:51] their commercial villages. That

[1:33:53] is my take on that. We have a

[1:34:00] mover. I had a mover. Did we

[1:34:01] have a seconder? Non?.

[1:34:05] >> Now.

[1:34:06] >> Do I have a seconder?

[1:34:09] Councillor Brent Cowan moved.

[1:34:12] 5.7 to 5.10.

[1:34:14] >> Eric Stork. District 7. I

[1:34:15] liked as a speak to the matter

[1:34:16] as well.

[1:34:17] >> Absolutely.

[1:34:18] >> Just for clarification, this

[1:34:19] bylaw is the general bylaw in

[1:34:21] terms of outdoor music and

[1:34:23] outdoor speakers. You can still

[1:34:25] do such events through a special

[1:34:27] permit process. We do not want

[1:34:29] to be something general across

[1:34:30] the board. One guy is playing

[1:34:32] rap music, the other guys

[1:34:33] playing classic next pre-show.

[1:34:34] That we want to have some sort

[1:34:35] of control element so you can

[1:34:36] still do outdoor shows in terms

[1:34:40] of the special process which is

[1:34:42] standard. Another thing, just to

[1:34:44] clarify, is the 50% rule is

[1:34:47] actually a bylaw that exists and

[1:34:50] if we aren't happy with, it then

[1:34:51] we should potentially change it

[1:34:53] but we have to follow the rules

[1:34:55] that governs us this moment.

[1:34:57] Thank you.

[1:34:59] >> All in favour of 5.7 to 5.10?

[1:35:03] All against? Cinq points 11?

[1:35:13] - 5.11 Adoption sans

[1:35:14] modification d'un Règlement

[1:35:15] relatif à la démolition des

[1:35:16] immeubles. Les principaux

[1:35:17] objectifs visés par le Règlement

[1:35:18] de démolition sont: protégés

[1:35:21] améliorer et mettre en valeur le

[1:35:23] cadre bâti des immeubles

[1:35:25] présentant une

[1:35:26] (---)

[1:35:27] un bien culturel au sens de la

[1:35:28] Loi sur le patrimoine culturel.

[1:35:30] Maintenir un parc immobilier de

[1:35:32] qualité et adapter, permettant

[1:35:33] de répondre aux besoins des

[1:35:35] ménages. S'assurer que le

[1:35:36] programme préliminaire de

[1:35:37] réalisation du sol dégagé

[1:35:39] contribué à la mise en valeur du

[1:35:41] paysage urbanisé existant. Avant

[1:35:42] le recours ultime à la

[1:35:45] démolition, donner la priorité à

[1:35:46] la rénovation, à la restauration

[1:35:48] ou à la réutilisation des

[1:35:50] bâtiments existants dans une

[1:35:51] perspective de durabilité, de

[1:35:53] réduction de l'empreinte

[1:35:54] carbone, lorsque l'entretien du

[1:35:55] bâtiment est encore

[1:35:56] raisonnablement possible,

[1:35:58] notamment en ce qui concerne les

[1:36:00] investissements requis.

[1:36:01] Planifier globalement

[1:36:02] l'exécution des travaux dans une

[1:36:04] perspective de gestion

[1:36:05] écologique et responsable des

[1:36:06] ressources affectées au projet.

[1:36:08] Et enfin, régler les problèmes

[1:36:10] de salubrité, de nuisance ou de

[1:36:12] sécurité des bâtiments

[1:36:15] obsolètes.

[1:36:16] - Pour cinq points 11. Do I have

[1:36:18] a mover?

[1:36:19] >> Brent Cowan.

[1:36:21] District 8. I'd asked for that

[1:36:22] to be read an English for the

[1:36:24] benefit of the audience.

[1:36:26] >> Adoption of the modification

[1:36:33] modification of a By-law

[1:36:34] respecting the demolition of

[1:36:35] immovables.. Protect enhance the

[1:36:36] move those that have heritage

[1:36:37] value or constitute cultural

[1:36:38] property within the meaning of

[1:36:39] the cultural heritage Act.

[1:36:40] Improve the quality and

[1:36:42] functionality of housing while

[1:36:43] maintaining the housing stock

[1:36:44] that needs expressed needs.

[1:36:46] Ensure that the preliminary

[1:36:47] program for the realization of

[1:36:48] the vacated lounge contribute to

[1:36:50] the enhancement of the existing

[1:36:52] urbanized landscape. Before

[1:36:54] resorting ultimately to

[1:36:56] demolition, give priority to

[1:36:57] renovating, restoring, or using

[1:36:59] existing buildings on the

[1:37:01] sustainability and carbon

[1:37:02] footprint reduction perspective

[1:37:03] in cases where maintaining the

[1:37:05] building is still reasonably

[1:37:07] possible. Particularly in terms

[1:37:08] of the investment required. Plan

[1:37:10] the overall execution of the

[1:37:12] work from the perspective of

[1:37:14] ecological and responsible

[1:37:15] management of the resources

[1:37:16] allocated to the project and

[1:37:18] lastly, resolve how, uses and

[1:37:21] safety issues related to

[1:37:22] obsolete buildings.

[1:37:25] >> So I move item 5.11. Brent

[1:37:30] Cowan. District 8.

[1:37:31] >> Seconder?

[1:37:35] >> All in favour?

[1:37:37] >> If I may? What is not written

[1:37:42] in that by law and I have asked

[1:37:46] for at least eight years -- I

[1:37:51] will get under ten years -- is

[1:37:55] that the replacement plan is not

[1:38:04] -- it has nothing to do with the

[1:38:08] demolition. Finally, I got that,

[1:38:11] it took a while but now the

[1:38:16] committee cannot state after

[1:38:19] seeing the plans. I was told

[1:38:23] that you will see a volumes and

[1:38:26] site planning no reshapes or

[1:38:33] things like that. I am really

[1:38:34] happy about this.

[1:38:37] - Donc, vous votez pour,

[1:38:38] Monsieur Cousineau?

[1:38:39] - Oui.

[1:38:40] - Vous êtes pour? O.K.. >> 6.1

[1:38:48] Consider a request for revision

[1:38:49] pertaining to the decision of

[1:38:50] the Demolition Committee

[1:38:51] regarding the refusal of the

[1:38:52] demolition and of the programme

[1:38:53] for the reutilization of the

[1:38:54] vacated land of the immovable

[1:38:56] located at 191 Du

[1:38:57] bord-du-lac-lakeshore road. An

[1:39:00] application for review of the

[1:39:01] decision rendered on November

[1:39:02] 14th, 2024 by the demolition

[1:39:04] committee has been filed. This

[1:39:06] decision refuses the request to

[1:39:07] demolish the building as well as

[1:39:09] the program of a realization of

[1:39:10] the vacated land. The building

[1:39:12] in question is not a heritage

[1:39:14] building. The application for

[1:39:15] review was received within the

[1:39:17] time limits prescribed by the

[1:39:19] bylaw. PC 20 and 18. In

[1:39:22] accordance with article 38 of

[1:39:23] the bylaw, Council must render a

[1:39:25] decision on the demolition

[1:39:26] request and the program of the

[1:39:28] realization of the vacated land

[1:39:29] as submitted to the demolition

[1:39:30] committee. Council may appeal

[1:39:31] the decision of the demolition

[1:39:33] committee or render the decision

[1:39:34] that the committee should have

[1:39:36] rendered.

