Video, transcripts, and deep links for 201 archived public meetings from 143 Wisconsin governments — city councils, county boards, and public agencies.
192 with a searchable transcript · 3 added in the last 7 days
Quotes mentioning surveillance cameras, from the most recent Wisconsin meetings we have transcripts for. Show all topics.
11:55 Obviously, we had some questions about flock from you and from the public. And so what we are right now, we don't have any money in the budget in 2027 for any licensed plate readers, and what we will use 2027 for, and then the time after that, is to determine…Play from 11:55
17:45 Let me be clear, the said yesterday I will not include funding for flock cameras in the budget that I produce on October 5th. Serious concerns have been raised by residents of this city, by more than two dozen Wisconsin law enforcement agencies that have already…Play from 17:45
35:38 The city already has a documented history of debate over to flock contract. And this renew the contract. The current contract is therefore an opportunity to public safety technology should establish a new principal require public accountability…Play from 35:38
41:06 …years because we have license plate readers and vehicles. That that has not ever been an issue. Um there there's there's sheriffs out there That that has not ever been an issue.Play from 41:06
38:25 Is there a contract with this that we could see also with flock? Yeah, I provided uh Adam as well the same contract. I can send it to you guys.Play from 38:25
36:40 The short answer is yes, it's ours. Um the you know, when you just have a camera that's a surveillance camera like, you know, in in Village Hall or whatever and um you know, you're you're generating hours and hours of that stuff by the day.Play from 36:40
56:54 The homeowners might rip them down. Might not be too happy. Yep. Public property. Make sure there's a a flock camera there. So, if anybody not, you may be talking about that in about a month.Play from 56:54
12:47 It's the signatures of 844 local taxpayers who caught you in the dark. I'm here to find out why exactly you bypassed the voters. Why you changed this county to a permanent lease with 30 flock Safety spy cameras.Play from 12:47
10:37 Waiting to see which vendor the county chooses ignores what residents have been saying all along. We don't want mass surveillance. Flock itself told Chief Hill that competitors have federal contracts, including with ICE and DHS.Play from 10:37
1:56:22 Okay. [clears throat] And if anyone's watching online, there's actually you can go on their website and you can fill out a form and then they come and look at your property and you they appear on your ring camera.Play from 1:56:22
1:06:09 …mmit My obction he toy cos t om a Mr. Morales shares my concerns with the surveillance state that I have. publiobut from a idgical dpnt, I don't I think that are use of flock in the city of Milwaukee, I think that our use of flock in the city of Milwaukee should trouble every single resident.Play from 1:06:09
49:43 My question is about we have the flocks safety cameras and they are license plate readers, But is that something and that it's specifically not facial recognition or tracking of people?Play from 49:43
Search all 201 Wisconsin meetings →
Where we're watching most closely — ranked by meetings we've archived in the last 90 days.