[1:39:40] >> For 6.1 in 6.2 as well.

[1:39:45] Est-ce qu'on a déjà eu 6,2? On a

[1:39:49] fait les deux? Le deuxième?

[1:39:52] - 6.2 Autoriser la participation

[1:39:53] de certains membres du conseil,

[1:39:54] ainsi que 2 employés aux assises

[1:39:55] annuelles de l'Union des

[1:39:56] municipalités du Québec devant

[1:39:58] se tenir du 14 au 16 mai 2025, à

[1:40:00] Québec. L'autorisation vise

[1:40:02] monsieur le maire de même que

[1:40:04] les

[1:40:05] (---)

[1:40:06] terres Stainforth est au stade

[1:40:08] Colin. Les conseillers Eric

[1:40:10] Stork et

[1:40:11] (inaudible)

[1:40:12] Bruno Tremblay et Brad Caron,

[1:40:13] ainsi que la directeur général,

[1:40:16] Karina Verdon et le directeur

[1:40:19] adjoint

[1:40:20] (inaudible)

[1:40:21] .

[1:40:22] - Alors, pour six points à six

[1:40:23] points de vue... Do I have a

[1:40:24] mover?

[1:40:27] >> And seconder?

[1:40:28] - Je veux m'adresser... >> Paul

[1:40:31] Bissonnette. District 2.

[1:40:34] >> Mayor, would you be surprised

[1:40:37] -- precise for 6.1, what is the

[1:40:41] decision for Council? From

[1:40:43] Council, please? Is it possible

[1:40:45] to do the vote for 6.1. I would

[1:40:48] also need to know what is the

[1:40:49] decision from Council.

[1:40:50] >> Myself as well because I was

[1:40:52] clear on a subsequent one but

[1:40:56] 6.1 is. We are voting to support

[1:40:58] the decision by either support

[1:41:02] or uphold the decision of the

[1:41:04] demolition committee.

[1:41:05] >> Does Council uphold the

[1:41:08] decision of the motion committee

[1:41:12] or overturn the decision?

[1:41:15] >> For 6.1, we are voting yay to

[1:41:17] uphold and nay --

[1:41:20] >> We can just ask it in one

[1:41:22] version.

[1:41:23] >> Who is in favour.

[1:41:24] >> All in favour of upholding

[1:41:26] the decision of the demolition

[1:41:27] committee?

[1:41:28] >> Do I address Council before

[1:41:29] we go to vote? Not Council. I

[1:41:35] will object to that decision

[1:41:38] even though I voted for not

[1:41:41] demolish sheen previously. 5.11

[1:41:47] was not considered back then and

[1:41:50] other reasons why I voted

[1:41:56] against the demolition,

[1:41:58] originally, was trying to save

[1:42:01] some material. The debate was on

[1:42:04] another level so I will be

[1:42:07] voting against.

[1:42:10] >> We are about to vote.

[1:42:12] >> You know what I mean.

[1:42:16] >> Maybe we do not know what you

[1:42:18] mean, Claude Cousineau. Could

[1:42:19] you be more specific?

[1:42:21] >> I will be voting against the

[1:42:27] committee's decision.

[1:42:30] >> So you want to overturn the

[1:42:33] motion committee decision?

[1:42:34] >> Yes.

[1:42:35] >> Thanks.

[1:42:36] >> We are going to have the vote

[1:42:38] right, now are we? Pour 6,1...

[1:42:40] All in favour of supporting the

[1:42:42] --

[1:42:43] >> I could just. I want to make

[1:42:46] something clear. Legally, the

[1:42:48] decision that we are making

[1:42:50] today is to uphold the decision

[1:42:54] by demolition committee with the

[1:42:56] information provided at the

[1:42:59] time. Obviously the gentleman

[1:43:01] who introduce himself earlier is

[1:43:04] questioning some reports and

[1:43:07] such. We are bound by the fact

[1:43:09] to make the decision based upon

[1:43:11] that information even though you

[1:43:12] disagree with it. The important

[1:43:14] thing here is if you want to put

[1:43:16] into question the information,

[1:43:19] you can do so. From us, we

[1:43:21] cannot make a decision based on

[1:43:23] other factors. We have to look

[1:43:24] at the information that is

[1:43:27] provided. Hopefully that makes

[1:43:30] sense but I'd be more than happy

[1:43:32] to explain it to you after. What

[1:43:33] I'm trying to say is that

[1:43:36] whatever information is provided

[1:43:38] by the demolition committees

[1:43:39] what we have to base it on. An

[1:43:41] opinion, second thought, I did

[1:43:42] this, way I did, that we have to

[1:43:43] go off of the information that

[1:43:45] is provided. If you question

[1:43:47] that information provided, that

[1:43:48] is something that should be done

[1:43:50] further down the line. Hopefully

[1:43:53] that makes sense.

[1:43:55] >> Can I add just a very short

[1:44:00] thing? This is not my first

[1:44:02] rodeo. I can bring up some

[1:44:05] addresses and it's so, so

[1:44:08] arbitrary that it's not fair for

[1:44:10] the citizens, for the owner.

[1:44:13] That is why I am voting against.

[1:44:20] To overturn the decision,

[1:44:23] whatever the vote is.

[1:44:29] >> All in favour of supporting

[1:44:31] the decision of the demolition

[1:44:34] committee?

[1:44:39] All against?

[1:44:50] >> 6.2 for some? You know hot

[1:44:52] for 6.2.

[1:44:53] >> Do I have a mover?

[1:45:00] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[1:45:02] >> And seconder?

[1:45:06] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[1:45:07] >> Of a very? I'm against?

[1:45:17] >> Organizations from the meld

[1:45:19] and pretty much 6.3 dollars

[1:45:20] Grant a financial support to

[1:45:21] various non-profit organizations

[1:45:22] for a total amount of $ 8,935.

[1:45:23] The organization's concerns are

[1:45:24] as follows, Via Association

[1:45:27] (---)

[1:45:28] Mark Vanier est une, Fondation

[1:45:29] Yvon Lamarre, l'habitation

[1:45:31] jeunesse de l'ouest de l'île.

[1:45:35] - 6.4 Autoriser la participation

[1:45:36] des membres du conseil au

[1:45:37] congrès annuel de la Fédération

[1:45:38] Canadienne des Municipalités

[1:45:41] devant se tenir du 29 mai au 1

[1:45:42] juin 2025, à Ottawa.

[1:45:44] L'autorisation vise monsieur le

[1:45:45] maire de même que Madame les

[1:45:47] conseillères Table Austin forte

[1:45:48] et Kelly Thorstad-Cullen.

[1:45:50] Messieurs les conseillers Eric

[1:45:51] Stork, Claude Cousineau, Bruno

[1:45:53] Tremblay et Braun Caron.

[1:45:56] >> For 6.3 and 6.4, do I have a

[1:45:59] mover?

[1:46:01] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.

[1:46:02] >> And seconder?

[1:46:04] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[1:46:05] >> You all in favour?

[1:46:07] >> Thank you.

[1:46:08] >> 7.1, for the minutes of

[1:46:09] October 23rd 2024 meeting of the

[1:46:13] youth advisory board.

[1:46:14] - 7.2 Déposer le procès-verbal

[1:46:15] de la réunion du 27 novembre

[1:46:16] 2024 du Comité consultatif

[1:46:17] jeunesse. 7.3, to file the

[1:46:23] minutes of the November 28,

[1:46:24] 2024, meeting of the

[1:46:25] Pointe-Claire Public Library

[1:46:26] Advisory Board.

[1:46:29] - 7.4 Nommer des membres au sein

[1:46:30] du Comité consultatif Stewart

[1:46:31] Hall. Suite à des mandats... à

[1:46:32] la fin des mandats de Cameron

[1:46:34] Tilson et de Jones

[1:46:35] (---)

[1:46:36] le comité consultatif recommande

[1:46:37] la nomination de deux nouveaux

[1:46:39] membres, soit madame

[1:46:41] (---)

[1:46:42] et madame Claudia Oliver a pour

[1:46:43] des mandats de trois, en soit du

[1:46:44] 1er janvier 2025 ou 31 décembre

[1:46:48] 2027. >> 7.5 Renew the mandates

[1:46:51] of members of the Canoe Kayak

[1:46:52] Club. These are the following

[1:46:53] members, Archambault, Julie

[1:46:59] Samson.

[1:47:00] - Pour cette virgule quatre et

[1:47:02] 7,5

[1:47:03] Do I have a mover.

[1:47:05] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.

[1:47:06] >> Seconder?

[1:47:09] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[1:47:10] >> All of our?

[1:47:11] - 8.1 Autoriser le paiement d'un

[1:47:12] montant de 41 522,20 $,

[1:47:13] représentant la cotisation

[1:47:14] annuelle à l'Union des

[1:47:15] municipalités du Québec, et ce,

[1:47:16] incluant la cotisation au

[1:47:17] Carrefour du capital humain. >>

[1:47:18] Thank you.

[1:47:28] >> 9.1 Exercise the renewal

[1:47:29] option provided for in the

[1:47:30] contract entered into with

[1:47:31] SPÉCIALISTES DE LA TRADUCTION

[1:47:32] R&R INTERNATIONAL INC., For the

[1:47:33] year 2025, in the amount of $

[1:47:35] 79,746.66, taxes included, for

[1:47:38] professional translation and

[1:47:39] revision services.

[1:47:42] - 9.2 Se prévaloir de l'option

[1:47:44] de renouvellement prévue au

[1:47:45] contrat intervenu avec PÉNÉGA

[1:47:46] COMMUNICATIONS INC.pour l'année

[1:47:47] 2025, au montant de 118681,79 $,

[1:47:51] taxes incluses, pour des

[1:47:52] services professionnels pour la

[1:47:53] refonte, la sauvegarde et les

[1:47:54] mises à jour du site Web et de

[1:47:55] l'intranet.

[1:47:58] - >> For 8.1, nine point to 9.2,

[1:48:02] do I have a mover?

[1:48:04] Bruno Tremblay, district six. >>

[1:48:07] Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[1:48:08] >> And seconder?

[1:48:10] >> Eric Stork you. District 7.

[1:48:11] He

[1:48:13] >> Then cute.

[1:48:19] - 10,1. >> Budget amendment 10.1

[1:48:21] to find a list of budget

[1:48:22] amendments and the register of

[1:48:23] cheques for the period of

[1:48:24] November 26, 2024, to December

[1:48:25] 31, 2024.

[1:48:34] - 10.2 Autoriser un soutien

[1:48:35] financier à la campagne

[1:48:36] Centraide 2024 au montant

[1:48:37] équivalent à 75% de la

[1:48:38] contribution des employés. La

[1:48:39] contribution total s'élève à

[1:48:40] (---)

[1:48:41] avec un ajout de 75% de ses

[1:48:42] contributions par la ville, soit

[1:48:43] 14750 dollars et 86, la

[1:48:47] contribution totale à Centraide

[1:48:48] et de 34418 dollars et 67. >>

[1:48:54] 10.3 Creation of residential and

[1:48:56] non-residential building

[1:48:57] subcategories for the

[1:48:59] 2026-2027-2028 assessment role.

[1:49:01] The act respecting municipal

[1:49:03] taxation allows municipalities

[1:49:04] to create subcategories of

[1:49:06] renewables on the assessment

[1:49:07] role. For taxation purposes, it

[1:49:09] is therefore proposed to create

[1:49:11] the following sub categories of

[1:49:13] nonresidential immovable is

[1:49:14] within the commercial category.

[1:49:17] First category, superregional

[1:49:19] cop shopping centre, 200 stores

[1:49:20] or more. Regional shopping

[1:49:22] centre which is 100 299 stores.

[1:49:25] Local shopping centres, 49 to 99

[1:49:28] stores. Neighbourhood shopping

[1:49:29] centres, from 15 to 44 stores

[1:49:31] and also neighbourhood shopping

[1:49:33] centre with 14 storms or less.

[1:49:35] And data hosting services. Four

[1:49:37] residential buildings, it is

[1:49:38] proposed to create the snow

[1:49:39] category of six dwellings or

[1:49:42] more.

[1:49:44] - 10.4 Autoriser un amendement

[1:49:45] budgétaire afin de transférer

[1:49:46] des fonds pour couvrir les

[1:49:47] postes budgétaires déficitaires

[1:49:48] du service des Travaux Publics

[1:49:49] et Immeubles. Le montant du

[1:49:50] transfert et de 67300 dollars

[1:49:52] transférés à quatre postes

[1:49:53] budgétaires différents.

[1:49:55] - Alors, pour une 10,2 à 10,4.

[1:49:59] Do I have a mover?

[1:50:03] >> Bruno Tremblay. So district

[1:50:04] 6.

[1:50:05] >> Seconder?

[1:50:07] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[1:50:08] Or

[1:50:09] >> A line favour?

[1:50:13] >> 10.5 Exercise the renewal

[1:50:14] option provided for in the

[1:50:15] contract entered into with

[1:50:17] GROUPE D'IMPORTATION ET

[1:50:18] DISTRIBUTION HUGO INC. Also

[1:50:21] known as

[1:50:22] (PROMOTION PLUS)

[1:50:23] , for the period of February 1,

[1:50:24] 2025, to January 31, 2026, in

[1:50:26] the amount of $ 59,866.67, taxes

[1:50:28] included for the supply of work

[1:50:30] clothes for blue collar workers.

[1:50:36] - 10.6 Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:50:37] des services d'entretien et

[1:50:38] d'assistance technique des

[1:50:39] logiciels Biblio Mondo, à

[1:50:40] Inmedia Technologies, pour les

[1:50:41] années 2025, 2026 et 2027, pour

[1:50:43] un montant total de 160 904,32

[1:50:44] $, taxes incluses. Bobby Homan

[1:50:50] d'eau et le système de

[1:50:52] bibliothèque intégré qui

[1:50:54] contrôle les acquisitions, le

[1:50:56] catalogage, les publications en

[1:50:57] tout genre. Les tout

[1:50:58] (---)

[1:50:59] de sécurité quant aux prêts et

[1:51:01] le portail Web de la

[1:51:03] bibliothèque et les services aux

[1:51:05] clients. >> 10.7 Award a

[1:51:07] contract for Azure backup and

[1:51:09] recovery for the years 2025 to

[1:51:10] 2028, to ITI INC. For a total

[1:51:12] amount of $ 376,299, taxes

[1:51:15] included. The proposed

[1:51:19] resolution will replace -- the

[1:51:21] proposed solution, sorry, will

[1:51:23] replace our current backup

[1:51:24] system and will also enable

[1:51:25] secure backup and recovery in

[1:51:26] the air gap cloud. The City has

[1:51:28] joined the group formed by the

[1:51:32] since 2022 in this contract is

[1:51:34] within the framework of said

[1:51:37] group.

[1:51:39] - 10.8 Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:51:40] l'achat des licences VMWARE pour

[1:51:41] l'année 2025, à SOFTCHOICE LP,

[1:51:43] pour un montant total de 99

[1:51:45] 338,40 $, taxes incluses. Les

[1:51:50] licences

[1:51:51] (---)

[1:51:52] incluent le support et entretien

[1:51:53] de nos systèmes vidéo

[1:51:57] (---)

[1:51:58] et nos serveurs est assez pour

[1:52:01] l'année 2025. Le support et

[1:52:03] entretien couvre le système de

[1:52:07] virtualisation

[1:52:08] (---)

[1:52:09] la majorité des employés. >> For

[1:52:13] 10.5 to 10.8, do I have a mover?

[1:52:19] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[1:52:20] >> Seconder?

[1:52:22] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.

[1:52:24] >> All in favour?

[1:52:30] >> Madeleine 11.1 Approve a deed

[1:52:31] of sale to be entered into with

[1:52:32] the ministère de

[1:52:33] l'Environnement, de la Lutte

[1:52:36] contre les changements

[1:52:37] climatiques, de la Faune et des

[1:52:38] Parcs, regarding lot 6 505 648

[1:52:39] of the Cadastre of Québec. Part

[1:52:40] of the car lot will be to come

[1:52:44] lot 600 58 in its acquisition

[1:52:46] will become the city owner of

[1:52:47] the entire park.

[1:52:55] - 12.1 Déposer la liste des

[1:52:56] changements au personnel par

[1:52:57] décisions déléguées pour le mois

[1:52:58] de janvier 2025. >> 12.2 Approve

[1:52:59] the list of non-delegated staff

[1:53:01] changes as of January 14, 2025.

[1:53:02] 13. Inspection et sécurité

[1:53:05] - Pour 11,1 à 11,2

[1:53:08] Do I have a mover?

[1:53:11] - Je propose d'approuver la

[1:53:13] liste des changements au

[1:53:15] personnel. >> And seconder?

[1:53:18] - Oui, je les ai comme mélangé.

[1:53:21] C'est comme moitié phrase pour

[1:53:23] le un et le deux. Je veux que je

[1:53:25] le répète? Déposer la liste des

[1:53:27] changements personnels et

[1:53:28] approuver la liste des

[1:53:29] changements au personnel.

[1:53:31] - 11,1 aussi.

[1:53:33] - Je suis désolé.

[1:53:34] (rires)

[1:53:36] - Et approuvé un acte de vente.

[1:53:38] (rires)

[1:53:40] - Thera c'était une forte,

[1:53:42] district IV. >> And seconder.

[1:53:45] >> Eric Stork. District 7.

[1:53:46] >> All in favour?

[1:53:48] >> Thank you.

[1:53:54] - 14.1 Se prévaloir de l'option

[1:53:55] de renouvellement prévue au

[1:53:56] contrat intervenu avec MARIO C.

[1:53:57] ET FILS

[1:53:58] (9042-0845 QUÉBEC INC.)

[1:53:59] , pour l'année 2025, au montant

[1:54:00] de 80 160,57 $, taxes incluses,

[1:54:01] pour des travaux d'entretien

[1:54:02] horticole et de plantation à

[1:54:03] taux horaire. Ce contrat permet

[1:54:04] le maintien et la pérennité des

[1:54:06] aménagements constitués de

[1:54:07] vivaces et d'arbustes dans les

[1:54:09] parcs et espaces verts sur le

[1:54:11] territoire de la ville.

[1:54:14] >> 14.2 Exercise the renewal

[1:54:15] option provided for in the

[1:54:16] contract entered into with MARIO

[1:54:17] C. ET FILS, for the year 2025,

[1:54:20] in the amount of $ 452 723,13,

[1:54:22] taxes included for maintenance

[1:54:23] and mowing of green spaces and

[1:54:25] sports fields. This contract

[1:54:28] provides for the mowing of green

[1:54:30] spaces and sports fields on city

[1:54:31] grounds as well as the edges of

[1:54:33] Highway. The contract ensure

[1:54:34] that grass areas are kept clean

[1:54:36] by removing waste as well.

[1:54:40] - 14.3 Renouveler le contrat

[1:54:41] dans le cadre de l'appel

[1:54:43] d'offres regroupé n°

[1:54:45] 2023-8115-50 pour la location

[1:54:46] des véhicules légers du Centre

[1:54:48] d'acquisitions gouvernementales

[1:54:50] à ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS CANADA,

[1:54:52] pour un montant total de 109

[1:54:53] 638,25 $ taxes incluses, pour la

[1:54:57] deuxième période du 1 février

[1:54:59] 2025 au 31 janvier 2026. >> 14.4

[1:55:03] Award a contract for the supply

[1:55:04] and the delivery of bulk

[1:55:05] materials for the year 2025, to

[1:55:08] MATÉRIAUX PAYSAGERS SAVARIA

[1:55:09] LTÉE, for a total amount of $

[1:55:13] 59,354.37, taxes included. There

[1:55:15] is contract covers a supply and

[1:55:17] delivery of various mixes of

[1:55:19] potting soil for the maintenance

[1:55:20] of green spaces, sports fields,

[1:55:22] floral arrangements, annual

[1:55:26] flowers, perennials and shrubs

[1:55:27] and for tree planting in the

[1:55:28] city.

[1:55:31] - 14.5 Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:55:32] la fourniture et la livraison de

[1:55:33] pièces d'égout et d'aqueduc par

[1:55:34] lot pour l'année 2025, à

[1:55:35] ST-GERMAIN ÉGOUTS ET AQueDUCS

[1:55:37] INC. Pour les lots A, c'est,

[1:55:44] bien E, G et I ), WOSELEY CANADA

[1:55:45] INC.

[1:55:46] (Lots B, F et H)

[1:55:47] Et IRON4CITY pour le logis

[1:55:51] (---)

[1:55:53] pour un montant total de 402

[1:55:54] 304,43 $, taxes incluses.

[1:55:55] (---)

[1:55:56] Chacun des lots a été octroyé au

[1:55:58] (---)

[1:55:59] conforme de ce lot. >> 14.6

[1:56:02] Award a contract for the supply

[1:56:03] and the delivery of a new

[1:56:04] asphalt paver, to 9018-7980

[1:56:06] QUÉBEC INC. Honour

[1:56:11] (INSTA-MIX)

[1:56:12] , for a total amount of $

[1:56:13] 275,940, taxes included. This

[1:56:14] contract is for the replacement

[1:56:15] of the current asphalt paving

[1:56:17] machine, which has reached the

[1:56:18] end of his youthful life.

[1:56:20] - Pour 14,1 à 14,6 Do I have a

[1:56:24] mover?

[1:56:25] >> Paul Bissonnette. -- But

[1:56:28] Bruno Tremblay. District 6. You

[1:56:29] >> Seconder?

[1:56:31] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[1:56:32] What

[1:56:34] >> I am against 14.1. I am

[1:56:36] voting against 14.1 in 14.4. I

[1:56:39] support all the others.

[1:56:41] >> Duly noted.

[1:56:46] - 14.7 Octroyer un contrat pour

[1:56:47] des travaux d'arboriculture à

[1:56:49] proximité du réseau électrique

[1:56:50] pour l'année 2025, à ÉMONDAGE ET

[1:56:52] ABATTAGE DIONNE INC., Pour un

[1:56:53] montant total de 95 314,28 $,

[1:56:56] taxes incluses, avec les années

[1:56:58] 2026 et 2027 en option.

[1:57:01] Puisqu'il faut être accrédité

[1:57:02] par Hydro-Québec pour travailler

[1:57:03] à proximité du réseau, une

[1:57:05] entreprise spécialisée dans ce

[1:57:06] type de travaux fournira un

[1:57:08] service efficace aux citoyens

[1:57:09] est requis.

[1:57:11] >> 14.8 Award a contract for the

[1:57:13] production and the delivery of

[1:57:15] pre-assembled rain-water barrels

[1:57:16] for the years 2025 and 2026, to

[1:57:18] USD GLOBAL INC., For a total

[1:57:20] amount of $ 43,644.51, taxes

[1:57:21] included, with the years 2027

[1:57:24] and 2028 in option. In response

[1:57:29] to the interest shown by

[1:57:30] residents in sustainable

[1:57:31] development and water

[1:57:33] conservation and in particular

[1:57:34] in obtaining rainwater barrels,

[1:57:36] the city is committed to

[1:57:37] supplying these barrels to

[1:57:38] residents at a reduced price

[1:57:40] compared to the market.

[1:57:42] - 14.9 Approuver une

[1:57:44] modification au contrat

[1:57:45] intervenu avec LES SERVICES

[1:57:46] PIERRE GOULET INC., Pour la

[1:57:47] détection de fuites d'eau sur le

[1:57:48] territoire de Pointe-Claire,

[1:57:49] pour un montant de 1 149,75 $,

[1:57:51] taxes incluses. Le but de cette

[1:57:54] modification et de se conformer

[1:57:55] à la demande de la direction de

[1:57:56] la gestion stratégique de l'eau

[1:57:59] municipale, des Affaires

[1:58:00] municipales et de l'habitation

[1:58:01] pour écouter sur une base

[1:58:02] annuelle un minimum de 100

[1:58:04] boîtiers de services afin de

[1:58:05] trouver les fuites sur les

[1:58:06] branchement qui ne sont pas

[1:58:07] toujours détectables par

[1:58:08] l'écoute au poteau d'incendie.

[1:58:11] >> 14.10 Approve a change order

[1:58:12] to the contract within the

[1:58:13] framework of the group purchase

[1:58:15] no. 2023-8115-50 for the rental

[1:58:18] of light vehicles from the

[1:58:19] Government Acquisition Center

[1:58:23] often known as the

[1:58:25] (CAG)

[1:58:26] to ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS CANADA,

[1:58:28] for a total amount of $ 20

[1:58:29] 786,13, including taxes, for the

[1:58:30] period from February 1, 2024, to

[1:58:31] January 31, 2025.

[1:58:37] - 14.11 Approuver une

[1:58:38] modification au contrat

[1:58:39] intervenu avec ZONE SST, pour

[1:58:40] les services d'un conseiller en

[1:58:41] santé et sécurité, pour un

[1:58:42] montant de 31 274,56 $, taxes

[1:58:45] incluses. Le service

[1:58:48] (---)

[1:58:49] est l'immeuble discontinue leurs

[1:58:50] efforts et projets en cours avec

[1:58:51] le même conseils en santé et

[1:58:54] sécurité pour combler le manque

[1:58:55] de personnel jusqu'à la fin août

[1:58:58] 2025.

[1:58:59] >> 14.7 to 14.11, do I have a

[1:59:03] mover?

[1:59:04] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[1:59:06] >> And seconder?

[1:59:07] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5. To

[1:59:09] >> All in favour?

[1:59:12] >> 15.1 Award a contract for

[1:59:13] inspection and repair work on

[1:59:14] fire protection components for

[1:59:15] the years 2025 and 2026, to

[1:59:18] PRÉVENTION-INCENDIE SAFETY FIRST

[1:59:19] INC., For a total amount of $

[1:59:21] 209,625.87, taxes included, with

[1:59:22] the years 2027, 2028 and 2029 in

[1:59:23] option.

[1:59:28] The equipment covered by this

[1:59:30] contract includes hydrants,

[1:59:32] sprinkler systems, fire pump,

[1:59:35] motors, sprinklers and fire

[1:59:36] detection systems.

[1:59:40] - 15.2 Approuver une

[1:59:41] modification au contrat

[1:59:43] intervenu avec CONSTRUCTION CPB

[1:59:44] INC., Pour des travaux

[1:59:45] d'agrandissement et

[1:59:46] réaménagement des Travaux

[1:59:47] Publics, pour un montant de 114

[1:59:48] 600,99 $, taxes incluses. Les

[1:59:51] modifications incluent des

[1:59:52] travaux d'architecture,

[1:59:54] d'électricité, de structure et

[1:59:55] de mécanique.

[1:59:58] >> 16.1 Authorize the signing of

[1:59:59] a consent form with Bell Canada

[2:00:00] for the burial work of the Bell

[2:00:02] network near the intersection of

[2:00:04] Bord-du-Lac-Lakeshore Road and

[2:00:05] Sainte-Anne Avenue. The purpose

[2:00:06] of this resolution is to

[2:00:07] authorize Mr. physiology, active

[2:00:10] admissible engineering

[2:00:11] department, to sign the consent

[2:00:12] notice prepared by Bell Canada

[2:00:13] for the burial of the Bell

[2:00:14] Service is located on the three

[2:00:16] Hydro Québec poles on behalf of

[2:00:17] the City of Pointe-Claire.

[2:00:20] - Pour 15,1 à 15,2, 16,1. Do I

[2:00:25] have a mover.

[2:00:27] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[2:00:28] >> And?

[2:00:30] - Je vais voter contre le 15,2.

[2:00:31] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[2:00:34] J'aimerais avoir l'opportunité

[2:00:35] de m'expliquer. Depuis le début,

[2:00:39] ce bâtiment-là aux Travaux

[2:00:43] publics, j'ai voté contre

[2:00:47] systématiquement. On est à près

[2:00:48] de 2 millions de surplus avec...

[2:00:52] en approuvant ce montant-là. Et

[2:00:56] si vous vous souvenez, à 10,4,

[2:01:01] on a loue des montants parce que

[2:01:07] (---)

[2:01:08] des immeubles, Travaux publics

[2:01:11] est déficitaire. C'est pour ça

[2:01:13] que je vote contre. Merci.

[2:01:25] - Les personnes qui sont

[2:01:26] présentes peuvent s'adresser au

[2:01:27] Conseil concernant les items

[2:01:31] 17.1 et 17.3. May address

[2:01:34] Council Madam 17.1 and 17.3. On

[2:01:41] continue. 17.1 Considérer une

[2:01:44] demande de dérogation mineure

[2:01:45] concernant la propriété située

[2:01:46] au 245,

[2:01:51] ... vous avez une question?

[2:01:53] (rires)

[2:01:57] >> I think you think you can

[2:01:58] take the microphone away.

[2:01:59] - Considérer une demande de

[2:02:01] grâce

[2:02:02] (---)

[2:02:03] aux située au 245, boulevard

[2:02:07] Brunswick

[2:02:08] (anciennement 1-243 Frontenac)

[2:02:09] , afin de permettre 27 espaces

[2:02:10] de stationnement extérieurs

[2:02:11] réservés aux visiteurs au lieu

[2:02:12] du minimum requis de 43.

[2:02:15] - Alors, pour 17,1. Do I have a

[2:02:19] mover?

[2:02:20] >> Eric Stork. District 7. What

[2:02:22] >> Seconder?

[2:02:26] >> Brent Cowan. District 8.

[2:02:27] >> All in favour?

[2:02:28] >> Thank you.

[2:02:32] >> 17.2 Consider a minor

[2:02:33] exemption request concerning the

[2:02:34] property situated at 30

[2:02:35] Hillcrest Avenue. It is to

[2:02:36] authorize an extension which

[2:02:37] will result in the main building

[2:02:38] having a lot coverage of 34%

[2:02:39] rather than the maximum

[2:02:41] permitted of 30%.

[2:02:45] - Pour 17,2. Do I have a mover?

[2:02:49] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[2:02:50] >> And seconder?

[2:02:52] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.

[2:02:53] >> All in favour?

[2:02:56] >> What's the language we are

[2:02:58] voting on? I approve minor

[2:03:04] variance. I move it.

[2:03:08] >> And Cynthia second it. All in

[2:03:11] favour? All against?

[2:03:27] - 17.3 Considérer une demande de

[2:03:28] dérogation mineure concernant la

[2:03:29] propriété située au 2800,

[2:03:30] autoroute Transcanadienne

[2:03:36] (sur l'immeuble portant le

[2:03:38] numéro 2800A et ayant front

[2:03:39] sur la voie de service sud)

[2:03:40] . Pour permettre un appareil sur

[2:03:41] le toit du côté est du bâtiment

[2:03:43] qui n'est pas entièrement

[2:03:44] dissimulé de la vue d'une

[2:03:46] personne de 1 mètre 82 et de

[2:03:49] grandeur, si tu es à la limite

[2:03:50] de propriété, en bordure de

[2:03:53] l'emprise publique, par un écran

[2:03:54] visuel intégré ou emménager au

[2:03:58] bâtiment.

[2:03:59] >> For 17.3, do I have a mover?

[2:04:02] >> Eric Stork. District 7. The

[2:04:04] >> And seconder?

[2:04:06] >> Brent Cowan to approve the

[2:04:09] minor exemption.

[2:04:10] >> All in favour?

[2:04:15] >> Excuse me, Mister Mayor,

[2:04:16] could we have the count that

[2:04:20] happened at 17.2. It was not

[2:04:22] clear.

[2:04:23] >> It was moved to approve the

[2:04:25] minor variance and voted

[2:04:32] against.

[2:04:33] >> Thank you. It just was not

[2:04:34] clear on my end. Thank you very

[2:04:36] much.

[2:04:38] >> 17.4 Consider the site

[2:04:39] planning and architectural

[2:04:40] integration programme plans with

[2:04:41] respect to the property situated

[2:04:42] at 245 Brunswick Boulevard

[2:04:44] (previously 1-243 Frontenac)

[2:04:46] it is a new construction.

[2:04:49] - 17.5 Considérer les plans

[2:04:50] d'implantation et d'intégration

[2:04:51] architecturale relatifs à la

[2:04:54] propriété située au 50, avenue

[2:04:55] du Golf. Pour des modifications,

[2:04:57] des plans déjà approuvées

[2:04:59] concernant la porte d'entrée et

[2:05:00] la porte de garage.

[2:05:02] >> 17.6 Consider the site

[2:05:04] planning and architectural

[2:05:05] integration programme plans with

[2:05:06] respect to the property situated

[2:05:07] at 30 Hillcrest Avenue. It is a

[2:05:09] Brandon exterior renovations.

[2:05:12] - 17.7 Considérer les plans

[2:05:13] d'implantation et d'intégration

[2:05:14] architecturale relatifs à la

[2:05:15] propriété située au 5, avenue

[2:05:16] Jervis Bay. Pour une démolition

[2:05:18] et une nouvelle construction.

[2:05:20] >> 17.8 Consider the site

[2:05:21] planning and architectural

[2:05:22] integration programme plans with

[2:05:23] respect to the property situated

[2:05:24] at 96 Montrose Avenue. It is the

[2:05:28] installation of solar panels.

[2:05:31] - 17.9 Considérer les plans

[2:05:33] d'implantation et d'intégration

[2:05:35] architecturale relatifs à la

[2:05:36] propriété située au 50, avenue

[2:05:37] Parkdale. Pour des rénovations à

[2:05:38] l'extérieur.

[2:05:40] >> 17.10 Consider the site

[2:05:41] planning and architectural

[2:05:42] integration programme plans with

[2:05:43] respect to the property situated

[2:05:44] at 20 Victoria Avenue. They are

[2:05:47] exterior renovations.

[2:05:48] - Pour 17,4, 17,10. Do I have a

[2:05:52] mover?

[2:05:53] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.

[2:05:55] >> And seconder?

[2:05:59] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[2:06:00] >> All in favour?

[2:06:02] - Je suis contre le 17,6 parce

[2:06:05] que j'étais contre le 17,9.

[2:06:11] - O.K..

[2:06:16] - 17,11.

[2:06:19] - 17.11 Adopter un premier

[2:06:20] projet de résolution pour un

[2:06:21] projet particulier de

[2:06:22] construction, de modification ou

[2:06:23] d'occupation d'un immeuble car

[2:06:26] (PPCMOI)

[2:06:27] au 27, avenue Salisbury

[2:06:29] (anciennement le 222,

[2:06:30] Autoroute 20)

[2:06:31] autorisant la construction d'un

[2:06:32] salon funéraire. En raison de

[2:06:33] l'incendie, le bâtiment a perdu

[2:06:34] les droits acquis dont il

[2:06:36] bénéficiait. La reconstruction

[2:06:38] d'un salon funéraire tel que

[2:06:39] présenté déroge aux dispositions

[2:06:41] du Code villageois. La Ville

[2:06:43] doit donc se prononcer sur une

[2:06:44] demande effectuée en vertu du

[2:06:47] Règlement PC 29 57 sur les

[2:06:51] (PPCMOI)

[2:06:52] .

[2:06:55] >> 17.12 Adopt a first draft

[2:06:56] resolution for a Specific

[2:06:57] Construction, Alteration or

[2:06:58] Occupancy Proposal for an

[2:07:01] Immovable

[2:07:02] (SCAOPI)

[2:07:03] at 1890 Des sources boulevard

[2:07:06] authorizing the construction of

[2:07:07] a new building and the

[2:07:08] redevelopment of the Manitoulin

[2:07:09] Transport site, in several

[2:07:10] phases. The company has

[2:07:12] submitted an application under

[2:07:15] bylaw governing specific

[2:07:16] instructions, operational

[2:07:18] occupancy proposals for removal

[2:07:20] in order to carry the project

[2:07:21] the deviate from the zoning by

[2:07:24] law for the purpose of expanding

[2:07:26] in reorganizing its operation.

[2:07:30] - 17.13 Adopter un premier

[2:07:31] projet de résolution pour un

[2:07:32] projet particulier de

[2:07:33] construction, de modification ou

[2:07:34] d'occupation d'un immeuble au

[2:07:37] 11-15, avenue Water's Edge

[2:07:38] autorisant la construction d'un

[2:07:39] nouvel immeuble multifamilial de

[2:07:40] 3 étages comprenant 16 unités

[2:07:42] d'habitation. La demande telle

[2:07:44] que présentée fait l'objet d'une

[2:07:46] demande de recommandations...

[2:07:48] fait l'objet d'une

[2:07:50] recommandation défavorable du

[2:07:52] CCU et vous recommandé de

[2:07:54] refuser le projet.

[2:07:57] >> For 17.11, is 1712 and 17.13,

[2:08:02] and may I remind the Council

[2:08:04] that at 17.13, we are voting who

[2:08:08] votes in favour of refusing the

[2:08:11] project. We are voting -- if you

[2:08:13] are voting in the affirmative,

[2:08:16] it's to refuse the project.

[2:08:18] - Pour 7,11, 7,12, sept virgule

[2:08:21] Thera. Do I have a mover?

[2:08:26] >> Brent Cowan. District 8. Hi

[2:08:27] >> And seconder?

[2:08:31] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[2:08:32] >> All in favour?

[2:08:33] - Monsieur Cousineau?

[2:08:36] - 17,12, 17,13.

[2:08:41] - Vous votez contre 17 virgule,

[2:08:43] 12 17,13? Vous êtes en faveur de

[2:08:46] 17,11?

[2:08:47] - Oui.

[2:08:50] >> Those against?

[2:08:51] - Alors, pour 17,11 contre

[2:08:57] 17,12...

[2:08:58] - Juste un instant.

[2:09:01] - Je pense que je vais suggérer,

[2:09:03] pour être certaine de faire un

[2:09:06] point...

[2:09:07] - Au coeur, pour 7,11.

[2:09:12] All in favour? - 17,2.

[2:09:18] All in favour? - Monsieur

[2:09:22] Tremblay a voté contre 17,12,

[2:09:23] parfait.

[2:09:25] >> Those against? We are getting

[2:09:29] those against, it might help us.

[2:09:32] 17,13. All those in favour of

[2:09:36] voting in refusing the project?

[2:09:38] Those against?

[2:09:40] - Vous êtes d'accord pour

[2:09:41] refuser le projet, Monsieur

[2:09:43] Cousineau?

[2:09:44] (inaudible)

[2:09:45] La manière que monsieur le maire

[2:09:46] l'a présenté.

[2:09:47] - Vous êtes d'accord pour

[2:09:48] refuser le projet?

[2:09:49] - Oui. Il devrait prendre des

[2:09:52] médicaments avant de venir...

[2:09:53] - Monsieur Tremblay, vous êtes

[2:09:55] d'accord de refuser 17,13.

[2:09:57] >> Should be doing a thorough

[2:09:58] time to make sure?

[2:10:06] 18.1 Award a contract for the

[2:10:07] supply and the delivery of

[2:10:08] French and English library books

[2:10:09] for the year 2025, to LIVRES

[2:10:10] BABAR INC., LIBRAIRIE CLIO,

[2:10:12] PARAGRAPHE, LIBRAIRIE MONET,

[2:10:14] LIBRAIRIE RAFFIN and LIBRAIRIE

[2:10:17] DE VERDUN, for a total amount of

[2:10:18] $ 295,000, taxes included. It is

[2:10:21] to meet the needs of its

[2:10:22] clientele in 2025, the library

[2:10:24] will purchase books in French

[2:10:25] and English for adults and

[2:10:26] children from approved

[2:10:27] bookstores in the Montréal area

[2:10:29] as prescribed by the act

[2:10:31] respecting the development of

[2:10:32] Québec firms in the book

[2:10:33] industry.

[2:10:35] - 18.2 Approuver une entente à

[2:10:36] intervenir avec Hockey West

[2:10:37] Island Inc. Concernant un

[2:10:38] partenariat avec l'association

[2:10:39] sportive. Cette entente, de même

[2:10:42] que celles mentionnées au point

[2:10:46] 18,3 à 18,5 de l'ordre du jour,

[2:10:49] établit la répartition des

[2:10:51] responsables tes entre la ville

[2:10:52] et l'organisme afin d'assurer

[2:10:54] l'habitation des normes en

[2:10:56] vigueur et à la mise à la

[2:10:58] disposition de l'organisme des

[2:11:00] installations et du matériel

[2:11:01] nécessaire pour la réalisation

[2:11:03] de leur offre de services. Il

[2:11:04] s'est inscrits dans la poursuite

[2:11:08] du

[2:11:09] (---)

[2:11:10] améliorant et spécifiant le

[2:11:11] soutien aux organismes

[2:11:12] partenaires dans la réalisation

[2:11:13] de leurs activités au bénéfice

[2:11:14] des citoyens de Pointe-Claire.

[2:11:19] >> 18.3 Approve an agreement to

[2:11:20] be entered into with

[2:11:21] Pointe-Claire Ringette

[2:11:22] Association regarding a

[2:11:23] partneship with the sports

[2:11:24] association.

[2:11:25] - 18.4 Approuver une entente à

[2:11:26] intervenir avec Club de Patinage

[2:11:27] de Pointe-Claire concernant un

[2:11:28] partenariat avec l'association

[2:11:29] sportive.

[2:11:31] >> 18.5 Approve an agreement to

[2:11:32] be entered into with Soccer

[2:11:33] Pointe-Claire regarding a

[2:11:34] partnership with the sports

[2:11:35] association.

[2:11:38] >> For 18.1 to 18.5, do I have a

[2:11:42] mover?

[2:11:43] >> I move to approve them all.

[2:11:46] Tara Stainforth. District 4. The

[2:11:47] >> And seconder?

[2:11:52] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.

[2:11:53] >> All in favour?

[2:12:00] - 18.6 Approuver une entente à

[2:12:01] intervenir avec la Commission

[2:12:02] Scolaire Lester-B.-Pearson

[2:12:03] concernant l'utilisation d'une

[2:12:05] portion du terrain adjacent à la

[2:12:06] cour d'école

[2:12:08] (École secondaire Horizon)

[2:12:10] pour l'installation d'un jardin

[2:12:12] communautaire temporaire.

[2:12:13] Fluctuations temporaire d'une

[2:12:14] portion du terrain adjacent à la

[2:12:16] cour d'école permettra

[2:12:18] l'installation d'un jardin

[2:12:20] communautaire et la tenue de

[2:12:21] certaines activités culturelles

[2:12:22] ou de loisirs, en lien avec la

[2:12:25] présence de jardins

[2:12:26] communautaires.

[2:12:28] >> 18.7 Authorize a donation of

[2:12:29] a family open paddle membership

[2:12:30] to the Teresa Dellar Palliative

[2:12:32] Care Residence. The residences

[2:12:34] organizing a silent auction as a

[2:12:36] fund-raiser for their annual

[2:12:37] Valentine's Day ball on February

[2:12:39] 14th, 2025. I have requested an

[2:12:40] open panel membership as a

[2:12:42] donation to raise funds for the

[2:12:44] option.

[2:12:46] >> I think we might separate

[2:12:49] 18.6 from the two subsequent

[2:12:51] because there will be votes

[2:12:53] against.

[2:12:54] >> You want to do 18.6 first?

[2:12:55] >> You do not mind. For 18.6, do

[2:12:57] I have a mover?

[2:13:02] >> That is me. Bruno Tremblay.

[2:13:05] District 6. For

[2:13:06] >> Seconder?

[2:13:08] >> Eric Stork. District 7.

[2:13:09] >> All in favour? That was

[2:13:14] against?

[2:13:21] >> I just want to point out I do

[2:13:23] not have nothing against

[2:13:24] community gardens, but with the

[2:13:25] information we received on this

[2:13:27] particular project, I cannot

[2:13:28] vote in favour. Thank you.

[2:13:30] >> I'd also like to speak. I

[2:13:32] agree. I am not against

[2:13:34] community gardens. Anyone that

[2:13:35] knows me, I love and fought for

[2:13:38] community gardens for a long

[2:13:39] time, unfortunately, how this

[2:13:40] was presented to us, I could not

[2:13:42] vote consciously in favour until

[2:13:43] some adjustments were done,

[2:13:45] which was not how it turned out.

[2:13:47] That is why I voted against it.

[2:13:52] - Pour appuyer monsieur

[2:13:53] Bissonnette et madame Homan, il

[2:13:57] nous manque beaucoup

[2:13:59] d'informations avant d'approuver

[2:14:00] ou des approuver.

[2:14:11] >> Can we get a get a

[2:14:15] clarification. I think it was

[2:14:16] carried 4 to 3?

[2:14:18] - 18.8 Autoriser la

[2:14:19] participation d'une employée au

[2:14:22] 1er Sommet de la pagaie organisé

[2:14:23] par la Fédération internationale

[2:14:24] de canoë devant se tenir du 27

[2:14:26] février au 2 mars 2025 à

[2:14:29] Hangzhou, Chine.

[2:14:32] (Aucune dépense ne sera

[2:14:33] engagée par la ville pour

[2:14:34] cette participation)

[2:14:35] . La Fédération internationale

[2:14:36] de canots et inviter madame

[2:14:37] Émilie fournir, responsable du

[2:14:38] club de canoë-kayak, à cet

[2:14:40] événement. Les frais de

[2:14:41] déplacement sont payés par la

[2:14:43] Fédération internationale de

[2:14:44] canots et. Madame fournaises

[2:14:45] siège actuellement sur le Comité

[2:14:48] de planche à pagaie, chapeauté

[2:14:49] par cette fédération.

[2:14:53] - Pour 17,8, et 17,8

[2:14:54] (---)

[2:14:55] . Do I have a mover?

[2:14:59] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[2:15:01] The

[2:15:02] >> And seconder?

[2:15:03] >> Eric Stork. District 7.

[2:15:05] >> All in favour?

[2:15:10] >> Pleasure.

[2:15:11] >> Foreclosure. Do I have a

[2:15:13] mover?

[2:15:14] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.

[2:15:15] >> And seconder?

[2:15:18] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.

[2:15:19] >> All in favour? Welcome to

[2:15:21] 2025, folks. Merci beaucoup.

2025-01-14 Conseil de la Ville de Pointe-Claire

Transcript